The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-08-2004 IOWA CITY SCATTERED SITE HOUSING TASKFORCE MEETING AGENDA 8 November 2004 City Hall, Lobby Conference Room 5:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes from October 18,2004 3. Taskforce Deliberation Regarding Recommendations to the City Council 4. Adjournment MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 2004 FROM: Scattered Site Housing Taskforce ~ Steven Nasby, Community and Economic Development Coordinator ~:...þ TO: RE: Information Requested for November 8 Meeting At your October 18, meeting the taskforce requested additional information and maps. City staff worked closely with the University of Iowa Field Problems Class to compile the information and map the data were possible. The following is a listing of the items in this packet. 1. Data sheet showing the current "poverty" income figures and the qualifying incomes for the Free\Reduced (F\R) Lunch Program. 2. Map showing the Low-Moderate Income (LMI) areas within Iowa City (by census tract and block group) according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). To qualify as an LMI household, the income threshold is set at 80% of the median income. A copy of the HUD median income guidelines has also been included. 3. A map showing tbe current poverty rates in Iowa City. These areas are identified as "green", "yellow" and "red". The areas in green are below the City's average poverty rate of 19.5%, the areas in yellow are between 19.6% - 40% and the areas in red are over 40%. 4. A series of 8 '/2" x 11" color maps include the following: the census tract boundaries and census tract numbers, percent change in the poverty rate by census tract from 1989 to 1999, Housing Tenure and Housing Price. 5. Police data map. This map shows the four "watch" areas within Iowa City and the number of IRS incidents that were reportable to the State of Iowa from January 1, 2004 to October 15, 2004. 6. A data sheet and maps showing the physical inventory of "assisted" housing (not including owner-occupied units) in Iowa City, the number of "assisted" housing units per census tract, the percentage of "assisted" housing units per census tract compared to the number of all occupied housing units and the percentage of "assisted" housing units per census tract compared to the number of rental housing units. November 4, 2004 Page 2 7. Data submitted by the ICCSD indicating the number of students by elementary school, proficiency rates and numbers of F\R lunch students. Additional data shows the juvenile statistics from 2002 and 2003, a description of the elementary attendance area boundaries and a history of non-contiguous boundary changes. 8. A memorandum submitted by the University of Iowa Field Problems class regarding the trends in F\R lunch students by elementary schools. The meeting will be held in City Hall, Lobby Conference Room at 5:00 p.m. If you are unable to attend or have any questions please contact me at 356-5248. MINUTES SCATTERED SITE HOUSING TASKFORCE OCTOBER 18, 2004 CITY HALL, LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Anciaux, Jerry Anthony, Darlene Clausen, Matthew Hayek, Jan Leff, Jan Peterson, Sally Stutsman, Joan Vandenberg STAFF PRESENT: Steve Nasby, Steve Rackis OTHERS PRESENT: Maryann Dennis, Charles Eastham, Alexis Kluklenski, Luke Pelz, Patti Santangelo CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Hayek called the meeting to order at 5:05 pm. Approval of the September 20. 2004 Minutes: Several revisions were noted for the Minutes. The names of Clausen and Leff were transposed though out as Clausen attended the meeting and Leff was not present. There was also an incorrect attribution of comments noted on pages 4 and 5. MOTION: A motion was made by Left, seconded by Anthony, to approve the September 20 minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously. DELIBERATIONS REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL Hayek began the meeting by inviting suggestions on how to proceed with the deliberations and then reviewed the multi-point process proposed in the August 30 memorandum to the Taskforce. Hayek said these were as follows: 1) Agree on a definition of "concentration", 2) Decide whether there is a concentration of assisted housing, 3) If there is a concentration of assisted housing, what are the impacts and are they positive or negative? and 4) If impact is negative, what are some options for the city to pursue to address the issue? Unless there are other suggestions, Hayek recommended the Taskforce follow this procedure. If at any point the answer to the question first question about concentration is "no," then the proceedings could be at an end. Peterson asked if the Taskforce has available a working definition of what is concentration? Hayek replied that is the first step; to outline a set of standards that the Taskforce thinks is appropriate. There may be one or several factors that should be considered, and it would be useful for the Taskforce to discuss different things that should or should not be part of the criteria. Anthony inquired if the City, who set up the Taskforce, defined concentration? If so, what terminology was used, concentration of low-income families or affordable housing? Anciaux replied he thought it was a concentration of government-assisted housing. Hayek agreed, saying that the question was centered on concentration of assisted housing. "Assisted housing" is defined in the City Council resolution, but "concentration" is not so it is up to the Taskforce to come with their own definition. Clausen said that when she was looking at the maps earlier on in the process, assisted housing was scattered, and there was a discussion of density in certain areas of the community. Anthony said that we have to decide what "concentration" means, but also what is concentrated. Is it a concentration of low-income families, affordable housing, assisted housing, publicly assisted housing, or poverty? These need to be defined. Hayek answered that he would like the Taskforce to brainstorm and talk about what would be appropriate to consider in relation to this topic. Hayek said that Peterson had previously noted a distinction between assisted housing and poverty rates. Peterson agreed, adding that it seemed in various discussions to come back to the issue of poverty rather Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 2 than housing location. She added that they probably correlate, but don't know for sure, and she had not seen data about different income levels. Clausen noted that the maps from Heather MacDonald do include median income level, including affordable housing prices for 50% median income households. Hayek replied that the information from MacDonald includes all housing, not just assisted housing. Clausen added that the information looks at where affordable housing is located, and maps indicating affordable housing could be compared to where concentrations of poverty may be located. Hayek added, that. with the free/reduced lunch numbers, could we correlate what percentage of assisted housing households qualify as low or moderate? Vandenberg replied that is a difficult correlation, as free/reduced lunch numbers are highly confidential. Assisted housing programs would have to disclose how many children live in their units, which schools they go to, and see if that information could be obtained. Vandenberg said the F\R lunch addresses cannot be released. Hayek clarified that he is interested in knowing on a school-by-school basis how many students receive free/reduced lunches. Vandenberg answered that she can get those numbers, but cannot correlate with assisted housing. A question was asked if anyone can also provide numbers of children live in poverty in the schools. Peterson asked what is the bussing pattern currently in place? She is unsure whether students receiving free/reduced lunch at a given school live in the neighborhoods. Hayek replied that bussing is fairly limited, and could be factored in. Leff noted that students are bussed a long distance from Hawkeye Court/Drive to Horace Mann, but does not think Grant Wood and Mark Twain schools are greatly affected by bussing. Vandenberg added that the farthest that students are bussed are from Lakeridge Manufactured Housing Park to Twain. Leff remarked that many Lakeridge students are open enrolling into the Highland School District. Peterson noted that the choice of schools that students are bussed to is interesting. Anthony inquired if there is there really a correlation between free/reduced lunch and school performance? Leff replied that statistically speaking nationwide; students who participate in free/reduced lunch programs score lower than students who do not participate. Peterson noted that this is not necessarily a direct correlation. Anthony agreed, adding that low scores could be influenced by other factors. Vandenberg replied that there is a correlation, though the suspected cause is the mobility factor more than anything else. Anthony noted there may be students who live in the Twain district and do not qualify for free/reduced lunches, who may be driving the scores down in that school. Leff replied that students who are not in assisted housing and who do not qualify for free/reduced lunch usually drive the scores up. Anthony would like to see information on the scores in relation to free/reduced lunches. Vandenberg agreed that information is available. How should it be broken down? Anthony replied by scores on ITBS, and free/reduced program, within each school. Vandenberg noted some of that information is on page 45 of the packet, where it is stated that 61 % of students at Mark Twain on free/reduced lunch program are not proficient and no one is saying that every student on the free/reduced program is not proficient. Hayek requested number of students who are not on free/reduced who are not proficient. Vandenberg said that information is available. The data is a year old, but is consistent from year to year. Peterson said the information they have show that there is a large range in students on free/reduced lunch programs who are not proficient, from 20% to 61%. What is the cause or difference? Vandenberg answered that it would be helpful to know the "n" value, or the overall number of students. Peterson added that she is curious what other factors in the environment affect whether a student is proficient or not. For example, if on free/reduced lunch program at one school, are you more likely to be proficient than students at another school? Leff replied that students learn best in a middle-class environment. Vandenberg added that teachers are better able to accommodate lower level students in a class when there are fewer students below proficiency. Stutsman asked why is Lemme so high? Vandenberg replied that there are a lot of Latino students in that school who have ESL barriers. Anciaux remarked that only 19% of students are not proficient, so the first number is important since there are not very many there who are not proficient. Vandenberg added that it Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 3 is the percent of free/reduced lunches that is so high. Peterson noted that the number of students is on page 44 of the packet. Hayek said that at this point, the discussion is centered on schools, and this is data currently available that should be incorporated in the analysis. Vandenberg