HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-01-02 OrdinancePrepared by: Sarah Walz, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5239 (REZ17-00016)
Ordinance No.
Ordinance rezoning approximately 3.6 acres of property from Neighborhood Public (P1) to
Planned Development Overlay Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1) zone located at 300 Teeters Court
(REZ17-00016)
Whereas, the applicant, Iowa City Community School District, has requested a rezoning of property
located at 300 Teeters Court from Neighborhood Public (P-1) zone to Planned Development
Overlay/Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1); and
Whereas, the proposed rezoning will allow further grading of a previously altered protected slope to
enable an expansion of Lincoln Elementary School; and
Whereas, the "neighborhood principles" included in the Comprehensive Plan, lists neighborhood schools,
and specifically elementary schools, as an integral part of healthy, sustainable neighborhoods that serve as a
focal point for community gathering and neighborhood identity; and
Whereas, the preservation and improvement of neighborhood schools is a goal of the City Council's
strategic plan; and
Whereas, the proposed addition to Lincoln Elementary School extends the life of one of Iowa City's
oldest neighborhood schools by preserving limited outdoor play space, providing ADA accessibility to all
portions of the building and property, and improving traffic circulation to the site; and
Whereas, the applicant has submitted information indicating that the subject protected slope had been
previously altered; and
Whereas, the applicant has presented information demonstrating that the proposed development activity
will not undermine the stability of the slope; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed rezoning and associated
Sensitive Areas Development Plan, attached hereto and by reference made part of this document, and has
recommended approval; and
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa:
Section I Approval. Property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of
Neighborhood Public (P1) to Planned Development Overlay Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1) zone
Chautauqua Heights Addition Bilk 6, Except lots 5-9 (Lincoln Elementary)
Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning
map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and
publication of this ordinance by law.
Section Ill. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is
hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the
County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owners expense, all as provided by law.
Section IV. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section V. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid
or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section,
provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
Section VI. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and
publication, as provided by law.
Passed and approved this day of 20_
Mayor
Approved by:
Ordinance No.
Page 2
Attest: fiV
City Clerk City Attorney's Office �� J
Ordinance No.
Page
It was moved by and seconded by_
Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
Botchway
Cole
Mims
Salih
Taylor
Thomas
Throgmorton
that the
First Consideration 01/02/18
Voteforpassage: AYES: Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas,
Throgmorton. NAYS: None. ABSTAINED: Botchway. ABSENT: None.
Second Consideration _
Vote for passage:
Date published
56
Prepared by Jann Ream, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240: 319-356-5120
Ordinance No. 18-4735
An Ordinance Amending Title 14, Zoning Code, Article 56, Sign
Regulations, to Broaden the Sign Allowance and Illumination
Requirements for Institutional Uses in Residential, ID and OPD zones,
and To Allow Plastic Trim Cap Channel Letters for Signs above the 5th
Story on High Rise Buildings.
Whereas, it is the purpose of the Zoning Code Sign Regulations to enhance and protect the
physical appearance and safety of the community, to protect property values and the character
of neighborhoods, and to preserve Iowa City's areas of natural, historic, and scenic beauty; and
Whereas, the Sign Regulations are further intended to provide fair and equitable treatment for all
sign users; to allow for creative design; to encourage economic development; to distinguish
between areas designed primarily for auto oriented commerce and areas designed for residential
living or pedestrian oriented commerce; and to establish a reasonable period of time for the
elimination of nonconforming signs; and
Whereas, the Sign Regulations seek to allow adequate communication through signage while
encouraging aesthetic quality and creativity in the design, location, size and purpose of all signs;
to establish limitations on signs that are appropriate to the land, building or use to which they are
appurtenant and are adequate for their intended purpose while balancing the individual and
community interests.
Whereas, to achieve these purposes, it is reasonable to allow trim cap letters on signs above the
5' story in CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones, and
Whereas, to achieve these purposes, it is reasonable to allow Institutional uses in certain
residential zones to have two signs, including a masonry wall sign, allow fascia signs up to 12
square feet, and allow internal illumination for one sign; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed changes to the sign
ordinance and recommends approval; and
Whereas, these amendments satisfy the purpose of the sign regulations and are in the public
interest.
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that:
Section 1. Approval. The Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City is hereby amended as
follows:
A. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Chapter 5, Site Development Standards, Article B, Sign
Regulations, Section 8, Signs Permitted by Zone by:
1. Deleting A(1)b and replacing it with the following:
Institutional uses in ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted two identification signs from
the following types: fascia, awning, canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. One sign
for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. All
other nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification
sign from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
2. Deleting B(1)a and replacing it with the following;
Principal uses, other than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one
identification sign from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
Institutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following sign types:
fascia, awning, canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. One sign for an institutional
use may also include copy announcing its services or activities.
3. Amending Table 513-1- Sign Specifications and Provisions in Residential, ID and OPD
Zones by:
a. Deleting the Fascia sign section and replacing it with the following:
Fascia ID -RS, RR -1, RS -5,
signs' R2 -8, RS -12, RNS-
4 sq. ft., except
Institutional uses are
allowed 12 sq. ft.
ID -RM, RM -12, RM- 12 sq. ft.
20, RNS-20, RM -44,
PRM
b. Inserting the following after "Integral signs':
height: Top of first
Limited to identification only,
except as allowed for institutional
uses
Not allowed for single-family and ti
two-family uses
Masonry RD RS, RR-1,RS-5, 12 sq. ft. 1 f less than the height of the
Wall signs RS-8,RS-12, RNS- masonry wall.
12, ID -RM, RM -12,
RM -20, RNS-20, Limited to institutional uses.
RM -44, PRM
c. Deleting footnote at the end of the table and replacing it with the following:
1. See subsections A(1)b and B(1)a of this section for the number of signs
allowed.
4. Deleting E(4) and replacing it with the following:
Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited.
Internally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited, except as specifically allowed
in Table 513-4.
5. Amending Table 5B-4, "Sign Specifications and Provisions in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -
10 Zones" by deleting the Fascia sign section and replacing it with the following:
rFascia signs Square footage equal
to 1.5 times the length
of the sign wall
B. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Chapter 5,
Regulations, Section 4, Construction and
and replacing it with the following:
No longer than 90% of the
length of the sign wall, sign
band or storefront, whichever
is most applicable to the
location of the sign
Back lit cabinet signs, where
the entire face is illuminated,
are prohibited
Internally illuminated plastic
trim cap letter forms are
prohibited except for buildings
of more than 5 stories when
the sign is above the 5t' story.
Limited to identification only.
Site Development Standards, Article B, Sign
Maintenance Requirements by deleting E(1)
1. Except for signs in the ID and residential zones, all permitted signs may be
internally or externally illuminated. All signs permitted in ID and residential zones
may only be externally illuminated with white light, except that institutional uses in
the PRM zone may have one sign internally illuminated.
Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudicated invalid or unconstitutional.
Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and
publication, as provided by law.
Passed and approved this 2nd day of January , 20'18.
:4=
Ma r
Ap/'Vved b�
ATTES
Cit Clerk ity Attorney's Office
Ordinance No. 18-4735
Page 4
It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas
Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
I M11
NAYS: ABSENT:
Botchway
Cole
Mims
Salih
Taylor
Thomas
Throgmorton
First Consideration 12/19/17
Voteforpassage: AYES: Dickens, Mims, Taylor, Thomas,
Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
Second Consideration _
Vote for passage:
that the
Date published 01/11/18
Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be
considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the
meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second
consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final
passage at this time.
AYES: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole.
NAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
r
r `l .per 01-02-18
CITY OF IO'VVA CITY 5b
X� MEMORANDUM
Date: October 27. 2017
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist
Re: Continue discussion of an amendment to City Code Section 14-513-8E, Sign Standards in the
Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South
Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above
the fifth story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high rise buildings.
Introduction:
During the Planning & Zoning Commission's October 19, 2017 meeting, the commission voted to
separate approval of the proposed amendments to the sign code and to consider the proposed
amendment to CB zones and certain delineated Riverfront Crossings zones at the next meeting. The
commission chair, requested more information concerning how other municipalities similar to Iowa City
regulate signage on high rise buildings.
History/Background:
The memo for the October 19, 2017 meeting explained the circumstances for staffs recommendation
that plastic trim cap letters be permitted above the 5t' story of a building in the CB and certain Riverfront
Crossings zones. During discussion, the commission was informed that the code allows illumination,
either external or internal, for wall (fascia) signs no matter where they are placed on the building. The
proposal before the commission was to allow plastic trim cap letters as a sign type for wall (fascia) signs
when they are above the 5th story of a building. Currently, that type of channel letter is prohibited in CB
and certain Riverfront Crossings zones because they are not appropriate for pedestrian oriented
storefronts.
The commission chair expressed concern about the illumination of these letters on the high rise buildings
downtown and in Riverfront Crossings. The chair requested information on how other municipalities,
similar in size and type to Iowa City, regulate this signage. Several municipalities were researched with
the results as follows:
Davenport: Population -102,612
Lighting is not specifically regulated in Davenport except for a maximum brightness in candelas (foot-
candles). The height of wall (fascia) signs in the downtown is not limited and they can be internally
illuminated. Roof signs are permitted and a roof sign is allowed on a building of any height and can be
internally illuminated.
Dubuque: Population — 58,531
In general, there is no height limit for wall (facia) signs and internal illumination is allowed. Dubuque has
very few high rise buildings. Most of their downtown is a historic district where signage is heavily
regulated — internal illumination on any sign in the historic district is not permitted.
Cedar Falls: population — 41,390
Cedar Falls has no typical high rise buildings in their downtown area. Their sign code does not regulate
lighting except to ban flashing or animated signage and making sure that any light (except for that
emanating from the sign itself) does not reflect onto adjoining premises. They allow roof signs and wall
(fascia) signs are allowed to cover up to 33% of the sign wall.
Sioux City, IA: Population 102,612
Sioux City allows roof signs but not in their downtown area. Wall (fascia) signs have no height limit and
allow internal illumination anywhere within the city. Size of wall signs is determined by street frontage.
October 27, 2017
Page 2
Staff has determined that not all internally illuminated channel letters are trim cap letters so sign installers
and their clients do have alternatives.
Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
For CB zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters in CB zones but only when the building is more than 5
stories.
7 4l
John Yapp, Develop ent Services Coordinator
I
�'�CITY OF IOWA CITY
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 13, 2017
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist
Re: Consider approval of amendments to City Code Sections 14-513-4E, Illumination
Requirements, City Code Section 14-513-BA8&13, Signs permitted in ID, OPD and Residential
zones and 14-513-8E to increase the size and type of signs for institutional uses; and Sign
Standards in the CB zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park,
South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs
above the fifth story
Introduction:
Residential zones: Over the past several months, several Religious Group Assembly uses in various
residential zones have applied for sign permits or inquired about what type of signage their church would
be allowed to install. Review of the sign code has revealed that signage for these uses in residential
zones is limited both in size and number of signs permitted. So much so that a majority of churches in
residential zones have existing signage that does not comply with our current code. Staff finds that both
the existing signage and the requested signage is not unreasonable, and therefore recommends
approval of the amendments.
CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones: In October of 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission
considered and approved several amendments to the Iowa City Sign Regulations in order to better
implement the recommendations of the Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and to
bring the sign code into compliance with a U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the regulation of.
signage. This was a significant revision of the sign code regulations and, with any significant revision, the
application of those changes can reveal unforeseen consequences and unwarranted limitations for
certain situations.
History/Background:
Residential Zones: Currently, in residential zones, signage for an Institutional Use such as a church
(Religious Group Assembly) is limited to one (1) sign from the following sign types: facia (wall sign),
awning, canopy or monument. In the single-family zones, facia signs are limited to four (4) square feet
and monument signs are limited to twelve (12) square feet per side. In multi -family zones, facia signs are
limited to twelve (12) square feet and monument signs are limited to twenty-four (24) square feet per
side. Churches in single family zones are not uncommon and most have both a monument sign and a
sign on the building wall which is not in compliance with the current code. (Note: the symbol of a cross is
not considered signage.) An exterior wall of a church sanctuary is generally a large wall of more than one
story. Most churches in residential zones are non-compliant with the sign code and already have larger
signs.
October 13, 2017
Page 2
Additionally, design trends for newly built churches include larger sites that incorporate retaining walls or
masonry walls at the entrance to the site. Masonry wall signs are currently not permitted in residential
zones but could be an appropriate sign type in certain situations.
Illumination Requirements: Internal illumination for signs is not permitted in residential zones. This makes
sense for single family zones and even for most multi -family zones. An internally lit cabinet can be
distracting and out of place in most residential zones.
The PRM zone is a high-density multi -family zone. There are just a few areas in Iowa City with this
zoning designation: along the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque street corridor between Davenport and Jefferson,
south of Highway 6 West near Carver Hawkeye arena and small pockets south of Burlington Street in the
Riverfront Crossing district (likely to be rezoned to a Riverfront Crossings zoning designation upon
redevelopment). Two recent sign permit applications were for Religious Group Assembly uses in the
PRM zone in the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque corridor. In both instances, the religious uses found the
maximum allowed size (24sf) for a new monument sign to be acceptable but were unhappy to learn the
new sign could not be internally illuminated — especially since the new signs were replacing existing
internally illuminated monument signs. Internal illumination for a sign for an institutional use in a PRM
zone would most likely only occur in the N. Clinton -N. Dubuque street corridor. Given the proximity of
commercial uses and the fact that these institutional uses have had internally illuminated signs for many
years without any complaints, it seems reasonable to allow Institutional Uses internally illuminated signs
but only in PRM zones.
