Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022 Comprehensive Master Plan
City of Iowa City RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Approved by City Council on October 18, 2022 ii City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Parks & Recreation Department Staff • Juli Seydell Johnson, Director of Parks & Recreation • Brad Barker, Superintendent of Recreation • Matt Eidahl, Assistant Superintendent of Recreation • Joyce Carroll, Recreation Program Supervisor – Social and Cultural Programs • Jeff Sears, Recreation Program Supervisor – Sports and Wellness • Kate Connell, Recreation Program Supervisor – Aquatics • Michelle Wiegand, Recreation Program Supervisor – Communications and Events • RaQuishia Harrington / Malory Smysor – Recreation Program Supervisor – Adaptive and Inclusion • Caelea Housh, Recreation Assistant • Gabe Gotera, Administrative Coordinator • Kumi Morris, Facility Manager • Eric Alverez, Assistant Facility Manager • Tyler Baird, Superintendent of Parks & Forestry • Josh Worrell, Assistant Superintendent of Parks & Forestry City Council • Megan Alter • Laura Bergus • Shawn Harmsen • Pauline Taylor • Bruce Teague (Mayor) • John Thomas • Janice Weiner Park Advisory Board • Missie Forbes • Alex Hachtman (Chairman) • Connie Moore • Brian Morelli • Christopher Odinet (Vice Chairman) • Boniface Penandjo Lemoupa • April Schmidt • Melissa Serenda • Brianna Wills Consultant Team • BerryDunn - Lead Consulting Firm ▪Barbara Heller, Engagement Manager ▪Dannielle Wilson, Project Manager ▪Elsa Fischer, Subject Matter Expert • Hitchcock Design Group ▪Eric Hornig, Landscape Architect • Williams Architects | Aquatics ▪Frank Parisi, Architect • WT Group ▪Rich Klarck, Architect ▪John N. McGovern, ADA Consultant ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City iv City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs v Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City vi City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Section 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 The Process ...............................................................................................................................2 1.2 The Participants ........................................................................................................................3 1.3 The Focus .................................................................................................................................3 Section 2: Demographic Profile ..............................................................................................5 2.1 Age .............................................................................................................................................6 2.2 Race ...........................................................................................................................................9 2.3 Household Income ..............................................................................................................10 Section 3: Community Engagement Findings ..................................................................11 3.1 Needs Assessment Survey Summary .................................................................................12 3.2 Focus Groups .........................................................................................................................16 3.3 Pop-Up Event Booths ..........................................................................................................18 3.4 Social Pinpoint Summary ....................................................................................................23 3.4.1 Social Pinpoint Survey Results ..................................................................................23 3.4.2 Non-users/Barriers Survey Results ..........................................................................28 3.4.3 Social Pinpoint Ideas Wall Results ............................................................................31 3.4.4 Social Pinpoint City Park Pool Forum Results .......................................................35 3.4.5 Future Investment in Recreation Facilities .............................................................36 3.5 High Level Themes ...............................................................................................................37 3.6 Phase 2 Engagement Feedback ........................................................................................38 Section 4: Recreation Programs Assessment ...................................................................47 4.1 Program Menu .......................................................................................................................48 4.2 Program Performance .........................................................................................................54 4.3 Similar Providers ...................................................................................................................65 4.4 Community Needs Assessment Alignment.....................................................................66 4.5 Trends ......................................................................................................................................70 4.6 Program Implementation Support ....................................................................................74 4.7 Programs and Services Recommendations ....................................................................82 Section 5: Facility and Field Analysis ..................................................................................85 5.1 City Park Pool ........................................................................................................................87 5.2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center ...............................................................................................90 5.3 Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center ...............................................................94 5.4 Outdoor Fields Summary ...................................................................................................99 TABLE OF CONTENTS vii Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 6: Key Findings, Concepts, and Recommendations .....................................106 6.1 Big Picture Concepts .........................................................................................................107 6.2 Connections .........................................................................................................................112 6.3 Continued Community Input ...........................................................................................113 Section 7: The Future .............................................................................................................114 7.1 Vision Statements .................................................................................................................115 7.2 Action Plan ............................................................................................................................116 Appendix A: Community Engagement Details ...............................................................119 Appendix A1: Comment Card Feedback .......................................................................120 Appendix A2: Focus Group Comments .........................................................................124 Appendix A3: Social Pinpoint Open Ended Feedback ................................................135 Appendix A4: Phase 2 Community Engagement Program Ideas .............................150 Appendix B: Recreation Assessment Supporting Details ...........................................165 Appendix B1: Statistically Valid Survey Findings Report ............................................167 Appendix B2: Statistically Valid Survey Open-Ended Responses .............................267 Appendix B3: Public Survey Data ....................................................................................283 Appendix C: Recreation Assessment Supporting Details...........................................331 Appendix C1: Similar Provider Details ............................................................................332 Appendix C2: Participation Heat Maps ..........................................................................343 Appendix C3: Departmental DEI Assessment ...............................................................347 Appendix C4: Life Cycle Analysis Details .......................................................................348 Appendix D: Aquatic Engineering Reports .....................................................................351 Appendix E: Facilities Architectural Reports ................................................................409 Appendix F: Accessibility and ADA Compliance Report .............................................471 Appendix G: Athletic Fields Report ...................................................................................489 viii City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION This page is intentionally left blank. SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 2 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION The City of Iowa City’s (City’s) Parks and Recreation Department (Department) committed to a community-focused planning initiative in 2021, designed to create a roadmap for future recreation programs, aquatic facilities, indoor recreation space, and outdoor athletic/specialty-use areas. Paramount to this project was the Department’s desire to listen and respond to the community’s needs. The project began by engaging all segments of the community through a wide variety of feedback channels. Then, combined with expert analysis of existing recreation programs and facilities, an action plan was developed to help establish a realistic implementation timeline and prioritize resources. The overarching goal of the plan is to prioritize resources to provide aquatic and recreation facilities and programs that are equitable, accessible, and responsive to the Iowa City community. 1.1 THE PROCESS Led by BerryDunn, a consulting team comprised of five different industry expert firms worked on the project from August 2021 to July 2022. A four-phase approach guided the planning process: ENGAGEMENT The initial round of community engagement focused on assessing the community’s overall recreation needs. A statistically valid survey, public survey, online public engagement platform, focus groups, stakeholder meetings, and in-person event booths provided a variety of participation methods. The surveys and online platform were available in multiple languages. The second round of communication honed in on specific areas that either needed follow-up feedback from the community or were new based on analysis findings. New questions and content on the online platform, two open houses, special event display, and public displays at the recreation centers allowed for continued public engagement. Additionally, as the findings and subsequent recommendations continued to be refined, the Department held a pool tour for the public to join the Parks Commission during its visits. ANALYSIS Each industry expert firm conducted an analysis process respective to their areas of expertise: aquatic engineering, facility architecture, accessibility, outdoor athletic field design, and recreation programs. Indoor sites examined included Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center and Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium. Outdoor sites examined included City Park Pool, City Park ballfields, Napoleon Park ballfields, Mercer Park, Kickers Soccer Complex, and the East Side Sports Complex master plan. The team also analyzed the 2019, 2020, and 2021 recreation program and service menus participation. VISIONING Data gathered through these individual analyses performed in the engagement and assessment phases informed the visioning process. The purpose of visioning is to develop the most appropriate response to the identified needs and priorities of the community based on all of the previous technical aspects of the process in collaboration with City leaders. PLANNING Four key big-picture concepts evolved from the visioning process. The concepts were explored with the public and governing bodies, then refined. The work from the previous phases fed into an action plan development process. With near-term and long-term timeline designations, the action plan prioritizes immediate needs. The subsequent comprehensive recreation facilities and programs master plan document outlines the facilities and program direction for the next ten years and beyond. 3Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.2 THE PARTICIPANTS The Department’s staff played a key role in administratively managing the project on behalf of the City and actively participating in the community engagement execution. The staff team embraced their role as owners of both the project and resulting plan, as a reflection of their continuous desire to meet residents’ leisure needs. A project steering committee (committee) provided support, guidance, and oversight of the project’s progress. The committee participated in meetings and workshops throughout the project, and helped to guide the visioning and plan development. Stakeholders representing groups, cultures, teams, businesses, and interests from a variety of perspectives participated in a series of focus groups. Their perspectives, insight, and time were of high value to this plan’s development. Community members voiced their opinions in a variety of ways throughout this planning process. Over 2,000 separate touch points informed the robust feedback dataset. 1.3 THE FOCUS It is important to acknowledge the external influencing factors that affect decision- making, impact recommendations, and influence strategically plan for the future. The list below demonstrates the factors the consulting team kept top of mind throughout the project’s progress. By no means is this an all-inclusive list of factors; the consulting team acknowledges that these factors highlight causes that are important to the City as well as recreation facilities and programs. 4 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION This page is intentionally left blank. 5Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION SECTION 2 Demographic Profile 6 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Demographic trends can inform the vision for future program growth and development; therefore, to gain insight into the characteristics of the City constituents, BerryDunn reviewed several key socioeconomic indicators in relation to recreation service provision. BerryDunn obtained demographic data used for the analysis from Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (Esri), a research and development organization that specializes in population projections and market trends. All data was acquired in 2021 and reflect actual numbers as reported in the 2010 U.S. Census, as well as demographic projections for 2021 (current) and 2026 as estimated by Esri. Final data from the 2020 U.S. Census was not available at the time of writing this report. An aspect to note while studying the City’s demographic profile is an acknowledgment that the U.S. Census data reflects permanent City resident population as well as the University of Iowa (University) student body. The data presented in this report does not separate these two groups’ unique age, race, or income designations. 2.1 AGE The median age of the 67,768 City residents recorded in the 2010 U.S. Census was 25.8 years compared to the national average median age of 37.2 years. Table 2.1 depicts the population of the City based on age group. The U.S. Census 2010 column contains actual data collected through the U.S. Census process. The 2021 and 2026 columns contain current and estimated projections, respectively. Table 2.1: Population by Age Age Group 2010 U.S. Census 2021 2026 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0 – 4 years 3,197 4.7%3,261 4.2%3,532 4.2% 5 – 9 years 2,779 4.1%2,987 3.8%3,138 3.8% 10 – 14 years 2,546 3.8%2,961 3.8%3,018 3.6% 15 – 19 years 7,523 11.1%8,124 10.4%8,364 10.1% 20 – 24 years 16,699 24.6%17,950 23.0%18,954 22.8% 25 – 34 years 11,168 16.5%12,812 16.4%13,217 15.9% 35 – 44 years 6,263 9.2%7,647 9.8%8,525 10.3% 45 – 54 years 6,143 9.1%6,075 7.8%6,494 7.8% 55 – 64 years 5,873 8.7%6,691 8.6%6,511 7.8% 65 – 74 years 2,790 4.1%5,790 7.4%6,371 7.7% 75 – 84 years 1,842 2.7%2,515 3.2%3,590 4.3% 85+ years 945 1.4%1,270 1.6%1,412 1.7% Total 67,768 78,083 83,126 The total population of the City is projected to experience an increase of 22.6% (or 15,358 people) between 2010 and 2026. 7 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Figures 2.1 and 2.2 break down the population shift between youth and adults according to the same age groupings in Table 2.1. Figure 2.1: Youth Population Shift 05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,5005,0005,5006,0006,5007,0007,5008,0008,5009,000 2010 Census 2021 2026 Youth Population Shift 0-4 years 5-9 years 10-14 years 15-19 years Figure 2.2: Adult Population Shift 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 2010 Census 2021 2026 Adult Population Shift 20-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75-84 years 85+ years Shifts in population across all youth age categories are projected to increase by 12.5% or 2,007 people. The largest anticipated increase is in teens ages 15 – 19 years: from 7,523 in 2010 to 8,364 in 2026, an increase of 841 people (or 11.2%). The next largest anticipated increase in quantity is youth ages 10 – 14 years, which is expected to increase by 472 (18.5%). The number of youth ages 5 – 9 years will likely increase by 359 (12.9%). The smallest anticipated increase in the youth population is for ages 0 – 4 years, with an anticipated increase of 335 (10.5%). The overall predicted shift in the adult population is impressive with an increase of 25.8% or 13,351 people. This increase is more than double the expected percentage increase for the youth categories. Like the youth categories, all of the adult categories are expected to increase, as well. The largest increase is predicted for those ages 65 – 74 years at 3,581 people (128.4%). The next highest increase in the adult population is predicted for those ages 35 – 44 years at 2,262 people (or 36.1%). The data suggests that many seniors are staying in the community and aging in place. In 2026, it is predicted that there will be three times more people over the age of 55 years than there will be in the youth age category. Future programming and comprehensive planning should focus on the influx of people over the age of 55, who nationwide have shown an increased demand for services that focus on their health and wellness, as well as a desire to give back to the community through volunteer efforts. The City’s Senior Center serves older adults; therefore, the Park and Recreation Department (Department) typically targets residents under the age of 55. That said, the two departments should consider more collaborative program expansion opportunities. Enhanced and expanded adult and senior programming— and accessible facilities, parks, and trails—will be critical for this age category. In addition, it appears that young adults are moving into (or staying in) the area; due to their potential for having children, youth and family programming services and family events could experience an increase in demand in the near future. A total of 6,566 people between the ages of 20 and 44 will be added to the community between 2010 and 2026. 8 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE For ease of analysis and a more practical application, BerryDunn combined the data charted in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 into more generalized age categories: youth, young- adult, adult, active adult, and senior. Figure 2.3 depicts the percentage of the City’s population by age category in 2010, and Figure 2.4 depicts the predicted breakdown of percentage by age category projected for 2026. Figure 2.3: City Population, 2010 U.S. Census 23.7% 41.1% 18.3% 12.8% 4.1% Iowa City Population 2010 Census Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) Figure 2.4: City Population, 2026 Prediction The shifts observed in Figures 2.3 and 2.4 are also represented in Figure 2.5: Figure 2.5: Population Shift by Age Category Iowa City Population 2010 Census 23.7% 41.1% 18.3% 12.8% 4.1% Iowa City Population 2010 Census Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 22.2% 39.4% 17.6% 16.0% 4.8% Iowa City Population 2026 Prediction Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) Iowa City Population 2026 Prediction 23.7% 41.1% 18.3% 12.8% 4.1% Iowa City Population 2010 Census Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 23.7% 41.1% 18.3% 12.8% 4.1% Iowa City Population 2010 Census Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 2010 Census 2021 2026 Population Shift by Age Category as a percentage of the whole Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 2010 Census 2021 2026 Population Shift by Age Category as a percentage of the whole Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 2010 Census 2021 2026 Population Shift by Age Category as a percentage of the whole Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) Population Shift by Age Category as a percentage of the Whole 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 2010 Census 2021 2026 Population Shift by Age Category as a percentage of the whole Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 9 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Earlier in this report, the charts depicted the quantity of population increases by age groups, whereas Figure 2.5 represents the shift in age categories as a percentage of the whole population. The percentage of active adults is predicted to increase by 4.2 percentage points, and seniors are predicted to increase by 3.3 percentage points. Conversely, the number of adults is predicted to decrease by 5.1 percentage points, and the number of youth is predicted to decrease by 4.1 percentage points. By 2026, the City’s population will be approximately 57% adults ages 20 – 54 years, 22.2% youth 0 – 19 years, and 20.8% over 55 years of age. Table 2.2: Race and Ethnicity Race and Ethnicity U.S. Census 2010 2021 2026 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 55,917 82.5%58,490 74.9%58,874 70.8% Black Alone 3,912 5.8%7,346 9.4%9,608 11.6% American Indian Alone 144 0.2%222 0.3%244 0.3% Asian Alone 4,673 6.9%7,392 9.5%8,889 10.7% Pacific Islander Alone 28 0.0%64 0.1%75 0.1% Some Other Race Alone 1,395 2.1%2,087 2.7%2,501 3.0% Two or More Races 1,699 2.5%2,482 3.2%2,935 3.5% Hispanic Origin (Any Race)3,624 5.3%5,360 6.9%6,453 7.8% 2.2 RACE The majority of City residents, 82.5%, reported having a race of White Alone in the 2010 U.S. Census. Those that reported having a race of Asian Alone accounted for 6.9% of the population. Those that reported having a race of Black Alone accounted for 5.8% of the population. The remaining 4.8% of the population reported as Two or More Races (2.5%), Some Other Race Alone (2.1%), or American Indian Alone (0.2%). The data projects that the City’s race composition will shift by 2026, with an increase of 5.8 percentage points in the Black Alone category and a decrease of 11.7 percentage points in the White Alone category. The ethnicity of Hispanic Origin (a designation independent of race designation) is expected to experience a 2.5% increase by 2026. A deeper investigation into population numbers instead of percentages, however, provides a more complete understanding of the predicted racial changes. The number of residents who identify as Black Alone is predicted to increase by 5,696 people. The number of residents who identify as White Alone is predicted to increase by approximately 2,957 people. By 2026, the population of the City is predicted to be 70.8% White Alone, 11.6% Black Alone, and 10.7% Asian Alone. Gaining a solid understanding of what all City ethnic groups desire to do in their free time will help to keep the Department relevant. 10 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Figure 2.6: 2021 Population by Race 2.3 HOUSEHOLD INCOME The median household income in the City was $50,694 in 2021, substantially lower than the U.S. national median income of $68,400 in 2020. A 9.5% increase is projected by 2026, to $55,518. Figure 2.7 shows the breakdown by income level. Figure 2.7: 2021 Household Income Nearly 50% of City households have an annual household income of less than $50,000. The Department cautions that the lower income levels are, to some extent, a reflection of the community’s university student population. 22.2% 39.4% 17.6% 16.0% 4.8% Iowa City Population 2026 Prediction Youth (0-19 years) Young Adult (20-34 years) Adult (35-54 years) Active Adult (55-74 years) Senior (75+ years) 2021 Population by Race 2021 Household Income 74.9% 9.4% 0.3%9.5% 0.1% 2.7%3.2% 2021 Population by Race White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races 74.9% 9.4% 0.3%9.5% 0.1% 2.7%3.2% 2021 Population by Race White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races 74.9% 9.4% 0.3%9.5% 0.1% 2.7%3.2% 2021 Population by Race White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 17.9% 9.1% 11.0% 11.5%14.0% 10.4% 13.0% 5.3% 7.9% 2021 Household Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ 11 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE SECTION 3 Community Engagement Findings 12 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 12 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS As part of the 10-year Comprehensive Recreation Facilities and Program Master Planning (Plan) effort for the City of Iowa City’s (City’s) Parks and Recreation Department (Department), a great deal of public engagement was sought. The plan focuses on community needs and requests for aquatic facilities, indoor recreation space, outdoor athletic/specialty use areas, and recreation programming. The overarching goal is to prioritize resources to provide aquatic and recreation facilities that are equitable, accessible, operationally efficient and responsive to the Iowa City community. The community engagement for the Plan included a statistically valid community needs assessment survey conducted by ETC Institute (the full report is included in a separate document, but a high level summary is included in this report), a public opportunity to participate in the ETC survey, focus groups, pop-up events conducted by Department staff, and a Social Pinpoint virtual engagement website utilized to gather feedback online. This sections includes a summary of each of these types of engagement and concludes with a series of themes that assisted the visioning process. 3.1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY SUMMARY A major component of the public engagement strategy for the Plan was the administration of a statistically valid survey by ETC Institute. Department staff worked with the consulting team to finalize the survey tool during October 2021, and it was mailed randomly to selected residents in November 2021. After the survey process was complete in January of 2022, a public-facing survey link was available for two weeks, to encourage the general public’s participation. Complete survey results and the survey tool are in separate document. A high level summary of the survey results is included in this section. The full ETC Institute report is located in Appendix B. METHODOLOGY ETC Institute mailed a survey packet to a random sample of households in Iowa City. Each survey packet contained a cover letter, a copy of the survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. Residents who received the survey were given the option of returning the survey by mail or by completing it online at www.ICPRSurvey.org. Ten days after surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails, text messages, and placed phone calls to the households that received the survey encouraging participation. The emails and text messages contained a link to the online version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete. To prevent nonresidents from completing a survey, everyone who completed the survey online was required to enter their home address prior to submitting. The goal was to obtain a minimum of 350 surveys—this goal was far exceeded with 450 completed surveys collected. The overall results for the sample of 450 households have a precision of at least +/- 4.6% at the 95% level of confidence. Thanks for doing this - I’m glad my taxes are being thoughtfully used for the betterment of our entire community. We actively want children in the IC area to have plenty of low-cost, high quality, fun and inclusive opportunities - that is why we live here! ” ~Anonymous Survey Respondent “ 13 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS DEMOGRAPHICS Table 3.1 summarizes the self-reported age of the survey respondents, the 2021 population estimates per Esri, and the age breakdown of survey respondents’ households. Table 3.1: Age Ranges, Respondent Ages and Breakdown of Survey Respondent Households Age Range Survey Respondents’ Self-Reported Age 2021 Population, Esri Estimate Age Breakdown of Survey Respondents’ Household Members 0 – 4 years n/a 4.2%6% 5 – 9 years n/a 3.8%6% 10 – 14 years n/a 3.8%6% 15 – 19 years 18% (18 – 34 years) 10.4%6% 20 – 24 years 23%4% 25 – 34 years 16.4%9% 35 – 44 years 19%9.8%13% 45 – 54 years 20%7.8%14% 55 – 64 years 21%8.6%16% 65 years and up 23%12.2%21% Participants in the public survey reported younger ages than the statistically valid survey. The difference was almost exclusively between 35 – 44 year age group and 55-64 year age group; there were 10 percentage points more respondents ages 35 – 44 years (32.4%) and 10 percentage points less respondents ages 55 – 64 years (9.8%). The race of the survey respondents and how those figures compare to the overall Iowa City demographics are depicted in Table 3.2. Table 3.2: Race of Population Compared to Survey Respondents Race 2021 Population Per Esri Survey Respondents White 74.9%82% Asian 9.5%7% Black 9.4%8% Other Races 6.3%3% Hispanic*6.9%5% *The ethnicity of Hispanic origin is a designation independent of race. Public survey respondents were primarily white (91.2%). A very large percentage of survey respondents (65%) have lived in the community for 21 years or more. 14 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 14 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS IMPORTANCE OF PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Respondents were asked to rate the importance of programs and facilities offered by the City of Iowa City. The top three responses are as follows: • Provide safe recreation activities for residents • Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health • Provide low cost recreation skill development classes for youth Public survey respondents’ top three areas of importance are slightly different: Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health, Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents, and Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs. The top five facilities used or visited by respondents include: • Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (70%) • City Park Pool (61%) • Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym (60%) • Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center (59%) • Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (48%) It is important to note that all three aquatic facilities rated in the top five – emphasizing the great importance of aquatics to City residents. Public survey results are exactly the same order (80%, 78%, and 70%). When asked which programs were most important to households, the top three are: • Farmers Market (55%) • Adult fitness and wellness programs (41%) • Nature programs (28%) Public survey ranking is exactly the same order (59%, 40%, and 27%). The top three reasons that survey respondents do not use Iowa City parks, recreation programs, facilities, and events are: • Too busy (25%) • Use the services of other agencies (22%) • The program or facility desired is not offered (20%) Public responses were significantly different than the statistically valid responses. Program or facility not offered (34%), Program times are not convenient (31%), and Lack of quality programs (28%) were the top three reasons for non-use. AQUATIC FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS With the high importance of outdoor swimming in Iowa City, several questions were asked regarding outdoor pool amenities. The outdoor pool amenities that are most important to survey respondents include: • Lap lanes (25%) • Shade areas (23%) • Deck chairs (22%) • Open recreational swimming area (21%) Amenities most important to public survey respondents include, Lap lanes (45%), Shade areas (34%), Open recreational swimming area (33%), and Lazy river (25%). Pool programs most important to survey respondents include: • Lap swimming (66%) • Water fitness classes/water aerobics (60%) • Swim lessons (53%) • Family open swim (50%) • Senior aquatic programs (48%) Public survey importance ratings are slightly different, Lap swimming (48%), Family open 15 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS swim (45%), Swim lessons (44%), and Water fitness classes/water aerobics (33%). With the age of City Park Pool, there is a need to renovate this facility. Respondents were asked, if the cost were the same, if they would prefer: • A new pool layout with new amenities (67%) or • Renovate the pool to look the same as it does now (17%) A total of 16% of survey respondents did not respond to this question. Public survey responses were quite similar: new (59.7%), renovate (28.7%), and not provided (11.6%). OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES Survey respondents were asked how supportive they are of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments. • Very supportive (35.6%) • Supportive (29.9%) • Neutral (21.5%) • Not supportive (7.4%) • Not at all supportive (5.5%) Public survey responses are quite similar: 60% very supportive or supportive. Reasons respondents were not supportive included the notion that Other City services should be a higher priority (42% statistically valid and 33% public), a desire for recreational skill development (public 33%) and the project does not serve the needs of all City residents (27% statistically valid and 25.6% public). FUNDING PROGRAMS FOR UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS A great majority (82%) think it is either important or very important for the City to fund programs for underserved populations. Public survey sentiment is the same (91%). PRIORITY INVESTMENT RATING The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC to provide organizations with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on park and recreation investments. The PIR was developed to identify the facilities and programs that survey respondents think should receive the highest priority for financial investment. The PIR reflects the importance that respondents place on items (sum of top four choices) and unmet needs (needs that are being only partly or not met) for each facility and program. The top priorities for investment of recreation center amenities based on the PIR include: • Indoor walking/jogging track (200) • Weight room (102) • Fitness room (93) • Meditation/yoga studio (93) • Arts & crafts classroom (89) The top priorities for investment for recreation programming based on the PIR include: • Adult fitness and wellness programs (174) • Nature program (130) • Farmers Market (124) • Adult art classes (80) • Adult art, dance, performing arts (65) The top priorities for investment for outdoor pool amenities based on the PIR include: • Shade areas (192) • Lazy river (162) • Deck chairs (154) • Lap lanes (135) • Open recreational swimming area (134) 16 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 16 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS The top priorities for investment for pool programs based on the PIR include: • Water fitness classes/water aerobics (190) • Lap swimming (168) • Senior aquatic programs (158) • Swim lessons (157) • Family open swim (139) ADDITIONAL PUBLIC SURVEY OBSERVATIONS In addition to the comparisons made in the above areas, the public survey results differed from the statistically valid survey results in a few areas. The reasons households do not use Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events more often are Program or facility not offered (33.8%), Program times are not convenient (30.6%), and Lack of quality programs (27.8%). The statistically valid results placed Too busy, Use of services of other agencies, and Program or facility not offered in the top three, respectively. Public survey respondents had more of a need for lap swimming (54.6%) and swim lessons (47.2%), than statistically valid respondents (40% and 30%, respectively). Mixed sentiment was expressed regarding the need for ICPR to host special events, in both survey response groups. The public survey resulted in more female respondents (71%), more white respondents (91%), and a higher annual household income (61% vs. 48% over $70,000). 3.2 FOCUS GROUPS The first week in November of 2021, 10 focus groups were conducted that included 44 people. This section of the report summarizes the information gleaned from these participants. The groups included the following: • Aquatics (2) • BIPOC (2) • Business and Visitor Organizations • Iowa City Leaders • Nonprofit: Disability and Adaptive Services • Nonprofit: Faith Based Services • Nonprofit: Social and Family Services • Nonprofit: Youth and Teen Advocacy Some of the focus group attendees were very knowledgeable about Department programs and services while others had grown children and were not participants themselves. Following introductions, each group was asked 12 questions that focused on: • Initial thoughts about the Department • Commitment to Diversity, equity, and inclusion • Recreation centers • Outdoor facilities • Aquatics • Programs INITIAL THOUGHTS ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT Initial thoughts about the Department included the notion of being outdoors in green space such as parks, bike trails, playgrounds, and community gardens. The breadth of programming was mentioned many times including: intergenerational programming, the many activities for children including swimming lessons, and City events. 17 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Some frustrations were expressed regarding pool scheduling and the perception of a lack of organization and communication on behalf the aquatics staff. DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION Attendees were asked how the Department could be more welcoming and two main themes emerged; the first, be more inclusive to minorities and reduce barriers, and the second, improve and enhance communication and program promotion. To be more inclusive, the following recommendations were made: • Hire more diverse staff – help ensure the staff make-up matches the demographics of Iowa City. • Provide literature and programs in different languages • Train staff on diversity, equity, and inclusion • Address transportation barriers • Improve services to those with disabilities • Provide all gender restrooms and family locker rooms at recreation centers and pools Attendees were asked “on a scale of 1 – 10 (with 10 being very important), how important is it for the City to fund programs for underserved populations”. The overall response for this question was 9.23. RECREATION CENTERS When discussing recreation centers, focus group attendees are interested in new social spaces for youth, teens, people with mobility challenges, and seniors. In addition to offering programs, some are interested in opportunities for informal and unstructured recreation. Events are well-regarded and more are desired. Indoor athletic spaces for sports (volleyball and basketball) and additional fitness spaces were also suggested as needs. People would like to see the current locker rooms renovated and updated. When asked what was missing from current recreation centers an indoor track, more fitness spaces, and larger gathering spaces for community events, engagement, performing arts, and celebrations were suggested. A maker space as well as a larger art room would provide many new opportunities. An indoor center for soccer, baseball, and football was mentioned as a desire. Family locker rooms and all gender restrooms were suggested for all current facilities and any new facilities that are added to the system. OUTDOOR FACILITIES Focus group attendees were asked “how supportive are you of improving outdoor athletic fields for tournament purposes?” The responses were as follows: • 42.1% indicated that they were supportive • 36.8% indicated that they had no opinion or needed more information • 21.1% indicated that they were unsupportive Some commented on what Coralville has and wishing that Iowa City would do the same for baseball and softball. Some felt that this plan should go to the bottom of the list with other priorities much more important. Others shared that generating revenue from this type of a facility sounded like a great idea and worth pursuing. There is an interest in more biking trails, more pickleball courts, and more community gardens. AQUATICS Two questions were asked focus group attendees about aquatics. The first about the importance of teaching children how to swim and the second about City Park Pool. For the question “On a scale of 1 – 10 (with 10 being very important), how important is it for every child to learn how to swim?” the response was 9.71. For the question “If the cost was the same, would you: a.) renovate 18 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 18 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS City Park Pool to look the same as it is now, or b.) design a new pool layout with new amenities?” • 54.2% indicated they would design a new pool layout with new amenities • 45.8% indicated they would renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now Suggestions were made for renovations at City Park Pool including: • Keep the 50 meter lap lanes • Add zero depth entry • Increase accessibility • Family friendly amenities • Increase the green space inside the fencing PROGRAMS There was a great deal of conversation about activities, classes, or events that people wished the Department would offer including: • Environmental education (including plant identification, mushroom hunting, and gardening) • Art Club (suggested at Mercer) • Swim awareness, keeping ourselves safe in the pool, water safety • Social games (Bingo) • Stress management (integrated with nature) and guided meditation in a green space • Life skills • Cooking classes The full list of comments noted during the focus groups can be found in Appendix A. 3.3 POP-UP EVENT BOOTHS Between September 12 and November 3, 2021, Department staff scheduled 17 pop- up event booths at a variety of City events, parks, and facilities. There were four different activities at each event, allowing people to provide their input on recreation facility funding, program interests, City Park Pool, and barriers to participation. Comment cards were also available for people to share any thoughts or ideas about the Department. Four events were cancelled due to inclement weather. Of the 13 events held, the three with the highest participation include: • Farmers Market (on Saturday, October 9, 2021) that attracted 69 people • SodaFest (on Saturday, October 2, 2021, at North Town) that attracted 49 people • Halloween Carnival (on Friday, October 29, 2021, at Robert A. Lee) that attracted 36 people. In addition, there was an opportunity to provide input regarding program interests in the lobby of the Iowa City Public Library November 16 – 18. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, all of the activities were administered through individual cards so that people could socially distance, if desired. Nearly 300 people provided input during these events. The results of the four activities and the comment cards are summarized in this section. RECREATION FACILITY FUNDING For the recreation facility funding activity, participants were provided play money (three $5 bills) and instructed to use their money to explain how they believe Iowa City should invest in facilities. There were six voting boxes labeled: • Gymnasium • Indoor aquatics • Indoor fields • Outdoor aquatics • Outdoor fields • Recreation Centers 19 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Event Outdoor Aquatics Indoor Aquatics Recreation Centers Outdoor Fields Indoor Fields Gyms Total Participants Rec-N- Roll/Dog Paddle $140 $115 $55 $50 $55 $20 29 City High Swim Meet $80 $70 $60 $20 $20 $10 17 Youth Swim Lessons $55 $70 $35 $145 $45 $10 24 Rec-N-Roll $55 $75 $35 $20 $35 $30 17 Rec-N-Roll $65 $35 $30 $10 $15 $25 12 SodaFest $180 $160 $115 $65 $120 $90 49 National Hispanic Heritage Event $35 $10 $115 $10 $20 $25 14 Rec-N-Roll $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Farmers Market (Saturday) $45 $35 $45 $30 $10 $15 12 Rec-N-Roll $65 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 6 Rec-N-Roll $20 $15 $45 $10 $15 $15 8 Farmers Market (Saturday) $155 $275 $195 $125 $90 $190 69 Rec-N- Roll (RAIN)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Halloween Carnival $65 $50 $25 $5 $35 $0 36 Rec-N-Roll $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 General $15 $30 $15 $25 $0 $5 6 General $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Total $975 $945 $775 $520 $465 $440 299 Each voting box was tallied at the end of the event. Table 3.3 includes all of the facility funding results. Table 3.3: Facility Investment Results Outdoor aquatics received the highest total of play money voting dollars ($975), followed by indoor aquatics ($945) and recreation centers ($775). 20 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 20 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Program Number Interested Percent of Respondents Aquatics 93 31.1% IC Farmers Market 93 31.1% Nature & Environmental 76 25.4% Cooking 71 23.7% Gardening 68 22.7% Fitness 67 22.4% Arts & Crafts 64 21.4% Music 63 21.1% Dance & Movement 59 19.7% Outdoor Adventures 58 19.4% Events 54 18.1% Adult Sports 51 17.1% Camps 49 16.4% Cycling 49 16.4% Pets 49 16.4% Lifelong Learning 47 15.7% Historical 45 15.1% Wellness 41 13.7% Winter Sports 41 13.7% Kids Club 38 12.7% Drama 34 11.4% Martial Arts 34 11.4% Youth Sports 32 10.7% Computers & Tech 31 10.4% Inclusive Rec 28 9.4% STEAM 24 8.0% Teen Rec 24 8.0% E-Sports 13 4.3% PROGRAM INTERESTS The next activity focused on recreation program interests. Participants were provided a card that listed 28 recreation program ideas. There was also a note on the card that if there was a program someone was interested in that was not on the list, to make note of it. Table 3.4: Summary of Program Interests The results of this activity were tallied by event and then totaled. The detailed results from each event are included in Appendix A. Table 3.4 includes the summary of program interests. 21 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Additional program suggestions include: • More programs for kids (5) • Musical instrument lessons: piano, violin, guitar • Climate change volunteering – retrofit/insulate old homes • Community events: adult drama, more Shakespeare in park, and a river festival • Socially engaged art programming • Yoga, foreign language club, racquetball, and home improvement • Wilderness classes like WILD in elementary schools; nature walks and classes • Frisbee golf, mountain bike trails, BMX, and a pump track • Cooperative games; outdoor chess CITY PARK POOL’S FUTURE For this activity, participants were provided a card regarding City Park Pool. The card explained that the pool is over 70 years old, and it is time to talk about the future. The question on the card asked, “If the cost were the same, would you prefer to: A.) Renovate City Park Pool to look the same way it does now. B.) Design a new pool layout with new amenities.” A total of 266 participated in this activity. The comments from the pop-up events are included in Appendix A. Table 3.5 includes the summary of this question from all of the pop-up events. Table 3.5: City Park Pool Renovation Results Option #% A – Renovate with same layout 87 32.7% B – Design with pool layout 168 63.2% No opinion provided 11 4.1% FACILITY & PROGRAM BARRIERS For this activity, participants were provided a two-sided card—on the front they were asked about barriers that prohibit their use of facilities, and on the back they were asked about barriers that prohibit their participation in activities, programs, and events. Facility Barriers For the facilities question, a list of 15 options was provided along with an opportunity to write in other barriers. Table 3.6 is the summary of all of the pop-up events and the input from the Library booth combined. Table 3.6: Summary of Facility Barriers Facility Barrier #% Parking fees 28 24.3% I’m too busy 19 16.5% Facilities too far from residence 15 13.0% Utilize other recreation facilities 14 12.2% Hours of operation are inconvenient 12 10.4% Don’t know anyone that uses facility 12 10.4% Fees too high 9 7.8% Lack of transportation 8 7.0% Hours difficult to find 7 6.1% Language barrier 6 5.2% Facilities do not have right equipment 5 4.3% Not interested 4 3.5% Don’t feel safe 4 3.5% Other 4 3.5% Facilities not well maintained 2 1.7% Poor customer service 2 1.7% 22 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 22 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Ten comments were included regarding “other” facility barriers, and these have been organized in the following categories: Covid-19, parking, safety, scheduling, and miscellaneous. • Covid-19: the pandemic has changed the way we use recreation facilities (“I will only take my children to outdoor pools.”) (2) • Parking: more free parking is needed. • Safety: I don’t use Mercer following the shooting at the playground. • Scheduling: I am elderly and looking for programs midday; I work nights. • Miscellaneous: locker rooms need updating; I need help using the equipment and no one is available to assist me (it’s intimidating); when people get loud and obnoxious downstairs, it’s off-putting (people talking loud on their cell phones); my kids are no longer using the facilities so I have less reason to go. Program Barriers For the program barriers, the card included 13 potential barriers to programs with an option to write in other barriers. Table 3.7 is the summary from all of the pop-up events and the input collected at the library booth. Table 3.7: Summary of Program Barriers Additional program barriers offered are organized in the following categories: marketing, parking, scheduling, and miscellaneous: • Marketing – Ten comments were received relating to the need for more program promotion, and frustrations with the website and online registration. • Parking – Four comments were received expressing a desire for free parking downtown, additional parking, and more infrastructure for biking. • Scheduling – Four comments were made about scheduling issues, including class times being inconvenient (work or other conflicts) and the hours of open swim.* • Miscellaneous – Nine comments were made, including: lack of childcare, health issues, no time, racquetball not offered, spots fill up fast (especially swim classes for young children), the programs I am interested in are not available, Program Barrier #% Didn't Know Program/Activity Existed 64 55.7% Classes full 24 20.9% Program times not convenient 23 20.0% Website hard to navigate 18 15.7% Past negative experience 15 13.0% Difficult registration 11 9.6% Other 10 8.7% Transportation not available 8 7.0% Program not offered 7 6.1% Not interested 6 5.2% Fees too high 5 4.3% Lack of quality programs 4 3.5% Not offered in preferred language 4 3.5% Use programs offered by others 4 3.5% Facilities not well maintained 2 1.7% Poor customer service 2 1.7% 23 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS the need for promotion in other languages, and “we use Nolte Pool at CRWE.” *Open swim was immediately expanded based on these results 3.4 SOCIAL PINPOINT SUMMARY Social Pinpoint is an online engagement tool that BerryDunn utilizes to gather community feedback. With assistance from staff, the City’s engagement website was customized for the project with a branded logo, Department colors, and community photos, and it was rolled out on September 18, 2021. The site included the following opportunities for residents to provide input on the master planning effort: • Two surveys: One for current users of City recreation programs and facilities, and one for non-users of the Department that included some questions regarding barriers to participation. • An Ideas Wall with options to post comments regarding the following areas: Programs and Activities, Special Events, Recreation Centers, Athletic fields, and aquatics. • A City Park Pool Forum that asked residents “What should City Park Pool look like in the future? If the cost was the same, would you prefer to: a.) Renovate City Park Pool to look the same way it is now or b.) Design a new layout with new amenities?” • A ranking question regarding how the City should invest in recreation facilities. Site guests were asked to rank the following facilities one through six in order of investment importance: gymnasium, indoor aquatics, indoor fields, outdoor aquatics, outdoor fields, and recreation centers. The site also provided two downloadable documents, including the BerryDunn consulting contract and Frequently Asked Questions. Detailed information regarding project phasing was also included on the main page to provide context to site visitors regarding the project. For those who preferred to review the site in a different language, a drop-down menu offered a total of 108 language options. In total, the site attracted 642 unique stakeholders who provided 409 comments and submitted 667 surveys. 3.4.1 SOCIAL PINPOINT SURVEY RESULTS Two very distinct surveys were included on the City’s Social Pinpoint site. The first survey was designed for people who use the Department’s facilities and take advantage of the programs. The second survey was for non-users of the system and focused on the barriers to participation. Program Users Survey Results A total of 462 people responded to the survey (but not every person answered every question). The results of each question are summarized in this section. Are you an Iowa City resident? A total of 461 people responded to this question with 415 people (90%) indicating that they are residents of Iowa City. In addition to residing in Iowa City, respondents provided ZIP codes for 15 other communities. A total of 15 respondents reside in Coralville (52241), and seven reside in North Liberty (52317). The other 13 ZIP codes provided included one or two respondents. How old are you? A total of 458 people responded to this question. Table 3.8 includes the responses to the question regarding age. 24 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 24 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Table 3.8: Age of Survey Respondents Age Range Number Percentage 36 – 50 years 193 people 42.1% 65 years and over 93 people 20.3% 26 – 35 years 80 people 17.5% 51 – 64 years 77 people 16.8% 18 – 25 years 11 people 2.4% Three people preferred not to provide their age, with one respondent under the age of 18 years. How often do you visit our recreation center facilities? A total of 459 people responded to this question regarding recreation center. The results are summarized in Table 3.9. Table 3.9: Recreation Center Facility Visits How often do you visit? Number Percentage Weekly 169 people 36.8% A few times per year 131 people 28.5% Monthly 95 people 20.7% Daily 42 people 9.2% Do you agree or disagree that Iowa City Recreation is an essential provider in the community? A total of 451 people responded to this question. The pie chart in Figure 3.1 summarizes the responses to this question. Figure 3.1: Iowa City is an Essential Provider A total of 324 people (71.8%) agree strongly with this statement, and another 97 people (21.5%) agree with this statement. Combined, over 93% of respondents agree with the notion that the Iowa City Recreation Department is an essential provider in the community. 25 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS How important is it that every child in Iowa City learns how to swim? A total of 449 people responded to this question. The results are depicted in the pie chart in Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Importance of Learning to Swim When the number of respondents who think it is very important that children learn to swim is combined with those that think it is important, the total is 412 people (or 91.8%). Please rate your satisfaction with the following Iowa City Recreation facilities Respondents were asked to evaluate five Iowa City Recreation facilities on a 5-point rating with one equating to “Very Dissatisfied” and five equating to “Very Satisfied.” Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center/415 responses 1 19 people (4.6%) 2 44 people (10.6%) 3 183 people (44.1%) 4 129 people (31.1%) 5 40 people (9.6%) Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center – Indoor Pool/397 responses 1 27 people (6.8%) 2 59 people (14.9%) 3 152 people (38.3%) 4 116 people (29.2%) 5 43 people (10.8%) Mercer Park Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gym/402 responses 1 8 people (2%) 2 32 people (8%) 3 136 people (33.8%) 4 158 people (39.3%) 5 68 people (16.9%) Mercer Park Aquatic Center – Indoor Pool/406 responses 1 10 people (2.5%) 2 41 people (10.1%) 3 116 people (28.6%) 4 159 people (39.1%) 5 80 people (19.7%) City Park Outdoor Pool/403 responses 1 18 people (4.5%) 2 43 people (10.7%) 3 120 people (29.8%) 4 132 people (32.7%) 5 90 people (22.3%) 26 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 26 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Have you ever felt uncomfortable using Iowa City Recreation facilities? A total of 426 people responded to this question. The responses offered included Disability, Gender Identity, Language, Religious Beliefs or Customs, Sexual Orientation, Other (please describe), and I am comfortable using Iowa City facilities. The results for this question are summarized in Table 3.10. Table 3.10: Results for Feeling Uncomfortable in Iowa City Facilities Reason Number Percentage I am not uncomfortable 365 people 85.7% Disability 15 people 3.5% Gender Identity 5 people 1.2% Race or Ethnicity 4 people 0.9% A variety of other reasons only listed once 37 people 8.7% No one indicated that they felt uncomfortable due to their sexual orientation or religious beliefs or customs. Several respondents wrote in responses to this question, and those are summarized in Appendix A3. If Iowa City were to build additional recreation center facilities, where should they be located? A total of 202 responses were received for this question, and many made multiple suggestions. In addition to discussing new facility locations, the amenities new or renovated facilities should contain were also suggested. This summary will focus on location information since that was the question posed. Table 3.11 includes all the locations and the number of times these locations were suggested as good locations for new recreation facilities. Table 3.11: Location of New Facilities Iowa City Location # of Times Suggested West 40 South, South District, South of Hwy 6 37 East or Far East 31 Northeast 10 Southeast 10 Downtown 9 North and North Dodge 8 Underserved locations 8 Mercer 7 Southwest 6 Central*5 *For the central location, City Park was mentioned four times specifically. Additional comments regarding the location of new facilities are included in Appendix A3. 27 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS How supportive are you of improving the current outdoor athletic fields for tournament purposes (Current facilities include Napoleon Park Softball Complex, Mercer Park Ballfields, City Park Ballfields, and Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park). 0 = Not Supportive At All, and 10 = Very Supportive. This question provided an opportunity to express the support of this plan with a number (0 through 10). The responses are as follows: Figure 3.3: Support for Tournaments at Outdoor Athletic Fields When adding up the top support (7 – 10), the total is 65.98%. Average support (4 – 6) for this plan is 14.93%. Little or no support for this plan (0 – 3), is 19.11%. Favorite Program Areas – If you were promoting Iowa City to a friend or family member, which of the following would you tell them about? (Please select all that apply) For this question, 15 program areas were included to select. There was also an option to select other and fill in another program area. The responses to this question are: • Iowa City Farmers Market: 298 • Aquatics: 289 • Youth Sports: 170 • Nature & Environment: 141 • Adult Sports: 103 • Outdoor Adventures: 100 • Camps: 96 • Gardening: 79 • Arts & Crafts: 72 • Inclusive Recreation: 53 • Teen Recreation: 52 • Dance & Movement: 43 • STEAM: 43 • Martial Arts: 29 • Drama: 24 • Other (Please tell us which programs you enjoy most): 33 Responses to the open ended “other” section are included in Appendix A3. New Programs & Activities – Which programs and activities would you like to participate in? (Please select all that apply). The focus of this question is for respondents to think about new programs and activities they would like to try. The responses are: • Winter Sports: 176 • Fitness: 172 • Wellness: 151 • Lifelong Learning: 119 • Cooking: 109 • Cycling: 107 • Kids Club: 106 • Pets: 88 • Music: 85 • Historical: 66 • Computers & Technology: 54 • E-sports: 21 • Are there programs you are interested in that are not listed? Please share your ideas: 47 The “other” program ideas shared are included in Appendix A3. 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 Level of Support (0 = Not Supportive, 10 = Supportive) Support for Tournaments at Outdoor Athletic Fields 28 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 28 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Special Events – What components of a special community event are important to you? (Please select all that apply) The focus of this question was to learn what special event components are most important. A total of 14 options were provided along with an “other” option. The results are: • Exercise & Active Lifestyle Activities: 235 • Local Entertainment: 222 • Smaller Neighborhood Gatherings: 214 • Food: 175 • Art: 156 • Larger City-Wide Gatherings: 147 • Performance Art: 113 • Games: 111 • Educational Content: 109 • Adult Beverages: 95 • National Entertainment: 91 • Nonprofit Vendors: 87 • Dance: 65 • Commercial Vendors: 44 • Other (Please tell us what other event components you would like to see Iowa City implement at community special events): 20 The suggestions for “other” event components are summarized in Appendix A3. Where do you get your information about recreation programs and events? (Please select all that apply) • Social Media – Facebook & Instagram: 224 • Word of Mouth – Family & Friends: 215 • Email – From ActiveNet Registration System: 198 • Website – icgov.org/Recreation: 181 • Rec Guide – Three times a year: 129 • Press Releases – Subscribed through Iowa City website: 123 • Posters & Flyers – Located at the rec facilities: 88 • Staff & Customer Service: 19 • Other (Please tell us where you learn about recreation programs, activities, and events): 13 The responses for “other” are included in Appendix A3. Share any other questions, comments, feedback, or ideas you have about Iowa City Recreation facilities, programs, activities, or events. A total of 162 comments were made in response to this question – many of which included several suggestions in one response. These responses are summarized in Appendix A3. 3.4.2 NON-USERS/BARRIERS SURVEY RESULTS A total of 84 non-users/barriers surveys were completed. This survey includes 11 questions—each question and a summary of the responses follows. Are you an Iowa City resident? A total of 73 people (86.9%) indicated that they live in Iowa City. Other ZIP codes provided include: • Coralville (52241): 4 (4.8%) • North Liberty (52317): 3 (3.6%) • West Branch (52358): 1 (1.2%) • Williamsburg (52361): 1 (1.2%) • Lone Tree (52755): 1 (1.2%) • Tipton (52772): 1 (1.2%) 29 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS How old are you? A total of 84 people responded to this question with responses as follows: • 35 people (41.7%) are 36 to 50 years of age • 19 people (22.6%) are between the ages of 26 and 35 years • 13 people (15.5%) are over age 65 years • 12 people (14.3%) are between the ages of 51 and 64 years • 5 people (5.9%) are between the ages of 18 and 25 years Iowa City Recreation is committed to the continual improvement of accessibility in our facilities and programs. Did you know that we offer activity modifications, staff training, and adaptive equipment for integrated recreation opportunities? • Yes: 42 • No: 41 • No, please tell me more: One email was provided to learn more information. Have you ever felt uncomfortable using Iowa City Recreation facilities? A total of 81 people responded to this question as follows: • Disability: 11 • Gender Identity: 3 • Language: 2 • Race or Ethnicity: 2 • Religious Beliefs or Customs: 0 • Sexual Orientation: 0 • Other (please describe): 20 • I am comfortable using Iowa City Recreation Facilities: 54 The “other” responses to this question are summarized in Appendix A3. Iowa City Recreation facilities are difficult for me or a member(s) of my household because of a: (Please select all that apply) A total of 81 responses were provided to this question: • NA: 59 (75.6%) • Mobility disability: 7 • Behavioral disability: 4 • Sensory disability: 4 • Cognitive disability: 4 • Disability not listed (if willing please share more): 3 Additional disabilities not listed include: hearing loss (2) and neurological disability (1). Facility Barriers – What prohibits you or member(s) of your household from visiting Iowa City Recreation Facilities? A total of 80 answers were provided to this question: • I don’t know anyone else using these facilities: 27 • Hours of operation are inconvenient: 23 • Facilities do not have the right equipment: 17 • Facilities are not well-maintained: 16 • Hours are difficult to find: 15 • Facilities are too far from my residence: 14 • Parking fees: 14 • Fees are too high: 11 • We utilize other recreation facilities: 10 • I don’t feel safe using Iowa City Recreation Center: 8 • Not interested: 5 • Lack of transportation: 3 • Poor customer service from staff: 3 • Language barrier: 0 • Other (Please describe other barriers that prevent visiting facilities): 19 The “other” responses to this question are summarized in Appendix A3. 30 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 30 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Program Barriers – What prohibits you or members of your household from participating in Iowa City Recreation activities, programs, and events? A total of 80 responses were submitted for this question: • Didn’t know program, activity or event existed: 35 • Program times are not convenient: 25 • Website is hard to navigate: 23 • Program not offered: 18 • Classes are full: 14 • Fees are too high: 13 • Registration is difficult: 10 • Lack of quality programs: 9 • Not interested: 8 • Use programs offered by other organizations: 6 • Past negative experience: 4 • Transportation not available: 2 • Registration and program not offered in preferred language: 1 • Other: (Please describe other barriers that prevent program participation): 12 The responses for “Other” are summarized in Appendix A3. Program & Facility Policies – What changes would you like to see made to the Iowa City Recreation program and facilities policies? Although no one actually answered the specific question posed, a total of 29 responses were provided to this question and are summarized in Appendix A3. Special Events – What components of a special community event are important to you? (Please check all that apply) • Smaller Neighborhood Gatherings: 46 • Local Entertainment: 43 • Exercise & Active Lifestyle Activities: 41 • Food: 35 • Art: 31 • Educational Content: 29 • Larger City-Wide Gatherings: 25 • Games: 22 • National Entertainment: 20 • Performance Art: 19 • Adult Beverages: 18 • Dance: 17 • Nonprofit Vendors: 14 • Commercial Vendors: 13 • Other (Please tell us what other event components you would like to see Iowa City implement at community special events): 7 The responses to “other” are summarized in Appendix A3. 31 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Where do you get your information about recreation programs and events? A total of 78 people responded to this question: • Social Media – Facebook & Instagram: 41 • Word of Mouth – Family & Friends: 35 • Email – from ActiveNet Registration System: 26 • Rec Guide – 3 times a year: 25 • Press Releases – Subscribed through Iowa City website: 22 • Website – icgov.org/Recreation: 21 • Posters & Flyers – Located at the rec facilities: 16 • Staff & Customer Service: 5 Share any other questions, comments, feedback, or ideas you have about Iowa City Recreation facilities, programs, activities, or events. There were a number of responses to this question, and they are summarized in Appendix A3. 3.4.3 SOCIAL PINPOINT IDEAS WALL RESULTS The Ideas Wall allowed residents to weigh in on six topic areas, including: Programs and Activities, Special Events, Recreation Centers, Athletic Fields, and Aquatics. In addition to providing comments, site guests could add comments to other people’s thoughts and also provide a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to different ideas shared on the site. Programs and Activities A total of 31 comments were made regarding Department programs and activities. Five of these comments relate to items that are not included in this planning effort such as bike trails, playgrounds, and park amenities. The rest of the comments have been organized into the following categories: • Fitness • New programs • Outdoor programming • Pickleball • Promotion • Self-guided tours, activities, and resources Fitness There is a desire for 30-minute group exercise classes offered on weekdays over the lunch hour. In addition, a suggestion was made to add fitness classes such as Spin, TRX, Zumba, Yoga, HIIT, Barre, Boot Camp, Kickboxing, and Pilates to current offerings. New Programs In addition to the many new program offerings that were suggested, some are interested in finding ways to connect with others who have similar interests. Program suggestions include: • Youth: Bike and skateboarding offerings, and “how to be an adult” classes for kids and teens. • Adults: Archery, badminton, pickleball, ping pong, and pool. Adventure class suggestions included snowshoeing, basic outdoor survival skills, overnight camping, and hiking. There was also a suggestion for some “women only” classes—specifically the adventure- type classes. • Virtual programs with local experts such as: how to start a book club, memes, scrapbooking, photography, and meal prep. 32 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 32 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Outdoor Programming The suggestions regarding additional outdoor programming often came with a comment regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. Respondents are interested in more events in neighborhood parks (as opposed to downtown) to avoid large crowds. The suggestions for events in neighborhood parks included concerts, movie nights, theatre, yoga, dances, and family friendly open mic nights. Pickleball There were several comments regarding pickleball at Mercer Park. There is some frustration with the condition of these courts (large cracks) and that there are not enough courts for the number of people playing this sport locally. There is a desire for dedicated, fenced pickleball courts at Mercer or elsewhere in the City. Apparently the courts at Mercer are difficult to find, so improved signage may be needed as well. Promotion There is a perception that the promotion of programs and events is very limited. Social media does not seem to be used to get the word out about offerings. Although Facebook is becoming less popular, Nextdoor was suggested as a good resource that is very site/area specific and could be utilized more frequently. It was suggested that the Department create videos for the City website and social media showing someone using the recreation centers, visiting the pools, and attending the Farmers Market. Seeing a video may help those who might feel intimidated about trying something new or visiting a new location. There is also a concern that seniors may not be aware of what is available to them. This population will not only need to know what is available, but also whether the facility is ADA accessible for those who have mobility challenges. Parking was also noted as a concern. Self-guided tours, activities, and resources There appears to be a great deal of interest in guided walks through City parks or wild areas that would educate people about the natural environment (Lake McBride, Hickory Hill, Ryerson’s Woods). Self-guided walking tours to highlight local points of interest were also suggested (such as the homes of Kurt Vonnegut, Gene Wilder, and Flannery O’Connor when they lived in the area). There is also interest in renting equipment to try a sport or activity (prior to making a large purchase), such as snowshoes, kayaks, and tents. In addition to equipment rentals, there is interest in information or directories that would link people to other people with similar interests. The suggestions made include Bike Library, Bicyclists of Iowa City, Eastern Iowa Hiking Facebook group, Archery classes, Backyard Abundance, and local bike shops. It was also suggested that the City offer opportunities for people to form their own walking groups and find other walkers in their area (the City would help connect people but wouldn’t provide the program or the instruction). Guided activities for snowshoeing and cross country skiing are also of interest. Helping people find ways to exercise on their own without having to come to a center or program was also suggested as the Covid-19 pandemic continues. Special Events Three comments and suggestions were made regarding the Department’s special events. The first suggestion is to have a mascot appear in random locations giving prizes to people who are wearing masks. There is some interest in bringing back the Halloween parade to Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (not on Halloween but a week or two prior). To enhance the event, it is suggested that the City partner with staff from the Pentacrest (the Old Capitol and a 33 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS collection of four buildings on the University of Iowa campus) and downtown businesses to host the Halloween night at the museums and business trick-or-treating. The last comment has to do with North Liberty (a suburb of Iowa City to the north) and their creative ways to provide outdoor activities such as fairy houses, ice sculptures on the trails, giant kites, and camping in your backyard or living room. The perception is that North Liberty connects with the local businesses and schools effectively to minimize costs and increase participation as well as bring in other from the surrounding communities. There is also a note to partner with University of Iowa students who are working toward recreation degrees to volunteer for the Department and earn credit. Recreation Centers A total of 38 suggestions or comments were made regarding recreation centers. Eleven of these comments relate to parks, park amenities, park lighting, trails, trail connections, off-road biking, mountain bike skills areas, single dirt bike tracks, a pump track, off-leash dog areas, and a suggestion for a pedestrian bridge connecting Iowa River Trail and Peninsula Parks to the Parks and Recreation Facilities in the City Park area. Since these are not topics included in this master planning effort, these comments will not be summarized further. The rest of the comments have been organized into the following categories: • Potential locations for a new recreation center • Desired program spaces in a new or renovated recreation center(s) • Equipment rental Potential locations for a new recreation center There is interest for new (or expanded) indoor recreation facilities in the City. There is a perception that the current facilities are old and obsolete and should be renovated or replaced. Wetherby Park on the south side was suggested as a location for additional City facilities that would be accessible to current residents as well as to the new housing areas being built on the south side of town. The west or east sides of the City were also suggested as good locations for a new center. It was pointed out that although Mercer is located on the east side, it only contains a pool and a gym and not fitness classes or equipment. If Mercer is to remain, several suggestions were made to expand the building and add amenities including an indoor track, fitness equipment, and group exercise spaces. The west side (near West High) was suggested as a good location for a new facility based on the population in the area with minimal facilities. Desired Program Spaces in a New or Renovated Recreation Center There were many suggestions regarding desired program spaces in recreation centers. The space mentioned most often on the Social Pinpoint Ideas Wall was the addition of an indoor track available to walkers, joggers, and those with strollers. Apparently Iowa City residents had access to the University of Iowa’s indoor track in the past but that access was eliminated several years ago. It was suggested that, if an indoor track was built, a sign-up system be put into place to avoid overcrowding. One suggestion indicated that a new track could be raised over a gymnasium as is done in other indoor recreation facilities. Fitness spaces are desired including workout rooms and flexible spaces for group exercise classes. A quiet room for yoga and meditation was also mentioned. It was suggested that some of these exercise spaces have access to the outdoors either with large doors or windows that open to a deck for meditation, sunset yoga, etc., to hold classes in the warmer weather. To 34 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 34 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS complement the fitness spaces, child care space is desired (for while parents are in the facility taking a class or working out). In addition to an indoor track, fitness spaces, and child care, other suggested new indoor recreation spaces include: • A teaching kitchen (with programming for all ages) adjacent to rental spaces for private events as well as programming • A children’s playground • Multipurpose space for a variety of programs and rentals • Sauna and steam facilities Equipment Rental One unique suggestion included making outdoor space heaters available for rent to use at outdoor social gatherings at people’s homes to prevent the spread of Covid-19 during the winter months. Athletic Fields A total of 27 comments were made in the athletic field section of the Ideas Wall. Ten of these comments relate to other park amenities such as the bocce ball court in College Green Park, the basketball courts at Court Hill, more dog parks, more hiking trails, and the need for a pump track, mountain bike skills course, and skateboard area at Riverfront Crossing Park (which people perceive as being underutilized). Several comments were made about having less space that requires mowing and chemicals and more space dedicated toward prairie restoration. There were several respondents who indicated a desire for more shade in all of the parks (near athletic fields and playgrounds). There were many respondents who expressed concern over the condition of the pickleball courts at Mercer. Desire was expressed for the following additions: • A small soccer field with a fence around it • Indoor and outdoor turf fields • Three basketball courts at Mercer Park (but not on the north side) • A large complex with good drainage that includes many sports fields and a stadium-like field for the more popular sports to attract tournaments Aquatics A total of 23 comments were posted on the Ideas Wall related to aquatics. One comment was about the pickleball courts at Mercer and another regarding the desire to have access to more equipment to check out such as volleyballs, badminton, scooters, and bigger bikes for children over 6 years of age. The rest of the comments regarding aquatics have been organized into the following categories: City Park Pool, aquatic scheduling suggestions, pool music, and the desire for new pool amenities. City Park Pool • Social Pinpoint visitors expressed their joy in long course swimming at City Park Pool and want to make sure this facility is not “ruined” with a renovation. The long course swimming is valued by many, and they do not want to lose this amenity for the sake of added entertainment. The suggestion was made to update the pool systems but not to redesign the layout (or add gimmicky things like splash pads, fountains, waterslides, or a lazy river). • Some would like City Park Pool to remain open for another two weeks in the fall while the weather is still warm. • One person would like this facility heated and open all year long with an outdoor hot tub added. Aquatic scheduling suggestions • The indoor pools do not have open swim in the evening due to lessons or swim team practice and meets. There is a desire for more public access to indoor swimming during the evening hours. 35 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS • A public swim schedule for both pools is suggested so that people can look ahead and see when there are meets and the pools are not available.* • Schedule some open swims for families at the pool at Robert A. Lee. • A swimmer who uses all three City pools has suggested that Mercer be used for lap swimming, Robert A. Lee be used for swimming lessons and small group classes, and City Park Pool be used for camps. Pool music • Four Social Pinpoint respondents expressed concern about adding loud music to the pool environment. It’s unclear if this is directed to the outdoor pool or the indoor pools. It is possible that one person had the concern and others weighed in. New pool amenities Several suggestions were made regarding new pool amenities including: • Providing a saltwater environment (indoors or out) • Adding a warm water therapy pool for walking, stretching, and water exercises • Adding a zero depth entry for young children or those with limited mobility • Adding water features and a slide to one of the existing indoor pools • Providing a larger shallow end area for families and a very shallow area with a fountain (9 inches to 1 foot) for very young children • Enclose the outdoor shallow pool at Mercer (apparently it is popular with ducks) and make it zero entry. *Completed as a result of the engagement process 3.4.4 SOCIAL PINPOINT CITY PARK POOL FORUM RESULTS A total of 242 responses were received on the City Park Pool Forum. The results are as follows: • A total of 111 respondents (45.9%) would like see the pool renovated with the same layout that exists currently. • A total of 98 responses (40.5%) would like a new layout (but many of these responses included a comment regarding their desire to keep the 50-meter lap lanes). • Another 25 respondents (10.3%) provided feedback but did not select either option A (same layout) or B (new layout). Some were not clear of what “other amenities” would include. Some suggested to combine the best of options A and B by: ▪Renovating but keeping the classic look and feel of the current facility ▪Including 50-meter lap lanes (and keeping lap swimming a main feature of a new facility) ▪Maintaining the low-key, family atmosphere ▪Adding zero depth entry ▪Adding heat to a renovated pool ▪Changing the surface of the pool interior to prevent rashes from occurring ▪Adding a snack bar (and potentially working with a partner or nonprofit to provide) Increasing the accessibility and making the facility more inclusive were mentioned many times. Some residents are in favor of slides, and others are not. Some suggested that if water slides are desired, they should be put at another outdoor pool in a new location. The last eight comments (3.3%) included in the City Park Pool Forum related to the location of City Park Pool, the perceived need for another pool, extended pool hours, 36 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 36 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS and the need for a snack bar. A comment was made that City Park Pool caters to one neighborhood in the City and suggested an additional outdoor pool be built elsewhere. Suggestions for new outdoor pool locations include the south side, the east side, Chadek Green, or Mercer (as these are on bus routes). Both a sauna and a hot tub were suggested as additions to a renovated facility as well. As expected, some people would like the pool open longer than three months in the summer and a couple of people suggested covering it so it could be used year-round. 3.4.5 FUTURE INVESTMENT IN RECREATION FACILITIES The last tool on the City’s Social Pinpoint site is a ranking question regarding how the City should invest in recreation facilities in the future. Site guests were asked to rank the following facilities one through six in order of investment importance: • Gymnasium • Indoor aquatics • Indoor fields • Outdoor aquatics • Outdoor fields • Recreation centers A total of 102 people responded to this question with the results depicted in the Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Support for Tournaments at Outdoor Athletic Fields Respondents are most interested in investment in recreation centers with a ranking of 2.97. Indoor aquatics is very close second with a ranking of 2.92. Outdoor aquatics came in third with a ranking of 2.68. Outdoor fields ranked fourth at 1.85. Gymnasiums were fifth at 1.41. Indoor fields came in last with a ranking of 1.26. Average Ranking 37 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS 3.5 HIGH LEVEL THEMES There was a great deal of information gathered from all the engagement efforts. In synthesizing all the data, four themes stand out and are worth reviewing in more detail. These themes include the renovation of City Park Pool, the addition of a new recreation center, program promotion, and renovations of the existing pickleball courts at Mercer Park. CITY PARK POOL The future of City Park Pool is very important to the residents of Iowa City. Some of the highlights from the engagement include the following. • According to the survey results: ▪City Park Pool is the second most- visited facility at 61%. ▪The top priorities for investment for outdoor pool amenities include shade areas, lazy river, deck chairs, lap lanes, and an open recreation swimming area. ▪The top priorities for investment in pool programs include water fitness classes, lap swimming, senior aquatic programs, swim lessons, and family open swim. • During the pop-up events: ▪Outdoor aquatics rated highest when attendees were asked to allocate $15. Outdoor aquatics rated higher than indoor aquatics, recreation center, outdoor fields, indoor fields, and gyms. ▪Over 63% of attendees indicated that they would desire a new pool layout with the renovation of City Park Pool. • On the Social Pinpoint site: ▪Although 45.9% of respondents indicated that they would like City Park Pool renovated in the same layout that it is currently, another 10% did not select an option (renovate in the same manner or renovate with a new layout) but made some suggestions. Clearly a 50-meter outdoor lap option is really important to the community. RECREATION CENTER There is a perception that the current indoor recreation facilities are old and obsolete and should be renovated or replaced. • According to the survey results: ▪Robert A. Lee was the most-visited facility by survey respondents (70%) ▪Adult fitness and wellness programs are the second most important following the Farmers Market. ▪The top priorities for facility investments including an indoor walking and jogging track (200), a weight room (102), a fitness room (93), and a mediation/yoga space (93). ▪The top programs for investment include adult fitness and wellness (174). • During the pop-up events: ▪Recreation centers ranked third after outdoor aquatics and indoor aquatics for facility investment. • On the Social Pinpoint site: ▪The following spaces were suggested as additions to a new facility: an indoor track, fitness spaces, childcare, a teaching kitchen, a children’s playground, and more multipurpose space. 38 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 38 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS ▪On the Ideas Wall, there were suggestions for new fitness programs such as Spin, TRX, Zumba, Yoga, HIIT, Barre, Boot Camp, Kickboxing, and Pilates. PROGRAM PROMOTION Program promotion appears to be an issue due to a number of frustrations with the City website. It also came up as an issue during the topic related to barriers that people don’t often know what’s available. There were no specific questions on the survey regarding program promotion or marketing. • During the pop-up events: ▪When asked about barriers to program participation, 64 people (55.7%) said they didn’t attend programs because they didn’t know the program or activity existed. ▪Another 18 people (15.7%) indicated that the website was difficult to navigate. ▪An additional 10 comments were made about the need for more program marketing and frustration with the website and online registration. • On the Social Pinpoint site: ▪When asked “where do you get your information about recreation programs and events?” the responses included: Social media (224), word of mouth (215), an email from ActiveNet (198), website (181), the Rec Guide (129), and press releases (123) were the top responses. ▪Many comments were made regarding the website, registration, and general program promotion on all of the open ended questions (details in the Appendices). IMPROVEMENTS TO PICKLEBALL COURTS AT MERCER PARK Although this topic was not included specifically as the focus of this master plan is recreation programs and facilities, the pickleball players in the community didn’t hesitate to weigh in. There were many comments on the Social Pinpoint site regarding the condition of the courts at Mercer and the need for more courts in the community. All of this data can be found in the Appendices. 3.6 PHASE 2 ENGAGEMENT FEEDBACK INTRODUCTION The Gather Here Recreation Facilities and Programs Master Plan process incorporated a second phase of community input, to ask the community for follow-up feedback and to vet additional ideas that came to light in the analysis phase of the project. The community could provide their feedback through the following means: • Saturday, May 21: Public Works Open House • Saturday, May 21 – Saturday, June 4: A series of surveys on the project website • Monday, May 23: Open House at Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium • Monday, May 23: Parks and Recreation Commission meeting • Monday, May 23: Open house at Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center The two open houses and Parks and Recreation Commission meeting included a presentation of the key findings. A handout summarized the draft master plan’s key findings was available at the meetings, the project website, and the City’s website. Visual displays, present at the meetings and online, depicted draft design concepts, athletic field 39 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS recommendation highlights, and program development categories. The public was able to listen to the presentations, view the visual displays, read the supporting documentation, and ask questions at the open houses. Then, the public was invited to provide feedback using the website’s survey tool or via paper survey. Because the Phase 2 tools were not statistically valid methods of gathering feedback, the resulting data represents high levels of participation from specific interest groups rather than a cross section of representative feedback. INDOOR POOL SURVEY The indoor pool survey asked the public three questions, and then offered an opportunity for open-ended feedback. The first three questions requested the respondents to use a sliding scale, with zero indicating that the change does not meet their/the community’s needs and a 10 indicating the change fully meets their/the community’s needs. For interpretation purposes, a score between zero and three was categorized as an unfavorable response, four to six were categorized as a neutral response, and seven to ten a favorable response. When asked the extent to which the survey respondent felt that shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community’s aquatic needs, most of the respondents (68.7%) indicated an unfavorable score. Some (10.3%) responded neutrally, and 21.0% responded favorably. Figure 3.5: Indoor Pool Survey Question 1 When asked the extent to which the survey respondent felt that shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve their household’s aquatic needs, the responses were generally the same as those for the community. Most (67.8%) selected an unfavorable score, 9.1% selected a neutral score, and 23.1% selected a favorable score. Figure 3.6: Indoor Pool Survey Question 2 When asked the extent to which the new Mercer indoor pool design represent the core values of this plan (equity, access, and responsiveness), more than half (56.9%) selected an unfavorable score, 10.2% selected a neutral score, and 32.9% selected a favorable score. 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community’s aquatic needs? 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better serve your household’s aquatic needs? 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 67.8% 9.1% 23.1% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better serve your household's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 40 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 40 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Figure 3.7: Indoor Pool Survey Question 3 The qualitative responses were plentiful: 224 survey respondents took time to provide written feedback. While a variety of feedback was received, key themes emerged. • The RAL pool’s downtown location was held in high regard. Forty one respondents (18.3%) mentioned the proximity to other downtown services as an important factor to renovating the RAL Pool. The downtown location was often referenced in support the City’s vibrant downtown initiative and the walkability to the downtown location was referenced in relation to both the City’s walkable city initiative and accessibility. • The central location of the RAL pool was cited as a positive reason to renovate it by 33 respondents, and 27 respondents mentioned the level of accessibility would be reduced if indoor pool services were relocated out of the current location. Similarly, 13 respondents felt the distance to Mercer was too far for them or for residents who live on the north, west, and south sides of the City, and nine felt a single location was inequitable. • Respondents often asked the City to renovate RAL, specifically stated “Please do not close RAL”, or shared similarly-worded sentiments 33 times (14.7%). • Cost was cited as a deterring factor for 29 (12.9%) of respondents. • The lack of direct bus routes to the Mercer location was mentioned by 27 respondents. Similarly, 10 respondents mentioned the change as an increase to the City’s carbon footprint due to the increased driving distance. • Comments often referenced a need for the City to have more than one public indoor pool – 25 indicated a need for two indoor pools, six indicated a need for a west side location, and two suggested adding an indoor pool with the City Park Pool renovation. • The concept of gender neutral locker rooms will require additional community education. While six respondents specifically celebrated the amenity, 26 indicated a level of uncertainty and/or discomfort with the notion of changing alongside other genders. Generally speaking, the 26 respondents were supportive of having gender neutral locker rooms available, they requested gender- specific options as well. • Favorable warm water comments were expressed by 23 respondents, and 18 expressed an overall positive sentiment toward the Mercer changes. Additionally, seven respondents indicated that the changes made sense, despite a few drawbacks. • There were concerns whether all aquatic needs would be met by the proposed consolidation of indoor pools. Fifteen respondents shared a perception that there would not be enough lap lanes, and seven others felt there might be overcrowding with competing uses. Eight expressed a need for deep warm water. To what extent does the new Mercer indoor pool design represent the core values of this plan: equity, access, and responsiveness? 56.9% 10.2% 32.9% To what extent does the new Mercer indoor pool design represent the core values of this plan: equity, access, and responsiveness? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 41 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS • Nine comments referenced a perception that Mercer Park is unsafe and/or has crime. • Although small in number, there was an interesting difference in opinion regarding the topic of parking. Some respondents felt RAL parking was easy to find (4), others felt Mercer parking was “better” (7), and yet others felt parking at Mercer was more difficult (5). The dichotomy seemed to exist between fee vs. free, and the proximity of spaces to the entrance. Additionally, this feedback dichotomy was different from the Phase 1 feedback, as every feedback method in Phase 1 resulted in negative feedback regarding parking (or lack thereof). A handful (3) of respondents asked the City to not sell the RAL property, if that was indeed the intended direction. One innovative thinker suggested the City consider creating a mixed-use development out of the land – with a recreation center on the lower level(s) and low income housing on upper levels. INDOOR PROGRAM SPACE SURVEY The indoor program space survey asked for open-ended feedback regarding the expansion of program space on the north side of the Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium complex. Proposed changes included a walking track, additional gymnasium, fitness/wellness rooms, multipurpose rooms, and an interactive kid’s game room. The overwhelming sentiment from the 92 respondents indicated that the walking track was a positive, welcome addition to the community. Comments such as, “I am so THRILLED about this indoor track!!!!!!!!!” resembles the sentiment of 35 (38%) survey respondents that agreed a walking track was a great, well-loved idea. A few concerns about the track centered around safety, in that a barrier would need to be added to protect track users from the gymnasium activities (6). Additionally, six respondents wondered if the track was “big enough” to accommodate the demand. Three suggested the track be elevated. An overall positive sentiment was expressed by 15 (16.3%) of respondents who wrote comments that simply stated, “Yes, good plan” and, “I really like this idea.” Eight (8.7%) respondents provided positive sentiment around the notion of having fitness equipment and/or classes at the location. Several respondents were focused on the indoor pool changes, and inserted their comments regarding their pool into the indoor program space survey. There were five overall negative comments from respondents who preferred to see investment in things like City streets. Three participants felt that investment should be made in other parts of the community (not just the east side), and one person specifically asked for investment on the west side of the City. Three respondents wanted to ensure tot time would still be offered, and/or that toddler- specific amenities be considered. Three other participants provided comments regarding the cost of the facility. Additional programmatic suggestions were provided by single respondents, such as a pickleball court, indoor soccer, jogging and walking, indoor climbing gym, artificial turf, climbing wall, and racquet/hand ball. CITY PARK POOL SURVEY The City Park Pool (CPP) survey asked the public three questions, and then offered an opportunity for open-ended feedback. The first three questions requested the respondents to use a sliding scale, with one indicating that the change does not meet their/the community’s needs and a 10 indicating the change fully meets their/ the community’s needs. For interpretation purposes, a score between one and three 42 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 42 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS was categorized as an unfavorable response, four to six were categorized as a neutral response, and seven to ten a favorable response. When asked the extent to which the survey respondent felt that the renovation would better-serve the community’s aquatic needs, 40.7% of respondents indicated an unfavorable score, 37.8% responded favorably, and 21.5% responded neutrally. Figure 3.8: City Park Pool Survey Question 1 The second question’s results shifted fairly significantly when respondents were asked to rate how the renovation would better- serve their aquatic needs. Over half (56.1%) indicated an unfavorable response, 29.0% indicated a favorable response, and 14.9% indicated a neutral response. Figure 3.9: Indoor Pool Survey Question 2 When asked the extent to which the design represented the core values of the plan (equity, access, and responsiveness), 43.1 provided an unfavorable response, 35.9% provided a favorable response, and 21.0% provided a neutral response. Figure 3.10: Indoor Pool Survey Question 3 The survey’s CPP conceptual design open- ended feedback opportunity yielded results from 212 respondents. Although a variety of perspectives were provided, some clear themes emerged from the data: • Expressed by 90 (41.1%) of respondents, the clearest message conveyed was that there are not enough lap lanes depicted in the conceptual design. Numerous experiences, stories, observations, and recommendations were shared via the respondents’ text. Eleven respondents requested more 50 meter lanes, and 18 requested more 25 yard lanes. • From a layout perspective, 32 (14.6%) respondents indicated they preferred a traditional pool footprint, one very similar to the current CPP layout. In various ways, respondents described an interest in retaining CPP’s historical feel and character; some used the notion of, “beauty in simplicity” to depict a basic pool layout having an endearing appeal. A desire for a larger To what extent do you feel this renovation would better-serve the community’s aquatic needs? To what extent do you feel that this renovation would better-serve your aquatic needs? To what extent does this design represent the core values of this plan: equity, access, and responsiveness? 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 68.7% 10.3% 21.0% To what extent do you feel shifting all indoor aquatics to Mercer would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 40.7% 21.5% 37.8% To what extent do you feel this renovation would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 56.1% 14.9% 29.0% To what extent do you feel that this renovation would better-serve your aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 43.1% 21.0% 35.9% To what extent does this design represent the core values of this plan: equity, access, and responsiveness? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 43 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS open swim area was expressed by 12 respondents, citing a need for more swim lesson space as well as space to simply play. Seven respondents indicated that the current pool layout offers more flexible use, as opposed to the proposed design. Some (3) described the current design as wasted space. • More than 10% (22) of respondents regarded the zero depth feature in a positive light, indicating their support and/or enthusiasm for the element. Three respondents did indicate it was too large. Five wished there could be a separate baby pool, and one wanted a fenced area for toddlers. • The gender neutral locker rooms were celebrated by 13 respondents (5.9%), while 13 others specifically wanted gender-assigned areas available. As observed in other survey question responses, there appears to be an uncertainty and apprehension around the notion of how gender neutral locker rooms would work; an accompanying strong feeling of needing privacy was woven throughout locker room based comments. • Various amenities received specific comments. The diving boards and diving well was favored by six respondents. Eleven respondents indicated that they either appreciated the drop slide or asked for a slide to be added. Conversely, five respondents expressed that they did not want a slide. A similar amenity, the current channel, was at times misinterpreted as a lazy river; some thought it would be fun, while others thought it an unnecessary extravagance. • Ten respondents specifically called out the trees, and asked that the trees be protected and/or preserved through this development process. • Three respondents specifically referenced a more adult-oriented pool design, while five others conveyed the opposite in wanting more water park features. Four respondents were specific in not wanting spray features, due to their noise and distraction from the tranquil park setting. • The idea of enclosing the lap lanes or creating an indoor pool in that location was mentioned by five respondents. Four respondents pointed out that the plan is a significant investment in something only available three months out of the year. • Cabanas received an overall lukewarm reception; five respondents felt they were unnecessary and two others indicated they were too far from entrance. • Public transportation was important to four respondents. Two liked the solar panels. Chemical free and/or natural options were requested by eight respondents. • Operationally, six respondents requested the hours of operation be extended – either earlier in the day or longer into the fall season. Three respondents requested warm (heated) water. An interesting perspective shared by two respondents was that the City should stop trying to make everyone happy. It was their opinion that in trying to please everyone, the design was pleasing no one. ATHLETIC FIELD PRIORITIES One survey question asked the respondents to help prioritize which athletic field site should receive improvements first by ranking the options from one to five. Based on a weighted scale calculation, the Mercer Park Fields master plan implementation received the highest priority (3.258 weighted score), 44 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 2: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 44 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Napoleon Park Softball Upgrades Kickers Sports Complex City Park Baseball Upgrades Eastside Sports Complex Master Plan Mercer Park Fields Master Plan Weighted Score Athletic Field Priorities Q1. Do you think the decentralized indoor program location model would provide better access for underserved populations to recreate indoors? 