HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2000 ICPD Reports/Memos1- ! ` A
r ICPD TRAINING ]
i7, i 1
DATE: December 1st, 2000 '
rl1
TO: Chief Winkelhake
From: K.Hurd
REF: Nov. Training Report
ASP Instructor Recertification
11/6/200
8 Hours
Officer Batcheller
ILEA
Recertification training for department's baton instructor. Refresher in techniques and
introduction of new techniques for instructors.
lsi Line Supervisor Training
11/6-17/2000
80 Hours
Sgts. Heick and Krei
MTTU IV
Training for first -line supervisors. Including communication skills, elements of
supervision, reports and record keeping, policy development and implementation,
community relations, discipline, civil liability and personnel development.
Accident Report Training
11/9/2000
8 Hours
ILEA I
Sgts. Campbell and Hurd
Training in the completion, implementation and use of the new state accident report form.
Tactical Officers Association Conf.
11/19-21/2000
24 Hours
Chicago
Sgts. Heick and Campbell
Training in various topics relating to the training and operations of tacticaltm's. -Also
review of techniques, tactics and operations. Review of new equipmgnt d herds.. .
Reid Interview and Interrogation
11/28-30/2000
MTTU IV
Officers Steva, Gonzalez and Frank
Training in the Reid techniques of Interviewing and Interrogation. Including identifying
signs of deception, and how to obtain confessions. Included legal issues related to
interviews and interrogations.
Regional Accident Investigation Meeting
11/27/200
4 Hours
Quad Cities
Officers
Hands on demonstration of accident investigation techniques, included measurements and
calculations for identifying various accident related information.
Canine Training
11/26-12/01/2000
40 Hours
Denison, IA
Officer Gist and Gallo
Annual update/refresher training for canine and canine handler. Includes training in
tracking, apprehension and narcotics location.
Open Records training
11/28/00
2 Hours
Iowa City
16 Supervisors
F
Training in the Iowa Pubic Records law. Identified different types of records and what
records/information is available to the public and what information should remain
confidential.
SRT Range training
08/22-23/00
8 Hours
17 SRT members
Training in firearm techniques and handgun qualification including training on the 1187
shotgun and qualification and night handgun qualification. r G, _ _ lF l-,, i S 3 9
SRT Situational Training
08/22-23/00
8 Hours
17 SRT members plus outside agencies
Joint training exercise with Coralville and Johnson County, including hostage/barricade
negotiations, building entry and search techniques.
Watch Training #s
00-24 Hazard Communications (Right to Know)
O1-18 Post Pursuit Considerations (video dealing with driver contact after a pursuit)
01-19 Domestic Abuse (review of G/O 99-10 and current revisions)
01-31 Miranda and the Deaf (video dealing with custodial contacts with the deaf)
Copy: City Manager
Captain Widmer
PCRB
Universal Precautions
Adapted from FBI Handbook of Forensic Science
Department personnel have the ultimate responsibility
to recognize chemical, biological, and physical hazards
present at calls for service. This article provides
familiarization of hazards, safety precautions, safe work
practices, and personal protective equipment (PPE)
recommended for dealing with situations in which you
may be exposed to Bloodborne Pathogens (BBP).
Routes of Exposure
Among the inherent risks associated with crime scene
investigations and evidence collection is exposure to
potentially infectious human blood and body fluids,
chemicals and physical hazards such as hypodermic
needles, broken glass, and other sharp objects. The
following provides a discussion of the different routes of
exposure by which a contaminant enters the body
resulting in an injury or illness.
Inhalation
Airborne contaminants at a scene can be in the form of
dust, smoke, vapor, gas or fume, or aerosol.
Depending on the contaminant, immediate respiratory
irritation or destruction might ensue upon inhalation.
Some airborne contaminants can enter the
bloodstream via the lungs when inhaled. Once in the
bloodstream, the contaminant can circulate throughout
the body and cause damage to the body. Proper work
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
Universal Precautions
Indianapolis v Edmond
4 Revised State Accident Report
Indianapolis v. Edmond
On Nov. 28, 2000 the United States Supreme Ct.
decided Indianapolis v. Edmond. In this case the
Indianapolis PD conducted a preplanned, advertised
and posted "Narcotics Checkpoint." As posted the
primary purpose of these stops was to locate illegal
narcotics. Upon being stopped there was a check of
the drivers license, registration and a sobriety check
(non -intrusive observation made). While this was going
on a K9 unit would do a walk around, exterior sniff of
the vehicle. The stops lasted approx. 2-3 minutes
unless an officer received consent to search or
developed probable cause to search. The validity of
these stops was contested as being a violation of the
41" Amendment, which protects against unreasonable
search and seizure.
