HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-2000 ICPD Reports/MemosICPD TRAINING
DATE: June 1, 2000
z r-,
TO: Chief Winkelhake
r -
From: K.Hurd _
�i= J
CD
REF: May Training Report y
I.A.I. Spring Conference
05/4-5/00
Officers Cox and Singleman
Ames
16 Hrs
Training for in identification techniques for crime scene technicians and processors.
Gang Training
05n-10/00
24 Hrs
Sgt. Lord, Investigator Gonzalez
Lansing Michigan
Update training in gang investigations, including changing trends, legal considerations
and prevention/intervention techniques.
Defensive Tactics Re -certification
05/11/00
Officer Welch
8 Hrs
ILEA
Mandatory re -certification for department defensive tactics instructor.
Spring Range Qualification and Training
Week of 5/15/00
Sworn personnel
8 Hrs.
Tiffin Gun Club and CRPD range
Spring firearm training and qualification. Training included training review of Use of
Force policy and new Less Lethal Projectiles policy. Training in the use and deployment
of less lethal munitions.
O '
LEIN School C7-11
05/08-29/00
Investigator Hart
r.
80 Hrs.
Training in investigation techniques, surveillance techniques and task force opera'tons. r
Explosive Devices Training
05/8-12/00
Officers Leik and Lorence
40 Hours
Omaha
Training in explosive devices for the departments bomb/explosive devices technician and
technician applicant. Includes hands and classroom sessions as well as training with new
equipment.
Explosive Devices Re -certification
05/15-19/00
Officer Leik
Huntsville, Alabama
Re -certification training for departments bomb/explosive devices technician. Includes
classroom and hands on sessions.
Basic Criminal Investigation
05/08-12/00
Officers Nixon, Batcheller, Steva
ILEA
Training in criminal investigations. Training was geared for newly appointed or officers
planning on entering the Investigative Section. Included, training in the areas of death,
burglary and arson investigations; and the identification, collection and evaluation of
evidence.
ACTAR Review/Testing
05/20-21/00
Officers Hewlett and Kelsay
Eau Claire, WI
16 Hrs.
Review for ACTAR (Accreditation for Traffic Accident Reconstructionists)
Officers review and take national accreditation test.
MATAI Conference
05/22-24/00
Officers Hewlett and Kelsay
Eau Claire, WI
24 Hrs.
Training in the investigation of low speed accidents. Included classroom and field work.
O
Narcotics Investigation 4 :_
05/22-26/00
Officers Batcheller and Gaarde '
40 Hrs
Camp Dodge - tJ
15 co
Training in the investigation of narcotics cases, investigative techniques and pW—cedur4
Class contained classroom and practical application of information.
Bike Officer Training
05/22-26/00
Officers Martin and Fowler
40 Hrs
MTTU IV
Training in the techniques and tactics of being a bicycle officer. Includes classroom and
riding exercises. Also includes different scenarios involving the use of a bicycle.
SRT Training Day
05/09/00
10 SRT members
8 Hrs
Regularly scheduled fitness assessment and training in vehicle/bus assaults and rescue.
Equipment maintenance.
SRT Range Training
05/23-24/00
CRPD Range
8 Hrs
12 SRT members
Monthly SRT weapons training and qualification. Introduction of new techniques by
Heick and Nixon. Training in less lethal munitions.
Search and Seizure Update
05/26/00
Mt Pleasant
8 Hrs
Droll, Shaffer
Training and update on laws and court decisions pertaining to search and seizure.
Watch Training #s
00-41 Dealt with Use of Force G/O
00-42 Civil Rights G/O 89-04 and protest situations.
00-43 Use of Leg Restraint Straps and Prisoner Transport order review
00-12 Gun on School Grounds
00-44 Hearing Impaired
Copy: City Manager
Captain Widmer
PCRB
OS
�;
1
r' '
C�
j
Co
..
y
iv
ca
training
Community Oriented Policing
What is it?
In FY2000 we received approx. $374,000 to assist in
Community Oriented Policing (COP). At this time we
have 8 officers who have been hired on federal grants
for the implementation of the COP program... But what
is COP?
