Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPreliminary AlternativesIowa City Gateway Preliminary Alternatives Public Input – November – December 2011 Prior to the public meeting for the Environmental Assessment and comment period scheduled for the spring/summer of 2012, the City of Iowa City added an additional opportunity for the community to see and provide input into draft alternatives. The Community was offered the opportunity to see draft alternatives for improvements to the Iowa City Gateway Corridor from November 25 through December 30, 2011. Draft alternatives and an online comment form were available at www.iowacitygateway.org. Additionally, a drop-in center was hosted for the public to see the draft alternatives in person or talk one- on-one with a member of the study team. That drop-in center was held from 3:30 to 7 p.m. on Thursday, December 8, 2011 at the Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center, 220 South Gilbert Street in Iowa City. Approximately 30 residents participated in the drop-in center. The alternatives shown as a part of this program were preliminary, and presented with information that they will likely be refined and updated over the next several months. In addition, efforts were made to stress to residents that any impacts to property or structures along the corridor may be lessened or eliminated as detailed design work is completed. Residents were also informed that the recommended alternative could be a combination of the three draft alternatives. Key notes and responses to comments:  The formal Purpose and Need for the Iowa City Gateway effort is: Purpose of the Proposed Action: Provide a reliable multimodal transportation corridor that reduces the impact of flooding on the local transportation system and the Iowa River corridor. Need for the Proposed Action: (1) Maximize the reliability of Dubuque Street; (2) Maximize the reliability of Park Road Bridge; (3) Minimize backwater created by Park Road Bridge; and (4) Address roadway deficiencies on Dubuque Street and Park Road.  An important project goal is to minimize negative impacts to properties, historic sites, natural sites and parklands.  The alternatives shown during this period are preliminary. During the detailed evaluation process, they will likely be refined.  Additional, detailed information about the evaluation of alternatives, their impacts and costs will be provided as part of the Environmental Assessment’s public meeting and formal comment process.  The findings and evaluations will be made public prior to the public meeting.  Input on locations beyond the Iowa City Gateway study area cannot be addressed in the evaluation or recommendations for the Iowa City Gateway project.  The goal is to raise the bridge, Dubuque Street and Park Road to the 500+1 flood elevation. However, those needs may need to be balanced against project costs.  To rea www Comme Foster Ro Ridge Ro  Alt B  Alt C be a s  Alt C possib  How and D  Alt A  Propo  We pr also a  Propo entire encou west o ad more abou .iowacitygate nts by Loca oad  Al wh Note Dubu impr ad/Taft/Dubu  A  A  A p - This alterna - Do not like steep decline o - Once again ble due to gra many dollars Dubuque Stree A - Don't raise osal A appear refer Proposa appears to inc osal C suggest e neighborhoo urage traffic to or vice versa. ut the decision eway.org and ation lt C - I'm assu hich is good. e: The only po uque Street to rovements to D uque Street In Alt A - Do no Still concerne after Dubuqu Alt A - It is n stub shown o Alt B - I like place with im ative has the b e that Ridge R onto Dubuque n, the propose ade change, un and city staff et? Taft Speedw s to be a com al B, if one mu lude the least ts that Taft Sp od along Ridg o use Ridge R n-making pro click on “Wh uming that thi otential impro o ensure that Dubuque Stre ntersection ot like that Ri ed that it wou ue Street is rai not clear how on the drawing this plan best mproved room best connecti Road entry/ex e from this po ed Ridge Road nless Dubuqu f time would way. Dead end mpromise betw ust be chosen t changes to o peedway and ge Road and W Road even mo cess, go to th hat is NEPA? is plan accom ovements are the intersecti eet. idge Road ent uld be a steep ised. the connectio g is not possib t as it keeps th m to make a tu on for Ridge it is moved ov oint even afte d connection ue Street is go be saved by n d Taft Speedw ween B and C n, because it re other streets an Ridge Road Whiting Aven ore than curre he “resources” ” mmodates the e at the interse ion functions s try/exit is mo decline onto on to Ridge R ble due to the he entry/exit urn right onto Road (better ver to Taft Sp er Dubuque St shown in this oing to be rais not putting an way. . etains the cur nd sites. connect. This nue and surrou ently happens ” page of eventual raisi