The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPZ Agenda Packet 01.16.2020PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Thursday, January 16, 2020 Formal Meeting – 7:00 PM Emma Harvat Hall Iowa City City Hall 410 E. Washington Street AGENDA: 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Discussion of Any Item Not on the Agenda 4. Case Nos. CZ19-05 and SUB19-16 Applicant: CJ Moyna & Sons Location: Fringe Area; West of Oak Crest Hill Rd SE, east of Highway 218 SE, and south of F50 SE a. An application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a rezoning of approximately 32.19 acres of County Residential (R) to County Highway Commercial (CH) and approximately 32.87 acres from County Agriculture (A) to County Commercial (C) in unincorporated Johnson County. b. An application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, an 11-lot commercial subdivision with five outlots in unincorporated Johnson County. 5. Case No. ZCA19-06 Applicant: Phil O’Brien An application submitted by Phil O’Brien requesting an amendment to the zoning code to allow animal related commercial uses in the Commercial Highway (CH-1) zone to allow for the development of a community-based indoor dog park and recreation center at 2513 N. Dodge Street. 6. Case No. DRC19-04 Applicant: Rob Decker, Axiom Consultants Location: 12 E. Court Street An application submitted by Rob Decker requesting a Level II design review, which includes a 7-story bonus height request, for two, 15-story buildings located at 12 E. Court Street. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 10, 2020 7. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: December 5, 2019 8. Planning & Zoning Information 9. Adjournment If you will need disability-related accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact Anne Russett, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5251 or anne-russett@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Upcoming Planning & Zoning Commission Meetings Formal: February 6 / February 20 / March 5 Informal: Scheduled as needed. STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Item: SUB19-16 Date: 01/16/2020 CZ19-05 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Adam Kos CJ Moyna & Sons 24412 Highway 13 Elkader, IA 52043 563-245-1442 AKos@cjmoyna.com Property Owner: Ray Frank, Edmund & Martha Freund, Judith Redeker, & CJ Moyna 24412 Highway 13 Elkader, IA 52043 563-245-1442 AKos@cjmoyna.com Requested Action: Approval of a County rezoning and preliminary plat. Purpose: Development of a commercial subdivision. Location: West of Oak Crest Hill Rd SE, east of Highway 218 SE, and south of F50 SE. Location Map: 2 Size: 65.15 Acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Undeveloped, R – County Residential and A – County Agricultural Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Woodlands – County Residential (R) South: Mobile home park – County Highway Commercial (CH) East: Open space and quarry areas – County Agricultural (A) West: Route 218, open space, woodlands – County Agricultural (A) Comprehensive Plan: NA District Plan: NA Neighborhood Open Space District: NA File Date: December 12, 2019 45 Day Limitation Period: January 27, 2020 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In June, 2019, the applicant submitted a comprehensive plan amendment application to Johnson County to amend the future land use map from Agricultural to Commercial for land located south of Riverside Drive and west of Oak Hill Crest Road. At the time of the application, City staff provided comment to the County Planning and Zoning Commission expressing staff’s concerns related to the request. See Attachment 3. After receiving the memo from City staff outlining concerns related to the proposed FLUM amendment, the Board of Supervisors requested a meeting with the City. On September 23rd, 2019, the applicant, MMS staff, City and County Planning staff, the City Manager, Mayor Throgmorton, Council Member Thomas and Board of Supervisors Rettig and Sullivan, held a meeting to discuss the City’s objection to the County’s future land use map amendment from an Agricultural land use designation to a Commercial land use designation. Although the City objected, land use policy decisions in the unincorporated area are the County’s and the Board of Supervisors adopted an amendment to the future land use map changing the land use designation from Agricultural to Commercial for approximately 60 acres. Subsequent to the adoption of the FLUM amendment, the applicant submitted a rezoning and preliminary plat application. Rezoning: The applicant, CJ Moyna & Sons, has requested rezoning of the parcels identified in Table 1.0 below. The subject properties are located south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive, in unincorporated Johnson County, Fringe Area C – outside of the City’s Growth Area. The City Council will provide a recommendation to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors on the rezoning. 3 Table 1.0 Preliminary Plat: The requested platting would create 11 lots for commercial development, with five outlots. Because the subject property is in the City/County Fringe Area, the subdivision must be approved by the City and by Johnson County. The subdivision must attain approval by the Iowa City Council before action can be taken by the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. With the property located in Fringe Area C – outside of the City’s Growth Area, the proposed subdivision must conform to the City’s Rural Design Standards. The City’s Growth Area terminates north of Riverside Drive. ANALYSIS (Rezoning): Current Zoning: The subject area is currently zoned County Residential (R) in the area north of the proposed Izaak Walton Road SE extension (shown on the plat as Outlot A). This zoning designation allows for single-family dwellings on at least 1-acre sized lots. The remaining balance of the property is zoned County Agricultural (A). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, “The Agricultural District is intended to preserve agricultural resources and protect agricultural land from encroachment of urban land uses. As a matter of policy, it is hereby determined that the highest and best use of these lands is agriculture and that the rural character of these areas be preserved.” Proposed Zoning: A 32.19-acre area north of the Izaak Walton Road SE extension (shown on the plat as Outlot A), is proposed to rezone to County Highway Commercial (CH). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, “The CH District is intended to establish and preserve higher impact commercial areas consisting of shopping centers and commercial strips where customers reach individual business establishments primarily by automobile. The uses permitted are generally high intensity in nature due to the large size of the principal building, high number of employees, and high traffic generators.” The remaining balance of the subject property is proposed to rezone to County Commercial (C). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, “The C District is intended to establish and preserve a business district convenient and attractive for a wide range of retail uses and businesses, government and professional offices, and places of amusement in a setting conducive to and safe for pedestrian traffic. The uses permitted are generally low intensity in nature due to the small size of the principal building, low number of employees, and low traffic generators.” Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Fringe Area Agreement, which a component of Parcel No. Acreage Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 1 32.87 County Agricultural (A) County Commercial (C) 2 0.09 County Residential (R) County Commercial (C) 3 32.19 County Residential (R) County Highway Commercial (CH) 4 the City’s comprehensive plan, states the following: “In the portions of Area C that are not within Iowa City’s growth area and which are zoned for non-farm development, development may occur in conformance with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance and City Rural Design Standards. Until otherwise changed by amending this agreement, this area shall be restricted to those uses consistent with a Rural/Agricultural area as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan, and as designated for a Rural/Agricultural area in Chapter 8:1.6 Class A District of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance as amended.” A rezoning to County Commercial and County Highway Commercial designations opens a wide variety of land uses such as shopping centers, warehousing, storage, restaurants, theaters, taverns, and a variety of retail and service oriented uses. The development of more intense commercial uses conflicts with the intent of the Fringe Area Agreement’s direction to maintain Rural/Agricultural land uses in this area. Based on the utilities and infrastructure needed to service most commercial land uses, City staff recommends that future commercial land use be located within the City’s corporate limits. ANALYSIS (Preliminary Plat): Subdivision Design: The proposed subdivision creates eleven (11) parcels for commercial development, with five (5) outlots. Izaak Walton Road SE, located to the east of the subject property, will extend west into the proposed subdivision. A 31.39-acre outlot (Outlot A) will be located north of the Izaak Walton Road extension. The plat shows Izaak Walton Road SE ending in a cul-de-sac, with a temporary turnaround easement in the southwest corner of Outlot A. The subdivision would create two additional streets, Oakside Road SE, which would stem off Izaak Walton Road SE in a north-south direction. Greenview Road SE would be a new east-west road between Oakside Road SE and Oak Hill Crest Road. The eleven (11) planned lots for development would range between 1 and 3.66 acres in size. Outlot B, located in the subdivision’s far southeast corner, would feature a 2.77-acre lot dedicated to storm water detention. Outlots C and E, respectively feature 4.18 and 3.37 acres of open space. Outlot D contains 0.23 acres of infrastructure for future right-of-way and potential future extension of Oakside Road SE to the south. Overall, City staff found that the subdivision design conformed with the City’s Rural Design Standards. Traffic Implications: The proposed 26’ wide internal streets would meet the minimum 22’ wide requirement from the City’s Rural Design Standards. Staff also noted that an overhead light might be appropriate at the intersection of Oak Crest Hill Road and Izaak Walton Road SE., due to the higher traffic speeds on Oak Crest Hill Road. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subdivision will be required to conform with County regulations pertaining to sensitive areas development. Open space outlots on the southern end of the proposed subdivision will be converted to preservation outlots, per the County’s direction to preserve the stream corridor along the property’s southern end. In addition, the subdivision proposed disturbing 2.67 acres of timber in Outlot A. Johnson County will require protection of off-site woodlands at a ratio of 8:1, equaling 21.36 acres of timber off-site to be put under perpetual protection. Storm Water Management: Stormwater management will be provided by installation of a 2.77-acre stormwater detention basin. Three separate 15’ wide storm sewer utility easements will service the basin, with two points of discharge on the north side of the basin, and one point of discharge in the basin’s southeast corner. 5 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service: Water service to the subdivision will be provided by a public well system, with distribution lines running along the north sides of Izaak Walton Road SE and Greenview Road SE and along the east side of Oakside Road SE, within the public right-of-way. Although it is labeled as a public well, this well will not be maintained by the City of Iowa City. Each lot will utilize individual septic systems, which will be required to conform to the Johnson County Board of Health Rules and Regulations Governing On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems. NEXT STEPS: The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on the rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council. The Council, will then provide a recommendation on the rezoning to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. The City must approve the preliminary plat for the Johnson County Board of Supervisors to take action on the plat. The Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission will have the rezoning and preliminary plat item for consideration on its February agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Rezoning): Based on the adopted policy in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement, staff continues to recommend denial of the CZ19-05, an application to rezone approximately 32,19 acres to County Highway Commercial and approximately 32.96 acres to County Commercial. As was stated earlier, a rezoning to County Commercial and County Highway Commercial designations opens a wide variety of land uses for this area that are not in compliance with the Fringe Area Agreement. The Fringe Area Agreement provides for the creation of a conflict resolution committee in situations where the City and County disagree on land use actions. Staff does not believe that a future conflict resolution committee meeting with Johnson County on this rezoning is necessary, since the City’s concerns over the future land use of the subject property have not changed since the meeting with the County on September 23, 2019. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Preliminary Plat): Staff is recommending approval of SUB19-16, an application for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, as the plat does not present any conflicts with the City’s Rural Design Standards. This recommendation is subject to the County’s approval of the proposed rezoning, which the City does not support. If the County Board of Supervisors does not approve the proposed rezoning, staff would recommend denial of the plat. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Memo to Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission, August 9, 2019 4. Preliminary Plat Approved by: __ ________________________________________________________ Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services BLACKFOOT TRL218SB TOSRIVERSI D E DRFU R NIS H CIR SE I N D I A NTRL FREUNDRDSESANDRDSEWINTE R E A G L E RD SE FOXTRLRED FOXCT SWDANE RD SWNUTWOODDR SWIZAAK WALTON RD SEWINTEREAGLETRLSEMEADOWVIEWLNSWOCEANBLVD SENA V A J OTRL ELKHORNTRLF50SEDAKOTA TRLCHEROKEETRLAPACHETRLO A K C RESTHI LLRDSES RIVERSIDE DRIZAAKWALTON RD D R I F TWOODLNSEF OUNTAIN CT SE S R I V E R S I D E D R T O 2 1 8 N B RIVERBENDRDSEHIG H W AY 218 OSAGE ST SW CAMINODELRIOSELA C I N A D R SW HIG H WA Y 2 1 8 SRIVERSIDEDRTO218SBSUB19-16218 Commercial Parkµ 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Prepared By: Jade PedersonDate Prepared: Dec 2019 An application submitted by Adam Kos on behalf of CJ Moyna for preliminary plat approval for 218 Commercial Park, a 65.15 acre, 11-lot and 5 outlot commercial subdivision located west of Oak Crest Hill Rd SE, east of Hwy 218 SE, and south of F50 SE. Date: August 9, 2019 To: Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission From: Neighborhood and Development Services Department Re: 2019 Fringe Area Future Land Use Map Amendments Introduction and Summary Neighborhood and Development Services staff appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comment on the County Future Land Use Map amendment applications within and near the Fringe Area. Although there is no formal review requirement stipulated in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement, staff appreciates the ongoing coordination with County planning staff on issues in the Fringe Area. This memo outlines the advisory positions of City staff on three County Future Land Use Map amendment applications. The City is currently analyzing long-range planning needs within the Fringe Area, and will need to incorporate any major County land use map amendments into its ongoing analysis. Approach to Analysis In staff’s review of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments, NDS staff: a) Compared the existing land use category to the proposed, including the general intended land uses and the associated density/intensity of development allowed. b) Reviewed the policies in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. c) Identified applicable goals and policies in the City’s comprehensive plan. For amendments proposing more intense land uses (e.g. commercial) that are more appropriate with access to City services and infrastructure, staff reviewed the annexation potential. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27757 of Charlie Ockenfels Application Background The proposed request by Charlie Ockenfels is to change 6.85 acres on the County’s Future Land Use Map from Agricultural to Residential on parcel number 1503253001 (this parcel does not currently have an address). The subject property is located at the southern end of the Oak Crest Hill region, off Indian Lookout Road. The majority of the properties surrounding the subject property are also shown as Agricultural on the County Future Land Use Map, with the exception of the land to the east, which is designated Preservation. Adjacent properties located to the west and north of the subject property feature larger lot residential homes, and have a mixture of zoning between County R-Residential and County A- Agricultural. Figure 1 is a zoning map that shows the location of the proposed amendment in blue. August 9, 2019 Page 2 Figure 1. Location of Proposed Amendment The end of the application packet contains seven copies of a plat outlining the subject parcel, with signatures from adjoining neighbors indicating support of the map amendment to County- Residential (as well as subsequent rezoning and subdivision of the parcel). The section of the application essay titled “Land Use and Map, Proposed South Land Use – Oak Crest Hill Region”, contains some language about how preexisting, lower density residential uses should be preserved, and how potentially similar residential uses could be built in the area east of Oak Crest Hill Road. This section of the application essay seems to be describing the area including the subject property. Analysis Table 1 compares the existing Future Land Use Map category to the proposed amendment. Table 1. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use Category Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Agricultural Residential Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Production & Animal Husbandry); Limited Residential Single-family detached dwellings (1 unit per acre of denser); Can include some non-residential development Residential Development Limited, case by case (no more than 2 acres per dwelling); should be associated with food production or consistent with historic use Limited to locations that can support and accommodate designated Residential densities Max Development Potential Development intensity not specified in the Future Land Use Map Category. 6 Dwelling Units* *Assumes a rezoning to standard County R zoning, with the ability to develop the site to its full build- out potential (not factoring in constraints from sensitive areas). Fringe Area Policy The subject parcel is located in Area “C” of the City’s Fringe Area, outside of the growth area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City’s rural design standards. August 9, 2019 Page 3 City’s Comprehensive Plan The City’s South Central District Plan does not cover the subject area. NDS’s Advisory Position Several large-lot residential land uses can be found to the west of the subject property. Indian Lookout Rd. SE is a paved road that can support demand for residential development. Given these existing conditions, NDS staff does not have concerns with the proposed amendment. Going forward, City staff believes that the County should be mindful of the potential for increased residential density on both the subject parcel and in the immediate surrounding area, in the event that subsequent Future Land Use Map amendment requests are received or ownership of property changes. However, as it relates to the subject property, development beyond 2-3 additional dwelling units will prove challenging due to constraints with sensitive areas. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27759 of Claude Greiner Application Background The proposed request by Claude Greiner is to change the County Future Land Use Map from Agricultural to Residential to allow for future residential development on two parcels equaling 73 acres. Figure 2 shows the subject properties in blue, next to the yellow area identified as Residential on the County Future Land Use Map. Figure 2. Location of Proposed Map Amendment In June of 2019, the Iowa City City Council approved a preliminary plat for a 7-lot subdivision located directly north of the subject properties. The approved subdivision contains a stubbed out street and stormwater detention infrastructure, intended to service both the subdivision to the north and planned development on the subject properties. Analysis There is a moderate degree of existing residential uses to the west along American Legion Road. Additionally, there is some estate housing to the north of American Legion Road. The existing residential land uses are identified on the County’s Future Land Use Map as Residential. While the subject properties would be directly adjacent to the land designated Residential, there are still large August 9, 2019 Page 4 swaths of undeveloped land within this designated area. Table 2 compares the existing land use category with the proposed. Staff anticipates that with a potential rezoning to County- Residential, a full build-out of the properties could yield between 50 and 70 dwelling units. Table 2. