The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-01-05 OrdinanceItem Number: 10.b. �r CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org January 5, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 196.17 acres of land located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Rd. from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) zone. /_1iETSI:ILTA 121ZIII & I Description Staff Report with Attachments P&Z Minutes Ordinance Conditional Zoning Agreement To: Planning & Zoning Commission Item: ANN20-0001/REZ20-0002 GENERAL INFORMATION: STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Date: October 15, 2020 Applicant: MMS Consultants 1917 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA 52240 319-351-8282 I. sexton 0)mmsconsultants.net Contact Person: Jesse Allen Allen Homes, Inc. 215 N. Linn St. Iowa City, IA 52244 319-530-8238 allenhomesinc(a�gmail.com Property Owner: Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust James T. Carson Revocable Trust Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust Steven M. Carson Requested Action: Annexation & Rezoning Purpose: Annexation of 196.17 acres of land currently in unincorporated Johnson County and rezoning it from the County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) zone to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID -RS). Location: Location Map: Size: West of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Rd. 196.17 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Farmland, County Residential (R) and County Urban Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K Residential (RUA) North: County RR -1 — Neighborhood Public (Farmland) South: County R — County Residential (Farmland) East: RS -8 and RM -12 - Medium Density Single - Family Residential (Residential) and Low Density Multi -Family Residential (Residential) West: County R — Neighborhood Public (Farmland) Iowa City/Johnson County Fringe Area Agreement Southwest District Plan — Single-Family/Duplex Residential; Open Space NA July 30, 2020 N/A since associated with an annexation The applicant, MMS Consultants, with the consent of the owners, is requesting annexation and rezoning of 196.17 acres of property located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Road. The applicant has requested that the property be rezoned from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development Single -Family (ID -RS) for the entire 196.17 acres. This area is located adjacent to Iowa City's current boundary and within Fringe Area C of Johnson County's Fringe Area Agreement with Iowa City. The Southwest District Plan shows this area within the City's growth area with a future land use of single-family residential and duplex housing at a density of 2-12 dwelling units per acre. A northern portion of the property (shown below in Figure 1.0) is shown as having a future land use of open space, surrounding a lake for stormwater detention. The City's 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan includes the extension of the Abbey Lane trunk sewer in its list of funded projects. Per the plan, construction is scheduled for 2023. The extension of the sewer will allow development to continue west of Highway 218. In anticipation of this trunk line extension, Planning staff is currently in the process of updating the Rohret South Subarea portion of the Southwest District Plan, which was adopted in October 2002. The Rohret South Subarea includes a concept plan (Figure 2) for the area contemplated for annexation. With the update to the plan underway, the vision for development, including the general intended land uses, street network, and storm water management system, will likely change from what is currently shown in the adopted plan. The applicant has been informed of the potential for change to the existing subarea plan. 3 Figure 1.0 — Subject Property within the Rohret South Subarea Future Land Use Map SOUTHWEST PLANNiNC DisTR1CT Rohm Soath Subarea h Legend laLge i �L it—[ Rew.A..W I.,- ilry[l h liOl4. F mils Anl 11 KN I-IMn•-,.pp _!arxrr h •hm (k,rl�pnnm 14frnrpl f 7.p RPI$ � •r— ,�y:fi,. - �n�.e gra.? ��.mt H•iir: � -%0l.N—id l — 1. �,11ttn•i ��IIIIxL•�'1�[ ri Figure 2.0 — Rohret South Subarea Concept Plan As of this writing, the applicant has not conducted a Good Neighbor Meeting. ANALYSIS: Annexation: The Comprehensive Plan has established a growth policy to guide decisions regarding annexations. The annexation policy states that annexations are to occur primarily through voluntary petitions filed by the property owners. Further, voluntary annexation requests are to be reviewed under the following three criteria. The Comprehensive Plan states that voluntary annexation requests should be viewed positively when the following conditions exist. 1. The area under consideration falls within the adopted long-range planning boundary. A general growth area limit is illustrated in the Comprehensive Plan and on the City's Zoning Map. The subject property is located within the City's long-range growth boundary. 2. Development in the area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing an undue burden on the City. The Southwest District Plan identifies the subject area as being appropriate for annexation and development upon provision of sanitary sewer and water services. The City's 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan identifies the extension of the Abbey Lane trunk sewer line (Rohret South Sewer) as viable for construction in 2023. The purpose of the trunk sewer line extension is to accommodate residential development that has been planned in the Rohret South Subarea of the Southwest District Plan. 5 The Comprehensive Plan encourages growth that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods to reduce the costs of providing infrastructure and City services. The subject property is bordered by the city limits on the north and east sides (across from Highway 218). Therefore, the subject property is contiguous to current development and meets the goal of contiguous growth. The proposed annexation will help to accomplish the City's larger goal of fulfilling the need for expanded housing options to accommodate the City's growing population. Because of this need, staff is recommending that as a condition of the rezoning, the developer satisfy the Comprehensive Plan's Annexation Policy requirement, as stated in Resolution 18-211, related to affordable housing. The policy requires annexation of land for residential use of 10 or more dwelling units satisfy the City's goal of creating and maintaining a supply of affordable housing by providing affordable units equal to 10% of the total units in the annexed area, with an assurance of long-term affordability. 3. Control of the development is in the City's best interest. The property is within the City's designated Growth Area. It is appropriate that the proposed property be located within the city so that residents of future development may be served by Fire, Police, water, and sanitary sewer service. Annexation will allow the City to provide these services and control zoning so that the subject area remains compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, upon annexation, the City will be able to guide future development of the area's road network and subdivision design to meet the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. For the reasons stated above, staff finds that the proposed annexation complies with the annexation policy. Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned County (R) Residential and County (RUA) Urban Residential. The County (R) zone allows for single-family residential dwellings to be built in the subject area, while the County (RUA) zone allows for multi -family residential at a density of up to four units per acre. The Southwest District Plan currently calls for single-family and duplex residential throughout the subject area. Because of the subject area's location in Iowa City's Fringe Area within the growth boundary, all development in this area must be constructed to City standards and it is unlikely that development would occur prior to annexation. The applicant is requesting rezoning of the subject property to Interim Development Single -Family (ID -RS) for all 196.17 acres of the property. The purpose of the Interim Development zone is to provide areas of managed growth in which agricultural and non -urban land uses can continue until the City is able to provide services to support development. Under this zoning, the only use that is permitted by right is agriculture. Low density single-family residential development at a density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres is also allowed. The applicant is currently exploring options for subdividing and developing the property. Interim zoning is appropriate for this property since it is currently not served by City sanitary sewer and water. Additionally, the proposed layout of development is still undetermined. Sanitary Sewer and Water: The subject area is currently not serviced by City sanitary and water utilities. The City currently has extension of the Abbey Lane trunk sewer line to the subject area within its 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. It is unlikely that this area will be serviced by sanitary sewer, and therefore suitable for urban development, before 2023. The nearest water main is located north of the subject property, along Rohret Road. The developer will be required to pay a water main extension fee of $456.75 per acre before public improvements are constructed. M Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property does contain a blue line stream. The stream will need to be incorporated into future development plans and may trigger a Level I or Level 11 Sensitive Areas Review upon subsequent rezoning. The Office of the State Archaeologist did state that an archaeological surface study should be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities, as the potential for intact and significant archaeological sites is moderate. It is expected that this survey will take place closer to subsequent rezoning and development of the subject area. Access and Street Design: Since the proposed rezoning is only for Interim Development Single -Family residential (ID -RS), the applicant does not yet have a design for street access and interior street connectivity on the subject property. These designs will become available for analysis upon subsequent rezoning and platting of the property. It is anticipated that access to the area will come from Rohret Road, north of the subject property. As the area continues to develop, access to the west and south will need to be provided. Staff hopes to have more direction on access and street design of the subject area upon completion of the Rohret South Subarea plan update. NEXT STEPS: Pending recommendation of approval of the proposed annexation and rezoning from the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council will hold a public hearing. Before the public hearing, utility companies and non -consenting parties will be sent the application via certified mail. Pending approval of the annexation by the City Council, the application for annexation will be sent to the State Development Board for consideration of approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ANN20-0001 and REZ20-0002, a voluntary annexation of approximately 196.17 acres and a rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) with the following conditions: 1. The developer satisfies the Comprehensive Plan's Annexation Policy, as stated in Resolution 18-211. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annexation Exhibit 2. Location Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Applicants Statement 5. Steve Carson Statement 6. Approximate Timeline of Annexation Approval Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP Department of Neighborhood and Development Services / 3 HUNTERS RUN A5 REG D IN PLAT f5o 22 AT PAGE 53 OF THE REG 5 Of THE JOHNSON COUNT REG R"S OFFICE <FN ARROW ESTATES RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 36 PAGE 254 OF THE REC0RP5 OF THE 01IN50N GGUNTY RECORDER"5 OFFICE I Oho `>�� o& 4 I �� HUNTERS RUN SUl!)DIVISION AS REGORPLP IN PLAT- BOOK 22 AT PAGE 53 OF THE RE60RPS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER"S OFFICE I NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19-T79N-R6W OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND 5\8" REBAR W\ YELLOW PLASTIC "MMS" CAP BOOK 41 AT PAGE 93 N89'26'11 "E 33.00' N44'43'20"E 146.90' N00'00'29"E 33.00' 0 N 0 co N .z z O U w L� O Q D O V) w Q H O z w H U_ O w z J H NLLJ AUDITORS PARCEL "A„ AS RECORDED IN PLAT f,OAK32 AT PAGE 14 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE '26'11 "E AUDITOR'S PARCEL AS REGORPEP IN PLAT 6 AT PAGE 181 OF THE FE OE JOHNSON GGU RECORPER'S OFFICE Q PARCEL "5" PLAT f500� 30 AT PAGE 70 AUDITOR'S PARCEL 98129 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40 AT PA&E 17/o OF TI1E RECORDS OF THE JOHN52N COUNTY REGORPER'5 OFFICE (� W Poi �> 6>�DOO 9810 \ 00<, 41 G F THORD5 NTY ---------- AUDITOR'S PARCEL 98129 AS REGORPED IN PLAT EOGK 40 AT PA&E 1766 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON GGUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OR ?E \ RO 6� 6i NORTH LINE OF THEINORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19 LEGEND AND NOTES ANNEXATION EXHIBIT A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA OWNERS: JAMES T CARSON REVOCABLE TRUST REBECCA ALBERTSON REVOCABLE TRUST THOMAS L CARSON & LINDA A CARSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST STEVEN M. AND MARY BETH CARSON 3207 ROHRET ROAD IOWA CITY, IA 52246 IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 800 LINCOLN WAY AMES, IA 50010 0 20 50 100 150 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "=200' i 2617.53' N0 v \\g X00 ANNEXATION 8,545,327 SF N89'22'07"E — — 1325.39' — N89'22'07"E APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: PLAT PREPARED BY: ALLEN DEVELOPMENT LLC ERIK SITTIG MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PO BOX 3474 119 WRIGHT STREET 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52244 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 N89'4419 E 737.85' — N N89'44'19"E 590.39' NORTHEAST CORNER NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE O \ �j S NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19 T79N-R6W �/�� R8� OF c4 V OF THE FIFTH P.M. A SECTION 20-T79N-R6W a N OF THE FIFTH P.M. w FOUND IDOT. MONUMENT o2c" W\ 1\2" REBAR FOUND CUT "X" O I BOOK 38 AT PAGE 218 0 BOOK 38 AT PAGE 259 I w ID 0; C �X, w " O bo � �V � Ld o c'J LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE - CONGRESSIONAL CORNER, FOUND hAFaFir Q rPEN��n 1 OLL=CT I_� Le lie / n � e - CONGRESSIONAL CORNER, REESTABLISHED \ - CONGRESSIONAL CORNER, RECORDED LOCATION RRI - PROPERTY CORNER(S), FOUND (as noted) O - PROPERTY CORNERS SET ASFSEV.l-45—�-f _ .ABER 1,11E, R53 (5/8" Iron Pin w/ yellow, plastic LS Cap embossed with "MMS" ) 0 - CUT "X" S: - PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES — — - CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES - - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - — - CENTER LINES - LOT LINES, INTERNAL - Nr .r - LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED — — — — — — — — — — - EASEMENT LINES, WIDTH & PURPOSE NOTED - ------------ - - - - - - -- - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES, PURPOSE NOTED (R) - RECORDED DIMENSIONS (M) - MEASURED DIMENSIONS C22-1 - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OWNERS: JAMES T CARSON REVOCABLE TRUST REBECCA ALBERTSON REVOCABLE TRUST THOMAS L CARSON & LINDA A CARSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST STEVEN M. AND MARY BETH CARSON 3207 ROHRET ROAD IOWA CITY, IA 52246 IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 800 LINCOLN WAY AMES, IA 50010 0 20 50 100 150 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "=200' i 2617.53' N0 v \\g X00 ANNEXATION 8,545,327 SF N89'22'07"E — — 1325.39' — N89'22'07"E APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: PLAT PREPARED BY: ALLEN DEVELOPMENT LLC ERIK SITTIG MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PO BOX 3474 119 WRIGHT STREET 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52244 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 N89'4419 E 737.85' — N N89'44'19"E 590.39' NORTHEAST CORNER NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE O \ �j S NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19 T79N-R6W �/�� R8� OF c4 V OF THE FIFTH P.M. A SECTION 20-T79N-R6W a N OF THE FIFTH P.M. w FOUND IDOT. MONUMENT o2c" W\ 1\2" REBAR FOUND CUT "X" O I BOOK 38 AT PAGE 218 0 BOOK 38 AT PAGE 259 I w ID 0; C �X, w " O bo � �V � Ld o c'J LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE — G _ F<Q l 2> \ hAFaFir Q rPEN��n 1 OLL=CT I_� Le lie / n � e ttv��-�� fl J wE9ER r�rrer+raR N -\=�'C]ENBGH D P [. iNGD RRI zOnLE. J rEA �u�I R55�.,.� ASFSEV.l-45—�-f _ .ABER 1,11E, R53 NORTHEAST QUARTER OF pLA£N�JF` RM12 W{SLOW :.REEK . ANNEXATION PARCEL S: cn p F__J_ p oo \ \ \ IV a �,x 70 iP P _ Him ti - Nr .r LLJfro ' ESCORT LN.. "�P 00 �C<: 0 ° . �j\ V w �� O DESCRIPTION -ANNEXATION PARCEL X: 0 � w �� A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST o Q QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST o QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL Cn o UJ \L OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: of o Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 79 North, Range 6 �� West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S89°18'06"W, along the South Line of OO \ o said Northeast Quarter, 2651.04 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof; Thence N00°00'29"E, along the M z \ West Line of said Northeast Quarter, 2610.20 feet; Thence N44°43'20"E, 46.90 feet, to a Point on the North ARC L � X00 a X00 � 00� z � I > 1 CENTER OF SECTION 19-T79N-R6W OF THE FIFTH P.M. SET 5\8" PIN W\ YELLOW PLASTIC LS CAP 17916 I 2651.04' N SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST I OUARTER OF SECTION 19 S89.18'06"w 196.17 AC 1325.35' U J NORTHEAST CORNER Line of said Northeast Quarter; Thence N89°26'11"E, along said North Line, 2617.53 feet, to the Northeast U) Corner THE Corner thf; ThN89°44'19"Elon the North Line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Q SOUTHWEST QUARTER thereof; Thence , along w OF THE Quarter of Section 20, Township 79 North, Range 6 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, 737.85 feet, to its NORTHWEST QUARTER I OF intersection with the Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line of Highway #218; Thence S48°04'02"E, along said SECTION 20-T79N-R6W OF THE FIFTH P.M. Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line, 793.23 feet, to its intersection with the East Line of said Northwest Quarter FOUND IDOT. ALUMINUM of the Northwest Quarter; Thence S00°01'48"W, along said East Line, 630.90 feet, to its intersection with the w306.03' S87'35'06"W, MONUMENT North Line of Lot 1 of Kitty Lee Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 28 at 314.87'(R) �- �.,� Page 3 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S87°35'06"W, along said North 1 00 o NN °or 1 ZnLine, 306.03 feet, to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 1; Thence S01°42'33"W, along the West Line of said Z � SUBDVISION ^o ' Lot 1, a distance of 144.26 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the Northwest Quarter of the �— 1017.56'(M) 1017.33' R) ss9 4719"w Z Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; Thence S89°47'19"W, along said South Line, 1017.56 feet, to the ( S89'47'19"W 'I SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 1 309.98' — — Southwest Corner thereof, and the Northeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of NORTHEAST CORNER said Section 19; Thence S00°00'12"E, along the East Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast OF THE Quarter, 1318.50 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Annexation Parcel contains 196.17 Acres, and is SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE subject to easements and restrictions of record. NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19-T79N-R6W OF THE FIFTH P.M. m FOUND 5\8" REBAR W\ RED PLASTIC100LS CAP O(�_ KITTY LEE SLAT 1V0 <, 2e �O \ "BRITT'S FIRST ADDITION" z 1\ Vi AS RECORDED IN PLAT P00T 28 m v� AT PAGE 3 Of THE RECORDS, OF O THE JOHNSON COUNTY \ �� 0 �� ° RE ORDER'S GFFIGE C rri OA.P. 2012092 N Oo IIVv�n `l�JlOv rn DO ° Oo�o IMI nO D �`vVVVV D ;;7 0 \ ri 0 o Fill \ ;;aAS RECORDED IN PLAT DOCK 35 AT PAGE 259 OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING r=n REGORDs of THE JOHNSAN GAUNTY REG°BEER'S I OFFICE N SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE D U) 1 rn ° NORTHEAST QUARTER OF C 0 rn rn 0 \ \ SECTION 19-T79N-R6W OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND IDOT. MONUMENT W\ 1\2" REBAR BOOK 31 AT PAGE 178 cn p ;;a --A A O m p oo \ \ \ N CO m A0 Io g Z � I\ 10 — WRID DQ�I��DDD�DOo 1 �0� AS RECORDED IN PLAT 600rC 49 AT PAGE 322 OF THE REGARDS OF THE JOHN50N COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE 10 I � I , M RA on CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revision ANNEXATION EXHIBIT A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date: 07-29-2020 Designed by: Field Book No: RLA 1291 Drawn by: Scale: RLW 1 "=200' Checked by: Sheet No: GDM Project No: IOWA CITY 7596-107 af: 1 .® l Nd mo CITY OF IOWA CITY (r w{LU RANIE� - ,� OO�F1 gv�YO Q� � t maw# y ASCADE /^`' d 'Ile W r +P . - rABBEY LN 01 { If '� = RUSHMORE DR -Z' C ity.,�.i M its - owl -pow- 1 — IV Ar - ,.. , : ,19►' - ' • '` l AF N VIEW DR let dit A_ / L.x `•rte • .• t s f. `�.._ ' Tn 4dr1 -, 41 C f' co UJ V r J. r T' O }.; •f w. - f �^ EARL RD fir _ •y 'six yA d �"# t i ' Re - �� ON f:UJ LULJ .� t DE SEK B LVD LN SW X/1 d � a , i �e 7. I4 An application submitted by MMS Consultants, on behalf of Allen Development, LLC for the annexation of 196.17 acres of property p p p Y located West of Highway 218 and South of Rohret Rd. and rezoning .;+�•.? �� of the subject property from County Residential R and Count xr4 y Urban Residential(RUA)to Single FamilyInterim Development(ID-RS). I - * due to new software implimentation there are 2 cases labled REZ20-02 * due to new software implimentation there are 2 cases labled REZ20-02 W. 9 L v C C CL C X a� v C no C W 'S U M1917 & Gilbert Street Iowa City. Iowa 52240 M MMS consultants Inc. 319.351.8282 mmsconsultants_net Experts in Planning and Development Since 1975 mms@mmsconsultants.net July 30, 2020 City of Iowa City Planning and Community Development Attn: Anne Russett 410 E Washington Iowa City, IA 52240 RE: Carson Annexation Dear Anne: MMS Consultants, on behalf of Allen Development LLC, would like to request an annexation for the property south of Rohret Road and west of Highway 218, please see attached Annexation Exhibit for exact location. The property is currently owner by Thomas L Carson & Linda A Carson Revocable Living Trust, James T Carson Revocable Trust, and Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust. Ownership is anticipated to be transferred to Allen Development LLC. The property is currently within Johnson County and is zoned residential. The applicant is proposing an annexation into the city limits of Iowa City. The property is within the growth area of the City of Iowa City, and is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is requesting Interim Development zoning due to infrastructure not being available at this time. As infrastructure becomes available, the applicant intends to develop the property into new neighborhoods, in compliance with City planning documents. The property immediately to the north of the described parcels is within city limits, is currently zoned RR -1 and is also owned by Thomas L Carson & Linda A Carson Revocable Living Trust, James T Carson Revocable Trust, and Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust. This property is also anticipated to transfer ownership to Allen Development LLC and be developed in conjunction with the property being requested for annexation. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact myself or John Yapp. Respectfully submitted, Jon Marner, Partner 7596-107L1.docx c.ARSON FARM Steve Carson, Mgr. 3207 Rohret Rd., Iowa City, IA 52246 (319)400-3427 August 8, 2020 Urban Planning Staff City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240 RE: Annexation of Carson Property To Urban Planning Staff: This letter is in support of the annexation by the City of Iowa City of approximately 1.95.0 acres of land owned by the Carson family in the Southwest District of Iowa City. The requested annexation of the property conforms with the projected development outlined in the 2002 Southwest District Plan for the Rohret South Subarea. This acreage appears to be the next logical area for city expansion to the west of US Hwy 218 and south of Rohret Road without skipping over other undeveloped property. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Steve Carson Targeted Annexation/Rezoning Timeline (timeline subject to change): • Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting— 10/15/20 • Mailing applications to utilities and non -consenting parties — 11/05/20 • Mailing public hearing notices — 11/05/20 • Setting of Public Hearing by City Council — 11/17/20 • City Council Public Hearing — 12/01/20 • City Development Board Submission — 12/04/20 • City Development Board Meeting — 01/14/21 • Annexation Approval — 02/15/21 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 15, 2020 —7:00 PM ELECTRONIC FORMAL MEETING FINAL MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Nolte, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Ray Heitner, Sarah Hektoen, Kirk Lehmann, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Luke Newton, Jon Harding, Jon Marner, Chant Eicke, Ryan Wade, Jeff Clark, William Means Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission set a public hearing for November 5, 2020 on an application to amend the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan, to expand the West Riverfront Subdistrict to include approximately 3.16 acres south of Myrtle Avenue, west of Riverside Drive, north of the Iowa Interstate Railroad, and east of Olive Street. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 3.1 acres of property located at the corner of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and Camp Cardinal Road, across the street from 80 Gathering Place Lane from Neighborhood Public (P-1) to Community Commercial with a Planned District Overlay (OPD/CC-2) subject to conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, provision of a 15 -foot -wide utility easement along the property's east side. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, payment of $5,000 toward the upgrading of approximately 25 feet of Camp Cardinal Road that is adjacent to the subject property that does not meet City standards is made. This amount is based off of Camp Cardinal Road being a collector street, and the applicant contributing 25% of the cost of the approximately 25 feet of the road that needs to be improved to the north property line. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of VAC20-0001 a vacation of 0.06 acres of Camp Cardinal Road right-of-way north of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and west of Gathering Place Lane in Iowa City. By a vote of 4-2 (Martin & Nolte dissenting) the Commissions recommends approval of ANN20-0001 and REZ20-0002, a voluntary annexation of approximately 196.17 acres rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) with the following conditions: 1. The developer satisfies the comprehensive plans annexation policy, as stated in Resolution 18- 211. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of VAC20-0002, a vacation of the St. Mathias Alley right-of-way south of North Dodge Street and east of 1120 North Dodge Street in Iowa City, Iowa with the amendment to just include the western tip of the alley right-of-way. By a vote of 5-1 (Townsend dissenting) the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street from High -Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multifamily Residential (PRM zone subject to the following condition: 1. Substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 if any PRM bonus provisions or minor adjustments are requested for the property. