Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutThe Lens - December 202312/5/23, 11:16 AM The Lens - December 2023 https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/37dc874 1/4 We only use cookies that are necessary for this site to function to provide you with the best experience. The controller of this site may choose to place supplementary cookies to support additional functionality such as support analytics, and has an obligation to disclose these cookies. Learn more in our Cookie Statement. The Lens - December 2023 City of Iowa City sent this bulletin at 12/05/2023 10:00 AM CST Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. December 2023 | The Lens is the City’s newsletter to expand conversations on equity, inclusion, belonging, and access. Upcoming Lens Webinars Rethinking Columbus: The Next 500 Years Presented by Bill Bigelow at noon on Thursday, Jan. 25, 2024. Bigelow is the curriculum editor of Rethinking Schools magazine and co-director of the Zinn Education Project. He is the author or co-editor of many Rethinking Schools publications. “We need to listen to a wider range of voices. We need to hear from those whose lands and rights were taken away by those who “discovered” them. Their stories, too often suppressed, tell of of 500 Subscribe to updates from City of Iowa City Email Address e.g. name@exam Subscribe Share Bulletin 12/5/23, 11:16 AM The Lens - December 2023 https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/37dc874 2/4 years of courageous struggle, and the lasting wisdom of native peoples. Understanding what really happened to them in 1492 is key to understanding why people suffer the same injustices today.” – Editors of Rethinking Columbus Preregistration is required. You can register at this link. Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss Presented by Professor Thomas W. Mitchell at noon on Thursday, Feb. 22, 2024. Mitchell is a law professor and national expert on property issues facing disadvantaged families and communities. Preregistration is required. You can register at this link. “There are many different aspects of property law and land use law … that have disserved disadvantaged communities but that have been understudied and undertheorized. If we can get teams of people to start looking at … those issues in a proactive and sustainable way, the work could generate a much bigger impact.” - Professor Thomas W. Mitchell 2024 Black History Calendars We have a limited number of complimentary 2024 Black History calendars for community members. The calendars are available, while supplies last, from 8 a.m. to noon and 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday in the Equity and Human Rights Office at City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street. Please note the Office is closed from noon – 1 p.m. daily. We can also send one to you via standard mail - just drop us a note at humanrights@iowa-city.org. The 2024 calendar features: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the Sit-In Movement, Wilma Rudolph, Simone Leigh, Thurgood Marshall, Bill Russell, Robert L. Johnson, Cicely Tyson, Bessie Coleman, Elijah McCoy, Frederick Douglass, and Ella Fitzgerald. What is Restorative Justice? In this country, society’s response to wrongdoing is typically retributive: our justice system focuses on punishment. A different philosophy, however, is gaining traction. In the 1970s, Howard Zehr began to develop what has become known as “restorative justice.” Known as the “grandfather” of restorative justice, Zehr directed the first formal victim-offender conferencing program in the U.S., and currently directs the Zehr Institute for Restorative Justice at Eastern Mennonite University. In the 50 years since Zehr began thinking about a new (or rather, very old) approach to addressing crime, restorative justice has grown into a worldwide philosophy and academic discipline with very practical applications. New Zealand’s entire juvenile justice system, for example, is restorative. What is it? Traditional Western legal thought is concerned with identifying who is responsible for a crime and how that person should be punished. Zehr noticed this leaves many needs unmet. First, victims often feel ignored, neglected, even abused by the process. Crime is viewed as an action against the state - a violation of laws - rather than a violation of the victim and the community. Second, offenders are not only punished, but alienated and not given support to become better-functioning members of society. Third, the traditional justice system completely ignores communities. In contrast, restorative justice is entirely focused upon needs and relationships. In this sense, it is very old. Many traditional cultures practice forms of restorative justice. Numerous African societies, the Maori, the Navajo, and Buddhists, for example, all have a word that represents the sense of living in harmony with each other, of being connected in a web of relationships that must not be disrupted. When harm is done, it not only damages individual relationships, but also disturbs the well-being of the entire community. Therefore, crime creates an obligation to make amends not only to the specific victim, but also to the community. In addition, the community has an obligation to the wrongdoer: to support their efforts to repair the damage and to reintegrate them into the community. 12/5/23, 11:16 AM The Lens - December 2023 https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/37dc874 3/4 The “who” and the “how” are important True to its focus on relationships and needs, modern restorative justice can take many forms. Different situations may call for different processes. Processes must be responsive to the situation and follow a set of basic principles. The principles are these: Crime is a violation of people and relationships. Wrongdoing creates obligations. The central obligation is to repair the harm, to the extent possible. The primary concern is for healing for all - the victim, the offender, and the community. This does not imply a lack of consequences, but the focus is not on punishment for punishment’s sake. The goals of restorative justice include allowing those most affected by the harm to make key decisions, making justice more healing for all involved, and reducing recidivism. When effective processes are used, victims are highly involved; offenders come to understand how their actions affected not only the victim, but also the community and themselves; offenders take responsibility and concrete actions to make