ection of Fost safely with th oved over to T Dubuque fro Road would b e grade chang of Ridge Roa Dubuque. than Alternat peedway. Co treet is raised s alternative w sed a lot (10 f n intersection rrent entrance s plan is detri unding areas. s as a connect ing of Foster ter Road and he proposed Taft Speedway om this point e e made. The s ge on Ridge R ad in the same tive A or C). oncerned this d. would not be feet +). at Taft Speed e to Ridge Ro mental to the . It would ion from east Road y. even short Road. e may dway ad. It e t to  Taft S dead e suppo petitio proce  City s lot of inters  The T unnec prope Note: separ proce part o that in coord Terrell M Cliff Apar Speedway sho end. I signed osed to be inc on? In my op ss. Raising T staff has alrea f people don’t ection should Taft Speedway cessarily cost erty values aro Decisions re rate process; t ess are at the of the Iowa Ci ntersection, in dinating close ill Park  T M p t c  H rtments  A w D ould not be ra d a petition ab luded in the p pinion, it look Taft Speedway ady said it wil want one. C d be deleted. y levee projec taxpayers mo ound it. egarding the the only porti intersection o ity Gateway p ncluding appr ely with the Ta The city wou Mill Park and put a great we traffic going w center could b Historical WP As one of the with Alternat Dubuque Stre aised to meet a bout this and s project’s publ ks like the city y is very expe ll put an inter City staff inclu ct is a comple oney and shou levee on or n ions of Taft Sp of Taft and Du project would ropriate chan aft Speedway uld be foolish d the Parkview elcome center west on I-80 be used to ste PA Site - Do e owners of th tives A and C eet from our s a raised Dubu so did almost lic comments y is censoring ensive and sh section at Du uded this inter etely unneces uld go away. ear Taft Spee peedway that ubuque. Any d only be mad nges to elevat team. to raise Taft S w Church are r where Parkv than the First eer people to d not disturb. he Cliff apartm in that they d south parking uque Street. 300 other pe on the websi g citizen input houldn’t be do ubuque St. and rsection in ev sary governm The size and edway are bei t are included changes to th de to ensure th tion. The Iow Speedway to a. It should a view Church t Avenue Cor downtown an ments I believ do not appear g lot. Taft Speedw eople. The pe ite—what hap t in violation one! d Taft Speedw very alternativ ment boondog d sight of it w ing conducted d in the Iowa he west of tha he safety and f wa City Gatew create a divid all be one par is and perhap ralville exit w nd other Iowa ve that there m r to continue o way should be etition was ppened to this of the NEPA way even thou ve. This ggle that will will likely harm d through a City Gateway at intersection functionality way team is de between T rk. Iowa City ps capture mo will. The welc a City areas. may be a prob our access to a s A ugh a m y n as a of Terrell could ore come blem Mayflowe  Alt C off/pi  Keep Kimball & Park Road  Alt C from r  Alt C  Alt C any al mode  C's pr er Residence  A  A  - Do not like cking up stud parking south & Dubuque  N d Bridge  A t  A  w - Straight Br road etc.... - The bridge - The propos lternative, wh ling been per roximity to th Hall Alt A - Appre off/pickup at Alt B - I like Mayflower to students. B seems to be and Mayflow e that it keeps dents. h of Mayflow No left turn. Alt A - The n to existing br How do you p Park Road? Alt B - The p a right angle. I think "B" is widening it. ridge and road angles too fa sed bridge alig hich is good f rformed for al he bridge east eciate that Du Mayflower a that it distanc o allow for bu e the best alte wer. Dubuque Str wer at private new Park Roa ridge to allow propose to tra proposed bridg s the best opti More trees sa d by City Park ar south. gnment on th for maintainin lternatives to end to the fra ubuque Street and allows for ces Dubuque us pick-up/dro ernative to me reet so close t road (hill too ad bridge align w new constru ansition from ge alignment on of the thre aved along Pa k, but no impr is alternative ng flood flows see which wo aternity turno t is moved ov r space betwe Street (move op-off and mo e. I like the e to Mayflower o steep to driv nment is strai uction while ex m four lanes on is better than ee plans. Mov ark Road. rovement for is probably t s through the ould have the off dooms tho ver (west) to a een traffic and ed west) away ore space betw extra space be r dorm and bu ve up during w ightforward, b xisting bridge n bridge to tw n Alternative A ving the Park r pedestrians ( the closest to bridge. Has e least impact se tenants! allow bus drop d students. y from the ween traffic a etween the roa uses dropping winter) but is it too cl e is maintaine wo lanes west A as it is mor k Road Bridge (lack of trails a right angle any hydraulic on river flow