HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018 Report
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City
Central Business District
Prepared for
City of Iowa City
Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission
Prepared by
Alexa McDowell
AKAY Consulting
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 2018
City of Iowa City
City Council
Mayor, Jim Throgmorton
Kingsley Botchway II
Rockne Cole
Susan Mims
Pauline Taylor
John Thomas
Mazahir Salih
Historic Preservation Commission
Chair, Ginalie Swaim
Thomas Agran
Cecile Kuenzli
Frank Wagner
Pam Michaud
Esther Baker
Zachariah Builta
Sharon DeGraw
GT Karr
Kevin Boyd
Gosia S. Clore
Neighborhood and Development Services
Bob Miklo, Senior Planner
Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner
Sylvia Bochner, Intern
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 01-02
Figure 01. Map of Project Survey Area Showing 2001 & 2018 Boundaries 02
2.0 Methodology 03-05
Table 01. National Register Listed Resources in the 2018 Survey Area 03-04
Table 02. National Register Listed Resources in Adjacency 04
2.1 Community Engagement 04-05
3.0 Development Overview 05-12
4.0 Summary of Findings and Recommendations 12-43
4.1 Standards of Evaluation 14
4.1.a Individually Eligible 16
4.1.b Contributing 17
4.1.c Non-Contributing 20
4.2 Statement of Findings 21-42
Table 03. Resource Evaluation Findings 22-35
Figure 02. Resource Map 36
4.2.a Individually Eligible 37
Table 04. Individually Eligible Resources 37-38
4.2.b Historic District Eligibility 38-39
Figure 03. Map of Proposed Historic District Boundaries -1 40
Figure 04. Map of Proposed Historic District Boundaries - 2 41
4.2.c. Historic Preservation Overly Zones 42
4.3 Recommendations 42-43
5.0 Historic Preservation Incentives 44
5.1 Historic Tax Credit Programs 44
5.1.a Iowa Historic Tax Credit Program 50
5.1.b Federal Historic Tax Incentive Program 50
5.1.c Iowa Historic Property Temporary Tax Exemption Program 51
5.2 City of Iowa City Programs 51
5.2 a Tax Increment Financing 51-52
5.3 Iowa Downtown Resource Center Programs 52
5.1.a Main Street Iowa 52
5.1.b Model Communities 52
5.1.c Workforce Housing Tax Credits 52
List of Tables
Table 01. National Register Listed Resources in 2018 Survey Area 03
Table 02. National Register Listed Resources Adjacent to 2018 Survey Area 04
Table 03. Resource Evaluation Findings 22
Table 04. Individually Eligible Resources 37
List of Figures
Figure 01. Map of Project Survey Area – 2018 36
Figure 02. Map of Proposed Historic District Boundaries 40
Figure 03. Map of Proposed Historic District Boundaries Without Urban Renewal 41
List of Images
Image 01. Franklin Printing – 115 S. Dubuque Street – 1856 06
Image 02. View of west side of S. Dubuque with 1870s era buildings 07
Image 03. The Airliner – 22 S. Dubuque Street – ca.1877/1950 08
Image 04. Englert Theatre – 221 E. Washington Street – 1913 09
Image 05. Kresge’s – 119-123 E. Washington Street – 1930 10
Image 06. Eldon Miller Building (Gabe’s) – 330 E. Washington Street – 1955 11
Image 07. Carnegie Public Library – 309 E. College Street – 1903 15
Image 08. Coast & Sons – 10-14 S. Clinton Street – 1895 18
Image 09. Things & Things & Things – 130 S. Clinton Street – 1970 19
Image 10. Commercial Building – 112 E. College Street – ca.1915 20
Image 11. Historic Image – E. College Street – ca.1915 21
Image 12. Before: Letts-Fletcher Company Warehouse, Marshalltown - 2011 45
Image 13. After: Letts-Fletcher Company Warehouse, Marshalltown - 2011 45
Image 14. Before: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building, Cedar Rapids – 2014 47
Image 15. After: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building, Cedar Rapids – 2016 47
Image 16. Before: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building – Interior – 2014 48
Image 17. After: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building – Interior – 2016 48
Image 18. After: Iowa State Bank & Trust – 102 S. Clinton – 2018 49
Appendices
Appendix A. 2018 Survey Resource Table and Maps
Appendix B. Updated Multiple Property Documentation Form “Architectural and Historical
Resources of the Central Business District, 1856-1984”
Appendix C. Project Presentations
Appendix D. Iowa Historic Tax Credit Program
Appendix E. Federal Historic Tax Credit Program
Appendix F. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
Appendix G. Jan Olive Nash,“Iowa’s Main Street Commercial Architecture,” MPD, 2002.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 1
1.0 Introduction
Iowa City has been proactive in the work of identifying, documenting, and evaluating the city’s
historic resources, with numerous expansive projects undertaken beginning in the 1990s. In
1993, an intensive level survey and evaluation of the city at large was undertaken. The resulting
Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) “Historic Resources of Iowa City, Iowa” by
historian Marlys Svendsen, created the evaluative framework for subsequent National Register
nominations by outlining historic contexts, discussing the impact of those contexts on the built
environment, and identifying resources (buildings, districts, objects, and landscape features) that
reflect the historic contexts. The National Park Service approved the MPDF in 1994 and it has
since been the foundation for evaluating the city’s historic resources for National Register
eligibility.
Since 1994 multiple amendments to the 1994 MPDF have been written to cover the previously
developed historic contexts or based on intensive-level surveys of specific neighborhoods in
Iowa City.
• "Brown Street Historic District” was listed in 1994 under the historic context "Iowa City
Neighborhoods: Town and Country (1840 -1940)" which was developed in the MPDF.
• "Architectural and Historic Resources of the Dubuque/Linn Street Corridor, 1839-
c.1940.” 1996.
• "Historic and Architectural Resources in College Hill, Iowa City, Iowa, 1839-1944."
1997. This MPD included two historic districts, the "College Green Historic District” and
the "East College Street Historic District.” 1997.
• “Historic Folk Housing of Iowa City, Iowa, 1839-c.1910.” 1997.
• "Architectural and Historic Resources of the Longfellow Neighborhood Area, Iowa City,
Iowa, c.1860-c.1946." 1998.
• "Architectural and Historic Resources of Original Town Plat Neighborhood (Phase II).
1845-1945.” 2000.
• "Architectural and Historic Resources of the Goosetown Neighborhood (Phase Ill), 1855-
1945.” 2000.
In 2000-2001 the work to identify and evaluate the city’s historic resources continued; that
project, also completed by Marlys Svendsen, focused on the Central Business District (CBD)
blocks located opposite Capitol Square of the Original Town Plat of Iowa City recorded in 1839
(Figure 01) with approximately 135 principal buildings located on 15-1/2 blocks. The 2000-01
project resulted in an amendment to the 1994 MPDF, but that amendment, “Architectural and
Historical Resources of the Iowa City Central Business District, 1855-1945,” was not submitted
to the Iowa State Historic Preservation Office. As a result, no action to register the amendment or
resources identified in the amendment occurred.
The present 2018-2018 amendment updates the 2001 document. While much of the content
remains intact with previously stated historic contexts retained as developed by Svendsen, the
document has been altered to correspond to a reduced survey area – a necessity given loss of
resources in the years subsequent to the 2001 project and the listing of the Jefferson Street
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 2
Historic District. The 2018 survey area covered nine square blocks with 115 buildings (Figure
01). The present MPD amendment also updates resource images and resource counts, updates
maps as appropriate, provides additional historic images for visual context, and expands historic
context specific to the “Urban Renewal and Redevelopment Era, 1960-1984.”
Figure 01. Map of Project Survey Area – 2018
(Map source: http://google.maps.com.)
This map illustrates the 2001 (dotted outline) and 2018 (darkened, 9-square blocks) project survey areas.
2.0 Methodology
The overall purpose of the present project was to update the report and Multiple Property
Documentation Form (MPDF) prepared for the City of Iowa City and Iowa City Historic
Preservation Commission in 2001. The primary goal of the 2018 project was the identification of
historic resources that individually or collectively meet the criteria for listing in the National
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 3
Register of Historic Places. A secondary goal of the 2018 project was documentation of present
conditions, including buildings lost subsequent to the 2001 project, changes (positive or
negative) to historic integrity of resources in the survey area, and documentation of buildings
constructed in the survey area subsequent to the 2001 project. A full description of the
methodology employed is contained in Section H of the Multiple Property Document Form
appended to this report.
Work on the update of the Central Business District Survey was completed over a 12-month
period beginning in June of 2017 and concluding in the fall of 2018. Seven buildings in the CBD
Survey Area were identified as having been previously listed in the National Register of Historic
Places; one registered resource, the Van Patten House, was razed in 2011 as a result of a fire, but
the 2001 registration of the Englert Theatre and the recent registration of the Iowa State Bank &
Trust accounts for the eight National Register listed resources in the 2018 survey area (locations
of the listed properties are noted in blue on the resource map, Figure 02).
