HomeMy WebLinkAboutMatching fund Rebrics final1
PUBLIC ART MATCHING FUND PROGRAM AWARDS RUBRIC
I. PROJECT DETAILS AND DESCRIPTION
Overall Application
3. Application is clear,
concise, and well composed.
This project is substantially
different from regular
programming or has not
been done before by the
City. Case for support is
exemplary and merits
investment from the City.
2. The application is clear.
This project has elements
that are different from the
applicant’s regular
programming. Case for
support is adequate.
1. IAC: Application is unclear
or poorly composed. This
project has been done by the
applicant previously or
closely resembles
artwork/events already
available in Iowa City.
Case for support is
inadequate or does not
merit City investment.
Artwork/event and materials description
3. Project and description
are exemplary and clearly
advance the mission, vision,
and goals laid out in the
Public Art Strategic Plan and
Iowa City Public Art
Management Plan.
2. Project and description
satisfactorily advance the
mission, vision, and goals
laid out in the Public Art
Strategic Plan and Iowa City
Public Art Management Plan.
1. Project and description
are unclear and do not
advance the mission, vision,
and goals laid out in the
Public Art Strategic Plan and
Iowa City Public Art
Management Plan.
Images/plans and project illustration
3. Work samples are of high
quality and clearly
demonstrate exceptional
capabilities in artistic
concept and form.
2. Work samples are of
average quality and
demonstrate capabilities in
artistic concept and form.
1. Work samples are of poor
quality or demonstrate
inadequate capabilities in
concept and form.
PAAC Definition of public art
3. Artwork/event
dynamically engages with,
and extends the definition of
public art found in the Public
Art Strategic Plan and Iowa
City Public Art Management
Plan.
2. 3. Artwork/event clearly
fits within the definition of
public art found in the Public
Art Strategic Plan and Iowa
City Public Art Management
Plan.
1. 3. Artwork/event does
not clearly fit within the
Public Art Strategic Plan and
Iowa City Public Art
Management Plan.
Project location
3. Project location is
considerately and
strategically thought out to
reach target audience.
Project is appropriate for the
location. Artist/contractor
utilizes City Parks/Facility
Inventory in the Public Art
2. Project location is suitable
for the project. The project is
appropriate for the location.
1. Project location is random
and project does not suit
chosen location.
2
Strategic Plan and Iowa City
Public Art Management Plan.
Technical ability to carry out scope of project
3. Project has strong
implementation objectives.
Timeline demonstrates
thoughtful planning and
detailed consideration.
Confident project will be
realized through a clear,
reasonable timeline. Artist
and partner responsibilities
are clearly defined.
2. Project has identified
implementation objectives.
Timeline demonstrates
planning and consideration
of most tasks needed. Artist
and partner responsibilities
are defined.
1. Project has unclear
implementation objectives
and timeline. Raises
concerns about project
achievability. Artist and
partner responsibilities are
undefined or unclear.
II. PROJECT COSTS AND BUDGET
PAAC matching fund expenses
3. Project budget is clear and
intended use of matching
funds is detailed.
2. Project budget is clear but
the intended use of matching
funds is implied but
inadequately detailed.
1. Project budget is vague
and the intended use of
matching funds is
inadequate.
Funds from other sources/impact of PAAC funds
3. Project leverages diverse
funding sources and in-kind
support as appropriate.
PAAC funds are clearly
integral to project
implementation.
2. Project demonstrates
some diversity in funding
sources or in-kind support as
appropriate. PAAC funds are
supplementary to project
implementation.
1. Project demonstrates
inadequate or unclear
leveraging of diverse funding
sources as appropriate. The
impact of PAAC funds is
vague or extraneous.
III. PROJECT OUTCOMES
Specific outcomes and measures
3. Project uses strong
qualitative and quantitative
measures to analyze
achievement of arts goals
and implementation
objectives. Project has
appropriate methods in
place to collect data on
evaluation measures.
2. Project identifies methods
or measures to analyze
achievement of arts goals
and implementation
objectives.
1. Evaluation methods and
measures are weak,
inadequate or unclear.
Engagement with broader community
3. Target community for
project is well defined, its
relevance to project is
evident. Plans to disseminate
2. Target community for the
project is identified. Plans to
disseminate project and
1. Target community for the
project is not defined. Plans
to disseminate and provide
3
and provide equitable access
to project are exemplary.
provide equitable access to
project are satisfactory.
equitable access to project
are inadequate.
Community partner integration
3. There is clear
demonstration of
collaborative partnership. All
involved parties share
significant responsibility for
the successful outcome of
the project.
2. There is some
demonstration of
collaboration. There is
investment on both sides,
but it is imbalanced.
1. There is little to no
demonstrated partnership. If
there are listed partners,
partners appear minimally
involved.