First off, COP is not riding around in your marked unit
answering your assigned calls and filling in the rest of
your watch writing traffic tickets. While officers are
responsible for handling calls in their areas, and do
need to address traffic violations, officers also need to
get out of the car, get with the citizens and assist in the
solving of existing problems and heading off potential
problems.
There is no single COP methodology. It varies not only
from city to city but can vary from area to area within a
city. It is a combination of proactive patrol, use of "non-
traditional" resources and problem solving, citizen
groups, other strategies tailored too and developed
with the members of a particular community. Often
times it will not involve traditional criminal activity nor
will it be something, which you are able to handle with
a traditional hook and book approach. You may
become involved in issues which we often pass -off as
a "civil problem, 10-8". While you may not have the
authority to handle a particular dispute, you may serve
continued on papa 2
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
'I 10 Desirable Attributes
1 Community Oriented Policing
4 Bond v US Search/Seizure decision
10 Desirable Attributes
Adapted from April 2000 Trainer magazine. Written by
Sgt. Brian Willis, Calgary Police Dept.
April's bulletin contained 10 Fatal Errors officers make.
This month we are including 10 desirable attributes.
These attributes may keep you from making one of the
10 Fatal Errors.
1. Acquire and maintain a high level of skill and
knowledge.
a. An officer must develop and maintain
fundamental skills. Develop an understanding
of basic safety tactics and effectively complete
these tasks on all calls.
b. Keep abreast of current legal issues.
c. Keep abreast of current trends in the
community.
d. Continually seek opportunities to train and
learn.
2. Establish and maintain sound tactical positioning.
a. Tactical positioning includes utilizing a proper
interview stance and proper reactionary gap.
b. When dosing the reactionary gap, have a plan
for dealing with any resistance or aggression.
c. Tactically position your vehicle on all stops.
d. Use the contact and cover principles on all
calls.
3. Continually perceive, assess and respond to threat
cues. This is a continual assessment process.
Take In all information and assess It for threat cues
and respond appropriately. Respond through the
use of sound tactical positioning and
implementation of a tactical action plan. Studies
indicate that officers who became victims of assault
often perceived pre -attack cues but shrugged them
off. Is retreat the most viable option? Utilize iftthen
thinking.
4. Develop and utilize a through, systematic search
pattern. Develop a system that covers the entire
body, the search must include the groin area. FBI
research indicates that 50% of all offenders stated
they felt the groin area was the most overlooked
area in a search and 36% said that is where they
carried their weapon. Determine what is on any
necklace• continued on page 3
training 1
-- conned hom page r
as the catalysis or conductor for the involved parties to
work out an agreement. Is there an issue that could
better be handled by another agency, i.e. social
services or housing? Instead of "referred to ... 10-8"
you make contact with the agency and serve as an
Intermediary between the neighborhood and the
agency. Does a particular neighborhood have a
concern about a particular area being used as
dumping ground? If they are willing to provide the
manpower to collect the debris, can you make
arrangements to get it picked up?
stream cleanup. (photo by Brotherton)
The question may be "How can I get started"? Right
now there are approx. 100 Neighborhood Watch
programs set up around the city. The department's
Crime Prevention officer can provide you with a list of
groups in your area and also provide a list of names of
the leaders and members of the respective groups.
You may then contact the chair of the particular group
and they can make arrangements for you to attend the
next watch meeting. In those instances where the
group has become inactive you may serve as a
catalyst for reigniting interest in the project. These
people live and work in the particular area and can be
a primary source of information for illegal activities,
and may very possibly be able to provide you with
suspects, in addition to being potential witnesses.
Also, they may identify situations or conditions which
may lead to illegal activity or present a health or safety
threat to the community. When they provide you
information you need to make sure that you get back
to the group or individual about what is or has been
done, concerning the problem. If upon checking on
the problem you find out that there is nothing that can
be done in the immediate future, you need to convey
this along with the reason, to the affected individual or
group. Failure to keep the community members
informed about what has been done gives them the
impression that they have been ignored or overlooked.
Policing under the COP method is multi -dimensional,
depending on your ability to look at situations from a
"big picture" perspective and problem solve creatively.
It requires that you use a wide variety of skills; social
work, negotiation, organization, planning and others. It
requires that you look at yourself as more than law
enforcement. To be effective officers must be open,
flexible and versatile and be willing to work with the
"awkwardness" of a multidisciplinary approach.