In United States v Martinez-Fuerte, the Supreme Court
had allowed the Border Patrol to conduct suspicionless
stops of persons in order to stem the flow of illegal
aliens. The court recognized that the government had
"longstanding interest in the integrity of the border",
and the problems associated with limiting stops to the
border itself.
In Michigan v. Sitz, the court decided that the use of
sobriety checkpoints was constitutional even though
they involve "brief suspicionless stops of motorists."
"This checkpoint program was clearly aimed at
reducing the immediate hazard posed by the presence
of drunk drivers on the highways, and there was an
obvious connection between the imperative of highway
safety and the law enforcement practice at issue."
Similar to Indianapolis v Edmond, both Martinez-Fuerte
and Sitz involved preplanned procedures that removed
discretion from the individual officer in determining who
should be stopped. These were allowed in part to
"...serve special needs, beyond the normal need for
law enforcement."
In a 6 - 3 decision the United States Supreme Court
decided in Indianapolis v. Edmond that the use of
Narcotic Checkpoints VIOLATED the 41" Amendment
prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. In
differentiating this case from Martinez;,F0i,4pSWdWQ1 i
training 1
continued from page 1
practices along with adequate ventilation can minimize
airborne contaminant inhalation. In extreme cases,
respiratory protection may be required.
Skin Contact
Skin contact is a frequent route of entry into the body
that can result in localized or systemic health effects.
Localized effects can result in irritation or damage to
the tissues at the point of contact. These effects can
include irritation, redness, swelling, or burning.
Exposure can be prevented by the use of appropriate
gloves, safety glasses, goggles, face shields, and
protective clothing.
Ingestion
Ingestion is a less common route of exposure.
Ingestion of a corrosive material can cause damage to
the mouth, throat, and digestive tact. To prevent entry
of chemicals or biological contaminants into the mouth,
wash hands before eating, smoking, or applying
cosmetics. Do not bring food, drink, or cigarettes into
areas where contamination can occur.
Injection
Needle sticks and mechanical injuries from
contaminated glass, metal, or other sharp objects can
inject contaminants directly into the bloodstream.
Extreme caution should be exercised when handling
objects with sharp or jagged edges.
SAFETY
Bloodborne Pathogen Safety
Universal precautions are a set of procedures which
officers may take to minimize their exposure to BBP. It
requires that officers treat all human blood, body fluids,
or other potentially infectious materials as if infected
with a bloodborne disease such as Hepatitis B Virus
(HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), and human
immunodefieiency virus (HIV). The following protective
measures should be taken to avoid direct contact with
these potentially infectious materials:
a) Use barrier protection such as disposable gloves,
coveralls when handling potentially infectious
materials. Gloves should be worn, especially if
there are cuts, scratches or other breaks in the
skin. Change gloves when torn, punctured, or
when their ability to function as a barrier is
compromised.
1. Prior to donning, inspect gloves for holes,
punctures and tears. Remove rings or other
sharp objects that could cause punctures.
2. When working with heavily contaminated
materials, it is prudent to wear a double layer
of gloves.
3. Change gloves when torn or punctured or
when their ability to function as a barrier is
compromised. When in doubt... CHANGE
gloves.
4. To avoid contamination of unprotected skin or
clothing, remove 1 ddisposable gloves by
grasping the cuffs and pulling them off inside
out. Discard disposable gloves in designated
containers. DO NOT. )2EUSE : n
b) Wear appropriate eye and face protection to
protect against splashes, sprays, and spatters of
infectious materials. Similar precou ipns should be
followed when cojiecting dried blodstains.
c) Place contaminated sharps in leak -proof,
puncture -resistant containers when transported or
discarded. Do not bend, recap, remove or
otherwise handle contaminated needles or other
sharps.
d) Do not eat, drink, smoke, or apply cosmetics
where human blood, body fluids, or other
potentially infectious materials are present.
e) Wash hands after removing gloves or other PPE.
Remove gloves and other PPE in a manner that
will not result in the contamination of unprotected
skin or clothing.
f) Decontaminate equipment after use with a solution
of bleach diluted 1:10, 70 percent isopropyl
alcohol, or other disinfectant. Allow sufficient
contact time to complete disinfection.
g) Deposit soiled clothing/equipment in a bag, which
is clearly marked as a biohazard, and submit it for
cleaning or decontamination.
