HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC Agenda Packet 4.9.2020
Thursday
April 9, 2020
5:30 p.m.
Electronic
Zoom Meeting Platform
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, April 9, 2020
Electronic Meeting – 5:30 p.m.
Zoom Meeting Platform
Agenda
A) Call to Order
B) Roll Call
C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
D) Certificate of Appropriateness – Consent Agenda
922 Rundell Street – Dearborn Street Conservation District (entry porch modification)
E) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff
Certificate of No Material Effect –Chair and Staff review
809 Ronalds Street – Brown Street Historic District (roof shingle replacement)
Minor Review –Staff review
920 Dearborn Street – Dearborn Street Conservation District (front stoop and step replacement)
Intermediate Review –Chair and Staff review
1. 813 Rundell Street – Dearborn Street Conservation District (rear basement egress window)
2. 820 Ronalds Street – Brown Street Historic District (minor change to a previous COA- revisions
to opening configuration on new outbuilding)
F) Consideration of Minutes for March 12, 2020
Electronic Meeting
(Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8)
An electronic meeting is being held because a meeting in person is impossible or
impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members,
staff and the public presented by COVID-19.
You can participate in the meeting and can comment on an agenda item by joining
the Zoom meeting via the internet by going to https://zoom.us/j/379370789. If you
are asked for a meeting ID, enter 379 370 789 to enter a 'Waiting Room' for the
meeting. If you have no computer or smartphone, or a computer without a
microphone, you can call in by phone by dialing (312) 626-6799 and entering the
meeting ID when prompted. Providing comment in person is not an option.
G) Commission Information and Discussion
1. Historic Preservation Fund Report (deferred from March 12, 2020 meeting)
2. Preserve Iowa Summit, Dubuque, June 4-6, 2020 (SAVE THE DATE)
3. Annual Historic Preservation Awards Update
H) Adjournment
If you will need disability-related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica
Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged
to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs.
Staff Report April 2, 2020
Historic Review for 922 Rundell Street
District: Dearborn Street Conservation District
Classification: Contributing
The applicant, Andy Small, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 922 Rundell Street, a
Contributing property in the Dearborn Street Conservation District. The project consists of the removal of
the block return on the sidewalls of the front entry porch.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.3 Doors
4.8 Masonry
4.10 Porches
Staff Comments
This house was built between 1925 and 1930 as a single-story gable roof house with a symmetrical gable
entry. It is constructed of concrete block which was a popular building material of the time though somewhat
rare in Iowa City’s current Historic and Conservation Districts. The exterior has been coated with stucco,
which may or may not have been original but has achieved historic significance. The house has wood shingle
siding in the gables, one-over-one double-hung windows, and a rear patio defined by a low concrete block
wall. On the front, a similar low concrete block wall defines the gabled entry porch.
The applicant is proposing to alter the entry point of the low concrete block defining the entry porch.
Currently the low block wall extends from the main wall of the house two to three feet. Then the wall
terminates with a portion of the wall that turns the corner to sit perpendicular to the portion of the wall
closest to the house. This front portion of the wall reduces that entry point to about 24 inches. By removing
the perpendicular portion of the wall that turns the corner, the opening can be increased by at least 8 inches,
allowing greater access to the front door. The wall alteration will be coated in stucco to match the existing
stucco texture. Some of this work was completed prior to submittal of an application for historic review.
The guidelines recommend that the original size and shape of door openings should be maintained. Blocking
down door openings to accommodate standard door sizes is disallowed. Porches are the focus of many
historic buildings and help define their overall character.
In Staff’s opinion, this alteration will not impact the historic character of this house if it is finished properly to
match the existing stucco texture and the front face of the wall is plumb and squared. This entry porch is
unique in terms of most of the historic construction that falls under the Commission’s purview. The above-
mentioned portions of the guidelines are included for general consideration of these types of elements (doors,
masonry, and porches) but do not address this situation directly. Most of them are concerned with reducing
larger historic elements to allow replacement with smaller more readily available modern products. This is not
the situation for this project.
It is not clear whether or not the entry porch and rear patio are original to the house but because of their
construction, attachment, and finish they are assumed to be historic if not original. Both low concrete walls
appear as room-like spaces with an entry opening added to one wall. On the back patio, the entry is located
mid-span in the south-facing portion of the wall. At the front porch, the entry is centered in the front-facing
west wall. Sometimes in concrete block construction a wall return or corner is included to add structural
stability to the wall from lateral forces.
