Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMatching fund Rebrics final1 PUBLIC ART MATCHING FUND PROGRAM AWARDS RUBRIC I. PROJECT DETAILS AND DESCRIPTION Overall Application 3. Application is clear, concise, and well composed. This project is substantially different from regular programming or has not been done before by the City. Case for support is exemplary and merits investment from the City. 2. The application is clear. This project has elements that are different from the applicant’s regular programming. Case for support is adequate. 1. IAC: Application is unclear or poorly composed. This project has been done by the applicant previously or closely resembles artwork/events already available in Iowa City. Case for support is inadequate or does not merit City investment. Artwork/event and materials description 3. Project and description are exemplary and clearly advance the mission, vision, and goals laid out in the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. 2. Project and description satisfactorily advance the mission, vision, and goals laid out in the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. 1. Project and description are unclear and do not advance the mission, vision, and goals laid out in the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. Images/plans and project illustration 3. Work samples are of high quality and clearly demonstrate exceptional capabilities in artistic concept and form. 2. Work samples are of average quality and demonstrate capabilities in artistic concept and form. 1. Work samples are of poor quality or demonstrate inadequate capabilities in concept and form. PAAC Definition of public art 3. Artwork/event dynamically engages with, and extends the definition of public art found in the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. 2. 3. Artwork/event clearly fits within the definition of public art found in the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. 1. 3. Artwork/event does not clearly fit within the Public Art Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. Project location 3. Project location is considerately and strategically thought out to reach target audience. Project is appropriate for the location. Artist/contractor utilizes City Parks/Facility Inventory in the Public Art 2. Project location is suitable for the project. The project is appropriate for the location. 1. Project location is random and project does not suit chosen location. 2 Strategic Plan and Iowa City Public Art Management Plan. Technical ability to carry out scope of project 3. Project has strong implementation objectives. Timeline demonstrates thoughtful planning and detailed consideration. Confident project will be realized through a clear, reasonable timeline. Artist and partner responsibilities are clearly defined. 2. Project has identified implementation objectives. Timeline demonstrates planning and consideration of most tasks needed. Artist and partner responsibilities are defined. 1. Project has unclear implementation objectives and timeline. Raises concerns about project achievability. Artist and partner responsibilities are undefined or unclear. II. PROJECT COSTS AND BUDGET PAAC matching fund expenses 3. Project budget is clear and intended use of matching funds is detailed. 2. Project budget is clear but the intended use of matching funds is implied but inadequately detailed. 1. Project budget is vague and the intended use of matching funds is inadequate. Funds from other sources/impact of PAAC funds 3. Project leverages diverse funding sources and in-kind support as appropriate. PAAC funds are clearly integral to project implementation. 2. Project demonstrates some diversity in funding sources or in-kind support as appropriate. PAAC funds are supplementary to project implementation. 1. Project demonstrates inadequate or unclear leveraging of diverse funding sources as appropriate. The impact of PAAC funds is vague or extraneous. III. PROJECT OUTCOMES Specific outcomes and measures 3. Project uses strong qualitative and quantitative measures to analyze achievement of arts goals and implementation objectives. Project has appropriate methods in place to collect data on evaluation measures. 2. Project identifies methods or measures to analyze achievement of arts goals and implementation objectives. 1. Evaluation methods and measures are weak, inadequate or unclear. Engagement with broader community 3. Target community for project is well defined, its relevance to project is evident. Plans to disseminate 2. Target community for the project is identified. Plans to disseminate project and 1. Target community for the project is not defined. Plans to disseminate and provide 3 and provide equitable access to project are exemplary. provide equitable access to project are satisfactory. equitable access to project are inadequate. Community partner integration 3. There is clear demonstration of collaborative partnership. All involved parties share significant responsibility for the successful outcome of the project. 2. There is some demonstration of collaboration. There is investment on both sides, but it is imbalanced. 1. There is little to no demonstrated partnership. If there are listed partners, partners appear minimally involved.