added that it is a concentration of poverty that is of concern to schools. It would be good to have a public policy that guides the City away from increasing poverty in some areas. In the classroom, it doesn't matter how the students got into poverty, just the effects, and she believes that the concentration of poverty is the issue. Anthony agreed, noting that housing is not a central issue. Peterson noted that assisted housing is not the only area where there is poverty. If the Taskforce is only looking at assisted housing, some areas of poverty are not considered, such as trailer courts. The existing map does not indicate all the information that correlates with what the Taskforce is trying to find out. Vandenberg added that Hills school has the highest freelreduced lunch number, due to Regency trailer court. However, she also noted that the map indicates factors that the City has control over, publicly controlled programs versus privately owned property. Hayek said that the Taskforce should consider connections between assisted housing and poverty, since in by definition or requirement, assisted housing falls into that category. Due to the different programs there is a spectrum of incomes, however all have to be low-moderate. Hayek noted that they should also look at connection between assisted housing and income levels in the area, if there is one. Anthony said that only a small percentage of assisted housing is publicly controlled. A lot of units are controlled by other organizations, so what the City can control is even smaller than first impression. Hayek noted that might be something to consider for the solution part of the discussion. Vandenberg said that within free/reduced lunch program also has a big spectrum. Homeless families have even more barriers than others that are receiving housing assistance. Even within poverty there are different gradations of need. Stutsman asked how many families on free/reduced programs are student families? This group may have greater resources than others. Vandenberg concurred, remarking that students are in temporary poverty versus households in generational poverty. The group that needs the most consideration during planning are the ones with the higher needs, which the map might help identify. Stutsman asked if they should start defining different groups? Leff said that it would be helpful to note the locations of resources as well, such as family resource centers and the focus should not be solely on schools. Anciaux said that he would like additional census tract information for Iowa City, including the number of subsidized housing units and the poverty level in each tract, and whether the situation has been aggravated by putting more subsidized housing in those tracts. Census tracts have roughly the same population levels, and that can be correlated to the schools the students are attending. If subsidized housing is being put into a tract with a high poverty level, it's going to the wrong place. Hayek replied that is an inference or conclusion they could make. Hayek said that information on income level based on census tract could be gathered. Anciaux asked if they could get a map of the census tracts with the number of assisted housing units and the level of poverty in each tract? Nasby responded that income level is not a problem, but not sure that the poverty level by tract\block group is available. Anthony replied that the data on poverty level is available by tract, though may not be available by block group. Anthony added that the definition of pocket of poverty or concentrated poverty is when over 40% of the population are below poverty level in a census tract. Hayek said that some of the census tracts in Iowa City are large. Anciaux replied he thought that comparisons could be made using the tracts, whether different areas have problems with poverty. Anthony agreed that census tracts are somewhat comparable in population. Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 4 Rackis said they could also get data on the number of owner-occupied units versus rental units in the census data. Peterson agreed that she would like to have information on the types of units. The different terms can be confusing when discussing subsidized or assisted housing. People with greater needs, such as homeless, should have greater consideration than those who are progressing towards self-sufficiency. Hayek said one map does provide some of that information, such as the transitional shelters. Peterson asked if the map included Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship or Habitat for Humanity housing? Nasby replied that the map does not include owner-occupied housing only rentals. Anciaux asked how many census tracts are in Iowa City? Nasby replied that there appear to be 17. Anciaux asked how many elementary schools in the City? Vandenberg replied there are 11 . Anthony asked if the boundaries of the schools follow census tracts? Vandenberg replied no. Peterson asked if this information is dealing only with Iowa City, not including Hills or North Liberty? Vandenberg replied yes. Hayek said the Taskfoce could recommend a larger district-wide discussion in the solutions section. Stutsman agreed that idea could merit additional discussion. Anciaux asked if the assisted housing units in the census tracts could be broken up between public and private owners, such as the Iowa City Fellowship? Nasby asked if he meant broken up by specific provider or type? Anciaux would like it broken down by provider, and include Burns and Burns if possible. Hayek said that on the map, the green and purple bubbles are Section 8. Anciaux replied that he would like to have a defined area and see how things are distributed, and the census tracts already have a lot of data available for use. Hayek asked if he would like to know the type of unit per block? Anciaux would like the data by tract as the 17 tracts have the same population. Rackis noted that the numbers in some areas may be skewed because of transitional housing and a voucher are used in the same unit, such as with HACAP and MECCA. Vandenberg asked if there is there an occasion when MECCA or HACAP would have units without Section 8 vouchers? Rackis replied this is possible, but not likely. When HACAP purchased Broadway, part of the arrangement was an agreement to use Section 8 vouchers. The City Council also passed a resolution that referrals from MECCA can have special admission into the transitional housing units. He added that they never have 100% occupied vouchers, but it is unknown whether the units are 100% occupied. Hayek said that MECCA, for example, are the vouchers distributed through HUD or through the City? Rackis answered they are distributed through the Iowa City Housing Authority (ICHA). Hayek asked if there is a set number of vouchers that go to MECCA? Rackis replied 12 units. Hayek asked if the vouchers are assigned to a place, or to a person? Rackis responded that the vouchers to MECCA function similarly to a project-based voucher program, but is more hybrid with special admission to the program. If a family leaves the transitional housing, they will take the voucher with them, so while there may be 11 vouchers, there are still 12 units. Rackis noted that it is unknown whether the extra unit is vacant or is occupied by someone not in the program. Hayek said generally, those 12 vouchers are maintained for those 12 units? Rackis replied that yes, families get a different voucher. HACAP and MECCA programs are considered special admissions to the Section Eight, by agreement with the City Council. The other special admission program is the Family Unification vouchers from DHS. Nasby noted that these could be sorted out by address if needed. Hayek said that Section 8 units are not the only ones to consider, but also units assisted with CDBG funds? Nasby replied that some may be using Section 8, and some may not. The census data is a Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 5 snapshot that only reflects data at that particular time. Rackis added that some of the elderly complexes will give a double count due to those being a tax credit building plus the use of vouchers. Hayek added that in some cases, even if Section 8 vouchers are not in use, the units might still be renting at low- to moderate-income level. Nasby agreed, noting that the programs would have an income cap, and it would just require eliminating the vouchers at that address from the data. Eastham added that the Housing Fellowship does rent to some families with lower income whose children do not qualify for free/reduced lunch program. The number is in the 10-15% range of their total number of units. Vandenberg asked if that is that because the families are at the 80% rather than 50% income? Eastham confirmed these families have higher incomes. Anthony asked what are the income requirements for the free/reduced lunch program? Vandenberg replied that to qualify for free is 30%, and reduced is 50% of median income. Anthony said that in subsidized housing, most families earn above 50% median income, but many families may not qualify for the free/reduced lunch program if living in tax credit housing. Hayek said it seems like the Taskforce is looking for additional layers of information. Vandenberg agreed that there are degrees of need and impact. The impact is different if there is a concentration of families at 80% median income, versus a concentration of families at 30%. Hayek said he thinks the Taskforce is missing some data also about transitional housing. Vandenberg noted that the census would provide some of this data Anciaux said that the census tract information might give them an insight into whether assisted housing is being concentrated in poor areas of the City. If the census data indicates the area is already at poverty level, then perhaps additional assisted housing should not be put there. Hayek noted that the Taskforce needs the additional information in order to decide whether concentration has positive or negative impacts. Leff added that she would like to defer definition of concentration until additional data is obtained. Anthony said the Taskforce would probably need additional information on poverty levels. Stutsman agreed, noting that there are many different income levels of poverty. She questioned if the number the Taskforce uses should be 50%, 30%, or something else? Dennis asked if the information used by the Taskforce includes elderly poor with no children and people with disabilities? Hayek replied that some of that data is already distinguished; though not the ones without school-age children. Stutsman said the focus has been the schools thus far, but should the Taskforce broaden its focus to include the elderly and persons with disabilities? Hayek replied that the numbers need to be researched. Rackis noted that subsets of data may be most useful, detailing different age levels. Vandenberg added that the data on elderly is relevant, and pointed out that neighborhoods don't fight creation of housing for the elderly. General agreement expressed by the Taskforce members to note housing for elderly and disabled persons in deliberations. Hayek asked if the information about property values arrived from the Homebuilders Association? Nasby replied that they are still waiting for board approval of the report, but it should be submitted by November 22. Peterson noted that there was some information on property values from Heather MacDonald. Hayek answered that they currently only have general information from the homebuilders, which reported that Coralville and North Liberty lots are more expensive than Iowa City. Leff added that Habitat for Humanity reported there were no lots available in Iowa City for less than $40K. Hayek said they also have information in packets on income and rent from the City on graphs. Nasby explained that the graphs all show the same information, but at different income levels. The wide lines are income, and the narrow lines are rent costs. HUD says families can spend 30% of income on housing, so the wide green line represents a 1.5 person household. This number was chosen because a one- bedroom unit can house one- or two-person families. In 1998, a 1.5 person family could afford $250 per month on housing. Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 6 Hayek noted that the number is actually 30% of 30%, meaning that the family is at 30% median income, and spending 30% of its income. The other graph indicates 30% of 50%. Nasby continued by explaining that according to the first graph, in 2003 a 1.5 person household could afford $400 per month, and the thin green line indicates the cost of a one-bedroom unit from 1998-2003. In the case of a 1.5 person household, the thick and thin green lines are close together, indicating a small gap between income and housing. The red line is for a 6-person household in a four-bedroom unit, which has a much larger gap between income and housing. The charts detail trends in income and housing costs, and all the charts indicate some sort of affordability gap. Families earning 30% median income will not be able to afford a unit in Iowa City without assistance. Hayek added that the gap for a 1.5 person family is small, but increases as the family size increases. The cost for a six-person family is double what that family can afford. But the chart for 50% median income changes dramatically. Again, the thin lines show the rental unit costs, and the thick lines show the income levels. Nasby remarked that the graph indicates all families can afford housing at the appropriate sizes on 50% income. Dennis asked if the figures for rent cost only? Nasby replied that the study does not discriminate completely as some units include utilities and some do not. Dennis noted that HUD includes utilities in the 30% figure allowed for housing, so though a family may be able to pay rent, they may still be burdened by the added expense of utilities. Rackis said that the ICHA has to calculate the maximum gross rent, which includes the contract rent plus utilities, and the family cannot pay 30% over the maximum gross rent because of HUD-required utility reimbursements. This may limit some families seeking units under Section 8, because of the need to adjust utility costs into the rent and then have the landlord pay the utilities instead of the tenant. Vandenberg said that on the 50% chart, the red line indicates the unit rents for $1200 and it is assumed the family can afford $2000? Nasby replied theoretically yes, for a six-person household at 50% median income. Anthony noted that there is not much difference in the two charts except for the lines. All the data points are the same, so are they both correct? Nasby agreed that the median family income line might not be correct on both. Hayek asked if the median income should almost be doubled? Anthony agreed the incomes should be doubled, but should the rental costs be the same? Nasby replied that the rental costs should be the same. Anthony said that according to the literature from MacDonald, Johnson County is the most cost-burdened county in the state in terms of housing. As such, he would like to have clarification about the income and rental levels on the chart. Nasby noted that it is the experience of the ICHA that families that reach 50% income also reach maximum rents? Rackis replied that families at this level or better reach payment standards, where they are paying the full contract rent and the HA is no longer assisting. There is a safety buffer in place, so families remain in the program for 6 months after reaching this point. This only includes the payment standards of the ICHA. There are units that exceed their payment standards, which families would not be able to afford at 50%. Peterson said that from previous discussions, a family at 50% of median income may just be getting out of assisted housing, but according to the chart, families at this level can easily afford rent in the city? Nasby confirmed that the chart is incorrect and will have to be redone. Hayek noted that the chart for 30% median income is correct, and requested that a revised chart be included in the packet for the next meeting, including a note on it that it is the revised chart. Peterson asked if the Taskforce is looking at the question of whether Iowa City has adequate affordable housing, or is that outside the purview of the discussion? Hayek replied that is up to the Taskforce to decide. Stutsman remarked that the City Council might like to hear the Taskforce's opinion, and that the question would likely evolve into that consideration sooner or later. Peterson remarked that it may not have originally part of the Taskforce's charge, but it would be difficult to evaluate all the data and not form some idea regarding the question. Stutsman confirmed that while it was Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 7 not specifically stated, there appears to be an interest in knowing the answer to the question. Hayek added that a recommendation on whether more or less assisted housing is needed could be included in step four of the deliberations. Stutsman asked if recommendations could be made regarding inclusionary zoning or other public policies? Hayek replied that depending on what the Taskforce decides in the other parts of the deliberation, a recommendation to evaluate certain policies might be made. The Taskforce will not give specific suggestions on what the policies should be, but rather a recommendation to have them evaluated. Stutsman said why would the policy be added without a statement whether there is enough assisted housing or not? Peterson answered that it could be used as general guideline for building in the future, rather than a specific policy. Whether or not more public housing is needed in Iowa City is a challenging question, because of different interpretations of the data. Hayek said that the conversation is appropriate for the Taskforce at a later meeting, but asked them to return to the definition of concentration, what other data and information does the Taskforce need or want? Peterson said that she would like to know generally accepted definitions of concentration. The articles tended to indicate that greater than 30% is high. Anthony added that in the census data, high poverty is 30% or above, while concentrated poverty is greater than 40%. Therefore, a "concentration" is higher than "high." Vandenberg asked if according to the census tract data, is there high or concentrated poverty in Iowa City? Nasby and Anthony replied that they did not think either level is recorded in any Iowa City tracts. Anthony remarked that according to federal standards, Iowa City does not have any appreciable levels of poverty, which is why the Taskforce needs to come up with its own standards. Vandenberg asked if the data could be evaluated in smaller areas? Nasby replied he is unsure whether the data on poverty is available for individual block groups, but he can check. Anciaux noted that it would be useful to look at the tract data to see if there are any trends in a particular area already, and whether assisted housing needs to be spread around in the future. Hayek noted that in order to make that recommendation, the connection needs to first be made between the concentrations and their impact. Peterson noted that trends also should to be evaluated. Heather MacDonald spoke of trends in her presentation, and evaluating where things will be in 20 years if things proceed unchanged. Anciaux added that it will be much more difficult to change in 20 years than it would be now. Peterson asked where is the highest concentration of poverty in Iowa City? Nasby reported he would have to look up the answer. Hayek: also need to factor in the student population, since the downtown tract data is likely impacted by the students. Nasby said the percentage of low- and moderate-income is available, though not the percentage of poverty. The following tracts include a population of at least 51 % low- and moderate-income families. Families under 80% median income are included in this group. Tract Percent of Population 4A 58.5 (includes Pheasant Ridge) 6 71.1 104 60.5 21 90.5 11 72.1 16 88.3 17 56.2 (east half, left of the 17) 15 52.0 (block group 2, east) (block group 1, west is 39%) 18 57.0 Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 8 Stutsman: are 11, 16, and 21 are students? Nasby replied yes, that is a likely answer but it also includes some elderly housing projects. Stutsman said she felt that students are in a different group of low income, mostly in that situation by choice and for a limited time. Peterson noted however that students do have an impact on available housing. Stutsman inquired whether they have an impact on services? Clausen replied if they have children, possibly. Stutsman asked if student families reflect a drain on schools? Rackis raised another aspect of the data. For example, tract 18 is 57% owner occupied and 43% rental. He said that tract has been identified as a drain on the schools because of assisted housing, even though it has a high percent of owner-occupied units. Nasby added a 57% owner-occupied rate is higher than the City as a whole. Anciaux asked how many block groups are in tract 18? Nasby replied two, and both groups have the same percentage of low-moderate income persons. Dennis said that if they are looking at median income, then that means half of the population makes more and half make less. So when talking about low-moderate, we're talking about 80% of the area median income. She added that 50% of income is the cutoff point for eligibility for assisted housing, so when looking at the census tract data, the data is skewed because of those making between 51 % and 80% of median income. Anthony said that regarding concerns about the student population, the neighborhood character is still stable and consistent even if groups of students come and go. To the extent that living conditions affect school performance, perhaps the consistent low-income character of the student areas do factor in. Clausen said that perhaps assisted housing should be discouraged in the north side of town, because those areas may already have a high concentration, which may affect how children learn in the schools. Hayek noted that he would like to continue to focus on definition of concentration. One factor may be strong neighborhoods, as suggested by Vandenberg. This is a less tangible and measurable factor. Hayek asked if we have any juvenile court information? Vandenberg reported that Lloyd Smith was only able to get it by school, not by address. It does not give very relevant information, because it is concentrated in the junior high and high schools, rather than geographically by residence. Also, schools with Behavior Disorder (BD) programs have a higher incidence of students in juvenile court. SD programs are not at all geographic. Hayek asked about the status of the crime data? Nasby reported that it is being divided up by watch area, so the number of calls in each area can be determined and evaluated. Anciaux asked how many watch areas are in Iowa City? Nasby replied four: one west of the river, one downtown, one in northeast, and one southeast. Vandenberg asked if they were based on population? Nasby answered no, the office he had talked with said it was just an area that was defined according to service needs. Hayek remarked that might be helpful to know in relation to how services are distributed in Iowa City, where the police are sending their services may help narrow down the information. Vandenberg asked if the Taskforce were looking at some trend data with the census tracts? Anthony replied that the Taskforce should not look at the 2000 data and say that things are increasing, but should go back to 1990 for an historical perspective. Leff added that the school district has information from 1995-2002. Anciaux asked if the census data break out poverty level, 30%, 50%, and 80%? Nasby replied that the information is only recorded at 80% or below, as HUD considers this low-mod income. He noted that LMI data is available from 1980, 1990, and 2000, but not more specific than 80%. Hayek said that the Taskforce has generated a good list of ideas for the discussion, and he will try to distill these ideas and present them to the group at the next meeting. Invited volunteers to assist with putting together a summary. Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 9 Anthony said that they need additional data in order to continue the discussion about the definition of concentration. Vandenberg said that with census data, does the information break down low-moderate income information. Clausen replied only 80% or below is available. Nasby added that the poverty level in each tract is available, which is defined as 30% median income. Hayek said staff would try to get as much requested data as possible, and put it into a list to be adopted. Probably need the data before the next meeting, to allow for review prior to discussion. Vandenberg asked if the Taskforce is going to try to quantify mobility? Hayek if there is some mobility information available from the school district and service assessment. Peterson said regarding list on the board, the Taskforce is not getting information from juvenile court, and how would we measure neighborhood cohesion? Stutsman asked if Marcia Klingaman would have data on cohesion and activity of the neighborhoods? Is activity level Neighborhood Associations a measure of cohesion? Vandenberg inquired if the census asks how long a person has lived in their neighborhood? Clausen replied yes. Stutsman wondered how would we define cohesion and stability? Peterson replied that it might not be feasible to define. Clausen remarked that comparing the numbers between 1990 and 2000 would give an indication of the stability of the area, whether there has been a major change over that time period. Hayek asked Clausen if she would be willing to evaluate the cohesion idea and bring a suggestion on the appropriate way to approach that to the next meeting. Clausen agreed. Anthony inquired if there is any way to get census tract data for mobility? Peterson replied that gathering neighborhood data is difficult. Anciaux asked if census tract 18 includes Grant Wood and Mark Twain? Hayek replied 18 includes Grant Wood and part of Twain. Anciaux asked if census tract 17 includes other part of Twain and Lucas? Vandenberg answered Longfellow rather than Lucas. Clausen notes that she would like an overlay map showing school districts over the census tracts with the income and housing information. Hayek inquired if the Taskforce should meet in two weeks on November 1? Stutsman and Clausen said they cannot attend a November 1 meeting. Hayek then asked if the next meeting should be November 15 or 8? Anthony inquired how long it will take to put together additional data. Nasby replied that it will be the most difficult to get Section 8 addresses by census tract. Rackis added that some data is easily available, but some will be very time-intensive to gather, particularly owner-occupied versus rental-occupied units by census tract. Hayek agreed that all data might not be available in time. Vandenberg: how much will the current map match up with the census tract? Hayek replied that census data could be overlaid. Rackis noted that the housing choice vouchers will be significantly different than the current map. Vandenberg asked if they could get data from a specific time? Rackis reported that the database will not allow them to gather census tract data from the past, because of turnover. Hayek asked if the March data as currently displayed on the map useful, or completely out of date? Rackis answered that it is similar, but not the same because of sales of units and turnover. Dennis noted that most rentals in Iowa City and Coralville go from August 1 through July 30. So many people will have moved since March. Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes October 18, 2004 Page 1 0 In response to a previous question, Nasby said that a tract map can be overlaid on current map, but will not be able to identify every individual unit. Anciaux said he is not concerned about maps so much as hard numbers. Interested in having census tracts overlaid and getting numbers of units in each tract. Rackis agreed, saying that numbers may not be easy to determine from the map. Hayek noted that the maps are secondary to the hard data. Anciaux added that census tract data could be very useful because it is comparable regarding population. Anthony noted to keep in mind that the poverty data in the census is from 2000. Hayek agreed, adding that it is the data that is available, and the Taskforce will need to keep its date that in mind. Hayek inquired if anyone volunteer to assist with distilling the brainstorm list from the board? The Taskforce needs to define concentration based on some points, and data needs to be gathered for other points. He would like a volunteer to assist with summarizing the information. Peterson said there appears to be a mix of information on the board, both of items to do with definition, and items to do with impact. Hayek suggested that the Taskforce members think about where each point fits, and at the next meeting discuss and come to a consensus. Vandenberg asked when will the police data be available? Nasby replied that it is relatively easy to run, but needs to be plotted on the map and it would be available for the next meeting. Peterson volunteered to assist Hayek with the summary. Hayek asked the Taskforce when is the next meeting? And if they should meet November 8, 15, or both? Stutsman sug~ested meeting on the 8th and see how the discussion goes. Peterson may not be able to meet on the 8 . Hayek agreed that the group will meet on the 8th, and will decide on the 15th during the meeting. Peterson said she would like to have info from the brainstorming session on the board written down. Hayek noted that he is writing it down. Anciaux volunteered to assist with summarizing as well. Hayek will write first draft and email it to the others for discussion. Stutsman acknowledged the concern about including elderly and disabled in consideration. Clausen noted that the Taskforce would like that information, but separated out. Peterson added that group may figure into the issue of concentration differently than the area of impact, and it would be good to know how that group fits in. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the taskforce, Vandenberg moved to adjourn. Anthony seconded, and the motion passed uncontested. Meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Minutes submitted by Robyn Miessler-Kubanek s:/pcd/minuteslScatteredSiteHousingT askforcel10-18-04ssht.doc ( NCOME ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES July " 2004 June 30, 2005 to FRE~MEAI,.$,",130% TWICE PERI EVERY TWO MONTH WEEKS Effectivéfrom REDUCED PRICE MEALS ·185 % TWICE PERI EVERY TWO MONTH WEEKS WEEKLY 233 3n 392 472 551 631 710 790 345 80 159 173 4,134 114 291 391 490 590 689 789 888 988 582 781 980 1,179 1,378 1,577 1,776 1;915 630 846 1,062 1,277 1,493 1,708 1,924 2,140 491 5,883 1,260 1,692 2,123 2,554 2,985 3,416 3,647 4,279 15,119 20.293 25,467 :3(j,911 35,815 40,989 46,163 51.337 100 199 216 432 5,174 268 359 451 542 634 725 817 908 530 718 90t 1,064 1,267 1,450 1,633 1,816 580 778 977 175 373 ,571 ,770 968 92 183 199 397 4,758 131 261 283 565 6.771 HDUSEHOlD SIZE 1:"..;..." Z.......;, ·3.·;~·;~...; 4·:...;~...:: 5.;...~;[ $..,..L;.i; T::".',..;L: 8;L..;.L f()f·T~.~~·...·~·~?·I·färriily me:mÞør.;:¡dd f......~. 2',':.;·,.;;:,,; 3·.....,·;;8.: 4·..·.....:;.:..{ !),;;,;,;;;,; ~¿;;L;W; 7;;;;;;.; 8_".;.:.; f#~.~~~~~·lifän1ilý me:mbEít, add 1...; 2.... i3:<;.. 4.... $...... 6.... 7..;; 8.... Foreachadd'Ji'amily mëmbei',_ add 466 625 784 943 1,102 1,261 1,420 1,579 505 677 849 ,022 ,194 ,366 ,538 .711 1 1 1 1 1 MONTHLY 1,009 1,354 1,698 2,043 2.387 2,732 3,076 3,421 12,103 16,237 20,371 24.505 28.639 32,m 36,907 41,041 ANNUAL MONTHLY WEEKlY ANNUAl 48 CONTIGUOUS STATES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, GUAM, AND TERRITORIES 1.4361 718 663 332 1,926 963 889 445 2,416 1,208 558 2,907 1.454 671 3.397 1,699 784 3,887 1,944 897 4,317 1 ;01 1i , 4,868 1,124' 1,t~p 1.342 1.568 1,794 2,021 2.247 2,189 2,434 17.224 23.107 28,990 34,873 40,756 46,639 52,522 58,405 414 556 697 839 981 122 ,264 ,405 1 1 1 227 .......... - 828 1,111 1,394 1,678 1,961 2,244 2.527 2,810 246 - ALASKA 897 1,204 1.511 1,817 2,124 2,431 2,738 3,045 1,793 2,407 3,d21 3634 , 4,248 4,861 5,475 6,089 21,516 28,879 36,242 43,605 50.968 58,331 65,894 73,057 1 1 1 1 1 1,160 1,556 1,953 2,349 2,746 3,142 3,539 3,930 13,910 18,668 23.426 28,184 32,942 37,700 42,458 47,216 142 - --...... 381 511 642 772 902 1,032 1,162 1,293 284 762 1,022 1,:283 1,543 1,804 2,064 2,324 2,585 307 - HAWAII 825 1,107 1,390 1,872 1.954 2,236 2,518 2,800 614 - - 1,650 2,214 2,779 3,343 3,907 4,471 5,036 5,600 7,363 19,795 26,566 33,337 40,108 46.879 53,650 60,421 67,192 ~' ~ ~ < ',_n , , ." :< , . ~ .- ... \,\"~'J ~, ,~"" 2i:iiio Census Iowa City and Coralville ~~ , ,,' " .tjtmJ<R:j;_,,,,·.tR·"'G~_,:·r ----- '.- -- -- ~~-;,.; , , , . , ;). I ¡ , ¡ , I , J , , J , I / / / . ,. '~.' , - -~- / !---;-.,-" ' " "- - '/ ., i . ;.., );-'ë;.'-.;,:\.. .- r:...,x..~-"~c: A;':'\:L:(\,;, .'r::c --C"""""'?""'..'.""."" ., ~<-....:."'-' .....'.~,.... - o o o o , -, ,~ , \-' 10.3 ,:; 'rl !~'¿jF"{\ t·>~:"'-----'··' ., ~-', '^;õi. " ---~~, B~1Ï~ttYr~~I~$S'.·~han Çïtrê~Î~~,i~~~~~; Foy~tt)1.··.r~teÞe:tvlløen 19;6%anci40$ pþverljiråteoVer40O¡o Low to Moderate Income Census Tracts & Block Groups - ,";"ßj"",_ i \ 1 I I , I - ~ , , , --~- , , ------- -' .. ,<tiE?;1 ",y,,", iJ;01§ ',d2,,-,,1 .,.,-.,-,' . '".., ---", -- :>,--,\~ \ I , , ---- ';01"<,,$' ~-- t\~ " --- " 2000 Census Iowa City and Coralville - '--';tRotR'~DÙ0.:'; H",~~~?, .-~-' ~ -- "", "~.,~'- '~; ! ~ h -~ '''''''''"'''''''''.. , I I I I , I I , I I I / / ,- - -- -., :::. " '.,",-"" '^-ifb .-- \,ii,' ''- --" ~ - -' - -, .- êom"~"" - . .' '"""'" ,-- , , /- , , - _.- r' 10~) i '-" - " __..c---c' ~ -..- ,~~~ ~'---~ .?