CB and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: The new sign code amendments have been in place for
several months and, as with any broad change to zoning regulations, deficiencies are revealed when
applied to real world situations. The regulation under consideration is the prohibition of plastic trim cap
channel letters. Attached is a specification sheet that demonstrates what constitutes a plastic trim cap
letter. The prohibition of this type of channel letter was a recommendation incorporated in the Downtown
District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and then amended into the city's sign code. The design and
fabrication of plastic trim cap letters necessitates that they are a large letter and geared toward vehicular
traffic. This type of letter was considered inappropriate for the pedestrian oriented downtown storefronts.
Both staff and the design firm hired to create the storefront and sign guidelines for the downtown district
believed that prohibiting this ubiquitous sign type downtown would stimulate better and more creative
signage for downtown storefronts. However, not every building in the CB zones is a small pedestrian
oriented storefront. Additionally, the sign regulations for the CB zones also apply to several Riverfront
Crossings subdistricts (South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East
Side Mixed Use subdistricts). Development in the Riverfront Crossings- South Downtown includes two
high rise hotels and a high rise condominium building. Additionally, the Sheraton Hotel on City Plaza will
be re -branding itself in the coming year. These uses lend themselves to a larger sign appropriate to the
building size and the use. Attached are examples of proposed signs for these uses — all of which include
plastic trim cap channel letters. The proposed signage is appropriate to these taller buildings and is
typical of what is allowed in other jurisdictions. Given that the size of the signs is now controlled by the
fagade width, staff believes allowing trim cap channel letters in these limited situations is acceptable.
Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and
residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase
the maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4)
allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
October 13, 2017
Page 3
For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the
fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner as the CB
zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
John Yapp, Development Sdrvices Coordinator
A. Sign Standards For ID And OPD Zones:
1. Permitted Signs:
a. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one
small identification building sign and one integral sign, as specified in table 513-1 of this section.
b. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification sign.
The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
For-ilnstitutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following types: fascia, awning,
canopy, tT�
monument or masonry wall sign. --One sign for an institutional use may also include
copy announcing its services or activities. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-
2016)
c. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -1, and ID -RP zones must comply with the sign
regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this
section.
d. Residential uses in any OPD zone are permitted signage in accordance with the requirements of the
underlying residential zone. Nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are
permitted signage in accordance with the sign regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign
Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this section.
2. Sign Specifications And Provisions:
a. All signs for residential uses in the ID and OPD zones are subject to the standards specified in table
5B-1 of this section.
b. All signs in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are subject to the standards specified in table 5B-1 of this
section.
c. All signs for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -I, and ID -RP zones are subject to the standards
specified in table 513-2 of this section.
d. In the OPD zone, all signs for nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are
subject to the standards specified in table 56-2 of this section. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008)
B. Sign Standards For All Residential Zones:
1. Permitted Signs:
Principal uses, other than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one identification
sign. The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument
sign. €er Institutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following sign types: fascia
awning, canopy, monument and masonry wall sign. the One sign for an institutional use may also
include copy announcing its services or activities.
b. Parks and open space uses are permitted entranceway signs as specified in table 5B-1 of this
section.
c. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one
small identification building sign and one integral sign as specified in table 513-1 of this section.
d. One monument sign is permitted at each street entrance of a subdivision or development of two (2)
acres or more. The maximum sign area is thirty two (32) square feet per side - may be double faced
for a total of sixty four (64) square feet - maximum height is five feet (5). All other monument signs
are permitted as specified in table 58-1 of this section.
2. Sign Specifications And Provisions: All signs in residential zones are subject to the standards
specified in table 56-1 of this section.
Table 5B-1: Sign Specifications And Provisions
In Residential And The ID And OPD Zones
Permitted
Signs
Awning
signs'
Canopy
signs
Zone
ID -RS, RR -1,
RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
ID -RS, RR -1,
RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Maximum
Sign Area
12 sq. ft. or 25% of
awning surface,
whichever is less
Sign cannot exceed 90%
of street -facing canopy
length and no more than
15 inches in height
Maximum Height And
Special Provisions
Maximum height: Top of
first story
Limited to identification
only
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
Signs may be mounted on
the face of the canopy,
upright on the top of the
canopy or underneath the
canopy. Signs mounted
on the face of the canopy
may not extend beyond
the edges of the canopy.
Signs mounted on the top
of the canopy or
underneath the canopy
must consist of individual
letter forms and may not
extend more than 15" in
height above or below the
canopy. The bottom of the
canopy or any letter forms
attached underneath the
canopy must be, at
minimum 8' above the
level of the adjacent grade
Canopy signs may not be
illuminated
Directional ID -RS, RR -1, 2 sq. ft. per face
signs RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS- May be double faced for
12, ID -RM, total area of 4 sq. ft.
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Entranceway Allowed for For signs located above Maximum height: 20'
signs parks and
or across the top of the
open space
subject archway, the
Up to 1 sign per facade of
uses in any
area of the sign may not
the subject archway
residential
exceed 25% of the area
zone, ID
delineated by the subject
The sign may not contain
zone, or OPD
archway
changeable copy
zone
For a sign located on the
Sign copy may not extend
side of the archway, the
beyond the edges of the
area of the sign may not
entranceway structure
exceed 33% of the
surface area of the side
Minimum clearance height
of the archway support
is 10' for entranceway
on which the sign is
signs across driveways
located. (See section 14-
and 8' for entranceway
5B-7, "Measurement
signs across walkways
Standards", of this
Entranceway signs are
article.)
not allowed if the subject
lot or tract already has a
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5'
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM- May be double faced for ` Limited to identification
44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. 'only, except as allowed
monument sign located at
the subject entrance
Fascia
ID -RS, RR -1,
4 sq. ft.
Maximum height: Top of
signs
RS -5, RS -8,
Institutional uses are
first story
RS -12, RNS-
allowed 12 sq. ft.
12
Limited to identification
only, except as allowed
ID RM, RM-
12 sq. ft.
;for institutional uses
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM-
Not allowed for single -
44, PRM
family and two-family
uses
Integral signs
ID -RS, RR -1,
2 sq. ft.
Up to 1 of these signs is
RS -5, RS -8,
allowed per building
RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
No permit is required
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Masonry Wall
ID -RS, RR -1,
12 sq. ft.
1 f less than the height of
signs
RS -5, RS -8,
the masonry wall.
RS -12. RNS-
12, ID -RM,
Limited to institutional
RM -12. RM-
uses.