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-005, a proposed amendment to the zoning code to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multifamily Residential Zones (PRM) for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure, as illustrated in attachment one of the staff report. CASE NOS. ANN20-0001 AND REZ20-0002: Applicant: MMS Consultants Location: West of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Rd An application submitted for an annexation and rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) zone for approximately 196.17 acres of land currently in unincorporated Johnson County. Heitner began the staff report showing an aerial view of the subject property, it is located to the City's immediate southwest. It is a pretty big piece of land at 196.17 acres. Heitner said the current zoning is split zone with County Residential and County Urban Residential, which is one of the more denser County zoning designations. He next showed a map of the growth area and noted the entire subject property is within City's growth area. Heitner stated the entirety of the rezoning would be to Interim Development Single Family Residential (ID -RS). Heitner showed the concept plan from the current Southwest District Plan. The Plan envisions this area as an array of single-family housing units, some open space and a detention lake running through the middle of the subject property. Regarding the annexation, staff looks at the Comprehensive Plan and established growth policy to guide decisions regarding annexations. The annexation policy states that acquisitions occur primarily through voluntary petitions filed by property owners and the Comprehensive Plan states that voluntary annexation requests should be viewed positively when the following conditions exist. First, the area under consideration falls within the adopted long-range planning boundary. Heitner reiterated that is clearly the case here as the entirety of the subject property is within the City's growth area and annexation of this property is anticipated. Second, development in the area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing an undue burden on the City. Heitner did point out that this property is not serviced by sanitary sewer, but the City does have in its Capital Improvement Plan an allocation to extend sanitary sewer to this area projected for 2023. Heitner reiterated this annexation and rezoning would be to an interim zone which is intended as a placeholder until a property can be fully serviced by City services and development on this property will not take place until that sewer extension is provided. Additionally, this property is contiguous to City limits to the north and to the east, although separated by Highway 218, but it is not a leapfrog development being annexed. Third, control of the development in the area is in the City's best interest. Staff reviewed this and noted the annexation will help accomplish the City's larger goal of fulfilling the need of expanding housing options to accommodate the City's growing population. Staff is recommending that a condition of the rezoning be the developer satisfy the Comprehensive Plan's Annexation Policy requirement, Resolution 18-211, related to affordable housing, requiring that any development associated with annexation containing 10 or more dwelling units must have 10% of that development meet affordable housing provisions. In terms of zoning, Heitner reiterated it is currently in a split zone between County Rural and Urban Residential. The entirety of this rezoning would be for ID -RS, single family residential and again the ID -RS zone is to be in place until the City can provide services to support development. With respect to water, Heitner explained there are water mains on the north side of the road and that would probably be the access point for water service to this development. City Engineering staff has confirmed that facilitation of water service is possible upon subsequent developments, the developer will be required to pay water main extension fee of $456.75 per acre before public improvements are constructed. Heitner also noted the property does contain a blue line stream so there is potential for sensitive areas analysis that would accompany any subsequent development. Additionally, staff reached out to the Office of the State Archaeologist and that office recommended that an archaeological surface study be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. Staff is not recommending that that study be a condition of this rezoning, but staff would like to see that study conducted before subsequent development takes place on this property. Heitner noted as common with annexations and interim rezones, the applicant does not have a design for street access or interior street connectivity to the property, those typically become available on subsequent rezoning and planning of the property. The role of the Commission is to determine whether the annexation and rezoning satisfies the following conditions as stated by the Comprehensive Plan's Annexation Policy that the area under consideration falls within the adopted Long Range Planning Boundary and development in the proposed area will fulfill an identified need without imposing an undue burden on the City, and that control of the development is in the City's best interest. In terms of next steps, pending approval from this Commission, Council would hold a public hearing on this annexation and rezoning request. Prior to that public hearing, utility companies and non -consenting parties will be sent the application by certified mail. Pending approval of annexation by Council the application will be sent to the State Development Board for approval as that's a requirement because there are other municipalities within two miles of this annexation request. Staff is recommending approval of ANN20-0001 & REZ20-0002, a voluntary annexation of approximately 196.17 acres rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) with the following conditions: 1. The developer satisfies the comprehensive plans annexation policy, as stated in Resolution 18- 211. Hensch asked if there is any reason to believe the State Development Board would have any objections to this. Heitner is not aware of any, the application fairly straightforward in terms of being within the growth area and being contiguous to the City. Hensch noted it is his understanding that that's really the biggest thing they look at with these annexation applications is whether there's continuity, or whether there's a leapfrog development being proposed so he suspects that the State Annexation Board will support this. Hensch added for the benefit of the newer members, an interim development zoning is just a placeholder and the Commission will see this again when it moves to a permanent rezoning for development. Heitner confirmed the Commission will review subsequent rezonings that take place in this area and said he only showed the concept plan that's currently within the Comprehensive Plan and staff is actually actively involved in doing a revision to that subarea plan for this District Plan so the sketch outlines a rough concept of streets but it's likely that that will be different as staff revises the District Plan here. Hensch also noted as an indicator of the growth going on this area, didn't the Commission a couple months ago approve a plat for north of Rohret, east of Slothower, for some infill development for that area. Heitner confirmed that is just north and west of this subject area. He added there's still a continued demand to develop outward in this area and that is why staff is working through the process of the revision to the sub area plan to make sure they have those goals and objectives for this area in place ahead of when most development takes place, and ahead of development and City service ability in this area. He stated that is something they hope to accomplish within the next year, the current plan is about 20 years old so it's due for an update. Craig noted she was confused when she reviewed this material because of the concept plan showed a huge body of water, but there's no water there in current pictures. She understands now that the concept plan showed in the staff report is from the Plan and the developer has no requirements to doing something that looks like that concept plan, they just have to follow the other guidelines the City has, and they can come back with a plan that has no water in it. Russett noted the maps that Heitner shared are the Future Land Use Map and associated concept for this area that are adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan in the Southwest District Plan so any proposals for development out here staff needs to review against those adopted visions and policies. Staff is currently updating that vision and staff has known that the sewer extension was going to be coming and knew that this area would be opened up for development. Since this plan was adopted in 2002 it's time to revisit it and update it and create a new vision. They anticipate they will have a new plan adopted and any future rezonings will be reviewed against the new plan and that is likely to happen before the development because that isn't going to happen till 2023 when the sewer line is expanded as part of the Capital Improvement Plan. Nolte noticed in one of the concept drawings there was a fire station indicated. Heitner acknowledged that but said that was just conceptualized back in 2002 but that illustration was shown just as a reference there wouldn't be any guarantee that there would be a fire station on this corridor moving forward. Nolte stated that is some of his concern, that road is so heavily trafficked right now. Watts Development is putting in 600 homes to the west, the Weber School is already beyond capacity, and Kitty Lee Road is a is a very narrow chip seal road right now so he doesn't think it's a good feeder road to this development. He would also like to better understand the identified need and if this is the type of housing they're looking for in the future. It appears to be unwalkable urban sprawl and he thought they were trying to get away from some of that. The size and scope of this whole development scares him, he does like the neighborhood commercial for the residents that already live in that area. Signs asked what is a non -consenting party? Heitner replied that would be anyone opposed to the application. Russett added they are specifically property owners within the proposed annexation area. She added for this proposed annexation, there are no non -consenting parties. Hensch opened the public hearing. Luke Newton (MMS Consultants) added that the developer is in conversations with the Iowa City School District to address their needs and concerns. Hensch noted they don't have a full concept yet but asked if there would be a water detention area somewhere. Newton confirmed there would be. Hensch closed the public hearing. Hektoen asked for clarification on the annexation policy is with regards to affordable housing. Heitner clarified that as a condition of the annexation, the developer would be required to abide by the Comprehensive Plan's affordable housing policy related to annexation, detailed and Resolution 18-211 that basically states when new land is brought into the City, affordable housing is addressed in the process. Craig moved to recommend approval of ANN20-0001 and REZ20-0002, a voluntary annexation of approximately 196.17 acres rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single -Family Residential (ID - RS) with the following conditions: 2. The developer satisfies the comprehensive plans annexation policy, as stated in Resolution 18- 211. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch acknowledge this is a little scary as it is a very large annexation, 200 acres almost, and no concept plan, however he really encourage people to look at this for what it is, interim development, and they will see this again. Also, staff is working on the Southwest District Plan so clearly that will change. Hensch wanted to caution everybody to not get too concerned about a concept plan. Signs noted also the process of changing the Southwest District Plan is going to involve a lot of public input and public meetings so the public will be able to weigh in on what they would actually like to see in this area. Townsend added she would just hope that the affordable housing pieces in there stay affordable, not just for 10 years or 20 years. Heitner agreed there would be plentiful opportunities for public involvement and the Commission will see the update as well. Signs noted having been through that process with the South District Plan here a couple years ago, it's extensive. Russett added they are taking a more targeted approach to this update, it's not an overall update of the entire District Plan, they're really focusing on this sub area, and this concept is pretty targeted. Martin noted she is typically not opposed to development, but one of the things that distresses her a little bit is that they are losing more and more farmland and while one of the things that they talk about is affordable housing, but there is also so much food insecurity. Granted the farmland out here is probably corn or soybeans, not something typically people are going to go and eat, but the point is that in the State of Iowa there is so much amazing land that is not used to its full potential. She understands this is going to take years and years to develop but wanted to put it on the record for people to think about the fact that making farmland available to smaller farms, people that are growing food to actually consume, should be at the forefront of conversation more so than just taking these this hundreds of acres and paving it over. Nolte agreed with Martin and is pro -development but stated this just doesn't make sense if they aspire to affordability and walkability and better transit and all those things, they can't just keep sprawling out like this. What good is it to have an affordable housing in a place where one must drive to get anywhere. He is also protective of farmland and realizes people own that land to develop it but it doesn't seem like the right way to grow the community over time. Hensch noted it's a voluntary annexation, so that's important to remember. Also if they don't allow for urban density within the City, then those houses will go somewhere, and then it will end up with one and five acre lots all throughout the County and actually take more land out of out of production. He doesn't know what the CSR (corn suitability rating) on this land is but that's a pretty important consideration, if it is in the 80s that's prime farmland, but if it's the 20s, 30s or 40s then it's production value is pretty low. He suggested perhaps in the future annexations they can be given the CSR listed on the properties. He added he is also responsible for local foods for Johnson County so he is very sensitive to this issue but these farms, like Martin said, are just corn and soybeans, there's nothing here that's going to be consumed by humans, and certainly not going to be consumed locally. He noted that is another issue and as a Commission how can they be proponents of local foods, or foods that humans consume locally, when the problem is land is so expensive in Johnson County that a farmer who's not growing commodity crops is likely unable to afford to purchase land to grow on those non commodity crops. Hensch acknowledged it's very difficult issue and something they probably should take up and have discussions about. Martin noted regarding the one and five acre plots and that taking up more land, when she was sent to New Orleans for a planning and zoning conference a few years back, one of the classes she took was on sustainability in food productivity, and those little lots can produce an enormous amount of food. She acknowledged that is a topic for a different time but just want to put that out there. Hensch agreed but unfortunately, those acres won't be zoned for agriculture or commercial production, so people wouldn't be able to grow crops for sale on those residential lots. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-2 (Nolte and Martin dissenting). DEFERRED INDEFINITELY Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5238 (REZ20- 0002) Ordinance No. Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 196.17 acres of land located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Rd. from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) zone. (REZ20-0002) Whereas, the owners of of approximately 196.17 acres of land located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Road have requested that the land be rezoned from County Residential (R) zone and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID - RS) zone; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Southwest District Plan, indicates that the subject area is appropriate for residential development; and Whereas, interim zoning allows for managed growth until utilities are identified and the land is platted; and Whereas, there is a public need to accommodate demand for affordable housing in Iowa City; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding satisfaction of these public needs through the provision of affordable housing, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, the property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of County Residential (R) zone and County Urban Residential (RUA) zone to Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) zone: A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 79 North, Range 6 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S89°18'06"W, along the South Line of said Northeast Quarter, 2651.04 feet, to the Southwest Comer thereof; Thence N00°00'29"E, along the West Line of said Northeast Quarter, 2610.20 feet; Thence N44°43'20"E, 46.90 feet, to a Point on the North Line of said Northeast Quarter; Thence N89°26'11 "E, along said North Line, 2617.53 feet, to the Northeast Corner thereof; Thence N89°44'19"E, along the North Line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 79 North, Range 6 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, 737.85 feet, to its intersection with the Northeasterly Right - of -Way Line of Highway #218; Thence S48°04'02"E, along said Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line, Ordinance No. Page 2 793.23 feet, to its intersection with the East Line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; Thence S00°01'48"W, along said East Line, 630.90 feet, to its intersection with the North Line of Lot 1 of Kitty Lee Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 28 at Page 3 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S87035'06"W, along said North Line, 306.03 feet, to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 1; Thence S01 °42'33"W, along the West Line of said Lot 1, a distance of 144.26 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; Thence S89047'11 9"W, along said South Line, 1017.56 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof, and the Northeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 19; Thence S00°00'12"E, along the East Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, 1318.50 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Annexation Parcel contains 196.17 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. Section It. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severabilitv. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 20 Mayor Approved �{ Attest: f ✓ ' �1.(7x/ City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen —11/24/2020) Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5238 (REZ20-0002) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"); and Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust, James T. Carson Revocable Trust, Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust, and Steven M. and Mary Beth Carson, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), and Allen Homes, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant'). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 196.17 acres of property located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Road; and Whereas, Applicanthas requested the rezoning of approximately 196.17 acres of land located west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Road from County Residential (R) zone and County Urban Residential (RUA) zone to Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID - RS) zone; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Southwest District Plan, indicates that the subject area is appropriate for residential development; and Whereas, this rezoning creates public needs to accommodate demand for affordable housing in Iowa City; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding satisfaction of these public needs through the provision of affordable housing, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2020) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner and Applicant agree to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust, James T. Carson Revocable Trust, Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust, Steven M. and Mary Beth Carson, are the legal title holders of the property legally described as: A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 79 North, Range 6 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S89°18'06"W, along the South Line of said Northeast Quarter, 2651.04 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof; Thence N00°00'29"E, along the West Line of said Northeast Quarter, 2610.20 feet; Thence N44°43'20"E, 46.90 feet, to a Point on the North Line of said Northeast Quarter; Thence N89°26'11"E, along said North Line, 2617.53 feet, to the Northeast Corner thereof; Thence N89044'19"E, along the North Line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 79 North, Range 6 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, 737.85 feet, to its intersection with the Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line of Highway #218; Thence S48°04'02"E, along said Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line, 793.23 feet, to its intersection with the East Line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; Thence S00°01'48"W, along said East Line, 630.90 feet, to its intersection with the North Line of Lot 1 of Kitty Lee Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 28 at Page 3 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S87035'06"W, along said North Line, 306.03 feet, to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 1; Thence S01°42'33"W, along the West Line of said Lot 1, a distance of 144.26 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20; Thence S89`47'19"W, along said South Line, 1017.56 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof, and the Northeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 19; Thence S00°00'12"E, along the East Line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, 1318.50 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Annexation Parcel contains 196.17 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. 2. Owner and Applicant acknowledge that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2020) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owners shall execute an affordable housing agreement committing to one or more of the following methods to satisfy the annexation policy: i. rent or sell 10% of the total units constructed on the above-described real estate to income -eligible families for a period of 20 years from the date certificates of occupancy are issued for each such affordable unit, to be administered in accordance with Iowa City Code of Ordinance 14-2G-8, or a similar state or federal affordable housing program; or ii. convey 10% of the total units to the City or an affordable housing provider for such affordable housing purposes; or iii. the payment of a fee -in -lieu thereof to the City's affordable housing fund, in an amount established by Resolution 18-213, approved on July 17, 2018, or, if said Resolution has been rescinded at the time Owners apply for a building permit, as otherwise established by Council resolution. 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2020), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this day of 20 City of Iowa City Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Appr ed by: 7 / . City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 11/24/2020) Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust im James T. Carson Revocable Trust Im Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust M Mary Beth Carson Steven M. Carson A Allen Homes, Inc. By: City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ) ss: Johnson County ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20_ by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust Acknowledgement: State of _ County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: James T. Carson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State of County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the James T. Carson Revocable Trust. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) TiUe (and Rank) My commission expires: Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State of _ County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: Steven M. and Mary Beth Carson Acknowledgement: State of _ County of This record was acknowledged before me Mary Beth Carson. Allen Homes, Inc. Acknowledgement: State of cr°`64 County of �o�f4/r ✓ 2020 by Steven M. and Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: This record was acknowledged before me on P'&' 2 7 , 2020 by ��c '#I fed (Name(s) of individual(s) as0 UJ9,4 (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of Allen Homes, Inc. Notary Public in and Or the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) o T 7a-42xon MwumOu 11!611 ~� ' ConuMtjI10 W YA P s My cOMWIS1 n 911" Title (and Rank) My cannlm n 8156% March 8 202T March 8 2022 My commission expires: Iowa Code §414.5 (2020), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject properly is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this day of City of Iowa City Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: City Attorney's Office 3 20_ Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust By: James T. Carson Revocable Trust Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust 0 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: James T. Carson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State often County of I. ea9LE0 This record was acknowledged before me on /6rnlewV..r 30 2020 by �Tw„es C� rsor (Name(s) of individual(s) as fr- Syfe e (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the aures T. Carson Revocable Trust. DEBORAH S ELGIN Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa J 4i Cam ton Numbw 122W7 W !^■ (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State of County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: 16wu Code §414.5 (2820), and b►st saU OvrQtOM $atrsty PdN'L rwcds that arab raawd by Ow.. roq%K*t d mnkV Cfi vW, 5. ]lits Condrtor%,A Zonk,p AWWO M stMatl be &WnW b ba a GW07 enl ny" wtr ith w I0. rd and W& W b Me hnd, end atali MMS M in OA taree and atkpo as A rsorr mid wtilh be to Dw land w &m or urd ra onW d hoard by tha CWy of Iowa Crty. She pmte% fwlher advxm%dgt Ihst Oft apr'60019114 dW V4" b 00 I)OWNI of and Asa ea two m"wo. rapMaaariet vw. wo geewona of"pr ow In dr tAMM1 to subjcdl PMW-Oty is varMterr" scm, redevolcoad. or subovwedl, aft derelopmerA VA OWDI n wdh the tmmt d ttds C.4r+drt.onat Zo" Aprw"m 6. Nothlnq b pill C"vjq W ZonN Ap"meri WON be wnMAx-J tk r11"arc thr; Uosw' from v"Op V wrh ell ether appkc*GA bd. stele. and ladwW rcgut>-ans. 7. itch C rdAronal ZonifV Alir'OWMIll *abe k"Mofah'd by mterencm into Vw ydvuknra reap"nq Do Ply "than upon &RKA O, pnd yW4;nton of the aldrlame. this agoorw *011 1110 re WPW K the Johnson County Reooed s LNfre at Ow. Applr„arg's est ~— w,tcd hLs y'rat 1 t�ma,. 4w+ , zv?o City of TomsCtly Thom" L Cmma"Linda & Carson Re�r:-oceWat.lvinpTrust BttK a T-sayue, Marc Ry. Abba Jemaa S. Canon Revacible Trust Itaia FruafMlnD CLAY Clerk Af powad by: Cay Alio 0 &-T" By, --- Robecica Alb@rtson Revocable Trust By Mary Beth Canon BY. — stave" M. Croon Allen Hems, Inc. ii C41y of taws CNy AcMnowNdgemMk S4ate of Iowa 1 ) ee'. Johnson County ) This IntkwrwM was scknwAUdged before me an _ 20 by SWO Teagw end Kobe FroehbV ea Mom and City Clark, nepscih*, d the City d lows City. NOWY Public eh end for the State of lows Isto ep Orr Soal) Tido (AM Rork) Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Colson Rowwablo Uving Trust Acknowledgement-, Stale 01,Y4,", County d nidi This record was Odowwbdped before me on .* -4 ` 2020 - Tam (Ar(Name(s)dvowduat(s)�g;IrA Uan PYPO of authority, surA sol aRCW or husteo) of Thomas L Careon and UMM A. Carson ReroGablo L+virKt Trust. 4 VP Autry pu6k In and for err SuOe afJawb- ,".qWI Ll. I auMA Acram werwnrvst a.�eoa tStrrorBe+i) GdMt,}SAA roerAr N"I"MARmelt rJ vrar rreA Two (W4 R") k►1 MN, siontypires—liI 2 James T. Gerson Revaerble TnM ACknowledgrnarM $we of _ County of Tm record wos suw*wwdp*d be(are ma oe . 2W by puna) al WKSAAAS) a gyps of aa#wft, wch as offim at rupee) of tie Jima T. Creon Revocable Trust - Nota ry Fumc in W4 far Via Sante of 1pwa [Sorry ar Scor) Trac (0ln Red j My tomrwaAolon eap'rer: Rebecca Alocruon Rrvocab4 Trust AtknowbOgrnaM: State of _ Csxa+ry d TM record was apvwaredpro beeps me on. 2uo by rf s)ollno,AAMO).t (type of aedeafy, troth as rfrgw or Kesler) ol 0* Rrbaoco Atnrloon Ravoca6lr Trent NfAry iR16ko in and roc !w Stullo of Ime (Surae or Saf) Tdr (tlnd Rork) My conn" on 0%0": Mary Beth Carson Steven M. Carson By: Allen Homes, Inc. City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ss: Johnson County ) uj RUA lay, This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20_ by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust Acknowledgement: State of County of This record was acknowledged before me on 2020 by (Name(s) of individuals) as Revocable Living Trust. (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Steven M. and Mary Beth Carson Acknowledgement: State of -,::r Ourk County of 1 j7,Y� This record was acknowledged before me on /VOV OLU 2020 by Steven M. and Mary Beth Carson. and for (Stamp or Seal) `� FNERESAACASWELL Ti le (ap�,gank) My commission expires: cOAy"N'"di°erezesee Allen Homes, Inc. Acknowledgement: State of County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of Allen Homes, Inc. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: M Iowa Code §414.5 (2020), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this day of 20—. City of Iowa City Thomas L. Carson and Linda A. Carson Revocable Living Trust Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: City Attorney's Office By: James T. Carson Revocable Trust By: Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: James T. Carson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State of _ County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2020 by (Name(s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the James T. Carson Revocable Trust. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust Acknowledgement: State of W County of 5c (1 14 This record was acknowledged before me on /! 30 2020 by Vebeec u A11x k.-, (Name(s) of individual(s) as T ., s 4 e e (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of the Rebecca Albertson Revocable Trust. r Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa ``a�uurryrp ON "'11 /A i SSP; (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) & „ �. , 7, My commission expires: Aog t3 zj 2 1 Item Number: 10.c. r � � At + at1Mw��al +•ate_ CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 5, 2021 Ordinance rezoning property located at 410-412 North Clinton Street from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (RM -44 / OHD). (REZ20-0009) ATTACHMENTS: Description PZ & HPC memos PZ Preliminary Minutes Rezoning ordinance r � ,:,® CITY OF IOWA CITY ��,M 4 � T4 MEMORANDUM Date: December 17, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner & Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark (REZ20-0009) Background The owners, Jeff and Bryan Clark, submitted a rezoning application requesting that the property at 410-412 N. Clinton Street be designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. The proposed rezoning request is being pursued in conjunction with a proposed rezoning from High -Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone for 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street (REZ20-0008) and a proposed zoning code amendment to allow minor adjustments in PRM zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure (REZ20-0005). The Commission recommended approval of the latter two rezoning requests at its October 15, 2020 meeting. These rezonings are currently being considered by the City Council. Staff has been coordinating with the applicant on the proposed local landmark designation and the redevelopment of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street for several months. In January 2019, the City Council �n� µms, . �� • considered an Iowa City Historic Landmark rezoning for the property (Figure 1). Both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission �. _ n .k - -` recommended approval of the landmark rezoning. While a majority - - - of the City Council supported the ° re designation, the vote failed as a supermajority was required, but not reached. After the failed vote at Council, City staff reached out to the property owner to explore - possible scenarios that could result in a voluntary local historic landmark designation. Through discussions, Figure 1. 410-412 N. Clinton Street the property owner of 410-412 N. Clinton Street mentioned the possibility of acquiring two properties immediately to the south - 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street. Assuming acquisition of these properties, the property owner was open to exploring a scenario in which the City would grant extra development potential on those lots in exchange for the local landmark designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street. After several discussions with the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council, both bodies supported continuing working with the property owner in order to come to a solution to protect 410-412 N. Clinton Street. The two-story brick Italianate-style house at 410-412 N. Clinton Street was built in 1865 and is associated with several prominent figures in Iowa City's history, including Dr. Milton B. December 11, 2020 Page 2 Cochrane, a member of the corps of surgeons during the Civil War, and Samuel Sharpless, a director of the Johnson County Savings Bank. The building is currently used as multi -family housing. Historic Preservation Commission Review The Historic Preservation Commission met December 10, 2020 and conducted a public hearing at which they reviewed and evaluated the historic significance of 410-412 N. Clinton Street. The Commission determined that the property meets the requirements for a landmark and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. The building is significant for its architecture, integrity of location and design, association with prominent citizens of Iowa City, and embodiment of distinctive characteristics. Additional details are provided in Attachment 2. Landmark designation for 410-412 N. Clinton Street, a property in a High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone, will require Historic Preservation Commission approval of any significant changes to the exterior of the building. Neither the garage nor the rear addition is contemporaneous with the historic house so they may be removed, rebuilt, and remodeled provided the design does not detract from the historic integrity of the building. Landmark status will also make the property eligible for special exceptions (Section 14-213-8 of the zoning code) that allow the Board of Adjustment to waive or modify certain zoning requirements to help support the continued use of historic buildings. Landmark designation will also make it possible for financial incentives such as tax credits and the Iowa City Historic Preservation Fund to be available. Plannina and Zonina Commission Review Local landmark designation is a zoning overlay and therefore requires a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council. The Commission's role is to review the proposed designation based on its relation to the Comprehensive Plan and proposed public improvements and plans for renewal of the area involved. There are two specific areas of the Comprehensive Plan that appear to apply to this proposal: 1). the Central District Plan and 2). the Historic Preservation Plan. The subject property is located within Subarea A of the Central District. The Central District Plan discusses challenges this area faces in terms of balancing the needs of different housing types and residents, including many student rentals. The plan encourages the provision of incentives to maintain, improve, and reinvest in older housing stock in the area, which can include incentives tied to historic preservation (Central District Plan pg 14). The designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as a historic landmark would contribute to this goal, along with the broader Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving historic resources and reinvesting in older neighborhoods (Central District Plan pg 2). Neighborhoods that are closest to the University benefit from a mixture of housing types including historic resources where a diversity of people can live and work or go to school in the vicinity. The Historic Preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan contains 3 specific goals relating to this proposal. Goal 1: Identify historic resources significant to Iowa City's Past. Under this goal the Commission is charged with continuing to research and evaluate properties and to pursue local landmark designation when appropriate. Goal 7: Establish and implement historic preservation objectives for the University of Iowa Campus and surrounding neighborhoods. Objective 7 of this Goal specifically supports efforts to preserve historic neighborhoods adjacent to the University campus as the campus expands, including avoiding negative impacts on individual historic resources. December 11, 2020 Page 3 Goal 10: Adopt strategies to preserve historic neighborhoods which reflect their organic development, historical roles and traditions, modern needs, and economic health and stability. In the Dubuque Street Corridor neighborhood, which includes this section of Clinton Street, Objective 2 provides more specific direction. Objective 2: Identify prospective sites for future redevelopment which will not adversely impact historic resources and include properties that are not individually eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Local landmark designation for 410-412 N. Clinton Street promotes this objective. The proposed landmark designation conforms with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan — providing incentives to maintain and improve older housing stock, especially near the University campus and identifying historic resources that are not currently protected by landmark designation. Additionally, the preservation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street would not be in conflict with plans for redevelopment in the area but would actively promote a diversity of housing stock and the preservation of historic resources. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0009, an application to designate 410-412 N. Clinton Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark and rezone from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/RM-44). Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Memo to the Historic Preservation Commission; December 10, 2020 Approved by: + DMTMfi Sitzman, AICP Development Services Coordinator I t i .��®41 CITY OF IOWA CITY T� I I 43A -e 1, FAIRCHILD ST CC - 4 I ad1 40 iL - �� e b!iiPL , O IP J m ENPORT ST W DAVENPORT - -� E DAV_ � ST — F � a J l 1 � An application submitted by Jeff Clark, to request the rezoning of = a� approximately 0.3 acres of property from High Density Multi -family (RM -44) to High Density Multi -family with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/RM-44). Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum Date: December 3, 2020 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 410-412 North Clinton Street, Cochrane-Sharpless-Dennis House A sub -committee of the Commission completed a study and identified several of Iowa City's early brick houses as priorities for local landmark designation. The subcommittee requested that the property at 410 N. Clinton Street, the Cochrane-Sharpless-Dennis House, be designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark in late 2017. In Spring 2018, a supermajority of Council failed to approve that landmark designation. Since then, City staff has worked with developers to create a plan for redevelopment of the neighboring properties to the South and the rear portion of this property. This plan also includes landmark designation of this property and a rehabilitation plan for the historic house that would be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission following the landmark designation and completed prior to completion of the development project. The enclosed Iowa Site Inventory Form provides a discussion of the building's history and architecture and the enclosed summary sheet provides additional information obtained through staff and Commission research. Indications are that the building was built in 1865. It should be noted that the historic portion of the house currently functions as a rooming house and provides affordable housing that is no longer allowed by code. This type of housing includes individual living spaces and shared bathrooms, providing housing for those who do not need or cannot afford more private space. Designation of the property as an Iowa City Historic Landmark will require Commission approval of any significant changes to the exterior of the building. Landmark status will also make the property eligible for special exceptions that would allow the Board of Adjustment to waive or modify certain zoning requirements. The Commission should determine if the property meets both Criteria A and B and at least one of the additional criteria (C -F) for local designation listed below: a. Significant to American and/or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture; b. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workmanship; c. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; d. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; e. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; f. Has yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Staff finds that 410-412 N. Clinton Street meets criteria A in that it is one of Iowa City's few remaining Civil War -era homes and criteria B in that it is an intact example of Italianate residential architecture in Iowa City that is not diminished by the addition because it is located behind the house. Staff finds that it meets criteria D in because of its association with active prominent members of the Iowa City community especially Cochrane and Sharpless. It also meets Criterion E as an intact representative of the Italianate-style architecture in Iowa City Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria A, B, D, and E. 2 Cochrane-Sharpless-Dennis House 410 North Clinton 410 North Clinton Street, built in 1865, is a two-story brick Italianate with a low -sloped side gabled roof. Unlike typical Italianate houses where the brackets are part of an elaborate cornice in this house the simple cornice is supported on paired brackets. The full -width front porch has paired columns and decorative brackets composed of carved -curling tendrils similar to the cornice brackets. The symmetrical facade includes a classically detailed center entry with narrow sidelights and transom with deeply recessed trim. Floor -to -ceiling 4 -over -6 double hung windows are symmetrically placed on the first floor. The second floor windows have heavy stone sills and lintels. The central window is 4 -over -6 like the first floor windows and the windows on each side are smaller 4-over4. The front fagade also has original shutters. Dr. Milton B. Cochrane settled in Iowa City in 1854. He was a surgeon in the 1st Iowa Cavalry and then promoted to the corps of surgeons of the United States Volunteers during the Civil War. He was a member of the State Historical Society from 1857 until his death in 1898. In 1859-60 He was a member of the Iowa City School Board. After the war he was appointed the first Superintendent of the Soldiers' Orphans Home at Davenport until he resigned in 1867. In the early 1880s he was appointed surgeon of an Indian Agency in Wisconsin. Samuel Sharpless and his wife Priscilla Crain owned this property from 1867 until at least 1915 when Priscilla died in the home. Sharpless was a director of the Johnson County Savings Bank, supervisor of various farming industries and a member of the Iowa City Council. In 1917 Edwin E. Dennis and his wife Anna Tantlinger bought the house and passed it on to their daughter Gertrude Dennis in 1936. Gertrude taught music, was an active Presbyterian, and served as part of the local Art Circle. She owned the house until 1965. 412 North Clinton is significant for its architecture and association with prominent citizens of Iowa City. Cochrane-sharpless-Dennis House 410 North Clinton IOWA SM. L N L'ORY e e � f I 19.1 �. f w l�1i.'-:li�1'"MOMIi.0 Al NG Ti fine', Bllm !�1! � � I. - -_ _6666.... _iVal UK I; gin 1113 i^oIIC #l:e 111111 111 - M: .11-1 1; lip --M 51111 1111 poli =I11 -6111: =111= =f =111 kill; el8d— :RIi:' M I 411 11u11 ■11- !1111 Y !ii#1lfl e . lilt ® M414 :1!111 10" 1■Ic:1016 i1n1■ F'1t�: 111 � �R1t� Im1ll Lc *Aon of Ne ti ; Survey M NmnWr 52-01 Q D 041 Database M Number Nona L Historic Name(s) Csx� 2. Cin Name(s) 3 Sw-ai Address 410:41? N. Clinton St.. Cit, IrnM City .. _ Vicinity ( ) t. County G. Subdivision Oris ir 1 Plat 7. Block(s) 9. U&M Mscripdow (If aural) Towndup RsAga Section Qwter cs fir. of Calk 10. Historic Fuwdou(s) Sir=ie dwe3.1 jM 01A 11, Current Funcdon(s) Oa B 'sj.f ga;j _., ., _. 12. Chir - Phone 9 Addsegs _ _91 t; Miden Ia*gym CAWSM, jM_z dt:y., XA ZIP52240_ .� e e � f I 19.1 �. f w l�1i.'-:li�1'"MOMIi.0 Al NG Ti fine', Bllm !�1! � � I. - -_ _6666.... _iVal UK I; gin 1113 i^oIIC #l:e 111111 111 - M: .11-1 1; lip --M 51111 1111 poli =I11 -6111: =111= =f =111 kill; el8d— :RIi:' M I 411 11u11 ■11- !1111 Y !ii#1lfl e . lilt ® M414 :1!111 10" 1■Ic:1016 i1n1■ F'1t�: 111 � �R1t� Im1ll Lc *Aon of Ne ti ; IOWA SITZ IN NTORY FORM CONTINUATION SHEET Sum., ID Nor 52-010 D 041 Dater ID Number Stmt Address 410--412 M. Clintcn St. Cit, IMM Cit Cm* Jdhrjg= L,c,qpl D=dpdoa: Wural) Twp Rsvao EaAw QU*. r Of QwAor -___ ----- of Roll / Frame? 0 / 7 _ iolci�3 VZ- vh�- , a brie. i• �t�.1 at rear Property Characteriak Vorm • Revidendal CFe! 2354402 Survey IDNumber 52-010-D041 8/23/89 Database ID Number ,,ire; t Address 410--412 N, C11_fi m St. City Ise wa City County tan _ D;xcnption: (if Rural) Township Range Section Quarter of Quiz <ger of Lotion Integriq-, Original Site , Moved Moved to Original Site Endangen d? ,,I or Y o yes, Uhy? Ground Plan: n. Build Shapes) El l w addition b. width T -s. by D oplh _ �....�� in uWu Architectural Style/Styhstic I dwaces Y-sy Stylistic Adntdes Code Late Victorian: Italianate Bracketed eaves, transan & a delights 42 tall slender windows 412 410 412 Mist=rials: Foundation Stone Poured concrete 40 100 1it�dk Brick Brick .._ _— --- 30 30 Roof Vital t 50 80 Nun*cr of Stories 2 3 Rauf Shape Gable - ygry low 2itch Z Gable 1 1 Builder(s) ur kwgn _ __ Architect(s) tri rid ginal Construction Date 1$65 Modification/Addition Data: 9 uni.c aFartmmt- b i.ldi ng added to rear in 1993 blot,- double end chinmys, oricinal exterior shutters ar*.d original porch. continr ilign Shm r it i Significant Interior Components: All original e:.cept for baths and kitchen Continuation 5b F I Surveyor Comments: ,112 is very old v7ith Italianate detailingw (brackets, 1ang Lrindicrrsr etc.) 410 is apartment building attached to rear of 412. Brick built for M. B. Cochran iri 1865 (from real estate apprai (Ment records.) Sources: Sanborn Fire Insurance fps: 188$, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933. Keyes pp 59-60 information provided by present owrer S Beds lurContinuation Sheet[ 1 cher tudy/Anomaly [ ] Surveyor „ Moraski/Etwin ler Date .1995-96 C IOWA SITE INVENTORY FORM EVALUATION SHEET ADDRESS: 410-412 North Clinton SURVEY ID # 52-010—DO41 Iowa City, IA REVIEWED BY: Molly Myers Naumann, Consultant DATE: February 1996 ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE & ASSOCIATED CONTEXTS: Dubuque/Linn Street Corridor: 1839—c.1946 APPLICABLE NRHP CRITERIA: AB _ C _X_ D NRHP ELIGIBILITY: INDIVIDUAL_ YES _X_ NO _ CONSERVATION DISTRICT: CONTRIBUTING X NON—CONTRIBUTING This two story brick residence from c,1865 is a good example of Italianate residential design. The house is rectangular with a small two story wing to the rear. It features a symmetrical three bay facade, the entry having both transom and sidelights. On the first floor two marrow floor—length windows are paired on each side of the entrance. At the second floor level the windows appear as pairs, but without space between them. Both sills and lintels are of stone. Paired. Italianate brackets are located at the cornice. The original end chmneys and exterior shutters are in place. The frontporch extends across the entire facade and features slender paired posts.; square in shape with chamfered corners. Delicate scroll brackets top each of the porch posts. The pitch of the gable roof is unusually low, one indication of a fairly early date. Although a multi—unit apartment building has been attached to this house at the rear, the integrity of the original structure remains quite high. It is considered to be individually eligible as a good example of its period and style, and is considered to a be a strong contributing structure in the Clinton Street Conservation District, HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE & ASSOCIATED CONTEXTS: Dubuque/Linn Street Corridor; 1839—c.1946 APPLICABLE NRHP CRITERIA: A X B_ C_ D_ NRHP ELIGIBILITY: INDIVIDUAL YES _X_ NO _ CONSERVATION DISTRICT: CONTRIBUTING X NON—CONTRIBUTING The Cochrane—Dennis House from c.1865 illustrates the development of the north part of Iowa City in the years following the removal of the state capital to Des Moines. The location of the State University of Iowa here in 1855, and the arrival of the railroad in 1856; ensured the continued growth of the former seat of state government. The Cochrane—Dennis House and the Dey House across the street at 507 North Clinton appear to be the last remaining examples of early residential design in this neighborhood. Both are good examples of the Italianate style and both have been well maintained. They demonstrate the use of mass—produced building materials that became available with the arrival of the railroad. The university was housed in the Old Capitol and two other buildings located on what is know known as the Pentacrest. The area to the north was a logical location for both faculty and students to five. Clinton Street appears to have always been the western edge of the so—called North Side Neighborhood, and even from the earliest days may have been considered to be separate. The Cochrane --Dennis House is considered to be individually eligible and is also a solid contributing structure in the proposed conservation district. PREPARED BY: Molly Myers Naumann, Consultant ADDRESS: 167 W. Alta Vista, Ottumwa, IA 52501 AFFILIATION: Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission ADDRESS: 401 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 PHONE: (515) 682-2743 DATE: February 19C-6 PHONE: (319) 356-5243 #h EsmofHU-c-iz::er.,v,_et�n Imi a 'dtete ; il,torical D psi 1;i -vi rot Z4..:. "�re;et it., Ia ,aL. '�t;', l�•. ;'. 522 rp a 071 Sitai,,:..'-'77=.- r 30-1418 i5tr§tt c-. srr+?'•� `�� .- -77 - e�ti+tliic.'.?::-'r7cQ��'. �I�ra;,,':1��.-a+.T..,.,.�e.w»....,-.• iyS id ]1P -Crane �. 'l l�'I'� f�•!.?*Y�IIi t!}� � '� •!� :1� ' L�'`Fit 4. $�' •_. _ _ ,Tcn-. S ir: �.._. ....-. _..._.._Caysrty .,. f;:FLSst:^ :17�,tiiiYr.�',3 t!hTy�; Wfe s'1 7L't'FWir:� lJlri'+ tilwL�a}�iy t�yaFsr 3:xdi.,ii s'. 4czsia:euf !rt s+�ri�tn S. ;1 hi Uvctflan: a:9n• ' ct � n him_, ; AcrF , 7. r Sc�Fit�ie�zer, � 121ar�f. T-c6ntr�ct-�Cralie, t e� f nteires -t L Kms: }�._."}°`G],cn YWfi s (�s4 c?�� c:?Fr.^�t'dtsrtittt�xm 4 IL [] irtdt+strl.J ®as=otir inatitutia;-s�l ❑ :ei! sti crsuitlpla.rzmiFy!t.Sr .� educa.lonn! [� ftr' rlcv#turaf ` 1. .�•.:t,.:;e •+;'Sr31Fs:; ❑ tl? wil:af a [j stf3 s O b,;,C!. [ j b.:.rd ;uld but:•, -.n 0 1"Mrssles ❑ S.uccO Q other- -_�- —-----�- �--�- - .� 12. S-Uc#tmd ";v -IL--: [] zad fry me ev s s interlocking IN ❑ vood frame whit i.ra; t metrt m (.. ) bar l:ocn � rar-t. �r, song ia.d-$+:. r�Izy'3ra+7S U !mn lt�mp D steel .'t`a'r^! °r':h cimair. tva.'IS ❑ �xiiu arced cOnc1 is 13. [j • v�mert © good ,'sr C7 r-�Iutiovated Iii. W ,wizina- Sit'? a rnaYaSy —if :.ii, `.•lir.n�....,� No*ws en ^�fei,'*.., It=:7,, uldlthx:%i$ lAth d Ias and rCle't. i. If %viown .� �- _ !...W r j `— `' (� II n- wnti iit;1......� .— ;. 1 rad:• 1 Otii6Lr F ids':ifC�r. r.Yituf ZYr U �� iS. i?�I! i�e!tk.•'+; ii�;Mi :�„+! 4L�r�i! 'IFi'�: 0 bi.!'Yi ❑ Otl:3r f1T[11 �ti�FCt:l S ❑ iti+:•. ,t' iPJFFr,"'. ❑ ,dc�8 © 4 dv ;ioeE rr--hree--: WVY-- ria.-ttJi Uinghr4rk.Ct#�---- 1E. �q no ❑ yL-y sf �o, •,Vdy; 1i.war: Tli1L}Rt}; is +° 1'. r- ❑ oaten iand nt'!l�js:ict::e ❑ 53::.ti :'; :� iiiJ; rt:flV{'S 5 [LLS:S+T is'� C ❑ l:tdustrial 0 resid-ntlal Q other ilnaiicatO sourMs of ir'form -lon for ail st:�`: mintg) �.+�.F�IS[l?Ct;74'a15i�iflf±�,il!C 5 . Kcil strrtct.ur-Andivid•;:1!y wxy al r: kirter for t � fV�t3on :.'. Cuniributiri'-tem.t.cre w ❑ C. N'fr Ugib?: rr�rrsirn Well preserved gable sided brick house with low pitched roof. Features Italianate front porch and paired cornice brackets. '.-{indows on the first floor are full length, those on the second floor are paired beneath stone lintels and Sills.. The center window on the second floor is floor length as well. See continuation sheet. 67, h, rilst..r�ca.i ,3 iFcar«c� ThErnE*(s) T Ztalianate-Two -story side gable c, .I.jcJ-jreIr!a'%4d:t:rfh/ may que"'.'f fortlit 11�!3:iOrr-21 l .;3str 5t6r.b. Contribuft structure 0w. Not elivilt ,Ontrusion The Samuel Sharpless family awned the house as late as 1912, and he was noted for his local investment activities as well as for his having served as Director of the -Johnson County Swings Bank for twenty five years. Gertrude F. Dennis owned the house from 1935 through the early 19501s at least. Zt. (for rn ey and secorde- Llat�X33 Z e Corm I t '^cis a' uklic..bon: ,_ e , i r ;� ; rr sr 'i : � l7:'.^,Ai, ii.IC� l-� r CB of 7CiJI.Cltinn, Ci;'I?., dtC.). Prepwed lky,...�.r— Addmsg ,far 11vi on of Fia.staic Prpnor ration Use Only 1. 0;'&4 Inform::.Ac a 3c),urcom on flvis FroNrty C_] Cove-' -�cwrc: Me 0 Wl.:dshield aurercsy ❑ Natioozil Rexis'er ❑ Graitts-In-Aid: � - ❑ Determination of tligtai+it;, 2. Subject Traces d. e. ❑ R,t ieav and C;c.ripIhm a Pfoiertt: ❑ Other_._._ ❑ Other ... m� © 3. Photo Images Aft S"I-aIa til/ lOs:as o�f � :istor'r�e � `' � : ��..- urti>;er 30-1418 lerwa Stag H.'storical Departrnsvit 26 Z. Jarx& Csi., IVvi city, Item N1unzbar(s) The Samuel Sharpless homestead, 412 N. Clinton Samuel Sharpless ( -1901) served for bienty•five years as the director of Johnson County Savings Banc, and was a noted local capitalist. (Aurner, Histor o..: Jbhnson County, Iowa (Cedar Rapids, Western Pub.Co., 1912 pp. 687-88 Planning and Zoning Commission December 17, 2020 Page 2 of 10 PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. REZ20-0009: Applicant: Jeff & Bryan Clark Location: 410-412 N. Clinton Street An application for a rezoning from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/RM-44) to designate the property as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Russett reiterated this is a rezoning to designate this property as a local historic landmark. The property is located at 410-412 North Clinton Street, just north of Davenport Street. Russett showed an aerial view of the property and also the current zoning map. The current zoning is RM -44, which is a higher density multifamily residential zone, across from this property is University property, dormitories, and then most of the rest of the neighborhood is also multifamily. Russett explained there's a lot of background related to this local landmark designation request. The Commission previously reviewed this request in 2018 but that rezoning failed at Council so it's coming back now. This application is also associated with two other cases that the Commission saw earlier this year, a text amendment to PRM, which is a multifamily zoning, and the rezoning of 400 North Clinton and 112 East Davenport Street to PRM. Martin asked why Council rejected the request previously. Russett replied the property owner at the time was not voluntarily landmarking the property and opposed the rezoning. To allow it to pass it needed a supermajority vote at Council and they weren't able to achieve a supermajority. After the landmark designation failed at Council, staff reached back out to the property owner to see if there was any way that the City and the owner could come to an agreement on him supporting a local landmark designation and what they came to at the staff level was a rezoning of the property to the south to allow more development potential and in exchange the property owner would be willing to landmark 410-412 North Clinton Street. Russett stated in terms of the review criteria when reviewing rezonings staff looks for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. This property is in the Central Planning District and there are goals in that Plan to preserve and protect historic buildings. The Historic Preservation Plan is also an element of the Comprehensive Plan and has goals related to identifying historic resources and adopting strategies to preserve historic neighborhoods. Staff finds this rezoning is consistent with all those goals. Russett next showed some building pictures noting the original structure and the newer addition from the 60s. She then showed a rendering of the historic structure with the proposed new development, which is being proposed to the south of the property. In terms of next steps, the application has already been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission, which recommended approval of the landmark and City Council has set a public Planning and Zoning Commission December 17, 2020 Page 3 of 10 hearing on Tuesday, January 5, for the first reading. Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0009, an application to designate 410-412 North Clinton Street as an Iowa City Local Landmark and rezone from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/RM-44). Townsend noted in the background information on the first page it says something about the assuming acquisition of these properties and the property owner was open to exploring a scenario with which the City would grant extra development potential on those lots in exchange for the local landmark designation. Townsend asked what special exchanges they are looking for. Russett said that is related to the PRM text amendment which would allow additional flexibility in that zone. The PRM zoning district has bonus provisions and the text amendment was to add a bonus provision that allowed additional development, potential additional height, and parking reductions and in return they would preserve a historic structure. Russett also recalled Townsend may have voted against either the text amendment or the rezoning as she was concerned with the height. Hensch opened the public hearing. Jeff Clark (applicant) was present to answer any questions from the Commission. Hensch asked for clarification that they, the applicants, are a willing participant in this historic designation. Clark confirmed there is no hesitancy and they've worked with staff to come to a project that will work there, and he believes it'll be very nice when it's done. Hensch closed the public hearing. Nolte moved to approve REZ20-0009, an application to designate 410-412 North Clinton Street as an Iowa City Local Landmark and rezone from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/RM-44). Craig seconded the motion. Hensch noted this is a remarkable property and has been around since the late 1800's so it will be wonderful to have it preserved. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ20-0011: Applicant: Gilbane Development Location: 700, 710, 720, and 730 S. Dubuque St. and 220 Lafayette St. An application for a rezoning from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone for approximately 1.9 acres of land. Heitner began the staff report with an aerial view of the subject property and a view of the zoning Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; (RE790-0009) 11ST rikTi USM Ordinance rezoning property located at 410-412 North Clinton Street from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to RM -44 with a Historic District Overlay (RM -44 / OHD). (REZ20-0009) Whereas, the applicant, Jeff Clark, has requested a rezoning of property located at 410-412 North Clinton Street from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to High Density Multi - Family Residential with a Historic District Overlay (RM -44 / OHD); and Whereas, this structure was originally constructed in 1865 and is associated with several prominent figures from Iowa City's history; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the preservation of historic buildings in the neighborhoods surrounding the University of Iowa campus; and Whereas, Goal 1 of the Historic Preservation component of the Comprehensive Plan calls for identification of resources significant to Iowa City's past with the objective of designating individual buildings as landmarks; and Whereas, the Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the proposed Historic Landmark designation, has found that it meets the criteria for landmark designation in its significance to Iowa City history, integrity of location and design, and has recommended approval; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed Historic Landmark designation rezoning, has found that it meets the Comprehensive Plan goals of providing incentives to maintain and improve older housing stock, especially near the University Campus and identifying historic resources that are not currently protected by landmark designation; Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I. Historic Landmark Approval. Property described below is hereby reclassified to High Density Multi -Family with a Historic District Overlay (OHD/ RM -44) zone: Iowa City Original Town, North Half of Lots 5 and 6 in Block 75 Section II. Zoning Mao. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Ordinance No. Page 2 Section IV. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section V. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VI. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of , 20_. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ap o ed by: Ci Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen —12/29/2020) Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: First Consideration _ Vote for passage: Mims, Salih. MUM 01/05/2021 Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner that the AYES: Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Item Number: 10.d. �r "m J IM% CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org January 5, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone. (REZ20-0008) (Pass & Adopt) r_1ir_TSIM ►'I51 Lt&3 Description PZ Staff Report w Attachments Correspondence Final PZ Minutes Ordinance & CZA with attachments Correspondence - Jackie Hockett STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ20-0008 — 400 N. Clinton St. & 112 E. Davenport St. GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: October 15, 2020 Jeff Clark 319/ 631-1867 0effmc1973(a)-yahoo.com John R. Rummelhart, Jr. Rezoning from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) to Planned High Density Multi - Family Residential (PRM) Development of multi -family housing 400 N. Clinton Street & 112 E. Davenport Street `wk_� 12,000 square feet Residential, RM -44 North: RM -44, Multi -family residential South: PRM, Multi -family residential East: RM -44, Multi -family residential West: Institutional Public (P-2), Residence Hall Comprehensive Plan: 25+ dwelling units / acres District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K Central District, High Density Multi -Family C1 Property owners and some residents located within 500' of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were also posted on the site. September 24, 2020 November 9, 2020 The applicant, Jeff Clark, has requested a rezoning from High -Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone for 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street. The proposed rezoning request is being pursued in conjunction with the proposed zoning code amendment to allow minor adjustments in PRM zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure (REZ20-0005) and a rezoning application to designate the property at 410-412 N. Clinton Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark (REZ20-0009). Staff has been coordinating with the applicant on the proposed redevelopment of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street for several months. Here is a summary of the timeline: January 2019: o The City Council considered an Iowa City Historic Landmark rezoning for the property at 410-412 N. Clinton Street (Figure 1). Both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the landmark rezoning. While a majority of the City Council supported the designation, the vote ultimately failed as a supermajority was required, but not reached. o After the failed vote at Council, City staff reached out to the property owner to explore possible scenarios that could result in a voluntary local historic landmark designation. Through discussions, the property owner of 410-412 N. Clinton Street mentioned the possibility of acquiring two properties immediately to the south — 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street (Figure 2). Assuming acquisition of these properties, the property owner was open to exploring a scenario in which the City would grant extra development potential on those lots in exchange for the local landmark designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street. The additional development potential would include a rezoning of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street to the PRM zone and potential text amendments to the PRM zone bonus provisions, which offer regulatory incentives for projects that provide public benefits. • May 2019: Prior to exploring this option with the property owner, staff presented this option at a City Council work session. During this work session the City Council expressed a willingness to consider a rezoning and text amendment. • January 2020: Staff presented the proposal to redevelop 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street in exchange for the designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as a local historic landmark to the Historic Preservation Commission. The main takeaway from 3 this meeting was to continue to explore solutions resulting in the local landmark designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street. • February 2020: Staff shared the Historic Preservation Commission's comments with the City Council. • February — June 2020: After the February Council meeting, the applicant worked with an architect to further revise the plans for the proposed redevelopment of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street. July 2020: Both the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council reviewed the revised plans [Attachment 3]. The Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council supported the revised plans and had the following comments: o Development of a rehabilitation plan based on the Secretary of Interior Standards for the 1860s historic building located at 410-412 N. Clinton Street. o Salvage of demolished buildings at 400 N. Clinton and 112 E. Davenport Streets. o Ensure that the proposed wall around the open space is not physically connected to the historic structure. o Substantial compliance with the concept plan and elevations to ensure the height is capped at 5 stories. Figure 1 . 410-412 N. Clinton Street Figure 2. 400 N. Clinton Street & 112 E. Davenport Street ri U"k FTIT W&I Current Zoning: The property is currently zoned RM -44. The purpose of the RM -44 zone is to establish areas for the development of high density, multi- family dwellings and group living quarters. Properties zoned RM -44 should have good access to all city services and facilities, including transit. Vehicular access and parking should be designed carefully to ensure efficient traffic and pedestrian circulation on adjacent streets. Due to the high density permitted in this zone, careful attention to site design is expected. Proposed Zoning: The applicant has requested a rezoning to PRM. The purpose of the planned high-density multi -family residential zone (PRM) is to provide for development of high-density multi -family housing in close proximity to centrally located employment, educational, and commercial uses. Because of the high density of development anticipated in this zone, special consideration of building and site design is required. The PRM bonus provisions provide regulatory incentives for projects that provide public benefits. For example, increases in height, density, and reductions in setbacks. The maximum base height in the PRM zone is 35 -feet, but with bonuses may increase to 65 -feet. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for residential development at a density of 25+ dwelling units per acre. The Central District Plan identifies this area as appropriate for High Density Multi -Family Residential Development, which is intended for high density residential development at 16-49 dwelling units per acre. This designation is reserved for areas close to downtown, the University, and other employment centers that have good access to city services and facilities. The proposed amendment aligns with goals related to the preservation and rehabilitation of historic buildings with the demand for infill development near downtown. Specifically: • Identify and support infill development and redevelopment opportunities in areas where services and infrastructure are already in place. • Support the Historic Preservation Commission's efforts to meet its goals. • Support housing rehabilitation programs and re -invest in housing in existing neighborhoods. Compatibility with Neighborhood: The site of the proposed rezoning is surrounded by existing multi -family residential development, as well as University of Iowa residence halls. The existing building to the north is two stories in height. Currier Hall across Clinton Street to the west is five stories in height. The concept provided by the applicant shows a five -story building with 32 dwelling units, 71 bedrooms and 21 subterranean parking spaces. It also incorporates 1,768 square feet of open space between the historic structure at 410-412 N. Clinton Street and the new building. Figure 3 shows the west elevation of the building which incorporates many of the suggestions made by staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, and the City Council. The concept shows a building that was reduced to five stories from previous concepts to align better with the height of Currier Hall across the street. It also incorporated a flat roof to visually reduce the building scale and added open space. The plans incorporate a portion of the new construction that wraps around the historic structure. That portion of the building is reduced to three stories. To ensure compatibility with the existing context of the neighborhood in terms of scale, and honor the Historic Preservation Commission's request that the height not exceed the 56 -feet as shown, staff proposes a condition to require substantial compliance with the attached site plan and elevations. 5 Figure 3. West Elevation NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. This rezoning is connected to the proposed PRM text amendment (REZ20-0005) and the local landmark rezoning of 410-412 N. Clinton Street (REZ20-0009), which will also be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff plans to have all three applications on the December 2, 2020 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's November 17 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport street from High -Density Multi - Family Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone subject to the following condition: 1) Substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 if any PRM bonus provisions or minor adjustments are requested for the property. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Site Plan and Elevations; July 1, 2020. Approved by: 1 +10 DOFi Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services i r _4 CITY OF IOWA CITY i*6 - .4 FAIRCHILD ST_ r- ! 4 •.- � •�. _� 1 "ice _ - :� ■.�"+ _ .. will _ r z ? r+ 0] J EDAVENPORT ST ` 1' la LOW 3 Os ti _� r•: S1 '7 —� iL An application submitted by Jeff Clark, for the rezoning of approximately 0.3 acres of property located at 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street from High Density Multi- family ulti family (RM -44) to Planned High Density Multi -Family (PRM). i I designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 sheet title Site Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number Garage Floor Plan 1 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 sheet title First Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number First Floor Plan 1 Scale: 1/8" =1 '-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title First Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number 3 Q Second Floor Plan 1 scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title Second Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number Q Third Floor Plan 1 Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title Third Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number 5 Q Fourth Floor Plan 1Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" (4) designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title Fourth Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number Q Fifth Floor Plan 1 Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title Fifth Floor Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number 7 Q 1 Roof Plan Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title Roof Plan date July 1, 2020 sheet number Q nnrTAI CII Mlnln DRll,f\ QUF\LLIV VVfiLL I II I I I I I I L I � - � I r_J_�_� r_�_L_, I I I I I I I I j) -West Elevation Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 rim Imo- J O O cc sheet title West Elevation date July 1, 2020 sheet number Q a I ■ _=■==gin= ■ __■_■_= ■ ROOFTOP TERRACE I� I� I� I� I� I� I� I� II� I I I, I� I� I� I� I, I, JI� 1 South Elevation scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 LE O O cc sheet title South Elevation date July 1, 2020 sheet number 10 Q ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- J——J —L iL L ---- East Elevation Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title East Elevation date July 1, 2020 sheet number 11 Q ss T-1- T L --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------L---J ---- S-------------------------------------------------------------------J r T r F--J-L-�-------------- F- L--1 L -----J L---------------- L -----J North Elevation Scale: 1/8" = T-0" designer Shelley McCafferty shellmac7@yahoo.com 605.209.7898 r� u O O cc sheet title North Elevation date July 1, 2020 sheet number 12 Q From: William Means To: Anne Russett Cc: Jessica Bristow Subject: Zoning Meeting on 400 N Clinton Date: Thursday, October 15, 2020 12:10:25 PM I F�I$K Dear Anne: & Members of the Zoning Commission Just yesterday I found out about the hearing about the re -zoning meeting tonight for 400 N. Clinton and 112 E. Davenport. Hopefully this email will get to you in time to include in the meeting. AM OPPOSED TO MAKING A ZONING CHANGE. I understand that the new zoning classification will allow for increased density and raises the maximum height of any new building. I believe that I emailed you in March of my opposition. My family has resided on the northwest corner of Fairchild and Dubuque Streets since 1920. 1 am the 3rd generation to live at 120 Fairchild. I maybe the last owner occupied residence in the area. (Market to Church, Dubuque to Clinton.) My house and carriage house was listed on the National Registry of Historical Places with the State of Iowa and the National Park Service in 1982 as the Jackson -Swisher - Keyser House & Carriage House. I have just completed a major restoration of the exterior. An article in the 20 February 2020 Iowa City Press -Citizen described the Cochran-Sharpless-Dennis House as as being one of very few pre -Civil War buildings that remain in town and deserves to be restored and preserved. For over 50 years the height restrictions in this area has limited building to three stories. Just to the north, and within the 400 block of North Clinton is the Schaumberg House which the University moved from the 300 block of North Clinton and restored for use by the writers' program. Across the street at 507 North Clinton is the Dey House which is the headquarters of the Writer's Worship Program. North Clinton Street ends after the 500 block at Church Street with the University President's House. My home at 120 Fairchild is sightly over 1/2 block from 412 North Clinton. Any new apartment building over 3 stories would significantly change the overall architectural climate of what remains of the original homes. No building North of Market Street is currently over 3 stories. Within one block of the area proposed to be rezoned to allow for increased height and density are four homes of significance: (1) Schaumberg House, (2) The Dey House, (3) the President's House, and (4) the Jackson -Swisher -Keyser House & Carriage House. Also, in the immediate area are two sorority house and a church. Any apartment buildings built in the last 30 years have meet current standards - even as they replaced the original homes. The zoning needs to remain to current height and density. Any new building needs to conform to the current standards. Of additional concern is while the area is very attractive for student housing, the current enrollment at the University has decreased and is projected to continue to decline. Significant new construction in the down -town and immediate areas has resulted in a surplus in housing units. The Clarks were recently approved to build 15 story buildings on Burlington Street which will add 1,575 beds. Major redevelopment is approved for the 100 block of College Street. There is no need to increase the number of units in the proposed rezoning area. Making the proposed zoning changes will just be another example of those with deep pockets getting their way and changing neighborhoods. The majority of the homes, converted homes, and apartments are owned by small landlords. It has been the policy of the City of Iowa City to encourage the converted homes in the Near NorthSide Neighborhood to be restored to single family homes. Saving and moving the Gloria Dei Lutheran home across Market Street to a city owned parking lot is an example of the previous commitment of the City Government to character of the neighborhood. Making the proposed zoning change is unnecessary and will significantly change the charm of the neighborhood. While I would like to see the Cochran-Sharpless-Dennis house preserved and restored, I do not think that it is necessary to make such significant zoning changes to do so. Thank You, William Means 120 East Fairchild Street Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 16 of 24 Hensch stated he is a huge fan and proponent of neighborhood commercial and completely supports this. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ20-0008: Applicant: Jeff Clark Location: 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street An application for a rezoning from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone for approximately 12,000 square feet. Russett began the staff report noting the property is located at the corner of North Clinton Street and East Davenport Street. The zoning map shows the area is currently zoned RM -44 and the proposal is to PRM and there is some PRM to the south and to the west. Russett stated there's a lot of background and history on this proposed rezoning. Back in January 2019 the Historic Preservation Commission submitted an application to designate the adjacent property, which is 410-412 North Clinton as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. This landmark rezoning was supported by both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission. It required a supermajority vote at the City Council which failed. After that failed vote, staff reached out to the property owner to identify a potential solution to help save that 410-412 North Clinton Street property and get that property landmarked and the property owner had proposed a solution of redeveloping 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street and voluntarily landmarking 410-412. Staff took that proposal to City Council in May 2019 and the City Council said that they were willing to consider three separate actions. The first would be the local landmark rezoning of 410-412. The second, which the Commission is considering right now, is the rezoning of 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street to PRM, and then the last is a text amendment to the PRM zone as what the applicant is proposing on this site goes above what current zoning in the PRM zoning would allow so that text amendment provides some flexibility and some bonus provisions in exchange for landmarking 410-412. In January 2020 this item was discussed with the Historic Preservation Commission and the main takeaway from that meeting was to continue to explore solutions to get 410-412 landmarked and Council concurred with that direction in February 2020. Since that time, the applicant has been working with an architect on plans for the site. Those plans have been reviewed by both the Historic Preservation Commission and City Council and they supported moving forward. Russett next showed some photos of the area and the proposed site plan. Currently on the historic property there's 18 residential units, the property to the south currently had 11 units. The proposal the applicant has submitted is of 32 units, 71 bedrooms and 21 parking spaces so in total it would be 50 units on this entire site around which is about 90 dwelling units per acre. Russett showed the elevation from North Clinton Street, noting the historic property and the five - story construction along North Clinton and East Davenport Streets. The applicant is proposing a portion of that building to wrap around the historic structure so that portion has been reduced to three stories. Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 17 of 24 Craig asked how much taller the new building to the current structure at 400 North Clinton Street is. Russett said the current structure is two stories, maybe two and a half with the attic, the new building is five stories, she is not sure how many feet taller it will be. Russett next provided a summary of the input from the Historic Preservation Commission, which reviewed these plans in July, and they supported the plans with a few requests. One is that there be an associated rehabilitation plan for the property at 410-412, that there's some consideration for salvage of demolished buildings, and they also wanted to ensure separation between the proposed open space and then also substantial compliance with the concept plan and the elevations to ensure no building would be above five stories. Russett reiterated the current zoning is RM -44, which allows multifamily dwellings but the maximum height in that zone is 35 feet. Both the RM -44 and the proposed PRM zoning allow higher density residential land uses but the PRM zone has a base max height of 35 feet but there are currently bonus provisions in the PRM zones that allow applicants to increase the height up to 65 feet. In terms of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Map shows this area to be appropriate for higher density residential as 25 dwelling units per acre and the Central District Plan also recommends multifamily residential at a density of 16 to 49 dwelling units per acre. Lastly, this this proposed rezoning aligns with goals related to historic preservation as well as infill development. In terms of compatibility with the neighborhood, the site is surrounded by existing multifamily residential as well as university residence halls. The proposed height of the building is the same height as Currier Hall across the street, and the plans incorporate a flat roof to visually reduce the building scale. Additionally, the proposal shows open space which goes beyond what is required by Code, and the portion behind the historic structure of the new building is reduced to three stories. Staff is recommending one condition with this rezoning to require substantial compliance with the site planning elevations to ensure compatibility with the existing context of the neighborhood and also to honor the Historic Preservation Commission's request that the height is capped at five stories. Russett noted the role of the Commission is to consider the proposed rezoning from RM -44 to PRM. The associated text amendment will be discussed as the next agenda item, but at this point the Commission's role is to determine if the PRM zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the neighborhood. In terms of next steps, the Commission will make a recommendation to City Council and in addition to this rezoning and the proposed text amendment (which the Commission will hear next) there is also the proposed rezoning for designating 410-412 as a local historic landmark that will come before the Commission next month. Staff did receive one email which Russett forwarded on to the Commission from a neighbor that did have concerns with the proposed rezoning and are opposed to the change. Staff is recommending approval of REZ20-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street from High- Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 18 of 24 Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multifamily Residential (PRM zone subject to the following condition: 1. Substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 if any PRM bonus provisions or minor adjustments are requested for the property. Hensch asked if staff knew the reasons for the failed City Council supermajority vote. Russett replied that since the property owner objected to the rezoning it required a supermajority vote and at least one of the Council members didn't support it for property rights reasons. Hensch asked if the Historic Preservation Commission is supporting this proposal. Russett confirmed they are. Hensch asked if there is an affordable housing requirement associated with this development. Russett replied no because the affordable housing requirement is only in Riverfront Crossings. He asked where the nearest adjacent PRM zone is located. Russett said it is to the south. Regarding the Historic Preservation Commission recommended rehabilitation plan 410-412 North Clinton Street Hensch asked if that is just a recommendation or can the Commission add that as a condition if they choose to approve this, because that rehabilitation plan should be a requirement because that is a beautiful structure but if it's not rehabilitated it just slowly going to fall apart. Russett explained that staff is proposing to require that as part of the request for flexibility to the zoning standards which will be addressed next with the text amendment. Signs asked if both the historic property and the proposed property are going to be owned by the same person or entity. Russett confirmed it is her understanding that they have a purchase agreement to purchase 112 East Davenport Street. Hensch opened the public hearing. Jeff Clark (applicant) said he was just present to answer any questions the Commission may have. Nolte noted It looks like the applicant has done a lot of work to accommodate all the changes and everything and is the applicant comfortable with where the development stands or are there other issues that as the developer is concerned with. Clark replied he thinks they've worked their way through everything and are just hoping to get it approved so they can get a plan finalized and get started. William Means thanked for the opportunity to speak, he is pleased that the house will be preserved but his concern in looking at the modified plan is the setback is a major change in the neighborhood. He does not think that the steel siding is compatible with all the brick buildings that are currently in the neighborhood. If it's a foregone conclusion that this needs to happen to save the house, he would like to have the City look at those aesthetics because those are major changes that will be starting in that area. He concluded since his family's been in that area for so long he is concerned and just wanted to thank the Commission for allowing him to express his opinion. Hensch closed the public hearing. Signs moved to recommend approval of REZ20-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 19 of 24 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street from High -Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multifamily Residential (PRM zone subject to the following condition: 2. Substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 if any PRM bonus provisions or minor adjustments are requested for the property. Nolte seconded the motion. Craig agrees with Mr. Means' concerns about the aesthetics as it concerns her that one of the criteria is that something fits into the neighborhood. She does appreciate all the changes that have been made and all the work that's obviously been done on this. She might reluctantly be able to support it, given her understanding that the Historic Preservation Commission has approved of it, but does agree with Mr. Means on the aesthetic. Hensch asked where is there an opportunity to just discuss our address aesthetic issues? Russett replied it has to go through the site plan review and there is a portion of the proposed new building, which is on the 410-412 property that would have to go to the Historic Preservation Commission for review. Hensch agrees it is a valid point to make sure the aesthetics blend in with historic property and with the character of the neighborhood so he would just feel better if they knew that that would be addressed somewhere in the process. Russett also added if the plan is to request an adjustment from standards, it does that have to go to the design review committee. Townsend shared concerns about the building itself, in that neighborhood, with all of those historic houses that are there, other than the dorms that have been there for years. She had the same concern with the construction on Burlington, putting a huge building amid all of those lower houses. She also thinks it takes away from the looks of the university. Martin asked if there is any way to know if the Historic Preservation Commission had concerns about the aesthetics or what their notes were from their meeting. Russett acknowledged the Historic Preservation Commission did have concerns with the demolition of those two structures and a larger building. The applicant worked with their architect on several changes that were requested by the Commission such as they originally had a pitched roof but revised it to a flat roof based on comments from the Historic Preservation Commission and the Friends of Historic Preservation. The main thing that came out of those meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission was that they felt very strongly that 410-412 should be landmarked. Townsend noted another concern is that a lot of those properties around the University are rentals and they've been renting them for years so if they put in this huge apartment complex it will take away from the properties that have been rented for years. She wondered if anybody knew how many vacancies there are around the university right now. Martin said they could call Brad Comer at the Iowa City Assessor's Office as he usually has his finger on the pulse of vacancies as best they can. Craig is interested in whether the university has an opinion about this, or were they made aware of this as it is right in the heart of one of the oldest parts of their campus. Signs noted the University is one of the main ones that seem to be tearing down houses and building new buildings so he would guess they don't have any concerns and they don't care. Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 20 of 24 Signs is also concerned with the materials. When he looks at this plan what comes to mind is the look of the property on South Riverside or one of the properties over on Iowa Avenue, that seem to contemporary for the spot. He feels it could very easily be modified to have more of a historic appearance. He is surprised there hasn't been more outcry about this application. Hensch noted he feels the primary importance is for 410-412 North Clinton Street to be preserved and not only preserved but rehabilitated so that it can last another 150 years. He also noted Mr. Clark is still on the call so he can hear their conversations regarding their desire, even though it may happen later on down the road for it to aesthetically fit in this neighborhood. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-1 (Townsend dissenting). CASE NO. REZ20-0005: Minor Adjustments in the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions Ordinance Consideration of the Minor Adjustments in the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions Ordinance, which amends Title 14 Zoning to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure. Lehmann began noting a lot of background on this item was address in the previous item. A PRM zone has special bonus provisions that can increase density and increase height, but it does not have the flexibility required to do the project as it's been currently described in the previous item. Therefore, at Council's August 4 work session, staff presented this concept to potentially redevelop 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Devonport Street with some zoning code relief or some flexibility. In return the developer would preserve and designate 410-412 North Clinton Street as a local historic landmark. Lehmann added this concept was also presented to the Historic Preservation Commission and they also got input from the Friends of Historic Preservation and all that was presented to Council. Based off that information Council had indicated that staff should proceed with Code changes to provide flexibility so long as historic property is preserved Lehmann noted this amendment is pretty focused on this application, but it may incentivize some future historic preservation efforts. Lehmann stated this proposed amendment allows some minor adjustments in the PRM zones, which provides flexibility from zoning regulations. The brief bullet points of the amendment include things like parking, setback, density requirements, the project must involve new construction, and it must involve the preservation of a separate potentially historic structure that is not yet locally protected. Lehmann noted using this amendment would require staff review and approval through the design review committee, through the level one design review process. Lehmann reiterated this amendment is designed for new construction projects, specifically in PRM zones, and have to involve the preservation of a separate abutting structure that is eligible to be designated as an Iowa City landmark. Lehmann defined abutting as it must share a property line and can't be across the street. Additionally, the property must not yet be designated as a landmark. So if it's already locally protected, one could not use this provision. Kellie Fruehlin From: Jackie B. <jackiehockett@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 9:24 PM To: Council Subject: 400 N. Clinton Land Grab A 7 DISK It seems as though this is too late of a comment, that the deals have been made and conversations had- but I cannot let the moment pass without making a comment as a citizen who has concerns with the deal -making on this land. I do not understand the choices of this council to continue to push through the destruction of old housing that are the finals bits and pieces of moments of our history- a block that matched when Currier Hall was built in ways (I know the house on the end was moved there when I was in college- when other lovely houses were bulldozed for university ambitions). Yes you are saving a plot of land and old house- but have made the trade for the death of other homes. Iowa City in general is sad to me. It is terrible to see all the empty storefronts in these new apartments. Building after building of the same terrible setup. To see these buildings that have truly ruined the landscape and experience of our city. 2020 has destroyed so many lives in ways that will be felt for decades- the businesses are hurting and your job as a council is to serve and help our community and economy thrive. I don't see how approving yet again ANOTHER student block of ugly housing to be built and perfectly good houses that are indeed student housing already is a good deal. This deal will change the landscape and ruin another corner of history anyway- so WHY make it? A civil war house next to this new build? I didn't even have to look at the article to have an idea that the Clark name would be associated with this deal, because that family seems to own this city and gets to hold land hostage. Building for building sake and not to beautify or betterment. We don't know the impact of COVID on our town and I fear the student housing will be empty. Bolster the small businesses and small land owners. Bolster our city. Stop building student housing for a while. Sincerely, Jackie Hockett DEFERRED to 1/19/21 Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; (REZ20-0008) Ordinance No. Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone (REZ20-0008). Whereas, the applicant, Joe Clark, has requested a rezoning of property located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street from High Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone for approximately 12,000 square feet; Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Central District Plan, indicates that the subject area is appropriate for high density multi -family residential development; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed zoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets a condition addressing substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations if future development requests bonus provisions; and Whereas, a public need is created by the rezoning since the PRM zone bonus provisions allow for additional development potential, and therefore, substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations will ensure a building with a maximum height of 5 -stories, which is compatible to surrounding uses; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2020) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner and applicant have agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city; and Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, the property described below is hereby classified Planned High Density Multi - Family Residential (PRM) zone: The east 50 feet of the south half of Lot 6, in Block 75, in Iowa City, Iowa, according to the recorded plat thereof; subject to easements and restrictions of record; and The south half of Lots 5 and 6 in Block 75 in Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 116, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, except the east 50 feet of the south half of said Lot 6, subject to easements and restrictions of record. Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owners) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Ordinance No. Page 2 Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 20_. Mayor Approvedfm� Attest: 4 . / City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen —11/24/2020) Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Sahh Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner that the First Consideration 12/01/2020 Vote for passage: AYES: Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration 12/15/2020 Vote for passage: AYES: Mims, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Salih. Date published Prepared by Anne Russett, Senior Planner. 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 (REZ20-0008) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), John R. Rummelhart, Jr. (hereinafter "Owner"), and Jeff Clark (hereinafter "Applicant"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 0.275 acres of property located at 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property from High Density Multi -Family (RM -44) to Planned High Density Multi -Family (PRM); and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding substantial compliance with the attached site plan and elevations, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2020) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need to ensure that future development is compatible with the existing neighborhood in terms of height and mass of the building; and Whereas, the PRM zone bonus provisions allow for additional development potential, and therefore, substantial compliance With the site plan and elevations will ensure a building with a maximum height of 5 -stories, which is compatible to surrounding uses; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. John R. Rummelhart, Jr. is the legal title holder of the properties legally described as: The south half of Lots 5 and 6 in Block 75 in Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 116, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, except the east 50 feet of the south half of said Lot 6, subject to easements and restrictions of record; and The east 50 feet of the south half of Lot 6, in Block 75, in Iowa City, Iowa, according to the recorded plat thereof; subject to easements and restrictions of record. 2. Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2020) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: a. In the event that any development on the subject property relies upon a PRM bonus provision or minor adjustment, the development must substantially comply with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 (attached). 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2020), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Owner's expense. Dated this day of 20_. City of Iowa City Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Appro p by: W 4. J City Attorney's Office — P&kAzrn Ik 24� % Jeff Clark By: City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ) ss: Johnson County ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 20 by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Jeff Clark Acknowledgement: State of V-+' County of erMNJ This record was acknowledged before me on -t r 20't(,,by Jeff Clark. Notary Public i a for sai ounty and State E JOSHUA L. WHETSTINE Commission Number 710!50 My Commission Expires (Stamp or Seal) _..___ _______ My commission expires: �� 1��' Z, John R. Rummelhart, Jr. Acknowledgment: State of County of This record was acknowledged before Rummelhart, Jr. JOSHUA L WHETSIINE 4tcommission Number 710950 My Commission Expires 7001E --"—�->� - me n �% 20 by John R. I� Notary is In and for said County and State (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: _— \U� 4 mxn tam rlFocram I+oxcwlaxm YMIIEM IUGiKN 944 — ve I Ske Plan Irx F •2'A Lm IIFR N16F f11dR.tlE ]tl R Lmwsuc+: Inml F unxocora� Ixnl F 101 IHBTl O.® 6 Ir0.110F° 0.a F 1O,l r,gplOt 1,1111 I Y�FR�I® 1F1 W nO n i I 2 1 0 N 110Ai 2 2 1 0 N n00112 2 2 1 0 R wax 2 2 1 0 1 1 N 11 I rlremlulr aauu2n2n6 IIObtT. a s aoue tr sp2a° I .o 2F IrF0.11J I m OarV Flom Plan ,T-,o- EN im L m Ln El ML �s m b. FAIR N C C Second Floor Plan _ 1 sw2 ve-ra d� �I u n Third Floor Wan fi sue W- Vr H C O a+ C n Fourth Floor Plan `/ sds uc-ra Fifth Flow Ran we va-ra .0 owm Y Mom 7 Roof Plan l'� e�ur•ru OOIIIl1lN T! Mtl:YI®EYNLL EEtu 9ONY �, a.Y.reA N smnE°'a� C smiEuxas y„0+ C YErua�Enc mrtEx V amYexo = ecru runoY.ms � YEIHBLLLg1Y cuwYc •r a e7 YEiHYY Y.1MM V 1EiN9PIJ C d 9lIMM2GVI VWIIG 1EiuiBf£ IIYC1[ WNR! E6mND1UEGP YYYHI M0W Y40 a.Y.reA n West!evatlon 9 *"sort ...r,... GLUM Mom ew.m. South F]evetlon 10 eae u-ro -?� - II IIIIIIII IIIA IIL...! _ •- Mom ew.m. South F]evetlon 10 eae u-ro n East Elevation sac va-ra �I ■ ■=■'_■ =�_■■ ■ H Item Number: 10.e. �r CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org January 5, 2021 Ordinance to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure. (REZ20-0005) (Pass & Adopt) /_1AIF_TOUILTA 121Z111&'3 Description Staff Report P&Z Minutes 10-15-2020 Ordinance t -�, CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 15, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Zoning Code Amendment (REZ20-0005) to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure Introduction The proposed amendment (REZ20-0005) modifies the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions in Iowa City Code section 14-213-7. It allows an applicant to seek minor adjustments in the Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) Zone for new construction projects which involve the preservation of a separate historic structure. Specifically, the proposed amendment allows the Staff Design Review Committee to consider waiving or modifying several standards. The purpose is to incentivize the designation of 410-412 N. Clinton Street as a local historic landmark, which would occur in conjunction with the redevelopment of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street. The amendment may incentivize some future historic preservation efforts, though its application is limited. The proposed amendment is detailed in Attachment 1. Background At City Council's work session on August 4, 2020, staff presented concepts for the potential redevelopment of 400 N. Clinton Street and 112 E. Davenport Street and input regarding the concept from the Historic Preservation Commission and Friends of Historic Preservation. The redevelopment would require relief from certain provisions of the zoning code, so in exchange, the owner would designate 410-412 N. Clinton Street as a local historic landmark. Council indicated that staff should proceed with code changes to provide the flexibility necessary for the redevelopment so long as the historic property is concurrently preserved. Proposed Amendment Staff developed the proposed amendment to be similar to existing forms of flexibility and incorporated it into the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions (14-213-7) section. It is written so new construction projects which involve the preservation of a separate abutting structure that is eligible to be designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark can utilize the provision, as will be the case at 400 N. Clinton Street. However, the minor adjustment provisions cannot be used in conjunction with other PRM Zone Bonus provisions. While all properties do not need to be under the same ownership, all owners must agree on the project. Waivers The proposed amendment allows applicants to request waivers from the following standards: 1) 14-213-4 Dimensional Requirements: Includes lot size, setbacks, height and width, lot coverage, open space, number of bedrooms per unit, and dwelling unit density; October 15, 2020 Page 2 2) 14-213-6 Multi -Family Site Development Standards: Includes parking area setbacks, location and screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, building entrances, materials, scale, and design. 3) 14-5 Site Development Standards: Includes general standards for off street parking and loading, signs, access management, intersection visibility standards, landscaping and trees, screening and buffering, outdoor lighting, and performance standards, but sensitive lands and features or floodplain management are specifically excluded. Approval Criteria The proposed amendment includes several requirements and approval criteria to ensure that the amendment meets its intent. First, the abutting historic structure cannot be designated as a local historic landmark prior to the minor adjustment application. In addition, the Design Review committee, through a level I design review process, must find that the requested minor adjustment meets the following approval criteria: 1. Historic Landmark Documentation. Must document that the historic property is being designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark in conjunction with the minor adjustment. Council must approve the landmark prior to a building permit being issued. 2. Rehabilitation Plan. Must detail how the project preserves the abutting historic property and its timeline for completion. This must be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission prior to submittal. 3. Landfill Diversion Plan. Must contain specifications as required by the Design Review Committee where such a project will involve the demolition of any existing buildings. 4. Redevelopment Character and Limitations. The proposed building height shall not exceed five stories and 60 feet, and its design will be reviewed to ensure it is sensitive to preserving the historic property and the characteristics of the site and the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the project shall not detract from or be injurious to other property or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Consistency with Plans. The adjustment must be consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, District Plans, and Historic Preservation Plan, as applicable. Because the amendment requires a design review process, staff will also receive a site plan and concept for the redeveloped property. If an applicant disagrees with a staff determination about a project, it may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment. Analysis The proposed amendment would only affect PRM zones in Iowa City, which are relatively limited in their geographic scope. PRM zones, shown in Figure 1 below, are primarily located in three areas, all of which are near downtown and/or the University of Iowa: 1. Near the west University of Iowa campus, between Highway 6 W and Newton Road; 2. In Riverfront Crossings, bounded by E. Harrison Street to the north, S. Linn Street to the east, the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the south, and S. Capitol Street to the west; and 3. Near the northside, bounded roughly by E. Davenport Street to the north, N. Dubuque Street to the east, E. Jefferson Street to the south, and N. Clinton Street to the west. This final area near the northside is where 400 N. Clinton and the proposed redevelopment are located. Based on this and the location of existing historic resources, staff anticipates the near northside area would be most likely to continue utilizing the minor adjustment in the future. While some other areas have historic resources, specifically in Riverfront Crossings, staff believes these are more likely to be rezoned and developed under the form -based code standards rather than through the proposed amendment due to the potential for higher densities. October 15, 2020 Page 3 Consequently, the implications of the proposed amendment are relatively limited. As noted, the PRM zones in Iowa City are geographically concentrated. There is also not much overlap between potentially historic properties and PRM zones, except in the northside and Riverfront Crossings, the latter of which is not likely to redevelop under the PRM zoning designation. As such, the proposed amendment may lead to the designation of additional buildings as local historic landmarks while promoting infill redevelopment that would further the goals of the City, similar to the proposed redevelopment at 400 N. Clinton Street. However, it is not likely to be widespread in its application. Figure 1. Map of PRM Zones J Zoning (Iowa City) Iowa City Zonis ■Planned High Density N9., --=arnily Residential (PRM) inl mol Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The proposed amendment effectively pairs goals related to the preservation and rehabilitation of historic buildings with the demand for infill development near downtown. By providing flexibility for redevelopment in return for the designation of historic properties, the proposed amendment helps preserve key buildings that contribute to the historic character of Iowa City's downtown neighborhoods. In addition, the requirement that a Rehabilitation Plan be submitted for the historic property, to be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, ensures that historic properties continue to see investment. Adoption also furthers climate action goals related to the diversion of landfill waste associated with the demolition of any buildings involved in the project. More specifically, the proposed amendment supports the following goals and strategies from the comprehensive plan: Identify and support infill development and redevelopment opportunities in areas where services and infrastructure are already in place. Support the Historic Preservation Commission's efforts to meet its goals. October 15, 2020 Page 4 Support housing rehabilitation programs and re -invest in housing in existing neighborhoods. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0005, a proposed amendment to the zoning code to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure, as illustrated in Attachment 1. Next Steps Because this zoning text amendment is directly connected to 400 N. Clinton St., 112 E. Davenport St, and 410-412 N. Clinton St., following a vote by the Planning and Zoning Commission, this amendment will be held to run concurrently through City Council with the following applications: 1. The rezoning of 400 N. Clinton St. and 112 E. Davenport St. from RM -44 to PRM (REZ20- 0008) 2. The local landmark designation of 410-412 N. Clinton St. (REZ20-0009) All three applications are expected to be on the December 1, 2020 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at Council's November 17 meeting. Attachments 1. Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment Approved by: 1 Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Attachment 1 Page 1 Draft Zoning Code Text Amendments Underlined text is suggested new language. Strike -through notation indicates language to be deleted. Italics indicate notes. Amend 14-2B-7 as follows: PRM ZONE BONUS AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS: A. Purpose: The PRM zone bonus provisions provide an incentive for developments to incorporate features that provide a public benefit and encourage excellence in architectural design. The PRM zone minor adjustment provisions allow flexibility to a project in a PRM zone which involves new construction in coniunction with the preservation of nearby historic properties. B. Application: The bonus and minor adjustment provisions will be administered through the design review process as set forth in chapter 8, article B, "Administrative Approval Procedures'; of this title. Decisions of the committee may be appealed to the board of adjustment. A project shall use either the provisions in C. "Bonus Provisions" or the provisions in D. "Minor Adjustments" below, but not both. 1. Bonuses Provisions include allowance of dwelling units in excess of the density otherwise achievable under the provisions of the base zone, additional building bulk, and/or reductions of the required setback area. Bonuses are based on a point system. Points may be awarded for public benefit features that the design review committee determines are appropriate in design and location. Bonuses will not be granted for site development features or standards already required by this title. De iSiens of +"o committee may e appealed to the beam! „fadjustment. The number of points allowed for public benefit features and the number of points required per bonus item are set forth in C. "Bonus Provisions" below.: 2. Minor adiustments to dimensional and site development standards may be allowed for a newly constructed building where the project also preserves a historic property as set forth in D. "Minor Adjustments" below. C. Bonus Provisions in the PRM Zone: Development that includes the following public benefit features may qualify for the bonuses listed in the Bonus Menu below. Public Benefit Features: a. Materials: Masonry finish on all nonfenestrated areas of walls visible from a public street. For purposes of this provision, "masonry" is defined as fired brick, stone or similar such materials, not including concrete blocks and undressed poured concrete. "Masonry" may include stucco or like material when used in combination with other masonry finish. Points allowed: 5 b. Open Space: The provision of usable open space of a size and at a grade that, at a minimum, allows passive recreational uses and is accessible to all residential occupants of the building. Such space may include yards, other than required setback areas, terraces and rooftop gardens designed and approved for outdoor activities. Balconies serving individual dwelling units are not eligible for this bonus. Points allowed: 1 per 250 square feet c. Historic Buildings: Rehabilitation of a historically significant building as determined by the survey of the historic and architectural resources for the vicinity. Points allowed: 7 d. Assisted Housing: Dwelling units committed to the city's assisted housing program or some other affordable housing program approved by the city, provided such units do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total units contained within a building. Points allowed: 3 per unit Attachment 1 Page 2 e. Streetscape Amenities: The provision of funds for all street furniture, lighting and landscaping improvements along adjacent street rights of way in accordance with an approved city streetscape plan. Points allowed: 5 f. Landscaping: The provision of additional landscaped areas that are visible from a public street. Required setback areas and required landscape buffers do not qualify for bonus points. Points allowed: 1 per 250 square feet g. Windows: Installing individual window units that have a height that is at least one and one-half (1.5) times greater than the width of the window unit in all primary living spaces, such as living rooms, dining rooms and bedrooms. Individual window units may be located side by side in a wider window opening. Skylights, windows in bathrooms and kitchens, and decorative windows, such as stained glass and ocular windows, are not required to meet this standard for the building to qualify for bonus points. Points allowed: 3 2. Bonus Menu: a. Setback Reduction: The front setback may be reduced by a maximum of fifty percent (50%). When determining the appropriateness of such a reduction, the character of adjacent development and setbacks will be considered. Points required: 7 b. Height Increase: The maximum allowed building height may be increased from thirty five feet (35) up to a maximum of sixty five feet (65), provided the portion of building exceeding thirty five feet (35) is stepped back a minimum of five feet (5) for each story located above thirty five feet (35) to reduce the appearance of the bulk of the building. Points required: 7 c. Density Bonus: (1) For effinienc-y pa4mento the minimum Int area per unit my be reduced to five hundred (500) quare feet Points required. 7 O1 For one bedroom apartments the 4h* -n um Int area ner unit may he reduGerl to soden hundred (700) quare feet. Points renu;.re_ l• 7 {} For efficiency apartments, the minimum lot area per unit may be reduced to four hundred twenty (420) square feet. Points required: 12 (il) Cor one bedroom apartments the minimum Int area ner unit may he reiLUnerl to four edfifty ( 4 Sn square feet. required. 1 d. Building Coverage Increase: The maximum building coverage may be increased to sixty five percent (65%). Points required: 7 D. Minor Adiustments in the PRM Zone: Minor Adjustments: Through a Level l Design Review, the Design Review Committee may approve a minor adjustment from any standard found in 14-2B-4 "Dimensional Requirements", 14-2B-6 "Multi -Family Site Development Standards," or 14-5 "Site Development Standards", except for those in 14-51 "Sensitive Lands and Features" and 14-5J "Floodplain Management Standards". Historic properties may have standards waived through the 14 -2B -8A "Historic Preservation Exceptions" process. 2. Applicability: The minor adjustment provides flexibility for new construction projects which involve preservation of a separate historic structure provided the following circumstances are met: a. The property for which a minor adiustment is requested abuts a property in any zone that is eligible to be designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark (herein "historic property"); b. The historic property is not designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark prior to receipt of an application for a minor adjustment; and c. An acknowledged statement from all owner(s), including those of the historic Property, is provided in a form acceptable to the City of Iowa City, including that Attachment 1 Page 3 any required plans submitted are done so with their free consent and are in accordance with the desires of said owner(s). 3. Approval Criteria: The request for a minor adjustment shall meet the following approval criteria to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee: a. Documentation that the historic property is pursuing designation as an Iowa City Historic Landmark in coniunction with the minor adjustment. The City shall not issue a building permit for the proiect seeking the minor adiustment until the City Council has approved the Iowa City Historic Landmark designation of the historic property; b. Submittal of a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Preservation Commission that details how the proiect preserves the abutting historic property and its timeline for completion; c. If the proiect involves demolition of (an) existing building(s), submittal of a demolition waste landfill diversion plan as required by the Design Review Committee; d. The proposed building height shall not exceed five (5) stories and sixty feet (60'), and its design shall be sensitive to preserving the historic property and shall fit the characteristics of the site and the existing neighborhood context; e. The proiect shall not detract from or be injurious to other property or improvements in the vicinity; and f. The requested adiustment shall be consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, District Plans, and Historic Preservation Plan, as applicable. Amend 14-2B-4 as follows: Dimensional Requirements: The dimensional requirements for the multi -family residential zones are stated in table 2B-2, located at the end of this section. Each of the following subsections describes in more detail the regulations for each of the dimensional requirements listed in the table. Provisional uses and uses allowed by special exception may have specific dimensional requirements not specified in table 2B-2, located at the end of this section. Approval criteria for these uses are addressed in chapter 4, article B of this title. Dimensional requirements may be waived or modified for developments approved through the planned development process (see chapter 3, article A, "Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)'; of this title) or through minor adjustments in PRM Zones as outlined in section 14-2B-7. "PRM Zone Bonus and Minor Adiustment Provisions" or historic preservation exception as outlined in section 14-2B-8, "Special Provisions", of this article. Amend 14-2B-6 as follows: K. Exceptions and Minor Adiustments: A special exception to waive or modifv specific provisions of this section may be requested through the historic preservation exception as outlined in section 14-2B-8, "Special Provisions", of this article. A minor adiustment to modify specific provisions of this section may be requested as specified in Minor Adiustments in PRM Zones" as found in section 14-2B-7. "PRM Zone Bonus and Minor Adiustment Provisions". MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 15, 2020 —7:00 PM ELECTRONIC FORMAL MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT FINAL Susan Craig, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Nolte, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend Ray Heitner, Sarah Hektoen, Kirk Lehmann, Anne Russett Luke Newton, Jon Harding, Jon Marner, Chant Eicke, Ryan Wade, Jeff Clark, William Means Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission set a public hearing for November 5, 2020 on an application to amend the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan, to expand the West Riverfront Subdistrict to include approximately 3.16 acres south of Myrtle Avenue, west of Riverside Drive, north of the Iowa Interstate Railroad, and east of Olive Street. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 3.1 acres of property located at the corner of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and Camp Cardinal Road, across the street from 80 Gathering Place Lane from Neighborhood Public (P-1) to Community Commercial with a Planned District Overlay (OPD/CC-2) subject to conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, provision of a 15 -foot -wide utility easement along the property's east side. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, payment of $5,000 toward the upgrading of approximately 25 feet of Camp Cardinal Road that is adjacent to the subject property that does not meet City standards is made. This amount is based off of Camp Cardinal Road being a collector street, and the applicant contributing 25% of the cost of the approximately 25 feet of the road that needs to be improved to the north property line. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of VAC20-0001 a vacation of 0.06 acres of Camp Cardinal Road right-of-way north of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and west of Gathering Place Lane in Iowa City. Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 2 of 24 By a vote of 4-2 (Martin & Nolte dissenting) the Commissions recommends approval of ANN20 0001 and REZ20-0002, a voluntary annexation of approximately 196.17 acres rezoning from County Residential (R) and County Urban Residential (RUA) to Interim Development — Single - Family Residential (ID -RS) with the following conditions: 1. The developer satisfies the comprehensive plans annexation policy, as stated in Resolution 18- 211. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of VAC20-0002, a vacation of the St. Mathias Alley right-of-way south of North Dodge Street and east of 1120 North Dodge Street in Iowa City, Iowa with the amendment to just include the western tip of the alley right-of-way. By a vote of 5-1 (Townsend dissenting) the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 12,000 square feet of land located at 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Davenport Street from High -Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Planned High Density Multifamily Residential (PRM zone subject to the following condition: 1. Substantial compliance with the site plan and elevations dated July 1, 2020 if any PRM bonus provisions or minor adjustments are requested for the property. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends approval of REZ20-005, a proposed amendment to the zoning code to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multifamily Residential Zones (PRM) for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure, as illustrated in attachment one of the staff report. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. CPA20-0002: Applicant: K&F Properties, LLC Location: 219, 223, and 245 S. Riverside Court and 119, 201, 203, 205, 207, and 209 Myrtle Avenue A request to set a public hearing for November 5, 2020 on an application to amend the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan, to expand the West Riverfront Subdistrict to include approximately 3.16 acres south of Myrtle Avenue, west of Riverside Drive, north of the Iowa Interstate Railroad, and east of Olive Street. Russett stated staff doesn't have a presentation for the Commission tonight on this item, they have received a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan, so they are asking the Commission to set a public hearing for that application for November 5. Hensch opened the public comment. Hearing no comments, Hensch closed the public comment. Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 20 of 24 Signs is also concerned with the materials. When he looks at this plan what comes to mind is the look of the property on South Riverside or one of the properties over on Iowa Avenue, that seem to contemporary for the spot. He feels it could very easily be modified to have more of a historic appearance. He is surprised there hasn't been more outcry about this application. Hensch noted he feels the primary importance is for 410-412 North Clinton Street to be preserved and not only preserved but rehabilitated so that it can last another 150 years. He also noted Mr. Clark is still on the call so he can hear their conversations regarding their desire, even though it may happen later on down the road for it to aesthetically fit in this neighborhood. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-1 (Townsend dissenting). CASE NO. REZ20-0005: Minor Adjustments in the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions Ordinance Consideration of the Minor Adjustments in the PRM Zone Bonus Provisions Ordinance, which amends Title 14 Zoning to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure. Lehmann began noting a lot of background on this item was address in the previous item. A PRM zone has special bonus provisions that can increase density and increase height, but it does not have the flexibility required to do the project as it's been currently described in the previous item. Therefore, at Council's August 4 work session, staff presented this concept to potentially redevelop 400 North Clinton Street and 112 East Devonport Street with some zoning code relief or some flexibility. In return the developer would preserve and designate 410-412 North Clinton Street as a local historic landmark. Lehmann added this concept was also presented to the Historic Preservation Commission and they also got input from the Friends of Historic Preservation and all that was presented to Council. Based off that information Council had indicated that staff should proceed with Code changes to provide flexibility so long as historic property is preserved Lehmann noted this amendment is pretty focused on this application, but it may incentivize some future historic preservation efforts. Lehmann stated this proposed amendment allows some minor adjustments in the PRM zones, which provides flexibility from zoning regulations. The brief bullet points of the amendment include things like parking, setback, density requirements, the project must involve new construction, and it must involve the preservation of a separate potentially historic structure that is not yet locally protected. Lehmann noted using this amendment would require staff review and approval through the design review committee, through the level one design review process. Lehmann reiterated this amendment is designed for new construction projects, specifically in PRM zones, and have to involve the preservation of a separate abutting structure that is eligible to be designated as an Iowa City landmark. Lehmann defined abutting as it must share a property line and can't be across the street. Additionally, the property must not yet be designated as a landmark. So if it's already locally protected, one could not use this provision. Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 21 of 24 The minor adjustment provisions can't be used in conjunction with the other existing PRM zone bonus provisions. Generally, the things that they can't do is make a building up to 65 feet in height, which is allowed under the bonus provisions. In addition, all properties don't need to be under the same ownership for this to move forward but all owners must agree to the project. This would be a minor adjustment process, and a level one staff review so it doesn't go to Council. Lehmann next discussed the waivers that can be requested using the proposed amendment. First is multifamily zone dimensional requirements found at 14-213-4 and includes a lot of the standards of zoning such as minimum lot size, setbacks, height, width, lot coverage, open space, number of bedrooms per unit, and dwelling unit density. It also includes multifamily zone site development standards found at 14-213-6 and includes things like parking area setbacks, locations, screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, building entrances, there are some material requirements and then also scale and design. Finally there are also general site development standards, found at 14-5 and include general standards for off street parking, loading signs, access management, intersection visibility, landscaping, screening and buffering, outdoor lighting performance standards, but does specifically exclude sensitive lands and features and floodplain management standards. As far as staff review of a project requesting the proposed amendment, there are five sets of approval criteria that they have to pass. First is a Historic Landmark Documentation which is where the applicant must document the historic property being designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark in conjunction with the minor adjustment, and Council must approve that historic application prior to a building permit being issued. Second, is the Rehabilitation Plan. The applicant must detail how the project preserves the abutting historic property and also provide a timeline for completion. This must be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission prior to submittal. Third is a Landfill Diversion Plan. One of the Historic Preservation Commission's concerns was about the landfill waste that is created through the demolition of existing properties, so the applicant must contain specifications as required by the design review committee where such a project will involve demolition of any buildings. Fourth, there are Redevelopment Character and Limitations that they wanted to ensure are part of the staff review. The building height can't exceed five stories and 60 feet and the building design must be sensitive to preserving the historic property and the characteristics of the site and surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the project shall not detract from or be injurious to other property or improvements in the vicinity. Finally, fifth is Consistency with Plans. The minor adjustment must be consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, District Plans, and Historic Preservation Plan. Lehmann noted when the City was looking at this amendment, staff was interested in sharing where might this amendment be used in the future since it was pretty specifically tailored for this certain circumstance. PRM zones in general are located in three areas across the City. First, there's an area near the west university campus, between Highway 6 and Newton Road. The second area is in Riverfront Crossings District, bounded by East Harrison Street in the north, South Linn Street on the east, the Iowa Interstate Railroad in the south and South Capitol Street in the West. Finally there's the Near North Side area, which is where the proposed redevelopment is that's bounded by East Davenport Street to the north, North Dubuque Street to the east, East Jefferson Street to the South and North Clinton Street to the west. So in terms of where might this be used in the future, staff anticipates the Near North Side would be the most likely area to use this provision as it tends to have more historic nearby properties Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 22 of 24 that could be protected that are not currently historic landmarks. Lehmann noted there are historic landmarks in the other areas, especially the Riverfront Crossings area, but those are already historic designated areas and also the Riverfront Crossings Codes allows much more flexibility as it allows a lot more density than what would be allowed through the PRM zone, even using the minor modification process and staff anticipates that area would be developed under that Form -Based Code instead. Lehmann reiterated the PRM zones are pretty geographically concentrated and have limited overlap with historic properties and staff hopes that it may promote some infill and lead to designation of additional buildings as historic landmarks, and staff doesn't expect it to be too widespread in its application or use in the future. As far as consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed amendment does relate to historic preservation and infill provisions of the Plan. It does provide some flexibility for redevelopment which can be a barrier to infill and it preserves key buildings contributing to Iowa City's historic neighborhoods. Additionally, the rehabilitation plan requirement ensures that investments in historic properties are maintained. This amendment also specifically supports the following goals and strategies. The first is identify and support infill development or redevelopment opportunities in areas where services and infrastructure are already in place. The second is support the Historic Preservation Commission's effort to meet its goals and the third is support housing rehabilitation programs and reinvest in housing in existing neighborhoods. In addition, that the fact that there's the diversion of landfill waste associated as an approval criterion, does further some climate action goals as well with making sure that demolition waste is being recycled to the extent possible or reused and diverted from the landfill. The role of the Commission is to determine if the proposed zoning code text amendment should be recommended for approval to City Council and City Council will make the final decision following three readings which will include a public hearing. Staff recommends approval of REZ20-005, a proposed amendment to the zoning code to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multifamily Residential Zones (PRM) for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure, as illustrated in attachment one of the staff report. Signs asked if the Historic Preservation Commission has weighed in on this yet and what was their opinion. Lehmann stated they have not weighed in on this specific proposed text amendment but staff crafted it based on the input they had gotten during the concept phases and were in communications with developers and based on feedback from Council. Hensch asked if there any other examples of the approval criteria because he really liked the landfill diversion of demolition materials language. Lehmann replied it is the first example, but staff is interested in exploring this as a further requirement criteria. Hensch agreed and really encourages staff to use it as approval criteria for other applications also because greenhouse gas emission, sustainability and wise use of resources is important. Craig asked staff about the areas chosen and what the thought process was as they are three pretty small areas. It also seems like there are historic structures outside of those three areas that have some potential for this so why limit it to those areas. Lehmann said at the moment they're limiting it to those areas because it's a pretty targeted amendment and the PRM zone Planning and Zoning Commission October 15, 2020 Page 23 of 24 already has bonus provisions that are allowed. Hensch opened the public hearing. Hearing from no one, Hensch closed the public hearing. Nolte moved to recommend approval of REZ20-005, a proposed amendment to the zoning code to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multifamily Residential Zones (PRM) for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure, as illustrated in attachment one of the staff report. Craig seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 1, 2020: Signs moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 1, 2020. Townsend seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett noted one item at the last meeting the Commission discussed the Good Neighbor Program and she wanted to tell the Commission about next steps. She will take the Commission's recommendations and prepare a memo to the City Council, probably in the next month or so, and she can keep the Commission posted on that. ADJOURNMENT: Craig moved to adjourn. Townsend seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. DEFERRED to 1/19/21 Prepared by: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ20-0006) Ordinance No. Ordinance to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow minor adjustments in Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zones for new construction projects which involve preserving a separate historic structure (REZ20-0005) Whereas, it is in the public interest to designate historic properties as Iowa City historic landmarks, such as the property at 410-412 N. Clinton Street; and Whereas, Planned High Density Multi -Family Residential (PRM) zone provides bonus provisions to encourage high quality redevelopment and properties zoned PRM may be located near properties that are potentially eligible to be designated as a local historic landmark; and Whereas, to incentivize historic preservation, it is reasonable to provide relief from certain provisions of the zoning code for the redevelopment of property abutting a historic property, so long as the abutting historic property is concurrently zoned a local historic landmark pursuant to the Iowa City Zoning Code; and Whereas, it is reasonable to grant relief from dimensional and site development standards through an administrative minor adjustment, subject to criteria that ensure that the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, District Plans, and Historic Preservation Plan are met; and Whereas, the City's comprehensive plan encourages infill development where services and infrastructure are already in place, supports the Historic Preservation Commission's efforts to meet its goals, and provides for housing rehabilitation programs and reinvestment in housing in existing neighborhoods; and Whereas, efficiency and one -bedroom units in PRM zones require only 435 square feet of lot area per unit minimum, which is denser than provided for in the bonus options; Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the zoning code amendment set forth below and recommends approval. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I. Amendments. The Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, Iowa is hereby amended by adding the following underlined language: A. Amend 14-213-7 as follows: PRM ZONE BONUS AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS: A. Purpose: The PRM zone bonus provisions provide an incentive for developments to incorporate features that provide a public benefit and encourage excellence in architectural design. The PRM zone minor adjustment arovisions allow flaxihility tn a Ordinance No. Page 2 B. Application: The bonus and minor adjustment provisions will be administered through the design review process as set forth in chapter 8, article B, "Administrative Approval Procedures", of this title. Decisions of the Desion Review Cnmmittaa mw he #_ C. 1. Bonuses Provisions include allowance of dwelling units in excess of the density otherwise achievable under the provisions of the base zone, additional building bulk, and/or reductions of the required setback area. Bonuses are based on a point system. Points may be awarded for public benefit features that the design review committee determines are appropriate in design and location. Bonuses will not be granted for site development features or standards already required by this title. Besisieas of the adjustment.Gemmittee may be appealed tG the bG;;Fd of The number of points allowed for public benefit features and the number of points required per bonus item are set forth in C. "Bonus Provisions" below.: 2. Minor adjustments to dimensional and site development standards may be allowed for a newly constructed building where the project also preserves a historic property as set forth in D. "Minor Adjustments" below. Public Benefit Features: a. Materials: Masonry finish on all nonfenestrated areas of walls visible from a public street. For purposes of this provision, "masonry" is defined as fired brick, stone or similar such materials, not including concrete blocks and undressed poured concrete. "Masonry" may include stucco or like material when used in combination with other masonry finish. Points allowed: 5 b. Open Space: The provision of usable open space of a size and at a grade that, at a minimum, allows passive recreational uses and is accessible to all residential occupants of the building. Such space may include yards, other than required setback areas, terraces and rooftop gardens designed and approved for outdoor activities. Balconies serving individual dwelling units are not eligible for this bonus. Points allowed: 1 per 250 square feet c. Historic Buildings: Rehabilitation of a historically significant building as determined by the survey of the historic and architectural resources for the vicinity. Points allowed: 7 d. Assisted Housing: Dwelling units committed to the city's assisted housing program or some other affordable housing program approved by the city, provided such units do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total units contained within a building. Points allowed: 3 per unit e. Streetscape Amenities: The provision of funds for all street furniture, lighting and landscaping improvements along adjacent street rights of way in accordance with an approved city Streetscape plan. Points allowed: 5 f. Landscaping: The provision of additional landscaped areas that are visible from a public street. Required setback areas and required landscape buffers do not qualify for bonus points. Points allowed: 1 per 250 square feet g. Windows: Installing individual window units that have a height that is at least one and one-half (1.5) times greater than the width of the window unit in all primary living spaces, such as living rooms, dining rooms and bedrooms. Individual window units may be located side by side in a wider window opening. Skylights, windows in bathrooms and kitchens, and decorative windows, such as stained glass and Ordinance No. Page 3 ocular windows, are not required to meet this standard for the building to qualify for bonus points. Points allowed: 3 Bonus Menu: a. Setback Reduction: The front setback may be reduced by a maximum of fifty percent (50%). When determining the appropriateness of such a reduction, the character of adjacent development and setbacks will be considered. Points required: 7 b. Height Increase: The maximum allowed building height may be increased from thirty five feet (35') up to a maximum of sixty five feet (65'), provided the portion of building exceeding thirty five feet (35') is stepped back a minimum of five feet (5') for each story located above thirty five feet (35') to reduce the appearance of the bulk of the building. Points required: 7 c. Density Bonus: (3) For efficiency apartments, the minimum lot area per unit may be reduced to four hundred twenty (420) square feet. Points required: 12 Building Coverage Increase: The maximum building coverage may be increased to sixty five percent (65%). Points required: 7 D. Minor Adjustments: 1. Minor Adjustments: Through a Level I Design Review, the Design Review Committee and 14-5J "Floodplain Management Standards" Historic properties may have standards waived through the 14-213-8A "Historic Preservation Exceptions" process 2. Applicability: The minnr nditiOmant nrnvirine flcviV ilifv f,. —.. 3. circumstances are met: a. The property for wh n C. accordance with their desires. a. Documentation that the historic property is pursuing designation as an Iowa City Historic Landmark in conjunction with the minor adiustment The City shall not issue a building permit for the project seeking the minor adiustment until the City Council has approved the Iowa City Historic Landmark designation of the historic Property: b. Submittal of a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Preservation Commission that details how the proiect preserves the abutting historic propertv Ordinance No. Page 4 c. If the project involves demolition of (an) existing buildings submittal of a demolition d. The proposed building height shall not exceed five (5) stories and sixty feet (601 and its design shall be sensitive to preserving the historic property and shall fit the characteristics of the site and the existing neighborhood context: e. The project shall not detract from or be incurious to other property or improvements in the vicinity: and f. The requested adiustment shall ha cnngistant with tho nnnic of rho Cnm n�ehc..c 6,o B. Amend 14-213-4 as follows: Dimensional Requirements: The dimensional requirements for the multi -family residential zones are stated in table 213-2, located at the end of this section. Each of the following subsections describes in more detail the regulations for each of the dimensional requirements listed in the table. Provisional uses and uses allowed by special exception may have specific dimensional requirements not specified in table 26- 2, located at the end of this section. Approval criteria for these uses are addressed in chapter 4, article B of this title. Dimensional requirements may be waived or modified for developments approved through the planned development process (see chapter 3, article A, 'Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)", of this title) or through minor Adjustment Provisions" or historic preservation exception as outlined in section 14-213-8, "Special Provisions", of this article. C. Amend 14-213-6 as follows: Adjustments in PRM Zones" as found in section 14-215-7 'PRM Zone Bonus and Minor Adjustment Provisions". Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication. Passed and approved this day of 2020. Ordinance No. Page 5 Mayor Approved by Attest: 4tvw k , / `L— City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 11 /24/2020) Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner that the First Consideration 12/01/2020 Vote for passage: AYES: Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor. NAYS: None. AYES: None. Second Consideration 12/15/2021 Vote for passage: AYES: Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims. NAYS: None. ABSENT: Salih. Date published Item Number: 10.f. �r CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org January 5, 2021 Ordinance rezoning approximately 0.55 acres of property from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB- 10/OHD) for property located at 109, 111, 115, 117, and 121 E. College Street. (REZ20-02) (Pass & Adopt) (Deferred from 12/1/20) rvir_Ta. ►•r��rLW1&I Description PZ Staff Report with Attachments PZ Final Minutes Ordinance Correspondence - Brandon Smith, Tailwind Group r � ,:,® CITY OF IOWA CITY ��'M 4 � T4 MEMORANDUM Date: May 14, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern Re: Designation 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street as Historic Landmarks (REZ20-02) Background: Tailwind College St. IC, LLC has requested that the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street, be designated as Iowa City Historic Landmarks. This request is a part of a larger proposed development project that would create a new apartment building on the southern portion of these lots while also preserving the historic storefronts of these buildings. The City of Iowa City is currently working towards nomination of an area in the downtown to be listed as a historic district in the National Register of Historic Places. These subject properties fall within the proposed historic district area. Construction of 109 East College Street (Dooley Block, west bay) started in 1874 for the Dooley Block, a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building with Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate fagade details. Since then, the two middle bays have been demolished and the two remaining bays were spilt into separate structures. This particular structure has been home to stores, billiards, and saloons over the years. It is considered key contributing according to the survey done as a part of the nomination process of the Downtown District for its distinctive architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. At 111-113 East College Street, the Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building was built in 1929 in the place of the two central bays of the original Dooley Block building. These properties were built as a 3 -bay, 2 -story building in a Commercial Brick Front style. Over the years, changes have occurred on the storefront of the structure, however they are recognized as historically appropriate. The 2017 survey done for the Downtown District considered this structure as key contributing for its architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. 115 East College Street is one of the original bays of the Dooley Block. This eastern bay is much like the western bay of the Dooley Block, with Late Victorian Romanesque and Italiante details. This building has undergone storefront and sign band alterations. Since the late 19th Century this structure has housed numerous shops over the years. For its distinctive architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, this building is considered key contributing according to the Downtown District survey for the potential listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street, was built in 1894 as a 4 -bay, 3 -story building. This building utilizes a Commercial Brick Front style and Chicago -style architecture. This structure has since had alteration of the storefronts of the two eastern bays. In 1930, the original entry bay was remodeled to reflect Art Deco styling in a small storefront. This building is associated with a locally significant individual in the commercial and financial history of downtown, C. F. Lovelace. For its architectural character, contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, and for its association with a locally significant individual, this structure May 14, 2020 Page 2 is considered key contributing by the 2017 Downtown District survey for the potential listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Historic Preservation Commission Review: The Historic Preservation Commission met on May 14, 2020 and conducted a public hearing at which they reviewed and evaluated the historic significance of properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street. The Commission determined that all the properties meet the requirements for landmark designation and voted to recommend approval of the local landmark designations. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Landmark designation is a zoning overlay and therefore requires a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council. The Commission's role is to review the proposed designation based on its relation to the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed public improvements and plans for the renewal of the area involved. There are two plans that apply to this proposal: 1) the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and 2) the Historic Preservation Plan. These properties fall within the jurisdiction of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossing Master Plan. This plan identifies all these structures as key historic buildings, see figure 1. Objective 1: Protect historic character and key historic buildings, of this plan, encourages the designation of historic resources and local landmarks to preserve the distinct character and ambiance of the downtown area. Figure 1. cx siing —11 bin � p6srq Wldnq J �^ lsiwls ..._— Fdsevq Wi�wgs � Sfo.Si�a#wdrwi . .' _ 1y 11�N�hdtlix� � [err6�s-g y�r«k IWliiy �A.,..., V1A-1MNC91101q ST. Hslak'Jpslk[r[r - G4iLEGE 5T. rZT�14 W -C a ac q The Historic Preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan has two goals that relate to this proposal. Goal 1: Identify historic resources significant to Iowa City's past and Goal 10: Adopt strategies that preserve historic neighborhoods. Specifically, Objective 5 of Goal 1 is satisfied by means of the nomination and pursuit of Local Landmark designation. The designation of these buildings as local landmarks would require review by the Historic Preservation Commission for any future alterations to the exterior of the buildings or requests for new development on the property. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends the approval of REZ20-02, an application to rezone the properties at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 East College Street from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD). May 14, 2020 Page 3 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Memo to the Historic Preservation Commission Approved by: 1 Da i zman, ICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Date: May 7, 2020 Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Dooley Block (west bay), 109 East College Street Sears Roebuck & Co. Building, 111-113 East College Street Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street Applicant Brandon Smith of Tailwind College St. IC, LLC, has requested that the properties at 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, and 117-123 East College Street be designated as Iowa City Historic Landmarks as part of an overall development project. Designation of the property as an Iowa City Historic Landmark will require Commission approval of any significant changes to the exterior of the building and new development proposed on the landmark properties. Landmark status will also make the property eligible for special exceptions that would allow the Board of Adjustment to waive or modify certain zoning requirements as well as State and Federal Tax Credit funding of rehabilitation work. As part of the 2017 update of the 2001 Survey and Evaluation of the Iowa City Central Business District, completed by AKAY consulting and partially funded by a grant from the National Trust, this group of buildings was evaluated for their contribution to a potential Downtown Historic District. The National Register Nomination of this Downtown Historic District is currently in process and includes these buildings as contributing structures within the district boundary. The site inventory forms updated for the study are included as documentation of each building's significance. Each building will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission for its eligibility for local landmark designation in individual public hearings at the May 14, 2020 Commission meeting. For local landmark designation, the Commission should determine if each property meets criterion a. and b. and at least one of the criteria c., d., e., or f. for local designation listed below: a. Significant to American and/or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture; b. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workmanship; c. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; d. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; e. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; f. Has yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. Dooley Block (west bay). 109 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Dooley Block was a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 with this bay. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The west bay at 109 College is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends the full depth of the lot. This bay has functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. The building fagade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. For instance, the paneled cornice and brackets are elements of an Italianate style and the semi -circular wood arches with their keystone detail are evident of the Romanesque. At the lower level, the transom was remodeled with the addition of prism glass prior to 1940, the sign band was removed or altered and the store front has been more recently updated. Since 1879 the building has housed numerous uses including stores, billiards, and saloons. While this building remains as only a portion of the original 4 -bay Dooley block, it has functioned individually since 1929 and with the exception of the storefront, has been relatively unaltered since 1940. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its distinctive architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Dooley Block (west bay), 109 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. 2 r■, Q hh _\J i Wr a q! �X �m ICA Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building, 111-113 East College Street The Sears, Roebuck, & Company Building was built in 1929, from central two bays of the flanking Dooley Block. This building style is commonly known as the Commercial Brick Front and is a 3 -bay 2 - story building filling the entire lot. The upper level includes a Chicago style window in each bay with a continuous terra cotta sill. Terra cotta detailing is also found in the coping on the stepped parapet, as stylized pilasters between the windows and as decorative accents in the brickwork above. The storefront originally had an entrance in the central bay with display windows above and a prism -glass transom and sign band above. The storefront today has been remodeled with entrances in the outer bays flanking the central display window and detailed in stone with a Classical Revival influence that is considered sympathetic to the original building. This building is considered a well-preserved example of the 20th century Commercial Brick Front and while the storefront has been altered, the changes are considered historically sympathetic. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Sears, Roebuck, & Company Building, 111-113 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. 3 111-113 East College Street, Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Dooley Block was a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 and concluding with the construction of this bay between 1892 and 1899. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The east bay at 115 College is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends for much of the depth of the lot. This bay has also functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. Like the west bay, the building fagade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. For instance, the paneled cornice and brackets are elements of an Italianate style and the semi -circular wood arches with their keystone detail are evident of the Romanesque. At the lower level, the storefront had been remodeled prior to 2001 to include a series of moldings separating the storefront from the upper story and an entrance to the east side of a modified shop window. Since 2001 the storefront has again been altered, replacing the shop window with four full -glass doors which fold back to open the entire front of the lower level. Since 1895 the building has housed numerous shops. While this building remains as only a portion of the original 4 -bay Dooley block, it has functioned individually since 1929 and with the exception of the storefront and sign band, has been relatively unaltered. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its distinctive architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. II Tr Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Crescent Block was built in 1894 as a 4 -bay 3 -story Commercial Brick Front building. Originally three larger bays housed storefronts and the smaller bay at 119 served as the entrance to the upper floors. This entry bay was remodeled in the 1930s with Carrara glass in an Art Deco styling to include a small storefront and the stairs to the upper level. The design includes a curved glass display window and the original wood and glass entrance door and tile floor. The west bay retains the original storefront treatment. The east half of the building was remodeled into a single modern storefront with new brick and an exposed aggregate facing above the individual windows and curved awnings. The first floor projects forward and includes a shallow standing seam roof that separates the storefront -level from the upper levels. At the third floor, the windows are tall, paired double -hung windows centered over each bay. Each pair has a thick stone lintel and two thinner sills. At the second floor, the east -most windows were replaced with large Chicago -style windows and the west include alternating pairs and individual windows of two different sizes. A tall, pressed metal cornice includes a rhythm of large and small brackets. In 1929, the building was occupied by Montgomery Ward who built a farm and home store addition at the back of the lot. This building is considered a moderately well-preserved example of a turn -of -the -century Commercial Brick Front building. The building is also associated with C. F. Lovelace who built the adjacent College Block building as well as other buildings in the downtown and is considered a locally significant individual in the commercial and financial history of downtown. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and potentially individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic places. Its unusual style reflects the influence of Chicago -style architecture in Iowa City. The building is also significant for its relationship to local fraternal groups that utilized the third floor. Despite significant modification of the two east storefront bays, the retention of the west storefront and the 1930s Art Deco storefront add to the building's significance. Overall, the building is significant for its architectural character, for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, and locally, for its association with C. F. Lovelace. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c, d and e. IJ 117-123 East College Street, Crescent Block Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-0409 New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa HPart of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Dooley Block (west bay) other names/site number 2. Location street & number 109 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) see full legal 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 05B LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 109 E. College Street Site Number 52-0409 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) Significant Dates Construction date 02 ARCHITECTURE 1874 ® check if circa or estimated date Other dates 05 COMMERCE 1929 Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect N/A unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 11/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: U Yes H No U More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e1 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Dooley Block (west bay) is a one -bay, 2 -story, 19- by 150 -ft., brick building that was constructed in ca. 1874. The building is a remnant of the original, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. From 1929, at which time the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the west bay (109) has beeen — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The east bay of the Dooley Block (115) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. As noted in the 2001 survey, this building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide, east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The stylistic character of the Dooley Block reflects the Late Victorian era during which it was constructed. As noted by Svendsen in 2001, the building fagade presents a mixture of the Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate styles. The paneled wood cornice has returning ends and four large brackets with small dentil-like brackets in between. The upper facade is clad in red brick with elaborate carved wood semi -circular or Romanesque arches over the single and paired 1/1 double -hung windows. Svendsen noted that the storefront had been remodeled "in recent years" with a side entrance and three fixed glass windows for a modified shop window. A series of moldings separates the storefront from the upper story. The 2001 survey also noted that the storefront has a prism -glass transom spanning the full width of the storefront with "new plate glass windows extending to grade." The transom treatment, though not original, predates 1940. No significant alterations of the fagade have been undertaken since the completion of the 2001 survey. The storefront is currently occupied by El Patron, a restaurant/bar. The upper elevation of the Dooley Block (west bay) remains unaltered from 2001, with character -defining features retained including the red brick cladding, ornate Italianate cornice, Roman arched window heads, prism glass transom, and storefront cornice details. As a result, the building retains a generally good level of historic integrity specific to 1929, which marks the year the building was disjoined from the larger Dooley Block and became an autonomous resource. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e2 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the fagade, looking south across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e3 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade, looking SW across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e4 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As noted, the Dooley Block is a one -bay remnant of the original block building, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. The block building was constructed in phases, the westernmost bay (109) dates to ca. 1874, the bay at 111 was in use by 1879, and the east two bays (113 and 115) were constructed in ca.1895. From 1929, when the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the remaining west bay has been — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The east bay of the Dooley Block (115) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. The building is a moderately well-preserved example of a Late Victorian Italianate style commercial building. Because the building has been disjoined from the original block building for well more than 50 -years, the resource is significant in its post -1929 form as a single, autonomous building. Given this, the Dooley Block is eligible for the National Register under Criterion C. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. It should be noted that additional evaluation of interior integrity may support a case for individual eligibility as an increasingly rare representation of an early commercial building in the Iowa City downtown. Historical Backgroun As noted by Svendsen, Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867. It is likely that Dooley constructed the westernmost bay of the building in ca. 1874 since the fire insurance map for that year lists the building as vacant. As late as 1918, city directories refer to the building as the "Dooley Block" confirming Dooley's long-standing connection to the building. Property Transfer Records do not show the property changing hands again until 1928 when a referee deed saw the lot sold to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided and this building was transferred to Mary Connell and F.E. Hunzinger a short time later. The property continued to be held by Hunzinger until the 1960s. Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1874 C 0 L 1, 3' E+ 1i - - -W11-1 i—i :N - it'=fir••-"- w r Fra ZI.n1L- J�� m 13 STEL I N G 11, 4) 1 (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) J 13 STEL I N G 11, 4) 1 (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-0409 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e5 Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1879 F //L COLLEGE. 191 i q—Xl ,14 —=7 r/ •a.rwr BURL—INGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Figure 03. Fire Insurance Map — 1883 (A COLLEGE � x °h• a ik r Z 0 �D Z s v ICEp j �nra�e,�aaccee.r _ � ■i 4 N r BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e6 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 04. Fire Insurance MaiD — 1899 1� rxt ejr dP tt rl� I�i + Ii�� I t 4' S.t �f t+...• ' � v� Y •� F ...z •�•ci + a , 117 a l { �'{resat... ti ,.� k.F:•±. •:+ti •_ y., n�— �• r +yJCla T.(SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) Figure 05. Fire Insurance Map — 1933 _ '� 3 r Sa,-o . 7'0 0 • as Kiri r �- s•- �� •�w i t s , jA' I� Z s C' o B2 c' 7777I111�� I --'-AF � E. BURLINGTON , tar (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1933) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e7 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Fire insurance maps show the building with a variety of uses through the years: hardware store (1879, 1883, 1888, and 1892); saloon (1899, 1906); pool hall (1912, 1920); store (1926, 1933, and 1970). City directories confirm the presence of the Hazard & Pratt Hardware Store at this location in 1878-79 and the Opera House Exchange, a saloon run by T.J. Kenny, here in 1904. By 1911, Thomas H. Kelley had a saloon here. When prohibition arrived, the business changed to a pool hall or billiards parlor with Henry Musack the proprietor from before World War I through the late 1920s. City directories show the building housed a series of grocers during the 1930s including the Piggly Wiggly Grocers in 1930 and the Self -Serve Grocery from the mid -1930s through World War II. Herbert Holmes and George Rebel also operated meat shops during this time period. After World War II, The Men's Shop clothing store was located here and continued operations until the mid-1960s (Svendsen, 2001). Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 109 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 115 (see "Dooley Block," 52-01088.) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e8 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - 1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the east (115) and west (109) bays of the Dooley Block flanking the 1929 infill of the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building. Note that, by this date, the prism glass storefront transom was part of the fagade at 109 (right). Also, Piggly Wiggly occupied the building. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e9 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Dooley's Block" 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Timeline: 109 E. College Street 1874 Fire insurance map shows a building with a similar footprint on this site (address then being 13); the occupant is noted as "vacant." Lot to the east is vacant, though a staircase is located on the east elevation. 1879 Fire insurance map shows a 2 -section addition to the rear of the building (now addressed at 39), so that the building stretches south to the alley. The occupant is noted as "Hardware" with a warehouse in the rear sections. The adjoining bay (then numbered 40) is in place —the bay embracing the former exterior staircase. The length of the new bay matches the original of the first bay. The sites of the east bays (113 and 115) of the Dooley Block are occupied by small scale buildings. 1883 Fire Insurance Map: No change to 109 (then 110); the space remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. A small addition has been made to the rear of 111 (then 112); the building is occupied by a dealer of agricultural implements. The sites of the east bays (113 and 115) of the Dooley Block are occupied by small scale buildings. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Paae 10 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 1888 Fire Insurance Map: The west bay (now numbered 109) remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. 1892 Fire Insurance Map: The west bay remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. 1899 Fire Insurance Map: The 4 -bay Dooley Block is in place. 1901 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 113-115 E. College Street 1915 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 109-115 E. College Street 1925 Historic image documents the original, four -bay configuration of the Dooley Block. 1929 Historic image documents the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building with the Dooley Block bays at 109 and 115 retained. 1933 Fire insurance map confirms the bay at 109 as an autonomous structure due to the removal of the middle two bays. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e11 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, West 19.3' of Lot 3. Assessor: PIN 1010380009 Lat/Long: 41.658860/-91.534107 Parcel Map - 2017 M� (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-04091 ❑ New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building other names/site number The Field House 2. Location street & number 111-113 East College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) see full legal 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02F COMMERCE/TRADE/department store 70 VACANT/NOT IN USE 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 09F05 COMMERCIAL/Brick Front foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other 07 TERRA COTTA Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 111-113 East College Street Site Number 52-04091 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 01 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Dates Construction date 1929 ❑ check if circa or estimated date Other dates Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect N/A unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 11/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Sears, Roebuck & Co. building is situated on a portion of Lot 3 in Block 82. Located on the south side of E. College Street, the building's fagade faces north. As noted in the 2001 evaluation, the building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The building footprint fully occupies the site which, according to the Iowa City assessor, measures 38- by 150 -feet. Built in 1929, the building is a two-story, brick construction in the 20d' century form commonly described as a Commercial Brick Front. The building fagade is clad in pressed brick laid in a Flemish bond with a taupe colored mortar. Typical of commercial properties, the fagade is arranged in a storefront with the transition to the upper fagade marked by a storefront cornice (Image 01). The upper story is organized into three bays, each bay dominated by a Chicago -style window. Each window configuration (one large, fixed pane window flanked by narrower, double -hung windows) features a header of soldier bricks and a running sill of glazed terra cotta. Terra cotta is also used in the coping of the stepped parapet, stylized pilasters that frame the bays, and has relief tiles that provide decorative accents to the brickwork. The brickwork itself is visually interesting and well executed — a large area laid in a basketweave pattern is found over each of the 2nd floor windows (Image 02). Terra cotta tiles are also used in the outer piers of the storefront. Like the upper level, the storefront is divided into three bays. Whereas the original storefront had a center entrance with plate -glass display windows to either side and a multi -part transom with prism glass spanning the front, the storefront today has a central, multi -light display window flanked by recessed openings, each with solid metal double -doors with a single sidelight and transoms above. Although the historic outer storefront piers of brick with terra cotta details are retained, the remainder of the storefront structure is clad in cast stone panels. Constructed to house Sears Roebuck & Co., a national franchise department store, the storefront originally had signage installed in the space immediately beneath the second floor windows as well as a vertical neon blade sign that extended from the beltcourse to parapet level (Image 03). In 2017, the exterior of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building retains a very good level of historic integrity, despite the alteration of the storefront. This is due in large part to the retention of the historic upper story fagade, which provides the basis of the building's visual character: Chicago -style windows, decorative brickwork, stepped parapet, and terracotta details (some deterioration noted) are all character -defining features which are retained. Further, the existing storefront (the construction date of which is undetermined) incorporates Classical Revival influenced details which are sympathetic to the historic character. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the facade (north elevation), looking SE (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Image 02. Detail view of upper facade details (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e3 Site Number 52-04091 Related District Number Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As a well-preserved example of a 20"' century Commercial Brick Front building form frequently adopted by national franchise stores prior to World War II, the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building is significant under Criterion C. Though the storefront has sustained significant alterations, those alterations are historically sympathetic. Further, the upper elevation, with its historic character -defining features intact, is well preserved. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City, specifically in association with its original occupant, the Sears & Roebuck Co. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. Historical Backgroun Prior to its construction, the site upon which the Sears Roebuck & Co. building is situated was occupied by the middle two bays of the Dooley Block (ca. 1879 and ca. 1895). Property transfer records show that Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867 (Svendsen, "Dooley Block," 2001). In ca. 1874 Dooley constructed the westernmost bay (109) of the Dooley Block, with a second bay completed by 1879. In ca. 1895 the remaining bays (now 113 and 115) were added on the east, resulting in a 2 -story, 4 -bay commercial block building in the Late Victorian Italianate style. The east bay (115) and west bay (109) remain today. Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1899 - �° .•.. � I io�rw�unrar� Co. s• 'I . I m•n (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1899.) The Dooley Block was constructed in phases. The completed block building (highlighted) first appears on fire insurance maps in 1899. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its middle bays and subsequent construction of the Sears Roebuck building at their place. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on - center just above the upper story windows (indicated). The upper fagades at 115 and 109 remain much as seen in this view (see Dooley Block site forms: 52-01088 and 52-04093). Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1926 COLLEGE O.wr, f Z J f E. %,BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1926.) The footprint of the Dooley Block remains relatively unchanged in the years just prior the construction of Sears Roebuck. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-04091 Related District Number Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Property transfer records show the property changed hands in 1928 when a referee deed records a sale to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided, with the Sears Roebuck & Co. building constructed on the west portion of the Lot 3 (111-113) and the east bay of the Dooley Block (115) transferred to the Koser Brothers. Lee and George Koser were realtors with Koser Brothers Real Estate (Svendsen, 2001). The west section of the Dooley Block (109, which is located in Block 4), was likewise sold. Sooner thereafter, the two center bays of the Dooley Block were razed and, in 1929, the present building was constructed to house the Sears, Roebuck & Co. department store. At the time Sears Roebuck appeared on E. College Street in Iowa City, the downtown was rich with department stores; the 100 block of E. College Street alone had (in addition to Sears Roebuck), Montgomery Ward & Co. (121-123) and White's Consolidated Stores (114-116). Yetter's was located one block to the north (115-117 E. Washington) and the Strub Co. was situated around the corner (118-122 S. Clinton Street). Figure 03. Fire Insurance Map — 1933 46 0 s s s;s I s s S SAS S � b 8� _ Srw • _ �� .wAv. �.. _ E- BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1933.) The 1933 fire insurance map documents the Sears Roebuck building (highlighted), noting it as a two-story, double -wide building, which stretched from E. College on the north to the alley at mid -block on the south. The map also notes that the building structure utilized iron columns. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e6 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 03. Historic Image: View looking SE along S. Clinton Street —1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) The remnants of the Dooley Block (115) remain at left and (109) at right, with the 20th century Sears Roebuck building complete with Chicago -style windows, providing an interesting visual foil to the Late Victorian architecture that remains intact on the bays of the original block. Figure 04. Advertisement — 1943 Sears, Roebuck and Co. 111-18 E. COLLEGE Retail Phone 4163 Mail Order Phone 9752 Quality, Service and Value 19wa City's Largest Department Store Invites ]Cour Patronage Complete $locks of Finest Merchandise to Please Everyone Ready -to -Wear Domestics Furniture Millinery Lingerie Radios Shoes Hosiery Hardware Men's Department Gloves Refrigerators Washing Machines Linens Stoves Silks Sporting Goods Auto Accessories (SOURCE: City Directory, 1943) Sears Roebuck remained in the building until the 1960s, at which time it relocated to Sycamore Mall in southeast Iowa City. The building was vacant for several years before the Goodwill Budget Store located here in the early 1970s. By 1978 through 2001, it housed The Field House, a restaurant and disco. (Svendsen, 2001). At the time of the present evaluation (October 2017) the building is vacant. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e7 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (109): 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2017. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (115): 52-01088." Iowa Site Form, 2017. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building: 52-04091." Iowa Site Form, 2001. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (109): 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2017. Timeline: Sears Roebuck & Co. 1926 City Directory (reverse listings) 111 Edward J. Watkins 111-1 /2 Edward L. Murphy 113 No occupant noted 1928 City Directory (reverse listings) 111 Edward J. Watkins 111-1 /2 Radio Doctors 113 Randalls Hardware 1930 City Directory Sears Roebuck & Co. 111-113 E. College Street Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e8 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, East 38.75' of West 58.05' of Lot 3. Assessor: PIN 1010380008 Lat/Long: 41.658660/-91.534022 Parcel Map - 2017 i1 14 I �� , �R��,.� 50' So 6S 1W' � �� N�' •' moon I sI (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel.php?gid=344414) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-01088 ❑ New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Dooley Block (east bay) other names/site number Gringo's Mexican Bar & Grill 2. Location street & number 115 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) E 22' of 3 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 05B LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 115 E. College Street Site Number 52-01088 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 02 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Dates Construction date 1895 ® check if circa or estimated date Other dates 1929 Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 10/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Dooley Block (east bay) is a one -bay, 2 -story, 22- by 150 -ft., brick building that was constructed sometime between 1892 and 1899. The building is a remnant of the original, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. From 1929, at which time the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the east bay (115) has beeen — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The west bay of the Dooley Block (109) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. As noted in the 2001 survey, this building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide, east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The stylistic character of the Dooley Block reflects the Late Victorian era during which it was constructed. As noted by Svendsen in 2001, the building fagade presents a mixture of the Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate styles. The paneled wood cornice has returning ends and four large brackets with small dentil-like brackets in between. The upper is clad in red brick with elaborate carved wood semi -circular or Romanesque arches over the single and paired 1/1 double -hung windows. Svendsen noted that the storefront had been remodeled "in recent years" with a side entrance and three fixed glass windows for a modified shop window. A series of moldings separates the storefront from the upper story. The storefront has a plastered cladding with the door recessed beneath a fixed curved awning. At an undetermined time since the 2001 survey, the storefront of the Dooley Block has been altered. The main entrance still remains on the left of the building, the fixed -glass windows have been replaced with four doors that fold back to open the entire front of the store. There is also a side entrance on the right side of the storefront labled as "13.5 College Ave." that leads to the second story. The first story is currently occupied by Graze: Food Guru Dining, and the occupant of the second story is unknown. The upper elevation of the Dooley Block remains unaltered from 2001, with character -defining features retained including the red brick cladding, ornate Italianate cornice, Roman arched window heads, and storefront cornice details. As a result, the building retains a generally good level of historic integrity specific to 1929, which marks the year the building was disjoined from the larger Dooley Block and became an autonomous resource. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the facade, looking south across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e3 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade, looking SW across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As noted, the Dooley Block is a one -bay remnant of the original block building, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. The block building was constructed in phases, the west two bays likely pre -date 1874 with the east two bays constructed in ca. 1895. From 1929, when the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the remaining east bay has been — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The west bay of the Dooley Block (109) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. The building is a moderately well-preserved example of a Late Victorian Italianate style commercial building. Because the building has been disjoined from the original block building for well more than 50 -years, the resource is significant in its post -1929 form as a single, autonomous building. Given this, the Dooley Block is significant under Criterion C. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. It should be noted that additional evaluation of interior integrity may support a case for individual eligibility as an increasingly rare representation of an early commercial building in the Iowa City downtown. Historical Backeround Prior to its construction, the site upon which this bay of the Dooley Block is situated was occupied by a small, one-story "marble shop" with a shed at the rear. Property transfer records show that Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867 (Svendsen, 2001). Dooley proceeded to construct the west two -bays of the block building (109 and 111), which the 1883 fire insurance map records along with a small, 1 -story "marble shop" with a shed at the rear in on the site of what would become the block's easternmost bay (115). The same footprint appears on subsequent fire insurance maps through 1892; the map in 1899 marks the first time a 2 -story building appears on the site. At that time, a grocer is noted as the occupant. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1883 LEGE N�ry . if �� I� � ~� � ! a i e ! �+ pe - C- 7 Ac�cr' C S LED 1 I �T�•s�aoGreiY - ; ■I i N e � IY BURLINGTON (D � (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) The 1883 fire insurance map notes the presence of the west 2 -bays of the Dooley Block (now 109 and 111) with 113 and 115 still occupied by small-scale buildings. The location of 115 is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays of what would, by ca. 1895 form the entire Dooley Block, highlighted in light blue. Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1892 9 _ .S rr _ .. P_ -VOL -LEGE s,� Y J za- JT• •I� ) i .� F-OuFtLINGTO K ' S (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1892) In 1892 the site upon which the easternmost bay of the Dooley Block (dark blue) was later constructed was occupied by a 1 - story building that was set back from the street. The lighter shading shows the location of the full extent of the site that would, by ca. 1895 be fully occupied by the Dooley Block. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e6 Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 03. Fire Insurance Man — 1899 t -4 n dV W 7 al3 R i1. s i LyH f._ _y t { �s k ' y 1 � r (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) By 1899, the remaining bays of the Dooley Block had been completed. The east bay (115) is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays also indicated. Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 115 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 109 (see "Dooley Block," 52-04093.) 11� a1� lcaac,'r�r'x {h�. ---max`__ x � }i i NI L N dV W 7 al3 R i1. s i LyH f._ _y t { �s k ' y 1 � r (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) By 1899, the remaining bays of the Dooley Block had been completed. The east bay (115) is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays also indicated. Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 115 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 109 (see "Dooley Block," 52-04093.) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e7 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image North side of E. College Street, looking SW - 1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the east (115) and west (109) bays of the Dooley Block flanking the 1929 infill of the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building. Property transfer records do not show the property changing hands again until 1928 when a referee deed saw the lot sold to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided, with the Sears Roebuck & Co. building constructed on the west portion of the lot (111-113) and this building (115) transferred to the Koser Brothers. Lee and George Koser were realtors with Koser Brothers Real Estate (Svendsen, 2001). City directories indicate that the Barth Brothers, grocers occupied the building in 1901. By 1911, Samuel Kelberg operated a shoemaking business from this address. He and his wife Dora lived on the second floor. In 1918 the business space was vacant and by 1926 Dr. John Mullen had offices here. City directories show the storefront changed frequently beginning in the 1930s: Smith & Hiatt Hardware Store (1930); Oakland Bakery (1934, 1940); Western Auto (1946-1962); Thrift Plan of Iowa City (1967); and Sherwin-Williams Co. Paints (1972). By the late 1970s, Gringo's Mexican Restaurant located here (Svendsen, 2001). At the time of the present evaluation the building was occupied by Graze, a restaurant (2017). Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet m Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "115 E. College Street," 52-01088." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Timeline: 115 E. College Street 1883 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and rear shed occupied by a "marble shop" and the west two bays of the Dooley Block (2 -story, interconnected structures with an interior staircase). 1888 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and rear shed occupied by a "marble shop" 1892 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and 2 rear sheds, occupied by a "marble shop" 1899 Fire insurance map shows a 2 -story, contiguous building sited flush with the neighboring buildings (4 -bay Dooley Block intact) and extending to the south approximately 50 -ft. Occupant: Grocer 1901 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 113-115 E. College Street Barth Brothers, grocers 1915 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 109-115 E. College Street Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e9 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 1920 Fire insurance maps notes no changes to the footprint, but the addition of an interior staircase at the front of the building, along the west wall. Occupant: millinery. 1925 Historic image documents the original, four -bay configuration of the Dooley Block. 1926 Fire insurance maps notes no changes to the footprint, and the interior staircase is retained at the front of the building, along the west wall. A 1 -story, freestanding auto garage is situated south of the building. Occupant: not specified. 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, Lot 3 east 22 -ft. Assessor: PIN 1010380007 Lat/Long: 41.658883/-91.533901 Parcel Map - 2017 (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel.php?gid=344413) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-04090 ® New ❑ Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Crescent Block other names/site number Lovelace -Moon Block 2. Location street & number 117-123 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) Lot 2 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 02B COMMERCE/TRADE/professional offices 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 03A04 SOCIAL/fraternal hall 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 09F05 COMMERCIAL/Brick Front foundation 02B COMMERCE/TRADE/professional offices walls 03 BRICK roof other 07 TERRA COTTA Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 117-123 E. College Street Site Number 52-04090 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 02 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Person (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Significant Dates Construction date 1894 ❑ check if circa or estimated date Other dates Architect/Builder Architect Builder Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Architectural Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 10/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Crescent Block is a three-story brick building constructed in 1894. The building is an example of a late 19th century Commercial Brick Front building form. Its four bays originally contained three shop spaces with an entrance to the upper floors in the narrow bay (119) to the right of center. This bay now also contains a narrow shop space in addition to the stairs access. The building is clad in a dark brown brick set with reddish tinted mortar. A twin band of corbeled brick extends across the front between the second and third levels. The original pressed metal cornice has widely spaced brackets with smaller brackets evenly spaced in between. The original storefront treatment is retained in the west bay (117). This bay has a recessed entrance set between plate glass display windows and a multi -part transom above. The first floor projects forward from the front fagade and has a shallow, standing -seam metal shed roof separating the first and second floors. An embossed metal cornice spans the transoms connecting to the hipped roof entrance hood above the entrance to the upper levels (119). This space was remodeled in the 1930s with carrara glass elements with Art Deco styling. The design is well-suited for the small size of this bay. The design includes a curved glass display window on the right with bands of black and white glass in the bulkhead and signboard areas. The original wood and glass entrance door and tile floor in the entrance are retained in this space. The east half of the building is now part of a single storefront. The modern design incorporated new brick with a gray exposed aggregate in the section separating the windows from the second floor. The windows have single fixed glass lights and are topped by separate curved, fixed awnings. The entrance is at the far east end. The upper levels of the building have an unusual arrangement of window openings. The third floor windows appear in pairs, are tall and narrow with stone sills, and have a single flat stone lintel above each pair. A pair of windows is centered in each of the original four bays. The windows consist of 1/1 double -hung sash with a transom of equal size above. Windows on the west half of the second level are shorter with a pair of 1/1 sash above the hipped roof entrance bay. The west bay has a pair of 1/1 sash plus transom centered in the bay with shorter 1/1 sash plus transoms on both sides. Fenestration of the east half of the second floor originally mirrored that on the west (Image 05), but in 1929 (likely with Montgomery Ward's move into the building) two large Chicago -style windows were introduced in place of those in the east half of the building (2017). The Chicago - style windows have since been replaced with new sash (the opening is retained). The building is approximately 80 -ft. wide and has an irregular depth. The third floor originally contained a hall space (Svendsen, 2001). In 2017, the building appears as previously described. The building is largely vacant, with only the storefronts at 117 and 119 occupied by Revival, a vintage clothing store. 