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use Category Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Agricultural Residential Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Production & Animal Husbandry); Limited Residential Single-family detached dwellings (1 unit per acre or denser); Can include some non-residential development Residential Development Limited, case by case (no more than 2 acres per dwelling); should be associated with food production or consistent with historic use Limited to locations that can support and accommodate designated residential densities; Max Development Potential Development intensity not specified in the Future Land Use Map Category. 73 Dwelling Units* *Dwelling unit figure based on an assumption of rezoning to County R-Residential zoning, at the maximum build-out of 1 unit per acre. Max build-out does not take into consideration the area needed for the development of roadways and stormwater management. Fringe Area Policy The two subject parcels are located outside of the City’s current Fringe Area, meaning that they are technically not subject to any of the regulations of the Fringe Area Agreement. These properties are; however, located within 2 miles of the City’s jurisdictional boundary. The closest Fringe Area classification can be found to the north and west of the subject parcels, which is Fringe Area B – Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area classification calls for rural/agricultural uses, and road infrastructure must meet the City’s rural design standards. City Comprehensive Planning The City’s Southeast District Plan does not cover the subject properties. However, about one-mile northwest of the County’s designated Residential land use area (see Figure 2), the Southeast District Plan does call for future housing to match what is located on the west side of Taft Avenue (upon improvement of Taft Avenue to City standards, and projected subsequent residential development). The density projected for this area is a low to medium range density, with lot sizes between 5,000 – 8,000 square feet in size (roughly 1/10 to 1/5 of an acre). With continued demand for expansion of the City eastward, it is not unreasonable to assume similar development patterns could eventually abut the County’s designated Residential land use area. NDS’s Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment from Agricultural to Residential. The land use change, and subsequent rezoning and development of the subject properties, could add a generous amount of estate-sized housing to an area that the City has seen outward growth and demand for increased residential growth. There is abundant land (approximately 190 acres) within the County’s designated Residential land use area for County Residential infill development. And finally, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council evaluation of the rezoning of the property to the north of the subject properties was met with some resistance, due to the area’s proposed departure from the agricultural uses prescribed in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. August 9, 2019 Page 5 While the rezoning was ultimately approved, a joint-consult between City and County staff was necessary. The subject application proposes a similar request, but is outside of the area identified for County residential infill development. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27760 of Adam Kos Application Background The proposed request by Adam Kos for a Future Land Use Map amendment is to change 115.37 acres of land designated Agricultural to Conservation Development and Commercial. This proposed amendment area is shown in Figure 3. The subject area currently contains A-Agricultural, R- Residential, and CH-Commercial Highway County zoning. The change in land use designation is intended to support a sizeable mixed commercial, residential, and conservation development project. Figure 3 shows the subject properties within the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment area. The proposed land use designations for each parcel are identified in the table. Figure 3. Location of Proposed Map Amendment August 9, 2019 Page 6 Analysis The application proposes changing the existing Agricultural land use designation to a combination of Commercial and Conservation Development land uses. The area along the northern end of the map amendment, proposed as Commercial, is already zoned R-Residential under the Johnson County zoning ordinance. The County land use plan still shows this area as Agricultural. This area is bordered by County A-Agricultural zoning to the south, Ryerson Woods to the northwest, and City property zoned General Industrial (I-1) to the east. While there is an adjacent intense zone in City I-1 to the east, the South Central District Plan calls for this area to transform to public/private open space in the future, thereby removing any contiguity the subject area might have with an industrial zone. Table 3. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use Category Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Agricultural Commercial Conservation Development Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Production & Animal Husbandry); Limited Residential Retail; Service; Office Protection of sensitive areas Residential Development Limited, case by case (no more than 2 acres per dwelling); should be associated with food production or consistent with historic use NA Permitted, but must use cluster subdivision design (50% open space requirement) Max Development Potential Development intensity not specified in the Future Land Use Map Category. Development intensity not specified in the Future Land Use Category. Up to 50% of acreage not containing sensitive areas could be developed for residential. Fringe Area Policy The subject area is within Fringe Area C – Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City’s rural design standards. Given the envisioned build out for this development, the proposed land use map amendment presents a radical change from the existing County land use designation and from what is prescribed in the City/County fringe area land use policy. City Comprehensive Planning The City’s South Central District Plan does not cover the subject area. However, the plan does call for the land to the east of the proposed commercial area at the project’s northern end to revert to open space. NDS’s Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Commercial map amendment application. While the subject area is outside of the City’s South Central District Plan area, adjacent properties that fall within the plan call for less intense uses, with the southern portion of the Plan area prescribing open space and single- August 9, 2019 Page 7 family residential. Development of Commercial land uses, which could take on a wide variety of ultimate uses, could be out of character with both the current and planned built environments of the subject area. As was previously stated, the proposed development would be a radical departure from what is prescribed in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. Based on the utilities and infrastructure needed to serve a commercial use, City staff recommends that future commercial development be located within the City’s corporate limits. The proposed Commercial area is outside of the City’s growth area; and therefore, annexation will not be contemplated. Additionally, the subject parcels contain several existing sensitive areas that should be left undisturbed, including unwooded wetlands, wooded wetlands, woodlands, highly erodible soils, and steep slopes. Lastly, City staff has general concerns about the viability of such a large-scale development in this location. The Iowa City area has seen construction of several commercial and mixed-use developments in recent years, many of which are located along the I-80 corridor. The remote location of this proposed development, in addition to an already saturated commercial retail market in the area, could prove challenging. Redevelopment of the S&G Materials Sand Quarry for Conservation Development might be appropriate. It is possible that the area might one day benefit from a trail connection to Iowa City’s southern trail network. City staff would like to be a part of any ongoing discussions on the extent of any redevelopment of the area for Conservation Development uses. Conclusion The decision on these amendments is the County’s; however, staff greatly appreciates the opportunity to comment on these proposed amendments. Staff looks forward to continuing coordination with County planning staff on updates to the Fringe Area policy. Date: January 16, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: Amendment to Title 14, Zoning of the Iowa City Code Related to Animal Related Commercial Uses in CH-1 Zones (ZCA19-06) Background on Proposed Amendments The City has been approached by Phil O’Brien regarding future development of a community based dog recreation center located at 2513 N. Dodge St. in Iowa City. The subject location is currently zoned Highway Commercial (CH-1). This zoning designation does not allow animal related commercial establishments, which is the commercial land use that staff feels is most appropriate for the proposed development. Highway Commercial zoning in the subject location fits the directive of the comprehensive plan. However, due to the subject location’s distance from residential zones and adjacency to more intense land uses, staff is supportive of text amendments to the animal related commercial land use that will best fit the proposed development. Background on the Proposed Community Based Indoor Dog Park and Recreation Center The proposed community based indoor dog park and recreation center is planned to be approximately 22,000 square feet in size and feature a full-service restaurant, retail space, pet friendly colab office spaces, rentable meeting spaces, an elevated on-leash dog walking track, over 15,000 square feet of agility and modular space for off-leash activities or custom events, and a dog friendly diving/pool area. Being mostly indoors, with some contained outdoor space and walking trails, the developer maintains that the facility would have minimal impact to any neighborhood businesses in the way of sound or outdoor activities. The developer believes the center will draw from a regional customer base. The developer’s research shows this location as being ideal for the future success of the project. Aside from the recreation center component, these uses described above are allowed by right in a CH-1 zone. Current Regulations Per section 14-4A-4B of the City Code, Animal Related Commercial Uses are defined as commercial services related to the temporary care, medical treatment, or cremation of domestic animals. Uses are divided into two subgroups, general and intensive, based on the intensity of the use, outdoor activity on the site, and the potential for noise and odor related externalities. Table 1.0 provides examples of animal related commercial uses for each subgroup. January 10, 2020 Page 2 Table 1.0 Animal Related Commercial Subgroup: Examples of Uses: General Veterinary clinics; animal grooming establishments; pet crematoriums Intensive Kennels; stables Table 2.0 shows which zones currently allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use or via special exception. Intensive animal related commercial uses are allowed as a provisional use, only in Intensive Commercial, CI-1 zones. Table 2.0 Use Categories Subgroups CO-1 CN-1 CH-1 CI-1 CC-2 CB-2 CB-5 CB- 10 MU Animal Related Commercial General S PR PR PR PR PR Intensive PR The proposed text amendment would not change how stand-alone veterinary clinics, animal grooming establishments, pet crematoriums, kennels, or stables would be regulated. Proposed Code Amendments Staff is proposing to amend the code to allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use in Highway Commercial (CH-1) zones. In addition, staff is proposing to amend the code to allow animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses as allowable provisional general animal related commercial uses. These two additional uses would be allowed in provisionally in CN-1, CH-1, CI-1, CC- 2, CB-2, and CB-5 zones. Both animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses would need to abide by existing additional criteria requiring provisional general animal related commercial uses to be conducted completely indoors, in a soundproofed building. The following definitions are proposed for animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses. Animal Daycare: A nonresidential facility offering care for domestic animals during daytime hours, not during overnight hours. Indoor Animal Recreation: An indoor facility used for the exercise, recreation, or training of domestic animals. Staff is also proposing to amend the code to allow private outdoor animal recreation uses via special exception in CH-1 zones. This amendment is not intended to regulate or otherwise constrain the keeping of household pets, or the development of public recreation facilities such as public dog parks. The special exception process would require all outdoor animal recreation uses to obtain approval from the City’s Board of Adjustment. Staff is proposing the following additional approval criteria to obtain a special exception for outdoor animal recreation uses. 1. Outdoor animal recreation areas must be located at least 400’ from any residential zone. January 10, 2020 Page 3 2. No outdoor animal recreation uses are allowed overnight. 3. All outdoor animal recreation areas must be fully enclosed by a fence that is of sufficient height to prevent animals from escaping. 4. Animals shall not be permitted in an outdoor animal recreation area unless a handler is present. 5. Where outdoor animal recreation facilities are accessed by the public, a double-entry gate is required. 6. All outdoor animal recreation areas must be kept in a clean, dry, and sanitary condition. The following definition is proposed for an outdoor animal recreation use. Private Outdoor Animal Recreation: An outdoor facility used for the exercise, recreation, or training of domestic animals. Rationale for Text Amendments The purpose of the Highway Commercial (CH-1) zone is to permit development of service uses relating to expressways or along arterial roadways. The applicant for the text amendment maintains that the proposed development of a community based indoor dog park and recreation center at 2513 N. Dodge Street will have a regional draw, making the proposed highway adjacent location convenient for the business’ patronage. The majority of the City’s current CH-1 zoning is clustered around N. Dodge Street, to the north and south of the Interstate 80 interchange. Each CH-1 parcel is within 1/3 of a mile of the Dodge Street and Interstate 80 interchange. The map in Figure 1.0 shows how each CH-1 parcel is bordered by either Mixed Use or Commercial Office zoning, which allows for significant distance separation between outdoor animal recreation uses and any residential uses. By requiring that outdoor animal recreation locations obtain a special exception, a public process is put in place to ensure that any concerns posed by residents, workers, and stakeholders are acknowledged. Staff feels that the provisional requirement for soundproofing in buildings with general animal related commercial uses is sufficient for the proposed new uses, animal daycare and indoor animal recreation. Figure 1.0 January 10, 2020 Page 4 Comparison to Peer Zoning Ordinances Table 3.0 shows a comparison of peer zoning ordinances pertaining to animal related services. Staff borrowed certain additional approval criteria from these peer ordinances. City Commercial Use Designation Uses Allowed Applicable Zones Additional Criteria Des Moines Animal Services • Boarding • Grooming • Stable • Veterinary • Industrial • Intense commercial • Mixed-use • Downtown. Outdoor exercise areas must be at least 200’ from residential zones. Cedar Rapids Outdoor animal runs (accessory to Animal & Pet Sales/Service Use) Areas for: • Animal training • Exercise • Recreation • Other activities. • Urban • Traditional • Suburban • Public • Must be 100’ from residential zones • Screened from public ROW • Overnight boarding not permitted outdoors. Davenport Animal Care Facility (Small) • Veterinary • Boarding (Day & Overnight) • Grooming • Training • Commercial • Mixed-Use • Agricultural • 6’ high min. fence height. • Overnight boarding not permitted outdoors. • Animal exercise areas must be sanitary. Next Steps Pending recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council must hold a public hearing to consider the proposed text amendments. Recommendation Staff recommends amending the City Code to allow the following: 1. Allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use in Highway Commercial (CH-1) zones. 2. The creation of animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses as general animal related commercial uses as provisional uses in CN-1, CH-1, CI-1, CC-2, CB-2, and CB-5 zones. 3. Allow outdoor animal recreation uses via special exception in CH-1 zones January 10, 2020 Page 5 Attachments: 1. Applicant Statement on Proposed Development Approved by: _______ __________________________________________ Danielle Sitzman, AICP Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Date: January 16, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, on behalf of the Staff Form-Based Code Committee Re: Level II Design Review – 12 E. Court Street Introduction Staff received a design review application last year, which includes a height bonus request, for the property at 12 E. Court Street. On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review these plans and make a recommendation to the City Council. This memo includes the project background, outlines the height bonus request, generally describes the project, and outlines the specific criteria used in the review. Although the Form- Based Code Committee has determined that the project meets the requirements of the form- based code, this is a discretionary process and staff has identified some concerns. The main concerns are as follows: • The applicant has proposed a skywalk between the two proposed buildings that extends across the proposed Capital Street extension. The skywalk is not supported by staff. • The proposed buildings include fully screened balconies. Although the screens are included for safety reasons, staff is concerned that the fully screened balconies will detract from the visual appearance of the buildings and does not support the balconies. • The plans include a proposed design for the Capital Street extension, which staff does not support. Staff recommends that the proposed right-of-way be redesigned to City specifications. Background In April 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning of approximately 3.41 acres of land located at 12 E. Court Street from the High Density Multi- Family Residential (RM-44) zone to the Riverfront Crossings – South Downtown (RFC-SD) zone subject to conditions related to the dedication of right-of-way along Capital Street, streetscape improvements, and additional review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In September 2018, the City Council adopted the rezoning subject to conditions related to the following [Attachment 1]: 1. Dedication of the Capital Street right-of-way; 2. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level II design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council; 3. Build the Capital Street right-of-way to City specifications; 4. Streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment; 5. Satisfaction of the affordable housing requirements; 6. Compliance with the building footprints shown for this area in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; 7. Development of a landscaped interior courtyard on the eastside of the project site; 8. Approval by the City Manager of the owner’s architect team; and 9. If requesting bonus height, that the project “demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood”. January 9, 2020 Page 2 Projects located in Riverfront Crossings zoning districts are subject to design review by the staff Form-Based Code Committee. The Form-Based Code Committee’s responsibility is ensuring that the plans comply with the form-based regulations. Staff received a complete application for design review in July 2019, which included a request for a height bonus. This request not only requires review by staff, but also by the Planning and Zoning Commission due to the rezoning condition, and the City Council. Bonus Height Request The applicant has requested seven stories of bonus height for two proposed 15 story, mixed - used buildings. The base maximum height in the RFC-SD zone is eight stories, but the maximum bonus height allowed is 15 stories through the discretionary design review process. The building height bonus provisions in the form-based code for Riverfront Crossings create an incentive for developers to incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objectives of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Requests for bonus height are reviewed by the Form-Based Code Committee through the Design Review process. Up to two stories of bonus height may be approved administratively by staff. Height bonus requests above two stories or transfer of development right requests (e.g. public right-of-way) must be approved by City Council through the Level II design review process. As is shown in Table 1, the applicant is requesting seven stories of bonus height for both the west and east buildings by meeting the approval criteria for public right-of-way height transfers, historic preservation height transfers, and bonus height for student housing as set forth in 14- 2G-7G of the zoning code. Table 1. Summary of Bonus Height Request West Building East Building Request Type Bonus Height Request Type Bonus Height Public Right-of-Way Height Transfer Floors 9-14 Public Right-of-Way Height Transfer Floors 9-14 Historic Preservation Height Transfer Floors 14-15 Historic Preservation Height Transfer n/a Student Housing Floor 15 Student Housing Floor 15 In addition to the specific approval criteria, the code also requires that that all proposals must demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. See Attachment 2 for the applicant’s submission to the Form-Based Code Committee, which includes building elevations and renderings, site plan, landscaping plans, and floor plans. Attachment 3 includes additional perspectives provided by the applicant General Description of the Project The two buildings are proposed on a sloping site between Burlington and Court Street s along the proposed extension of Capital Street west of the Voxman Music Building. See Figure 1. January 9, 2020 Page 3 Figure 1. Location of Proposed Project West Building The west building is proposed west of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15-story building will include 492 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor (and a portion of the basement level) of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street, as well as some residential units that face the main courtyard area and alley. The non-residential uses include a proposed office use along Court Street, a retail use at the intersection of Burlington and Capital Streets and academic amenity space along Capital Street. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. In terms of recreational amenities, the plans show a half basketball court, a track, a jacuzzi area, and an outdoor pool deck along Burlington Street. Trash and recycling areas are provided on each floor and small community study areas (approximately 220 square feet) are provided on floors 4-15. The plans also show that the on- site parking and open space requirements have been met. Specifically, the code requires 239 vehicle parking spaces and 241 are proposed. The plans also include spaces for scooter and bicycle parking. In terms of open space, the plans show that 15,037 square feet of open space will be provided through the provision of one large, landscaped, public courtyard; two smaller, landscaped, public forecourts, and two smaller, private courtyards. The main courtyard space extends from Capital Street west to the alley behind the building. It is 48 feet wide and is open for the first three stories of the building. See Figures 2 and 3 for more information on the proposed open space areas. Two additional private courtyard spaces are provided along the alley side of the building and two, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. Table 2 provides a summary of the west building. January 9, 2020 Page 4 Figure 2. Overview of Open Space Areas Blue areas indicate public open space and green areas indicate private open space. Figure 3. East Perspective of the West Building Public Courtyard January 9, 2020 Page 5 Table 2. West Building Summary Proposed Required/Allowed Stories 15 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 492 n/a Bedrooms 953 n/a Vehicle Parking 241 239 Bicycle Parking 278 271 Open Space 15,037 sq ft 9,530 sq ft Office 3,649 sq ft n/a Retail 1,699 sq ft n/a Flex Space (non-residential) 1,473 sq ft n/a Recreational Amenities 16,996 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,211 sq ft n/a East Building The east building is proposed east of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15-story building will include 426 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street. This includes a proposed office space at the corner of Burlington and Capital Streets, academic spaces along Capital Street, and a retail use at the Capital and Court Street intersection. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. No recreational spaces are provided within the east building; however, it includes a 3,623 square foot restaurant on the 15th floor. The plans demonstrate that the requirements related to on-site parking and open space are met. The code requires 205 vehicle parking spaces and the plans show 208 vehicle spaces, as well as parking for scooters and bicycles. Similar to the west building, the plans show that public and private open space requirements will be met through landscaped forecourts and courtyards. Specifically, the main public courtyard area extends from Capital Street east to the alley and two other smaller, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. See Figure 2, above, for more detail on the proposed open space areas. Table 3 provides a summary of the east building. Table 3. East Building Summary Proposed Required/Allowed Stories 15 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 426 n/a Bedrooms 820 n/a Vehicle Parking 208 205 Bicycle Parking 246 244 Open Space 10,332 sq ft 8,200 sq ft Office 9,134 sq ft n/a Retail 1,473 sq ft n/a Restaurant 3,623 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,824 sq ft n/a Materials The applicant has proposed a variety of materials for both buildings, including metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete. Along the first floor of Capital Street the applicant has proposed an artistic component in the form of a graphic panel behind metal screens near building entrances. The renderings show the metal screen with plantings growing up them and the lighted graphic panels behind the screens. See Figure 4. January 9, 2020 Page 6 Figure 4. Metal Panels with Graphic Panels along Capital Street In addition, the applicant has proposed balconies. Due to safety concerns with balconies incorporated into such a large student housing project, the applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies with a perforated panel and a metal screen. The applicant has provided staff with material samples, which staff will bring to the Commission’s meeting. Skywalk The applicant has proposed a connection between the east and west buildings via a skywalk, which is located at the fourth floor between the open courtyard area and Burlington Street. Capital Street Right-of-Way The applicant’s plans also show the proposed public right-of-way for Capital Street. The plans show a 100-foot right-of-way, which includes 12.5-foot walkways on both sides of Capital Street, two 12.5-foot travel lanes and angled parking. The plans also show planter boxes along both sides of Capital Street and a pedestrian crosswalk aligned with the main courtyards of each building. Specific Approval Criteria Public Right-of-Way Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a public right-of-way height transfer the applicant must dedicate land (the sending site) that is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. In this case, the applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way to re-open Capital Street between Burlington and Court Streets. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the area of the right-of-way to be dedicated multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way that will result in the re- opening of Capital Street per the executed conditional zoning agreement. Based on the amount of right-of-way that will be dedicated the applicant has enough square footage from the sending site (i.e. the proposed ROW) to transfer that development potential to the proposed buildings. In total, the applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 square feet of the ROW development potential to the two buildings. The extension of Capital Street is also envisioned in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and also identified as a primary street on the regulating plan that was adopted as part of the Riverfront Crossings Form-Based Code. January 9, 2020 Page 7 That said, staff does not support the proposed design of the Capital Street right-of-way. Specifically, the applicant has proposed angled parking, which staff recommends be changed to parallel parking. Staff would also like to see the width of the travel lanes reduced. The incorporation of parallel parking will ensure consistency with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Reducing the width of the travel lanes and incorporating parallel parking will ensure consistency with the City’s recent street reconstruction projects, like Washington Street in downtown. Furthermore, the conditional zoning agreement requires that the applicant build the Capital Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer. The current design does not align with the City’s expectations. Lastly, staff does not support the proposed skywalk across Capital Street that connects the two buildings. Staff is concerned that it could block views of the Old Capital and potentially divert activity away from the street-level. Historic Preservation Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a historic preservation height transfer the applicant must transfer development potential from an Iowa City historic landmark to a receiving site. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the acreage of the sending site multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant previously supported the designation of the Tate Arms building as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. In 2015, the City Council approved the transfer of a portion of the development potential of the sending site (i.e. Tate Arms) to an adjacent property. As part of this previous agreement, the applicant rehabilitated the Tate Arms building. The current request is to transfer the remaining potential of the Tate Arms building, 27,400 square feet, to 12 E. Court Street. Student Housing Up to 5 floors of additional building height may be granted for projects that are ideally located and designed to provide a high-quality living environment for college students. Student housing height bonus requests must also meet the following criteria: Location Criteria: 1. Projects must be located on land that is within the University Subdistrict, South Downtown Subdistrict, or the West Riverfront Subdistrict; and 2. Is within one thousand feet (1,000') walking distance along public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus. Management, Design And Amenity Criteria: 1. An enforceable plan for on site management and security must be submitted to and approved by the City; 2. For projects with 200 or more bedrooms, professional 24 hour on site management and security must be provided. A professionally staffed management office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the building; 3. Interior and exterior usable shared open space must be provided with amenities that create a high quality living environment for students. The management plan must include adequate provisions for management, maintenance, and security of such spaces; 4. A secure bicycle parking/storage area shall be provided and maintained within the building or parking garage; 5. The owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City codes; 6. The City reserves the right to inspect the property to verify compliance with these provisions. January 9, 2020 Page 8 Staff Findings: The project meets the location criteria. It is located within the South Downtown subdistrict, right across the street from the University of Iowa Campus. As for the management plan, the applicant has submitted a management plan that has been reviewed by the City, including the Police Department [Attachment 4]. The Police Department is comfortable with the direction provided by the applicant to date; however, there are several details to work out. These details include confirmation of camera coverage at points of egress, ingress, common areas, public areas, and businesses; exact protocols for the Police Department accessing video; protocols for timely repairs to the video systems; as well as staffing requirements. In terms of staffing, staff recommends at least three security personnel providing security 24/7. Staff recommends a final administrative review and approval of the management plan, which must include these details, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Although the plans show the provision of academic amenity space in both the west and east buildings, the plans lack detail on how this amenity space creates a high-quality living environment for students. Staff recommends that the applicant provide more justification on the amenity spaces. More specifically, is the amount and type of amenity spaces proposed adequate based on today’s student’s needs and the size of the project? In addition, staff does not support the proposed balconies on a student housing project of this scale. The applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies; however, staff is concerned with the visual appearance of fully screened balconies, especially with the metal and wiring solutions that have been presented. The fully enclosed balconies could detract from the higher quality components of the building and still allow for minor nuisances (e.g. noise, debris). The plans demonstrate compliance with the number of required on-site bicycle parking. The bicycle parking provided within the parking garage is secured with a fence enclosure around the bike parking. Staff recommends that this fencing be chain-link or some other non-opaque material for safety reasons. The City will require and ensure that the applicant obtain a rental permit prior to occupancy. Rezoning Conditions In addition to reviewing the project against the bonus height criteria, staff also reviewed the project against the following rezoning conditions: • Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Figure 5 shows the image referenced in this rezoning condition. The master plan shows four U-shaped buildings along the Capital Street extension. Staff determined that this condition has been met. Figure 6 shows the comparison of the master plan footprints with the proposed footprints provided in the development plans. Combining the west and east buildings, the plans show 139 linear feet more along the exterior building walls (an increase of 5%) and 2,977 more square feet (an increase of 4.8%). January 9, 2020 Page 9 Figure 5. Image from Page 61 of the Plan, Looking South Figure 6 also helps illustrate that the master plan contemplated four buildings, while the proposal includes two buildings. The proposed plans include a connection at the fourth floor, which results in two buildings, but allows for the public courtyards to extend to the western and eastern edges of the property. Figure 7 shows the proposed connection at the fourth floor above the public courtyard area. See also Figure 3 for the rendering showing the courtyard, which includes the proposed landscaping, amenities, and artistic components. Figure 6. Footprint Comparison – Master Plan v. Proposed Plan January 9, 2020 Page 10 Figure 7. East Elevation of West Building • Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa’s Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Staff determined that this condition has also been met. The plans for the east building show an interior courtyard that extends and is open from Capital Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building. • In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form-Based Code, any request for bonus height shall “demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood”. Staff Findings: The buildings will be constructed of steel and concrete. The proposed materials include metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete, which are approval materials per the form-based code. The buildings will have extensive window and door openings, which meet the fenestration requirements of the form-based code. Despite the sloping nature of the site, all entrances from Burlington, Clinton, and Court Streets are designed at-grade. The window and door openings, as well as the at-grade entrances help create a more walkable and inviting environment. To break up the façade, the buildings are stepped back along Burlington, Court, and Capital Streets. Along Capital Street, the building stepbacks are deeper at the southern end and narrow toward Burlington Street. The stepbacks meet the requirement of at least a 10-foot stepback above the fifth story. In addition, the forecourt and courtyard openings, in combination with the vertical and horizontal articulation help to create a visually appealing façade. The open spaces along Capital Street also help to keep visual interest. These spaces are open to the public and provide open seating areas and are fully landscaped. The project is located on a sloping site between the Voxman Music Building and a recent 8-story residential project at 316 E. Madison Street. To the south of the project site is the Johnson County Courthouse. Although there are no other buildings of this scale in the immediate vicinity, the City Council adopted the form- based code to help incentivize redevelopment in Riverfront Crossing by allowing up to 15 stories through a discretionary process. January 9, 2020 Page 11 Role of the Commission Typically, the Planning and Zoning Commission is not involved in the design review process. However, since a Level II design review is required, the adopted conditional zoning agreement requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. Recommendation Based on the information provided by the applicant, as described above, the Staff Form-Based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the requirements of the Riverfront Crossings Form-Based Code. Although it meets the technical requirements of the code, awarding the bonus height is at the sole discretion of the City Council. Furthermore, staff recommends the following modifications and details: 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re-design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. Attachments: 1. Conditional Zoning Agreement 2. Applicant’s Submittal to the Form-Based Code Committee 3. Additional Perspective Provided by the Applicant 4. Applicant’s Management Plan Prepared by: Sylvia Bochner, Planning Intern,410 E.Washington Street, Iowa City,IA 52240;319-356-5240 REZ18-00014) Ordinance No. 18-4765 An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 3.41 acres from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44) zone to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC-SD) zone located at 12 E. Court Street. (REZ18-00014) Whereas, the applicant, 100-500 LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located at 12 E. Court Street from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict RFC-SD); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that this property is appropriate for redevelopment of high density multifamily housing that contributes to a pedestrian friendly streetscape;and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions addressing the need for compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan including dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street;and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner and applicant has agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now,therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44)to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict(RFC-SD): ALL OF LOT 5,ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY,JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF.ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY,JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF.ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1,2, 3,4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. Section II.Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 18-4765 Page 2 Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication,as provided by law. Passed and approved this 4th day of September 2018. M OR ATTEST: Al ii' C TY CLERK A de / /j J fi D !0 City Attorneys Office Ordinance No. 18-4765 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Vacant—Botchway seat X Cole X Mims X Salih X Taylor X Thomas X Throgmorton First Consideration 08/21/2018 Voteforpassage: AYES: Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas,Throgmorton. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Vacant-Botchway seat. Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date published 09/13/2018 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. Prepared by:Sylvia Bochner,Planning Intern,410 E.Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240(319)356-5240(REZ18-00014) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation hereinafter"City")and 100-500, L.L.C. (hereinafter"Owner"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 3.41 acres of property located at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the Owner has requested the rezoning of said property from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC- SD); and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, including dedication of right of way and the construction of Capitol Street and streetscape enhancements on Burlington Street, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need for dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street and streetscape improvements on Burlington Street; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. 100-500 LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as ALL OF LOT 5,ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT ppdadntlagt/rezl8-000D14 cm pentacrest gardens81818.doe 1 THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any new development of the subject property, Owner shall; Submit and obtain the City's Manager's written approval of a phasing plan for the development. The plan shall include dates by which Owner shall dedicate right of way to the City of sufficient width, as determined by the City, to facilitate the reestablishment of Capitol Street. In no event shall dedication of the Capitol Street Right of Way occur more than 36 months after issuance of the initial building permit, and in no event shall completion of the Capitol Street improvements occur more than 24 months after dedication of the right of way. ii. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level II design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. b. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in said phasing plan or an amendment thereto, Owner shall dedicate the Capitol Street Right of Way to the City and build the Capitol Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property. c. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property, Owner shall install streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment on Burlington Street and Court Street, as described in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. d. Owner shall satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the provision of on-site owner-occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on-site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City in an affordable housing agreement entered into prior to issuance of a building permit for development of any portion of the above-described property. e. Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. f. Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a level II design review process. ppdadrragt/rez18-000014 cza pentacrest gardens81618.doc 2 g. The owner's architect team must have demonstrated experience to the City's reasonable satisfaction with both: 1) high-quality urban design; and, 2) large-scale student housing and/or residence halls (exterior and interior). The owner shall submit the qualifications of the architect team to the City Manager prior to the design review process to ensure this condition is met. The City Manager must confirm compliance with this condition in writing prior to the commencement of the design review process. h. In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form-Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. The Owner and City acknowledge that in the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. The parties acknowledge that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. 7. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 8. The Owner acknowledges that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 9. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 4th day of September 2018. City of Iowa City J' Throgmorton, ayor By: Attest: a r otr- Waft/act/mile-000014 cza pentacrest gardens81618.doc 3 Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk By: A roved by: Lia. 1/42- TullllolityAttorney's Office City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on l..r 9 , 2042, by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Lb O 5 Notary Public i nd for the Stawa ri VV S.MAYER Stamp or Seal) co My cornritur& Wes Title (and Rank) Lia.¢"Se Speci- 1 / 100-500, L.L.C. Acknowledgment: State of ),,;.zL County of Scr1 This record was acknowledged before me on 8 116, ) K (Date) by Sarntes A.0Ice r1C (Name(s) of individual(5) as 0 u:ne r type of authority, such as member)of 100-500, L.L.C. Notary Public in and f the State of Iowa Stamp or Seal) erwi KELl1E K.FRUE ow lCm'respt E> 19 Title (and Rank) S a My commission expires: ppdaddagtrez18-000014 czs pentacrest gardens81818.doc 4 WEST BUILDING EAST BUILDING COURT STREET BURLINGTON STREET CAPITOL STREET SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 VICINITY MAP KEY PLAN ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 INDEX OF DRAWINGS CODE REVIEW G001W TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING SHEET 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 12 EAST COURT IOWA CITY, IOWA DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 WEST BUILDING SITE LOCATION 12 E COURT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA General Information Residential Unit Count Units Beds Efficiency 99 99 1-Bed 93 93 2-Bed 163 326 3-Bed 149 (29.5%)447 Total 504 965 Motor Vehicle Parking Count Required 242 Provided Car Stalls 218 Scooter Stalls 24 (10%) Total 242 Bike Parking Count 1 stall for first 50 residential units, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units Required 50 + (1/2 x 454)= 277 Provided Interior 240 Exterior 38 278 Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" 2'-0" at Court Street 5'-0" (+/-) at Capitol Street Rear 5'-0" 5'-0" Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25'-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Flex Glazing between 2 and 10 feet above adjacent ground Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedroom Required 965 beds x 10 sq.ft. per bedroom 9,650 sq.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W1 1,807 sq.ft. Forecourt W2 2,367 sq.ft. Courtyard W1 1,690 sq.ft. Courtyard W2 2,286 sq.ft. Courtyard W3 6,950 sq.ft. 15,100 sq.ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min)See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right-of-Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 10 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 11 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 12 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 13 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 14 27,822 sq.ft. 10,954 sq.ft. 128,280 sq.ft.150,064 sq.ft. Historic Preservation Height Transfer Tate Arms House landmark status = 34,800 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area 7,400 sq.ft. previously used 27,400 sq.ft. transfered to west building 34,800 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 14 27,822 sq.ft. 16,868 sq.ft. 15 27,822 sq.ft. 10,532 sq.ft. 27,400 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 0.62 floors or 17,290 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 27,822 sq.ft. 17,290 sq.ft. PRESENTATION G001W TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING SHEET L001W LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C100W CIVIL PLAN A100W LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS 243 C001W E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN G002W SITE DIAGRAMMING L001W LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C100W CIVIL PLAN A100W LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS C001W E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 with subordinate Forecourt 241 23 220 283 50 333 A100W LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN C100W CIVIL PLAN A100W LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS C001W E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN C100W CIVIL PLANC001W L001W LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN2 241 4 953 9,530 Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" 2'-0" at Court Street 5'-0" (+/-) at Capitol Street Rear 5'-0" 5'-0" Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25'-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Flex Glazing between 2 and 10 feet above adjacent ground Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedroom Required 965 beds x 10 sq.ft. per bedroom 9,650 sq.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W1 1,807 sq.ft. Forecourt W2 2,367 sq.ft. Courtyard W1 1,690 sq.ft. Courtyard W2 2,286 sq.ft. Courtyard W3 6,950 sq.ft. 15,100 sq.ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right-of-Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 27,822 sq.ft.27,822 sq.ft. 10 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 11 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 12 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 13 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 14 27,822 sq.ft. 10,954 sq.ft. 128,280 sq.ft. 150,064 sq.ft. Historic Preservation Height Transfer Tate Arms House landmark status = 34,800 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area 7,400 sq.ft. previously used 27,400 sq.ft. transfered to west building 34,800 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 14 27,822 sq.ft. 16,868 sq.ft. 15 27,822 sq.ft. 10,532 sq.ft. 27,400 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 0.62 floors or 17,290 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 27,822 sq.ft. 17,290 sq.ft. with subordinate Forecourt 4 953 9,530 Building Amenity Interior Academic 9,211 sq.ft Interior Recreation 16,215 sq.ft. Exterior 16,996 sq.ft 42,422 sq.ft 239 492 87 87 953 442 271 228 278 (30%) 492 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 (23 car stalls will be designed as 69 scooter stalls) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 2,275 2,356 1,660 1,796 15,037 A205W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN A206W ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN G002E SITE DIAGRAMMING 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 South Downtown District Plan diagram from p. 61 of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Masterplan with the 12 East Court site outlined in red. Project FOOTPRINT TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 62,530 SQ. FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 64,906 SQ. FT MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 55' 60' 45' 60' 55' 45' 45' A B NARRATIVE THESE DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO, AND IMPROVES UPON, THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHOWN IN THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN. 46'-8" 46'-8" 46'-8" 140'-0" 108'-0" 46'-8" 46'-8" 46'-8" 140'-0" 388'-0" 60'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 38'-0" 70'-0" 160'-0" 50'-0" 158'-0" 368'-0" 67'-0" 45'-0" 142'-0" 104'-0" 45'-0" 65'-0" 142'-0" 388'-0" 60'-0" 45'-0" 55'-0" 55'-0" 45'-0" 60'-0" 160'-0" 48'-0" 160'-0" 368'-0" 32'-0" 30'-0" KEY A SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. B ENLARGED VIEW OF THE SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. C GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE MASTER PLAN. D GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE LOWER FLOORS 1-3 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. E DASHED OUTLINE OF THE UPPER FLOORS 4-15 OF THE EAST AND WEST BUILDINGS. F BOLD OUTLINE ILLUSTRATING THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONT CAPITOL STREET. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DECREASES THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONTS CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. G. GREEN SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING EXTERIOR COURTYARDS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR OPEN SPACE ALONG CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. H RED DASHED LINE INDICATING THE SUN PATH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE UPPER FLOORS AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE PULLED BACK FROM CAPITOL STREET TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT AT STREET LEVEL AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. H F E D E D C F F F H G 1W 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 40'-0" 48'-0" EAST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,328 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,340 SQ. FT. WEST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,468 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 33,190 SQ. FT. EAST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,361 LINEAR FT. (2.5% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,108 SQ. FT. (1% UNDER MASTER PLAN) WEST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,574 LINEAR FT. (7.2% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 36,399 SQ. FT. (9.6% OVER MASTER PLAN) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 -- \\ i. '   ,P 6 rL _J ---c il  L -6 I I �_'  Ii 'I �,, /=; ' 1-�,�'�_."='�:7 �L- PVC +h" ; -I □ I---�I J11 /7/    CCH 1 iL ASB12 PJS493 VDC15 '(6 21 CC6 2 voe 24 f I -T D1i 11 �- n '(6 28   3 A 6 %WL 20 I l NWL43 %W#6 35 VMP137 CLV165 HPH4 HBB2HFW  H 4 B 6 W 4BB 2*$P 131 AP 4 C#*6 143*$P 131 7 HPH8 'I I I   0B6 +++ P!(6 450 HBB 5 4 6 PCS32 HBB8 HGH18 HBB1 HPH18& /C 6 PCS32& /C 6 P*C 3 PC(6 32 P*C 3 H6 14 32 P*C I f fl I I I I I ' I III I I kI' 11" \. I I ----+- 1 PC(6 23)6 1 (PD 45 2 cs 24 L 12(PD 36"C 2 PC(6 20T6 3 (PD 21 PC 34"6 2%W 19 (B 4 PC 18 --T 3 / /��/ /� �1 µ�////£� L /J////J////��/ L /� ,- OH3  CKF 78 PC(6 32 P*C 6 16  H + W 6 Fir� \ l I ' ' P*C 3 PC(6 32 H6 10 P$6 12 P!(6 424 HBB2 P$6 12  % .T W 1 C#*6 134 C 2 D 6 *$P 57*$P 99 [ I 30 I '1 1 IA�BI 0 HBB 1 H 5 6   HPH 614*$P 102 C#*6 143 CPD 4 ߰ *$P 75 HPH 10W 1 HBB 4 HW 5 ■ ■ ■ · .. "-��---_-/:... �= = c   □. ' \\ 7/ II C¥ -T/ ■ I / ■I .. ··�; 0 7 i I 18 I PH$6 18 )C6 28 BA 2 C'6 2 ((6 17 I 0 10 20 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY BOTANICAL NAME)2F )UWpSrb}Wg )I* )gWfRhU_bWr^qRha\jrR)~gh*paeebRhUW ++4 +rR~RWS}Ur}SRffafhWpga} 3.G +WqUa}URhRVWh}a} +9/ +ReRgRnqj}~a}RUb]jrR9Rre0jWr}Wr +:P +jhRefRraRgRcRfb} +D4 +Web}DUUaYXhRea} +F- +jrh}Rf~WphbYlebR 2*) 2ahd^jTbejTR)gh2jeV 2*F 2ahd^jTbejTRFrbhUW~jhIWh~p 29+ 2ghjUfRV}VbjbU}.}msW}}j8/I 2K7 2eWVb~}bR~pbRURh_j}bhWpgb}IdfahW 4** 4VrRh^WRmRhaUfRR7<PD*D 40Q 4j}R}bWTjeVbRhR/pRhUW}QbefbRg} 424 4j}ReRhUbYjeaR 4F5 4j}RFR~raj~ 4GI 4WgWrjURffb}GTIWfeR ;KL :apajVWhVrjhebmWqR @IL A}RIeR~aUR-RaVDVjg @Q; AWmRRrRUWgj}RQRedWr}=j DP4 D}~|ar^bhaRhR F+I FRhbUgap^Rg+_WWhhWId F04 FWhha}W~gRfUjmWUrjbVW}5RgWeh F4? FRhbUgap^Rg4WR?WRe F8I FRU_}RhVrRKWrgahRfa} FP+ FRx`WhjUa}}}obhoWZjebRLpjda G)2 G_}RpjgR~aUR2rjej I2I Igm_jpaURpmj}x VjjrWhTj}}ab9jeg^RfR IF ImjpjTje}_WWrjfWma} K+2 KsRVW}URhbR+jhUjrV2pRmW P-+ PaTphgjmf}BRhg P?F PahURgbkjp COMMON NAMEFRiWrTRrd?RieW )~gh*rbfeaRhUWIWzaUWTWrr L_jgeW}}+jUd}ir5R_jrh .R}~WphGWVTV 9Rrf0jWp}Wr0WR~_WpGWWV2pR}} ;aejY~_WPReeW +jggjh4RUdTWrr FR^jVR-j^jjV )~gh2jeV2ahd^j FrahUWjhIWhr2ahd^j .}mpW}}j9WhUd+j[WW~rWW IdebhW5jhWfjU} *jTj4VrRh^WR /rRhUW}QbeeaRg}5j}~R 2pWWh5j}~R FR~rbj~4j}R GTIWefR-Reae LeamLpWW )YWpTphWpLmWej QRedWr}=j+R~gbh .R}~Wy6jm4jrhTWRg +_WWhhWIdIa~U_^pR}} 4RgWeh-RrY0jh~Rah2rR}} 4WR?WReIaU_^pR}} 8RmRhW}WImp^W GWVQRefPbr^bhaR+rWWmWr 2pjfj/rR^pRh~IgRU 2RfRIhjTWts FqRbpaW-ujm}WWV +jhUjpV2pRmWImaVW{jr -Rw.rjmWRh+pRhTWpvT}_ FWrbahdfW SIZE REMARKS SPACING QUANTITY# +ReaiWp PRraW} " # +ReamWp PRraW} ߰߰ # +ReaiWp PRraW} ! 1.5" +ReamWp PRraW} #  +jh ' "(( % +jh ߰ #'# ߰ +ReamWp Varies % 1.5" +ReamWp Varies & ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} " ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ! ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ' ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ' # +jh "' #  +jh "' ߰%  +jh ߰" ߰"  +jh ߰" ('  +jh ߰" '߰ ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ߰ ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} "  +jh ߰" #& ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} %  +jh ߰" &(  +jh ߰" "#  +jh ߰" # % +jh ߰ ߰&%  +jh !% % ߰"! #2Rf % ' # +jh ! !"  +jh ' ߰"  +jh ߰" #% # +jh ! % % +jh ߰ &'# ߰V&68]-&]O3V/&OV, Jqzo}~F}}߰uy  .p'xxrUrSeet 9Zvr 8pCity, :p  !rr;Zwr *rGwr:p  &OJ[eA^߰J^[ &<j=B/J4=J//V !l:PG'PKZfC_!K`Z  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:!  EJ,[&߰S/߰V&68c/&] W:aA!L+@f:R.X  Zm'!GPX.G.nL:K.! k!b.WDPP:!  {g&]gYA/J48J//V LKk.K5:K..X:L5  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:!  F/S/J4<J//V !l:PG'PKZfC^!KaZ  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:#  TVO?/&]J߰F/ 12 EAST COURT OER$>>,  .pZ|swt 8p'w:p  TVO?/&]JO 8[[g/ ,߰c/ ,/[&V=T]8OJ u 1 u I 1 : uD c z 0 u z 0 z z c : I z  *.Z:5LX.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PL  *.Z:5LW.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PL  +.Z:5KX.i:0kZf$G:ZZ:PK  +.Z:5KX.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PK  +0Z:5KX.i:0kZf$G:ZZ:PK (M1hH"NNIQN\QN>N) U"9ulhorized opying, diacDl.n or mm1t wthout wrltn p1nniln by Nau1111nn Morn Inc. is prohibit. PRELIMINARYCEM1EH,ECJMHO,N7EC [7//cJ߰F/ LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANS & SCHEDULE [72/cJeF%/V L002 UP UP UP UP UP 380.00' 380.00' 149.22'100.00'127.15' 130.00' 25.01' 250.00' 152.14'100.00'150.70' 380.00' 0 10 20 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS 319.519.6220 PROJECT NAME OWNER PROJECT NO. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 18-0003 C001 SITE PLAN JUNE 11, 2019 12 E. COURT ST DESIGN REVIEW APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 42.6637' 10' SETBACK 2' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 108' BLDG-BLDG 55' 26.5' 26.5' 15' 25' 15' 5' SETBACK CAPITOL STREET N CAPITOL STREETN CAPITOL STREET A SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. PAINTED CROSSWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. PROPOSED STAIRS. PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION B C D E F G 140' 50' ALLEY (20') H 50' ALLEY (20') ALLEY (20') A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B D E E E E E F F F F G G 11 11 11 11 46.67' 46.67' 46.67' 160' 60' 60' 50' 50' 160' 46.67' 46.67' 46.67' 140' 12' 60.58' 70' 33.75' 46.67' 46.67' 40' 41.67' 9' H H H H H H H H H H C C C E BURLINGTON STREET E COURT STREET 100' ROW 4' 5' 12.5' 4' 5' 12.5' RAMP TO LOWER LEVEL REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 48' LEGEND: PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE PUBLIC GREEN SPACE JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 I J K K K I I I I I I J J NOTES: 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND PLANTINGS. SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 E 8.13' 7.51' 10' SETBACK 4' 2' SETBACK 50' 70' 160' 48' 50' 40' 46.67' 4' 2' SETBACK OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 2' L L L 6.7' F F F F F F F F F F DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 C2 A211W C2 A211W 8642 639'-9"640'-9" DN UP UP A2 A211W A2 A211W 5'-0"135'-0"70'-0" 38'-0" 140'-0" PARKING STAIR A203WC1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 368'-0" C2 A211W C2 A211W STAIR ELEV. 8642 MOPED PARKING UP DN DN DN 646'-6" 640'-9"639'-9" COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W 5'-0"135'-0" 140'-0" COMPACT 20'-0"90'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"38'-0"70'-0" MOPED PARKING STAIR ELEV. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A100W LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS 7.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 7.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS 8.28.2019 N 1/16" = 1'-0"A4 LOWER LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0" A1 MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN N 136 135 134 132 133 146 144 147 145 151 149 153 156 155 158 157 159 163 161 169 167 173 171 176 175 177 179 178 77 80 79 82 81 83 84 168 166 172 170 174 180 182 76 78 160 164 162 165 154 123 124 121 122 114 113 110 111 107 109 105 99 106 108 104 96 98 103 150 148 152 129 131 127 128 130 126 142 141 143 140 137 138 139 94 90 92 87 88 86 85 95 6 93 91 89 112 185 189 187 191 190 192 193 186 188 219 220 217 209 218 216 208 204 206 214 212 210 202 198 200 196 197 195 194 205 207 203 201 199 215 213 211 184 75 97 102 101 100 115 117 119 116 118 120 125 181 183 TYPICAL PARKING STALL: 18'-0" X 9'-0" SPACE NUMBER LABELS: 9'-0" 18'-0" # TYPICAL COMPACT PARKING STALL: 15'-0" X 9'-0" SPACE NUMBER LABELS: 9'-0" 15'-0" # TYPICAL MOPED PARKING STALL: 7' X 3'-6" SPACE 3'-6" 7'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1118 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0104.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0207.19.201907.29.2019 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 C2 A211W C2 A211W 8 6 4 2 639'-9" 640'-9" DN UP UP A2 A211W A2 A211W 5'-0" 135'-0" 70'-0" 38'-0" 140'-0" PARKING STAIR A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT CAMPACT 227 229 231 233 235 237 239 240 241 210 212 214 216 218 219 220 221 223 225 203 204 205 206 208 202 224 226 211 213 215 217 222 207 209 192 191 190 199 198 197 196 194 200 228 230 232 234 236 238 193 195 200 201 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 368'-0" C2 A211W C2 A211W STAIR ELEV. 8 6 4 2 UP DN DN DN 649'-9" 646'-6" COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W 5'-0" 135'-0" 140'-0" COMPACT 20'-0"90'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"38'-0"70'-0" STAIR ELEV. COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT 131 133 114 116 118 120 122 124 126 127 128 129 097 099 101 103 105 106 107 108 110 112 090 091 092 093 095 089 111 113 098 100 102 104 109 094 096 078 077 076 085 084 083 082 080 086 115 117 119 121 123 125 132 134 130 186 185 184 183 181 079 189 188 187 182 081 176 174 172 175 173 171 169 167 165 164 163 162 160 170 168 166 159 157 161 158 156 135 136 155 154 152 150 149 148 147 146 145 140 141 137 139 142 143 144 138 153 151 180 178 179 177 088 087 40'-0" 48'-0" 40'-0" 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 UP UP UP UP UP UP 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S SECURITY 1332 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY 1699 SF RETAIL 162 SF MECH. 640 SF EXERCISE 84 SF OFFICE 1705 SF LOBBY 797 SF REC. HALLWAY 972 SF 3BD 2162 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY TRACK ABOVE TRACK ABOVE 1175 SF OFFICE SHELL 2835 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY 972 SF 3BD 673 SF 1BD 1193 SF 3BD 3294 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY VEST. 403 SF 1BD Q.5 A.5 419 SF 1BD 54 SF RECYCLING 112 SF FIRE 28 SF PACKAGES 130 SF EGRESS 291 SF EGRESS LOBBY CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 972 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 649 SF 2BD 108 SF STORAGE C2 A211W C2 A211W STAIR ELEV. STAIR. STAIR ELEV. STAIR 8 6 4 2 OPEN TO OFFICE BELOW 361 SF 1BD 607 SF 2BD CORRIDOR 241 SF MECH/ ELEC OPEN TO COURT BELOW 676'-0" 668'-0" 673'-6" 674'-4" A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W A5 A221W A5 A221W A6 A221W A6 A221W 140'-0" 5'-0" 65'-0" 15'-0" 50'-0" 5'-0" 70'-0" 38'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 20'-0" 368'-0" 41'-8" 41'-8" 1796 SF FORECOURT W1 6950 SF COURTYARD W3 2356 SF FORECOURT W2 2275 SF COURTYARD W2 1660 SF COURTYARD W1 3'-4" 19'-8" 30'-0" 20'-4" 38'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 21'-8"6'-8"9'-8" 3'-4" 21'-8"6'-8"9'-8" 3'-4" 5'-0" 130'-0" 5'-0" 130'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 41'-8" 21'-8"6'-8"21'-8" 3'-4" 5'-0" 41'-8" 28'-4"21'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 A203W C5 672'-8" C6 A221W C6 A221W MECH ELEC/ TELE 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S PARKING 2474 SF OFFICE Q.5 A.5 382 SF ELECTRICAL WEST PARKING ENTRY 1302 SF STORAGE/MECH C2 A211W C2 A211W ELEV. ELEV. STAIR STAIR 8642 BIKE PARKING DNUP UP UP UP 655'-6" 649'-9" 659'-6" 4339 SF HALF BASKETBALL COURT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT 659'-9" 668 SF WASTE/ RECYCLING 239 SF WASTE/ RECYCLING 655'-6"18'-2" A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W 70'-0" 38'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 90'-0" 20'-0" 368'-0" 5'-0"135'-0" 140'-0"BIKE PARKING PARKING COMPACT A201E C2 A202E C2 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 CHASE ABOVE CHASE ABOVE UTILITY TRENCH BIKE RACK PARKING (14) RACKS (70) BIKES 4'-2" BIKE WALL RACK PARKING (118) BIKESBIKE PARKING (3) RACKS (15) BIKES BIKE PARKING (3) RACKS (15) BIKES BIKE PARKING (2) RACKS (10) BIKES BIKE PARKING (4) RACKS (20) BIKES BIKE PARKING (2) RACKS (10) BIKES BIKE PARKING (2) RACKS (10) BIKES BIKE PARKING (3) RACKS (15) BIKES SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS 7.