>~ ' - , , + , , 1 <\ ",'~ 1'- " ¡/ ,/ ~ c" -~ ',,'-,-- , , . " \ Ii I II I, \¡ Low to Moderate Income Census Tracts & Block Groups Luke Pelz owa City Census Tract Data Selected Community Characteristics 1990 2000 Census Data, Summary File 3 The Scattered Site Housing Task Force Tracy Glaesemann, Alexis Kuklenski, 10 November 2004 Source Prepared for Amanda Cline By: Point e Chan rates * Povel 1990 Percent Median Household Income 1990 Point Chan¡:¡e 2000 1 -0.5% $32,039 $54,268 69% 14.7% 11.4% -3.4% ,~i:ci."'''''''''n-'''';~V-\Ni2-''~''f'''i!'''''m'''''w""","'dw"","":o~w,,,,,,w"",,-,,w'~o'''~'''"'''''''''''~''''Ií';'.""cO' >"'''''''W'.~M''"' ""~'-' """""/-"'d"''c,j'l,w'(ffill'"im'~"''''' ~":""!("-'3'~"'~""""'='""''''''''''''h'''£I+~;'-'-~:i''> ","""""''''''''",''''::'''''M~"^'''~~ ',="~h,,,,,,", ')"'Ä'~'_""'" ',_ ~"P"k_',w==_ _, _'~_'_"_'~':¡g;' ~gt¡¡;d'l' ,,~-,,'-jJ' '( .. ",.,w,_,"_',_" 'N'" "H""'''''~i'I' . ' """-,'~''''''; :!!;' .,. _"'_""M'" " , '"j£")C''''';''''Þ'''''~ '-""~'Jv"P;J!j' , '~'''ú\F''"''"'''''''' nt; l'Ivh'H'-S"'"''" ,,'.', """. ~T",',t:"'_' '''1:' __ GÙP,"""",/, -0bii+~"~"" ,'W ,,,,,-IN-J'-','-'''' '" '---"-""'-),",-,d>j.:j¿ fA'! {fdg;š=:?:~":;?'d%¥f:LtA0k$o>x:,,,,,,,,,,,::;:'¿;;:ij§2i-,,;_:,;';"dh0'1¡J(;\}+Ùfif0"'~' },-,i;u~"",,::, Æd.Ž¿:~"ËL ¡¡,~",&bi;"'~fi:rfu01.s:-;;j?E-"_'-'.,,,,;!?,,,.,J0, ;4_0§,;ç,iiß;L::>";'_,,"J'7éiJh:g0,¡0;~';~=,~;tl;Jlttjt4n{L-;,,,-,v;;,:,$!S' 4 4.4% 5.1% $17,718 $34,583 95% 34.6% 19.5% -15.1% ''Ä""1-^'22/:;:''='-~~''~''H-''''"'''''''''''-:;.,n''",^=''-'''Y'',,,^',^,'''!!!1'j "",,%_,wO>"~"''''N'''''__'_'''''~%~ ,"-" ""'~'7-""-:'-"''''''''m''''''- 'Š'&="""'=~'·"'\"'»''''''-'''''~'''~' -""""""""",--",,~-~ ~""""'--'~"~"""-""'"''''''''''^--'''~'--'"'''''''''''IíÆ%-'>M';'''''",j~,'y~,y "i2 '"-TA?",^,.-¡,,~,¿¡P'·\-';:<i;'''Ó''''~''' ,c;, ~ZY'0:i'7''''-''''' ~" "108/:<;:\;';Y:'2/ Vi' ,",,,,,,"_ _"::-::-:'" ,!II' T- '", " j <""",'F",,:'j ~ji¡"'" :::"""""-,,?.:¢,,,~,~,:- '_:¡¡¡¡!/A 'G0!-:';:731' _,;c N{!J2/;fÒf~,,!~"'í\1i::"~ 0bi-+,"""0Ú, ¡) n' ~",Ä' ,,,\_,,..,,,/,,_,-.,,,, __'/'",""""';" " ^ ,"'P'''0,__,,'''''''.''' __ __"",'",_,__, , (-" """",__, ';"" '''''~,'''''''' ,__',.¥ __'__"""~,,,·,,',,'__Ä . ,,,,'h'~ """"'__"'-"" '__~'''__~''''__'',' __"Ä,"''''"Y~'~- ,n' -- "i',""'.¡\~,;CV.(f'l;¡ '-'j''''''='>'N ,d~i"'/"'A',1,--"--'-- =^"-;;!c'-'"=C:(-cii:-i ,;¿,;><""" '--",,' -','Wi"''''''' , >i, ,,>,;,:;,;"':c_<V'~· ""d';;';\<';:;:/~'-- -- __""",-~,-,,,,,c;"Jc,, ,Vj",,,,,,,-,:,,,;;:c,--"ii'-- i b;",_",v, y_"",y",,,,~:,_,~-,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, "-'-'H,,,,,,;Z"""""''0-=='=:Yf',,,"'''i'''':~0-;;,:,,Ji~~Ä ,'_X-'_ """JilW~"~'t'W,,,."'N'--''''':'4,,;~,c,,,,S),,),,,,__-~,\,,,,,''i'-:":'-S~t7n,,'-,"___ ~''''''''''''Ä'1'7,it,''j_''''==:!1G;'W1,;¡''''j',:,'''''U''_'_''''~'",,",__,",''''''''''''i"=__;(5!!",,,;~ 6 4.0% 2.8% $16,961 $23,727 40% 34.2% 27.5% -6.7% ,,,,,,,,,,__,=,,,^~____,w'"____'^__'__';'''"''-'':_''''''',"\\;'''i'i~'''''i"';¡g¡¡--,,,,,~--,,--,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,--,,,,~,,,,,,,=,__,,qy '2"----."'--v"'--iliR---"'"%""""'-''''I"'~' '~-""'''--,''''''''''''''''''''__''''''~,w.__''''''''., "__""__~'~___'__""'^,"",0^,~""""'_''''__''____''''''';'-'f~' '_""'"')V''''''~'~'''''~''''''' "'="""'''''''~-'~n'''''~'''''''''''iI'''-- "--~"--,,-----,, ,,-- -",,,"-.,'''''--'''',,,,,, "'--"',~~'" ~ ~--"",,"" ,',' !i:'''''''''''''''^''''''---' W"_M~""",, ,,- ,~,',"-,,"""'" '¡¡' ""''''''-'"'''~~fìJ.~' ""~,.",,,,,,,, ,,,,'=,-,"'HB", . _,__,M~___' ' -, ,~""."""",..",,,, '" "", ,',,,, ,-- .-"~----",, """ - ",,,,,------,,,------ "" "''''''-~,,/.- ~ "'~- (,,,,,,,,,,,,,, --,-""~,'," , "' "",_,,,--=-;;--' "",T,-'-"~-",,,''''''-~~'''''_,,,,''' ',mi"\""'""\.k',' ",,~- " ,=~'''''''''~ ",'"' i ",""','m,'''','~"",, '~""',,^"P'7.""~ """ ..1''''';''''''''"''- " 'k,~,""+-!J"JhW l.' ,'," ;::;¡;;:+:''':,,,/i.L t ''''''-'''<P~''''', '., , *,,^__¢d!;q-i-Y,',''''' """JU"'-i;;,,,",,,1 :4, '" "'- ':r;277L ' '~""';-;'~:::::;',,"', "' . '--+",~,:;-~":;-.::;:;",,, . ,,;¡: '!.!ß;;,"""" -,"', ,"'" c;Ë?:7"%"-"" t S _t.'(+;"¢''''~N ',*, 10 ;-; """_".,.),,,,,~,,,¡;J;,,,,!!.),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,},,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,^,,,,,,,__,'p,,,=,"==~,,h"~'''''''''''Á'''''''''''''_'";'''''' h,,,,,",,'rrWf,,,;(f,~,,-,;;g,,~,,,,,,,,"","'d~,_~,,,,«"''''''''',,,~:,",,,,,,"",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;~"" W",-",,,,,,,~,'_,,",.;,,Jff~ØL'__7",,,J§~!IIl"h,,-"""""',^'",''''e''^,,,=",,-'-"""'''' 12 2.1% 1.8% -0.3% $42,813 $55,042 29% 11.3% 6.3% -5.1% "'C:¡;¡_"/'/";:P"'i"",~,^"~",-,-,~-""v,~,,,p,,,,'j"'""'>hi;~"'''''\R~'''' '::;':::-~"'OC';;'-"W"'.F""""";*" 0;""'~''''''D'lN\.'' -- '''''''''/'''~''''J""",^"",;p",,-,yil~'';;'';'''''--='-'_'t''T '4);n"":-""i:îi~---;"i$""7""'''',''''''''''"''"''-.o"",.-=,,,,,,",""'-''-','If'OC''''''''''''''''''''~'''''"~'OC^''' ""''''''''Iii!!.''''"'---''~'·'!ß\' '''''"'..',".' "~"~--""~-m'" , " , ',"''','.,' '@' .""",," ..-,-, " __.__m"'n""..'" =""w".'""", --,' '''''''''''---'''''''''''~¡Y¡¡¡¡M;''~''''''----~!<I!Iii" "^,,,,,;,,,,,. """"",^,,,,, \1----",""" "~,,-,,--,,,," ,,,,,,,--, ",,'" -," '^'~'''---''''^',,' ,', '''",--" -",,,,,,,,,,, " """,",";' " ,n \",,""\"'1"'''' I ,,,J,,,,,,,,-":,,,,,,.,,-' ^' "^"^''',,~,= " """",,"\"H_ ''''''Ie ,y)"',,-' \,\,,-, "'ç,. ,," "''''''''';'"1'''''= '''" ~;;"~'::;"""^'" "" ~""~"---'''''''''';¡' '"""h";:::':--i";¡¡"c:--"" /"'-j/ss'XMt..0 -"f."""S'*'V¿''',':...''",""rS'!iYJ2ii2J,'' ',¡/-ij):/,{',y,;, 'L,wiQ,g""L':,,,, ,0+21;+,,) ~ _ --Yr;{,,:?:ihhÚ't, " ---';:¡'",'n"br "'-i~ cßhi!Y+>i.i,Y.'i. ," ='nk¿Mh".,;\ò,,^,,} '~~"Ä'''''''''_'''''~' ,__"""Z"__"'_'~' ~'''~'''''~''''''',,,, '" ',,,,,,^,,'I,,f;¡¿L,,,~,,,,,,,", ,,","""N --"_"N",,' __~"''S ~~"""M'_ """,,!?,, .,"..", _.. ". ,__"" ,,",," __ ";);1..,,3;,,, '"'n___'" ,~_,,,' ..,,,,,,,..JI1, .,__,,-,,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,.,~?i"~M,ln1.,^z,,..,,,__,,,,,__,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,in,, 14 ~~.. 4:5%' 4.1%"-0~4% $37.86T$53,ci89~~'40o;';~ ~~.~." 8:9% ....~ 7~'2o/:'" ~~1:7% ".'~"",,",,,~,,,-,,"--.. ,"" , """",µ"-~"",, --~, ,,, ~'"' """"~¡i~ --" ..'''''''''''''c,__''_..."_'_~ ""~""""_---- . """'Ä~",~",,,,,,,,,,~--,,..~n~"""""~~ _"_________~__"'''.'''~'''''''''''-'''''''''''''''''''''..'''m''''--'''n, "''''''''>G!f"'.''--''-'''' '" '""?~~fi_""""'"'" ",'.""~'" ~' ~". ,""., ""'~""".~ .. "~,..,~" "'~'"""II" ,""' ".",,," , '" .. "-::iij;~;:;::;::;:-" --ísr¡;'__,,-;,..1" "="'--';Zi>"^,, '"' _¡hfir~:::'''h'', i x'S ?!,J,,0/Y , , Ai: =.""",,, " "J3;,w'AS3¡;::;': N :,,,/ 'x" YS",0nnz ,~ X'E3Ò1'fJi/£0J!:.':f "" ,r;:.;¡Ai':ij,;bli';'" -". , '0; "i'eW:>'1i"!!!)' ( ..1,f¡',:K,,'C:~, :;;;NN·;,,,';;, t;:=/A~",,,,,!i. Iï"", t7'?o:~Vj 'í" ,,·""'170 ,,' ;;¿~__:'""y,,;,,, ~ '", -7fi'il'''5115;:;", ,",;:;:,,"'''to''''''!:'''' "","", 'iH2Z20?",'?ê] ~ ) __,''x 01' ,,;;;',,", --'.'\'f7.::"::;-"",,, ([,:1, ,d~'!;£,~/J!i:.1)"!,"L"~~...,,_, ,,,"",,,^,,'''.LFX-'''>:Ò' J>:,\,!,-q""I\t'--7"A'ill&b!1b'1",,~__;150cS;,"'jnr;,;O:';',h"h;;-"SWhK~ªi" !3~tŠ'i:;n',;~jì0kKbd;)~2?l"'''9iD1'ii::''''';.-;~~,___,~,--"",;""",,,~,i'''i;0'-4 16 6.7% 6.0% -0.6% $13,672 $16,591 21% 54.6% 57.6% 2.9% "'''¡<îi!i<'''Þ!!f''~-:,,(>+ò'''·''''.f.!g~, 'j0dP'-'lQè'~I''-1')''~'}~;.1-'·''Y=.- ~-----~".;,:.,';;f;';;\"M';¡"''''i''·''''''>' §Þ'>"""""'''''K+=''''''1Ä;:t'~''''''''''''''''''''4ru"'~''''"';;;>'''#;C:f,,:Jil'.'-~"'""-"""P'" """i"";;"i2f-"';!e'~'.'""""";""-"'-"=-0~'~ti·~"~'"""'-ij;i:a,=""-;;;'-"-""0',^---C""'~-" m,nN\0/';þ/ , ¡";L,,=;Mi~ r\ò!tiO'lÄAk\ U,'L~=", '-, -=""""1'>- '10. u;c "",pOl' ,;J" ';;¡(Ai"*j7 " ':::',~"t;"'"!j:;^''''' f;X ~,:~,j'k"'ïU '''''~''~N'P T, """",,"-::-:::- ,", 'W,"*~¡"¡"';1t" ¢;;¡;:¡,,,,,KLt!t\t ZSli#01iV!#i2F~"" "" '" "",VA;;;.::;;:< . 0%;' ÇI""I",.. _, S,' ,1)þ;,;I;:;¡-1/6, . f '0";;"0']5;(,,,1' '''I' .'C-'-, P:¥4!l}10;J, Æ:.., i§i;;klF{p;ri' ,-:"::F¿i3ù)f'3S:"-",, 'i C-"-'i/"SChY.0_'0_""I'ic-"_$XkQ,¿""",,,,""',",",¢'OC==f'A"",^Z' {,,,iR, .0Nh"n;>.~1;''\'';à0\ N;_0,.,_."Þ:ttÄ,{;l.~joJ>f'i,!-",Jo)i)'3 1,-\.IL, G""Y"=~1d~*,,=- }'¥+'A,,-'ò-iD;¡h"6r~>0;"'_"";.0_;;_'.t,;qji~ 18 6.4% 6.7% 0.3% 33% 14.2% 13.8% -0.4% Y';"Li.t!'''F(/~'", ''''+\-,¡v''''"''''''''~''>'~U'\\''''\''-\'0'¿0''''~",'=~';''''.'~~~'~'''o8"¡1'''"'''''-"~' "~O ",~""",ú- v:.'F"'::h.'J'^"~-x.R' ''''üæ¡n,''''''''J¿,'iÚ!íö:'''Ij'''' W"'.0'1XHC'!"·'I!"" """'!I~~,q ;,;:--1'o",0>LG" r 'L+:~:?:¡;1';?!f0" c.. -:'¿EifbTÈl''-'''/'7~' i ,,,,Ú,':'-;FTii,,< ,; ~' 1" ",,'\,.0.!::-./' ;..",' 'iHJi;j;'::-';¡7'~ '!I'G =;:;)t;',-,^d"'-' ~'3!I' ',' ",,,_"'",W"",' "'" "".. ,"'",," ~_"~, ," ,~ ','" "','"ò"" , I,,," """,,'--. _ -"'''''''", ".. ~""''''^ "",,, , '~"'~ ,,' 'COd',"/"" , ~_~~""~.,, - ';"'¡'"',<,,,=,,^,, ,_,' ',"",-",-,;Of'::', ..~ ',-"~'-'-""",, ,^,- """""'11'))",11' """ ; ",,,,-..,=.=,,~p=,,,,,,~;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_=_,,_,,-^,'C,,_'f!þ,,,,,,?!:,*,d.t,,,__~=<-.--,~,,,",;,;.-nu,,'C:=c--, (fi;, ''''", ~.-'l'j=~E¿¿f!:1h!1"'N"'""=~Ä"-_",~.;:-)::t.h",''h"",_]",,,,q0'M', ''0: 23 5.5% 3.6% -1.9% $31,154 46% 22.8% 23.2% 0.4% 6.1% -2"0% 2000 opulation 2000 5.3% Percent of 1990 5.8% CT 12.0% 10.0% "',---'-__"·.-"__'"^'c,=_"",..,......"....,..,."..,....,.;,."'"",,,',..-'""',,,.n,,,_,,,,,,__,,,,,'_'·', ".."""...""".,--,,_.....,..,, ------------""--..,--'=--'~~"--''''''''··'''..''iJj''''''''''''IWi·';--'-- ""~~~' U"""""""'~Æ)!I'"'"'""' "~ K""m;z=- __,,' ","",,~,,"''''__''''--' M "N--;·,p"·""'·"'''·''''__ ^" <'.E'''"';'''''"':'' - .. n,::::-j:'N,1";SS"--; if' ,,'{¡Ú}'::!f,,??,!;!> .: .i' 2 'è.. "" "''' i·,,,.,,?f,,,"-"-"-,""',__'n', - .. ,,,,...;..,,...,,,-~,, ,"', ,_ ~ ....,,!"_.,,,,iB.~_"",""_,,;,,,',,'~,,,,._&''''''--=,%.þ.,'\,'',,.',"\'^''".h"".,,,",'___""'''''~ $27,407 $40,560 48% ""'-"''''·''-'''';··--'-''1iiD''''''·''.''''''T.'~--''¡~fízr''X''''''~~''''''''..~,,~.._,' ~~~.~~~$!;~ -:~'Ji¡;a~±;;;7;~:1~ra~j ,¢J_m"""s~\*,q¡;!f"""^"'''0....".'"",''''.'''';m "'......~w\".'"d'X.=,.,_""'\,.'~,"ee_="'\.'.,=",:,,',J 104 -0.2% ";0P"="'=¡;'\="""---'"""e'T'i";J"'~"/~¡;;¡-"^,¢<,~",.',-",,;.'cs'-;;jp;"'''.'~=''''",,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,"\00,."''''''''''',::''\ i"",~--:::: '.'. ;:S\p:¡{G,;rt=' "^'''V ="'"",Kc:::;-='{' < ':C¡JW';!;"'C'>*'I!iI'Ji.' -0i-r:; ?!:*~,~!Fi'ß;!h0"'~~MZ;;;7';-ES;:;~¡_¡J:];fi\f:--'-&S\'J, I ,j,: ';,02'" )O,,,,,,,=,,,;;,,,,,\,,,,,,,,,,,,,,#,L,,,~<::;-;,^,,.',,/,,,.þ,"'="':="'''';;,,,'','i.'C'''.'C''''''..n>-'''.-i:'0!.;::;¡.':''¡'.'(,'0-'''''''''Y{c 5.9% -2.1% 15.0% 17.1% 32% $41,617 $31,524 100.0% 100.0% TOTAL ndividuals I when calculating poverty n college dormitories. and unrelated rates of2 1 p nator (the base) I people , from military group quarters the denomi The following groups are excluded institutionalized people, people i under 15 years old n . Luke PelZ owa City Census Tract Selected Community Characteristics 19902000 Census Data, Summary File 3 The Scattered Site Housing Task Force Alexis Kuklenski Data ne, Tracy Glaesemann, 10 November 2004 I for: Source: Prepared Amanda I C By (owner occupied) 90 2000 00 $166,100 62% ~'Ü&'-';<#h'i;_,^,"-""';'Þi" -'1;:;202\:0;_'"'--11:0 """lic,7),d *""""""",,\-, i "',' '~8¿ÚhR' .' ""C,",~";J.,,,> '. ," ," NÞ'W;,",-+~="" ,.~0"0.W:"·.w,~-o;;<n;",;";kkL,,d'¿h,~t, 46% ""..>""~~,;",',',,þ^,"> ·...=.~i;;'%_.{; """""_'""_' ',I .'..).,",,,,,, ,. " ,-<'-";"'''==",,, 56% ¿¡1;;0,^"~~:i!1 ,--~'" q,'_.J.,"<M",..",;i, 55% housin 1990 2000 1 5.1% 4.6% -0.4% 31.5% -1.8% jm+:;a;n;;i;1")'~'''<i;jU'\>'''''0~'-¡;;'--'~i>0rjj>kiXY"""";""">:1Aéi:tjfj¥;;";¡¡g;'Þi'«;lj:\""'!m'/;>9,,' iJ2J2;;t;;¡Z3m!' P~-q~>,~'1;':';!n;t:'{Jòij1i:~7#/-'"'e<"'C'"";"~~';'"'22f,;/,jjj'.;j~<,'\;-!