When dealing with a situation ask the complainant
what they would like to have happen or if they have
any suggestions on how to handle the problem. This
will not only let the person know that you are interested
in resolving the problem, but it is possible they may
have a viable, practical suggestion on handling the
problem. What you may perceive as a "trivial" matter
may be based on an ongoing neighborhood problem.
Instead of handling a situation repeatedly, by applying
COP techniques, making the effort to find out what is
going on and taking the time to work out a long term
solution, you may very well save the community,
yourself and other officers from having to re -address
the problem.
Is COP appropriate for all situations? No. There will
stilt be many incidents where you will need to function
in a "traditional" mode. If you respond to a domestic
dispute and it turns out to be verbal, you may be able
to resolve this by making contact with agencies which
can assist with counseling, or you make arrangements
for alternative housing for a day or so, while parties
cool off and take advantage of services within the
community, if the incident was physical in nature you
are obligated to conduct the Investigation and when
the primary physical aggressor is Identified, arrest him
or her. However since you are active In the community
you are now more likely to get a call from a neighbor if
any no contact orders are violated.
Hostage/barricade situation, this is a SRT situation, but
afterwards the neighbors may be in a position to
provide background information. Who will they be
more likely to talk with? A police agency which drives
through the area several times a night, or one that
recently coordinated an effort to clear a playground
area regularly frequented by loud and intoxicated
subjects.
Does COP require more of it's officers? Yes, you will
be required to address situations you wgtdd have not
dealt with in the past. You may spen(tmore time
handling a call in an effort to a the ne:� --,for
return visits. You will often time acting ti;Jaw
enforcement but rather as a resQufce person. ;VVhat
are the benefits? Closer ties toffiq.pommunit"d
people within the community, increased sUport�a
cooperation from members of thsti�murciiy an a
safer more livable community.
L N
training 2
page I
UPCOMING TRAINING
THIS IS A PARTIAL LISTING OF UPCOMING TRAINING
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE. DO NOT CONSIDER THIS A
POSTING. LETTERS SUBMITTED BASED ON THIS WILL
NOT BE CONSIDERED A REQUEST TO ATTEND.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE MTTU IV
DATE Jury 11-13
Police Response to Elder Abuse
TRAININa EVENT
PLACE MTTU IV
DATE Nov. 6 -17
Line Supervision
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE CRPD RANGE
DATE wEEK of Ocr 16-19
Fall Firearms Qualification
TRAININe EVENT
PLACE CHCAGO
DATE Jury 10-14
Financial Crimes Investigation
This and That
5. Utilize sound tactical principles when handcuffing.
If there are any indications that resistance is going
to be encountered use a tactical Ong method
instead of a speed cuffing method. Approach
should be initiated from a sound tactical position.
Remember that the Closer the subject gets to
being placed into a cell, the subject's stress level
increases and the officer's tend to decrease.
6. Control the subject's hands. Again, control the
subject's hands. Eyes may be the window to the
soul but the hands will hurt you. You need to see
the palms of each hand. When having a subject
remove their hands from their pockets, consider
having them remove them one at a time.
7. ALWAYS wear body armor. Research indicates
your chances of surviving an armed encounter is
14X greater when wearing body armor.
8. Live by the "plus one rule". If there is one known
subject, always assume there is at least one more.
When searching subjects and a weapon is located,
always assume they have at least one more.
9. Always weigh risk v gain in determining any
course of action. Avoid unnecessary risks. Use
sound judgement, cover, tactics and backup to
eliminate any unnecessary risks.
10. Live a healthy lifestyle. This includes adequate
rest, following sound nutritional guidelines and
maintaining an exercise program. Appraise your
level of stress and developing appropriate copping
mechanisms is also critical to an officers emotional
well being. —
O
C7
c
=n
=C
—
N
v
Recently there have been occasions where an officer has requested to attend training and had court
scheduled during the training. While this is usually not a problem when the training is being held locally, it does
pose a problem when the training is out of town. It is the responsibility of the officer to make arrangements to
have the case continued or otherwise resolved. If the conflict cannot be resolved contact a watch supervisor
for advice on how to proceed. Depending on the case, another officer may be assigned to attend the training.
In any event, do not miss court without notifying the attorney involved and your supervisor. Failure to make
arrangements and/or failure to notify may result in disciplinary action.