EYE
Appropriate eye protection, such as safety glasses and
goggles should be worn when handling biological and
chemical materials. Face shields offer better
protection to the face when there is a potential for
splashing or flying debris. Face shields must be worn
in combination with safety glasses or goggles because
face shields alone are not considered appropriate eye
protection. Contact lens users should wear safety
glasses or goggles to protect the eyes. For personnel
who wear prescription glasses, protective eyewear
should be worn over prescription glasses.
POST EXPOSURE
If you are exposed to a BBP you need to immediately
wash the affected area with soap and water and a
supervisor notified. If there has been a significant
exposure you need to complete a Report of Exposure
to Infectious Disease form. These are available at
Mercy and U of I emergency rooms. A determination
will be made by the medical staff as to the extent of the
exposure. If it is determined that there has been a
significant exposure treatment for Post Exposure
Prophylaxis will be instituted at this time. (treatment
should begin within 24 hours of the exposure)
In addition to the Report of Exposure form, the
exposed party(s) will need to complete an ICPD
incident report and if the exposure is deemed
"Significant", an OSHA report.
training 2
page 1
UPCOMING TRAINING
The following is a listing of training, which MAY be
available. DO NOT consider this a posting. Any
request to attend based on this listing will not be
considered a request to attend.
TRAINING EVENTS
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE MONTGOMERY HALL
DATE BEGINNING JAN. 8T", 5 CONSECUTIVE WEEKS
MATS
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE MTTU IV
DATE BEGINNING JAN. 6" , 5 CONSECUTIVE SATURDAYS
Instructor Development
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE MTTU IV
DATE FEB. 12 - 16
Criminal Investigative Techniques
TRAINING EVENT
PLACE WASHINGTON COUNTY RANGE
DATE DEC.27TH
Supplemental firearm training
Accreditation Update
We are currently in the process of developing a
general order relating to Racial Profiling. While there
is not currently a CALEA standard relating to this, they
are in the process of developing one. In addition we
are attempting to remain in the forefront of the issue.
As part of this effort we may be changing the method
in which we record data on the drivers of vehicles
subject to traffic stops.
Additionally, in the IACP model policy on this issue, a
great deal of time was spent going over officer
interaction techniques. The techniques contained in
their model were those which were covered by Lt..
Johnson in Verbal Judo. Officers should review verbal
judo techniques and institute the associated
procedures in their contacts with citizens. Utilizing
these techniques in conjunction with the use of the In -
car recorders will hopefully go a long ways toward
minimizing complaints of this type against officers and
department. The order will be detailed further at
MATS.
the court states "...what�rjncigalfy, distinguishes these
checkpoints from those we have previously approved
is their primary purpose." "We have never approved a
checkpoint program rwhose, primary: {SUr'pose was to
detect evidence ofcriminal wrongdoing. Rather, our
checkpoint cases have recognized only limited
exceptions to the general' rule that';e ,seizure must be
accompanied by,`,some 'measure `�of` individualized
suspicion." "...each of the checkpoint programs that
we have approved was designed primarily to serve
purposes closely related to the problems of policing
the border or the necessity of ensuring roadway
safety." "Because the primary purpose of the
Indianapolis narcotics checkpoint program is to
uncover evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing, the
program contravenes the Fourth Amendment.
In Indianapolis v Edmond the Court determined that
the primary purpose of the checkpoint will in part,
determine the validity or constitutionality of a
checkpoint. The Constitutionality of a checkpoint
"...still depends on a balancing of the competing
interests at stake and the effectiveness of the
program." "When law enforcement authorities pursue
primarily general crime control purposes at
checkpoints such as here, however, stops can only be
justified by some quantum of individualized suspicion."
The purpose of checkpoints must be directly related to
a highway traffic safety issue or some other specific
issue which the state has an overriding interest.
Checkpoints, which involve a stop, which is a seizure,
requires reasonable suspicion or a compelling or
overriding reason as to their need. Checkpoints are
not permissible for "general crime control purposes."
"Because the primary purpose of the Indianapolis
checkpoint program is ultimately indistinguishable from
the general interest in crime control, the checkpoints
violate the Fourth Amendment." "... if this case were
to rest at such a high level of generality, there would
be little check on the authorities' ability to construct
roadblocks for almost any conceivable law
enforcement purpose."
