HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-14-2024 CPRB Meeting PacketMEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
PUBLIC COVER MEMO
DATE:
May 9, 2024
TO:
CPRB Members
FROM:
Connie McCurdy
RE:
Board Packet for meeting on TUESDAY, May 14, 2024
The following documents for your review and comment at the next board meeting are included
in the Agenda Packet emailed/mailed to you on May 9, 2024.
• Agenda for May 14, 2024 Meeting
• Minutes of the meeting on April 9, 2024 - Draft
• Office Contacts — April 2024
• Complaint Deadlines
PUBLIC AGENDA
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2024 — 5:30 P.M.
HELLING CONFERENCE ROOM
410 E. Washington Street
ITEM NO. 1 CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
ITEM NO. 2 CONSIDER MOTION ADOPTING CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED OR
AMENDED
• Minutes of the meeting on 04/09/24
ITEM NO. 3 NEW BUSINESS
• Legislative bill to eliminate police review boards — SF2325 (now dead).
ITEM NO. 4 OLD BUSINESS
None
ITEM NO. 5 PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
(Commentators shall address the Board for no more than 3 minutes. The Board shall not
engage in discussion with the public concerning said items).
Community Police Review Board Members cannot engage in discussion or debate in
accordance with open meeting laws. Comments can be sent to the Community Police
Review Board to be included in the next meeting packet via CPRBCo.iowa-citv.ortt.
ITEM NO. 6 BOARD INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 7 STAFF INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 8 MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS
• June 11, 2024, 5:30 p.m. — Helling Conference Room
• July 9, 2024, 5:30 p.m. — Helling Conference Room
• August 13, 2024, 5:30 p.m. — Helling Conference Room
• September 10, 2024, 5:30 p.m. — Helling Conference Room
ITEM NO. 9 CONSIDER MOTION TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION based on Section
21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or
authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a
condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds,
and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies
including but not limited to cities, boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5)
police officer investigative reports, except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the
Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are
made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of
government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications
from such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons
would be discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available
for general public examination.
ITEM NO. 10 ADJOURNMENT
Ifyou will need disability -related accommodations to participate in this program/event, please contact
Connie McCurdy at (319) 356-5043, cmccurdy@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged
to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs.
DRAFT
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES — APRIL 09, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Chair Jensen called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Melissa Jensen, Ricky Downing, Saul Mekies, Orville Townsend,
Jerri MacConnell, Amanda Remington,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jessica Hobart
STAFF PRESENT: Staff Connie McCurdy, Legal Counsel Patrick Ford (5:35 p.m.),
City Clerk Kellie Grace
OTHERS PRESENT: Police Chief Dustin Liston, City Council Liaison Laura Bergus
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL
(1) Accept CPRB 24-03 Summary Dismissal.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Townsend, seconded by Downing, to adopt the consent calendar as presented.
• Minutes of the meeting on 03/12/24.
• ICPD Quarterly Summary Report IAIR/CPRB, 1 sc Quarter 2024.
Commissioner Mekies stated that he will be absent from the 05/14/24 meeting. Vice -Chair Downing
noted that he will be absent from the 08/13/24 meeting. City Clerk Grace mentioned that Commissioner
Remington's and Commissioner Townsend's terms expire 06/30/24.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
NEW BUSINESS
ICPD process for determining when a mental health liaison is called to assist an officer during a call:
Commissioner Mekies had requested this agenda item at the 03/12/24 meeting.
Chief Liston stated that all officers are trained in mental crisis help. When the officers respond to calls,
they assess the situation to determine if a liaison is needed. The department has two liaisons that they
use, and they follow up with the individuals after the initial call. Chief Liston also noted that they engage
with DHS frequently in certain situations.
Commissioner Remington mentioned that follow ups are needed to ensure individuals get the help they
need. Commissioner Mekies had concerns about the lack of social workers, and what the results of that
might be, and how society will view it.