With this project, the goal is to increase the front entry width by making the smallest alteration possible. With
a wall this short, it is unlikely that the corner is necessary for structural stability. If the end of the altered wall
is finished professionally and the floor slab is repaired appropriately, staff finds this project an appropriate
solution for increasing the ease of access to this home.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 922 Rundell Street as presented in the
staff report
Application for Historic Review
Property Owner/ Applicant information
(Please check primary contact person)
Historic Designation
(Maps are located at the following link: www.icgov.org/historicpreservationresources)
Proposed Project Information
Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or
properties located in a historic district or conservation district
pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-3B. Guidelines for
the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and
regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic
Preservation Handbook, which is available in the
Neighborhood and Development Services office at City Hall
or online at: www.icgov.org/historicpreservationresources
The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must
comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the
office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the
meeting. See last page of this application for deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use:
Date submitted:
Certificate of No material Effect
Certificate of Appropriateness
Major Review
Intermediate Review
Minor Review
Property Owner Name:
Email:
Address:
Phone Number:
City: State: Zip Code:
This Property is a local historic landmark.
This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location):
Contractor/Consultant Name:
Email:
Address:
Phone Number:
City: State: Zip Code:
Address:
Use of Property: Date Constructed (if known):
OR
Brown St. Historic District
College Green Historic District
East College St. Historic District
Longfellow Historic District
Northside Historic District
Summit St. Historic District
Woodlawn Historic District
Clark St. Conservation
District
College Hill Conservation District
Dearborn St. Conservation District
Goosetown/ Horace Mann
Conservation District
Governor-Lucas St. Conservation
District
Within the district, this Property is Classified as:
Contributing Noncontributing Nonhistoric
Jefferson St. Historic District
Andy Small
videocentermedia@gmail.com 3193511200
25 N Van Buren
Iowa City IA 52245
SAME
922 Rundel
RENTAL ?
Application Requirements
Application Requirements
Addition
Building Elevations
(Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.)
Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all
listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected.
Product Information
Floor Plans
Site Plans
Photographs
Alteration
Building Elevations
(Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening
alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project is a minor
alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.)
Product Information Photographs
Construction
Building Elevations
of a new building
Product Information
Floor Plans
Site Plans
Photographs
Demolition
Photographs
(Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such
as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.)
Evidence of deterioration Proposal of Future Plans
Repair or Restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance.
Other
Please contact the Preservation Specialist at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with applications
Project Description:
Materials to be Used:
Exterior Appearance Changes:
Photographs Product Information
To Submit Application:Download form, Fill it out and email it to jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org or mail to Historic
Preservation, City of Iowa City, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240
The cinder block porch had the last blocks at 90 degree so the entrance was too tight fit the fridge, couch, counter cabinets, etc
anything into the house 28 inches was too narrow to get anything into the house so I had to pop them off and was planning on
replacing them with the same Cinder block minus 4 inches. I am a self proclaimed stucoo Master and it will be a seemless. I also
replaced the roof which had holes in it with the same exact shingle. The front door must be replaced, the glass was vandalized and
the door knob installed incorrectly, in the dead center with the deadbolt below the door know, BRILLIANT! I dont have photos for
before, please see attached. I would have replace the screw on extrerior storm windows which really should be 1.5" wider for
maximum efficiency but now that I know its historic unfortunaltey I probably can't afford the specifc requred "historical" ones.
Any advice on the storms wold be greatly appreciated, you have my permission to enter the exerior of the property at your leasure,
thank you for your time.
stucco/sand, solid metal door 9 screews 3 hinges.
short cinder blocks by four inches to allow for stove and fridge to enter.
, 1,.
llt:1@
tlt
t1;ti
t1
'=l
r-rur-{ll/il u
Ll_\iil tr r\at \_/t3xo
3
<2' 2" >
Eh''
{ifl,1"\apl
x
.rio
o
2!\I?
