Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-07-2000 ICPD Reports/Memos0 w 0 Department Memorandum 00-12 m DATE: February 18, 2000 r n co r (� o5 = 0 TO: Chief Winkelhake o All Commanders FROM: Captain Widmer SUBJECT: November & December Use of Force Review The bi-monthly "Use of Force Review Committee" met on February 18, 2000. It was composed of the following personnel: Captain Harney Captain Widmer Sgt. Campbell Officer Lorene The review of submitted reports for November (22 incidents - 32 reports) and December (17 incidents - 23 reports) revealed no policy or training concerns. It should be reported that this was the most positive review to date in that only 2 reports were found to contain errors, all of a minor nature. These are being returned to the respective Watch Commanders. In comparison with the previous year, there were 28 incidents in November and 25 in December. This again represents a decrease in use of force incidents. Also of note, in the 29 total incidents for this period, 5 were the result of officers being called upon to put down injured animals. Copy: City Manager PCRB N O _ _ iTl D � IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TRAINING BULLETIN 00-10 February 7th, 2000 Commanders (Pass on to all officers) k.hurd Watch Training This week's watch training deals with "Juvenile notification requirements". The attached information identifies when a notification needs to be made who needs to be notified and who is responsible for making the notification. There are no changes to our current procedures but this is merely a chart that clarifies what needs to be done. Cc: Chief Winkelhake Capt. Hamey Capt. Widmer r Watch Training 00-33 Juvenile Notification Requirements Scenario - While walking the plaza you come across an intoxicated juvenile. � take i J him into custody and decide to transport him to the PD without cuffing him. eareh him and during the search you come upon a pint bottle of alcohol with the se.;9 broken and a baggie containing marijuana. Upon arrival at the PD you fill out the appropriAF referrals and paperwork, and notify the parents who agree to come to the PD to pick him up. Critical Issues - Were you justified in searching the juvenile without his parents being present? Upon releasing him to his parents what if any notification requirements do you have? Discussion - In this scenario the officer had the right and the responsibility to search the juvenile prior to transporting him. Once he is taken into custody for public intoxication he could be searched incident to arrest. In addition consistent with General Order 99-03, Prisoner Transport, 'Prior to transport, all prisoners shall be thoroughly searched for any weapons or contraband." In addition, "Known juveniles will be handcuffed only when reasonably necessary to ensure the safety of the officers, juvenile or others." The attached table will hopefully assist in determining when and who needs to be notified upon dealing with a juvenile. Code Allegation Who has duty Who is to be Triggering to notify notified event 280.24 Use/possession of School Law Enforcement Knowledge of use alcohol or or possession controlled substance on school grounds 123.47B Possession of Peace Officer Parent Youth discovered alcohol * School in possession 123.4713 Possession of Peace officer or Juvenile Court Youth taken into alcohol * Juvenile Court School custody 124.415 Possession of a Peace officer Parent Youth discovered controlled in possession substance 124.415 Possession of a Peace officer or Juvenile Court Youth taken into controlled Juvenile Court School custody substance 915.24 Any delinquent act Juvenile Court in Victim Complaint, except simple conjunction with Petition, misdemeanor County Atty. Dispositional Review order 232.29 Aggravated Intake officer School Informal Misdemeanor or adjustment higher if child is 14 or older 232.47 Any indictable Juvenile Court School Adjudication *The fact that a juvenile has consumed alcohol DOES NOT constitute possession of alcohol. I.e. If a juvenile is detained for a .02 revocation the school SHOULD NOT be notified by the officer unless they were also in possession of unconsumed alcohol. O N 9 CIO D — SLO .M D IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING BULLETIN 00-1 3 DATE: February 14th, 2000 _ TO: Commanders (Pass on to all officers) FROM: k.hurd SUBJECT: WT N_ O 1 cu This week's watch training deals with the prioritization of general orders. It is designed to assist officers identify which orders are critical to know, need to know and nice to know. Cc: Chief Winkelhake Capt. Hamey Capt. Widmer 1 I — Watch Training 00-34 n —n General Orders Scenario - While it is important for all members to be aware of all orders, rul aRSI otFer u directives pertaining to the operation of the Department, there are obviously ordet's which are of a higher priority or of a more critical nature thr Critical Issues - How am I supposed to know which directives are the most important? What do the different levels mean? How much do I need to know about the particular "level" of directive? What if I don't fully understand a "critical" order? When is this going to happen? Discussion - Orders will be identified as being one of three levels; Red, which are critical in nature; Green, which are important in nature; and black which are "non -critical" or administrative issues, Roughly 11r• Red Orders - Critical in nature, they are issues, which directly affect the safety