HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-08-2005 Police Citizens Review BoardAGENDA
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
March 8, 2005 — 7:00 P.M.
LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
410 E. Washington Street
ITEM NO. 1 CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
ITEM NO.2 CONSIDER MOTION ADOPTING CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED OR
AMENDED
• Minutes of the meeting on 02/08/05
• ICPD General Order #01-01 (Racial Profiling)
• ICPD General Order #01-05 (Officer Involved Shootings/Lethal Incident
Investigations)
• ICPD Department Memo #05-03
• ICPD Use of Force Report — January 2005
ITEM NO. 3 OLD BUSINESS
• Policy/Procedure for extension requests
ITEM NO.4 NEW BUSINESS
ITEM NO. 5 PUBLIC DISCUSSION
ITEM NO. 6 BOARD INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 7 STAFF INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 8 CONSIDER MOTION TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION based on
Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are
required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept
confidential as a condition for that government body's possession or continued
receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential
personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities, boards of
supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports,
except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18)
Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a
government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of
government, to the extent that the government body receiving those
communications from such persons outside of government could reasonably
believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that
government body if they were available for general public examination.
ITEM NO.9 MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS
• April 12, 2005, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
• May 10, 2005, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
• June 14, 2005, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
• July 12, 2005, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
ITEM NO. 10 ADJOURNMENT
MEMORANDUM
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEw BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
DATE:
March 4, 2005
TO:
PCRB Members
FROM:
Kellie Tuttle
RE:
Board Packet for meeting on March 8, 2005
Enclosed please find the following documents for your review and comment at the next board
meeting:
• Minutes of the meeting on 02/08/05
• ICPD General Order#01-01 (Racial Profiling)
• ICPD General Order#01-05 (Officer Involved Shootings/Lethal Incident Investigations)
• ICPD Department Memo #05-03
• ICPD Use of Force Report — January 2005
• PCRB Complaint Deadlines
• PCRB Office Contacts — February 2005
• Extension request to Council for PCRB Complaint #04-02
• Extension request to Council for PCRB Complaint #04-03
Other resources available:
National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement
NACOLE provides information regarding civilian oversight in law enforcement nation wide. For
more information see: www.NACOLE.org
DRAFT
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES — February 8, 2005
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Loren Horton called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Candy Barnhill, Beth Engel, Loren Horton, Greg Roth and Roger Williams
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Legal Counsel Catherine Pugh (7:07) and Staff Kellie Tuttle
OTHERS PRESENT: Captain Tom Widmer from the ICPD.
CONSENT
CALENDAR Motion by Engel, seconded by Roth, to adopt the consent calendar.
• Minutes of the meeting on 12/09/04
• ICPD Use of Force Report — November 2004
• ICPD Use of Force Report — December 2004
• ICPD Quarterly/Summary Report — IAIR/PCRB, 2004
• ICPD Department Memo 04-57
• ICPD General Order #91-04 (Report Form Development and Control)
• ICPD General Order #95-01 (Emergency Operation of Police Vehicles)
• ICPD General Order#01-06 (Juvenile Procedures)
• ICPD General Order#01-08 (Criminal Intelligence)
Horton wanted to point out to board members who may not have been around when it
occurred, under Juvenile Procedures D(6), which is the age of consent from a juvenile, age of
consent is currently fourteen. The Board had given a recommendation which was considered
that the age be changed from tweleve.
Motion carried, 5/0, to accept the consent calendar as amended removing ICPD General
Order #01-01 (Racial Profiling) to be placed on the next agenda, the item was inadvertently left
out of the packet.
OLD BUSINESS Report of meeting with Chief Winkelhake — Horton met with the Police Chief regarding the
Board's concerns of extension requests and the timeliness, the good cause shown, and
whether the complainant is notified of the extension requests.
NEW BUSINESS Policy/Procedure for extension requests — Barnhill had requested at the December meeting
that the Board discuss the procedure for granting extension requests. Barnhill stated she
would like to develop a mechanism to prevent what had happened with a recent complaint,
and suggested the Chief's report be due before or in sequence with a meeting so that if the
Chief needed an extension he would be able to do so in a timely manner. The Board could
discuss the request at their meeting and then get back to him. Horton explained that
according to the City Code the Chief's report is due 90 days after the file date of the complaint
and then the Board's report is due to the City Council 45 days after the filing of the Chief's
report. Therefore the due dates of the reports can not be changed but the Board could adjust
their meeting schedule or call a special meeting. Barnhill inquired whether the Board could
deal with extension requests electronically or by phone. Pugh asked to be given a few
minutes to research the meeting requirements. Horton explained that changing the ordinance
to adjust the number of days would not address the issue because the process is put into
motion by the date the complaint is filed. Barnhill wondered if the ordinance could be changed
for this particular scenario to allow for an electronic vote. Engle stated she felt there was an
implicit trust that is embedded and if the Chief asks for an extension, there must be a reason
for it. Roth inquired if the Board could ask that an extension request be submitted so that it
can be dealt with at a regular meeting or request the extension a certain number of days
before the report deadline. Pugh responded that the SOP's don't allow the Board to meet
PCRB — Page 2 DRAFT
February 8, 2005
electronically or by phone; there has to be a quorum present to be considered a meeting; a
special meeting can be called by the Chair or three members can request the Chair to call a
meeting; there must also be 24-hour notice of the meeting place, time, and agenda to each
member and the media. Tuttle stated media notification is the posting of the agenda on the
Lobby bulletin board.