SRT members requesting training need to make sure that when it conflicts with regularly scheduled SRT
training days that a SRT supervisor is advised of the situation in advance. SRT has mandatory training and
attendance requirements for its members.
Entire Bond V US decision mentioned on pg.4 is available in the training office.
"They selected worthy men of talent, in order to prepare themselves for any contingency." Wu Chi 400 BC
training 3
May Training
Officer
Training
Hours
Cox, Singleman
I.A.I. Conf.
16
Akers, Gonzalez
Gang Conf
24
Welch
DT Recert.
8
Sworn
Range/Less Lethal
8
Hart
LEIN School
80
Leik, Lorence
Explosive Devices
40
Leik
Ordinance Recert.
40
Nixon, Steve
Batcheller
Basic Crim. Invest
40
Hewlett, Kelsey
ACTAR review/testing
16
Hewlett, Kelsey
MATAI Conf.
24
Batcheller,Gaarde
Narcotics Invest.
40
Martin, Fowler
Police Cyclist
40
Shaffer, Droll
Search/Seizure
8
STEVEN DEWAYNE BOND V. UNITED STATES
On April 17"' the U.S. Supreme Court released it's
ruling pertaining to a tactile search of a subjects
personal belongings while using public transportation.
Briefly, Bond was on bus which was stopped by the
US Border Patrol. Upon determining that the
occupants of the bus (Greyhound) were legally in the
country, the agent began feeling the packages and
belongings which were in the overhead
compartments. Upon squeezing Bond's duffel bag
he felt a "brick -like" object. Bond admitted the bag
was his and consented to the agent opening the bag.
Inside was a "trick" of methamphetamine. Bond was
subsequently indicted for conspiracy to possess with
intent to distribute methamphetamine. The case
wound its way to the U.S. Supreme Court which in a
7-2 decision, decided that the physical manipulation
was an unreasonable search of Bond's possessions.
The Fourth Amendment provides that "the right of the
people to be secure in their effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated ... A traveler's personal luggage is clearly an
c
r�
_. 71
CALEA Update' —_
We are formally entering the 9,ccgredhation
so in way of review ... CALEA and3 fo e
Commission on Accreditation Q) ' w o nt
Agencies. CALEA was fo'41lded in• 1979 in
consultation with the Intematiod—al Chte s%of Police
(IACP), National Organization of Black Law
Enforcement Executives (NOBLE), National Shertiffs'
Association (NSA), and the Police Executive
Research Forum (PERF). These organizations
provided and continue to provide guidance to CALEA
in the identification, development and refinement of
accreditation standards.
In the current (4"' Edition) manual there are 439
standards, divided among 41 chapters. Of the 439
standards, there are approx. 20 percent which do not
apply to us. (.e. standards refering to reserves or jail
facilities) The standards are Identified as either
mandatory or other than mandatory. To attain
accreditation we are required to meet all applicable
mandatory standards and 80% of the other than
mandatory standards.
In most cases CALEA standards Identify what needs
to be addressed but do not specify how it should be
met, thus allowing us to address the standard in a
manner which best fit our department.
visual searches from aircraft, there was no "physical
Invasion" of the property, and any member of the
public could have lawfully observed the defendants'
property. These differ from Bond in that they "involved
only visual, as opposed to tactile, observation.
Physical invasive inspection is simply more intrusive
than purely visual inspection." While the agent did not
"frisk" petitioner's person, he did conduct a probing
tactile examination of petitioner's carry -on luggage.
Passengers "generally use it to transport personal
Items that, for whatever reason, they prefer to keep
close at hand. " While Bond could expect that it would
be "exposed to certain kinds of touching and
handling." The agent's "physical manipulation" of his
luggage "far exceeded the casual contact which could
have been expected from other passengers." Bond by
using an opaque bag and by directly placing it above
his seat sought to preserve privacy. Additionally,
when a passenger places a bag in an overhead bin, he
expects that it may be moved, He does not expect that
other passengers or bus employees will, as a matter of
course, feel the bag in an exploratory manner.
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TRAINING BULLETIN 00-32
May 1 st, 2000
Commanders (Pass on to all officers)
k.hurd
WT 00-41
yr:,
This week's watch training deals with the recently reviewed Use of Force order.