What this case DOES NOT do is, invalidate the use
and Constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints (based on
the real and immediate need to remove intoxicated
drivers from the roadway). The court states in
Indianapolis v Edmond, "Only with respect to a smaller
class of offenses, however, is society confronted with
the type of immediate, vehicle bound threat to life and
limb that the sobriety checkpoint in Sitz was designed
to eliminate." It also "...DOES NOT (emphasis added)
impair the ability of police officers to act appropriately
upon information that they properly learn during a
checkpoint stop justified by a lawful primary
purpose...". Le. if during the course of a stop at a
sobriety checkpoint the officer develops reasonable
suspicion or probable cause they may act on it.
Entire decision available in the training office.
training 3
Revised State Accident
Report Form _I
The Iowa Department of Transportation has evised
the Accident Report form. The new form ,99pb',4,' into
effect 01/01/01. This revision DOES NOT chaste ouN
response or procedures regarding accidents. We will
continue to collect crash data regardless of the dollar
amount. There have been several coding changes,
inclusions and deletions from the existing form,
requiring duplicate information only be filled out 1 time,
and movement of data fields. In addition, there is a
supplemental report that can be used when there is a
3 or more vehicle accident. Several of the main
changes on the accident report are:
1. There is no longer a need to complete the Iowa
Supplemental Truck and Bus Accident Report as
this information is now included on the report form.
(requirements/criteria remain the same)
2. Officers are now required to complete the
sequence of events, first harmful event, and the
most harmful event.
When completing the sequence of events field
officers need to take into account the following:
a. There will not necessarily be 4 events.
b. The most harmful event is where the most
damage or the injury occurred. (An injury is
deemed more harmful than damage)
c. The first harmful event is when damage first
occurred or when the first injury occurred.
d. This information is completed for each vehicle.
The sequence of events is divided in 5 different
f
sec ions,
Si�Gtion 1 - Pre -crash events
-'Section 2 - Non -collision events
Section 3 - Collision with (non -fixed objects)
Section 4 - Collision with fixed object
l -,',,Section 5 - Misc. events
The pre -crash event(s) are those which initiated the
action. The non -collision event(s) are those which
cause harm but do not involve contact with another
object. Collision with, are those events that involve a
collision with objects on the roadway.
Collision with fixed object(s) is those events involving
contact with a fixed object. Misc. events include
other events, which cause injury or damage.
A sample sequence of events might be 05 - animal
or object in roadway, 06 - evasive action, 01 - ran off
road (right), 30 - collision with pole (also most
harmful event) and 30 collision with pole for the first
harmful event. In this case 30, collision with pole
would be used 2 times, as the most harmful event
and as the 1s' harmful event.
We are now delineating between non -injury
accidents that are over/under $1000. IF the total
amount of damage is under $1000 and NO injuries,
officers will only need to fill out the basic
driver/vehicle information and completing a brief
narrative and diagram of the incident. The changes
and revisions will be covered in greater detail later
this month.
THIS AND THAT
At least 45 percent of arrestees charged with violent crimes or robberies, burglaries and theft tested positive
for the use of one or more drugs.
In State v. Homan, the Ohio Supreme Court stated "The NHTSA reported field sobriety tests (SFST) were
effective in determining legal intoxication only when the tests were administered in the prescribed,
standardized manner..." "Field sobriety tests have small margins of error making strict compliance critical.
Here the trooper's failure to strictly follow testing procedures made results unreliable. These results should
have been excluded from trail." (NOTE -the defendant was subsequently convicted on the basis of other
evidence, but emphasizes the importance of following the guidelines laid out by the NHTSA when
administering and evaluating SFST.)
With the passage of the federal .08 BAC to be eligible for federal highway funds, it is likely that Iowa will pass
a .08 BAC limit in relation to OWI within the 3 year deadline. With this in mind, a reevaluation of the
Standardized Field Sobriety tests (with minor modification) indicate that they are useful and accurate in
identifying those drivers who are above or below .08 ( in particular the HGN) There is also a recent analysis
which has classified certain classes of driving behavior as having an x% likelihood of having a BAC of .08 or
more.
Act in the valley so that you need not fear those who stand on the hill. Danish proverb
training 4
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAINING BULLETIN 01-27
DATE: Nov. 6th, 2000
TO: Commanders (All Sworn)
. FROM: k.hurd
SUBJECT: WT 01-18 Post Pursuit Considerations
This weeks watch training deals with post pursuit considerations. The associated
video identifies and discusses factors which officers should consider when
making contact with persons in the suspect vehicle after a pursuit.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Harney
Capt. Widmer
I
Watch Training 01-18
Post Pursuit Considerations
Scenario - You become engaged in a pursuit. The vehicle stops after traveling for 1
mile. You approach the vehicle.