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 7.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS 8.28.2019 1/16" = 1'-0" A1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING - UPPER N 1 2 3 4 5 40 38 36 34 39 37 35 42 41 43 46 45 49 47 51 55 53 59 57 63 61 67 65 68 71 69 60 58 64 62 66 70 74 72 48 50 54 52 56 44 8 6 10 9 11 13 12 14 15 19 17 23 21 25 29 33 31 16 20 18 22 28 32 30 24 26 27 656.5 657.6 658.8 659.9 661.6 663.4 665.2 667 667.5 669.2 671 671 671 671.6672.2 672.6 672.6 672.6 673.3673.9 674.3674.3 674.3674 673.8 673.5 673.5 671.7 669.9 668 665.9 663.8 661.7 659.5 TYPICAL BIKE RACK 5'-8" 3'-3" POWDER COATED STEEL BIKE RACK 7 73 7 LOOP WAVE BIKE RACK - 5 BIKE CAPACITY - POWDER COATED PACK- AGES RECYCL 2162 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY Amenities will include small and large group study rooms, lounge areas, recreation activities such as pool and foosball, informal lecture areas, computer labs and bathrooms. 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 2'-0" 10'-0" 6'-7" 4'-0" A205W C1 A205W D1 (UTILITY METERS) (UTILITY METERS) (UTILITY METERS) 5'-8" N 7'-1" WALL RACK BIKE PARKING DIAGRAM UP 1783 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY CORRIDOR 241 SF MECH/ ELEC 21'-8" 1473 SF COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL TYPICAL BIKE RACK RECREATION AMENITY LOUNGE RECREATION AMENITY EXERCISE ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY Study will include small and large study rooms, a computer lab and wifi. FLEXIBLE SPACE RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY Study will include small and large study rooms, a computer lab and wifi. UP UP UP 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S 2474 SF OFFICE Q.5 A.5 382 SF ELECTRICAL WEST PARKING ENTRY 1302 SF STORAGE/MECH C2 A211W C2 A211W ELEV. ELEV. STAIR STAIR 8 6 4 2 BIKE PARKING DN UP 655'-6" 659'-6" 4339 SF HALF BASKETBALL COURT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT 659'-9" 668 SF WASTE/ RECYCLING 239 SF WASTE/ RECYCLING 655'-6" 18'-2" A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W 70'-0" 38'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 90'-0" 20'-0" 368'-0" 5'-0" 135'-0" 140'-0" COMPACT A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 CHASE ABOVE CHASE ABOVE UTILITY TRENCH BIKE RACK PARKING (14) RACKS (70) BIKES 4'-2" BIKE WALL RACK PARKING (118) BIKES BIKE PARKING (3) RACKS(15) BIKESBIKE PARKING (2) RACKS (10) BIKESBIKE PARKING (3) RACKS (15) BIKES22'-0" 74'-0" TRANS- FORMER COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT 018 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 001 003 005 007 009 010 011 012 014 016 015 017 002 004 006 008 013 019 020 021 030 072 071 070 069 068 075 074 073 067 061 059 058 062 060 056 054 052 050 049 048 046 057 055 053 047 045 044 043 041 039 038034 035 031 033 032 042 040 065 063 066 064 037 036 051 GAS METERS RECREATION AMENITY HALF BASKETBALL COURT SECURE FENCE ENCLOSURE AROUND BIKE PARKING 40'-0" 48'-0" 40'-0" 48'-0" 23 CAR PARKING SPOTS WILL BE DESIGNED AS 69 SCOOTER PARKING SPOTS ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY 1783 SF Study will include small and large study rooms and wifi. 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CO ELECTRICAL GEAR ELECTRICAL GEAR 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 972 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 429 SF 1BD 972 SF 3BD 429 SF 1BD 972 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 1210 SF 3BD 1160 SF 3BD 1153 SF 3BD 1203 SF 3BD 459 SF 1BD 972 SF 3BD 621 SF 2BD 510 SF 1BD 649 SF 2BD 782 SF 2BD 501 SF 1BD 226 SF ELEC 26 SF RECYCLING CORRIDOR CORRIDOR C2 A211W C2 A211W STAIR ELEV. STAIR STAIR ELEV. 8 6 4 2 585 SF 2BD OPEN TO BELOW 7047 SF TRACK AND FITNESS 495 SF 1BD 460 SF 1BD 588 SF 2BD 597 SF 2BD 972 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 489 SF 1BD 585 SF 2BD 531 SF 1BD A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W A5 A221W A5 A221W A6 A221W A6 A221W 140'-0" 70'-0" 38'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 368'-0" 46'-8" 41'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 41'-8" 41'-8"5'-0" 19'-7" 30'-1" 20'-4" 5'-0" 130'-0" A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 A203W C5 C6 A221W C6 A221W 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S 967 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 967 SF 3BD 1210 SF 3BD 1160 SF 3BD 1153 SF 3BD 1203 SF 3BD 531 SF 1BD 585 SF 2BD 489 SF 1BD 585 SF 2BD 459 SF 1BD 972 SF 3BD 510 SF 1BD 954 SF 3BD 961 SF 3BD 967 SF 3BD 972 SF 3BD 585 SF 2BD 595 SF 2BD 419 SF 1BD 782 SF 2BD 459 SF 1BD 501 SF 1BD 493 SF 1BD Q.5 A.5 STAIR ELEV. STAIR 26 SF RECYCLING 226 SF ELEC CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR ELEV. STAIR C2 A211W C2 A211W 8 6 4 2 621 SF 2BD 429 SF 1BD 634 SF 2BD 1952 SF AMENITY 1896 SF POOL DECK 536 SF EFF 934 SF 2BD 779 SF 2BD 673 SF 1BD 941 SF 2BD 153 SF ELEC 685 SF MECHANICAL A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W A5 A221W A5 A221W A6 A221W A6 A221W 140'-0" 70'-0" 38'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 368'-0" 46'-8" 41'-8" 5'-0" 135'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" 9'-8" 30'-0" 10'-4" 10'-0" 5'-0" 41'-8" 41'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 130'-0" 5'-0" A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 A203W C5 C6 A221W C6 A221W SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N 1/16" = 1'-0" A1 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N RECYCL RECYCL 419 SF 1BD 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 (UTILITY METERS) (UTILITY METERS) (UTILITY METERS) 7047 SF TRACK AND FITNESS (UTILITY METERS) RECREATION AMENITY JACUZZI OUTDOOR AMENITY POOL DECK RECREATION AMENITY TRACK AND FITNESS 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 40'-0" 48'-0" 40'-0" 48'-0" 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S STAIR 963 SF 3BD 963 SF 3BD 963 SF 3BD 595 SF 2BD 305 SF 1BD 595 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 963 SF 3BD 187 SF ELEC 910 SF 3BD 910 SF 3BD 595 SF 2BD 595 SF 2BD 963 SF 3BD 280 SF EFF 254 SF EFF 254 SF EFF Q.5 A.5 298 SF 1BD 128 SF DECK ELEV. ELEV. CORRIDOR STAIR C2 A211W C2 A211W 192 SF DECK 8 6 4 2 802 SF 2BD 305 SF 1BD 802 SF 2BD 802 SF 2BD 809 SF 2BD 809 SF 2BD 156 SF RECYCL 966 SF 3BD 809 SF 2BD 267 SF 1BD 280 SF EFF 966 SF 3BD 966 SF 3BD 221 SF EFF 182 SF DECK OPEN TO DECK BELOW 305 SF 1BD 595 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 595 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 298 SF 1BD 185 SF DECK 260 SF DECK 784 SF SCREENED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 127 SF DECK 90 SF DECK 128 SF DECK 668 SF SCREENED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 90 SF DECK 90 SF DECK 1184 SF SKYWALK CONNECTION 668 SF SCREENED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 128 SF DECK 90 SF DECK 90 SF DECK 128 SF DECK 187 SF DECK 89 SF DECK 93 SF DECK 188 SF DECK A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W A5 A221W A5 A221W A6 A221W A6 A221W 105'-0" *10'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" *10'-0" 38'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" *348'-0" 25'-0" 5'-0" 16'-8" 31'-8" 5'-0" 10'-0" 25'-0" 5'-0" 40'-0" 15'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" 16'-2" 8'-10" 5'-0" 16'-8" 31'-8" 5'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 5'-0" 31'-8" 16'-8" 5'-0" 8'-10" 16'-2" A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 A203W C5 C6 A221W C6 A221W 1 3 5 7 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S Q.5 A.5 C2 A211W C2 A211W 8 6 4 2 963 SF 3BD 280 SF EFF 963 SF 3BD 963 SF 3BD 802 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 305 SF 1BD 595 SF 2BD 595 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 305 SF 1BD 963 SF 3BD 963 SF 3BD 804 SF 2BD 804 SF 2BD 254 SF EFF 595 SF 2BD 298 SF 1BD 254 SF EFF 595 SF 2BD 305 SF 1BD 963 SF 3BD 963 SF 3BD 806 SF 2BD 806 SF 2BD 298 SF 1BD 254 SF EFF 595 SF 2BD 595 SF 2BD 267 SF 1BD 221 SF EFF 809 SF 2BD 966 SF 3BD 966 SF 3BD 966 SF 3BD 280 SF EFF 156 SF RECYCL 187 SF ELEC CORRIDOR ELEV ELEV A2 A211W A2 A211W A4 A211W A4 A211W BALCONY STAIR STAIR 105'-0" 5'-0" 40'-0" 15'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" *48'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" 50'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0" 10'-0" *348'-0" 5'-0" 16'-8" 31'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 31'-8" 16'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 5'-0" 40'-0" 15'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" 3'-4" A203W C1 A201W C2 A202W C2 A204W C2 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N N 1/16" = 1'-0" A1 FIFTH THRU FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 (UTILITY METERS) (UTILITY METERS) COMMUNITY STUDY 221 SF 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 50'-0" 48'-0" 40'-0" 48'-0" COMMUNITY STUDY 221 SF 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 44-3 140 10 25PROPERTY LINE PROP. LINE 4 5 BEYOND 45 15 45 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 659-6 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE WEST = EL 659-6 BUILDING STEPBACK = EL 712-8 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 673-6 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE EAST = EL 673-6 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE MID-BLOCK = EL 668 RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY AVERAGE GRADE AT WEST BUILDING= EL 668.4 55555555555555555555555 5 528STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA = 54% OF WALL AREA BUILDING GLAZING AREA = 34% OF WALL AREA 35 30 3020 (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 C5 A205W C5 A205W SIM UPPER FACADE GLAZING AREA = 3,075 SF UPPER FLOOR FACADE TOTAL AREA = 12,215 SF PERCENT OF GLAZING = 25% OF WALL AREA PERSPECTIVE T PICAL FRONTAGE FACADE 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0444-3 140 10 25 PROPERTY LINE PROP. LINE 4 5 45 15 45 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 659-6 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE WEST = EL 659-6 BUILDING STEPBACK = EL 712-8 -6 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE MID-BLOCK = EL 668 RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY AVERAGE GRADE AT WEST BUILDING= EL 668.4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 8 26-8 20 20 31-8 (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) CL 20 (FACADE BAY) 21-8 (FACADE BAY) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W01 W04 W01 W01 W01 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W01 W02 W04 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W04 W01 W01 W01 44-3 4 45154510 1405PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE GRADE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER = EL 656-6 BUILDING STEPBACK = EL 712-8 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE WEST = EL 659-9 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 667 AVERAGE GRADE AT WEST BUILDING = EL 668.4 25 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE EAST = EL 672-8 55555555555555555555555 5 5 28STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA = 54% OF WALL AREA BUILDING GLAZING AREA = 34% OF WALL AREA RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY 35 30 3020 (FACADE BAY)(FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 C5 A205W C5 A205W SIM UPPER FACADE GLAZING AREA = 3,075 SF UPPER FLOOR FACADE TOTAL AREA = 12,215 SF PERCENT OF GLAZING = 25% OF WALL AREA PERSPECTIVE OF ROOF AREAS 3ft walk path may need to move wall 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0444-3 4 45 15 45 10 140 5 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE GRADE AT CORNER = EL 667 25 FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE EAST = EL 672-8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 8 STOREFRONT GLAZING AREA = 54% OF WALL AREA BUILDING GLAZING AREA = 34% OF WALL AREA RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY 26-8 2020 31-8 (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) 20 (FACADE BAY) CL 21-8 (FACADE BAY) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 S 10 6-8PROPERTY LINE 55 W01 W01 W04 W01 W01 W01 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W01 W02 W04 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 70 368 505050505060 10 50 102 5010 10 PASS THROUGH COURTYARD ER = EL 667 RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY BALCONIES WITH FULL HEIGHT GUARDRAILS, TYPICAL OVE H = EL 672-8 E AT 56-856-8 3-43-4 3-43-4 3-456-856-8 3-43-4 3-43-4 3-4 6-83-4 10 10 30 20 10 30 10 (GLASS BEHIND SCREEN)10 30 1010 10 30 10 2828EA 21-8 21-8 20 20 11-8 21-8FACADE BAYS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0207.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 C5 A205W D5 A205W UPPER FACADE GLAZING AREA = 23,127 SF UPPER FLOOR FACADE TOTAL AREA = 40,716 SF PERCENT OF GLAZING = 57% OF WALL AREA 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 70 368 40 50 48 50 50 60 10 50 10 2 44-350 10 10 OPEN TO ALLEY PASS THROUGH COURTYARD RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY BALCONIES WITH FULL HEIGHT GUARDRAILS, TYPICAL 5 6-8 5 6-8 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 5 6-8 5 6-8 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 6-8 3-4 10 10 35 25 25 (GLASS BEHIND SCREEN) 25 10 10 25 25 2 8 2 8 25 2535 35 20 FACADE BAYS CL CL CL CL CL 20 20 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W07 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 C5 A205W D5 A205W 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 TRANSFORMER 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 48 40 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W07 W07 W07 W07 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A205W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS 7.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 7.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS 8.28.2019 ADD 1 POINT OF COURTYARD ADD IMAGE OF FORECOURT CONNECTION ABOVE COURTYARD ALLEY CAPITOL STREET COURTYARD C1 CONNECTION ABOVE COURTYARD ALLEY CAPITOL STREET NORTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING COURTYARDD1 COURTYARD TYPICAL COURTYARD PERSPECTIVE A1 TYPICAL COURTYARD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE A METAL PANEL METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL TUBE FRAME METAL "CORNICE" TRIM 0'-2" 0'-2" METAL PANEL CORNICE DETAIL D5 3" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR WALL CORNICE DETAIL C5 3" = 1'-0" METAL WINDOW TRIM COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM TERRACOTTA PANEL WINDOW JAMB TRIM DETAIL B5 3" = 1'-0" 1 1/2" EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 10'-0" 3'-4"10'-0" 5'-0"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"1'-8"3'-4"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"10'-0" 6'-8"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"3'-4"3'-4" 3"3"3"3" 3"3" WINDOW TYPE A: SINGLE WINDOW TYPE B: SIDE-BY-SIDE WINDOW TYPE C: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 10'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" WINDOW TYPE D: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" WINDOW TYPE E: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 30'-0"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 3"3" WINDOW TYPE F: GROUPED 3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2" SPANDREL PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW METAL WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL SPANDREL PANEL PROJECTED WINDOW, TYPICAL GLASS, TYP SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A206W ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0104.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS07.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0207.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS08.28.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 09.06.2019 1/2" = 1'-0"A3ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS10'-0" 3'-4" 10'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" W01 SINGLE W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 10'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" W06 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 30'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" W07 GROUPED 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" SPANDREL TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW METAL WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL SPANDREL TRIM PANEL, TYPICAL PROJECTED WINDOW, TYPICAL GLASS, TYPICAL10'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE 1/2" = 1'-0" A3 ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS 7.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 7.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS 8.28.2019 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 B5 A206W C5 A206W B5 A206W D5 A206E D5 A206E SPANDREL TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW METAL WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL SPANDREL TRIM PANEL, TYPICAL PROJECTED WINDOW, TYPICAL GLASS, TYPICAL 3" 3 1/2" C5 WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL 1'-8" WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM STRUCTURAL FLOOR D5 LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 05 722'-8" LEVEL 06 732'-8" LEVEL 07 742'-8" LEVEL 08 752'-8" LEVEL 09 762'-8" LEVEL 10 772'-8" LEVEL 11 782'-8" LEVEL 12 792'-8" LEVEL 13 802'-8" LEVEL 14 812'-8" LEVEL 15 822'-8" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" 1 3 5 7 ROOF 832'-8" 8 6 4 2 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" LEVEL B3 WEST 637'-6" OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 11'-8" 10'-0" 15'-0" 8'-0" 12'-6" 9'-0" 9'-0" HALF BASKETBALL COURT COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY RETAIL TRACK AND FITNESS PARKING AMENITY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL POOL DECK ALLEY SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STREET PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 25'-0" 5'-0" A221W A3 +/- 5'-0" 10'-0" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 05 722'-8" LEVEL 06 732'-8" LEVEL 07 742'-8" LEVEL 08 752'-8" LEVEL 09 762'-8" LEVEL 10 772'-8" LEVEL 11 782'-8" LEVEL 12 792'-8" LEVEL 13 802'-8" LEVEL 14 812'-8" LEVEL 15 822'-8" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" 1 3 5 7 ROOF 832'-8" 8 6 4 2 LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 11'-8" 10'-0" 18'-4" 17'-2" 9'-0" COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY PARKING PARKING WASTE/ RECYCLING PARKING RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ALLEY SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STREET PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 5'-0" A221W A4 +/- 5'-0" 25'-0" LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 05 722'-8" LEVEL 06 732'-8" LEVEL 07 742'-8" LEVEL 08 752'-8" LEVEL 09 762'-8" LEVEL 10 772'-8" LEVEL 11 782'-8" LEVEL 12 792'-8" LEVEL 13 802'-8" LEVEL 14 812'-8" LEVEL 15 822'-8" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S ROOF 832'-8" Q.5A.5 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" LEVEL B3 WEST 637'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 11'-8" 10'-0" 15'-0" 3'-4" 4'-8"12'-6" 9'-0" 9'-0" PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE BURLINGTON STREET COURT STREET OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL COURT YARD PARKING PARKING COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY OFFICE COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY REC. HALLWAY TRACK AND FITNESS LOBBY A221W A2 A221W A1 10'-0" *10'-0" 10'-0" 2'-0" SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 A211W BUILDING SECTIONS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 1/16" = 1'-0" A2 BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH @ WEST BUILDING 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH @ WEST BUILDING 1/16" = 1'-0" C2 BUILDING SECTION NS @ WEST BUILDING 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 4 4 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" Q S LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" COURT STREET 10'-0" 2'-0" PROPERTY LINE OFFICE OFFICE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" 46'-8" LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" A B A.5 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" PROPERTY LINE BURLINGTON STREET 10'-0" *10'-0" COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY TRACK AND FITNESS RESIDENTIAL PARKING AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" 46'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" 8 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" LEVEL 01 B 674'-4" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STREET PROPERTY LINE +/- 5'-0" 10'-0" RETAIL TRACK AND FITNESS PARKING RESIDENTIAL AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" 46'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" 8 LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STREET PROPERTY LINE +/- 5'-0" COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" 46'-8" PARKING LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" L LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" 10'-0" 3'-6" 1'-8" 11'-8" 16'-8" COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY BIKE PARKING RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL METAL SCREEN WALL METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL BALCONY BALCONY LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" 8 LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STREET PROPERTY LINE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" PARKING +/- 5'-0" 5'-0" METAL SCREEN WALL METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL 6'-0" 11'-8" 46'-8" COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY BALCONY BALCONY LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL 02 TRACK 691'-0" 5 6 LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL VESTIBULE PARKING 3'-4" 6'-0" ENTRY CANOPY FORECOURT 16'-8" SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 1/8" = 1'-0"A2 FRONTAGE SECTION @ S 1/8" = 1'-0" A1 FRONTAGE SECTION @ N 1/8" = 1'-0" A3 FRONTAGE SECTION @ NE 1/8" = 1'-0" A4 FRONTAGE SECTION @ SE 1/8" = 1'-0" A6 TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY 1/8" = 1'-0" A5 TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY 1/8" = 1'-0" C6 TYPICAL FORECOURT ENTRY CANOPY 17'-4" 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 30'-3" 16'-6" 17'-4" 17'-4" 17'-4" 22'-0" 4 4 4 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 208 52 246 Minor Adjustment #2- The owner requests approval of a deviation from the facade continuity requirement set forth in 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards." The proposed north facade has less than 75% continuity due to alley access to parking and service areas. 