CPRB
April 09, 2024
Page 2
DRAFT
Commissioner Townsend would like to know if there is a way to show the value of this program to the
City Council so it will remain in place and not be cut. Chief Liston mentioned that he's talked with the
council about performing studies that would show a comparison between the number of calls received
by an individual before engaging with a mental health liaison or Mobile Crisis and then after they have
received help from one or the other.
Commissioner MacConnell noted that some individuals won't accept help, and so court orders are
sometimes needed. She also mentioned that mental health workers cannot go out thinking that they
can fix situations without needing the police at times. MacConnell stated that the police are needed,
and the safety of police officers and mental health workers are important.
OLD BUSINESS
Chair Jensen noted that there was no old business.
Commissioner Mekies wanted to know the status of the Legislature's attempt to do away with the
CPRB. Chair Jensen responded to this saying that it did not pass.
Commissioner Townsend noted a mistake on his attendance record. Staff will make the correction on
the final approved minutes to City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Dean Abel spoke to concerns that he had about legislation that would abolish the Police review boards.
He mentioned that it passed in the Senate, but the House of Representatives wanted to tweak it. He
then asked if the board did anything about it, such as write a letter.
Chair Jensen responded saying that they were aware of it and that she was contacted by a reporter,
however; a letter was not written.
Commissioner MacConnell stated that she talked to the Chief and found out that the City Manager was
aware of this situation, and that the City has a liaison that works with our representatives.
Chief Liston noted that the city has a lobbyist. Abel wanted to know if the lobbyist took a position on it,
and Chief Liston said that he was unaware.
Legal Counsel Patrick Ford intervened to stop the discussion noting that this should be put on the
agenda for next month (this will be added to New Business on the May 14, 2024, agenda).
Commissioner Remington explained to Abel that they couldn't continue the conversation because it
was not on the current agenda, and it needed to be noticed to the public before it could be discussed.
Abel thanked the board for putting it on the next agenda.
CPRB
April 09, 2024
Page 3
BOARD INFORMATION
DRAFT
Commissioner Remington mentioned that a discussion is needed regarding Dean Abel's concerns
about the legislature abolishing review boards. This item will be added to New Business on the May
2024 agenda.
Commissioner Mekies wanted to make a certificate for retired CPRB staff Tammy Neumann in
recognition of her work with the board. Staff McCurdy brought a sample for the board to review. The
board members all agreed, and a formal certificate was signed at the meeting by Chair Jensen.
STAFF INFORMATION
City Clerk Grace introduced Connie McCurdy as the new CPRB staff person. Grace noted that she will
attend a few meetings with McCurdy until she is settled in.
TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change)
• May 14, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
• June 11, 2024, 5:30 PM., Helling Conference Room
• July 9, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
• August 13, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
Vice -Chair Downing was curious about having enough members for the meetings after Commissioner
Remington and Commissioner Townsend were done with their terms at the end of June. City Clerk
Grace noted that the vacancies will be advertised beforehand, and the hope is that they will be filled so
new members can start in July.
The Board agreed to no changes to the existing meeting schedule at this time but will review it again at
future meetings.
Commissioner MacConnell noted that there was only one board vacancy listed in the City Council
meeting minutes in the newspaper. Staff will look into this issue.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Motion by Commissioner Remington, seconded by Commissioner Mekies, to adjourn into Executive
Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are
required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a
condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11)
personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities,
boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where
disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule
or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons
outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from
such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be
discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public
examination.
Motion carried 610. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Open session adjourned 6:03 p.m.