20.RNS-
20,RM-44,
PRM
Monument
ID -RS, RR -1,
12 sq. ft. per sign face
Maximum height: 5'
signs'
RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS-
May be double faced for
Limited to identification
12
a total area of 24 sq. ft.
only, except as allowed
for institutional uses
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5'
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM- May be double faced for ` Limited to identification
44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. 'only, except as allowed
Small ID -RS, RR -1,
identification RS -5, RS -8,
signs RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
2 sq. ft.
for institutional uses
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
The sign must be a
building sign
Up to 1 of these signs is
allowed per building
No permit is required
Note:
1. Only 1 sign is permitted; 1 fascia sign, 1 awning sign, 1 canopy sign, or 1 monument sign except
for institutional uses (See subsections Alb and B1a of this section.)
E. Illumination Requirements: Illuminated signs must conform to the following requirements: (Ord.
08-4319, 11-3-2008)
Except for signs in the ID and residential zones, all permitted signs may be internally or externally
illuminated. All signs permitted in the ID and residential zones may only be externally illuminated
with white light except that, in the PRM zone, one sign for an institutional use may be internally
illuminated. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016)
2. Illumination through the use of exposed lamps or inert gas tubes is allowed, provided the exposed
lamp does not exceed eleven (11) watts or that an inert gas tube does not draw more than sixty (60)
milliamps. When inside frosted lamps or exposed lamps with a diffusing screen are used, no lamp
shall exceed twenty five (25) watts.
Illumination through the use of LEDs is allowed only as specified for electronic changeable copy. All
signs using LEDs must have installed ambient light monitors and must at all times allow such
monitors to automatically adjust the brightness level of the electronic sign based on ambient light
conditions. At no time shall the sign be operated at a brightness level greater than the
manufacturer's recommended levels. The electronic changeable copy must be monochromatic. It
must utilize a dark background with only the message or image lit in a single color.
4. Artificial external light sources used to illuminate a sign face must be located and shielded such that
the bulb is not directly visible from any adjacent residentially zoned property or public right of way
and must use a narrow cone of light that does not extend beyond the illuminated sign face.
5. Illumination on a property, including illumination from signs, must not exceed 0.5 initial horizontal
foot-candle and 2.0 initial maximum foot-candles as measured at any point along a property
boundary that is adjacent to or across the street from properties that are zoned residential, CN -1, or
CO -1.
6. All illuminated signs are subject to the provisions of the electrical code, including any permit fees.
7. Permit applications for electronic changeable copy signs must include a copy of the manufacturer's
operating manual, including any recommended standards for brightness and other display
operations.
8. For electronic changeable copy signs, whether the sign is programmed from the site or from a
remote location, the computer interface that programs the sign shall be made available to city staff
for inspection upon request. If the computer interface is not immediately available, the sign shall
cease operation until such program can be provided. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008)
E. Sign Standards In CB -2, C13-5 And CB -10 Zones:
1. All signs in the C13-2, C13-5 and CB -10 Zones are subject to the standards specified in table 513-4 of
this section.
2. The maximum sign area for each type of sign, special provisions, and any restrictions on the number
of signs allowed are specified in table 5B-4 of this section. Unless specifically limited in table 513-4 of
this section, any number of signs may be installed.
3. Signage for residential uses must comply with the requirements for residential uses in the RM Zones
as stated in table 56-1 of this section.
4. Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited. and
ilnternally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited except as specifically allowed for fascia
signs in Table 56-4 (Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016)
Table 513-4: Sign Specifications And
Provisions In The CB -2, CB -5 And CB -10 Zones
Permitted
Signs
Awning
signs
Banner
projecting
signs
Maximum Maximum
Sign Area j Height
25% of awning surface
Same allowances as
I upper level projecting
signs
Top edge of first
story awning
Same
restrictions as
upper level
projecting
i signs
Provisions
1 Each storefront is
allowed up to a total of 3
signs from the following
sign types: canopy
signs, awning signs, and
projecting signs. Awning
signs are only allowed
on first story awnings
Note: See subsection
14 -3C -3C of this title for
awning and canopy
design standards
Only permitted on
multiuse buildings where
access to uses is
primarily through a
common lobby from the
street such as an indoor
shopping mall or where
a single use occupies a
large multi -story building
Standards"; of this
article.)
Fascia signs Square footage equal to
1.5 times the length of
the sign wall
Flags --
i
i
Freestanding 12 sq. ft per linear foot of
signs lot frontage, not to
exceed 40 sq. ft. per
sign face
20'
across walkways
An entranceway sign is
not allowed if the
property has a masonry
wall sign, monument
sign, or freestanding
sign
No longer than 90% of
'the length of the sign
wall, sign band or
storefront, whichever is
most applicable to the
location of the sign
Back lit cabinet signs,
where the entire face is
illuminated, are
prohibited
Internally illuminated
plastic trip cap letter
forms are prohibited
exceat for buildings of i
more than 5 stories '
when the sign is above p
the P story.
Limited to identification
only.
1 additional flag may be i
displayed in conjunction
with any city, county,
state or federal flags +
No permit is required
(Allowed only in the CB -2
IZone
Only 1 freestanding sign
is allowed per lot
Allowed only through
approval of a minor
Channel Letter Trim -cap
Channel Letter Trim -cap
CHANNEL LETTER TRIM- CAP is the most widely
used signage material in the world. It is first-class
aluminum coated with plastic, which enjoys the
features of firm, elastic and seamless.
It can be easily made into any channel letter and
logo. It has thoroughly changed the static effect of
traditional crone signs, cutting down the cost and
time involved and improving the level of signage
making. 20mm(J shape) and 26mm(Arrow shape)
are available.
Width 20mm1314'1
46M11508e0lRoll
- -
JT -301A
Mack
JT -305A
Red
JT -306A
aloe
_
JT -307A
Green
JT -308A
Chrome
JT -309A
Gold
JT -312A
Purple
JT -313A
Yellow
JT -314A
Omnge
JT -316A
Whae
JT -316A
Brown
JT -317A
Gray
Widtl126mmn'1 45Mn SMetO toff
Lk4301 Black
LM -305 Red
LM -306 Blue
LM -307 Green
LM -308 Chrome
UX309 Gold
LW312 Whhe
1A4313 Yellow
LW314 Orange
LM -315 Purple
LM -316 &own
LW317 Gray
Trim -cap roll
Trim cap samples
Are you looking for wider than 26mm trim cap? Our Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy°
should be suit to your needs for channel letter making.