or welfare of the officer, public or suspects; or are issues, which statistically have a higher probability in litigation against the officer/city; or issues of importance which affect the officer on a regular basis. An example of this would be the department's Use of Force or Vehicle Pursuit orders. These type orders are ones, which the officer must thoroughly know and understand. Deviations from these directives are likely to lead to punitive disciplinary action. These orders will be identified with the title of the order appearing in red type. (MUST KNOW) Green Orders - These are orders, which directly affect the operations of the department, or are used on a regular/daily basis, or are of importance to the officer but are not normally thought of as "life safety issues" and are less likely to result in litigation against the officer or city. An example of this type order would be Vehicle Crashes. Officers investigate crashes on a regular basis and need to know the order but need not memorize all aspects of the order. If the officer had a question on the order, he/she could probably receive clarification from a supervisor or another officer, without unduly hampering the officer's duties. Deviation from this directive is less likely to pose a hazard to the public, officer or others. A single deviation from this level directive is less likely to result in punitive disciplinary action. These will be identified with green type in the title box. (NEED TO KNOW) Black Orders - These are orders, which are not safety issues and do not directly affect the daily operations of the department. It is unlikely that an officer or the city would be subject of litigation as a result of these type directives. An example of this type order would be Form Development or Written Directive System. While it would be "nice to know" information, if officers had a question relating to this they would likely have time to look up the order for clarification. These will have black type in the title box. (NICE TO KNOW) As new orders are developed they will be assigned a category. As existing orders are reviewed, they will placed in a category upon completion of the review. NOTE: this is titled General Orders, this does not apply to departmental rules and regulations, which the officers are expected to know and abide by. Q N n o O S-_ n D N 0 IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TRAINING BULLETIN 00-14 February 21 st, 2000 Commanders (Pass on to all officers) k.hurd WT 00-35 Prisoner Transport This week's watch training deals with re -issued G/O 99-03 Prisoner Transport. Also attached is the now color coded front page of this order which was covered in last weeks watch training. Cc: Chief Winkelhake Capt. Hamey Capt. Widmer O n� c, c� C) i D n, 0 Watch Training 00-35 Prisoner Transport Scenario - While on the plaza you and your partner observe two females fighting. Upon stopping the altercation and separating the parties you make a decision to arrest both of them for disorderly conduct and public intoxication. While they are both unhappy about being arrested, they have calmed down and indicate that they are roommates and were fighting about a guy who had been dating both of them. While enroute to the jail you notice one of the subjects is beginning to gasp for breath but indicates by shaking her head, she doesnI want to go to the hospital. Critical Issues - Since they are no longer combative, can they transported together? What are the officers responsibilities/duties pertaining to medical care of prisoners. Can she refuse to go to the hospital? If taken to the hospital, can the officer leave upon dropping her off. Discussion - General Order 99-03, Prisoner Transport states; "...combatants should be transported separately." Even thought the parties had calmed down, the preferred option would be to transport each combatant separately. Of course this may be determined in part by the availability of any transport unit(s). Ref the medical problem, the same order goes as follows; "...physical well-being of prisoners shall be monitored during transit. Particular attention shall be directed to persons reported or suspected of being under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol... a. Prisoners who report or display symptoms of serious physical illness or injury during transit shall be taken to an emergency room for treatment. b. Escorting officers shall remain with the patient at all times unless relieved by other authorized personnel. (this may include medical staff)" In this case, the officer should interpret the gasping for breath as a serious illness or injury. This goes back to: A - Airways or B - Breathing in basic life support training. Since this is a symptom of a serious illness/injury, the subject should be transported to ETC for observation/treatment regardless of the wishes of the prisoner. Upon arrival at the ER, the officer may remove the handcuffs for treatment if the prisoner does not pose a threat to the medical personnel. The officer may stand by until treatment is completed and then transport or the officer may, upon being released by a supervisor or medical personnel, return to service and return for the prisoner upon completion of treatment. -.u.! -i €-- w DATE: February 291th9 2000 TO: Commanders (Pass on to all officers) FROM: k.hurd SUBJECT: WT 00-30 DNA This week's watch training deals with DNA evidence. The scenario is based on an assault. Obviously it is not practical