CPRB
April 09, 2024 DRAFT
Page 4
REGULAR SESSION
Returned to open session at 6:16 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner MacConnell, second by Chair Jensen, to set level of review for CPRB
Complaint 23-15 to 8-8-7 (13)(1)(A), on the record with no additional investigation.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Motion by Commissioner MacConnell, second by Commissioner Townsend, to set level of review for
CPRB Complaint 24-01 to 8-8-7 (13)(1)(A), on the record with no additional investigation.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Motion by Commissioner Remington, second by Vice -Chair Downing, to summarily dismiss CPRB
Complaint 24-03.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Remington, seconded by Vice -Chair Downing to adjourn.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m.
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2023-2024
(Meeting Date)
TERM
04/20/23
05/09123
6/13123
711123
8/8/23
9112/23
101323
10/10/23
11/14/23
12/12/23
01/1124
02/13/24
3/12/24
04/09/24
NAME
EXPIRES
Forum
Forum
Ricky
6/3026
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Downing
Jessica
6/3026
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
Hobart
Melissa
6/3025
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
Jensen
Jerri
6/3027
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
Macconnell
Saul Mekies
6/30/25
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
Amanda
6/3024
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
Remington
Orville
6/3024
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0/E
X
X
Townsend
Stuart
6/30/24
X
O/E
O
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Vander Vegte I
i
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No meeting
--- = Not a Member
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City IA 52240-1826
(319)356-5041
CPRB REPORT OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL TO THE CITY
COUNCIL
Re: Investigation of Complaint CPRB 24-03
CPRB Complaint 24-03, filed March 26, 2024, was summarily dismissed as
required by the City Code, Section 8-8-30 and 8-8-3(E). The complaint was not
filed within 180 (one hundred eight) days of the alleged misconduct.
City Code, Section 8-8-3(D):
D. All complaints to the board must be filed with the City Clerk within one
hundred eighty (180) days of the alleged misconduct.
City Code, Section 8-8-3(E)
E. Only those complaints to the board which do not involve the conduct
of an Iowa City sworn police officer or are not filed within one hundred
eighty (180) days of the alleged misconduct may be subject to summary
dismissal by the board.
DATED: April 9, 2024
KFIB/Timeliness Report Form:4/13/99
Senate File 2325 - Reprinted
SENATE FILE 2325
BY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
(SUCCESSOR TO SF 457)
(SUCCESSOR TO SF 231)
(As Amended and Passed by the Senate March 4, 2024)
A BILL FOR
1 An Act relating to city civil service employees and related
2 procedures and including effective date provisions.
3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
SF 2325 (3) 90
je/js/mb
S.F. 2325
1 Section 1. Section 364.3, Code 2024, is amended by adding
2 the following new subsection:
3 NEW SUBSECTION. 18. A city with a civil service commission
4 established under chapter 400 shall not adopt, enforce, or
5 otherwise administer an ordinance, motion, resolution, or
6 amendment, or use any other means, to establish a board or
7 other entity for the purpose of citizen review of the conduct
8 of police officers.
9 Sec. 2. Section 400.1, subsection 1, Code 2024, is amended
10 to read as follows:
11 1. In cities having a population of eight thousand or over
12 and having a paid fire department or a paid police department,
13 the mayor, one year after a regular city election, with the
14 approval of the council, shall appoint three civil service
15 commissioners. The mayor shall publish notice of the names
16 of persons selected for appointment no less than thirty days
17 prior to a vote by the city council. Commissioners shall hold
18 office, one until the first Monday in April of the second year,
19 one until the first Monday in April of the third year, and one
20 until the first Monday in April of the fourth year after such
21 appointment, whose successors shall be appointed for a term
22 of four years. In cities having a population of more than
23 seventy fifty thousand, the city council may shall establish,
24 by ordinance, the number of civil service commissioners at not
25 less than three five but not more than seven.