39.2% 16.9% 26.9% 16.9% Q1. Do you think the decentralized indoor program location model would provide better access for underserved populations to recreate indoors? Yes No Maybe Unsure followed closely by the Eastside Sports Complex master plan implementation (3.196 weighted score). Figure 3.11: Athletic Field Priorities DECENTRALIZED INDOOR PROGRAM SPACE The public was asked three questions in relation to the concept of indoor program space decentralization, and were then given an opportunity to provide open-ended feedback. The first question asked, “Do you think the decentralized indoor program location model would provide better access for underserved populations to recreate indoors?” More than one third (39.2%) indicated yes, there would be better access, and 16.9% indicated there would not be better access. Figure 3.12: Decentralization Survey Question 1 Athletic Field Priorities Weighted Score 45 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS The second question asked, “Does a decentralized indoor program location model make sense for Iowa City?” Nearly half (45.7%) indicated yes, the model makes sense and 17.8% indicated it did not. Figure 3.13: Decentralization Survey Question 2 The third question asked, “Would this shift in indoor program locations better-meet the needs of you/your household?” The number of respondents indicating yes, it would meet their needs was 19.2%; 39.2% indicated it would not meet their needs. Figure 3.14: Decentralization Survey Question 3 The qualitative feedback provided in the open-ended question shed some light on the previous three questions’ answers. There was an overall positive sentiment expressed by 39.7% of the 58 respondents (23). Nearly one third of the respondents (18) indicated they needed more information to make the decision. Although the questions were seeking feedback on the concept, respondents consistently cited needing more detailed information regarding location, programming, and operations in order to make an informed decision. Seven respondents asked whether specific programs would be present and/or offered suggestions on what programs would work in the concept. Two respondents asked for additional service on the west side of the City. Eight respondents indicated that the City should invest elsewhere, especially in its existing facilities. Cost was mentioned by three participants. Five participants felt it would be better to centralize facilities; two of which mentioned that centralization helps promote participation from all neighborhoods, demographics, and backgrounds. Two participants felt the City should instead partner with the schools instead, and one suggested partnering with “Kirkwood CC”. Q2. Does a decentralized indoor program location model make sense for Iowa City? 39.2% 16.9% 26.9% 16.9% Q1. Do you think the decentralized indoor program location model would provide better access for underserved populations to recreate indoors? Yes No Maybe Unsure Q3. Would this shift in indoor program locations better-meet the needs of you/your household? 39.2% 16.9% 26.9% 16.9% Q1. Do you think the decentralized indoor program location model would provide better access for underserved populations to recreate indoors? Yes No Maybe Unsure 45.7% 17.8% 24.8% 11.6% Q2. Does a decentralized indoor program location model make sense for Iowa City? Yes No Maybe Unsure 19.2% 39.2%22.3% 19.2% Q3. Would this shift in indoor program locations better-meet the needs of you/your household? Yes No Maybe Unsure 46 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT This page is intentionally left blank. 47 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT SECTION 4 Recreation Programs Assessment 48 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT The recreation programs assessment reviews the Department’s recreation program and service offerings through a series of individual analyses. BerryDunn reviewed the results of these analyses from a global perspective. This recreation assessment report offers detailed insight into the Department’s recreation program offerings, and helps to identify the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for future program direction. This report also assists with identifying program categories, programming gaps, and future program considerations. The reports and data that informed the recreation assessment process included the Department’s seasonal program guides; participation data; Department revenue and expenses; and program metric worksheets completed by staff. Internal meetings and interviews with staff and the Steering Committee also provided insight. The integration of community engagement results with analysis data helped to inform and drive program and service recommendations. EQUITY ROOTS From project inception, Department staff sought a process and plan rooted in equity. Because of this high priority, every step of the process paused to ensure the integration of equitable approaches, questions, and considerations. Examples of equity integration include: • Project website incorporated Google Translate feature, sought feedback from non-user and user perspectives, and encouraged a variety of means to participate • Scattered throughout the community, event booths incorporated a variety of means to provide feedback • Focus groups were designed to reach across program interests, a diverse array of nonprofit groups, and businesses • The statistically valid and public surveys incorporated very direct and pointed equity-centered questions • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)- based individual program assessments • Department-wide DEI assessment of service administration, policies, and execution • Program and facility recommendations based on DEI prioritization 4.1 PROGRAM MENU The program menu consists of the recreational activities offered for a specific time frame. The 2019 program menu contains the last full data set for one year of programs not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and was therefore used for the program menu analysis. This section will review the menu’s core program areas, service format, program inventory, program distribution, and age segmentation. CORE PROGRAM AREAS Adult Recreation Adult recreation encompasses most programs that serve participants ages 18 years and older. Arts and crafts, sports, fitness/wellness, nature awareness and outdoor education are examples of program categories offered specifically for adult audiences. Examples of specific activities include vegetable gardening, Olympic weightlifting, tennis, volleyball, basketball, yoga, forest bathing, bocce tournaments, and Spikeball tournaments. In some cases, high school students are welcome to participate in activities within the Adult Recreation core program area. 49 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Aquatics Swim lessons, lap swimming, aqua fitness, lifeguard instruction, and an introduction to swim team competition are examples of the types of aquatic programs offered in the City’s three pool facilities. A variety of swim lesson levels provide a progression- based means by which to learn how to swim. Swim lessons are also broken out by target age group, including parent-tot, preschool, youth, preteen, and adult. Finally, private lessons are offered as an alternative to the prescheduled days and times at which group lessons are held, or to offer one-on-one instruction to support special needs, learning styles, and/or personal preference. A large emphasis is placed on quality, affordable, and accessible swim lessons as a programmatic initiative defined in the 2017 Iowa City Parks Master Plan. Camps/Days Off Traditional weeklong, full-day summer camps for youth who have completed kindergarten through sixth grades are offered each summer. In 2019, themed summer camps were offered for nine weeks, Monday through Friday. In addition to the 9 a.m. – 4 p.m. core camp day, additional supervised play was available from 7:30 – 9 a.m. and 4 – 5:30 p.m. Weeklong, half-day Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Math (STEAM) camps were also offered throughout the summer, with topic areas such as Inventor’s Workshop, Animated Animals, and Cool Ceramics. A variety of spring and winter break camps and activities are offered as additional ways for youth to recreate during the traditional days off school. Two-hour and half-day activities are offered by grade level and in specialty topics such as Winter Outdoor Explorations and Design and Build with Clay. STEAM-based activities are also offered in the areas of robotics, Lego engineering, and super structures. Events Events are typically one-day opportunities to recreate, frequently due to a holiday, specific celebration, competitions, and/or themed activity. Examples include Fall Equinox Celebration, Glow Stick Strider Bike Race, Tot Monster Bash, Monarch Festival, Dog Swim, Earth Fest, Freeze Fest, and a community dinner on the third Sunday of the month. Party in the Park is a series of park visits held at parks throughout the community, held weekly in June – September each year. The events are free and include arts, crafts, games, and activities. A Farmers Market is held May through October on Saturdays. Vendors sell their fresh produce, products, and wares in an open-air format. The markets are considered special events, and yet the Department also specifically assigns themes to some of the dates with Farm to Street Dinner, Kids Day, and Holiday Markets as “special” market events. Fitness/Wellness Fitness/wellness programs center on the participants’ physical health. Examples of fitness/wellness classes include group exercise, dance and movement classes, yoga, line dance, and mindfulness meditation. Activities such as Tot Time and a Youth Triathlon represent other ways the Department has targeted the improvement of physical health through recreation. Inclusive and Adaptive Recreation Inclusive and adaptive recreation programs offer people with special needs the opportunity to recreate in a supportive, engaging environment. The types of programs offered for this population segment span from arts, music, movement, life skills, and sports via Special Olympics. Social events and clubs offer opportunities to spend leisure time together to celebrate holidays, watch movies, and have game nights, for example. 50 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Outdoor Education Outdoor education programming encourages participants to explore, learn about, and spend time in the outdoor world. Activities in this core program area include fishing, Endangered Habitats (e.g., rainforests, coral reefs), Walk the Creek, Climate Change, Adventure Clinics (e.g., kayaking, canoeing), and Getting to Know Endangered Species (e.g., big cats, polar bears, sea turtles). Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics (STEAM) Also a targeted area of programs identified through the Iowa City Parks Master Plan, STEAM programs challenge youth participants to explore, invent, and create through its variety of offerings. Preschool- aged participants can participate in activities like Slimy Art & Science Experiments, while youth participants and their families can partake in Outrageous Science for Families. Clay workshops explore projects such as stamped bowls, marbled beads, and lids and spouts. Camp offerings frequently include a STEAM focus. Youth Sports Youth sports programs offer skill development opportunities for youth in areas such as cheer, tumbling, tae kwon do, flag football, tennis, skateboarding, volleyball, basketball, T-ball, and more. Based in a community recreation approach, participation, exploration, and growth are encouraged over competition. OTHER SERVICES In addition to the core programs and activities, the Department facilitates other types of community leisure services. Park amenities such as disc golf courses, off-leash dog parks, skate parks, basketball courts, pickleball and tennis courts, ball diamonds, multipurpose fields, community gardens, and splash pads offer opportunities to recreate outside. Rentals of water recreation equipment (e.g., canoes, kayaks, stand up paddleboards, pedal cruisers) also help facilitate outdoor exploration. Birthday party hosting services provide a themed, facilitated means by which to celebrate. SERVICE FORMAT The Department offers recreation services in a variety of formats. Drop-in activities include open gym gymnasium/game rooms at both recreation centers, pickleball, tot time, and roller skating. Self-serve leisure pursuits include facility rentals and a fitness center. Enrollment-based activities, or those activities that are held on scheduled days and times that require pre-registration, are offered in a seasonal program menu. Events are offered both as one-time events as well as in a series format (e.g., Rec N Roll, Farmers Market). The Department also partners with other entities to help provide community events. Although some programs are free, most require some sort of financial contribution. The Department offers a RecAssist program that provides financial assistance to qualified participants. PROGRAM INVENTORY The following is a list of major program categories that park and recreation agencies throughout the country commonly provide. This list helps to identify if there are any common program areas not offered by an agency. Most agencies offer a majority of programs. In matching the Department’s inventory of programs against this list, a majority of the program areas, 66.7% are represented. (Purple text represents programs not offered by the Department.) • Active Adult • Aquatics • Arts • Before/After School • Biking • Birthday Party Services • Child Care • Cooking • Dance • Day/School Break Camps 51 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT For comparison purposes, the consulting team reviewed the program category percentages against its database of park and recreation agencies nationwide. The comparison agencies’ average percentage of program categories was 64.5%, which is slightly lower than the Department’s 66.7%. The program categories depicted with blue text represent opportunities for program menu expansion where aligned with community needs. For example, senior programming is provided by the Senior Center; therefore, program expansion in this area would only be prudent if unmet needs were identified. PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION Understanding how the Department’s enrollment-based program menu is distributed across the core program areas helps to identify the extent of programming within each program area in relation to the whole. Figure 4.1 depicts the total of programs offered in 2019 according to program area and season. Figure 4.1: Total Programs Offered in 2019 Aquatics scheduled the largest quantity of programs (916), regardless of season. Youth sports offered the second-largest quantity of programs in 2019 (225). Conversely, the areas with the lowest quantity of programming were events (21) and fitness/wellness (20). The distribution of the core program areas in relation to each other is depicted in Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: 2019 Enrollment-based Program Distribution • Esports • Early Childhood • Environmental/ Nature • Extreme Sports • Fitness • General Interest • Golf • Gymnastics/ Tumbling • Historical Programs • Homeschool • Horseback Riding • Ice Skating/ Hockey • Language Arts • Lifelong Learning • Martial Arts • Music • Open Gym • Outdoor Adventure • Pets • Pickleball • Preschool • Running/ Walking • Seniors • Special/ Community Events • Specialty Camps • Sports • STEM/STEAM • Summer Camp (Daylong) • Sustainability/ Green • Teen • Tennis • Theatre/Acting • Therapeutic Recreation • Trips • Wellness 01002003004005006007008009001,000 Adult RecreationAquaticsCamps/Days OffEventsFitness/WellnessInclusive & Adaptive RecOutdoor EducationSTEAMYouth SportsTotal Programs Offered in 2019, by Category and Season Winter/Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 52 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT When analyzing the program distribution, it is important to remember that the Department offers several drop-in format services in addition to the enrollment-based services depicted in Figure 4.2. Examples include the open use of the fitness center, gyms, and pools. Figure 4.2: 2019 Enrollment-based Program Distribution AGE SEGMENTATION The age segment analysis reviews the distribution of the program offerings according to the age segments serviced. For the purposes of this assessment, BerryDunn delineated age categories according to the following age structure: • Early Childhood, ages 0 – 5 years • Youth, ages 6 – 12 years • Teen, ages 13 – 18 years • Adult, ages 18+ years • All Ages Aquatics 55.9% Youth Sports 13.7% STEAM 9.9% Camps/Days Off 5.7% Outdoor Education 5.7% Inclusive & Adaptive Rec 4.1% Adult Recreation 2.4%Events 1.3% Fitness/Wellness 1.2% 2019 Enrollment-based Program Distribution2019 Enrollment-ased Program Distribution 53 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT BerryDunn tallied the number of registration- based program opportunities geared toward particular age groups for the three seasons. If a program section spanned clearly across two age categories (e.g., ages 8 – 14 years), BerryDunn counted that section once in the youth category and once in the teen category. Special events typically service participants of all ages, and therefore were included in the all ages category. Figure 4.3 displays the Department’s 2019 program menu’s percentage of registration-based programs offered according to each age segment. Figure 4.3: Age Segmentation of Enrollment-Based Programs Offered, 2019 A solid portion of programming, 16.6%, is designed for participants of all ages. Of all the age-specific programming, 83.5% of programs are designed for youth and 16.5% are designed for adults 18 years of age and older. As a reminder, senior programs are provided by the Senior Center, and therefore, the Department does not duplicate the City’s existing senior services designed for adults ages 50+. The age segmentation analysis is one helpful method to review the Department’s programming related to the community demographics. Demographic data can be helpful to consider how programming efforts are aligned with the makeup of the community. The adjacent comparison of the community’s population and enrollment- based program offerings in Figure 4.4 demonstrates two key age segments’ relationship between the population percentage and percentage of programs offered. Figure 4.4: Population vs. Program Menu *Note: University population included in the Adult age segment Most (83.5%) of the Department’s enrollment-based programs are designed for youth, while the youth age segment represents 23.7% of the community’s population. Adults, ages 18 – 54 years make up 59.4% of the population, while 16.5% of enrollment-based programs are designed for adults. The notion of offering a majority of programming for youth is consistent with most park and recreation agencies’ program menus across the country; that said, the percentage of youth programming is more often within the 60 – 75% range. The program menu’s age segmentation does not need to mirror the community’s age demographic segmentation in an exact manner; however, an ongoing goal can be to balance the menu toward a reflection of the community makeup. Age Segmentation of Enrollment-Based Programs Offered, 2019 40.7% 21.5% 37.8% To what extent do you feel this renovation would better-serve the community's aquatic needs? Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 21.8% 34.5%13.4% 13.8% 16.6% Age Segmentation of Enrollment-Based Programs Offered, 2019 Early Childhood (0-5 years) Youth (6-12 years) Teen (13-17 years) Adult (18+ years) All Ages 21.8% 34.5%13.4% 13.8% 16.6% Age Segmentation of Enrollment-Based Programs Offered, 2019 Early Childhood (0-5 years) Youth (6-12 years) Teen (13-17 years) Adult (18+ years) All Ages 21.8% 34.5%13.4% 13.8% 16.6% Age Segmentation of Enrollment-Based Programs Offered, 2019 Early Childhood (0-5 years) Youth (6-12 years) Teen (13-17 years) Adult (18+ years) All Ages AdultYouth 23.7% of Population 83.5% of Programs 59.4% of Population 16.5% of Programs 54 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT CURRENT SERVICES To acknowledge the program menu’s post-pandemic evolution, it is important to mention that the Department’s current program offerings have shifted since 2019. Because of the public’s appetite for programs to be held outdoors and in following the Department’s Master Plan initiatives, the Department has expanded upon its outdoor activities. Fishing, archery, flag rugby, snag golf, tae kwon do in the parks, Barre3 in the Park, walking club, and ParkRun club are examples of how the Department is encouraging outdoor recreation. 4.2 PROGRAM PERFORMANCE In addition to assessing the menu of programs as offered, it is helpful to assess how the programs actually perform. The extent of program performance can be measured in participation, financial performance, and the life cycle analysis. ENROLLMENT Total enrollment into the Department’s programs was 10,090 in 2019. Aquatics had the highest enrollment with 2,607 participants, followed by youth sports with 1,950, and inclusive & adaptive recreation with 1,815. Figure 4.5: 2019 Enrollment by Core Program Area and Season Events had the highest enrollment- based participation in the winter/spring season (1,177), followed by aquatics (843) and youth sports (791). Aquatics had the highest enrollment-based summer season participation (1,119), followed by inclusive & adaptive recreation (749) and camps/days off (693). The fall 2019 season’s top enrollment was in inclusive & adaptive recreation (770) followed by aquatics (645) and youth sports (639). Figure 6 demonstrates the enrollments for each core program area as a percentage of the whole. Figure 4.6: 2019 Enrollment Aquatics accounted for one-quarter (25.8%) of the 2019 enrollments, and youth sports and inclusive & adaptive recreation accounted for approximately one-fifth of the programming each, 19.4% and 18.0% respectively. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Adult RecreationAquaticsCamps/Days OffEventsFitness/WellnessInclusive & Adaptive RecOutdoor EducationSTEAMYouth Sports2019 Enrollment by Core Program Area and Season Winter/Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 Aquatics 25.8% Youth Sports 19.4%Inclusive & Adaptive Rec 18.0% Events 14.0% Camps/Days Off 9.1% STEAM 8.5% Outdoor Education 2.6% Adult Recreation 2.0%Fitness/Wellness 0.7% 2019 Enrollment2019 Enrollment 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Adult RecreationAquaticsCamps/Days OffEventsFitness/WellnessInclusive & Adaptive RecOutdoor EducationSTEAMYouth Sports2019 Enrollment by Core Program Area and Season Winter/Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Adult RecreationAquaticsCamps/Days OffEventsFitness/WellnessInclusive & Adaptive RecOutdoor EducationSTEAMYouth Sports2019 Enrollment by Core Program Area and Season Winter/Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Adult RecreationAquaticsCamps/Days OffEventsFitness/WellnessInclusive & Adaptive RecOutdoor EducationSTEAMYouth Sports2019 Enrollment by Core Program Area and Season Winter/Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 55 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Aquatics accounted for nearly 56% of the program menu and 26% of all enrollments, which is typically due to smaller class size and the advertisement of several course sections that can be combined, if needed. Compared to other park and recreation agencies nationwide, the fact that 18% of all enrollments are in the inclusive and adaptive recreation program area is quite commendable; the percentage is generally much lower. CANCELLATION RATES The difference between the number of courses offered and the number of courses held results in the cancellation rate. A higher rate will generally indicate one of two things: either a) the programming team has been charged with trying new, innovative programs that have not been successful yet; or b) the programs being offered simply are not meeting the needs of the community. The first scenario requires patience and perseverance to allow time for exploration and to push communication efforts. The second scenario requires research to understand what factors contributed to the program cancellations (e.g., instructor performance, inconsistent instructors, child aged out, or other barriers such as time, day, or transportation). Typically, the target range of a “desirable” cancellation rate is between 10% – 20%, with 12% – 15% being most ideal. Any higher than 20% indicates the staff are doing a lot of work preparing for and marketing courses that do not run. A goal of the Department could be to reduce all program area cancellation rates below 20%. The Department’s cancellation rates improved between 2018 and 2019, from 27.7% to 25.9% respectively. The unexpected nosedive of 72.8% in 2020 was due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Recovery to 32.7% in 2021 has already demonstrated remarkable resilience in the Department’s staff to keep trying to offer programs despite the global crisis. Figure 4.7 depicts the number of programs offered as compared to the number of programs that actually ran (i.e., cancellation rate), between the years of 2018 and 2021. Figure 4.7: Number of Programs Offered vs. Ran PARTICIPANT RESIDENCY A community park and recreation department’s primary market is its residents. Exploring participation data for residency can monitor whether a department is reaching its intended primary market—its residents. Figure 4.8 depicts enrollments into the Department’s programs based on residency over time. Figure 4.8: Participant Residency The more reliable data of 2018 and 2019 demonstrates a consistent resident enrollment base of 79% in both years. The years impacted by COVID-19 show an increasing amount of nonresidents utilizing the Department’s services (23.3% and 28.6% in 2020 and 2021). BerryDunn consultants are seeing this trend occur nationwide, specifically when a neighboring community 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2018 2019 2020 2021* Number of Programs Offered vs. Run Number of Programs Offered # of Programs that Ran 79.0%79.4%76.7%71.4% 21.0%20.6%23.3%28.6% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 Participant Residency Res NR 56 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT is offering a service that a resident’s own community decided to not offer during the pandemic. Because this study heavily emphasized an aquatics assessment, a deeper dive into aquatics-based residency was conducted. Figure 4.9 demonstrates the breakdown of aquatic program participants based on residency, in each season of 2019. Figure 4.9: Aquatic Participant Residency As compared to the residency of all programs, the aquatic programs’ enrollment of residents was higher than nonresidents (83.2% residents in aquatics vs. 79.4% total). PARTICIPANT REACH The Department was interested in understanding where its current participants were coming from, and whether it was missing any geographic areas. The consulting team created visual depictions of all 2019 program participants in the form of heat maps, as demonstrated in Figure 4.10. 82.7%81.3%87.3% 17.3%18.7%12.7% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Winter/Spring Summer Fall Participant Residency: Aquatic Programs, 2019 Res NR 57 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.10: Participant Reach Heat Map The participant reach heat map represents unique participants, meaning it recorded the participant’s household location only once, regardless of the number of programs that person participated in throughout 2019. The yellow color represents the highest concentration of participant households, whereas blue is the lowest concentration. Blue circles in areas of high population density might be an opportunity to target new participants; that said, traditional university student housing areas may be receiving their program services through the school. Additional heat maps can be found in Appendix C, including a state of Iowa perspective as well as enlarged views of the west and east halves of the City. 58 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT FINANCIAL REVIEW BerryDunn observed the fiscal tracking of recreation program revenue and expenses for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. In their financial actuals reporting document, Department staff summarized the performance of eight key categories: farmer’s market, social & cultural, aquatics, inclusive & adaptive recreation, youth sports, dog parks, and general recreation operations. The degree to which parks and recreation services are subsidized by tax dollars varies between communities, often due to factors such as philosophical ideologies. The amount of money recouped to cover the expenses to run a program, or cost recovery, is often established at desired percentage targets. In the Department’s case, an overall Department-wide goal of 40% cost recovery in recreation programs was targeted in pre- pandemic fiscal years. Actual cost recovery performance resulted in 37% in 2018 and 39% in 2019. Cost recovery percentages for six of the eight key categories increased between the two years. Though a success indicator, cost recovery is not central to the Department’s mission and not as strong of an indicator as equity in participation, for example. RECASSIST PROGRAM As a means by which to serve participants who cannot afford to pay full price for programs, activities, memberships and events, the RecAssist program provides financial assistance to income-eligible City residents. One application is filled out annually, and can be completed online. Eligible participants can have 50% of most program fees and swim passes waived, and a 100% fee subsidy for swim lessons. The funding to cover the additional 50% of swim lesson fees is covered through a scholarship generated via privately donated dollars; the remaining 50% is covered by tax subsidy. The Department does a good job of advertising the existence of the program, as demonstrated by the dedication of entire pages of its program guide to advertise the program’s availability. LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS The program assessment included a life cycle analysis of programs selected for review. This type of assessment helps to determine if Department staff need to develop new and more innovative programs, reposition programs that are in the decline stage, or continue with the current balance of life cycle stages. BerryDunn based this assessment on staff members’ opinions of how their core programs were categorized according to four life cycle stages: introduction, growth, mature, and decline. Table 4.1 outlines the description of those life cycle stages and the Department’s percentage of programs within each stage. 59 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Table 4.1: Life Cycle Stages Life Cycle Stage Description Department Percentage Introduction Getting a program off the ground, heavy marketing 18.9% Growth Moderate and interested customer base, high demand, not as intense marketing 44.2% Mature Steady and reliable performer, but increased competition 17.9% Decline Decreased registration 18.9% Figure 4.11 depicts the percentage of programs in each life cycle stage. A healthy balance between the stages is optimal, with a bulk of programs in the growth and mature stages. That is the case for the Department, with 62.1% of programs in the growth and mature stages. Figure 4.11: Life Cycle Stages As a normal part of the planning cycle, there should always be programs in the introduction stage that bring new and innovative programming to the menu. There will typically also be programs in the decline stage; those programs should be either repositioned or decommissioned. The Department’s percentage of programs in the decline stage (18.9%) is somewhat high. To reduce this balance, look to Figure 4.12 to identify areas to either reposition or decommission. Additionally, efforts to encourage the introduction of new programs, as well as to shift the introduction programs into growth status, would create a more balanced menu. The COVID-19 pandemic caused the Department to undergo such analysis. Programs such as Rain Barrel, Forest Bathing, and Adult Softball Leagues were not brought back post-pandemic as a result of careful analysis. ICPR Life Cycle of 2019 Programs by Stage Introduction 18.9% Growth 44.2% Mature 17.9% Decline 18.9% ICPR Life Cycle of 2019 Programs by Stage 60 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.12 provides a visual representation of all major program categories and their respective spread across life cycle stages. Figure 4.12: Life Cycle Distribution of Programs Individual program areas should strive to have programming that falls into all four life cycle stages, with the majority in the growth and mature stages (green and blue in Figure 4.12). Three of the nine core program areas demonstrate programming in all four life cycle stages. Events and outdoor education have programs in two stages, introduction and growth, which indicates an opportunity to strengthen and develop the offerings into solid, mature status. The absence of introduction or mature programs in STEAM indicates an opportunity to introduce new opportunities and either reinvest or divest the programs in the decline stage. 1 2 5 1 5 4 4 5 2 9 8 2 8 4 6 4 1 1 5 1 3 6 2 1 5 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Youth Sports STEAM Outdoor Education Inclusive & Adaptive Recreation Fitness/Wellness Events Camps/Days Off Aquatics Adult Recreation ICPR 2019 Life Cycle Distribution of Programs Introduction Growth Mature Decline ICPR 2019 Life Cycle Distribution of Programs 61 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION OUTCOMES ANALYSIS The diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) outcomes analysis offers the opportunity to measure the Department’s programs against a prescribed DEI rubric. The outcomes analysis uses a quantitative scale to measure qualitative results. The DEI rubric provides scoring guidance according to outcomes indicators. BerryDunn asked Department staff members to rate their program areas according to three outcome categories and indicators, outlined below: DIVERSITY • Variety of skill/ability levels: The extent to which a program offering is designed for a variety of skills and/or ability levels. • Cultural connection: The degree of ethnic, artistic, historic, linguistic, culinary, and/or customs content woven into the program syllabus. • Primary dimension: The celebration of, information regarding, content design, and/or marketing toward the primary dimension of diversity (e.g., race, age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity). EQUITY • Geographic locations: The extent to which program locations are spread out geographically or transportation is provided. • Fairness: Whether participation is restricted, either by private invitation or equipment/clothing requirements. • Scheduling: The variety of sections, days, times, and/or flexibility in attendance. • Health/wellness: The degree to which the wellness wheel factors, such as social, intellectual, emotional, occupational, environmental, financial, spiritual, and/or physical dimensions of wellness are covered. INCLUSION • Program serves underserved groups: The extent to which the program intentionally reaches underserved groups and provides readily-available financial aid. • Access: The degree to which participation is supported by support and/or inclusion services. • Engagement: The spectrum of participation based on audience/ lecturer approach versus immersive/ interactive participation. Department staff used the 10 outcomes indicators to assess programs within their core program areas. Staff reviewed each outcome measure using a four-point scale, with one being the lowest score and four being the highest score available. The results of this exercise are demonstrated in Figure 4.13, which shows the average rating for each outcome indicator, for each program area. 62 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.13: DEI Outcomes and Conditions Matrix The strongest scoring indicators were fairness (3.8) and health/wellness (3.3). The indicators with the lowest rating were geographic locations and scheduling, both 1.5. Interestingly, the highest and lowest scores were all within the equity outcome category. When summarized, according to the outcome categories, inclusion had the highest average score (2.7), followed by equity (2.5), and diversity (2.3). Figure 4.14: DEI Outcomes and Conditions Summary DEPARTMENTAL EQUITY ANALYSIS The DEI Outcomes analysis studied outcomes related to specific program areas. To examine the extent to which the Department’s service provision is equitable, a Department-wide assessment of equitable service provision was conducted. The Department staff and consulting team identified three core departmental categories of equity for study: administrative, program menu, and program execution. The administrative category looks at concepts such as policies, procedures, hiring practices, and staff training. The program menu category reviews program planning, pricing, and scheduling. Program execution refers to how programs are led, by whom, and the communication therein. To help describe and measure each of these categories, a series of measurement indicators were identified as actionable items by which equitable service could be assessed. These measurement indicators are depicted in Figure 4.15. 63 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.15: Departmental Equity Analysis Categories and Indicators Administrative • Fair registration policies and processes (i.e. reserve windows of time to accommodate different schedules, multilingual forms) • Simplified financial aid application and use process • Equipment supply/check-out (equipment library concept as well as program-based) • Hiring practices (race, geographic origin, gender) • Staff training in equity, bias, cultural awareness, mental health first aid, de-escalation, etc. Program Menu • A variety of price levels throughout core program categories • Community groups/partners included in program menu creation • Representative planning (program designed by staff or residents from underserved populations) • Thoughtful scheduling (avoid/ accommodate religious observances; coordinate with other community groups’ events) Program Execution • Multilingual instructors • Program led in language(s) other than English • Community collaboration/ partnerships to plan and/or execute • Inclusion aides • Greeters/guides/welcome crew • Representative leadership (i.e., instructors) • Marketing/outreach to specific, underserved groups • Marketing/outreach regarding financial aid availability 64 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Because equitable achievements are typically a work in progress, often with no benchmarking or standards with which to compare, a progress spectrum was instead used to assess each measurement indicator. Five phases within the spectrum are depicted in Figure 4.16. Figure 4.16: Equity Analysis Spectrum Five Department staff members completed an exercise that aligned an indicator with the spectrum location they felt best-matched their current equity efforts. The results generated a weighted score, to help quantify a qualitative measurement effort. The higher the score, the stronger the staff felt their equity practices were moving toward the expert/leader end of the equity progress spectrum. Non-Existent / Weak Emerging Developing Transforming Expert / Leader 65 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Most of the staff’s phase assignment of the 17 indicators landed in the non-existent/ weak and emerging phases. When translated to a numeric score, 11 of the 17 indicators (64.7%) scored below a 15. The other 35.3% (6) scored above a 15, or in the developing, transforming, or expert/leader phases. Appendix C provides a visual depiction of where each indicator landed on the spectrum. The strongest performing indicators are thoughtful scheduling (score of 17) and simplified financial aid application and use process (16). The indicators that did not score as high include program led in language(s) other than English, multilingual instructors (6), and equipment supply/check- out (7). The next step of this process is to establish goals that will help move the equity needle from more indicators landing on the left, or non-existent/weak side of the spectrum, to the right, or expert/leader side of the spectrum. Possible aspirations include: • Raise the scores to all land at 15 or above • Establish departmental goals specific to one indicator in each of the three categories each year • Target the indicators that the Department feels it has the most control over, and therefore might see the fastest results • Raise each score by one point every year Iowa City is unique in its acknowledgment that there are minority groups served by the City whom have not received equitable services due to racial, income, sexual orientation, or other factors. The Department is making an effort to prioritize the understanding of the unique needs and barriers faced by each group. 4.3 SIMILAR PROVIDERS The Department provides hundreds of recreation programs and events, a wide variety of services, and a number of high- quality facilities to both residents and City visitors. In addition to the Department’s services, there are other providers of similar services within the City and County. This section summarizes the public, nonprofit, and private organizations that also provide a variety of recreation programs, events, and leisure services in and around the City. The goal of this effort is to help ensure that Department staff are aware of the many opportunities that exist, to potentially fill gaps, to seek out partners when appropriate, and to reduce (or eliminate) the potential duplication of efforts. The consulting team identified nine key similar providers that offered a similar scale and scope of services. Table 4.2 was created as part of a study to determine duplicate services or service gaps related to recreation programming within the City. This information depicts the general program areas each organization. The gray column demonstrates a breakdown of Department programs and similar providers’ services listed in subsequent columns. 66 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Table 4.2: Key Similar Provider Inventory KEY SIMILAR PROVIDER INVENTORY ICPR ICSC CRC UIFH NLCC SCC JCC ICPL CPL NLCL Adult Recreation X X X X X X X X X Aquatics X X X X Camps X X X Events X X X X X X X Fitness Centers/ Wellness X X X X Inclusive & Adaptive X Outdoor Education X X STEAM X X X X X Youth Sports/Travel X X X X ICPR – Iowa City Parks & Recreation SCC - Solon Community Center ICSC - Iowa City Senior Center JCC - Johnson County Conservation CRC – Coralville Recreation Center ICPL - Iowa City Public Library UIFH – University of Iowa Field House CPL - Coralville Public Library NLCC – North Liberty Community Center NLCL - North Liberty Community Library In addition to these nine providers, Appendix C provides a more thorough listing of recreation providers in the area. 4.4 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT ALIGNMENT The community engagement process resulted in a plethora of program-related feedback. The surveys, focus groups, website, and event booth feedback helped to identify the community’s expressed programming needs. This section compares these key programming takeaways with what was discovered through the data analysis phase; the result is an understanding of alignment between community needs and what is (or is not) being provided. OBSERVATIONS Welcoming Culture The Department demonstrates a deep desire to welcome and include all community members in its facilities, programs, and services–which is reflective of the community-wide sentiment regarding culture. When asked specific questions about the extent to which statistically valid survey respondents and their household members felt welcomed in facilities and programs, an extremely low number of respondents indicated any unwelcoming feelings or behaviors by others. Several of the statistically valid survey’s open-ended responses referenced a desire for the Department to continue to offer recreational opportunities that promoted a sense of community, belonging, and inclusion of diverse cultures. For example, several special event ideas requested continued age and gender inclusive opportunities that celebrated different cultures. Of course no organization is perfect; some of the focus group participants provided suggestions to improve the Department’s efforts to be welcoming, and the staff identified areas in which they could improve their policies, procedures and programs to be more inclusive. The Department’s intent to make this planning process as inclusive as possible, to hold equity at the center 67 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT of decision-making, and to continuously make progress on its diversity, equity, and inclusion spectrum position demonstrates a commitment to thought leadership and action. Based on community sentiment, the Department should absolutely carry on with its continuous improvement efforts and strides to create a welcoming culture. STEAM The Department’s 2017 Park Master Plan identified STEAM programming as a component within its philosophical approach to parks and recreation. In 2019, 9.9% of the programs offered were STEAM related. The engagement process discovered that although STEAM programs are important and of interest to respondents, they did not make the top of the list. Of 28 activity options, STEAM programs ranked 26th in the number of in-person event respondents who were interested. One in about every eleven statistically valid survey respondents listed STEAM as one of top four most important program areas. While this data may at first appear to lean toward a lower prioritization of STEAM programs, it is important to observe not only the quantity of interest and importance, but also the degree to which the need is met. Seventy two percent of the statistically valid survey respondents who had a need for STEAM programs indicated their need was partial or fully unmet. This data suggests that there continues to be a need for STEAM programming. Coupled with the fact that BerryDunn identified few similar providers of STEAM programs, the Department should continue to place emphasis on STEAM education opportunities. Nature Programs The Department strives to connect the community to nature through parks, open space, and programs. The Department’s 2017 Parks Master Plan prioritized its role in the City’s educational mission, and established a goal to teach basic outdoor recreation skills to the community. When asked about their need for nature programs, 28% statistically valid survey respondents listed nature programs as one of top four most important—which represented a spot in the top three responses. The statistically valid survey results estimate 8,603 households with unmet needs for nature programming. Along with the fact that 25.4% of in-person event respondents were interested in nature programs (also one of the top three answers), the engagement results indicate high overall community interest. The percentage of nature programs offered in 2019 was relatively low (5.7%), and there are minimal similar providers. To better-meet the community’s need for nature programs, the Department should consider increasing nature program offerings and access through partnerships, equipment, and facilities. Youth Sports A very traditional recreation program area, youth sports are often the most familiar type of program for community members. A majority (63%) of statistically valid survey respondents who had a need for youth sports indicated that their needs were fully and mostly met. Eight percent of statistically valid survey respondents listed youth sports as one of the top four most important programs and 10.7% of in-person event respondents were interested (ranked 23rd of 28 options). As the second-highest percentage of all programs offered by the Department in 2019 (13.7%) and the second- highest number of enrollees (1,958), youth sports demand is strong. There are some community-based providers of youth sports, and because of that, the Department has an opportunity to consider re-defining what the breadth and depth of youth sports provision entails. For example, emphasizing lifelong sports and non-traditional sports could better support community wellness and diversity in sport options. 68 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Aquatics The Department places a high priority on aquatic programming, evidenced by the fact that aquatics programs accounted for 55.9% of programs offered in 2019. The community also placed a higher priority on pool programs; community engagement feedback resulted in 31.1% of in-person event respondents interested in aquatics programs (tied for top answer), and 13% statistically valid survey respondents listed youth learn to swim programs as one of top four most important. Additionally, the top three of four “high priority” pool programs involve aquatic exercise. With only a few community- based providers in the area, the Department should continue to serve the community’s aquatic program needs. Youth learn to swim program needs were fully or mostly met for just over half (55%) of statistically valid survey respondents who had a need for youth learn to swim, which indicates strong demand and need that the Department can help continue to fulfill. Farmers Market High attendance figures and positive community sentiment expressed through the community engagement process showed great pride and need for the farmers market events. Over half, or 55%, of statistically valid survey respondents listed as one of top four most important (top answer). About one- third (31.3%) of in-person event respondents selected farmers markets as one of their top activities. The Department’s efforts are clearly meeting the community’s need for farmers markets (88% of statistically valid survey respondents with a need for farmers markets had fully and mostly met needs) and should continue to provide access to fresh, local foods and products and the positive socialization opportunity. Adult Fitness and Wellness Beyond offering a free fitness center at Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center, the Department’s fitness and wellness programs accounted for only 1.2% of programs in 2019. According to the statistically valid survey results, 10,944 households have a need for adult fitness and wellness programs that are not fully met. Additionally, 22.4% of in-person event respondents were interested in fitness programs (6th of 28 options). In addition to adult fitness and wellness classes, community engagement feedback placed extremely high value on an indoor walking/ jogging track. The Department should focus on this gap and demand by adding facilities and programs that support the community’s need for additional fitness and wellness services. Inclusive and Adaptive Recreation The Department has made great strides in providing programs and services that are inclusive and adaptive for a variety of community members’ needs. The success of these efforts are evidenced by the 1,815 enrollments into 2019 Inclusive & Adaptive programs, which accounted for 18% of all program enrollment (top 3) that year. Sixteen percent of statistically valid survey respondents indicated a need for programs for people of all abilities. Despite the successful growth of this program area, according to the statistically valid survey results, 2,566 households have a need for inclusive and adaptive recreation that are not fully met. Due to the fact that there are minimal similar providers in the area, it is extremely important that the Department not only maintain its current level of inclusive and adaptive programs, but also consider expanding to include services such as inclusion aides and a dedicated indoor space with adaptive recreation equipment. 69 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT GAPS Considering the aforementioned observations and similar provider offerings, the following list summarizes the gaps identified between the Department’s program menu and the community’s programmatic needs: • Adult fitness and wellness • Nature • Aquatic • Inclusive & Adaptive OPPORTUNITIES Analysis of the above observations and gaps help identify opportunities to enhance key program areas as well as target market audiences. Programs: Aquatics, inclusive & adaptive rec, and youth sports program areas experienced high participation in activities that are not offered through many other area providers. Programming in these core program areas should be continued, as the Department is a primary provider of these services. Active adult, esports, extreme sports, homeschool, and language arts are program areas that could be explored for potential new or expanded services. Additionally, growing programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations will add depth to the program menu’s offerings. Fill the gaps within the adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas. Audiences: Conscious effort to provide leisure activities to adult audiences presents an opportunity to connect with the community in a new and exciting way. Four distinct age groups within the umbrella term “adult” exist – young adults, adults, active adults, and seniors. Rough age brackets for these groups are: • Young Adults: 18 – 34 years • Adults: 35 – 49 years • Active Adults: 50 – 64 years • Seniors: 65+ years. The recreational interests and needs of adults ages 18 – 34 can be significantly different than those ages 50 – 64. While the Department’s current adult programming uses the umbrella “adult” qualifier, there is significant opportunity for targeted programming designed for each of the four groups. The Department currently offers drop-in opportunities for all ages, such as park concerts and the Farmer’s Market; there is opportunity to grow targeted registration- based programs geared toward specific adult age groups. Although senior programming is offered via the City’s Senior Center, there is significant potential for the Department to reach adults who do not see themselves as seniors. The City’s Senior Center advertises membership availability for residents ages 50 and over; however, according to a Pew Research center survey, the typical baby boomer believes that old age begins at age 72. This perception can lead to low senior center participation by older adults who do not feel they belong in a senior center setting. The Department should continue to discuss active adult and senior service partnership opportunities with the Senior Center staff; then, an action plan for Department- led young adult, adult, and active adult programming should be developed. Department staff expressed a desire to reach the teen population more and in a different way. One strategy to consider is to reach out to student leaders involved in school clubs and groups. Actively listening and then nimbly responding to the students’ ideas will create trust and generate more ongoing participation. Partnering with the school and/or supplementing events that the school cannot offer can also reach the teen population in a different way. 70 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT 4.5 TRENDS The following information details park and recreation industry trends, grouped according to categories, including: • Aquatic • Youth Sport • Age Group These trend categories were selected due to their alignment with this plan’s focus on aquatics, outdoor recreation facilities, and recreation programming. An awareness of current trends helps recreation agencies stay abreast of possible ways to refresh, expand, and/or shift its program menu to stay relevant and interesting. AQUATIC TRENDS Municipal pools have shifted away from the traditional rectangle shape, and in many cases contain zero depth entry, play structures that include multiple levels, spray features, and small to medium slides, and separate play areas segmented by age and ability. Indoor warm water therapy pools continue to grow in popularity with the aging population, creating a shallow space for low impact movement at a comfortable temperature enables programming options to multiply. “Endless” or current pools that are small and allow for low impact, higher intensity movement are becoming a popular means by which to exercise in the water. The concept of water fitness is a huge trend in the fitness industry, where historically land-based programs have moved into the pool. Aqua yoga, aqua Zumba, aqua spin, aqua step, and aqua boot camp are popular. Whether recovering from an injury, looking for ease-of-movement exercise for diseases like arthritis, or simply shaking up a fitness routine, all demographics are gravitating to the water for fitness. Partnerships can be important such as cardiac patients from nearby hospitals, and arthritis or multiple sclerosis patients can use these the pools for therapy. Swim lessons generally account for the most significant number of participants and revenues for public pool operations. Lessons can be offered for all ages and levels, including private, semi-private and groups. Swimming pools and their swim lesson opportunities are a popular amenity for summer day camp programs. YOUTH SPORTS TRENDS The following seven trends areas are specific to youth sports, in that they encompass participation patterns, desires of participants, and provide strategic direction. TRADITIONAL SPORT PROGRAMMING Participation in the traditional sports of basketball, football, and soccer has been trending downward across the country over the past several years. Baseball participation has also experienced declines, but there is currently slight upward movement. However, travel teams for these sports were strong prior to COVID-19. It is estimated that many private, travel sports clubs will fold following the pandemic, putting pressure on municipal recreation programs to fill the gaps. Additionally, equity in youth sports is being sought by programs such as the LA84 Foundation’s Play Equity Fund, designed to “bring sport and play to all children, regardless of their race, gender, zip code, or socioeconomic status.” Many grant programs are focusing efforts on making sport equipment accessible, promoting girls in sports, and funding school-based programs. Additionally, the National Recreation and Park Association offers a free toolkit to raise awareness about the benefits of youth sports and to encourage youth sport participation. 71 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT LIFE SPORTS According to the Learning Resources Network, “Top Trends in Recreation Programming, Marketing and Management” article “life sports” are a new priority in the recreation world, where the focus is on developing youth interests in activities that they can enjoy for a lifetime, such as biking, kayaking, tennis, golf, swimming, and jogging/walking. PROJECT PLAY The Aspen Institute is the coordinating body for an initiative designed to increase youth sport participation rates. Member organizations started developing goals in 2017 that would strategically tackle the problem of getting and keeping kids active. In its Phase 1, the group created a website dedicated to coaching kids, a parent checklist, public service announcements encouraging kids to not retire from sports, and a provider checklist designed to reduce the pressure on early sport specialization. Its tools are typically free, and as more tools continue to develop, they will be a tremendous resource to youth sport providers nationwide. PARKOUR Parkour is a physical training discipline that challenges the participant to move their body through obstacle courses, very much like military training. Using body movements such as running, jumping, and swinging, the participant moves through static indoor courses or outdoor urban environments. Some agencies are adding Parkour type playgrounds in parks to attract the teen population. The Wetherby playground is designed in this manner. TEQBALL Created in Hungary in 2012, teqball is a gender-equitable game that incorporates soccer and table tennis components. Using a curved table and a soccer ball, single- or double-team opponents work to score 12 points first in a three-set match. Designed for indoor and outdoor play, this non-impact sport is cultivating international interest. OUTDOOR ACTIVE RECREATION Outdoor active recreation includes activities such as kayaking, canoeing, stand up paddle boarding, skiing, snowshoeing, snowboarding, mountain biking, and climbing. Rentals for those who want to “try before they buy” are popular in many areas. All of these types of activities have experienced an increase since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. SPECIALTY AUDIENCES Decades ago, recreation agencies focused on offering an entire set of programs for a general audience. Since that time, market segments have been developed, such as programming specifically for seniors. Recently, more market segments have been developed for specialty audiences, such as the LGBTQ+ community, retirees, military veterans, cancer patients, people needing mental health support, and individuals with visible and invisible disabilities. Sports opportunities specific to the groups’ needs can provide comfort and increased camaraderie. 72 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMMING TRENDS BY AGE GROUP TRENDS FOR YOUTH 13 AND UNDER STEM or STEAM Programs STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs or STEAM, which includes arts programming, is another area of growing popularity. Some examples include: learn to code, design video games, mod Minecraft, create with Roblox, engineer robots, print 3D characters, and build laptops. Summer and School Break Camps Participation in park and recreation youth camp programs continues to be very strong. For some agencies, these programs are the most significant revenue producers. Nature Related Programming There is an international movement to connect children, their families and their communities to the natural world. The New Nature Movement, which includes adults, is having an impact. Examples of physical amenities designed to connect with nature include installing fitness playgrounds such as Burke playground’s Elevate and Gametime’s Challenge Course and nature themed play spaces such as The Mud Kitchen & Word Garden at Morton Arboretum in Lisle, Illinois. The City is continuing this trend in its nature- based play area at Riverfront Crossings Park – currently the largest nature play area in Iowa. Youth Fitness The organization Reimagine Play developed a list of the top trends for youth fitness. The sources for their trends information comes from ACSM's (American College of Sports Medicine) Worldwide Survey of Fitness Trends, ACE Fitness, and SHAPE America. The top trends include: • Physical education classes are moving from sports activities to physical literacy curriculums that include teaching fundamentals in movement skills and healthy eating • High Intensity Internal training classes • Wearable technology and digital fitness media • Ninja warrior training and gyms • Outdoor recreational activities • Family fitness classes • Kids obstacle course races • Youth running clubs TRENDS FOR TEENS/YOUNGER ADULTS AGES 13-24 YEARS Esports Esports (also known as electronic sports, e-sports, or eSports) is a form of competition using video games. Forbes reported in December 2019 that eSports audiences exceed 443 million people across the world and the International Olympic Committee is considering it as a new Olympic sport. Local recreation offerings can include training classes, open play, tournaments, and major competition viewing. A new recreation center in Westerville, Ohio includes a dedicated esports room and college campuses across the country are also launching esports programs. Marquette University is the first Division I school to launch a varsity esports program. 73 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Holistic Health Park and recreation’s role in maintaining a holistic lifestyle will continue to grow. Opportunities to practice mindfulness, authentic living, and disconnection from electronic media are intentionally being sought out. Programs to support mental health, including those that help to combat anxiety, perfectionism, and substance abuse in youth and young adults are increasingly needed. TRENDS FOR ADULTS 25-54 Aerobic Activities For most age groups, swimming for fitness or weight training are the two most frequently mentioned activities that people indicate they would like to participate in. Running, walking and biking for fitness continue to show strong and consistent growth. A good balance of equipment and classes is necessary to keep consistent with trends. Fun Fitness “Fun” fitness is a current trend. Exercises like “P90x,” “Insanity,” or “Crossfit” have proven that a lot of equipment to get fit is not required. Since these programs have become popular, newer versions have become available, some cutting the time in half to look and feel fit. These types of classes have been and will continue to grow in popularity at recreation departments and fitness centers. Group Cycling Group cycling continues in popularity as the younger fitness enthusiasts embrace this high performance group exercise activity as well as program variations to attract the beginner participant are developed. Despite its continued popularity, group cycling is not projected to grow much beyond current participation numbers. Yoga Yoga in any form and for anyone has grown in popularity. Participation with someone or something else (goats, babies, dogs), for a variety of audiences (runners, golfers), and to help with ailments (stress, arthritis) has expanded yoga into a vast opportunity for growth. Outdoor Fitness Many agencies around the country have added fitness equipment in parks. In Mecklenburg County, NC, their outdoor exercise sites are called Fitzones. In order to place the equipment in the most ideal locations, they looked at neighborhood health disparities. Utilizing numerous data points (i.e., obesity rates in surrounding area, income, population density around the park, diabetes rates, mortality rates) and GIS mapping, this data was overlaid with their parks. Pickleball With 4.8 million people in the country playing pickleball, it is a fitness trend not to be taken lightly. Though not at its peak, pickleball is still trending nationwide as the fastest growing sport in America with the active aging demographic. Cornhole Cornhole (also known as bag toss, bagg-o, or bags) is a low impact, low cost activity that can be played by people of all ages. Young adults are signing up for leagues that can be held indoors or outdoors and offered all year long. It is a social activity that does not take much skill to participate. Although it can be offered recreationally, some competitive leagues are offered as well. TRENDS FOR ADULTS 55+ Lifelong Learning A Pew Research Center survey found that 73% of adults consider themselves lifelong learners. Do-it-yourself project classes and programs that focus on becoming a more “well-rounded” person are popular. Phrases 74 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT like, “how to” can be added to the agency website’s search engine optimization as consumers now turn to the Internet as their first source of information regarding how- to projects. Topics like safeguarding online privacy are also trending. Fitness and Wellness Programs such as yoga, Pilates, tai chi, balance training, chair exercises, water fitness, and others continue to be popular with the older generation. Specialized Tours Participants are looking for more day trips that highlight unique local experiences or historical themes. For example, a focus on authentic food, guided night walks, bike tours, concentration on a specific artist’s work, and ghost walks are among the themes being sought out. Creative Endeavors Improv classes are specifically targeting age groups with classes called, “Humor Doesn’t Retire.” Workshops and groups help seniors play, laugh, and let loose while practicing mental stimulation, memory development, and flexibility. Pickleball Pickleball continues to be very popular with this age group as well. Regardless of category, there is also a revival of previously popular recreational activities. Similar to fashion trends, activities that were popular in the 1970’s like carpet ball, kickball, and roller-skating, and macramé art have sprung renewed interest. Additionally, bocce is an ancient sport that has slowly made its way to the United States. The notion of making the old, new again continues to make comeback in a variety of forms. 4.6 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT Two factors that contribute to successful program implementation include, a.) the access to physical spaces in which to hold the programs, and b.) the existence of a solid internal operational support structure. Physical spaces include those that the City owns and manages, such as recreation centers, as well as partner facilities, such as school buildings. Internal operational support structure includes a variety of staff functions (e.g., administrative, recreation programming, human resources, marketing, information technology); equipment and tools; and policies and procedures. FACILITIES BerryDunn examined 2019 facility utilization records for the two recreation centers and outdoor athletic fields. ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center’s (RAL) program rooms consist of the Social Hall, Meeting Room A, Meeting Room B, and the Craft Room. The Social Hall is the largest of the four rooms and is used most often (35% of total hours). Sundays consistently host religious gatherings and weekdays typically host programs such as line dancing, tae kwon do, chorus rehearsals, summer camp, and events. The meeting rooms are programmed about 20% of the total hours, and host activities such as community meetings, community dinners, meditation, yoga, basic tae kwon do, and birthday parties. In addition to arts and crafts classes, the Craft Room hosts STEAM classes, adult painting, and camps. The Craft Room was not used nearly as often (354 hours) as the two Meeting Rooms (1,984 hours) and Social Hall (1,747 hours). The gym was used 2,325 hours, in both full-court and half-court configurations. 75 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT A facility use snapshot assessment observed four months of 2019 RAL room schedules: January, April, July, and October. The room schedules reflect reservations for activities, rentals, meetings, and events actually held. Insights gleaned included use by day of week, peak and off-peak, weekday and weekend, and total use. Figure 4.17: Snapshot of RAL Program Use by Day Within the snapshot assessment, Sundays were the most heavily used day (20% of hours used), followed by Tuesday (16%). Fridays were the least used days within the snapshot months. Figure 4.18: Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Weekdays accounted for 68% of the hours used and weekends accounted for 32% hours used. This demonstrates fairly balanced use between weekdays (representing 71% of a week) and weekends (representing 29% of a week). Figure 4.19: Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak Peak hours in a typical recreation center setting occur Monday through Thursday 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturday from 9 a.m. to Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Day Monday 15% Tuesday 16% Wednesday 13% Thursday 15% Friday 9% Saturday 12% Sunday 20% Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Day Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak Weekday 68% Weekend 32% Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Peak 33% Off-Peak 67% Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak 76 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT 3 p.m. (22 hours), or about 23% of operating hours. These hours are designated as peak because, historically, these are the times that people are available to recreate the most. The snapshot schedules showed that peak usage accounted for about 33% of use and 67% off-peak. From a capacity perspective, about 26% of total available peak hours were used in the snapshot assessment. While it is unrealistic to fill any program room to 100% capacity, setting a goal to fill more of each room’s peak times with more programming (and therefore increase percent capacity) is recommended. MERCER AQUATIC CENTER AND SCANLON GYM The Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gym (Mercer) is the eastern-most recreation center, located in Mercer Park and adjacent to the Iowa City Southeast Junior High School. In addition to a 50-meter pool and gymnasium, a meeting room, fitness room, and Procter & Gamble Room provide space for a variety of recreation programs. The aquatic center balances a mix of lap lane swimming, aquatic fitness, swim lessons, swim team practice, and open swim. Swim meets are also held in the facility. Scanlon gym is primarily used for tot time during the morning hours of each weekday throughout the year. Evenings are frequently used by the Rockets volleyball group. Weekends are typically reserved for tot parties during the day and for some indoor sports at night during winter months. The three program rooms host a variety of scheduled activities. A facility use snapshot assessment observed four months of 2019 Mercer room schedules: January, April, July, and October. The room schedules reflect reservations for activities, rentals, meetings, and events actually held. Insights gleaned included use by day of week, peak and off- peak, weekday and weekend, and total use. In the facility use snapshot, the second-half of the week (Thursday through Sunday) was scheduled more frequently than the first-half (Monday – Wednesday). Figure 4.20: Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Day The Mercer Fitness Room was typically scheduled for youth dance and tumbling classes during peak weekday evening times and Saturday mornings. Sunday afternoon and evenings held religious meetings in the Fitness Room. The room also hosted yoga and occasional meetings. Summer camps used the space, as did swim meets. The maximum capacity is 20, and can therefore only support programs with a small number of participants. The Mercer Meeting Room is also small (capacity 30), and is therefore only used for small group meetings, trainings, and event support. Although not reflected on the snapshot facility schedule documents, the Procter & Gamble (P&G) room’s primary purpose on weekday afternoons was to provide a location for youth drop-in use. The room includes pool tables, foosball table, and a ping-pong table. Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Day Peak 33% Off-Peak 67% Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak Monday 3.5% Tuesday 12.2%Wednesday 7.6% Thursday 20.9% Friday 22.1% Saturday 16.9% Sunday 16.9% Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Day 77 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.21: Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Weekdays accounted for 65.7% of the hours used and weekends accounted for 34.3% hours used. This demonstrates fairly balanced use between weekdays (representing 71% of a week) and weekends (representing 29% of a week), although skewed a bit more heavily to weekend use. Figure 4.22: Snapshot of Mercer Program Use by Peak/Off-Peak The snapshot schedules showed that peak usage accounted for about 27.7% of use and 72.3% off-peak. From a capacity perspective, about 23% of total available peak hours were used in the snapshot assessment. INDOOR POOL USE To better understand daily pool attendance, Department staff tracked participation at both MPAC and RAL pools in 2019 through the pandemic, and then again in May 2022. Figure 4.23 depicts the average number of swimmers per hour of open swim, for the entire month tracked, and by individual facility. The 2019 and 2020 data includes aqua fitness participants while the 2022 does not. This is because the participants used to be able to use their pool pass to check in for the aqua fitness classes, and now the operations have changed to separate lap swim and aqua fitness. Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Weekday 65.7% Weekend 34.3% Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Weekday/Weekend Snapshot of RAL Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak Peak 27.7% Off-Peak 72.3% Snapshot of Mercer Program Room Use by Peak/Off-Peak 78 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT Figure 4.23: Average Swimmers per Hour, by Month and Facility This translates to a subsidy of approximately $11.31 per visit at RAL as opposed to a subsidy of approximately $1.35 per visit at MPAC. These estimates only use the lifeguard labor expense and do not include any other operational expenses such as chemicals, water, supervisory staff, etc. These calculations are for demonstration purposes only, to provide data to support efficient and responsible use of tax dollars in the future. OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FIELDS Outdoor athletic field use schedules were reviewed by BerryDunn, to review the degree to which fields were used in 2019. City Park fields were used the most during the month of June, when two to three weeknights were at full capacity and tournament play occurred every weekend on at least two fields, if not most of them. Spring weekdays were booked to the extent that there were some makeup/rainout practice nights available. Weekend use was occasional in April/May and heavy in June, although weekend dates were not completely booked. July experienced a full month of rest. Fall While the Phase 2 qualitative feedback expressed support and positive affection toward RAL pool, the actual pool use figures do not reflect this sentiment. Most months experienced an average of less than four swimmers per open hour at RAL. In the months studied, most (eight of eleven) hour-long time blocks averaged less than 16 swimmers per hour, which would indicate the ability of an eight-lane pool to support 2 swimmers per lane during these times. The 7-8 a.m., 9-10 a.m., and 10-11 a.m. time blocks would generally all support 3 swimmers or less per lane, based on the actual participation figures provided. From a fiscal perspective, the City is subsidizing lap swimming at a much higher rate at RAL than MPAC. RAL pool averaged 2.29 swimmers per open hour in May 2022 (293 total visits); MPAC averaged 8.04 swimmers per open hour in May 2022 (3,293 total visits). Using the actual May 2022 visit totals, an average of $2.62 and average lifeguard hourly wage of $16.00, RAL pool was subsidized by approximately 81% (more than $3,300), while MPAC was subsidized by 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 MPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMPACRALMa r-19 Apr-19 May-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 May-22Average Number of SwimmersMonth and Facility Average Swimmers per Hour, by Month and FacilityAverage Swimmers per Hour, by Month and Facility 79 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT use in August, September, and October saw less use than spring. Six or seven fields were used two nights per week in the start of fall, with gradual reduced play to a handful of field uses recorded in October. Fall use was less than 50% peak weeknight times and 10% weekend days. Mercer fields were used after school and into the evenings starting mid-April, on average four nights per spring week for 1.5-3.5 hours depending on the field. June saw heavy use, with nearly every weeknight booked. Weekend tournaments occurred about every-other week from April through June. July saw sporadic use, and August through October were significantly less busy than spring months. Use dwindled to one field per night three days per week in September, and an occasional weekday practice or weekend game in October. Spring at Napoleon fields was quite busy the majority weeknights, for 2.5 hours on nearly every field. Although April/May weekends were not busy, June Saturdays were busy with tournaments. July saw much less use, with one regular rental on two fields one night a week and sporadic use the rest of the month. August use returned to spring levels, with an average of two to three weeknights used. Mid-September shifted to football in the outfields, with practices approximately two to three nights per week through the end of October. At Kickers Soccer Park, spring Saturdays were quite busy, with nearly all fields full the first half of the day and at least four fields full the second half of the day for most Saturdays in April and May. Weeknight practices were spread across 8-12 fields three to four nights per week until mid-May. June and July weekdays were busy with daytime summer camps, clinics, and evening practices. Fields 3, 4, and 5 were in high demand most August evenings. September and October were quite busy with practices and games on a large quantity of fields, most days and all weekends – especially Saturdays. Cross country meets were also held at the park, approximately one per week through the fall. Overall, the ball diamond quantity seems to allow for sufficient rain day makeups and regular use. That said, the quality of the fields and/or their location do not inherently stand up to the weather conditions–as exemplified most by the flood-prone lower City Park, which inhibits access to the City Park fields. Rectangular fields used for football over ball diamond outfields is not ideal; they do not allow for sufficient rest and growth. The high-demand fields at Kickers do not seem to have an opportunity for rest, which makes the field quality and longevity difficult. No significant usage evidence pointed to the immediate need for additional ball diamonds; that said, it is more apparent that upgrades to the existing ball diamond locations would enhance drainage and therefore increase playing time capacity. There does appear to be a need for rectangular, multipurpose fields as nontraditional sports such as lacrosse, ultimate Frisbee, rugby, cricket, etc., gain popularity. The current overlay fields at Napoleon Park are not ideal for these sports or the traditional sports of football and soccer. As a focus on equity continues and as a desire for nontraditional sports grows, the additional rectangular fields in the Eastside Sports Complex Master Plan should be considered first if a phased development approach is conducted. FACILITY NEEDS ALIGNMENT According to the statistically valid survey, the respondents’ top needs for programs included farmers market, adult fitness and wellness programs, and nature programs. The identified program gaps included adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive programs. This section examines whether the existing facility spaces meet these programmatic needs and gaps. 80 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT The current space for the farmers market is working and does provide shelter from the weather; however, it does not offer much room for expansion if growth is desired. Adult fitness and wellness programs do not currently have a space that would host larger group exercise classes. Fitness and wellness was a top program priority, and the spaces to support fitness and wellness (indoor walking/ jogging track, weight room, and fitness room) were three of the top four statistically valid survey respondents’ top choices for most important amenities. It is not essential for nature programs to have indoor support space, and yet general multipurpose rooms can be useful to get classes started or to hold a class indoors due to inclement weather. The current aquatic spaces offer a nice variety of indoor and outdoor locations, as well as varied indoor water temperatures. This variety aligns with the various desired pool program uses (i.e., swim lessons, lap swim, aqua exercise, open swim). That said, a more accessible, warm water therapy pool could enhance swimming opportunities for youth and seniors. Finally, the inclusive & adaptive programs have made do with the general program spaces, but could better- serve its participants from a dedicated space with additional adaptive equipment. The Department’s general multipurpose rooms, meeting rooms, and gyms are supporting existing program needs, and yet not necessarily in the most beneficial way. This is primarily due to the location of the program spaces. Current indoor program spaces are centralized between two recreation centers that are quite close in proximity, which does not provide geographic access to many of the City’s residents. Multipurpose rooms can serve 13 of 20 (65%) of the program categories listed in the community needs assessment surveys. Additionally, the larger program room (the Social Hall) was in the highest demand and can support events, cultural programs, and a diverse array of program types. Although the community engagement feedback demonstrated high regard for aquatic services, actual use at RAL and the high capital and operational costs of maintaining two indoor pools suggests a single indoor aquatic facility would be a prudent use of resources. Consider adding warm water to Mercer Park Aquatic Center to consolidate the aquatic operation. BUSINESS FUNCTIONS The community engagement findings identified lack of awareness as a significant barrier to participation. Because the feedback indicated that people often did not know about the programs and services, there appears to be a need for enhanced marketing and program promotion. The current website upgrade project should help enhance public communication; additional staff support could also provide more robust public engagement, awareness, and participation. Similarly, based on similarly sized recreation departments’ administrative support structures, a dedicated full-time human resources position would be ideal. Finally, support from information technology experts is essential to properly administer customer registration functions, maintain staff communication, and secure facility access control. These business support functional areas are mentioned as a best- practice reference to help ensure these positions continue to support parks and recreation service provision. BUSINESS PROCESSES The aquatics focus groups highlighted the aquatic fitness operations as a business improvement process opportunity. Because aquatics was a key assessment component involved in the project, BerryDunn investigated the opportunity with staff. In 2019, the Department shifted to employee-led water fitness program instruction, after having been previously led by volunteer instructors. Catalysts for 81 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT the change included a desire to provide a service that increased value through trained, certified staff and increase program safety. In an attempt to support flexible payment options for the new employee-led water fitness classes, Department staff offered multiple payment structure options (e.g., punch pass, drop-in, monthly rates). The attempt to accommodate participants with multiple fee structures actually resulted in more confusion and frustration among participants. Additionally, there was continuous confusion around water fitness scheduling, most notably with the lack of an assigned location for the classes to be held in the pool. BerryDunn offered the Department staff a set of suggestions to help clarify the process and establish a set operational plan. • Set a payment structure and stick with it. Make sure it is easy to follow and administer. • Establish a location in the pool for every class, then clearly communicate the schedule. Examples included listing the schedule online, on a bulletin/white board on-site, and using a-frame signs next to the lanes. The schedule should depict a set time frame or dates for which it applies. • Create a one-page communication piece that clearly communicates the participation process as of “X” date. The information should articulate the rationale for the water fitness class structure, explain the payment structure, and outline where the participants can gain access to the lane assignment schedule. Department staff immediately took action on the aquatic feedback and took actions prior to this report’s completion. BerryDunn also recommends reconvening the aquatic focus groups to learn the participants’ perspectives of the updated process and discover if there are further improvement opportunities after the six- to twelve-month trial period concludes. PROGRAM MENU DIRECTION One way to help ensure the Department is making informed decisions about its program menu is to maintain a database of its program offerings – outside of the registration software. The database should contain information such as: • Core program area: • Roles • Delivery model • Pricing model • Age segment • Skill level • Location The first step is to maintain the database with accurate information. This can be done on a quarterly or annual basis. A matrix format can be used, with each program listed in the left column and each information category listed in the first row. BerryDunn provided a template matrix to the Department staff, for future use. Once filled in, the staff can run a series of analyses that will help inform the next program menu’s decision-making. It can also help the Department establish annual goals and then report out successes. For example, perhaps in this hypothetical example the data shows that 60% of programs were offered at the intermediate skill level. Staff might look at that percentage and realize that their menu should be better- aligned to their mission, and would like to shift to providing a majority of programming at the beginner skill level. The resulting goal could be to increase the number of beginner-level programs. Similarly, if the data demonstrates geographic inequities, the staff can adjust program locations in future program offerings. With the planning matrix data, the staff can make more informed, defensible decisions that are intentionally rooted in equity. 82 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT BerryDunn started exploring some of the information categories with the Department staff, encouraging them to first determine what their current roles, delivery model, and pricing models are; then, determine where they want them to be. The current Department roles (for each type of program) could be partner, provider, facilitator, or resource. The delivery model could be self-directed or leader-directed. Pricing model could be free, recover costs, or pay as able. These three information categories will take time for the staff to think through; the others, age segment, skill level, and location, are less philosophical. As a part of the exploration, the Department staff started to seriously consider the notion of offering more “pay as able” leisure opportunities. The next steps will be to continue these conversations throughout the next several years’ program menu planning sessions – using the data to guide future menu development. 4.7 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES RECOMMENDATIONS PROGRAMMING • Explore active adult, esports, extreme sports, homeschool, and/or language arts programs for potential new or expanded services • Grow programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations • Fill in programmatic gaps for adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas • Consider segmenting adult programming into four target areas; partner with the Senior Center to provide additional active adult programming. • Connect with existing student leadership groups to help develop programs/events and attract participants • Consider a “learn and explore” program series - from cultures to sports • Review trending programs for applicability to the City FACILITIES • Create additional fitness and wellness program space • Secure additional multipurpose room space when opportunities arise • Consider decentralizing indoor program space locations by establishing geographic indoor program spaces on the north, east, south, and west sides of the City • Consider the addition of an indoor warm water pool to support swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim at Mercer Aquatic Center or a west side location • Consider establishing a dedicated inclusive & adaptive program space with specialized equipment • Design the program menu to fill peak use timeslots to 100% capacity 83 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 4: RECREATION PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION • Review the programs in the decline life cycle stage; establish decommissioning or rejuvenation plans for each • Consider targeting geographic areas with low participant reach • Become students of Departmental data by developing, maintaining, and regularly analyzing a program database DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION • Continue heavily promoting and advertising the RecAssist program • Review the DEI Outcomes and Conditions matrix for indicator improvement opportunities • Review the Departmental equity analysis spectrum and establish improvement goals • Set up registration software to allow demographic self-reporting • Establish program planning and evaluation cycles (i.e. add DEI question in customer survey) • Develop DEI-focused staff training plan • Conduct program audits by experts for things like cultural relevancy and accuracy • Review of code of conduct expectations and enforcement guidelines • Establish role as a career pathway provider KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI’S) • Establish program analysis KPI’s and assign reporting accountability • Track participant demographic data (e.g., percent of non- white, % of low income) • Reduce all program area cancellation rates below 20% • Number of barrier reductions and/or removals (with qualitative evidence narrative) • Document evidence of staff training use and/or implementation (i.e., de-escalation, translation, awareness) in both quantity and with supporting narrative • Develop a qualitative, post-program staff reflection opportunity 84 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS THE DEPARTMENT’S THREE RECREATION FACILITIES WERE PREVENTATIVE PROGRAMMING • Explore active adult, esports, extreme sports, homeschool, and/or language arts programs for potential new or expanded services • Grow programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations • Fill in programmatic gaps for adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas • Consider segmenting adult programming into four target areas; partner with the Senior Center to provide additional active adult programming. • Connect with existing student leadership groups to help develop programs/events and attract participants • Consider a “learn and explore” program series - from cultures to sports • Review trending programs for applicability to the City FACILITIES • Create additional fitness and wellness program space • Secure additional multipurpose room space when opportunities arise • Consider decentralizing indoor program space locations by establishing geographic indoor program spaces on the north, east, south, and west sides of the City • Consider the addition of an indoor warm water pool to support swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim • Consider establishing a dedicated inclusive & adaptive program space with specialized equipment • Design the program menu to fill peak use timeslots to 100% capacity ADMINISTRATION • Review the programs in the decline life cycle stage; establish decommissioning or rejuvenation plans for each • Consider targeting geographic areas with low participant reach • Become students of Departmental data by developing, maintaining, and regularly analyzing a program database Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion • Continue heavily promoting and advertising the RecAssist program • Review the DEI Outcomes and Conditions matrix for indicator improvement opportunities • Review the Departmental equity analysis spectrum and establish improvement goals • Set up registration software to allow demographic self-reporting SECTION 5 Facility and Field Analysis 85 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR RENOVATE? As park and recreation departments face decisions about how to maintain their aging facilities, there are varying levels of upkeep to consider. Conducting regular, preventative maintenance can help to proactively prolong the lifespan of equipment, amenities, and spaces. That said, at some point decisions must be made as to whether it is more appropriate to conduct repairs to existing equipment, amenities, and spaces or if a renovation project is more appropriate. Several decision-making factors play into how staff can prudently weigh the options: • Consultant’s Priority Ratings: Based on the consulting team’s assessment, the three-tiered priority system can assist with weighing the urgency of the decision. For example, are priority one items so significant that they must be completed to continue safe operation? • Costs: In addition to the item’s cost estimate, the design, engineering, contingency, and project management expenses must be included. • Outcomes: What operational changes and/or efficiencies will result from the potential change, and how does the change impact the expected lifespan? Will the change create a more accessible, inclusive environment for those who need ADA accommodations, all genders, and for family groups? • Community Need: How does the current facility meet the community’s needs, what needs are currently unmet, and will potential changes better-meet those needs? • Budget: To what extent can the City afford the potential changes and/or are there alternative financing mechanisms available? A balanced, thoughtful review of these factors should be weighed with every potential facility change. User and program data should be gathered and reported to the public for at least one year. Additional public input should be then be sought; a statistically valid survey can help represent a variety of community perspectives. ANALYSIS The scope of the facility and fields portion of this project was to establish a visionary roadmap for the Department’s recreation centers, pools, and athletic fields. To do that, the facilities’ current status needed to be evaluated. The resulting findings subsequently help define improvement opportunities as well as provide decision-making data points such as priority rating and cost. The Department’s three recreation facilities were evaluated by experts from three separate industries: architecture, aquatics, and accessibility. The three firms, Williams Architects | Aquatics; WT Group; and Recreation Accessibility Consultants, submitted their individual facility reports relative to their observations and recommendations for City Park Pool, Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gym, and Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center. The firm’s reports, including full details regarding each recommendation, can be found in Appendix D, E, and F. 86 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS BerryDunn compiled the results of the three reports into a summary format, as seen on the following pages. Each facility’s recommendations and corresponding cost estimates are provided in order of the respective consultant’s priority. Important notes regarding the cost estimates: • The cost estimate totals are rounded to the nearest dollar, reflect the highest dollar amount when a cost range was provided, and do not include the “unknown” items – some of which are likely to be significant • The estimate only represents the items’ cost, and not the design, engineering, or contingency costs • The cost estimates cover the unit or items in current dollar value and do not account for inflation • Full cost opinions are beyond the scope of this study • Unless noted otherwise, these cost estimates continue operations in their current form, to keep CPP and RALRC operational until full renovations can take place In addition to the recreation facilities, athletic field sites were also evaluated by expert landscape architects. Hitchcock Design Group’s findings summary is included at the end of this section; the firm’s full report can be found in Appendix F. Sections 5.1-5.3 list prioritized recommendations and cost estimates, by facility. As a reminder, schematic design costs, the public input cost, the final design work, the engineering fees, and any additional contingency fines are not included. 87 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Priority One 5.1 CITY PARK POOL Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL OPTION 1: MAINTAIN UNTIL REPLACEMENT WITHIN 3 YEARS A. Replace the gutter grating on main pool perimeter gutter $25,000 to $30,000 B. Repair the leak in the gutter supply tube $1,000 to $1,200 C. Replace the influent and effluent pressure gauges on the eastern most filter gauge panel $150 to $200 D. Change the feed tube on the Stenner acid feed pumps $100 to $150 yearly E. Provide spill containment pallets for the acid storage $1,000 to $2,000 F. Adjust/repair wading pool grating $1,000 to $1,500 POOL OPTION 2: EXTEND THE POOL LIFE 10 YEARS G. Evaluate and test the main pool concrete structure Unknown H. Perform leak detection testing to locate the source of the leaks in the main pool structure $4,000 to $6,000 I. Install a PVC pool liner in the main pool – only if intention is to operate as-is for more than 3 years $250,000 to $300,000 J. Evaluate and provide recommended repair methods for the existing balance tank Unknown BATHHOUSE A. Soffit – Replace damaged soffit vents.$31,800 B. Fascia– Replace damaged cedar fascia and install gutter.$11,660 C. Lower Level - Resolve confined space with an additional means of egress/stair.$106,000 D. Investigate water loss. $21,200 ADA A. Parking: Add and acquire signs, repair slope, reconfigure accessible stalls $10,259 B. Exterior Accessible Route: Construct resistant pads, install detectable warning, maintain foliage, repair CIL, designate an access aisle, repair passenger loading zone. $6,575 C. Exterior Doors: Correct, replace or repair (slope) on all door along public route, CIL, replace hardware, and remount hardware.$15,868 D. Interior Doors: Remove locker room doors, relocate storage, furniture and other obstacles, fill and maintain gaps, replace for all doors and hardware, inspect, adjust and maintain all doors along public circulation route. $27,593 88 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendations Cost Estimate E. Interior Route: Lower operating mechanisms, replace 5% of locker operating mechanisms, repair slope at drinking fountain, mount complaint signage, and lower wide segment of service counter. $2,310 F. Public Spaces: Relocate protruding objects in first aid room. $350 G. Restrooms Multiple Users: Acquire and mount signage, lower mirrors, insulated exposed pipes under one sink, lower changing tables, create a wheelchair accessible stall, relocate protruding objects, and hand dryers. $13,696 H. Restrooms Single User: Acquire and mount signage directing patron to accessible restrooms.$420 I. Locker Rooms Main: Designate 5% or no less than one locker as accessible, replace locker hardware, replace one bench, and renovate accessible shower in each locker room. $22,957 J. Signage: create template for signs, implement a sign revision program, and mount signage. $630 K. Pool: Repair, bevel or ramp CILS on pool deck, correct or repair slopes along the pool deck, assure pool life is kept out when in season, Install complaint sloped entry in wading pool, maintain access characteristics on AR bleachers, construct firm, stable and slip resistant pads, and replace drinking fountain. $14,786 Total Priority 1 Direct Cost Estimate $627,154 *Not including “unknown” cost estimates 89 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Priority Two Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Refinish three meter dive stand base and railing supports and the one meter dive stand bases $4,000 to $6,000 B. Repair deck cracks and deck settlement $15,000 to $20,000 BATHHOUSE A. Replace asphalt roof shingle assembly $201,000 Total Priority 2 Direct Cost Estimate $227,000 Priority Three Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Provide Variable Frequency Drive, VFD, in lieu of the existing pump motor starter for the main pool and wading pool circulation pumps. $16,000 to $20,000 B. Replace the main pool pressure sand filters. $120,00 to $150,000 BATHHOUSE A. Renovate Interiors (e.g., lockers, partitions, hardware, drywall)$846,000 ADA A. Employee Spaces: Employee only area permit, relocate obstacles, $0 B. Interior Doors: Employee doors only up renovation $0 C. Exterior Doors: Upon renovation make corrections to employee only doors $1,386 D. Alarms: Upon renovation install audible and visual alarms in all rooms & spaces $1,570 Total Priority 3 Direct Cost Estimate $1,018,956 Total City Park Pool Direct Cost Estimate*: $1,873,110 (short term solution, less than 10 years) *Not including “unknown” cost estimates 90 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS 5.2 MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER Priority One Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Perform leak detection testing on the wading pool structure and underground piping $2,000 to $3,000 B. Repair the cracks in the wading pool structure $5,000 to $8,000 C. Replace hot tub jet pump $2,000 to $3,000 D. Continue to service and maintain all pumps $2,000 to $3,000 yearly E. Change the feed tubes on each of the Stenner chlorine feed pumps, total of 3 pumps $150 to $200 yearly F. Replace cracked deck tile around main pool $6,000 to $8,000 G. Perform leak detection testing on the wading pool structure and underground piping $2,000 to $3,000 BUILDING H. Roofing Natatorium Roof: Conduct further analysis of the assembly with a roof core to investigate the condition of the sub-surface insulation board. $10,600 I. Roofing Translucent Roof Panel (Kalwall): Remove and replace perimeter sealant and check flashing. $16,854 J. Exterior Envelope Lintel: Remove rust and repair. $10,600 K. Exterior Envelope Expansion Joint: Remove and replace sealant in expansion joint to prevent water infiltration.$3,975 L. Exterior Envelope Solarium: Replace the Solarium glazing gaskets. $28,620 M. Interior Review Gymnasium: Identify location of water infiltration. Verify slope of exterior concrete landing. Adjust hardware prior to removing and replacing damaged flooring. $10,600 N. Interior Review Natatorium: Repair cracked ceramic tile as not to cause patron injury.$53,000 ADA O. Parking: Repaint stalls and access aisles, add one van parking sign, acquire and mount correct fine sign or stall and at appropriate heights and locations, raise existing accessible parking signs, create AR with crushed and compacted stone or similar outdoor material. $6,702 P. Exterior Accessible Route: Recut or re-pour curb ramp to be max running slope, install complaint detectable warning at curb ramps, correct or fill gaps on AR and sidewalks running slope along AR, designate an access aisle for the passenger drop-off area. $20,865 91 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendations Cost Estimate Q. Exterior Doors: Relocate storage and other obstacles, correct or repair slope at doorway landing, install cement pad at exit, replace hardware, inspect, adjust and maintain closing speed on door closers, and replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows. $25,299 R. Interior Doors-Aquatic Center: Relocate storage and other obstacles, replace hardware with lever hardware, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 IBF to open interior doors and closing speed on door closers. $9,776 S. Interior Accessible Route-Aquatic Center: Remove, or relocate storage in CRS at fixtures and operable parts and min 36” AR, lower operating mechanisms along interior AR, relocate protruding objects along the interior AR, in map room and fitness, and in CFS at fixtures and operable parts. Replace locker room drinking fountains. Lower 36” wide segment of services counters to max. $13,346 T. Public Spaces Aquatic Center: Replace operable parts, table or bevel a 36” wide portion of the mats, remove or relocate storage in CGS, lower operating mechanisms, replace operable parts. $1,400 U. Restrooms-Multiple User Front Hall: Remount signage for both on wall, latch side of the door, lower hooks in both accessible stalls, remount toilets in both to 16” to 18” from the side wall to centerline, Replace toilet seats, or re-set or replace toilets, Replace toilet tank in men's with one having flush mechanism, Relocate or recess hand dryers. Adjust timing of sink faucets in W to remain on for min 10 seconds, stall door in women's to be self-closing, and Rehang stall door in W. Remount toilet paper dispenser in women's, Correct or repair slope at stall in women's. $9,710 V. Restrooms –Multiple Users Pool: Remount signage for both on wall, latch side of the door, Lower sinks in both to max, Adjust timing of sink faucets in both to remain on min 10 seconds, Lower paper towel dispensers in both to max, Remount toilets, Replace toilet seat, or re-set or replace toilets, Remount side grab bars, Remount rear grab bars, Adjust stall doors in both to be self-closing, Remount toilet paper dispensers, Lower hook in men's accessible stalls, Replace toilet tank in men's with one having flush mechanism, Rehang stall door in men's. $10,832 W. Restrooms Multiple Users Locker Room A: Upon renovation, acquire and mount signage. $210 X. Restrooms - Single Users: Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door.