Horton asked if the policy should be calling a special meeting if a regu;ar meeting did not meet
the timeline. Barnhill disagreed and thought it needed to be much more definite so that if the
Board did not grant the extension, the Police Department would be given ample time to finish
writing the Chief's report. Roth stated that he did not believe that they would receive a report
either way if it were not ready. Barnhill stated that there were issues with the last request that
some board members felt there was not "good cause shown". Horton replied that in his
discussion with the Chief there would be good cause shown from now on in his requests.
Barnhill would like to table the discussion so that Horton can give his report regarding the
meeting with the Chief in closed session since it dealt primarily with the complaint and then
discuss it further at the March meeting if necessary.
PUBLIC
DISCUSSION None.
BOARD
INFORMATION Horton asked if the Police Citizens Academy had enough participants to proceed. Widmer
responded that it did and that they had almost 25.
Barnhill asked Widmer if arrest photos are black and white or color, if they were digital and
could the camera be adjusted for light skin tone and dark skin tone. Widmer replied that
Johnson County does the processing for ICPD. He thought the County did digital, but was
unsure if they did any adjustments. Barnhill's concern was that if someone sustained an
injury, would that injury show in the photo. Dark skin tones and light skin tones photograph
very differently than one another and how would one identify a superficial injury (bruise,
scrapes, etc.) Widmer replied that they the Iowa City Police Department has a policy when
they note an injury that was caused by an officer or if the officer feels could become an issue,
they bring them to the police department and take their own photos using ulterior light sources
and expertise within the department. There are certain people who have been trained in
photography. They also have 35mm, Polaroid, and digital capabilities. Widmer is assuming
that at the County the camera is pretty much set and they snap the picture with the proper
format.
Barnhill also asked Widmer how many investigators are in the Police Department that can also
investigate complaints filed with the Police Citizens Review Board. Widmer explained the
current policy is that the Captain of Operations is in charge of investigations. The Chief will
direct his letter to the Captain of Operations to conduct an investigation. That Captain has the
option to assign it to himself, to the other Captain (Widmer), or to one of the four lieutenants.
They then try to match them up with a Sergeant who can assist them so there are two people
together on a complaint. The complaint is never assigned to a supervisor of an officer about
whom the complaint has been filed. They always try to use a supervisor from another shift or
from investigations.
Barnhill asked Widmer if Incident Reports are filled out by all officers who are directly or in-
directly involved. Widmer stated that every time a case number is filed there has to be a
report filed. A coversheet with the basic information is filled out, but sometimes there will be
supplemental reports filed from other officers. It is at the officer's discretion. If it was a minor
incident, only one officer will sign off on the report and state the other officers that were
present. Barnhill asked who decides what information is given to the Board with the Chief's
report. Widmer explained that a complete report is given to the Chief and the Chief takes that
report and reviews it and submits it along with all documentation or evidence to the legal
PCRB — Page 3 DRAFT
February 8, 2005
department where they request 30 days to review everything. What the Board receives
however, the investigators have no control over. What the Chief submits to the Board is based
on what is advised by the City Attorney's office. Barnhill confirmed with Pugh that if additional
information was needed it would be after the level of review was set by the Board and the
Board could request it.
Barnhill asked Widmer if the Iowa Code and a departmental code says in the course of an
arrest what an officer must do. Can a Police Chief counsel his staff and say you will try to do
this when possible? Widmer stated that if the Code says you will do something, the
department can make it more excessive/restrictive, but they can not make it less than what the
Code states.
Horton pointed out in the Use of Force Report for December there were sixteen incidents other
than dispatching raccoons, etc. the same officer was in nine of the sixteen. Widmer explained
that they do review the incident reports and track the officers, locality, workload and any
patterns that may be occurring.
Barnhill asked where the Chief's final report goes, if it is made public. Horton stated that it is
never public, only the Board's final report is public after it goes to the City Council.
STAFF
INFORMATION Tuttle noted that the Finance department had supplied Citizens' Summarys of the 2006-2008
Proposed Financial Plan to all boards and commissions and that members were welcome to
one.