26 Sec. 3. Section 400.18, subsections 1 and 3, Code 2024, are
27 amended to read as follows:
28 1. A person holding civil service rights as provided in
29 this chapter shall not only be removed, discharged, demoted,
30 or suspended arbitrarily, but may-"111�
31
32 with just cause and upon a finding by a preponderance of the
33 evidence that an act or failure to act by the employee that is
34 in eentram violation of law, city policies, or standard
35
In the judgment ef the-peT-s,&n
SF 2325 (3) 90
-1- je/js/mb 1/7
S.F. 2325
1 having the appointing power as provided in this ehapter, er the
___ department,__ -=-"
3 te shew that the empleyee is unsuitable or unfit for empleyfftent
4 rules, or that the employee is physically or mentally unfit as
5 determined under guidelines established pursuant to section
6 400.8A. This subsection shall not be construed to modify the
7 rights, requirements, or procedures provided in section 400.8A
8 or other rights, requirements, or procedures provided by law.
9 3. The city shall have the burden to prove that the act or
10 failure to act by the employee was in men violation
11 of law, city policies, or ,
12 suffieient to shew that the employee is unsuitable or enfit for
13 empleyment department rules. For purposes of this chapter,
14 the city shall establish each element of the charges specified
15 under section 400.22 by a preponderance of the evidence. The
16 city shall have the burden to prove that the punishment imposed
17 upon the employee is proportionate, reasonable, and just in the
18 totality of the circumstances under the factors provided in
19 section 400.27, subsection 1, paragraph -b-.
20 Sec. 4. Section 400.19, Code 2024, is amended to read as
21 follows:
22 400.19 Removal, discharge, demotion, or suspension of
23 subordinates.
24 The person having the appointing power as provided in
25 this chapter, or the chief of police or chief of the fire
26 department, may, upon presentation of reasonable and just
27 grounds for such action to the subordinate in writing,
28 peremptorily remove, discharge, demote, or suspend a
29 subordinate then under the person's or chief's direction
30 due to any act or failure to act by the employee that is in
31 per, violation of law, city policies, or standard
32 operating preeedur-es, or that in the judgment of the persen er
33 chief department rules, and is suffieient deemed reasonably
34 anticipated to be detrimental to m—t-hat the .mr_= =- is
35 tinsuitable or unfit fer employment public. This section
SF 2325 (3) 90
-2- je/js/mb 2/7
S.F. 2325
1 shall not be construed to modify the rights requirements
2 or procedures provided in section 400 8A or other rights
3 requirements, or procedures provided by law.
4 Sec. 5. NEW SECTION. 400.22A Exculpatory evidence.
5 A person shall not knowingly withhold exculpatory evidence
6 from an employee subject to a written specification of charges
7 filed under section 400.22.
8 Sec. 6. Section 400.23, Code 2024, is amended to read as
9 follows:
10 400.23 Time and place of hearing.
11 Within ten days after such specifications are filed, the
12 commission shall fix the time for a hearing, which shall be not
13 less than five nor more than twenty days thereafter, and the
14 place for hearing the appeal aid. The commission shall notify
15 the parties in writing of the time and place so fixed, and the
16 notice shall contain a copy of the specifications so filed.
17 Hearings under this section shall be held during normal city
18 business hours unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and
19 the commission. The commission in its discretion may grant a
20 continuance or stay of a hearing upon request
21 Sec. 7. Section 400.24, Code 2024, is amended to read as
22 follows:
23 400.24 Oaths — books and papers — procedures.
24 1. The presiding officer of the commission or the council,
25 as the case may be, shall have power to administer oaths in the
26 same manner and with like effect and under the same penalties
27 as in the case of magistrates exercising criminal or civil
28 jurisdiction.
29 2. The council or commission shall cause subpoenas to be
30 issued for such witnesses and the production of such books and
31 papers as either party may designate. Issuance of subpoenas
32 shall be consistent with the Iowa rules of civil procedure
33 The subpoenas shall be signed by the chairperson of the
34 commission or mayor, as the case may be, or by an attorney
35 representing a party before the commission. The council or
SF 2325 (3) 90
-3- je/js/mb 3/7
S.F. 2325
1 commission shall provide a copy of each subpoena to both
2 parties upon issuance. A party, or an attorney representing
3 a party, shall provide copies of any material produced in
4 response to a subpoena to the opposing party upon receipt of
5 such material.