Table 01. National Register Listed Resources in 2018 Survey Area
Historic Name
Image Address Built
Date
Listed Site
Number
College Block Building
125 E. College St. 1878 1973 52-01089
Trinity Episcopal Church
320 E. College St. 1871 1974 52-01096
Franklin Printing House
115 S. Dubuque St. 1856 1986 52-01562
Old Post Office
28 S. Linn St.
1904/
1931
1979 52-02227
Paul-Helen Building
207 E. Washington St. 1913 1986 52-02816
Englert Theatre
221 E. Washington St. 1912 2001 52-02821
Boerner-Fry Company/Davis
Hotel
332 E. Washington St. 1899 1983 52-02826
Iowa State Bank & Trust
(Johnson County Savings Bank)
102 S. Clinton St. 1912 2017 52-01063
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 4
In addition, five National Register properties and one historic district are located on the north and
west edges of the CBD Survey Area. They are:
Table 02. National Register Listed Resources Adjacent to the 2018 Survey Area
Historic Name
Address Listed
Old Capitol National Historic Landmark Pentacrest 1972
Congregational Church 30 N. Clinton St. 1973
Pentacrest Historic District Pentacrest 1978
Park House Hotel 130 E. Jefferson St. 1978
St. Mary’s Church & Refectory 220 E. Jefferson St. 1980
Jefferson Street Historic District 2004
The update of the 2001 amendment to the 1994 Multiple Property Documentation Form,
“Architectural and Historical Resources of Iowa City Central Business District (1855-1984)”
was the final outcome of the CBD Survey.
2.1 Community Engagement
A critical component of the 2018 project was engaging the community in a discussion about the
project, its various components, and the possible outcomes. Identifying individuals and groups
with a variety of perspectives and talking with them about their viewpoints, ideas, and
recommendations was an early focus of the project. In September 2017, a public presentation
was held at the Englert Theatre. While the content of the presentation focused on providing an
overview of the project, the discussion that followed provided time to address the many
questions and concerns related to preservation of historic downtown buildings; the impact of new
buildings on the historic fabric; the importance and related challenges of maintaining a vibrant
downtown; and concerns about loss of identity in the historic downtown due to the pressures of
development.
In November 2017, a presentation focused on issues of concern specific to business and property
owners was held. Content included a discussion about the potential effects of a finding for
National Register eligibility and the related local overlay zoning. Questions about the design
review process and the potential for that process to be beneficial to business owners were raised,
as was the perceived importance of incentivizing historic rehabilitation of downtown buildings.
Questions about the complexity of the historic tax credit programs and the need for local
guidance in navigating the programs were discussed. Attendees also commented on the
challenges of business owners to function efficiently in historic buildings and expressed concerns
about the challenges of business owners located in buildings owned by absent landlords. Finally,
examples of appropriate and inappropriate storefront alterations were shown with a discussion
about how such alterations can play a significant role in the overall visual character of the
historic downtown.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 5
A final public presentation was held in October of 2018 to present the project findings and
recommendations.
Along with this series of public presentations, one-on-one conversations between the consultant
and interested parties were undertaken. Nancy Bird, Nate Kaeding, Thomas Agran, Marc Moen,
Bobby Jett, Kevin Monson, Kent Jehle, Karen Kubby, Cecile Kuenzli, Jim Throgmorton, David
Kieft, Alicia Trimble, Joshua Moe, Geoff Fruin, and John Yapp all took time to speak about their
views related to the project focus. It cannot be understated how important those conversations
were to developing an understanding of the perspectives of city officials, historic preservation
advocates, University of Iowa interests, local financial institutions, local architects, developers,
downtown business owners, and the Iowa City Downtown District (ICDD). The ideas and
concerns of this group informed the process as it continued through conclusion. Several of the
recommendations included in this report are the direct result of that input.
3.0 Development Overview
The 2001 survey identified development trends experienced in Iowa City's Central Business
District during the previous decades, and classified them as similar to evolutionary patterns in
commercial development found in many American communities. As Svendsen notes, such
evolutionary patterns are often described as "organic,'' in that a downtown is not the product of a
single property owner, a single architectural design, or a single historical period. Rather, a
downtown represents the collective financial investment and architectural preferences of
hundreds of individual owners and business operators through many generations. The urban
renewal period departed from that organic evolutionary pattern to the degree that the alteration of
the downtown, through the mass demolition of buildings and the introduction of contemporary
features such as the pedestrian mall, occurred under the control of a more centralized force
versus the more typical individualized efforts that typify earlier evolution of the downtown
character. The proximity of the University, with considerable property owned by it and the
municipality, and the role played by institutional planners and property managers also
contributed substantially to the generally organic pattern evolution in the Iowa City CBD.
Svendsen noted that, when established in the 1840s and 1850s, downtown Iowa City faced onto
the six-acre Capitol Square. Old Capitol served the territory, then the state as the statehouse. A
mix of small-scale frame and brick commercial buildings, churches and dwellings were built on
the north, east and south sides of the square. These early buildings were utilitarian in design,
serving basic needs of the new settlers and were soon replaced. Iowa Avenue was planned as a
wide boulevard from Capitol Square on the west edge to Governor's Square on the east edge of
the Original Town Plat. Although a governor's mansion was never built, the 120-foot width of
the street made Iowa Avenue the widest and most important thoroughfare in the city despite the
fact its symbolic role never materialized.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 6
Image 01. Franklin Printing – 115 S. Dubuque Street - 1856
(Source: AKAY Consulting, November 2017.)
Built in 1856, the National Register listed Franklin Printing (left) is the oldest remaining commercial
building in the 2018 survey area. Its companion on the right dates to 1860, making it the second oldest
commercial building in the survey area. Franklin Printing, in particular, retains a high degree of historic
integrity specific to its early construction date.
Other street widths in the CBD ranged from 80-feet for most of the north-south streets (Dubuque,
Linn, Gilbert, and Van Buren) to 100-feet for the east-west streets (Jefferson, Washington,
College, and Burlington). Because it fronted onto Capitol Square, Clinton Street was given the
more generous width of 100-feet. One block east of Capitol Square, along the north side of Iowa
Avenue, a city park was platted with nearby reserves for churches and a school. South Market,
one of three public squares on the Original Town Plat, was established three blocks away
between Gilbert, Van Buren, College, and Burlington streets (Svendsen, 2001).
The railroad arrived in Iowa City at the end of 1855 and the capital was moved to Des Moines
two years later. In a decision that would eventually have profound significance, the state
legislature established a university in 1847 and willed the abandoned capitol to it in 1857.
Capitol Square (now, the Pentacrest) became its campus with the now established business
district adjoining it on three sides. First-generation commercial buildings gradually were
replaced with two- and three-story brick commercial blocks (Image 01). After the Civil War,
more substantial church structures replaced earlier ones, an opera house appeared, and several
additional University buildings were erected. The downtown continued to serve as the economic
and social crossroads of the community (Svendsen, 2001).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 7
The decade of the 1870s produced the largest number of extant buildings in the downtown; in
2001, two-dozen or 17% of the buildings in the survey area dated to the 1870s. In the reduced,
2018 survey area, the percentage is comparable. Mostly two-story, narrow-front commercial
buildings with residential flats for their owners on upper levels, by 1880 these buildings lined
Clinton and Dubuque Streets and adjoining blocks. Clothiers, tailors, and milliners favored
Clinton Street; most banks built along Washington Street; saloons and billiard halls selected
Dubuque Street; and a collection of hardware stores, boot and shoe sellers, dry goods
establishments, jewelers, bakeries, and hotels were scattered along the other blocks of the
downtown (Image 02). Fire was the greatest hazard of this era and occurred regularly. A number
of catastrophic fires created opportunities for new buildings in the place of early structures.
Image 02. View of the west side of S. Dubuque with 1870s era buildings
(Source: AKAY Consulting, November 2017.)
The four buildings in this view (bound by the Hotel Jefferson at left and Prairie Lights at right) were
constructed in the 1870s. Changes to facades have left them with more or less visual character reflective
of their early construction dates.
The 1880s and 1890s produced changes in the use of both of the public squares located in the
downtown. South Market was changed from a brush-covered localized dump to a railroad depot
site for both passengers and freight. In 1890 the city authorized transfer of the city park block to
the university. A series of new buildings was constructed on the city park block, including
Chemistry Hall and Homeopathic Hospital, as well as the first sections of the University Hospital
during the following decade. Construction of more ornamented buildings continued during the
1880s and the 1890s (Svendsen, 2001). In 2001, 20 buildings survived from this period; the
number located in the smaller, 2018 survey area is 13. Svendsen also noted that more than one-
third of the buildings in the 2001 survey area were built prior to 1900. In 2018 that percentage
stands at 47 of 115 buildings.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 8
It is important to keep in mind that, while construction dates reveal significant historical trends
and patterns, they are not necessarily an accurate indicator of historic character retained today.