Critical Issues - Besides the officer safety factors, what other factors should an officer
consider when approaching a vehicle after a pursuit, or a vehicle which has failed to stop
until an extended distance has been traversed for a traffic violation.
Discussion - Pursuits and situations in which a person fails to stop in what an officer
feels is a reasonable amount of time create stress on the officer. This often results in a
"dump" of adrenaline and/or elevates the officer's emotions. You need to recognize this
and work at keeping your "emotions" in check. This will allow you to make a more
professional approach AND more importantly allow you to take command of the
situation in a safer manner. (Decreases the likelihood of tunnel vision)
Remember your Verbal Judo Training
0
M
OV I
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TRAINING BULLETIN 01-28
Nov. 13th, 2000
Commanders (All Sworn)
k.hurd
WT 00-24 Hazard Communication/Right to Know
It is that time again, attached is a MSDS and questions which can be answered
using the MSDS. Upon completion of the question sheet, you need to print your
name and then sign in the designated section. I do NOT need the questions
returned to me.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
I
Watch Training 00-24
Hazard Communication/Right to Know
Scenario - While in the PD you become aware that there has been a spill of a chemical in
in a hallway. The product is Polyurethane. You are unsure as to any 1'arAs, which tj�
material may present and are unclear on what, if any steps you should iNtike to clean-up,`
the spill.
Critical Issues -
Where can you readily locate information about the material?
Once located, what can the MSDS tell you?
What are the potential health hazards of the material?
What precautions/protective measures should be taken when handling the material?
What steps should be taken when cleaning the spill?
Discussion -
In the Police Department, Material Data Safety Sheets (MSDS) may be found in the
following places:
1. Break Room
2. Custodians Closet
3. Watch Commanders Office
4. Lab
Using the attached MSDS answer the attached questions. (Supervisors have each member
sworn/non-swom on your watch complete the attached questions.)
MSDS TRAINING PROGRAM OUTLINE
I. NAME OF SUBSTANCE(S) AND SYNONYMS
II. SUBSTANCE DESCRIPTION -• -
- How substance is used
- Where substance is used
- What quantifies are used
- What form is the substance
Ill. FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
- Extinguishing Media
- Special Fire Fighting Procedures
IV: HEALTH HAZARD DATA
- Overexposure Effects _
- Emergency First Aid
V. REACTIVITY DATA
- Stability
- Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid)
- Hazardous Decomposition Products
VI. SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES
- Specific Steps
-13-
Waste Disposal
VII. SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION
- Respiratory Protection
- Ventilation
- Protective Gloves
- Eye Protection
- Other Personal Protective Equipment
Vill. SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
- Handling
- Storage
- Other Precautions
14-
REXTHANE® Heavy
blyuretho
95 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
MAN;FAC'TTIRER'S NAME ENCRGPNCY TELEPHONE W.
THE SHERWIN -WILLIAMS CO. - (21611.$66.2917
101 Pt OSPeCt Avenue N.N. INFORMATIOrf TELEPHONE no.
Cleveland, Ohio 41115 �'- /" t2161. S4f1'2y02
DATE OF PAEPAAAVION
I-Jul-95
Section I — PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NUMBER ANO MANE
H44 V 20 REXTnMW Heavy Duty Polyurethane Varnish
Section II — HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS VaPa,
CAS fN INGREDIENT %b1WEIGHT ACGM-TLV OSHA•PEL Unity Puuws
110.41-4 1 Ethylbenzene 9 100 100 PPM ).1
STEL 125 125 PPM
1110-20-7 1 Xylene 51 100 100 PPM 5.9
STEL 150 ISO PPM
Unknown Toluene Diisucyanate Polymer 10 Not Established
514-8/-9 1 2.1-Toluene Diisocyanate (maximum) 0.E 0.005 CD.02 PPW
STEL 0.02 PPM
91-011-7 1 2,6-toluene Diisocyanate Imeximual 0.2 Not Established
9 Ingredient subject to the reporting tequirements of the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARAI Section 311, CO CPA 172.65 C
Section III — PHYSICAL DATA
PAODWT HEIGHT 6 00 Ib real EVAPORATION RATE - Slower than Ether
SPECIFIC GRAVITY - 0.96 VAPOR DENSITY - Heavier than At
BOILING RANGE 277 292 "F MELTING POINT - N.A.