This is designated as a red, 'need to know" order. The main clarification is that
photos should be taken of all injuries to suspects or officers, regardless of the
extent. The order was also updated to include existing tools.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Harney
Capt. Widmer
ro
Watch Training 00-41 Q _
Use of Force Review
Scenario - You respond to a fight call in the plaza. Upon your arrival you arrest;a person 'E i
for disorderly conduct. He refuses to follow commands and actively resists -during The J
cuffing process. The subject is directed to the ground where he is subsequcnja � �cuffgd.
He has several small abrasions and says he doesn't want any treatment. D �>
Critical Issues - What are your obligations. What documentation needs to be done.
Discussion - General Order 99-05, Use of Force was just reviewed and reissued. It
contains several minor changes and clarifications.
Under this order since the subject was injured, albeit minor, EMS shall be summoned to
the scene to "ensure appropriate medical treatment'.
Under NOTIFICATION OF COMMAND B. "The on -duty watch supervisor shall be
immediately notified or summoned to the scene on any incident where the use of force
results in a physical injury." This notification or summoning must be made regardless of
the extent of the injury.
Under REPORTING USE OF FORCE INCIDENTS, 1. " A Use of Force report with a
written narrative regarding any use of force incident will be included with the incident
report. The report(s) shall contain the following information... g. Pictures taken of an
injuries to either the officer or suspect." This is to be done regardless of the extent of
the injury. The purpose of this is to protect the officer from unfounded complaints
regarding the extent of an injury. There have been several incidents where suspects have
made a complaint ref. the extent of an injury. Photos would have assisted in quickly
resolving these complaints. Bottom line ... if there is a visible injury, take a photo of it.
Other changes in the Use of Force order include removing the ASP from Level III,
Compliance Techniques. When we were issued the PR24 we were trained in leverage
techniques for controlling subjects. We are not trained in any compliance or control
techniques with the ASP.
We will soon be training in the use of Less Lethal projectiles. They are included in
LEVEL IV ASSAULTIVE (bodily harm).
Additionally, while not spelled out, whenever a shotgun is deployed in a tactical situation
it is a considered a Use of Force the same as drawing your sidearm and officers must
complete a Use of Force report.
USE OF FORCE is a "red" order. Officers must thoroughly understand this order, and
will be held accountable for any deviations from this order. If there are any questions
regarding the order check with a watch supervisor for clarification.
o�
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TRAINING BULLETIN 00-34
May 8th, 2000
Commanders (Pass on to all officers)
k.hurd
WT 00-42 Civil Rights
This weeks watch training deals with the recently re -issued G/O 89-04 Civil
Rights and protest type situations. While a protest or picket may tax the
resources of the department, persons have a constitutional right to engage in
these activities provided they do not endanger or restrict the rights of others and
meet minimal notification requirements. Our purpose in these situations is to
maintain the peace and see that the protest and any counter -protest remain
peaceful and orderly. City ordinances pertaining to protests begin in section 10-
2-1 of the City Code.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
Watch Training 00-42
G/O 89-04 Civil Rights
Scenario - A group of people decide to protest a medical clinic that performs abortions.
As the protesters begin their picketing of the clinic, a crowd of onlookers starts to gather
and then a group of clinic supporters arrive and stage across the street from the protesters.
After a few minutes, members from the opposing views begin hurling taunts and insults
at each other, and the groups and onlookers begin to spill on to the street.
Critical Issues - What can be done to prevent the protest from happening? How many
people can attend the protest? Are they merely exercising their right of free speech when
they start hurling insults and taunts? What steps should be taken to contain the
demonstration?
O
Discussion - As stated in G/O 89-04 Civil Rights, "All persons of this country`_?€`
guaranteed the right to seek redress of grievances by: _
1. Freedom of Speech - -
2. Peaceful assembly
3. Peaceful picketing - J
4. Distribution of handbills"... ='
y r,
The rights set out above ...do not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefs to express
may do so at any public place..."The exercise of these rights of free expression must not:
1. Conflict with the governmental responsibility to keep public streets and public
facilities open and available for public use.
2. Include the use of inflammatory remarks related to any instance where a clear and
present danger of a riot against any person or group of persons exists."