6 3. The parties shall have the right to engage in discovery
7 including the filing of interrogatories, requests for
8 production of documents, and the taking of depositions. The
9 commission shall hear and render rulings on any discovery
10 disputes consistent with the Iowa rules of civil procedure.
11 Sec. B. Section 400.26, Code 2024, is amended to read as
12 follows:
13 400.26 Public trial.
14 The trial of all appeals shall be public, and the parties
15 may be represented by counsel or by the parties" authorized
16 collective bargaining representative. However, upon the
17 request of the employee, the deliberations of the commission
18 in a city with a population of less than two hundred thousand
19 shall be held in closed session.
20 Sec. 9. Section 400.27, subsections 1, 2, and 3, Code 2024,
21 are amended to read as follows:
22 1. a. The civil service commission has jurisdiction to hear
23 and determine matters involving the rights of civil service
24 employees under this chapter, and may affirm, modify, or
25 reverse any case on its merits.
26 b. If the commission determines that the city proved the
27 employee committed the charge as specified, the commission
28 shall determine whether the removal, discharge, demotion, or
29 suspension of the employee was with just cause based upon
30 the totality of the circumstances. For the purposes of this
31 subsection, the commission shall consider factors including
32 the nature of the conduct at issue in the circumstances, the
33 proportionality of the punishment to the conduct at issue,
34 the employees work history, whether the employee reasonably
35 could comply with the policy or rule in the circumstances and
SF 2325 (3) 90
-4- je/js/mb 9/7
S.F. 2325
1 whether the employee's conduct was objectively reasonable in
2 the circumstances, the employee's defenses or justifications
3 any mitigating or aggravating factors, whether the punishment
4 is reasonably calculated to correct the employees behavior or
5 conduct, if the punishment is necessary to protect the public
6 interest, whether the city, its employees, or the appointing
7 authority acted in accordance with the law, city policies
8 department rules, or standard operating procedures or if the
9 policy failed in the circumstances The commission shall only
10 consider, order, or impose discipline upon the employee for
11 charges proven by the city.
12 C. The commission shall reverse the city"s decision and
13 dismiss a specific charge with prejudice if the city fails to
14 meet its burden of proof as to that charge
15 d. The final decision of the commission shall be based upon
16 a majority vote of the commission, shall be made in writing_
17 and shall include findings of fact and conclusions relied upon
18 and reasoning or rationale for the decision, separately stated
19 The commission shall render and serve its final decision upon
20 the parties by certified mail within thirty days of the close
21 of the record or trial unless the parties consent to a later
22 date in writing or on the record The final decision may be
23 served upon an employee by electronic mail with the consent of
24 the employee.
25 2. a. The Except as otherwise provided in this section,
26 the city attorney or solicitor shall be the attorney for the
27 commission or when requested by the commission shall present
28 matters concerning civil service employees to the commission,
29 except the commission may hire a counselor or an attorney
30 on a per diem basis to represent it when in the opinion of
31 the commission there is a conflict of interest between the
32 commission and the city council. The counselor or attorney
33 hired by the commission shall not be the city attorney or
34 solicitoI. The e t shall pay the -- - ineurred -
y the
35
SF 2325 (3) 90
-5- je/js/mb 5/7
S.F. 2325
1 b. Upon the filing of a notice of appeal pursuant to section
2 400.21, a city attorney, assistant city attorney, or solicitor
3 who represents or has represented the commission shall not
4 represent the city or its officers or employees in an appeal
5 pending before the commission unless the employee waives the
6 conflict of interest in writing or on the record. If the
7 commission is required to hire a counselor or attorney that
8 is not a city attorney, assistant city attorney, or solicitor
9 as provided in this subsection, the city shall pay the costs
10 incurred by the commission in employing a counselor or attorney
11 under this section, and the commission shall independently seek
12 and retain such an attorney.