§"'"~3"'-!tì'·;j·,<','¿';' ""+",.'~'~""~~ ..""_.~' 'J,.""",,.,., ' '_"'="'~"""" ,,!. ~",,·w.~,.. '_.~. '""""~_",' . .' .W'" 'F"'·'" . .,. ~Y'+,O"""",'"o",,, '''',",',,,",''''', . ''''d'''''GC' - --""""''¡'<d'','''f ~.,". ,·,·,c·_,,·,','H""'" "'. ""'''-,''''''^'''' "-'1'."" fM'1i!/" I''H~'"'' . 't- ,''''~'2 ¿".T"",-,,,,,,,-TJj0h . __ ,¡s;p>' !fL~ ¥...--;:;;:;.'1!JL. :,,,.~ V"þ!;{¡l,-,,,,,,,, . 'evE 4,1/;>1[:";+)01',,.J' j,' --' .m"iGJi.'J!0!2S;T2,-";,, ,"; ~ _)*c··.;,!;0¿&(*'f, Æi,; /4KP ,.......,,,....,',.......,...,...>C{':'..,,,.......,,..:''"-:. :..c::"':--"..w~...._...,:--;;;..:,:¡;"-h.""""""~_¥.~,~,..,,... ',..."'.".......'...__..".",..~.:--"""'..,':..,...",'..............,"")''''''''''',np"""""",,,,,,,,~,_,,,,,,,,_,,,~,,,, 4 4.5% 5.3% 82.0% 64.5% -17.5% ¥jce(,.,,>,·,,¡f2~ii0_···'<k·--~'''¿'·;~'''';';'·=~It·,,;, ~œ' ";+iim;Vi;#di'~'qti-;'+"i:;"m"",i"ii0,"--"'- ¿'jL\j&0ihiL0~" 'T;s"':;::::;TQ-007¡-' '.i'A, '. . i:A,;;fST¿SfJ;¡, tv, 'Ci> ==Ä~"""= . +A'0i;';1·)t)Y'biiW-- ,.&ÄJ·f/¡~,;;i!ii#_";;E:;"·,~~J. +:;; "",.".,._.G-.-~''''~''''''=M~'''''''''''.""",,,,,..~. "~.................,.....,..,.,,,,. ,.."'"..."..''__''...=-!....,,. 6 5.5% 4.0% 80.0% 79.4% -0.7% ""''';''''''''>'''''-'i;'-';''¡'~~'''';'';''~>'''~''-+''''-''''';''":;;+-i-""'"''':"'!Jl''' ,,·;.0"i'-;'~;"·'~·'«·~···'-'·'i;-'/i¡;'¿' }J;~'":c!!'~!if."'''''-:r''''-'''1!~·''';iif(f!SS..''' ." .0;\.1h>!-¡¡¡;i':\;<¡'·;;'" '''''"" "",,"""")""-T'\ '" '.þpê'1·kW . ;¡ . Ut.,,;5!:: . '" ''')V.·,.;;.å#d01. - tl'ß ...........,,"........ .""... '.". "'-',."""....~. s¡ "'''''''''--'''''''''''''.'__'' ¡..·.id),.!..o~...'"".. . ",,,oW,"',,,..'-,,),,,.. .",,,,, '''''''''·M'',''·''''''''''·'M, ·.W ~ ....",,,.....,.....V......___..,...............,....."."n"""........,....,....n...n....."..."_"."..,:h.._..."".._.....,,~,,%")....,,,..., 12 2.4% 1.9% -0.5% 29.7% 28.3% -1.4% h....é....;·.....;.......·..'...;;."'''..-...''.''·.....''·;s-.·';:;;·..·;;;.-;...>=';'''''''_'';''''''ii''''¿~'''~;'';''--''''^0'';;;';;;'''ifiH:j,,"''''';;'''' ,;";·,,,,:;;.-;..;"",;·.-;"',·':";·,"";;;:""'·.0··:,·.·..,"<-·"',,___.''''''''''''''m>''''1ø''';''''';;'~'<''''''''''''''''''-'''''';;';'''-='=~''Ä;~' V,èÒ/,,-,,"HN ,'. ",;"-f."''''''' '" '.. r.,',."","'"'''''' '.' W'~'S"""""''''''"' p~ ~".,,, '""="""""-'¡BJ"'''' ... . "",'" '.",,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,. . .~,.="'""""'''''... " ,,'''-'' ,""'"'' ,___"".,, ," '"~~'" '>" ,.. "" ...""..," . ~"'''c,~_ " ","W ~.~, ~". ..... '._"'"'' ,,,- -~..~,,~. '-<", """'_'__."__·'h." . A'~"_" '7 .. '''''',__>:..,,''' >:: , "~""".,, ,'.'h· , " . _~~""-"0"'~",'" . ., AA....'.......". "',,," '¥""","". "CI"_' "d i",·=..-=·..·~" "'S;"";!,",,, ... '....'"'.'"".+. .' .. ","ß;".Nd'iC'0.' .~ mž:.',,"""',',,"',"'. . """,=;-"""""", . , . ~"N1("[,'''' ',,'} ;.',µ, .;."'.Çn"'''''!!f:G_''''''".fÚG£-\é_".\'"\,,'A''''\'S,'¡~,.,;-wP>;.,~.+_---="'" ";0f.rh++'N"'),h,ii'FA""W""">'<;.FP""8"'G''''''",',";~¡'.Ho.3.'!dh, .;."imxA>¥8! ... ~~ ~14..4A% 4.2%. -0,3% 29.6%~~~,,~29.1,,&.. -0,5% m"_""~'"'''''''''~i0''>''''''W~~'",,''m.''__.;'',,"-'''="'_-''''".........'''''''''..'''*''''q'''~'''''.{'~''''' ",,",," *--Y'''''''''·'''''''t:'è_Y-~a..''' "~""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"''t\A''~'''''Y,P1"7.0'",,,"."-'-p ::;';;::E0¿t"~!!1\' ' .+,1';""#; ~m~""''''''" "0f,"'2(1.""--"~'~ "'ig t.--n0:(\;n;j;~"FL·'"': ..ß;P1.X;';';':"?I'Xi7'.' ":.!j'0.i!,;;;'~'~(~"o" '.,,, ,.....".. '" ,.,..'--"0' _ .~=.,'C', ,.,',""=, ,,' J"m....~~_ "-"-,C",'__C",.,,.!,, "",...~~'_ ., .. ...... .... ..... . ",...." ".,,-',',,","= , ". "" . .. .. ___ .. ''',,' ". ..".... ....w'"',~"~,, Ô11nJdG"0"1'M",,;!;.."0w=-,,'L'''·'''';Wg'r.,;,, " .Þ: __("'X"",,,,'--- ...- 'ß4,¡';iJ!Gt!i2:C2",,~" ....."',"'""".,---,1;;"';\.;*"""" ---,.Jg¡gi&"~",,,-~,......=---,..o;',,, .'..'.."..,....."",..-i,"-U·..__",,,..,,_,'~~.·.="'..)....,,..,,",.'..,.j... -'''...h.'''...''''."...~..,''''''''~ ...".'>.." "d., -'"""..........,....'-"...".....=....."..."",GL:\......,-'l!L ~"~¥~"...~~___",,~,,"_~"'~.,,' 16 7.2% 6.5% -0.7% 90.1% 92.9% 2.7% 18 6.9% 7.2% 0.4% ;.,."'.;:;<;;...-..;;~.Ä,;;;;;;...Ä0;;;,;;;.:;iii··ÙÚ;00Ùiif'}ij.;·;;;.'.;:,····.,·;.,;ij;>-;·<;;;;;.¡..!I!;;;'';!fI!!!·..--·X;·~è'H' ¡2-:]·'HSR~r . " ..-\:;<0:£';::;1' »"J . ';'0%"th¡¡~'" ..?/i\tj'¡/'if1.,v1r;; .i<,' ",,,,,.,,,,,,,,+;---...,, =-----"'.~,.."... J """-'"'''-''''' "),,/1-,,,..,- s·..,''''''''''· ''''-''=---:-;.. "",'n¡""'~f\" "Þ'''----' . . ....,,/....ètJ:t,S(:i , .\>;or" ;=.F,,,.y-'-",,x.:;,<...Ah.'Ó;(~',,7',.,,..""::=-=%t!7"þ.'.'<'!'.-;8Q,;·,"",.".s''''"''--'''~,".'''0''''''-'" 23 3.1% 2.7% -0.4% 51.3% 53.3% 2.1% 104 5.7% 5.5% -0.2% 30.3% 24.7% -5.6% "..;"..-.""~..."'---,.....".."v.-"........iJ..·...,.......·,.."...·..__......,..·..".'''...'.n''.'~·";__''',.",,.,..'..;..;,,~,....,'..c:..;'"'......... .-.,'....-,·....."..<N"'.-w.._,.·~'~"""c,,..,.,'.,,·,''''d''',~,,,,,,,,,,~,, ,........."",--,...,,,,...,,..,..,.,,,,,..,,...,'-''',n__. .;'''-'"'''F''-'~''--'' ".""·'-F'.''''''"'''''''"--'''''''''''''''''''~"'''''''_'''''''''·,.,l,m..;'L*,~W""'- A' ,=, ;'",.<':"""""";"~';""i""';;""""---"''''~''''-''"'''''\'';='iim".. ·..""œ"·''-'..·..····'..,d'·V.·"'·.·''''''~,,..,.,~;---~.,.,....... ."~,..^..".._....,."m.S!. ~~,,,._" ,-"",,' ~'''1''W'~'''''''''''''' 'Ð''''>'''''''''<N''~~µ ""''''''P''''''0''''~-' ,....".,.;..; ",..".,.,. . "¡;'\;'¡"'" " . -~""'~ .. ,·$,"X'Cf..""""-~,,~ . ~'''t; "';M"~~t'ß';;·w...... . ''''__''''''---'''''''''-'','' '^ p'. ·+p,.~W k . 'n-= .·",~,..'t""·A, j . "'k''-'''' . .""''-''''-..'' "..:!o.....t',=.'''.'' v, p,"',,,,,,",,,,,,,,. ,""'"";"'.,,,.,"'''',,'''....-,,¡;, ""'.-'''''="'... ..' "."'.....' ~",.".,,,' ,jL...,"....__..", '" ""''''''M..~ "","".,." ",,"-~..' ... "",)q...,,,....?_~,,.,,~~___y.,,,..,'_,;,,,,..,_ ,."",~...,.A;J.,"..." ''''_P"...,,,~_,,,.. ,...-,1/,;....,.,/11;.., .,...,......,""....."1...'.~....,"',"',,~"..~,W..._~,,,.,,'...',..,.....~A.", ,,......,,,"'0"", ...^,.'---,..........,,,,",.......n.........',,....,..,.....,..,..............,.....,.".,.,'.'n"..........,......,..,...,..'. ,,~.,,~~_.. Percent e chan Median home value Percent Median :ross rent ter 991 10 445 1 Point e Chan ied Percent Renter occu (of occupied units) 1990 33.3% Point Chan Percent of units ,;:"'!':'.':'± 1% ,600 $117,500 87% ·'0",.'"..~'''"·.-,..;y.'',,,..,v...,,,.-,,·..,·,..·,~'''.,·''''-'','''c_. '~'~~., "'i¡¡1 .a:'.~ ... . ,;J!if'·Y0'W:1f i ·'M.·7 , ,...A",·ni?V1,".""" , .,,'...,........""..--,. '. ,.;q" ",,,,,,-,,,,,,.,....,,.,.'."""""""""."""" 35% 2000 CT 82% $133,800 $73,700 35% $566 $420 -4.0% 2of2 p 43.3% 47.3% 100.0% 100.0% 3.02 3 1 2 5 1 I 6 I I 1 5 4 105 I - Source: ESRI and US Census 200O. This document was created by the Urban & Regional Planning Department at the University of Iowa. 14 7 I 8 I 04 I D Tract Boundary The number inside the tract boundary is the designated census tract 10#. 5 Miles 2.5 .25 o 619 755 , I Housing IBR Report IBR incidents per Watch Area 1/01/2004 To 10/15/2004 Scattered i Total number of S From -I I I ',= I --.....-- ì" · -, ',., I " , , I ",>, , I'" I ~"'" , I 85 '\ I /~~8ER1 ~~l·~.!-- ,/ ,,-t<.\..--.J....... , ""..;"'/\ ~ ~\ /~ ...__5':./ \§ ¡ 3- \ "1J--",,-- \ I \~ \~ , 1\ , \ ð="~' I' ~ (, ~':, \\ I ~~-,---)! \1 \-j \ "- II J ""'~~"@"~ } ¿jfY I. ('1 ---"---- --- I I I , ! , , i ì I --'--"'- , , , , " --~""'-.'>- '--"--"='-~-~" I I , r- ~ -L-':J , , r, -i , I , J 4-20THST _____.w_~______ , ~ ~ , \ ,JJ II IJ. r ~ 1 I ) r- I I (r..'. , I - · < < a · 883 r I -- I ) , " ~ -..lL.--=- /' / - w, ./ '~ /'\ - \'::\, , \_,~~y \ ì j!'-~\" ----, ...: ',\ '~r õ .~< -\:!. -, \\ - l_\_____¡__ \ ð \ I I -( \ ! --11""" I~ \ ""'+ I "i /~ \ : I If', J' I I r ~1!t:=- );:1 I I _J ~ _,'I I I '"">,, \ I I "",' 1\\.--"- -f- \ , , \\ \' t /1 \ - / " -'-." , ,( .' "' )1 -------'/ ¡ , I ~! '- ß ,/ \~ \~ \'t;. I~ '2 '~ \ / R) 1/ ~,r, ,- ¡#/ i\ , ~, I ,I"""," ' ij!"-"----'-' --.-. ~I """"I, -~i-,"",r£RSOi~! --I ~ ) , r, \ \ \ I I -r , , - II II ! \I ~...._ Il_ _I I I I -\, I "\. ''\'' I " '¡I''''i' 598 ! -'':',--~-- -. ___"~I~! ! "--~ ", '~- --...0., , '--,,,~ ", ',\ ., -'1- """""" : ", ,I r I "'__"¡ iI)f I "_~ "">. .. ~ f '. I ,__«i'''' "" ',<" -_.~.~ - - '--.'--.. \{A / -- '\ P'- I /' --- 'h\ ji /' "- ""'-- ~\ /' L /' ""0__"" 0 I I . ,\, , > " "">, . I ,/ I,' . _ '\.\ CI ,'\:\1.- I \\. ~ - -'\j ! , ~ 598 ". ",,", \, . '1'\\ ',I KEY Watch Area Number of incidents \ '".~ l ----~_ \ ---- '" , , \ I 1 N'I'''-- -~".'^- .... c ~, ,. '-- , . ~ 'I" ~, ---~--" -----/ ~ ,,- o , , " , -------- w / .--- Physical Assisted Housing Inventory Prepared for: The Scattered Site Housing Task Force By: Amanda Cline, Tracy Glaesemann, Alexis Kuklenski, Luke Pelz 10 November 04 Table 1 Number of all occupied CT units# 1 2040 Number of assisted units 38 #Includes owner-occupied units and occupied rental units Units included in inventory: Provider or buildina (sorted alphabetically) Autumn Park Capitol House Concord Terrace DVIP Ecumenical towers Citizen Building Emerson Pointe Four Oaks- Emergency youth shelter Four Oaks- Transitional housing GICHF GICHF- Longfellow Manor* Penn insula Dev. (7 GICHF & 10 ICHA)* HACAP ICHA Lexington Place MECCA Pheasant Ridge Regency Heights I & II Shelter House Successful Living Systems Unlimited Villa Garden TOTAL Percent of occupied units that are assisted 1.9% Number of rental units 643 Number of assisted units 38 Percent 0 rental units that are assisted 5.9% 1 o ..... ..... ........ ...... ......................................'];...5........ ..................... ... ....... ............... .... ....................... ... ....................... .. ....................... .. :.:;:;:::;:::;:::;:::;:.:;>:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:.....:::: 1150 0.2% 0.0% ......... ................. ................... ····h'S··'.');öK· :;"#;~ii,,ð: ....,........ .............. 