In response to the above questions... chapter 2, section 10-2-4 of the City Ordinances
states in part ... any person planning to picket... shall give the Chief of Police... at least
one hour written notice prior to the event. This shall include... location of demonstration,
date, starting time, hours and duration of the protest, estimated number of persons
participating in the picket. This means they have a right to protest/picket provided they
make the notification to the PD one -hour or more prior to the protest. They are required
to give an estimate of the number of persons picketing but obviously they are not
responsible for the number of onlookers or counter -picketers.
While the protest/picketing is a clear expression that is protected under the I"
Amendment, this DOES NOT extend to the point of inciting a riot. Also ordinances and
laws pertaining to disorderly conduct may come into play.
Additionally, 10-2-2 of the City Ordinances states "Picketing, protesting and
demonstrations shall be conducted only on public sidewalks maintained by the City or
other public walkways. No picketing, protesting or demonstrating shall be conducted on
that portion of the streets used primarily for vehicular traffic." Thus once a protest or
picket extends onto the streets it is in violation of the ordinance. Ordinance 10-2-3 A.
states "Interference with Traffic, Businesses and Public Facilities: Picketers, protesters
and demonstrators shall not block or obstruct free passage of any pedestrian or vehicular
traffic or interfere with ingress or egress to any business or public facility." City
Ordinance 10-2-6 further states "Whenever the free passage of any street, sidewalk or
public way in the City is obstructed by picketers, protesters or demonstrators and such
obstruction continues after a police officer has requested dispersal and removal, such
obstruction shall constitute a public offense.
Our function in picket/protest situations is maintaining order. Citizens have a right to
protest/picket provided they do not obstruct a pedestrian or vehicular traffic or otherwise
break the law. G/O 89-04 requires:
1. To the extent possible, the Watch Commander is responsible for assuring that
adequate manpower is available to control and maintain order in every instance where
crowds have formed or are expected to form.
2. Police personnel in command at the scene of any assembly must be aware of their
responsibility to afford protection to both participants and non -participants, and will
deal with illegal acts promptly, decisively, and impartially.
The fact that you may or may not agree with the protesters is irrelevant. As long as the
protesters are not acting in an illegal manner they have the right to express their opinions.
Unless immediate action is needed to protect someone from serious injury or death,
officers should refrain from taking action until the incident commander can orchestrate a
unified response to any problems.
QJ
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TRAINING BULLETIN 00-37
May 15th, 2000
Commanders (Pass on to all officers)
k.hurd
WT 00-43 Leg Restraints
0
This weeks watch training deals with the use of the leg restraint system. This is
to be use in conjunction with the restraint strap, demonstrating the use of the
device. While most people think they know how to use, I have seen it use to tie a
person's leg together in an "overhand" knot type fashion more than once. In
addition to being incorrectly applied, by failing to "hang the tail" out the door, the
subject is still able to kick.
This training need was recently identified and developed by Officer Droll. Thanks
for the assistance.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
Watch Training 00-43
Leg Restraint
Scenario - You arrest a subject for disorderly conduct. During the arrest the subject
actively resists during the cuffing procedure. When you go to place him in the backseat,
he comes assaultive and begins kicking at the officers and kicking at the back door while
you attempt to close the door.
Critical Issues - Your safety, the safety of the subject being transported and department
equipment. Obviously while the subject is in this mind -set and his legs are free, your
safety is compromised. Also he could injure himself while engaged in this type behavior.
In addition it costs between $200-600 (depending on if the door itself is damaged] to
replace a backdoor window and approx. $500 to replace a back wig4ow. We end up
replacing windows in these type situations several times each year.
Discussion - Each vehicle should have a leg restraint in the vehicle. (if you cannot locate
it, notify a watch supervisor so arrangements can be made to replace it) The strap is a
black nylon strap made from seatbelt material. The strap is designed to restrain the legs
of a violent subject thus limiting their ability to kick officers or damage the interior to the
squad car. This strap shall not be used to "hog tie" the subject prior to transport. G/O 99-
03, Prisoner Transport... "Officers are ,prohihited from transporting prisoners who are
restrained in a prone position. The technique of "hog tying" shall not be used by
members of this department."