SOLIDS BY WEIGHT - /0 \ SOLUBILITY IM HATER - N.A.
SOLIDS By VOLUME - 33.5 \ PhmuclaxicAur RF\LTiVE - NO
VOC ITheoretical) - 4.110 lb. $75 gm. 1D17S (MFPA) Rating - 7. 9 1
Section IV — FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
PLAMNABILITY CLASSIFICATION FLASH POINT 71 aP PNCC Let 1.0 UEL 7.0
RED LABEL - Flammable, flash below 100 aF
£XTINOUISNIRO MEDIA -- Carbon Dioxide, Dry Chemical, Alcohol Poem
LINUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS
Keep containers tightly closed. Isolate from heat, electrical equipment, sparks, end open
Items. Closed containers nay explode when exposed to extreme heat. Application to hot surfaces
requires special precautions. Wring emergency conditions overexposure to decomposition
products may cause a health hazard. Symptoms may not be Immediately apparent. Obtain medical
attention.
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
Pull protective equipment Including self-contained breathing apparatus should be used.
Water spray nay be ineffective. If water is used, fog nozzles are preferable. Water my be
used to cool closed Containers to prevent pressure build-up and possible autolgnitlon or
explosion when exposed to extreme heat.
Section V — HEALTH HAZARD DATA
ROUTES OF EXPOSURE
Exposure my be by INHALATION endror SKIN or EYE contact, depending onconditionsOf use. To
.:minimize exposure, follow recommendations for proper use, ventilation, and personal protective
equipment.
ACUTE Health Hazards
EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE
Irritation of eyes, skan and upper respitatory system. In a confined area vapors in high
concentration my cause headache, nausea or dizziness.
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF OVEREXPOSURE
Headache, dizziness, nausea, and loss of coordination are Indications of excessive exposure
to vapors or spray mists.
Redness and Itching or burning sensation my indicate eye or excessive skin exposure.
MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE
May cause allergic skin reaction in susceptible persons or sensitization. This effect may be
delayed several hours after exposure.
ENEROEACY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES
If INHALED: It any breathing problems occur during use. LEAVE THE AREA and get fresh air.
It problems remain or occur later, IMMEDIATELY get medical attention.
If on SKIN: Nash affected arse thoroughly with soap and water.
Remove contaminated clothing and launder before re -use.
If in EYES: Flush eyes with large amounts of water for 15 minutes. Oat medical attention.
It SWALLOWED: Cot medical attention.
CHRONIC HeaRh Hazards
Toluene Dllsocyanste ITDI1, listed by NtP, has been shown to cause cancer In laboratory
animals when administered directly Into the stomach. No evidence of cancer from exposure to Tot
by Inhalation bag been reported.
Prolonged overexposure to solvent Ingredients In Section Il may cause adverse effects to the
liver, urinary, and reproductive system .
:ne Varnish B44Vw0
Pa rams sensitive to lsocyanotes will experience increased allerg/et
e tesetlpn'onr�r *peened
exposure. —
Report* have assoclatad repeated and prolonged overexposure to solvei lttr,petmanent brain
and nervous system damage.
Section VI — REACTIVITY DATA < 1 C .
STABILITY - Stable
CONDITIONS TO AVOID -- None known. .i
INCOMPATIBILITY
Contamination with Water. Alcohols, Mines and other compounds iFh react LithriepcIanates.
may result In danyaroux pressure In. and possible bursting of. cl syd containers
UA2ARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS
BY fire: Carbon Dioxide. Carbon. Monoxide, oxides of Nitrogen, possibility of Hydrogen CYanidt
HAZARDOUS POLYNERIrArrON - Will Nut Occur
Section VII — SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED
Remove all sources of ignition. ventilate the area. All personnel In the area should be
protected as In Section Vill. Cover spill with absorbent matatial. Deactivate spilled material
with a 10% ammonium hydroxide solution (household ammonial. After 10 minutes, collect in open
containers and add rote ammonia. Cover loosely. Wash spill area with soap and water.
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD
Waste trap this product may be hazardous as defined under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act IRCRAI e0 CFR 261. Waste moat be tested for ignitability to determine the
applicable EPA hazardous waste numbers.
Incinerate In approved facility. Do not Incinerate closed container. Dispose of in
accordance with Federal. State, and Local regulations regarding pollution.