7.4% Units 64 81 30 16 81 18 54 6 6 88 6 17 38 84 30 12 248 75 12 38 99 48 1150 Table 2 Percent of all assisted CT units in each tract 1 3.3% Note: Units for residential facilities (Shelter House, DVIP, & Four Oaks) were calculated by dividing the number of beds by the average number of people per household in Iowa City according to 2000 census data. . Units under construction Source: Assisted units collected by University of Iowa and City of Iowa City; Community data from 2000 Census Data Summary File 3 ../------ J! ( ~wu ,.; , < , ~ 4ZCTliST , < < Ò . ""':' 1.9% ~ .,.... I , o " . < . ~ Iowa City avsraga = 3.7% At or above city-wide average Assisted Units as Percent of All Occupied Units (Owner Occupied & Rentals) 2000 Census Tracts Iowa City and Coralville \ l" \ ----~, It ( , / - " ~TOO'ÆRIiIGHW"Y ~ 'Js!1 "" ~ ..... ~~" I , < < a . , o . o ~ . I , , I I Iowa City average = 7.4% At or above cÆywwide Bverage ~ Assisted Units as Percent of Rental Units 2000 Census Tracts Iowa City and Coralville 2003 Iowa Test of Basic Skills 3rd - 6th Grades Reading Comprehension National Norms Number Not Proficient Not Free I Reduced Lunch Number Not Proficient on Free I Reduced Lunch Number I % Not Proficient Building Enrollment 26 16 21 16 30 14 9 22 36 24 49 19 17 19 42 50 44 42 23 9 5 39 16 2 21 24 21 24 29 2 47 7 4 57 68 (28.3%) 39 (33.6%) 30 (19.2%) 21 (11.6%) 69 (32.2%) 30 (18.5%) 11 (8.8%) 43 (26.7%) 60 (28.6%) 45 (31.9%) 73 (29.7%) 48 (34%) 19 (13.9%) 66 (42.9%) 49 (17.8%) 54 (18.5%) 101(44.3%) 433 189 287 315 376 286 249 289 408 270 456 264 232 314 492 538 433 2003 Free Reduced Lunch -- Building 119 (27%) 103 (54%) 31 (11%) 25 (8%) 119 (32%) 51 (18%) 9 (4%) 62 (21%) 120 (29%) 120 (44%) 106 (23%) 107 (41 %) 4 (2%) 191 (61%) 73 (15%) 25 (5%) 194 (45%) School Coralville Central Hills Hoover Horn Kirkwood Lemme Lincoln Longfellow Lucas Mann Penn Roosevelt Shimek Twain Weber Wickham Wood Johnson County Juvenile Court Statistics Complaint by School January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2002 School Female Male Total BLC 2 2 4 City High 53 80 133 Coralville Central 1 2 3 Grant Wood 5 2 7 Kirkwood 3 3 6 Kirkwood c.c. 5 7 12 Lemme 2 - 2 Longfellow - 6 - Lucas - 1 - None 18 25 43 Northwest Jr. High 15 15 30 Other (County) 33 62 95 Senior High Alt. Ctr. 7 3 10 South East Jr. High 22 23 45 Twain 5 5 Unknown (County) 98 194 292 West High 24 55 79 Rural JC 3 31 34 Johnson County Total 291 516* 807 * includes one undetermined COMPLAINTS by SCHOOL January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 Johnson County SCHOOL SCHOOLS F M TOTALS BLC 3 7 10 CITY HIGH 64 81 145 CLEAR CRK-AMANA HIGH 9 16 25 CLEAR CRK-AMANA MID 5 3 8 CLEAR CRK ELEM 2 2 CORALVILLE CNTRL ELEM 4 4 GRANT WOOD ELEM 2 4 6 HILLS ELEM 2 2 HORN ELEM 2 2 KIRKWOOD 1 2 3 KIRKWOOD ELEM 1 1 LEMME ELEM 1 2 3 LONE TREE JR/SR HIGH 4 4 LONGFELLOW ELEM 3 3 LUCAS ELEM 3 4 7 MANN ELEM 2 1 3 NONE 18 32 50 NORTHWEST JR HIGH 13 38 51 OTHER 91 129 220 PENN ELEM 1 1 REGINA ELEM 1 1 REGINA HIGH 3 3 6 ROOSEVELT ELEM 2 2 SHAC 8 8 16 SHIMEK ELEM 2 2 SOLON HIGH 2 5 7 SOUTHEAST JR HIGH 24 58 82 TWAIN ELEM 1 9 10 UNKNOWN 20 31 51 WEST HIGH 48 108 156 GENDER TOTALS 463 857 1320 Lane Plugge, Ph.D. Superintendent (319) 339-6890 Fax Number SCHOOL Coralville Central Hills IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 509 S. Dubuque Street Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 688-1000 IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIPTION The western boundary begins at Highway 6 and 10th A venue, north along 10th Avenue to 5th Street, northwesterly along 5th Street to 12th Avenue includes Carol Ann Apartments Building B. North to include both sides of 12th avenue (including families living in the Parkside Manor Apartments) to 8th Street, on 8th Street east to the equivalent of 11th Avenue extended, north to Interstate 80. West along Interstate 80 to Clear Creek Township line, north along the Clear Creek/ Amana boundary. North on Clear Creek/ Amana boundary to Crandic railroad tracks, southeast on railroad tracks to Holiday Road. Go east on center line of Holiday Road to just east of 1st Avenue then south to Interstate 80. East on Interstate 80 to the Iowa River. South along the Iowa River to the Coralville east city limits. South along the city limits to railroad tracks. West along the railroad tracks to beginning point. Beginning with the junction of the Iowa River and the southwest corner of section 34 of East Lucas Township north along the Iowa River to the city limits line (north of Isaac Walton Road), west and north on the city limits to Highway 1 excluding Thatcher and Baculis Trailer Courts. West on Highway 1 (center line) to just east of Naples Avenue south to the north boundary of section 29 of West Lucas Township just south of Osage Street, then west to west of Sharon Center Road. Then north on the west side of Sharon Center Road, Highway 1 (both sides to Weber) to the Mid Prairie School District boundary line. Follow the Mid Prairie School District boundary line south and east to the Highland School District boundary line, follow the Highland School District boundary line east to the Iowa River, then follow the Iowa River north to the beginning point. Hoover Beginning at the intersection of 1st Avenue and Muscatine Avenue west and northwest following the center line of Muscatine to the intersection of 7th Avenue. North on 7th A venue following the center line of the street to the junction of Rochester A venue, west on Rochester A venue following the center line to Ralston Creek, north and east following Ralston Creek to an imaginary point east and just north of Dodge Street Court, west on Dodge Street Court (following back lot lines) to just south of Highway I, following Highway 1 North behind ACT. Commencing again at the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Scott Boulevard, Gust north of Rochester Avenue; both sides of Rochester to Lemme Elementary School), west to the comer of the northwest Lemme Elementary School boundary, south on Green Mountain Drive following the center line to Washington Street, east on Washington Street following the center line to just west of Glenn Drive, south on the back lot lines of Glenn Drive and Shrader Road running parallel with the Lemme boundary to just south of Court Street, west on the back lot lines of Court Street to a point just east of Terrace Road south on the back lot lines of Terrace Road to just south of Friendship Street and then west on the back lot lines of Friendship Street to just east of 1st A venue, following the back lot lines of 1st A venue to Muscatine Avenue to the point of beginning. Horn Beginning at the northern point of the University Heights city limits line following the University Heights city limits east along the rock Island railroad right-of-way to Melrose Avenue, west along the center line of Melrose A venue to Sunset Street. South along the center line of Sunset Street to 1400 Aber Avenue then diagonally southwest to the city limits. West along the city limits, then diagonally northwest to a point just north and east of Burry Street. Straight north including both sides of Teg Drive to Benton Street. West along the center line of Benton Street to Mormon Trek Boulevard. North along the center line of Mormon Trek Boulevard to the railroad tracks. Southeast along the railroad tracks to the University Heights city limits to the point of beginning. Kirkwood Beginning at the junction of 10th Avenue and a point south of Highway 6 at the Rock Island railroad right-of-way, north along 10th A venue to 5th Street. Northwesterly along 5th Street to just west of 12th A venue includes Carol Ann Apartments Building A and C. North along the back lot lines of 12th Avenue (excluding Parkside Manor Apartments) to 8th Street, east on 8th Street to a boundary established if 11 th Avenue were extended, north to Interstate 80. West along Interstate 80 to the Clear Creek/ Amana boundary line. South along the Clear Creek/ Amana boundary line to the railroad right-of-way just south of Highway 6 and 218. East along this line to the point of beginning. Includes Camp Cardinal Road. Lemme Beginning at the junction of Court Street and Shrader Road (both sides), north and west around Glenn Drive (both sides) to Washington Street then west on the center line of Washington Street to the center line of Green Mountain Drive and in a northwest direction to Rochester Avenue. East along Rochester A venue (both sides) to the Scott Township line, north on Scott Township line to 1-80, east on 1-80 to eastern school district boundary. Follow the school district boundary south to between Scott Township 8 and 17, go west on the line between Scott Township 8 and 17 (Court Street if extended) to northwest corner of Scott Park. Follow Scott Park boundary west and south to junction of Scott Blvd. and American Legion Road (includes Scott Park Drive). North on Scott Blvd. to Court Street, west on Court Street to Friendship Street. West along the back lot line between Friendship Street and Shamrock Drive to Kenwood Drive, north on Kenwood Drive (both sides) to Court Street, west on Court Street to the point of beginning. Also included in this area is Breckenridge Trailer Court. Lincoln Bounded by the Iowa River on the north and east, the Coralville Central . Elementary School boundary on the west and the Roosevelt Elementary School boundary on the south. Also included is the River Heights and Stewart Road area which is described as the area from the Iowa River north on Dubuque Street including both sides of the highway except for the residence on the west side of Dubuque Street between Stewart Road and the West Overlook Road, then east on the West Overlook Road including both sides of the road to the Iowa River. Longfellow Beginning at the point of the Iowa River and Iowa A venue, east on Iowa Avenue to the corner of Iowa Avenue and North Dodge Street, north to the junction of Jefferson Street and North Dodge Street, then east on Jefferson Street to 7th A venue, south on 7th A venue to Muscatine, southeast on Muscatine to just west of 2nd A venue, south on the back lot lines of 2nd A venue to the railroad tracks, following the railroad tracks to east of Summit Street, then south along the back lot lines of Summit Street to Kirkwood Avenue, west on Kirkwood Avenue to the Iowa River. Also included is the area beginning at the school district boundary on Scott Township line between sections 8 and 17, south along district boundary to 1/2 mile into Section 17, then east 1/4 mile, south following the school district boundary east then south then west to a point 0.4 miles east of Scott Blvd. (This area inludes Fairway Lane, Owl Song Lane, all developments in Windsor Ridge, and all new developments in this area.) Also included is the area south of Highway 6 Bypass and east of the Bon- Aire Trailer Court (including both sides of the blacktop road that divides East Lucas & Scott Township - Sioux Avenue). Lucas Beginning at a point at the junction of Muscatine A venue and 2nd A venue, east on Muscatine to just east of 1st Avenue, north on back lot lines of 1st A venue to south of Friendship Street, east on the back lot lines of Friendship Street to just east of Terrace Road. North on back lot lines of Terrace Road to just south of Court Street, east on back lot lines of Court Street to west of Kenwood Drive south along the back lot lines of Kenwood Drive to Friendship Street. East on the back lot lines south of Friendship Street to Petersen Street, north on Petersen Street to Court Street, then east on Court Street to the city limits, south along the city limits line (city limits is 300 ft. east of Scott Blvd. on the east side of Muscatine A venue) to the middle line of Muscatine A venue (American Legion Road) and east on Muscatine for 0.4 miles then south to the railroad tracks, west on the railroad tracks to 2nd Avenue (both sides) then north to the beginning point. Mann Beginning at the junction of the Iowa River and Iowa A venue, follow the Iowa River north to just south of Kimball Road, along the back lot lines of Kimball Road east to Governor Street, south on Governor Street to the corner of Dodge Street and Governor Street, east on the center line of Dodge Street to Dodge Street Court, east on Dodge Street Court (both sides) to Ralston Creek, south following Ralston Creek to Rochester Avenue. West on Rochester Avenue to 7th Avenue, south on 7th Avenue to Jefferson Street, west on Jefferson Street to North Dodge Street, south on North Dodge Street to Iowa Avenue, west on Iowa Avenue to the point of beginning. Also included is the area north of the river bordered on the east by the Shimek Elementary School boundary including the Taft Speedway, Foster Road, Country Club Acres area, bordered on the north by Interstate 80 and on the west by the Iowa River. Also included in the Mann attendance area is the University housing located west of Hawkeye Drive east to Mormon Trek. Penn Beginning at Jones Blvd. and Penn Street, north along Clear Creek/ Amana boundary to the Iowa River. South along the river to north of Woodfield