to collect and process DNA evidence at all assaults, but officers should be aware of potential locations and sources of DNA evidence in the most serious incidents. Cc: Chief Winkelhake Capt. Harney Capt. Widmer Watch Training 00-30 - DNA Scenario - You respond to an assault call. Upon your arrival you identify several items which may contain DNA evidence. Critical Issues - What is DNA? Where may it be located and what is its source? What procedures should be followed when collecting potential DNA evidence? How should it be collected and pkgd? Discussion - The following is excerpted from the Department of Justice pamphlet What Every Law Enforcement Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence. What is DNA? DNA is short for dioxyribonucleic acid, which is a fundamental building block for an individuals entire genetic makeup. It is a component in virtually every cell in the human body. In addition, a person's DNA is the same in every cell of his/her body. DNA is powerful evidence because with the exception of Identical Twins, each person's DNA is different from everyone else's DNA. DNA collected from a crime scene can either link a suspect to the evidence or eliminate a suspect. In addition, evidence can be compared from one crime scene to another crime scene, potentially thousands of miles apart. Useable DNA may be found on evidence that is decades old. However, several factors can affect the DNA left at a crime scene, including environmental factors. One thing DNA cannot do is, tell when a suspect was at a crime scene or how long they were present. Because extremely small samples of DNA can be used as evidence, greater attention to contamination issues is necessary when identifying, collecting and preserving DNA evidence. DNA can be contaminated when DNA form another source comes in contact with the evidentiary DNA. This can be done when someone coughs, sneezes over the evidence, touches their mouth, nose, or other parts of the face. To avoid contamination of DNA evidence, officers should always take the following precautions: 1. Wear gloves and change them often. 2. Use disposable instruments or clean instruments thoroughly before reusing on another sample. 3. Avoid touching the area where you believe DNA may exist. 4. Avoid talking, sneezing and coughing on evidence. (aka - don't breathe on it) 5. Avoid touching your face, nose and mouth when collecting and packaging evidence. 6. Put evidence into new paper bags or envelopes, not into plastic bags. Do not use staples. i G7 a In addition officers should be cognizant of the fact that since DNA is contained in biological materials, those involved in the collection and handling of the materials/evidence should take those precautions consistent with the handling of bodily fluids. Since only a few cells can be sufficient to obtain useful DNA information to help your case, the list below identifies some common items of evidence that you may need to collect, the possible location of the DNA on the evidence, and the biological source containing the cells. Remember that just because you cannot see a stain does not mean there are not enough cells for DNA typing. DNA does more than identify the source of the sample; it can place a known individual to a particular location or in contact with the victim or instrument. EVIDENCE POSSIBLE LOCATION OF DNA ON EVIDENCE SOURCE OF DNA Blunt instrument Handle, end Sweat, skin, tissue Hat, bandana, or mask Inside Sweat, hair, dandruff Eyeglasses Nose or ear pieces, lens Sweat, skin Facial tissue, cotton swab Surface area Mucus, blood, sweat, semen, ear wax Dirty laundry Surface area Blood sweat, semen Toothpick Tips Saliva Used cigarette Cigarette butt Saliva Stamp or envelope Licked are Saliva Tape or ligature Inside/outside surface Skin, sweat Bottle, can, or glass Sides, mouthpiece Saliva, sweat Used condom Inside/outside surface Semen, vaginal or rectal cells Blanket, pillow, sheets Surface area Sweat, hair semen, urine, saliva Through and through bullet Outside surface Blood tissue Bite mark Person's skin or clothing Saliva Fingernail, partial fingernail Scrapings Blood, sweat, tissue Once evidence, which may contain DNA specimens, is collected it must be handled with care. It should not be exposed to direct sunlight, kept from getting to hot, and stored in packaging which will not collect or retain moisture. This evidence should be submitted as evidence and sent to the lab as soon as possible. At scenes where DNA evidence is being or has been collected, officers need to identify all persons who are present and/or may have been in contact with the evidence beirt collected. This is necessary as they may be requested to provide samples of W, which narrow the scope of the investigation. I.e., if a friend or relative has been in cdne2t with a victim, they may have left hair, cigarette butts or other items containing then &qA�af scene. By identifying them, a sample may be collected which can then be used _narrow the focus of the investigation. -n r J„ c� r Protecting the Crime Scene by George Schiro Forensic Scientist Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory The most important aspect of evidence collection and preservation is protecting the crime scene. This is to keep the pertinent evidence uncontaminated until it can be recorded and collected. The successful prosecution of a case can hinge on the state of the physical evidence at the time it is collected. The protection of the