EXECUTIVE
SESSION Motion by Williams, seconded by Barnhill, to adjourn into Executive Session based on Section
21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or authorized
by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that
government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal
information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities,
boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports,
except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications
not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its
employees by identified persons outside of government, to the extent that the government
body receiving those communications from such persons outside of government could
reasonably believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that
government body if they were available for general public examination.
Motion carried, 5/0. Open session adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
REGULAR
SESSION Returned to open session at 8:32 p.m.
Motion by Roth, seconded by Williams, to request a 45-day extension for PCRB Complaint
#04-02. Motion carried, 5/0.
Motion by Roth, seconded by Williams, to request a 30-day extension for PCRB Complaint
#04-03. Motion carried, 5/0.
MEETING SCHEDULE
• March 8, 2005, 7:00 p.m., Lobby Conference Room
• April 12, 2005, 7:00 p.m., Lobby Conference Room
• May 10, 2005, 7:00 p.m., Lobby Conference Room
• June 14, 2005, 7:00 p.m., Lobby Conference Room
ADJOURNMENT Motion by Barnhill, seconded by Roth, to adjourn. Motion carried, 5/0. Meeting adjourned at
8:35 p.m.
OPS-17.1
RACIAL
PROFILING
Date of Issue General Order Number
January 10, 2001 01-01
Effective Date Section Code
February1, 2001 OPS-17
Reevaluation Date =New
s / Cancels
December 2005 12
C.A.L.E.A.
1.2.4.1.2.9,41.3.8161.1.2.9
INDEX AS:
Racial Profiling
Complaints
Supervisor Responsibilities
Warrants
Reference
Search and Seizure
Traffic Stops
Arrests
Discipline
-
__n
co
>
N
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this order is to unequivocally state that racial and ethnic profiling by
members of this department in the discharge of their duties is unacceptable, to provide
guidelines for officers to prevent such occurrences, and to protect officers from
unfounded accusations when they act within the parameters of the law and
departmental policy.
II. POLICY
It is the policy of the Iowa City Police Department to patrol in a proactive manner, to
investigate suspicious persons and circumstances, and to actively enforce the laws,
while insisting that citizens will only be detained when there exists reasonable suspicion
(i.e. articulable objective facts) to believe they have committed, are committing, are
about to commit an infraction of the law, or there is a valid articulable reason for
contact. Additionally, the seizure and request for forfeiture of property shall be based
solely on the facts of the case and without regard to race, ethnicity or sex.
OPS-17.2
III. DEFINITIONS
Racial profiling - The detention, interdiction, exercise of discretion or use of authority
against any person on the basis of their racial or ethnic status or characteristics.
Reasonable suspicion - Suspicion that is more than a "mere hunch" or cu.njasity, bqi; is
based on a set of articulable facts and circumstances that would warrant �pa-persott;of
reasonable caution to believe that an infraction of the law has been committed-, is about
to be committed or is in the process of being committed, by the person _o'r -persons
under suspicion. ("Specific and articulable cause to reasonably believe criminal activity i
is afoot.")
IV. PROCEDURES {�
The department's enforcement efforts will be directed toward assigning officers to those
areas where there is the highest likelihood that vehicle crashes will be reduced,
complaints effectively investigated or addressed, and/or crimes prevented through
proactive patrol.
A. In the absence of a specific, credible report containing a physical description, a
person's race, ethnicity, or gender, or any combination of these shall not be a factor
in determining probable cause for an arrest or reasonable suspicion for a stop.
B. Traffic enforcement shall be accompanied by consistent, ongoing supervisory
oversight to ensure that officers do not go beyond the parameters of reasonableness in
conducting such activities.
1. Officers shall cause accurate statistical information to be recorded in accordance
with departmental guidelines.
2. The deliberate recording of any inaccurate information regarding a person
stopped for investigative or enforcement purposes is prohibited and a cause for
disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.
C. Motorists and pedestrians shall only be subjected to investigatory stops or brief
detentions upon reasonable suspicion that they have committed, are committing, or
are about to commit an infraction of the law. Each time a motorist is stopped or
detained, the officer shall radio to the dispatcher the location of the stop, the
description of the person detained, and the reason for the stop, and this information
shall be recorded. The exception to this procedure is when officers are taking part in
safety checkpoints and are working with other officers.
D. If the police vehicle is equipped with a video camera, the video and sound should be
activated prior to the stop to record the circumstances surrounding the stop, and
should remain activated until the person is released.
E. No motorist, once cited or warned, shall be detained beyond the point where there
exists no reasonable suspicion of further criminal activity.