Many of the downtown commercial buildings received facelifts as a result of fire or for the
purpose of “modernizing.” As a result, a building constructed prior to 1900 may not retain the
visual character of its construction era. One example is The Airliner (22 S. Clinton St.), which
was built in ca.1888, but underwent a complete façade replacement in 1950 that removed all
vestiges of its 19th century character (Image 03). While it is true that approximately 40% of the
commercial buildings in the 2018 survey area were constructed prior to 1900, the percentage to
retain their 19th century visual character is closer to 25%, and only a handful of those retain a
high level of their original character.
Image 03. The Airliner - 22 S. Clinton Street – ca.1877/1950
(Source: AKAY Consulting, November 2017.)
Although constructed prior to 1900, the building’s visual character is representative of its mid-20th
century façade replacement.
Svendsen also notes that, during the decades prior to World War I, the downtown experienced a
building boom. University enrollment grew, new buildings were added to the Pentacrest
Campus, and the hospital complex was expanded three times. Streets were paved using brick,
electric street railways began operation, and retail trade thrived. In 2001, 20 buildings survived
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 9
from this boom period, including several that define the downtown skyline. They included a
multi-story bank and office building (Iowa State Bank & Trust, 1912), a major hotel (Hotel
Jefferson, 1913), and a new theatre (Englert Theatre, 1913) to replace the declining opera house.
The 2018 survey area retains 19 buildings constructed between 1900-1920, including those
Svendsen notes as particularly noteworthy (Image 04). Interestingly, in comparison to buildings
constructed prior to 1900, those of the period from 1900-1920 retain a higher degree of historic
integrity specific to their period of construction. Likely due to their functions (not commercial
retail), fewer have seen major alterations. Also during this period, a civic corridor replaced
residences along and near Linn Street; a public library, post office, and several fraternal halls
joined City Hall, then located on the northwest corner of Linn and Washington streets.
Image 04. Englert Theatre - 221 E. Washington Street - 1913
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
Like most of the survey area buildings constructed between 1900 and 1920, the Englert Theatre retains
the historic character indicative of its construction date.
Downtown development held steady during the l 920s and 1930s with the most significant
change being the appearance of national and regional franchise stores. Chain stores first appeared
prior to World War I and continued to thrive, despite the economic struggles of the Great
Depression (Image 05). A number of buildings went through receivership, accelerating the rapid
rotation of businesses that typified downtown Iowa City.
Several trends in 20th-century technology and popular culture manifested themselves in the
downtown prior to World War II. The arrival of the automobile spawned construction of service
stations, car dealerships, and garages, including several along Burlington and south of College
Street along Linn and Gilbert streets. Tobacco shops, confectioneries, soda fountains, billiard
halls, and movie theatres sprang up in existing buildings scattered throughout the business
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 10
district. The only major building constructed in the decade prior to World War II housed the
Iowa City Press-Citizen newspaper. Less than a dozen buildings constructed during the 1920s
and '30s survived in 2001. While only seven buildings constructed between 1920 and 1930 are
retained in 2018, some 19th century buildings received new facades during that period (e.g. 28 S.
Clinton, Ewers Men’s Store).
Image 05. Kresge’s - 119-123 E. Washington Street - 1930
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
The Kresge’s Building represents both a 1930s architectural style and the appearance of national
and regional franchise stores in Iowa City.
The 20 years that began with World War II saw the population of Iowa City nearly double.
Enrollment at the University fluctuated dramatically before leveling off in the late 1950s.
Shortages and workforce disruptions during the war stifled downtown development during the
early 1940s. An ample supply of office and retail space discouraged additional development
during the following decade despite a robust retail climate. As a result, the general size and scale
of buildings in the business district remained unchanged. The same core blocks provided a mix
of retail shops, banks, theatres, hotels, service stations, office buildings, restaurants, and civic
buildings with a handful of residences scattered in. In 2018 only three buildings erected during
these two decades survive, down from seven in 2001 (Image 06). Notably, seven buildings in the
2008 survey area received major alterations during the war years – either additions or new
facades.
Downtown property owners and municipal leaders focused attention on solving traffic
congestion and parking problems during this period. In the late 1940s parking meters were
introduced and the first municipal parking lots were built on parcels along the eastern edge of the
downtown. Congestion was addressed by street widening, removal of boulevard or median strips,
and installation of traffic signals.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 11
Image 06. Eldon Miller Building (Gabe’s) - 330 E. Washington Street - 1955
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
This building, commonly referred to as Gabe’s, was built in 1955 by the Eldon Miller trucking company.
The building façade retains its mid-20th century character and stands as only one of three buildings in the
2018 survey area built in the 1950s.
The last four decades of the 20th century in downtown Iowa City have been dominated by the
debate over urban renewal. Introduced in ca.1960 as a strategy to revitalize an aging city center,
measures eventually were broadened to include the construction of new municipal buildings and
parking ramps as well as proposals for street closures. The strategy of acquiring and demolishing
aging buildings to provide larger parcels for redevelopment proved highly controversial.
Bolstered by the receipt of federal funding, this policy eventually resulted in clearing 11-acres of
land or nearly six city blocks. Simultaneously, the University built major new buildings in the
three blocks extending along the north side of Iowa Avenue.
By the year 2000, the CBD Survey Area had evolved to contain a series of intensely developed
commercial blocks generally consisting of two- and three-story buildings with scattered multi-
story banks, office buildings, apartment buildings, parking ramps, and a hotel. A multi-block
pedestrian mall extended along College Street from Clinton to Linn streets and along Dubuque
Street from College to Washington streets. Three blocks of the University of Iowa's downtown
campus stretched along the north edge of the survey area with the former Capitol Square, known
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 12
as the Pentacrest, lying to the west of the CBD. An assortment of moderate to large-scale public
and private civic buildings was located along the east edge, with the south edge marked by the
major arterial street of Burlington Street, and a series of public parking ramps. The Old Capitol
Center, a two-story shopping mall, was located south of the Pentacrest along the west edge of the
CBD.
In the years subsequent to the 2001 survey, the CBD has undergone a significant transformation.
Some 14 buildings have been lost during that period; 11 of the 14 dated to more than 50 years of
age, with 2 of the 14 non-extant buildings dating to the City’s urban renewal program (114-116
S. Dubuque and the much-altered, 1981 Iowa City Public Library building at 123 S. Linn Street).
Demolitions have occurred in the wake of loss to fire (e.g., Peoples Steam Laundry at 225 Iowa
Avenue and Van Patten House at 9 S. Linn Street) and to facilitate construction of new buildings
(e.g., Vogel House at 229 E. Iowa Avenue and J.C. Penney building at 130 S. Dubuque Street).
Loss of buildings along the outer edges of the CBD, particularly along E. Burlington Street on
the south, have tilted the historic to non-historic ratio; today, only one building dating to more
than 50 years of age (Montgomery Ward & Co. Farm Store at 120 E. Burlington) remains on E.
Burlington Street between S. Clinton and S. Gilbert streets. The parking ramp between S.
Dubuque and S. Linn streets is associated with the urban renewal period, its scale and poured
concrete construction accounting for much of the streetscape’s visual character. The remaining
blocks on the Burlington Street corridor are visually defined by contemporary, freestanding,
relatively large-scale buildings, that combine retail space on the ground floor with apartment
living on the floors above. This changed character is mirrored on the south side of Burlington
Street where construction of new retail-apartment and commercial buildings (e.g., Hilton
Gardens and MidWestOne Bank office building) has occurred.
Most recently, tower-type buildings (eight or more stories) have been constructed in the CBD.
The 14-story Plaza Towers/Hotel Vetro was built in 2004. The building site was cleared as part
of the City’s 1970s and 1980s urban renewal program and remained a parking lot until
construction of the 2004 building. The building’s height and materials are reflective of a
changing aesthetic in the CBD; as such it has been the source of ongoing controversy in the years
since plans for its construction were made public. The 14-story Park@201 (201 E. Washington
Street) was completed in 2014 on the former site of the 1970s Dain, Kalman & Quail Building.
The location of that steel-frame, glass-sheathed tower on the pedestrian mall, in the heart of the
CBD and adjacent to Black Hawk Park, has likewise drawn particular debate. The 2001
construction of the Vogel House at 229 Iowa Avenue, which required demolition of an 1898
building of the same name, also drew some controversy.
These examples illustrate the prevailing pressures to “build up” and the resulting conflict
between, on the one side, the preservation of historic buildings and the character they create in a
community, with, on the other side, the desire (and perceived demand) to build tall buildings
with a contemporary appearance in response to the economics of land values, rental rates, and
the changing face of retail business. Creating economic vitality while preserving the historic
character of a community is a challenge confronting towns and cities across the country. This
challenge must find resolution in Iowa City.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 13
4.0 Summary of Findings and Recommendations
The 2018 Central Business District Survey Area includes a variety of building types and forms
ranging from contiguous, narrow-front commercial buildings to freestanding commercial
buildings, fraternal halls, and public buildings. Portions of the area were first settled when Iowa
City served as Iowa's territorial and then state capital. All of these first-generation structures
have since been replaced with more permanent buildings one or more times. Approximately 115
primary structures were evaluated during the present Central Business District Survey. Existing
site forms were updated for all previously evaluated buildings located within the boundaries of
the 2018 survey area. Updates included: revision of property descriptions and integrity
discussions when warranted; insertion of current photographs; review and revision of building
histories and associated contexts when needed; addition of historic images and fire insurance
maps when useful to understanding a building’s historic evolution; update of bibliographic
resources and geographical information; and insertion of a parcel map.