Aluminum Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy®
Find out the products at http://www, pansign.com/products-49. htm for more details
SIGN SPECIFICATIONS
TAI .6tBA11Wie6Lflle83
Li6hllrq LW j
WIM6a 3Bp
oe.MMolbReavuiAcrNki
iRf Mer:NMN I
1Mnm Cala: PeMtBMck I
61nww10ob:6Mck 1
MMalMbrt rALurro RaW ,
I61-ILLBM6MRUt
tWh LIED
voBepeM
BeawMAl Fae it JAarykl
Na tear. MMe.mn T.Itlrnrt NRN
Aaabd Nat 6uiMee Ilea Mee eeawl
Netun Celv:. 10 MMcn aaae3
TMmap CMd:6MM ro Meth Races
MataletloRAwn roxaB
3M ML CAMS
1:3630-016 M!66.a
L 3836-V BMCe
3:363X74 elaeaual pang
4:363 311Baw616&ue
4:38 14SUpll Bepe
e: 383X118 Ilrtrt'/ebw
h.383p101ught66At Fumpem Blue
6:3836-13BUme 8lem
em66sed day New lll>BI
61066666 MBtlt Vi6N rMrS-1
rT H YA T T P L A F F=
m MI
i�P�BLOCKI
0➢IPA
Rise HyaH
bwa Clty.IA
8ea8BM
uR• R��RgMI 4 Ya
1
smaLo�na. VBrlous
LL -01
i C6 Lelttan
' 79295
col
W.fNT•be..
cw HYATT PLACE
EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
BRANDING
Site ID / Center No.:
Iowa City , IA
Location Name:
Hyatt Place at Iowa City
Street:
435 South Linn Street
City, State:
Iowa City, IA
Zip:
52240
EI A E C 0 D IE
9 f H � t
W-------------------------------------------------------------------- I.
eilr� � ]
w I _�A°a--�-----1�_I _ _C
r I --el
FRONT VIEW
MODEL
"COLOR DETAIL"
■
BLACK; SERIES 2590-22
3M 3630-22
YIELLOW [ SERIES 2500-2244A
3M VF0719
■ LAVENDER O SERIES 2500-3146
AVERY AB/60-T
BLUE, SERIES 25902529
3A13630147
PISTACHIO r SERIES 2WO-2157
3M 3530.149
ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LOGO $ LETTERS
ORANGE t SERIES 2500-M
3M 369084
LINE ARM a SERIES 2100-M
® APRINO GIVEN r
SERIES M440 (361 9510150 LVII e6• S
SERER 25802202 (3M MISS) LVd Seen
(1IAVROFe'«5
UGIT 8111E ALWAYS APPLIED
AS A DFRISER FOR THE POGO
® ARLON LACK /S154RFACE LAI'PERF.VWYL 0 FILLERr ALMVANAIJOD®SAINR
MODEL #2
19' 5118'F318-
23/4'
31W
33/4'
8"
19'-101/2'116
3/8-
37
• 25 3/8' 8 7/16'
35V
4518-
5-
105/8'
26'-6"
22"
56'
3/4' 1114'
4314'
61/8"
6112'
141/4"
35'4"
287/8"
100'
3f 38' 2 5/8'51R'
6 7/8'
7 Irt
39'-9'
32 3/4'
126'
• 2 1/4' 14'
6'
7 314'
81/8'
17 3/4
44•-2'
36'
156'
50 518' 615116'
7114'
9 3116'
10'
21 318
53"118"
M'
224'
56' 8 W6'
7 718" 10 5/16' 10 718"
23 9116 58'•5 IN
47 718'
274'
• 63 318' 21" 83/8-
9"
11518"
12114"
26 5/8'
667T
54 118'
350'
"F • •
(a HYATT PLACE
EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
BRANDING
Site ID / Center No.:
Iowa City , IA
Location Name:
Hyatt Piam at tows city
Street:
435 South Linn Street
City, State:
Iowa city, IA
Zip:
52240
.. Y�T+rIf Y%'trt,� `Y,,L•�yP �'��#�..,�t;:.. _., a Y.. .., L _._ ..._
L41%'
it
a
t N
r
S iNlEa fAB. fiLO1FJN'1MCAlGLL ♦' RDUNDNEAO SS SCKW
YNNIFDUWM_MMI00®MTWFWSH PAI ' TQ MAT
nIVETEe 10 N1 AIKKIM.aW{NG PAINTED iO'MATCN FILLER
NSOE FAIrlIEDRFF4ELINFY.}EIE '•'-Fa Y�.� CLFM LEIJNSNN
AM
WYZ•}i Crt6.®•I9SCK
CEYENOE➢MO 1, EDGE
•• ., "'SCI�YFDTEF DA
11?TW. NJtOm FACE fI9. iPOAI yg' VFF&AFTE ONFIRSTSEELFACE
! .1W iWLCLFMNU$IWO -' Eµt V'NYL AFPLIEOON FlRST SURFACE
(♦ :y.. ;'t W VWYE MMTS WACF • �BUWACE. SEE COLOR OETAR.
HY.a1RE1V �� .. BEECOLORBETAIe VMlE LED..
• 1. LUN . K. FOOT
� Fll'{AA%1'LG NI[!%MBP/iEA TVNVOt MnCM POa
jf: M.T9DIM WNL
y • ` RW[:MO4FOA1F61VROOF PPR
tm Ll[BBP6i TOOT � . � 2Raw..i RRAMFPFANF
L6
' YA1w®1 NDE
Y5M16MFD6rETN1FCgWf ATfMMtlEOFPMr
MOWMIBrOM _ AN
RX" tLL
!••V • 11EAwG FAB. FaaMOOW'aELW 4uFLw_[IbLEaMI
+ l.� "' 4Y.t1YMRFYB
"• :'M• FNFOFLAl.RN1YAN➢DffO MIIN FWW
_ ''BFIQAMDWKIFDI0
'•). • Af NW. MfM9
Fm RILPIED WIIF
' • . �• T9P'wA ]rriwc
A•' 31 X CLG NONLCRROSKFATTENEA 5.6.YY9{}1 W'LO.MO
41FWG4F gTEwFAS
Mae: lMDI{
Fwe.:.RwT ngpoaa By oUen
SECTON LOGO tECFrOFt LEFFEna
NTS FRS
it
FAM
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 2, 2017 — 7:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carolyn Dyer, Ann Freerks, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Max
Parsons, Mark Signs, Jodie Theobald
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Jann Ream
OTHERS PRESENT:
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
By a vote of 7-0 the Commission recommends approval of an amendment to City Code
Sections 14 -5B -8E Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown,
University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow
plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
• •-6
Freerks called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
CODE AMENDMENT:
Discussion of amendment to City Code Sections 14-513-8E Sign Standards in the Central
Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert
and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high-rise buildings.
Ream noted that the Commission requested more information on illumination on the high-rise
building signs. So Ream prepared a map to show where the existing high-rise buildings are and
also where others are proposed or already built. The map shows how the high-rise buildings
are concentrated in the downtown and south downtown Riverfront Crossings area. Next Ream
spent time walking the areas and driving in her car to get an idea of the viewsheds for these
high-rise buildings from surrounding neighborhoods. She showed some Google images (not all
completely up-to-date) and pictures she took herself to give the Commission some idea of what
the viewsheds look like. Ream found that the buildings skyline are exclusively visual from the
arterial streets (Burlington, Gilbert, Dubuque, Clinton and Washington Streets). There is a small
area while on Riverside Drive where one can look across the river and see the buildings. Ream
also noted that due to the topography (and vegetation) of the area and the existing buildings in
the area the viewsheds of the high-rise buildings can change drastically (from completely
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 2, 2017 —Formal Meeting
Page 2 of 4
obscured to viewable in half a block). Ream added that when viewing the MidWestOne
Building, the sign on that building would not be allowed in the new zoning standards, it would be
at least one-third smaller.