Lane, southwesterly to north of 275th Street. Go east to just east of Dubuque Street, north to North Liberty January 1996 city limits (south of Juniper Street). Follow North Liberty city limits south and west to Crandic railroad tracks. North on railroad tracks to just south of Golfview Drive (including Golfview Mobile Home Park Expansion). West to Hwy 965 then north on center line of Hwy 965 to Penn Street. West on Penn Street to beginning point. (Also included is the new development called Quail Creek west of Hwy 965). Roosevelt Beginning at a point on Riverside Drive and Iowa A venue, south following the Iowa River to the Twain Elementary School boundary. From the beginning point west on a line that would parallel Newton Road, south on a line to meet the northern point of the University Heights city limits, following the University Heights city limits east along the Rock Island railroad right-of-way to Melrose Avenue. West on Melrose Avenue to Sunset Street, south along the center line of Sunset Street to 1400 Aber Avenue, then diagonally southwest to the city limits. In addition, west of the Horn Elementary School boundary between the city limits on the south, Melrose A venue on the north and Mormon Trek on the west are assigned to Roosevelt Elementary School. Also, Bartelt Road and Roberts Road (Pheasant Ridge Apts.) are assigned to Roosevelt. Shimek Beginning at a point east of Tanglewood Street south of Interstate 80, south between Bjaysville Lane and Ridge Road to a junction with the center line of Dubuque Street, south to Kimball Road (both sides assigned to Shimek), east on Kimball Road to Governor Street, southeast to Dodge Street. Along the center line of North Dodge Street to a point just east of Conklin Street. Northeasterly along Highway 1 (both sides) to Interstate 80, following Interstate 80 west to the beginning point. Also included is all of Newport Township north of Interstate 80 and East Lucas Township north of Interstate 80 west to Dubuque Street (not including Dubuque Street). Twain Beginning at the southwest corner of section 35 of East Lucas Township, north along the Iowa River to a point at the junction of the Iowa River and Kirkwood A venue, east on Kirkwood A venue to just east of Summit Street, north along the back lot lines of Summit Street to the railroad right- of-way, following the railroad right-of-way east to the city limits. Commencing again at a point on the Highway 6 Bypass just west of a private drive and east of the Bon-Aire Trailer Court, west on the Highway 6 Bypass to just west of Taylor Drive. South along the back lot lines of houses facing Taylor Drive to south of Sycamore Street SE and Kountry Lane. Then east to just west of Sioux Avenue, south to just north of Napolean Street. Then west to the Iowa River. Weber Beginning at the corner of Melrose A venue and Mormon Trek south along the center line of Mormon Trek (excluding Pheasant Ridge Apts.) to Highway 1. West on Highway 1 (center line) to just east of Naples Avenue, south to the northern boundary of section 29 of West Lucas Township just south of Osage Street, then west to west of Sharon Center Road. Then north on the west side of Sharon Center Road to just south of Highway 1. Go west south of Highway 1 to the Mid-Prairie School District boundary. Follow the Mid-Prairie School and Clear Creek/ Amana District boundary north to the railroad tracks south of Highway 6. Follow the railroad tracks east (excluding Camp Cardinal Road) to Mormon Trek Road, south on Mormon Trek Road to just south of Hawkeye Park. Then west at this point to just west of Hawkeye Drive, Wickham Wood Revised: 11/94 5/96 3/00 7/02 south to Melrose A venue and east on Melrose A venue to the beginning point. Beginning at Jones Blvd. and Penn Street south along Jones Blvd. to the Clear Creek/ Amana boundary, east and south on Clear Creek/ Amana boundary to the Crandic railroad track, southeast on railroad to Holiday Road. Follow center line of Holiday Road to east of North Liberty Road (Lincoln boundary). Follow Lincoln boundary north to Muddy Creek, east on Muddy Creek to the intersection of the north/ south Muddy Creek extension, north on extension of Muddy Creek to Spring Valley Development, northeasterly to Dubuque Street (Stewart Road extension), north on center line of Dubuque Street to north of West Overlook Road, then east to the Iowa River. Follow the river north to north of Woodfield Lane (both side to north corridor school), go southwesterly to north of 275th Street, then west to just east of Dubuque Street (both sides to north corridor school). Go north to North Liberty January 1966 city lirrúts (south of Juniper). Follow North Liberty city lirrúts line south and west to Crandic railroad tracks, go north on railroad tracks to north of Golfview Drive (Golfview Mobile Home Court excluded as well as Golfview Mobine Home Court Expansion), then west to Hwy 965. North along the center line of Hwy 965 to Penn Street, west on Penn Street to beginning point. (Also excluded is the new development called Quail Creek west of Hwy 965). Beginning at a point at the junction of the Highway 6 Bypass and just west of Taylor Drive, south along the back lot lines of houses facing Taylor Drive to south of Sycamore Street SE. East along the south side of Sycamore Street SE to west of Sioux A venue. North on the west side of Sioux Avenue to Highway 6 Bypass. West on the Highway 6 Bypass, including the Bon-Aire Trailer Court and Lakeside Apartments, to the beginning point. Iowa City Community School District Elementary School Boundary Change History of Non-contiguous Neighborhoods Lemme 1988-89 Breckenridge (formerly Meadowbrook) Mobile Homes from Lucas to Lemme- overcrowding issue at Lucas (59 students currently attend Lemme from the Breckenridge neighborhood) Lincoln 1981-82 River Heights from Penn to Lincoln - overcrowding issue at Penn and underutilized space at Lincoln (101 students currently attend Lincoln from these neighborhoods, significant development has taken place since the boundary change) Longfellow 1988-89 American Legion Road from Lucas to Longfellow - overcrowding issue at Lucas and underutilized space at Longfellow (82 students currently attend Longfellow from these neighborhoods) Mann 1986-87 Hawkeye Drive from Coralville Central to Mann - Iowa Department of Instruction (Department of Education) mandated the population of minority students be reduced at Coralville Central- this regulation is no longer mandatory (27 students attend Mann from the Hawkeye Drive neighborhood) Roosevelt 1986-87 Pheasant Ridge (formerly Mark IV) Apartments from Coralville Central to Roosevelt- Iowa Department of Instruction (Department of Education) mandated the population of minority students be reduced at Coralville Central- this regulation is no longer mandatory (45 students attend Roosevelt from Pheasant Ridge) Twain 2003-04 Lake Ridge Homes from Hills to Twain - overcrowding issue at Hills (56 students from Lake Ridge currently attend Twain) Memo To: Scattered Site Housing Task Force From: Amanda Cline, Tracy Glaesemann, Alexis Kuklenski, and Luke Pelz Date: 10 November 2004 We are a group of graduate students at the University of Iowa working on a capstone project. We are working with Steve Nasby concerning assisted housing in Iowa City. Part of our project is to support the Task Force in their decision-making process by providing data in a useful manner. To get up to speed on what you are doing, we read through past Task Force minutes and the material that has been presented to you. We have also attended two meetings (Sept. 20th and the Oct. 4th public meeting). We are impressed by the amount and breadth of information that you have considered. This memo consists of some additional data on the freelreduced lunch program from the iowa Department of Education. The impetus for the creation of the Task Force was a letter from the Iowa City Community School District regarding their concern that a few elementary schools enrolled the bulk of students living in assisted housing. The worry is that amassing students who live in assisted housing in a small number of schools puts strain on those specific schools because of the additional support and assistance those students need to succeed. The number of students eligible to receive free or reduced lunch is one measure used by the School District to make the argument that an increase in strain on specific elementary schools is due to increased students living in assisted housing. The elementary schools in the Iowa City Community School District increased by 92 students between the 2000-01 and the 2003-04 school years. In that same time period, the number of students eligible for free/reduced lunch increased by 163 students. (Iowa Department of Education, Basic Education Data Survey) However, a closer look at the data is warranted. Graph 1 displays the percentage of students in each of the 17 elementary schools in the Iowa City Community School District who are eligible for free/reduced lunch for school years 2000-01 through 2003-04. One interesting point to note is that this percentage at Wood Elementary actually declined between the 2002-03 and 2003-04 school years. Another way to analyze this data is to compare the change in free/reduced lunch with the change in enrollment. Seven of the 17 elementary schools experienced larger increases in the number of students who receive freelreduced lunch than in total enrollment between 2000-01 and 2003-05 school years, denoted with an asterisk (*) below. This suggests that increases in, free/reduced lunch are not solely due to people moving into this community. Five schools experienced a decrease in the percentage of students eligible for free/reduced lunch between the 2000-01 and 2003-04 school years (Penn, Weber, Lemme, Lincoln and Wickham). Change in Enrollment and Free/Reduced Lunch School Years 2000-01 through 20003-04 Total change Percentage Total change free/reduced eligible for in enrollment lunch free/reduced School (students) (students) lunch 2000-01 MARK TWAIN* 32 68 51.6% ROBERT LUCAS 117 61 21.0% HORACE MANN* -20 23 29.4% GRANTWOOD* -62 7 34.7% HERBERT HOOVER* -16 3 10.2% BOHUMIL SHIMEK 4 1 1.3% LINCOLN 37 -1 4.7% ROOSEVELT -49 -5 38.7% HELEN LEMME -23 -8 21.1 % LONGFELLOW -97 -19 20.8% WEBER 43 -25 20.5% Source: Iowa Department of Education, Basic Education Data Survey Table ranked on change in free/reduced lunch. Percentage eligible for freelreduced lunch 2003-04 67.9% 30.2% 39.9% 41.2% 11.9% 1.7% 3.6% 44.3% 19.9% 21.2% 13.7% Point ChanQe 16.3 9.2 10.6 6.6 1.7 0.4 -1.1 5.5 -1.1 0.4 -6.8 While the data presented here gives some indication of the change in those receiving free/reduced lunch, it does not investigate the relationship between free/reduced lunch and students living in assisted housing. Because student information is confidential, we were not able to match the addresses of students in the free/reduced lunch program with the location of assisted housing. It is our understanding that the School District is the only entity that would have this data. Graph Percentage of Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch School Years 2000-01 through 2003-04 70.0% Twain 60.0% Roose-ælt Wood Mann 1 50.0% 40.0% Lucas Longfellow Lemme 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% Lincoln'k -= ~ I· Shimek , 2003-04 2002-03 0-01 through 2003-04 0.0% 2000-01 Source: Iowa Departrrent of Education, Basic Education