A resource count by property type remains similar to that of the 2001 project. What a count of
the properties in the present survey does not reflect is the shift from commercial to apartment
buildings in the areas within the 2001 survey area, but now just outside the 2018 survey area;
although not reflected in the count, their proximity impacts the physical and visual character of
the survey area. Further, a count by property type would not reflect the impact of high-density
development.
A range of American architectural styles spanning the latter half of the 19th century and the 20th
century remain represented by the buildings in the CBD Survey Area. The work of important
local and Midwestern architectural firms and designers is represented in modest as well as large-
scale buildings. They include Chauncey Lovelace of Iowa City, Proudfoot and Bird and their
successor firm - Proudfoot, Bird & Rawson - of Des Moines, Dieman & Fiske of Cedar Rapids,
Liebbe, Nourse & Rasmussen of Des Moines, Vorse, Kraetsch & Kraetsch of Des Moines, H.L.
Stevens Co. of Chicago, Kruse and Klein of Davenport, and J. Bradley Rust of Iowa City. Urban
renewal era designers have also made their impact in the CBD, including the Iowa City firm of
Hanson Lind Meyer and Des Moines architects, Brooks Borg Skiles. The work of these
architectural firms, along with that of other designers and craftsmen whose names are not known,
include examples of the Greek Revival, Italianate, Classical Revival, Beaux-Arts, Georgian, and
Modern styles.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 14
4.1 Standards of Evaluation
The resources1 of the present project area were evaluated using the standards and guidelines
established by the Secretary of the Interior, National Park Service. Further clarification of
integrity standards specific to Iowa’s downtown commercial buildings was provided in the 2002
Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF) “Iowa’s Main Street Commercial
Architecture,” written by Jan Olive Nash (Appendices).
Resources are evaluated for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places under four
criteria2:
• Criterion A: A property associated with events that have made a significant contribution
to the broad patterns of our history.
• Criterion B: A property associated with the lives of person significant in our past.
• Criterion C: A property that embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic
values, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack
individual distinction.
• Criterion D: Property has yielded or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory
or history.
Once determined that a resource has a significant association under one or more of these criteria,
it is evaluated for historic integrity. The standards for evaluating historic integrity have become
increasingly more stringent over the decades since the 1966 passage of the Historic Preservation
Act, which established the National Register of Historic Places. Specific to this project, in the 15
years since the previous evaluation of the Iowa City downtown was completed, standards have
changed significantly; buildings that were then considered individually eligible sometimes don’t
meet the current standard. As a result, some of the buildings designated as individually eligible
in the 2001 Multiple Property Document are now designated as contributing resources even if
their historic integrity is retained at a similar level.
Integrity standards for the evaluation of resources have some variability depending on how the
case for eligibility is being made. When evaluating for significance under Criterion A (historical
association), the standard for integrity is somewhat lower because the case for significance does
not rely on the architecture itself. Buildings with significance under Criterion B (significant
person association) typically have a similar integrity standard as those with a case made under
Criterion A. In contrast, when evaluating for significance under Criterion C (architecture) the
standard for integrity is high, which makes sense given that the loss of historic integrity
diminishes the architecture itself.
1 For the purpose of evaluating for National Register eligibility, the term “resource” refers to buildings, structures,
objects, and landscape features. For the sake of clarity and because the resources of the Iowa City project area are
predominantly buildings, the following definitions are specific to the evaluation of buildings.
2 See Appendix NEED for additional information regarding registration criteria including special consideration for
properties less than 50 years of age.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 15
Image 07. Carnegie Public Library (1903) – 218 S. Linn Street
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
The Carnegie Library is considered National Register eligible under Criterion A in its association with the
history of the library movement in Iowa, specifically as an example of a Carnegie library. Some loss of
integrity of the exterior and (likely) interior is evident, but because a case for eligibility can be made
under Criterion A the integrity standard is somewhat lower than if the case relied solely on the building’s
architectural significance.
Mitigating factors such as rarity of a building type or architectural style within the community,
(or historic district) or an elevated historical significance, are taken into consideration when
balancing a building’s significance against its level of historic integrity. Buildings of this sort
often warrant specialized designation as “key contributing” (C/K) buildings (see further
discussion below).
The resources within the project area were evaluated for their potential significance under
Criteria A and C. The operating assumption, based on the results of the 2001 MPDF, was that all
of the historic resources would have significance under Criterion A in association with the
history of commerce in Iowa City and that all would bear the potential to contribute to the
architectural fabric of the commercial downtown under Criterion C.
Proceeding under that understanding, the buildings were evaluated for historic integrity for the
purpose of determining whether they should be considered individually eligible (C/I), a
contributing resource to a potential historic district (C), a key contributing resource to a potential
district (C/K), or a non-contributing resource to a potential historic district (NC). The resources
are coded as such in the resource table (Table 03).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 16
4.1.a Individually Eligible
The standard for determining individual eligibility is high – these buildings should be seen as the
cream of the crop. Generally speaking, individually eligible buildings must retain high historic
integrity on the exterior and on the interior, with character-defining features specific to the
period of significance retained. As noted in the 2002 MPDF by Jan Olive Nash, resources may
be individually eligible in the cases “where they display high integrity and their historical
associative or architectural characteristics are strong.”3
A thorough evaluation of building interiors was not part of the present survey’s scope of work.
As a result, some assumptions about the integrity of interiors were made based on observations
from the exterior and known changes in function. Buildings considered to bear the potential for
individual eligibility demonstrate a significant historic association, a high level of historic
integrity on the exterior, and the likelihood of an appropriate level of historic integrity on the
interior.
Given the high standards for individual eligibility, it is to be expected that few buildings be so
designated. Of the 115 buildings located in the 2017 survey area, 8 are currently individually
listed on the National Register of Historic Places (Table 01) with 11 additional buildings
identified in the present survey project as bearing the potential for individual listing (Table 03 &
04). It is important to note that a thorough evaluation of interiors may support individual
eligibility for additional buildings.
It should be noted that designations for individual eligibility are recommendations only. In the
case a property owner chooses to pursue individual nomination to the National Register of
Historic Places, additional research and evaluation would be necessary to support both a case for
significance and to verify that sufficient historic integrity is retained on both the exterior and the
interior.
Example: A building considered significant as an example of Italianate architecture (Criterion C)
must retain the elements that define it as Italianate architecture, including an interior that remains
representative of the period of construction. If those elements are gone or significantly altered,
the building would likely not be considered an individually eligible resource.
In contrast, a building significant in its historical association (Criteria A or B), rather than as an
example of an architectural style, could have a lower level of historic integrity and still be
considered individually eligible.
In numerous cases in the present project, a building was determined significant under both
Criterion A (historic association) and Criterion C (architecture). In that situation, the standard for
historic integrity must meet the dominant case.
3
Jan Olive Nash, “Iowa’s Main Street Commercial Architecture,” National Register of Historic Places Multiple
Property Documentation Form,” 2002.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 17
4.1.b Contributing
Contributing resources represent those buildings, 50 years or more of age, with a demonstrated
historical association or representing an architectural style, but which lack the degree of historic
integrity necessary to be considered individually eligible.4 Together, contributing resources
within a district retain sufficient historic integrity to convey a sense of time and place.
The 2002 MPD “Iowa’s Main Street Commercial Architecture” by Jan Olive Nash provides the
standard for evaluating contributing resources:
“Judgments about the integrity of the district will take into consideration the expected alterations
and typical motivations of Main Street tenants and owners. Change is a constant on Main Street
because merchants treated their storefronts as an important way of inviting shoppers-both
pedestrian and rolling-to stop in and buy something. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century merchants
have generally linked attracting customers with having an updated and remodeled storefront
composed of the latest materials and styles. Storefronts at the street level show more alterations
than on the upper floors. Alterations range from stylish updates that reference specific popular
architectural influences to piecemeal projects conducted over a longer period of time, perhaps by
several tenants or property owners. Large upper floor window sashes are replaced by smaller
windows and the excess space bricked in or filled with plywood. Sometimes these windows are
simply covered over. Stamped sheet metal cornices are often missing at the roofline.