Freerks asked about the 1.5 times the size of the side of the building standard for signs and is
that for each side or the building as a whole. Ream stated it is for each side, each sign wall is
treated separately.
Freeks stated her appreciation that Reams went out and walked and drove the area to be able
to show the Commission a real feel for how the area looks.
Ream stated as requested she looked at what other communities allow and one of the things
that surprised her was how many communities allowed roof signs, and illumination of roof signs.
She looked at four communities in Iowa, cities of a fairly similar size, plus she looked at both
Burlington Vermont and Boulder Colorado because they are both of similar size and university
towns with similar ped mall areas. Neither of those two communities allow high-rise buildings.
The tallest building in Boulder allowed is 55 feet (5 stories) and in Burlington it is 65 feet.
Hektoen added that the issue of illumination is not pending application so if there is a majority of
commissioners that wish to pursue this further it could be added to the worklist and proceed
from there.
Freerks opened the public discussion
Seeing no one Freerks closed the public discussion
Hensch moved to recommend approval of an amendment to City Code Sections 14-513-8E
Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University,
Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow
plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
Martin seconded the motion.
Freerks understands the amendment was to allow the plastic trim caps but wanted to use the
opportunity to learn more and open the conversation and to let City Council know that some of
the commissioners have concerns or thoughts of how it might affect things in the future.
Freerks would rather plan than react.
Theobald noted that she likes the community of Lacrosse Wisconsin and how they have created
their riverfront. However at this point Iowa City is already further down the road and these
conversations should have been at the beginning. In Lacrosse it appears there is a historic
overlay over the entire downtown and all the signs must be wood or metal and cannot be backlit
to be kept with the historic nature of the buildings.
Ream noted that Dubuque Iowa had the same requirements.
Signs stated he was intrigued by Ream's comment that Boulder does not allow high-rises and
has building limits of 55 feet. His thought was that "ship has sailed" here in Iowa City, we have
driven the prices of land up so high that one cannot afford to not build up high. Signs feels the
City will see more and more high-rises because of that new reality. Ream added that Boulder
passed their height ordinance in 1971.
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 2, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 3 of 4
Hektoen added that in the context of affordable housing Boulder has a pretty serious affordable
housing crisis.
A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 19, 2017
Theobald moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 19, 2017.
Parsons seconded the motion.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0.
PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION:
Freerks noted that in the Staff memo there were a number of places where it stated
"Commission Chair expressed" or "Commission Chair requested" and asked that in the future
that is not used so there doesn't appear to be a bias or so that others will not be afraid to say
something or ask something in fear of being "called out" in a memo. She added this is a place
for information and that the Commission collectively works as a group. The meeting minutes
will indicated individual's statements and opinions.
Signs noted he will be absent for the December 7 meeting.
Martin will be absent December 21 and January 4.
ADJOURNMENT:
Signs moved to adjourn
Martin seconded.
A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017—Formal Meeting
Page 15 of 21
homes in Iowa City. There just are not enough. Huge numbers of people who work at The
University of Iowa live far away which makes for long commutes and excessive use of cars.
Iowa City really does need housing like this that is affordable. She is prepared to vote for
deferral, but is not opposed to the concept.
Parsons also agrees with the concept, but his one concern might be the flow from multi -family to
single-family. Overall this is a great concept and just needs a little more detail. He is leaning
toward voting for this rezoning, but if they did decide to defer, he is open to discuss some more
of those ideas to work out the kinks. Parsons stated he also thinks the intersection at Gilbert
Street and McCollister Boulevard should be improved before any development happens
because it is a busy intersection.
Parsons noted that the P&Z review limitation period expires before their next meeting and asked
how that would affect things if they deferred consideration of the rezoning.. Freerks said the
applicant could waive the limitation period. She reminded the commission that a three/three vote
would be a denial. Hektoen confirmed that four votes in favor of a rezoning is required for
approval. Freerks noted that the motion was to approve, but it could be withdrawn. Theobald
said she supports the application, but knows good things often come with further scrutiny, so
she could go along with deferral. Freerks said she didn't want the application to languish, but
that it warranted further examination to make sure it was consistent with the comprehensive
plan. She asked if Hensch wanted to withdraw his motion and allow another meeting to allow
more time for the developer to address some of the concerns. Hensch indicated that he would
not withdraw his motion.
A vote was taken and the motion failed with a 3-3 vote. (Freerks, Martin, Dyer opposed).
Signs rejoined the meeting.
CODE AMENDMENT:
Discussion of amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E, Illumination Requirements, City
Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned
Development, and Residential zones and 14-513-8E to increase the size and type of signs for
institutional uses and to allow internal illumination in the Planned High Density Multifamily zone;
and Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University,
Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic
trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
Ream noted that the application is a long description for some very simple concepts they wish
to change in the Code. Most of the requests have been from religious institutions, both existing
and new churches, that brought to light some inadequacies in the Sign Code. As explained in
the memo a facia sign in most residential zones was limited to four square feet and only one
sign was allowed. Most of the churches in Iowa City do not comply with the Sign Code, and not
that permits were issued in error, permits were just never issued. However with the construction
of some new churches and inquiries on what signage could be done it was apparent to Ream
that adjustment needed to be made to the Sign Code. The proposed change is not great, 12
square feet is not a large sign but having a 12 square foot sign on the wall of the church and a
monument sign out closer to the roadway seems to be reasonable.
The second major change is due to having a couple of institutional uses in a PRM zone, which
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 16 of 21
is technically a residential zone. One example is in a high density area near The University of
Iowa and the Northside Marketplace and they were requesting internal illumination for their
small monument signs. One church already had their monument sign internally illuminated for
20 years and when they requested to update and get a new sign they were told it could not be
internally illuminated because it was in a residential zone. However there was no issue for the
20 previous years so the request is to allow internal illumination in PRM zones for institutional
uses only. Ream stated there are only three PRM zones in Iowa City, one over by Carver
Hawkeye Arena and there are no institutional uses there. The other area is in the Riverfront
Crossing District south of Burlington Street and currently there are no institutional uses there
now and if one is built in the future the area would be rezoned Riverfront Crossings which would
allow illuminated signage. So this change will really only affect one PRM zone at this time and
there are two institutional uses in that zone both of which have asked for their monument sign to
be internally illuminated.