Using the leg restraint
Obviously the strap is only used with violent subjects; therefor, extreme caution must be
used when applying the strap to avoid being kicked. The strap has a "D" ring sewn in the
middle of the strap. One end of the strap has both the hook and loop type Velcro sewn to
it. The strap is placed on the suspect by wrapping the Velcro end of the strap around the
subject's ankles. The Velcro side must be to the outside. Slide the Velcro end through
the "D" ring and pull the strap tight. Once the strap is tight, simply bring the Velcro end
sticking out of the "D" ring around the ring and attach it to itself. Be sure to press the
Velcro together along the entire length to ensure it won't come apart during transport.
The subject is then placed into the squad car. Place the subject's feet in the floor well as
close to the door as possible. The other end is placed so it hangs out the door. The door is
then closed which will secure the strap.
Prior to arrival at the jail it is recommended that you advise them of the combative nature
of the individual so adequate personnel will be available for safely removing the subject
from the vehicle.
We currently have two models of leg restraints, Toka and Human brand restQnts. On
the Toka the rubber grommets keep the strap from being pulled back through tlriroor, 6n
the Human, the yellow buckle keeps the strap from coming back through the door )
—1
v�
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TRAINING BULLETIN 00-38
May 15th, 2000
Commanders (Pass on to all officers)
k.hurd
WT 00-12 Gun on School Grounds
This weeks watch training deals with the presence of a firearm on school
grounds. While there may be grounds for searching the vehicle w/o consent or
obtaining a warrant, officers should consider obtaining one or the other in an
attempt to minimize any subsequent challenges.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
r
Watch Training 00-12
Gun on School Grounds
Scenario - You are dispatched to a high school ref. a gun in a vehicle. Upon your arrival
you are met by the principal who states that a student had approached her and stated that
he had overheard another student talking about going hunting after school and having a
gun in their car in the school parking lot. A teacher located the vehicle and states a long
hard -sided case is visible in the "trunk" area of a hatchback. The vehicle is registered in
the parents' name. The district has a zero tolerance for weapons on the school grounds
and requests that all appropriate criminal charges be filed. The suspect student is called
to the office and refuses to speak with the principal. He demands to talk with his parents
prior to allowing any search of the vehicle.
0
5_ n �-
Critical Issues - >
What criminal charges if any apply?
Can the vehicle be searched prior to the parent's arrival?
Discussion Y
724AB Carrying weapons on school grounds —penalty —exceptions.
A person who goes armed with, carries, or transports a firearm of any kind, whether
concealed or not, on the grounds of a school commits a class "D" felony. For the
purposes of this section, "school" means a public or nonpublic school as defined in
section 280.2.
18 USC 922(q)(2)(A) makes possession of a firearm in a school zone punishable by up to
5 years imprisonment.
The law in this case is explicit. Anyone carrying or transporting a firearm on school
grounds commits a class D felony. The Iowa City School District makes it clear to its
students that bringing a firearm on to school grounds is a violation of school policy and a
violation of state code. This is a case where a decision not to arrest should not be
exercised. While the transportation may be for a lawful reason, it's mere presence on the
school grounds is a clear violation of state code. In addition it is a federal offense to
possess a firearm on school grounds.
In this scenario, the vehicle is unattended and stationary. While there is an automobile
exception to the warrant requirement, the preferred method would be to attempt to obtain
consent to search prior to entering the vehicle. Lacking consent the officers should
consider contacting a supervisor or the County Any's office to determine if the vehicle
should be entered without a warrant. While the existence of the statement to the friend
and the presence of a gun case in the car may rise to the level of probable cause, due to
the seriousness of the incident and the likely notoriety which will arise, obtaining consent
or warrant would greatly diminish any challenge based on the legality of the search.
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
TRAINING BULLETIN 00-39
May 30th, 2000
Commanders (Pass on to all officers)
k.hurd
WT 00-44 Hearing -Impaired
V
This weeks watch training deals with the dealing with the hearing impaired.
Included is the number for an interpreter as provided by the Evert Conner Center.
There are specific requirements officers need to meet/follow when dealing with a
deaf/hearing impaired person. This is particularly true when it is in a custodial
setting.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
Watch Training 00-44
Hearing Impaired
Scenario - It is 02:30 and you observe a vehicle going through a red light. You stop the
vehicle and make your approach. Upon reaching the drivers' door, the operator taps on
his ears and is able to make known to you that he is deaf. The driver's eyes are watery
and bloodshot; you detect an odor of alcohol on the driver's breath. You decide that you
are going to administer SFST.