OPS-17.3
F. No person or vehicle shall be searched in the absence of a warrant, a legally
recognized exception to the warrant requirement as identified in General Order
00-01, Search and Seizure, or the person's voluntary consent.
1. In each case where a search is conducted, information shall be recorded,
including the legal basis for the search, and the results thereof.
2. A cursory "sniff" of the exterior of a vehicle stopped for a traffic violation by a
police canine may be recorded on the department's canine action report form.
TRAINING
Officers shall receive initial and ongoing training in proactive enforcement
tactics, including training in officer safety, courtesy, cultural diversity, the laws
governing search and seizure, and interpersonal communications skills.
1. Training programs will emphasize the need to respect the riglrgf a)f'
citizens to be free from unreasonable government intrusion or' police.=
action. — ^=
COMPLAINTS OF RACIAUETHNIC PROFILING:
Any person may file a complaint with the department if they feel thi have
been stopped or searched based on racial, ethnic, or gender -based profilingv
No person shall be discouraged or intimidated from filing such a complaint, or
discriminated against because they have filed such a complaint.
1. Any member of the department contacted by a person, who wishes to file
such a complaint shall refer the complainant to a Watch Supervisor who
shall provide them with a departmental or PCRB complaint form when
requested. The supervisor shall provide information on how to complete
the departmental complaint form and shall record the complainants name,
address and telephone number.
2. Any supervisor receiving a departmental complaint form regarding
racial/ethnic profiling, shall forward it to the Commanding Officer Field
Operations and all such complaints shall be reviewed and the complaint
acknowledged in writing. The complainant shall be informed of the results
of the department's review within a reasonable period of time. The report
and the reviewer's conclusion shall be filed with the. Chief of Police, and
shall contain findings and any recommendations for disciplinary action or
changes in policy, training, or tactics.
3. Supervisors should periodically review a sample of in -car videotapes of
stops of officers under their command. Additionally, supervisors shall
review reports relating to stops by officers under their command, and
respond at random to assist or observe officers on vehicle stops.
4. Supervisors shall take appropriate action whenever it appears that this
policy is being violated.
O PS-17.4
REVIEW
1. On an annual basis or as requested by the Chief of Police, the
Commanding Officer Administrative Services, or designee, shall provide
reports to the Chief of Police with a summary of the sex, race, and/or
ethnicity of persons stopped.
2. If it reasonably appears that the number of self -initiated traffic contacts by
officers has unduly resulted in disproportionate contacts with members of
a racial or ethnic minority, a determination shall be made as to whether
such disproportional ity appears department wide, or is related to a specific
unit, section, or individual. The commander of the affected unit, section,
or officer shall provide written notice to the Chief of Police of any reasons
or grounds for the disproportionate rate of contacts.
3. Upon review of the written notice, the Chief of Police may direct additional
training towards the affected units/sections or to individual officers.
4. On an annual basis, the department may make public a statistical
summary of the race, ethnicity, and sex of persons stopped for traffic
violations.
5. On an annual basis, the department may make public a statistical
summary of all profiling complaints for the year, including the findings as
to whether they were sustained, not sustained, or exonerated.
6. If evidence supports a finding of a continued ongoing pattern of racial or
ethnic profiling, the Chief of Police may institute disciplinary action up to
and including termination of employment of any involved individual
officer(s) and/or their supervisors.
P
R. inkelhake, Chief of Police
WARNING
This directive is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal or civil
proceeding. The department policy should not be construed as a creation of a higher
legal standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respect to third -party
claims. Violations of this directive will only form the basis for deWmentaa
administrative sanctions;
INV-02.1
OFFICER INVOLVED
SHOOTINGS /
LETHAL INCIDENT
INVESTIGATIONS
Date of Issue General Order Number
AUGUST 1, 2001 101-05
Effective Date Section Code
AUGUST 6, 2001 INV-02
Reevaluation Date Amends / Cancels
February 07 02/05 Re -Issue
C.A.L.E.A. Reference
1.3.5,1.3.691.3.89 1
--
�J
INDEX AS:
Use of Force Deadly Force
Shootings Internal Affairs
L
I. PURPOSE
It is the purposed of this policy to provide guidelines for the investigation of officer -
involved shootings or incidents resulting in the death or serious injury of person
possibly resulting from police actions.
11. POLICY
It is the policy of the Iowa City Police Department that officer -involved shooting
incidents and incidents resulting in serious injury or death be investigated with the
utmost thoroughness, professionalism and impartiality to determine if officer actions
conform with the law and departmental guidelines and directives. Further, the Iowa City
Police Department will provide necessary assistance to officers involved in these type
incidents.