Ream reminded the Commission that there was a major revision to the Sign Code last year for
the Downtown Districts based on a consultant group recommending new Downtown District
Storefront and Signage Guidelines. Based on the recommendations for the Downtown Zones
there was a certain type of channel letter that was prohibited (plastic trim cap channel letters).
This recommendation was based on small pedestrian oriented storefronts in the downtown
areas. When that change was made Staff forgot about two things. One, the Riverfront
Crossings Districts, by reference, use the CB Sign requirements. Secondly, not everything that
is going on in the Riverfront Crossings Zone is going to be pedestrian oriented storefronts.
There are three major hotels being built and the Sheraton Hotel is about to be rebranded. Staff
felt that for these large multi -story buildings channel letter signage is appropriate.
Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
• For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID,
OPD and residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for
Institutional Uses; 3) increase the maximum fascia sign -size for Institutional Uses in
single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4) allow internal illumination for one (1)
sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
• For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for
signs above the fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated
in the same manner as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
Freerks expressed her concern with the illumination of signs about five stories and would like to
know how many places in the area will have such signage. She is afraid it could become light
pollution. Her concern is if the need is for wayfinding, but it's not like it would be hard to
navigate throughout downtown Iowa City to get where one needs. It is understandable in a city
like Cedar Rapids where one needs to be able to see the signage from the interstate but that is
not the case in Iowa City.
Hensch agreed and commented that the way people find things such as hotels in modern
society is through smart phones and GPS.
Ream reminded the Commission that at one time the City's sign allowance was 15% of a sign
wall, so on a 14 story building that is 100 feet wide. Freerks disagreed because at that time
there were no 14 story buildings so this is really starting over and a blank slate. Ream agreed
and noted that the City specifically changed that requirement to prevent the sides of those
buildings from becoming billboards. So now the allowance is 1.5 times the width or length of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 17 of 21
side wall. Therefore they have reduced greatly the size of the sign that could be done. Ream
also stated that the plastic trim cap is not the only way to illuminate a channel letter, so by
saying we cannot use the plastic trim cap letters does not mean it will stop the illumination or
fear of light pollution.
Freerks asked if at this time there are any illuminated signs above the fifth floor in any of the CB
zones and Ream confirmed there is not at this time. Freerks is concerned about the impact.
Perhaps there could be language that states the signage cannot be on the side of a building
where residential neighborhoods would see it. She feels illumination of signs this high on
buildings will change the character of downtown.
Freerks opened the public discussion.
Doug Brown (Gloria Dei Lutheran Church) thanked the Commission for their time and
consideration. Gloria Dei has been located at the corner of Dubuque and Market Streets since -
1855 when it was first known as First English Lutheran Church. In 1961 the building burnt down
and was replaced by the existing structure. Sometime after that in the 1990's they installed a
sign on the property facing outwards towards the corner of Market and Dubuque Streets, it is a
backlit sign. Brown is unsure if it was grandfathered in or what process allowed it. Gloria Dei's
location in Iowa City has been cherished by past and present members of the Iowa City
community through visits on Sunday morning and social media. They continue to enjoy
connecting with people who remember going to church here as a child, where they were
married, where they celebrated baptism and confirmation, or attended during their college
years. One of their oldest members, having completed a lifetime of mission work, joins them
from Asia every week on their Facebook Live broadcast.
They are committed to open their doors to new and existing members and past and present and
future. A year ago, in 2016, Gloria Dei reaffirmed their commitment to remain in the downtown
Iowa City area with a $1 million renovation project. The project included updating their electric,
HVAC, and sound systems along with updating their classrooms and lounge areas. Most
critically they updated their kitchen facilities. They use this updated kitchen for their culinary
ministry with the goal of providing food and community events for the Iowa City area. They
believe and remain committed to their role and presence in downtown Iowa City. Most recently
they hosted a pig roast which raised $3,000 and half the proceeds to benefit world hunger relief
and the other half to local food banks.
While churches across the country are experiencing a decline in membership, Gloria Dei's
membership remains steady. As a part of their communications outreach they have also
expanded their digital role in reaching out to the community as well (smart phones). In the past
years they have updated their website, established active social media channels with Facebook,
Twitter, YouTube and other channels. Being in the downtown area over the years has proven to
be challenging at times. Their identity is being lost in the maze of buildings that are evolving
around them. It is difficult for anyone to know who they are and what they are by their physical
location. If one is driving downtown on Dubuque Street they might not even notice the building
or the building sign set back on the property. Their focus on providing an updated sign is to
help them reach out into the community, their intent is with a new backlit sign to provide a fresh
look to the property and to engage the community to let them know the doors are open and
welcoming. Brown thanked the City Staff for all their efforts on the church's behalf and
appreciate the willingness to review their present circumstances.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 18 of 21
Freerks thanked Brown for keeping Gloria Dei in the downtown community area
Freerks closed the public discussion
The Commission discussed approving part of the recommendations but allowing for more
discussion and comment on the allowance of plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
floor.
Signs moved to recommend amendments to City Code Sections 14-56-4E,
Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-BA&B, Signs permitted in Interim
Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones.
Parsons seconded the motion.
Signs explained that his motion is to allow the Staff recommendation for Residential, ID and
OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and residential zones; 2)
Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase the
maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet;
4) allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
Freerks agrees with this and is in favor.
Parsons feels that signs are more for advertising and people really use smart phones for
navigating.
A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0.
Theobald moved to defer a decision on the Staff recommendation for CB zones and
certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner
as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
Parsons seconded the motion.
Ream asked for clarification on what the Commission would like this amendment to be. Freerks
noted she feels there needs to be more discussion regarding allowing large lit signs on 15 story
buildings. Ream stated that the signs are already allowed, this amendment was just to allow a
certain type of channel letter that isn't currently allowed. Freerks noted her concern is not
knowing how frequently this type of signage can occur, it sounds like it could be over the whole
area if it were redeveloped with five story and taller buildings. Ream said she can inform the
Commission where they see these types of signs being requested and it's mainly for hotels and
tall large one -tenant buildings (such as the MidWestOne Building). So how many signs would
be requested depends on how much of such development would occur in that area. Right now
the only controls are the size of 1.5 times the fagade length and the type of channel letter that is
allowed. Freerks agreed, but noted that could allow fora 34 foot sign on the hotel so perhaps
this is the time to discuss how signage is really used and what is necessary but yet won't be
light pollution.
Martin asked if there has ever been cases where lit signs had to be shut off by a certain time of
night. Ream said it hasn't ever been in the City Ordinances. Signs agreed that would be an
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 19 of 21
interesting concept. Ream noted that a hotel would say that their guests arrive at all times of
day/night. Martin added that she does rely on signs to find places, especially at night when it is
hard to use her phone.
Pat McAllister (Nesper Signs) noted that the issue is allowing trim cap that has nothing to do
with illumination. Trim cap only defines how the edge of the letter will be done, and with higher
elevations one will not be able to see if it is plastic or metal trim cap, the plastic is just easier to
form the letters. As far as illumination goes, according to Code there are all types of illumination
allowed and that is a different topic for a different time.