8. Statement of Significance This building is a moderately well-preserved example of a turn -of -the -century Commercial Brick Front building. Constructed in 1894 under the auspices of C.F. Lovelace, that connection provides an additional avenue for considering significance; Lovelace being associated with the adjacent College Block as well as the construction of other downtown buildings. He also has deep and significant ties to commercial and financial institutions in the city. Although it is unlikely that a case under Criterion B in association with Lovelace should be made for the Crescent Block, certainly that association elevates the general significance of the building. Further, the building is an unusual example of commercial design, with stylistic influences reflecting the influence of Chicago architecture on Iowa City design - an association worth additional consideration. Lovelace's role in the design should also be examined. Finally, as a mixed-use building the Crescent Block has long associations with the history of commerce in downtown Iowa City (including as a professional office space), and to the history of local fraternal groups that utilized the third floor hall. Though portions of the storefront have sustained significant alterations, the retention of a 1930s era Art Deco Style storefront (119) as well as one of the original storefronts Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City (117) gives the Crescent Block added importance. As a result, this building is considered individually eligible for the National Register under Criterion C and likely under Criterion A as well. Retention of a good level of historic integrity on the interior would be important to a successful nomination. The building is counted as a contributing structure in a potential historic district. Image 01. View of the fagade (north) elevation, looking SW across the Ped Mall (E. College Street) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e3 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade (north) elevation, looking SE across the Ped Mall (E. College Street) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Image 03. View of the 1930s Art Deco storefront faced in black Carrara glass (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Historical Backeround As noted, the Crescent Block is located on the urban renewal era pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. 20 -ft. wide east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits (Svendsen, 2001). Property transfer records show this property changing hands in 1890 and 1895 when Manley Moon and Milton Moon each acquired half of Lot 2 in Block 82 from Robert Finkbine and Chancy Lovelace, architects in the partnership of Finkbine and Lovelace (Svendsen, 2001). Lovelace and Moon are responsible for the building's construction in 1894 (2017). When the pending construction was announced in April of that year, the news account noted that work would commence in early May. The 80- by 80 -ft., three-story building would have three "three fine store rooms with modern fronts" on the first floor; offices on the second floor; and the third floor would be fitted for a large hall. Demolition of a brick building on the site was underway the first week in May (2017). At the time the building was under construction, news accounts referred to the property as the Lovelace and Moon Block, but in late December the property owners announced the building would thereafter be known as the Crescent Block; no explanation for the name was given. Lovelace and Moon held the property until 1923 when M.G. Koser, a local real estate agent, acquired the building (2017). City directories and fire insurance maps show the building with a number of retail tenants through the years. In 1899 fire insurance maps show the building with a pharmacy, china and notions store, and hardware store. The 1904 city directory shows the Crescent Pharmacy run by W.W. Morrison (117) and Bruce Moore's hardware store (123). By 1906 a clothing store was in place at 121 joining the drug store and hardware stores already in place. The Elks Club occupied the third floor meeting hall. Five years later, the Crescent Pharmacy continued but A.A. Pickering's Store replaced the clothing store selling "china, glass, queensware, fancy goods and toys" and the Knights of Columbus rented the third floor hall space after the Elks moved to their newly completed building on the southwest corner of Gilbert and Washington streets. The second floor had 10 office suites occupied by lawyers, insurance agents, and abstractors. After World War I and during the 1920s, William Smith and Richard Hiatt operated a hardware store from(121 and a grocery store opened in 123. The pharmacy continued from 117 but with a new name, Morrison's Pharmacy (Svendsen, 2001). In 1929 a major shift came when the Montgomery Ward and Co. department store located in 121-123. Montgomery Ward had their farm store and implement sales in a building located directly to the south fronting onto Burlington Street. They remained the anchor retail tenant in the building until the late 1960s when Goodwill Industries occupied 121-123. By 1940, the Koser Brothers Real Estate Office was located at 119. M.G. Koser owned the building at the time. The drug store space was taken over about the same time by Western Auto and continued through the early 1960s. By the late 1970s the first of several restaurants and/or bars opened in the building - Maxwell's Cocktail Lounge occupied 121-123. In 2000, the Union Bar occupied 121-123 and the Soap Opera specialty soap shop was in 119. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-04090 Related District Number Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image — ca. 1910 7 (Source: State Historical Society of Iowa) In this view of the south side of E. College Street, looking east from Clinton we see the Crescent Block at left. At that time, the Dooley Block remained fully intact at center, and the Coldren Opera House/Iowa City State Bank was located on the corner (now the Savings and Loan Building). Image 05. Historic Image — ca. 1925 (Source: State Historical Society of Iowa) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e6 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 06. Historic Image — ca. 1965 N (Source: Iowa City Public Library) By this time, the 2'6 floor windows of the east two bays had been altered. This likely occurred concurrent with Montgomery Ward's move into the building in 1929. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Paae 7 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Crescent Block: 52-04090." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Newspapers Iowa City Herald. "Iowa City Improves." April 18, 18 94. Iowa City Herald. "Local News." May 02, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Iowa City Alive and Moving." May 02, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Local News." September 22, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Over the City." November 24, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "The Crescent Block." December 21, 1894. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Page 8 Site Number 52-04090 Related District Number Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, Lot 2 Assessor: PIN 002+1010380005-006 (2 parcels, currently one property owner) Lat/Long: 41.658824/-91.533763 Parcel Map - 2017 COLLEGE 0 Z W N O O0 220 Z J U 212 224 W 228 N N it N � m 102 :D N ABURLINGTON Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 3 of 13 Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved to approve SUB20-04, an application submitted by Pleasant Valley LP for a preliminary plat of the Pleasant Valley Preserve subdivision, a 7 -lot, 7.6 acre residential subdivision in unincorporated Johnson County. Townsend seconded the motion. Parsons sees no reason not to approve this application. Hensch agrees with Parsons, this is in compliance with the Fringe Area Agreement and he doesn't have any concerns at all about this. Signs agreed, it is pretty straightforward. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. REZ20-02: Applicant: Tailwind College St. IC, LLC Location: 109, 111, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street An application submitted by Tailwind College St. IC, LLC for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Russett reiterated this is a rezoning application for a historic district overlay for several properties within the Ped Mall on East College Street. She reminded the Commission that these local landmark rezonings ensure the preservation of historic resources in the community and require upon approval that exterior changes to these buildings undergo historic review, which could be a review by the City Preservation Planner or the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). The HPC did review this application at their meeting last week and recommended approval of the landmark designation. Russett added although this item isn't related to the development project, the applicant is seeking to preserve the existing buildings that front East College Street and build a new building behind those historic structures and that review of the development, the new buildings, would be subject to historic review upon approval of this rezoning. Russett next showed an aerial of the site and then the zoning map. All of the area is zoned CB 10, which is the downtown zoning designation. She pointed out property which is currently Martinis is currently a local historic landmark. Russett next went through the properties and showed some current photographs and some historic photographs. First is 109 East College Street, which is the west bay which was constructed in 1874. Next are the central bays of the Dooley Block at 111 through 113 East College Street and the east bay of the Dooley block at 115 East College Street. Next is a historic photograph that shows the Dooley block prior to the demolition of the central bays. The central bays were demolished, and the Sears company built there as a three -bay Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 4 of 13 building in 1929. Moving on to the Crescent block, 117 and 123 East College Street, which is currently Revival and Union Bar, Russett showed a historic photograph of the Crescent block at the left side of the screen and the Dooley block in the center. Russett pointed out Martinis, which is currently a local historic landmark. Russett noted the storefront at 121 E. College Street was remodeled, so it is not the original facade of the building. It was remodeled in 1930 to reflect an art deco styling, so even though it's not the original facade, it was remodeled during the period of significant, so the art deco storefront is an important feature of this building. Russett noted the next steps after the Planning Commission makes a recommendation, City Council will have a public hearing and if approved, exterior modifications will be subject to the historic review process. Staff does recommend approval of REZ20-02 for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Martin asked how this historic overlay will affect the restaurants there, the current restaurant signage, and patio seating. Is there anything that can negatively impact the current business. Russett replied if they wanted to make any changes to the size or the signs that would be subject to historic review. Martin noted the original Sears sign shown she thinks is far too large for current sign standards, so could someone then decide to put a sign like that up since that was original. Russett replied yes and noted they had a project similar to that on the Historic Preservation Commission agenda last week where a historic sign was larger than the current signage standards and HPC recommended approval of it, but it needs to also get a special exception from the Board of Adjustment to approve the signage size requirements. Martin wanted confirmation they wouldn't see a negative impact on the current businesses because it's just a facade and signage restraints and there could potentially be benefits. Russett replied there's definitely benefits if the buildings become local historic landmarks, there's a grant program that the projects could potentially be eligible for so there are financial resources as well, but only for the exterior of the buildings. Signs noted in the report comments the developer is planning to build a new structure behind the historical structure. From the overview it looks like some of those buildings go all the way back to the alley and so is it okay if they demolish parts of those buildings in the rear. Russett noted that the demolitions would have to be reviewed by the HPC prior to the demolition. Hekteon noted the whole property will be zoned historic, not just the facades. Hensch asked if this historic designation then allows these properties to become eligible for the State Historic property tax credits. Russett noted that was correct. Baker asked about the redevelopment behind the fagade and what regulations kick in controlling the height of the redevelopment and can something go above the current facade behind it higher. Russett said that would have to be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and staff has reviewed some preliminary designs, and the applicant has already submitted a historic review application. The City Historic Preservation Planner did a sightline study and provided some recommendations on what might work in terms of height but the HPC will make those final decisions. The only reason City Council would be involved in this is if the applicant is seeking TIF funding otherwise Council would not have a say in the project. Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 5 of 13 Hensch opened the public hearing. Kevin Monson (Neumann Monson Architects) is representing Tailwind and noted this project has been in the works for probably a year and a half and they've had multiple opportunities to review the project with City staff and with the City administration. He noted it's a very complex project and some of these storefronts have been vacant for a very long time and one of the issues with the current size is that local businesses cannot utilize that large of a footprint. With this project for instance the Sears and Roebuck building it is going to be reduced in size to the original footprint of the adjoining Dooley block buildings and thereby making it much more advantageous for local businesses to be able to use that footprint. The Union Bar will be reduced in this project, again, downsizing the size of the building. Additionally the Union Bar has been selling its equipment so there'll be another use for that facility. Monson stated this it is a good project for the Ped Mall to get it alive again and get appropriate businesses back in that block. It's an exciting project but they have a lot of steps to go before they make it happen. Signs asked what they are envisioning, will there be residential in the rear. Monson confirmed that is correct, they are looking at a residential facility. They've been guided by City to the height restriction and their building will be no taller than the Graduate Hotel. He added the beautiful thing about this is there actually will be a garden space between the existing buildings and the new building, so they will be separated and that separation actually helps differentiate the older historic buildings from what is a contemporary building to be placed at the rear of the site. Hensch asked if these buildings facades have all been remodeled, although very long ago, so will the facades have stay as they are now, or any improvements would have to be as close to the original construction prior to remodels. Monson noted the fagades have been greatly altered over the years and stated they are going to be kept as they are now except for the Union Block where the Union Bar is as they would like to restore that section closer to the Montgomery Ward era of the building, rather than the Union Bar era of the building. He noted the upper elevations above the first floor are fairly intact and very similar to the conditions when they were first built, so those will be maintained and restored to continue on that heritage. They will also be following the Secretary of Interior's guidelines for Historic Preservation with the new construction and not match the existing building with the new structure because that would be historically incorrect. The Secretary of Interior guidelines states it is not appropriate and can be confusing for the public as what was there and what wasn't there. Baker asked if they are envisioning the development behind the facade to be as high as the Graduate Hotel. Monson confirmed the guidelines that they've received says they can go no higher than the Graduate Hotel. He noted it's interesting when looking at the sight lines, because of the distance of that building setting back from the Ped Mall, there are very few views of a new building. Because the existing buildings are so close when one is in the Ped Mall there isn't much of a glimpse of anything behind it. Monson also stated they promise not to put any plaid on their building either like the Graduate Hotel did. Townsend asked if Monson has any idea what other businesses would be interested in residing in these buildings. Monson is not sure but they do have a not-for-profit that they've been talking to for over a year about occupying the Crescent Block building, the top floors of it, and that is looking promising. Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 6 of 13 Signs noted by taking off the back parts of some of those larger buildings they are going to end up with more reasonably sized units as far as potential rentals go. Monson replied that's right and they think it is the right way of preserving downtown but also making it viable. They to restore these buildings and get them back into service and building the buildings behind the current structures is the answer. Dyer asked if the new building have windows on all sides. Monson confirmed it will. Hensch asked if some of the upper floors of the structures are unoccupied presently or have been for some time. Monson confirmed that's correct. Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved to approve REZ20-02, an application submitted by Tailwind College St. IC, LLC for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Baker seconded the motion. Townsend noted her surprise that those buildings weren't on the historic society already. She does wonder what will happen to the ones on the other side of the street and if they are going to try to put those on historic society. Russett mentioned they are working on a nomination to the National Register right now for the entire Downtown District to hopefully be listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Townsend added she would hate to see some funky high rise right across the street. Signs stated it is already there, the one on the corner is a relatively new structure from the 70s or 80s, so part of the blocks already been redone by the Plaza Center One. Signs stated it sounds like an interesting project and a way to maintain the street character in the Ped Mall and take better advantage of the rest of that space. He agrees there's a positive to reducing the size of some of those massive buildings with it'll probably help limit some of the massive uses of those buildings. He is intrigued and thinks there could be some real good things happening there. Hensch supports this application now even more than when he was reading it because he thinks it's very important to maintain the character and history of Iowa City and now learning that a lot of those spaces are unoccupied anyway, that is not the best use to get more people downtown. They need places to live, they need more businesses and more variety of businesses. Plus, this will allow the property to be eligible for tax credits. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. SUB20-05: Applicant: Allen Homes, Inc. Location: East of Scott Blvd and north of American Legion Road DEFERRED to 1/19/21 Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; (REZ20-02) Ordinance No. Ordinance rezoning approximately 0.55 acres of property from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB- 10/OHD) for property located at 109, 111, 115, 117, and 121 E. College Street (REZ20-02) Whereas, the applicant, Tailwinds College St. IC, LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located at 109, 111, 115, 117, and 121 East College Street from Central Business (CB -10) to CB - 10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the preservation of historic buildings; and Whereas, Goal 1 of the Historic Preservation component of the Comprehensive Plan calls for identification of resources significant to Iowa City's past with the objective of designating individual buildings as landmarks; and Whereas, Goal 10 of the Historic Preservation component of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the adoption of strategies to preserve historic neighborhoods; and Whereas, the Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the proposed Historic Landmark Designation and has found that it meets the criteria for landmark designation in that it is significant to American and/or Iowa City's history, architecture, archeology and/or culture; possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, and workmanship; associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; and embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed rezoning and has recommended approval of the Historic Landmark designation rezoning and has found that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals of preserving historic resources; and Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of Central Business (CB -10) to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) Lots 2 and 3, Block 82, Original Town of Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County, Iowa. Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Section IV. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. Page 2 Section V. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section A. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of , 20 Attest: City Clerk Apo d by: - 5VJ. , � (�A , Ci Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen —10/27/2020) Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner First Consideration 11/02/2020 that the Vote for passage: AYES: Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration 11/17/2020 Vote for passage: AYES: Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Date published Kellie Fruehling From: Anne Russett Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:51 PM To: Kellie Fruehling; Danielle Sitzman Subject: Fwd: Tailwinds - Local Landmark Rezoning Kellie - please see the request for deferral below regarding the local landmark rezoning on E. college Street. Thanks, Anne Begin forwarded message: From: Brandon Smith <bsmith@thetailwindgroup.com> Date: December 29, 2020 at 3:46:38 PM CST To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Cc: Kevin Monson <KMonson@neumannmonson.com> Subject: RE: Tailwinds - Local Landmark Rezoning RCSK Hey Anne, We'd like to formally request to defer the 3rd reading to the January 19th City Council meeting. Thank you. Brandon Smith Vice President of Operations & Development 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 Mankato, MN 56001 (0) 507.322.1200 x962 (C) 507.995.6431 www.thetailwindsroup.com AGOI WION I MAt OPMENT I MANAGEMENT TAILWIND group From: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Sent: Monday, December 28, 202012:37 PM To: Brandon Smith <bsmith@thetailwindgroup.com> Cc: 'Kevin Monson' <KMonson@neumannmonson.com> Subject: Tailwinds - Local Landmark Rezoning [EXTERNAL] Hi, Brandon — Just a reminder that the aro and final reading of the local landmark rezoning for your properties on E. College St. is scheduled for 1/5. If you would like the adoption of the ordinance to be deferred, I will need a request in writing. Thanks, Anne CITY OF IOWA CITY Anne Russett, AICP UNESCO CITY OF UTEJRATURE Senior Planner WWW.ICGOV.ORG 0000 Disclaimer She/Her/Hers p:319-356-5251 410 E Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Item Number: 12. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY -�"�'�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 5, 2021 Ordinance Amending Title 2 of the City Code, entitled "Human Rights," to update methods of service allowed. (First Consideration) Prepared By: Kristin Watson, Human Rights Investigator Reviewed By: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator & Equity Director Susan Dulek, First Assistant City Attorney Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: This change will save funds previously spent on certified mail fees Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Ordinance Executive Summary: The Human Rights Ordinance restricts service of several types of documents to certified mail only. This proposed update simply adds additional options for service, due to advances in technology, and staff experience in investigating complaints. Background /Analysis: Certified mail was once the preferred method of ensuring delivery of important documents to a recipient. Certified mail, however, often involves significant delay, as recipients often do not timely retrieve it. Occasionally, a recipient will not retrieve certified mail at all, causing extended delay beyond the control of staff. This ordinance adds the options of service by email and personal service. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance 12 Prepared by: Kristin Watson, Human Rights Investigator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5015 Ordinance No. Ordinance amending Title 2 of the City Code, entitled "Human Rights," to update methods of service allowed. Whereas, Title 2 presently requires service solely via certified mail in several Sections; and Whereas, due to advances in technology service via email is secure and practical; and Whereas, personal service is also impliedly but not explicitly allowed; and Whereas, it is in the best interest of the City to amend Title 2 to align with current technological abilities and work environments, Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, Section I. Amendments. 1. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 4, entitled, "Enforcement," Section 2-4-2, entitled, "Investigation of Complaints; Predetermination Settlement," Subsection A., is hereby amended by adding the following underlined text: A. Upon the filing of a verified complaint, the human rights coordinator shall serve notice on the respondent. Notice shall include both a copy of the complaint and a statement of the respondent's procedural rights and obligations under the law or ordinance. Service shall be effected by certified mail, email, or personal service within twenty (20) days of filing for complaints in the areas of employment, public accommodation, credit or education, and within seven (7) days of filing for complaints alleging discrimination in the area of housing. 2. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 4, entitled, "Enforcement," Section 2-4-2, entitled, "Investigation of Complaints; Predetermination Settlement," Subsection C., is hereby amended by adding the following underlined text: C. After reviewing materials responsive to the questionnaire/document request, the human rights office shall determine whether the complaint warrants further investigation. If the human rights office finds there is a reasonable possibility of a probable cause determination or the legal issues present in the complaint need further development, the human rights office shall promptly resume the investigation of the complaint. A complaint determined by the human rights office not to warrant further processing by the human rights office shall be administratively closed. Notice of such closure shall be promptly served upon the complainant and the respondent by certified mail, email, or personal service. Service is effective upon mailing or emailing. Such notice shall state the reasons for administrative closure. 3. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 4, "Investigation of Complaints; Predetermination by adding the following underlined text: entitled, "Enforcement," Section 2-4-2, entitled, Settlement," Subsection H., is hereby amended H. A complaint may be closed as satisfactorily adjusted when the respondent has made an offer of settlement acceptable to the human rights coordinator but not the complainant. Notice of intended closure shall state the reasons for closure and be served by certified mail, email, or personal service upon the complainant. The complainant shall be allowed thirty (30) days to respond in writing to the human rights coordinator either stating the reasons why the offer is Ordinance Page 2 unacceptable or accepting the offer. The human rights coordinator will review and consider the response before making a closure decision. 4. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 4, entitled, "Enforcement," Section 2-4-3, entitled, "Proceedings on Complaints; Probable Cause," Subsection B., is hereby amended by adding the following underlined text: B. If the human rights office finds that no probable cause exists, the human rights office shall issue a written finding dismissing the complaint and notifying the parties of the complainant's right to appeal the finding. Notice of the no probable cause determination shall be promptly mailed to the complainant and to the respondent by certified mail or email. Service is effective upon mailing or emailing. The no probable cause determination may also be personally served 5. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 4, entitled, "Enforcement," Section 2-4-8, entitled, "Findings and Order," Subsection B., is hereby amended by adding the following underlined text: B. If upon taking into consideration all of the evidence at a hearing, the commission finds that a respondent has not engaged in any such discriminatory or unfair practice, the commission shall issue an order denying relief and stating the findings of fact and conclusions of the commission, and shall cause a copy of the order dismissing the complaint to be served by certified mail email, or personal service on the complainant and the respondent. Section Il. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 2021. Mayor Ap5t��Attest: (3�j City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sue Dulek — 12/30/2020) 2 Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: First Consideration 01/05/2021 Vote for passage: Taylor, Teague Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner AYES: Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, . NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. that the