Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-02-02 OrdinanceItem Number: 10.a. �r A�� CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org February 2, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning property located south of Kennedy Parkway and west of Camp Cardinal Blvd from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Rural Residential (RR -1), High Density Single -Family (RS -12), Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12), and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20) for approximately 27.19 acres of land. (REZ20- 0013) ATTACHMENTS: Description PZ Staff Report w Attachments PZ Meeting Minutes Rezoning Ordinance Conditional Zoning Agreement STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern and Anne Russett, Senior Planner Item: SUB20-0004 & REZ20-0013 Date: January 7, 2021 Cardinal Pointe West Part 3 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant and Property Owner: Crossing Land LLC 755 Mormon Trek Blvd Iowa City, IA 52246 319-337-4195 info@southgateco.com Contact: Brian Vogel, PE Hall & Hall Engineers, Inc 1860 Boyson Road Hiawatha, IA 52233 319-362-9548 brian@hallenge.com Requested Action: Approval of preliminary plat & Rezoning from ID -RP to RR -1 (12.80 acres), RS -12 (6.05), RM -12 (3.46 acres), & RM -20 (4.88 acres) Purpose: To allow the development of Cardinal Pointe West Part 3, a 27 -acre, 19 -lot residential subdivision that will include 1 multi -family lot, 6 duplex lots, 12 single- family lots, and one outlot for future development Location: West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and South of Kennedy Parkway Location Map: Size: 27.19 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K Undeveloped, Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) North: RS -12 — High Density Single -Family RM -12 — Low Density Multi -Family RR -1 — Rural Residential South: RR -1 — Rural Residential ID -RP - Interim Development: Research Park East: RS -8 — Medium Density Single -Family Residential West: R — County Residential A — County Agricultural Conservation District — Clear Creek Master Plan Clear Creek Property owners beyond of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Subdivision signs were also posted on the site. November 23, 2020 January 7, 2021 The property owner, Crossing Land, LLC, is requesting approval for the rezoning of 27.19 acres of land from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1) for 12.80 acres, High Density Single -Family (RS -12) for 6.05 acres, Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12) for 3.46 acres, and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20) for 4.88 acres. The applicant is also requesting approval of a preliminary plat for Cardinal Point West — Part 3, a residential subdivision with 12 single-family lots, 6 duplex lots, and 1 multi -family lot with 32 proposed dwelling units. The plat also includes 3 outlots. Outlots I and J (to be rezoned RR -1) are proposed for open space to be maintained by a homeowner's association. Outlot K (to be zoned RM -20) is reserved for future development. Prior to this application, the applicant received approval for two subdivision and rezoning applications — Cardinal Pointe West Parts 1 and 2. The proposed preliminary plat is a continuation of Parts 1 and 2. Attached is the concept that was provided in 2015 with the rezoning and subdivision applications for Part 1. This area was annexed into the city between 1969 and 1972. Since 1983 the area has been zoned Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to reflect possible development of an office park along Highway 218. However, in May of 2002, City Council signed a resolution endorsing the Clear Creek Master Plan memorandum of understanding that includes a concept that envisioned a "conservation -type" development including residential and commercial uses in the areas surrounding Camp Cardinal Boulevard. While there are still several acres of land zoned Interim Development that are undeveloped, the areas surrounding Camp Cardinal Boulevard have seen only residential development since the memorandum, with the exception of one parcel zoned Commercial Office (CO -1) at the intersection of Kennedy Parkway and Camp Cardinal Boulevard 3 and one parcel zoned Community Commercial (CC -2) at the intersection of Camp Cardinal Road and Camp Cardinal Boulevard. Due to concerns about meeting face-to-face, the applicant did not hold a good neighbor meeting. In -lieu of a good neighbor meeting, the applicant sent out a detailed letter (attached) and informational packet to surrounding neighbors with contact information to discuss concerns and questions about the project. ANALYSIS - Current Zoning: Based on the previous comprehensive plan, the area is currently zoned as Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP). The context of the 1997 comprehensive plan, however, recognized that with the establishment of the Oakdale Campus north of Interstate 80, the possibility of additional development of office and research park type uses in this area may not be realistic. The plan also recognized that the topographical and infrastructural limitations of the area, and therefore, supported development with a mix of uses, such as low density residential and office commercial uses. The plan also supported clustered development that would result in pedestrian friendly neighborhood with minimal disturbance of the sensitive areas. The current ID -RP zoning only allows agricultural uses by right. As such, a rezoning is necessary to allow any development of this property. Proposed Zoning: The Rural Residential Zone (RR -1) is intended to provide rural residential character for areas in the city that are not projected to have the utilities necessary for urban development in the foreseeable future or for areas that have sensitive environmental features that preclude development at urban densities. The areas proposed to be rezoned to RR -1 are proposed to be private open space to be maintained by the homeowner's association. The High -Density Single -Family Zone (RS -12) is intended to provide for development of single- family dwellings, duplexes and attached housing units at a higher density than in other single-family zones. Because this district represents a relatively high density for single-family development, dwellings should be in close proximity to City services and facilities, especially parks, schools and recreational