INV-02.2
IV. PROCEDURES
A. OFFICER ON SCENE RESPONSIBILITIES
Officers involved at the scene of a shooting or other incident resulting in
the death or serious injury of a person resulting from the actions or
involvement of a member of the Iowa City Police Department, shall take
those measures that are reasonably possible and appropriate to protect
their safety, the safety of others, and to preserve evidence essential to the
investigation of the incident. This includes but is not limited to --..the
following actions as appropriate:
1. Ensure that the threats to officer safety and the safety to athers_are
addressed. —
2. Secure and separate suspects.
3. Relay information on fleeing suspects to communications and otfier ,
field units and work with them to establish a containmerit4rea. r
4. Request a supervisor and additional backup, emergenyy medical
service and any other assistance immediately required. --
5. If injured, administer emergency first aid to oneself if possible, then
administer basic medical aid to suspects and others as necessary,
pending arrival of emergency medical assistance.
6. Secure any suspect weapons as evidence. DO NOT open, reload,
remove shell casings or in any other manner alter the weapons
involved other than taking those steps required to make the
weapon and scene safe. (After the scene is secure)
7. As time and capabilities permit before supervisory and other
assistance arrives:
a. Secure the area, establish a perimeter with crime scene tape and
limit access to authorized personnel necessary to investigate the
incident and assist the injured.
b. Note time, survey the entire area for relevant facts, individuals who
are present and who depart the scene, witnesses, potential
suspects and suspect vehicles.
c. Protect evidence from loss, destruction or damage that is likely to
occur before backup can arrive. Ensure that evidentiary items are
not moved, note original location and position of persons, weapons,
and other relevant objects and evidence.
d. Record the names, addresses and phone number of all witnesses
and other persons present at the scene and request that they
remain on hand in order to make a brief statement whether or not
they saw the incident.
B. SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES AT THE SCENE
1. Ensure the safety and determine the condition of the officer(s),
suspect(s) and third parties.
2. If the officer has been shot or otherwise injured in the incident:
a. Ensure that an officer accompanies and remains with the officer at
the hospital.
b. Ensure that the officer's family is notified on a priority basis and in
person by a Watch Commander or Supervisor when possible.
Ensure that they are assigned transportation to the hospital or
INV-02.3
other location where they are needed as soon as possible. Watch
Supervisors should refer to the officer's Emergency Notification
form prior to making the notification.
c. Do not release the officer's name to the media or unauthorized
parities prior to the family being notified.
d. Assign an officer to the family for security, support, control of the
press and visitors, establishment of communications and related
matters.
e. Ensure that the clothing of officers and other injured persons is
collected for potential evidentiary purposes and that related
equipment of the officers is safeguarded.
3. If the officer is not injured, move him/her away from the center of
activity accompanied by another officer.
4. Secure the officer(s) weapons as evidence. This shall be done in
as discreet manner as possible and away from the immediate
scene. The weapon shall be replaced as soon as reasonably
practical, preferably immediately upon removal of the involved
weapon. DO NOT open, reload, remove shell casings or in any
other manner alter the weapons involved other than taking those
steps required to make the weapon and scene safe. (After the
scene is secure)
5. Confirm that the preliminary steps in item IV -A have been
adequately addressed and, if not, take appropriate action to ensure
that necessary actions are taken.
6. Ensure that the immediate area is contained and detain any
suspects therein.
7. To the extent necessary, ensure notifications are made, to other
agency personnel, to include:
a. Watch commander
b. Commanding Officer Field Operations -
c. Commanding Officer Administrative Services' r=
d. Commander of Investigations
e. Chief of Police
f. Public Information Officer v
g. City Legal Department
h. County Attorney
i. Medical Examiner
j. Chaplain
8. Establish a command post if necessary.
9. Appoint a recorder to make a chronological record of activities at
the scene, to include: persons present, actions taken by police
personnel and the identity of any personnel who entered the
incident/crime scene, to include emergency medical and fire
personnel.
10. Diagram the scene and photograph it as soon as possible.
11. Establish a media staging area as time permits unless the Public
Information Officer assumes this responsibility.
12. Begin the following:
I N V-02.4
a. Locate and secure -or secure in place - the officer's weapon(s) and
ammunition casings. Check the weapons of all officers present, for
discharge and secure the weapon when evidence of discharge
exists.
p. Locate the suspect's weapon(s) ammunition and expended
cartridges.
c. Collect information about the suspect, including name, physical
description, domicile and other pertinent information.
d. Locate and secure as evidence any clothing that may have been
removed from the suspect by emergency medical psrsonnel'or
others. -
e. Determine the original position of the officer(s)and thee-suspedf(s)
at the time of the shooting or use of force.
