HomeMy WebLinkAboutSummary of findings for year 2018
Iowa City Police Traffic Study
Brief Summary
Prepared by:
Chris Barnum
St. Ambrose University
June, 2019
1
Iowa City Police Traffic Study
For several years now, the City of Iowa City has partnered with St. Ambrose University
to develop and implement an analysis of the Iowa City Police Department’s traffic stop activity.
The current investigation focuses on evaluating stops made by the ICPD between January 1st,
2018 and December 31st 2018. These analyses center on evaluating two broad categories of
discretionary police conduct: (i) racial disparity in vehicle stops—instantiated as racial
differences in the likelihood of being stopped by the ICPD and (ii) dissimilarities across racial
demographics in the outcome or disposition of a stop.
To evaluate the racial demographics of stops, our research team utilized driver-population
benchmarks fashioned from roadside observations and census data. A benchmark should be
thought of as the proportion of minority drivers on the roads in a given location. In plain terms,
the benchmark is a standard that can be used to judge the percentage of minority drivers that
should be stopped by the police when no bias is occurring. In Iowa City, the population
characteristics of the city were divided up into one-square-mile units called observation zones’
(see figure one below).
Figure 1. City of Iowa City Observation Zones.
2
Once the boundaries of the observation zones were determined, roadside surveyors were
deployed to monitored traffic at several locales within selected zones. The observers watched
traffic at various times of the day ranging from 7:00 am until 2:00 am. To date, observers have
logged more than 110,000 observations from locations across the city. Results show a high
degree of inter-rater consistency between observers across all zones. The observational
benchmarks were updated 2018 with additional observations in several zones.
The process of comparing police data to benchmarks is straight forward. It centers on
identifying differences between the demographic percentages from ICPD traffic stop data and
benchmark information. Any positive difference between benchmark values and police data
signifies disproportionality or an over representation of minority drivers in the data. Although,
disproportionality can indicate bias or discrimination, it does not necessarily do so. It is possible
for disproportionality to occur for a number of legitimate reasons, including differences between
racial groups in driving behavior, vehicle condition, drivers’ license status and so forth.
Our methodology makes it possible to track disproportionality by area, by time of day, by
duty assignment and by individual officer. While this method serves as a useful tool in assessing
disproportionality, please keep in mind that the method is only an estimate of disproportionality
in police activity, not a certainty. This stems from the fact that the analyses are predicated on
differences between stops and benchmarks, and that benchmarks are formed from samples of the
drivers on the roads in a given area and time. Consequently, like any sample, a benchmark may
be associated with a degree of sampling error.
3
2018 Analyses
Figures 2, 3 and 4 give the number of 2018 ICPD traffic stops by observation zone for the
department as a whole, as well as for daytime and nighttime patrol assignments. The information
indicates that for each grouping, most ICPD officers tended to make the lion’s share of traffic
stops in the downtown area of the city (zone 21) followed by the Broadway-Wetherby (zone 29)
and surrounding areas (zones 28, 30 and 13).
Figure 2. Number of traffic Stops by Observation Zone for Officers Working During the Day
Number of stops
dept. = 12,349
4
Figure 3. Number of traffic Stops by Observation Zone for Officers Working During the Day
Figure 4. Number of traffic Stops by Observation Zone for Officers Working at Night
Number of stops
days = 2,957
Number of stops
nights = 9392
5
Disproportionality
The figures below show the percentage of minority drivers stopped by ICPD officers and
corresponding benchmark values for select observation zones. The charts show information for
department as a whole, as well as the day and night shifts. In each chart, any positive difference
between the percentage of minority drivers stopped and benchmark values signifies
disproportionality. In general, the information suggests that levels of disproportionality tended
to be lowest in areas where the most stops were made, and highest in areas were the fewest stops
were made.
Figure 5. Comparison of Minority Stop percentages to Benchmarks for All ICPD Officers
Index = 0.07
6
Figure 6. Comparison of Minority Stop percentages to Benchmarks for Officers Working During the Day
Figure 7. Comparison of Minority Stop percentages to Benchmarks for Officers Working at Night
The index values shown in each chart give a weighted average of the difference between stop
percentages and benchmark values. The higher the index the greater the disproportionality.