I
"I
ooo
ag
oo
=o.
a
!liNi
,i
1tql
=
7oo
_-J-
/.,,\
\
mtroILaoo
3-
<2'. 2',>
sNfi
N
5s-f
-
fll,.}o.l
iil
BEoeo
<6'3'> r <2,2"> <10'9">
I
rc
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
March 12, 2020
MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Agran, Kevin Boyd (by phone), Gosia Clore, Lyndi Kiple,
Jordan Sellergren, Austin Wu
MEMBERS ABSENT: Helen Burford, Sharon DeGraw, Cecile Kuenzli, Quentin Pitzen
STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow
OTHERS PRESENT: V. Fixmer-Oraiz
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action)
CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairperson Agran called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
1214 Sheridan Avenue – Longfellow Historic District (Rear screened porch and deck addition,
window and door changes to earlier rear addition).
Bristow explained 1214 Sheridan Avenue is in the Longfellow Historic District. Currently the
house is clad in metal siding and soffits. Most of the windows have been replaced with one-
over-one double-hung windows and there has been an addition on the rear of the house. The
current project is to add a screened porch addition to the back of the house, as well as a small
deck and change some of the window openings.
Bristow displayed the site plan and pointed out where the screened porch will go. It will be set in
from the east side of the house and from the west side. The owners need to create a space
between the screened porch and the garage. There is a small set of stairs from the screened
porch to a small deck, as well as from the deck to grade.
The project proposes to change out an attic window on the west side of the house, as well as
two second-floor bedroom windows on the west side. On the east side there is a small kitchen
window that will be changed out.
Bristow shared a current image of the back of the house, which is the older addition, with a door
with an entry canopy, two windows on the second floor, and two windows on the first floor. She
said all these openings will change. The door and canopy will be removed. The pair of windows
on the first floor will be replaced with a set of French doors. On the second floor there will be a
door to a new roof deck on the screened porch, as well as a small group of ganged windows for
a bedroom. A rendering of the proposed project showed the new door on the second floor with
the group of windows and the second-floor deck, with a railing that has plain square spindles.
The screened porch will have a screen door. There will be French doors in the back of the
house. A window will replace the existing passage door. Below the screened porch portion of
the addition the space will be enclosed with skirting.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2020
Page 2 of 6
Staff worked with the contractor to determine how to design the railing and the columns since
the front of the house has large battered columns and high masonry piers with a solid railing.
There will not be battered columns on the addition. Instead, a simple, 6 x 6 column, but keeping
that idea of the enclosed balustrade below, so the screen will just fit in the space above the
balustrade. Bristow said there would be a short column, which is what they would have done on
the front porch, as well next to the screen door. If a full-height column was not needed, they
would have had a short column.
Bristow noted the new windows will be metal clad, wood double hung. Originally the house had
five-over-one double-hung widows, but all of them have been changed out except for the
bedroom windows. She said the pair of bedroom windows on the east side were approved to be
changed out as part of one of the previous projects.
Agran asked for clarifying questions, then opened and closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Clore moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at
1214 Sheridan Avenue as presented in the application and staff report. Kiple seconded
the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
JOHNSON COUNTY POOR FARM PROJECT PRESENTATION:
V. Fixmer-Oraiz, Project Manager for the Johnson County Historic Poor Farm, presented the
farm’s 10-year master plan to familiarize the Commission with the project. The Poor Farm is
within City Limits but owned by Johnson County. It adheres to State Historic Preservation
standards.
Fixmer-Oraiz thought it was important to acknowledge the Algonquin family of tribes that were
here - the Illini, the Iowa, and the Dakota family, and not only to say this is who was here then,
but Native people are still here. She said the Historic Poor Farm has interest in engaging Native
Americans.
Fixmer-Oraiz explained poor farms came over in the 1800s from Europe. It was a social
experiment on what to do with people who had disabilities, mental health issues, or those who
were poor. Europe modeled a farm setting where people could have fresh air and a daily routine
working on a farm, trying to be self-sufficient. She said Iowa is about as far west as the idea
traveled, and every county had a poor farm. Often the land was of very poor quality. At any point
in time there was anywhere from 10 individuals to over 80 at one point. They were growing their
own food. They had cows and other livestock. They were canning.
Fixmer-Oraiz said when the Supervisors wanted to acknowledge this poor farm site there was a
lot of pushback. Residents were poor and/or had mental health issues. They used to be called
insane and indigent. Putting them all in one place created problems. Based on documentation,
the Johnson County site included people who were incredibly aggressive. She said, as the
system developed and Mt. Pleasant opened, folks moved on to facilities that had shock therapy.