C. POST -SHOOTING TRAUMA -
1. Sworn and non -sworn personnel shall be familiar with' folfow
the provisions established by the Iowa City Police Dep'airtment]-n
post-shooting/use of deadly force emotional trauma in police
personnel.
a. The Officer in Charge shall ensure that those involved in the
incident are allowed to contact family members as soon as
practical after the incident. In the event the officer is injured and
unable to contact family members, the Commanding Officer Field
Operations or designee shall ensure that immediate family
members are notified in person as soon as reasonably practical
after the incident.
b. The name of the officer(s) involved in the incident shall not be
released until there has been a reasonable opportunity to notify
immediate family members.
c. The Commanding Officer Field Operations or designee shall make
contact with all involved officers within 24 hours of the incident and
explain Employee Assistance Programs that are available to the
employee.
d. Within 72 hours of the incident, the Commanding Officer Field
Operations or designee shall contact a traumatic stress
professional. He/she shall arrange for private appointments for the
officer(s) determined to be directly involved in the incident and as
requested, for their immediate family members.
e. Upon request, agency personnel will be provided counseling
services, for post incident stress.
2. All personnel should be familiar with available mental health
services and avail themselves of these services following officer -
involved shooting/use of deadly force incidents.
3. The Chief of Police may place an officer involved in an incident
resulting in death or serious injury on administrative leave or
remove him/her from field duty consistent with the departments
Use of Force Order. Prior to returning to field duty, officer(s)
involved in the incident may be required undergo a fitness for duty
evaluation.
INV-02.5
D. INVESTIGATOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Investigation of officer -involved shootings/use of deadly force shall be the
responsibility of the Commanding Officer Field Operations. In cases
where the force is used by the Commanding Officer Field Operations, the
investigation shall be assumed by the Chief of Police or designee. The
Commanding Officer Field Operations may appoint an Officer in Charge
(at the rank of sergeant or above) who shall be responsible for ensuring
that the following tasks are adequately addressed in the order deemed
necessary and appropriate.
1. Ensure that tasks itemized in sections IVA and IVB of this policy have
been appropriately and adequately completed. Take measures to
ensure that any deficiencies in completing tasks are immediately
remedied.
2. Receive a general briefing and walk-through by the supervisory officer
regarding the circumstances surrounding the shooting/use of deadly
force.
3. Ensure that the overall scene and evidentiary items are photographed
and videotaped. Videotape all persons present at the scene. Color
photographs of the officer as he/she appears at the scene shall, be
taken, to include any injuries sustained., _
4. Ensure thorough inspection of the scene and proper cottdct_ton of7 all
items and substances of evidentiary value.
5. Obtain taped statements from the suspects.,
6. Ensure that notification is provided to next -of -kin of _injured.- or, '
deceased suspects, preferably by someone of the rank of=sergeant or
above.
7. Locate and identify witnesses and conduct initial tajb2-recdpded
interviews.
8. Tape record interviews with fire department personnel, emergency
medical service providers and other first responders to the scene.
9. Conduct separate tape-recorded interviews with each officer involved.
a. Conduct the interview in a private location away from sight and
hearing of agency members and others who do not have a need
and a right to the information.
b. Advise the officer(s) not to discuss the incident with anyone except
a personal attorney or attorney representing the city, union
representative, family member, health care professional, outside
agency investigator (Division of Criminal Investigation) assigned to
investigate the incident, or departmental investigator until the
conclusion of the preliminary investigation.
c. Be cognizant of symptoms of post -traumatic stress, to include time
and space distortions, confusion, hearing and visual distortion and
emotional impairment, including shock. (Defer tape-recorded
interviews if these symptoms are evident)
10.Take any weapon used by the officer(s) into custody and handle it as
evidence. The officer shall be provided a replacement weapon when
practical after collection of his/her weapon. Firearms shall be taken
from officers in a discrete manner.
1
11.Where an officer has died, the Officer in Charge shall ensure that
procedures established for line -of -duty deaths and death notifications
are followed.
12.Contact the medical examiner and attend the autopsy of officer and/or
suspect. Determine entrance and exit wounds, estimates of the
shooter's position, the presence of controlled substances in the
decedent's blood, or other related evidence.
13.Obtain search warrants as necessary for searches of vehicles,
containers, homes and vehicles.
14. Develop a statement of preliminary basic facts for the media to be
delivered by the agency spokesperson in conformance with the
department's media policy.
15.Other investigative procedures as determined by the Officer in Charge
or Commander of Field Operations.
16. Complete a report detailing the finding of the investigation ,I
E. CHIEF OF POLICE
The Chief of Police or designee may request the Iowa Department of -
Criminal Investigation to conduct an independent investigation of all
incidents resulting in the death of an officer or citizen, resultirg'from or in
the performance of their duties.
The Chief of Police shall cause an Internal Affairs investigation to be
initiated in incidents resulting in death or serious injury of an officer or
citizen, resulting from or in the performance of the officer's duties.