Since change is a historical factor present from Main Street's inception, a greater degree of
alterations can be accommodated in a commercial district before the integrity of the district is
seriously compromised. Essential characteristics such as massing, survival of the historic pattern
of fenestration and storefront composition, and contribution to the street's overall profile are key
components. Where a building's facade is hidden behind new materials, much of the original,
historic fabric may still be present underneath since merchants had little motivation to spend more
on a remodeling project than was commercially practical or necessary. Still, the application of an
overlay material like metal siding or Perma-stone may have necessitated removal of projecting
architectural elements. Inspection behind the cladding should be performed where possible in
order to gauge the extent and condition of original features intact underneath. If a building is
completely hidden behind materials that were applied after the period of significance and no
inspection underneath is possible, then that building will be non-contributing to the district. The
building should be reevaluated, however, if and when the cladding is removed. If the cladding
was applied within the period of significance, then the building might be considered contributing
if the remodeling reflected the context of continued progress and success in the commercial
district and the desire to update an older building to reflect that progress.”
As noted, in cases where mitigating factors such as rarity of a building type or architectural style
within the community (or historic district) or an elevated local historical significance exists,
resources bear a specialized designation as “key contributing” (or C/K) to indicate the increased
impact their loss within the downtown streetscape would carry. Buildings with the designation of
key contributing may have a diminished historic integrity (preventing individual eligibility), but
4 Resources significant in association with Urban Renewal date to less than 50 years of age. As a result, a special
case for consideration must be made. See the appendices for additional information about Criterion Consideration G.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 18
their significance to the character of the streetscape, due to either their architectural style or their
historical context, elevates their importance.
The buildings along S. Clinton Street between Iowa Avenue and Washington Street provide an
example of the key contributing designation. The entire streetscape has a critical physical and
historic association with the early establishment and subsequent development of the University
of Iowa Pentacrest. Further, the streetscape remains intact and representative of the evolution of
commercial facades over a period from the late 1880s through the mid-20th century, with
architectural styles ranging from Commercial Italianate to Modern. While the buildings that
bookend the block (the Dey Building on the north and the Whetstone building on the south) are
considered individually eligible, the remaining buildings lack sufficient integrity for individual
registration. Lacking individual eligibility, designation as key contributing underscores the
significance of the streetscape and the individual buildings.
Image 08. Coast & Sons (1895) – 10-14 S. Clinton Street
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
Although the storefront of this three-bay commercial building has been altered multiple times, the
building’s upper façade retains the various elements that create its architectural style. The infill of
portions of the window openings negatively impacts the integrity, but retention of the historic form, mass,
and character-defining features makes it a contributing resource. Its rare style in the Iowa City CBD and
location within a contiguous streetscape of significant buildings mark it as key contributing.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 19
Image 09. Things & Things & Things (1970) – 130 S. Clinton Street
(Source: AKAY Consulting, April 2018.)
Although not yet 50 years of age, this building meets the standard for exceptional significance in
association with the City’s urban renewal era.
In cases where a resource is not yet 50 years old (the guideline established by the Secretary of
the Interior for consideration of “historic” resources), consideration of contributing status must
be filtered through Criterion Consideration G, which provides guidance for evaluating the
potential significance of exceptional resources that don’t meet the age guideline (Appendices). In
cases where the standard for “exceptional significance” can be met, a resource can be considered
individually eligible and/or a contributing resource at less than 50 years old. The Things &
Things & Things building was the first urban renewal era buildings completed in Iowa City
(Image 09). As such, the building is historically associated with a period that was of monumental
importance, not just in Iowa City, but across the country.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 20
4.1.c Non-Contributing
Resources dating to less than 50 years of age (absent significance under Criterion Consideration
G) or with historic integrity that does not meet the standards previously described are considered
non-contributing.
Image 10. Commercial Building (ca.1915) - 112 E. College Street
Although this building was constructed in ca.1915, the storefront and the upper façade have been altered
less than 50 years ago, resulting in a visual character that is contemporary. Comparison with its historic
appearance (Image 11) illustrates the loss of historic integrity.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 21
Image 11. Historic Image – E. College Street - ca.1915
(Source: State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.)
A portion of the College Street commercial building (now occupied by Saloon) is seen in its early
existence at far left. Today, only the building height and width remain reflective of the original building.
As a result, the building is considered a non-contributing resource.
4.2 Statement of Findings
Through the process of survey and evaluation, it has been determined that 11 buildings in the
CBD are individually eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and that a
potential historic district with a total of 75 contributing buildings, two contributing landscape
features, and 19 non-contributing buildings exists.
The following resource table (Table 03) identifies each building in the survey area by Iowa Site
Form number, street address, historic name and/or common name, and construction date. In
addition, evaluation findings are noted: NRHP indicates buildings that are already listed on the
National Register; C/I indicates resources considered individually eligible and as such contribute
to the significance of a potential district; C/K indicates key contributing resources that lack
sufficient integrity for individual eligibility, but which bear elevated local significance; C
indicates contributing resources without elevated local significance; and NC indicates non-
contributing resources.
Resource maps that follow are color coded to identify their status. See Figures 02-04.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 22
Table 03. Resource Evaluation Findings
Key: NRHP = National Register of Historic Places Listed
C/I = Individually Eligible/Contributing to a potential district
C/K = Key Contributing
C = Contributing
NC = Non-Contributing
Site
Number
Image Address Historic Name
(Common Name)
Built
Date
Status
E. BURLINGTON ST.
52-04068
120
S. Burlington St.
Montgomery Ward & Co.
Farm Store
ca.1930 NC
52-05437
180
S. Burlington St.
(Commercial/Mixed-Use Building 2015 NC
54-05431
304
S. Burlington St.
(Commercial/Mixed-Use Building) 2006 NC
52-04064
310-318
S. Burlington St.
(Commercial Building) 1986 NC
52-00763
320-322
S. Burlington St.
(Commercial/Mixed-Use Building) ca.1985 NC
52-04063
340
S. Burlington St.
(Commercial/Mixed-Use Building) 1986 NC
S. CLINTON ST.
52-01938
8
S. Clinton St.
(105 E. Iowa Avenue)
Dey Building
(Iowa Book & Supply)
1917
C/K
52-01051
10-14
S. Clinton St.
Coast & Sons Building 1892 C/K
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 23
52-01052
16
S. Clinton St.
Namur Bakery Building
(McDonald Optical)
ca.1874/
ca.1884
C/K
52-01053
18-20
S. Clinton St.
Commercial Building ca.1874/
ca.1944
C/K
52-01055
22
S. Clinton St.
The Airliner ca.1888/
1950
C/K
52-01057
24-26
S. Clinton St.
Racine’s Cigar Store No. 3 ca.1874 C/K
52-01058
28
S. Clinton St.
Ewers Men’s Store ca.1874/
ca.1923
C/K
52-01059
30
S. Clinton St.
Bloom-Ries Building
(Moses Bloom Clothing Store)
ca.1870 C/K
52-01060
32
S. Clinton St.
Whetstone Building ca.1868 C/K
52-01063
102
S. Clinton St.
Iowa State Bank & Trust
(Johnson County Savings Bank)
1912 NRHP
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 24
52-04075
114
S. Clinton St.
Strub Building
(Roshek’s Department Store)
1865/
ca.2005
NC
52-04074
124
S. Clinton St.
Hawkeye Barber Shop 1979 C
52-01069
130
S. Clinton St.
Things & Things & Things
building
1970 C
52-04072
132
S. Clinton St.
Bill Hill Music Studio 1971 C
52-04040
210-212
S. Clinton St.
(Safeway 2000 Building/Joseph’s) 2000 NC
52-04070
224
S. Clinton St.
Commercial Building
(Bread Garden)
1955/
1995
NC
52-01071
226
S. Clinton St.
Carson & Thatcher Motor Co. ca.1905/
1980s
NC
E. COLLEGE ST.
52-05432
E. College from Clinton
to Linn St. and
S. Dubuque from
College to Iowa Ave.
City Plaza
(Ped Mall)
1978-79 C
52-01070
103
E. College St.
Savings and Loan Building 1877/
1940
C/K
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 25
52-04093
109
E. College St.
Dooley Block (west bay) ca.1874/
1929
C/K
52-04085
110
E. College St.
Carson Building ca.1916 C
52-04086
112
E. College St.
Commercial Building ca.1915 NC
52-01087
114-116
E. College St.
Schneider Bros. Furniture Store 1883/
1906
C
52-04091
111-113
E. College St.
Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building 1929 C/K
52-01088
115
E. College St.
Dooley Block (east bay)
ca.1895/
1929
C/K
52-04090
117-123
E. College St.
Crescent Block ca.1895 C/I
52-04087
118-120
E. College St.
Commercial Building ca.1874 C
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 26
52-01089
125
E. College St.
College Block Building 1878 NRHP
52-04088
128
E. College St.
(125 S. Dubuque St.)