Section Vlll — PROTECTION INFORMATION
PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN USE
NO PERSON SHOULD USE TUIS PRODUCT OR BE IN THE AREA WHERE IT IS BEING USED, IF THEY HAVE
CHRONIC (IANG-TERN) LUNG OR BREATHING PROBLEMS OR IF THEY EVER HAD A REACTION IV ISOCYANATES.
Use only with adetluata ventilation. Avoid breathing vapor and spray mist. Avoid Contact
with skin and eyes. Nash hands after using.
This coating may contain materials classified as nuisance particulates Ilisted Vs Dust- in
Section Il) which may be present at hazardous levels only during sanding or abrading of the
dried film. If no specific dusts are listed in Sectlon 11, the applicable limits for nuisance
dusts are ACGIH TLV to mg./mD (total duet), OSHA PEL IIS mg./ml Itotal dustl. S mg./m.l frespi-
rable fraction).
VIZITZLATIGN
Local exhaust preferable. General exhaust acceptable if the exposure to materials In
Section It is maintained below applicable exposure limits. Refer to OSHA Standards 1010.94,
1910.107, 1910.100.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
Where ovatspray Is present, a positive pressure air supplied respirator M19C NIOSH/MSMO
approved) should be worn. If unavailable, a properly fitted organic vapor/particulate
respirator approved by NIOSH/KSHA'for protection against materials in Section 1I may be
effective. Follow respirator manufacturer's directions for use. Near the respirator for the
whole time of spraying and will all vapors and mists are gone. NO PERSONS SHOULD BE ALLOWED
IN THE AREA WHERE THIS PRODUCT 19 BEING USED UNLESS EOUIPPED WITH THE SAME RESPIRATOR
PROTECTION RECOMMENDED FOR THE PAINTERS.
When sending or abrading the dried film, "at a dust/mist respirator approved by N10SH/WSHA
for dust which ray be generated from this product, underlying paint, or the abrasive.
PROTECTIVE GLOVES
Near gloves which are recommended by glove supplier for protection against materials in
Section it.
EYE PROTECTICN
Wear safety spectacles with unperforated aldeahields.
OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Use barrier cream on exposed skin.
Section IX — PRECAUTIONS
DOL STORAGE CATEGORY - IC
PRVCAUTIQNS TO BE TARFN IN MANDLINO AN, STORING
Contents are FLAMMABLE. Keep away from heat, sparks, and open (lase. During use and until
all vapors are gone; Keep area ventilated - Do not smoke - Extinguish all flames, pilot lights,
and heaters - Turn off stoves, electrical tools and appliances, and anyothersources of Ignition.
Consult HFPA Code. Use approved Bonding A" Grounding procedures.
Keep Container closed when not in use. Transfer only to approved containers With complete
and apptoprlate labeling. Do not take Internally. Keep out of the reach of children
07HER PRECAUTMNS
Intentional misuses by deliberately concentrating and inhaling the contents can be harmful on
fatal.
Section X — OTHER REGULATORY INFORMATION
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65
WARNING: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer
and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
The above Information pertains to this product as Currently formulated, and Is based on
the information available at this time. Addition of reducers or other additives to this
product may substantially alter the composition and hazards of the product. Since conditions
of use are outside our Control, we make no warranties, express or Implied, and assume
no liability In connection with any use of this information.
7
0
Employee name (print) Job Title Frp qc,14j;ignature
. ploy .
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAINING BULLETIN 01-30
DATE: Nov. 20th, 2000
TO: Commanders (All Sworn)
FROM: k.hurd
SUBJECT: WT 01-19 Domestic Abuse
This weeks watch training covers information officers need to obtain when
responding to a domestic dispute. General order 99-10 Domestic Violence
details responsibilities when responding to a domestic. Of importance, all
officers present at a domestic need to complete a report detailing their
observations and anything they were told or heard.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Hamey
Capt. Widmer
Watch Training 01-19
Domestic Abuse Order
Scenario - You are dispatched to a domestic dispute. Upon yours arrival you 'get:
conflicting stories as to what has happened. Both parties have been drinking and have no
visible injuries. There are no witnesses. Neither party wishes to pursu,@&, incident,
Critical Issues - What are the responsibilities of the responding officers? What if upon
arrival it is determined that the parties do not meet the criteria defining a "domestic
relationship"? Can the officer have the ECO reclassify the call? What
information/evidence should the investigating officer collect?