She said, the eugenics board was highly involved at that point, deciding where people would go.
Fixmer-Oraiz noted in Iowa there are three poor farms left that have existing buildings and
Johnson County’s is one of the best examples, with the oldest building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2020
Page 3 of 6
Fixmer-Oraiz shared slides of the Johnson County Historic Poor Farm. The farm is 160 acres on
the south side of Melrose Avenue just beyond Hwy 218. It is across from Johnson County
Secondary Roads. Chatham Oaks is onsite, which is an entity that takes care of people on a 24-
hour basis, people with mental health and physical disabilities. It is on the existing foundation of
the original poor farm where they housed people. That building was razed in 1963 and then they
built on top of it. To the northeast is Melrose Ridge, a housing component for Chatham Oaks
residents.
Fixmer-Oraiz explained 120 acres are in an historic district. It was registered on the National
Register of Historic Places in 2014. Leah Rogers, now part of Tallgrass Historians, did the
nomination. The nature of poor farms was such that people didn’t want other people to know
they had family there, or they didn’t want people to know that they went there. Because of this,
many items were either thrown away or people died and had no family to collect their
belongings.
Fixmer-Oraiz showed the site’s mutability over time, beginning in the 1870s. She said for the
past 30 to 40 years about 120 acres were corn and soy beans. The County contracted it out to a
farmer. She was hired by the County to make this public land available again to the public.
During the master planning process, the Supervisors wanted to focus on historic preservation,
local food, housing, conservation, recreation and trails, with an education component to each of
those.
The mission of the Johnson County Historic Poor Farm is to provide a public space for
connecting to the land and local history through inclusive community-led opportunities. Values
include accessibility beyond compliance, food justice, storytelling, collaboration, resilience, and
community building.
Fixmer-Oraiz said the farm has a disability-first framework because of the people who were
housed here; it’s their place. She said there was a Federal mandate that care providers for
people with disabilities must make sure there are a certain number of hours every day that
residents must be outside of the facility. Much of that time was spent at the Historic Poor Farm.
She said it is difficult to get around the farm due to mud and broken concrete. That’s why the
framework includes accessibility beyond compliance. Food justice – there’s a lot of local food on
site. Storytelling – that’s how you build community. Collaboration – there are many things that
happen on the site. Resilience and community-building is activating the site and being sure to
think about the future.
Fixmer-Oraiz detailed the make-up of the farm. There are 15.5 acres of prairie. Johnson County
Conservation planted that two years ago and it will be burned for the first time this year. There
are three trails running through the farm. Ten acres make up a land access program. It is
essentially for farmers. You can get one-eighth of an acre up to a couple acres. The County
provides water and storage. There is a CSA and three other farms that produce direct-to-
market. There’s the pollinator meadow or the prairie meadow in the middle. She noted that
Confluence, a design firm in Cedar Rapids, helped design a signage packet for the farm.
Fixmer-Oraiz said the farm is currently going through a review process with the City Building
Inspector and Engineering for upgrading the parking and roadway. She noted the need to
maintain a balance between historic preservation and safe public access. She said the farm is
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2020
Page 4 of 6
trying to use materials that do not look like pavement everywhere. Areas being reviewed include
a fire lane and 18 permanent parking stalls right in front of the asylum building. For the fire lane
they are using macadam base. They would like to use turf grow-through pavers for overflow
parking since it’s not used as parking all the time. It would help prevent ruts any time it is wet.
Bike racks are another consideration.
Fixmer-Oraiz detailed the structures on site. The Monitor-Roof Stock Barn, aka west barn, is on
the National Register. It was completely restored last year. It was upgraded for three-season
use and can be rented for events.
There is a gambrel roof dairy barn, established in 1912. It does have a silo, a concrete trough
and corn cribs attached to it. It had lead paint, which has been remediated. It contains milking
stanchions and an upstairs hayloft. She said the idea is for this barn to be an exhibit piece.
Fixmer-Oraiz noted the asylum is the oldest existing poor farm building in the state, built in
1861. It is registered separately from the Poor Farm. She said it is made up of cells and is two
buildings that were put together. She said access to the asylum will be improved.
The farm includes corn cribs, built in the early 1900s, and a granary, which will be improved, but
Fixmer-Oraiz wasn’t sure ADA access would be possible.