Plaza Centre One 1977 C
54-05434
309
E. College St.
Old Library Condos/
Crepes De Luxe Cafe
2001 NC
52-01095
312
E. College St.
Iowa City Masonic Temple 1914 C/I
52-01096
320
E. College St.
Trinity Episcopal Church 1871 NRHP
52-04059
325-393
E. College St.
(Commercial Building) 1996 NC
S. DUBUQUE ST.
52-01545
1
S. Dubuque St.
(127 E. Iowa Avenue)
Park House ca.1867 C
52-01546
2-4
S. Dubuque St.
Market Hall 1873/
ca.1947
C
52-01548
5
S. Dubuque St.
F.J. Epeneter Building
(north half)
1883/
ca.1933
C
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 27
52-01549
6-8
S. Dubuque St.
Ham’s Hall
(north two-thirds)
ca.1873/
ca.1930
C
52-01550
7
S. Dubuque St.
F.J. Epeneter Building
(south half)
1873 C
52-01551
9
S. Dubuque St.
Patterson Block
(north half of north half)
1879/
1899/
1982
C
52-01552
10
S. Dubuque St.
Ham’s Hall
(south one-third)
1870 C
52-01553
11
S. Dubuque St.
Patterson Block
(south half of north half)
1879/
1899/
1982
C
52-01554
12
S. Dubuque St.
Commercial Building
(Sports Column)
ca.1870 C
52-04094
13-15
S. Dubuque St.
Prairie Lights Book Store 1983/
1993
NC
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 28
52-01556
14
S. Dubuque St.
Mueller Block
(Sports Column)
ca.1910 C
52-01557
17
S. Dubuque St.
J.J. Stach Saloon ca.1876 C
52-01558
19-21
S. Dubuque St.
Scanlon Saloon/
Maresh & Holubar Tin Shop
ca.1874/
ca.1875
C
52-01559
23
S. Dubuque St.
Commercial Building 1879/
1970
NC
52-05429
109
S. Dubuque St.
Jefferson Cafeteria ca.1915 C
52-01561
111
S. Dubuque St.
Commercial Building ca.1860 C
52-01562
115
S. Dubuque St.
Franklin Printing House 1856 NRHP
52-01564
118
S. Dubuque St.
Commercial Building ca.1881 C/K
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 29
52-01567
124
S. Dubuque St.
Iowa Theater 1936 C
52-04065
220
S. Dubuque St.
Holiday Inn
(Sheraton Hotel)
1984 C
54-05430
229
S. Dubuque St.
Dubuque Condominiums 2015 NC
E. IOWA AVE.
52-01940
113-115
E. Iowa Ave.
Bashnagel Building ca.1875 C
52-01941
117
E. Iowa Ave.
Studio Tea Room ca.1922 C
52-05436
119
E. Iowa Ave.
Commercial Building 2004 NC
52-01943
121-123
E. Iowa Ave.
Brunswick Hall ca.1890 C
52-01944
211
E. Iowa Ave.
C.O.D. Steam Laundry Building ca.1895 C
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 30
52-01945
213
E. Iowa Ave.
Reardon Hotel ca.1900 C
52-05423
219
E. Iowa Ave.
Capitol Square Condominiums 2002 NC
52-05428
225
E. Iowa Ave.
Brueggers Bagel Bakery 2011 NC
52-05425
229
E. Iowa Ave.
Vogel House 2001 NC
52-04039
325
E. Iowa Ave.
Tower Place & Parking Facility 2000 NC
S. LINN ST.
52-02225
13-15
S. Linn St.
Hohenschuh Mortuary 1917 C/K
52-02227
28
S. Linn St.
Old Post Office 1904/
1931
NRHP
52-02228
104-116
S. Linn St.
J.A. O’Leary Velie Co. Garage/
Iowa Apartment Building
1919/
1924
C
52-02229
122
S. Linn St.
Meardon Building 1977 C
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 31
52-04056
123
S. Linn St.
Iowa City Public Library 2004 NC
52-05426
201
S. Linn St.
Plaza Towers/Hotel Vetro 2004 NC
52-02230
218
S. Linn St.
Iowa City Public Library
(Carnegie)
1903 C/I
52-04054
222
S. Linn St.
Leff Law Firm 1966 NC
52-02231
224
S. Linn St.
Residence ca.1888 NC
52-04055
225
S. Linn St.
Dubuque Street Parking Ramp 1980 NC
E. WASHINGTON ST.
52-02800
109
E. Washington St.
Hands Jewelry Building ca.1868/
1968
C/K
52-02804
110
E. Washington St.
Western Union Building 1938 C
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 32
52-02805
112
E. Washington St.
Sunier Music & Jewelry Store 1900/
1929
C/K
52-02806
114
E. Washington St.
Commercial Building ca.1874 NC
52-02807
111-117
E. Washington St.
Younker’s Department Store 1951 C
52-02808
118
E. Washington St.
Freeman Building ca.1874/
ca.2002
NC
52-02809
120
E. Washington St.
Bremer’s Building 1964 C
52-02810
121
E. Washington St.
S.S. Kresge Co. Building 1930 C
52-02811
124
E. Washington St.
Security Insurance Co. building ca.1869/
ca.2010
NC
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 33
52-02812
126
E. Washington St.
Commercial Building ca.1869 C
52-02813
128
E. Washington St.
Arcade Building 1874/
1927
C
52-01487
129-131
E. Washington St.
Hotel Jefferson 1913/
1926
C/I
52-02814
132
E. Washington St.
Pryce & Schell Building ca.1879 C
52-05427
201
E. Washington St.
Park@201 2012 NC
52-02815
202-214
E. Washington St.
First National Bank 1911 C/K
52-02816
207
E. Washington St.
Paul-Helen Building 1913 NRHP
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 34
52-02818
216
E. Washington St.
Stillwell Building
ca.1880 C/K
52-02819
218
E. Washington St.
IXL Block (west bay) 1883 C/K
52-02820
220
E. Washington St.
IXL Block (center bay) 1883 C/K
52-02821
221
E. Washington St.
Englert Theatre 1912 NRHP
52-04053
225
E. Washington St.
Schump Transfer & Storage 1910 C
52-04052
227
E. Washington St.
Stilwell Building 1910/
ca.1949
C
52-02823
228
E. Washington St.
First National Bank Drive-In Bank 1962 NC
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 35
52-04051
229
E. Washington St.
Meacham Travel 1971 C
52-02824
319
E. Washington St.
Iowa City Press-Citizen Publishing 1937 C/I
52-02825
320
E. Washington St.
Ecumenical Housing 1980 NC
52-02827
325
E. Washington St.
B.P.O.E. Hall 1909 C
52-05433
328
E. Washington St.
The Abbey Apartments 2011 NC
52-02829
330
E. Washington St.
Eldon Miller building
(Gabe’s)
1955 C
52-02826
332
E. Washington St.
Boerner-Fry Company/
Davis Hotel
1899 NRHP
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 36
Figure 02. Resource Map – 2018
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 37
4.2.a Individually Eligible
As noted, the standard for determining individual eligibility is high. Of the 115 buildings located
in the 2018 survey area, 8 buildings are individually listed on the National Register of Historic
Places (Table 01.) with the following 11 buildings identified in the present survey project as
bearing the potential for individual listing.
Table 04. Individually Eligible Resources
Historic Name
(Common Name)
Image Address Built
Date
Site
Number
Dey Building
(Iowa Book & Supply)
8 S. Clinton St.
1917
52-01938
Whetstone Building
32 S. Clinton St. ca.1868 52-01060
Crescent Block
117-123 E. College St. ca.1895 52-04090
Iowa City Masonic Temple
312 E. College St. 1914 52-01095
Commercial Building
118 S. Dubuque St. ca.1881 52-01564
Iowa City Public Library
(Carnegie Library Building)
218 S. Linn St. 1903 52-02230
Hotel Jefferson
129-131 E. Washington St. 1913/
1926
52-01487
Stillwell Building
216 E. Washington St. ca.1880 52-02818
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 38
IXL Block (west bay)
218 E. Washington St. 1883 52-02819
IXL Block (center bay)
220 E. Washington St. 1883 52-02820
Iowa City Press-Citizen
319 E. Washington St. 1937 52-02824
Designations for individual eligibility are recommendations only. Additional research and
evaluation would be necessary to fully support both a case for significance and to verify that
sufficient historic integrity is retained on both the exterior and the interior. The Iowa State
Historic Preservation Office and the National Park Service review nominations to the National
Register of Historic Places to ensure the resource meets the standards for registration.
Because the local standards for eligibility specific to building exteriors align with National
Register standards, properties designated C/I are eligible for local landmark designation under
the Iowa City Historic Preservation Ordinance. The ordinance also provides designation of C/K
or “key contributing” resources for landmark designation. It is important to note, however, that
the local ordinance does not regulate building interiors for landmarked properties.