The Chief of Police may require a Critical Incident Debriefing within 10-
days of the incident or completion of the investigation. This analysis
should include the Commanding Officer Administrative Services and, as
applicable, representatives of outside agencies involved in the incident,
the Watch Commander of the watch that the incident occurred, on -duty
supervisors at the time of the incident, Incident Commander, and others
as determined by the Commanding Officer Administrative Services. Other
command or supervisory personnel may attend with the consent of the
Commanding Officer Administrative Services.
R. J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police
WARNING'
This directive is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal or civil
proceeding. The department policy should not be construed as a creation of a higher
legal standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respect to third -party;
claims.Violations of this directive will only form the basis for departmental
administrative:sanctions.
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
USE OF FORCE REPORT
January 2005
OFFICER DATE INC #
INCIDENT
FORCE USED
58,04 010105 05-28
OWI
Subject assaulted Officer and was
directed toward the ground where they
refused to put hands behind their back.
Officers used hand control techniques
to put the subject's hands behind back
for handcuffing.
18 010505 05-496
Fight
Subject resisted arrest and attempted to
assault another Officer. Officer used
hand control techniques to put the
subject's hands behind back for
handcuffing.
06 010605 05-639
Trespass
Subject assaulted Officers and was
exposed to a chemical irritant. Officer
used hand control techniques to put the
subject's hands behind back for
handcuffing.
15 010805 05-911
Fight
Officer observed subject with what
appeared to be a handgun. Officer
drew sidearm and ordered subject
against a wall. The weapon was found
to be a BB gun made to be an exact
replica of an actual handgun.
21 010905 05-1132
Assist other Agency
Officer assisted JCSO with a felony
with Traffic Stop
traffic stop on 3 burglary suspects.
Officer drew sidearm during stop while
suspects were being taken into custody.
59 010905 05-1141
Theft/Harassment
Subject resisted arrest. Officer used
hand control techniques to put subject's
hands behind his back to be
handcuffed.
13,0�� 011005 05-1354
Traffic Stop/Recovered
Officers drew sidearms while suspect
Stolen Vehicle
driving a stolen vehicle was taken into
custody.
r `1
19,42 011105 05-1497 Traffic Stop Subject was taken into custody for a
driving offense and resisted arrest.
Officers directed the subject to the
ground and used hand control
techniques to put the subject's hands
behind their back to be handcuffed.
58 011205 05-1521 Fight Subject was placed under arrest. While
being handcuffed subject refused to
place hands behind his back. Officer
used hand control techniques to put
subject's hands behind back to be
handcuffed.
12 011405 05-1839 Traffic Stop Subject refused to stop for a marked
squad car with top lights and siren
activated. Subject eventually did pull
over and was taken into custody.
81 011405 05-1836 Fight Subject had been placed under arrest
and handcuffed. Subject refused to put
legs into squad car for transportation.
Officer used control technique to assist
subject into car.
84 011505 05-2022 Fight Subject resisted arrest. Officer used
control techniques to escort subject
away from an establishment and
handcuffing.
19 011505 05-2157 Traffic Stop Suspect fled on foot from a traffic stop
and entered a residence. Officer
entered the same residence with
sidearm drawn and ordered the subject
to the ground. The subject complied
and was handcuffed.
31 011505 05-2022 Fight Subject had been placed under arrest
and handcuffed. Subject then refused
to walk to a squad car. Officers carried
subject to squad car.
15 011505 05-2116 Harassment Subject was taken into custody on an
arrest warrant. Subject resisted arrest
and was directed toward the ground.
Officers used hand control techniques
to handcuff the subject and were
unsuccessful. Subject was then
exposed to a chemical irritant. Subject
` = then complied and was taken into
custody.
1:
17,18
28
05,95
IL]
36
19
34
1:
011705 05-2399
011905 05-2875
011905 05-2722
011905 05-2846
012105 05-3165
012205 05-3417
012305 05-3522
012605 05-3920
56 012705 05-4231
Assault
Subject had been arrested and
handcuffed for an assault. Subject
refused to sit in the squad car to be
transported. Officer used a control
technique to assist subject into squad
car.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch an
injured deer.
Intoxicated Subject
Subject fled from Officers on foot.
Subject was caught and directed to the
ground. Subject refused handcuffing
efforts. Officers then used hand control
techniques to place handcuffs on the
subject.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch a sick
raccoon.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch an
injured deer.
Traffic Stop
Officer observed a handgun next to the
driver of a vehicle that had been
stopped. Officer drew sidearm while
occupants of the vehicle were taken
into custody. The weapon was found to
be a BB gun.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch an
injured deer.
Fight
Subject was taken into custody and
resisted arrest. Subject refused to walk
to squad car and had to be carried by
Officers. Subject then refused to get
into squad car. Officers used control
techniques to assist subject into squad
car.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch an
injured deer.