scene begins with the arrival of the first police officer at the scene and ends when the scene is released from police custody. kil police departments and sheriffs offices should include intensive training for its personnel on how to properly protect crime scenes. Potentially, any police officer can be put into the position of first responding officer to a crime scene. The first officer on the scene of a crime should approach the scene slowly and methodically. In some cases this is not altogether practical. The first officer may also be involved in arresting an uncooperative suspect or performing life saving measures on an injured victim. In either ease the officer should make mental or written notes (as is practical in each situation) about the condition of the scene as it was upon the officer's arrival and after the INSIDE THIS ISSUE I Protecting the Crime Scene 1 Vehicle Searches 4 Body Armor continued on page 2 Vehicle Searches This article is based on an article by Lisa A. Regini in the July 1999 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. See the publication for the full article. This article focuses on the motor vehicle exception to the warrant requirement of the 4ch Amendment. " The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" The U.S. Supreme Court has identified exceptions to the warrant requirement of the Constitution. For a search under the motor vehicle exception, the officer must posses probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains evidence or contraband and that the officer must have lawful access to the vehicle. The probable cause needed to justify the warrantless search of a vehicle is the same standard required to support the issuance of a warrant. In the past there has been confusion about necessity of the government demonstrating that obtaining a warrant was impractical. This view is inconsistent with Supreme Court rulings. Le. In Pennsylvania v. LaBaron, the court concluded that the ready mobility of the vehicle and its reduced expectation of privacy "excuse the failure to obtain a search warrant once probable cause to conduct the search is dear." In United States v. Ludwig, the court concluded that "if police have probable cause to search a car, they need not get a search warrant first even if they have time and opportunity." Another area of confusion is when the vehicle is not likely to move out of the area in the immediate future. In these cases, the Supreme Court has ruled that ...the motor vehicle exception applies in situations even where it is not likely that the vehicle would be moved before a warrant could be obtained. Le. In United States v. Johns, the court upheld a warrantless search training 1 page scene has been stabilized. The officer should keep notes on the significant times involved in responding to the crime scene (time dispatched to scene, time left for scene, time anived at scene, time left scene, etc.). An effort must be made to disturb things as little as possible in assessing the situation. Particular attention should be paid to the floor since this is the most common repository for evidence and it poses the greatest potential for contamination. Notes should also be taken if the officer has to alter something in the investigation. Some things the officer should note include: the condition of the doors, windows, and lighting (both natural and manmade); if there are any odors present; if there are any signs of activity; how EMS or fire personnel have altered the scene; anything essential about the suspect (description, statements, physical condition, mental condition, intoxication, etc.); and anything essential about the victim. Once the scene has been stabilized, the scene and any other areas which may yield valuable evidence (driveways, surrounding yards, pathways, etc.) should be roped off to prevent unauthorized people from entering the area and potentially contaminating it. Investigators and other necessary personnel should be contacted and dispatched to the scene, however, under no circumstances should the telephone at the scene be used. Once the officer has secured the scene, he or she could do the following: record witness names and others who may have entered or been at the scene; separate witnesses and suspect(s); do not discuss the events or the crime with witnesses or bystanders or let the witnesses discuss these events; listen attentively but discreetly; and protect evidence which may be in danger of being destroyed. Any actions taken should be reported to the investigators. Many times the arrival of additional personnel can cause problems in protecting the scene. Only those people responsible for the immediate investigation of the crime, the securing of the crime scene, and the processing of the crime scene should be present. Non- essential police officers, district attorney investigators, federal agents, politicians, etc. should never be allowed into a secured crime scene unless they can add something (other than contamination) to the crime scene investigation. One way to dissuade unnecessary people from entering the crime scene is to have only one entrance/exit into the crime scene. An officer can be placed here with a notebook to take the names of all of the people entering the crime scene. The officer can then inform them that by entering the crime scene they may pose a problem by adding potential contamination, and the reason that the officer is taking their names is in case the crime scene