Signs noted that when looking at the big picture of what downtown is transitioning to with the
taller buildings and more urban look he has less of an issue with signs and illumination. The
light pollution issue goes with an urban area and living in an urban environment means dealing
with urban issued.
Freerks understands that point but also wants to make sure it is palpable for the surrounding
neighborhoods. There needs to be a balance. Freerks is interested in knowing how
communities the size of Iowa City (not Des Moines or Cedar Rapids) address their lighting
standards on taller structures.
Signs would also like to see a map that would indicated what areas are affected by tall building
signage.
Miklo stated this issue would be placed on the next agenda for discussion.
A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 5. 2017
Parsons moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 5, 2017.
Signs seconded the motion.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0.
PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION:
Theobald asked about the fireworks sales item discussed at the last meeting and questioned
the area on the west side that isn't zoned industrial but has a temporary industrial permit (the
old Menards) would that be able to be a fireworks sales area. Miklo said it would not.
Freerks would like to re -implementing work session meetings prior to major items such as
tonight so the Commission has time to ask more questions and get more details before
decisions are made.
ADJOURNMENT:
Signs moved to adjourn.
lM'6
MIN
11u1 Ilii ii
EXISTING HIGH RISE BUILDINGS:
Ecumenical Towers
259 Iowa (AKAR building)
Jefferson Hotel
Plaza Towers
201 @ Park
Sheraton
Century Link
Midwest One
Hilton Garden
UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR PROPOSED
The Chauncy
The Rise
7 S. Linn
Element (Hieronymous property)
316 S. Madison St
Legend
Untitled Map \
Washington St near College Green Park �V �. �, Hawk City Productions
n.
000
�Ga i1
✓x rer W
n.
4A
.. �1�_i 1 _lU� n I
'MINS"Ili �if ��l l�l� i�.,, �.�1�
� q
.�,�, i
MtlMrrJ ..
�" �
_� �
� ��
n y
e "�`. �t Yf i �t � 4 �
.;, � ����
.� -- ��
fk
A
/30
I
E1
W.
�l
Alw
201
i k.
fill
-lit
f
r.
,
•q •+ aaw� area
a4a '.\Ia
E• Jeff@f5(
1_
(.,,I
0/A
r
2017/10/30
iIa��11
�1+r
�31`Y
mm
2017/10/30
few. � — 'y��7y.' • * �4 Val ol
,d
pan&,C—.com
. a�frt..:� �n.MN rner mmau warm. x�
rm.ror svmmx
ExMla III
upn[eo. Cn.nmr umr Vr DsV
�p rau m.vur<e�ra..nml Lnmr my
oNW.r svBelrc .1 mer 1. mort a CriC enn elnp Xacnlnc ,.,J "j,
opw coowl r.N
SIpn SW Vu[x CXMINFIIm f C. p
r '+� NC• flit
iCI. umM6xCllt iy` 1 01 .tl ,
M.BnRk 5M1w1 �in a
h
XOItletl Oerspex .M1Vm1911v a 1er::1"::,1'1 If MCI-a'ial ue-.
LVmlmacmce jil r xlOnx rin.q:-i nVc.
EMbpIVmF<xMF Meleverdr�gna�x- 9-).N A— n DI air ana'a.l,.
u01mn0 lx i.lre 0pmmr uMI xmne,- Iusf...
LN—.,: ]6mn: „I .._. .rov: I- amu x.,m KIWI
rucsmN.r
wpnwels
NIKILNpxy ANLL
COrwl
CNk $M1wl
tlumN �rTlm-
r op
IIVNHI MMS WII
WMNIWN
rmar.ue Nen
NIDI LRGr
are wp ue+els N.INw Nan xnvn da» «pva. w..r L.„, eoa. ranm5m
.�..rase.la N. wurrruw.aumm xr..r m.rlr,.
5^ Alumen
Returns
1 Siam Neal
U.L. Appr
Electsobt
tlauslmi
M 1'4'
Drain Mo
erylie
1^ Trim
Cap
`r
Prepared by: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565022
ORDINANCE NO. 18-4736
Ordinance amending Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1,
entitled, "Definitions," to exclude small employers from the definition
of employer, matching State code.
Whereas, the Human Rights Ordinance (Title 2 City Code) presently defines an employer as
a person who employs one or more employees;
Whereas, State law currently exempts as an "employer' any person who regularly employs
less than four individuals ("small employers");
Whereas, when the Human Rights Ordinance was updated in August 2008 to remove small
employers from liability in employment discrimination claims, the definition of "employer" was not
modified;
Whereas, the Human Rights Department believes the change should be made so the
definition of "employer" mirrors the State; and
Whereas, it is in the best interest of the City to adopt this amendment.
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa:
Section I. Amendments.
1. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions," Section 1,
entitled "Definitions" is hereby amended, removing .the words "who employs one or more
employees," as follows:
Employer: Includes any person, wherever situated, who solicits individuals within the city to
apply for employment within the city or elsewhere. The term includes the city itself, and to the
extent not inconsistent with state law, all other political subdivisions, public corporations,
governmental units conducting any activity within the city and public agencies or corporations.
Section II. Repealer. All Ordinances and parts of Ordinances in conflict with the provision of
this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval
and publication, as provided by law.
Passed and approved this 2nd day of January , 2018.
42n 4<- ;gss��
MAVOR Approved by:
ATTES12eCet
CITY CLERK City Attorney's Office
—1�-
Ordinance No. 18-4736
Page 3
It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas that the
Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS
ClUIRTIM
Botchway
Cole
Mims
Salih
Taylor
Thomas
Throgmorton
First Consideration 12/19/17
Vote, for passage: AYES: Thomas, Throgmorton, Botchway,
Cole, Dickens, Mims, Taylor. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
Second Consideration _
Vote for passage:
Date published 01/11/18
Moved by Mims, seconded by Taylor, that the rule requiring ordinances to be
considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the
meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second
consideration and vote be waived and -the ordinance be voted upon for final
passage at this time.
AYES: Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas.
NAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
r 1 CITY OF IOWA CI1-02-18
�r� COUNCIL ACTION REPO
December 19, 2017
Ordinance amending Title 2 entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1, entitled
"Definitions" to exclude small employers from the definition of employer,
matching State code.
Prepared By: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator
Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager
Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney
Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendations: Staff: Approval
Commission: None
Attachments: Ordinance
Executive Summary:
The current Human Rights ordinance does not include a small employer exemption in its
definition of "employer". State code includes such an exemption. The Human Rights ordinance
was updated in August of 2008 to reflect this exemption in the area of employment
discrimination but the definition of an employer was never updated to reflect this exemption.
The Human Rights Department wishes to mirror this change in the definition of employer.