$210 Y. Signage: Create template for signs, Implement a sign revision program throughout the building, Mount signage at all permanent rooms/spaces with Braille and access symbol. $1,260 Z. Pool: Relocate protruding objects along pool deck, Lower 36” wide segment of service counter to max, Replace pool lift with compliant lift, Replace or remount handrails, Correct or repair running slope of entry, Replace drinking fountain. $11,510 92 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendations Cost Estimate AA. Fitness: Create 36” wide AR to one of each type of fitness equipment, Create 30” by 48” “parking space” next to one of each type of fitness equipment offered. $0 BB. Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym: For all doors along public circulation route, relocate storage and other obstacles, firmly secure carpet, replace hardware with lever hardware, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers. $795 CC. Public Spaces- Scanlon Gym: Repair, bevel or ramp CIL in rooms indicated, Lower operating mechanisms to max, Lower sink height to max. $2,573 Total Priority 1 Direct Cost Estimate $276,937 Priority Two Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Repair/replace the wading pool cracked deck areas $8,000 to $10,000 BUILDING B. Roofing: Full replacement $2,445,768 C. Roofing, Gymnasium Skylights: During the roofing replacement, replace compromised skylight with new.$73,700 D. Exterior Envelope Blue Storefront Window and Door System: Replace perimeter sealant at storefronts to avoid leaks into building.$87,100 E. Electrostatically recoat storefront finish $201,000 F. Interior Review Proctor + Gamble / Game Room: Replace floor as funds become available G. Interior Review Lobby: Remediate water infiltration from translucent panel and repair damaged drywall and acoustic panel.$40,200 H. Interior Review Locker / Toilet Rooms: Refinish epoxy flooring as budget allows.$88,400 ADA I. Restrooms Multiple Users Locker Room A: Create accessible stall with grab bars and fixtures, Relocate or recess drinking fountains, hand dryers, shelf in W, Leave as is, men’s sink height; cite construction tolerance, leave as is, mirror not above sink; sink mirror OK in W, lower changing table, Lower one or add hook at max 48” aff in shower area W. $12,422 J. Restrooms Multiple Users Locker Room B: Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible locker RR (checklist). $210 93 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendations Cost Estimate K. Restrooms - Single Users: Remove, or relocate scale in CFS at fixtures, operable parts in fitness, Remount toilet in fitness, Replace toilet seat, or re-set or replace toilet, Acquire and mount grab bars in the correct location in fitness, Remount toilet paper dispenser, Insulate exposed pipes under sink in fitness, Relocate or recess towel dispenser in fitness, Guard restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible restroom. $3,261 L. Locker Room A: Designate 5% or no less than 1 locker in both as accessible, with signs with access symbol, hooks and operating mechanisms, Replace locker hardware on designated lockers, Replace benches in both dressing area, If folding table is intended for use as a changing table; remount at a height of 17” to 19”, Create accessible shower in M locker room, Enlarge shower stall in W, Correct or repair slope to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS in women's, Remount grab bars in the women's shower, Replace shower control in women's with a compliant lever control, Replace shower benches. $23,988 M. Pool: Install pool lift to spa, make it available every hour the spa is open.$7,000 Total Priority 2 Direct Cost Estimate $2,983,049 Priority Three Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Provide a heater for the outdoor wading pool $5,000 to $6,000 BUILDING B. Exterior Envelope Masonry Crack: Continue to monitor further development. Clean during tuck-pointing. unknown ADA C. Exterior Doors: Repair, bevel, or ramp CIL at two door entries, replace thresholds, inspect, adjust and maintain 8.5 IBF, and upon renovations make above corrections to employee only doors. $4,186 D. Interior Doors-Aquatic Center: For all doors along public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from opposite side, correct or repair slope at doorway landing, remove portion of wall, remove and rehang to swing outward rather than inward, repair, bevel or ramp CILs at door entries, and employee only doors upon renovation. $30,546 E. Employee Space Aquatic Center: Relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs, employee only areas permit approach enter and exit. $0 F. Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym: For all doors along the public circulation route, replace threshold at interior doors with ADA thresholds, For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation. $254 94 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS G. Employee Spaces - Scanlon Gym: Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs, relocate obstacles to create turning space.$0 Total Priority 3 Direct Cost Estimate $40,986 Total Mercer Direct Cost Estimate: $3,295,972 5.3 ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER Priority One Recommendations Cost Estimate POOL A. Camera the existing main drain and gutter collection piping.$4,000 to $5,000 B. Replace the existing cast iron/steel underground pool piping, main drains and gutter collection $210,000 to $230,000 C. Provide a new surge tank $60,000 to $80,000 D. Provide new EPD filters $70,000 to $90,000 E. Change the feed tube on the Stenner acid feed pumps $50 to $80 yearly BUILDING F. Interior Review Men’s and Women’s Locker Rooms: Investigate cause of water seepage at corridor. $26,500 G. Remediate rusting structural components $106,000 H. Remove and replace rusted door hardware $2,120 I. Code compliant mean of egress: Arts & crafts $47,700 J. Code compliant mean of egress: Meeting Rooms A&B $39,750 K. Code compliant mean of egress: Gym corridor 79,500 ADA L. Parking: Create two or more 8’ accessible parking stalls, add one van parking sign to one accessible stall and repaint stall and access aisle, Repair or correct slope of parking space and access aisle. $15,712 M. Exterior Accessible Route: Correct or fill 2.75” gap along AR to ramp, Install handrails on both sides of Gilbert street stairway, Shorten game room entrance ramp run, Correct game room entrance ramp and landing cross slope, Enlarge landing on Gilbert St. entrance, Install a second handrail on the Gilbert St. entrance ramp, Replace existing handrail on Gilbert St. entrance, and Install rail along bottom edge of ramp. $12,644 95 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS N. Exterior Doors: For all doors along public circulation route; correct or repair slope at doorway landing, repair, bevel, or ramp CIL at two door entries and doorway maneuvering clearance to max, remove or recess a portion of wall, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles, fill and maintain gaps at doorways, replace hardware with lever hardware and on doors to hazardous areas with knurled lever hardware, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers and 8.5 lbf to open exterior doors. $15,285 O. Interior Doors - Lower Level: For all doors along the public circulation route, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles to create 60” maneuvering space around doors, replace shelf with one that protrudes, fill and maintain gaps at doorways, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated, remount hardware, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers, install kick plate on doors, replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows. $29,097 P. Interior Accessible Route: Lower operating mechanisms and Relocate protruding objects along the interior AR, Replace drinking fountain with hi-lo bowl, Lower 36” wide segment of service counter to max, and replace handrails with compliant handrails on main and social room stairways. $10,407 Q. Public Spaces - Lower Level: Relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs, Relocate protruding objects, Tape or bevel a 36” wide portion of the mats, Replace operable parts with one not requiring tight pinch, grasp to use and Replace one table with one allowing knee and toe clearance. $3,220 R. Restrooms - Single Users (Pool): Renovate pool deck restrooms to be accessible single user restrooms and install doors for privacy.$4,683 S. Signage: Create template for signs, Implement a sign revision program throughout the building, and Mount signage at all permanent rooms/ spaces. $2,310 T. Fitness: Create 30” by 48” “parking space” and 36” wide AR to one of each type of fitness equipment.$0 U. Pool: Relocate protruding objects, Correct or repair slopes along the pool deck, Replace pool lift with a compliant model, Sloped entry not compliant; install a second means of entry to the pool, and Replace drinking fountain. $32,898 V. Interior Doors - Upper Level: For all doors along the public circulation route; relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles. $0 W. Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level: Insulate exposed pipes under one sink in both, Lower light switches in both, Acquire and mount a min 36" long rear grab bar, mounted behind the toilet, Adjust stall doors in both to be self-closing, Rehang stall door, Remount toilet paper dispenser, Lower mirror in men's, Adjust timing of sink faucets in M, Remove urinal privacy wall in M, Replace toilet tank in M, and Raise sink bowl in 3 W. $6,645 96 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS X. Program Kitchen - Upper Level: Install hardware not requiring a tight pinch or grasp on cabinet, Remove base cabinet and lower sink height, Replace oven with one having controls on the front panel, Remove or raise oven hood, and Lower paper towel to max 44” aff. $6,580 Total Priority 1 Direct Cost Estimate $846,131 Priority Two Recommendations Cost Estimate BUILDING A. Roofing: Replace roofing assembly in the next 2-5 years. Upgrade roofing insulation thickness to comply with current energy code requirements. $1,548,504 B. Exterior Envelope: Repair spalled concrete at ramp to prevent further deterioration.$13,400 C. Exterior Envelope: Extend downspouts to the ground to prevent water staining.$13,400 D. Interior Review Racquetball: Provide proper ventilation to comply with code. Provide accessibility to a remodel space for future programming $86,765 ADA E. Elevator: Remount handrails and adjust re-entry timing.$1,100 F. Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers: Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, Lower mirror in W so reflective surface is max, Insulate exposed pipes under one sink in both, Lower changing tables in both to max, Create accessible stall in place of ambulatory stall, Relocate or recess hand dryers in both and sink and shelf in W, and lower urinal so that rim height is max. $15,400 G. Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room: Insulate exposed pipes under one sink, Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, Remount mirror not above a lav or counter so the bottom edge is max, Lower soap dispensers to max, Create accessible stall with grab bars and fixtures mounted in correct locations and heights. $5,798 H. Restrooms - Single Users (Pool): Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible pool restrooms once renovated. $210 I. Restrooms - Single User (Lifeguard): Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons.$210 J. Restrooms - Single User (near game room): Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible Restroom.$4,803 97 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Recommendations Cost Estimate K. Locker Rooms: Designate 5% or no less than 1 locker as accessible in both, Replace hardware on designated lockers, Enlarge shower stalls in both, Remount control to above grab bar, Replace shower seats in both with a rectangular or L-shaped bench, Replace shower controls in both with a compliant lever control, Lower hook in men's, Remount shelves in men's. $23,503 L. Interior Doors - Upper Level: For all doors along the public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from the opposite side, widen AR to door, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs in doorway, correct or repair slope at doorway landing, replace doors, replace hardware, remount hardware, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers and 5 lbf to open interior doors, and replace doors. $50,973 M. Public Spaces - Upper Level: Relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through potters studio, Relocate protruding objects, Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at fixtures and operable parts, Lower operating mechanisms, Replace operable parts, Lower counters to max 34" aff, in the alternative, add a work surface at max, Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at sink in potters studio and craft room, Lower sink height to max, and Lower a 30” wide portion of railing to max 32”. $6,300 Total Prority 2 Direct Cost Estimate $1,770,366 Priority Three Recommendations Cost Estimate BUILDING A. Interior Review Lobby: Update finishes as allowed by program and budget.$418,500 B. Interior Review Fitness: Upgrade ventilation to accommodate usage.$206,325 C. Interior Review Gymnasium: Replace Acoustical Panels $315,000 D. Interior Review Gymnasium: Repair/Paint Ceiling $164,160 E. Interior Review Men’s and Women’s Locker Rooms: Update Locker Room and Toilet facilities as budget allows.$621,000 F. Interior Review Meeting Rooms A & B: Update finishes as budget allows.$426,600 ADA G. Exterior Doors: For all doors along public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from opposite side and upon renovation; make corrections to employee only doors. $1,750 H. Interior Doors - Lower Level: For all doors along the public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from the opposite side, widen AR to door, replace doors, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs, For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation, $36,423 I. Interior Accessible Route: Provide an AR to all public areas required $43,000 J. Public Spaces - Lower Level: Raise fan to min 80”, or pad object.$0 98 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS K. Employee Spaces - Lower Level: Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, to create turning space and relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs. $0 L. Alarms: Install audible and visual alarms, Upon renovation install audible and visual alarms in all rooms and spaces $6,279 M. Interior Doors - Upper Level: For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0 N. Employee Spaces - Upper Level: Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as turning space of 60" in rooms noted, and tables and chairs. $0 Total Priority 3 Direct Cost Estimate $2,239,037 Total Robert A. Lee Direct Cost Estimate: $4,855,534 99 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS 5.4 OUTDOOR FIELDS SUMMARY The following pages include the conclusions of the sports field assessment study and recommendations for improvements and future development items for each of the study areas. The conclusions section is divided into two parts: proposed improvements and an action plan. GOALS AND STRATEGIES This section identifies five areas of opportunity to improve Iowa City’s outdoor sports amenities. These opportunities are broken into overarching goals with several strategies to meet it. Existing Facility Improvements Existing facility improvements are small- and large-scale improvements to the four developed study areas outlined in this report. E1. Improve Site Access and ADA Accessibility and Compliance, including: • Providing accessible routes to all amenities and support services • Expanding and improving neighborhood/park connections and trailheads • Expanding bike route and bus route access to sections of the community with barriers to recreation access including the east and west sections of the community E2: Upgrade Ballfields to restore or replace aging and damaged amenities and improve player and spectator experience, considering • Providing additional shade and seating • Upgrades to key fields for a “Big League” feel considering stadium style seating, sports lighting, scoreboards, press box, and improved restroom/ concessions/storage. E3: Improve Support Buildings in the parks such as restrooms, concession buildings, maintenance/storage facilities, and open- air shelters that are currently spread out geographically. Several of these buildings have compliance and/or functionality limitations due to their size and/or layout and history of partial improvements. • Assess all support buildings to identify buildings to be renovated in place • Assess all support buildings to identify buildings replace or consolidate E4: Develop and implement Sport Field Improvement Standards in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects. • Continue to implement drainage, irrigation, and lighting improvements • Consider orientation and size improvements along with potential consolidation • Oversize fields for improved turf management • Consider dedicated field features such as goals, player benches, and spectator seating It is very important for IC to have facilities for all, with an emphasis on the underserved.” ~Anonymous Survey Respondent “ 100 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS E5: Complete Court Repairs, in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, including: • Resurfacing and/or replacing asphalt paving and color coat to keep cracking and ponding to an appropriate level • Replacing damaged and/or outdated fencing, nets, and goals E6: Complete Parking Lot Repairs, in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering: • Resurfacing and/or replacing asphalt paving and striping • Realigning or relocating lots with poor functionality • Reducing capacity of oversized lots E7: Develop and implement Sustainability Plans for each Park Site in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering: • Upgrading site and sports lighting to LED • Converting underutilized lawn to native prairie • Naturalizing turf detention basins E8: Develop, adopt, and implement Signage and Wayfinding Standards in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects. • Develop a signage brand package for Iowa City Recreation for adoption across all park and open space locations considering park identity, amenity identification and labeling, regulatory signage, and site mapping/ wayfinding E9: Add and improve Non-sport Amenities to serve daily park users and sporting event drag-along visitors including playground, splash pads, climbing and challenge activities, picnic games, etc. E10: Plan for and implement small-scale improvements and large-scale renovations to the parks, including: • City Park • Mercer Park • Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park • Napoleon Park New Facility Development New facilities are the potential addition of amenities or new park sites that either do not currently exist within the Iowa City Recreation system or the addition of an amenity to a new site. N1: Implement planned Eastside Sports Complex development of park amenities and site access improvements including ballfields (to address the community deficiency), flag football, and tournament sports and meet community interest in this new park space. N2: Plan for, fund, and develop an Artificial Turf Field Complex of two to three fields at a single park location, considering: • Development of multi-purpose rectangular fields and diamond ballfields • Phased implementation to avoid over-burdening the initial investment and maintenance replacement costs • Funding and partnership opportunities to ease the financial burden on Iowa City • Final location to be determined based on community support 101 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS N3: Assess ongoing participation and demand for Pickleball Court development and provide additional amenities as needed. • Assess tennis participation to determine capacity for existing court conversion and/or shared-use courts N4: Assess demand for and feasibility of Miracle Field baseball complex and develop amenities as needed. Final location to be determined based on community support and feasibility N5: Assess demand for and feasibility of a new indoor/outdoor Fieldhouse and develop facility as needed. Final location to be determined based on community support and feasibility Operation and Program Opportunities Operation and program opportunities are potential methods for managing the implementation of these goals through the development and adoption of policy and best practices. O1: Engage Affiliate Investment Partners to support Iowa City Recreation initiatives through consensus building, community outreach, and/or fiscal support. O2: Provide Donor Opportunities for park amenities O3: Pursue Grant Funding Opportunities considering national, state, and local sources of fiscal assistance. O4: Strengthen and grow Community Relationships with academic organizations with research and community give-back missions. Planning Initiatives Planning initiatives are system-wide standards and plans for non-site specific improvements and support amenities. P1: Develop and adopt Landscape and Amenity Standards and implement them in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects to provide a cohesive Iowa City Recreation experience across all properties. P2: Develop Programming Overlays for special events such as festivals, cross- country programming, community races, etc. P3: Develop and adopt Park Security Plans and implement them in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering security lighting, cameras, and staff patrols. Acquisition Opportunities Acquisition opportunities identify areas of the community where available recreation service is limited or access to services is impeded. These opportunities also account for how potential future development in Iowa City may lead to new recreation needs. A1: Monitor and address Western Community Athletic Service needs as potential future community development, demographics and available recreation offerings by others change. A2: Identify opportunities to expand recreation access through East Edge North/ South Connections to existing and proposed amenities at Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park, Mercer Park, and Eastside Sports Complex. Prioritize safe access across Highway 6, through the industrial district, and along the railroad line along the east edge of the City 102 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS Proposed Improvements The Proposed Improvements table consists of a list of capital improvements and Action plan items for each of the five study sites. Table 5.1: Proposed Athletic Field Improvements RECOMMENDATIONS CITY PARK EASTSIDE SPORTS COMPLEX* IOWA CITY KICKERS SOCCER PARK MERCER PARK NAPOLEON PARK Create Park Master Plan (long-term vision)2018 2016 2020 Special spaces/park identity is needed X X X X Provide paved ADA connections to all park amenities X X X X Add identity and wayfinding signage in parks and along trails X X X X X Add trail head identity, and ADA trail-system access in the park X X Improve spectator amenities (seating, views, etc.) X X Replace backstops and fencing X X X Add/improve netting and other ball control/ safety measures X X X Add/improve lighting/ scoreboards X X X X Possible artificial turf location X X Restore grass and rest fields Improve drainage/ grading X X Improve/add irrigation X X Add/Improve water access/drinking fountains X 103 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS CITY PARK EASTSIDE SPORTS COMPLEX* IOWA CITY KICKERS SOCCER PARK MERCER PARK NAPOLEON PARK Add/improve restroom facilities X Add/improve concessions facilities X X Add/improve maintenance/storage facilities X X Add/renovate shelters/ shade X X X Add/expand parking X X X Provide pedestrian/ bicycle access to the park X X Provide bus route access to the park X X Expand park acreage by acquiring adjacent parcel(s) X Improve multi-use open space X Add landscape layer X X X X Add/improve support amenities (playgrounds, fitness equipment, courts, etc.) X X 104 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS HIGHLIGHTS CITY PARK POOL As anticipated, the 72-year-old pool is nearing its end of useful life and should be replaced. If the intention is to replace the pool within three years, continue making necessary repairs as are currently done every year. If the intention is to extend the life of the pool 10 years, at which time the pool will be replaced, install a PVC pool liner. MERCER The facility was found to be in overall good condition. While the priority one repair needs are relatively minor, the City should prepare for a full roof replacement. Renovation and expansion opportunities could help meet unmet community needs, provide a more accessible facility, and gain operational efficiencies by centralizing the indoor aquatic operation. RALRC The most unexpected facility analysis result was in the state of the RALRC natatorium. Overall, the natatorium was found to be in fair condition. The condition of the original piping is a significant concern and should be replaced. The wading pool chemical controller and piping, pool filters, and surge tank also need to be replaced. The accessibility into the pool is difficult for those with mobility difficulties. Due to the age of the facility being 58 years, the cost to repair verses a complete renovation should be considered. From an operational perspective, the cost to operate two indoor pools within three miles of each other should be considered in the equation as well. A renovation of the entire recreation center could be considered, to address the building’s egress deficiencies, maximize programmatic space use, and meet the community’s unmet recreation program needs. FIELDS The athletic field recommendations focus on taking care of existing fields before building new. Examples of this include continued replacement of backstops, fencing, spectator areas, irrigation, subdrainage, and lighting. Basketball, tennis, pickleball courts, and support parking are ready for repair/repaving and netting/fencing replacement. Accessible routes are needed to multiple facilities. Support buildings need compliance updates and consolidation for efficiency. Future development should align with general sustainability plans and enhance the visitor experience. 105 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 5: FACILITY AND FIELD ANALYSIS This page is intentionally left blank. 106 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS The Department’s three recreation facilities were evaluated by experts from three separate industries: architecture, aquatics, and accessibility. The three firms, Williams Architects | PROGRAMMING • Explore active adult, esports, extreme sports, homeschool, and/or language arts programs for potential new or expanded services • Grow programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations • Fill in programmatic gaps for adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas • Consider segmenting adult programming into four target areas; partner with the Senior Center to provide additional active adult programming. • Connect with existing student leadership groups to help develop programs/events and attract participants • Consider a “learn and explore” program series - from cultures to sports • Review trending programs for applicability to the City FACILITIES • Create additional fitness and wellness program space • Secure additional multipurpose room space when opportunities arise • Consider decentralizing indoor program space locations by establishing geographic indoor program spaces on the north, east, south, and west sides of the City • Consider the addition of an indoor warm water pool to support swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim • Consider establishing a dedicated inclusive & adaptive program space with specialized equipment • Design the program menu to fill peak use timeslots to 100% capacity ADMINISTRATION • Review the programs in the decline life cycle stage; establish decommissioning or rejuvenation plans for each • Consider targeting geographic areas with low participant reach • Become students of Departmental data by developing, maintaining, and regularly analyzing a program database Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion • Continue heavily promoting and advertising the RecAssist program • Review the DEI Outcomes and Conditions matrix for indicator improvement opportunities • Review the Departmental equity analysis spectrum and establish improvement goals • Set up registration software to allow demographic self-reporting SECTION 6 KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS, & RECOMENDATIONS 107 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the analysis and the community’s feedback have culminated in the following key findings: • The community would like to upgrade City Park Pool’s amenities to create a more accessible facility that meets a variety of aquatic needs—so long as the facility’s original aesthetics and character are maintained. • The Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center indoor pool is in need of extensive and expensive repair; investing in Mercer Aquatic Center would provide more accessible and centralized aquatic services. • Additional facility space is needed for multipurpose and fitness/wellness use, spread across geographically diverse locations, as expressed in Phase 1 public input. This can be accomplished with an addition to Mercer, along with space at City Park Pool and one to two other locations. • A warm water pool would provide better access to, and support for, swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim. • Supply and demand gaps exist in adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas. • More programs for teens and all four adult age segments (young adult, adult, active agers, and seniors) are needed. • Programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations demonstrate a significant growth opportunity. • The public’s prioritization of existing athletic field location improvements indicated Mercer Park should be improved first. 6.1 BIG PICTURE CONCEPTS BerryDunn identified opportunities to respond to the findings with solutions that consider new approaches to recreation service delivery. The big picture concepts encourage the continued development of services rooted in equity, renovation of existing facilities first, and schematic designs that meet a variety of identified community needs. These concepts will each need to be vetted through a full design and public input process before a final design is approved. MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER AND SCANLON GYMNASIUM FACILITY This facility is divided into two distinct service provision areas; the northern half of the facility provides gymnasium and multipurpose space, and the southern half provides a small program room and an aquatic center. The center section of the facility houses locker rooms, offices, and two reception desks. 108 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Indoor pools – Possible shift in service provision location Through this assessment process, we learned that the Robert A. Lee (RAL) indoor pool is in need of extensive and expensive repair. The consulting team’s recommendation is to add a warm water pool adjacent to the existing Mercer Aquatic Center 50M pool. These changes would result in new warm water swimming opportunities for youth and seniors, would increase operating efficiencies, and would reduce the City’s carbon footprint. Repairing the existing pool at RAL does not address facility obstacles, such as the entrance, pool size and depth, ADA accessibility, and building footprint. For comparison purposes, the cost to fully renovate RAL’s pool and locker rooms is estimated between $4,500,000 and $5,040,000; the cost to add the warm water pool to Mercer Aquatic center is estimated between $8,140,000 and $9,050,000. These estimate ranges are quite broad due to the difficulty of long-term estimating in the current construction climate. These changes would also support equitable indoor aquatic access for people of all gender identities and abilities. Figure 6.1. Mercer Park Aquatic Center Concept The schematic designs for aquatic facilities shown dramatically increase accessibility options for entering and exiting pools and hot tub. Locker rooms are updated to be accessible and inclusive. The next step is to conduct a focused community outreach effort to gather public input regarding the future of RAL. 109 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Fitness and Wellness – Opportunity to expand service provision Renovating the central circulation area to create gender neutral changing, locker, and restroom facilities, consolidating the service desk into a single location, and centralizing a larger party/program room allows for more efficient use of the space. Additionally, reconfiguring the current multipurpose room allows for expanded fitness and wellness space and flexible multipurpose room space. Finally, the addition of a third court to the existing gymnasium creates an opportunity for an indoor walking track around the perimeter. Figure 6.2. Mercer Park Scanlon Gymnasium Addition Concept 110 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Decentralized Indoor Space Engagement feedback and program analysis identified a need for more equitable access to indoor program locations throughout the City (North, East, South, and West). In order to do this, the consulting team proposes a decentralized indoor space model by adding a multipurpose room to the upgraded City Park Pool Bathhouse building (north), additional multipurpose rooms to Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gym (east), a new neighborhood center in the South District (south), and a future west side programming space as opportunities arise. The building design concept shown below depicts a possible building design for satellite facilities. Open, welcoming aquatic facilities that encourage the use by all and promote the Department’s vision that every child learns how to swim requires the community to consider new version of swimming facilities. Figure 6.3. Satellite Facility Concept 111 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS City Park Pool Based on the consulting team’s analyses, the 72-year-old City Park Pool needs to be renovated. Community feedback indicated a desire for amenities that would create a more accessible facility that meets a variety of aquatic needs—so long as the facility’s original aesthetics and character are maintained. The preliminary conceptual drawing incorporates the expressed priorities and areas of importance, alongside operational, physical, and maintenance considerations. Highlighted changes include gender neutral changing areas, shade, zero depth entry, current channel, 50-meter lap lanes, diving well, solar panels, and a community room. Improved outcomes include inclusive design, increased bather load, new program and event square footage, and enhanced environmental responsibility (i.e., reduction in chemicals and water use). Figure 6.4. City Park Pool Concept Next Step: Conduct a focused community outreach effort to develop renovation design. 112 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Athletic Field Priorities The consulting team has identified improvement and/or development opportunities at five athletic field sites. A brief description is below: 1. City Park Baseball Upgrades i. Highlights: ball diamond improvements, pickleball/tennis ii. Estimate: $4M – $5M 2. Eastside Sports Complex Master Plan Implementation i. Highlights: six ball diamonds, up to 10 rectangular fields, dog run, picnic areas, loop trail, restrooms, playground, indoor facility ii. Estimate: $35 – $40M 3. Kickers Sports Complex i. Highlights: Improve ADA access, signage, and spectator amenities ii. Estimate: $1M – $2M 4. Mercer Park Fields Master Plan Implementation i. Highlights: ball diamond renovation, new concessions roof, shade features, LED lights, pickleball renovation/expansion ii. Estimate: $3M – $4M 5. Napoleon Park Softball Upgrades i. Highlights: ball diamond improvements ii. Estimate: $1.5M – $2M PROGRAM GROWTH The recreation programs assessment identifies programmatic opportunities for growth and enhancement. Supply and demand gaps exist in adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas. More programs for teens and all four adult age segments (young adult, adult, active agers, and seniors) are needed. Finally, the community has an appetite for specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations. A list of program titles generated from the Phase 2 public feedback is located in Appendix A4. 6.2 CONNECTIONS The big picture concepts connect observations from this planning process with proposed actions. The community engagement process showed fitness and wellness as a high priority; therefore, the recommendations to expand Scanlon gym, and expanding fitness options at RAL. As an existing City initiative, the Climate Action Plan drove the recommendations to reduce CPP and MPAC water volume and chemical use and add solar panels to CPP. Because equity and access were emphasized throughout staff and community engagement, gender neutral locker room and restrooms were added to CPP and MPAC, geographically distributed indoor program spaces were recommended, and internal planning adjustments and KPI’s planned. The consulting team observed opportunities for operational efficiencies in consolidated indoor aquatics and better use of the MPAC lobby when the two service desks are consolidated and locker rooms are redesigned. To execute the ADA transition plan in a more expedited manner, the consulting team recommends an increased annual budget allocation and implementing the needed changes with the proposed facility upgrades. 113 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 6: KEY FINDINGS, CONCEPTS & RECOMMENDATIONS 6.3 CONTINUED COMMUNITY INPUT Community feedback used to inform this report’s recommendations placed more weight on Phase 1 feedback, due to the statistical validity and cross-community representation involved during that stage of the community input process. Phase 2 participation was self-selected, and therefore may not representative of the community as a whole. Future planning and solidification of facility changes should involve new, additional community input opportunities. This input gathered in this long-term visioning process provided directional guidance. As facility-specific plans are explored and developed, the planning process should include intentional outreach to non-users and underserved populations and additional engagement opportunities. A facility-specific statistically valid survey of the community may also be necessary. 114 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 7: THE FUTURE The Department’s three recreation facilities were evaluated by experts from three separate industries: architecture, aquatics, and accessibility. The three firms, Williams Architects | PROGRAMMING • Explore active adult, esports, extreme sports, homeschool, and/or language arts programs for potential new or expanded services • Grow programs that are focused on specific cultural experiences and/or celebrations • Fill in programmatic gaps for adult fitness and wellness, nature, aquatic, and inclusive & adaptive program areas • Consider segmenting adult programming into four target areas; partner with the Senior Center to provide additional active adult programming. • Connect with existing student leadership groups to help develop programs/events and attract participants • Consider a “learn and explore” program series - from cultures to sports • Review trending programs for applicability to the City FACILITIES • Create additional fitness and wellness program space • Secure additional multipurpose room space when opportunities arise • Consider decentralizing indoor program space locations by establishing geographic indoor program spaces on the north, east, south, and west sides of the City • Consider the addition of an indoor warm water pool to support swim lessons, aquatic exercise, and open swim • Consider establishing a dedicated inclusive & adaptive program space with specialized equipment • Design the program menu to fill peak use timeslots to 100% capacity ADMINISTRATION • Review the programs in the decline life cycle stage; establish decommissioning or rejuvenation plans for each • Consider targeting geographic areas with low participant reach • Become students of Departmental data by developing, maintaining, and regularly analyzing a program database Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion • Continue heavily promoting and advertising the RecAssist program • Review the DEI Outcomes and Conditions matrix for indicator improvement opportunities • Review the Departmental equity analysis spectrum and establish improvement goals • Set up registration software to allow demographic self-reporting SECTION 7 THE FUTURE 115Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 7: THE FUTURE 7.1 VISION STATEMENTS The following vision statements define each core area’s direction answer the question, “What does the future of _______ look like?” City Park Pool is an outdoor aquatic facility open during the summer months. The facility meets the aquatic needs of numerous constituent groups, including families, people of all gender identities, people of all abilities, exercisers, and leisure users. The layout and design fosters welcoming and inclusive access both into the facility itself as well as physically into the water. • The future of CPP involves a bathhouse and pool renovation that would help serve the City’s outdoor aquatic needs for the next 70 years. Redesigning to include components that would serve a large variety of programmatic needs, including lap swim, diving, deep water, lessons, and shallow leisure play, would expand the facility’s community reach. Increased water access via zero depth entry, stairs, and ramp into the lap lanes increases physical accessibility. The bathhouse renovations would allow for gender neutral access, gender neutral locker rooms, and community multipurpose space. Changes would include intentional efforts to reduce the facility’s carbon footprint, such as reduced water and chemical use and solar panels. Regardless of design components, future changes will honor the character, aesthetic beauty, and tree canopy of the current site. The Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium is a recreation center located on the east-central side of the City. Its location within a park supports indoor/outdoor leisure pursuits, and school adjacency fosters healthy and safe out-of- school time options. The center primarily serves the community’s active recreation needs through its gymnasium, aquatic, fitness/wellness, and multipurpose room spaces. • The future of MPAC/SG includes a refreshed, aesthetic facelift. A renovation would increase space for gymnasium use, multipurpose use, and warm water exercise/instruction. Simultaneous benefits include a roof repair and ADA transition plan execution. The result will be a more efficient use of space that fosters more equitable access and increased services. Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center is a community gathering space in the City center that provides a safe space for a variety of leisure pursuits and recreation endeavors. An assortment of physical spaces allows for broad programmatic use, to support wellness, social connection, and creative expression. The center’s drop-in and scheduled activities are provided daily. • The future of RAL includes a facility renovation that will support the continued access to gymnasium space, fitness and wellness facilities (track, equipment, group classes), updated/enhanced art space(s), and multipurpose rooms. The specific design of these spaces hinges on a decision regarding the indoor pool at RAL. The current pool footprint could be renovated to include an updated pool, or shifted to serve a variety of community needs, including but not limited to: indoor pickleball courts, indoor skate park, social service extension offices, artificial turf, indoor bocce courts, indoor playground, climbing wall, indoor farmers market space, indoor gardening, and/or expanded art studio. A change in use of the pool space could increase the vitality of the building by adapting the space to currently unavailable, but desired community recreation uses. 116 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SECTION 7: THE FUTURE Iowa City’s Outdoor Athletic Facilities provide ball diamonds, courts, and grass rectangular fields that support a variety of sport endeavors. All facilities strive for physical accessibility, updated features and equipment, opportunities for shade, and support amenities for athletes and spectators. Scattered throughout the community, the facilities are available for scheduled structured use and open play. • The future of the outdoor athletic facilities entails a series of improvements that will enhance the playability, accessibility, aesthetics, and support amenities of the key athletic facility sites. ICPR’s Program Menu is a diverse array of structured and unstructured leisure, educational, and skill-building activities. The program menu is developed with equity as its foundation. Participants’ diverse learning styles, backgrounds, participation preferences, abilities, and interests are kept top of mind throughout the development, registration, execution, and evaluation of each activity. The programming staff work to reduce barriers to participation by fostering a welcoming atmosphere, offering financial assistance, supporting physical needs, providing transportation options, and dispersing activities throughout geographic locations. The program menu continuously evolves to meet the community’s changing leisure interests and to capitalize on partnership opportunities as they arise. • The future of programming will rely on intentional, structured planning initiatives that will continue to engage the community, keep offerings fresh, ensure cultural and community relevancy, and intentionally improve on the spectrum of diversity, equity, and inclusion throughout the service provision process. 7.2 ACTION PLAN The roadmap to achieve the vision statements is laid out through a series of steps and actions, timed over the course of the next ten or more years. The subsequent Action Plan will help the City and Department staff align resources to execute the plan. The result is a series of short-, mid-, and long-range tasks based on priority. The tasks are incorporated into an Action Plan Tracking Tool, to monitor and report out each initiative’s progress. The tool has been provided to Department staff as an independent tool from this report. Finally, as future public engagement progresses, the Department should continue to gather cross-representation in all public input, as completed in Phase 1 of this process. 117Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SECTION 7: THE FUTURE This page is intentionally left blank. 120 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS This page is intentionally left blank. 121 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS 122 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Appendix A1: Comment Card Feedback • Please add more outdoor swim classes in summer. Even pre- pandemic we would have preferred outdoor. It would be great to have limited "tot" time hours in toddler pool in those weeks between school starting and Labor Day for non- school-age kids • We need a new outdoor pool with slides • Bring back the City Park train and amusement park! • Shortage of regulation baseball fields and would like to see outdoor fields project near Sycamore. • If we can have more hours for swimming and soccer practice. We really miss soccer practice for our kids. • You guys are doing an amazing job. Keep it up!!! • Great job w/ all you do! Fun parks for kids that may not have best environment at home - very helpful! More options than just sports options! Clean bathrooms very much appreciated. Thanks!! :) • Expansion of fitness center - free weights and racks • We'd <3 an indoor walking track! - Claire Shaw • Splash pads open past Labor Day. Closing based on temperature. • Weeds in Chadick plots; in between plots; bring in bugs; placement of gates • You guys do a great job. :) <3 • More bike programs. • Thank you for steering I.C. toward WALKABILITY, RESILIENCE, EQUALITY, ENVIR. HEALTH; Building IN & up, esp'ly - not OUT (which drains TAXES) • Keep outdoor lap swim - where kids actually learn to swim. Plenty of splash pads around. Waterpark is like an electric prom - no lesson on skill but just immediate gratification. • Redo pickleball courts; Need some more, esp. Mercer - Mike Parker 116 Pentro Drive • Opportunities for ARTISTS (LOCAL) to sell artwork at Parks and Rec events… Arts festivals / Pop ups w/ music and food vendors. Prioritizing artists significantly impacted by Covid/ pandemic bacchi14@gmail.com • Thank you for all the work you put into Wetherby Park last year. It has made the trail (paved) accessible to more persons - even terrain and easy wheeling. My concern is the entry way to the park that goes between two homes and creates another entry from the south. The top of the walkway has deteriorated considerably and makes travel difficult from strollers, bikes, wheelchairs and anyone with balance issues. Someone unfamiliar with that entry would find themselves stymied at the top. Lacks ADA compliance. Gett to another entrance may be difficult. • We do need an outdoor pool and also two indoor pools. We need a user friendly website and better communication between the City and the aquatics division so everyone is on the same page. We need less closure of Mercer pool. Swimming is so important and the more availability of swim times and places to swim the better I think. I'd love to see City Park Pool open longer in the fall if it could be. • We love City Park Pool! We'd support limited renovations - some new fun things, but now a full blown CRAZY waterpark. :) <3 • We need a ice rink in City Park - for APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS 123 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS winter and summer. A warming house w/ concessions and hot cocoa. Boathouse on Iowa River for the community, not just University. Jill- tobin@iowa.edu • We would love to see more inside winter activities / open gym / climbing structures for little kids <7 • Better workout gyms / equipment • Maybe offer more splash pads or add a playset for younger kids in Washington Hills Park (currently has park for older kids, rope-based cross walks) • Zero entry will open up facility to multiple swimmer levels - some people want to have fun, but without the risk of swimming. • Rock wall; gymnastics; water sliads - water falls; fireworks; outdoor movies; baseball; soccer • Charlotte wants girls baseball, NOT softball • Me gustaria que hubrera mas parkes cereanos [centrales?] con juego para ninos. {I would like there to be more [central?] parks with games for children} • More pottery room and facilities. It's great to have all these options of activities! • More spaces for teens to hang out and more offerings. Translation of materials. • Would love to see a small community nature center / Some amenities are in poor shape. Wetherby community garden water supply, for example, is a hazard! :( • Keep walking trails plowed during winter months • Everyone I know loves City Park Pool and is opposed to making into some sort of Aqua Park. When you are closer to making a decision I would be happy to circulate a hard-copy petition of people who share that opinion. It would be great if the new pool has open-air (no root) changing areas (the way it was 40 years ago) Gary Sanders 831 Maggard IC 52240 garyiclabor@yahoo.com 319/337- 7739 • More outdoor swim lesson availability would be great. • I would love to see some small prairie pollinator gardens at a variety of City land. This would help people learn about this issue. • Thanks for asking public input. • I appreciate the changes made at Creekside Park. I see kids playing basketball, young children playing on the equipment. I use the walking path/trails w/ my dog and so also appreciate the doggie bags and garbage. I like the new plantings, cornered seating - the only thing missing is gardening space and this is a good model for all parks. • Beyblade Tournament - Indoor wave simulation pool (e.g. body boarding) - Pokemon tournament - Mechanism (if not Gov Xpress app) to submit upkeep comments such as NMSP basketball ground markings and community weeding where weeds may hurt built environments (often concrete!) • Blessings @ thanks you guys for all your good deed, something everyone should involve themselves in - Victoria Palmer 319-621-6812 • Would love an indoor facility in South District. Including pool, gym, gathering space and/or theatre! • Update both rec centers • More craft offerings (arts/paintings) • Check gazebo in College Green Park regularly for people who use it as a temporary home. 124 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Warm water pool indoors • Indoor fields for year long soccer would be great! • Glad to be able to join in the fun again! My son loved the bouncy slides! • Add more to Mercer - Splash Pads • I'd prefer to invest the indoor fields. E.g. the badminton courts • Facility Investment: (A) Gymnasiums © Indoor fields • Please include weekday morning hours at City Park Pool for stay at home momes with small children. I have been wanting to go but it is only open for kids during their nap times during the week. • More pool availability on Sunday and times for working families • Day camp! Whenever school is out, have camps. Coordinate with the school schedule. Keep City Park simples, don't overhaul with too many extra amenities • Great friendly staff! • City Park Pool renovate w/ upgraded activities (like NL pool); Also indoor fields for winter rec and activity options. THANK YOU!!! • Loved Rec activities for children • More parking for free; parking for longer time. • Times of young children's activities are inconvenient. Need evenings and weekends for preschool programs in dance, arts and crafts. As per mom w/ too many kids to write. • Generally we (spouse and I) feel the Rec Dept. does a fine job, but there are moments that have given us pause, mostly related to recreational hours at the pools. Why close City Park Pool for 30 minutes at 4:30 - isn't there a better time for cleaning? Also, hours sometimes shift without it being clear why and even with adequate notice. • Mercer Pool! Close it (yes, I know why) leaves the entire east side lacking a pool. Losts of less financially stable people struggle to meet fees. More scholarships needed. • More investment in bike infrastructure (trails, lanes, road diets, parking, etc.).; Allow adult beverages at all public parks - at least outside in the downtown area; Start an outdoor adventure program w/ outings to various locations in Iowa City and beyone. (Camping, hiking, backpacking, etc.) • More venues for local musical groups. • As many programs and facilities as possible should be free or low cost. So the annual budget should accommodate this (planning ahead). Public facilities should be broad and reach out to everybody, which historically I think they try to do, but can always do better. • Please assess the schedule for Aquacize. Ideally the cost(s) - please include a monthly pass. • City Park - no provision for people who want to walk around and enjoy the tall trees (next to Park Road) or the open space by the river; Flower beds? (Around Ashton House the layout is beautiful!!) • More pickleball hours. Better bathrooms at Robert Lee. Mercer needs resurfacing for pickleball courts. • For Upper Park and other areas could there be a "tour" for different disabilities? The tour woujld allow people who are newly back to Iowa City to view the park safely. • Have a van that goes out to neighborhoods that might have 125 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS barriers without transportation. Sort of "pop-up" events - Bring snacks. Some teen therapy too. • PLEASE DON'T DESTROY CITY PARK POOL!!!! Instead - full staff it, keep it clean, and extend the hours. Thanks! - A 25 Year Resident, Parent and City Park Pool Lover • Keep facility open later till 10 p.m. including pool tables. • It would be great to have City Pool open after Labor Day when it can be the hottest days of the year. Many people complain about this every year to no avail. • Some of the maintenance staff hostile and unfriendly. Soccer Park restrooms dirty, this was after soccer season. Last Summer I created a F.B. group called Iowa City Area Park and Trail Enthusiasts • 1. City Park could use a full makeover - I like the hillside playspot recently built there; 2. Keep the old style wooden shelter houses. The new metal prefabbed ones have no character. • In general I think IC rec services are wonderful. Just a couple thoughts… many people who use RA Lee complain about parking. Although I don't have any tech skills to suggest how to do this, but if Lee users could have 1-2 hours parking time I think it would increase usage..... I find the IC website particularly hard to negotiate/ navigate. This might reflect more my limited tech abilities. Overall though an A+. Thanks, Mark Cannon • I would invest in an outdoor water park with lazy rivers, slides, food and drink stands. Kind of like North Liberty pool except here in Iowa City - Bella R. • We LOVE Robert A. Lee Pool! Jen Wehr is THE BEST instructor. Thank you for such a great facility. It's wonderful when lifeguard Erin shares her music. • Rec Centers / Mental Health • Expand Terry Trueblood swimming beaches and clean up the water quality • Get better balls and better hoops. • Swim lessons are our current primary use of services. The instructors are GREAT!! They do a remarkable job of both instructing as well as dealing with difficult students and, unfortunately, parents. We don't have much for constructive thoughts, but wanted to relay how pleased we are with your staff. THANK YOU! - A very pleased family • We have had an excellent experience taking private lessons w/ Jen. In just a short time, I have seen huge imporvements in both of my kids. She is innovative, bringing tools (hula hoops) that peak interest, engage and develop. She is fully present and engaged, meeting the kids where they are and encouraging them to stretch outside their comfort zone. I will always request Jen and recommend her as an instructor. This experience has been far more valuable in advancing both my children's swimming skills than traditional lessons. I wish the rec center would offer more private and semi-private options. I also found Jen to be very professional in her communications. She worked well with us as we navigated sick kids and rescheduling. • I love coming to the pool but it's often crowded - I wish there were a way to know if it’s busy or not before coming out. Thanks! • Rec Center More Pottery! • 1. Weight room is great. 2) If you ever replace the benches in the looker 126 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS rooms (here and Mercer) they need to be twice as wide so bym bags don't fall off so easily. • You should have bike trails along busy roads, not on them, to encourage outdoor recreation and active transportation. • Therapeutic pool, please. • Thanks mucho for helping us homeless people survive and recuperate from daily trauma…most people do not yet realize that if they continue to tray and kill us, we will be be forced to do a lot worse. • Golf course! • Club house that can host events. Also on grounds will be tennis, pickleball, basketball courts. Also, golf course can double as cross country skiing in winter. • City Golf Course. I'll even design in for free. Appendix A2: Focus Group Comments 10 Groups/47 people • Anne Russett • Caitlin McGowan • Caleb Recker • Chance Ramey • Christine Fachman • Curtis Brenton • David Borger Germann • Donald Spellman • Dustin Liston • Elsworth Carman • Eric Nurnberg • Geoff Fruin • Hal Ide • Heidi Pierce • James Davis • James Mims • Jane Cranston • Jason Havel • Jennifer Wehr • Joan Cook • Katie Roche • Laurie Nash • Liz Hubing • Marcia Bollinger • Marjie Caruth • Mark Nidey • Mark Sertterh • Mazir Salih • Megan Alter • Megan Brown • Melissa Clarke-Wharff • Missie Forbes • Olanthda Fields • Phillip Hansen 127 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Redmond Jones • Reggie Shipp • Roger Lusala • Ronnie Smith • Shams Ghoneim • Shannon McMahon • Sue Dulek • Sue Nidey • Susan Bethel • Taylor Moore • Theresa Messlein • Tony Branch • Wendy Ford When you think of the ICPR Department (i.e., programs, services, facilities, staff) what are the first thoughts that come to your mind? • Consistent, offers a lot of things, very engaging • Inconsistencies with hours of operation posted online, wish events/ activities were communicated more (website/Facebook) • Accessed a lot when kids were younger, tot times, kids gymnastics • Opportunity moving forward: room for growth in programming for minorities • 2 large community centers but to be part of them, you have to go to them. Embed more into neighborhoods. • People they work with there – most effective having relationships with individuals within the Department • Recreation center • Pools • Activities • Mercer City pool • Mercer Park gatherings for Muslims • Facilities important to the community • Mercer – special time for Muslim women to swim • Parks and green spaces • Prairie restoration projects • Community • Volunteering • Willing to try new things (programs) and take chances • Gym space • Multi-room space • Fun • Crowded • Need sensory space • Many parks • Pools – first experience with parks and rec. • Different classes • It’s fun • Places to play, meet friends, enjoy • Little kids – lots for kids to do • Party in the Park program – people really enjoy it • Anything that gets neighbors together • Kids in summer camp • All the work that parks does in the right of ways (trees) and I appreciate it. • Aquatics • Community Gardens • Turnover (x2). ◦Mercer staff – at the customer service level, even pre-Covid. Results – confusion on who is who and what’s happening. Leads to inconsistency. ◦3rd P&R Dir. and 5th aquatics director, changes with swim program had to change with every leadership change, which created 128 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS struggles with swim lesson and less assimilated with swim planning meetings. No long term vision/planning. ◦When University opened a facility and started a club, very difficult ripple effects for the City’s club program and then swim lessons. • Intergenerational opportunities. • Intergenerational and something for everyone. I chose the City facility because it has more diversity reflected (age, body type, etc.) than the U of I facility. Hope for that – meet needs of everyone along age spectrum. • Impressed with the breadth of what the staff manages (community gardens, sports). Sometimes a little un-focused – things are done well but never think of the next step. • City Park is hidden gem. • Mercer staff – whether student issues or sports organization – always flexible and supported. • Partnerships, with schools and multiple other entities. • Kids need opportunities, and P&R provides. • Exposure. City Park and Mercer are fantastic pools; exposure meaning taking advantage of the facilities and make sure people know they’re well run and community is invested in them. Bring multiple swim entities together to talk and plan for the future of aquatics. • It’s amazing. Kids learned to swim through IC. • City website difficult to navigate • I love our parks, bike trails. • Deep sense of frustration over the way pools are being run right now. ◦Management frustration ◦Lack of organization and communication ◦Sentiment: Not committed to a group exercise program in the pools. ◦Pricing model ‘screwed up’ – one class is four times per month as $4/month; another class might have five other times, perhaps a punch card instead (vs refunding); the month-to-month registration isn’t working ▪$200 in one month for six classes, but staff let other people with a pass take the class ▪Used to be $200/year unlimited; now $4/class ▪New rule – 5 people minimum (but both pricing structures happening at the same time) ◦A) commit to a set program b) facility to have program in, c) designated place to have those classes, d) pricing model ◦Instructors have to figure out where to have class in the pool ◦Lap swimmers start swim and then fitness start their class in the same lap lanes ◦Instructors ‘fight’ with swim team to find a space to hold class ◦People sign-up and don’t know where the class will be. ◦Staff don’t take attendance against a list of registrants • Communication – schedules change, then staff don’t know details • Hard to get people to commit to four classes per month • The locker rooms: rusty, moldy, drainage doesn’t drain toward drain, too small, dirty • Downtown location is harder to get to • We don’t know when pools are 129 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City open (referenced the current Mercer repairs) ◦Example of an hour of closure at Robert A Lee • Incredibly possible swim program when I was younger (people would stand in line to get into lessons); interest and usage seems to have declined. Lost institutional knowledge of how to run a good aquatics program. • Post schedule – even if it’s a white board • Indoor/outdoor Facilities • parks • Aquatics • Support for partnerships – school districts • Youth programs • Welcoming • Playgrounds • Shared challenges – Covid – empathy for those challenges • Welcoming, accommodating What can the Department do to make its facilities and programs more welcoming? • Consistent partnerships – communication has changed (and not for the better) • Really great job with their staff, representation with staff of color and different cultures • Better access to facilities • Swim lessons were moved abruptly – feels like there are concerted efforts for the rec center to not be inclusive • Concerted effort to keep minorities out (Robert A. Lee) • Robert A. Lee – not an inclusive environment – used to be a community center but it does not feel that way anymore • Access to internet, adult support • Not welcoming to youth of color • Need more diverse staff – hiring and listening to diverse staff • Letting kids be kids according to their norms • HAVE allowed homeless people to shower at the Robert A. Lee • Continue Street Outreach group working with P&R • Language is a barrier • population not computer savvy – communication to those communities • Sharing what is available (communication) • More social media presence • Optimize space • Think outside the bubble and change some things up • More sensory space (stem room), fidgets, relaxing music, sensory pen • For programs that are crowded having sensory time for registration • Need all genders family restrooms • Expansion of what is currently offered • Lack of interest for males • Training on mental health first aid • Further training on mental health escalations and how to handle those situations • No matter what area you are in, difficult to reach all of the audiences. • Very diverse population and the City has done some things to be more inclusive • Different languages • Need to remove barriers – cost • Transportation 130 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Mentorship opportunities. Need to get people (volunteers) to help provide mentorship, to connect people with resources. Can’t afford to pay staff to do this work. • Not a lot of places for kids or adults to calm down (quiet rooms). The kids in her program would benefit from more events and sports. • Need more adult volunteers. Her kids use Mercer but she believes there are some barriers – some of this population may need more adult supervision and more structure. • Bus services may not line up with some activities. • Support for children with special needs: combination of inclusion and programs specifically designed for those with disabilities. She works with children with behavioral issues – getting them involved requires more adult presence and more structured programs and events. • Establish clear expectations for staff: communication and customer service. • Train staff on DEI • (love the question) • I wonder – free and reduced lunch as a measure extended to other services? • Kids that live walking distance – want them to be able to participate, swim, without fees. • Hiring practices should include more diversity. • Swim lesson scholarship fundraisers – money got fed into the schools. When City said they’d do it, it disappeared. Would like to revive it. • Community events – invite parents/ guardians and community leaders to come and see what’s going on at Mercer. • Get the kids’ input regarding what type of programming they’d like to see. • USA swimming grant money; City should act on it. • Eels have an outreach program – fee gets reduced USA Swim membership to $5 and costs less to swim at meets. • Get kids as drown-proof as possible. • Provide opportunities to all, reducing as many barriers as possible. • Make sure the staff matches the demographics of the area. • Reduced swim lesson costs. Subsidized fee is good for ‘economically disadvantaged people’. • Handicap chair at Robert A Lee does not work right now. Staff have to test it and warm it up first, but feel it is dangerous. • I’m not aware of roadblocks other populations face. • Mercer example: 12 year old boys told they didn’t have an adult and couldn’t use facilities • It takes reaching out. Not enough to have paperwork to reduce pricing. • Swimming skill and comfort in the water is important for all. • Need to advertise the program more; flyers at the library, post in the newspaper (older generation still gets paper), Facebook • No one reads documents put on line, such as handbooks • Go to schools and talk about swimming, work with PE teachers • Worked on-site so has always felt included • Restrooms and locker rooms needs to be examined and updated • Generate unanimity through programs 131 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Gender neutral spaces • Updates to the pool • Funding for DEI • Locker rooms needs to be updated • IC has a large population with disabilities; need to gear some activities toward those with disabilities – more inclusive to where anyone can join, • Have more activities throughout the daytime hours On a scale of 1-10, how important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? (1 = not important at all, 10 = essential) • 10, 5, 7, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 9, 10, 8, 10, 10, 5, 8, 10, 10, 10, 9, 8, 10 = 9.23 What holds you back from participating in programs, facilities, and events? • Lack of timing to plan • Scheduling conflicts • Online sign-up system – not user friendly • Allowing organizations to have accounts instead of having individuals needing separate accounts • Fields for practice are hard to reserve and very challenging • Equity • Transportation (Mercer a bit harder to get to) • Game of soccer is under represented, facilities not set up for soccer eight months out of the year, need large indoor recreation facility (football/ soccer) • Transportation for those who don’t drive and not near a bus line • Culture & familiarity, interpreters • Crowds • Age ranges (intellectual disabilities) – making space for those of other ages to attend • Staff training for children with disabilities • Cost to participate – fixed incomes, • Difficult process for those on Medicaid to participate, • Access to programming – equity and inclusion, cost to RESPIT providers • Summer programs are very popular. One parent couldn’t get her daughter into programs. Huge need and lots of people who want those spots. • She hasn’t utilized a whole lot of them – others have said that bus scheduling doesn’t line up with activities and a lack of childcare. • Paying for Robert A Lee parking • Communication (advertising) is lacking • Geographical location of events • Transportation • Language barriers • Childcare • Financial restrictions • Mercer Park shooting – keeps others away What services should the City’s recreation centers provide? • Swimming • Opportunities for informal/ unstructured recreation • Free and open recreation • Accessible to everyone • Extra staff just to engage with the kids • Ice skating • Diverse staff - diverse staff will be in diverse community 132 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Need to be very careful with kicking kids out of rec. programs – and more creative in address behavioral issues • Cater to children and teens • Social spaces for teens to meet • More social events for children • Space for seniors and people with mobility challenges • Indoor walking space • Training for everyone on mental health and first aid • Basic module for autism • Partnering with Dept. of University Rec centers • Expanding aquatics • Demand for recreation is shifting over time. One time special events or short-stints. Harder and harder for families to make long term commitments. More demand for one time events. Facilities are built more for static programs – not flexible for large events. Halloween event is an example. Space limits them. A thousand came through the building that evening during the event. • Aquatic and athletic programming and community spaces • Gathering space, aquatics sports arts & crafts • Deficit of rehearsal space with lockable storage spaces • Steam room • All age spaces, especially athletic and aquatic • Athletics fine arts, community gathering spaces, community engagement opportunities, celebrations • More diverse programming • More social and/or lifeskills programming (i.e. FAFSA) • Swim clinic • Bring in famous and/or high level performers to attract participants • Multipurpose spaces (different opportunities like dance, cheer, etc.) • Not familiar with what occurs in the facilities. • Volleyball, basketball • Little kids brought in Big Wheels • Should be in conjunction with the schools: preschool programs with the City, story hours, swimming due to no pools in the schools • Tot time • Workout rooms, especially in winter and at Mercer • Aerobics classes (Jazzercise, Yoga) • E-sports • Needs to be based off of mission statement • Drop-in usage • Arts • Any program that intrigues young children • Make more about the people • Offer a variety of youth programs • Certain services that are currently offered that could be offered to a better ability – pool • Universally designed playgrounds • Partnership with public health and safety • Recreation areas should be visually appealing • Need a downtown pool (one centrally located pool) • Splash pads • Safe, open space to congregate in leisure activities • Appropriate signage 133 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Craft room with the large tables and basic art supplies (Maker space) • More interactive/sensory independent activities What should they not provide? • Police intervention in autistic or mental health situations – call mobile crisis unit instead What types of rooms and recreation spaces are missing from the current recreation centers? (Mercer and Robert A Lee) • Feels they have the proper spaces, could use more advertisement on what spaces are available and for what use • Indoor soccer • Incorporating affordable childcare at Robert A. Lee • Partnering with the library for board games, chess/checkers, as a drop-in opportunity • Roller skating • Larger pool with more opportunities for outdoor pool use. When I lived in Ames, they offered swim lessons, aquacize, etc. at their outdoor pool and it was very popular. Obviously it's seasonal, but more kids are available for swim lessons in the summer, too. • Indoor peaceful walking space, larger indoor spaces for soccer/baseball/ football, universal design with access to all, visual arts space • Quiet space • Family lockers rooms • All gender restrooms • Saunas, hot tubs • Different exercise equipment for all ages • Visual aids for exercise equipment • YouTube video for autistic folks • Color coded signage • Workout equipment at Mercer in a small room. It was been removed. Longer term – indoor/outdoor sports facility with soccer, baseball, volleyball, basketball – partnered with a bank. Wouldn’t have to be the same scale as Bettendorf. Difficult to fund and pull off but there would be a good response. • Mercer needs a new bulkhead • Exercise equipment at Mercer • Hot tub at Robert A Lee • Flexible spaces • Lacking on fitness equipment How supportive are you of improving outdoor athletic fields for tournament purposes? • No opinion. Depends on where it’s placed and what would be moved for that space to be built • Doesn’t have to be either/or, economic impact of having such spaces, very supportive, benefits far out way the cost • Does not apply to their specialties, low on the list of priorities, scale of 1-2, would depend on what kinds of tournaments are offered • As a coach and user (softball), it’s important. Need a safe surface to play on. Iowa is behind with their playing surfaces. They enable more of the community to participate. It’s about the spectators as much as the athletes. The friends you meet. • If the community needs this, then she’s supportive. • Neutral (x) • Don’t know enough (x2) • Kickers fields need outdoor lighting for expansion (choose solar) 134 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Could the fee generate revenue for the City? • Upkeep of facilities are important (four-court fieldhouse could also stimulate economy); could also be nice. BUT should not be a top priority (as discussed earlier). • Coralville has invested and running more baseball/softball tournaments; I would support if the City wanted to add. • Seems like we have a lot of weekends where facilities aren’t used, if we upgrade so we could host, it would benefit the community from a revenue facility. IC has stayed stagnant, where other communities around here have invested and grown. Current is great, but improve to take to the next level. • Not supportive • Schools spend so much money on sports, not a need and is overserved. • If improvements are needed • Appreciate the recent work done to improve athletic facilities in neighborhood parks • Supportive • Not enough fields to even practice on • Not a fan for tournaments – guess it would depend on what the tournament purposes were being built for • If utilized more and draw more of a crowd then perhaps beneficial (economic benefits) What outdoor recreation facilities would better-support the Department’s ability to provide recreation programs and services? • Ice skating rink • Outside theatre, musical events without having to pay • More local playgrounds/parks with accessible pathways, • getting rid of wood chips, • some autistic kids are runners – need better parking, built in less busy intersections • Skate Park is heavily used. • Mountain biking trails. • Increasing the mileage of their bike trails. • Some more tennis facilities – only ones now are at City Park – need in other areas. • Water park type pools (big investment) but other communities have them. • Pickleball and bocce are needed. • There is a need for additional community gardens. All of the current spaces fill up quickly – west side of town. Education on how to garden would be ideal, too. • More turf • Tennis courts • More inclusive leisure spaces for adults with disabilities On a scale of 1-10, how important is it for every child to learn how to swim? (1 = not important at all, 10 = essential) • 10, 10, 8, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 8 or 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10 = 9.71 • There is a barrier for participation – cost is an issue City Park Pool is 72 years old, so it is time to talk about its future. If the cost was the same, would you: a.) Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now, or b.) Design a new pool layout with new amenities? • A: IIIIIIIIIII = 11 • B: IIIIIIIIIIIII = 13 • Leave it to the experts, new pool/ amenities, and better access • New pool, walk-in area, more 135 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS activities, more green space, fight for a chair or you’re on the cement, access for special needs and seniors • Need family friendly amenities. • Zero entry is important. • Makes me sad to think about it changing. • Kids create their own fun – not reliant on amenities. • Locker rooms would dry out when they had no roof – go that far back (remove the roof). • She would lean toward maintaining current layout. She knows many people are not interested in change here. • Maintain the lap lanes and diving board as amenities, and add new features (x2) • Determine what will bring in most revenue (x2) • Draw – 50m lap lanes, keep 8 (current nine are cramped) • Add features on west side, ok (spray umbrella, expanded kiddie pool), but don’t take away from 50m • kids can use imagination, nice large pool and setting; harder to staff more amenities • Would also like to keep some of the amenities of the old pool • A – just because he likes to swim laps, does need a zero entry • Accessibility into the pool is challenging • B. – Design a new pool layout with new amenities. Maintain some of the same features. Are there any types of activities, classes, or events that you wish the Department would offer? • More promotion for current activities, as well as new activities, on the weekends • Classes offered in at least three different languages • Fun but life skills related • Cooking classes for young adults • Gardening • Stress management integrated with nature • Guided mediation in a green space • Plant identification • Mushroom hunting • Swim awareness, keeping ourselves safe in the pool, water safety awareness classes • Better leverage the university facilities. Great indoor fields. Significant climbing wall. These relationships are not in place and maybe the university would not be interested but it’s worth pursuing. They have the senior center, library, and university that are all providing classes – need to help ensure they don’t duplicate. Need to work together and promote each other’s opportunities. • Not fully aware of what’s available (no children). • Environmental education courses are provided by a small college in one person’s town – more unique things than just sports. • Art Club at Mercer – things like this. Existing team/club to partner with the Department to offer programs and services. Provide a space and an instructor. Lots of her co-workers would be willing to volunteer. The kids they serve utilize Mercer every day. • Jingle Cross – an event with dogs. • Her kids used to enjoy pottery classes – participation has dropped significantly. 136 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Try to fill spaces to capacity • Need more advertising for swim lessons • Social games (Bingo) Is there anything else about recreation facilities and programs that you would like to share? • Program to work with children with anger issues. Mental health awareness. • Dissemination of information, malaise from the pandemic (church numbers, volunteering), youth sports has increased tremendously, people willing to invest in kids and their activities • DEI suggestion – intersectional approach, cultural diversity events, working with local area agencies to have more education in the public, demonstrating through employment for opportunities to grow • What can we do to build on the successes that we started during Covid? • Increased snow removal so people could get out and walk • Drive in movie was successful • Geocashing. • Tours of parks • More virtual programs • More dog parks • Year-round ice rink • Protect trees during construction • P&R Dept. – think of as many collaborative arts/culture opportunities as possible – so many would be excited to partner with them. • Increase collaboration for community events, beyond of athletics. • Mercer – pull out bleachers removed; current bleachers were supposed to be temporary (need more seating, especially to host more meets) • Comment – partnered with senior center band to open up their room • It’s a health-conscious community • Staffing • Becky is a fantastic teacher • Helen and Connie are fantastic instructors as well • Substitutes for water fitness instructors is difficult • Difficult to find people with ability and interest in lifeguarding and aquatic instructors • Morale is low – Do they need to be treated more like professionals and paid more? • Example: “Kate told a previous staff member that they needed to be more loyal to the program.” • Parks Dept. doing a great job. • City needs to do a better job managing funding. 137 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Appendix A3: Social Pinpoint Open Ended Feedback Have you ever felt uncomfortable using Iowa City Recreation facilities? The write in responses to this question include: • Afraid of being knocked over. Not enough programs for elderly & disabled. • Because some residents stare at nakedness in the women’s locker room. Not much you can do about that, beyond educate. • Have had people approach me while working out at Robert A. Lee enough times that it made me uncomfortable to go back as a female by myself. • I feel that I can’t just go use the facilities due to pressure about all of the above. • I’ve had challenges getting lap swimming in because of the excellent programs you offer to the young and the old, but if you’re considering building a new facility, I’d like to suggest a dedicated lap pool! • Money, it can be expensive to go to the pool as a family, I specifically choose evening swim but those rates are only at City Park and family night is only at Robert A. Lee. I am not sure why this isn’t consistent at all pools if attending on those nights as it makes it more accessible. Scheduling is also a factor, if too difficult to understand and switches often not worth it to me to juggle. • Pandemic. • Schedule in Mercer Aquatic Park and Robert A. Lee are terrible. You never know when open and when closed. Alternatives to get acute information take time, because I have to do that each time I want to visit, I mean weekly. • The design of the Robert A. Lee space is too small and needs updating. • The locker rooms at Robert A. Lee were filthy and I did not feel comfortable before or after my swim. • There have been times I haven’t felt safe. • This summer at City Park Pool there were a few altercations with large groups of teens. I felt unsafe. • We have had to shut down practice and/or adjust games at Mercer baseball fields due to violence taking place in the neighborhood as well as concern for player safety. If Iowa City were to build additional recreation center facilities, where should they be located? Additional responses to this question include: • Current facilities should be maintained prior to building new (7 responses) • No preference or unsure of the best location for new facilities (5 responses) • Public transportation routes should be considered (4 responses) • New facilities should be constructed next to schools for youth engagement (1 response) Favorite Program Areas – If you were promoting Iowa City to a friend or family member, which of the following would you tell them about? Additional responses to this question include 21 comments regarding pickleball—some about how much they love playing in Iowa City, and others about the condition of the Mercer courts. Other items mentioned include disc golf, toddler activities, tennis, tumbling, outdoor movies, party in the park, programs for adults, and roller skating. 138 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS New Programs & Activities – Which programs and activities would you like to participate in? Additional responses to this question include: • Adult programs to learn a new hobby, sport, or skill (ultimate Frisbee league, drone flying, curling, gateball): 5 • More aquatic classes such as water aerobics, lap swim, and swim lessons: 3 • Adult fitness classes such as yoga, Pilates, meditation, kickboxing, weightlifting, and Qigong: 3 • More family activities (indoor clubs, skate night): 2 • More slots for current activities for youth (art camp): 2 • Outdoor adventure such as rock climbing, orienteering, kayaking, and fishing: 2 • Conservation, environmental, and nature programs for youth and families: 2 • Adult dance (ballroom, tango, contra, salsa, and belly dance): 2 • Social programs for adults/single socials and friendship socials: 1 • Roller skating: 1 • Skateboarding: 1 Suggestions for new recreation center amenities include pickleball courts, an indoor track, and indoor turf soccer fields. A dedicated roller rink was also mentioned. Suggestions for new park amenities include more pickleball courts, outdoor exercise trail, paddle courts, rentable field space, better bike trails, expanded trails that are inclusive for all communities, lighted cross country ski trail, and more open space for imagination including fields, woods, and wetlands. And there was another comment about heating City Park Pool so it can be used all year long. Special Events – What components of a special community event are important to you? Suggestions for other special event components include the following: • Pickleball tournaments: 4 • Live music, art and sciences, and art sales: 3 • Soccer, basketball, and volleyball tournaments: 2 • Similar to the Winter Markets, winter gatherings with vendors, winter- friendly sports, and bonfires: 2 • Environmental/nature themes: 1 • Farm to table: 1 • Food trucks: 1 • Gardening: 1 • Outdoor dance/movement, live music, Tai Chi or Qigong in the parks: 1 • More kid-friendly events: 1 • More pet-friendly events: 1 Where do you get your information about recreation programs and events? • The “Other” responses to this question include: • For the “other” option, the following information was provided: • Newspapers (Gazette, Press Citizen): 7 • Little Village Magazine: 2 • ICCSD Emails: 2 • South District Neighborhood Association: 1 • JCPB Mailing List: 1 • The cards that were given out all summer: 1 • Social media of other organizations: 1 139 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Share any other questions, comments, feedback, or ideas you have about Iowa City Recreation facilities, programs, activities, or events. A total of 162 comments were made in response to this question—many of which included multiple suggestions in one comment. The responses have been organized into the following categories: adult programs, aquatic programs and lap swimming, arts and culture, City Park Pool, general programming, happy customers, indoor pools, marketing and registration, Mercer Recreation Center, park suggestions, pickleball, recreation center, youth programs, and miscellaneous. Most comments are summarized (not included verbatim) and combined with other similar ideas for ease in reporting. Adult/Senior Programs • Adult sports, classes and activities are needed after work hours – we don’t all have the day off (2). • I would like programs where I can meet other adults. • More programs for adults who are not yet seniors – who still work but would like to have options. • Please bring back adult softball at the Hawkeye softball fields. • Please offer yoga and keep offering adult beginner martial arts. • I would like somewhere for adults to climb and participate in parkour-like activities. • I am interested in more family events, exercise classes downtown, and evening and weekend classes for working moms. • I wish there were more fitness events for seniors in the evening hours. • Offer a 24-hour workout option for adult (swim/walk/run) for folks who have a hard time getting in during regular hours or have social anxiety and would like a quieter time to visit. • I would love a low cost, lunch hour fitness class offered at Robert A. Lee Center for folks who work downtown – just 30 minutes, all abilities, cardio/ strength or vary daily. Aquatic Programs and Lap Swimming • I would like to see more availability of youth swim lessons – especially evenings and weekends (3). Hire better staff so lessons are more structured and teach to specific goals. • The current swim lessons fill up so fast and are so short. As soon as my kids start to get the hang of something, the lessons are over. And it’s difficult to sign-up for the next session when you don’t know if they will pass a level. So then we have to wait until the following season and have lost skills that were learned. I would like a more year-round, without interruption, swim lesson experience (even if it’s private). • I would like an early morning swim time before the high school team arrives. I don’t know their vaccination status or their exposure to Covid-19 and would like to swim before them. • Opportunities for adults to swim have been severely limited over the past four years. It would be nice to have more opportunities for adult swim and for children who swim well to be able to participate in lap swim (the 16- year old age limit is arbitrary). • Treat your instructors well, we depend on them for classes/community. Pam was chased out after faithfully working for you for years. Now there are very limited options for water aerobics for working people. Make it a priority to find more instructors and offer more classes. 140 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Arts and Culture • It seems a lot of money has been spent on athletics in our community parks and recreation centers. I would like to see the City turn to supporting all of the art forms as well. The mental health and creative needs of our community, young and old, would be much enhanced with a well thought out and supported community art center. I would like it to include everyone and encourage everything: culinary arts, theatre, dance, music and the traditional fine and applied arts and crafts. It should be centrally located and be served by public transportation to make it accessible for all. • Would like to see consideration for cultural resources (in addition to natural resources) included in the master planning process. City Park Pool A total of 29 comments were made regarding this iconic community facility including: • City Park Pool is the best! Please don’t change it too much – keep it simple. Keep the long course lap swimming. This facility is an institution that has been important to generations of Iowa City families. I tell anyone who will listen that this is Iowa City’s best kept secret. As many indoor pools as we have in Johnson County, City Park Pool is the only outdoor pool that offers lap swim. (21) • Please upgrade City Park Pool with modern amenities such as zero depth entry, a splash pad, water slides, a lazy river, more seating, and concessions. (6) • I would like to see more shade options at City Park Pool. (1) • I was extremely disappointed that City Park Pool was fixed up yet it still isn’t handicapped accessible. (1) • Expand the hours at City Park Pool – as a working parent, I am not able to get to the pool during the week. It seems to close too early on the weekends as well. (1) • Outdoor pools are valuable for social gatherings for community members of all ages and a great way to provide affordable entertainment for youth in the summer months. • I love the $2 swim option after 5pm at City Park Pool! • City Park Pool is an incredible asset to our community. The pool, the park, the history are so important. Please do not modify this community asset but focus on a newer facility in the southern part of town instead. General Programming & Events These comments related to general recreation programming: • You should add more indoor sports options for winter such as soccer, tennis, paddle, and basketball. • I would like to see more family outdoor movie options all year long. • I have enjoyed classes at the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center and would like to see more offered there. • I would like to see cross country skiing classes offered in one of the parks. • Provide opportunities for students to earn credits to create programming. Partner with higher education for curriculum development regarding how to plan and manage an event. • I would like to see more safety trainings offered. • Provide performing arts programming (a chance to be in a play, write a play, etc.). • Cooking classes would be fun. 141 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • We are interested in opportunities for cross country skiing, biking, kayaking, and canoeing. • Too often what is done is done halfway – like Juneteenth. I stayed 10 minutes and left. Where is the interactive education? Juneteenth was a campaign rally and an opportunity for vendors to sell merchandise. • There are many more musicians than represented at events/Farmers Market. It seems there is an archaic and arbitrary booking system – first come, first served. Why not accept submissions by a certain date and then cull the group down to represent the community and different genres? Happy Customers Sixteen respondents took the time to share their appreciation about the Department including: • As part of a nonprofit organization, I am pleased and grateful for space provided for rehearsals and performances. • I have lived in the Iowa City area all of my life and have been involved with mean recreation programs over the years. I am happy to see the Recreation Department survey our citizens. I hope you get a good response. • I really enjoyed the music, gardening, and programs at the local neighborhood parks. • I recently returned to the Iowa City area after several years away and I am more impressed with the City’s ability to be inclusive and harmonious. IC is truly an overlooked gem, and I wish every community could take a page from your book. Well done, and keep it up! • I think Iowa City Parks and Recreation is a great organization. I can’t wait to see the plans of how to improve service. • Love the City Park trails, walkability, and pool! • One element of Iowa City that I have always been impressed by is the parks and recreation facilities. They are well-maintained, provide a variety of activities (from playgrounds, pools, to walks in the woods). They should be a point of pride for this community. Thank you for all of your hard work in making our lives better. • Thank you for all that you do! • The bike trails and cross country skiing options are really important to me. Swimming laps at Mercer has been wonderful through the years. I love Hickory Hill Park and use it for walks often. • The trails were not mentioned but they are great. The prairie restoration project is wonderful. And the handling and concern for the safety of citizens during the pandemic is appreciated. • I appreciate all of the updates and improvements made at Mercer Pool. I am grateful that we have a facility for the cold months of the year. • The ICDPR did a great job designing and maintaining the pickleball courts in Mercer Park. My family and friends have been pleased to use these courts often during the pandemic. • I love City Park Pool and have used it happily for many years. The improvements made over the years have made the facility better and better. I bring guests there and they are always impressed by it. Mercer Pool is also excellent. I have also enjoyed classes at the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center. • I love so much about how family- focused Iowa City is! The new 142 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS and improved parks popping up everywhere are wonderful and I really value them. • Thanks for your efforts to obtain feedback. Keep up the great work! • I have really enjoyed Iowa City Parks and Recreation since moving here 1.5 years ago. Everyone at the desk answering questions has been so helpful! Indoor Pools These comments relate to the City’s indoor pools: • It would be so helpful to not have to enter the Mercer Pool area by way of a gendered restroom. • Mercer pool is perfect except the water is way too cold for many participants. Stop catering to the swim team and lap swimmers who like it cold. This is sometimes the only form of exercise seniors can do; we all hate cold water. • Please keep the Mercer Park Aquatic Center open as many hours as possible – 7 days a week! And please be sure that senior-friendly items such as pool stairs are always in place. • The deep end bulkhead at Mercer Park Aquatic Center needs to be replaced. It is outdated and will be compromised within a few years. • I would like to see an outdoor pool option at Mercer, perhaps with a few waterslides (2). • Upgrade the shower stalls and privacy in the changing areas at Mercer. • I really like using all of the pools in Iowa City, just feel like they need to be remodeled/updated to be a little cleaner/newer. I love how affordable they are, to allow low barrier for all socio-economic levels. • If I were in-charge, the repair and ongoing maintenance of existing pools would be at the top of the list. • It would be nice if lap swimming were emphasized at one pool and recreation swimming at the others. • It would be nice to have a sauna or steam room at the aquatic facilities. • I work in Iowa City but live in North Liberty. I seek out your aquatic centers even though it is inconvenient for me because you offer the best opportunities for lap swim. • I would like to see water slides or other amenities added to the Iowa City pools. It would be a big draw for kids of all ages and provide an enticing goal for kids who don’t swim well to improve. • Let’s convert to salt water pools instead of chlorine. An indoor/ outdoor pool would be fantastic! • More and bigger pool facilities are needed. • More areas for young children to swim safely and keep warm. • More swim and outdoor options – splash pads. • My family loves using the City’s pools but it’s been difficult to find open swim availability at Robert A. Lee. Mercer has been very accommodating with their times, but the water seems to be kept colder. We would love to see a family centric indoor pool with indoor splash pad. • Open hours at Mercer Aquatic Center and Robert A. Lee are terrible – you never know when they are open or closed. • Please keep both pools open for lap swimming with as many lane lines in for swimmer safety as much as possible. • Current policy of not offering a class due to less than five regular 143 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS registrations does not take into account the number of swimmers who have a monthly pass. • Aquatics management does a poor job of communicating and is not open minded about considering alternate ideas. • The loss of the university athletic club and no pool on the west side has created a strain on the existing pools. • Expand Mercer Aquatic Center to include an outdoor pool with a water slide. Marketing and Registration Eight respondents shared some of their concerns with Department marketing and the registration process including: • Finding the pool hours on the ic.gov website is way more difficult than necessary. Please post a link on the home page of each pool schedule. • The City needs to actually market activities. It seems 100% of marketing is via the website. • Twitter would be a helpful option for promotion. • Make it easier to register siblings for the same program session. • I love having a variety of options but the process to register can be cumbersome and annoying. For family activities, why don’t you get the option to register a family and then include how many participants are coming? It seems strange to register each individually and then the email confirmation has everything all jumbled up, not in date order or anything logical. Auto reminders would be great as registration is 8 – 12 weeks in advance. • Some activities are hard to sign- up for when there is an unknown component like practice to be set by the coach (no specific day) and this could potentially lead to a conflict with other activities. • I wish for a website and registration system I can navigate and use to register my kids on my own. • I wish for print mailings of events as I often find out after the fact. • Registering for aquatics is not user friendly. Mercer Recreation Center The comments made regarding the Mercer Recreation Center relate to the disappointment regarding the removal of the fitness center area from this facility including: • I used to use the workout room at Mercer Park Aquatic Center, and I miss it there. Overall, the Robert A. Lee workout center is far larger and more open. The Mercer workout room was really small, and with cinderblock walls, and only a tiny window in the door, so it could feel claustrophobic. It would be nice for there to be a second workout center option for Iowa City residents. • Wish Mercer would still have their fitness area. Moving it solely to RAL, it doesn’t seem as accessible. • Add a new exercise room for adults at Mercer. • I use Mercer primarily to swim. I would use an exercise bike if you had one at Mercer. It’s not worth driving downtown for 15 minutes of bike riding. • I love using the City’s facilities, it’s just that there aren’t equal offerings at all. While it’s nice to have some facilities with their own unique features, it would be nice to have exercise room at Mercer with a view of the pool so parents can exercise but be close to lessons or other youth activities. 144 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Park Suggestions Although this master planning effort does not include parks, many people took the opportunity to provide suggestions for park improvements including: • We need some decent options for mountain biking and BMX riders in our area. Coralville, Des Moines, Grinnell, and the Quad Cities have already explored this and made them a priority. This includes expanding skate parks, dirt trails, and pump track options. • It would be great to have some more attention paid to the Mercer Park fields including 1). Lighting the parking lot (currently there are no lights and it’s always dark as teams walk to their cars at night. 2). Significantly trim back the bushes in front of the Mercer concession stands. This is an unnecessary barrier for those working in the stands – the bushes can remain but they should be trimmed back. 3). The bathroom facilities are very poorly maintained during the summer. • Bring back the infield dirt at Happy Hallow Park. • City Park needs some work. • Due to Covid-19, people are doing more of their exercising year-round outside. It would be very helpful to have restroom facilities on trails open year-round. I have to limit my access for this reason. • Improve pools, bike trails, and adult courts. • Iowa City needs an athletic complex like the one built in Bettendorf with turf fields (2). • I see a lot of utility from another pedestrian bridge to the Peninsula Parks from Mannville Heights Crandic Park area. • It would be great if every major park had a fenced-in-off-leash dog area. I would guess that more residents in Iowa City have dogs than children – why not provide more areas for those residents? This is especially true because of Iowa City’s expensive housing market – fewer young adults can afford to buy a house with a yard, and so many condos and townhouses don’t have personal yards. Providing more convenient, off-leash dog areas would provide more services to a lot of young adults. • It would be nice if City Park had a community boat house for storing boats used for rowing. It would be great if the Ashton House could become a café. Hours could be limited so that special events like wedding receptions can still take place. • The City Park side of town needs something to draw people and to make that side of town special (more than the baseball fields). The tennis courts need maintenance. • In general, I would prefer if the City enhanced park spaces at a slower rate and did it really well. North Market Square Park is one of the nicest parks in town. A very nice pavilion is preferable to a huge pavilion made of low quality materials. I believe people treat the space better when the structure and design elevate the quality of the space. College Green Park would benefit with the addition of the same park pavilion that is located at North Market Square Park. • It would be nice if the City extended the wide bike path from Broadway all the way east to Scott Boulevard. • I wish for playgrounds that were actually fun. The playground downtown by the library and the City Park new playground are my family’s favorites. 