Fixmer-Oraiz said in order to engage the community a couple groups were created. Over 70
organizations were originally invited to join the Community Action Team. She said a dozen or so
have remained core and they help with projects and programs. She said organizations were
asked who they served, how were they serving them, and were there any gaps or opportunities
that the farm could help serve.
Fixmer-Oraiz said transit is their #1 issue and having the bus line out there is important to the
farm. She said a lot of folks use that bus line.
Another group created was the Disability Advisory Committee. They are engaged with
improvements on the site.
Historical Resources Roundtable Discussions – Fixmer-Oraiz encouraged anybody interested to
join. She said with the nature of poor farms, there are so many holes and gaps in information.
The discussions are a way to try to get it all together.
The community food production area is currently made up of two nonprofits – Grow Johnson
County, which provides fresh fruits and vegetables to food pantries and hunger relief agencies
in the County, and Global Food Project of Iowa City, which is community garden plots for new
Iowans and immigrants. Global Food Project of Iowa City is becoming a program of IC
Compassion.
Agran thanked Fixmer-Oraiz for the presentation. He admired the way the farm was honoring
the contours and natural intentions of the land itself. He said that element of preservation is
through conservation and more future-oriented land stewardship. While the Historic
Preservation Commission focuses on granular details of houses, the bigger picture includes
preservation of whole neighborhoods and preserving a way of people interacting in a certain
kind of built environment that is broader than just the siding on a house.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2020
Page 5 of 6
Wu asked if the bus line was preserved in any of the three proposed scenarios from the Transit
study.
Fixmer-Oraiz said it was preserved in one of the proposals.
Bristow noted she had served on the County Historic Preservation Commission when the
County was involved with grants to start some of the planning. She had been out to the farm to
help assess how much of the material would need to be saved or retained through a field survey
of the west barn.
Fixmer-Oraiz hoped to present this project to City Council to promote retaining transit to the
farm and asked the Commission for their support.
REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF:
Minor Review – Staff Review.
510 North Dodge Street – Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (rear stoop and step
replacement).
Bristow noted that with this project the back stoop and step are being replaced.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 13, 2020
MOTION: Clore moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission’s
February 13, 2020 meeting. Wu seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
COMMISSION INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION:
Historic Preservation Fund Report.
Agran recommended a motion to postpone the Historic Preservation Fund Report until a
meeting with better attendance.
MOTION: Clore moved to postpone the Historic Preservation Fund Report to a future
meeting. Wu seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
Preserve Iowa Summit, Dubuque, June 4-6, 2020.
Bristow noted the Preserve Iowa Summit will be in Dubuque June 4-6, 2020. Registration is
open. She said she would email the registration so Commission members could determine if
they want to go, and for what portions. Commission members need to then let her know. Based
on interest and budget, she would let them know how many people the City could take.
Annual Historic Preservation Awards.
The Historic Preservation Awards were discussed.
ADJOURNMENT: Clore moved to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Kiple.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Judy Jones
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2020
Page 6 of 6
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2019-2020
NAME
TERM
EXP. 4/11 5/09 5/23 6/13 8/08 8/19 9/12 10/10 11/14 12/12 1/09 2/13 3/12
AGRAN,
THOMAS 6/30/20 O/E O/E X X X X X X X X X O/E X
BOYD, KEVIN 6/30/20 X X O/E X X X X O/E X O/E X X X
BUILTA, ZACH 6/30/19 X X X X -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
BURFORD,
HELEN 6/30/21 O/E X X X X X X X X X X X O/E
CLORE,
GOSIA 6/30/20 X O/E X O/E O/E X X X X O/E X X X
DEGRAW,
SHARON 6/30/19 X X X O/E X X O/E O/E X O/E X X O/E
KARR, G. T. 6/30/20 X X X X X X X -- -- -- -- -- --
KUENZLI,
CECILE 6/30/19 X X X O/E X X O/E O/E X X X X O/E
KIPLE, LYNDI 6/30/22 -- -- -- -- X X X X X X O/E O/E X
PITZEN,
QUENTIN 6/30/21 X X X X X X X X X X X X O/E
SELLERGREN,
JORDAN 6/30/22 -- -- -- -- X X X X X X O/E O/E X
SHOPE, LEE 6/30/21 X X X O/E -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
WU, AUSTIN 6/30/20 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- O/E X X