Discussion - When responding to a reported domestic, the responding officers are
required to complete a report detailing the circumstances. To the extent which it applies,
the reports need to include the following information from ALL responding officers:
1. Names of all the parties involved, including witnesses and those present. Include an
address and phone # of where the victim will be staying so they Domestic Abuse
Investigator may follow-up.
2. Relationship between the suspect and victim. (This must also be included on any
resulting charge.)
3. The location of the assault.
4. The existence of any no contact order. IF a no contact order exists, the investigating
officer must check the criminal history of the person involved too see if there has
been a previous violation of the order. (allows for enhanced penalties)
5. Description of the scene.
6. Notation of any weapons used.
7. Photograph all injuries INCLUDING any injuries to the suspect.
8. If alcohol is involved, PBT and record the results of both the suspect and victim.
9. Whether there is a 9-1-1 tape.
10. Whether medical treatment was received.
11. Indication of if the victim was notified of their "Victim's Rights".
12. Record any excited utterances.
13. If there are other domestic charges pending.
If upon arrival it is learned that the incident is NOT a domestic, the responding officer
must complete a report containing the name, address and phone #s of the party(s)
involved and a brief narrative explaining why the incident is not a domestic. I.e., verbal
dispute, No locate, non -domestic dispute...
The ECO CANNOT reclassify an incident once it is dispatched as a domestic. In those
incidents where an officer is dispatched to a call other than a domestic and it is learned
that it is a domestic, the officer is responsible for requesting the ECO to reclassify the call
as a domestic.
In the above scenario, the officer would need to complete a report, detailing the
circumstances. Since there are no injuries and neither party wishes to pursue the incident,
the officer should provide the parties with information/referral information relating to
domestic violence. The investigating officer should attempt to obtain a PBT from both
parties involved and record the results in the report. Prior to clearing, the officer should
check for the existence of any no contact orders. The report should be forwarded to the
Domestic Abuse Investigator for follow-up.
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAINING BULLETIN 01-31
DATE: Nov. 27th, 2000
TO: Commanders (All Sworn)
FROM: k.hurd
SUBJECT: WT 01-20 Miranda and the Deaf
This weeks watch training deals Miranda and the Deaf. Bottom line, it will be up
to the officer to show that the deaf defendant new and understood the warning in
whatever form it was given.
Cc: Chief Winkelhake
Capt. Harney
Capt. Widmer
0
Watch Training 01-20
Miranda and the Deaf
Scenario - You are dispatched to a store ref. shoplifter in custody. Upon your arrival the
store employee indicates that the person attempted to take $200 jacket. Upon making
contact with person you discover that he is deaf.
Critical Issues - How can you most effectively communicate with a deaf person? What
steps should you take to insure that the suspect is properly advised of their rights? Lip
reading? Present in writing? Interpreter? Where can I contact a person who knows sign
language?
Discussion - As demonstrated in the attached video, there are substantial hurdles to
overcome when dealing with a deaf suspect. At times it may be best to wait until the deaf
person has an atty. and interpreter present and the interaction can be videotaped. The
ECO has a phone number where a sign language interpreter can be reached.
8
Department Memorandum 00-67
DATE: December 12, 2000
TO: Chief Winkelhake
All Commanders
FROM: Captain Widmer
SUBJECT: July -October Use of Force Review
The "Use of Force Review Committee met on December 8, 2000. It was composed of the
following personnel;
Captain Johnson
Captain Widmer
Sgt. Hurd
Sgt. Campbell
The review of submitted reports for July (12 incidents - 14 reports), August (19 incidents
- 27 reports), September (27 incidents - 44 reports) and October (26 incidents - 42
reports) revealed no policy or training concerns.
There were several administrative issues that were noted;
1) Again, numerous reports are not being specific on the type of
indicate... "arrest" is not specific. As a matter of clarification, "Type of
Incident" should be what the original CFS or reason for the encounter is.
Many of the reports list 'interference", but what did the incident start out as -
that is what we are attempting to track.
2) Several instances of the proper boxes not being checked under "type of force
used". Most common is 'other" not being indicated when hands-on is used.
3) Two instances were found where an officer would refer to other officer(s)
taking hands-on action, yet only one report was submitted.
4) Reminder that many of the reports are becoming wordy. The Use of Force
report is to document the use of force, not the entire incident.
Watch Commanders are to insure that these matter are addressed and complied with in the
future. Noted reports are being returned with the discrepancy highlighted. Overall, the
use of force reporting is exceptional and indicates officer professionalism and adherence to
proper police policy.
Copy: City Manager
PCRB