13 c. A counselor or attorney who represents the commission
14 in an appeal before the commission shall be fair and impartial
15 toward the parties. The counselor or attorney representing the
16 commission may provide advice and counsel to the commission
17 on matters before it and assist the commission with its
18 proceedings and trial as may be necessary or requested.
19 3. The city or any civil service employee shall have a
20 right to appeal to the district court from the final ruling or
21 decision of the civil service commission. The appeal shall be
22 taken within thirty days from the €li-ng service of the formal
23 decision of the commission. The district court of the county
24 in which the city is located shall have full jurisdiction
25 of the appeal. The scope of review for the appeal shall be
26 limited to a trial de novo appellate review without a trial er
27 evidenee.
28 Sec. 10. Section 400.27, Code 2024, is amended by adding the
29 following new subsections:
30 NEW SUBSECTION. 2A. The commission shall provide for the
31 production of evidence and exchange of exhibits in advance of
32 trial. The city shall mark its exhibits with numbers. The
33 employee shall mark its exhibits with letters.
34 NEW SUBSECTION. 6. In addition to any other remedies and
35 relief, upon application, the district court may award an
SF 2325 (3) 90
-6- je/js/mb 5!7
S.F. 2325
1 employee who substantially prevails reasonable attorney fees,
2 expert fees, and costs and expenses. The city civil service
3 employee shall bear the burden to prove that the employee
4 substantially prevailed in the judgment.
5 Sec. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act, being deemed of
6 immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment.
SF 2325 (3) 90
—7— je/js/mb 7/7
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
OFFICE CONTACTS
April 2024
Date Description
None
May 14, 2024 Mtg Packet
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
COMPLAINT DEADLINES
CPRB Complaint #23-15
Filed: 12/20/23
Chief's report due (90 days): 03/19/24
Chief's report filed: 02/23/24
BdA.[if . �1liNll!I�.yIA'�.i5NSh7.
CPRB meeting #1 (Review):
CPRB meeting #2 (Review):
CPRB report due
(90 days from the date of the Chief/City
Manager's response to the complainant
or Complainant's response deadline if
no response received)
CPRB Complaint #24-01
Filed:
Chiefs report due (90 days):
Chiefs report filed:
04/09/24
05/14/24
6/13/24 (if no response from complainant)
01 /25/24
04/24/24
02/26/24
CPRB meeting #1 (Review):
CPRB meeting #2 (Review):
CPRB report due
(90 days from the date of the Chief/City
Manager's response to the complainant
or Complainant's response deadline if
no response received)
04/09/24
05/14/24
O6/16/24 (if no response from complainant)
May 14, 2024 Mtg Packet
CPRB Complaint #24-02
Filed: 03/08/24
Chief's report due (90 days): 06/06/24
Chief's report filed:
Complainant's response to the Chief's report
(21 days to respond, no response received)
Chief/City Manager response to the
Complainant's response (10 days to respond): ??/??/24
CPRB meeting #1 (Review): ??/??/24
CPRB meeting #2 (Review): ??/??/24
CPRB report due
(90 days from the date of the Chief/City
Manager's response to the complainant
or Complainant's response deadline if
no response received)
CPRB ComDlaint #24-04
Filed: 04/25/24
Chief's report due (90 days): 07/24/24
Chief's report filed: 05/01/24
Complainant's response to the Chief's report
(21 days to respond, no response received)
Chief/City Manager response to the
Complainant's response (10 days to respond): ??/??/24
CPRB meeting #1 (Review): ??/??/24
CPRB meeting #2 (Review): ??/??/24
CPRB report due
(90 days from the date of the Chief/City
Manager's response to the complainant
or Complainant's response deadline if
no response received)
TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE
June 11, 2024 July 9, 2024 August 13, 2024 September 10, 2024