145 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • I wish for more outdoor play – working with the school district on play opportunities. • I wish for more woods and land and exploring opportunities. Outdoor lighting is needed at Kickers Soccer Park. • Please expand dog parks, add larger baseball fields, and keep up with other cities by adding waterpark style pools, mini soccer fields, and trails. Be a leader and not fall behind. • Please invest in more dirt trails in Iowa City. Coralville has invested heavily in Creekside and Woodpecker trails for beginning mountain bikers. Iowa City has wooded lands that are underutilized and there are no substantial off-road riding available in City limits. A pump track in the City (or another central location) would also be fun for all people. • We would love to see more splash pad facilities in City parks. • With the new Iowa Heartlanders hockey team, I would love to see youth hockey rinks pop-up at parks with lighting and concessions. • Please continue to develop and connect bike trails. • Access to trash cans and recycling containers are sometimes inadequate. We need more trash bins around busing and parks. (2) Pickleball Pickleball is a very popular activity in Iowa City and around the country. It is mentioned in nearly every tool on the Social Pinpoint site. For this specific survey, there were 22 comments regarding the sport. All but four of these comments relate to the current condition of the Mercer courts: the large cracks that have formed and the courts that cannot be used due to their condition. Additional suggestions regarding pickleball include: • Redo the courts at Mercer and add more. • Consider turning more tennis courts into pickleball courts – could part of Willow Creek be turned into pickleball courts? • Add shade, water, and benches courtside. • Other cities are redoing and adding to their pickleball court inventory – Iowa City should be doing the same. At any given time, there can be 30 to 40 people playing at Mercer and two of the courts cannot be used due to the large cracks. • Pickleball is on the rise with young and especially senior players. It would be nice to see improvement at Mercer and an additional facility at City Park. • Pickleball is the fastest growing sport in the nation and it will only get bigger – Iowa City would be well-served to keep pace. • It would be great to have to have a practice wall in the tennis/pickleball area. • If/when the Mercer courts are redone, provide a design in which participants do not need to walk through one court to reach another as this disrupts play. Recreation Center • There is no place to walk inside in Iowa City that is easy to get to and has good parking options. Smaller cities have indoor tracks. When the University restricted access, it put a big hole in this terrific exercise option that the North Liberty track can’t fill due to the distance for Iowa City residents. (6) • We need an indoor turf soccer facility. (3) 146 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • The Robert A. Lee Recreation Center is so old and needs to be replaced. (2) • I have always wondered why there is no YMCA-type facility in Iowa City. It’s time to have an “everything is here” place instead of piecemeal throughout town. Robert A. Lee parking is a nightmare. • I see a great need for more indoor space for the winter months. Parks are free – we need more, warm, free indoor spaces, too. • Although the current indoor facilities were adequate for the time, they don’t meet today’s needs. In addition to an indoor track, a larger fitness area is needed. Other amenities such as a climbing wall or bouldering would be great for younger people. Youth Programs • A Lego league would be well attended. • I wish soccer was available during the week for youth. • For youth basketball, I wish we had something similar to North Liberty and Coralville. • Please offer more openings for youth sports and events. If the demand is there, please considering opening more slots. • Iowa City is not capitalizing on the youth sports movement by not having adequate facilities and not maintaining the ones that they have. Youth sports tournaments can bring in a lot of revenue to the community (via restaurants, hotels, and shopping). Iowa City is large enough – we could be hosting a tournament every weekend providing opportunities for our youth as well as an economic boost to our community. • I wish the tumbling classes extended past age 7. • Provide low-key sports and active classes for kids. • We have loved the “Try Fishing” activity. I like that you can sign-up for one or more but not have to commit to a 6-week activity. It is low cost and something we can do as a family together (we only have one pole, but we are together). • I would love to see a sports sampler for young kids to see what sports they are interested in without signing them up for each one individually. • We love tot time at Mercer. Miscellaneous Comments These last few comments did not fit neatly in any of the other categories. • Instead of trying to do everything, how about focusing on core objectives and doing them well. • If you are looking to make changes to recreation spaces, please focus on expanding services to underserved neighborhoods (add a pool with slides on the south side) instead of making changes to City Park Pool. • Activities are too expensive for low income families and having to go to a recreation center to show a food stamp or Medicaid card and fill out an application each time you want to register a child for a program is degrading, embarrassing, and hard for people who have to travel to the recreation center to do this – make this available online. • The City needs to treat the Iowa City Eels better and help them grow as they did in the late 1980s to early 2000s. The way this organization has been treated since the departure of Chad Dyson and the construction of the CRWC is concerning since the University of Iowa often attempted to put it out of business. This includes 147 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS building a better partnership with the ICDPR swim lesson program and helping the organization run meets and swim clinics. • I see recreation as a good thing but I wouldn’t classify it as “essential.” Streets, police, water, sewage are “essential” responsibilities of local government. If the local economy cannot support parks and recreation, then those should be cut so local government can provide “essential” services. • Keep the roller skating! Would love an outdoor roller/ice skating rink. • Please consider advancements on the east side of Iowa City – it’s growing very rapidly. • Like most places in Iowa City, you neglect the fact that not all are comfortable or can easily wear a mask – thus you are not inclusive. • Please increase access to shared spaces for independent groups to meet. The meeting rooms at the library and Robert A. Lee are great but often filled. Non-profits and community groups often struggle to find space for 10 – 40 people to meet. Have you ever felt uncomfortable using Iowa City Recreation facilities? The following “other” responses were provided to this question including: • Covid-19 concerns: 4 • Cleanliness of facilities: 3 • Parking: 1 • Does not seem like they are meant for college students: 1 • Having kids of mixed gender with me: 1 • I live by City Park Pool and have never been in – it appears outdated: 1 • I am looking for a swimming opportunity for my son who gets overwhelmed in crowded environments – this is preventing him from learning to swim: 1 • Most things are for kids and families – what about seniors? My fiancé is 75 and has Parkinson’s disease. • My autistic son has great difficulty with events and activities: 1 • The lack of privacy in the bath house at City Park Pool is just awful: 1 • Transients/homeless overtaking locker rooms and restrooms (and the stench): 1 • Unfamiliar with the places/equipment, etc.: 1 Facility Barriers – What prohibits you or member(s) of your household from visiting Iowa City Recreation Facilities? The “other” responses to this question include: • Programs and lap swimming not available when I am: 3 • Lack of family changing rooms. Need a way to enter pool areas without going through a gendered locker room. My household only swims at City facilities with groups like the Iowa City Autism Community renting facilities because then we can enter the pool without going through a gendered locker room first: 3 • I find it difficult to find class times or the right information about activities and facilities: 2 • Lack of marketing and difficulty navigating the website: 2 • Noise and crowding during times when children can be present: 2 • City Park Pool doesn’t have steps: 1 • Facilities need to be updated: 1 • I assume I won’t be able to find a pool 148 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS lane or workout station: 1 • I sometimes use Mercer Park Pool and Gym but I think the places are too old: 1 • I tried participating in the arthritis water aerobics class about 4 years ago at Mercer. The water was so cold it hurt: 1 • Large groups of teenagers taking over the facilities and not following policies: 1 • Mercer and City Park Pool locker rooms are not clean, or cleaned consistently. People have returned to using the University pool as it’s cleaned consistently: 1 • Mercer locker rooms do not have accessible toilet stalls. There are accessible restrooms on the pool deck, but not in the locker rooms. I have spoken to the managers about this but no action was ever taken: 1 • Robert A. Lee Pool is too deep for small children even in the shallow parts. The pool also smells bad: 1 • Since 2006 I have attended the 5:30pm deep water aerobics class at RAL. Since 2013 my goal was to attend five nights a week, and often achieved that goal. I was happy to pay nonresident fees as I am a Coralville resident. I was not the only participant who had been attending this program for a very long time. Since the resumption of classes that has not been possible. There is no longer the commitment to support this class. Communication between management and individuals staffing the desk is lacking. I consistently received inaccurate information when I called or asked at the desk for particulars about the program. The sign-up process online is awful! Multiple individuals told me they also were unable to navigate to a successful enrollment. Programs that were supposedly online could not be found, resulting in enrollment being low and classes being cancelled. I signed up for a water aerobics pass and then a class was cancelled and a swim pass could not be used unless class was being held. Now with the resumption of swim lessons at RAL for the kids, the dressing rooms are crowded and social distancing is impossible. So even though there is a 5:15pm class available I will not be attending it because it is not safe. The cost has also become prohibitive for attending as often as I did. Program Barriers – What prohibits you or members of your household from participating in Iowa City Recreation activities, programs, and events? The “other” comments to this question include: • Activities are available for under 18 only: 1 • Covid-19 policies are not clearly stated: 1 • Covid-19: 1 • Don’t know when classes are posted, don’t know what I am missing out on: 1 • Drive is too far from residence, otherwise I would enjoy participating more: 1 • Looking for crafting for adults: 1 • Need free parking: 1 • Not enough trained instructors who are skilled at teaching autistic people: 1 • Online registration is extremely hard and there isn’t a helpful user guide provided. Please layout the activities and add tags for ages permitted, include options to learn more so more options appear to list ALL possible classes based on criteria. 149 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS From swim, I have multiple swimmers at multiple levels and I want their levels at the same time. Not all levels are at the same time and people mess up the levels all the time. Give parents a rough idea of what each level is so that you aren’t constantly reshuffling kids: 1 • Programs don’t seem to be aimed at my demographic: 1 • Registering online is almost impossible. The website is very user unfriendly. 1 Program & Facility Policies – What changes would you like to see made to the Iowa City Recreation program and facilities policies? Although no one actually answered this question specifically, a total of 29 responses were provided to this question including: • A website that is user friendly. Correct time/information about classes on website (and communicated to desk staff). A payment plan that advantages frequent users and is flexible (many people have conflicts during most months which makes paying by the month inconvenient – it becomes a barrier to participating). Locker rooms are cleaned thoroughly on a regular basis. More water aerobics classes (deep water) available in the evening. • Better and safer facilities, better hours, better communication about programs/fees • I like that more trails are having the snow removed • I miss the program guide with all classes organized by age • I am particularly averse to human interaction, so I avoid public rec facilities • Improve web user experience • I play pickleball at Mercer – the courts are crumbling • I would love more variety in programming for adults to learn new skills and activities archery, kayaking, C25K, badminton. Ways for adults to try new activities with a low barrier to entry. • Attention to the Mercer locker rooms for accessible toilet seats • Make sure that staff are aware that caregivers can get into the pools for free when accompanying people with disabilities. • Make the website easier to navigate. • More adult activities with adults with disabilities. I have an intellectual delay but I still enjoy things that maybe teens would. • More awareness of your services and more programs for adults. • More classes geared toward senior citizens so we don’t have to navigate parking downtown to use the SC. • More neuro-diverse programs to include ADHD. • Any activities where parents are not required to be present outside the normal school operating hours are welcome. • More spots are needed to meet the high demand – especially for swimming lessons. They sell out immediately. • New registration system. The swim schedules are incredibly difficult to read. Why isn’t it in a calendar layout with times for each center/pool? • I would like you to upgrade parks and update pools. • Not enough accessible parking at the Farmers Market. • Please allow people to enter the pool areas without going through gendered locker rooms. This could be achieved by allowing people to enter the pool directly without the 150 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS use of any locker room or by offering a gender neutral space. • Pool schedules are not reasonable for working people. The evening times are often taken up by swim teams and lessons, pushing out the open lap swim. This probably points to the need for more pools. • Start learning from the Illinois Park Districts and YMCA organizations. • Still waiting on City Park to have new kids’ activities since the carousel rides are no longer there. Any activities for ages 8 – 13? • Use more volunteers to expand pool access hours. • Way more stuff for seniors and the disabled especially. • What adaptive equipment is available? Do staff know about adaptive equipment? • Would like to see aquatic programming like water aerobics offered early morning for working adults. The evening programs start too early to get there on time after work. • You need more individualized swim classes, particularly in the Covid-19 era where people aren’t excited about having their little children unmasked around a bunch of other kids. Special Events – What components of a special community event are important to you? The following additional suggestions were made regarding additional components at special events: • Foreign language classes • For the drive in or park movie nights, please lease not so many non-family friendly shows – have the adult one later • More partnerships with JoCo and hiking on our local trails and learning bike trail paths • Masking required and enforced. It’s not enough to say they are required. • Music, vintage cars • Pickleball • Gardening and local botany events • Partying in the parks • The events I have attended are low quality with too much commercialism. New and updated equipment is needed. So many special events feel like marketing ventures. • Would love to see a triathlon event for small kids (run, bike, splash pad) Share any other questions, comments, feedback, or ideas you have about Iowa City Recreation facilities, programs, activities, or events. These are the responses to this question. • Access free training from Regional Autism Assistance Program for staff so more autistic children and adults can access programs. Provide more swimming lessons for people with disabilities and make sure instructors are fully trained. • Appreciate everything the City does to make our City a great place to live! • At Robert rec center should have schedule time for adult roller skating • Do I understand correctly that your programs are mostly geared toward kids and seniors? I don't know what services IC Recreation even offers for someone like me, a single millennial who works full-time. I've become kind of crowd-phobic since having Covid so if you ever offered virtual sessions to encourage folks how to explore new hobbies that would be something I might be interested in. 151 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Not sure if you even do that or not. Thank you! • I am very disappointed in the lack of cleanliness at especially the RAL facility and the lack of deep water classes in the evening. I would like to participate, but there is currently no reason for me to attend. • Staggering the start times of swim lessons would help relieve some of the overcrowding in the parking lot and dressing rooms. • Someone (leader of programs) needs to think through how the activities will co-exist in the pool. Multiple times I showed up and there was nowhere to hold the class as the space was being used by other classes and it was very evident that adult water aerobics was lowest on the priority list. Some staff tried to find a workable solution, others were rude. • I don’t know how to subscribe to press releases, email, or the recreation guide. I don’t even know what I am missing! • If the pool and parks are updated with what they need, will the fees go up slightly for recreation programs? • I really like City Park Pool and would hate for it to be updated with things like big slides or more of a waterpark feel. There are other places where that can already be done. Please keep things simple. • I really wish there was more out there about activities being offered. The website is very difficult and not user friendly. • It is very hard to get into aquatic lessons for children – they are always full. • It would be nice if the shower/locker room areas were cleaned more often or to a higher standard. Often the soap dispensers in the showers are empty especially the handicap accessible ones. • I would like to see more programs offered geared toward adults. Some nature programs are offered on occasion, would like to see more of those. Other educational opportunities like guest speakers, panels on a variety of topics. I would really like to take advantage of the adult softball and volleyball programs, but I will never have enough people for a team. It would be nice if it was clear how to find other people that are not on a team so we could make our own if possible. I think smaller, neighborhood specific block parties would be really neat so people get a chance to mingle with all of the neighbors they might not actually see or talk to. • Love the many pickleball courts but would like them updated. • Need to build facilities in south Iowa City. The City is growing in that direction and the South District is underserved. • Parking is terrible. That is a huge barrier. It does not seem like the City is really trying to improve. 100% public relations with very little substance. • Please consider creating more free and/or very low cost indoor places for families and children to go during the snowy months. • Robert A. Lee Recreation Center needs to be replaced and it has a reputation of having homeless or trouble making kids ruining visits there. • Should offer ability for selected people to volunteer in order to get reduced fees for expensive things like children’s camps. • Sometimes new activities or more sections are added after the initial 152 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS registration date, it would be nice to get a notification to know there are new things and what they are. I typically only register on the first day because spots are so limited I can barely get into any activity. Please add more theatre and music opportunities. Coralville is the closest and that’s a drive for anyone east and south side. • The Robert A. Lee Recreation Center doesn’t have the equipment I want to use. No free weights? • We are grateful for Autism Community nights at City Park Pool once a month in the summer. It is nice to have the pool for people with autism and their families. Appendix A4: Phase 2 Community Engagement Program Ideas Survey respondents were asked to provide specific program ideas that would support program development in seven key areas: Fitness, Nature, Aquatics, Inclusive & Adaptive, Teens, Adult, and Culture. A list of the survey respondents’ program idea suggestions are provided in the following pages. Fitness • Fitness Boot camps; opportunities for organized sports like softball, volleyball, basket for adults and active agers. • Public indoor tennis facilities. • The indoor track, as mentioned, except making sure it's long enough/ wide enough for heavy use. • I would like to see more programming for middle and high school at risk youth to keep them busy with productive activities and out of trouble. • Flag football, MANY more swim lessons are needed for children, baseball beyond t-ball • More kids programs. More parents night out opportunities. • "Please bring a sports complex • To the Eastside of Iowa City. Many surrounding areas have the ability to host larger basketball and volleyball tournaments that we cannot. We are missing out on revenue to hotels and restaurants in the area that tournaments bring. Also it would bring positive growth and development to the Eastside. " • I would like to see more activities offered in parks around the city. We are looking forward to the baseball in Willow creek park this summer. 153 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Disc golf -- (a) add new courses, (b) regularly mow existing Peninsula Park course. Disc golf helps the city meet equity goals because it engages people across all age groups and socioeconomic groups. Parking overflow occurs regularly at the Peninsula Disc Golf Course because this fitness and wellness activity grew rapidly during the pandemic. Participation is now sustained, year- round, at a much higher level than the city anticipated. The good news is that disc golf is very inexpensive compared to playground structures and high-maintenance sports fields/ facilities. • More soccer and river activities • More and Improved Pickleball Courts • Spin classes. More diverse opportunities. Allow for fitness entrepreneurs to use city space to start out. Allow for new yoga or trainers to use facilities to make money - this small scale wealth- building rather than the tax breaks for large developers is the way to go. • "I'd like an outdoor recreation trail with fitness equipment, including ellipticals, an arthritic pool downtown, and more paved bike trails that are not part of the road (but don't chop up existing parks to provide them)." • Parent + kid classes for young children – nature exploration, soccer, etc. but the main purpose being a way for young children to socialize with each other without the pressure to detach from parents in order to do so. • Any and all! For every age group and for those with disabilities! • Please bring back Olympic-style weightlifting classes as well as open access to barbells/free weights. Please offer open access to TRX equipment as well as TRX classes (adjustable to all ages/fitness levels). • Yoga, Olympic Lifting, Junior Roller Derby, Advanced Swim Workout for adults (participants work closely with a swim coach to improve technique and maximize swimming strengths), triathlon training, paddleboard classes at Terry Trueblood, aquayoga on paddleboards, aquafitness on paddleboards • Walking/hiking/biking • Zumba/aerobic dance classes • More river activities would be great. We have a great (ok, somewhat polluted, but still) river that runs through town. Particularly the sections just south of down town are quite safe and could be leveraged more for programming. • Bicycling trails (both paved and single-track mountain biking). Winter sports options such as outdoor ice rinks, cross-country skiing. Dog parks. • Open gym programs on weekends where families can come and use facilities such as walking tracks, pools, basketball courts etc • Add a bike pump track in City Park where the train used to be. • Gender-neutral/inclusive volleyball programs (and youth leagues?) for all ages, indoor soccer facilities, indoor climbing walls for all ages, volleyball and walleyball courts to be reserved by teams and/or community members, indoor miniature golf course and/or outdoor miniature golf course. • Lap swimming outdoors in the morning expansion. Lap swim maintained with enough lanes for the community. • Nowhere to put comments: the expenses for the outdoor, elaborate ball diamonds are way too expensive. • Track, an indoor place to walk/run and upgrading baseball and softball 154 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS areas. A bigger place or area to light weights also for the eastside of town. More classes • I inventoried the total number of baseball and softball fields in Iowa City. Currently, there are 23 baseball and softball fields at various parks in Iowa City. There are only 21 soccer fields at Kickers Soccer Park. There are no other high quality, well- maintained soccer fields in Iowa City. The East Side Sports Complex features dedicates more space to baseball and softball fields than any other sport. Why? There already exists 23 well-maintained baseball and softball fields in Iowa City. This town needs more soccer fields, not additional baseball and softball fields! I do not support spending more tax- payer money on additional baseball and softball fields and upgrades and improvements. I suggest investing money in other sporting facilities. For example, the tennis courts at City Park are poorly maintained and in poor shape. • My top desire is for more classes on offer that accommodate a 40-hr per week day job. All the aquatics classes are at like 10:00 a.m. I would love to partake in water fitness, dance classes (especially hip hop or African dance), organized hikes or walking, yoga, gentle aerobics, beginning weight lifting, tai chi, mindfulness or stress reduction sessions. • I am in love with pretty much 99% of the Eastside Sports Complex plan and think it is long overdue. We have fallen behind other communities, many half our size, and the complex would bring in additional tourism dollars. I especially love the variety of offerings at the Eastside Sports Complex plan beyond baseball and appreciate the attention to having it be multi-purpose, with a dog park, playground and trails as well as an indoor facility. I also love the idea of a large destination playground and perhaps it could be a fully inclusive playground like Ankeny’s Miracle Playground or a large adventure playground like at City Park. • Low intensity interval training. Low cost personal training and a good weight room for independent use. • Natural swimming opportunities, like Weber Park pool in Minneapolis. Ponds and water features. Hiking trails, like at the Japanese gardens at the St. Louis Botanical center. Arboretums like the Bickelhaupt Arboretum in Clinton, IA. • Adults have to use private gyms or the Senior Center to find instructor guided aerobics or weight classes. • "?? Where is Eastside sports complex??? • About fitness/wellness--hope for more consistent, frequently offered all-age fitness/wellness classes (Pilates, yoga, etc) " • increased access via walking/biking should be a priority to reduce the amount of driving necessary to access recreation facilities • I would love to see a strengthening program targeted to aging, but not geriatric, women. • Water Fitness classes, Shallow & Deep water • Walking clubs, Fitness goal clubs • Yes • Regarding Athletics Fields: Baseball & Softball fields are not available to meet the community needs. Fields are packed during season and can not support growth. East side complex would also allow for more tournaments, that will drive economic impact. 155 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Yes • Dancing/Rave • Aquatic Exercise • Yoga Mindfullness • Yes • Yes • Meditation, healing, yoga • Deep H20 water exercise • Yes • Add opportunites to RAL • "Essentrics" classes; spin classes • Exercise Room, Pool • Yes • Continue to increase connectivity of dedicated walking & cycling paths. • Please expand and add separate bike trail to Terry Trueblood area. Maintain sidewalk at Terry Trueblood during winter. People do hike even in the winter. • Why are the updates mainly on the east side of the city? There are many people living on the west side that would enjoy outdoor spaces to use. • Is it time to consider coordinating and consolidating the recreation programs for the growing communities of Coralville, Iowa City, North Liberty and Tiffin? This would allow residents to utilize facilities closest to their neighborhoods or select where to attend programs they most desire. • Lessons for rock climbing, pickle ball • " my concern is that the aquatics facilities usage has been based on usage prior to covid, and now people may end up becoming much more exercise and activity oriented after 2 years of Covid. • RAL pool should not be closed." • More fitness for middle aged working people! Everything is at 9am during the workday or at night when we all get off work and need to pick up our kids. Perhaps coordinate classes with youth activities so we can do them at the same time or offer more lunch hour classes. Earlier classes would also work. • Why no tennis courts? It's already hard to get an open court in Iowa City. • options are already available for seasonal sports outdoors. • Indoor Hand or racquetball courts at Mercer, add a few outdoor basketball courts at City Park in the area that is on flat up by entrance so students in mayflower, Greeks and rentals in area use the park more!! Would be more visible for attracting people to use park and easily monitored for many reasons. Could increase pool usage by same population too! !! • How about some fitness classes at Terry Trueblood! Nature • City Park or to Crandic Park to the Peninsula. • The insect museum was a popular event, it would be great to see more like this to get young people interested in nature. Maybe the city could also offer landscaping internship programs for at risk youth to provide them with opportunities to learn career skills and to have a job/ program to keep them busy while out of school • Please please please consider a pedestrian bridge from West Park to the peninsula trail system. It takes forever to walk to peninsula from Manville Heights and would expand the trail system's convenience tenfold. • A community program to remove 156 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS invasive species from Iowa City parks • More mountain bike trails and nature paths • Canoeing and kayaking. Better interconnected bike path options — in nature and not on roads and sidewalks. • Find more ways to reclaim nature - build more connections throughout the community. • "First Day Hike on January 1. • Pond activities for children in City Park. • Kayak trail." • Learning about the lifecycle of plants or birds for young kids (ages 5 and under?). My almost-five-year- old requires individualized care so sending her into a day-camp on her own is not an option. She loves learning and would love the opportunity to take part though so a parent+kid class would be amazing. • Access to all that is safe and educational! • Please partner with Backyard Abundance and/or Hike It Baby (via local Facebook group) and/or Bur Oak Land Trust etc. to offer more outdoor guided exploration in the free natural spaces in Iowa City. I think partnerships would reach more audience and make use of expertise of these local organizations. • Guided walks through Ryerson Woods, Hickory Hill, trail running groups, mountain biking • More trails - hickory park style. Hiking/biking. Activities all families can enjoy. Maybe more fishing and walking - similar to Terry Trueblood. • More summer nature programs for kids. They fill up so fast it's impossible to get into programs • Planting seeds/starter plants to encourage personal gardens at home sites. • More river activities would be great. We have a great (ok, somewhat polluted by farmers upstream, but still) river that runs through town. Particularly the sections just south of down town are quite safe and could be leveraged more for programming. • Hiking, geocaching, bird watching. • Adding to Hickory Hill park to prevent housing encroachment • I like the prairie plantings at City Park. Less money spent on mowing enormous swathes of turf is extremely desirable. I prefer butterflies and pollinators to expensive mowed turf anytime. • Organized hikes, tree identifications workshops, invasive weed ID and pulling, organized clean-ups, cross- country skiing with equipment rental, perennial or vegetable gardening classes from beginner to advanced, container gardens, help build a cob structure in a park, community gardens • I would love to see the implementation of a cyclo cross course biking course • More led hikes, bikes, rows, cross country skis, snowshoeing, or swims, and nature camps as well as more opportunities for the community to foster and help take care of the nature we have. Collaborations with Tap Root and/or But Oak Land Trust. I also noticed the parks listed above were all sports parks. If it is not part of a different master plan in a different place, then I advocate for maintenance and land management in Hickory Hill. • Natural swimming opportunities, like Weber Park pool in Minneapolis. Investment in creeks and waterways, 157 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS bike trails. Stop putting up cheap, plastic playgrounds. Logs, rock, trees, climbing and scrambling structures. Botanical gardens and arboretums. Ponds and water features. Hiking trails, like at the Japanese gardens at the St. Louis Botanical center. Arboretums like the Bickelhaupt Arboretum in Clinton, IA. • Naturalist guided hikes and gardening classes. • "Walking groups, continue with more trails, occasional gatherings for things like--foraging, garlic mustard elim, etc. • Bike trails that better incorporate Eastside neighborhoods into city plan (along Creek?) • "making streets and walking paths around Iowa City safer and more attractive will do more to help promote natural environments and access to "nature" than anything else. • Amana Colonies • Hands on activities for parents + young children, City wide nature scavenger hunt. • Hiking/Birdwatching • Urban gardening; Butterfly gardens; Trails • Yes • gardening, camping, overall connection/preservation of nature • Walking/hiking paths; more natural plantings for endangered monarchs, etc. • Trails • Yes • More shade trees EVERYWHERE • Better trails • To promote shopping and dining by bicycle, please improve safe access to businesses and restaurants along Hwys 1 & 6 (southwest side of Iowa City) and Riverside Drive, including bike racks at each business and restaurant. Also, more bike racks near more businesses in the downtown area and Northside Marketplace would be helpful. • Build another similar area like the Terry Trueblood area just east ( other side of Sand Road). And expand the Terry Trueblood dramatically to the west. Also somehow separate the walkers and bikers- it is unsafe for walkers when bikes zoom by. • Park programs at more parks in the summer, and any outdoor nature activities would be greatly enjoyed by our family. • We do need nature programs and coordination with Johnson County Conservation should be considered to offer programming and avoid duplication. • The registration process is super confusing, some are registered through a private group in a separate system some aren't, some cost money, some don't. Very hard and honestly overwhelmed at navigating multiple systems. Gardening skills with ISU extension would be great. Understanding native plants, nature walks, trail maps. • Nature walks led by knowledgeable specialists would be fun. • Partner with UI to get students out to field campus, local prairies, etc 158 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Aquatics • Women’s water exercises; more options for swimming lessons and fun activities for kids at the pool. • Do not close downtown pool. People walk from work to the pool at lunch and after work. • I would like to see women's or a decent number of private locker rooms continue to be available in addition to gender neutral. As a woman I would not be comfortable using the same locker room as heterosexual men, and would be concerned about sexual assault for young girls. I have dealt with cat calls walking to and from public transit and do not think this community is a safe place for exclusively gender neutral, unless there is a large number of private gender neutral rooms. • The number one priority for the city should be increasing the spots available for children’s swim lessons. It’s almost impossible to get them in it because it fills up within minutes. More private lessons would be ideal. Many children need to catch up due to missing lessons during Covid shut dow a • We need even a small indoor pool west or north west of downtown. RLee and Mercer are a bit far for people in that area. • Safer locations for indoor pools • There really should be three pools. Central (rec center), East (Mercer) and a new western aquatic center. • "Adult swim lessons or coaching. • School district should partner again with City to require kids to learn to swim." • I've taken my 2 year old to the parent- child Iowa City aquatics program (indoor, at Robert Lee) and it was too cold to be at all enjoyable. Every child in the class was shivering and had purple lips. Even I, the adult, found the water so cold and miserable that I dreaded going. My daughter ended up crying every time we got there for a lesson, which is the opposite reaction we're going for when introducing a kid to water – the point is to teach them to love hopping in and learning to swim. We both hated the experience so much that we stopped going before our sessions were even complete. • Just make the venues better and safer! Not that they’re not safe now! • More classes for those dealing with mobility issues • Please offer aqua aerobics at 6 or 6:30am for people who have to work at 8/8:30am. Please add additional slots for children's swim lessons and adult swim lessons. • See list above • Fishing • zero entry outdoor pools and young kid features - city park and mercer • Iowa City pools are not an inviting place for smaller kids. The coralville and north liberty pools offer a much better experience for kids and parents. • More swim lesson availability • "More river activities would be great. We have a great (ok, somewhat polluted by farmers upstream, but still) river that runs through town. Particularly the sections just south of down town are quite safe and could be leveraged more for programming. • Honestly, I'm more concerned about having an accessible nearby pool that's not on the far east side of town where I'm at than I am about the exact nature of the programming." • Warmer pool water, more swim lesson options, special events (such as 159 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS evening swims), swim / dive team. • Currently, it seems as though Iowa City is far behind in the Corridor including Coralville and North liberty in terms of providing an aquatic center with water features and slides for a variety of ages. Any upgrade to a pool facility should include much more than additional space for swimming lanes. • Provide option for individual (non- group) swimming lessons in outdoor pool. Increase swimming lesson options in the summer because they always fill so fast - there is a need. And there is a need for more individual lesson opportunities. • Lap swimming outdoors in the morning expansion. Lap swim maintained with enough lanes for the community. • Evening water workout classes • Collaborate w North Dodge Athletic Center to provide IC residents on north side more accessibility to an indoor pool. • My top desire is for more classes on offer that accommodate a 40-hr per week day job. All the aquatics classes are at like 10:00 a.m. One- time or drop-in swim lessons to learn better form or new strokes. Or something like a personal trainer, but for swimming or aquatic fitness specifically. Recommendations for activity, length of time, etc. based on desired outcome. I love having a place for open family swim, but I do mostly use the pools for lap swimming. It would be really fun to join a team sport that is played in water. It could be something very low key or more active. • More 50 M or 25 Y lap pools to accommodate competitive youth swimming. And swimming lessons which are always instantly full. Coordination with iccsd to support community & school uses • My goodness! We need pool fun for teens! Check out Furman Aquatic Center in Ames for a facility that meets the needs of an entire community. • More water aerobics and adult swimming programs (competitive). Again, we need more lap swimming areas, especially in the outdoor months. • Water aerobics at times that working adults can attend. • "Natural swimming opportunities, like Weber Park pool in Minneapolis. Spaces like Naturbad Riehen. https:// www.dwell.com/article/natural- swimming-pools-chlorine-free- f6b464e5 • More water aerobics....do the needed repairs to the downtown pool!!!! • Longer season for City Park Pool. It's still warm in September and October. Lovely for outdoor swimming. Also, please reconsider use of CPP for private parties. They now seem to be the priority--it's not right for a public facility to be so frequently off limits to the public, sometimes during with little notice during regular posted hours. Consider plan that allows small parties to use pool during public hours. • "Expanded swimming lesson availability." • more lap swim time, free swim lessons (esp. for underserved populations) • Since Washer balm is closed maybe use Robert E Lee could e some type "Lesser Water Venue" • "Deep & Shallow, Lessons" • More Lessons for children • Zero Entry Pools 160 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • RAL Please Keep It • WE NEED AN AWESOME OUTDOOR WATER PARK. IT'S TIME! THANK YOU! • Yes • Year round Lap Swim & Recreational Swim w/ grandkids • Competitive swimming • Aquatics • Warm Water Exercise Classes • Maximize lap swim opportunities at City Park. • Aquatic Exercise • Lanes for swimming! Lanes for Swimming! Lanes for swimming! • Yes • More lap lane: Focus on fitness!! • Swim lessons / lap swim • Keep Robert A. Lee pool open • Yes • Lap swimming • DONT CLOSE RAL • More lap lanes and longer lap swims; more open swims; deepwater access besides diving • Robert A Lee Indoor Pool • Yes • Yes • Better indoor pool ventilation • yes • Lazy river • If City Park Pool is going to become the focus for families with children, please keep RAL and dedicate that space for adult swimmers only. I think it’s a serious disservice to take away the RAL as an indoor swimming option. • DO NOT CLOSE THE DOWNTOWN ROBERT E. LEE POOL. I could not find a specific survey about the downtown pool, which sends a message the your decision to close it is already a done deal. Please keep the Downtown open. Also, add lap lanes and hours for lap swimmers at all pools. • Please offer plenty of lap swimming options. I know there are times of higher and lower usage but please understand that lap swimmers are highly addicted (!) and it's very frustrating when you have to schedule your whole day around a small window of time while also trying to calculate if there will be an open lane. We need lots of open lap lanes and lots of available time blocks. Thank you. • See comment above regarding coordinating and/or possible consolidation with Coralville, Iowa City, North Liberty and Tiffin to offer programs for residents that more closely align with neighborhoods. For example, eliminating the downtown pool impacts folks downtown and on the west side but coordinating recreation activities with Coralville may offer a new location opportunities that more closely align with neighborhoods. The same might be true for youth sports programs. • lessons for paddle boarding • Aquatic exercise, not just geared to seniors. More paddle boarding and kayaking clinics, events at Terry Trueblood • I would like to see attention to aquatics, especially for older adults and women. The new plans leaves out deep water aquacise and severely limits lap swimming options. • "We do not need a ""warm water"" pool at Mercer that will take away lap swim and other aquatic programming at Robert A Lee • for twice the cost. Robert A Lee is far 161 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS more equitable, sustainable option. This survey does not address the closure of this important community assetm (Robert A Lee pool). " • Expand swimming lessons to get more people esp kids taught to swim. Partner with public private and home schoolers for swimming lessons for academic courses and paid for by school system/state funding Inclusive & Adaptive • Would love programs that are inclusive to sensory kids, kids who need relaxed behavioral expectations, and ADHD minds. • If you develop more neighborhood oriented space - listen to those communities/neighborhoods, give them opportunities for things their neighborhood wants. Each could have their own special activities. • Add an inclusive fishing dock to City Park • More parent + child classes. My daughter requires individualized care but loves learning and making friends. She doesn't have the opportunity to join very many programs since she requires one of her caregivers or someone trained in how to properly care for her in order to participate so offering more parent + kid opportunities would remove that hurdle. • ALL ages and include those with disabilities! • N/A • n/a • I am glad to see more gender-neutral bathrooms and locker rooms being planned. • I don't know. • The play equipment at James Alan McPherson Park is a cheap, ineffective nod to accessibility. Cheap plastic ramps to not make a space that anyone in the community wants to use. • Iowa City is culturally rich and diverse. • ensuring access to programming and facilities regionally so people don't have to drive (increases inclusivity) • Zero Entry Pools • Yes • Zero entry pool access • Pave trails access and PLOWING SNOW REMOVAL TO SHELTERS • See above • Art and science experiences specifically aimed at twice exceptional (gifted and neurodivergent) kids. Courses that teach skills to kids that may be behind developmentally (e.g. beginning bike riding lessons for 8-14 year olds) • Not all bathrooms need to be gender neutral, having some as an option is what is helpful. Otherwise all you are making are single user restrooms so just call them that. • Restore and keep the Robert A Lee pool open and extend hours!!!! • Could use part of the parking lot adjacent to Robert e Lee to add to bldg to add classroom space on east side and reduce parking fees for those with rec pass in Chauncey ramp Teens • More things for teens to get involved in, especially during the summer. • Public indoor tennis facility. • We need more programs to engage at risk youth productivity in things they enjoy. A program I worked with in LA a few years back did a photo voice program and another where kids could make their own movie. 162 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS • Anti-bully prevention, Mental health, general fun things for them to do in their free time • I'd love to see Iowa City adopt a program similar to the Coralville/ North Liberty Knight Riders program where they have kids bike around to contribute to community service learning projects. Another option would be to partner with the existing program to offer something in Iowa City. • "Ideally, Iowa City would have a Bett Plex. The Bett Plex is busy all of the time. • Iowa City needs a nice safe indoor soccer field for kids to play on in all kinds of weather and practice on." • n/a • I think teens are taken care of for the most part! • N/A • Babysitter's Course • Group/collaborative entrepreneurial, environment, and tech skill related activities. • Swim / dive team. • Non-competitive swim team and running options. • Climbing walls and teaching how to use them, community service opportunities • Pick-up basketball games at a certain day/time decided by random drawing or something like that. I think that would give them something to be organized around and help included kids who don't have a regular group to play with. Help people meet each other. Movie nights. Board game nights. Skateboarding clinics. Life skills classes (simple repairs, etc). Free-form art night - simple supplies provided with fun music. Jam sessions - bring your instrument. Escape room or logic game night. Photography courses. Digital media courses. • My goodness! We need pool fun for teens! Check out Furman Aquatic Center in Ames for a facility that meets the needs of an entire community. • Leadership opportunities, and activities that foster community connection, career development and positive mental health. • Natural swimming opportunities, like Weber Park pool in Minneapolis. More spaces for roller skating. Water features and splashpads that are not cheap plastic. Sculptural fountains and ponds that you can cool off in. • Art • 0 Neighborhood areas for kids t ouse! Neighborhood centers, schools. etc • Teen sports for beginning athletes • Game Rooms, Science Room, Study Spaces • Yes • Create a young teens life guard mentoring and training program, starting w grade schoolers or middle school kids, which would increase pool of life guards by the time they are teenagers. • See above • I'd like to see Mercer Park fields and playground safety improved so that I feel comfortable sending my child to participate in activities offered here. • Safe place to hang out. Need staff involvement to steer activities and keep it a safe environment though. • Tennis • Anti gang activities? After school programs, music, art/craft, tutoring, look at YMCA type orgs to see what they offer? 163 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Adult • More sports and organized fitness • Public indoor tennis. • I've thought it would be fun to do a dance aerobics class. • More advanced art offerings • "Outdoor recreation trail. • The Eastside sports complex design is trying too hard to offer everything. Put the dog park somewhere else." • Help the adults like the teens and youth are helped! • Additional adult swim lessons, please! Aqua aerobics at 6 or 6:30am. Cross- promote or additional activities from Backyard Abundance (I just signed up for their foraging series!), Hike It Baby, Bur Oak Land Trust, Turkeyfoot Folk School, etc. • N/A • Co-ed recreational sports leagues (slow pitch softball, volleyball, others?) • n/a • Adult jazz or contemporary dance lessons for beginners • Pick-up team sports for people who don't want to commit to a league - bags, kubb, softball/baseball, lawn bowling, basketball, volleyball, etc. Classic movie night, maybe with theme. • Date night offerings. • Natural swimming opportunities, like Weber Park pool in Minneapolis. More spaces for roller skating. Botanical gardens and arboretums, walking and hiking spaces. • Art, create better studio space and bring in good instruction."as above: • More and more consistently offered fitness/wellness for all ages (Pilates, yoga, barre), best with some flexibility (punch card system) • More arts/culture classes (basic drawing, etc). I took a great class at RAL many years ago (well-attended) and have been hoping/watching for that class again . " • I would love to see a strengthening program targeted to aging, but not geriatric, women. • Need indoor Pickleball courts • Zero Entry Pools • Yes • Yes • Computer class & Craft Classes • Yes • Yes • Book clubs • Yes • Continue offering art classes • More classes • Improve awareness of existing activities by creating a centralized guide on the city web site. If this already exists, I haven’t found it, so visibility isn’t optimal. • Add specific pool hours for swimmers over 65. For example, it is very difficult and dangerous for elders to circle swim in crowded lap lanes. Provide more lap lanes. And prove specific lanes for older swimmers. • See above • See above regarding classes for working parents. • Tennis • Expand 55+ like pallotti, yoga, Tai chi, water exercise, dance, with sliding scale fees 164 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS Culture • I love Juneteenth celebration at Mercer. I would like to continue to see this. • More investment in Pride. • If you develop neighborhood rec centers, celebrate the history, heritage, and culture of those neighborhoods. • Overall, I think Iowa City does a pretty good job with this! Start talking about and concentrating on safety for those attending events! Because of the way the world is and because of the “lone wolf” evil doer’s • I would like to see more inclusive celebrations. Iowa City has a very diverse population including African, Anglo-Saxon, German, Irish, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern to name a few. So many things to experience and learn. • I would like to see language lessons for K-6 age children, in Chinese, French, Spanish (songs, games, etc - age appropriate and engaging). This would build a lifelong foundation of cultural exchange for children. • N/A • Earth cycle events, such as solstice celebrations, etc... • I would love to see programming put together to celebrate the big cultural months: Black History, Women's History, Asian American and Pacific Islander History, Latino and Native American History Month. I'd also like to see something organized around Juneteenth and be well-publicized. For all of the above: dancing, food, music, readings, activities to participate in • Scavenger hunt related to Iowa City history. Downtown celebrations and performances representing the cultures that have immigrated to Iowa City recently or a celebration for Indigenous People's Day. • "Downtown Weatherdance fountain stage improvements were done wall. • Hiking trails, like at the Japanese gardens at the St. Louis Botanical center. Arboretums like the Bickelhaupt Arboretum in Clinton, IA. "Any Summer of the Arts programs have been great--I know not a City activity, but assume City supports. They would be a good model for smaller gatherings,focusing on/ presented by neighborhoods or specific cultural groups. • Emphasis on over 2 centuries of Iowan immigration history • Indoor farmers Market; Solstice. etc... • Yes • Yes • More social halls, auditorium. • Yes • Parties in the park are fab • More cultural events with food • How about a shop by bicycle weekend downtown to help people discover the fun and benefits of a more bicycle friendly shopping experience. Restaurants could offer drive through service for cyclists. This could be paired with sidewalk sales for businesses. • Do not add party rooms are City Park Pool. That is what the park shelters and other indoor pool facilities are for. • See above • Partner with other existing events or groups to put on events. • More Input on cultural activities from all populations of color and ethnic origin. This survey is mainly reaching Caucasians bc of access barriers to see and read survey 165 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS 166 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DETAILS This page is intentionally left blank. 167 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 168 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs …helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 Submitted to the City of Iowa City, Iowa ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Lane, Olathe, Kansas 66061 January 2022 Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report 2022 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 169 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Appendix C1: Similar Provider Details In addition to the organizations listed in the similar provider summary (Table 4.2), there are a number of other organizations throughout the City and County that provide recreation programs and services. These organizations include nonprofits and private organizations. Unlike the organizations included in Table 4.2, these nonprofits and private organization typically offer one or two specific opportunities or target a specific age group or interest. Additionally, based on this report’s focus on aquatics, indoor and outdoor swimming opportunities are included in this report. University of Iowa One of the largest providers of recreation and leisure opportunities within the City is the University of Iowa. The University of Iowa operates 11 facilities including, Campus Recreation and Wellness Center, Field House, Fitness East, Hawkeye Recreation Fields, Hawkeye Rugby Fields, Hawkeye Softball complex, Hawkeye Tennis & Recreation Complex, MacBride Nature Recreation Area, Outdoor Rental Center, P. Sue Beckwith, M.D., Boathouse, and Challenge Course These facilities offers the following amenities: • Three full-service fitness and wellness centers • Eight basketball/volleyball courts • Five badminton courts • Sixteen racquetball courts • Two squash courts • Olympic weightlifting room • Six multi-activity rooms • Climbing wall (52.5 feet) • Five tennis clubs • Three indoor swimming pools APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Appendix B1: Statistically Valid Survey Findings Report 170 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 2021 Iowa City Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey Executive Summary Overview ETC Institute administered a Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey for the City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department during the months of November and December of 2021 and January 2022. The survey will help the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department plan for future recreation programs and facilities that meet the community’s needs and preferences. Methodology ETC Institute mailed a survey packet to a random sample of households in the City of Iowa City. Each survey packet contained a cover letter, a copy of the survey, and a postage‐paid return envelope. Residents who received the survey were given the option of returning the survey by mail or completing it online at ICPRSurvey.org. Ten days after the surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails, text messages, and placed phone calls to the households that received the survey to encourage participation. The emails and text messages contained a link to the online version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete the survey. To prevent people who were not residents of the City of Iowa City from participating, everyone who completed the survey online was required to enter their home address prior to submitting the survey. ETC Institute then matched the addresses that were entered online with the addresses that were originally selected for the random sample. If the address from a survey completed online did not match one of the addresses selected for the sample, the online survey was not included in the final database for this report. The goal was to complete a minimum of 350 completed surveys from City residents. The goal was far exceeded with 450 completed surveys collected. The overall results for the sample of 450 households have a precision of at least +/‐4.6 at the 95% level of confidence. This report contains the following: Charts showing the overall results of the survey (Section 1) Priority Investment Rating (PIR) that identifies priorities for facilities and programs (Section 2) Tabular data showing the overall results for all questions on the survey (Section 3) A copy of the survey instrument (Section 4) The major findings of the survey are summarized on the following pages. City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 1 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Facility Use and Ratings Respondents were asked to indicate if they or any members of their household have used or visited a list of recreation facilities in Iowa City. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (70%), City Park Pool (61%), Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym (60%), and the indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center (59%) were the most used facilities by respondent households. For each of the facilities respondents indicated they, or members of their household, have used they were asked to rate the overall quality of the facility. Although the facilities were used less, the Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park (97%), Softball Fields – Napoleon Park (94%), and community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Weatherby Park) (91%) received the highest quality ratings based on the sum of “excellent” and “good” ratings. The chart below shows the quality ratings for all of the facilities respondents were asked to rate. When asked to indicate which three facilities from the list are most important to their household City Park Pool (32%), Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center (31%), Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym (28%), and Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (28%) were selected most by respondents. Q2‐1. Rating the Quality of the Facility Respondents Have Used or Visited by percentage of respondents who indicated they have used or visited the facility (excluding “not provided”) 54% 32% 29% 41% 36% 24% 30% 25% 18% 24% 15% 11% 53%44% 40% 59% 60% 47% 51% 62% 49% 51% 52% 45% 54% 52% 3% 5% 7% 11% 11% 11% 12% 19% 22% 28% 24% 28% 32% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 7% 3% 5% Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Softball Fields (Napoleon Park) Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) City Park Pool Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Pickleball Courts (Mercer Park) Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Tennis Courts (Mercer Park / City Park) 0% 20% 40%100%60% 80% Excellent Good Fair Poor Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Off Leash Dog Parks (Thornberry / Rita’s Ranch) Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 2 171 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Facility Use and Ratings Respondents were asked to indicate if they or any members of their household have used or visited a list of recreation facilities in Iowa City. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (70%), City Park Pool (61%), Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym (60%), and the indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center (59%) were the most used facilities by respondent households. For each of the facilities respondents indicated they, or members of their household, have used they were asked to rate the overall quality of the facility. Although the facilities were used less, the Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park (97%), Softball Fields – Napoleon Park (94%), and community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Weatherby Park) (91%) received the highest quality ratings based on the sum of “excellent” and “good” ratings. The chart below shows the quality ratings for all of the facilities respondents were asked to rate. When asked to indicate which three facilities from the list are most important to their household City Park Pool (32%), Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center (31%), Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym (28%), and Robert A. Lee Recreation Center (28%) were selected most by respondents. Q2‐1. Rating the Quality of the Facility Respondents Have Used or Visited by percentage of respondents who indicated they have used or visited the facility (excluding “not provided”) 54% 32% 29% 41% 36% 24% 30% 25% 18% 24% 15% 11% 53%44% 40% 59% 60% 47% 51% 62% 49% 51% 52% 45% 54% 52% 3% 5% 7% 11% 11% 11% 12% 19% 22% 28% 24% 28% 32% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 7% 3% 5% Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Softball Fields (Napoleon Park) Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) City Park Pool Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Pickleball Courts (Mercer Park) Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Tennis Courts (Mercer Park / City Park) 0% 20% 40%100%60% 80% Excellent Good Fair Poor Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Off Leash Dog Parks (Thornberry / Rita’s Ranch) Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 2 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 172 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Recreation Center Amenity Needs and Priorities Recreation Center Amenity Needs: Respondents were asked to identify if their household had a need for 22 recreation amenities and rate how well their needs for each were currently being met. Based on this analysis, ETC Institute was able to estimate the number of households in the community that had the greatest “unmet” need for various amenities. The three recreation center amenities with the highest percentage of households that have an unmet need were: 1.Indoor walking/jogging track – 12,188 households (40%), 2.Meditation/yoga studio – 6,678 households (22%), and 3.Weight room – 6,414 households (20%). The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the 22 recreation center amenities assessed is shown in the chart below. Q4. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Recreation Center Amenities are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 12,188 6,678 6,141 5,803 5,611 5,434 5,150 5,084 4,751 4,370 4,265 3,952 3,596 3,590 3,583 3,527 2,837 2,737 2,189 2,053 1,926 1,793 Indoor walking/jogging track Meditation/yoga studio Weight room Fitness room Arts and crafts classroom Climbing walls Fitness classroom Indoor playground Roller skating rinks Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Maker's Space Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Theater space Gym space Indoor sports fields Photography studio Martial arts studio Community kitchen Gymnastics facilities 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 3 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 173 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Recreation Center Amenity Importance: In addition to assessing the needs for each recreation center amenity, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents placed on each item. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the three most important amenities to residents were: 1.Indoor walking/jogging track (44%), 2.Weight room (23%), and 3.Gym space (23%) The percentage of residents who selected each amenity as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart below. Q5. Recreation Center Amenities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 44% 23% 23% 20% 19% 17% 17% 14% 14% 12% 10% 10% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 4% 3% 3% 2% Indoor walking/jogging track Weight room Gym space Fitness room Arts and crafts classroom Meditation/yoga studio Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Indoor playground Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Fitness classroom Maker's Space Roller skating rinks Climbing walls Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Indoor sports fields Theater space Gymnastics facilities Community kitchen Photography studio Martial arts studio 0% 10%50%20% 30% 40% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 4 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 174 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Priorities for Facility Investments: The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC Institute to provide organizations with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on recreation and parks investments. The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) equally weights (1) the importance that residents place on amenities and (2) how many residents have unmet needs for the amenity. [Details regarding the methodology for this analysis are provided in Section 2 of this report.] Based the Priority Investment Rating (PIR), the following recreation center amenities were rated as high priorities for investment: Indoor walking/jogging track (PIR=200) Weight room (PIR=102) The chart below shows the Priority Investment Rating for each of the 22 recreation center amenities assessed on the survey. Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Center Amenities Based on the Priority Investment Rating 200 102 93 93 89 75 74 74 71 64 61 61 57 46 45 45 42 36 24 23 23 21 Indoor walking/jogging track Weight room Fitness room Meditation/yoga studio Arts & crafts classroom Gym space Indoor playground Meeting rooms for community groups & classes Fitness classroom Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Climbing walls Roller skating rinks Maker's Space Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Theater space Indoor sports fields Photography studio Community kitchen Gymnastics facilities Martial arts studio 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (50‐99) Low Priority (0‐50) High Priority (100+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 5 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 175 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Recreation Programming Needs and Priorities Recreation Programming Needs. Respondents were also asked to identify if their household had a need for 20 recreation programs and rate how well their needs for each program were currently being met. Based on this analysis, ETC Institute was able to estimate the number of households in the community that had “unmet” needs for each program. The two recreation programs with the highest percentage of households that have an unmet need were: 1.Adult fitness and wellness programs – 10,944 households (36%) and 2.Nature programs– 8,603 households (28%). The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the 20 recreation programs assessed is shown in the chart below. Q6. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Recreation Programs are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City Adult fitness and wellness programs 10,944 Nature programs 8,603 5,454 4,798 4,794 4,260 3,809 3,399 3,185 3,176 3,156 3,015 2,638 2,566 2,418 2,366 2,345 2,207 2,025 1,983 Adult Art classes Adult sports programs Adult art, dance, performing arts STEAM Programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Family events Tennis lessons and leagues Youth learn to swim programs Youth summer camp programs Farmers Market Programs for people of all abilities Gymnastics and tumbling programs Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth sports programs Teen Programs Preschool programs/early childhood 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 6 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 176 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Recreation Program Importance. In addition to assessing the needs for each program, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents place on each program. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the three most important programs to residents were: 1.Farmers market (55%), 2.Adult fitness and wellness programs (41%), and 3.Nature programs (28%). The percentage of residents who selected each program as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart below. Priorities for Programming Investments. Based the priority investment rating (PIR), which was described briefly on page v of this Executive Summary and is described in more detail in Section 2 of this report, the following three programs were rated as “high priorities” for investment: Adult fitness and wellness programs (PIR=174) Nature programs (PIR=130) Farmers Market (PIR=124) The chart on the following page shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the 20 programs that were rated. Q7. Recreation Center Amenities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 55% 41% 28% 16% 15% 13% 12% 11% 9% 8% 8% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% Farmers Market Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Family events Youth learn to swim programs Adult art, dance, performing arts Adult sports programs STEAM Programs Youth sports programs Programs for people of all abilities No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Tennis lessons and leagues Youth summer camp programs Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth fitness and wellness programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs Photography studio Martial arts studio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 7 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 177 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Outdoor Pool Amenity Needs and Priorities Outdoor Pool Amenity Needs. Respondents were also asked to identify if their household had a need for 17 outdoor pool amenities and rate how well their needs for each amenity were currently being met. The three outdoor pool amenities with the highest percentage of households that have an unmet need were: 1.Shade areas – 10,307 households (34%), 2.Lazy river – 8,860 households (29%), and 3.Active water features – 8,136 households (27%). The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the 17 outdoor pool amenities assessed is shown in the chart on the following page. Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Programming Based on the Priority Investment Rating 174 130 124 80 65 64 57 56 52 45 41 39 38 37 35 28 28 27 26 25 Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Farmers Market Adult Art classes Adult art, dance, performing arts Adult sports programs Family events STEAM Programs Youth learn to swim programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Tennis lessons and leagues Programs for people of all abilities Youth summer camp programs Youth sports programs Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (50‐99) Low Priority (0‐50) High Priority (100+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 8 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Recreation Program Importance. In addition to assessing the needs for each program, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents place on each program. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the three most important programs to residents were: 1.Farmers market (55%),2.Adult fitness and wellness programs (41%), and3.Nature programs (28%).The percentage of residents who selected each program as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart below. Priorities for Programming Investments. Based the priority investment rating (PIR), which was described briefly on page v of this Executive Summary and is described in more detail in Section 2 of this report, the following three programs were rated as “high priorities” for investment: Adult fitness and wellness programs (PIR=174) Nature programs (PIR=130) Farmers Market (PIR=124) The chart on the following page shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the 20 programs that were rated. Q7. Recreation Center Amenities Most Important to Householdsby percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 55%41%28%16%15%13%12%11%9%8%8%6%6%5%5%5%4%4%4%2%3%2%Farmers MarketAdult fitness and wellness programsNature programsAdult Art classesFamily eventsYouth learn to swim programsAdult art, dance, performing artsAdult sports programsSTEAM ProgramsYouth sports programsPrograms for people of all abilitiesNo school day activitiesYouth outdoor skills programsTennis lessons and leaguesYouth summer camp programsPreschool programs/early childhoodTeen ProgramsYouth art, dance, performing artsYouth fitness and wellness programsGymnastics and tumbling programsPhotography studioMartial arts studio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th ChoiceCity of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 7 178 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Outdoor Pool Amenity Importance. In addition to assessing the needs for each outdoor pool amenity, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents place on each item. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the four most important outdoor pool amenities to residents were: 1.Lap lanes (25%), 2.Shade areas (23%), and 3.Deck chairs (22%), and 4.Open recreational swimming area (21%). The percentage of residents who selected each amenity as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart on the following page. Q9. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Outdoor Pool Amenities are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 10,307 8,860 8,136 7,773 6,866 6,776 6,506 5,779 5,278 5,008 4,513 3,943 3,821 3,631 3,504 2,895 2,017 Shade areas Lazy river Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle cou Water slides Deck chairs Zero‐depth/beach entry Adult deck Concessions and concession area Wave pool/surf simulation Open recreational swimming area Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, et Lap lanes Splash pad/sprayground Deep water (7+ feet) Diving boards 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 9 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 179 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Priorities for Outdoor Pool Amenity Investments. Based the priority investment rating (PIR), the following three amenities were rated as “high priorities” for investment: Shade areas (PIR=192) Lazy river (PIR=162) Deck chairs (PIR=154) The chart on the following page shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the 17 outdoor pool amenities that were rated. Q10. Outdoor Pool Amenities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 25% 23% 22% 21% Lazy river 19% Adult deck 17% 13% 13% 12% 12% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% Diving boards 5% Water sports 3% Lap lanes Shade areas Deck chairs Open recreational swimming area Water slides Zero‐depth/beach entry Deep water (7+ feet) Active water features Concessions and concession area Toddler features Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Splash pad/sprayground Wave pool/surf simulation 0%10%40%20%30% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 10 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 180 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Pool Program Needs and Priorities Pool Program Needs. Respondents were also asked to identify if their household had a need for eight pool programs and rate how well their needs for each program were currently being met. The two programs with the highest percentage of households that have an unmet need were: 1.Water fitness classes/water aerobics – 7,115 households (23%), 2.Senior aquatic programs – 6,051 households (20%), and The estimated number of households that have unmet needs for each of the eight pool programs assessed is shown in the chart on the following page. Top Priorities for Investment for Outdoor Pool Amenities Based on the Priority Investment Rating 192 162 154 135 134 130 128 127 118 97 84 83 78 77 67 50 39 Shade areas Lazy river Deck chairs Lap lanes Open recreational swimming area Adult deck Water slides Active water features Zero‐depth/beach entry Concessions and concession area Toddler features Wave pool/surf simulation Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Deep water (7+ feet) Splash pad/sprayground Water sports Diving boards 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (75‐149) Low Priority (0‐74) High Priority (150+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 11 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 181 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Pool Program Importance. In addition to assessing the needs for each pool program, ETC Institute also assessed the importance that residents place on each item. Based on the sum of respondents’ top four choices, the four most important pool programs to residents were: 1.Lap swimming (66%), 2.Water fitness classes/water aerobics (60%), 3.Swim lessons (53%), and 4.Family open swim (50%). The percentage of residents who selected each program as one of their top four choices is shown in the chart on the following page. Q11. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Pool Programs are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City Water fitness classes/water aerobics 7,115 6,051 5,447 4,866 4,488 3,090 1,544 1,341 Senior aquatic programs Swim lessons Lap swimming Family Open Swim Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 12 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 182 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Priorities for Pool Program Investments. Based the priority investment rating (PIR), the following three amenities were rated as “high priorities” for investment: Water fitness classes/water aerobics (PIR=190) Lap swimming (PIR=168) Senior aquatic programs (PIR=158) Swim lessons (PIR=157) The chart on the following page shows the Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each of the eight pool programs that were rated. Q11. Pool Programs Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 66% 60% 53% 50% 48% 17% 7% 2% Lap swimming Water fitness classes/water aerobics Swim lessons Family Open Swim Senior aquatic programs Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Sw Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0%20%40%60%80% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 13 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 183 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Barriers to Usage and Participation Respondents were given a list of 16 potential barriers to their household’s usage of or participation in Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events. The biggest barriers to usage and participation were: 1.Too busy (25%), 2.Use services of other agencies (22%), and 3.Program or facility not offered (20%). In addition to identifying the barriers to the usage of or participation in Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with nine statements regarding facility use barriers. Based on the sum of “strongly agree” and “agree” responses fewer than 10% of respondents agreed with any of the statements provided. The statements provided asked respondents to indicate if they or someone in their household feels uncomfortable using Iowa City Parks and Recreation facilities due to various circumstances. Top Priorities for Investment for Pool Programs Based on the Priority Investment Rating 190 168 158 157 139 69 32 22 Water fitness classes/water aerobics Lap swimming Senior aquatic programs Swim lessons Family Open Swim Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (75‐149) Low Priority (0‐74) High Priority (150+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 14 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 184 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Additional Findings Importance of Providing Recreation Programs and Facilities. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of eight value statements regarding the importance of Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for various purposes. Based on the sum of “very important” and “important” responses the following purposes received the highest level of importance ratings: Provide safe recreation activities for residents (95%), Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical and mental health (95%), and Provide low‐cost recreation skill development classes for youth (93%). City Park Pool. Sixty‐seven percent (67%) of respondents indicated that they would prefer to see the City design a new pool layout with new amenities at City Park Pool versus 17% who indicated they would prefer the City renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now; 16% of respondents did not provide a response. Outdoor Sport Facility Improvements. Sixty‐six percent (66%) of respondents indicated they were either “very supportive” (36%) or “supportive” (30%) of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments. Thirteen percent (13%) of respondents gave “not supportive” (7%) or “not at all supportive” (6%) responses, while 22% of respondents gave a “neutral” rating. Respondents who gave “not supportive” or “not at all supportive” responses were asked to check up to two reasons why they are not supportive of this potential improvement to outdoor sports facilities. Based on the sum of respondents’ top two choices 42% indicated that other City services should be a higher priority. Special Events. Forty‐three percent (43%) of respondents believe there is a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to host events in addition to the many large event opportunities hosted throughout the year by non‐profits and the University of Iowa. Thirty‐six percent (36%) of respondents indicated there is not a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to host events and 21% of respondents did not provide a response. Underserved Populations. Eighty‐two percent (82%) of respondents indicate it is either “very important” (49%) or “important” (33%) for the City to fund programs for underserved populations. Thirteen percent (13%) gave “neutral” ratings, 2% gave a “not important” rating, and 3% gave a “not at all important” rating. City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 15 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 185 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Section 1 Charts and Graphs City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 1 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Section 1 Charts and Graphs City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 1 186 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q1. Rating the Importance of Programs and Facilities Offered by the City of Iowa City by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) 73% 77% 68% 55% 48% 46% 37% 34% 23% 18% 25% 34% 37% 36% 38% 41% 3% 3% 5% 9% 11% 14% 19% 18% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 6% 8% Provide safe recreation activities for residents 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Important Important Neutral Not Important/Not at All Important Promote appreciation and preservation of the cultural and historical heritage of the community Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical and mental health Provide low‐cost recreation skill development classes for youth Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities Provide access to local whole foods Contribute to the community's economy City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 2 Q2. Recreation Facilities Used or Visited by Respondents by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 70% 61% 60% 59% 48% 45% 43% 38% 30% 28% 22% 10% 10% Robert A. Lee Recreation Center City Park Pool Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Off Leash Dog Parks (Thornberry / Rita’s Ranch) Tennis Courts (Mercer Park / City Park) Softball Fields (Napoleon Park) Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) Pickleball Courts (Mercer Park) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 3 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 187 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q2‐1. Rating the Quality of the Facility Respondents Have Used or Visited by percentage of respondents who indicated they have used or visited the facility (excluding “not provided”) 53% 54% 32% 29% 41% 36% 24% 30% 25% 18% 24% 15% 11% 44% 40% 59% 60% 47% 51% 62% 49% 51% 52% 45% 54% 52% 3% 5% 7% 11% 11% 11% 12% 19% 22% 28% 24% 28% 32% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 7% 3% 5% Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Softball Fields (Napoleon Park) Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Off Leash Dog Parks (Thornberry / Rita’s Ranch) Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) City Park Pool Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Pickleball Courts (Mercer Park) Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Tennis Courts (Mercer Park / City Park) 0%20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Excellent Good Fair Poor Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 4Q3. Facilities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top three choices 32% 31% 28% 28% 26% 18% 16% 15% 11% 10% 8% 6% 3% City Park Pool Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) Softball fields (Napoleon Park) Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 5 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 188 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q4. Percentage of Respondents That Have a Need for Recreation Center Amenities by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 55% 42% 40% 36% 36% 33% 31% 30% 22% 21% 20% 20% 19% 18% 17% 17% 14% 12% 10% 9% 9% 8% Indoor walking/jogging track Fitness room Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Gym space Weight room Fitness classroom Meditation/yoga studio Arts and crafts classroom Indoor playground Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Climbing walls Roller skating rinks Maker's Space Dance studios Theater space Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Indoor sports fields Gymnastics facilities Martial arts studio Photography studio Community kitchen 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 6Q4. How Well Households’ Need For Recreation Center Amenities Are Being Met by percentage of respondents who indicated their household had a need for the amenity 26% 27% 14% 15% 18% 15% 15% 12% 12% 14% 16% 12% 9% 8% 8% 6% 13% 11% 6% 9% 10% 3% 49% 37% 40% 34% 26% 28% 24% 27% 22% 19% 15% 18% 19% 19% 19% 20% 13% 14% 15% 9% 8% 9% 19% 27% 36% 40% 43% 33% 35% 39% 38% 29% 34% 35% 22% 31% 36% 22% 28% 31% 32% 38% 19% 28% 6% 9% 9% 11% 12% 23% 25% 22% 28% 38% 34% 35% 50% 42% 36% 51% 47% 44% 48% 44% 64% 60% Gym space Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Fitness room Fitness classroom Weight room Gymnastics facilities Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Arts and crafts classroom Dance studios Theater space Pottery studio Meditation/yoga studio Indoor walking/jogging track Maker's Space Martial arts studio Indoor sports fields Community kitchen Indoor playground Roller skating rinks Photography studio Teaching kitchen Climbing walls 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 7 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 189 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q4. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Recreation Center Amenities are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 12,188 6,678 6,141 5,803 5,611 5,434 5,150 5,084 4,751 4,370 4,265 3,952 3,596 3,590 3,583 3,527 2,837 2,737 2,189 2,053 1,926 1,793 Indoor walking/jogging track Meditation/yoga studio Weight room Fitness room Arts and crafts classroom Climbing walls Fitness classroom Indoor playground Roller skating rinks Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Maker's Space Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Theater space Gym space Indoor sports fields Photography studio Martial arts studio Community kitchen Gymnastics facilities 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 8Q5. Recreation Center Amenities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 44% 23% 23% 20% 19% 17% 17% 14% 14% 12% 10% 10% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 4% 3% 3% 2% Indoor walking/jogging track Weight room Gym space Fitness room Arts and crafts classroom Meditation/yoga studio Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Indoor playground Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Fitness classroom Maker's Space Roller skating rinks Climbing walls Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Indoor sports fields Theater space Gymnastics facilities Community kitchen Photography studio Martial arts studio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 9 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 190 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q6. Percentage of Respondents That Have a Need for Recreation Programming by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 74% 57% 43% 26% 24% 23% 22% 22% 19% 19% 18% 18% 16% 16% 16% 13% 13% 11% 11% 10% Farmers Market Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Family events Youth learn to swim programs Adult sports programs Adult art, dance, performing arts STEAM Programs Youth sports programs Youth summer camp programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Programs for people of all abilities Tennis lessons and leagues Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs 0%20% 40% 60% 80% 100% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 10Q6. How Well Households’ Need For Recreation Programs Are Being Met by percentage of respondents who indicated their household had a need for the program 54% 18% 20% 17% 17% 12% 15% 14% 8% 10% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 9% 6% 7% 7% 3% 34% 45% 37% 38% 30% 35% 28% 26% 31% 29% 30% 26% 25% 23% 21% 21% 23% 21% 21% 15% 9% 30% 36% 29% 44% 42% 34% 48% 40% 41% 48% 47% 37% 47% 44% 41% 45% 50% 45% 62% 2% 8% 7% 16% 10% 12% 23% 12% 21% 21% 15% 19% 30% 21% 25% 29% 26% 22% 27% 21% Farmers Market Youth sports programs Family events Youth learn to swim programs Youth summer camp programs Programs for people of all abilities Preschool programs/early childhood Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Teen Programs Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Tennis lessons and leagues Youth outdoor skills programs Adult Art classes No school day activities Adult sports programs STEAM Programs Adult art, dance, performing arts Gymnastics and tumbling programs 0%20%40%60%80%100% Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 11 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 191 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q6. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Recreation Programs are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 10,944 8,603 5,454 4,798 4,794 4,260 3,809 3,399 3,185 3,176 3,156 3,015 2,638 2,566 2,418 2,366 2,345 2,207 2,025 1,983 Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Adult sports programs Adult art, dance, performing arts STEAM Programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Family events Tennis lessons and leagues Youth learn to swim programs Youth summer camp programs Farmers Market Programs for people of all abilities Gymnastics and tumbling programs Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth sports programs Teen Programs Preschool programs/early childhood 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 12Q7. Recreation Programs Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 55% 41% 28% 16% 15% 13% 12% 11% 9% 8% 8% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% Farmers Market Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Family events Youth learn to swim programs Adult art, dance, performing arts Adult sports programs STEAM Programs Youth sports programs Programs for people of all abilities No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Tennis lessons and leagues Youth summer camp programs Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth fitness and wellness programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs Photography studio Martial arts studio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 13 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 192 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q8. Reasons Households Do Not Use Iowa City Parks and Recreation Programs, Facilities, and Events More Often by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 25% 22% 20% 18% 17% 15% 13% 13% 13% 13% 11% 11% 10% 5% 3% 2% Too busy Use services of other agencies Program or facility not offered Not interested Program times are not convenient Classes are full Lack of quality programs Facility too far to walk/bike Operating hours not convenient Too far from residence Facilities do not have right equipment Facilities are not well maintained Fees are too high Registration is difficult Poor customer service from staff Lack of transportation 0%20%40% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 14Q9. Percentage of Respondents That Have a Need for Outdoor Pool Amenities by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 46% 44% 43% 40% 33% 32% 32% 30% 30% 29% 29% 27% 25% 23% 19% 19% 15% Shade areas Open recreational swimming area Deck chairs Lap lanes Lazy river Adult deck Deep water (7+ feet) Concessions and concession area Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Active water features Water slides Zero‐depth/beach entry Diving boards Splash pad/sprayground Toddler features Wave pool/surf simulation Water sports 0%20%40%60%80% 100% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 15 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 193 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q9. How Well Households’ Need For Outdoor Pool Amenities Are Being Met by percentage of respondents who indicated their household had a need for the amenity 36% 30% 19% 23% 23% 13% 12% 8% 12% 9% 7% 7% 5% 6% 4% 3% 3% 38% 40% 52% 40% 34% 37% 36% 30% 22% 18% 16% 11% 11% 6% 8% 7% 5% 19% 24% 25% 28% 31% 29% 36% 40% 31% 45% 36% 29% 27% 9% 25% 8% 25% 7% 6% 5% 9% 12% 22% 16% 23% 36% 28% 41% 53% 57% 79% 64% 82% 67% Diving boards Deep water (7+ feet) Lap lanes Open recreational swimming area Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Splash pad/sprayground Deck chairs Concessions and concession area Adult deck Shade areas Toddler features Zero‐depth/beach entry Water sports Lazy river Water slides Wave pool/surf simulation Active water features 0%20%40%60%80%100% Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 16Q9. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Outdoor Pool Amenities are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 10,307 8,860 8,136 7,773 6,866 6,776 6,506 5,779 5,278 5,008 4,513 3,943 3,821 3,631 3,504 2,895 2,017 Shade areas Lazy river Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle cou Water slides Deck chairs Zero‐depth/beach entry Adult deck Concessions and concession area Wave pool/surf simulation Open recreational swimming area Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, et Lap lanes Splash pad/sprayground Deep water (7+ feet) Diving boards 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 17 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 194 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q10. Outdoor Pool Amenities Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 25% 23% 22% 21% 19% 17% 13% 13% 12% 12% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% 5% 3% Lap lanes Shade areas Deck chairs Open recreational swimming area Lazy river Adult deck Water slides Zero‐depth/beach entry Deep water (7+ feet) Active water features Concessions and concession area Toddler features Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Splash pad/sprayground Wave pool/surf simulation Diving boards Water sports 0%10%20%30%40% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 18Q11. Percentage of Respondents That Have a Need for Pool Programs by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 40% 37% 32% 32% 30% 13% 7% 5% Lap swimming Water fitness classes/water aerobics Senior aquatic programs Family Open Swim Swim lessons Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0%20% 40% 60% 80% 100% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 19 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 195 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q11. How Well Households’ Need For Pool Programs Are Being Met by percentage of respondents who indicated their household had a need for the amenity 15% 19% 12% 8% 9% 12% 6% 5% 45% 35% 29% 31% 29% 19% 18% 5% 33% 34% 39% 41% 42% 35% 40% 26% 8% 11% 20% 20% 20% 35% 36% 63% Lap swimming Family Open Swim Swim lessons Senior aquatic programs Water fitness classes/water aerobics Swim team Special aquatic events Dive team/diving programs 0%20%40%60%80%100% Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 20Q11. Estimated Number of Households in Iowa City Whose Needs for Pool Programs are Only “Partly Met" or "Not Met” by number of households based on an estimated 30,568 households in Iowa City 7,115 6,051 5,447 4,866 4,488 3,090 1,544 1,341 Water fitness classes/water aerobics Senior aquatic programs Swim lessons Lap swimming Family Open Swim Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Not Met Partly Met City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 21 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 196 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q11. Pool Programs Most Important to Households by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top four choices 66% 60% 53% 50% 48% 17% 7% 2% Lap swimming Water fitness classes/water aerobics Swim lessons Family Open Swim Senior aquatic programs Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Sw Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0%20%40%60%80% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 22Q13. City Park Pool: If the cost were the same, would you... 17%67% Not Provided 16% by percentage of respondents Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now Design a new pool layout with new amenities City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 23 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 197 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q14. Respondent's Level of Agreement With Facility Use Barrier Statements by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 7% 6% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 18% 14% 14% 19% 19% 13% 14% 13% 13% 18% 20% 23% 18% 19% 25% 24% 22% 23% 57% 59% 59% 60% 60% 61% 62% 63% 64% ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICP ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICP Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICP Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICP Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICP 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual orientation Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 24 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 198 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? Very supportive 36% Supportive 30% Neutral 22% Not supportive 7% Not at all supportive 6% by percentage of respondents (excluding “don’t know”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 25Q15a. Reasons Respondents Are Not Supportive of Making Improvements to Outdoor Sports Facilities by percentage of respondents who gave “not supportive" or “not at all supportive" responses (up to two selections could be made) 42% 27% 26% 16% 12% 6% 4% Other City services should be a higher priority I need more information before I can respond Other recreation opportunities are more important My family doesn't play traditional sports 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% This project does not serve the needs of all City residents I believe the focus should be recreational skill development, not tournaments I don't believe these types of projects bring attract & retain sports tournaments City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 26 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 199 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q16. Special Events: Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to host events? by percentage of respondents Yes 43% No 36% Not Provided 21% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 27 Q17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? Very important 49% Important 33%Neutral 13% Not important 2% Not at all important 3% by percentage of respondents (excluding “don’t know”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 28 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 200 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q18. Counting yourself, how many people in your household are in the following age groups? Under 5 years 6% 5‐9 years 6% 10‐14 years 6% 15‐19 years 6% 20‐24 years 4%25‐34 years 9% 35‐44 years 13% 45‐54 years 14% 55‐64 years 16%65‐74 years 14% 75‐84 years 6% 85+ years 1% by percentage of persons in household City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 29Q19. What is your age? 18‐34 years 18% 35‐44 years 19% 45‐54 years 20% 55‐64 years 21% 65‐74 years 15% 75+ years 8% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 30 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 201 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q20. How many dogs are in your household? 0 54% 1 31% 2 11% 3 3% 4+ 1% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 31Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City? 0‐5 years 11% 6‐10 years 10% 11‐15 years 6% 16‐20 years 8% 21‐30 years 21% 31+ years 44% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 32 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 202 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q22. Your gender: Male 49% Female 51% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) Prefer to Self Describe: 0.2% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 33 Q23. Are you or other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino Ancestry? Yes 5% No 95% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 34 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 203 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q24. Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? by percentage of respondents (multiple selections could be made) 79% 8% 7% 1% 2% White African American/Black Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaska Native Other 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 35Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home? Yes 98% No 2% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 36 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 204 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? Yes 16% No 84% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 37Q27. What is your total annual household income? Under $30K 12% $30K to $49,999 22%$50K to $69,999 18% $70K to $89,999 15% $90K to $119,999 15% $120K to $174,999 12% $175K+ 5% by percentage of respondents (excluding “not provided”) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 38 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 205 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Section 2 Priority Investment Ratings City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 39 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Section 2 Priority Investment Ratings City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 39 206 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Priority Investment Rating Iowa City, Iowa The Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was developed by ETC Institute to provide governments with an objective tool for evaluating the priority that should be placed on parks and recreation investments. The Priority Investment Rating was developed by ETC Institute to identify the facilities and programs residents think should receive the highest priority for investment. The priority investment rating reflects the importance residents place on items (sum of top 4 choices) and the unmet needs (needs that are only being partly or not met) for each facility/program relative to the facility/program that rated the highest overall. Since decisions related to future investments should consider both the level of unmet need and the importance of facilities and programs, the PIR weights each of these components equally. The PIR reflects the sum of the Unmet Needs Rating and the Importance Rating as shown in the equation below: PIR = UNR + IR For example, suppose the Unmet Needs Rating for playgrounds is 26.5 (out of 100) and the Importance Rating for playgrounds is 52 (out of 100), the Priority Investment Rating for playgrounds would be 78.5 (out of 200). How to Analyze the Charts: High Priority Areas. An rating in this range generally indicates there is a relatively high level of unmet need and residents generally think it is important to fund improvements in these areas. Improvements in this area are likely to have a positive impact on the greatest number of households. Medium Priority Areas. A rating in this range generally indicates there is a medium to high level of unmet need or a significant percentage of residents generally think it is important to fund improvements in these areas. Low Priority Areas A rating in this range generally indicates there is a relatively low level of unmet need and residents do not think it is important to fund improvements in these areas. Improvements may be warranted if the needs of very specialized populations are being targeted. The following pages show the Unmet Needs Rating, Importance Rating, and Priority Investment Rating for Iowa City, Iowa. City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 40 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 207 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Unmet Needs Rating for Recreation Center Amenities the rating for the item with the most unmet need=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative amount of unmet need for each item compared to the item with the most unmet need 100.0 54.8 50.4 47.6 46.0 44.6 42.3 41.7 39.0 35.9 35.0 32.4 29.5 29.5 29.4 28.9 23.3 22.5 18.0 16.8 15.8 14.7 Indoor walking/jogging track Meditation/yoga studio Weight room Fitness room Arts & crafts classroom Climbing walls Fitness classroom Indoor playground Roller skating rinks Meeting rooms for community groups & classes Maker's Space Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Theater space Gym space Indoor sports fields Photography studio Martial arts studio Community kitchen Gymnastics facilities 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 41Importance Rating for Recreation Center Amenities the rating for the item rated as the most important=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative level of importance for each item compared to the item rated as the most important 100.0 52.1 51.4 45.7 43.2 37.9 37.7 32.0 31.5 28.3 22.4 21.9 16.4 16.2 15.8 15.3 13.9 13.2 8.2 7.5 6.4 3.9 Indoor walking/jogging track Weight room Gym space Fitness room Arts & crafts classroom Meditation/yoga studio Meeting rooms for community groups & classes Indoor playground Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Fitness classroom Maker's Space Roller skating rinks Climbing walls Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Indoor sports fields Theater space Gymnastics facilities Community kitchen Photography studio Martial arts studio 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 42 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 208 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Center Amenities Based on the Priority Investment Rating 200 102 93 93 89 75 74 74 71 64 61 61 57 46 45 45 42 36 24 23 23 21 Indoor walking/jogging track Weight room Fitness room Meditation/yoga studio Arts & crafts classroom Gym space Indoor playground Meeting rooms for community groups & classes Fitness classroom Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Climbing walls Roller skating rinks Maker's Space Pottery studio Teaching kitchen Dance studios Theater space Indoor sports fields Photography studio Community kitchen Gymnastics facilities Martial arts studio 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (50‐99) Low Priority (0‐50) High Priority (100+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 43Unmet Needs Rating for Recreation Programming the rating for the item with the most unmet need=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative amount of unmet need for each item compared to the item with the most unmet need 100.0 78.6 49.8 43.8 43.8 38.9 34.8 31.1 29.1 29.0 28.8 27.5 24.1 23.4 22.1 21.6 21.4 20.2 18.5 18.1 Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Adult sports programs Adult art, dance, performing arts STEAM Programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Family events Tennis lessons and leagues Youth learn to swim programs Youth summer camp programs Farmers Market Programs for people of all abilities Gymnastics and tumbling programs Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth sports programs Teen Programs Preschool programs/early childhood 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 44 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 209 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Importance Rating for Recreation Programming the rating for the item rated as the most important=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative level of importance for each item compared to the item rated as the most important 100.0 74.0 51.2 30.0 28.0 23.2 21.4 20.7 16.6 14.8 14.6 10.6 10.2 9.7 9.5 8.6 7.3 6.8 6.8 3.3 Farmers Market Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Adult Art classes Family events Youth learn to swim programs Adult art, dance, performing arts Adult sports programs STEAM Programs Youth sports programs Programs for people of all abilities No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Tennis lessons and leagues Youth summer camp programs Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Youth fitness and wellness programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 45Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Programming Based on the Priority Investment Rating 174 130 124 80 65 64 57 56 52 45 41 39 38 37 35 28 28 27 26 25 Adult fitness and wellness programs Nature programs Farmers Market Adult Art classes Adult art, dance, performing arts Adult sports programs Family events STEAM Programs Youth learn to swim programs No school day activities Youth outdoor skills programs Tennis lessons and leagues Programs for people of all abilities Youth summer camp programs Youth sports programs Youth fitness and wellness programs Youth art, dance, performing arts Preschool programs/early childhood Teen Programs Gymnastics and tumbling programs 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (50‐99) Low Priority (0‐50) High Priority (100+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 46 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 210 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Unmet Needs Rating for Outdoor Pool Amenities the rating for the item with the most unmet need=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative amount of unmet need for each item compared to the item with the most unmet need 100.0 86.0 78.9 75.4 66.6 65.7 63.1 56.1 51.2 48.6 43.8 38.3 37.1 35.2 34.0 28.1 19.6 Shade areas Lazy river Active water features Water slides Deck chairs Zero‐depth/beach entry Adult deck Concessions and concession area Wave pool/surf simulation Open recreational swimming area Toddler features Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Water sports Lap lanes Splash pad/sprayground Deep water (7+ feet) Diving boards 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 47Importance Rating for Outdoor Pool Amenities the rating for the item rated as the most important=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative level of importance for each item compared to the item rated as the most important 100.0 92.0 87.1 85.5 75.9 66.7 52.2 52.2 48.6 48.2 41.0 40.6 39.4 32.5 32.1 19.7 12.9 Lap lanes Shade areas Deck chairs Open recreational swimming area Lazy river Adult deck Water slides Zero‐depth/beach entry Deep water (7+ feet) Active water features Concessions and concession area Toddler features Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Splash pad/sprayground Wave pool/surf simulation Diving boards Water sports 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 48 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 211 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Top Priorities for Investment for Outdoor Pool Amenities Based on the Priority Investment Rating 192 162 154 135 134 130 128 127 118 97 84 83 78 77 67 50 39 Shade areas Lazy river Deck chairs Lap lanes Open recreational swimming area Adult deck Water slides Active water features Zero‐depth/beach entry Concessions and concession area Toddler features Wave pool/surf simulation Shallow water (2‐4 feet) Deep water (7+ feet) Splash pad/sprayground Water sports Diving boards 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (75‐149) Low Priority (0‐74) High Priority (150+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 49Unmet Needs Rating for Pool Programs the rating for the item with the most unmet need=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative amount of unmet need for each item compared to the item with the most unmet need 100.0 85.1 76.6 68.4 63.1 43.4 21.7 18.8 Water fitness classes/water aerobics Senior aquatic programs Swim lessons Lap swimming Family Open Swim Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 50 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 212 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Importance Rating for Pool Programs the rating for the item rated as the most important=100 the rating of all other items reflects the relative level of importance for each item compared to the item rated as the most important 100.0 90.3 80.4 75.8 73.1 25.7 10.3 3.6 Lap swimming Water fitness classes/water aerobics Swim lessons Family Open Swim Senior aquatic programs Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 51 Top Priorities for Investment for Pool Programs Based on the Priority Investment Rating 190 168 158 157 139 69 32 22 Water fitness classes/water aerobics Lap swimming Senior aquatic programs Swim lessons Family Open Swim Special aquatic events Swim team Dive team/diving programs 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Medium Priority (75‐149) Low Priority (0‐74) High Priority (150+) City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 52 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 213 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Section 3 Tabular Data City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 53 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Section 3 Tabular Data City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 53 214 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q1. Please indicate how important you think it is for Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for each of the following purposes. Rate the importance of each item on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Very Important," and 1 means "Not at all Important." (N=450) Not at all Very important Important Neutral Not important important Not Provided Q1‐1. Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health 76.2% 18.0% 3.3% 0.7% 1.3% 0.4% Q1‐2. Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs 54.0% 33.8% 8.9% 1.6% 0.9% 0.9% Q1‐3. Contribute to community's economy (e.g., offering activities that draw visitors from around the community, offering opportunities to build life/employment skills, enhancing real estate values, etc.) 36.7% 37.6% 18.4% 4.9% 1.1% 1.3% Q1‐4. Promote appreciation & preservation of cultural & historical heritage of the community 33.3% 40.4% 17.6% 6.0% 1.8% 0.9% Q1‐5. Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities 48.0% 36.4% 10.7% 2.4% 1.6% 0.9% Q1‐6. Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents 72.0% 22.7% 2.9% 1.1% 0.7% 0.7% Q1‐7. Provide access to local whole foods (e.g., farmers markets, community gardens) 45.8% 35.8% 13.8% 2.2% 1.1% 1.3% Q1‐8. Provide low‐cost recreation skill development classes for youth (e. g., swimming lessons, basic sports skills, basic recreation skills, etc.) 67.1% 24.7% 4.7% 1.1% 1.6% 0.9% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 54 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 215 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q1. Please indicate how important you think it is for Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for each of the following purposes. Rate the importance of each item on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Very Important," and 1 means "Not at all Important." (without "not provided") (N=450) Not at all Very important Important Neutral Not important important Q1‐1. Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health 76.6% 18.1% 3.3% 0.7% 1.3% Q1‐2. Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs 54.5% 34.1% 9.0% 1.6% 0.9% Q1‐3. Contribute to community's economy (e.g., offering activities that draw visitors from around the community, offering opportunities to build life/ employment skills, enhancing real estate values, etc.) 37.2% 38.1% 18.7% 5.0% 1.1% Q1‐4. Promote appreciation & preservation of cultural & historical heritage of the community 33.6% 40.8% 17.7% 6.1% 1.8% Q1‐5. Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities 48.4% 36.8% 10.8% 2.5% 1.6% Q1‐6. Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents 72.5% 22.8% 2.9% 1.1% 0.7% Q1‐7. Provide access to local whole foods (e.g., farmers markets, community gardens) 46.4% 36.3% 14.0% 2.3% 1.1% Q1‐8. Provide low‐cost recreation skill development classes for youth (e.g., swimming lessons, basic sports skills, basic recreation skills, etc.) 67.7% 24.9% 4.7% 1.1% 1.6% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 55 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 216 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q2. Please indicate if you or any member of your household have used or visited each of the recreation facilities listed below. (N=450) Yes No Q2‐1. Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 60.2% 39.8% Q2‐2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 70.4% 29.6% Q2‐3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 59.1% 40.9% Q2‐4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 47.8% 52.2% Q2‐5. City Park Pool 61.1% 38.9% Q2‐6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 45.1% 54.9% Q2‐7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 37.6% 62.4% Q2‐8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 28.0% 72.0% Q2‐9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 29.8% 70.2% Q2‐10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 9.8% 90.2% Q2‐11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 10.0% 90.0% Q2‐12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 43.1% 56.9% Q2‐13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 22.2% 77.8% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 56 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 217 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q2. If "Yes," please rate the overall quality of the facility. (N=405) Excellent Good Fair Poor Not provided Q2‐1. Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 23.2% 59.8% 11.4% 1.8% 3.7% Q2‐2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 14.2% 52.1% 27.4% 2.8% 3.5% Q2‐3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 27.4% 57.5% 10.2% 1.1% 3.8% Q2‐4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 17.7% 50.2% 27.0% 0.9% 4.2% Q2‐5. City Park Pool 24.4% 49.1% 21.1% 1.8% 3.6% Q2‐6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 51.2% 42.9% 2.5% 1.0% 2.5% Q2‐7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/ Happy Hollow Park) 34.3% 48.5% 10.1% 3.0% 4.1% Q2‐8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 51.6% 38.1% 4.8% 0.8% 4.8% Q2‐9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 10.4% 50.7% 30.6% 5.2% 3.0% Q2‐10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 22.7% 43.2% 22.7% 6.8% 4.5% Q2‐11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 28.9% 46.7% 17.8% 2.2% 4.4% Q2‐12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 39.2% 44.3% 10.3% 1.0% 5.2% Q2‐13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 31.0% 57.0% 7.0% 1.0% 4.0% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 57 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 218 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q2. If "Yes," please rate the overall quality of the facility. (without "not provided") (N=405) Excellent Good Fair Poor Q2‐1. Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 24.1% 62.1% 11.9% 1.9% Q2‐2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 14.7% 53.9% 28.4% 2.9% Q2‐3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 28.5% 59.8% 10.5% 1.2% Q2‐4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 18.4% 52.4% 28.2% 1.0% Q2‐5. City Park Pool 25.3% 50.9% 21.9% 1.9% Q2‐6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 52.5% 43.9% 2.5% 1.0% Q2‐7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 35.8% 50.6% 10.5% 3.1% Q2‐8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 54.2% 40.0% 5.0% 0.8% Q2‐9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 10.8% 52.3% 31.5% 5.4% Q2‐10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 23.8% 45.2% 23.8% 7.1% Q2‐11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 30.2% 48.8% 18.6% 2.3% Q2‐12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 41.3% 46.7% 10.9% 1.1% Q2‐13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 32.3% 59.4% 7.3% 1.0% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 58 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 219 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. Top choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 55 12.2 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 36 8.0 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 68 15.1 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 20 4.4 % City Park Pool 53 11.8 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 18 4.0 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 15 3.3 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 3 0.7 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 11 2.4 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 11 2.4 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 1 0.2 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 50 11.1 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 25 5.6 % None chosen 84 18.7 % Total 450 100.0 % Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. 2nd choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 38 8.4 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 49 10.9 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 48 10.7 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 28 6.2 % City Park Pool 45 10.0 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 32 7.1 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 20 4.4 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 16 3.6 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 17 3.8 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 7 1.6 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 5 1.1 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 27 6.0 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 17 3.8 % None chosen 101 22.4 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 59 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 220 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. 3rd choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 33 7.3 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 39 8.7 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 22 4.9 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 32 7.1 % City Park Pool 45 10.0 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 21 4.7 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 13 2.9 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 18 4.0 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 19 4.2 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 7 1.6 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 9 2.0 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 38 8.4 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 25 5.6 % None chosen 129 28.7 % Total 450 100.0 % SUM OF THE TOP THREE CHOICES Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 3) Sum of the top three choices Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center‐Scanlon Gym 126 28.0 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 124 27.6 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 138 30.7 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 80 17.8 % City Park Pool 143 31.8 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 71 15.8 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 48 10.7 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 37 8.2 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 47 10.4 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 25 5.6 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 15 3.3 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 115 25.6 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 67 14.9 % None chosen 84 18.7 % Total 1120 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 60 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 221 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q4. Recreation Center Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation center amenity listed below. (N=450) Yes No Q4‐1. Arts & crafts classroom 29.8% 70.2% Q4‐2. Climbing walls 20.2% 79.8% Q4‐3. Community kitchen 8.4% 91.6% Q4‐4. Dance studios 17.6% 82.4% Q4‐5. Fitness classroom 33.1% 66.9% Q4‐6. Fitness room 42.0% 58.0% Q4‐7. Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.)36.4% 63.6% Q4‐8. Gymnastics facilities 10.4% 89.6% Q4‐9. Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts21.3% 78.7% Q4‐10. Indoor playground 22.0% 78.0% Q4‐11. Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 12.2% 87.8% Q4‐12. Indoor walking/jogging track 55.3% 44.7% Q4‐13. Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 19.3% 80.7% Q4‐14. Martial arts studio 9.3% 90.7% Q4‐15. Meditation/yoga studio 31.3% 68.7% Q4‐16. Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 39.6% 60.4% Q4‐17. Photography studio 8.7% 91.3% Q4‐18. Pottery studio 17.1% 82.9% Q4‐19. Roller skating rinks 19.6% 80.4% Q4‐20. Teaching kitchen 14.2% 85.8% Q4‐21. Theater space 17.3% 82.7% Q4‐22. Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 36.2% 63.8% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 61 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 222 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q4. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=395) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4‐1. Arts & crafts classroom 11.6% 26.8% 39.3% 22.3% Q4‐2. Climbing walls 2.7% 9.3% 28.0% 60.0% Q4‐3. Community kitchen 12.5% 12.5% 28.1% 46.9% Q4‐4. Dance studios 11.7% 21.7% 38.3% 28.3% Q4‐5. Fitness classroom 14.9% 34.2% 39.5% 11.4% Q4‐6. Fitness room 14.4% 40.4% 36.3% 8.9% Q4‐7. Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.)25.5% 49.0% 19.3% 6.2% Q4‐8. Gymnastics facilities 15.4% 28.2% 33.3% 23.1% Q4‐9. Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts15.2% 24.1% 35.4% 25.3% Q4‐10. Indoor playground 10.5% 14.0% 31.4% 44.2% Q4‐11. Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 6.1% 20.4% 22.4% 51.0% Q4‐12. Indoor walking/jogging track 9.1% 18.8% 22.1% 50.0% Q4‐13. Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 8.3% 19.4% 30.6% 41.7% Q4‐14. Martial arts studio 8.3% 19.4% 36.1% 36.1% Q4‐15. Meditation/yoga studio 12.1% 18.1% 35.3% 34.5% Q4‐16. Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 27.1% 36.8% 27.1% 9.0% Q4‐17. Photography studio 8.8% 8.8% 38.2% 44.1% Q4‐18. Pottery studio 16.4% 14.8% 34.4% 34.4% Q4‐19. Roller skating rinks 6.1% 14.6% 31.7% 47.6% Q4‐20. Teaching kitchen 9.6% 7.7% 19.2% 63.5% Q4‐21. Theater space 14.3% 19.0% 28.6% 38.1% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 62 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 223 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q4. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=395) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4‐22. Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 18.2% 26.3% 43.1% 12.4% Q4‐23. Other 11.8% 35.3% 5.9% 47.1% Q4‐23. Other Q4‐23. Other Number Percent Swimming 1 5.6 % Outdoor walking paths 1 5.6 % Walking, sidewalks 1 5.6 % Outdoor swimming pool 1 5.6 % Outdoor sand volleyball 1 5.6 % More dog trails 1 5.6 % Hiking trails 1 5.6 % Ice Skating Rink (outdoor‐Pavillion type) 1 5.6 % Meeting rooms for clubs open in the evening 1 5.6 % An adventure pool with a zero depth end and a water slide 1 5.6 % Pool 1 5.6 % PUMP TRACK 1 5.6 % Disc golf 1 5.6 % Pool for lap swimming 1 5.6 % Playground area, splash pad 1 5.6 % Tennis courts 1 5.6 % Zoom programs 1 5.6 % Outdoor basketball 1 5.6 % Total 18 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 63 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 224 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. Top choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 25 5.6 % Climbing walls 11 2.4 % Community kitchen 5 1.1 % Dance studios 5 1.1 % Fitness classroom 11 2.4 % Fitness room 28 6.2 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 46 10.2 % Gymnastics facilities 5 1.1 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 20 4.4 % Indoor playground 23 5.1 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 7 1.6 % Indoor walking/jogging track 77 17.1 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 8 1.8 % Martial arts studio 2 0.4 % Meditation/yoga studio 13 2.9 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 22 4.9 % Photography studio 2 0.4 % Pottery studio 5 1.1 % Roller skating rinks 7 1.6 % Teaching kitchen 4 0.9 % Theater space 4 0.9 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 19 4.2 % Other 14 3.1 % None chosen 87 19.3 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 64 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 225 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 2nd choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 24 5.3 % Climbing walls 7 1.6 % Community kitchen 3 0.7 % Dance studios 6 1.3 % Fitness classroom 22 4.9 % Fitness room 28 6.2 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 27 6.0 % Gymnastics facilities 3 0.7 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 22 4.9 % Indoor playground 13 2.9 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 9 2.0 % Indoor walking/jogging track 49 10.9 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 9 2.0 % Martial arts studio 3 0.7 % Meditation/yoga studio 22 4.9 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 21 4.7 % Photography studio 2 0.4 % Pottery studio 11 2.4 % Roller skating rinks 6 1.3 % Teaching kitchen 10 2.2 % Theater space 3 0.7 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 28 6.2 % Other 4 0.9 % None chosen 118 26.2 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 65 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 226 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 3rd choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 11 2.4 % Climbing walls 7 1.6 % Community kitchen 2 0.4 % Dance studios 7 1.6 % Fitness classroom 13 2.9 % Fitness room 22 4.9 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 16 3.6 % Gymnastics facilities 4 0.9 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 13 2.9 % Indoor playground 14 3.1 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 7 1.6 % Indoor walking/jogging track 49 10.9 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 13 2.9 % Martial arts studio 2 0.4 % Meditation/yoga studio 20 4.4 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 19 4.2 % Photography studio 6 1.3 % Pottery studio 7 1.6 % Roller skating rinks 16 3.6 % Teaching kitchen 8 1.8 % Theater space 8 1.8 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 32 7.1 % Other 1 0.2 % None chosen 153 34.0 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 66 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 227 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 4th choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 25 5.6 % Climbing walls 7 1.6 % Community kitchen 5 1.1 % Dance studios 12 2.7 % Fitness classroom 10 2.2 % Fitness room 12 2.7 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 12 2.7 % Gymnastics facilities 4 0.9 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 7 1.6 % Indoor playground 13 2.9 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 4 0.9 % Indoor walking/jogging track 22 4.9 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 14 3.1 % Martial arts studio 1 0.2 % Meditation/yoga studio 20 4.4 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 12 2.7 % Photography studio 3 0.7 % Pottery studio 9 2.0 % Roller skating rinks 14 3.1 % Teaching kitchen 9 2.0 % Theater space 11 2.4 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 24 5.3 % Other 4 0.9 % None chosen 196 43.6 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 67 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 228 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? (top 4) Sum of the top four choices Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 85 18.9 % Climbing walls 32 7.1 % Community kitchen 15 3.3 % Dance studios 30 6.7 % Fitness classroom 56 12.4 % Fitness room 90 20.0 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 101 22.4 % Gymnastics facilities 16 3.6 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 62 13.8 % Indoor playground 63 14.0 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 27 6.0 % Indoor walking/jogging track 197 43.8 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 44 9.8 % Martial arts studio 8 1.8 % Meditation/yoga studio 75 16.7 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 74 16.4 % Photography studio 13 2.9 % Pottery studio 32 7.1 % Roller skating rinks 43 9.6 % Teaching kitchen 31 6.9 % Theater space 26 5.8 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 103 22.9 % Other 23 5.1 % None chosen 87 19.3 % Total 1333 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 68 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 229 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q6. Recreation Programming Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation program listed below. (N=450) Yes No Q6‐1. Adult art, dance, performing arts 21.6% 78.4% Q6‐2. Adult fitness & wellness programs 57.1% 42.9% Q6‐3. Adult sports programs 22.2% 77.8% Q6‐4. Adult Art classes 26.2% 73.8% Q6‐5. Family events 24.4% 75.6% Q6‐6. Farmers Market 74.4% 25.6% Q6‐7. Gymnastics & tumbling programs 9.6% 90.4% Q6‐8. Nature programs 42.9% 57.1% Q6‐9. No school day activities 17.8% 82.2% Q6‐10. Preschool programs/early childhood 11.3% 88.7% Q6‐11. Programs for people of all abilities (all‐ inclusive programming) 15.6% 84.4% Q6‐12. STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 19.3% 80.7% Q6‐13. Teen programs 10.7% 89.3% Q6‐14. Tennis lessons & leagues 15.6% 84.4% Q6‐15. Youth art, dance, performing arts 12.7% 87.3% Q6‐16. Youth fitness & wellness programs 12.9% 87.1% Q6‐17. Youth learn to swim programs 23.1% 76.9% Q6‐18. Youth outdoor skills programs 16.4% 83.6% Q6‐19. Youth sports programs 19.1% 80.9% Q6‐20. Youth summer camp programs 18.4% 81.6% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 69 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 230 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q6. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=402) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q6‐1. Adult art, dance, performing arts 6.8% 20.5% 45.2% 27.4% Q6‐2. Adult fitness & wellness programs 6.9% 30.4% 47.5% 15.2% Q6‐3. Adult sports programs 6.1% 23.2% 45.1% 25.6% Q6‐4. Adult Art classes 10.6% 21.3% 43.6% 24.5% Q6‐5. Family events 20.2% 37.1% 36.0% 6.7% Q6‐6. Farmers Market 54.1% 34.4% 9.2% 2.4% Q6‐7. Gymnastics & tumbling programs 2.9% 14.7% 61.8% 20.6% Q6‐8. Nature programs 8.3% 26.1% 47.1% 18.5% Q6‐9. No school day activities 8.6% 21.4% 41.4% 28.6% Q6‐10. Preschool programs/early childhood 14.9% 27.7% 34.0% 23.4% Q6‐11. Programs for people of all abilities (all‐ inclusive programming) 11.5% 34.6% 42.3% 11.5% Q6‐12. STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 6.9% 20.8% 50.0% 22.2% Q6‐13. Teen programs 9.5% 28.6% 40.5% 21.4% Q6‐14. Tennis lessons & leagues 8.8% 24.6% 36.8% 29.8% Q6‐15. Youth art, dance, performing arts 8.3% 31.3% 39.6% 20.8% Q6‐16. Youth fitness & wellness programs 14.0% 26.0% 48.0% 12.0% Q6‐17. Youth learn to swim programs 17.0% 38.3% 28.7% 16.0% Q6‐18. Youth outdoor skills programs 9.7% 22.6% 46.8% 21.0% Q6‐19. Youth sports programs 17.6% 44.6% 29.7% 8.1% Q6‐20. Youth summer camp programs 16.9% 29.6% 43.7% 9.9% Q6‐21. Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 70 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 231 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q6‐21. Other Q6‐21. Other Number Percent Biking 1 14.3 % Kinetics classes 1 14.3 % Youth and adult recreational ice skating 1 14.3 % Astronomy program 1 14.3 % TWEEN PROGRAMS 1 14.3 % TODDLER PROGRAMS 1 14.3 % Pickleball league 1 14.3 % Total 7 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 71 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 232 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. Top choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 11 2.4 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 78 17.3 % Adult sports programs 9 2.0 % Adult Art classes 10 2.2 % Family events 15 3.3 % Farmers Market 129 28.7 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 3 0.7 % Nature programs 25 5.6 % No school day activities 10 2.2 % Preschool programs/early childhood 7 1.6 % Programs for people of all abilities (all‐inclusive programming) 10 2.2 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 1 0.2 % Teen programs 1 0.2 % Tennis lessons & leagues 5 1.1 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 2 0.4 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 2 0.4 % Youth learn to swim programs 17 3.8 % Youth outdoor skills programs 1 0.2 % Youth sports programs 13 2.9 % Youth summer camp programs 3 0.7 % Other 3 0.7 % None chosen 95 21.1 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 72 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 233 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 2nd choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 14 3.1 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 48 10.7 % Adult sports programs 28 6.2 % Adult Art classes 24 5.3 % Family events 20 4.4 % Farmers Market 57 12.7 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 2 0.4 % Nature programs 40 8.9 % No school day activities 5 1.1 % Preschool programs/early childhood 5 1.1 % Programs for people of all abilities (all‐inclusive programming) 4 0.9 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 13 2.9 % Teen programs 5 1.1 % Tennis lessons & leagues 7 1.6 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 3 0.7 % Youth learn to swim programs 13 2.9 % Youth outdoor skills programs 9 2.0 % Youth sports programs 9 2.0 % Youth summer camp programs 7 1.6 % Other 3 0.7 % None chosen 134 29.8 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 73 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 234 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 3rd choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 13 2.9 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 34 7.6 % Adult sports programs 10 2.2 % Adult Art classes 15 3.3 % Family events 17 3.8 % Farmers Market 41 9.1 % Nature programs 41 9.1 % No school day activities 7 1.6 % Preschool programs/early childhood 6 1.3 % Programs for people of all abilities (all‐inclusive programming) 10 2.2 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 14 3.1 % Teen programs 4 0.9 % Tennis lessons & leagues 6 1.3 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 6 1.3 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 9 2.0 % Youth learn to swim programs 16 3.6 % Youth outdoor skills programs 7 1.6 % Youth sports programs 7 1.6 % Youth summer camp programs 9 2.0 % None chosen 178 39.6 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 74 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 235 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 4th choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 15 3.3 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 22 4.9 % Adult sports programs 4 0.9 % Adult Art classes 25 5.6 % Family events 17 3.8 % Farmers Market 19 4.2 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 3 0.7 % Nature programs 20 4.4 % No school day activities 4 0.9 % Preschool programs/early childhood 3 0.7 % Programs for people of all abilities (all‐inclusive programming) 12 2.7 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 13 2.9 % Teen programs 8 1.8 % Tennis lessons & leagues 6 1.3 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 6 1.3 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 6 1.3 % Youth learn to swim programs 11 2.4 % Youth outdoor skills programs 8 1.8 % Youth sports programs 7 1.6 % Youth summer camp programs 4 0.9 % Other 3 0.7 % None chosen 234 52.0 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 75 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 236 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? (top 4) Sum of the top four choices Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 53 11.8 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 182 40.4 % Adult sports programs 51 11.3 % Adult Art classes 74 16.4 % Family events 69 15.3 % Farmers Market 246 54.7 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 8 1.8 % Nature programs 126 28.0 % No school day activities 26 5.8 % Preschool programs/early childhood 21 4.7 % Programs for people of all abilities (all‐inclusive programming) 36 8.0 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 41 9.1 % Teen programs 18 4.0 % Tennis lessons & leagues 24 5.3 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 17 3.8 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 17 3.8 % Youth learn to swim programs 57 12.7 % Youth outdoor skills programs 25 5.6 % Youth sports programs 36 8.0 % Youth summer camp programs 23 5.1 % Other 9 2.0 % None chosen 95 21.1 % Total 1254 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 76 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 237 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q8. CHECK ALL of the reasons you and the members of your household do not use Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events more often. Number Percent Classes are full 68 15.1 % Facilities are not well maintained 50 11.1 % Facilities do not have right equipment 51 11.3 % Facility too far to walk/bike 57 12.7 % Fees are too high 43 9.6 % Lack of quality programs 58 12.9 % Lack of transportation 8 1.8 % Not interested 81 18.0 % Operating hours not convenient 57 12.7 % Poor customer service from staff 13 2.9 % Program or facility not offered 89 19.8 % Program times are not convenient 78 17.3 % Registration is difficult 23 5.1 % Too busy 114 25.3 % Too far from residence 57 12.7 % Use services of other agencies 100 22.2 % Other 45 10.0 % Total 992 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 77 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 238 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q9. Outdoor Pool Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of outdoor pool amenity listed below. (N=450) Yes No Q9‐1. Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 28.9% 71.1% Q9‐2. Adult deck 32.2% 67.8% Q9‐3. Concessions & concession area 30.2% 69.8% Q9‐4. Deck chairs 42.7% 57.3% Q9‐5. Deep water (7+ feet) 32.0% 68.0% Q9‐6. Diving boards 24.9% 75.1% Q9‐7. Lap lanes 40.0% 60.0% Q9‐8. Lazy river 32.9% 67.1% Q9‐9. Open recreational swimming area 44.4% 55.6% Q9‐10. Shade areas 46.0% 54.0% Q9‐11. Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 30.0% 70.0% Q9‐12. Splash pad/sprayground 22.7% 77.3% Q9‐13. Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 19.1% 80.9% Q9‐14. Water slides 28.7% 71.3% Q9‐15. Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 14.9% 85.1% Q9‐16. Wave pool/surf simulation 19.1% 80.9% Q9‐17. Zero‐depth/beach entry 27.1% 72.9% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 78 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 239 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q9. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=329) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q9‐1. Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 2.7% 5.3% 24.8% 67.3% Q9‐2. Adult deck 11.9% 22.0% 30.5% 35.6% Q9‐3. Concessions & concession area 7.8% 29.6% 40.0% 22.6% Q9‐4. Deck chairs 11.9% 35.6% 36.3% 16.3% Q9‐5. Deep water (7+ feet) 30.4% 40.0% 24.0% 5.6% Q9‐6. Diving boards 35.7% 37.8% 19.4% 7.1% Q9‐7. Lap lanes 18.7% 51.6% 24.5% 5.2% Q9‐8. Lazy river 5.6% 6.3% 8.7% 79.4% Q9‐9. Open recreational swimming area 23.4% 39.8% 27.5% 9.4% Q9‐10. Shade areas 8.5% 18.2% 44.9% 28.4% Q9‐11. Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 22.8% 34.2% 30.7% 12.3% Q9‐12. Splash pad/sprayground 12.6% 36.8% 28.7% 21.8% Q9‐13. Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 6.7% 16.0% 36.0% 41.3% Q9‐14. Water slides 3.5% 7.9% 24.6% 64.0% Q9‐15. Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 4.8% 11.3% 27.4% 56.5% Q9‐16. Wave pool/surf simulation 2.7% 6.8% 8.2% 82.2% Q9‐17. Zero‐depth/beach entry 7.1% 11.1% 29.3% 52.5% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 79 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 240 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. Top choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 20 4.4 % Adult deck 31 6.9 % Concessions & concession area 5 1.1 % Deck chairs 19 4.2 % Deep water (7+ feet) 13 2.9 % Diving boards 3 0.7 % Lap lanes 64 14.2 % Lazy river 25 5.6 % Open recreational swimming area 30 6.7 % Shade areas 21 4.7 % Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 9 2.0 % Splash pad/sprayground 7 1.6 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 13 2.9 % Water slides 11 2.4 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 2 0.4 % Wave pool/surf simulation 5 1.1 % Zero‐depth/beach entry 15 3.3 % None chosen 157 34.9 % Total 450 100.0 % Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 2nd choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 13 2.9 % Adult deck 19 4.2 % Concessions & concession area 12 2.7 % Deck chairs 39 8.7 % Deep water (7+ feet) 20 4.4 % Diving boards 5 1.1 % Lap lanes 23 5.1 % Lazy river 18 4.0 % Open recreational swimming area 24 5.3 % Shade areas 21 4.7 % Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 11 2.4 % Splash pad/sprayground 13 2.9 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 13 2.9 % Water slides 10 2.2 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 2 0.4 % Wave pool/surf simulation 4 0.9 % Zero‐depth/beach entry 22 4.9 % None chosen 181 40.2 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 80 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 241 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 3rd choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 12 2.7 % Adult deck 15 3.3 % Concessions & concession area 15 3.3 % Deck chairs 20 4.4 % Deep water (7+ feet) 11 2.4 % Diving boards 8 1.8 % Lap lanes 13 2.9 % Lazy river 29 6.4 % Open recreational swimming area 20 4.4 % Shade areas 38 8.4 % Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 12 2.7 % Splash pad/sprayground 8 1.8 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 12 2.7 % Water slides 18 4.0 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 5 1.1 % Wave pool/surf simulation 8 1.8 % Zero‐depth/beach entry 11 2.4 % None chosen 195 43.3 % Total 450 100.0 % Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 4th choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 9 2.0 % Adult deck 10 2.2 % Concessions & concession area 14 3.1 % Deck chairs 20 4.4 % Deep water (7+ feet) 11 2.4 % Diving boards 6 1.3 % Lap lanes 12 2.7 % Lazy river 13 2.9 % Open recreational swimming area 22 4.9 % Shade areas 23 5.1 % Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 12 2.7 % Splash pad/sprayground 8 1.8 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 7 1.6 % Water slides 20 4.4 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 6 1.3 % Wave pool/surf simulation 19 4.2 % Zero‐depth/beach entry 11 2.4 % None chosen 227 50.4 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 81 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 242 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs SUM OF THE TOP FOUR CHOICES Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 4) Sum of the top four choices Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 54 12.0 % Adult deck 75 16.7 % Concessions & concession area 46 10.2 % Deck chairs 98 21.8 % Deep water (7+ feet) 55 12.2 % Diving boards 22 4.9 % Lap lanes 112 24.9 % Lazy river 85 18.9 % Open recreational swimming area 96 21.3 % Shade areas 103 22.9 % Shallow water (2‐4 feet) 44 9.8 % Splash pad/sprayground 36 8.0 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 45 10.0 % Water slides 59 13.1 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 15 3.3 % Wave pool/surf simulation 36 8.0 % Zero‐depth/beach entry 59 13.1 % None chosen 157 34.9 % Total 1197 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 82 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 243 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q11. Pool Program Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of pool program listed below. (N=450) Yes No Q11‐1. Dive team/diving programs 4.9% 95.1% Q11‐2. Lap swimming 39.6% 60.4% Q11‐3. Senior aquatic programs 32.4% 67.6% Q11‐4. Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 13.3% 86.7% Q11‐5. Swim lessons 30.2% 69.8% Q11‐6. Swim team 7.3% 92.7% Q11‐7. Water fitness classes/water aerobics 37.3% 62.7% Q11‐8. Family Open Swim 32.2% 67.8% Q11. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=331) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q11‐1. Dive team/diving programs 5.3% 5.3% 26.3% 63.2% Q11‐2. Lap swimming 15.0% 44.9% 32.7% 7.5% Q11‐3. Senior aquatic programs 8.3% 30.6% 40.7% 20.4% Q11‐4. Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 6.0% 18.0% 40.0% 36.0% Q11‐5. Swim lessons 12.0% 29.1% 39.3% 19.7% Q11‐6. Swim team 11.5% 19.2% 34.6% 34.6% Q11‐7. Water fitness classes/water aerobics 9.0% 28.6% 42.1% 20.3% Q11‐8. Family Open Swim 19.2% 35.2% 34.4% 11.2% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 83 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 244 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. Top choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 2 0.4 % Lap swimming 86 19.1 % Senior aquatic programs 56 12.4 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 7 1.6 % Swim lessons 63 14.0 % Swim team 4 0.9 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 33 7.3 % Family Open Swim 40 8.9 % None chosen 159 35.3 % Total 450 100.0 % Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. 2nd choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 2 0.4 % Lap swimming 32 7.1 % Senior aquatic programs 34 7.6 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 13 2.9 % Swim lessons 38 8.4 % Swim team 7 1.6 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 64 14.2 % Family Open Swim 44 9.8 % None chosen 216 48.0 % Total 450 100.0 % Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. 3rd choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 2 0.4 % Lap swimming 31 6.9 % Senior aquatic programs 19 4.2 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 18 4.0 % Swim lessons 19 4.2 % Swim team 4 0.9 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 38 8.4 % Family Open Swim 29 6.4 % None chosen 290 64.4 % Total 450 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 84 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 245 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City SUM OF THE TOP THREE CHOICES Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 3) Sum of the top three choices Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 6 1.3 % Lap swimming 149 33.1 % Senior aquatic programs 109 24.2 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 38 8.4 % Swim lessons 120 26.7 % Swim team 15 3.3 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 135 30.0 % Family Open Swim 113 25.1 % None chosen 159 35.3 % Total 844 City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 85 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 246 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q13. City Park Pool celebrated its 72nd anniversary in 2021. It is time to talk about the pool's future. If the cost were the same, would you... Number Percent Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now 78 17.3 % Design a new pool layout with new amenities 302 67.1 % Not provided 70 15.6 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q13. City Park Pool celebrated its 72nd anniversary in 2021. It is time to talk about the pool's future. If the cost were the same, would you... (without "not provided") Number Percent Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now 78 20.5 % Design a new pool layout with new amenities 302 79.5 % Total 380 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 86 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 247 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (N=450) Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Not provided Q14‐1. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race 0.0% 2.9% 12.0% 19.6% 50.0% 15.6% Q14‐2. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual preference 0.0% 0.9% 10.9% 20.7% 51.3% 16.2% Q14‐3. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity 0.2% 0.7% 11.8% 19.8% 51.8% 15.8% Q14‐4. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs 0.0% 0.4% 11.1% 19.1% 53.6% 15.8% Q14‐5. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin 0.0% 0.9% 11.1% 18.7% 52.9% 16.4% Q14‐6. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid 0.4% 4.7% 10.9% 15.6% 45.1% 23.3% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 87 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 248 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (N=450) Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Not provided Q14‐7. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability 0.2% 1.6% 14.4% 14.4% 45.6% 23.8% Q14‐8. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability 0.2% 1.8% 14.4% 13.8% 45.6% 24.2% Q14‐9. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability 0.4% 5.1% 13.6% 13.3% 43.8% 23.8% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 88 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 249 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (without "not provided") (N=450) Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Q14‐1. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race 0.0% 3.4% 14.2% 23.2% 59.2% Q14‐2. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual preference 0.0% 1.1% 13.0% 24.7% 61.3% Q14‐3. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity 0.3% 0.8% 14.0% 23.5% 61.5% Q14‐4. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs 0.0% 0.5% 13.2% 22.7% 63.6% Q14‐5. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin 0.0% 1.1% 13.3% 22.3% 63.3% Q14‐6. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid 0.6% 6.1% 14.2% 20.3% 58.8% Q14‐7. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability 0.3% 2.0% 19.0% 19.0% 59.8% Q14‐8. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability 0.3% 2.3% 19.1% 18.2% 60.1% Q14‐9. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability 0.6% 6.7% 17.8% 17.5% 57.4% City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 89 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 250 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? Number Percent Very supportive 149 33.1 % Supportive 125 27.8 % Neutral 90 20.0 % Not supportive 31 6.9 % Not at all supportive 23 5.1 % Don't know 32 7.1 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “DON’T KNOW” RESPONSES Q15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? (without "don't know") Number Percent Very supportive 149 35.6 % Supportive 125 29.9 % Neutral 90 21.5 % Not supportive 31 7.4 % Not at all supportive 23 5.5 % Total 418 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 90 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 251 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q15a. Please check the top TWO reasons why you are not supportive of the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department making improvements to outdoor sports facilities. Number Percent I need more information before I can respond 22 25.6 % I don't believe these types of projects bring attract & retain sports tournaments 3 3.5 % Other City services should be a higher priority 36 41.9 % This project does not serve the needs of all City residents 23 26.7 % My family doesn't play traditional sports 5 5.8 % Other recreation opportunities are more important 10 11.6 % I believe the focus should be recreational skill development, not tournaments 14 16.3 % Other 4 4.7 % Total 117 Q16. Special Events. Iowa City has many large event opportunities throughout the year hosted by non‐profits and the University of Iowa. Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to also host events? Number Percent Yes 193 42.9 % No 164 36.4 % Not provided 93 20.7 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q16. Special Events. Iowa City has many large event opportunities throughout the year hosted by non‐profits and the University of Iowa. Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to also host events? (without "not provided") Number Percent Yes 193 54.1 % No 164 45.9 % Total 357 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 91 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 252 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? Number Percent Very important 209 46.4 % Important 141 31.3 % Neutral 55 12.2 % Not important 9 2.0 % Not at all important 12 2.7 % Don't know 24 5.3 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “DON’T KNOW” RESPONSES Q17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? (without "don't know") Number Percent Very important 209 49.1 % Important 141 33.1 % Neutral 55 12.9 % Not important 9 2.1 % Not at all important 12 2.8 % Total 426 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 92 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 253 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q18. Counting yourself, how many people in your household are... Number Percent Under 5 years 66 5.6% 5‐9 years 70 6.0% 10‐14 years 71 6.1% 15‐19 years 70 6.0% 20‐24 years 47 4.0% 25‐34 years 106 9.1% 35‐44 years 146 12.5% 45‐54 years 158 13.5% 55‐64 years 189 16.2% 65‐74 years 160 13.7% 75‐84 years 73 6.2% 85+ years 13 1.1% Total 1169 100.0% Q19. What is your age? Number Percent 18‐34 81 18.0 % 35‐44 84 18.7 % 45‐54 87 19.3 % 55‐64 91 20.2 % 65‐74 65 14.4 % 75+ 35 7.8 % Not provided 7 1.6 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q19. What is your age? (without "not provided") Number Percent 18‐34 81 18.3 % 35‐44 84 19.0 % 45‐54 87 19.6 % 55‐64 91 20.5 % 65‐74 65 14.7 % 75+ 35 7.9 % Total 443 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 93 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 254 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q20. How many dogs are in your household? Number Percent 0 233 51.8 % 1 133 29.6 % 2 47 10.4 % 3 13 2.9 % 4+ 4 0.9 % Not provided 20 4.4 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q20. How many dogs are in your household? (without "not provided") Number Percent 0 233 54.2 % 1 133 30.9 % 2 47 10.9 % 3 13 3.0 % 4+ 4 0.9 % Total 430 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 94 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 255 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City? Number Percent 0‐5 49 10.9 % 6‐10 45 10.0 % 11‐15 28 6.2 % 16‐20 35 7.8 % 21‐30 92 20.4 % 31+ 194 43.1 % Not provided 7 1.6 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City? (without "not provided") Number Percent 0‐5 49 11.1 % 6‐10 45 10.2 % 11‐15 28 6.3 % 16‐20 35 7.9 % 21‐30 92 20.8 % 31+ 194 43.8 % Total 443 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 95 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 256 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q22. Your gender: Number Percent Male 220 48.9 % Female 226 50.2 % Prefer to self‐describe 1 0.2 % Not provided 3 0.7 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q22. Your gender: (without "not provided") Number Percent Male 220 49.2 % Female 226 50.6 % Prefer to self‐describe 1 0.2 % Total 447 100.0 % Q22‐3. Self‐describe your gender: Q22‐3. Self‐describe your gender Number Percent Non‐binary 1 100.0 % Total 1 100.0 % Q23. Are you or other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino ancestry? Number Percent Yes 24 5.3 % No 423 94.0 % Not provided 3 0.7 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q23. Are you or other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino ancestry? (without "not provided") Number Percent Yes 24 5.4 % No 423 94.6 % Total 447 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 96 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 257 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q24. Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? Number Percent White 354 78.7 % African American/Black 34 7.6 % Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander 32 7.1 % American Indian/Alaska Native 4 0.9 % Other 7 1.6 % Total 431 Q24‐5. Self‐describe your race/ethnicity?: Number Percent Multi‐race 2 28.6 % Mixed 2 28.6 % Slavic 1 14.3 % More than one 1 14.3 % Mexican 1 14.3 % Total 7 100.0 % Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home? Number Percent Yes 429 95.3 % No 9 2.0 % Not provided 12 2.7 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home? (without "not provided") Number Percent Yes 429 97.9 % No 9 2.1 % Total 438 100.0 % Q25a. What language is the primary language in your home? Number Percent Chinese 5 55.6 % Spanish 2 22.2 % Asian 1 11.1 % Danish 1 11.1 % Total 9 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 97 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 258 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? Number Percent Yes 69 15.3 % No 374 83.1 % Not provided 7 1.6 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? (without "not provided") Number Percent Yes 69 15.6 % No 374 84.4 % Total 443 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 98 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 259 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q26‐1. Please describe the disability: Number Percent Autism 3 5.9 % Mobility 2 3.9 % Mental disability 2 3.9 % Sensory, concentration, intellectual disability 1 2.0 % Mental illness 1 2.0 % Paralyzed from chest down 1 2.0 % severe COPD 1 2.0 % Autistic (2 members) 1 2.0 % Ankle transplant 1 2.0 % Standing and walking for more than a short time are painful 1 2.0 % Spinal stenosis and pain with ambulation 1 2.0 % Transplant 1 2.0 % Intellectual disability 1 2.0 % Mood disorder 1 2.0 % Hearing 1 2.0 % Neurological disease 1 2.0 % PTSD 1 2.0 % Mobility is compromised 1 2.0 % Mobility issues, making movement slow 1 2.0 % Coordination problems due to 2 strokes 1 2.0 % Clubbed feet with one and degenerated knees where walking is very difficult 1 2.0 % Difficulty walking long distances or standing for long time 1 2.0 % Walking 1 2.0 % MS 1 2.0 % Bipolar 1 disorder 1 2.0 % Stroke recovery 1 2.0 % Neuropathy 1 2.0 % BACK PROBLEMS 1 2.0 % WEAK LEGS 1 2.0 % CEREBRAL PALSY 1 2.0 % Walking problem, falls 1 2.0 % Low vision 1 2.0 % Immuno comprismised 1 2.0 % Visually impaired 1 2.0 % Balance, motor skills 1 2.0 % Mobility impaired 1 2.0 % ADHD 1 2.0 % Service connected 1 2.0 % Sleeping and digestive disorders 1 2.0 % Back related disability 1 2.0 % Legs 1 2.0 % Age 1 2.0 % Spinal displasia 1 2.0 % Autism spectrum disorder 1 2.0 % Mental health 1 2.0 % Sensory, autism spectrum 1 2.0 % Wheelchair bound 1 2.0 % Total 51 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 99 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 260 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q27. What is your total annual household income? Number Percent Under $30K 45 10.0 % $30K to $49,999 82 18.2 % $50K to $69,999 65 14.4 % $70K to $89,999 56 12.4 % $90K to $119,999 55 12.2 % $120K to $174,999 44 9.8 % $175K+ 20 4.4 % Not provided 83 18.4 % Total 450 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” RESPONSES Q27. What is your total annual household income? (without "not provided") Number Percent Under $30K 45 12.3 % $30K to $49,999 82 22.3 % $50K to $69,999 65 17.7 % $70K to $89,999 56 15.3 % $90K to $119,999 55 15.0 % $120K to $174,999 44 12.0 % $175K+ 20 5.4 % Total 367 100.0 % City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 100 Appendix B3: Statistically Valid Survey Full Report 261 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Section 4 Survey Instrument City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 101 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Section 4 Survey Instrument City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 101 262 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 220 S. Gilbert Street • Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1632 • 319-356-5100 Reimagine Recreation in Iowa City Dear Select Iowa City Residents, You have been randomly selected to complete this survey to gather information and preferences about Iowa City’s recreation facilities and programs. The survey will take approximately 15‐20 minutes to complete. Data collected will help the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department plan for future recreation opportunities that truly meet the community’s needs and preferences. Participation is voluntary. The survey is anonymous and you will not be contacted for further information. What if I don’t use Iowa City Recreation Services? All community voices are essential. We recognize that not everyone receiving this survey will be a current, active user of recreation facilities and programs but we still really want to hear from you! Please share with us your preferences, potential barriers to participation that you may currently experience and what could make you become an active user. The voices of those not currently participating are just as critical! Please complete and return your survey within the next two weeks. We have selected ETC Institute, an independent consulting company, as our partner to administer this survey. They will compile the data received and present the results to the City of Iowa City. Your responses will remain confidential. Please return your completed survey in the enclosed postage‐paid envelope addressed to ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, KS 66061. If you prefer, you may also complete the survey online at ICPRSurvey.org. Si desea realizar esta encuesta en su idioma preferido, llame al 844‐811‐0411 Si vous souhaitez répondre à ce sondage dans la langue de votre choix, veuillez appeler le 844‐393‐4437 如果您想以您喜欢的语言参加此调查，请致电 844‐872‐2562 ∙ �� ����ﻻا ��ﺮ� � ������ا ����� �����ﺳﻻا اﺬﻫ ءاﺮﺟإ ��� ��ﺮ� ��� ا�إ8190‐247‐844 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Brad Barker, Recreation Superintendent, at 319‐356‐5100 or by email at brad‐barker@iowa‐city.org. You may find information about this project and participate in additional surveys and discussion at the following website: berry.dunn.mysocialpinpoint.com/iowa‐city‐rec‐master‐plan Please take this opportunity to let your voice be heard and help us reimagine recreation for the future! Sincerely, Brad Barker Recreation Superintendent City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 102 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 263 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 2021 Iowa City Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment The City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department would like your input to help determine recreation priorities for our community. This survey will take 10-15 minutes to complete. If you would prefer to complete the survey online please visit ICPRSurvey.org. We greatly appreciate your time! 1. Please indicate how important you think it is for Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for each of the following purposes. Rate the importance of each item on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Very Important," and 1 means "Not at all Important." Purpose Very Important Important Neutral Not Important Not at All Important 1. Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical and mental health 5 4 3 2 1 2. Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs 5 4 3 2 1 3. Contribute to the community's economy (e.g., offering activities that draw visitors from around the community, offering opportunities to build life/employment skills, enhancing real estate values, etc.) 5 4 3 2 1 4. Promote appreciation and preservation of the cultural and historical heritage of the community 5 4 3 2 1 5. Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities 5 4 3 2 1 6. Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents 5 4 3 2 1 7. Provide access to local whole foods (e.g., farmers markets, community gardens) 5 4 3 2 1 8. Provide low-cost recreation skill development classes for youth (e.g., swimming lessons, basic sports skills, basic recreation skills, etc.) 5 4 3 2 1 2. Please indicate if you or any member of your household have used or visited each of the recreation facilities listed below by circling either "Yes" or "No" to the right of each facility. If "Yes," please answer the question to the right of the facility regarding "the overall quality of the facility." Facilities Have you or any member of your household visited? If "Yes," please rate the overall quality of the facility. Excellent Good Fair Poor 01. Mercer Park Recreation Center – Scanlon Gym Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Indoor Pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Indoor Pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. City Park Pool Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Baseball Fields (Mercer Park / City Park / Happy Hollow Park) Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Softball Fields (Napoleon Park) Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. Tennis Courts (Mercer Park / City Park) Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Pickleball Courts (Mercer Park) Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Off Leash Dog Parks (Thornberry / Rita’s Ranch) Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Community Garden Plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park)Yes No 4 3 2 1 3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 2, or circle "NONE."] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ NONE City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 103 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 264 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 4. Recreation Center Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation center amenity listed below by circling either "Yes" or "No" to the right of each recreation center amenity. If "Yes," please answer the question to the right of the recreation center amenity regarding "how well are your needs being met." Type of Recreation Center Amenities Do you have a need for this amenity? If "Yes," how well are your needs met? Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Arts and crafts classroom Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Climbing walls Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Community kitchen Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Dance studios Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Fitness classroom Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Fitness room Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Gymnastics facilities Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Indoor playground Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Indoor walking/jogging track Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Maker's Space (STEAM related tools and equipment) Yes No 4 3 2 1 14. Martial arts studio Yes No 4 3 2 1 15. Meditation/yoga studio Yes No 4 3 2 1 16. Meeting rooms for community groups and classes Yes No 4 3 2 1 17. Photography studio Yes No 4 3 2 1 18. Pottery studio Yes No 4 3 2 1 19. Roller skating rinks Yes No 4 3 2 1 20. Teaching kitchen Yes No 4 3 2 1 21. Theater space Yes No 4 3 2 1 22. Weight room (weight and fitness machines) Yes No 4 3 2 1 23. Other: _______________________________________ Yes No 4 3 2 1 5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 4, or circle "NONE."] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 104 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 265 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 6. Recreation Programming Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation program listed below by circling either "Yes" or "No" to the right of each program type. If "Yes," please answer the question to the right of the program regarding "how well are your needs being met." Type of Recreation Programs Do you have a need for this program? If "Yes," how well are your needs met? Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Adult art, dance, performing arts Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Adult fitness and wellness programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Adult sports programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Adult Art classes Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Family events Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Farmers Market Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Gymnastics and tumbling programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Nature programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. No school day activities Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Preschool programs/early childhood Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. STEAM Programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, and math) Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Teen Programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 14. Tennis lessons and leagues Yes No 4 3 2 1 15. Youth art, dance, performing arts Yes No 4 3 2 1 16. Youth fitness and wellness programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 17. Youth learn to swim programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 18. Youth outdoor skills programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 19. Youth sports programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 20. Youth summer camp programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 21. Other: _______________________________________ Yes No 4 3 2 1 7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 6, or circle "NONE."] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE 8. CHECK ALL of the reasons you and the members of your household do not use Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events more often. ____(01) Classes are full ____(02) Facilities are not well maintained ____(03) Facilities do not have right equipment ____(04) Facility too far to walk/bike ____(05) Fees are too high ____(06) Lack of quality programs ____(07) Lack of transportation ____(08) Not interested ____(09) Operating hours not convenient ____(10) Poor customer service from staff ____(11) Program or facility not offered ____(12) Program times are not convenient ____(13) Registration is difficult ____(14) Too busy ____(15) Too far from residence ____(16) Use services of other agencies ____(17) Other: ______________________________________ City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 105 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 266 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 9. Outdoor Pool Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of outdoor pool amenity listed below by circling either "Yes" or "No" to the right of each type of outdoor pool amenity. If "Yes," please answer the question to the right of the outdoor pool amenity regarding "how well are your needs being met." Type of Outdoor Pool Amenities Do you have a need for this outdoor pool amenity? If "Yes," how well are your needs met? Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Adult deck Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Concessions and concession area Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Deck chairs Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Deep water (7+ feet) Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Diving boards Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Lap lanes Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Lazy river Yes No 4 3 2 1 09. Open recreational swimming area Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Shade areas Yes No 4 3 2 1 11. Shallow water (2-4 feet) Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Splash pad/sprayground Yes No 4 3 2 1 13. Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) Yes No 4 3 2 1 14. Water slides Yes No 4 3 2 1 15. Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) Yes No 4 3 2 1 16. Wave pool/surf simulation Yes No 4 3 2 1 17. Zero-depth/beach entry Yes No 4 3 2 1 10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 9, or circle "NONE."] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 4th: ____ NONE 11.Pool Program Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of pool program listed below by circling either "Yes" or "No" to the right of each type of pool program. If "Yes," please answer the question to the right of the pool program regarding "How well are your needs being met." Type of Pool Programs Do you have a need for this pool program? If "Yes," how well are your needs met? Fully Met Mostly Met Partly Met Not Met 01. Dive team/diving programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 02. Lap swimming Yes No 4 3 2 1 03. Senior aquatic programs Yes No 4 3 2 1 04. Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) Yes No 4 3 2 1 05. Swim lessons Yes No 4 3 2 1 06. Swim team Yes No 4 3 2 1 07. Water fitness classes/water aerobics Yes No 4 3 2 1 08. Family Open Swim Yes No 4 3 2 1 12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? [Write in your answers below using the numbers from the list in Question 11, or circle "NONE."] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ NONE City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 106 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 267 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 13. City Park Pool celebrated its 72 nd anniversary in 2021. It is time to talk about the pool's future. If the cost were the same, would you... [Check only ONE item.] ____(1) Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now ____(2) Design a new pool layout with new amenities 14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." Facility Use Barriers Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 1. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race 5 4 3 2 1 2. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual orientation* 5 4 3 2 1 3. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity 5 4 3 2 1 4. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs 5 4 3 2 1 5. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin 5 4 3 2 1 6. ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid 5 4 3 2 1 7. ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability 5 4 3 2 1 8. ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability 5 4 3 2 1 9. ICPR Facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability 5 4 3 2 1 15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? ____(1) Very supportive ____(2) Supportive ____(3) Neutral ____(4) Not supportive [Skip to Q15a.] ____(5) Not at all supportive [Skip to Q15a.] ____(9) Don't know [Skip to Q15a.] 15a. Please check the top TWO reasons why you are not supportive of the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department making improvements to outdoor sports facilities. ____(1) I need more information before I can respond ____(2) I don't believe these types of projects bring attract and retain sports tournaments ____(3) Other City services should be a higher priority ____(4) This project does not serve the needs of all City residents ____(5) My family doesn't play traditional sports ____(6) Other recreation opportunities are more important ____(7) I believe the focus should be recreational skill development, not tournaments ____(8) Other: _______________________________________________________________________________ 16. Special Events. Iowa City has many large event opportunities throughout the year hosted by non- profits and the University of Iowa. Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to also host events? ____(1) Yes ____(2) No 16a. What type of events do you most prefer? ____________________________________ 16b. What type of characteristics, activities, and/or format do you prefer from a quality special event? City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 107 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 268 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? ____(1) Very important ____(2) Important ____(3) Neutral ____(4) Not important ____(5) Not at all important ____(9) Don't know 18. Counting yourself, how many people in your household are... Under 5 years: ____ 5-9 years:____ 10-14 years: ____ 15-19 years: ____ 20-24 years: ____ 25-34 years: ____ 35-44 years: ____ 45-54 years: ____ 55-64 years: ____ 65-74 years: ____ 75-84 years: ____ 85+ years: ____ 19. What is your age?______ years 20. How many dogs are in your household?______ dogs 21. How long have you lived in Iowa City?______ years 22. Your gender: ____(1) Male ____(2) Female ____(3) Prefer to self-describe: _________________________ 23. Are you other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino Ancestry? ____(1) Yes ____(2) No 24. Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? ____(1) White ____(2) African American/Black ____(3) Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander ____(4) American Indian/Alaska Native ____(5) Other: _____________________________________ 25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home?____(1) Yes [Skip to Q26.] ____(2) No 25a. What language is the primary language in your home?_______________________________ 26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? ____(1) Yes, [Please describe if comfortable: ________________________________________] ____(2) No 27. What is your total annual household income? ____(1) Under $30,000 ____(2) $30,000 to $49,999 ____(3) $50,000 to $69,999 ____(4) $70,000 to $89,999 ____(5) $90,000 to $119,999 ____(6) $120,000 to $174,999 ____(7) $175,000 or more 28. Please share any additional parks and recreation needs, comments, or concerns that you or your household may have. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ This concludes the survey. Thank you for your time! Please return your completed survey in the enclosed return-reply envelope addressed to: ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, Kansas 66061 Your responses will remain completely confidential. The address information printed to the right will only be used to help identify geographic areas with special interests. Thank you! *After administration of the survey was complete, ETC Institute received a request to change Q14.2 to read "sexual orientation" instead of "sexual preference." City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Needs Assessment Findings Report ETC Institute (2022)Page 108 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 269 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q8. CHECK ALL of the reasons you and the members of your household do not use Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events more often. (N=45) • Closed because of covid. Paid parking • A municipal government should take care of police protection, roads, sewers, water and trash removal. Recreational facilities should be provided by profit earning businesses and are not a proper function of a municipal government. One reason why taxes are so high that they are driving away folks who would like to live here is because the city insists upon doing many things which are not a part of proper governing. • Can be extremely competitive-just want it to be fun for my child-don’t feel safe • COVID 19 • COVID and lack of knowledge about what is offered • Covid closures • Covid safety • Don’t have much information about what is available • Don’t know enough about • Facilities available through Coralville and the University are superior even if more expensive. Private Facilities have evolved to meet opportunities and demand bit at a premium cost. I.C. Parks and Rec have fallen behind across the board. Lack of investment and vision. 20 years behind. • Haven’t had time lately • Homeless- can be scary • I am disabled, and my partner works odd hours and gets lots of exercise on his job. • I belong to a gym • I can do some of what I want to do at home. • Indoor courts for evening times. • Kids are grown and gone. • Lack of information on all programs available-only online? Printed catalog? • Lack of knowledge about them • Lazy • MASKS REQUIRED • Need has not arisen • Never hear about any opportunities • Never saw any info on any of these programs. • New here. • No childcare available • No need • No running track indoors, safety concerns • No toddler programs and COVID 19 • Not aware of things being offered • Not aware of what is available Appendix B2: Statistically Valid Survey Open-Ended Responses APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 270 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs • Not informed on offerings • Parking downtown • Parking fees • Parking is too difficult • Pool is cold • Programs not publicized • "Safety - Mercer is closest to our home, seldom use do to public safety in the surrounding neighborhood. • Timing - it is difficult given most of these programs have shut down or impaired due to covid…for summer sports we went to Coralville / North Liberty this past year because IC committed to having the programs much later than Coralville/NL. • Safety concerns, too many loiterers • Simply uninformed of program offerings • Swimming water aerobics • Too crowded (especially with kids) who aren't using the facilities for what they are meant for. Discrimination/pestering of seniors. Feels unsafe • Unaware of what is available. • We cannot tolerate fumes in indoor pools. APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 271 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q15a. Please check the top TWO reasons why you are not supportive of the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department making improvements to outdoor sports facilities. (N=4) • I am fine with bringing in tournaments for additional revenue but not at the expense of the local residents • I do not do, or watch them • Recreational facilities should be provided by profit making ventures, not by “let’s do everything in the world for our citizens“ City • Would not want funds diverted away from other programs for this. APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 272 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q15a. What type of events do you most prefer? (N=116) • An indoor court space similar to Green State Fieldhouse in Coralville with court space rentable for tournaments and practices would be a good thing. • Anything that is not currently available or could be expanded with newer facilities. Martial arts tournaments, triathlons, sports that aren't necessarily popular around Iowa City but could be with added emphasis, such as lacrosse or field hockey. • Art fairs, farmer's market • Art festival, car show • Art maker fairs • Arts & music festivals • Arts, music concerts • Athletics • Baseball, swimming • Biking, running • Broader family based events such as carnivals, festivals, performances, or programs where my family can actively participate • Celebrate town history • City gatherings, cultural gatherings or celebrations. • Community focus, conservation • Community swim events • Competitive sports • CONCERTS • Concerts, food festivals • Concerts, movies, • CULTURAL • Cultural events • Devoted to residents only • Disc golf course • Dog day at a pool, tennis, track and field. Dog shows, horse events • Educational • Entertainment events in parks • ENTERTAINMENT, STAGE PERFORMANCES • Event meets • EVENTS AROUND DOGS, NATURE • Events that appeal to the neighborhood. • Events that are welcoming to everyone, not just families or couples • Events with pets welcome. Kickball team. Open fishing for families and fishing tournaments • Family • Family Centered Events • Family events APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 273 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City • Family events well before the sun sets (bedtime). • Family friendly, Outdoor live music, Free, Events for kids • Family friendly, 5ks or similar runs and athletic activities, celebrations, music events • Family friendly, similar feel to farmers markets, etc. • Farmers Market • Farmers market, Thieves market, Ballroom dance classes, Live band dances for youth • farmer's markets • festivals of different cultures • Festivals. • Fitness-sports eg marathons • Flower & produce award events & events in sustainable gardening practices, Adult fitness competitions-track & field, more women's sports events, power lifting, iron man, muddlers competition, charity dance event • FOR JO CO RESIDENTS • Free • Free events, food festival, kid activities • Fun events with low emphasis on competition and more about participation • history lectures/walks/speakers • Holiday, farmers markets, children's programs • I'd like to see a masters swimming program for adults in Iowa City: preferably downtown at the Lee swimming pool. It could be as easy as posting daily work-outs online and having weekly or semi-weekly (maybe alternating between Mercer and Lee) access to a coach. • Kids and toddler events • Large group participation such as races • Learning events and physical activity events • Lessons • Live concerts, 4th of July party ,art fair, taste of Iowa • Live music / outdoor theater/ adult evenings in park near water • Live music, art show • Local neighborhood facilities and parks • Markets • Markets, family activities, running events • Minor sports tournaments. • More crafts shows • Movies in park, the farmers market, better and more festive decorations for the Christmas season—Iowa city’s seasonal decorations are bland and blah and sad!! I’m glad they are finally doing the tractor rides and visits with Santa!! • Music • Music concerts • Music concerts • Music, cultural, local • Nature education • Outdoor music, art and cultural events. APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 274 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs • Outdoor music and recreation • Outdoor music, farmers market • Outdoor, food, culture • Outdoors • Outdoors • Outdoors • Party in the park; farmers market crafts/games/music; holiday events like the Halloween party, solstice party, winter fest, bike rally. • Party in the parks • Performers, music • Regional youth tournaments, soccer, special Olympics, dog shows, triathlon • Road running races • Roller derby, adult sports tournaments • Running races • Sci fi conference • Seasonal, holiday • Single track bicycling/cyclocross and Coralville does a much better job promoting and accommodating those sports. Also prefer more natural focused areas and programming which the county does well, not so much Iowa city. I enjoy hiking and running as well. • Small • Soccer, racquetball • Social gatherings with a focus • Socials, facility tours, educational • Something that everyone of all ages can attend. • Something that the community can participate in the activities downtown during Rajbari a few years ago come to mind. I felt like I was involved, even though i did not bike riding! • Sport events, baseball • Sporting events • Sporting events • Sports, music, and arts/cultural events. • Stem programs, • Street fair and rides • Street festivals • Summer camps, youth sports, adult swimming and fitness • Summer events • Swimming • Swimming • Swimming, walking. • Tennis and adult only swimming times • The thieves market needs to be brought back to Iowa City. The University of Iowa disallowed the use of the IMU, pushing trade once again from Iowa City to coville. Drawing outlying • Theater and swimming • Toddler events APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 275 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City • Visiting groups • Water aerobics classes • Youth and support tourneys • Youth sports • Youth sports is a huge business! The city is missing out on revenue on multiple levels - restaurants, hotels, shopping, etc. By not having facilities to host these events. • Youth sports tournaments APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 276 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Q15b. What type of characteristics, activities, and/or format do you prefer from a quality special event? (N=87) • Accessibility, good advertisement ahead of time, ease of registration • Activities that recruit singles for team events, all age & gender inclusive • Adult events • Adult higher level educational art music and or talks • Arts, music, food trucks, close-off streets • Children activities • Cleanliness, accessibility • Community building through the arts • Community dinners featuring different cultures • Community interest • Concerts in the park • Concessions, family friendly, open to public • Connection with other families • Craft show • Day long events where you come and go as you please. Events where there seems to be something for everyone, all ages, skill levels, background. • Don’t have an opinion • drawing outlying communities towards Iowa City. All-inclusiveness within activities. Farmers market and holiday markets are 2 that I really like • Drop in, open house style • During summer • Events that are open to all and encourage learning and active fun • Extended hours for some events • Family events, low/no cost, advance notice • Family friendly with emphasis on diversity • Family friendly, fun for all ages • Family oriented art/music • Family oriented events • Food, community • For the elderly and handicapped • Free • Free, food that accommodates dietary restrictions, Artsy • Good parking, family oriented, reasonably priced entry and attendance, uniqueness. Fundraisers, charity events • Good pr, communication, fair pricing, community involvement, excitement • Good size turn out, well organized • Good vendors, inclusive of ages • Group dance session for exercise APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 277 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City • Hands on activities • Holiday concert • I’m not sure • Inclusive • Inclusive of all ability • Inclusive, variety and competitive • Interactive, surprising, community building, fun • Kid friendly, informative, fun and social • Learning • Lectures and education, exhibitions • Like Disney on ice • Local food and drinks available, fun for all ages, free or reasonable admission fees, activities that enable getting to know your neighbors • Low cost, good parking, advertise on tv, social media • Lower barriers to participation • Meets the needs of the community. • More food/vendors • Nice venue • No cost, fun • Not crowded, plenty of access • Open to all ages, no gay parades • Open walking/biking paths. Need more options for pets to go off-leash. Need more pet waste bags and garbage cans available on walking/biking trails so people pick-up after their pets and then throw it out! • Organization of scheduled events and diversity of entertainment concurrent with a variety of concessions • Outdoor events in shaded areas for listening to concerts or private tables with umbrellas for shade • Outdoor festivals • Outdoor theater • Outdoor, smaller venue. • Outside • Pamphlets, structure, music/liveliness • Parking, tournaments, hotel and restaurants. • Performance, cultural, or interactive. A large sports complex sit unused too much of the year as a waste of valuable space and money. • Plenty of benches, as I am disabled and ambulate with a cane-- need to sit after walking for 5 minutes or longer. I will have surgery eventually... • Resident only • Safe • Safe events • Safety is important. • Sense of community building APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 278 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs • Single day or evening cooking classes for 2, parents and teens • Single day, outdoor • Some music, some food and drink stands • Something for all ages • Something for young and old! • Something that benefits a wide variety of people and is inclusive and stimulates the mind, along with physical development. Not baseball & softball tournaments for kids, mostly from smaller whiter Trump supporting towns. • Spaced out, free or low cost, wellness for body and brain • Swimming • Swimming, senior aquatics • Teach about nature, the environment and community • That they not happen. • Toddler aged kid-friendly activities • Tournaments • Well advertised, low cost/free • Well organized, multi-day and with enough parking or access to convenient shuttles. • Youth soccer and ball fields APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 279 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Q28. Please share any additional parks and recreation needs, comments, or concerns that you or your household may have. (N=116) • 2 years ago I slipped and fell at Mercer Indoor pool, tearing out 3 of the 4 ligaments in my let knee due to slippery tile. I have not been back due to fear. I truly hope that floor has been replaced by a non slip floor. • A new facility on the southwest side would be great. Parking downtown discourages us from going there. It also seems small and run down. It’s hard to get the kids into programming such as swim lessons in Iowa City so we tend to use Coralville services instead. We liked the parties in the parks over the summer. • Adaptive dancing classes • affordable, access, walkable, youth survival swim skill lessons. • Appreciate the facilities that we do have. On line registration system is NOT user friendly at all and needs to be totally revamped. Better communication between parks and rec and pool/aquatics program is needed. • Botanical Garden • City bike lanes. Cleared walking paths for winter use. • City pool and Mercer Pool are clean, safe and well managed. • Concerned about overall safety. Many more bad seeds in town • Continue to maintain parks and sports activities. • Do not neglect the needs of winter entertainment and park activities-indoors and outdoors • East side community center near Chadek Green • heard there may be a way to add recreational rapids. Interested in this ideas. • Hickory Hill is IC's greatest asset. how does cutting trees help? • I am HUGELY disappointed by the lack of parking for MANY IC parks. The location of many “neighborhood” parks feel like throw away plots the developers couldn’t use for anything else. They are too far away or visually inaccessible making it hard for kids to go to on their own. The play structures are often big & expensive but NOT shaded, which makes them unusable large parts of the day. It would be much better to have several smaller climbing/playing structures (all with good shade sails). That would allow kids more play choices - and make it less likely that one group of loud and/or assertive kids could dominate a structure and essentially scare other kids off. Structures should NOT age specific but should offer different play options from imaginative to physical to skill oriented. Drinking stations should be ample and well maintained, as should bathrooms. • I appreciate Weatherby Park walking path and upkeep. • I believe in the importance of quality sports and recreation facilities as well as quality bike and running paths. I do support paying for these services that benefit all people of the community • I do not like how expensive it is to rent park shelters • I don't use many facilities so I am not a very good judge of opportunities available. I do classes at one of the Silver Sneakers facilities so don't have a need to use city facilities. • I enjoy the walking trails including Sycamore and Terry Trueblood. • I feel it is important to provide opportunities for youth and families who cannot afford high fee. • I get disappointed when I see large sums of $ invested in parks, but there is little to do in those parks except walk. No volleyball courts, no pickle ball courts, no jacket all courts, just trails. Seems like a waste to me. Would love to see more opportunities for recreation built into the APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 280 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs parks (beyond walking trails) • I hope the summer camp program info could be posted earlier. We used the service in Coralville because they post the info much earlier and with more program options. • I look forward to changes that foster community recreation. • I love 30 M lap swimming at City Park Pool. Would like to extend the season into both spring and fall • I love Becky Harkema’s classes water aerobics classes especially at Mercer pool. My husband and I love biking in all weather so we deeply appreciate the bike paths City of Iowa maintains and increases. These are critical and well used by all ages throughout the city. Older adults maintain their health by being active. Pools with clean, working bathroom stalls and showers are appreciated. Thank you! • I never get any information about the parks and rec programs • I strongly believe the city should serve all people/neighborhoods. Downtown should not be the only focus for events. Many minority families do not attend, due to comfort level, transportation. • I think you are doing a great job. continue to offer services to those who cannot afford. especial children and youth. • I use and love Hickory Hill Park for the escape into nature that it provides. • I wish the farmers market would last until 1:00 on Saturday or at least 1230. • I would like to see expanded/upgraded facilities, especially pools. Our family has enjoyed all of the park upgrades that have been implemented in the past few years. • I would love to see City Pool renovated like Splash Landing in Bettendorf. It would also be nice to have an outdoor pool attached to Mercer. • IC facilities are embarrassing compared to other cities • I'd like to see a masters swimming program for adults in Iowa City: preferably downtown at the Lee swimming pool. It could be as easy as posting daily work-outs online and having weekly or semi-weekly (maybe alternating between Mercer and Lee) access to a coach. • I'd love to see senior's softball (ages 50+) during the week. • If you are going to spend tax dollars to build buildings to rent out or host large events, that prevent residents from regular access, then I am glad to vote no. We need an indoor running /walk track • indoor soccer field and indoor soccer teams during the winter to be able to practice • Indoor walking track is very much needed. Activities for aged individuals would be helpful. Also there is no playground equipment for younger kids at City park. What happened to the swings and etc.? • Iowa city has been great, but there are a lot of “hidden gems” here that I had to find out by word-of-mouth. How can a new resident find information about activities in the city? What sorts of recreational facilities are available? We’re always looking for things to do. • Iowa City's rec programs are in need of updates. Coralville and North Library seem to have more modern facilities and programs. we need more programs for youth with disabilities, updated pool and indoor walking trails • It is important that residents have access . • It is very important for IC to have facilities for all, with an emphasis on the underserved. • Keep forward thinking, Iowa city cannot afford to have a mediocre public recreation programs and facilities • Keep the peaceful atmosphere at City Park Pool . • Keep the pool open after 4:30 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 281 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City • Keep up the good work. • Love all the outdoor parks and bike trails. Thanks for maintaining these • love more single use dog parks, runs for those who do not play well with others. More pool options for infants/toddlers. • love the paths, running trails • love the services and events at Mercer, our local parks & pool. Neighborhood access is important to us. • Love to see more water parks available. More options for off-leash dog parks. More hiking/biking trails. • maintain trails/bike path. These are what we use. • Many of the outdoor parks no longer feel safe or provide the right level of amenities. Example: Mercer park no longer has bathrooms due to vandalism, and at times we have to leave due large numbers of unsupervised children and teens being rough and conducting illicit activities. • More communication about opportunities especially for low income families • More commuter bike trails • More fruit trees in the park; more community garden spaces needed in more park. More bike trails -a path going to west liberty • more maintenances of Kiwanis Park, the trails. Remodel Robert Lee building. Too many teens are loitering, I would not send my kids there. • more no school day and summer camp options. Day pass to city park pool is too expensive • more paved paths, bike trail • more sand volleyball courts. • More trails for hiking and running • My husband would definitely appreciate a young adult (20-30s) basketball league or club in Iowa City • Nature experience and appreciation are critical for new generation of citizens who advocate for less development. More green areas • Need a pool on the SW side of Iowa City and the S side of Iowa City • need an indoor rec facility in the east side. • need better promotion of rec. activities in Iowa City • need indoor activities/PlaySpace for young children during winter . Need childcare locations, Important when school is closed. • Need more biking/walking paths. The ones we have need maintenance. Would love expansion in biking, walking paths. • Need signage at dog parks to tell owners to pickup after their dogs. Mercer pickleball courts need repair. more courts somewhere else? • Neighborhood parks. Without fear of drug usage or "gangs" • No concerns. Parks and Recreation makes it possible to enjoy life. Would like to see the City fund something like a surf pool or zip line that could generate funds yet that scholarships would get lower income people in to participate too. • Open activities after early dismissal from school on Thursdays. • Parking near several sports fields is not sufficient. • Parks & indoor facilities made with non toxic materials. Toxins emitted from latex paints, composite plastics & rubber tires are not acceptable!!! Glyphosate & other chemical herbicides & pesticides in & within 1 acre vicinity of outdid park areas should be prohibited @ all times! • Photography. More adult gardening classes/ spaces. Or, make them easier to find or access. APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 282 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS Better meeting spaces, more cozy or personal meeting spaces. • Plant white oaks; more native plants and education signs; fix the dog park sewer system; update Ritas ranch; fun things for kids at city park to replace the rides; non paved jogging trails and walking trails • please leave City Park pool intact, like the adult swim hours. • please plow the paved trails after the streets are done • Please prioritize maintenance and upkeep of ALL existing facilities before expanding or building expensive new facilities (i.e. water park at upper City Park). Please consider significant upgrades to the hazardous entrance at Thornberry Dog Park. • post covid we hope to be more active in parks and public spaces. • renovate city park pool (similar idea as Coralville outdoor pool) water aerobics for seniors with arthritis • Seems like gang activity, no Security • serve all interests • So often, youth and adults are busy meeting scheduled obligations and find it difficult to register for multiple programs. They need options which provide flexibility with easy and reliable access to drop in such as ice rink, roller rink, rowing club, putt putt golf etc. • Taxes are high enough • Thank you asking for community input! • Thanks for doing this - I'm glad my taxes are being thoughtfully used for the betterment of our entire community. We do not have children, but actively want children in the IC area to have plenty of low-cost, high quality, fun and inclusive opportunities - that is why we live here! • The city seems to come up with finds to build new amenities, but then fails to maintain them • The East Side should develop a new facility similar to the NL rec center, or Mount Vernon LBC. The east side population, + West Branch are sufficient to justify. • The edge of the city pool leaves splinters in kids hands when they try to climb out. The city pool desperately needs redone. It’s out of date and unsafe • The key system in not convenient at Mercer Pool. I would like to just pay all up front. • The new playground at City Park is in a very bad location!! If you’re having a family gathering but the kids want to play in the equipment, you have to leave your gathering to take the kids up to the playground. The playground equipment is good, but the location should be in the park where the original playground equipment was!! • The parks department should help neighborhoods have access to green areas throughout the city and in all neighborhoods • The parks that we have are very poorly maintained. The weeds in the parking lots alone show that we as a city have no pride in our facilities. • The policy on parks and rec id cards has changed over time and I’m hazy on what’s required when I arrive at rec center. Thanks for all you do • the showers at Mercer need to be reconfigured soon, so that male disabled persons card for by a woman can change and not disturb the women. there are 2 dressing rooms, make one for disabled • There needs to be access to a splash pad on the west side of town. Willow Creek Park would be an excellent site for this. This could even be a safety issue for low income families unable to air condition their home properly. • Truly, element Hass to be put on such activities in order to save the citizens from outrageous property taxes. • We enjoy ICPR programing a lot and frequent your events, parks, facilities and classes. 