4.2.b. Historic District Eligibility
While evaluating individual buildings in a survey project such as the present one is important, it
is necessary to keep in mind that, as stated in Nash’s 2002 Main Street MPD, “the overarching
significance for the majority of commercial buildings stems from their location on Main Street,
not their individual status.” Only by examining the role individual buildings played in the trade
and commerce of a community as elements of the larger grouping that together comprise Iowa
City’s commercial district, do we gain a full understanding of historic associations and their
significance. As the heart of a community, the commercial district has long been central to the
economic health of a town. Further, it has historically served as a community gathering space
where the social networks were established and maintained. Commercial districts also functioned
historically as a civic space where the political views and community memory could be
expressed, either in the course of daily conversation or through symbolic actions like parades and
flag displays (Nash, E-24). Historic images of the Iowa City CBD document such events:
university engineering students parading down S. Clinton Street in 1911; local residents and
students celebrating a 1922 football victory over Purdue; patriotic salutes on E. Washington
Street in 1915; and the protests of the 1970s illustrate the role of the CBD as civic space.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 39
A potential historic district exists in the CBD survey area (Figure 03). The proposed boundary
encompasses 96 resources (75 contributing buildings, 2 contributing landscape features, and 19
non-contributing buildings) dating from the earliest remaining building (Franklin Printing, 1856)
through the last urban renewal building constructed (Holiday Inn, 1984). The proposed boundary
is bound by S. Clinton Street on the west, running two blocks east along Iowa Avenue, turning
south for ½-block along S. Linn Street, turning east along the alley between Iowa Avenue and E.
Washington to S. Gilbert Street, turning south to E. College Street, turning west to S. Linn Street
to the alley between E. Burlington Street and E. College Street to S. Clinton Street.
The proposed district contains the best-preserved commercial buildings in the CBD including
examples of Greek Revival, Late Victorian era Commercial Italianate, Renaissance,
Romanesque, Classical Revival, Georgian, and Moderne style building designs. It also includes a
collection of public buildings constructed prior to World War I in a "civic corridor" along the
east edge of the CBD. Significantly, the proposed district embraces the significant alterations
that resulted from the City’s urban renewal program. While the buildings constructed during the
period associated with the program (1970-1984) lack the architectural features many think of as
“historic,” the buildings do represent the architectural trends and technologies of the period.
More importantly, they are directly associated with an historic period that contributes
significantly to the character of the district today.
The proposed district boundaries also embrace the pedestrian mall. In contrast to similar
landscape features that appeared in urban renewal projects across the country, the Iowa City
pedestrian mall was a success. Where the majority of other such projects have been reversed in
recent years, the pedestrian mall remains a beautiful gathering place that contributes to the civic,
social, and economic vitality of the downtown. Its place within the physical and historical
context of the CBD cannot be overvalued.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 40
Figure 03. Map of Proposed Historic District Boundaries - 2018
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 41
It is important to note that without embracing the significance of the urban renewal resources the
pedestrian mall would not be included within the district boundaries. Further, due to the
significant alteration of the setting along College Street and one block of Dubuque Street, the
buildings facing the pedestrian mall would be adversely impacted. The result would be a
diminished district boundary that excludes those resources (Figure 04).
Figure 04. Map of Historic District Boundaries Without Urban Renewal Resources - 2018
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 42
4.2.c. Historic Preservation Overlay Zones
Iowa City's zoning ordinance provides special protection for properties that qualify either as a
local historic district or a historic landmark under the designation "historic preservation overlay”
zone (OHP). All areas identified as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
individually or as a historic district qualify for local designation and protection. It is
recommended that, through time, the Historic Preservation Commission seek designation of all
properties identified as National Register eligible in the amendment to the Multiple Property
Documentation Form, “Architectural and Historical Resources of Iowa City Central Business
District (1855 - 1984).” Highest priority should be given to designating individually eligible
properties with particular attention to any identified as threatened. Further, resources designated
as key contributing in the potential historic district should be designated as local landmarks
4.3 Recommendations
The Iowa City CBD has seen many changes over the course of its 170-year history. The
magnitude of those changes is evident by reviewing the extensive collection of historic images
held by the State Historical Society of Iowa in Iowa City, the Iowa City Public Library, and the
University of Iowa Special Collections. Evolution of a downtown is far from unusual - it’s to be
expected. It is in the examination of what has been lost that we can begin to value the importance
of protecting what remains.
• Preparation of a nomination of the Iowa City Central Business District with the
boundaries to include the resources of the urban renewal period is strongly
recommended.
• Designation of a local overlay district that follows the boundaries of the National
Register district and provides the protections available by local ordinance is
recommended.
• Immediate designation of C/I (individually eligible) resources as local landmarks.
• Immediate consideration of C/K (key contributing) resources for landmark designation.
• Provision of a full-time City staff person with dedicated responsibility for overseeing the
downtown historic resources is recommended. Said staff should possess knowledge of
local design review as it relates to downtown resources and a thorough understanding of
financial incentives for historic preservation, (i.e., historic tax credit programs).
• Establishment of a collection of topical digital resources accessible from the City
website.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 43
• Continued partnership with the Iowa City Downtown District to actively engage business
owners in the historic rehabilitation of buildings with an understanding that current
business trends may sometimes require adaptation of buildings to meet those challenges.
• Immediate development of a clearly delineated policy aimed at addressing the pressure
for increased density and contemporary design within the proposed historic district.
Development of that policy should seek out successful models for responding to
development pressures, particularly related to the impact of height, massing, and
materials of new construction as well as the growing trend for adding stories (housing or
terraces) to existing historic buildings. The process should consider existing policy and/or
planning tools (e.g., form-based zoning, TIF, local landmark ordinance, etc.) to determine
how to create a comprehensive approach to the protection of the downtown historic
resources while promoting economic viability and downtown vitality.
• The City should pursue and promote other financial incentives for owners of historic
properties that seek historic rehabilitation including, but not limited to, tax exemption
from Johnson County.
• The City should actively promote non-financial incentives to property owners who wish to
undertake the historic rehabilitation of buildings.
One means of promoting historic rehabilitation of downtown buildings relates to the
International Existing Building Code (IEBC), which is “intended to provide requirements for
repair and alternative approaches for alterations and additions to existing buildings.” As such,
it is commonly used in historic rehabilitation projects where retention of historic features
may be in conflict with standard building codes. While the City currently defers to the IEBC
in some cases, it remains underused.
The City should proactively promote the use of the IEBC in historic rehabilitation, including
information regarding the IEBC in communications with potential developers and individual
property owners.
Further, the City should promote the flexibility that exists in the current zoning code that
allows the Board of Adjustment to waive parking for buildings that are listed on the National
Register of Historic Places, either as part of a district or individually. The waiver is also
available for buildings designated as local landmarks regardless of their National Register
status.
Promotion of historic rehabilitation as an environmentally friendly approach to development
is another important way of considering and supporting historic preservation. Promotion of
the benefits of green construction should be incorporated into the larger effort to promote
historic rehabilitation of downtown resources.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 44
5.0 Historic Preservation Incentives Opportunities for the Iowa CBD
The Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA) and the Iowa State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) offer multiple funding opportunities directed at the historic rehabilitation of
downtown properties for the purpose of preserving historic resources and enhancing community
economic vitality. Summaries of the applicable programs follow with links to additional detail.
It is important to note that State and Federal tax credit programs are subject to congressional
action with increased and continued scrutiny in recent years. Preservation groups in Iowa and
across the country have worked diligently to bring the profoundly significant impact of these
programs on historic buildings and the communities in which they are located to the attention of
congressional representatives with important success.
As noted by the National Park Service, the Federal Historic Tax program approves some 1,100
projects annually with nearly $6 billion in private investment leveraged. In this way, the program
supports private investment in the rehabilitation and re-use of historic buildings. Further, the
program generates new jobs and is one of the country’s most successful and cost-effective
community revitalization program. Since 1976, the program as leveraged over $84 billion in
private investment resulting in the preservation of 42,293 historic properties.
5.1 Historic Preservation Tax Credit Programs
Historic tax credit (HTC) programs, both the state and the federal programs, have been
successfully used across Iowa for the rehabilitation of historic buildings of many types:
commercial buildings, schools, libraries, warehouses, residences have found re-use and renewal
because of the availability of these programs and with rehabilitation of individual resources has
come economic revitalization of communities across the state. Excellent examples of the positive
impact of the historic tax credit programs are found in Des Moines, Davenport, Cedar Rapids,
Waterloo, Fort Dodge, Mason City, Dubuque, Sioux City, and Council Bluffs as well as in
smaller communities like Perry, Waverly, Belle Plaine, and Marshalltown (Image 12-13).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 45
Image 12. BEFORE: Letts-Fletcher Company Warehouse – Marshalltown, Iowa - 2011
(Image by AKAY Consulting, March 02, 2011).
Image 13. AFTER: Letts-Fletcher Company Warehouse – Marshalltown, Iowa - 2015
(Image by AKAY Consulting, May 11, 2015).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 46
The Letts-Fletcher Company Warehouse in Marshalltown is one example of a warehouse-to-
residential conversion. Along with the rehabilitation of the Tall Corn Hotel just across the street,
the project spurred significant reinvestment in the city’s historic downtown commercial district.
Historic rehabilitation of the building, which is a contributing resource to the Marshalltown
Commercial Historic District, was made possible by a combined state and federal historic tax
credit of approximately $2 million. This type of large-scale adaptive re-use of an historic
building has been used to stimulate re-development in Davenport, Sioux City, Fort Dodge, and
Des Moines. While many of those projects involved the transition of a former warehouse
building to housing, numerous other historic building types have also been successfully
rehabilitated using the historic tax credit programs.