Index = 0.057
Index = 0.092
7
Officer Level Analysis:
We calculated a disparity index for each officer making more than twenty-four stops
during 2018. The index consists of two ratios and was calculated by comparing the percentage of
minority stops to minority benchmarks divided by the percentage of whites stops to white
benchmark values. A disparity index value equaling 1.00 indicates no disproportionality in stops,
while values greater than 1.00 suggest disparity. The disparity index values can be interpreted as
a comparison of fractions or ratios. Accordingly, an officer’s disparity index value equaling 2.0
indicates that the officer was twice as likely to stop a minority driver as a non-minority driver,
given the benchmark values. And other values can be interpreted similarly. Below we show two
figures, one for 2018 and a second for 2017. In each, the blue horizontal lines indicate 100 stops,
the thick dashed lines show the median index values for the department and the thin dashed lines
give the 90th percentile index value for the department. The blue or black dots represent officers.
Figure 8. Officer Index Values 2018.
8
Figure 9. 2017 Officer Index Values.
A comparison of the charts suggests that extreme index values for officers decreased in
2018. Likewise, in comparison to 2017, the median index value for all officers was lower in
2018 than in 2017.
Stop Outcomes Results
We used an examination of stop outcomes to assess disproportionality in citations,
warnings, arrests, consent searches and probable cause searches. As the name implies, a stop
outcome gives information about the consequence or disposition of a stop. A good example is
whether or not a driver received a ticket as a result of the stop. In what follows, we measure
disproportionality using an estimator called an odds ratio. This estimator is a measure of effect
size and association. It is useful when comparing two distinct groups and it summarizes the odds
of something happening to one group to the odds of it happening to another group.
The values shown in table 1 give odds ratios for various stop outcomes over time. The
information for 2018 shows ICPD officers were: (i) less likely to issue a citation to minority
drivers than others; (ii) but, were more likely to arrest minority drivers than others; and (iii) were
more likely to initiate probable cause searches for minority drivers compared to others. Looking
more closely at arrests, supplemental analyses indicate that the odds favoring minority driver
arrests decreased in circumstances where officers made highly discretionary arrests. In these
situations, officers have a great deal of choice about whether or not to make an arrest. Although
9
high discretionary arrests occurred rarely (only 74 happened in 2018), when they did occur, the
odds favoring minority arrests fell to 1.38 from 2.04 for non-discretionary arrests. This is an
important finding which suggests officers’ arrest patterns are less disparate against minority
drivers in conditions where they have a great deal of choice or discretion.
Table 1. Department Outcomes and Univariate Odds Ratios by Year
Odds Ratio
2005 2006 2007 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Citations -1.4 -1.5 -1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.07 1.0
Arrests 2.5 2.8 2.6 3.1 3.2 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.82 1.98
Search 2.5 3.4 5.6 2.7 3.9 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.9 2.1 ---- ---
Hits -1.6 1.2 -2.9 -2.3 -1.3 -1.2 1.1 -1.1 1.1 1.1 ---- ---
In 2018 ICPD officers initiated only a single consent search. Consequently, we could not
calculate odds ratios for this outcome. Also, please note that in 2018 we began analyzing the
number of probable cause searches conducted by ICPD officers. Results from the analyses show
disproportionality. Of the 272 pc searches performed by ICPD officers in 2018, 119 involved
minority drivers. The odds ratio for this outcome equals 2.45, indicating that the odds an ICPD
officer would pc search a minority driver was about two-and-half times that of a nonminority
driver. However, hit rates or seizures resulting from pc searches of minority drivers actually
occurred less frequently than seizures involving nonminority drivers. In simple terms, when
officers conducted a pc search, they were more likely to find contraband or evidence from
nonminority drivers than from minority drivers—even though the odds were greater that the
police would pc search minority drivers than others.
Conclusions
This study examined the traffic stop behavior of the Iowa City Police Department using traffic
stop data from 2018, roughly 12,000 stops. The investigation focused on two broad categories of
discretionary police conduct: (i) racial disparity in vehicle stops and (ii) disparity in the outcome
or disposition of a stop. Findings from the examination of disproportionality in vehicle stops
show stable or decreasing levels of disproportionality for stops made in 2018 compared to
previous years. Additionally, the results of the analyses for stop outcomes indicate some racial
disproportionality in certain outcomes—including moderate amounts in arrests and probable
cause searches.