283 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Sometimes the location of activities is the reason we might not participate. We don't need IC to copy everything else other places are doing but it would be nice to have theater for youth not all in Coralville. The only theater classes in IC are at the Englert and reserved for older kids, can there be some space sharing for local groups to use IC spaces too? Sometimes there are activities offered at IC buildings but registration is through a different system than the city so it is confusing or not clear certain things cost money. More family classes with a family rate would be nice rather than individual basis, perhaps a group of so many, etc. • We have children who visit with dogs. Love the dog parks. Before Covid used the pools a lot. Hope to again soon. As a dancer and choreographer, I strongly recommend that there be spaces with sprung floors for dance/movement. I have volunteered with several community projects, Iowa Dance Festival, Save the Englert. Library Poetry Month events. We have used rec facilities and floors are not good for extended use by dancers. Also: Have had to move multiple times over past 30 years. Rental space for non university staff is hard to find. • We like city park • We love parks and rec. we used them more when kids were younger. They are great ! • we love pickle ball but work different hours. The courts have some cracks • We need an indoor walking track, that is my number one priority; current toddler programs are offered on weekdays, please extend to weekends; not enough lap lanes for lap swim or spots for toddler swim • we need better gym space. A better pool & baseball/softball field • we need to bring horses back to Iowa and allow trainer to offer lessons with an open arena. Teach/enable city kids how to be safe and how to handle large animals • We were disappointed that the small shelter at Scott Park was removed even though it was still in decent shape. Not everyone wants to have a meal & conversation with lots of children jumping around& screaming. While we support having child- friendly parks, it seems like Seniors are being forced out. A couple of small shelters away from the playgrounds would be nice. It would also be nice to have a couple of trash cans closer to the shelters so that disabled people don’t have to walk so far. Just an opinion- but the new playgrounds are hideous looking- too much plastic! • Willow Creek park is an excellent community park used by many people. We need more parks like this one. • would like information in the mail. • Would like more hot tubs and stretching areas for post-exercise recovery. • Would like more picnic tables with umbrellas for people to sit and eat food/ drink while at farmer’s market downtown • Would love to have fitness room open later in evening at Mercer • would love to see more sports, like Manchester. Keep some green space • You are doing a great job. • your questions covered them! APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 284 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs This page is intentionally left blank. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 285 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 1 Q1. Please indicate how important you think it is for Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for each of the following purposes. Rate the importance of each item on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Very Important," and 1 means "Not at all Important." (N=216) Very Not at all important Important Neutral Not important important Not provided Q1-1. Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health 81.5% 16.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.4% Q1-2. Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs 54.6% 35.2% 7.4% 1.4% 0.5% 0.9% Q1-3. Contribute to community's economy (e.g., offering activities that draw visitors from around the community, offering opportunities to build life/ employment skills, enhancing real estate values, etc.) 31.5% 30.6% 26.9% 8.3% 1.4% 1.4% Q1-4. Promote appreciation & preservation of cultural & historical heritage of the community 32.9% 40.3% 19.4% 4.6% 1.4% 1.4% Q1-5. Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities 52.3% 34.3% 9.7% 1.4% 0.0% 2.3% Q1-6. Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents 79.6% 16.7% 1.9% 0.5% 0.0% 1.4% Q1-7. Provide access to local whole foods (e.g., farmers markets, community gardens) 40.3% 39.4% 15.7% 2.3% 0.5% 1.9% Q1-8. Provide low-cost recreation skill development classes for youth (e.g., swimming lessons, basic sports skills, basic recreation Appendix B3: Public Survey Data APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 286 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 2 skills, etc.) 75.0% 20.4% 2.3% 0.5% 0.0% 1.9% WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q1. Please indicate how important you think it is for Iowa City to provide recreation programs and facilities to residents for each of the following purposes. Rate the importance of each item on a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Very Important," and 1 means "Not at all Important." (without "not provided") (N=216) Very Not at all important Important Neutral Not important important Q1-1. Provide opportunities for residents to maintain or improve physical & mental health 82.6% 16.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% Q1-2. Provide gathering spaces for community events, organizations and/or informal clubs 55.1% 35.5% 7.5% 1.4% 0.5% Q1-3. Contribute to community's economy (e.g., offering activities that draw visitors from around the community, offering opportunities to build life/ employment skills, enhancing real estate values, etc.) 31.9% 31.0% 27.2% 8.5% 1.4% Q1-4. Promote appreciation & preservation of cultural & historical heritage of the community 33.3% 40.8% 19.7% 4.7% 1.4% Q1-5. Help revitalize areas of the community through new or enhanced facilities 53.6% 35.1% 10.0% 1.4% 0.0% Q1-6. Provide safe recreation activities for Iowa City residents 80.8% 16.9% 1.9% 0.5% 0.0% Q1-7. Provide access to local whole foods (e.g., farmers markets, community gardens) 41.0% 40.1% 16.0% 2.4% 0.5% Q1-8. Provide low-cost recreation skill development classes for youth (e.g., swimming lessons, basic sports skills, basic recreation skills, etc.) 76.4% 20.8% 2.4% 0.5% 0.0% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 287 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 3 Q2. Please indicate if you or any member of your household have used or visited each of the recreation facilities listed below. (N=216) Yes No Q2-1. Mercer Park Recreation Center- Scanlon Gym 69.9% 30.1% Q2-2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 79.6% 20.4% Q2-3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 67.1% 32.9% Q2-4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 63.4% 36.6% Q2-5. City Park Pool 78.2% 21.8% Q2-6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 47.7% 52.3% Q2-7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 29.6% 70.4% Q2-8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 27.8% 72.2% Q2-9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 26.9% 73.1% Q2-10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 13.0% 87.0% Q2-11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 12.5% 87.5% Q2-12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/ Rita's Ranch) 42.6% 57.4% Q2-13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 22.7% 77.3% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 288 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 4 Q2. If "Yes," please rate the overall quality of the facility. (N=213) Excellent Good Fair Poor Q2-1. Mercer Park Recreation Center- Scanlon Gym 16.1% 60.8% 20.3% 2.8% Q2-2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 9.7% 52.7% 25.5% 12.1% Q2-3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 19.1% 61.0% 18.4% 1.4% Q2-4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 9.1% 54.5% 28.0% 8.3% Q2-5. City Park Pool 19.6% 54.0% 18.4% 8.0% Q2-6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 33.3% 55.2% 10.4% 1.0% Q2-7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 25.0% 51.7% 18.3% 5.0% Q2-8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 31.5% 48.1% 18.5% 1.9% Q2-9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 8.9% 48.2% 39.3% 3.6% Q2-10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 18.5% 33.3% 33.3% 14.8% Q2-11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 23.1% 38.5% 30.8% 7.7% Q2-12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/ Rita's Ranch) 29.7% 64.8% 3.3% 2.2% Q2-13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 27.7% 59.6% 10.6% 2.1% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 289 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 5 Q2. If "Yes," please rate the overall quality of the facility. (without "not provided") (N=213) Excellent Good Fair Poor Q2-1. Mercer Park Recreation Center- Scanlon Gym 16.1% 60.8% 20.3% 2.8% Q2-2. Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 9.7% 52.7% 25.5% 12.1% Q2-3. Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 19.1% 61.0% 18.4% 1.4% Q2-4. Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 9.1% 54.5% 28.0% 8.3% Q2-5. City Park Pool 19.6% 54.0% 18.4% 8.0% Q2-6. Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 33.3% 55.2% 10.4% 1.0% Q2-7. Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 25.0% 51.7% 18.3% 5.0% Q2-8. Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 31.5% 48.1% 18.5% 1.9% Q2-9. Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 8.9% 48.2% 39.3% 3.6% Q2-10. Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 18.5% 33.3% 33.3% 14.8% Q2-11. Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 23.1% 38.5% 30.8% 7.7% Q2-12. Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/ Rita's Ranch) 29.7% 64.8% 3.3% 2.2% Q2-13. Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 27.7% 59.6% 10.6% 2.1% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 290 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 6 Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. Top choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center-Scanlon Gym 24 11.1 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 37 17.1 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 43 19.9 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 11 5.1 % City Park Pool 49 22.7 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 10 4.6 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 6 2.8 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 6 2.8 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 6 2.8 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 3 1.4 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 13 6.0 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 6 2.8 % None chosen 2 0.9 % Total 216 100.0 % Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. 2nd choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center-Scanlon Gym 29 13.4 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 28 13.0 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 25 11.6 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 20 9.3 % City Park Pool 45 20.8 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 11 5.1 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 6 2.8 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 7 3.2 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 5 2.3 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 5 2.3 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 3 1.4 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 17 7.9 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 10 4.6 % None chosen 5 2.3 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 291 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 7 Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q3. 3rd choice Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center-Scanlon Gym 19 8.8 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 25 11.6 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 22 10.2 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 24 11.1 % City Park Pool 36 16.7 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 14 6.5 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 9 4.2 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 5 2.3 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 4 1.9 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 5 2.3 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 4 1.9 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 15 6.9 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 15 6.9 % None chosen 19 8.8 % Total 216 100.0 % Q3. Which THREE of the facilities from the list in Question 2 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 3) Q3. Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Mercer Park Recreation Center-Scanlon Gym 72 33.3 % Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 90 41.7 % Indoor pool at Mercer Park Aquatic Center 90 41.7 % Indoor pool at Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 55 25.5 % City Park Pool 130 60.2 % Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park 35 16.2 % Baseball fields (Mercer Park/City Park/Happy Hollow Park) 21 9.7 % Softball fields (Napoleon Park) 12 5.6 % Tennis courts (Mercer Park/City Park) 15 6.9 % Pickleball courts (Mercer Park) 16 7.4 % Iowa City Skatepark (Terrell Mill Park) 10 4.6 % Off leash dog parks (Thornberry/Rita's Ranch) 45 20.8 % Community garden plots (Chadek Green Park, Kiwanis Park, Reno Street Park, Wetherby Park) 31 14.4 % None chosen 2 0.9 % Total 624 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 292 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 8 Q4. Recreation Center Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation center amenity listed below. (N=216) Yes No Q4-1. Arts & crafts classroom 35.2% 64.8% Q4-2. Climbing walls 29.6% 70.4% Q4-3. Community kitchen 6.0% 94.0% Q4-4. Dance studios 18.1% 81.9% Q4-5. Fitness classroom 31.5% 68.5% Q4-6. Fitness room 43.5% 56.5% Q4-7. Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 44.9% 55.1% Q4-8. Gymnastics facilities 12.0% 88.0% Q4-9. Indoor pickleball/squash/ racquetball courts 23.1% 76.9% Q4-10. Indoor playground 28.7% 71.3% Q4-11. Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 17.6% 82.4% Q4-12. Indoor walking/jogging track 61.1% 38.9% Q4-13. Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 24.1% 75.9% Q4-14. Martial arts studio 5.1% 94.9% Q4-15. Meditation/yoga studio 28.7% 71.3% Q4-16. Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 39.8% 60.2% Q4-17. Photography studio 9.3% 90.7% Q4-18. Pottery studio 26.4% 73.6% Q4-19. Roller skating rinks 27.8% 72.2% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 293 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 9 Q4. Recreation Center Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation center amenity listed below. Yes No Q4-20. Teaching kitchen 16.2% 83.8% Q4-21. Theater space 8.8% 91.2% Q4-22. Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 38.9% 61.1% Q4-23. Other 12.0% 88.0% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 294 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 10 Q4. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=210) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4-1. Arts & crafts classroom 13.3% 31.7% 35.0% 20.0% Q4-2. Climbing walls 7.8% 3.9% 13.7% 74.5% Q4-3. Community kitchen 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% Q4-4. Dance studios 3.2% 6.5% 32.3% 58.1% Q4-5. Fitness classroom 1.9% 20.4% 51.9% 25.9% Q4-6. Fitness room 7.5% 37.5% 38.8% 16.3% Q4-7. Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 24.7% 49.4% 21.2% 4.7% Q4-8. Gymnastics facilities 4.8% 14.3% 23.8% 57.1% Q4-9. Indoor pickleball/squash/ racquetball courts 2.2% 8.7% 37.0% 52.2% Q4-10. Indoor playground 1.8% 1.8% 17.9% 78.6% Q4-11. Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 0.0% 14.3% 20.0% 65.7% Q4-12. Indoor walking/jogging track 0.8% 5.9% 11.8% 81.5% Q4-13. Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 2.4% 19.5% 19.5% 58.5% Q4-14. Martial arts studio 0.0% 20.0% 30.0% 50.0% Q4-15. Meditation/yoga studio 2.1% 12.8% 29.8% 55.3% Q4-16. Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 22.2% 34.7% 36.1% 6.9% Q4-17. Photography studio 7.1% 7.1% 28.6% 57.1% Q4-18. Pottery studio 6.7% 31.1% 22.2% 40.0% Q4-19. Roller skating rinks 5.7% 5.7% 28.3% 60.4% Q4-20. Teaching kitchen 3.3% 0.0% 16.7% 80.0% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 295 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 11 Q4. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q4-21. Theater space 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% Q4-22. Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 13.7% 38.4% 26.0% 21.9% Q4-23. Other 4.5% 31.8% 31.8% 31.8% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 296 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 12 Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. Top choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 15 6.9 % Climbing walls 6 2.8 % Community kitchen 1 0.5 % Fitness classroom 5 2.3 % Fitness room 14 6.5 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 31 14.4 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 12 5.6 % Indoor playground 24 11.1 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 7 3.2 % Indoor walking/jogging track 41 19.0 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 3 1.4 % Martial arts studio 1 0.5 % Meditation/yoga studio 2 0.9 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 6 2.8 % Photography studio 1 0.5 % Pottery studio 2 0.9 % Roller skating rinks 6 2.8 % Theater space 2 0.9 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 9 4.2 % Other 17 7.9 % None chosen 11 5.1 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 297 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 13 Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 2nd choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 12 5.6 % Climbing walls 10 4.6 % Community kitchen 6 2.8 % Dance studios 6 2.8 % Fitness classroom 6 2.8 % Fitness room 13 6.0 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 16 7.4 % Gymnastics facilities 2 0.9 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 13 6.0 % Indoor playground 14 6.5 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 8 3.7 % Indoor walking/jogging track 38 17.6 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 4 1.9 % Martial arts studio 1 0.5 % Meditation/yoga studio 4 1.9 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 9 4.2 % Pottery studio 4 1.9 % Roller skating rinks 9 4.2 % Teaching kitchen 1 0.5 % Theater space 1 0.5 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 17 7.9 % Other 2 0.9 % None chosen 20 9.3 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 298 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 14 Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 3rd choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 9 4.2 % Climbing walls 6 2.8 % Community kitchen 1 0.5 % Dance studios 3 1.4 % Fitness classroom 15 6.9 % Fitness room 15 6.9 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 14 6.5 % Gymnastics facilities 2 0.9 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 7 3.2 % Indoor playground 6 2.8 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 7 3.2 % Indoor walking/jogging track 18 8.3 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 11 5.1 % Meditation/yoga studio 8 3.7 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 11 5.1 % Photography studio 3 1.4 % Pottery studio 10 4.6 % Roller skating rinks 7 3.2 % Teaching kitchen 2 0.9 % Theater space 1 0.5 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 17 7.9 % Other 4 1.9 % None chosen 39 18.1 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 299 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 15 Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q5. 4th choice Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 10 4.6 % Climbing walls 8 3.7 % Community kitchen 2 0.9 % Dance studios 4 1.9 % Fitness classroom 5 2.3 % Fitness room 12 5.6 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 9 4.2 % Gymnastics facilities 7 3.2 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 5 2.3 % Indoor playground 6 2.8 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 5 2.3 % Indoor walking/jogging track 10 4.6 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 8 3.7 % Meditation/yoga studio 12 5.6 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 13 6.0 % Photography studio 2 0.9 % Pottery studio 9 4.2 % Roller skating rinks 10 4.6 % Teaching kitchen 6 2.8 % Theater space 3 1.4 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 11 5.1 % Other 4 1.9 % None chosen 55 25.5 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 300 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 16 Q5. Which FOUR types of recreation center amenities listed in Question 4 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? (top 4) Q5. Sum of top 4 choices Number Percent Arts & crafts classroom 46 21.3 % Climbing walls 30 13.9 % Community kitchen 10 4.6 % Dance studios 13 6.0 % Fitness classroom 31 14.4 % Fitness room 54 25.0 % Gym space (e.g., basketball, volleyball, etc.) 70 32.4 % Gymnastics facilities 11 5.1 % Indoor pickleball/squash/racquetball courts 37 17.1 % Indoor playground 50 23.1 % Indoor sports fields (e.g., soccer, lacrosse, football) 27 12.5 % Indoor walking/jogging track 107 49.5 % Maker's Space (STEAM related tools & equipment) 26 12.0 % Martial arts studio 2 0.9 % Meditation/yoga studio 26 12.0 % Meeting rooms for community groups & classes 39 18.1 % Photography studio 6 2.8 % Pottery studio 25 11.6 % Roller skating rinks 32 14.8 % Teaching kitchen 9 4.2 % Theater space 7 3.2 % Weight room (weight & fitness machines) 54 25.0 % Other 27 12.5 % None chosen 11 5.1 % Total 750 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 301 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 17 Q6. Recreation Programming Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of recreation program listed below. (N=216) Yes No Q6-1. Adult art, dance, performing arts 26.4% 73.6% Q6-2. Adult fitness & wellness programs 58.8% 41.2% Q6-3. Adult sports programs 19.9% 80.1% Q6-4. Adult Art classes 32.4% 67.6% Q6-5. Family events 34.3% 65.7% Q6-6. Farmers Market 73.1% 26.9% Q6-7. Gymnastics & tumbling programs 16.7% 83.3% Q6-8. Nature programs 44.0% 56.0% Q6-9. No school day activities 22.2% 77.8% Q6-10. Preschool programs/early childhood 15.7% 84.3% Q6-11. Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 13.0% 87.0% Q6-12. STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 20.8% 79.2% Q6-13. Teen programs 13.4% 86.6% Q6-14. Tennis lessons & leagues 14.4% 85.6% Q6-15. Youth art, dance, performing arts 18.1% 81.9% Q6-16. Youth fitness & wellness programs 19.4% 80.6% Q6-17. Youth learn to swim programs 36.1% 63.9% Q6-18. Youth outdoor skills programs 25.5% 74.5% Q6-19. Youth sports programs 27.3% 72.7% Q6-20. Youth summer camp programs 24.5% 75.5% Q6-21. Other 5.1% 94.9% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 302 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 19 Q6. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=207) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q6-1. Adult art, dance, performing arts 5.0% 20.0% 27.5% 47.5% Q6-2. Adult fitness & wellness programs 4.7% 22.6% 44.3% 28.3% Q6-3. Adult sports programs 2.8% 27.8% 36.1% 33.3% Q6-4. Adult Art classes 5.8% 19.2% 32.7% 42.3% Q6-5. Family events 5.9% 32.4% 51.5% 10.3% Q6-6. Farmers Market 52.4% 39.5% 5.4% 2.7% Q6-7. Gymnastics & tumbling programs 3.0% 3.0% 42.4% 51.5% Q6-8. Nature programs 2.6% 25.6% 44.9% 26.9% Q6-9. No school day activities 0.0% 5.6% 27.8% 66.7% Q6-10. Preschool programs/early childhood 0.0% 10.7% 35.7% 53.6% Q6-11. Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 0.0% 4.8% 71.4% 23.8% Q6-12. STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 2.9% 22.9% 40.0% 34.3% Q6-13. Teen programs 5.0% 10.0% 35.0% 50.0% Q6-14. Tennis lessons & leagues 4.8% 23.8% 42.9% 28.6% Q6-15. Youth art, dance, performing arts 0.0% 19.2% 46.2% 34.6% Q6-16. Youth fitness & wellness programs 0.0% 29.0% 41.9% 29.0% Q6-17. Youth learn to swim programs 13.8% 38.5% 32.3% 15.4% Q6-18. Youth outdoor skills programs 2.6% 17.9% 51.3% 28.2% Q6-19. Youth sports programs 12.2% 46.9% 38.8% 2.0% Q6-20. Youth summer camp programs 7.0% 27.9% 39.5% 25.6% Q6-21. Other 0.0% 10.0% 50.0% 40.0% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 303 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 20 Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. Top choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 9 4.2 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 41 19.0 % Adult sports programs 7 3.2 % Adult Art classes 7 3.2 % Family events 10 4.6 % Farmers Market 57 26.4 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 1 0.5 % Nature programs 10 4.6 % No school day activities 9 4.2 % Preschool programs/early childhood 3 1.4 % Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 6 2.8 % Teen programs 2 0.9 % Tennis lessons & leagues 1 0.5 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 1 0.5 % Youth learn to swim programs 13 6.0 % Youth outdoor skills programs 1 0.5 % Youth sports programs 10 4.6 % Youth summer camp programs 4 1.9 % Other 4 1.9 % None chosen 20 9.3 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 304 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 21 Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 2nd choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 12 5.6 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 22 10.2 % Adult sports programs 6 2.8 % Adult Art classes 12 5.6 % Family events 8 3.7 % Farmers Market 31 14.4 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 2 0.9 % Nature programs 20 9.3 % No school day activities 5 2.3 % Preschool programs/early childhood 5 2.3 % Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 6 2.8 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 1 0.5 % Teen programs 5 2.3 % Tennis lessons & leagues 2 0.9 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 3 1.4 % Youth learn to swim programs 12 5.6 % Youth outdoor skills programs 4 1.9 % Youth sports programs 15 6.9 % Youth summer camp programs 3 1.4 % Other 1 0.5 % None chosen 41 19.0 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 305 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 22 Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 3rd choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 7 3.2 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 12 5.6 % Adult sports programs 6 2.8 % Adult Art classes 9 4.2 % Family events 7 3.2 % Farmers Market 29 13.4 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 3 1.4 % Nature programs 18 8.3 % No school day activities 2 0.9 % Preschool programs/early childhood 4 1.9 % Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 3 1.4 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 7 3.2 % Teen programs 4 1.9 % Tennis lessons & leagues 6 2.8 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 2 0.9 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 4 1.9 % Youth learn to swim programs 13 6.0 % Youth outdoor skills programs 4 1.9 % Youth sports programs 5 2.3 % Youth summer camp programs 15 6.9 % Other 3 1.4 % None chosen 53 24.5 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 306 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 23 Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? Q7. 4th choice Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 9 4.2 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 11 5.1 % Adult sports programs 6 2.8 % Adult Art classes 18 8.3 % Family events 10 4.6 % Farmers Market 11 5.1 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 5 2.3 % Nature programs 11 5.1 % No school day activities 5 2.3 % Preschool programs/early childhood 3 1.4 % Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 2 0.9 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 7 3.2 % Teen programs 3 1.4 % Tennis lessons & leagues 2 0.9 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 5 2.3 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 6 2.8 % Youth learn to swim programs 10 4.6 % Youth outdoor skills programs 6 2.8 % Youth sports programs 8 3.7 % Youth summer camp programs 6 2.8 % Other 4 1.9 % None chosen 68 31.5 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 307 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 24 Q7. Which FOUR types of recreation programs listed in Question 6 are MOST IMPORTANT to your household? (top 4) Q7. Sum of top 4 choices Number Percent Adult art, dance, performing arts 37 17.1 % Adult fitness & wellness programs 86 39.8 % Adult sports programs 25 11.6 % Adult Art classes 46 21.3 % Family events 35 16.2 % Farmers Market 128 59.3 % Gymnastics & tumbling programs 11 5.1 % Nature programs 59 27.3 % No school day activities 21 9.7 % Preschool programs/early childhood 15 6.9 % Programs for people of all abilities (all-inclusive programming) 17 7.9 % STEAM programs (science, technology, engineering, arts, & math) 15 6.9 % Teen programs 14 6.5 % Tennis lessons & leagues 11 5.1 % Youth art, dance, performing arts 7 3.2 % Youth fitness & wellness programs 14 6.5 % Youth learn to swim programs 48 22.2 % Youth outdoor skills programs 15 6.9 % Youth sports programs 38 17.6 % Youth summer camp programs 28 13.0 % Other 12 5.6 % None chosen 20 9.3 % Total 702 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 308 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 25 Q8. CHECK ALL of the reasons you and the members of your household do not use Iowa City Parks and Recreation programs, facilities, and events more often. Q8. All the reasons you do not use City Parks & Recreation programs, facilities, & events more often Number Percent Classes are full 55 25.5 % Facilities are not well maintained 55 25.5 % Facilities do not have right equipment 50 23.1 % Facility too far to walk/bike 23 10.6 % Fees are too high 17 7.9 % Lack of quality programs 60 27.8 % Lack of transportation 11 5.1 % Not interested 24 11.1 % Operating hours not convenient 55 25.5 % Poor customer service from staff 2 0.9 % Program or facility not offered 73 33.8 % Program times are not convenient 66 30.6 % Registration is difficult 16 7.4 % Too busy 38 17.6 % Too far from residence 17 7.9 % Use services of other agencies 48 22.2 % Other 41 19.0 % Total 651 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 309 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 26 Q9. Outdoor Pool Amenity Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of outdoor pool amenity listed below. (N=216) Yes No Q9-1. Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 36.6% 63.4% Q9-2. Adult deck 29.6% 70.4% Q9-3. Concessions & concession area 32.4% 67.6% Q9-4. Deck chairs 52.8% 47.2% Q9-5. Deep water (7+ feet) 37.0% 63.0% Q9-6. Diving boards 31.0% 69.0% Q9-7. Lap lanes 54.2% 45.8% Q9-8. Lazy river 38.0% 62.0% Q9-9. Open recreational swimming area 47.7% 52.3% Q9-10. Shade areas 56.0% 44.0% Q9-11. Shallow water (2-4 feet) 37.5% 62.5% Q9-12. Splash pad/sprayground 26.4% 73.6% Q9-13. Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 24.1% 75.9% Q9-14. Water slides 36.1% 63.9% Q9-15. Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 9.3% 90.7% Q9-16. Wave pool/surf simulation 17.6% 82.4% Q9-17. Zero-depth/beach entry 39.4% 60.6% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 310 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 27 Q9. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=199) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q9-1. Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% Q9-2. Adult deck 16.4% 30.9% 21.8% 30.9% Q9-3. Concessions & concession area 3.1% 15.6% 39.1% 42.2% Q9-4. Deck chairs 22.6% 42.5% 25.5% 9.4% Q9-5. Deep water (7+ feet) 41.6% 31.2% 22.1% 5.2% Q9-6. Diving boards 45.2% 38.7% 12.9% 3.2% Q9-7. Lap lanes 22.4% 45.8% 26.2% 5.6% Q9-8. Lazy river 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 94.5% Q9-9. Open recreational swimming area 36.2% 36.2% 23.4% 4.3% Q9-10. Shade areas 1.9% 15.7% 46.3% 36.1% Q9-11. Shallow water (2-4 feet) 23.9% 37.3% 28.4% 10.4% Q9-12. Splash pad/sprayground 16.0% 24.0% 22.0% 38.0% Q9-13. Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 2.5% 0.0% 25.0% 72.5% Q9-14. Water slides 2.8% 0.0% 8.5% 88.7% Q9-15. Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 89.5% Q9-16. Wave pool/surf simulation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Q9-17. Zero-depth/beach entry 1.4% 9.9% 26.8% 62.0% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 311 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 28 Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. Top choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 18 8.3 % Adult deck 8 3.7 % Concessions & concession area 4 1.9 % Deck chairs 7 3.2 % Deep water (7+ feet) 5 2.3 % Diving boards 6 2.8 % Lap lanes 60 27.8 % Lazy river 17 7.9 % Open recreational swimming area 21 9.7 % Shade areas 10 4.6 % Shallow water (2-4 feet) 6 2.8 % Splash pad/sprayground 2 0.9 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 13 6.0 % Water slides 5 2.3 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 1 0.5 % Zero-depth/beach entry 10 4.6 % None chosen 23 10.6 % Total 216 100.0 % Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 2nd choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 7 3.2 % Adult deck 9 4.2 % Concessions & concession area 5 2.3 % Deck chairs 10 4.6 % Deep water (7+ feet) 14 6.5 % Diving boards 9 4.2 % Lap lanes 22 10.2 % Lazy river 12 5.6 % Open recreational swimming area 21 9.7 % Shade areas 23 10.6 % Shallow water (2-4 feet) 7 3.2 % Splash pad/sprayground 6 2.8 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 9 4.2 % Water slides 12 5.6 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 1 0.5 % Wave pool/surf simulation 4 1.9 % Zero-depth/beach entry 10 4.6 % None chosen 35 16.2 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 312 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 30 Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 3rd choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 8 3.7 % Adult deck 12 5.6 % Concessions & concession area 6 2.8 % Deck chairs 20 9.3 % Deep water (7+ feet) 5 2.3 % Diving boards 5 2.3 % Lap lanes 11 5.1 % Lazy river 13 6.0 % Open recreational swimming area 15 6.9 % Shade areas 21 9.7 % Shallow water (2-4 feet) 7 3.2 % Splash pad/sprayground 8 3.7 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 8 3.7 % Water slides 17 7.9 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 1 0.5 % Wave pool/surf simulation 5 2.3 % Zero-depth/beach entry 11 5.1 % None chosen 43 19.9 % Total 216 100.0 % Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q10. 4th choice Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 12 5.6 % Adult deck 5 2.3 % Concessions & concession area 9 4.2 % Deck chairs 11 5.1 % Deep water (7+ feet) 8 3.7 % Diving boards 5 2.3 % Lap lanes 4 1.9 % Lazy river 12 5.6 % Open recreational swimming area 14 6.5 % Shade areas 19 8.8 % Shallow water (2-4 feet) 8 3.7 % Splash pad/sprayground 4 1.9 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 4 1.9 % Water slides 10 4.6 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 3 1.4 % Wave pool/surf simulation 8 3.7 % Zero-depth/beach entry 15 6.9 % None chosen 65 30.1 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 313 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 32 Q10. Which FOUR of the outdoor pool amenities from the list in Question 9 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 4) Q10. Sum of top 4 choices Number Percent Active water features (climbing wall, obstacle course, lily pad walk, zip line, etc.) 45 20.8 % Adult deck 34 15.7 % Concessions & concession area 24 11.1 % Deck chairs 48 22.2 % Deep water (7+ feet) 32 14.8 % Diving boards 25 11.6 % Lap lanes 97 44.9 % Lazy river 54 25.0 % Open recreational swimming area 71 32.9 % Shade areas 73 33.8 % Shallow water (2-4 feet) 28 13.0 % Splash pad/sprayground 20 9.3 % Toddler features (slide, sprays, play structures, etc.) 34 15.7 % Water slides 44 20.4 % Water sports (basketball, volleyball, log roll, etc.) 6 2.8 % Wave pool/surf simulation 17 7.9 % Zero-depth/beach entry 46 21.3 % None chosen 23 10.6 % Total 721 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 314 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 33 Q11. Pool Program Needs. Please indicate if you or any member of your household has a need for each type of pool program listed below. (N=216) Yes No Q11-1. Dive team/diving programs 4.2% 95.8% Q11-2. Lap swimming 54.6% 45.4% Q11-3. Senior aquatic programs 23.1% 76.9% Q11-4. Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 18.1% 81.9% Q11-5. Swim lessons 47.2% 52.8% Q11-6. Swim team 12.5% 87.5% Q11-7. Water fitness classes/water aerobics 36.6% 63.4% Q11-8. Family Open Swim 47.2% 52.8% Q11. If "Yes," how well are your needs met? (N=198) Fully met Mostly met Partly met Not met Q11-1. Dive team/diving programs 11.1% 11.1% 0.0% 77.8% Q11-2. Lap swimming 17.5% 48.2% 30.7% 3.5% Q11-3. Senior aquatic programs 4.4% 20.0% 48.9% 26.7% Q11-4. Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 2.9% 11.8% 47.1% 38.2% Q11-5. Swim lessons 9.1% 30.7% 37.5% 22.7% Q11-6. Swim team 18.2% 9.1% 45.5% 27.3% Q11-7. Water fitness classes/water aerobics 1.4% 26.1% 52.2% 20.3% Q11-8. Family Open Swim 10.9% 43.5% 35.9% 9.8% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 315 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 34 Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. Top choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 1 0.5 % Lap swimming 70 32.4 % Senior aquatic programs 19 8.8 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 5 2.3 % Swim lessons 49 22.7 % Swim team 3 1.4 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 7 3.2 % Family Open Swim 33 15.3 % None chosen 29 13.4 % Total 216 100.0 % Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. 2nd choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 3 1.4 % Lap swimming 16 7.4 % Senior aquatic programs 11 5.1 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 10 4.6 % Swim lessons 27 12.5 % Swim team 9 4.2 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 46 21.3 % Family Open Swim 42 19.4 % None chosen 52 24.1 % Total 216 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 316 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 35 Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? Q12. 3rd choice Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 2 0.9 % Lap swimming 18 8.3 % Senior aquatic programs 13 6.0 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 19 8.8 % Swim lessons 18 8.3 % Swim team 6 2.8 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 18 8.3 % Family Open Swim 23 10.6 % None chosen 99 45.8 % Total 216 100.0 % Q12. Which THREE of the pool programs from the list in Question 11 are MOST IMPORTANT to you and the members of your household? (top 3) Q12. Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Dive team/diving programs 6 2.8 % Lap swimming 104 48.1 % Senior aquatic programs 43 19.9 % Special aquatic events (Floating Pumpkin, Night Swim) 34 15.7 % Swim lessons 94 43.5 % Swim team 18 8.3 % Water fitness classes/water aerobics 71 32.9 % Family Open Swim 98 45.4 % None chosen 29 13.4 % Total 497 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 317 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 36 Q13. City Park Pool celebrated its 72nd anniversary in 2021. It is time to talk about the pool's future. If the cost were the same, would you... Q13. What would you say about City Park Pool's future Number Percent Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now 62 28.7 % Design a new pool layout with new amenities 129 59.7 % Not provided 25 11.6 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q13. City Park Pool celebrated its 72nd anniversary in 2021. It is time to talk about the pool's future. If the cost were the same, would you... (without "not provided") Q13. What would you say about City Park Pool's future Number Percent Renovate City Park Pool to look the same as it is now 62 32.5 % Design a new pool layout with new amenities 129 67.5 % Total 191 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 318 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 37 Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (N=216) Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Not provided Q14-1. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race 0.5% 2.8% 8.3% 22.7% 48.6% 17.1% Q14-2. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual preference 0.9% 1.4% 7.9% 23.6% 50.0% 16.2% Q14-3. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity 0.9% 2.3% 8.8% 22.7% 46.8% 18.5% Q14-4. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs 0.0% 0.5% 7.4% 22.7% 50.5% 19.0% Q14-5. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin 0.5% 1.4% 6.0% 22.7% 49.5% 19.9% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 319 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 39 Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Not provided Q14-6. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid 1.4% 3.2% 6.9% 19.4% 43.1% 25.9% Q14-7. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability 1.9% 3.2% 6.5% 18.5% 43.1% 26.9% Q14-8. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability 2.3% 1.9% 6.9% 16.7% 42.6% 29.6% Q14-9. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability 2.3% 4.6% 6.9% 17.1% 41.2% 27.8% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 320 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 40 WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (without "not provided") (N=216) Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Q14-1. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on race 0.6% 3.4% 10.1% 27.4% 58.7% Q14-2. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on sexual preference 1.1% 1.7% 9.4% 28.2% 59.7% Q14-3. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on gender identity 1.1% 2.8% 10.8% 27.8% 57.4% Q14-4. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on religious beliefs or customs 0.0% 0.6% 9.1% 28.0% 62.3% Q14-5. Someone in my household is uncomfortable using ICPR facilities due to the way they feel they are treated based on our country of origin 0.6% 1.7% 7.5% 28.3% 61.8% Q14-6. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who uses a wheelchair or other mobility aid 1.9% 4.4% 9.4% 26.3% 58.1% Q14-7. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a cognitive or behavioral disability 2.5% 4.4% 8.9% 25.3% 58.9% Q14-8. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a sensory disability 3.3% 2.6% 9.9% 23.7% 60.5% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 321 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 41 WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q14. Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using a scale of 5 to 1, where 5 means "Strongly Agree," and 1 means "Strongly Disagree." (without "not provided") Strongly Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree disagree Q14-9. ICPR facilities are difficult for my household to use because we have a member who has a disability 3.2% 6.4% 9.6% 23.7% 57.1% APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 322 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 42 Q15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? Q15. How supportive would you be of City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities Number Percent Very supportive 63 29.2 % Supportive 59 27.3 % Neutral 51 23.6 % Not supportive 21 9.7 % Not at all supportive 10 4.6 % Don't know 12 5.6 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “DON’T KNOW” Q15. How supportive would you be of the City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities that could potentially attract and retain large youth and adult sports tournaments? (without "don't know") Q15. How supportive would you be of City making improvements to outdoor sports facilities Number Percent Very supportive 63 30.9 % Supportive 59 28.9 % Neutral 51 25.0 % Not supportive 21 10.3 % Not at all supportive 10 4.9 % Total 204 100.0 % Q15a. Please check the top TWO reasons why you are not supportive of the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department making improvements to outdoor sports facilities. Q15a. Reasons why you are not supportive of City Parks & Recreation Department making improvements to outdoor sports facilities Number Percent I need more information before I can respond 8 18.6 % Other City services should be a higher priority 14 32.6 % This project does not serve the needs of all City residents 11 25.6 % My family doesn't play traditional sports 5 11.6 % Other recreation opportunities are more important 10 23.3 % I believe the focus should be recreational skill development, not tournaments 14 32.6 % Other 5 11.6 % Total 67 APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 323 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 43 Q16. Special Events. Iowa City has many large event opportunities throughout the year hosted by non- profits and the University of Iowa. Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to also host events? Q16. Is there a need for City Parks & Recreation Department to also host events Number Percent Yes 85 39.4 % No 87 40.3 % Not provided 44 20.4 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q16. Special Events. Iowa City has many large event opportunities throughout the year hosted by non- profits and the University of Iowa. Is there a need for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department to also host events? (without "not provided") Q16. Is there a need for City Parks & Recreation Department to also host events Number Percent Yes 85 49.4 % No 87 50.6 % Total 172 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 324 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 44 Q17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? Q17. How important is it for City to fund programs for underserved populations Number Percent Very important 119 55.1 % Important 66 30.6 % Neutral 14 6.5 % Not important 3 1.4 % Not at all important 1 0.5 % Don't know 13 6.0 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “DON’T KNOW” Q17. How important do you think it is for the City to fund programs for underserved populations? (without "don't know") Q17. How important is it for City to fund programs for underserved populations Number Percent Very important 119 58.6 % Important 66 32.5 % Neutral 14 6.9 % Not important 3 1.5 % Not at all important 1 0.5 % Total 203 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 325 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 45 Q18. Counting yourself, how many people in your household are... Mean Sum Under 5 years 0.3 68 5-9 years 0.3 67 10-14 years 0.3 56 15-19 years 0.2 44 20-24 years 0.1 22 25-34 years 0.2 52 35-44 years 0.7 139 45-54 years 0.4 89 55-64 years 0.2 36 65-74 years 0.4 74 75-84 years 0.1 11 85+ years 0.0 3 Q19. What is your age? Q19. Your age Number Percent 18-34 37 17.1 % 35-44 66 30.6 % 45-54 40 18.5 % 55-64 20 9.3 % 65-74 41 19.0 % Not provided 12 5.6 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q19. What is your age? (without "not provided") Q19. Your age Number Percent 18-34 37 18.1 % 35-44 66 32.4 % 45-54 40 19.6 % 55-64 20 9.8 % 65-74 41 20.1 % Total 204 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 326 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 46 Q20. How many dogs are in your household? Q20. How many dogs are in your household Number Percent 0 97 44.9 % 1 81 37.5 % 2 22 10.2 % 3+ 4 1.9 % Not provided 12 5.6 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q20. How many dogs are in your household? (without "not provided") Q20. How many dogs are in your household Number Percent 0 97 47.5 % 1 81 39.7 % 2 22 10.8 % 3+ 4 2.0 % Total 204 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 327 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 47 Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City? Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City Number Percent 0-5 25 11.6 % 6-10 32 14.8 % 11-15 29 13.4 % 16-20 35 16.2 % 21-30 32 14.8 % 31+ 56 25.9 % Not provided 7 3.2 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City? (without "not provided") Q21. How long have you lived in Iowa City Number Percent 0-5 25 12.0 % 6-10 32 15.3 % 11-15 29 13.9 % 16-20 35 16.7 % 21-30 32 15.3 % 31+ 56 26.8 % Total 209 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 328 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 48 Q22. Your gender: Q22. Your gender Number Percent Male 48 22.2 % Female 154 71.3 % Prefer to self-describe 2 0.9 % Not provided 12 5.6 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q22. Your gender: (without "not provided") Q22. Your gender Number Percent Male 48 23.5 % Female 154 75.5 % Prefer to self-describe 2 1.0 % Total 204 100.0 % Q22-3. Self-describe your gender: Q22-3. Self-describe your gender Number Percent Nonbinary 1 100.0 % Total 1 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 329 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 49 Q23. Are you or other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino ancestry? Q23. Are you of Hispanic or Latino Ancestry Number Percent Yes 9 4.2 % No 194 89.8 % Not provided 13 6.0 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q23. Are you or other members of your household of Hispanic or Latino ancestry? (without "not provided") Q23. Are you of Hispanic or Latino Ancestry Number Percent Yes 9 4.4 % No 194 95.6 % Total 203 100.0 % Q24. Which of the following best describes your race/ethnicity? Q24. What best describes your race/ethnicity Number Percent White 197 91.2 % African American/Black 4 1.9 % Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander 6 2.8 % American Indian/Alaska Native 2 0.9 % Other 8 3.7 % Total 217 Q24-5. Self-describe your race/ethnicity?: Q24-5. Self-describe your race/ethnicity Number Percent Indian 1 100.0 % Total 1 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 330 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 50 Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home? Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home Number Percent Yes 204 94.4 % No 3 1.4 % Not provided 9 4.2 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home? (without "not provided") Q25. Is English the primary language spoken in your home Number Percent Yes 204 98.6 % No 3 1.4 % Total 207 100.0 % Q25a. What language is the primary language in your home? Q25a. What language is the primary language in your home Number Percent Danish 1 100.0 % Total 1 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 331 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 51 Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability Number Percent Yes 32 14.8 % No 165 76.4 % Not provided 19 8.8 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability? (without "not provided") Q26. Does anyone in your household have a disability Number Percent Yes 32 16.2 % No 165 83.8 % Total 197 100.0 % Q26-1. Please describe the disability: Q26-1. What kind of disability Number Percent Amputation 2 11.1 % Walking 1 5.6 % Arthritis 1 5.6 % Walking difficulty 1 5.6 % Hearing 1 5.6 % Mobile, intellectual, sensory 1 5.6 % Autism 1 5.6 % Autism, anxiety, adhd 1 5.6 % Diabetes 1 5.6 % Ambulatory issues 1 5.6 % Hard hearing 1 5.6 % Chronic pain that severely limits mobility 1 5.6 % Craniofacial difference 1 5.6 % Get headaches when around cell phones 1 5.6 % Cerebral palsy 1 5.6 % Spinal cord injury 1 5.6 % Learning disability 1 5.6 % Total 18 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 332 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Iowa City Non-Random Survey Results ETC Institute (2022) Page 52 Q27. What is your total annual household income? Q27. What is your total annual household income Number Percent Under $30K 7 3.2 % $30K to $49,999 17 7.9 % $50K to $69,999 25 11.6 % $70K to $89,999 21 9.7 % $90K to $119,999 45 20.8 % $120K to $174,999 38 17.6 % $175K+ 27 12.5 % Not provided 36 16.7 % Total 216 100.0 % WITHOUT “NOT PROVIDED” Q27. What is your total annual household income? (without "not provided") Q27. What is your total annual household income Number Percent Under $30K 7 3.9 % $30K to $49,999 17 9.4 % $50K to $69,999 25 13.9 % $70K to $89,999 21 11.7 % $90K to $119,999 45 25.0 % $120K to $174,999 38 21.1 % $175K+ 27 15.0 % Total 180 100.0 % APPENDIX B: NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEYS 333 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 334 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Appendix C1: Similar Provider Details In addition to the organizations listed in the similar provider summary (Table 4.2), there are a number of other organizations throughout the City and County that provide recreation programs and services. These organizations include nonprofits and private organizations. Unlike the organizations included in Table 4.2, these nonprofits and private organization typically offer one or two specific opportunities or target a specific age group or interest. Additionally, based on this report’s focus on aquatics, indoor and outdoor swimming opportunities are included in this report. University of Iowa One of the largest providers of recreation and leisure opportunities within the City is the University of Iowa. The University of Iowa operates 11 facilities including, Campus Recreation and Wellness Center, Field House, Fitness East, Hawkeye Recreation Fields, Hawkeye Rugby Fields, Hawkeye Softball complex, Hawkeye Tennis & Recreation Complex, MacBride Nature Recreation Area, Outdoor Rental Center, P. Sue Beckwith, M.D., Boathouse, and Challenge Course These facilities offers the following amenities: • Three full-service fitness and wellness centers • Eight basketball/volleyball courts • Five badminton courts • Sixteen racquetball courts • Two squash courts • Olympic weightlifting room • Six multi-activity rooms • Climbing wall (52.5 feet) • Five tennis clubs • Three indoor swimming pools • One 50-meter competitive swimming pool with 18-foot deep diving well • Recreation fields, including rugby and softball complex • Nature recreation area • Outdoor rental center • Boathouse • Challenge course In addition to providing the facilities listed above, the University of Iowa also provides a number of programs including student sports clubs, camps, programs for adults, fitness, swimming, tennis, basketball, racquetball, volleyball, and special events. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 335 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Nonprofit Providers Other notable nonprofit providers of recreation type services within the City and County are divided into four categories including: • Early childhood and camps • Programs for people with disabilities or dealing with serious illness • Youth sports and general recreation • STEM/environmental education programming The nonprofits included in Table C1 provide the City and neighboring regions with early childhood programming and youth camps. Table C1: Nonprofits offering Early Childhood and Camp Programs Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered Coralville Summer Day Camps 1506 8th St. Coralville, IA https://www.coralville. org/418/Summer-Day- Camps Hiking, Specialty Camps, and Theater Camp Goose Town 521 N. Dodge St., Iowa City, IA http://www. mannbasp.com/camp- goosetown.html Hiking, Swimming, Arts & Crafts, Science Experiments, Field Trips Camp IO-DIS-E-CA 3271 Sandy Beach Rd. NE Solon, Iowa https://campiodiseca. org/ Provides year-round outdoor recreational Camp Tanager 1614 W Mt. Vernon Rd., Mt. Vernon, IA https://tanagerplace. org/prevention/camp- tanager/ Day/Night Camps for children with disability ages 6-11 The Arc of Southeast Iowa 2620 Muscatine Ave., Iowa City, IA https://www.arcsei. org/ Summer Day Camps children/youth with disability Iowa Hawkeyes Sports Camps N411 Carver Hawkeye Arena, Iowa City, IA https://www. iowasportscamps. com/ High School and College indoor and outdoor sports camp University of Iowa Wildlife Camps Iowa City, IA https://wild.education. uiowa.edu/wildlife- camps Nature based and outdoor camps APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 336 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Table C2 includes nonprofit organizations in Iowa City that provide programs and services for residents with disabilities or those battling serious illnesses. Table C2: Nonprofits that offer Programs for People with Disabilities or Those Dealing with Illness Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered Johnson County Disability Services 2651 Roberts Rd., Iowa City, IA https://www. johnsoncountyiowa. gov Programs for people with disabilities The Arc Southeast Iowa 2620 Muscatine Ave., Iowa City, IA https://www.arcsei. org/our-history/ Direct, support programs to people with disabilities Mayors Youth Empowerment Program 407 Highland Ct., Iowa City, IA http://www.myep.us/ home.html Providing person-centered services which facilitate personal growth and community inclusion to people with disabilities Systems Unlimited, Inc. 2533 Scott Blvd. SE, Iowa City, IA https://www.sui.org Provides services to people living with disabilities and mental health needs across eastern Iowa APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 337 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City There are several nonprofits in and around Iowa City that provide a variety of youth sports opportunities and general recreation. These organizations are summarized in Table C3. Table C3: Nonprofit Sports and General Recreation Organizations Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered North Liberty Recreation Leagues Not found https:// northlibertyiowa.org Leagues includes Boys & Girls Youth Basketball Volleyball, Flag Football Iowa City Kickers Soccer Club PO Box 226 Iowa City, IA https://www. ickickers.org/ Boys & Girls Soccer grades K-12 Iowa Soccer Club Inc. 220 Lafayette St. #124, Iowa City, IA https:// iowasoccerclub. com/ Provides professional coaching for youth soccer players of all levels Solon Futbol Club PO Box 501 Solon, IA https://www.solonfc. org/home Boys & Girls Soccer grades 3rd – 8th Solon High School Soccer 33600 Inwood Dr., Solon, IA https:// ia.varsitybound.com Boys & Girls Soccer grades 9-12 Iowa City Alliance Soccer Club PO Box 660 Iowa City, IA https://sites.google. com/a/icalliance.org/ iowa-city-alliance- soccer-club Boys & Girls Soccer ages 3 - 18 Solon Community Center 313 S Iowa St., Solon, IA https://www.solon- iowa.com Provide youth programs that include; Soccer, Baseball/Softball, Swim Lessons, Tee Ball, Camp Creamery, Dance, Flag Football, Child Basketball Camp, Girls Volleyball, Basketball, Ice Skating APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 338 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs There are several providers in and around Iowa City that provide STEM and environmental educational opportunities. These organizations are summarized in Table C4. Table C4: Iowa City Nonprofit Providers of STEM and Environmental Education Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered Art of STEM 120 North Dubuque St.,Iowa City, IA https://www. facebook.com/ ARTofSTEMIowaCity/ Provides integrated and applied processes of art & knowledge of math and science in order to create technologies and solutions for real- world problems, using an engineering design approach. Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education at the University of Iowa 600 Blank Honors Center, Iowa City, IA https://belinblank. education.uiowa.edu/ Offers specialized educational opportunities for students, assessment, counseling, and consultation services, curriculum and facilitates professional development of educators. Coralville Parks and Recreation 1506 8th St.,Coralville, IA https://www. coralville.org/ Grades 5 & 6: STEAM Wars Iowa City Fab Lab 870 South Capitol St Iowa City, IA https://icfablab.org/ A community center which makes tools and technology accessible to everyone in the corridor. Jacobson Institute University of Iowa 30 North Dubuque StreetIowa City, IA https:// jacobsoninstitute.org/ Workshops to incorporate STEM into teaching programs K-12. Equip students with critical STEM innovation and entrepreneurship skills. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 339 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Iowa State University (Extension & Outreach) Johnson County 4-H 3109 Old Highway 218 S Iowa City, IA https://www. extension.iastate.edu/ johnson/4h Iowa 4-H Youth development is a premier youth development program of education to K-12 youth with a focus on healthy living, STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), leadership and civic engagement, and communication and the arts. Mathnasium of Iowa City 2451 Coral Ct.,Iowa City, IA https://www. mathnasium.com/ iowacity Provides help to kids in grades 1-12 to better understand math. Sylvan Learning of Coralville 1100 5th St.,Ste. 105, Coralville, IA https://locations. sylvanlearning.com/ us/coralville Focuses on building academic confidence, igniting intellectual curiosity and inspiring a love for learning. Provides individualized personal support to help children grasp concepts. Southeast Iowa STEM Region 2301 Oakdale Blvd Ste. 8, Coralville, IA https://se.iowastem. org/ Provides STEM services to Southeast Iowa STEM Region. The Iowa Governor's Advisory Council, is a collaborative effort with a partnership with The University of Iowa and Kirkwood Community College APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 340 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Private Organizations In addition to the many nonprofit organizations, there are a number of private entities in and around the City that provide recreation and leisure opportunities to residents. Table C5 includes all of the private organizations offering recreation and leisure services to City residents. There are a wide range of private fitness facilities within Iowa City. Although some of these have changed their operations due to Covid-19 (less offerings and smaller classes), they all appear to be open and providing services. Table C5: Private Fitness Facilities in and around Iowa City Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered 9Round Fitness 308 1st Ave, Suite 105, Coralville, IA https://www.9round. com Semi-private instructions, Kickboxing, Circuit Training, Heart Rate Training, Nutrition Support Alchemy Strength and Conditioning 2345 James St. Ste. 3, Coralville, IA https://www. alchemystrong.com Personal Training, tool, individual programming, Competitions for: CrossFit, Martial Arts, Hockey, Baseball and Basketball Anytime Fitness 458 Hwy 1 West, Iowa City, IA https://www. anytimefitness.com/ gyms/1110/Iowa-City- IA-52246/0 24-Hr Access, Open Gym, Free weights, machines, Personal Training, Fitness assessment, Virtual Coaching, Battle ropes. Barre3 1312 Melrose Ave., Iowa City, IA https://barre3.com/ studio-locations/iowa- city Barr in-studio and livestream, Community Barre3. Core Fitness Iowa 1395 Jordan St., North Liberty, IA https://www.facebook. com/CoreFitnessEast/ Two facilities (Iowa City and North Liberty) that provides sauna and steam rooms, personal training, group exercise, “Kid’s Club” childcare, boot camp, women’s only workout area. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 341 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CrossFit Kilo II 860 S Capitol St., Iowa City, IA https://crossfitkilo2. com/ Open Gym, Free weights, machines, CrossFit camp. Curves 881 22nd Ave., Coralville, IA https://www.curves. com Boxing, Cardio, Body Basics, Balance, Health & Wellness, Nutrition, 8-week body project for Women Fifth Street Fitness 808 5th St., Coralville, IA https://5thstreetfitness. com/ Open Gym, Free weights, machines for circuit training Grit Gym 3599 Dolphin Dr. SE #64h, Iowa City, IA https://www.gritgym. com/ Small Group and Personal Training Iowa City Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu 2001 Stevens Dr. #1, Iowa City, IA https://www. iowacitybjj.com/ Xande Ribeiro, Six Blades Jiu-Jitsu Jiu-jitsu: Adult, Women, Self Defense, Kids, Family, Specialized Training Magni Barbell Club 4193 Alyssa Ct., Iowa City, IA https://www.facebook. com/magnibarbell Strength compound for Powerlifting, Strongman, Olympic lifting and strength training. North Dodge Athletic Club 2400 N Dodge St., Iowa City, IA https://www.ndacgym. com/ Tennis, Fitness, Group exercise, Personal/Group Training, Aquatics, Basketball, Youth Programs/Activities, Racquetball, Karate Orange Theory Fitness 1303 5th St., Coralville, IA https://www. orangetheory.com/ en-us/locations/iowa/ coralville/ Total-body group workout that combines science, coaching and technology APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 342 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Performance Health & Fitness 3290 Ridgeway Dr. Ste. 1, Coralville, IA https:// performanceforhealth. com/ Personal Training, Group Fitness, Nutrition Coaching, Health Coaching, Team Training, Boot Camp, Sport & Speed Athlete Dev., Performance App/ Blog, Free Wellness Challenges Planet Fitness 1660 Sycamore St., Iowa City, IA https://www. planetfitness.com/ gyms/iowa-city-iowa- city-market-place-ia Open Gym, Free weights, machines for circuit training The Pro-Fit Gym 770 Quarry Rd.,Coralville, IA https://www. theprofitgym.com/ CrossFit, Athlete academy, Personal Training, Small group training, Physical Therapy, Warrior standards, Free Trial classes, Youth programs TheGYM 213 E College St., Iowa City, IA https://thegymiowacity. com/ 24/7 Access, New equipment, Personal Training, Outdoor Terrace, Free Parking, Indoor Pool (Aquatics) Thrive Gym 2205 E Grantview Dr., Coralville, IA https://thrivegym.com/Group Exercise, Personal Training, Kids Club, Open Gym, Sauna, Strength Top Shape Gym 1395 Jordan St.,North Liberty, IA http://topshapegym. com/ Group Training, Personal Training, Open Gym, Body Pump, Yoga, Body Step, Aqua Blast, Body flow Top Shape Gym 1555 S 1st Ave., Iowa City, IA https://topshapegym. com/ Group and Personal Training Programs APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 343 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City University of Iowa, Field House 225 S Grand Ave., Iowa City, IA https://recserv.uiowa. edu/field-house 334,000 square feet facility. Includes:8 Basketball/Volleyball Courts, 5 Badminton Courts, 16 Racquetball Courts, 2 Squash Courts, Cycling Studio, Mind/ Body Studio, Olympic Weightlifting Room, Field House Pool, 6 Multi-Activity Rooms, classrooms, locker rooms, saunas, table tennis, and an indoor track. University of Iowa, Fitness East Recreational Facility Halsey Hall, Iowa City, IA https://recserv.uiowa. edu/facilities/fitness- east Cardiovascular Equipment, Cable Machine Equipment, Free Weights, and Open gym. Versa Fitness 2201 E Grantview Dr., Coralville, IA https://www. versafitnesstraining. com Cardio classes, Wide Range of Equipment, Kettlebells, Battle Ropes, Bodyweight, Med Balls, Interval training, Fit Tempo, Resistance training, Aerobic condition, and Spin classes. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 344 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Swimming Opportunities Table C6 provides a listing of indoor swimming opportunities within the City. Table C6: Indoor Swimming Facilities in Iowa City Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered Coralville Recreation Center Indoor Pool 1506 8th St.,Coralville, IA https://www. coralville.org/279/ Indoor-Pool Swim Lessons, Aqua Aerobics North Dodge Athletic Club 2400 N Dodge St., Iowa City, IA https://www. ndacgym.com/ 25 yard long indoor pool providing swim lessons, water aerobics classes for all ages North Liberty Community Center 520 W Cherry St., North Liberty, IA https:// northlibertyiowa. org/departments/ recreation/ Provides aquatic services and camps University of Iowa, Field House Pool 225 S Grand Ave., Iowa City, IA https://recserv.uiowa. edu/field-house Programs and services include swim lessons, open swim, lap swim, masters swim, an age group competitive swim club (the Iowa Flyers), and American Red Cross certification courses Outdoor swimming pools in Iowa City are summarized in Table C7. Table C7: Outdoor Swimming in and around Iowa City Organization Name Address Website Programs Offered Coralville Community Aquatic Center 1513 7th St., Coralville, IA https://www. coralville.org/273/ Coralville- Community-Aquatic- Center Summer Outdoor Pool with splash deck with fountains and play structures. APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 345 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Appendix C2: Participation Heat Maps The following series of heat maps depict the household location of the Department’s 2019 participants. The blue circles indicate sparse participation; the warmer colors depict dense areas of participation. Figure C1: 2019 Participation, State Perspective APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 346 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Figure C2: 2019 Participation, City Perspective APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 347 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Figure C3: 2019 Participation, West Side of City Perspective APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 348 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Figure C4: 2019 Participation, East Side of City Perspective APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 349 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Appendix C3: Departmental DEI Assessment Figure C5: Visual Depiction of Departmental DEI Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Administrative Equity: 1 Fair registration policies and processes (i.e. reserve windows of time to accommodate different schedules, multilingual forms)13 2 Simplified financial aid application and use process 16 3 Equipment supply/check-out (equipment library concept as well as program-based)7 4 Hiring practices (race, geographic origin, gender)15 5 Staff training in equity, bias, cultural awareness, mental health first aid, de-escalation, etc.15 Program Menu Equity: 1 A variety of price levels throughout core program categories 10 2 Community groups/partners included in program menu creation 11 3 Representative planning (program designed by staff or residents from underserved populations)8 4 Thoughtful scheduling (avoid/accommodate religious observances; coordinate with other community groups' events)17 Program Execution: 1 Multilingual instructors 6 2 Program led in language(s) other than English 5 3 Community collaboration/partnerships to plan and/or execute 15 4 Inclusion aides 12 5 Greeters/guides/welcome crew 8 6 Representative leadership (i.e., instructors)12 7 Marketing/outreach to specific, underserved groups 12 8 Marketing/outreach regarding financial aid availability 15Weighted ScoreICPR Departmental Assessment Non-Existent / Weak Emerging Developing Transforming Expert / Leader APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS Non-Existent / Weak Emerging Developing Transforming Expert / LeaderNon-Existent / Weak Emerging Developing Transforming Expert / LeaderWeightedScore1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 350 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Appendix C4: Life Cycle Analysis Details Life Cycle Analysis Program Categorization by Area and Stage ADULT RECREATION Introduction Growth Mature Decline Bocce Tournament - Doubles Rain Barrel Adult Tennis Acrylic Painting Spikeball Tournament - Doubles Forest Bathing Adult Basketball Watercolor Futsal Tournament - 5v5 Gardening Adult CoRec A Volleyball Misc. Arts Misc. Nature Education Adult CoRec B Volleyball Bus Trip - Chicago Cubs vs Mets - June 21 Wheel and Hand Building Adult Women's A Volleyball Senior High Basketball League Adult Women’s B Volleyball AQUATICS Introduction Growth Mature Decline Adult Preschool Lessons Parent Tot Floating Pumpkin Patch Lessons Level 1-6 Iowa City NC Swim Team Private Lessons Safe Swimming Saturday Private Swim Lessons Underwater Egg Hunt Custom Private Swim Lessons Blended Lifeguard Training Lifeguard Instructor Course Water Safety Instructor APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 351 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CAMPS & DAYS OFF Introduction Growth Mature Decline Summer Camp Spring Break Camp Winter Break Camp 12/23/19 No School Day Camps EVENTS Introduction Growth Mature Decline Hispanic Heritage Month Freeze Fest Winter Solstice Halloween Carnival STEAM events Taste of Market Kid's Day at Market Rollerskating Arts at Neighborhood Center FITNESS & WELLNESS Introduction Growth Mature Decline Adult Yoga Children's Yoga INCLUSIVE & ADAPTIVE Introduction Growth Mature Decline Misc. Dance Misc. Dance Basketball Bocce Misc. Crafts Misc. Crafts Flag Football Aquatics Misc. Life Skills Misc. Life Skills Soccer Volleyball Cooking Cooking Cheer / Dance Team Wintersports BINGO/Games BINGO/Games Tennis Parties Taekwondo Bowling Track & Field Running Softball APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 352 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs OUTDOOR EDUCATION Introduction Growth Mature Decline Misc. Nature Adventure: Walk the Creek STEAM Introduction Growth Mature Decline Misc. Art: Preschool Misc. Dance: Youth Misc. Art Wheel and Hand Building YOUTH SPORTS Introduction Growth Mature Decline Wrestling 3 on 3 Basketball 5 on 5 Basketball Football Strider Bike Race TKD Tumbling Tennis Volleyball Triathlon Lacrosse APPENDIX C: RECREATION ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING DETAILS 353 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 354 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS This page is intentionally left blank. 355 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City of Iowa City City Park Pool Facility Evaluation March 25,2022 Prepared for: City of Iowa City Prepared by: WT Group APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 356 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY ...................................................................3 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................3 OBSERVATIONS ..............................................................................................3 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................3 STAFF DISCUSSIONS ....................................................................5 OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................6 MAIN POOL.......................................................................................................6 WADING POOL .................................................................................................9 FILTRATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................10 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................16 APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 357 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City of Iowa City commissioned the WT Group to provide an assessment of City Park Pool, located at 200 E. Park Road, Iowa City, IA 52246. The intent of the evaluation was to determine the present condition of the pools and the filtration systems to consider planning for aquatic repairs/replacements as they relate to short term and long- range considerations for this facility. METHODOLOGY The evaluation consisted of an on-site visual inspection on September 9, 2021 of the facility with onsite discussions with staff regarding areas of specific concerns. The investigation included a visual examination of the pool and pool filtration system.This report will help identify items that do not meet the current regulations of the Department of Public Health and required repairs/replacements. Reference to DOH violations,in the body of this report,should not necessarily be construed as grounds for pool closure. OBSERVATIONS The facility includes a 50 Meter T shaped pool with an attached deep well, and a zero depth entry wading pool. CONCLUSION The main pool is 72 years old and the wading pool is 6 years old. Staff maintains the facility well and services equipment as needed. The findings of our facility assessment indicate the following areas of major concern. 1.The main pool loses a tremendous amount of water, which varies year to year. This year the pool was losing approximately 30,000 gallons per day.The pool structure is deteriorating and requires major repairs every year.It is estimated that water loss due to evaporation and splash out is between 2,500 gallons and 5,000 gallons per day. 2.The main pool gutter grating is worn and abrasive. Patrons are getting abrasions from the fiberglass grates. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 358 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 4 3.The balance tank lining is falling off, per staff. There are cracks in the structure and the tank is leaking. Repairs/replacements of the deficient items listed in this report could be done and the City of Iowa City could continue to operate the facility. However, with a pool that is 72 years old, it is not a suitable long-term investment solution to continue making major repairs to the facility. We feel that the pool structure is approaching the end of its useful life and plans should be made to replace the facility in the future.The following are our recommended options: 1.Replace the pool. 2.If the intention is to replace the pool within three years continue making necessary repairs as are currently done every year. 3.If the intention is to extend the life of the pool 10 years, at which time the pool will be replaced, install a PVC pool liner. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 359 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 5 STAFF DISCUSSIONS The following are problems and concerns that were brought up during our kick-off discussion with staff members. 1.The main pool is 72 years old and the wading pool is 6 years old. 2.The main pool is leaking water. It varies year to year. The worst year they ever had was 50,000 gallons of water per day. This year they were losing 30,000 gallons of water per day. 3.Every year concrete repairs need to be made to the main pool structure. There are cracks and hollow spots every year, source of water loss. 4.The pool is painted every year. 5.The gutter grating is in poor condition. People are getting abrasions. 6.The balance tank lining is falling apart. The tank has cracks, causing leaking into the basement. Staff painted the inside of the surge tank for waterproofing. A crack in the surge tank was fixed this year. 7.The wading pool has a new filtration system. 8.The pool was renovated with new stainless steel gutters and all new PVC pool piping. Staff does not know what year that was done. 9.Every couple of years the gutter supply gets pinhole leaks in the welds. Currently there is a pin hole leak on the gutter supply located near the spectrum ADA lift. 10.Budget is in place to buy new ADA lifts. 11.New dive stands were put in in 2015. 12.The pools do not use heaters. 13.The three-meter dive stand stairs are new. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 360 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 6 OBSERVATIONS The following are observations and discussions regarding the condition and function of the pool structure and pool equipment MAIN POOL 1.The pool decks are in overall good condition. There are some areas where the decks have cracks and some settlement, which is a tripping hazard and violates DOH code. 2.The one- meter dive stand bases should be refinished. The stainless steel handrails are in good condition. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 361 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 7 3.The three-meter dive stand base and railing supports should be refinished.The stainless steel handrails are in good condition. 4.The three-meter dive stand stairs are new and in great condition. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 362 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 8 5.The gutter grating is raised in some areas, which is a hazard. The grating is worn and has a rough finish;people are getting abrasions per staff. The grating should be replaced and securely anchored. 6.The stainless steel perimeter gutter is in very good condition and incorporates surge weirs.Gutters seem very level, no settlement in the pool structure. The gutters do not run flooded. There is a cracked weld on the supply near the ADA lift, which needs to be repaired. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 363 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 9 7.The pool ladders are in great condition. 8.Per staff, the main pool is leaking water. It varies year to year. The worst year they ever had was 50,000 gallons of water per day. This year they were losing 30,000 gallons of water per day. This type of water loss causes a very significant cost for make-up water and for chemical use. WADING POOL 1.The wading pool grating has a large gap at the south corner and the grating is raised, both conditions create a hazard. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 364 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 10 2.The wading pool is 6 years old and in very good condition. The wading pool decks are in very good condition. FILTRATION SYSTEMS MAIN POOL FILTRATION 1.Three US Filter horizontal pressure sand filters are used. The filters are over 15 years old but in good condition. Piping and valves are in excellent condition.Staff has not had any problems with the filters. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 365 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 11 2.The eastern most filter influent and effluent pressure gauges are not working and should be replaced. 3.Calcium hypochlorite is used as a sanitizer and hydrochloric acid is used for pH control. There is no containment for the acid, which is a hazard in case of a spill.The Stenner feed pump for the acid appears to be in good condition. It is recommended to change the feed tubes in the Stenner pump yearly. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 366 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 12 4.The circulation pump is a newer Aurora 344 series, which is in very good condition.It is noted that pump seals, impellers and motors do require periodic replacement and are considered maintenance items. 5.The circulation pump strainer is newer and in very good condition. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 367 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 13 6.A newer BECS system 5 chemical controller is used.The controller is in very good condition. 7.The Signet flow meter does not meet the manufacturer’s requirements for installation clearances from sources of turbulence. FLOW METER APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 368 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 14 8.The circulation pump uses a motor starter. It is recommended to replace the motor starter with Variable Frequency Drives, VFD’s. A VFD will save energy, extend the life of the pump, allow fine tuning of flow and allow ramping up the flow as the filter gets dirty when connected to the Signet Magmeter flow meter. WADING POOL FILTRATION 1.The wading pool filtration system is 6 years old and in excellent condition.Valves and piping are in excellent condition. 2.The Signet flow meter does not meet the manufacturer’s requirements for installation clearances from sources of turbulence. FLOW METER APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 369 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 15 3.There is a leak at the circulation pump discharge flange connection and is corroding the bolts. The leak should be repaired. 4.The circulation pump uses a motor starter. It is recommended to replace the motor starter with Variable Frequency Drives, VFD’s. A VFD will save energy, extend the life of the pump, allow fine tuning of flow and allow ramping up the flow as the filter gets dirty when connected to the Signet Magmeter flow meter. 5.A BECS system 3 chemical controller is used. The controller is in good condition. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 370 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 16 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations and opinion of probable cost address major items identified in this report as needing repair, replacement or renovation. It is recognized that this Consultant or Owner have no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor’s methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, and market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Consultant cannot, and does not, warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Owner’s project budget or from any opinion of construction cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the Consultant. Each recommendation has been assigned a priority level, which determines the importance of the repair/replacement. The below recommendations do not include engineering fees, if required. The priority level assigned to a recommendation is based on the following: Priority Time Frame Assessment Criteria 1 Immediate to 1 year Deterioration of structure; health and human safety deficiencies; maintenance items that will reduce future maintenance; Department of Public Health Code compliance. 2 1 year to 3 years Repairs that will be required in the near future; improvements that will reduce or eliminate future maintenance.Department of Public Health Code compliance. 3 3 year to 5 years Improvements that will improve the performance of the facility; Improvements that will APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 371 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 17 enhance the facility; Improvements that will be required due to equipment reaching the end of its useful life. NOTE: ENGINEERING DESIGN FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROBABLE COST RANGE. PRIORITY LEVEL 1 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Consult a structural engineer to evaluate and test the main pool concrete pool structure to determine the concrete properties by assessing the strength and other properties such as corrosion of reinforcement, cracking, and void structure 1 UNKNOWN Knowing the condition of the existing concrete structure will allow making better recommendations for repairs/replacements. Perform leak detection testing to locate the source of the leaks in the main pool structure and verify that leaks are not in the piping. 1 $4,000 TO $6,000 The pool lost 30,000 gallons of water per day this past year.This type of water loss causes a very significant cost for make-up water and for chemical use. Install a PVC pool liner in the main pool. 1 $250,000,000 TO $300,000 The main pool is 72 years old. The pool is leaking significant amounts of water. Every year concrete repairs need to be made to the main pool structure. There are cracks and hollow spots in the pool structure every year.A PVC liner will extend the life of the pool 10 to 12 years. Liners typically need to be replace every 10 years. Consult a structural engineer to evaluate and 1 UNKOWN The balance tank lining is falling apart, per staff. The tank has APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 372 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool 18 RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS provide recommended repair methods for the existing balance tank. cracks, causing leaking into the basement. Staff painted the inside of the surge tank for waterproofing. A crack in the surge tank was fixed this year. Replace the gutter grating on the main pool perimeter gutter. 1 $25,000 TO $30,000 The grating is worn and has a rough finish; people are getting abrasions per staff. Repair the leak in the gutter supply tube. 1 $1,000 TO $1,200 There is a cracked weld on the gutter supply. Replace the influent and effluent pressure gauges on the eastern most filter gauge panel/ $150 TO $200 Maintenance staff can perform the work. Change the feed tube on the Stenner acid feed pumps. 1 $100 TO $150 yearly Maintenance staff can perform the work. Recommended to do yearly for a seasonal facility. Provide spill containment pallets for the acid storage. 1 $1,000 TO $2,000 There is no containment for the carboys, which is a hazard in case of a spill. Adjust/repair wading pool grating 1 $1,000 TO $1,500 ALLOWANCE The wading pool grating has a large gap at the south corner and the grating is raised. PRIORITY LEVEL 2 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Refinish three-meter dive stand base and railing supports and the one- meter dive stand bases. 2 $4,000 TO $6,000 ALLOWANCE Repair deck cracks and deck settlement 2 $15,000 TO $20,000 ALLOWANCE There are some areas where the decks have cracks and some settlement APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 373 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City Park Pool 19 PRIORITY LEVEL 3 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Provide Variable Frequency Drive, VFD, in lieu of the existing pump motor starter for the main pool and wading pool circulation pumps. 3 $16,000 TO $20,000 A VFD will save energy, extend the life of the pump, allow fine-tuning of flow and allow ramping up the flow when connected to the main flow meter. Replace the main pool pressure sand filters. $120,00 TO $150,000 The filters are over 15 years old. The typical life span for these type of filters is 20 to 24 years. It should be budgeted to replace the filters in the next 5 to 8 years. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 374 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center Facility Evaluation March 25,2022 Prepared for: City of Iowa City Prepared by: WT Group APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 375 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY ...................................................................3 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................3 OBSERVATIONS ..............................................................................................3 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................3 STAFF DISCUSSIONS ....................................................................4 OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................5 MAIN POOL.......................................................................................................5 WADING POOL .................................................................................................9 HOT TUB ...........................................................................................................12 MAIN POOL FILTRATION SYSTEM .................................................................13 WADING POOL FILTRATION SYSTEM ...........................................................15 HOT TUB FILTRATION SYSTEM .....................................................................16 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................19 APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 376 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City of Iowa City commissioned the WT Group to provide an assessment of Mercer Park Aquatic Center Pools,located at 2701 Bradford Dr., Iowa City, IA 52240. The intent of the evaluation was to determine the present condition of the pools and the filtration systems to consider planning for aquatic repairs/replacements as they relate to short term and long range considerations for this facility. METHODOLOGY The evaluation consisted of an on-site visual inspection on September 9, 2021 of the facility with onsite discussions with staff regarding areas of specific concerns. The investigation included a visual examination of the pool and pool filtration system.This report will help identify items that do not meet the current regulations of the Department of Public Health and required repairs/replacements. Reference to DOH violations,in the body of this report,should not necessarily be construed as grounds for pool closure. OBSERVATIONS The facility includes an outdoor Wading pool,an indoor 8 lane 50 Meter pool with two bulkheads and an indoor Hot Tub. CONCLUSION The facility is 32 years old and in overall good condition. Staff maintains the facility well and services equipment as needed. The findings of our facility assessment indicate the following areas of concern. 1.The wading pool is losing approximately 1” to 1-1/2”of water daily.Water loss due to evaporation and splash out equate to approximately ¼” to ½” per day. A leak detection company should be contracted to find the source of the leaks, weather in the piping or in the structure. 2.The wading pool structure has numerous cracks that should be repaired 3.The caulk joint at the wading pool wall to deck joint is in poor condition and should be replaced. 4.The stainless gutter cover plate at the ramp entry has some significant corrosion.The cover plate should be cleaned and polished on a regular basis.The same is true for the stainless steel perimeter gutter, stainless steel bulkheads and the stainless steel deck equipment. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 377 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 4 5.The starting blocks are in fair condition. Rust is forming on the base plates. It is recommended to refinish the starting blocks. 6.The decks are in overall good condition. There are numerous areas around the pool where deck tiles are cracked, which is a potential hazard for patrons. These repairs should be performed in order to extend the life of the facility, meet DOH code requirements and reduce further deterioration and address life safety issues.Other recommended repairs in this report should be also addressed based on priority level. STAFF DISCUSSIONS The following are problems and concerns that were brought up during our kick-off discussion with staff members. 1.The facility opened in 1989. 2.The wading pool is losing approximately 1” to 1-1/2” of water per day. 3.The 50 Meter pool and Hot Tub are not losing water. 4.The 50 Meter pool filtration system was renovated in 2010 from a Vacuum DE filter to pressure sand filters. The original Vacuum DE filter is used as a surge tank. 5.No sand is getting into any of the pools. 6.All the pumps are running well and serviced as needed. 7.The gutters in the 50 Meter pool do not run flooded. 8.All valves on each filter system operate well. 9.The original bulkheads are difficult to move and get stuck. The bulkheads are moved 8 times per year. 10.The High School and Swim Club use the 50-Meter-long course. 11.The wading pool is not ADA compliant. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 378 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 5 OBSERVATIONS The following are observations and discussions regarding the condition and function of the pool structure and pool equipment MAIN POOL 1.The decks are in overall good condition. There are numerous areas around the pool where deck tiles are cracked. It is recommended to replace the cracked tiles. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 379 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 6 2.The original Paddock stainless steel bulkheads are difficult to move. The bulkheads should be cleaned and polished on a regular basis. 3.The stainless steel gutters are in good condition. There are areas where minimal surface rust is present. The gutters should be cleaned and polished on a regular basis. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 380 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 7 4.The grab rails at the recessed steps are in overall good condition. There is some surface rust on some of the grab rails. The escutcheon plates are rusted and should be replaced. 5.The stainless steel stanchions have surface rust. The stanchions should be cleaned and polished on a regular basis. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 381 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 8 6.The gutter cover plate at the ramp entry has some significant corrosion.The cover plate should be cleaned and polish on a regular basis. 7.The starting blocks are in fair condition. Rust is forming on the base plates. It is recommended to refinish the starting blocks. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 382 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 9 8.The dive stand is in good condition. It appears that it has been refinished. WADING POOL 1.The Wading pool walls have numerous cracks. Some of the cracks have been patched. 2.The wading pool is losing approximately 1 to 1-1/2 inches of water per day. It is recommended that leak detection testing be performed to locate leaks in piping and the structure. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 383 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 10 3.There is no ADA access into the wading pool. 4.The caulk joint at the wading pool wall to deck joint is in poor condition. 5.The wading pool deck is in fair condition. Cracks are present at the corners of the pool and around the pool. There is some differential settlement that has created a tripping hazard. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 384 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 11 6.The deck at the access from the indoor facility to the wading pool area is higher than the wading pool deck causing a tripping hazard. 7.The deck does not have any deck drains. It appears that the original design was to sheet water to the grass area. However, the grade at the grass is higher than the decks. The first 2.5 feet of deck adjacent to the pool wall slope to the pool, which causes ponding of water and is a slip hazard. 8.The pool finish is in fair to poor condition. It is recommended that the pool be repainted. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 385 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 12 HOT TUB 1.The hot tub has a tile finish which appears to be in good condition. 2.The stair handrail is in good condition but the escutcheon plates are corroded and should be replaced. 3.There is no ADA access into the hot tub. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 386 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 13 MAIN POOL FILTRATION SYSTEM 1.The main pool filtration system was renovated in 2010 and is in very good condition. Four National horizontal sand filters are used. 2.Calcium hypochlorite is used as a sanitizer and CO2 is used for pH control. Hydrochloric acid is used to adjust alkalinity if needed. 3.UV is used as a secondary disinfectant. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 387 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 14 4.A BECS system 5 chemical controller is used.The controller is working well and in good condition. 5.The circulation pump is in good condition and running well. It is noted that pump seals, impellers and motors do require periodic replacement and are considered maintenance items. 6.A VFD is used as a motor starter. A VFD saves energy, extends the life of the pump, allows fine tuning of flow and allows ramping up the flow as the filter gets dirty when connected to the main flow meter. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 388 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 15 WADING POOL FILTRATION SYSTEM 1.The wading pool utilizes a Sta-Rite System 3 pressure sand filter. The filter appears to be newer and in very good condition. 2.The circulation pump is currently being serviced. It is noted that pump seals, impellers and motors do require periodic replacement and are considered maintenance items. 3.Calcium hypochlorite is used as a sanitizer and sodium bisulfate is used for pH control.Chlorinator appears in good condition. The Stenner feed pump appears to be in good condition. It is recommended to change the feed tubes in the Stenner pump yearly. 4.The wading pool does not incorporate a pool heater. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 389 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 16 HOT TUB FILTRATION SYSTEM 1.The hot tub utilizes two Sta-Rite System 3 pressure sand filters. The filters appear to be newer and in very good condition. 2.The circulation pump appears to be in good condition. It is noted that pump seals, impellers and motors do require periodic replacement and are considered maintenance items APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 390 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 17 3.The jet pump is older and is currently not working.It is recommended to replace the jet pump. 5.Calcium hypochlorite is used as a sanitizer and sodium bisulfate is used for pH control.The infinity chlorinator is newer and in good condition. The Stenner feed pump appears to be in good condition. It is recommended to change the feed tubes in the Stenner pump yearly. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 391 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 18 6.The Sta-Rite hot tub water heater is 4 to 5 years old and runs well. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 392 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 19 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations and opinion of probable cost address major items identified in this report as needing repair, replacement or renovation. It is recognized that this Consultant or Owner have no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor’s methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, and market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Consultant cannot, and does not, warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Owner’s project budget or from any opinion of construction cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the Consultant. Each recommendation has been assigned a priority level which determines the importance of the repair/replacement. The below recommendations do not include engineering fees, if required. The priority level assigned to a recommendation is based on the following: Priority Time Frame Assessment Criteria 1 Immediate to 1 year Deterioration of structure; health and human safety deficiencies; maintenance items that will reduce future maintenance; Department of Public Health Code compliance. 2 1 year to 3 years Repairs that will be required in the near future; improvements that will reduce or eliminate future maintenance.Department of Public Health Code compliance. 3 3 year to 5 years Improvements that will improve the performance of the facility; Improvements that will APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 393 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Mercer Park Aquatic Center 20 enhance the facility; Improvements that will be required due to equipment reaching the end of its useful life. NOTE: ENGINEERING DESIGN FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROBABLE COST RANGE. PRIORITY LEVEL 1 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Perform leak detection testing on the wading pool structure and underground piping to locate the source of the leaks in the pools. 1 $2,500 TO $3,500 The wading pool is losing 1” to 1- 1/2” of water per day. Repair the cracks in the wading pool structure. 1 $6,000 TO $8,000 ALLOWANCE A structural engineer should be consulted for the crack repairs. Replace hot tub jet pump. 1 $2,000 TO $3,000 The jet pump is older and is currently not working. Continue to service and maintain all pumps. 1 $2,000 TO $3,000 yearly allowance Change the feed tubes on each of the Stenner chlorine feed pumps, total of 3 pumps. 1 $150 TO $200 yearly Maintenance staff can perform the work. Recommended to do yearly for a seasonal facility. Replace cracked deck tile around main pool. 1 $6,000 to $8,000 ALLOWANCE Potential hazard for patrons. Clean and polish the stainless steel perimeter gutter, gutter cover plate at the ramp entry, stainless steel bulkheads and all the 1 -Maintenance staff can perform the work. Recommended to do yearly for a seasonal facility. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 394 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center 21 RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS stainless steel deck equipment. PRIORITY LEVEL 2 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Repair/replace the wading pool cracked deck areas.Replace deck directly adjacent to wading pool wall to provide positive drainage. 2 $8,000 TO $10,000 ALLOWANCE Cracks are present at the corners of the pool and around the pool. There is some differential settlement that has created a tripping hazard. The first 2.5 feet of deck adjacent to the pool wall slopes to the pool, which causes ponding of water and is a slip hazard. Provide an ADA access lift for the Hot Tub 2 $10,000 TO $12,000 There is no ADA access into the hot tub. Refinish starting blocks 2 $4,000 TO $6,000 PRIORITY LEVEL 3 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Provide a heater for the outdoor wading pool. 3 $4,000 TO $6,000 A heater will enhance the use for children. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTSS 395 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Community Rec. Center Facility Evaluation March 25, 2022 Prepared For: City of Iowa City Prepared By: WT Group APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 396 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY .................................................................. 3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 3 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 3 OBSERVATIONS .............................................................................................. 3 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 3 STAFF DISCUSSIONS .................................................................. 5 OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................ 6 MAIN POOL ....................................................................................................... 6 FILTRATION SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 9 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 13 APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 397 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City of Iowa City commissioned the WT Group to provide an assessment of the Robert A. Lee Aquatic Center Pool, located at 2201 Gilbert Street., Iowa City, IA 52240. The intent of the evaluation was to determine the present condition of the pool and the filtration systems to consider planning for aquatic repairs/replacements as they relate to short term and long range considerations for this facility. METHODOLOGY The evaluation consisted of an on-site visual inspection on September 9, 2021 of the facility with on- site discussions with staff regarding areas of specific concerns. The investigation included a visual examination of the pool and pool filtration system. This report will help identify items that do not meet the current regulations of the Department of Public Health and required repairs/replacements. Reference to violations of the State Administrative Code, in the body of this report, should not necessarily be construed as grounds for pool closure. OBSERVATIONS The facility includes an indoor 6 lane 25-yard pool with an attached deep well and wading pool. A climbing wall is installed in the deep well. CONCLUSION The facility is 58 years old and in fair condition for a facility of its age. Staff maintains the facility well and services equipment as needed. The findings of our facility assessment indicate the following areas of concern. 1.The existing cast iron/steel underground pool piping is in very rusted, per staff, and has required replacement in the surge tank. The condition of the original piping is a significant concern. The rust in the piping is staining the pool finish. The underground inlet supply piping, gutter collection piping and main drain and piping should be replaced. 2.The wading pool inlets are on the same supply line as the pool inlets. There is no way to determine the flow going to the pool and no way to adjust the inlets to provide a one-hour turnover in the wading pool, which is required by current code. The wading pool inlet supply APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 398 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 4 should be a separate supply line that can be adjusted to provide a one-hour turnover. Additionally, the wading pool should have its own chemical controller. 3.The wading pool main drain has been abandoned, which does not allow flow back to the filtration system through the bottom of the pool. The main drain and main drain piping should be replaced. 4.The filters have reached the end of their useful life and should be replaced. 5.Staff indicated the surge tank is deteriorating and in very poor shape. The City of Iowa City has already budgeted for replacement of the existing surge tank. 6.The filters have reached the end of their useful life and need to be replaced. Repairs/replacements of the deficient items listed above and in this report could be done and the City of Iowa City could continue to operate the facility for many years. However, with a pool that is 58 years old, continual repairs will be required to maintain the facility. The cost of the repairs versus replacing the pool needs be compared to determine which direction should be taken. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 399 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 5 STAFF DISCUSSIONS The following are problems and concerns that were brought up during our kick-off discussion with staff members. 