While most projects, particularly large commercial projects, use both the state and the federal
program, smaller projects may be better suited to just the state program; this is related to how the
tax credits are awarded. It’s important to carefully consider the circumstances of a potential
rehabilitation project and its developer/owner, including the specific requirements and potential
benefits of each programs in order to decide the best approach.
In the case of the Barton-Ford Motor Company building in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, both state and
federal tax credits were used in the historic rehabilitation of this small-scale building. The
Barton-Ford Motor Company building is a contributing resource in the Cedar Rapids 2nd Avenue
SE Auto Row Historic District (listed, 2015). After a number of alterations and years of vacancy,
a small business owner undertook its rehabilitation for re-use as a brewery/restaurant.
The project is included here as a successful example of a small-scale historic tax credit project,
provided to illustrate the potential benefit to property owners of smaller-scaled buildings that
exists in the historic tax credit programs (Images 14-17).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 47
Image 14. BEFORE: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building (1912) - 2014
(Image by AKAY Consulting, March 02, 2014).
Image 15. AFTER: Barton-Ford Motor Company/Quarter Barrel Brewing - 2015
(Image by AKAY Consulting, May 11, 2015).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 48
Image 16. BEFORE: Barton-Ford Motor Company Building – Interior - 2014
(Image by AKAY Consulting, March 02, 2014).
Image 17. AFTER: Barton-Ford Motor Company/Quarter Barrel Brewing – Interior - 2016
(Image by AKAY Consulting, May 11, 2016).
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 49
Unfortunately, the historic tax credit programs are under utilized in Iowa City. Perhaps the recent
historic rehabilitation of the Iowa State Bank & Trust will encourage other such projects in the
downtown, specifically, but across the city generally. The completed project is an excellent
example of a successfully completed historic rehabilitation utilizing both State and Federal
historic tax credits
Image 18. AFTER: Iowa State Bank & Trust – 102 S. Clinton – 2018
(Image by AKAY Consulting, April, 2018).
It cannot be denied that the process of applying for historic tax credits can be daunting, with
hoops to be jumped through and red tape to be cut. However, with thorough planning and a
willingness to respond to the requirements of the programs, the financial benefit is significant
and, in many cases, is what makes rehabilitation of historic buildings possible. Guidance from
the Iowa State Historic Preservation Office is essential for evaluating the appropriateness of
historic tax credits. A number of preservation consultants in the state have considerable
experience navigating the process and can be invaluable in the work of completing a successful
project.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 50
5.1.a Iowa Historic Tax Credit Program
The following is an overview of the Iowa HTC program. Please note that it is only a summary
and additional issues, such as timing of the process, additional expenses incurred, and tax
implications (to name a few), should be considered in the process of determining the viability of
the program for a specific project. See appendices for additional information.
The Iowa Historic Tax Credit (HTC) program (https://iowaculture.gov/history/preservation/tax-
incentives/state-tax-credit) provides a state income tax credit for “the sensitive, substantial
rehabilitation of historic buildings.” Use of the program supports retention of character-defining
features and spaces of historic buildings and contributes to the revitalization of the
neighborhoods in which an historic resource is located. The Iowa HTC program provides an
income tax credit of up to 25% of qualified rehabilitation expenditures (QREs).
The State HTC program is available to eligible taxpayers, defined as the fee simple owner of the
property or someone having a long-term lease that meets the requirements of the federal
rehabilitation programs. The applicant may be a nonprofit, but may not be a governmental body.
Before applying, it is strongly recommended that an owner consult their accountant or tax
advisor to assure that the state tax credit is beneficial and that the definition of an eligible
taxpayer is met.
The State program has two tracks: the Small Projects track (for projects with QREs of $750,000
or less) and the Large Projects track (for projects with QREs in excess of $750,000). While the
application process is generally the same regardless of the project size, those that fall in the large
projects category are typically far more competitive and registration for those projects occurs
twice a year; the small projects are registered on a rolling basis.
5.1.b Federal Historic Tax Incentive Program
The Federal program offers a 20% tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic, income-producing
buildings (https://www.nps.gov/tps/tax-incentives/before-you-apply.htm). Unlike the state
program, owner-occupied residential properties do not qualify) that are determined to be
“certified historic structures.” As with the state program, projects are evaluated to ensure that the
proposed work complies with the Secretary’s Standards for Rehabilitation. See appendices for
additional information.
Eligible tax credit projects must meet several qualifying standards including certification as a
historic property (National Register listed or determined eligible as an individual or a
contributing resource to an historic district) through completion of Part 1 of the application
process. In addition, the project building must be defined by the IRS as "depreciable," that is,
used in a trade or business or held for the production of income. The amount of the rehabilitation
must be "substantial,” meaning the rehabilitation involves the greater of $5,000 or an amount
equal to the owner's adjusted basis in the building. Expenses incurred in a Federal historic tax
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 51
credit project may occur during a two-year period or be phased over a five-year period. For
phased projects, plans must be approved prior to work commencing.
In the cases where application is made to both the state and federal programs, each element of
the application process for both programs is submitted simultaneously to maximize efficiency of
the review process. A review period for each element of the application will take a minimum of
90 days, so it is important to account for sufficient time to undertake the application process.
In summary, the State and Federal historic tax credit programs have been an essential tool
supporting the historic rehabilitation of historic buildings across Iowa. Despite that fact, the
programs have been under-utilized in Iowa City – the downtown commercial district has only
two projects that used the programs. The Englert Theatre and, more recently, the Iowa State
Bank & Trust are excellent examples of rehabilitations supported by the HTC programs. As
noted, both the State and the Federal tax credit programs have and continue to undergo
revamping. Fortunately, the longstanding and significant benefits that have resulted from the
programs have supported their retention in a climate when other tax credit programs have been
eliminated.
5.1.c Iowa's Historic Property Temporary Tax Exemption Program encourages the
rehabilitation of historic buildings by allowing county governments to abate increases in local
property taxes resulting from completion of a certified rehabilitation. The program provides a
combination of full exemption for four years from any increased valuation resulting from the
work, and decreasing exemption (up to the new valuation) during the subsequent four years. To
be eligible a minimum of $5,000 of rehabilitation investment must be made. Before completing
the three-part application, it is advisable to estimate the adjusted basis and the total rehabilitation
investment for the project to determine whether it will likely meet the "substantial rehabilitation"
test. Criteria for approval are similar to those described above for the federal and state tax
credits. https://iowaculture.gov/history/preservation/tax-incentives/property-tax-
exemption/before-you-apply
5.2 City of Iowa City Programs
5.2.a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a mechanism used to provide financial assistance for
projects within a designated urban renewal area and TIF district. The difference between taxes
derived from unimproved, underdeveloped, or underutilized property and those derived after its
development, redevelopment, or expansion is the “increment” of taxes which may be pledged by
the City to help finance project expenses incurred by the City or the developer in furtherance of
the development.
The TIF ordinance makes available to the City incremental tax revenues for repayment of
project-related expenses or the provision of a property tax rebate. The incremental tax revenues
include those levied by and for other taxing jurisdictions, such as the county, school district, and
community college.
Survey and Evaluation Update
Iowa City Central Business District
October, 2018 52
TIF financing is available in the form of public infrastructure improvements or in the form of
forgivable loans or property tax rebates for qualifying businesses. The amount of available TIF is
dependent on the amount of new taxable property value added to the property.
It is important to note that the TIF policy approved in November 2017 includes language that
encourages the preservation of historic resources: “New construction requiring the demolition of
structures on the National Register of Historic Places, or those identified as individually eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places or those identified as key properties are not eligible
for tax increment financing.”
5.3 Iowa Downtown Resource Center Programs (Iowa Economic Development Authority)
Main Street Iowa. Utilizing the Main Street Approach, communities capitalize on the unique
identity, assets, and character of their historic commercial districts. Assistance from the Main
Street Iowa team includes training workshops, architectural and design assistance, business
assistance, and other technical assistance opportunities. Financial incentives made available to
Main Street communities includes the Main Street Challenge Grant.
https://www.iowaeconomicdevelopment.com/MainStreetIowa
Model Communities: Connecting leaders to share successful practices. The program partners
with Iowa communities to share community development best practices. Downtown Resource
Center Downtown Forums held in four Iowa model communities in June 2018.
https://www.iowaeconomicdevelopment.com/programDetails?pid=125&ppid=101
Workforce Housing Tax Credits. The program provides tax benefits to developers to provide
housing in Iowa communities, focusing especially on projects involving abandoned, empty or
dilapidated properties. The tax incentives include a refund of sales, service or use taxes paid
during construction. Developers may receive a state investment tax credit of up to 10% of the
investment directly related to the construction or rehabilitation of housing.
https://www.iowaeconomicdevelopment.com/WHTC
APPENDICES