amends; and everyone gains a sense of closure and reintegration into the community. To achieve this, practitioners of restorative justice must keep several central questions in mind. The primary question is, who has been harmed? Although the obvious and primary answer is the victim, restorative justice takes a wider view and asks also how the offender may have been harmed and how the offender’s experiences may have led to who they are or what they have done. It also considers how the community may have been harmed. Incidentally, restorative justice practitioners avoid using the terms victim and offender, as they are too stereotypical. They prefer “those who have been harmed” and “those who have caused harm” as more accurate and less judgmental labels. However, we will use victim and offender here for brevity. Once those who have been harmed are identified, the next question is, what are their needs? Restorative justice considers the needs of all involved. Victims need information. Too often in the criminal justice system, victims are secondary to the machinery of conviction and punishment. They are not familiar with the legal system and are often not told what is happening and why. This leads to victims feeling lost, angry, and re-victimized. Similarly, they need information from the offender, answers to questions they may have about the event. All restorative justice processes seek to give the victim as much clarity as possible. Victims also need to tell their stories. Testimony in court is often dry and limited to the facts. Victims may present a victim impact statement at sentencing, but this is limited and without interaction with the offender. Part of the trauma of crime is that it upsets a victim’s sense of themselves and their place in the world. Describing the full impact of the experience is therapeutic. Another thing crime takes from victims is their sense of control. Crime disrupts a person’s control over their body, their possessions, their emotions, their environment. Being involved in the process can help a victim regain that sense of control. Finally, victims need restitution or vindication. Victims need to be made whole to the extent possible. Some crimes can’t be made right. A murdered child is gone forever. But even in these cases, some sense of closure can be gained when an offender takes full responsibility for their actions and recognizes the extent of the harm done. Although an apology cannot change what happened, it can bring a measure of relief as an acknowledgment of the harm done. Offenders need true accountability. Facing what one has done, being confronted by the full effects of one’s actions, and taking an active role in making amends is often harder than simple punishment. Offenders also need to experience a personal transformation - they need to heal from whatever caused them to create harm, often need treatment for addictions, and often need help enhancing their personal competence, whether in soft skills, such as dealing with stress and anger, or with concrete skills such as job training. Offenders also need support to re-integrate into the community. An example is those convicted of sex offenses. They are often released with little support, ostracized by their home communities and feared by communities where they are not known. When they participate in restorative justice practices such as support and accountability circles, their rates of recidivism decline. Communities also have needs. In modern society, “the community” is often amorphous, but can be viewed as those with a stake in the situation besides simply the victim and offender - family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, fellow students - whoever is in some way connected to and affected by the harm. Core approaches After identifying who has been harmed and what their needs are, restorative justice goes on to ask what obligations the harm has created, who has a stake in the situation, what is the cause, and what is an appropriate way to address and remedy the harm, which includes attention to preventing further harm. While restorative justice processes are fluid to allow for individual circumstances, there are several primary forms these processes take: victim/offender conferencing, family group conferencing, and circles. Victim/offender conferencing is just what it sounds like - a meeting between those who have harmed and those who have been harmed. Sometimes a surrogate may take the place of an individual if it is inappropriate or impossible to be involved. A trained facilitator always guides the process. The parties work together to identify the harm and its effects, and a signed restitution agreement is often - but not always - the result. 12/5/23, 11:16 AM The Lens - December 2023 https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/37dc874 4/4 Family group conferencing expands the participants to the families of both the victim and offender, and may include de facto family, such as partners or roommates. The process follows that of victim/offender conferencing, but widens the scope. The families participate in crafting the agreement and in ensuring it is fulfilled. Finally, circles may be used for several different purposes. In a circle process, participants sit in a circle, with an object designated the “talking piece.” Passing the talking piece allows each person a chance to speak uninterrupted in turn. A facilitator assists. Circles have been used to determine sentencing, resolve ongoing conflicts, promote healing, provide support, and assist in accountability. While these processes are the standard, restorative justice exists on a continuum. There are many programs that incorporate elements of restorative justice without being exclusively so. For example, some programs bring together groups of victims and offenders who are not involved in the same harms. Still, these groups serve an important healing function, as they allow victims to tell their stories and offenders to understand consequences in general. Fundamentally, restorative justice is concerned with restoring balance and harmony where it has been disturbed. Learn more Those interested in learning more about restorative justice can visit the Zehr Institute website or read any of Howard Zehr’s books and articles, especially The Little Book of Restorative Justice, from which the information for this article was obtained. Questions? Contact Us STAY CONNECTED: SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Preferences | Unsubscribe | Help Powered by Privacy Policy | Cookie Statement | Help