Injured Animal
Officer used sidearm to dispatch an
injured deer.
29,58 012805 05-4292 Bar Check Subject was taken into custody and
resisted arrest. Officers used hand
control techniques to put subject's
hands behind back for handcuffing.
31,05 012905 05-4631 Intoxicated Subject
Subject fled on foot from Officers.
Officers caught subject and directed
him to the ground for handcuffing.
46 012905 05-4548 Animal Complaint
Officer used sidearm to dispatch a dog
that had bitten another subject and then
attempted to attack the Officer.
17 013005 05-4659 Fight
Subject had been arrested and refused
to sit in squad car to be transported.
Officer used control techniques to assist
subject into squad car.
21 013105 05-4822 Assault
Subject had been placed under arrest
for assault. Subject refused to remain
in a seated position while at ICPD.
Officer used control techniques to assist
subject into a seated position.
CC: City Manager, Chief, Captains, Lieutenants, Training Sergeant, City Clerk, Library
N
DEPARTMENT MEMO 05-03
TO: Chief RJ Winkelhake
Captain Matt Johnson
FROM: Captain Widmer
REF: Nov/Dec Use of Force Review
DATE: February 11, 2005
The bi-monthly "Use of Force Review Committee met on February 11, 2005. It was composed
of Captain Widmer, Sgt. Lord, Sgt. Hart and Officer Fortmann.
The review of submitted reports for November (15 incidents-17 reports) and December (18
incidents- 25 reports) revealed no policy or training concerns. Of the 33 incidents, 14 (42%)
were for destruction of an animal. In addition, 2 reports from October were submitted late and
reviewed with these reports.
Several administrative issues were revealed. As a reminder/clarification, multiple Use of Force
Reports by a single officer do not need to be filled out for the same incident. Multiple use of
force incidents regarding the same incident can be linked together much like the incident report
would read. One officer this cycle had six use of force reports for two incident. For example, if
the suspect fights during the arrest, has to be held down after he is transported to the hospital for
treatment, and then again attempts to fight when being taken out of the car at JCSO , that can all
be documented on one use of force report ... the key is the incident number. If a second officer
was involved in any or all of these uses of force, only one additional use of force report is
necessary.
In the destruction of animals, the animal is not a suspect. "Suspect injuries" are not a part of
proper documentation.
Lastly, document actions taken with some detail. If you describe the force as "hands-on
technique", put a little more detail to describe the "hands-on technique" used.
Reports with examples of the above issues are being returned to the appropriate supervisor.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Copy: City Manager, PCRB, Watch Commanders
March 8, 2005 Mtg Packet
PCRB COMPLAINT DEADLINES
PCRB Complaint #04-02
Filed:
07/08/04
Chief's Report due:
10/06/04
Extension Request:
12/06/04
Add'I Ext Request:
01/07/05
Chief's Report filed:
01/07/05
PCRB Report due:
02/22/05
45-day Ext Request:
04/08/05
PCRB Complaint #04-03
Filed: 11 /08/04
Chief's Report due: 02/07/05
Chief's Report filed: 02/01/05
PCRB Report due: 03/18/05
30-day Ext Request: 04/18/05
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
OFFICE CONTACTS
February 2005
Date Description
2/3/05 Individual called stating he had the PCRB Complaint form and
was having difficulty getting officers name and badge number of
alleged incident from the Police Department because they have a
restraining order against him. Was going to fill out the complaint
form to the best of his knowledge and file in our office sometime
this week or next.
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City IA 52240-1826
(319)356-5041
February 9, 2005
Mayor Ernest W. Lehman
410 E. Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
At the February 8, 2005 meeting, the PCRB voted in open session to request a 45-day
extension in addition to its regular 45-day reporting deadline for the Public Report according to
the City Code for PCRB Complaint #04-02 for the following reasons:
• Due to timelines and scheduling
• Public Report presently due February 22, 2005
45-day Extension request — Report would be due on April 8, 2005
The Board appreciates your prompt consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
II KT
Loren Horton, Chair
Police Citizens Review Board
cc: City Attorney
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City IA 52240-1826
(319)356-5041
February 9, 2005
Mayor Ernest W. Lehman
410 E. Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
At the February 8, 2005 meeting, the PCRB voted in open session to request a 30-day
extension in addition to its regular 45-day reporting deadline for the Public Report according to
the City Code for PCRB Complaint #04-03 for the following reasons:
• Due to timelines and scheduling
• Public Report presently due March 18, 2005
30-day Extension request — Report would be due on April 18, 2005
The Board appreciates your prompt consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Loren Horton, Chair
Police Citizens Review Board
cc: City Attorney