HomeMy WebLinkAboutGO 90-02 Report ReviewSER 01.1
REPORT REVIEW
Date of Issue General Order Number
November 20, 2001 90-02
Effective Date Section Code
October 1, 2014 SER-01
Reevaluation Date Amends / Cancels November 2017
C.A.L.E.A. Reference 82.2.1
INDEX AS:
Report Review Reports Required
Report Process Evaluations
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this order is to provide an orderly system for the preparation and audit of
official reports; to identify and correct inadequacies; and, to cause improvement in the
quality, accuracy and timeliness of reporting. This order defines the procedures,
authorities and responsibilities involved in the preparation, processing and review of
official reports in the Iowa City Police Department.
II. POLICY
It is the policy of the Iowa City Police Department to achieve and maintain a high level of quality in documenting the circumstances and actions involved in official police
activities. This objective is essential to the validity of police records; the support of
criminal prosecution; and, the effectiveness of investigative analysis and evaluative
efforts. This policy applies to all official reports regardless of report format or origin.
While the majority of reports result from sworn officer action, the involvement of Community Service Officers, Emergency Communications Operators and other
members in the reporting process is within the purview of this order.
SER 01.2
III. DEFINITIONS
Report Review Officer - One of the duties assigned to the Sergeant of Planning
and Research.
For the purpose of this order report refers to; report forms provided by the
Department, traffic citations, charges, State Accident and Implied Consent forms, supplemental reports, and other reporting formats as determined by the Chief of
Police or Designee. This includes the use of electronic forms approved by the
Chief of Police.
IV. PROCEDURES
A report review function has been established in the Iowa City Police Department for the
purpose of providing a central review and audit of official reports. The capture of data
from reports for officer performance evaluation would tend to encourage individual
interest in report quality improvement. The report review function is therefore redefined to incorporate responsibilities related to these systems and processes.
A major objective of the report review process is to promote uniformity in preparation,
supervisory review, correction, evaluation and timely processing of reports among the
different organizational components. While uniformity tends to equalize factors such as error correction and performance weighting, it is not intended to reduce the authority or
flexibility of first line supervisors in their review and assessment of reports; or, their
actions to provide training to eliminate inconsistencies.
It is stressed that report review is a joint responsibility of all personnel involved in the reporting sequence, from initiating officer to supervisor, review officer and command
staff. Review, correction, evaluation and training necessary to report quality should be
conducted at every level and not considered a task solely for Records Section report
review.
1) Reporting Officers
a) To the extent possible officers are delegated the authority and responsibility
for determining the nature and extent of police action necessary in each
assigned activity.
b) Officers shall complete reports for all classifications of calls as determined by
the Report Review Officer, as directed by Departmental orders, as
determined by a watch supervisor, or for incidents which a responding officer
determines documentation is appropriate. Reports shall be concise, legible,
and timely.
c) Reports shall be completed on forms designated by the Report Review
Officer or as designated in Departmental Orders. Report forms shall be
completed to the extent possible and include mandatory fields and other
relevant information.
SER 01.3
d) For all incidents requiring a report, the assigned officer shall submit to the
Records Section, documentation detailing the circumstances associated with
the incident, by the end of the officer’s tour of duty. If the incident is one in
which an incident report is not required, i.e. PAULA, a copy of the charge will serve as documentation. Incidents which require an incident or accident report, shall be completed at least to the extent that any supervisor can
identify; the type of incident, date, time, location, victim and suspect. The
assigned officer shall indicate on the submitted documentation that the
incident is under investigation. For incidents under investigation by the initial reporting officer, the officer shall
complete the report as soon as practical. All reports shall be completed
within 30 calendar days. Reports of investigations extending beyond 30 days
require the approval of the Watch Commander on which the original incident occurred. Officers shall file an update report on all cases that extend beyond 30 days at intervals not exceeding 10 days. The Watch or Section
Commander may waive the mandatory update reports by submitting in
writing, notice to the Report Review Officer that the update reports have been
waived. Where applicable, the person waiving the update report should include an anticipated date of completion.
e) For incidents requiring follow-up investigation by the reporting or other officer,
the originating officer shall complete required reports to the extent possible
and submit a copy to the on duty watch commander. When an officer requests follow-up by another officer, the originating officer shall complete a follow up request sheet and attach it to a copy of the original report. The
follow up request will be submitted to an on duty watch commander.
f) Copies of all charges shall be submitted prior to the end of the officer's watch. Traffic Citations shall be submitted as determined by the Report Review Officer. All other charges shall be submitted to a watch supervisor for review.
Officers shall submit a copy of all non-traffic charges to the ECO for
docketing. (this includes juvenile charges)
2) Watch Supervisors a) Watch supervisors have the primary authority and responsibility to review and
determine adequacy of subordinate reporting; to require correction or addition
to reports when necessary; to delay report submission where justified; or
require the completion of any report prior to the end of the reporting officers watch.
b) Watch supervisors are responsible for timely report completion and
submission, and for conducting or recommending personnel training required
for improvement in reporting quality.
SER 01.4
c) A watch supervisor may withhold a report for cause. The supervisor holding the report shall submit in writing the reason for holding the report. I.e.
incomplete, incorrect or illegible.
3) Report Review Officer a) The Report Review Officer is a function of the Sergeant of Planning and Research. The Report Review Officer is delegated the authority and
responsibility to act on behalf of the Chief of Police in conducting a review of
all police reports.
b) The Report Review Officer is authorized to conduct detailed review of all police reports; to return unacceptable reports for correction; to monitor the
status of the reporting process and recommend such action or training as
required for improvement. The Report Review Officer shall maintain a record
of all returned reports along with their final disposition.
c) The Report Review Officer is responsible for timely processing of reports,
coordination with supervisors and Department Staff on questions and
improvement action; maintenance of such records and analytical data as required to support the review and related systems.
4) Report Review Procedures
a) All reports will be assigned a number and be forwarded to a watch supervisor
prior to the end of the watch during which the report was originated. Any delay in submission shall be approved by the respective watch supervisor, and a copy indicating the case is under investigation shall be submitted to
Records.
b) Watch supervisors shall review reports for completeness, accuracy and adequacy; and shall require necessary corrections or additions.
c) The Report Review Officer or designee shall review submitted reports and
ensure that all incidents requiring reports have been accounted for. Incident reports will be coordinated with the supervisor, Investigative Section, to determine feasibility of further investigative action. Copies of selected reports
will be forwarded to investigations for action.
d) The Report Review Officer or designee will examine each report to determine the adequacy of the report. Where correction or additional information is needed, the report will be returned to the responsible Watch Commander with
a Revision Request form attached, specifying the nature of error, omission or
clarification and a due date for return. The Watch Commander shall cause
any correction to be made by the reporting officer. I. Reports returned for clarification, correction or completion shall be completed and resubmitted within 10 working days. Reports requiring
an extension shall be approved in writing by the Watch Commander of
SER 01.5
the officer involved. Such extension shall indicate the reason, i.e. officer unavailable, along with an anticipated date of completion.
e) The Report Review Officer or designee will ensure entries are logged and
traffic citations entered into the traffic records system. f) The Report Review Officer or designee shall forward relevant reports to
affected divisions or watches. He/she shall forward reports or classifications
of reports to the Investigative Section as requested by the Investigations
supervisor. g) Upon review by the Report Review Officer, reports shall be forwarded to the
Records section for processing and filing.
Samuel Hargadine, Chief of Police
WARNING
This directive is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal or civil proceeding. The department policy should not be construed as a creation of higher
legal standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respect to third-party
claims. Violations of this directive will only form the basis for departmental
administrative sanctions.