investigators need to collect fingerprints, shoes, fibers, blood, saliva, pulled head hair, and/or pulled pubic hair from all those entering the crime scene. This will sometimes discourage non -essential personnel from entering the crime scene. The officer can also stop unwanted visitors from entering the restricted areas. If extraneous people do have to enter the scene, then make sure that they are escorted by someone who is working the scene. This is to make sure that they will not inadvertently destroy any valuable evidence or leave any worthless evidence. Eating, drinking, or smoking should never be allowed at a crime scene. Not only can this wreck a crime scene but it can also be a health hazard. A command post should be set up for such purposes. The post is to be set up somewhere outside the restricted areas. It could be a vehicle, picnic table, hotel room, tent, etc. It can be used as a gathering place for non-involved personnel, a place for investigators to take breaks, eat, drink, or smoke, a communication center, a place for press conferences, a central intelligence area, etc. The best thing about it is that it is away from the crime scene. Protection of the crime scene also includes protection of the crime scene investigators. One person, whether a civilian or a police crime scene investigator, should never be left alone while processing the scene. This is especially true if the suspect has not been apprehended. There are many stories of suspects stiff hiding at or near their area of misdeed. That is why there should always be at least two people working the scene. At least one of these people should have a radio and a firearm. RECOMMENDED READING: Fisher, BarryA.J, Arne Svensson, and Otto Wendell. "Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation"New York: Elsevior, 1981 February training Member Training Hrs ICPD MATS 32 ICPD NCIC Recert 2 97,29,53 Sex Offender Conf 32 28 DATA recovery 40 96,45,58 CST Training 40 SRT Range 8 SRT Scenario 8 Inst. FATS inst 2 57 Swom FATS .25 WT 00-33,34,35,3Q. ; ) v ammg a �� O UPCOMING TRAINING This is a partial listing of upcoming training that may be available. Do not consider this a posting. Any letters submitted based on this WILL NOT be considered a request to attend. CALENDAR OF EVENTS TRAINING EVENT PLACE CAMP DODGE DATE APRIL 3-7 Counterdrug raid training. TRAINING EVENT PLACE MTTU IV DATE 03/28/00 Motor Vehicle Theft for Patrol Officers TRAINING EVENT PLACE MTTU IV DATE 2 OFFERINGS 5115-19 AND 5/22-26 Police Cyclist training TRAINING EVENT PLACE MTTU IV DATE SEPT.2000 Vehicle Dynamics This and That conanuea rrom page 1 of a motor vehicle which had been seized (impounded) days prior to the search. (in impound type incidents, the method preferred by the Johnson County Ally. is to obtain a warrant) Another area of confusion has been in the area of containers within a motor vehicle. In California v. Acevedo, the court decided that if an officer has probable cause to search the vehicle, they may search anywhere and anything within the vehicle which may contain the object of there search. In Wyoming v. Houghton, the Supreme Court extended this to the containers which belonged to a passenger in a motor vehicle. Of note, if an officer notices a package sitting on the ground immediately outside the door of a motor vehicle, they would need to obtain consent or a warrant prior to searching the package. One issue, which remains, is; the passenger and operator of a motor vehicle have a much higher expectation of privacy about their person, than does the motor vehicle. Prior to searching someone without a warrant, the officer must have an articulable fear for their safety (this is a limited pat down), must have permission, or must search incident to arrest. WRhout presence of one of these exceptions the results of any search are highly suspect. Recent studies reveal the following reference police involved shootings: 1) 85% are at distances under 7 yards, 66+% occur at night, 80% occur outdoors, incidents last only matter of seconds, 3 or fewer rounds are fired, 40% involve multiple assailants, 60-80% of officers are not wearing body armor, and most shootings involve low - caliber handguns. Annually, 1 in 30 officers will be involved in civil litigation, of these 40-45% involve the use of force. Of these, approx. 90% will be "won" by the def. (officer). The most common reason that litigation results from the application of force is POOR REPORTING/DOCUMENTATION. The Use of Force and Canine Operations general orders are due for review in March. If you have any questions, suggestions, comments, or concems regarding these orders, please forward such to me by the 1If. According to the recently released ATF report Commerce in Firearms in the United States, of active dealers, 1.2 percent (1,020) of current firearms dealers account for 57 percent of crime gun traces. Each of these dealers had 10 or more crime guns traced to them. Just 0.2 percent (132) dealers had 50 or more crime guns traced to them, accounting for 27 percent of crime gun traces. (note these figures deal with weapons obtained from dealers and not stolen weapons) "To be conscious that you are ignorant of the fads is a great step to knowledge." Benjamin Disraeli training 3 BODYARMOR According to the FBI, "...the Risk of Fatalit for officers assaulted with a firearm while not wearing body armor is 14 Times Higher than for officers wearing body armor." Between 1980 and 1997 there were 1,465 officers were the victim of felonious deaths. Of these, 375 or approx. 