1.The facility opened in 1966. 2.The pool structure is in good condition and recently repainted. 3.The hydrostatic relief valves threads are rusted and need to be replaced. 4.No sand is getting into the pool. 5.The pool is not losing water. 6.The surge tank is in bad shape. 7.The filters and surge tank have been budgeted to be replaced. The filters are original. Filters are leaking. 8.The cast iron/steel piping is very rusted. Causes discoloration in pool. 9.Source water has high iron content. 10. The circulation pump was replaced two years ago. 11. Two cast iron/steel pipes in the surge tank have crumbled. 12. The gutter collection pipe broke off in the surge tank and has been repaired. 13. The wading pool main drain is not used. At some point it was plugged. The wading pool main drain has a lot of sediment in the pipe, which can be seen from inside the surge tank. 14. There is no competitive swimming at this pool. The pool is used more for water aerobics. 15. The pool gets busy during lessons. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 400 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 6 OBSERVATIONS The following are observations and discussions regarding the condition and function of the pool structure and pool equipment MAIN POOL 1.The gutter grating is buckling. It needs to be adjusted to fit properly. 2.The pool gutters run flooded. The system needs to be balanced for proper flow. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 401 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 7 3.The pool has a plaster finish and tile lane lines. The lane lines look to be in good condition. The pool has been recently painted. The rust in the existing piping is discoloring the pool finish. 4.The wading pool finish is in poor condition. The wading pool should be repainted. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 402 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 8 5.The safety line at the deep well is installed on the deep side of the 5’-0” water depth, which is a violation of Department of Public Health Code requirements. This is a potential hazard. 6.The wading pool is 1’-7” deep around the entire perimeter and there is no step/ramp entry. The pool is not ADA accessible. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 403 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 9 7.There are no deck drains around the pool. The facility was designed for the decks to drain back to the pool gutter. This is a violation of current DOH code requirements. The only deck drains in the facility are around the wading pool. The decks are in good condition. FILTRATION SYSTEM 1.The pool filters are EPD high rate sand filters. It is unknown how old the filters are. The filters are leaking. The filter backwash valves were replaced 5 years ago. Typically, EPD filters have a life span of 20 to 24 years. It is recommended that the filters be replaced. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 404 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 10 2.The Pentair CMK-100 self-priming pump is two years old and in excellent condition. It is noted that pump seals, impellers and motors do require periodic replacement and are considered maintenance items. 3.The surge tank water level is running too high. This is causing the pool gutters to run flooded. The system needs to be balanced. The piping in the surge tank is extremely corroded. Staff indicated that the surge tank structure is in very poor condition and budgeted to be replaced. CORRODED PIPING WATER LEVEL TO HIGH. NO SURGE CAPACITY APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 405 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 11 4.A new BECS system 5 chemical controller is used. 5.Calcium hypochlorite is used as a sanitizer and CO2 is used for pH control. Hydrochloric acid is used to adjust alkalinity if needed. There is not containment pallet for the hydrochloric acid, which is a hazard. The Stenner feed pump for the acid appears to be in good condition. It is recommended to change the feed tubes in the Stenner pump yearly. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 406 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 12 6.The Signet Magmeter flow meter does not meet the manufacturers requirements for installation clearances from sources of turbulence. 7.The circulation pump uses a motor starter. It is recommended to replace the motor starter with Variable Frequency Drives, VFD’s. A VFD will save energy, extend the life of the pump, allow fine tuning of flow and allow ramping up the flow as the filter gets dirty when connected to the Signet Magmeter flow meter. 8.The wading pool inlets are on the same supply line as the pool inlets. There is no way to determine the flow going to the pool and no way to adjust the inlets to provide a one-hour turnover in the wading pool. 9.The existing cast iron/steel underground pool piping is in very rusted, per staff, and has required replacement in the surge tank. The condition of the original piping is a significant concern. The rust in the piping is staining the pool finish. 10. Staff indicated the surge tank is deteriorating and in very poor shape. 11. Staff indicated that the threads on the hydrostatic relief valves are worn and they are no longer functional. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 407 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 13 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations and opinion of probable cost address major items identified in this report as needing repair, replacement or renovation. It is recognized that this Consultant or Owner have no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor’s methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, and market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Consultant cannot, and does not, warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Owner’s project budget or from any opinion of construction cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the Consultant. Each recommendation has been assigned a priority level which determines the importance of the repair/replacement. The below recommendations do not include engineering fees, if required. The priority level assigned to a recommendation is based on the following: Priority Time Frame Assessment Criteria 1 Immediate to 1 year Deterioration of structure; health and human safety deficiencies; maintenance items that will reduce future maintenance; Department of Public Health Code compliance. 2 1 year to 3 years Repairs that will be required in the near future; improvements that will reduce or eliminate future maintenance. Department of Public Health Code compliance. 3 3 year to 5 years Improvements that will improve the performance of the facility; Improvements that will APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 408 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 14 enhance the facility; Improvements that will be required due to equipment reaching the end of its useful life. NOTE: ENGINEERING DESIGN FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROBABLE COST RANGE. PRIORITY LEVEL 1 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Camera the existing main drain, inlet supply and gutter collection piping to determine the extent of the corrosion and condition. 1 $4,000 TO $5,000 The existing cast iron/steel underground pool piping is in very rusted, per staff, and has required replacement in the surge tank. The condition of the original piping is a significant concern. The rust in the piping is staining the pool finish. OPTION 1 Replace the existing cast iron/steel underground pool inlet supply piping, gutter collection piping and main drain piping. Replace the main drains. Replace the hydrostatic relief valves. Provide a separate inlet supply to the wading pool. Provide a separate chemical controller for the wading pool. 1 $210,000 TO $230,000 The facility was built as a fall-out location, and thus the foundations and floor structures are heavily embedded with heavy duty rebar and high strength concrete. When the project is bid, the original structural plans should be included in the bid documents to make contractors aware of this condition. Because of these conditions, it is unknown what the demolition cost will be and could significantly impact the probable cost estimate. OPTION 2 Install a stainless steel perimeter gutter. Replace the main drains. Replace the hydrostatic relief 1 $240,000 TO $260,000 The facility was built as a fall-out location, and thus the foundations and floor structures are heavily embedded with heavy duty rebar and high strength concrete. When the project is bid, the original APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 409 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 15 RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS valves. Provide a separate inlet supply to the wading pool. Provide a separate chemical controller for the wading pool. structural plans should be included in the bid documents to make contractors aware of this condition. Because of these conditions, it is unknown what the demolition cost will be and could significantly impact the probable cost estimate. Provide a new surge tank. $60,000 TO $80,000 ALLOWANCE Provide new EPD filters. 1 $70,000 TO $90,000 Change the feed tube on the Stenner acid feed pumps. 1 $50 TO $80 yearly Maintenance staff can perform the work. Recommended to do yearly for a seasonal facility. Provide spill containment pallets for the acid storage. 1 $600 TO $1,000 There is no containment for the carboys, which is a hazard in case of a spill. PRIORITY LEVEL 2 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Provide an ADA lift for the wading pool. 2 $10,000 TO $12,000 Repaint the wading pool. 2 $6,000TO $8,000 Install wall anchors for an additional lane line that will act as a safety line at the deep well. 2 $4,000 TO $5,000 The safety line at the deep well is installed on the deep side of the 5’-0” water depth, which is a violation of Department of Public Health Code requirements. This is a life safety issue. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 410 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Robert A. Lee Recreation Center 16 PRIORITY LEVEL 3 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION PRIORITY LEVEL PROBABLE COST RANGE REMARKS Provide Variable Frequency Drive, VFD, in lieu of the existing pump motor starter for the main pool and circulation pump. 3 $8,000 TO $10,000 A VFD will save energy, extend the life of the pump, allow fine tuning of flow and allow ramping up the flow when connected to the main flow meter. APPENDIX D: AQUATIC ENGINEERING REPORTS 411 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City : FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL 412 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs City Park Pool Facility Conditions Assessment 200 E. Park Rd. Iowa City, Iowa 52246 29 September 2021 CITY OF IOWA CITY COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FOR RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 413 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 1 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................2 A. Analysis Criteria .....................................................................................................................................2 B. Property Information .............................................................................................................................3 C. Systemic Condition Summary ................................................................................................................4 D. Additional Comments / Observation .....................................................................................................5 1. Structure ............................................................................................................................................5 2. Roofing ..............................................................................................................................................5 3. Exterior Envelope ..............................................................................................................................5 4. Interior Finishes ................................................................................................................................5 5 Outdoor Aquatics ..............................................................................................................................6 II. Facility Condition Index (FCI) .....................................................................................................................8 III. Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................11 CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 414 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 2 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Iowa City commissioned Williams Architects | Aquatics to provide a Facility Assessment of the City Park Pool located at 200 E. Park Rd. Iowa City, Iowa. The intent of the Facility Evaluation is to determine the overall condition of the facility’s Architectural Systems inclusive of roofing, exterior elevation and interior finishes. The evaluation shall prioritize facility improvements, repair and recommendation to assist the City in preparing year by year capital budgets over a ten year life span. This report is being prepared in tandem with WT Group with their assessment of Aquatic Systems and ADA Audit for the facility. A. ANALYSIS CRITERIA The Williams Architects | Aquatics team provided visual observation of the system with information gathered by the City and operational / maintenance input by the City Staff. No testing, commissioning or exploratory probing was conducted by the consultant team. The assessment did not include calculation or analysis of the existing system. The facility assessment describes property conditions at the time of the site visit and research conducted. The walk-thru observation included areas readily accessible by the consultant team. All areas may not have been observed nor disclosed by City Staff. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 415 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 3 B. PROPERTY INFORMATION Table 1 Property Information City Park Pool Address:200 E. Park Rd Year Constructed / Renovated:Constructed 1948 / Bathhouse 1972 Current Occupants: Bather Load Contact: Property Type:Aquatics Facility Site Area:N/A Building Area: 4,700 GSF Number of Buildings:One Bathhouse Parking Type and Number of Spaces:N/A Building Construction:Single Wythe Masonry Roof Construction:Wood Trusses with Asphalt Shingle Exterior Finishes:Concrete Masonry Units Exterior Windows:Not Applicable Exterior Doors:Hollow Metal Doors and Frames Inaccessible Building Areas:Surge Tanks / Lobby Ceilings - Drywall Fire and Life Safety Exit Signs and Back up Light Fixtures FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 416 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 4 C. SYSTEMIC CONDITION SUMMARY Generally the property appears to be constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in the recent and is in fair to good condition. Refer to the enclosed summary: Table 2 Systemic Condition Summary Bathhouse Building Site Not Reviewed HVAC Not Conditioned or Heated (1) Structure Good Plumbing Not Reviewed Roofing Good / Fair Electrical Not Reviewed Exterior Envelope Good Fire Protection Not Reviewed Interior Finishes Fair / Poor Conveying System (Elevators) Not Applicable (1) The Bathhouse was constructed as an open air structure with no roof. The roof was added at a later date. Systemic Condition Summary Aquatic Amenities 50 Meter Pool REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Leisure Zero Depth REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Concrete Decks Good / Fair (1) The following recommendations contribute to the immediate repair or replacement as Priority One as defined by the Facility Condition Index. Exterior A. Soffit – Replace damaged soffit vents. B. Fascia– Replace damaged cedar fascia and install gutter on pool side. Interior C. Lower Level - Resolve confined space with an additional means of egress/stair. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 417 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 5 Aquatics D. Investigate water loss. Consider pool liner. E. Remove hazard of peeling paint. F. Conduct annual inspection of pool vessel sealant. Refer to WT Group Aquatics Assessment for additional information. D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / OBSERVATION - BATHHOUSE - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1. Structure No significant related items were noticed to remediate. The exterior load bearing single wythe masonry wall and wood roof trusses are in good condition. 2. Roofing The asphalt shingles are in fair to poor condition. The shingles are over 20 years old and have exceeded its life expectancy. The City staff identified multiple leaks in the system and near skylights. Recommendation: Replace asphalt roof shingle assembly. (Priority Two). 3. Exterior Envelope The exterior masonry walls are in good condition. The following was observed: a. Soffit vent around the perimeter are damaged. b. The cedar fascia is rotted along the pool side. The elevation is missing gutters and downspouts. Recommendation: Remove and replace damage soffit vents with aluminum. Install gutter on pool side prior to removing and replacing damaged fascia board. (Priority One.). 4. Interior Review The Bathhouse is constructed primarily of painted concrete masonry units, exposed concrete floor and exposed roof wood trusses. The Bathhouse is naturally ventilated. No heating, cooling or mechanical ventialtion is provided. The pumps are located in a confined lower level space. The entry space has a drywall ceiling. Due to the age, the building is in fair condition. Elements of the building are in FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 418 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 6 poor to very poor condition due to the corrosive environment and open to the outside elements. The following was observed: a. Lower Level / Basement can be considered a high hazard confined space due to the presence of electricity and chemical. The City staff identified that the backwash cycle of the leisure pool filters floods the basement due to the lack of capacity in the sump pit. b. Lower Level The City staff identified seepage from the adjacent surge tank into the Lower Level. c. Steel Lockers are in poor condition due to the weather and rusting. d. Doors / Frame / Hardware are in poor to very poor condition. The door and frames are rusting due to the exposure to chlorine or the weather. e. Toilet Partitions are in fair to poor condition due to the exposure to winter conditions or usage. f. Lobby / Soffit The interior gypsum board ceilings have peeling paint and delaminated drywall seams due to excessive moisture. Recommendation: Due to the environment exposure of the building amenities, replacement or repair should be considered as part of normal maintenance. Yearly inspection should be conducted on door hardware and other equipment as not to create a hazardous life safety issue. We recommend resolving the Lower Level confined space with an additional means of egress. (Priority One). 5. Outdoor Aquatics The City recently added the zero depth pool, it was completed in 2016 along with new shade structures. Additional concrete deck was provided with a new perimeter fence. The stair to the 3 meter board is new. The City staff identified water loss from the pool vessel. No major new crack was observed around the perimeter of the concrete vessel. Concrete patches to the FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 419 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 7 vessel was observed. Sealant joints beneath the stainless steel gutter was missing at several locations. Peeling paint was observed on the pool bottom potentially creating a hazard. The City staff noted the pool is painted yearly and the sealant was replaced four years ago. The perimeter concrete deck appear in good/fair condition. Some areas have spalling concrete, while other concrete cracks have sealant. The City identified that the pool shell is reviewed annually and damage and loose caulk is removed and replaced annually in April/May by a sealant/caulking contractor. The sealant joint beneath the stainless steel gutter was replaced two years ago. Recommendation: Investigate source of water loss and remediate. Remove hazard of peeling paint. Conduct annual inspection of sealant in pool vessel. Repair and caulk excessive cracks and spalls on concrete deck. (Priority One). Program Note: The pool concrete vessel is in poor condition due to the age of the facility. Future program is being evaluated. The City may consider a pool liner to extend the longevity of the vessel. In addition, if the City chooses to reimagine the program offering at the City Park pool, an increase in bathers would impact the available parking at the park. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 420 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 8 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) A. CONDITION RATING INDEX DEFINITION FCI Rating Definition Priorities Good Exceeds Expectation - in a new and well maintained condition 4 - Replace Beyond 10 years - future repair or replacement due to end of life cycle. Fair Meets Expectations - subjected to use but remains serviceable and functioning condition. 3 - Replace or repair with 5-10 years due. Performance or due to end of life cycle. Poor Marginally Meets Expectations - subjected to long term wear. Near- ing the end of useful or serviceable life. 2 - Replace in 1-5 years due to end of life cycle. Very Poor Below Expectation - has reached the end of its useful life. 1 - Replace within one year or immediately due to extensive deterioration of life safety concern. B. Key Findings Summary Key Findings Value Year 1 (Current Year) Priority One - Immediate Repair $ 170,660 Years 1-5 - Priority Two - Capital Need $ 201,000 Years 5-10 - Priority Three - Capital Need $ 846,000 Years 10+ -Priority Four - Capital Need $ Total Capital Need $1,217,660 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 421 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 9 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) The major issues contributing to the immediate repair (Priority One) costs are summarized below. Further detail on the specific cost that make up the key findings can be found in the cost table. A. Soffit – Replace damaged soffit vents. B. Fascia– Replace damaged cedar fascia and install gutter. C. Lower Level - Resolve confined space with an additional means of egress/stair. D. Investigate water loss. Consider pool liner. E. Remove hazard of peeling paint. F. Conduct annual inspection of pool vessel sealant. Refer to WT Group Report for additional recommendation. Current Replacement Value (CRV) Bathhouse 4,700 GSF x $400/SF $ 1,880,000 Aquatics - 50 Meter Lap Pool with Dive Well 17,120GSF x $350/SF $ 6,023,500 - Kiddie Pool 1,215 GSF x $350/SF $ 425,250 - Shade Structures 2 x $50,000 $ 100,000 - Deck Area 32,100 GSF x $ 75/ SF $ 2,407,500 Total CRV $ 10,836,250 C. Supporting Repair / Replacement FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 422 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 10 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOLFacility NameCity Park PoolFacility NameCity Park Pool Address 200 East Park Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52246Address 200 East Park Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52246FeatureOverall RatingCurrent Replacement Value (2021)Escalation Rate End of Cycle YearEnd of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Comments IDFeatureRating IndexQtyCommentSFCost Per SF SubTrade CostSubtrade Cost.CITY PARK POOLCURRENT REPLACEMENT VALUEBathhouse47004001,880,000$ Lap Pool172103506,023,500$ Kiddie Pool 1215350425,250$ Shade Structures2 50000100,000$ Deck Area32100752,407,500$ -$Total CRV10,836,250$ EXTERIOR-$6 % Per Year Aver2030-$ Building Envelope1Repair Damaged SoffitContinuous Vent missing in several locations130,000$ 60,300$ 31,800$ -$ Allowance1Cedar Fascia RepairRotted Fascia18,000$16,080$ 8,480$ Allowance1Install Gutter on Pool Side New Gutter to avoid water damage13,000$6,030$ 3,180$ AllowanceRoofing-$-$ 2Full replacementAsphalt Shingle Replacement2600025150,000$ 301,500$ 201,000$ INTERIORLobby / CorridorBuilding Interiors1Lower Level Confined Space Provide Second Means of Egres1500200100,000$ 106,000$ Allowance for a stairway.Building Interiors2Lower LevelAssess Water Seepage At Surge Tank- Leaking20,000$ 40,200$ 21,200$ Assessment Evaluation ValueBuilding Interiors3Bathhouse RenovationRenovation of Interiors due to climate including Lockers, Partitions, Hardware, and Drywall4700100470,000$ 944,700$ 846,000$ Renovation Cost of Interior ItemsElectricalNot ReviewedPlumbingNot Reviewed Mechanical SystemsNot Reviewed -$Lap Pool Pool Structures / Vessels. 1Pool Vessel In Poor Condition 17210350 6,023,500$ 12,107,235$ Repacement Cost of Vessel Only.Play Features & AmenitiesRefer to WT Report-$-$ `-$-$ Allowance to Replace GuttersKiddie Pool Pool Structures / Vessels.Refer to WT ReportPlay Features & AmenitiesRefer to WT Report-$-$ Allowance to Replace GuttersFiltration /Sanitation Refer to WT Report-$-$ Allowance to Clean GratesFiltration /Sanitation Refer to WT ReportSubtotal6,804,500$ 13,476,045$ 170,660$ 201,000$ 846,000$ -$ End of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Subtrade Cost.Footnote:1. Replacement cost generated from original cost assuming an average 6% escalation.Original Cost: APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 423 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 11 IV APPENDICES A. Photo Survey FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 424 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 1 APPENDIX A PHOTO SURVEY FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 425 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 2 Damaged Soffit Vents Rotted Cedar Fascia Spalling Concrete Deck FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 426 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 3 Missing Sealant Below Gutter Sealant Joint in Dive Well Peeling Paint and Missing Sealant in the Pool Vessel FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 427 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 4 Peeling layers of Paint at the Pool Bottom Rusted Locker Toilet Partition FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 428 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 5 Rusted Door at Chlorine Room Peeling Paint in Lobby Ceiling Corroded Door, Frame and Hardware FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 429 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 6 Lower Level Surge Tank Wall Seepage Lower Level Confined Access FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT CITY PARK POOL CITY PARK POOL APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 430 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs Mercer Park Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gym Facility Conditions Assessment 2701 Bradford Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52240 28 September 2021 CITY OF IOWA CITY COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FOR RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 431 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 1 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................2 A. Analysis Criteria .....................................................................................................................................2 B. Property Information .............................................................................................................................3 C. Systemic Condition Summary ................................................................................................................4 D. Additional Comments / Observation .....................................................................................................6 1. Structure ............................................................................................................................................6 2. Roofing ..............................................................................................................................................6 3. Exterior Envelope ..............................................................................................................................6 4. Interior Finishes ................................................................................................................................7 II. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................................10 III. Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................13 MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 432 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 2 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Iowa City commissioned Williams Architects | Aquatics to provide a Facility Assessment of the Mercer Park Aquatic Center located at 2701 Bradford Drive in Iowa City. The intent of the Facility Evaluation is to determine the overall condition of the facility’s Architectural Systems inclusive of roofing, exterior elevation and interior finishes. The evaluation shall prioritize facility improvements, repair and recommendation to assist the City in preparing year by year capital budgets over a ten year life span. This report is being prepared in tandem with WT Group with their assessment of Aquatic Systems and ADA Audit for the facility. A. ANALYSIS CRITERIA The Williams Architects | Aquatics team provided visual observation of the system with information gathered by the City and operational / maintenance input by the City Staff. No testing, commissioning or exploratory probing was conducted by the consultant team. The assessment did not include calculation or analysis of the existing system. The facility assessment describes property conditions at the time of the site visit and research conducted. The walk-thru observation included areas readily accessible by the consultant team. All areas may not have been observed nor disclosed by City Staff. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 433 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 3 B. PROPERTY INFORMATION Table 1 Property Information Mercer Park Aquatic Center Address:2701 Bradford Drive Year Constructed / Renovated:Aquatics / 1988 Gymnasium / 1998 Current Occupants: Occupant Load Contact: Property Type:Aquatics Facility Site Area:N/A Building Area:50,700 GSF Number of Buildings:One Parking Type and Number of Spaces:N/A Building Construction:Brick and Block Roof Construction:Metal Joist and Deck Exterior Finishes:Masonry Exterior Windows:Storefront and Curtainwall Exterior Doors:Aluminum Inaccessible Building Areas:Surge Tanks / Above Ceilings Fire and Life Safety Alarms and strobes, fire extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs and back-up light fixture included in building. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 434 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 4 C. SYSTEMIC CONDITION SUMMARY Generally the property appears to be constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in the recent and is in fair to good condition. Refer to the enclosed summary: Table 2 Systemic Condition Summary Bathhouse Building Site Not Reviewed HVAC Not Reviewed Structure Good Plumbing Not Reviewed Roofing Fair Electrical Not Reviewed Exterior Envelope Good Fire Protection Not Reviewed Interior Finishes Good / Fair Conveying System (Elevators) Not Applicable Systemic Condition Summary Aquatic Amenities 50 Meter Pool REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT SPA REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Outdoor Wading Pool REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Interior Tile Deck Good The following recommendations contribute to the immediate repair or replacement as Priority One as defined by the Facility Condition Index. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 435 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 5 Exterior A. Roofing – Investigate roofing insulation at Natatorium. B. Roofing – Recaulk translucent roofing (Kalwall). C. Masonry – Recaulk expansion joints. D. Solarium – Investigate window gasket for leaks. E. Elevation – Repair rusted lintels. Interior F. Gymnasium - Remediate water infiltration at door. Repair wood floor. G. Pool - Repair cracked ceramic tile. Aquatics Refer to WT Group Aquatics Assessment for additional information. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 436 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 6 D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / OBSERVATION - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1. Structure No significant related items were noticed to remediate. The structure above the Pool was concealed by the ceiling and was not observed. Recommendation: Due to the corrosive environment of the indoor pool, visual observation of the structure is recommended during the dehumidification installation at the Center. 2. Roofing The single-ply rubber EPDM roof was installed circa 2008-2009. The roofing is near the end of life and warranty period. The City Staff identified the following roofing concerns a. Natatorium Roof – Several areas appeared “spongey” underfoot. It appears the roof insulation is either wet or detached from the decking. Recommendation: Conduct further analysis of the assembly with a roof core to investigate the condition of the sub-surface insulation board (Priority One). b. Proctor + Gamble Room – Roof drain leak was identified by City Staff. c. Translucent Roof Panel (Kalwall) – City Staff identified leaks with the accumulation of snow and ice. Potential failure of perimeter sealant was observed from the roof. Gypsum board damage was observed in the Lobby. Recommendation: Remove and replace perimeter sealant and check flashing. (Priority One). They identified the repairs as bid in January 2021 - Mercer Aquatic Center Masonry and Skylight Repairs. d. Gymnasium Skylights – The double wall domed skylights appear to have a compromised seal. The City Staff identified leaks at the skylights. Recommendation: During the roofing replacement, replace compromised skylight with new. Install new skylight on taller, insulated curbs to avoid leaks at flashing detail. (Priority Two). FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 437 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 7 3. Exterior Envelope The exterior masonry appears in good condition. The City Staff noted the building was scheduled to be tuckpointed identified as a higher priority. The team observed the following: a. Water stains were observed at the brick recess backs. No failure is evident. b. Blue Storefront Window and Door System – The Blue Storefront Window and Door System has delaminated finishes throughout. In addition, the perimeter sealant is dried and cracked. Recommendation: Replace perimeter sealant at storefronts to avoid leaks into building. The delaminated storefront finish may be electrostatically recoated if desired. The performance of the storefront assembly does not appear to be impacted. (Priority Two). c. Lintel – The entrance lintel and the Gymnasium corridor lintel are rusted. They do not appear to be structurally compromised. Recommendation: Remove rust and repair. Continue yearly maintenance observation to assess any further deterioration. (Priority One). d. Expansion Joint – The sealant in the masonry expansion joint appears to be failing near the condensing unit. Recommendation: Remove and replace sealant in expansion joint to prevent water infiltration. During tuck-pointing of masonry, remove and replace remaining sealant in elevations. (Priority One). e. Solarium – The City Staff identified leaks in the Storefront Solarium sloped roof frame. Recommendation: Replace the Solarium glazing gaskets. (Priority One). f. Loading Dock – Crack at the foundation wall. Recommendation: Continue to monitor crack during yearly inspections. g. Masonry Crack – Was observed at the head of the Natatorium window. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 438 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 8 h. Efflorescence was observed at various locations around the building. Recommendation: Continue to monitor further development. Clean during tuckpointing. (Priority Three). 4. Interior Review The City identified repairs to items a-d, g and h as bid in January 2021 - Mercer Aquatic Center Masonry and Skylight Repairs. A dehumidification unit will be provided for the Natatorium. The interior finishes appear in fair condition and may require replacement due to exceeding expected life cycles. In addition to facility assessment observations, the narrative addresses programmatic challenges identified by City Staff. Further investigation and analysis shall be identified at later visioning / program sessions. a. Proctor + Gamble / Game Room The spaces are in good condition. The vinyl composition tile has cracks at locations in the flooring. Recommendation: Replace floor as funds become available, identified as a higher priority (Priority Two). b. Gymnasium The space is in good condition. The City Staff identified the wood floor is recoated yearly due to activity in the Gymnasium. The wood floor near an exterior door has water infiltration that caused buckling and partial water damage of the wood floors. The Gymnasium floor is screened and recoated annually. Recommendation: Identify location of water infiltration. Verify slope of exterior concrete landing. Adjust hardware prior to removing and replacing damaged flooring. (Priority One). c. Lobby The Lobby is in good / fair condition. Damaged acoustic panel and drywall soffit was observed due to water infiltration at the translucent roofing. Recommendation: Remediate water infiltration from translucent panel and repair damaged drywall and acoustic panel. (Priority Two). Program Note: Provide spectator seating areas. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 439 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 9 d. Wellness Room The Wellness Room is in good condition. The entry door is sticking and difficult to open. Program Note: Identify better program usage. Facility presently does not have pool parties. e. Locker / Toilet Rooms The Locker and Toilet Rooms are shared by the entire facility. Accessible Family Toilet Rooms were provided in the Natatorium, renovated in 2018. Ponding water was observed near the lavatory. The epoxy floor in both Locker Rooms is in fair condition. The Men’s shower was partially refinished in Summer 2021. The staff noted the epoxy flooring was refinished approximately 15 years ago. Recommendation: Refinish epoxy flooring as budget allows. (Priority Two). Program Note: The facility has two sets of Men’s and Women’s Locker Rooms. The Women’s Locker Room shares showers between each locker room. Opportunity to combine for a more efficient use. f. Natatorium The Natatorium space is in good condition. In addition to comments previously noted, the ceramic tile floor has cracks or delaminated tile in various locations around the pool. Recommendation: Repair cracked ceramic tile as not to cause patron injury. (Priority One). The City noted that the repairs are scheduled. g. Pool Filtration Cracks were observed in the concrete masonry wall adjacent to the Chlorine Room. No structural failure is evident. Similarly, a crack was noticed in the concrete slab above the surge tank. Recommendation: Tuckpoint masonry wall. Continue to monitor crack in the concrete slab. (Priority Two). FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 440 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 10 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) A. CONDITION RATING INDEX DEFINITION FCI Rating Definition Priorities Good Exceeds Expectation - in a new and well maintained condition 4 - Replace Beyond 10 years - future repair or replacement due to end of life cycle. Fair Meets Expectations - subjected to use but remains serviceable and functioning condition. 3 - Replace or repair with 5-10 years due. Performance or due to end of life cycle. Poor Marginally Meets Expectations - subjected to long term wear. Near- ing the end of useful or serviceable life. 2 - Replace in 1-5 years due to end of life cycle. Very Poor Below Expectation - has reached the end of its useful life. 1 - Replace within one year or immediately due to extensive deterioration of life safety concern. B. Key Findings Summary Key Findings Value Year 1 (Current Year) Priority One - Immediate Repair $ 134,249 Years 1-5 - Priority Two - Capital Need $ 2,936,208 Years 5-10 - Priority Three - Capital Need $ Years 10+ -Priority Four - Capital Need $ Total Capital Need $ 3,070,457 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 441 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 11 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) The major issues contributing to the immediate repair (Priority One) costs are summarized below. Further detail on the specific cost that make up the key findings can be found in the cost table. A. Roofing – Investigate roofing insulation at Natatorium. B. Roofing – Recaulk translucent roofing (Kalwall). C. Masonry – Recaulk expansion joints. D. Solarium – Investigate window gasket for leaks. E. Elevation – Repair rusted lintels. F. Gymnasium - Remediate water infiltration at door. Repair wood floor. G. Pool - Repair cracked ceramic tile. Refer to WT Group Report for additional recommendations. Current Replacement Value (CRV) Building 50,700 GSF x $400/SF $ 20,280,000 Aquatics - 50 Meter Pool 11,700GSF x $350/SF $ 4,095,000 - Spa 120 GSF x $350/SF $ 42,000 - Outdoor Wading Pool 760 GSF x $350/SF $ 266,000 Total CRV $ 24,683,000 C. Supporting Repair / Replacement FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 442 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 12 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM -$ -$ -$ -$ Facility NameMercer Park Aquatic Center Facility NameMercer Park Aquatic Center Address 2701 Bradford Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52240Address 2701 Bradford Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52240FeatureOverall RatingCurrent Replacement Value (2021)Escalation Rate End of Cycle YearEnd of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Comments IDFeatureRating IndexQty CommentSFCost Per SF SubTrade Cost Subtrade Cost.Mercer Park Aquatic Center Current Replacement ValueBuilding5070040020,280,000$ 50 Meter Pool and Dive117003504,095,000$ Spa12035042,000$ Outside Wading Pool 760350266,000$ -$ Total CRV24,683,000$ Exterior-$ 6 % Per Year Aver2030-$ Roofing1Investigate Roof Assembly at Natatorium1110,000$ 20,100$ 10,600$ Allowance to Investigate Roofing Assembly1Replace Perimeter Sealant at Translucent Roof Panels15303015,900$ 31,959$ 16,854$ 2Gymnasium Skylights222 250055,000$ 110,550$ 73,700$ 2Full replacementSingle Ply 250700361,825,200$ 3,668,652$ 2,445,768$ -$ -$ Building Envelope-$ -$ 2Blue StorefrontReplace Sealant Around Perimeter265,000$ 130,650$ 87,100$ Allowance to Replace Sealants2Blue StorefrontElectrostatically Repaint.2150,000$ 301,500$ 201,000$ Allowancd to Electrostatically Refinish Frames1Rusted LintelRemove Rust and Repaint Lintels.10,000$ 20,100$ 10,600$ Allowance to refinish lintels.-$ 1Masonry Expansion Joint Replace Sealant in Expansion J 1251503,750$ 7,538$ 3,975$ Sealant in One Location.1Solarium GlazingReplace Solarium Gaskets19003027,000$ 6 % Per Year Aver54,270$ 28,620$ Interiors-$ -$ -$ Building InteriorsGymnasium1Water Infiltration at DoorRepair Infiltration and Repair Gym Flooring12005010,000$ 20,100$ 10,600$ Replace Damaged Wood Flooring-$ -$ -$ Lobby2Water Infiltration Repair from RooRepair Drywall and Acoustic Pa 220015030,000$ 60,300$ 40,200$ Men's and Women's Locker Room Corridor2Epoxy FlooringReplace Epoxy Flooring230002266,000$ 132,660$ 88,440$ Natatorium1Repair Ceramic Tile1150,000$ 100,500$ 53,000$ Allowance to replace damaged tile-$ -$ -$ Subtotal2,317,850$ 4,658,879$ 134,249$ 2,936,208$ -$ -$ End of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Subtrade Cost.Footnote:1. Replacement cost generated from original cost assuming an average 6% escalation.Original Cost: APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 443 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 13 IV APPENDICES A. Photo Survey FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 444 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 1 APPENDIX A PHOTO SURVEY FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 445 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 2 Translucent Roof Panel Water Leak Gymnasium Skylights - Compromised Seal Brick Water Stain in Reveal FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 446 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 3 Brick Water Stains at Lintel. Delaminated Storefront Finish and Cracked Sealant Rusted Masonry Lintel at Entry FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 447 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 4 Rusted Masonry Lintel at Gynasium Corridor Sealant Failure in Masonry Expansion Joint Solarium Gaskets Leaking FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 448 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 5 Loading Dock Foundation Wall Crack Efflorescence on Masonry Walls Masonry Wall Crack FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 449 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 6 Crack in VCT Flooring at Game Room Gymnasium Flooring - Water Infiltration Lobby - Water Damage to Drywall Soffit FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 450 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 7 Lobby - Water Damage to Acoustic Panels Family Changing - Ponding Water Locker Room - Epoxy Flooring FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 451 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 8 Locker Room Epoxy Flooring Cracked Pool Tile Cracked Pool Tile FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 452 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 9 Cracked Cove Base Tile Filter Room - Masonry Cracks Filter Room - Crack in Surge Tank FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM MERCER PARK AQUATIC CENTER & SCANLON GYM APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 453 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Facility Conditions Assessment 220 South Gilbert St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 28 September 2021 CITY OF IOWA CITY COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FOR RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 454 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 1 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................2 A. Analysis Criteria .....................................................................................................................................2 B. Property Information .............................................................................................................................3 C. Systemic Condition Summary ................................................................................................................4 D. Additional Comments / Observation .....................................................................................................5 1. Structure ............................................................................................................................................5 2. Roofing ..............................................................................................................................................5 3. Exterior Envelope ..............................................................................................................................5 4. Interior Finishes ................................................................................................................................5 II. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................................10 III. Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................13 ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 455 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 2 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Iowa City commissioned Williams Architects | Aquatics to provide a Facility Assessment of the Robert E. Lee Community Recreation Center located at 220 South Gilbert St. in Iowa City, Iowa. The intent of the Facility Evaluation is to determine the overall condition of the facility’s Architectural Systems inclusive of roofing, exterior elevation and interior finishes. The evaluation shall prioritize facility improvements, repair and recommendation to assist the Department in preparing year by year capital budgets over a ten year life span. This report is being prepared in tandem with WT Group with their assessment of Aquatic Systems and ADA Audit for the facility. A. ANALYSIS CRITERIA The Williams Architects | Aquatics team provided visual observation of the system with information gathered by the City and operational / maintenance input by the City Staff. No testing, commissioning or exploratory probing was conducted by the consultant team. The assessment did not include calculation or analysis of the existing system. The facility assessment describes property conditions at the time of the site visit and research conducted. The walk-thru observation included areas readily accessible by the consultant team. All areas may not have been observed nor disclosed by City Staff. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 456 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 3 B. PROPERTY INFORMATION Table 1 Property Information Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Address:220 South Gilbert St. Year Constructed / Renovated:Constructed 1963 Current Occupants: Occupant Load Contact: Property Type:Community Recreation Center Site Area:N/A Building Area:46,800 SF Number of Buildings:Building - Two Story Parking Type and Number of Spaces:N/A Building Construction:Precast Concrete Roof Construction:Double Tee Precast Concrete Exterior Finishes:Masonry Exterior Windows:Storefront and Curtain Wall Exterior Doors:Aluminum Inaccessible Building Areas:Surge Tank Fire and Life Safety Alarms and strobes, fire extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs and back-up light fixture included in building. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 457 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 4 C. SYSTEMIC CONDITION SUMMARY Generally the property appears to be constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in the recent and is in fair to good condition. The aging infrastructure would require continued updates and maintenance. Refer to the enclosed summary: Table 2 Systemic Condition Summary Bathhouse Building Site Not Reviewed HVAC Not Reviewed Structure Good Plumbing Not Reviewed Roofing Fair Electrical Not Reviewed Exterior Envelope Good Fire Protection Not Reviewed Interior Finishes Fair Conveying System (Elevators) Good Systemic Condition Summary Aquatic Amenities Lap Pool REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Wading Pool REFER TO WT GROUP AQUATICS ASSESSMENT Concrete Deck Good / Fair The following recommendations contribute to the immediate repair or replacement as Priority One as defined by the Facility Condition Index. Interior A. Natatorium - Remediate rusted structural connection. B. Natatorium - Replace rusted door hardware. C. Lower Level Corridor - Provide code compliant means of egress. D. Upper Level Corridor - Provide code compliant means of egress. E. Exterior Wall - Investigate water seepage at Lower Level Corridor along Gilbert. Aquatics Refer to WT Group Aquatics Assessment for additional information. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 458 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 5 D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / OBSERVATION - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1. Structure No significant related items were noticed to be remediated. City staff commented that previous investigation of the structure identified issues with the roof precast tendon at the support. Some rusting of the connections was observed in the Natatorium. 2. Roofing The single ply modified bitumen roofing membrane appears in fair condition. Based on City staff input, the roof assembly is nearing the end of life. Some areas appear in poor condition. City staff noted roof leaks in gymnasium, Natatorium and corridor. Staff also noted a number of roof drain leaks. Recommendation: Replace roofing assembly in the next 2-5 years. Upgrade roofing insulation thickness to comply with current energy code requirements (Priority Two). 3. Exterior Envelope The masonry brick on the exterior are in good condition. The exterior fascias and curtain wall appear in good condition. The staff noted leaks at the high window into the Social Hall and condensation during the winter on the inside of the Natatorium. The masonry brick was observed to have water stains at multiple locations near the elevated downspout locations. (See photo in Appendix). The entry ramp had spalling concrete at hand rail location. (See photo in Appendix). The masonry wall on the roof is missing weeps from the cavity wall. The staff did not report any infiltration issue. (See photo in Appendix). Recommendation: Item described above are normal maintenance items: Repair spalled concrete at ramp to prevent further deterioration. Extend downspouts to the ground to prevent water staining. Monitor masonry walls for infiltration, drill in weep if an issue arises. (Priority Two). 4. Interior Review In general, overall the building finishes appear in fair condition due to the maintenance upkeep provided by City staff. Although in fair condition, some finishes require replacement due to exceeding the expected life cycle. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 459 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 6 The narrative below identifies programmatic challenges identified by City staff. Additional investigation and analysis is identified at later Visioning/Program Session. a. Lobby: The Ground Level Lobby finishes appear in fair condition. The finishes have exceeded their life expectancy and require updating. Recommendation: Update finishes as allowed by program and budget. (Priority Three). b. Fitness: The Fitness space appears in good condition. The staff identified ventilation issues in the space considering the space’s original program use. Recommendation: Upgrade ventilation to accommodate usage. (Priority Three). c. Weight Lifting: The Weight Lifting space appears in fair condition. The space is contracted to an outside vendor. Spatially, the space is challenging to program due to the configuration. d. Gymnasium: The staff identified roof leaks in the Gymnasium. The space appears in fair condition. The tectum acoustical panels are in poor condition and require replacement. The precast roof/ceiling has peeling paint due to mositure issues from the roof. Recommendation: Replace acoustic panel and repair ceiling as budget allows. (Priority Three). e. Racquetball: The Racquetball Court is not being used at this time. The space is not accessible and requires ventilation. The adjacent unfinished storage space, although accessible lacks ventilation as well. The staff identified a program opportunity for both these spaces. Recommendation: Provide proper ventilation to comply with code. Provide accessibility to a remodel space for future programming. (Priority Two). Program Note: Explore program opportunities of space in Visioning session. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 460 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 7 f. Men’s and Women’s Locker Rooms: The Locker Room / Toilet Rooms are in fair condition due to the age of the facility. Updating of finishes is required. Staff identified water seepage along Gilbert St. corridor. Recommendation: Update Locker Room and Toilet facilities as budget allows. (Priority Three). Investigate cause of water seepage at corridor. (Priority One). Program Note: Staff identified transitioning to Gender Neutral / Single Use facilities to maximize use of space and incorporate unused corridor space along Gilbert St. g. Natatorium: The City staff identified roof leaks above the Natatorium at roof drain location. The overall condition of the space is in fair condition due to the environmental condition of the space. Some rusting was observed at the structural connections as previously identified. The epoxy flooring is in fair condition, fading was noticed in some areas. New family changing room has been provided off the pool deck. Due to the corrosive environment, exterior door hardware is rusting. The wall acoustical panels are in fair condition. The City staff identified failure of an exhaust fan due to power logs under the roof. Refer to WT Group Assessment of Aquatic System for additional information. Recommendation: Refer to roofing recommendation under a separate section. 1. Remediate all rusting structural components to prevent further deterioration. (Priority One). 2. Replace rusted door hardware at door. (Priority One) 3. Conduct regular maintenance inspection of the space due to corrosive environment. (Priority One). FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 461 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 8 h. Lower Level Corridor: The Lower Level Corridor near the Gymnasium does not comply with the means of egress requirement of the building and life safety code. The corridor presents a dead-end corridor in excess of twenty feet. Recommendation: Consult with local authority having jurisdiction and provide an acceptable code compliant means of egress. (Priority One). i. Arts & Crafts / Pottery Room: The Arts and Crafts Room are in good condition. The casework in the room has exceeded its life expectancy. Program Notes: The Pottery Room is limited to 6-7 people with limited space at times the group expands into the Arts and Crafts. Additional storage is required. j. Social Hall: The finishes in the Social Hall are in good condition. The operable, acoustical panel is inoperable. The HVAC unit was not working in the space at the time of visit. It is scheduled for an emergency replacement. Program Note: The space is used for a number of activities. Acoustic control is an issue. Program would require a Kitchenette for serving. k. Meeting Rooms A & B: The finishes in Meeting Room A & B are in good condition. HVAC control of both spaces was identified as challenging along with the acoustic control. The Kitchenette is in fair condition. The exhaust hood above the stove is inoperable. The cabinets in the Kitchenette space have exceeded the life expectancy. The spaces do not have cooling. Recommendation: Update finishes as budget allows. (Priority Three). Program Notes: Spatially, the size of Meeting Room A & B is limiting. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 462 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 9 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER l. Office / Upper Lobby: The Main / Central Offices were renovated 3 years ago and are in good condition along with the Lobby. m. Upper Level Corridors: Similar to the Lower Level Gymnasium Corridor, the Upper Level Corridor leading to Meeting Room A, Meeting Room B and the Craft Room do not comply with the means of egress requirement of the building and life safety code. The corridor presents a dead- end corridor in excess of twenty feet. Recommendation: Consult with local authority having jurisdiction and provide an acceptable code compliant means of egress. (Priority One). APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 463 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 10 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) A. CONDITION RATING INDEX DEFINITION FCI Rating Definition Priorities Good Exceeds Expectation - in a new and well maintained condition 4 - Replace Beyond 10 years - future repair or replacement due to end of life cycle. Fair Meets Expectations - subjected to use but remains serviceable and functioning condition. 3 - Replace or repair with 5-10 years due. Performance or due to end of life cycle. Poor Marginally Meets Expectations - subjected to long term wear. Near- ing the end of useful or serviceable life. 2 - Replace in 1-5 years due to end of life cycle. Very Poor Below Expectation - has reached the end of its useful life. 1 - Replace within one year or immediately due to extensive deterioration of life safety concern. B. Key Findings Summary Key Findings Value Year 1 (Current Year) Priority One - Immediate Repair $ 301,500 Years 1-5 - Priority Two - Capital Need $ 1,670,000 Years 5-10 - Priority Three - Capital Need $ 2,151,000 Years 10+ -Priority Four - Capital Need $ Total Capital Need $ 4,122,500 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 464 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 11 II FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) The major issues contributing to the immediate repair (Priority One) costs are summarized below. Further detail on the specific cost that make up the keyfindings can be found in the cost table. A. Natatorium - Remediate rusted structural connections. B. Natatorium - Replace rusted door hardware. C. Upper Level Corridor - Provide compliant means of egress. D. Lower Level Corridor - Provide compliant means of egress. E. Exterior Wall - Investigate seepage at corridor wall along Gilbert St. Current Replacement Value (CRV) Building 46,800 GSF x $500/SF = $23,400,000 Aquatics - Lap Pool 3,900 GSF x $400/SF = $ 1,570,000 - Wading Pool 500 GSF x $400/SF = $ 200,000 TOTAL CRV $25,170,000 C. Supporting Repair / Replacement FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 465 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City 12 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER-$ -$ -$ -$ Facility NameRobert A Lee Community Recreation CenterFacility NameRobert A Lee Community Recreation CenterAddress 220 S Gilbert Street ,Iowa City, Iowa 52246Address 220 S Gilbert Street ,Iowa City, Iowa 52246FeatureOverall RatingCurrent Replacement Value (2021)Escalation Rate End of Cycle YearEnd of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Comments IDFeatureRating IndexQtyCommentSFCost Per SF SubTrade CostSubtrade Cost.Robert A Lee Current Replacment ValueBuilding4680050023,400,000$ Lap Pool39004001,560,000$-$Wading Pool 500400200,000$Aqua Climb15,000$ -$Total CRV25,175,000$ Exterior-$6 % Per Year Aver2030-$ Building Envelope2Repair Spalling Concrete at Entry Ramp2110,000$20,100$ 13,400$ 2Extend Downspouts to prevent staining on Brick2110,000$20,100$ 13,400$ Roofing-$-$ 2Full replacementSingle Ply 232100361,155,600$2,322,756$ 1,548,504$ 2000-$-$ -$-$ Building Interiors-$ Lobby3Renovated FinishesLobby Finish Upgrade31550150232,500$418,500$ Fitness3Upgraded Ventilation Fitness HVAC3327535114,625$6 % Per Year Aver230,396$ 206,325$ Gymnasium3Replace Acoustical Panels Replace Acoustical Panels-3350050175,000$351,750$ 315,000$ Gymnasium3Paint CeilingPaint Ceiling376001291,200$183,312$ 164,160$ Old Racquetball / Exercise2Upgrade VentilationHVAC Unit218503564,750$130,148$ 86,765$ Men's and Women's Locker Room3Renovation Of Facilities Renovate Locker Room32300150345,000$693,450$ 621,000$ Women's Locker Room Corridor1Investigate Water Seepage Remediate125,000$50,250$ 26,500$ Allowance to Investigate- Not Including RemediationNatatorium1Remediate Rusting Structural Components11100,000$201,000$ 106,000$ Allowance to Investigate and RemediateNatatorium1Remove and Replace Rusted Door Harware145002,000$4,020$ 2,120$ Meetings Rooms A+B3Renovation Of Facilities Updated Finishes31580150237,000$476,370$ 426,600$ Upper Level Corridors1Code Compliant Mean of EgressArts and Crafts130015045,000$90,450$ 47,700$ Extend Corridor to exteriorUpper Level Corridors1Code Compliant Mean of Egress Meeting Room A + B125015037,500$75,375$ 39,750$ Extend a Corridor to ExteriorLower Level Gym Corridor1Code Compliant Mean of EgressGym Corridor150015075,000$150,750$ 79,500$ Enclosed Vestibule.-$-$ -$-$ Subtotal2,720,175$ 5,000,227$301,570$ 1,662,069$ 2,151,585$ -$ End of Cycle Replacement Cost.Priority One (2022)Priority Two (2022-2026)Priority Three (2026-2031)Priority Four (+2032) Subtrade Cost.-$ Footnote:1. Replacement cost generated from original cost assuming an average 6% escalation.Original Cost: ARCHITECTS/AQUATICSAPPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 466 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs 13 IV APPENDICES A. Photo Survey FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 467 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 1 APPENDIX A PHOTO SURVEY FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 468 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 2 Rusting Structural Connection Roofing Membrane Condition Roof Drain Cover Missing FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 469 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 3 Masonry Brick Water Stains at Downspout Spalling Concrete at Entry Ramp Roofing Counterflashing - Missing Masonry Weeps FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 470 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 4 Gymnasium - Acoustical Panels Gymnasium - Peeling Paint Unused Racquetball Courts FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 471 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APX-A 5 Locker Rooms Epoxy Pool Deck Fading Pool Door Hardware Corroding FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 472 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APX-A 6 Lower Level Gymnasium Corridor Upper Level Corridor to Meeting Rooms FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER APPENDIX E: FACILITIES ARCHITECTURAL REPORTS 473 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 474 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs IOWA CITY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITIES MASTER PLAN ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT MARCH 21, 2022 INTRODUCTION The Department retained The WT Group, LLC Accessibility Practice in early 2013. We were then known as Recreation Accessibility Consultants, LLC, and we rebranded in 2017. Our scope was limited to access audits of City Park Pool, Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gym, and the Robert A. Lee Community Center. The plan was to then, in the next fiscal year conduct audits of all parks, and to create a facilities and parks transition plan. Due to changes in Department leadership, that second step regarding parks, and the mandated transition plan, never occurred. The Department then, in 2021, retained BerryDunn for a facilities master plan. The WTG Accessibility Practice is on the BerryDunn team. Our scope was to inspect the same three facilities and note whether the work we recommended had been completed, and if completed, whether it was compliant. ADA REQUIREMENTS AS APPLIED TO THE 2021 WORK The two ADA requirements for existing facilities like the three facilities in our scope, as well as all Department parks and sites, is very clear. The title II regulation at section 35.105 describes the first requirement, a self-evaluation (we call it an access audit) to determine if the facilities and parks comply with the federal 2010 Standards for Accessible Design. The second requirement is a Transition Plan, which establishes the order of retrofits at facilities and parks. A Transition Plan is incomplete if it does not address all existing sites. A Transition Plan has four required components: • it must describe each deficit; • it must describe how to treat each deficit (retrofit, replace, leave as is, etc.) • it must identify the person responsible for barrier removal; and • it must identify the date by which barrier removal will occur. When we draft a Transition Plan, we have always added a cost reference for planning purposes for each retrofit, as we recognize that no municipality can undertake retrofits without an idea of the cost to be incurred. For the 2021 Iowa City project, we have prepared a partial Transition Plan. It does include cost references for planning purposes. These are not estimates, as there is no design from which to make an estimate. The total retrofit cost reference is $724,620.90. APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 475 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City City of Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department Facilities Master Plan and Accessibility Considerations March 21, 2022 page 2 We recognize that as the Department acts on other recommendations regarding these facilities, that some of the retrofits will be addressed. This possible blend of new construction or alterations (which must be fully compliant) and retrofits for the Transition Plan (which must occur whether new construction or alterations occur) will undoubtedly yield new figures to consider. The US Department of Justice guidance regarding Transition Plans has been consistent: make retrofits occur as soon as is possible. It is an understatement to say that such guidance is not helpful for the Department. We typically recommend an eight to ten-year range for a full transition plan that includes all parks and all facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING ADA COMPLIANCE 1. For the three facilities in our scope, we urge the Department to set aside $100,000 annually for retrofits. Since 2014, less than 11% of the recommended retrofits have been achieved. 2. For the purposes of cost-efficiency, we urge the Department to blend ADA retrofits for these three facilities with other retrofits identified as necessary for Department parks. 3. For future work on facilities, we urge the Department to heed the requirements for full compliance on new construction, including alterations and additions. 4. We know the City has an ADA Coordinator, but these are Department activities. We urge the Department to name a person or persons responsible for Transition Plan implementation, and coordinate that activity with the citywide ADA Coordinator. 5. We are impressed by the Department’s commitment to diversity and underserved populations, including people with disabilities. Another of the ADA requirements is a review of public facing policies for title II compliance, coupled with a review of how the Department invites, analyzes, and fulfills requests for reasonable modification. That was not in the Master Plan scope, but we urge the Department to address this requirement soon. CONCLUSION It is important to commit to the implementation of the Partial Transition Plan. While it is likely that decisions made about these facilities will make some of the recommendations unnecessary, these recommendations make Department facilities accessible to and usable by Iowa City residents and visitors with disabilities. Prepared and presented by: John N. McGovern, JD Partner, Principal-in-Charge The WT Group, LLC Accessibility Practice JNM/IOWA CITY SUMMARY 202201 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 476 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 1 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed City Park Pool 1.1.2 Parking Add one van parking sign to one accessible stall and repaint stall and access aisle to 11’ and 5’ or 8' and 8' $283.50 each 1 $283.50 1 City Park Pool 1.1.3 Parking Repair or correct slope of parking space and access aisle to max 2.08% in any direction $3,062.50 each 3 $9,187.50 1 City Park Pool 1.1.4 Parking Acquire and mount correct fine sign for all stalls $210.00 each 2 $420.00 1 City Park Pool 1.1.5 Parking Reconfigure accessible stalls to avoid requiring pedestrians to cross vehicular way, in the alternative, leave as is with striped crosswalk $367.50 each 1 $367.50 1 City Park Pool 1.2.1 Exterior Accessible Route Construct firm, stable, and slip resistant pads at least 36” by 48” adjacent to 20% of benches, and locate along an AR $161.00 each 1 $161.00 1 City Park Pool 1.2.2 Exterior Accessible Route Install detectable warning at curb ramps ways as a smart practice $329.00 each 2 $658.00 SP City Park Pool 1.2.3 Exterior Accessible Route Maintain foliage along AR to allow compliant 36” clear width $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 not verified - new foliage growth City Park Pool 1.2.4 Exterior Accessible Route Repair, bevel, or ramp CIL along AR $96.25 each 3 $288.75 1 City Park Pool 1.2.5 Exterior Accessible Route Designate an access aisle for the passenger drop off area by painting an aisle that is 60” wide and 20’ long $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 1 City Park Pool 1.2.6 Exterior Accessible Route Correct or repair passenger loading zone slope to max 2.08%$3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 1 City Park Pool 1.4.1 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, correct or repair slope at doorway landing to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 3 $9,187.50 1 City Park Pool 1.4.2 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CIL in doorway maneuvering clearance to max .25”$96.25 each 2 $192.50 1 City Park Pool 1.4.3 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CIL at three door entries to max .25”$96.25 each 4 $385.00 1 City Park Pool 1.4.4 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 5 $2,572.50 1 City Park Pool 1.4.5 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, remount hardware to be 34” to 48” aff $3,530.00 each 1 $3,530.00 1 City Park Pool 1.4.6 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows max 43" aff $1,386.00 each 1 $1,386.00 3 City Park Pool 1.4.7 Exterior Doors Upon renovation ; make above corrections to employee only door $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 City Park Pool 1.6.1 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, remove doors to locker rooms and widen AR to 36” due to lack of maneuvering clearance on both sides $2,772.50 each 2 $5,545.00 1 City Park Pool 1.6.2 Interior Doors Leave as is , maneuvering clearance in closet or small space, correction is technically infeasible $0.00 n/a 1 $0.00 CO City Park Pool 1.6.3 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles to create 60” maneuvering space around door $1,750.00 each 5 $8,750.00 1 City Park Pool 1.6.4 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, fill and maintain gaps in doorway maneuvering clearance to max .5”$350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 City Park Pool 1.6.5 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with doors having 80” overhead clearance and 32" clear width $2,772.50 each 3 $8,317.50 1 City Park Pool 1.6.6 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 9 $4,630.50 1 City Park Pool 1.6.7 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware on doors to hazardous areas with knurled lever hardware as a smart practice $514.50 each 3 $1,543.50 SP City Park Pool 1.6.8 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 477 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 2 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed City Park Pool 1.6.9 Interior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 City Park Pool 1.6.10 Interior Doors For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 City Park Pool 1.7.1 Interior Route Lower operating mechanisms along the interior AR to max 48” aff to the highest operable part $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 City Park Pool 1.7.2 Interior Route Replace 5% of locker operating mechanisms with one not requiring a tight pinch or grasp $210.00 each 2 $420.00 1 City Park Pool 1.7.3 Interior Route Correct or repair slope at drinking fountain to max 2.08% to allow CFS $122.50 sf 12 $1,470.00 1 City Park Pool 1.7.4 Interior Route Mount compliant signage at all doors along the egress route $210.00 each 2 $420.00 1 City Park Pool 1.7.5 Interior Route Lower 36” wide segment of service counter to max 36” aff $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 City Park Pool 1.8.1 Public Spaces Relocate protruding objects in first aid room or place cane detectable warning at foot of hooks $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 City Park Pool 1.9.1 Employee Spaces Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through storage $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 3 City Park Pool 1.9.2 Employee Spaces For all other deficits, leave as is, employee work area pursuant to 2010 Standards 106.5 Defined Terms, until an employee with a disability works here $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO City Park Pool 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users Acquire and mount signage, including access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, 48” to baseline of lowest character and 60” to baseline of highest character for both $210.00 each 2 $420.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users Lower mirrors so reflective surface is max 40” aff in both $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users Leave as is, mirrors not above lav and make correction above $0.00 each 2 $0.00 CO City Park Pool 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users Insulate exposed pipes under one sink in both $77.00 each 2 $154.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users Lower changing table to max 34" aff to surface when in open position and max 48" aff to handle when in closed position in both $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users Create a wheelchair accessible stall in place of ambulatory stall with grab bars and fixtures mounted in correct locations and at correct heights in both $5,510.75 each 2 $11,021.50 1 City Park Pool 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users Relocate or recess hand dryers to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t be greater than 4” in both $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.8 Restrooms - Multiple Users Relocate protruding objects or place cane detectable warning at foot of sink $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 City Park Pool 1.11.1 Restrooms - Single User Restrooms not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible restroom $210.00 each 2 $420.00 1 City Park Pool 1.13.1 Locker Rooms - Main Designate 5% or no less than 1 locker as accessible, mounting signage having the access symbol and hooks and operating mechanisms max 48” aff in both $420.00 each 16 $6,720.00 1 City Park Pool 1.13.2 Locker Rooms - Main Replace locker hardware on designated lockers in both $210.00 each 16 $3,360.00 1 City Park Pool 1.13.3 Locker Rooms - Main Replace one bench in each dressing area with one having a seat depth of 20” to 24” deep, 42” long, affixed to the wall or having a back and mounted 17” to 19”aff $840.00 each 2 $1,680.00 1 City Park Pool 1.13.4 Locker Rooms - Main Renovate accessible shower in each locker room to be of compliant dimension $5,598.50 each 2 $11,197.00 1 City Park Pool 1.13.1 Locker Rooms - Guard Leave as is , existing employee only locker room and shower; modify policy allowing employee with a disability to use public locker area or make renovations to existing locker area $0.00 each 1 $0.00 CO City Park Pool 1.14.1 Alarms Upon renovation install audible and visual alarms in all rooms and spaces $523.25 each 3 $1,569.75 3 City Park Pool 1.15.1 Signage Create template for signs that addresses height of sign, size of characters, location of Braille, and other requirements $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 478 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 3 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed City Park Pool 1.15.2 Signage Implement a sign revision program throughout the building, discriminating between directional signs and signs for permanent spaces $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 City Park Pool 1.15.3 Signage Mount signage at all permanent rooms/spaces having Braille and access symbol, 48” to baseline of lowest character, 60” to the baseline of highest character sign and on the latch side of the door $210.00 each 3 $630.00 1 City Park Pool 1.16.1 Pool Repair, bevel, or ramp CILs on pool deck to max .25” $0.00 each 3 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 City Park Pool 1.16.2 Pool Correct or repair slopes along the pool deck to 2.08% max cross and 5% max running $122.50 sf 75 $9,187.50 1 FAILED - ISSUES WITH POOL DECK 8.31.21, SEE REPORT City Park Pool 1.16.3 Pool Assure pool lift is kept out when in season and make it available every hour the pool is open $0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 City Park Pool 1.16.4 Pool 1.16.4 Install compliant sloped entry in wading pool; if technically infeasible leave as is (CPP175)$0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 City Park Pool 1.16.5 Pool Maintain accessible characteristics on AR to bleachers; see City Park report upon completion for more detailed on deficits $0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21, REMOVED City Park Pool 1.16.6 Pool Construct firm, stable, and slip resistant pads at least 36” by 48” adjacent to 20% of benches, and locate along an AR $0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21, REMOVED City Park Pool 1.16.7 Pool Replace drinking fountain with a hi-lo bowl fountain $5,598.25 each 1 $5,598.25 1 FAILED - STILL HAS ISSUES - SEE REPORT Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.1 Parking Repaint stalls and access aisles to be 8’ and 5’ each $73.50 each 3 $220.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.2 Parking Add one van parking sign to one accessible stall and repaint stall and access aisle to 11’ and 5’ or 8' and 8' $283.50 each 2 $567.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.3 Parking Acquire and mount at appropriate heights and locations compliant accessible parking signs for all the stalls $210.00 each 7 $1,470.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.4 Parking Acquire and mount correct fine sign for all stalls $210.00 each 7 $1,470.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.5 Parking Raise existing accessible parking signs so lowest end of bottom sign is min 60” aff $0.00 staff time 7 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.1.6 Parking Create curb ramps at the head of each new access aisle for connection to the route.$1,487.00 each 2 $2,974.00 1 revised recommendation Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.1 Exterior Accessible Route Re-cut or re-pour curb ramp to be max running slope 8.33%, max cross slope 2.08%, having a top landing as wide as the ramp and 36” deep and side flares max slope 10% $1,487.00 each 1 $1,487.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.2 Exterior Accessible Route Install compliant detectable warning at curb ramps from walkways to vehicular ways as a smart practice $329.00 each 1 $329.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.3 Exterior Accessible Route Correct or fill gaps on AR $96.25 each 7 $673.75 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.4 Exterior Accessible Route Correct or repair sidewalk cross slope along AR to max 2.08% $122.50 sf 75 $9,187.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.5 Exterior Accessible Route Correct or repair sidewalk running slope along AR to max 5% $122.50 sf 50 $6,125.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.2.6 Exterior Accessible Route Designate an access aisle for the passenger drop off area by painting an aisle that is 60” wide and 20’ long $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.1 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, relocate storage and other obstacles for 60” maneuvering space around doors $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 ONGOING Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.2 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, correct or repair slope at doorway landing to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 4 $12,250.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.3 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, widen doorway at exit for 12” maneuvering clearance on push side $1,750.00 each 3 $5,250.00 CO INFEASIBLE Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.4 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, install cement pad at exit that allows 18” clearance on the latch side, and extend a pathway away from the building for emergency egress $3,835.00 each 3 $11,505.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 479 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 4 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.5 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, remove portion of wall to allow 18” clearance on the latch side $1,750.00 each 1 $1,750.00 CO INFEASIBLE Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.6 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with ones having 80" overhead and 32" clear width, LEAVE AS IS, 78" CLEARANCE $2,772.50 each 7 $19,407.50 CO INFEASIBLE Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.7 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CIL at two door entries to max .25”$96.25 each 8 $770.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.8 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace thresholds at exterior doors with ADA thresholds $253.75 each 8 $2,030.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.9 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 3 $1,543.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.10 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 8.5 lbf to open exterior doors as a smart practice $0.00 staff time 14 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.11 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 9 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.12 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows max 43" aff $1,386.00 each 1 $1,386.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.4.13 Exterior Doors Upon renovation ; make above corrections to employee only doors $0.00 each 0 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.1 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along public circulation route, relocate storage and other obstacles for 60” maneuvering space around doors $0.00 staff time 10 $0.00 1 ONGOING Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.2 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from opposite side for 18” maneuvering clearance on the pull side $1,750.00 each 1 $1,750.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.3 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, correct or repair slope at doorway landing to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 8 $24,500.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.4 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, remove portion of wall to allow 18” clearance on the latch side $1,750.00 each 2 $3,500.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.5 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, remove and rehang to swing outward rather than inward to provide 54” maneuvering clearance on the pull side of door $350.00 each 2 $700.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.6 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along public circulation route, replace doors with ones with 80” overhead clearance, 32" clear width $2,772.50 each 5 $13,862.50 CO ALLOWABLE EXCEPTION - DOOR FRAME AT 78" Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.7 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs at door entries to max .25” $96.25 each 1 $96.25 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.8 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 19 $9,775.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.9 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors $0.00 staff time 16 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.10 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.11 Interior Doors - Aquatic Center For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.1 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Remove, or relocate storage to provide min 36" AR $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.2 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Lower operating mechanisms along the interior AR to max 48” aff to the highest operable part $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.3 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at fixtures and operable parts along the AR $0.00 staff time 3 $0.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 480 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 5 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.4 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Relocate protruding objects along the interior AR or place cane detectable warning at foot of AED, wallet locker, and drinking fountains $350.00 each 3 $1,050.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.5 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Replace locker room drinking fountains with hi-lo bowl $5,598.25 each 2 $11,196.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.7.6 Interior Accessible Route - Aquatic Center Lower 36” wide segment of service counters to max 36” aff $1,099.00 each 1 $1,099.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.1 Public Spaces - Aquatic Center Relocate protruding objects in map room and fitness or place cane detectable warning at foot of TVs, towels, and hook $350.00 each 3 $1,050.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.2 Public Spaces - Aquatic Center Tape or bevel a 36” wide portion of the mats to provide a designated entry to the mat area and prevent trip hazard $140.00 each 1 $140.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.3 Public Spaces - Aquatic Center Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at fixtures and operable parts $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.4 Public Spaces - Aquatic Center Lower operating mechanisms to max 48” aff to highest operable part $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.5 Public Spaces - Aquatic Center Replace operable parts with ones not requiring a tight grasp or pull $210.00 each 1 $210.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.1 Employee Space - Aquatic Center Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through rooms indicated $0.00 staff time 7 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.2 Employee Space - Aquatic Center Employee only areas permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles to create turning space of 60" in rooms indicated $0.00 staff time 3 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.3 Employee Space - Aquatic Center For all other deficits, leave as is, employee work area per 2010 Standards 106.5 Defined Terms, until an employee with a disability works here $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount signage for both on wall, latch side of the door, 48” to baseline of lowest character and 60” to baseline of highest character $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Lower hooks in both accessible stalls to max 48” aff $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount toilets in both to 16” to 18” from the side wall to centerline $1,828.40 each 2 $3,656.80 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Replace toilet seats, or re-set or replace toilets in both to 17” to 19” aff, see above for cost $0.00 each 2 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount side grab bar in both to max 12” from the rear wall at the close end and min 54" on the far end, and 33” to 36” aff $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount rear grab bar to behind the toilet, 12” to one side of center and 24” to the other and 33” to 36” aff in both $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Relocate or recess hand dryers to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t be greater than 4” in both $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.8 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount flush mechanism in men's to be on the open side, in the alternative, install an auto flush unit $295.75 each 1 $295.75 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.9 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Adjust timing of sink faucets in W to remain on for min 10 seconds $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.10 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Adjust stall door in women's to be self closing $420.00 each 1 $420.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.11 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Rehang stall door in W to be max 4" from adjacent stall partition and on the stall wall farthest from the toilet, see above for cost $0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.12 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Remount toilet paper dispenser in women's to max 7” to 9” from front of toilet, 15” to 48” aff and min 12" above or 1.5" below grab bar $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.13 Restrooms - Multiple Users Front Hall Correct or repair slope at stall in women's to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 481 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 6 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Remount signage for both on wall, latch side of the door, 48” to baseline of lowest character and 60” to baseline of highest character $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Lower sinks in both to max 34” aff to front of rim $2,380.00 each 2 $4,760.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Adjust timing of sink faucets in both to remain on min 10 seconds $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Lower paper towel dispensers in both to max 48” to highest operable part $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Remount toilets in both to 16” to 18” from the side wall to centerline $1,828.40 each 2 $3,656.80 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Replace toilet seat, or re-set or replace toilets in both to 17” to 19” aff, see above for cost $0.00 each 2 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Remount side grab bars to max 12” from the rear wall at the close end and min 54" on the far end, and 33” to 36” aff in both $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 FAILED - NEED REMOUNT IN BOTH - SEE REPORT Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.8 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Remount rear grab bars to behind the toilet, 12” to one side of center and 24” to the other and 33” to 36” aff in both $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 FAILED - NEED REMOUNT IN BOTH - SEE REPORT Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.9 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Adjust stall doors in both to be self closing $420.00 each 2 $840.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.10 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Remount toilet paper dispensers in both max 7” to 9” from front of toilet, 15” to 48” aff and min 12" above or 1.5" below grab bar $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.11 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Lower hook in men's accessible stalls to max 48” aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.12 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Replace toilet tank in men's with one having flush mechanism on the open side, in the alternative, install an auto flush unit $0.00 n/a 1 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.13 Restrooms - Multiple Users Pool Rehang stall door in men's to be max 4" from adjacent stall partition and on the stall wall farthest from the toilet $0.00 n/a 1 $0.00 1 REPLACED WITH FAMILY SINGLE USERS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Upon renovation, acquire and mount signage, including access symbol mounted on wall, latch side of door, 48” to baseline of lowest character and 60” to baseline of highest character at both $210.00 each 1 $210.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Create accessible stall with grab bars and fixtures mounted at correct locations and heights in both $5,510.75 each 2 $11,021.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Relocate or recess drinking fountains, hand dryers, shelf in W to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t exceed than 4” $350.00 each 3 $1,050.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Leave as is, men’s sink height; cite construction tolerance $2,380.00 each 1 $2,380.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Leave as is, mirror not above sink; sink mirror OK in W $350.00 each 1 $350.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Lower changing table to max 34" aff to surface when open and max 48" aff to handle when in closed position in women’s $350.00 each 1 $350.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room A Lower one or add hook at max 48” aff in shower area W $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room B Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible locker RR (checklist)$210.00 each 1 $210.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users Locker Room B Leave as is, all deficits, correct locker room A RR $0.00 each 1 $0.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Single Users Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, 48” to baseline of lowest character and 60” to baseline of highest character $210.00 each 1 $210.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 482 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 7 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Single Users Remove, or relocate scale in CFS at fixtures, operable parts in fitness $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Single Users Remount toilet in fitness to 16” to 18” from side wall to centerline $1,828.40 each 1 $1,828.40 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Single Users Replace toilet seat, or re-set or replace toilet to 17” to 19” aff, see above for cost $0.00 each 1 $0.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Single Users Acquire and mount grab bars in the correct location in fitness $397.75 each 2 $795.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Single Users Remount toilet paper dispenser max 7” to 9” from front of toilet, 15” to 48” aff and min 12" above or 1.5" below grab bar in fitness $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Single Users Insulate exposed pipes under sink in fitness $77.00 each 1 $77.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.8 Restrooms - Single Users Relocate or recess towel dispenser in fitness to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t be greater than 4” $350.00 each 1 $350.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.11.9 Restrooms - Single Users Guard restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible restroom $210.00 each 1 $210.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.1 Locker Room A Designate 5% or no less than 1 locker in both as accessible, with signs with access symbol, hooks and operating mechanisms max 48” aff $420.00 each 8 $3,360.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.2 Locker Room A Replace locker hardware on designated lockers $210.00 each 8 $1,680.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.3 Locker Room A Replace benches in both dressing area with one with seat 20” to 24” deep, 42” long, affixed to the wall or having a back, mounted 17” to 19”aff $840.00 each 2 $1,680.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.4 Locker Room A If folding table is intended for use as a changing table; remount at a height of 17” to 19” aff and reduce gap at wall to max 2.5” in both $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.5 Locker Room A Create accessible shower in M locker room $5,598.50 each 1 $5,598.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.6 Locker Room A Enlarge shower stall in W, if feasible, to 30” deep by 60” wide with a 60” opening $5,598.50 each 1 $5,598.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.7 Locker Room A Correct or repair slope to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS in women's $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.8 Locker Room A Remount grab bars in the women's shower in the correct locations for the shower type and at 33" to 36" aff $393.75 each 2 $787.50 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.9 Locker Room A Replace shower control in women's with a compliant lever control with a shower head on a 59” hose and usable as hand held $540.75 each 1 $540.75 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.10 Locker Room A Replace shower benches with compliant one in both and mount in the correct location $840.00 each 2 $1,680.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.13.1 Locker Room B Leave as is, locker room B and make above corrections for Locker Room A $0.00 each 0 $0.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.15.1 Signage Create template for signs that addresses height of sign, size of characters, location of Braille, and other requirements $0.00 staff time 0 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.15.2 Signage Implement a sign revision program throughout the building, discriminating between directional signs and signs for permanent spaces $0.00 staff time 0 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.15.3 Signage Mount signage at all permanent rooms/spaces with Braille and access symbol, 60" to middle of sign and on latch side of door $210.00 each 6 $1,260.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.1 Pool Ensure diving board stays in down position $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.2 Pool Relocate protruding objects along pool deck or place cane detectable warning at foot of drinking fountain and hose $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.3 Pool Lower 36” wide segment of service counter to max 36” aff $1,099.00 each 1 $1,099.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.4 Pool Leave deep end as is , ensure same programs in shallow end $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.5 Pool Replace pool lift with compliant lift $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21, NEEDS ARMRESTS Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.6 Pool Replace or remount handrails to 34" to 38" aff $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.7 Pool Correct or repair running slope of entry to max 8.33% $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 483 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 8 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.8 Pool Install sloped entry in wading pool; if technically infeasible leave as is $21,000.00 each 1 $21,000.00 CO Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.9 Pool Install pool lift to spa, make it available every hour the spa is open $7,000.00 each 1 $7,000.00 2 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.10 Pool Replace drinking fountain with hi-lo bowl $5,598.25 each 1 $5,598.25 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.1 Fitness Create 36” wide AR to one of each type of fitness equipment $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.16.2 Fitness Create 30” by 48” “parking space” next to one of each type of fitness equipment offered $0.00 staff time 6 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.1 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along public circulation route, relocate storage and other obstacles for 60” maneuvering space around doors $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.2 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with doors having 80” overhead clearance and 32" clear width $2,772.50 each 1 $2,772.50 CO LEAVE AS IS, ALLOWABLE 78" CLEARANCE Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.3 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, replace threshold at interior doors with ADA thresholds $253.75 each 1 $253.75 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.4 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, firmly secure carpet to prevent tripping hazards $140.00 each 2 $280.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.5 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 1 $514.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.6 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors $0.00 staff time 8 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.7 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.6.8 Interior Doors - Scanlon Gym For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.1 Public Spaces - Scanlon Gym Repair, bevel or ramp CIL in rooms indicated $96.25 each 2 $192.50 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.2 Public Spaces - Scanlon Gym Lower operating mechanisms to max 48” aff to highest operable part $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.8.3 Public Spaces - Scanlon Gym Lower sink height to max 34” aff $2,380.00 each 1 $2,380.00 1 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.1 Employee Spaces - Scanlon Gym Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through storage $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.2 Employee Spaces - Scanlon Gym Employee only areas permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles to create turning space of 60" in storage $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 3 Mercer Park Aquatic Center 1.9.3 Employee Spaces - Scanlon Gym For all other deficits, leave as is, employee work area pursuant to 2010 Standards 106.5 Defined Terms, until an employee with a disability works here $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.1.1 Parking Create two or more 8’ accessible parking stalls, with one 5’ adjacent access aisle, with proper signage and striping $1,589.00 each 2 $3,178.00 1 FAILED - LACKS ENOUGH STALLS Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.1.2 Parking Add one van parking sign to one accessible stall and repaint stall and access aisle to 11’ and 5’ or 8' and 8' $283.50 each 1 $283.50 1 FAILED - LACKS VAN SIGN Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.1.3 Parking Repair or correct slope of parking space and access aisle to max 2.08% in any direction $3,062.50 each 4 $12,250.00 1 FAILED - SLOPES IN 1ST STALL Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.1 Exterior Accessible Route Correct or fill 2.75” gap along AR to ramp $96.25 each 3 $288.75 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.2 Exterior Accessible Route Install handrails on both sides of Gilbert street stairway, mounted 34” to 38” aff with top and bottom extensions $980.00 each 2 $1,960.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.3 Exterior Accessible Route Shorten game room entrance ramp run to max 30’ or a max of 30” rise $6,510.00 each 1 $6,510.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.4 Exterior Accessible Route Correct game room entrance ramp and landing cross slope to max 2.08% $875.00 each $0.00 1 FAILED - SEE REPORT Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.5 Exterior Accessible Route Enlarge landing on Gilbert St. entrance to be 60” deep and as wide as the ramp $875.00 each 1 $875.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.6 Exterior Accessible Route Install a second handrail on the Gilbert St. entrance ramp $980.00 each 1 $980.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 484 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 9 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.7 Exterior Accessible Route Replace existing handrail on Gilbert St. entrance with one that is rounded and/or extend to the ground, with handrail extensions and mounted 34” to 38” aff $980.00 each 1 $980.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.2.8 Exterior Accessible Route Install rail along bottom edge of ramp that prevents a 4” sphere from passing through $525.00 each 2 $1,050.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.1 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, correct or repair slope at doorway landing to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 4 $12,250.