4 72 72 426 820 (29%) 205 820 8,200 Minor Adjustment #2- The owner requests approval of a deviation from the facade continuity requirement set forth in 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards." The proposed north facade has less than 75% continuity due to alley access to parking and service areas. 4 820 8,200 Building Amenity Interior Academic 9,824 sq.ft Interior Recreation 0 sq.ft. Exterior 10,351 sq.ft 20,175 sq.ft 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 (20 car stalls will be designed as 60 scooter stalls) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 2,356 1,796 10,332 A205E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A206E ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS EAST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,328 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,340 SQ. FT. WEST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,468 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 33,190 SQ. FT. EAST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,361 LINEAR FT. (2.5% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,108 SQ. FT. (1% UNDER MASTER PLAN) WEST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,574 LINEAR FT. (7.2% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 36,399 SQ. FT. (9.6% OVER MASTER PLAN) 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 40'-0" 48'-0" 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 -- \\ i. '   ,P 6 rL _J ---c il  L -6 I I �_'  Ii 'I �,, /=; ' 1-�,�'�_."='�:7 �L- PVC +h" ; -I □ I---�I J11 /7/    CCH 1 iL ASB12 PJS493 VDC15 '(6 21 CC6 2 voe 24 f I -T D1i 11 �- n '(6 28   3 A 6 %WL 20 I l NWL43 %W#6 35 VMP137 CLV165 HPH4 HBB2HFW  H 4 B 6 W 4BB 2*$P 131 AP 4 C#*6 143*$P 131 7 HPH8 'I I I   0B6 +++ P!(6 450 HBB 5 4 6 PCS32 HBB8 HGH18 HBB1 HPH18& /C 6 PCS32& /C 6 P*C 3 PC(6 32 P*C 3 H6 14 32 P*C I f fl I I I I I ' I III I I kI' 11" \. I I ----+- 1 PC(6 23)6 1 (PD 45 2 cs 24 L 12(PD 36"C 2 PC(6 20T6 3 (PD 21 PC 34"6 2%W 19 (B 4 PC 18 --T 3 / /��/ /� �1 µ�////£� L /J////J////��/ L /� ,- OH3  CKF 78 PC(6 32 P*C 6 16  H + W 6 Fir� \ l I ' ' P*C 3 PC(6 32 H6 10 P$6 12 P!(6 424 HBB2 P$6 12  % .T W 1 C#*6 134 C 2 D 6 *$P 57*$P 99 [ I 30 I '1 1 IA�BI 0 HBB 1 H 5 6   HPH 614*$P 102 C#*6 143 CPD 4 ߰ *$P 75 HPH 10W 1 HBB 4 HW 5 ■ ■ ■ · .. "-��---_-/:... �= = c   □. ' \\ 7/ II C¥ -T/ ■ I / ■I .. ··�; 0 7 i I 18 I PH$6 18 )C6 28 BA 2 C'6 2 ((6 17 I 0 10 20 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY BOTANICAL NAME)2F )UWpSrb}Wg )I* )gWfRhU_bWr^qRha\jrR)~gh*paeebRhUW ++4 +rR~RWS}Ur}SRffafhWpga} 3.G +WqUa}URhRVWh}a} +9/ +ReRgRnqj}~a}RUb]jrR9Rre0jWr}Wr +:P +jhRefRraRgRcRfb} +D4 +Web}DUUaYXhRea} +F- +jrh}Rf~WphbYlebR 2*) 2ahd^jTbejTR)gh2jeV 2*F 2ahd^jTbejTRFrbhUW~jhIWh~p 29+ 2ghjUfRV}VbjbU}.}msW}}j8/I 2K7 2eWVb~}bR~pbRURh_j}bhWpgb}IdfahW 4** 4VrRh^WRmRhaUfRR7<PD*D 40Q 4j}R}bWTjeVbRhR/pRhUW}QbefbRg} 424 4j}ReRhUbYjeaR 4F5 4j}RFR~raj~ 4GI 4WgWrjURffb}GTIWfeR ;KL :apajVWhVrjhebmWqR @IL A}RIeR~aUR-RaVDVjg @Q; AWmRRrRUWgj}RQRedWr}=j DP4 D}~|ar^bhaRhR F+I FRhbUgap^Rg+_WWhhWId F04 FWhha}W~gRfUjmWUrjbVW}5RgWeh F4? FRhbUgap^Rg4WR?WRe F8I FRU_}RhVrRKWrgahRfa} FP+ FRx`WhjUa}}}obhoWZjebRLpjda G)2 G_}RpjgR~aUR2rjej I2I Igm_jpaURpmj}x VjjrWhTj}}ab9jeg^RfR IF ImjpjTje}_WWrjfWma} K+2 KsRVW}URhbR+jhUjrV2pRmW P-+ PaTphgjmf}BRhg P?F PahURgbkjp COMMON NAMEFRiWrTRrd?RieW )~gh*rbfeaRhUWIWzaUWTWrr L_jgeW}}+jUd}ir5R_jrh .R}~WphGWVTV 9Rrf0jWp}Wr0WR~_WpGWWV2pR}} ;aejY~_WPReeW +jggjh4RUdTWrr FR^jVR-j^jjV )~gh2jeV2ahd^j FrahUWjhIWhr2ahd^j .}mpW}}j9WhUd+j[WW~rWW IdebhW5jhWfjU} *jTj4VrRh^WR /rRhUW}QbeeaRg}5j}~R 2pWWh5j}~R FR~rbj~4j}R GTIWefR-Reae LeamLpWW )YWpTphWpLmWej QRedWr}=j+R~gbh .R}~Wy6jm4jrhTWRg +_WWhhWIdIa~U_^pR}} 4RgWeh-RrY0jh~Rah2rR}} 4WR?WReIaU_^pR}} 8RmRhW}WImp^W GWVQRefPbr^bhaR+rWWmWr 2pjfj/rR^pRh~IgRU 2RfRIhjTWts FqRbpaW-ujm}WWV +jhUjpV2pRmWImaVW{jr -Rw.rjmWRh+pRhTWpvT}_ FWrbahdfW SIZE REMARKS SPACING QUANTITY# +ReaiWp PRraW} " # +ReamWp PRraW} ߰߰ # +ReaiWp PRraW} ! 1.5" +ReamWp PRraW} #  +jh ' "(( % +jh ߰ #'# ߰ +ReamWp Varies % 1.5" +ReamWp Varies & ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} " ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ! ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ' ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ' # +jh "' #  +jh "' ߰%  +jh ߰" ߰"  +jh ߰" ('  +jh ߰" '߰ ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} ߰ ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} "  +jh ߰" #& ߰ +ReamWp PRraW} %  +jh ߰" &(  +jh ߰" "#  +jh ߰" # % +jh ߰ ߰&%  +jh !% % ߰"! #2Rf % ' # +jh ! !"  +jh ' ߰"  +jh ߰" #% # +jh ! % % +jh ߰ &'# ߰V&68]-&]O3V/&OV, Jqzo}~F}}߰uy  .p'xxrUrSeet 9Zvr 8pCity, :p  !rr;Zwr *rGwr:p  &OJ[eA^߰J^[ &<j=B/J4=J//V !l:PG'PKZfC_!K`Z  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:!  EJ,[&߰S/߰V&68c/&] W:aA!L+@f:R.X  Zm'!GPX.G.nL:K.! k!b.WDPP:!  {g&]gYA/J48J//V LKk.K5:K..X:L5  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:!  F/S/J4<J//V !l:PG'PKZfC^!KaZ  .'PfW^Za :Pk!':d:#  TVO?/&]J߰F/ 12 EAST COURT OER$>>,  .pZ|swt 8p'w:p  TVO?/&]JO 8[[g/ ,߰c/ ,/[&V=T]8OJ u 1 u I 1 : uD c z 0 u z 0 z z c : I z  *.Z:5LX.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PL  *.Z:5LW.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PL  +.Z:5KX.i:0kZf$G:ZZ:PK  +.Z:5KX.i:.kZf$G:ZZ:PK  +0Z:5KX.i:0kZf$G:ZZ:PK (M1hH"NNIQN\QN>N) U"9ulhorized opying, diacDl.n or mm1t wthout wrltn p1nniln by Nau1111nn Morn Inc. is prohibit. PRELIMINARYCEM1EH,ECJMHO,N7EC [7//cJ߰F/ LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANS & SCHEDULE [72/cJeF%/V L002 UP UP UP UP UP 380.00' 380.00' 149.22'100.00'127.15' 130.00' 25.01' 250.00' 152.14'100.00'150.70' 380.00' 0 10 20 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS 319.519.6220 PROJECT NAME OWNER PROJECT NO. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 18-0003 C001 SITE PLAN JUNE 11, 2019 12 E. COURT ST DESIGN REVIEW APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 42.6637' 10' SETBACK 2' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 108' BLDG-BLDG 55' 26.5' 26.5' 15' 25' 15' 5' SETBACK CAPITOL STREET N CAPITOL STREETN CAPITOL STREET A SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. PAINTED CROSSWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. PROPOSED STAIRS. PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION B C D E F G 140' 50' ALLEY (20') H 50' ALLEY (20') ALLEY (20') A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B D E E E E E F F F F G G 11 11 11 11 46.67' 46.67' 46.67' 160' 60' 60' 50' 50' 160' 46.67' 46.67' 46.67' 140' 12' 60.58' 70' 33.75' 46.67' 46.67' 40' 41.67' 9' H H H H H H H H H H C C C E BURLINGTON STREET E COURT STREET 100' ROW 4' 5' 12.5' 4' 5' 12.5' RAMP TO LOWER LEVEL REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 48' LEGEND: PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE PUBLIC GREEN SPACE JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 I J K K K I I I I I I J J NOTES: 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND PLANTINGS. SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 E 8.13' 7.51' 10' SETBACK 4' 2' SETBACK 50' 70' 160' 48' 50' 40' 46.67' 4' 2' SETBACK OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 2' L L L 6.7' F F F F F F F F F F DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S 12 14 15 A4 A211E A4 A211E Q.5 A.5 C1 A211E C1 A211E 9 10 11 13 641'-10" 643'-0" 647'-0" UP UP UP 140'-0" 269'-0" 74'-8" MOPED PARKING PARKING COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S 12 14 15 A2 A211E A2 A211E A4 A211E A4 A211E Q.5 A.5 C1 A211E C1 A211E 9 10 11 13 99'-0" 97'-0" 172'-0" 368'-0" STAIR ELEV. ELEV. STAIR UP DN UP UP UP 652'-0" 656'-0" PARKING 64'-6" 10'-2" 65'-4" 140'-0" C6 A221E C6 A221E COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT ELEV. CHASE ABOVE 152 154 156 158 160 155 157 159 161 162 163 164 165 166 180 178 176 174 172 171 170 169 168 167 198 196 194 192 190 188 186 185 184 182 208 207 206 204 202 200 199 197 195 104 102 100 098 096 095 094 093 092 091 118 116 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 106 135 133 131 129 128 127 126 124 122 120 136 134 132 141 140 139 138 137 143 144 142 130 119 117 115 145 146 147 148 150 151 153 149 205 193 191 189 187 181 179 177 175 173 183 105 103 101 099 097 107 076 078 080 082 084 079 081 083 085 086 087 088 089 090 074 075 077 073 123 121 125 203 201 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 GAS METERS ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY Study will include small and large study rooms, a computer lab and wifi. SECURE FENCE ENCLOSURE AROUND BIKE PARKING 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 10'-0" 40'-0" 48'-0" 10'-0" A B E F G H I J K L M N O P Q S 12 14 15 A2 A211E A2 A211E A4 A211E A4 A211E Q.5 A.5 C1 A211E 9 10 11 13 PARKING 623 SF ELEC 99'-0" 97'-0" 172'-0" 368'-0" ELEV. ELEV. STAIR UP UP UP 665'-0" 661'-0" 659'-10" UP 64'-6" 10'-2" 65'-4" 140'-0" BOTTOM OF SPEED RAMP A203E C2 A201E C2 C2 C6 A221E C6 A221E 66 CHASE ABOVE CHASE ABOVE UTILITY TRENCH 157 SF WTR COMPACT COMPACT ELEV. 002 004 006 008 010 001 003 005 007 009 011 012 013 014 015 016 030 028 026 024 022 021 020 019 018 017 044 042 040 039 038 037 036 035 034 032 059 057 055 053 052 051 050 048 047 046 060 058 056 065 064 063 062 061 067 068 066 054 045 043 041 069 070 071 072 031 029 027 025 023 033 049 20 CAR PARKING SPOTS WILL BE DESIGNED AS 60 SCOOTER PARKING SPOTS ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY Study will include small and large study rooms, a computer lab and wifi. 1779 SF COMMERCIAL OR BUILDING AMENITY 236 SF MECH/ ELEC 672'-8" 21'-8" 1473 SF RETAIL ACADEMIC AMENITY STUDY Study will include small and large study rooms, and wifi. 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Building power will be fed from transformer in West building. There will be no transformer on this property. 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 40'-0" 48'-0" 40'-0" 48'-0" 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ELECTRICAL GEAR COMMUNITY STUDY 254 SF 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 50'-0" 48'-0" 50'-0" 48'-0" COMMUNITY STUDY 254 SF 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 50'-0" 48'-0" COMMUNITY STUDY 254 SF 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 93-4 12-11 80-5 PROPERTY LINE 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 831-8 20 28-4 (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W01 W04 W01 W01 W01 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W04 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W04 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 37-4 45 25 4 15 45 140 5 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE SOUTH = EL 668 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 683 BUILDING STEPBACK = EL 712-8 AVERAGE GRADE AT EAST BUILDING = EL 675.3 10 RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 8 31-8 20 20 26-8 (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) (FACADE BAY) 20 (FACADE BAY) 21-8 (FACADE BAY) 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W01 W04 W01 W01 W01 W02 W02 W02 W02 W02 W01 W02 W04 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 W01 20 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 2 PROPERTY LINE 70 368 40 50 48 50 50 60 10 50 10 37-4 50 10 10 OPEN TO SCHOOL OF MUSIC ALLEY RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY RECESSED BUILDING ENTRY WITH METAL CANOPY 2 BALCONIES WITH FULL HEIGHT GUARDRAILS, TYPICAL 10 10 25 6-8 5 6-8 5 25 25 6-8 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 25 25 6-8 5 6-8 5 10 35 10 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 (GLASS BEHIND SCREEN) 2 8 2 8 20 35 35 25 25 FACADE BAYS 20 CL CL CL CL CL 20 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W07 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 48 160 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W01 W03 W02 W01 W02 W06 W02 W05 W02 W06 W07 W07 W02 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 10'-0" 3'-4"10'-0" 5'-0"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"1'-8"3'-4"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"10'-0" 6'-8"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"3'-4"3'-4" 3"3"3"3" 3"3" WINDOW TYPE A: SINGLE WINDOW TYPE B: SIDE-BY-SIDE WINDOW TYPE C: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 10'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" WINDOW TYPE D: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" WINDOW TYPE E: SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 30'-0"1'-8"5'-0"3'-4"1'-8"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 3"3" WINDOW TYPE F: GROUPED 3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2"3 1/2" SPANDREL PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW METAL WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL SPANDREL PANEL PROJECTED WINDOW, TYPICAL GLASS, TYP SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 TB Version 16.3 KEYPLAN A206W ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS 18.094 100-500 LLC 111 East Something 12 EAST COURT Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 04.22.2019 PRE-DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05.07.2009 PRICING DRAWINGS 07.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 07.29.2019 ADDITIONAL PRICING SHEETS 08.28.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 09.06.2019 1/2" = 1'-0"A3ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS10'-0" 3'-4" 10'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" W01 SINGLE W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 10'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" W06 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 30'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3" 3" W07 GROUPED 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" SPANDREL TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW METAL WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL SPANDREL TRIM PANEL, TYPICAL PROJECTED WINDOW, TYPICAL GLASS, TYPICAL 10'-0" 5'-0" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3'-4" 1'-8" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE 1/2" = 1'-0" A3 ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 053" 3 1/2" C5 WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL B5 A206E B5 A206E C5 A206E 1'-8" WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM STRUCTURAL FLOOR D5 D5 A206E D5 A206E 4 4 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 4 4 4 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 24'-0" 21'-6" 24'-0" 17'-4" 17'-4" 17'-4" 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS 12 EAST COURT 18.094 01/09/2020 PR - 1BIRDS-EYE RENDERINGS SOUTHWEST CORNER SOUTHEAST CORNER NORTHEAST CORNERNORTHWEST CORNER NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS 12 EAST COURT 18.094 01/09/2020 PR - 2STREET-VIEW RENDERINGS COURT & CAPITOL INTERSECTION BURLINGTON STREET AND UI RECREATION BUILDING NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS 12 EAST COURT 18.094 01/09/2020 PR - 3OPEN-SPACE RENDERINGS COURT & CAPITOL INTERSECTION COURTYARD AT EAST BUILDING WEST BUILDING AND COURTYARDTYPICAL FORECOURT 12 EAST COURT (FORMER PENTACREST GARDEN APARTMENTS) Enforceable Security Plan Resubmittal September 2019 Form Based Development Worksheet Item G.8.b.(1) – Page 19 60 E. COURT ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 | 319.519.6220 AXIOM PROJECT # 18-0003 CIVIL  STRUCTURAL  MECHANICAL  ELECTRICAL  SURVEY  SPECIALTY TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. PURPOSE… 1 II. FACILITY PROFILE… 1 FLOORPLANS… 2 III. SECURITY SYSTEMS… 3 LIGHTING STRATEGY… 3 CCTV… 4 ACCESS CONTROLS … 4 ALARMS… 5 ON-SITE MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY… 5-6 IV. INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS… 6 PHYSICAL SECURITY… 6 DATA COMMUNICATIONS… 6 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES… 6 BUILDING MANAGEMENT… 6-7 TENANT and STAFF… 7 VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES… 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES… 8 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES… 9-10 IX. SPECIAL EVENTS… 10 P a g e | 1 I. PURPOSE This Enforceable Security Plan establishes a schematic Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for building security controls, implementation of security monitoring, and management of the overall system. In addition to establishing the SOP, this revised plan is provided as part of the overall Design Review Documents requirements for the September 2019 resubmittal. It is the intent of document to detail how our plan meets the requirements as stated in the Form Based Development Worksheet - item G.8.b.(1) – page 19. Overall, we want to reserve the capability to evolve this system over the life of the project design so that it will better serve the residents who live here by maximizing available technologies and capabilities of available systems as they evolve. Smart phone technology will be key to the overall implementation of this plan and we plan to provide an agile, flexible, and trackable service. This will help eliminate unwanted access to the facility and better control over who has access and when, as well as giving them the ability to quickly report (and respond) to requests. Most importantly – we need the facility to remain functionally relevant for as long as possible and want to make the entire project as adaptable, safe, and usable for a variety of residents as m uch as we are able. While the intent of the facility is to be primarily students to start, we don’t know that it will stay that way or how the facility will evolve over the life of the building. We intend for this building to have a 100-year lifespan. II. FACILITY PROFILE The 12 East Court Street (12EC) site, formerly known as Pentacrest Garden Apartments, is composed of a 3.4-acre lot with a proposed total building footprint in excess of one-million square feet. The site will have four (4) mixed-use buildings on it, that are connected North-to-South above the fifth floor at the primary step-back. An underground parking facility two levels deep sits underneath both the West and East set of buildings. All of the four buildings are fronted by forecourts that lead to the primary entry point/lobby of each building. All of the buildings except for the Northeast one have rear private courtyards as well. The overall site is split West-to-East by a central pedestrian concourse per the M aster Plan. South Capitol street will run North-South through the site on a new 100’-0” city right-of-way that will be re-opened between Burlington and Court streets. All grade-level entry points are indicated in the diagram below. The pedestrian and bicycle corridor between the structures (Capitol Street) – while not part of the building security plan, is also developed to provide maximum benefit and safety to those walking and bicycling the block. The design basis for this block will be similar to that of the new Washington Street streetscape in P a g e | 2 Iowa City between Clinton and Linn streets. Pedestrian refuges, pinch-downs, visual screening, and lighting improvements provide a corridor which is safely designed for residents both inside and outside. There are twenty-six (26) total at-grade building access points as well as eight (8) entry points below grade from the parking garage – 2 per level, per side. WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Overview of the ground floor entry-points demarcated. E9 1 3 2 4 5 7 8 6 9 11 12 10 14 13 15 16 17 18 21 19 20 22 23 26 25 24 P a g e | 3 AT-GRADE The primary access points to the buildings are located in each of the four (4) forecourts on the Capitol street side. These access points enter into vestibules and subsequently into lobbies for each building (5, 10, 17, 22.) The stairwells located near each lobby area include emergency egress doors which exit into the private courtyards which can then access the alleyways via secured one -way gates (4, 6, 9, 11, 23.) In the case of the NE tower, the egress door simply exits out onto the rear at-grade sidewalk on the East side of the building (19.) Commercial units and amenity areas are accessed at the multiple location points – some of these will be exit-only configurations (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26.) UNDERGROUND There are two garage access points located in public alleyways that lead to the underground parking structures. The West garage is accessed at the SW corner of the SW building (12) and the East garage is accessed near the East mid-point in the East alley (20.) The garage accesses will be double 10’-0” vehicle doors with an adjacent person-door. Within the garages there are secured access points into the North-most and South-most stairwells where building entrants can enter the building via the elevators or stairways. The NE stairwell and elevator will also access the proposed rooftop restaurant. III. SECURITY SYSTEMS 12EC will provide a robust security system to help establish safer and more secure living quarters and commercial spaces for all tenants. Our design team will accomplish this with a proactive rather than a reactive approach. Our design approach has been to create an environment that is tailored towards safety and an incredible living and learning environment. To accomplish this we have provided: ▪ High quality lighting plans ▪ Closed-circuit television systems ▪ Intuitive, adaptable, and modern access controls ▪ Adaptive alarm systems ▪ 24-7 on site security and maintenance ▪ Collaboration with University of Iowa and City personnel Lighting Strategy (DR300) Exterior lighting has been strategically placed to highlight the perimeter of the towers including building access points, private courtyards, forecourts, the primary pedestrian concourse, and even the rear public alleyways. The lighting plan will provide sufficient foot candles (FC) as required by the IECC and local codes - allowing for clear visibility throughout the site – without spilling beyond the perimeter into neighboring lots and streets. The exterior lights will be white-hue LEDs with an appropriate temperature P a g e | 4 selection, that will operate via photocell activation (dawn-to-dusk.) These will act as a deterrent/security feature while providing adequate lighting for excellent video capture. Interior lighting will be arranged and designed with the same scrutiny as exterior lighting to create a well- lit, safe environment indoors. This will include common areas, shared hallways, lobbies, utility areas, amenity spaces, and underground parking facilities. These areas will provide 24/7 lighting to ensure proper monitoring via closed circuit television systems and keep areas of public traffic visible. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) 12EC will be monitored 24/7 by CCTV cameras throughout the facility. This will include entry doors, vestibules, lobbies, amenity spaces, parking garages (360-degree 2MP), common hallways (180-degree 2MP)), forecourts, courtyards and controlled gate access points. Every ingress and egress point to the building will be covered by video (single-point 3MP cameras.) Public areas will also be monitored along the building frontage with 180o cameras that are able to view the central concourse, forecourts, courtyards, and commercial frontages. At this time we intent to use the ExacqVision system, Z-series Hybrid & IP Network Video Recorders or something equivalent. Exacq provides a large-capacity storage recorder which works in tandem with cloud-based uploading to allow for users to view footage anywhere using proprietary viewing software. It also includes a mobile app to allow for easy monitoring and data retrieval. The feed will be a continuous loop which will be viewable at the main security office as well as at each security kiosk. Security staff on site will have full time access to the live-feed video and will be able to monitor the video feeds 24/7. The combination of our conscientiously designed floor plans and strategical placement of cameras will create a complete coverage of the site and building. Electronic Access Control Electronic access controls will be provided via proximity pads throughout the site. All exterior access points for residential areas will be provided with this entry system. Residential occupants throughout the facility will be able to access the building through the four primary vestibule locations in the forecourts. These locations will be locked and security -controlled 24-7 with only authorized residents having access privileges. The NE entry point will be a public entry point during normal operating hours as well as determined restaurant operating hours in the early evening. Outside of operating hours this location will be locked and secured in the same fashion as the other three forecourt locations. P a g e | 5 The courtyard access points will be egress only and may not re-entered upon exit. Garage access points will be controlled via garage-door-openers, mobile apps, or access codes given only to residents and interior garage doors will be accessible via access panel the same as the forecourt entry points. Access points will be accessible via electronic security panels controlled by key -fobs, reader cards, smart phones or both. Door King high-rise systems are a similar system that has been used in the past and could be utilized on this project although priority may be gi ven to something that is more smart-phone integrated and discourages the possibility of memorizing codes, or giving access out to non -residents. Door King’s (DK) 1835/90 Series High Rise Building Telephone Entry/Access Control System (shown in Figure 2) provides digital access control devices such as keycard and fob readers to provide multi -user access into common spaces. There will be door-prop alarms at all building locations outside of the NE primary location and commercial unit entries. This fob and mobile app access system will be implemented on all Parking Garage and Level 1 entry points as detailed above. Residents’ guests wishing to enter the facility shall only be able to enter by receiving access from a resident who is in proximity of the building either from a local access point (panel/pad) or via a smartphone app. Individual residential units will also be access controlled with only that units residents being able to access it. Adjustments to units based on move -in/move-out, expired leases, etc… will be able to be quickly and efficiently controlled by the building management of 12EC. Tight controls will be maintained for accessory areas such as the well ness facility, pool, study areas, and skywalk. Access to these areas will be restricted. Alarms Commercial tenants shall be responsible for providing and maintaining their own alarm systems . Primary and secondary entry doors to all residential areas at and below grade shall have alarm systems on them in case of forced entry. This alarm system shall ring to the 24-7 primary office/desk location as well as security kiosks in each building. These systems will ring to security who will then make a final determination whether to escalate the call to the authorities. These entry points will also include an extended-open alarm to prevent stuck doors or instances where tenants prop open doors and inadvertently leave them unattended. These systems will be triggered to alarm internally to the help desks after an extended period so that building security can respond. Individual residential units shall not have alarms but may install them upon management approval. On-Site 24/7 Management and Security Personnel The primary security, management, and maintenance office will be located on Level 1 in the Northeast building. This location will be professionally managed and staffed 24 -7. This location shall have primarily P a g e | 6 surveillance, entry, and alarm access to all areas of the entire facility with remote access to all of the security/management kiosks inside of the other three buildings. All locations shall be able to communicate with one another via an intercom system. IV. INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS Numerous security safeguards protecting information and technology systems will be present at 12 EC. Based on the type of occupancy, quantity of units, and scale of the building, the follow features are to be provided: Physical Security • All network server and IT equipment shall be in a locked and secured room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have fire extinguishers located within the room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have smoke detectors installed in room. • The network server and IT rooms shall operate on an uninterruptible power supply (UPS). • No food or beverages are to be allowed inside or around network server & IT rooms or enclosures. • When leaving and closing out secured areas, ensure all sensitive and confidential information is properly stored and not left in the open. Data Communications Security A firewall and security services shall be implemented for the communication between the 12EC public internet access and the general public and business patrons. Future innovations may allow for offsite integration of a number of these features. V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Building Management Responsibilities The main responsibility of the Building Management is to implement the provided security systems, properly utilize and monitor CCTV cameras, provide maintenance and upkeep of security systems, maintain a safer space for occupants, report incidents to local authorities where applicable, and record video for all monitored locations. To exercise the full capabilities of the surveillance and security systems implemented, a central on-site management/security desk will be staffed 24/7 and equipped with monitors tied into the CCTV cameras, providing continuous loop for surveillance of the site as well as the previously described building areas. Fob and mobile access will be periodically checked and managed. Necessary firmware and software updates will be provided to ensure the system is fully functionable and reliable. To help create a safe environment for building occupants, the management and security desk will be available to tenants 24/7. P a g e | 7 Appropriate personnel will be sufficiently trained to use the video system per the final plan and design once the building is completed. Security personnel on site will be trained to manage the building but staff will only be as good as a call to ICPD. On site security will not be armed or trained to respond to active threats but will respond as quickly as possible to those events with calls to ICPD and direction to personnel who arrive as well as assistance with access to the areas in question. Tenant and Staff Responsibilities All leased tenants shall be required by their lease-contract to act in a responsible fashion with regard to their fellow building residents. Tenants, both residential and commercial, are expected to not prop doors open to prevent unauthorized personnel form entering the building. Residents are also expected to not allow anyone into the building that is not a guest and does not have individual access. Building occupants will be expected to report any incidents involving criminal activity to the building security and management desk. Emergency situations that involve a potential threat to human safety should be reported immediately by residents to the ICPD prior to notifying building management and security. VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES The main goal of 12 EC’s security plan is to provide a proactive approach to public safety to prevent criminal activity from occurring instead of simply reacting to incidents that may transpire . This is accomplished not only by trying to identify smart integration of modern security systems but also by way of smart design and integration. Our project includes a number of well designed and integrated features to achieve these goals: ▪ Smart layouts of floorplans with good sight lines and lighting levels ▪ A well-constituted exterior lighting plan providing high quality LED lighting to vital exterior areas as well as lesser considered areas like the heavily-trafficked public alleyways behind the buildings. ▪ Residential unit access controls tailored to individual residents and easily altered/adjusted by management. ▪ Residential unit door design with solid-core frames in a swing-out configuration so that doors to residential units would be very difficult to break into compared to more typical apartment design. ▪ Integration with City and University personnel to allow for review of final design and security considerations in order to provide good dissemination of information and a provision of lessons learned. P a g e | 8 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES As part of this security plan, local emergency response personnel were contacted to determine expected emergency response times. While not every entity was able to provide such times due to too many unknown variables, a number of information pieces were provided. With 12EC’s central downtown location, the site is located within minutes of nearly every available emergency service. Iowa City’s Fire Department (ICFD) is within an estimated four-minute response area. Once on-site, the ICFD has access to all sides of the site via primary streets and alleyways. The closest fire station to 12EC is ICFD First Station 1 Headquarters which is located at 20 South Gilbert Street. ICPD is located at the same location as ICFD and can generally respond quickly to this location. While specific response times can not be given due to a variety of factors, expectations are for generally quick and responsive requests for assistance. In addition, this security plan will be reviewed and coordinated with ICPD prior to full acceptance and implementation. University of Iowa Campus Security services are also located close to site – only 1 block away – directly adjacent to the North. ICPD will be given access to video and security data for issues of safety directly related to the building that would cause direct harm to the occupants or the building. The Owner intends to work with the ICPD as necessary to maintain a safe and secure environment and allow ICPD access to reasonable amounts of information per their ongoing requests. In much the same way that the dormitories work with calls from RA staff (or general residents) to public safety to events/active threats – the intent at our building will be for security staff (or residents) to call ICPD to respond to these events quickly and effectively. Emergency medical services (EMS) have reported to have a response time of under five -minutes in urban areas which include downtown Iowa City. To aid in the response procedure of EMS responses, personnel will have access to all sides of the site as well. The closet EMS service station is Johnson County Ambulance Services which is located on 808 South Dubuque Street. A University of Iowa Quick Care clinic is located only 2 blocks from the site on Clinton Street. P a g e | 9 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC’s surveillance systems will be analyzed to verify no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it P a g e | 10 shall be addressed in a reasonable amount of time. Broken equipment shall be noted and repaired as necessary. The type of system 12EC will implement will provide complete and ongoing feedback loops as to the functioning of the system. All camera function will be available in real time and malfunctioning or broken cameras will be able to be identified immediately. Owner intends to keep the system operational and functional with ongoing minute by minute capability to verify alarm operation, video operation, and failsafes to ensure systemwide functionality. This system is designed to maximize capability without draining WiFi. Ongoing maintenance logs are not as necessary with a live-response system like this but annual inspections and maintenance run-throughs will be performed on the system per the requirements and recommendations of the manufacturer. Freeman Lock and Alarm/ATEC, who will install and maintain this system for the Owner has confirmed this is the typical protocol for these newer systems and they will be in charge of maintaining them at all times. Tenants shall also be responsible for reporting any observed defects in security access systems that affect building access points and tenant dwelling spaces. In the event a tenant requires maintenance involving their unit’s access control, the tenant shall submit an emergency maintenance request to building management to resolve the issue. The Owner would like to be adaptable to issues and would like to work with the City and ICPD to change building protocols as time goes on and processes and amended towards Iowa City’s larger buildings. “How does this building compare to other buildings?” will be critical and the Owner would like to keep security protocols at similar levels. Annual checks of systems should be a part of the annual check of ALL systems (e.g. fire alarms) and part of the overall annual building permit process. IX. SPECIAL EVENTS The primary special event expected at the 12EC facility will be move -in/move-out events. These events will primarily take place in the late May/early June and early August timeframes and, to a lesser degree, in mid December. Because of the large amount of residential units, all move-in/move-out events will be coordinated with the City to facilitate any allowed street closures and to apply for the required permits. In addition, emergency personnel will be notified that such events will be taking place in order to coordinate as necessary. It may be necessary during these times to temporarily adjust the security systems described herein for short periods of time. An additional security person patrolling at periodic high volume times such as these would be a possibility if requested by ICPD. The Owner would like to work with ICPD to determine what these times will be and will address and reformulate these processes based on the future and final design of the building. MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 7 , 2019 – 7:00 PM – FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Baker, Carolyn Dyer, Mike Hensch, Max Parsons, Mark Signs MEMBERS ABSENT: Phoebe Martin, Billie Townsend STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hekteon, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Gina Landau RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 5-0 the Commission recommends approval of CZ19-03, an application submitted by Richard and Jane Kroeze for a rezoning of approximately 3.21 acres of property located in unincorporated Johnson County from County Agriculture (A) and County Residential (R) to County Residential (R-3). CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. CZ19-03: Applicant: Richard and Jane Kroeze Location: 4201 Nursery Lane SE An application submitted by Richard and Jane Kroeze for a rezoning of approximately 3.21 acres of property located in unincorporated Johnson County from County Agriculture (A) and County Residential (R) to County Residential (R-3). Russett began the staff report showing a location map of the area, it located off Sand Road and Nursery Lane. The current property has two different zoning designations and Russett showed the zoning map and pointed out there are three separate parcels, each of which have both an ag and residential zoning designation. This property is in the fringe area B outside of the City's growth area. Regarding background on this application, this is a proposed rezoning to single family residential for the 3.2 acres and the existing zones do not align with the current parcel boundaries. If approved, the applicant intends to perform a boundary line adjustment and sell the property. In terms of compliance with the County's Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use map identifies this area as appropriate for agriculture. And the same is true for the City/County Fringe Area Agreement where the land use policy in that document recommends agricultural uses are Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 2 of 9 preferred. In summary the County Land Use Plan and the City/County Fringe Area Agreement both recommend agricultural uses in this area. However, Russett noted there are several other things going on this site. The existing development is located on two parcels in one lot each of which have two zoning designations so it is split zoned. The County policy is to have only one designation per parcel or lot. The proposed rezoning would clean up the existing zoning designations and have one zoning designation for the area. Furthermore, there's already a single-family home on the site, and the proposed zone would not allow any additional residential units. The role of the Commission is to provide a recommendation on this rezoning to City Council, and then that will be passed on to the Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission and eventually to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors for their final decision. Staff is recommending approval of this rezoning, Russett mentioned is not directly consistent with policies in both the County's Comprehensive Plan and the Fringe Area Agreement, however, because of the various circumstances in this area, they are recommending approval. Again, because the subject area is already partly zoned for residential uses and contains an existing single family residential use, no further residential development would be allowed. The rezoning would create a single zoning classification for that area, which would allow for more efficient zoning regulation and implementation. Finally, the Johnson County Zoning Ordinance states an intent to eliminate instances of splits zoned lots and if this rezoning is approved, the applicant would seek a boundary line adjustment which would result in one zoning designation for the area. Signs asked if the resulting 3.21 acre parcel would only be zone to hold one house. Russett confirmed that was correct. Hensch noted this application looks pretty straightforward, even though it is in conflict with Fringe Area Agreement since this is just going to clean up the zoning on the parcel, that's the main reason staff support it. Russett acknowledged that was correct. Hensch noted this is immediately just adjacent south of Pleasant Valley golf course correct? Russett confirmed that was correct. Dyer asked if it would it be possible to tear that house down and replace it with another different house? Russett acknowledged that would be possible, but only one house could be built on the lot total. Hensch opened the public hearing. Gina Landau (MMS Consultants) didn’t have much to add about this but did want to reiterate that this rezoning is solely to bring these parcels into compliance. The County doesn't allow split zoning. Landau is unsure of when this happened but whenever something happens with a parcel in the County now they like to try and bring it into compliance, so that is the goal of this rezoning. Once the mentioned boundary line adjustment takes place, so after this rezoning hopefully goes through, she believes the new 3.21 acre parcel has a purchase agreement with it. She has been told it's an organization that helps people trying to escape abusive relationships. The plan is to use the home for living quarters and the outbuildings for children and play areas. Landau acknowledged Dyer’s question on if they could level the house and that would happen however that really is not the intention, there's already purchase agreement in place. Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 3 of 9 Hensch asked if there is access to Nursery Lane SE to the on the north? Landau acknowledged there are two accesses, the southern most access will remain and there will be an access easement on Sand Road and there is an existing one on Nursery Lane as well. Both of those would be utilized, the Nursery Lane access is for the home and the one off of Sand Road will enable access to the outbuildings and to the adjacent farmland that is still being farmed. Parsons asked if the Kroeze family initiated this rezoning themselves or did they have any encouragement from the County to clean it up? Landau stated the Kroeze family initiated MMS to help get this parcel sold, but with all the zoning issues was kind of a mess. The initial intention was only for MMS to do the boundary line adjustment which would have enabled the selling but since all this stuff is going with the rezoning the County wanted that cleaned up first. So the first order of business is to clean up the rezoning to make all 3.21 the same zoning. Landau also noted even if this purchase of agreement falls through at least it's all zoned the same and in the future can be sold as one part. Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved to recommend approval of CZ19-03, an application submitted by Richard and Jane Kroeze for a rezoning of approximately 3.21 acres of property located in unincorporated Johnson County from County Agriculture (A) and County Residential (R) to County Residential (R-3). Signs seconded the motion. Hensch noted it’s likely the Commission will be seeing more of these types of applications in the future as cleanup of these splits zonings parcels surrounding Iowa City happen. Parsons acknowledged it seems a straightforward request. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. SOUTH DISTRICT FORM-BASED CODE UPDATE: Russett wanted to provide an update to the Planning Commission where staff is with the development of a new form-based code for a portion of the South District. She will provide a little bit of background, an overview of the draft code, and discuss next steps and some stakeholder outreach that they’ve done so far. This is the same presentation she gave at the City Council work session on Tuesday. In terms of the project background, this project dates back to 2015 when the South District Plan was adopted, then in 2017 the City entered into a contract with Opticos Design to conduct the phase one study, which was really an assessment of whether or not implementing a form-based code in the South District was feasible. After Opticos completed the phase one study, they determined that a form-based code could work in this area and the City Council directed staff to continue to work with Opticos on formed based regulations for the South District. Russett noted looking at both the policies in the South District Plan and the results of the phase one study there were several things that were consistent in terms of land use policy between those two documents. The community wanted neighborhood centers with walkable amenities, they wanted Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 4 of 9 to expand on established open spaces, they wanted a strong network of trails, they wanted a variety of housing options, including missing middle housing (those housing types that are between detached single family and larger scale multifamily), street connectivity and walkability as well as better predictability in the land development process. Russett stated those objectives align quite well with the project goals of the development of the new form-based code. Staff wants to implement the direction from that phase one study in the South District Plan. They want to create a walkable community, to preserve environmental resources, to have a highly interconnected network of streets and a variety of housing types with predictability. They want predictability in the land development process not just for developers, but for all community members and neighbors so they have a better understanding of what can be built next to them. Additionally they’d like to be able to apply these regulations to other green field areas in the city. Russett showed an area that was developed under a form-based code and prior to its development it was a green field, this is New Town St. Charles, Missouri, which is outside of St. Louis. By the way it was developed, there are green spaces and open spaces and a very connected grid network of streets and paths. She showed some street views to show what this type of development looks like from the street and these show the features that the City hopes to accomplish with the new form-based code. There are green spaces that are not only amenities for the community, but also a function of stormwater management. There's a diversity of housing types. There's a clear connection between the private realm and the front of the building and the connection to the sidewalk and the street in the public realm. Russett pointed out the blue house in the middle as an example of what they like to call house scale multifamily, it is a multifamily building but it fits within an existing single-family neighborhood context, there's probably six to eight units in that in that building there. Parsons noted some of these pictures remind him of the Peninsula neighborhood and asked if the goal is to achieve some of those characteristics with a new twist. Russett replied some of the goals of the Peninsula are similar to the goals down here. Russett stated Opticos has developed an initial draft of the code, just the text of the code, and that is available on the project website. Russett provided a high-level summary of what's included in that draft. First, the form-based code is based on the transect, the transect is a way to categorize environments, both natural environments and built environments. An example is on the left there is the natural transect stone, which is open space preservation all the way up to the right, which is the T-6 transect, which is the urban core. Russett showed some images that of the variation between T-1, the natural transect, all the way to the urban core and Iowa City has all of these depending on where you're at in the City. There are natural areas, an urban core and everything in between. However, in the South District, there are three of these transects, the natural transect, T-3 which is the sub urban and T-4 which is the general urban. So the initial draft of the code proposes six zoning districts, one is the natural district and then there's two T-3 districts and three T-4 districts. Russett reiterated the T-1 is a natural zone with no development, it open space and nature. The T-3 neighborhood edge zone is probably the lowest intensity zone, the zone would allow two stories maximum with an occupied attic. Russett showed an image that these buildings are set back a bit further from the street, there's more front yard space, but there are three different housing types that would be allowed in this zone, single family detached house, a duplex and a Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 5 of 9 cottage court. In the next T-3 zone it is a little bit more intense, but it's still only two stories maximum with an occupied attic. The buildings are a little bit closer to the street and maybe a little bit closer together. Additionally there's more housing types that would be allowed in this zone, the multiplex small and the townhouse small would be allowed in this the zoning district. Moving on to the T-4 zoning districts, the first is T-4 which is neighborhood small. This district will allow moderate intensity housing options but they are still primarily house scale multifamily. So the maximum height would be two stories with an occupied attic. Next is the T-4 neighborhood medium which allows for a little bit taller buildings that are three stories with an occupied attic. The buildings would be a little bit larger but still considered house scaled multifamily and the housing types allowed would be the multiplex large in the courtyard building. Baker noted looking at this image the first thing that strikes him is where's the parking? Russett stated typically it's in the back, there are onsite parking requirements but maybe it's not well reflected in the images. Signs asked about the occupied attic, if it can be occupied then it would be two and a half stories. Russett confirmed. Lastly Russett explained the T-4 main street zone, which can be thought of as the neighborhood commercial zone. This will probably be used pretty sparingly within the South District, but this unlike the other zoning district, which allow house scale multifamily and house scale buildings, this district would allow block scale buildings and allow three stories with an occupied attic. Moving on to uses, form-based codes do regulate uses, so there would be a section of the code that outlines what land uses are allowed in which zones and how they how they would be allowed. The code also has draft thoroughfare standards, this would be the types of street network, roadway width and sidewalk width and the types of bicycle facilities that would be allowed on different thoroughfares. The draft includes eight different thoroughfare types, and staff is currently reviewing those with the public works department. It also includes civic space standards and outlines seven different options for different types of civic space. Russett stated the code will also include frontage standards, which will outline frontage options on how the building interacts with and is connected to the public right-of-way or the public realm. In terms of the frontage standards there are 11 different types of frontages that would be allowed on various building types throughout the district. Lastly are the building types, Russett has already mentioned some of the building types when she went through those zoning districts, they can be thought of as the various housing types that would be allowed, but they wouldn't always be residential uses some could be nonresidential uses. In addition to the text of the code, there will be a regulating plan, which is still being developed. The regulating plan will be very similar to a zoning map but it will have some additional information so it will identify the various zoning districts throughout the planning area. It will identify areas for civic and open spaces, it will have identified neighborhood centers, and it will have a thoroughfare and street and block network within it. Staff is exploring developing a regulating plan option that would rezone this area and are hoping that when the regulating plan is adopted these new zoning districts would be applied in this area as part of that which goes back Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 6 of 9 to some of the goals of a predictable process. Staff wants to get to a point where everyone can get behind the standards that are in this code and will allow developers to move forward with a subdivision and the site plan stage and not have to move forward with the rezoning. Signs asked Russett to clarify the rezoning part. Russett stated she brings it up because it's a little bit different than how it was approached in Riverfront Crossings. That form-based code was adopted and there were a handful of parcels that were rezoned as part of that code update, but for the most part, Riverfront Crossings was not rezone to the new zoning district. Therefore what they would like to do here in the South District is actually rezone the land as part of this process. Hekteon stated that part of the challenge with the Riverfront Crossings context is it's not green field and therefore sometimes conditions are necessary as certain public needs are created by that rezoning and the only real authority the City has is to impose those conditions is through the rezoning process. With a green field kind of situation, it can be set up ahead of time and there's not the need to correct historical or changes of circumstances for things such as the street pattern or needs for utilities or the need to be accommodating to adjacent uses. The need to retain that power to impose conditions is mitigated in a green field context. Russett added that even though they didn't do it in Riverfront Crossings for the reasons Hekteon explained, it's pretty common with form-based code to do the rezoning as the text amendment to the code and the map amendment. Russett wanted to mention a little bit on stakeholder outreach. The development of the code started earlier this year and in April they had stakeholder interviews and meetings with several different groups of people from architects, developers, community members, Chamber of Commerce, realtors, housing advocates, several different groups. In July of 2019, staff presented a residential market analysis to larger landowners and developers in this area. In addition to developing the code, part of the scope of work was doing a housing market study to determine whether or not there is a demand for missing middle housing types. The results of that market analysis was presented and is also available online. To summarize the report very, very briefly, that results showed that there is a market for missing middle housing types in this area. There's additional information in that study regarding price points for different housing types for sale and rental and absorption rates. Russett stated last month they released the initial draft of the form-based code and had Opticos in town to present the draft at two separate meetings. One meeting was with developers and larger landowners and the second was with community residents. They have requested feedback on that the draft by mid-December, and then in January 2020, they will release the regulating plan draft options and plan to have more meetings with stakeholders to discuss the map. In terms of timeline and next steps right now they are in the middle of reviewing the initial draft code and as the community is reviewing it staff is also reviewing it and will be providing feedback to Opticos. In January, the draft regulating plan options will be made available. Staff will also compile all of the comments that they receive on the draft, both on the regulating plan and the text of the code and send that back to Opticos. Opticos will then prepare a revised draft that will also be vetted, it will be looked at it internally and also at meetings with the community and send back more comments to Opticos. Finally, hopefully in spring of next year, they will have an adoption draft that they will be ready to take forward to the Commission into the City Council. Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 7 of 9 Parson asked to be reminded when the Commission had the joint meeting with Opticos with the Council when they were here one time. Russett asked if that was on the Riverfront Crossings form-based code. Dyer said it was both, it was sort of their preliminary of this and also Riverfront Crossings. Russet thought that was probably April or July. Hensch stated they were here even before that as he was interviewed about the near North Side a couple years ago. Russett stated that was also part of the phase one study it included the North Side. Signs thinks this all happened just before Opticos came out with the residential market analysis, they gave us just a hint at what was coming but they hadn't really released a plan yet. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: NOVEMBER 7, 2019 Signs moved to approve the meeting minutes of November 7, 2019. Dyer seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett noted a few weeks ago the Commission reviewed a text amendment to the Code regarding the affordable housing requirement in Riverfront Crossings to ensure that any Low- Income Housing Tax Credit projects could also be counted towards that requirement. That was adopted by Council on Tuesday. Hensch asked regarding development on Prentiss Street has Council approved it. Russett said it is approved however they have not resolved the height issue yet and staff has not received any design or application for design review. Hekteon noted the rezoning application from last meeting down off Lehman and Soccer Road, the applicant requested indefinite deferral at the Council level. Baker asked what is the status of the Pentacrest development? Russett stated staff is reviewing those plans right now at the design review committee. It will probably be coming before the Commission soon because there was a condition in that rezoning that the Commission has to review the elevations. Hensch asked who all constitutes the Design Review Commission committee? Russett stated it is herself, our senior building inspector Tim Hennes and the Development Services Coordinator, Danielle Stitzman. Baker had a question last meeting about electronic amplification of music on outdoor areas and staff was going to check on that. This was especially in terms of the Kum & Go and whether or not this could be an issue raised at the Board of Adjustment. Hekteon stated the City Attorney's office looked into that and they think there's a criteria that sort of generally says it will not be injurious to the property values of the adjacent neighborhood, so that would be about the only place that that would fit. However, in this particular situation the office felt like that would not be a reasonable condition for staff to recommend to the Board of Adjustment. Planning and Zoning Commission December 5, 2019 Page 8 of 9 Baker understands that and seriously would like for the Commission to consider a Code revision that just simply prohibits the outdoor amplification of music everywhere so this is not even a question anymore, not something to be settled the Board of Adjustment or negotiated here, that there's just no reason that any business should be allowed to broadcast in an outdoor area amplified electronic music. He feels it would be a simple Code revision if there is interest in it. He feels it is beyond an irritation, it is pollution. Baker wants to know if there's some interest on part of the Commission to at least have staff see what it would take to revise the Code to just make this not an option. Parsons asked it Baker is asking for no outdoor music whatsoever. Baker stated live music performances would not be affected by something like this, he is talking about the constant drone that some businesses have, like the Kum & Go, with outdoor amplified noise. Parsons asked what about a restaurant patio during a summer day and they're just they're having outdoor music. Baker would ban that, Parsons said he would not want to. Hensch stated the Commission discussed this in depth about the amplified music on Joe's place several years ago for the rooftop garden and he thought that was a pretty good compromise solution. So if that comes up again, he feels they can just handle it that way. Hekteon stated it might be different contexts and different approval criteria for a rooftop patio and set a different standard for sound and not an outright prohibition, but with conditions and limitations and restrictions. Baker sees the difference between an outdoor patio and restaurant versus the overhang of an outdoor HyVee or Kum & Go or something like that. Signs feels it would be hard to draw that line. Parsons agrees and says it comes across as singling out a certain business or sector and not encompassing everybody. Hensch thinks it is an extremely complex issue, this is an urban area, there's a lot of noise. It's a collegiate town with a lot of music and a lot of application things so this will take a lot of discussion. Baker said it is the distinction between music as part of the establishment itself versus just background noise. Signs disagreed because at an outdoor patio it's background noise. ADJOURNMENT: Parsons moved to adjourn. Signs seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2018 - 2019 1/17 (W.S.) 2/4 4/2_) 2/21 2/21 3/7 3/21 4/4 4/18 5/16 6/6 6/20 7/18 8/15 9/5 10/3 10/17 11/7 BAKER, LARRY X X X X X X X O/E X X X X X O/E X X DYER, CAROLYN O/E X X X X X X O/E X X X X X O/E X X FREERKS, ANN -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HENSCH, MIKE X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X X X X X MARTIN, PHOEBE X O/E X X X O/E X X X X O/E O/E X X X X PARSONS, MAX X X X X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X SIGNS, MARK X X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X X X X THEOBALD, JODIE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TOWNSEND, BILLIE X X X O/E X X X X X X X X X X X X 12/5 BAKER, LARRY X DYER, CAROLYN X HENSCH, MIKE X MARTIN, PHOEBE O/E PARSONS, MAX X SIGNS, MARK X TOWNSEND, BILLIE O/E KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member