Critical Issues - Can I administer SFST? If so, do I have to call an interpreter? Can I
administer a PBT? Intoxilyzer? Can I question him? Where can I get an interpreter? Do
these requirements apply if this is a non -custodial situation? A traffic stop?
Discussion - Iowa Code and Federal ADA regulations directly impact the way in which
officers deal with the deaf or hearing impaired. Iowa Code 804.31 Arrest of deaf or hard -
of -hearing person requires in part:
When a person is detained for questioning or arrested for an alleged violation of a law or
ordinance and there is reason to believe that the person is deaf or hard- of -hearing, the peace
officer making the arrest or taking the person into custody or any other officer detaining the
person shall determine if the person is a deaf or hard -of -hearing person as defined in section
622B.1. If the officer so determines, the officer, at the earliest possible time and prior to
commencing any custodial interrogation of the person, shall procure a qualified interpreter in
accordance with section 622B.2 and the rules adopted by the supreme court under section
62213.1 unless the deaf or hard -of -hearing person knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waives
the right to an interpreter in writing by executing a form prescribed by the department of human
rights and the Iowa county attorneys association. "emphasis added"
The chapter additionally states: This section does not prohibit the request for and administration
However, upon the arrival of the interpreter the officer who requested the chemical test shall
explain through the interpreter the reason for the testing, the consequences of the person's
consent or refusal, and the ramifications of the results of the test, if one was administered.
"emphasis added"
When an interpreter is not readily available and the deaf or hard -of -hearing person's identity is
known, the person may be released by the law enforcement agency into the temporary custody of
a reliable family member or other reliable person to await the arrival of the interpreter, if the
person is eligible for release on bail and is not believed to be an immediate threat to the person's
own safety or the safety of others.
An answer, statement, or admission, oral or written, made by a deaf or hard -of -hearing person.in
reply to a question of a law enforcement officer or any other person having a prosecutorial;
function in a criminal proceeding is not admissible in court and shall not be used agairtsIthe degf'
or hard -of -hearing person if that answer, statement, or admission was not made _da'Qticited
through a qualified interpreter, unless the deaf or hard -of -hearing person had waived the right to,
an interpreter pursuant to this section. In the event of a waiver and criminal proceeding's the court --
shall determine whether the waiver and any subsequent answer, statement, or admission made_ ,.
by the deaf or hard -of -hearing person were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made:
When communication occurs with a person through an interpreter pursuant to this section, all
questions or statements and responses shall be relayed through the interpreter. The role of the
interpreter is to facilitate communication between the hearing and deaf or hard -of -hearing parties.
An interpreter shall not be compelled to answer any question or respond to any statement that
serves to violate that role at the time of questioning or arrest or at any subsequent administrative
or judicial proceeding.
Ref. casual contacts, an interpreter is not required, as the subject is free to leave. In area
of traffic stops, officers are not required to contact an interpreter when issuing a citation,
however officers need to spend additional time explaining by; communicating in writing,
pointing to relevant sections, gestures, or other methods, the citation.
Where can an interpreter be reached? As covered in MATS, the Evert Conner Center is
available 24 hours a day for interpreter services. The number is 338-3870 or pager #
888-318-2360.
When dealing with the deaf or hearing impaired, officers need to remember that while
they may be nodding in agreement, they may still not understand or understand only part
of what is being communicated. When in a custodial setting officers would probably be
required to show that any waivers were knowing and voluntary, additionally it requires
that the waiver be in writing on the appropriate form.
Officers are not required to provide an interpreter prior to the administration of a PBT or
Intoxilyzer test. If the PBT were offered in the field obviously the contacting of an
interpreter would be impractical, however upon arrival at the PD the officer should
contact the # listed above and make appropriate arrangements. Officers are not required
to wait for the arrival of an interpreter prior to administering a breath or chemical test but
prior to any questioning of a subject they would need to have the interpreter present or a
knowing and voluntary wavier signed. The one thing that is likely, is that the results of
any field sobriety tests administered without the presence of an interpreter is likely to be
suppressed.