26% of these were wearing body armor. Of that 375; 355 were killed in firearms assaults. Of those killed with firearms, in excess of 94% were hit outside the armor coverage areas. The remaining "6%" of deaths were the result of the officer being killed when the weapon (ammunition) used exceeded the limit/level of the vest being wom. There were NO DEATHS resulting from body armor failure. If the armor was rated up to a certain level, and the ammunition was within this range, the armor did not fail. However, there are several instances where the vest stopped rounds that exceeded the vests rated capacity. There were no deaths as the result of blunt trauma. Le. being shot and having the vest stop the round but the displacement/trauma caused by being shot causing the death. Information from 95 to 97 felonious deaths indicate; of CALEA Update As indicated in WT 00-34 earlier this month, we instituted a "prioritization" of General Orders. The reason for this is there is a great deal of information which officers are expected to know. Since it is not practical to expect officers to know all written directives in their entirety, we would identify those areas, which were a safety issue, a high liability area for the officer or department, or frequently used. Prisoner Transport G/O W03 was the first order reissued under these guidelines. Prisoner Transport was re -issued as a "Red" or high priority order. Officers need to thoroughly know and understand this order. This order will be reviewed annually in order to identify any problems and/or incorporate any changes in law or procedure. In March General Order 99-04, Canine Operations and General Order 99-05 Use of Force will be reviewed. those killed by firearms while wearing a vest, 47+% were shot in the head, 47+% were shot in the upper torso outside the vest area, and 5+% were shot in the lower torso. Since 1980 85% of the rounds, which have been fired at officers, would have been stopped by a level II vest. It is estimated that between 1980 and 1998, of the 1030 officers which were killed while not wearing a vest, that 41% or 423 of the deaths could have been prevented. Percentage of "caliber" of weapons used in preventable deaths. Preventable deaths are those in which the round struck an officer in an area normally protected by a vest. 0.367,9310mm, A0,A6 ■shotgun Cl A4 mag D UK HG ;-o The following orders are being reviewed at Legal; Civil Rights - this is a review/update of G/O 89-04; Disciplinary Philosophy - this is a review/update of G/O 89-02; Harassment - this deals with harassment/sexual harassment and is more specific than the general city policy; Body Armor- deals with the wearing and use of Body Armor; Bomb Threats/Emergencies - deals with the initial response to bomb threats, call out of bomb disposal personnel. Under development at this time are standards pertaining inspections (line and staff). it is intended that these inspections review equipment, procedures, policies, and sections. As a general rule these inspections will be announced and areas of emphasis may be designted. training 4 DATE: March 1,-2000 - - TO: Chief Winkelhake From: K.Hurd- REF: February Training Report MATS 2000 Beginning 01/10/2000 continuing for 5 consecutive weeks Required for all ICPD sworn personnel with partial attendance for non -sworn This years MATS contains the following blocks: 32 hours Mon. Hazardous Materials recert. Bloodborne pathogens CPR Tue. ASP and Use of Force training Crowd control Techniques Defensive Tactics/weapon retention Wed. Drug awareness Driving course Hostage/Barricade overview Disability awareness Thurs. Crisis Center Services Communications Skills Rapid Deployment procedures DATA Analysis and Recovery 02/07-11 /2000 Des Moines 40 hours Gass r� _n _.Investigator Gass received training in the analysis andrecovery of information stored on computers. This training was provided consisted in classroom and hands on training in the methodology and techniques needed for the safe recovery of data. Crime -Scene Technician Training 02/21-25/00 Marshalltown 40 flours Lalla, Denison, Bailey _Officers:received training in the techniques used to identify, record and record different types of evidence at crime scenes. Training consisted of lecture and hands on training. NCIC 02/23/00 78 ICPD members sworn/non-sworn 2 hours Training and certification in the use of the departments mobile data terminals and systems linking Iowa City with NCIC and NLETS. FATS Instructor Training 02/29/00 ICPD 2 hours Supervisors and firearms instructors who had not previously trained in the use of the FATS system and persons requiring or requesting refresher training were instructed in the use, operation and upkeep of the FATS. _ FATS training Month long 57 members trained with FATS -+c CO SRT Range 02/21 & 22 /00 16 SRT 8 hours SRT members trained in the use of their sidearm and specialty weapons SRT Scenario Training 02/ 15/2000 16 SRT 8 hours Regularly scheduled physical testing for SRT members of equipment. Room entry drills. Maintenance Squad Meeting Training Weekly ICPD All members WT #s 00-33 Juvenile Notifications 00-34 General Orders 00-35-Prisoner Transport 00=30;DNA Evidence Copy: City Manager Captain Widmer PCRB Who/When parents/courts must be notified Prioritization of General Orders Re-issue/review of Prisoner Trans. order Possible DNA evidence location and source i