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 - SLOPE STILL EXISTS, POWER DOOR Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.2 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CIL doorway maneuvering clearance to max .25” $96.25 each 3 $288.75 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.3 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, remove or recess a portion of wall to allow 18" maneuvering clearance on pull $1,750.00 each 1 $1,750.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.4 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles for 60” maneuvering space at doors $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 ONGOING Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.5 Exterior Doors For all doors along public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from opposite side for 18” maneuvering clearance on pull side $1,750.00 each 1 $1,750.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.6 Exterior Doors No maneuvering clearance at door due to stairs, leave as is, correction is technically infeasible $0.00 each 1 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.7 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs at two door entries to max .25” $96.25 each 3 $288.75 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.8 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, fill and maintain gaps at doorways to max .5” $96.25 each 2 $192.50 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.9 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 1 $514.50 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.10 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware on doors to hazardous areas with knurled lever hardware as a smart practice, see above for cost $0.00 each 1 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.11 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 8.5 lbf to open exterior doors as a smart practice $0.00 staff time 12 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.12 Exterior Doors For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 4 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.4.13 Exterior Doors Upon renovation ; make above corrections to employee only doors $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.5.1 Elevator Car interior should be min 68" from side to side, car is only 57.5" wide, leave as is until renovations are made $0.00 each 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.5.2 Elevator Remount handrails to be min 32" aff to max 36" aff $350.00 each 2 $700.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.5.3 Elevator Adjust re-entry timing so door stays open for min 20 seconds $400.00 each 1 $400.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.1 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles to create 60” maneuvering space around doors $0.00 staff time 9 $0.00 1 ONGOING Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.2 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, remove or recess a portion of wall to allow 18" maneuvering clearance on pull $1,750.00 each 2 $3,500.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.3 Interior Doors - Lower Level No maneuvering clearance at door due to stairs, leave as is, correction is technically infeasible $0.00 each 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.4 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from the opposite side to create 18” of maneuvering clearance on the pull side $1,750.00 each 2 $3,500.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.5 Interior Doors - Lower Level For doors on public circulation route widen AR to door to min 54” for maneuvering clearance $770.00 each 4 $3,080.00 3 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 485 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 10 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.6 Interior Doors - Lower Level Leave as is , lack of maneuvering clearance at game room stairway door; not along the accessible route $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.7 Interior Doors - Lower Level Leave as is , maneuvering clearance in closet or storage, correction is technically infeasible $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.8 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with doors having 80” overhead clearance and 32" clear width $2,772.50 each 10 $27,725.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.9 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace shelf with one that protrudes max 4"$420.00 each 4 $1,680.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.10 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs at door entries to max .25”$96.25 each 22 $2,117.50 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.11 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, fill and maintain gaps at doorways to max .5” $96.25 each 1 $96.25 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.12 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 38 $19,551.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.13 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, remount hardware to be 34” to 48” aff $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.14 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors $0.00 staff time 21 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.15 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 7 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.16 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, install kick plate on doors up to 10” from the bottom $140.00 each 1 $140.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.17 Interior Doors - Lower Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows max 43" aff $1,386.00 each 5 $6,930.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.18 Interior Doors - Lower Level For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0.00 each 0 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.1 Interior Accessible Route Provide an AR to all public areas required to be accessible $43,000.00 each 1 $43,000.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.2 Interior Accessible Route Lower operating mechanisms along the interior AR to max 48” aff to the highest operable part $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.3 Interior Accessible Route Relocate protruding objects along the interior AR or place cane detectable warning at foot of fire extinguisher cases, display cases, AED, and ladder $350.00 each 4 $1,400.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.4 Interior Accessible Route Replace drinking fountain with hi-lo bowl $5,598.25 each 1 $5,598.25 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.5 Interior Accessible Route Lower 36” wide segment of service counter to max 36” aff $1,099.00 each 1 $1,099.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.6 Interior Accessible Route Replace handrails with compliant handrails on main and social room stairways, mounted 34” to 38” aff $980.00 each 2 $1,960.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.7 Interior Accessible Route Install detectable warning strip on top tread of the racquetball stairway as a smart practice $210.00 each 1 $210.00 CO TO BE REMOVED Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.7.8 Interior Accessible Route Install handrails on both sides of the racquetball stairway, mounted 34” to 38” aff with top and bottom extensions and having a 1.25” – 2” in diameter, or a non circular grip that has a perimeter dimension of 4”- 6.25” max $980.00 each 2 $1,960.00 CO TO BE REMOVED Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.1 Public Spaces - Lower Level Raise fan to min 80”, or pad object to prevent hazard in overhead clearance $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.2 Public Spaces - Lower Level Relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create turning space in pool staff/first aid $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.3 Public Spaces - Lower Level Relocate protruding objects in gym exercise room, game room, and pool staff/first aid or place cane detectable warning at foot of fire extinguisher, paper towels, flat TV, big TV, and first aid kit $350.00 each 5 $1,750.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.4 Public Spaces - Lower Level Tape or bevel a 36” wide portion of the mats to provide a designated entry to the mat area $140.00 each 1 $140.00 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 486 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 11 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.5 Public Spaces - Lower Level Lower operating mechanisms to max 48” aff to highest operable part $0.00 staff time 7 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.6 Public Spaces - Lower Level Replace operable parts with one not requiring tight pinch, grasp to use $210.00 each 1 $210.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.7 Public Spaces - Lower Level Replace one table with one allowing knee and toe clearance $1,120.00 each 1 $1,120.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.1 Employee Spaces - Lower Level Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through rooms indicated $0.00 staff time 9 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.2 Employee Spaces - Lower Level Employee only areas permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles to create turning space of 60" in rooms indicated $0.00 staff time 8 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.3 Employee Spaces - Lower Level For all other deficits, leave as is, employee work area pursuant to 2010 Standards 106.5 Defined Terms, until an employee with a disability works here $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, 48” to baseline of lowest character, 60” to baseline of highest character for both $210.00 each 2 $420.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Lower mirror in W so reflective surface is max 40” aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Leave as is, mirror in M as mirror over sink is compliant $0.00 n/a 1 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Insulate exposed pipes under one sink in both $77.00 each 2 $154.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Lower changing tables in both to max 34" aff to surface when open and max 48" aff to handle when in closed position $350.00 each 2 $700.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Create accessible stall in place of ambulatory stall, with grab bars and fixtures mounted in correct locations and heights in both $5,510.75 each 2 $11,021.50 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Relocate or recess hand dryers in both and sink and shelf in W to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t exceed 4” $350.00 each 4 $1,400.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.8 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Pool Lockers Lower urinal so that rim height is max 17” aff $1,704.50 each 1 $1,704.50 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room Insulate exposed pipes under one sink $77.00 each 1 $77.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room Acquire and mount signage, with access symbol, on wall, latch side of door, 48” to baseline of lowest character, 60” to baseline of highest character $210.00 each 1 $210.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room Remount mirror not above a lav or counter so the bottom edge is max 35" aff and the top edge is min 74" aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room Lower soap dispensers to max 44” aff for forward reach over sink $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Men's Near Game Room Create accessible stall with grab bars and fixtures mounted in correct locations and heights $5,510.75 each 1 $5,510.75 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Single Users (Pool) Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible pool restrooms once renovated $210.00 each 1 $210.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Single Users (Pool) Renovate pool deck restrooms to be accessible single user restrooms and install doors for privacy $4,683.00 each 1 $4,683.00 1 FAILED, INSTALLATION ISSUES 8.31.21, SEE REPORT Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Single User (Lifeguard) Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible RR until renovations are made $210.00 each 1 $210.00 2 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 487 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 12 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Single User (near game room) Restroom not accessible, acquire and mount signage directing patrons to accessible Restroom $4,803.40 each 1 $4,803.40 2 FAILED, INSTALLATION ISSUES 8.31.21, SEE REPORT Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.1 Locker Rooms Designate 5% or no less than 1 locker as accessible in both, with signage wit access symbol and hooks and operating mechanisms max 48” aff $420.00 each 11 $4,620.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.2 Locker Rooms Replace hardware on designated lockers with hardware operable without a tight pinch or grasp $210.00 each 11 $2,310.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.3 Locker Rooms Replace benches in both dressing areas with ones having a seat depth of 20” to 24” deep, 42” long, affixed to the wall or having a back and mounted 17” to 19” aff $840.00 each 2 $1,680.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.4 Locker Rooms Enlarge shower stalls in both, if feasible, to compliant dimensions for a alternate roll in shower of 36” deep by 60” wide with a 36” opening on the long dimension $5,598.50 each 2 $11,197.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.5 Locker Rooms Remount control to above grab bar, max 48” aff in both $467.25 each 2 $934.50 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.6 Locker Rooms Replace shower seats in both with a rectangular or L-shaped bench and mount in the correct location for an alternate roll-in shower $840.00 each 2 $1,680.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.7 Locker Rooms Replace shower controls in both with a compliant lever control with a shower head on a 59” hose and usable as hand held $540.75 each 2 $1,081.50 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.8 Locker Rooms Lower hook in men's to max 48” aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.13.9 Locker Rooms Remount shelves in men's to min 40" aff to max 48" aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.14.1 Alarms Install audible and visual alarms in rooms and spaces where alarms have been installed since 1992 $0.00 each 0 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.14.2 Alarms Upon renovation install audible and visual alarms in all rooms and spaces $523.25 each 12 $6,279.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.15.1 Signage Create template for signs that addresses height of sign, size of characters, location of Braille, and other requirements $0.00 staff time 0 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.15.2 Signage Implement a sign revision program throughout the building, discriminating between directional signs and signs for permanent spaces $0.00 staff time 0 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.15.3 Signage Mount signage at all permanent rooms/spaces having Braille and the international symbol of accessibility, mounted at 60" to the middle of the sign and on the latch side of the door $210.00 each 11 $2,310.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.1 Fitness Create 36” wide AR to one of each type of fitness equipment $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.2 Fitness Create 30” by 48” “parking space” next to one of each type of fitness equipment $0.00 staff time 6 $0.00 1 VERIFIED 8.31.21 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.2 Fitness Remount wipes to max 48” to the highest operable part $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.1 Pool Relocate protruding objects along the AR or place cane detectable warning at foot of drinking fountain, hose , and storage bar $350.00 each 3 $1,050.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.2 Pool Correct or repair slopes along the pool deck to 2.08% max cross and 5% max running $122.50 sf 100 $12,250.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.3 Pool Replace pool lift with a compliant model that is usable independently and make it available every hour the pool is open $7,000.00 each 1 $7,000.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.4 Pool Sloped entry not compliant; install a second means of entry to the pool such as a transfer wall, stairs or a transfer system $7,000.00 each 1 $7,000.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.5 Pool Replace drinking fountain with hi-lo bowl $5,598.25 each 1 $5,598.25 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.1 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, relocate storage, furniture, and other obstacles to create 60” maneuvering space around doors $0.00 staff time 15 $0.00 1 ONGOING Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.2 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, remove and rehang door to open from the opposite side to create 18” of maneuvering clearance on the pull side $1,750.00 each 2 $3,500.00 2 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 488 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 13 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.3 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, widen AR to door to min 54” for maneuvering clearance $770.00 each 1 $770.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.4 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, repair, bevel, or ramp CILs in doorway maneuvering clearance to max .25” $96.25 each 1 $96.25 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.5 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, correct or repair slope at doorway landing to max 2.08% in any direction for level CFS $3,062.50 each 1 $3,062.50 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.6 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with doors having 80” overhead clearance and 32" clear width, leave as is maintenance at stage and social room corner storage $2,772.50 each 8 $22,180.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.7 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace hardware with lever hardware where indicated $514.50 each 24 $12,348.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.8 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, remount hardware to be 34” to 48” aff $350.00 each 2 $700.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.9 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain 5 lbf to open interior doors $0.00 staff time 12 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.10 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, inspect, adjust, and maintain closing speed on door closers so that doors do not close to 3” faster than 3 seconds when started at 70 degrees $0.00 staff time 3 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.11 Interior Doors - Upper Level For all doors along the public circulation route, replace doors with ones having sidelight viewing windows max 43" aff $1,386.00 each 6 $8,316.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.6.12 Interior Doors - Upper Level For employee only doors; make above corrections upon renovation $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.1 Public Spaces - Upper Level Relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through potters studio $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.2 Public Spaces - Upper Level Relocate protruding objects in social room, meeting room, meeting room a, and craft room or place cane detectable warning at foot of fire extinguisher, shelves, and towels $350.00 each 4 $1,400.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.3 Public Spaces - Upper Level Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at fixtures and operable parts $0.00 staff time 3 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.4 Public Spaces - Upper Level Lower operating mechanisms to max 48” aff to highest operable part $0.00 staff time 7 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.5 Public Spaces - Upper Level Replace operable parts with one not requiring a tight pinch or grasp to operate $210.00 each 2 $420.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.6 Public Spaces - Upper Level Lower counters to max 34" aff, in the alternative, add a work surface at max 34" aff and allowing knee and toe clearance $1,120.00 each 1 $1,120.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.7 Public Spaces - Upper Level Remove, or relocate storage in CFS at sink in potters studio and craft room $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.8 Public Spaces - Upper Level Lower sink height to max 34” aff $2,380.00 each 1 $2,380.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.8.9 Public Spaces - Upper Level Lower a 30” wide portion of railing to max 32” to provide viewing area; if railing can’t be lowered, replace with plexiglass or other viewing window to provide a line of sight $980.00 each 1 $980.00 2 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.1 Employee Spaces - Upper Level Employee only area permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles such as tables and chairs to create AR through rooms indicated $0.00 staff time 10 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.2 Employee Spaces - Upper Level Employee only areas permit approach, entry, and exit, relocate obstacles for turning space of 60" in rooms noted $0.00 staff time 12 $0.00 3 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.9.3 Employee Spaces - Upper Level For all other deficits, leave as is, employee work area pursuant to 2010 Standards 106.5 Defined Terms, until an employee with a disability works here $0.00 n/a 0 $0.00 CO Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.1 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Insulate exposed pipes under one sink in both $77.00 each 2 $154.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.2 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Lower light switches in both to max 48” to highest operable part $350.00 each 2 $700.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.3 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Acquire and mount side grab bar to max 12” from the rear wall at the close end and min 54" on the far end, and 33” to 36” aff in both $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 489 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City CITY OF IOWA CITY FACILITIES PARTIAL TRANSITION PLAN 14 Site Cite Type of correction Recommendation Price/unit unit type # of units Total cost Phase Status/Work Completed Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.4 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Acquire and mount a min 36" long rear grab bar, mounted behind the toilet, 12” to one side of center and 24” to the other and 33” to 36” aff $393.75 each 2 $787.50 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.5 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Adjust stall doors in both to be self closing $420.00 each 2 $840.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.6 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Rehang stall door to be max 4" from adjacent stall partition and on the stall wall farthest from the toilet $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.7 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Remount toilet paper dispenser max 7” to 9” from front of toilet, 15” to 48” aff and min 12" above or 1.5" below grab bar $0.00 staff time 2 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.8 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Lower mirror in men's so reflective surface is max 40” aff $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.9 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Adjust timing of sink faucets in M to remain on for min 10 seconds $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.10 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Remove urinal privacy wall in M for 42" AR to accessible stall $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.11 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Remount flush mechanism in M to be on the open side, in the alternative, install an auto flush unit $295.75 each 1 $295.75 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.12 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Relocate or recess needle disposal in men's to not interfere with general circulation path, protrusions can’t be greater than 4" $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.11.13 Restrooms - Multiple Users - Upper Level Raise sink bowl in W to provide 27" knee clearance, in the alternative, acquire shallower model and reduce front panel $2,380.00 each 1 $2,380.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.1 Program Kitchen - Upper Level Install hardware not requiring a tight pinch or grasp on cabinet to allow 50% accessible shelving $210.00 each 5 $1,050.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.2 Program Kitchen - Upper Level Remove base cabinet and lower sink height to max 34” aff $2,380.00 each 1 $2,380.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.3 Program Kitchen - Upper Level Replace oven with one having controls on the front panel $2,800.00 each 1 $2,800.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.4 Program Kitchen - Upper Level Remove or raise oven hood to allow min 80" overhead clearance $350.00 each 1 $350.00 1 Robert A. Lee Community Center 1.16.5 Program Kitchen - Upper Level Lower paper towel to max 44” aff for a forward reach over sink $0.00 staff time 1 $0.00 1 TOTAL $724,620.90 APPENDIX F: ACCESSIBILITY AND ADA COMPLIANCE REPORT 490 City of Iowa City | Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs APPENDIX G: ATHLETIC FIELDS REPORT This page is intentionally left blank. 491 Recreation Master Plan for Recreation Facilities and Programs | City of Iowa City APPENDIX G: ATHLETIC FIELDS REPORT IOWA CITY RECREATIONFACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 2SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction Executive Summary Iowa City Context Map Park Locations MapPark Systems Regional Circulation Map Local Access Circulation Map Transportation Barrier Map Service Area Maps 1-mile service area 2-mile service area 3-mile service areaSystem Data Acreage and Facility Need Site Evaluation Sports Field InventorySite Studies City Park Eastside Sports Complex Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Mercer Park Napoleon ParkConclusions Goals and Strategies Proposed ImprovementsAppendix IDNR Useful Life Criteria Eastside Sports Complex Market Study345101112131415161822303438424853565860 IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 3EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe process began with an analysis of land assets related to the overall system in Iowa City. Utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data provided by Johnson County, we identifi ed the fi ve main outdoor athletic venues including City Park, Mercer Park, Napoleon Park, Kickers Soccer Park, and the planned Eastside Sports Complex. We reviewed regional and local circulation including potential barriers to equitable access, fi nding that each of the sites are relatively equally positioned for local and regional level tournament play. We reviewed the parks against national community park service area standards (1mile to 3 miles) and found good service area coverage with gaps located in the older parts of town where large land areas are not available and on the western edge where development may encourage additional park land soon.We benchmarked land areas against like sized agencies across the country and the National Parks and Recreation Association (NRPA) and found a surplus of park land area against the 10 acres / 1000 person standard. When reviewing specifi c uses against NRPA standards, Iowa City is defi cient in basketball, lacrosse, tennis, football, multi-purpose artifi cial turf fi elds, and adult softball. It is notable that the fi eld sports are often played on another designated fi eld type and may not be truly defi cient. Excluding the planned Eastside Sports Complex, several small defi ciencies exist in soccer and baseball, but these are address within the plan.Each of the fi ve facilities were visited and reviewed for quality of the facilities provided related to the sports they support. Field quantities and sizes were identifi ed. Key fi eld criteria were noted including orientation, grading, drainage, accessibility, equipment condition, age, supporting park elements, supporting athletic elements, user groups, and intensity of use. Each fi eld was ranked with a rating system based on meeting these criteria indicating the relative need for updates/improvements.Recommendations include continued replacement of backstops, fencing, spectator areas, irrigation, sub-drainage, and lighting. Basketball, Tennis, Pickleball Courts, and support parking are ready for repair/repaving and netting/fencing replacement. Accessible routes are needed to multiple facilities. Support buildings are in need of compliance updates and consolidation for effi ciency. Align development with general sustainability plans including LED lighting, native planting, and best management practices where appropriate. Look for opportunities to enhance the visitor experience balanced with resource availability including park and fi eld identity signage, wayfi nding signage, landscape layers, site furniture, seating, shade, and quality material selections. Provide non-participant entertainment like playgrounds, splash pads, whiffl e ball, challenge course, and picnic games to improve the family experience throughout.Implement Mercer Park and Eastside Sports Complex Master plans including elements that will bring visitors from the region as well as providing robust amenities for local use. Consider additional Tennis and Pickleball additions. Consider fi eld-house model facilities on south and west sides of town. Consider a Miracle fi eld or Wheelchair softball fi eld.Consider western edge athletics off erings aligned with development. Consider safe north-south crossing and connecting trails over Highway 6, Industrial district, and railroad on east edge and greenway trail expansion from Kickers to Eastside to north neighborhoods. University of IowaCo Rd F46 Co Rd W 6 6 Co Rd W62Co Rd F8WCo Rd F46Co Rd W66§¨¦I-80§¨¦I-80STATEHWY27STATEHWY1TATEHWY965STATEHWY27US Hwy 6US Hwy 218US Hwy 218LegendIowaCityBoundaryIowaCityRecreationFacilityStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetIOWA CITY CONTEXT MAP LegendIowaCityBoundaryIowaCityRecreationFacilityStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetPARK LOCATIONSMAP 6SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PARK SYSTEMS The following pages include information about park access and locations within the Iowa City community for each of the Study locations. These include circulation and transportation mapping, opportunities and barriers to park access, and the expected service area for regular park users. Regional Circulation MapThe Regional Circulation Map illustrates the possible routes of travel to each of the fi ve study locations. As community park locations with an emphasis on sports programming, these locations are considered drive-to destinations and attract a range of visitors from the local Iowa City community to neighboring communities or even other states through travel sport participation. As such, this map focuses on the parks as destinations, with travel information to the nearest highways and interstates to determine the sites’ feasibility as a regional destination. Local traffi c and non-vehicular considerations can be found on the Local Access Circulation Map and Planning Area Map. Considering regional access, each study area is relatively equal in the distance and time needed to access to a major road ranging from 4 to 10 minutes and 1.3 to 6.2 miles. All of the routes to the parks except the future Eastside Sports Complex are also on maintained and paved city or county roads. The local roads immediately outside Eastside Sports Complex will require improvements before receiving the high levels of vehicular traffi c expected at the park. Additionally, each park has multiple public entrances and parking areas for vehicular access which make them well suited to accommodate heavy traffi c volumes and a variety of concurrent uses and activities.Local Access Circulation MapThe Local Access Circulation Map illustrates alternative methods for park visitors to access the study areas without the use of a private vehicle, including walking/bicycling paths and bus routes. Park access without the use of a vehicle is crucial when considering equity in access for those who are unable to drive due to physical, mental, or fi scal restrictions. A robust non-vehicular circulation system is also key in engaging all members of the community in sports and other types of recreation including children, young adults, students, and others who are not likely to have easy access to private vehicular transportation at all times. While the University of Iowa (UI) campus provides its own options to staff , faculty, and students, it can be expected that these demographics also contribute to park visitorship. Of the fi ve study areas City Park, Napoleon Park, and Mercer Park are located along the Iowa City Bus Route and each locations has at least one stop near a park entrance. Additionally, preliminary development discussions for Eastside Sports Complex indicate an intent to connect the future park development to the bus route once it is open to the public. Similarly, a 2020 system update indicated that service may be extended towards Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park if housing development in the area increases.City Park, Napoleon Park, and Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park are directly connected to designated city pedestrian and bicycle trails in addition to public sidewalks. While not connected directly, there are also trails that run within a few blocks of both Mercer Park and Eastside Sports Complex which may be considered for future expansion into each park. In the case of Mercer Park, city sidewalks connect the park to the trail. IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 7Transportation Barrier MapThe Transportation Barrier Map is used to assess park access by identifying barriers to safe and comfortable pedestrian access such as major roads or highways, railroad corridors, and impassible natural features. These barriers are shown as bold dashed blue lines in the map. Additionally, areas that do not included residential development are known as non-planning areas and are shown with a dark blue hatch pattern. Because these areas are based on physical barriers rather than evenly dividing the City by the cardinal directions, the planning areas vary from the District boundaries identifi ed in Iowa City Master Parks Plan District Map adopted in the 2017 Gather Here Master Plan. Even through the fi ve study areas are considered drive-to destinations, it is common for residents to seek out non-vehicular access to parks and for residents living closest to the parks to utilize them for their regular, neighborhood park needs. Due to the variety of uses these fi ve study locations serve, it is important to consider barriers to pedestrian and non-vehicular access. As illustrated by the Transportation Barrier Map, there are clear barriers to pedestrian access in the west, north, and south sections of the City The center of the City and east edge are much more accessible around the densest residential neighborhoods and in the downtown areas as shown by the large geographic size of planning area seven compared to the rest of the City. Additionally, the UI campus should also be considered in context. While the east edge of campus blends into planning area seven with a clear lack of pedestrian barriers, the north, south, and west edges of campus are much more distinct. The University also fulfi lls a unique role within the City with its own seasonal population, its own jurisdictional agencies, and as a provider of services, including recreation. 8SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Service Area MapService areas are the distance a local community member can be expected to travel to utilize public parks and open spaces. The size of a service area is dependent of the park classifi cation and is typically defi ned by National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) which recognizes fi ve classifi cations and assigns general activity descriptions and size criteria for each. The fi ve study locations are identifi ed by the NRPA are; Mini Park, Neighborhood Park, Community Park, Large Urban Park, and Sports Complexes. Community Parks, Large Urban Parks, and Sports Complexes have similar descriptions as athletic and community-wide gathering places and typically have a service area of 1-mile to 3-miles. The fi ve study locations which Iowa City classifi es as Regional (City Park) , Community (Mercer Park), and Specialty Parks (Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park, Napoleon Park, Eastside Sports Complex) also fi t this defi nition and the map shows a 1-mile, 2-mile, and 3-mile service area for each location. The 1-, 2-, and 3-mile service areas are shown as orange halos. The shape of each halo is determined by analyzing the existing road and sidewalk infrastructure to identify the actual route of travel and distance covered from each pedestrian and vehicular entrance location. In some locations, residents may have access to multiple study locations, these are designated by darker shades of orange where multiple park service areas overlap.Overall, the access to sports provided at the study locations is concentrated in the center of Iowa City with the largest gaps in service occurring at the west edge of the City boundary. The 1-mile service area excludes several sections of residential development in planning areas two, three, four, seven, eight, nine, and ten, however the service to these planning areas increase dramatically when the distance is increased to 2- and 3-miles. At the maximum distance of 3-miles only a small percentage of residents within planning areas four, eight, and nine do not have access to a study area within a 3-mile drive of their home. While this analysis only considers the fi ve planning sites, other local agencies, including the University of Iowa and local public and private schools systems also provide outdoor sports fi elds. When considering these other local providers, it can be assumed that some university staff and students are having their competitive and recreational needs partially or fully met by campus amenities. Additionally, school Physical Education classes and teams provide sports programming and locations for their students. Other community members may also use these facilities for drop-in play and/or with sports organizations not affi liated with Iowa City Parks and Recreation when they are not in use by school programs.When considering fi elds off ered by other agencies, some of the largest gaps in service may be fi lled. UI’s primary recreation fi elds are located within planning area four and West High School in planning area eight also provides facilities for a variety of sports covering large sections of the western edge of the City. In the northeast corner of the City, Regina Catholic Education Center in planning area three and Iowa City High School in the north-center edge of planning area seven provide a variety of sports fi elds which may fi ll this gap in City service. LegendIowaCityBoundaryPark AccessPointCAMBUSBusRouteCoralvilleBusRouteIowaCityBusRouteIowaCityRecreationFacilityStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetLegendIowa City BoundaryPark Access PointCAMBUS Bus RouteCoralville Bus RouteIowa City Bus RouteIowa City Recreation Study LocationsIowa City Parks and G Green SpacesUI PropertyREGIONAL CIRCULATION MAPTravel Time/DistanceTime MilesCity Park to Interstate 80 8 min. 2.70City Park to Interstate 80 4 min. 1.30Mercer Park to Interstate 80 10 min. 3.80Mercer Park to Interstate 80 9 min. 4.20Eastside to Interstate 80 9 min. 3.60Eastside to U.S. Highway 218 15 min. 6.20Kickers to U.S. Highway 218 10 min. 4.00Napoleon Park to U.S. Highway 2184 min. 2.80Napoleon Park to U.S. Highway 2185 min. 3.00 LegendIowaCityBoundary¿BusStop-ParkAccess¿BusStopCAMBUSBusRouteCoralvilleBusRouteIowaCityBusRouteTrailsIowaCityRecreationFacilityStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetLOCAL ACCESS CIRCULATION MAP LegendIowaCityBoundaryPlanningAreaNon-PlanningAreaIowaCityRecreationFacilityStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertyUofIBoundarySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetTRANSPORTATION BARRIER MAP University of IowaLegendIowaCityBoundaryPlanningAreaNon-PlanningAreaParkAccessLocationServiceArea-1.0-milesStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertyUIBoundarySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500FeetWWWWeWWWWsttttt WWWeWWWWWWsttttt HiHHghhhgg hHiHiHiHiHHghghghghghgggggg SScSchooooohogggSScSchohohoooloooooooooooooowawaCCCititiyy y IoIoIowawwaaaawwawwawwawaCCCititity y yhShhhSchhhoooooHHHHHiHiHiHigSchcooooooooooyyyHiHiHighgghHiHiHighghghSSSSSchhcooooooooooooooolllSSSchchhhchoooooooooooolSERVICE AREA MAP - 1-MILE University of IowaLegendIowaCityBoundaryPlanningAreaNon-PlanningAreaParkAccessLocationServiceArea-1.0-milesStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertyUIBoundarySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500Feet2WeWWWWWsttt WeWeWWWWeWstststt HHighgg hHHHiHghghggghggggggg SSSchohoohohhggSSSchohohohoooooooooololooooooooooooooooooawawwaCCCitity y IooooooowawwwaawaaaaawawawawawwCCCititty yyhhhhShhhcchoolHHHHHHgSchooooyyyyHiiHiHiHiHiHiHiHighhhhhHHiHiHghghhSSSSSchcoooooolllSSScchoooolPLANNING AREA MAP - 2-MILE University of IowaLegendIowaCityBoundaryPlanningAreaNon-PlanningAreaParkAccessLocationServiceArea-1.0-milesStudyLocationsIowaCityParksandGreenSpacesUIPropertyUIBoundarySchools¯0 5,000 10,0002,500Feet3WeWWWWWWstttttWeWeWWWWWWWWWWWWWstttttt HHHHhhghggggg hhHiHiHiHiHiiHiHiHiiighghghggghgghggggghghggggggg ScScShoooooohohhgggScScShohohoooooolololololooooooooooooowawaCCCitittyyy y y IoIoIowawwaawawawawawwCCCitiitititity yyyyyhhhShhhSSchcoooooHHHHiHiHHiHigSchooooyyyyyHiHiHiggghhhHiHiHighghghSSSSSSSchcooooooollllllSSSchccoooooolSERVICE AREA MAP - 3-MILE 16SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN SYSTEM DATAThe following pages include analysis and benchmarking data that compares Iowa City’s sports off erings to state and national criteria and objectively rates the overall park condition and individual fi eld condition for each study location. Facility NeedFacility need can be determined by comparing the current and planned Iowa City sports locations to state and national benchmarks to determine how the City compares to other public recreation providers. This study includes three types of benchmarking.NRPA Acreage BenchmarkingThe National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) sets the national standard for acreage level of service at 10 acres per 1,000 population as benchmark and further defi nes recommendations for active park acreage at Mini, Neighborhood, and Community Parks. These benchmarks are used to understand how Iowa City’s active and total park acreages compare to these national standards NRPA Amenity BenchmarksThe NRPA also manages an online, self-reporting database known as Park Metrics where public recreation agencies can input data on their operations, properties, and amenities. This assessment compares Iowa City to 18 peer agencies located throughout the nation with populations between 75,000 and 85,000 including:• Arlington Heights Park District, IL• Boynton Beach Recreation and Parks Department, FL• Cedar Park PARD, TX• City of Gastonia, NC• James City and County Parks and Recreation, VA• City of Largo Recreation, Parks, and Arts, FL• Longview Parks and Recreation, TX• Loveland Parks and Recreation, CO• Mansfi eld Parks and Recreation Department, TX• Medford Parks and Recreation Department, OR• City of Northport, FL• O’Fallon Parks and Recreation, MO• RMWB (Regional Municipality of Wood Buff alo), AB• Rochester Hills Parks and Forestry, MI• Schaumburg Park District, IL• Scranton Parks and Recreation Department, PA • City of St. Joseph Parks, Recreation and Civil Facilities Department, MO• Town of Flower Mound, TXIDNRThe Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) publishes it fi ndings regarding publicly available park land and open space, resident activity, and natural resources in fi ve-year reports. The 2018-2023 IDNR Outdoor Recreation in Iowa Plan referenced the results of the 2018 Iowa Residents’ Participation in and Opinions on Outdoor Recreation for several key sports amenities. IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 17Sports Field InventoryThis matrix inventories the number, type, size, and numerical ranking based on overall condition for each athletic fi eld located in the study locations. The overall numerical ranking is based on fi elds’ grading and drainage, accessibility to the fi eld and spectator areas, and the condition of the equipment, if any. These rankings are determined by averaging the scores for these three conditions. Rankings range from 1.0 - poor to 4.0 - excellent and are also indicated by color where red represents the lowest rank and green the highest rank. For amenities where equipment is not needed, is highly portable, or is provided by others, such as soccer and lacrosse fi elds, the equipment category was left blank and has no impact on the numerical ranking.In addition to the overall ranking, the matrix also records other factors including the fi eld orientation, overlap with other activities, age of the fi eld compared to useful life criteria, available complementary amenities, and frequency of use. While these factors do not contribute to the numerical ranking, they are important considerations when prioritizing fi eld improvements. The fi eld orientation is color coded to indicate the most favorable conditions where green indicates the ideal north/south orientation while red shows the least preferred east/west fi eld orientation where players are facing the sun. The fi nal factor recorded in the use matrix is the days per month each fi eld is used, as documented by Iowa City for each user group. The information included in the matrix is recorded from the fi eld participation in 2020 through 2021, which is likely below average as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic. State and locally mandated closures and participation limitations, economic hardships, and decreased resident interest due to safety concerns are thought to have contributed to lower than normal enrollment and participation. 18SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN FACILITY NEEDNRPA Acreage Benchmarking Compared to the NRPA recommendations for community parks, Iowa City has a defi cit 468.0 of existing active park acres (Mini, Neighborhood, and Community Parks). However, including Community, Regional, and Specialty Parks under the NRPA “community park” category results in a surplus of 753.6 acres. The four existing development study locations (City Park, Iowa City Kickers Soccer Complex, Mercer Park, and Napoleon Park) fall into the Community/Regional/Specialty Park category.Eastside Sports Complex is currently undeveloped but planned for future development as a 78.5 acre Specialty Park. When considering both existing and planned development active space, the future addition of this property raises the City’s total acreage surplus to 945.0 acres.All fi ve study locations (City Park, Iowa City Kickers Soccer Complex, Mercer Park,Napoleon Park, and Eastside Sports Complex) fall into the Community/Regional/Specialty Park category.y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y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evel of Service Analysis: 10 acres / 1,000 population - Existing Development OnlyLevel of Service Analysis: 10 acres / 1,000 population - Existing & Planned Development IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 19NRPA Amenity BenchmarksCompared to the NRPA Park Metrics medians, Iowa City currently off ers more than the average number of fi elds for youth baseball, adult softball, and youth soccer at it’s existing four study locations (City Park, Iowa City Kickers Soccer Complex, Mercer Park, and Napoleon Park). When considering the planned Eastside Sports Complex addition, the City is expected to increase service for youth baseball, adult baseball, youth soccer, and adult soccer. Comparisons of amenity need can be found on the following page.Park Metrics information was not provided for some amenities, these are noted as insuffi cient data or “ISD”.*Five of the 18 peer agencies provide at least one multipurpose synthetic turf fi eld and the quantity varies greatly, ranging from one to nine fi elds per agency. However, all of the fi elds for all fi ve agencies are located at a single park location as part of a single sports complex, rather than an agency off ering synthetic turf at multiple locations.Additionally, overlay fi elds are not a distinct fi eld type but an overlapping use of the other types of fi elds which are already counted, as such, they are not rated by need. While this overlay is not ideal, it is a common situation.Park Metrics also tracks agency responsibilities. Of the 18 peer communities recorded, 81.3% (13 agencies) “administer or manage tournament/event quality outdoor sports complexes” and 18.8% (3 agencies) “administer or manage tournament/event quality indoor sports complexes”. While not specifi c to sports complexes, it is also common for these peer communities to “operate, maintain, or manage special purpose parks and open spaces” (81.3% / 13 agencies) and to “operate, maintain, or contract tourism attractions” (62.5% / 10 agencies).Iowa Facility AverageSurplus / Deficit Surplus / DeficitPopulation per Facility Existing # of Facilities (total)Existing and Future # Facilities (includes Eastside Sports ComplexExisting # of Facilities per population Total # of Facilities needed to meet the NPRA Park Metric medianCurrent Above Average / Below AverageHighest to Lowest NeedFuture Above Average / Below Average (includes Eastside Sports Complex)Highest to Lowest NeedPopulation Per Facility (per the NPRA Park Metric)Outdoor Sports Fields10 18 0.23 10.3-0.3617.78 7,5602 4 0.05 2.00.074.06 38,3908 0 0.00 5.12.982.95 15,2070 0 0.00 4.1-4.13-4.13 19,1180 0 0.00 2.1-2.14-2.14 37,7994 10 0.13 ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD17 19 0.24 10.16.9925.997,7007 9 0.12 8.5-1.557.579,1500 0 0.00 ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD0 0 0.00 5.1-5.12-5.1215,1680 0 0.00 7.1-7.11-7.1110,9328 0 0.00 8.3-0.3N/A-0.3N/A 9,375Outdoor Court Fields9 9 0.12 18.3-9.31-0.314,2668 8 0.10 ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD ISD7 7 0.09 10.7-3.723.327,271Information above is based on the 2020 the NPRA Park Matrix database information from 19 agencies reporting populations between 75,000 and 85,000. NameTennis CourtsPickleball CourtsBasketball CourtsBaseball Fields (youth)Softball Fields (youth)Soccer (youth)Overlay Fields Baseball Fields (adult)Softball Fields (adult)Multi-purpose Synthetic FieldFlag FootballLacrosse FieldsField Hockey FieldsFootball FieldsSoccer (adult)13 Agencies event quality o u t d o or sports complexesAdminister o r m a n age tournament81.3% 20SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN IDNRAccording to the results of the 2018 Iowa Residents’ Participation in and Opinions on Outdoor Recreation study, adult and child sport participation such as basketball, football, and softball has remained steady with no signifi cant decreases or increased in participation. The following tables show the percent of survey respondents who participated in sports in Iowa in the two years prior to 2018 and the interest of survey respondents in participating in sports in Iowa in the next two years after 2018. 16%15%12%5%4%0%5%10%15%20%YouthBaseballYouthSoccerYouthSoftballSoccer asan AdultBaseball asan AdultInterest in Participation12%11%8%2% 2%0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%Baseball(children)Soccer(children)softball(children)Baseball(adult)Soccer (adult)Participation Rates in Iowa 22SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Overall RatingWidth (ft)Length (ft)Base Distance (ft)Outfield Line depth (ft)Centerfield depth (ft)Official ClassificationRatingExcellent (flat and well drained)Good (slopes don't affect play, well drained)Fair(some impact on play, 1-2 closures)Poor (impact on play, closed frequently)Excellent(meets all requirements and bmps)Good (minimally accessible)Fair (not all areas accessible)Poor(no access to field or spectator areas)Excellent (like new and < 1/4 useful life)Good (little/no damage, half useful life or less)Fair (loss of function but safe, 3/4 useful life)Poor (damaged/unsafe, at/past useful life)Field OrientationAthletic Field Assessment432143214321Napoleon ParkSoftball Field 1 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 3.0SSoftball Field 2 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 3.0WSoftball Field 3 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 3.0NSoftball Field 4 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 3.3ESoftball Field 5 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 1.3SESoftball Field 6 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 2.0NESoftball Field 7 NA NA 60 180 180 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 1.3SWSoftball Field 8 NA NA 60 200 200 NFHS FP (F)18U/USSSA FP (MF) U14 1.3NWFlag Football Field 1 80 200 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U10 2.0N/S ANGLEDFlag Football Field 2 80 200 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U10 2.0N/S ANGLEDFlag Football Field 3 80 200 NA NA MA NFL FLAG U10 2.0N/S ANGLEDFlag Football Field 4 80 200 NA NA MA NFL FLAG U10 2.0N/S ANGLEDCity ParkBaseball Field 1 NA NA 60 180 180 U7 / U8 1.7NEBaseball Field 2 NA NA 60 200 200 U7 / U8 1.7NWBaseball Field 3 NA NA 60 200 220 U7 / U8 1.3NEBaseball Field 4 NA NA 60 180 180 U7 / U8 1.3SWBaseball Field 5 NA NA 60 180 180 U7 / U8 1.7SWBaseball Field 6 NA NA 60 180 180 U7 / U8 1.7SEBaseball Field 7 NA NA 60 190 190 U7 / U8 1.3SWBaseball Field 8 NA NA 60 125 150 U7 / U8 1.3SESizeEquipment ConditionGrading and Drainage AccessibilitySPORTS FIELD INVENTORY1.0 - Poor4.0 - ExcellentBest OrientationWorst Orientation IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 232022Activity Overlap (approximate %)Year Constructed / Last major rennovationAge / Useful LifeRestroomsConcessionsShelter (Storm Safey Location)Parking PlaygroundPool Splash PadPlayers BenchesBleachersGoalsBackstopLine FenceOutfield FenceBasesPitcher's MoundSports LightingBatting CagesScoreboardMarchAprilMay JuneJuly August SeptemberOctoberNovemberGamePracticeAffiliateRecreationDrop in UseSchool100% 2012 10XXXXX XXNAXXXXNAXXX 13122121189 XXX XSB1100% 2012 10XXXXX XXNAXXXXNAXXX 1311192731 XXX XSB2100% 2012 10XXXXX XXNAXXXXNAXXX 1291778611 XXX XSB3100% 2012 10XXXXX XXNAXXXXNAXXX 121117813611 XXX XSB40% 1978 43XXXXX XXNAXXXXNA X 44120064 XXX XSB50% 1978 43XXXXX XXNAXXXXNA X 47151067 XXX XSB60% 1978 43XXXXX XXNAXXXXNA X 35100000 XXX XSB70% 1978 43XXXXX XXNAXXXXNA X 612110200 XXX XSB8100% 2021 1XXXXX NANANANANAXNA 1414 XXX XFF1100% 2021 1XXXXX NANANANANAXNA 1414 XXX XFF2100% 2021 1XXXXX NANANANANAXNA 1414 XXX XFF3100% 2021 1XXXXX NANANANANAXNA 1414 XXX XFF40% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXXXX 71020011100 XXX XBB10% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXXXXX 812200870 XXX XBB20% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXX X 510180500 XXX XBB30% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXX X 510181501 XXX XBB40% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXXXX 510200871 XXX XBB50% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXX X 612180770 XXX XBB60% 2008 14XXXXX XXNAXXXXX X 57120400 XXX XBB70% 2021 1XXXXX XXNAX X X 5790000 XXX XBB8Intensity of UseUser GroupDays of Use / MonthPark Amenities Sports Amenities 24SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Overall RatingWidth (ft)Length (ft)Base Distance (ft)Outfield Line depth (ft)Centerfield depth (ft)Official ClassificationRatingExcellent (flat and well drained)Good (slopes don't affect play, well drained)Fair(some impact on play, 1-2 closures)Poor (impact on play, closed frequently)Excellent(meets all requirements and bmps)Good (minimally accessible)Fair (not all areas accessible)Poor(no access to field or spectator areas)Excellent (like new and < 1/4 useful life)Good (little/no damage, half useful life or less)Fair (loss of function but safe, 3/4 useful life)Poor (damaged/unsafe, at/past useful life)Field OrientationAthletic Field Assessment432143214321SizeEquipment ConditionGrading and Drainage AccessibilityMercer ParkBaseball Field 1 NA NA 90 320 360 U14 & up 3.3NEBaseball Field 2 NA NA 90 300 315 U14 & up 2.0SEBaseball Field 3 NA NA 80 300 300 U13 / U14 2.3SWBaseball Field 4 NA NA 80 240 250 U13 / U14 1.3SWSoccer Field 1 90 160 NA NA NAAYSO U8 & Tball Field 1.3N/SSoccer Field 2 70 120 NA NA NAAYSO U7 & Tball Field 1.3N/SSoccer Field 3 50 75 NANANA MICRO 1.3E/WSoccer Field 4 50 75 NANANA MICRO 1.3E/WKickers Soccer ParkSoccer Field 1 210 310 NA NA NAAYSO U18 1.7N/SSoccer Field 2 210 310 NA NA NAAYSO U18 1.7N/SSoccer Field 3 210 300 NA NA NAAYSO U18 1.7N/SSoccer Field 4 240 360 NA NA NAAYSO U18 1.7N/SSoccer Field 5 240 360 NA NA NAAYSO U18 1.7N/SSoccer Field 6 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7N/SSoccer Field 7 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7N/SSoccer Field 8 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7N/SSoccer Field 9 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7N/SSoccer Field 10 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.3N/SSoccer Field 11 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.3N/SSoccer Field 12 67.5 110 NA NA NAAYSO U6/U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 13 67.5 110 NA NA NAAYSO U6/U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 14 55 90 NA NA NAAYSO U6/U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 15 55 90 NA NA NAAYSO U6/U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 16 90 140 NA NA NAAYSO U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 17 90 140 NA NA NAAYSO U8 2.3N/SSoccer Field 18 240 360 NA NA NAAYSO U18 2.3E/WSoccer Field 19 240 360 NA NA NAAYSO U18 2.0E/WSoccer Field 20 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7E/WSoccer Field 21 140 220 NA NA NAAYSO U12 2.7E/W1.0 - Poor4.0 - ExcellentBest OrientationWorst Orientation IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 252022Activity Overlap (approximate %)Year Constructed / Last major rennovationAge / Useful LifeRestroomsConcessionsShelter (Storm Safey Location)Parking PlaygroundPool Splash PadPlayers BenchesBleachersGoalsBackstopLine FenceOutfield FenceBasesPitcher's MoundSports LightingBatting CagesScoreboardMarchAprilMay JuneJuly August SeptemberOctoberNovemberGamePracticeAffiliateRecreationDrop in UseSchoolIntensity of UseUser GroupDays of Use / MonthPark Amenities Sports Amenities0% 2020 2XXXXXX XXNAXXXXXXXX XX XBB10% 1966 55XXXXXX XXNAXXXXXXX 1317269882 XXX XBB20% 1966 55XXXXXX XXNAXXXXXXX 1216215813 XXX XBB30% 1966 55XXXXXX XXNAXXXXXXX 10162021596 XXX XBB40% 2020 2XXXXXX NANANANANA NA 102020 102020 XX XS10% 2020 2XXXXXX NANANANANA NA 102020 102020 XX XS20% 2020 2XXXXXX NANANANANA NA 102020 102020 XX XS30% 2020 2XXXXXX NANANANANA NA 102020 102020 XX XS40% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 9100521513 XXX XS10% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 913051119 XXX XS20% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 55115131616 XXX XS30% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 11101316211516 XXX XS40% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 981313221413 XXX XS50% 2010 12XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 355001211 XXX XS60% 2010 12XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 775301111 XXX XS70% 2010 12XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 94520106 XXX XS80% 2010 12XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 66530510 XXX XS90% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 33210277 XXX XS100% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 1127278 XXX XS110% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 7600043 XXX XS120% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 3300056 XXX XS130% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 3300044 XXX XS140% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 3300064 XXX XS150% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 33002128 XXX XS160% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 5500143 XXX XS170% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 6705257 XXX XS180% 1986 35XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 0000000 XXX XS190% 2020 1XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 000511311 XXX XS200% 2020 1XXXXX XNANANANANA NA 0000000 XXX XS21 26SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Overall RatingWidth (ft)Length (ft)Base Distance (ft)Outfield Line depth (ft)Centerfield depth (ft)Official ClassificationRatingExcellent (flat and well drained)Good (slopes don't affect play, well drained)Fair(some impact on play, 1-2 closures)Poor (impact on play, closed frequently)Excellent(meets all requirements and bmps)Good (minimally accessible)Fair (not all areas accessible)Poor(no access to field or spectator areas)Excellent (like new and < 1/4 useful life)Good (little/no damage, half useful life or less)Fair (loss of function but safe, 3/4 useful life)Poor (damaged/unsafe, at/past useful life)Field OrientationAthletic Field Assessment432143214321SizeEquipment ConditionGrading and Drainage AccessibilityEast Side Sports Complex (planned)Baseball Field 1 NA NA 90 275 300 U14 / U14 & up 4.0NWBaseball Field 2 NA NA 90 275 300 U14 / U14 & up 4.0NEBaseball Field 3 NA NA 90 275 300 U14 / U14 & up 4.0SWBaseball Field 4 NA NA 90 275 300 U14 / U14 & up 4.0SEBaseball Field 5 NA NA 90 300 350 U14 / U14 & up 4.0NEBaseball Field 6 NA NA 90 300 350 U14 / U14 & up 4.0SEBaseball Field 7 NA NA 70 225 250 U11 / U12 4.0SWBaseball Field 8 NA NA 70 225 250 U11 / U12 4.0SEBaseball Field 9 NA NA 80 250 275 U13 / U14 4.0NWBaseball Field 10 NA NA 80 250 275 U13 / U14 4.0NESoccer Field 1 225 360 NA NA NA NFHS 4.0N/SSoccer Field 2 225 360 NA NA NA NFHS 4.0N/SSoccer Field 3 150 300 NA NA NAAYSO U14 4.0N/SSoccer Field 4 150 300 NA NA NAAYSO U14 4.0E/WFlag Football Field 1 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/SFlag Football Field 2 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/SFlag Football Field 3 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/SFlag Football Field 4 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/SFlag Football Field 5 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/SFlag Football Field 6 90 240 NA NA NA NFL FLAG U12 4.0N/S1.0 - Poor4.0 - ExcellentBest OrientationWorst Orientation IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 272022Activity Overlap (approximate %)Year Constructed / Last major rennovationAge / Useful LifeRestroomsConcessionsShelter (Storm Safey Location)Parking PlaygroundPool Splash PadPlayers BenchesBleachersGoalsBackstopLine FenceOutfield FenceBasesPitcher's MoundSports LightingBatting CagesScoreboardMarchAprilMay JuneJuly August SeptemberOctoberNovemberGamePracticeAffiliateRecreationDrop in UseSchoolIntensity of UseUser GroupDays of Use / MonthPark Amenities Sports Amenities0% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX XBB10% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX XBB20% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX XBB30% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB40% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB50% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB60% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB70% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB80% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB90% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXNAXXXXXXXX 14282828282828 XXXBB100% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANAXNAX 14282828282828 XXXS10% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANAXNAX 14282828282828 XXXS20% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANAXNAX 14282828282828 XXXS30% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXS40% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF10% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF20% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF30% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF40% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF50% 2023 -1XXXXX XXXXNANANANANA NA 14282828282828 XXXFF6 IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 29SITE STUDIES The following pages include detailed assessments of the existing conditions of each of the fi ve study locations: City Park, Eastside Sports Complex, Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park, Mercer Park, and Napoleon Park. This section includes a profi le of each study area including aerial photography, individual fi eld identifi cation, the overall site rating for the park, the overall fi eld condition for all of the fi elds at the park, the total number of each type of fi eld, and a peak use study. The information included in this section was gathered during site visits, City staff , and excerpts from the Site Evaluation and Sports Field Inventory Tables. The peak use study for each park considers the expected number of players, coaches, offi cials, and fans for each type and size of fi eld, and the expected number of vehicles needed to accommodate the people using each fi eld. These numbers are adjusted per season and compared to the provided number of parking spaces to determine the estimated surplus or defi cit of parking. For Eastside Sports Complex and Mercer Park, this section also includes the proposed improvements being considered. 30SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CITY PARK200 Park Rd107 ACRES¯0460920230Feet1.7 1.71.3 1.31.7 1.71.3 1.30.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0Baseball Field1Baseball Field2Baseball Field3Baseball Field4Baseball Field5Baseball Field6Baseball Field7Baseball Field8City ParkOverall Field Condition 31Peak Usage / Parking StudyIowa City Athletic Field AssesmentPeople / Car 3City ParkFlip Factor 50%SportQtyPlayersCoachesOfficials / StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars Baseball / SoftballSP SU FA WIBaseball - High School 0 24 6 3 1 24 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Pony 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Bronco 7 24 6 1 2 48 567 189 X 189 X 189 - - Baseball - Little League / Pinto 1 24 6 1 2.5 60 94 31 X 31 X 31 - - Softball - Youth 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - X - - Softball - Adult 0 24 2 2 1 24 0 0 X - X - X - - Batting Cages 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 330 110 X 110 X 110 X 110 - 991 330 330 330 110 - SoccerSP SU FA WIU15/U19 (11v11) 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - U12 / u14 (9v9) 0 26 6 2 1.5 39 0 0 X - - X - - U10 (7V7) 0 20 6 2 2 40 0 0 X - - X - - U8 (7V7) 0 16 6 2 2.5 40 0 0 X - - X - - U6 (5V5) 0 14 6 1 3 42 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - FootballSP SU FA WIFootball - Flag 0 28 4 3 2 56 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Youth 0 36 6 3 2.5 90 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Competitive- Stad048 8 5 419200 - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 - - X - - 00 - - - - LacrosseSP SU FA WILacrosse 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - Court SportsSP SU FA WITennis 6 4 0 0 0.5 2 39 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 Pickleball 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - Volleyball 0 8 0 00.54 00X- X - X - X - Basketball - Full 0 10 0 0 1 10 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Half 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 X - X - X - X - 39 13 13 13 13 13 General ActivitiesQtyVisitors -- StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars SP SU FA WIshelter - small 2 12 0 0 0 0 24 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 shelter - large 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - playground 1 40 0 0 1.5 60 102 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 splash pad 0 80 0 1 1.5 120 0 0 X - X - X - X - passive use 1 40 0 0 0 0 40 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 camps / school groups 0 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 - X - - - 166 55 55 55 55 55 1195 398 SP 398 SU 398 FA 178 WI 68Perm Temp TotalParking Provided (River Lot) 81 0 81 81 81 81 81Parking Provided (Lower Lot) 48 0 48 48 48 48 48Parking Provided (Carni Lot) 32 0 32 32 32 32 32Parking Provided (BB Lot) 76 76 76 76 76 76Parking Provided (West Lot) 13 0 13 13 13 13 13Total Parking Provided 250 250 250 250 250Surplus (Deficit)(148) (148) (148) 72 182SeasonPark Notes• Existing restroom facility is minimally compliant, undersized, and outdated• STMA Environmental Certifi cation held for City Park• LED light replacement to align with climate action goals• Asphalt replacement needed on tennis and basketball courts • City Park is in a fl ood risk areaBaseballFields8Tennis Courts6 32SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CITY PARKMaintenance Building / Tennis CourtsCentral WalkwayBaseball FieldsBaseball FieldsBaseball FieldsNew Fencing/Backstop IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 33Baseball FieldsTennis CourtsConcessions/Restroom BuildingBaseball FieldsParking Area 34SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN EASTSIDE SPORTS COMPLEX (As Planned) Between Taft Ave SE and Compass Drive 79 ACRES¯0 400 800200Feet4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.00.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0East Side Sports ComplexOverall Field Condition 3546Soccer FieldsFlag FootballBaseballFields10Peak Usage / Parking StudyIowa City Athletic Field AssesmentPeople / Car 3Eastside Sports Complex (planned)Flip Factor 50%SportQtyPlayersCoachesOfficials / StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars Baseball / SoftballSP SU FA WIBaseball - High School 2 24 6 3 1 24 116 39 X 39 X 39 - - Baseball - Pony 6 24 6 3 1.5 36 423 141 X 141 X 141 - - Baseball - Bronco 2 24 6 1 2 48 162 54 X 54 X 54 - - Baseball - Little League / Pinto 0 24 6 1 2.5 60 0 0 X - X - - - Softball - Youth 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - X - - Softball - Adult 0 24 2 2 1 24 0 0 X - X - X - - Batting Cages 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 351 117 X 117 X 117 X 117 - 1052 351 351 351 117 - SoccerSP SU FA WIU15/U19 (11v11) 2 32 4 3 2 64 210 70 X 70 - X 70 - U12 / u14 (9v9) 2 26 6 2 1.5 39 130 43 X 43 - X 43 - U10 (7V7) 0 20 6 2 2 40 0 0 X - - X - - U8 (7V7) 0 16 6 2 2.5 40 0 0 X - - X - - U6 (5V5) 0 14 6 1 3 42 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 170 57 X 57 - X 57 - 510 170 170 - 170 - FootballSP SU FA WIFootball - Flag 6 28 4 3 2 56 558 186 - - X 186 - Football - Tackle Youth 0 36 6 3 2.5 90 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Competitive- Stad048 8 5 419200 - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 279 93 - - X 93 - 837 279 - - 279 - LacrosseSP SU FA WILacrosse 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - Court SportsSP SU FA WITennis 0 4 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 X - X - X - X - Pickleball 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - Volleyball 0 8 0 00.54 00X- X - X - X - Basketball - Full 0 10 0 0 1 10 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Half 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 X - X - X - X - 00 - - - - General ActivitiesQtyVisitors -- StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars SP SU FA WIshelter - small 4 12 0 0 0 0 48 16 X 16 X 16 X 16 X 16 shelter - large 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - playground 1 40 0 0 1.5 60 102 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 splash pad 1 80 0 1 1.5 120 203 68 X 68 X 68 X 68 X 68 passive use 1 40 0 0 0 0 40 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 camps / school groups 1 30 0 1 0 0 31 10 - X 10 - - 423 141 131 141 131 131 2822 941 SP 651 SU 492 FA 697 WI 131Perm Temp TotalParking Provided (Area 1) 185 60 245 245 245 245 245Parking Provided (Area 2) 252 108 360 360 360 360 360Parking Provided (Area 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking Provided (Area 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Parking Provided 605 605 605 605 605Surplus (Deficit)(336) (46) 114 (92) 474SeasonPark Notes• FUTURE PARK DEVELOPMENT PLANS• Market Study included in the appendix 36SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN EASTSIDE SPORTS COMPLEX (As Planned)View Looking WestView Looking EastView Looking SoutheastView Looking EastView Looking NorthwestView Looking Southeast IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 37Core AreaSpectator AreaEntry SpinePlay ExperienceSoccer FieldsOverall 38SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN KICKERS SOCCER PARK4400 Soccer Park Rd87 ACRES¯0420 840210Feet1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.72.7 2.7 2.7 2.72.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.32.02.7 2.7 2.7 2.70.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0Kickers Soccer ComplexOverall Field Condition11223344556677889910101111121213131414151516161717181819192020212122222323 3923Soccer FieldsCross Country Course(2 laps = 5K)Peak Usage / Parking StudyIowa City Athletic Field AssesmentPeople / Car 3Kickers Soccer ComplexFlip Factor 50%SportQtyPlayers CoachesOfficials / StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars Baseball / SoftballSP SU FA WIBaseball - High School 0 24 6 3 1 24 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Pony 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Bronco 0 24 6 1 2 48 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Little League / Pinto 0 24 6 1 2.5 60 0 0 X - X - - - Softball - Youth 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - X - - Softball - Adult 0 24 2 2 1 24 0 0 X - X - X - - Batting Cages 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - X - X - - 00 - - - - SoccerSP SU FA WIU15/U19 (11v11) 7 32 4 3 2 64 735 245 X 245 - X 245 - U12 / u14 (9v9) 10 26 6 2 1.5 39 650 217 X 217 - X 217 - U10 (7V7) 0 20 6 2 2 40 0 0 X - - X - - U8 (7V7) 6 16 6 2 2.5 40 336 112 X 112 - X 112 - U6 (5V5) 0 14 6 1 3 42 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 861 287 X 287 - X 287 - 2582 861 861 - 861 - FootballSP SU FA WIFootball - Flag 0 28 4 3 2 56 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Youth 0 36 6 3 2.5 90 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Competitive- Stad0 48 8 5 4 192 0 0 - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 - - X - - 00 - - - - LacrosseSP SU FA WILacrosse 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - Court SportsSP SU FA WITennis 0 4 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 X - X - X - X - Pickleball 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - Volleyball 0 8 0 0 0.5 4 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Full 0 10 0 0 1 10 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Half 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 X - X - X - X - 00 - - - - General ActivitiesQtyVisitors -- StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars SP SU FA WIshelter - small 2 12 0 0 0 0 24 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 shelter - large 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - playground 2 40 0 0 1.5 60 203 68 X 68 X 68 X 68 X 68 splash pad 0 80 0 1 1.5 120 0 0 X - X - X - X - passive use 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - camps / school groups 0 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 - X - - - 227 76 76 76 76 76 2809 936 SP 936 SU 76 FA 936 WI 76Perm Temp TotalParking Provided (South Lots) 206 0 206 206 206 206 206Parking Provided (6-9 Lot) 125 0 125 125 125 125 125Parking Provided (North Lot) 365 0 365 365 365 365 365Total Parking Provided 696 696 696 696 696Surplus (Deficit)(240) (240) 620 (240) 620Season 40SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN KICKERS SOCCER PARKSoccer Fields (7,8,14)Soccer Fields (8,13)Pedestrian Bridge/Soccer Fields (8, 9)Soccer Fields (1,2,3)Open Air Shelter North Entry / North Natural Area IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 41North Parking AreaPlayground North Playground SouthSoccer Fields (1,2,3)/South ParkingSouth Restroom/Storage/ConcessionNorth Parking Area 42SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN MERCER PARK1317 Dover St27 ACRES3.32.02.31.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.30.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0Baseball Field1Baseball Field2Baseball Field3Baseball Field4Soccer Field 1 Soccer Field 2 Soccer Field 3 Soccer Field 4Mercer ParkOverall Field Condition1122334411223344 434Soccer FieldsPeak Usage / Parking StudyIowa City Athletic Field AssesmentPeople / Car 3Mercer ParkFlip Factor 50%SportQtyPlayers CoachesOfficials / StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars Baseball / SoftballSP SU FA WIBaseball - High School 2 24 6 3 1 24 116 39 X 39 X 39 - - Baseball - Pony 1 24 6 3 1.5 36 71 24 X 24 X 24 - - Baseball - Bronco 1 24 6 1 2 48 81 27 X 27 X 27 - - Baseball - Little League / Pinto 0 24 6 1 2.5 60 0 0 X - X - - - Softball - Youth 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - X - - Softball - Adult 0 24 2 2 1 24 0 0 X - X - X - - Batting Cages 1 8 1 0 0 0 9 3 X 3 X 3 X 3 - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 134 45 X 45 X 45 X 45 - 410 137 137 137 48 - SoccerSP SU FA WIU15/U19 (11v11) 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - U12 / u14 (9v9) 0 26 6 2 1.5 39 0 0 X - - X - - U10 (7V7) 0 20 6 2 2 40 0 0 X - - X - - U8 (7V7) 2 16 6 2 2.5 40 112 37 X 37 - X 37 - U6 (5V5) 2 14 6 1 3 42 112 37 X 37 - X 37 - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 112 37 X 37 - X 37 - 336 112 112 - 112 - FootballSP SU FA WIFootball - Flag 0 28 4 3 2 56 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Youth 0 36 6 3 2.5 90 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Competitive- Stad0 48 8 5 4 192 0 0 - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 - - X - - 00 - - - - LacrosseSP SU FA WILacrosse 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - Court SportsSP SU FA WITennis 3 4 0 0 0.5 2 20 7 X 7 X 7 X 7 X 7 Pickleball 8 4 0 0 0 0 32 11 X 11 X 11 X 11 X 11 Volleyball 0 8 0 00.54 00X- X - X - X - Basketball - Full 0 10 0 0 1 10 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Half 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 X - X - X - X - 52 17 17 17 17 17 General ActivitiesQtyVisitors -- StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars SP SU FA WIshelter - small 2 12 0 0 0 0 24 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 X 8 shelter - large 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - playground 1 40 0 0 1.5 60 102 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 splash pad 0 80 0 1 1.5 120 0 0 X - X - X - X - passive use 1 40 0 0 0 0 40 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 camps / school groups 1 30 0 1 0 0 31 10 - X 10 - - 197 66 55 66 55 55 994 331 SP 321 SU 219 FA 232 WI 72Perm Temp TotalParking Provided (Big Lot) 260 0 260 260 260 260 260Parking Provided (Pool Lot) 69 0 69 69 69 69 69Total Parking Provided 329 329 329 329 329Surplus (Deficit)(2) 8 110 97 257SeasonPark Notes• Asphalt repair needed on tennis and pickleball courts • Asphalt replacement needed on parking lot• School District utilizes fi eld 1BaseballFields4Tennis Courts3Pickleball Courts8 44SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN MERCER PARKBaseball Field (2)Baseball Field (1)Parking AreaBaseball Field (2)Playground / ShelterEntry Walkway IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 45Baseball Field (1)/ Maintenance BuildingSpectator AreaBaseball Field (4)Baseball Field (3)Baseball Field (2)Concession/Restroom Building 46SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Iowa City, IowaMercer ParkConcept PlanISSUE DATE: MAY 19, 2020 All drawings are preliminary and subject to change.© 2020 Hitchcock Design GroupNORTHSCALE: 1”=60’30’ 60’0’ 120’PREPARED FOR: City of Iowa CityDrop-off area with striped crosswalkCarriage walk connecting to existing tennis court pathwayBench, typicalOrnamental tree, typicalDouble swing access gateShade tree, typicalCovered dugout, typicalField 4New backstop, line fencing, and nettingBleachers, typicalExisting tennis and pickleball courts to remainStone access drive to maintenance buildingExisting maintenance building to remainNew roof on existing concessions / restroom building to remainExpanded concessions patio with new ramp and stairsRelocated bleachers and shade structureRelocated backstop with higher netting and new line fencingShade structure with tables (approximately 30’ x 30’)Covered dugout, typicalCarriage walkSeat wall, typicalPortable ticket boothNew fenceUpgraded LED field lights, typicalNew bull pen areaExisting bleachersImprove drainageExisting tree, typicalExisting bleachers, typicalCovered dugout, typicalNew backstop, line fencing, and nettingExisting press box to remainChampionship plaza with ornamental planting, seatwall, benchesRenovated batting cagesStone paved maintenance yardRelocated bleachers and shade structurePaved maintenance roadRelocated backstop with higher netting and new line fencingCovered dugout, typicalNew scoreboardDover StreetField 1Field 2Field 3MERCER PARK (As Planned) 48SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN NAPOLEON PARK2501 S Gilbert St28 ACRES¯0360 720180Feet3.0 3.0 3.03.31.32.01.3 1.32.0 2.0 2.0 2.00.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0SoftballField 1SoftballField 2SoftballField 3SoftballField 4SoftballField 5SoftballField 6SoftballField 7SoftballField 8FlagFootballField 1FlagFootballField 2FlagFootballField 3FlagFootballField 4Napoleon ParkOverall Field Condition112233445566778811223344 494Flag FootballPeak Usage / Parking StudyIowa City Athletic Field AssesmentPeople / Car 3Napoleon ParkFlip Factor 50%SportQtyPlayersCoachesOfficials / StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars Baseball / SoftballSP SU FA WIBaseball - High School 0 24 6 3 1 24 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Pony 0 24 6 3 1.5 36 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Bronco 0 24 6 1 2 48 0 0 X - X - - - Baseball - Little League / Pinto 0 24 6 1 2.5 60 0 0 X - X - - - Softball - Youth 8 24 6 3 1.5 36 564 188 X 188 X 188 X 188 - Softball - Adult 0 24 2 2 1 24 0 0 X - X - X - - Batting Cages 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 282 94 X 94 X 94 X 94 - 846 282 282 282 282 - SoccerSP SU FA WIU15/U19 (11v11) 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - U12 / u14 (9v9) 0 26 6 2 1.5 39 0 0 X - - X - - U10 (7V7) 0 20 6 2 2 40 0 0 X - - X - - U8 (7V7) 0 16 6 2 2.5 40 0 0 X - - X - - U6 (5V5) 0 14 6 1 3 42 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - FootballSP SU FA WIFootball - Flag 4 28 4 3 2 56 372 124 - - X 124 - Football - Tackle Youth 0 36 6 3 2.5 90 0 0 - - X - - Football - Tackle Competitive- Stad0 48 8 5 4 192 0 0 - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 186 62 - - X 62 - 558 186 - - 186 - LacrosseSP SU FA WILacrosse 0 32 4 3 2 64 0 0 X - - X - - flip factor -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0 X - - X - - 00 - - - - Court SportsSP SU FA WITennis 0 4 0 0 0.5 2 0 0 X - X - X - X - Pickleball 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - Volleyball 0 8 0 0 0.5 4 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Full 0 10 0 0 1 10 0 0 X - X - X - X - Basketball - Half 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 X - X - X - X - 00 - - - - General ActivitiesQtyVisitors -- StaffFans / Player FansTotal People Cars SP SU FA WIshelter - small 1 12 0 0 0 0 12 4 X 4 X 4 X 4 X 4 shelter - large 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 X - X - X - X - playground 1 40 0 0 1.5 60 102 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 X 34 splash pad 0 80 0 1 1.5 120 0 0 X - X - X - X - passive use 1 40 0 0 0 0 40 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 X 13 camps / school groups 0 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 - X - - - 154 51 51 51 51 51 1558 519 SP 333 SU 333 FA 519 WI 51Perm Temp TotalParking Provided (Hard Surface Parking) 380 0 380 380 380 380 380Parking Provided (Grass Area) 0 100 100 100 100 100 100Total Parking Provided 480 480 480 480 480Surplus (Deficit)(39) 147 147 (39) 429SeasonPark Notes• Parking lot maintenance and repair under public works jurisdictionSoftballFields8 50SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN NAPOLEON PARKRestroomSpectator AreasParkingSoftball FieldsRestroom/ConcessionPlayground 52SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN CONCLUSIONSThe following pages include the conclusions of the sports fi eld assessment study and recommendations for improvements and future development items for each of the study areas. The conclusions section is divided into two parts: proposed improvements and an action plan. Goals and StrategiesThis section identifi es fi ve areas of opportunity to improve Iowa City’s outdoor sports amenities. These opportunities are broken into overarching goals with several strategies to meet it. Proposed ImprovementsThe Proposed Improvements table consists of a list of capital improvements and Action plan items for each of the fi ve study areas. IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 53Existing Facility ImprovementsExisting facility improvements are small- and large-scale improvements to the 4 developed study areas outlined in this report.E1. Improve Site Access and ADA Accessibility and Compliance, including: • Providing accessible routes to all amenities and support services• Expanding and improving neighborhood/park connections and trailheads• Expanding bike route and bus route access to sections of the community with barriers to recreation access including the east and west sections of the communityE2: Upgrade Ballfi elds to restore or replace aging and damaged amenities and improve player and spectator experience, considering• Providing additional shade and seating• Upgrades to key fi elds for a “Big League” feel considering stadium style seating, sports lighting, scoreboards, press box, and improved restroom/concessions/storage.E3: Improve Support Buildings in the parks such as restrooms, concession buildings, maintenance/storage facilities, and open air shelters that are currently spread out geographically. Several of these buildings have compliance and/or functionality limitations due to their size and/or layout and history of partial improvements.• Assess all support buildings to identify buildings to be renovated in place• Assess all support buildings to identify buildings replace or consolidateE4: Develop and implement Sport Field Improvement Standards in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects.• Continue to implement drainage, irrigation, and lighting improvements • Consider orientation and size improvements along with potential consolidation• Oversize fi elds for improved turf management• Consider dedicated fi eld features such as goals, players benches, and spectator seatingE5: Complete Court Repairs, in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, including:• Resurfacing and/or replacing asphalt paving and color coat to keep cracking and ponding to an appropriate level• Replacing damaged and/or outdated fencing, nets, and goalsE6: Complete Parking lot Repairs , in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering:• Resurfacing and/or replacing asphalt paving and striping• Realigning or relocating lots with poor functionality• Reducing capacity of oversized lots E7: Develop and implement Sustainability Plans for each Park Site in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering:• Upgrading site and sports lighting to LED• Converting underutilized lawn to native prairie• Naturalizing turf detention basinsE8: Develop, adopt, and implement Signage and Wayfi nding Standards in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects.• Develop a signage brand package for Iowa City Recreation for adoption across all park and open space locations considering park identity, amenity identifi cation and labeling, regulatory signage, and site mapping/wayfi ndingE9:Add and improve Non-sport Amenities to serve daily park users and sporting event drag-along visitors including playground, splash pads, climbing and challenge activities, picnic games, etc. Goals and Strategies 54SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN E10: Plan for and implement small-scale improvements and large-scale renovations to the parks, including:• City Park• Mercer Park• Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park• Napoleon ParkNew Facility DevelopmentNew facilities are the potential addition of amenities or new park sites that either do not currently existing within the Iowa City Recreation system or the addition of an amenity to a new site.N1: Implement planned Eastside Sports Complex development of park amenities and site access improvements including ballfi elds (to address the community defi ciency), fl ag football, and tournament sports and meet community interest in this new park space.N2: Plan for, fund and develop an Artifi cial Turf Field Complex of 2-3 fi elds at a single park location, considering:• Development of multi-purpose rectangular fi elds and diamond ballfi elds • Phased implementation to avoid over-burdening the initial investment and maintenance replacement costs• Funding and partnership opportunities to ease the fi nancial burden on Iowa city• Final location to be determined based on community supportN3: Assess ongoing participation and demand for Pickleball Court development and provide additional amenities as needed.• Assess tennis participation to determine capacity for existing court conversion and/or shared-use courtsN4: Assess demand for and feasibility of Miracle Field baseball complex and develop amenities as needed. • Final location to be determined based on community support and feasiblityN5: Assess demand for and feasibility of a new indoor/outdoor Fieldhouse and develop facility as needed. • Final location to be determined based on community support and feasibilityOperation and Program OpportunitiesOperation and program opportunities are potential methods for managing the implementation of these goals through the development and adoption of policy and best practices. O1: Engage Affi liate Investment Partners to support Iowa City Recreation initiatives through consensus building, community outreach, and/or fi scal support.O2: Provide Donor Opportunities for park amenities such as memorial bricks, benches, trees, etc. O3: Pursue Grant Funding Opportunities considering national, state, and local sources of fi scal assistance.O4: Strengthen and grow Community Relationships with Town/Gown organizations with research and community give-back missions.Planning InitiativesPlanning initiatives are system-wide standards and plans for non-site specifi c improvements and support amenities. P1: Develop and adopt Landscape and Amenity Standards and implement them in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects to provide a cohesive Iowa City Recreation experience across all properties.P2: Develop Programming Overlays for special events such as festivals, cross-country programming, community races, etc.P3: Develop and adopt Park Security Plans and implement them in coordination with Park Improvement and Renovation projects, considering security lighting, cameras, and staff patrols. IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 55Acquisition OpportunitiesAcquisition opportunities identify areas of the community where available recreation service is limited or access to services is impeded. These opportunities also account for how potential future development in Iowa City may lead to new recreation needs. A1: Monitor and address Western Community Athletic Service needs as potential future community development, demographics and available recreation off erings by others change.A2: Identify opportunities to expand recreation access through East Edge North/South Connections to existing and proposed amenities at Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park, Mercer Park, and Eastside Sports Complex.• Prioritize safe access across Highway 6, through the industrial district, and along the railroad line along the east edge of the City 56SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSRecommendations City ParkEastside Sports Complex*Iowa City Kickers Soccer Park Mercer Park Napoleon Park Create Park Master Plan (long-term vision)2018 2016 2020Special spaces/park identity is neededXX XXProvide paved ADA connections to all park amenitiesXXXXXAdd identity and wayfinding signage in parks and along trailsXXXXXAdd trail head identity, and ADA trail-system access in the parkXXImprove spectator amenities (seating, views, etc.)XXXXReplace backstops and fencingXX XAdd/improve netting and other ball control/safety measuresXX XAdd/improve lighting/scoreboardsXX XXPossible artificial turf locationXXRestore grass and rest fieldsImprove drainage/gradingXXImprove/add irrigationXXAdd/Improve water access/drinking fountainsXAdd/improve restroom facilitiesXXAdd/improve concessions facilitiesXXAdd/improve maintenance/storage facilitiesXXAdd/renovate shelters/shadeXXXAdd/expand parking XX XProvide pedestrian/bicycle access to the parkXXXProvide bus route access to the parkXXExpand park acreage by acquiring adjacent parcel(s)XXImprove multi-use open spaceXAdd landscape layerXXXXXAdd/improve support amenities (playgrounds, fitness equipment, courts, etc.)XXX IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 57The appendix includes the following items:• IDNR Useful Life Criteria• Eastside Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis - Introduction and Executive Summary APPENDIX 58SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN IDNR Useful Life CriteriaIDNR Division of Grant Administration Useful Life Criteria 7/21/97 1IDNR Grant Administration Division Per IPRA-Park & Natural Resource Management Section’s Recommendations USEFUL LIFE CRITERIAFACILITY Expected useful lifeEvaluation Criteria – FactorBB/Softball fields 8-10 years # Games/week, # Practices/week Grass infields? Maintenance Procedure/Standards Is site used for multiple uses, soccer, football? Is space used for organized or programmed events? Spectator considerations – bleachers Concession stands BB/Softball Field Lighting 20 years Pole Type (wood, steel, concrete) Wiring type (aluminum, copper) HID or incandescent fixtures Existing FC vs. new standards Accepted grounding systems? Panel Capabilities/Technology Electrical Code compliance Soccer Fields 8-10 years Usage rating A/B/C/D # games/week, # weeks/year, time of year, age of user Irrigation system 20 years Irrigated Y/N Usage # games per week Drainage considerations Maintenance standards/levels Is site used for organized or programmed events? To what extent? Is site used for multiple uses? Softball, BB or football Tennis Courts Lighted Y/N (Use BB Criteria) Resurface 12-15 years Surface clay, asphalt, other Total Renovation 20-25 years Color coat/overlay/rebuild Frequency of color coating Location – high water table Fencing material/posts Preventive maintenance Location: Water table concerns Is site used for organized or programmed events? To what extent? Are courts used for making ice? Basket Ball Courts Same as tennis courts Resurface 12-15 years Total Renovation 20-25 years Volleyball Courts Sand / Grass? Lighted Y/N Borders Bleachers/spectator area Shuffleboard Same as tennis courts Resurface 12-15 years Total Renovation 20-25 years IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 59IDNR Division of Grant Administration Useful Life Criteria 7/21/97 2Picnic Shelters 25 years Support structures: masonry, steel, wood Roof type: metal, asphalt, shingle, slate, cedar shake Construction type: post & beam, frame Historical value and consideration Preventive maintenance record Is site used for organized or programmed events? To what extent? Playgrounds 15 years metal Meet Standards? ASTM, CPSC, ADA 10 years plastic Daily usage by intended user group 8 – 12 years wood Location: school, or neighborhood park Surfacing Material Preventive maintenance record Border construction material Location: retention area/water? Boat Launch Ramps 15-20 years Construction materials, gravel, concrete Location i.e. Lake Michigan Annual Usage Is facility fee generating? Region Fishing Piers & Docks 15-20 years Orginial construction materials plastic, wood, aluminum Location i.e. Lake Michigan Annual volume/usage Winter removal and storage? Preventive maintenance record Swimming Pools 25 years Stand alone site? Bathhouse 25 years Heated for winter? Boathouse 10-15 years Attached to Community Center Y/N Mechanical room connected? ADA compliance Y/N Local Code compliance? Preventive Maintenance record Location i.e. Lake Michigan Restrooms Same as pools Same as pools Parking Lots Gravel, asphalt or concrete Resurface 10-12 years Monthly volume and load use Total Renovation 20-25 years i.e. delivery trucks or garbage Spring use –heavy, moderate, light Seal coating frequency Preventive maintenance record Original construction design loads Location: flooding/water concerns Snow removal or salt use? Curbed or sheet drainage to edges Bike Paths Same as Parking lots Same as Parking lots Interpretive Center Same as Bathhouse Same as Bathhouse 60SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Eastside Sports Complex Market Study SUBMITTED TO Iowa City / Coralville Area Convention and Visitors Bureau (dba Think Iowa City) SUBMITTED BY Johnson Consulting DATE November 2019 EAST SIDE SPORTS COMPLEX ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 61 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 62SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 6 East Monroe Street| Fifth Floor| Chicago, Illinois 60603| Phone: 312.447.2010www.chjc.comSection 1 Introduction and Executive Summary|November 2019East Side Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis –Iowa City, IAPAGE 1 INTRODUCTIONJohnson Consulting was retained by the Iowa City / Coralville Area Convention and Visitors Bureau (dba Think Iowa City) to provide an economic and fiscal impact analysis of a proposed 70-acre sports complex in Iowa City, IA. The site is located approximately 5 miles to the southeast of downtown Iowa City.Figure 1 - 1 provides an overview of the master plan for the East Side Sports Complex (ESSC), as prepared by Hitchcock Design Group (HDG). It is intended that the full master plan will be developed in 3 Phases. Figure 1 - 1Source: Hitchcock Design Group IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 636 East Monroe Street| Fifth Floor| Chicago, Illinois 60603| Phone: 312.447.2010www.chjc.comSection 1 Introduction and Executive Summary|November 2019East Side Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis –Iowa City, IAPAGE 2 Preliminary concepts prepared by HDG reflect a number of overarching goals for the project that include serving as an economic development catalyst, being accessible to all income levels, becoming a regional draw that is unique to Iowa City, integrating with neighborhoods, and promoting sustainability. It is intended that the project will be developed in multiple phases.STUDY OBJECTIVESThe key objectives of our study are to provide:1. An analysis of key market characteristics as they relate to the potential to support a new sports complex.2. An independent review of the program and concepts prepared by HCG.3. An economic and fiscal impact analysis of the proposed project. METHODOLOGYIn order to complete the analysis required for this project, Johnson Consulting performed the following tasks:1. Analyzed local market characteristics, based upon published sources of data and information.2. Provided an independent assessment of the proposed sports and recreation facilities on the subject site.3. Projected the market performance of the proposed project over a 10-year period, in terms of demand and utilization. 4. Estimated the economic and fiscal impact of the proposed project.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIn the absence of a detailed feasibility study, it is our opinion, based upon our experience working in the local market and our national industry expertise, that the master plan for the ESSC including all 3 Phases of development, as proposed by HDG and shown in Figure 1 - 1, is reasonable and market-supportable. Having said that, we have not opined on the overall quality of the site nor its locational attributes. The ESSC as presently proposed will serve to support more of a local parks and recreational use rather than a sports tourism complex, and if positioned and marketed appropriately, it will be able to attract a small number local tournaments and events. The proposed scale is not conducive with a sports tourism destination. If it is the intention to create a significant tourism impact, we recommend that a detailed market and financial feasibility study be undertaken to inventory existing facilities in the market place and define a market-driven program that can drive tourism and contribute to economic development. 64SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 6 East Monroe Street| Fifth Floor| Chicago, Illinois 60603| Phone: 312.447.2010www.chjc.comSection 1 Introduction and Executive Summary|November 2019East Side Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis –Iowa City, IAPAGE 3 DEMAND PROJECTIONSFigure 1 - 2 summarizes the projected utilization of, and attendance at, the proposed ESSC, assuming all 3 Phases are completed, in Year 5 (stabilized year of operation). The proposed ESSC is projected to host 38 events and attract 4,289 participants and 13,410 spectators in Year 5. Events are projected to include a mix of baseball/ softball, soccer/ lacrosse, and flag football regional and local tournaments, leagues, and camps, clinics and lessons, as well as a small number of community special events.Figure 1 - 2Figure 1 - 3 shows the estimated visitation to the ESSC in terms of person-days. As shown, total visitation will equate to 19,481 person-days in Year 5. Leagues and Camps/ Clinics/ Lessons are projected to draw participants to the market for multiple days, while all other events are assumed to be single-day.East Side Sports Complex - Iowa City, IANumber of EventsParticipant SpectatorActivity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Attendance AttendanceTournaments-RegionalBaseball/ Softball1122222222 6001,500Soccer/ Lacrosse1111111111 375 938Flag Football1111111111 100 250Tournaments-LocalBaseball/ Softball45678888881,1522,880Soccer/ Lacrosse1122222222 360 900Flag Football1122222222 280 700LeaguesBaseball/ Softball3455666666 432 432Soccer/ Lacrosse2334444444 360 360Flag Football2223333333 270 270Camps/Clinics/LessonsBaseball/ Softball1122222222 180 90Soccer/ Lacrosse1111111111 90 45Flag Football1111111111 90 45Special EventsCommunity Special Events1234555555-5,000Total 202431353838383838384,28913,410Source: Johnson ConsultingYear 5 (Stabilization) IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 656 East Monroe Street| Fifth Floor| Chicago, Illinois 60603| Phone: 312.447.2010www.chjc.comSection 1 Introduction and Executive Summary|November 2019East Side Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis –Iowa City, IAPAGE 4 Figure 1 - 3IMPACT ANALYSISFigure 1 - 4 shows the total estimated economic and fiscal impact of all 3 Phases of the ESSC. As shown,in a stabilized year (Year 5) visitors to the ESSC are projected to generate $1.6 million in direct spending, $2.8 million in total spending, and $1.0 million in increased earnings, and support 26 full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs annually. The fiscal impact of all 3 Phases of the ESSC is estimated to be $125,000 of tax revenues, annually in a stabilized year (Year 5). Of this, the City’s share includes $35,000 in local lodging tax revenues, annually.East Side Sports Complex - Iowa City, IAEstimated Person-DaysYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Spectator Person-DaysTournaments-Regional672 1,344 2,016 2,419 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688 2,688Tournaments-Local1,120 2,240 3,360 4,032 4,480 4,480 4,480 4,480 4,480 4,480Leagues266 531 797 956 1,062 1,062 1,062 1,062 1,062 1,062Camps/Clinics/Lessons45 91 136 163 180 180 180 180 180 180Community Special Events1,250 2,500 3,750 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000Subtotal 3,353 6,706 10,059 12,070 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410Participant Person-DaysTournaments-Regional269 538 806 968 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075Tournaments-Local448 896 1,344 1,613 1,792 1,792 1,792 1,792 1,792 1,792Leagues532 1,062 1,594 1,912 2,124 2,124 2,124 2,124 2,124 2,124Camps/Clinics/Lessons273 540 813 972 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,080Community Special Events0000000000Subtotal 1,522 3,036 4,557 5,465 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071Total 4,875 9,742 14,616 17,535 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481Source: Johnson Consulting 66SPORTS FIELDS ASSESSMENTIOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 6 East Monroe Street| Fifth Floor| Chicago, Illinois 60603| Phone: 312.447.2010www.chjc.comSection 1 Introduction and Executive Summary|November 2019East Side Sports Complex Economic Impact Analysis –Iowa City, IAPAGE 5 Figure 1 - 4As discussed above, the scale and proposed program at the ESSC will limit its use to local and some regional play, and does not provide the critical mass necessary to serve as a sports tourism destination. As such, the estimated economic and fiscal impact of the project is relatively small. If the desire is to create a tourism draw and contribute to economic development, it is recommended that a detailed market and financial feasibility study be undertaken to arrive at a market-driven and supportable development that will be a major attractor for Iowa City. East Side Sports Complex - Iowa City, IAEstimated Spending Volume and Economic and Fiscal ImpactVisitation and Economic Activities Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Person-DaysSpectators3,353 6,706 10,059 12,070 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410 13,410Participants1,522 3,036 4,557 5,465 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071 6,071Total 4,875 9,742 14,616 17,535 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481 19,481Room Nights1,151 2,302 3,452 4,142 4,601 4,601 4,601 4,601 4,601 4,601Direct Spending ($000)Av. Daily SpendLodging$96.00$110 $228 $352 $435 $497 $512 $527 $543 $560 $576Meals and Incidental Expenses50.00244 502 775 958 1,096 1,129 1,163 1,198 1,234 1,271Total $354 $729 $1,127 $1,393 $1,593 $1,641 $1,690 $1,741 $1,793 $1,847Economic Impact ($000)MultiplierYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Direct Spending$354 $729 $1,127 $1,393 $1,593 $1,641 $1,690 $1,741 $1,793 $1,847Indirect Spending0.333118 243 375 463 530 546 562 579 596 614Induced Spending0.459163 335 517 639 731 753 776 799 823 848Total Spending $635 $1,307 $2,019 $2,495 $2,855 $2,940 $3,028 $3,119 $3,213 $3,309Increased Earnings0.671238 489 756 934 1,069 1,101 1,134 1,168 1,203 1,239Employment (in FTE jobs)18.4767132024262626262626Fiscal Impact ($000)Tax RateYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10State Sales Tax6.0%$15 $30 $47 $57 $66 $68 $70 $72 $74 $76State Excise (Lodging) Tax5.0%6111822252626272829Local Lodging Tax7.0%8162530353637383940Total Tax Revenue $28 $57 $89 $110 $125 $129 $133 $137 $141 $145Source: Johnson Consulting IOWA CITY RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN 67