facilities. The RS -12 zone allows for single-family lots with a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet, and a minimum lot width of 45 feet. Duplexes are allowed on lots with a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and lot width of 55 feet. All RS -12 lots within the proposed subdivision meet the minimum requirements. Although lots 55-66 meet the requirements for duplex development, only lots 48-53 are intended to be duplexes with lots 55-66 intended for detached single-family dwellings. The Low -Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (RM -12) is intended to provide a diverse variety of housing options in neighborhoods throughout the City including the development of high-density, single-family housing and low-density, multi -family housing. The applicant is proposing 32 townhouse -style, multi -family units in 7 buildings containing 4 to 5 dwellings each with a private rear land or alley for vehicular access. The Medium Density Multi -Family Zone (RM -20) is intended to provide an assortment of attached, detached single-family and multi -family housing options and is well suited to be located adjacent to commercial areas with good access to City services and facilities. Currently Outlot K is proposed to be rezoned to RM -20. The applicant has not provided any details on the proposed site plan for this zone, but when that plan is created care should be taken to ensure the site and building design is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Based on the minimum lot area per unit standards of the RM -20 zone, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed on the 4.49 -acre outlot is 108 units. ri Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: This property is located within the Northwest Planning District. While the district plan for this area has not been prepared, the comprehensive plan identifies the Clear Creek Master Plan as a guiding document for this area surrounding Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The Clear Creek Master Plan shows this area as suitable for residential, commercial and office development. The plan also aims to create a conservation -type development that allows for higher density development in exchange for the preservation of sensitive areas. The master plan also states that the intended maximum allowable density for any subdivision would not exceed 20 dwelling units per acres. The density of the proposed rezoning and subdivision is around 6 units per acre. Additionally, the IC2030 comprehensive plan housing policy (pg. 28) seeks to develop neighborhoods with a mix of housing types. The comprehensive plan also lays out land use policy to guide development away from environmentally sensitive areas, such as woodlands and steep slopes (pg. 24). The requested rezoning and subdivision design conform with the conservation design envisioned in the Clear Creek Master Plan as well as the policies for housing and land use laid out in the comprehensive plan. Subdivision Design: The subdivision includes 19 residential lots and three outlots. The proposed residential development is a mix of RS -12 lots (48-53,55-66) and one RM -12 lot (54). Lots 48-53 are expected to be developed with duplex residential uses, and lots 55-66 are expected to be developed with single-family residential uses. Lot 54 is expected to be developed with townhouse -style, multi -family buildings with 4-5 dwellings per building. In order to ensure consistency with the existing development pattern to the north, staff is recommending a condition that development shall substantially comply with the concept plan for the area shown as Lot 54 on the preliminary plat. Additionally, in order to ensure useable outdoor space on Lot 54 staff is recommending a condition that requires staff approval of a landscaping plan and screening of garages along Declan Drive and Mason Drive. Outlots I and J contain the majority of the woodlands and steep and critical slopes. These outlots are identified as private open space areas to be maintained by the homeowner's association. Outlot K is reserved for future development. The preliminary plat also shows the extension of Dubs Drive and Preston Lane. Preston Lane is shown to intersect with Camp Cardinal Boulevard in this phase. The subdivision code requires that block lengths range from 300 feet to a maximum of 600 feet (15-3-4A(2)). Longer block lengths may be considered where topographic conditions, water features or existing development prevent shorter block lengths. Midblock pedestrian connections may be required for longer block lengths. The block lengths shown on the preliminary plat are in conformance with the subdivision regulations, with the exception of Preston Lane between Declan Drive and Camp Cardinal Boulevard. Due to the presence of steep wooded ravines located on Outlot J, no street intersections are proposed east of Preston Lane except for the connection to Camp Cardinal Boulevard. As a result, the length of Preston Lane between Declan Drive and Camp Cardinal Boulevard exceeds the 600 feet normally required by subdivision code. However, the proposed design helps minimize the disturbance of the wooded areas located on the property and complies with the comprehensive plan's emphasis on conservation design for this area. The subdivision regulations also state that "Any portion of a residential lot that is within three hundred feet (300') of the Interstate 80 or Highway 218 right of way shall be identified as a noise buffer, and no residential structure will be permitted within this three hundred foot (300') buffer area." (15-3-4C) A small sliver of Outlot K falls within the 300' buffer (see Figure 1) and as such, when Outlot K is platted for development, that area would not allow residential uses. 5 Figure 1. Area within Outlot K within 300' of the Highway 218 Right -of -Way ST GASKETE7— I553-- - STORM SEWER {Tl➢) I 1 � _–__ �_•3 _f}]5lRIG�V SMSPMY 3lxCR Gi3lhlM J I 1 _--- ____ _^_ L(T A(ft ,O.W.) L138,857 _ _ f I I xe SF 3.17 AC --IXIS 1.11=R OEPE.=P T a OJRQT N I r pp ^NG G'�N�APV I �r I(l (( IOSF P < PER orrn : rAc 105E 6Ei)PUIX1 � I I I OO ]89E�RGGMS RE(lylgEp OPEN qP{E - PSO Sr PRW[O® GPEN SPACE = 13,�N1 SF I � OLITLOT K 195,300 SF `-WRQ 4.48 AC f �� ,� ,Pnom Me RezGN®mRn zo, rvr a 51 458 SF i 1, 35 AC 9110' GP19E! FRGX H]GHWAV r zla w�Mr-Gr-wa• 1p� Traffic and Transportation: Preston Lane will extend from Kennedy Parkway on the north to Camp Cardinal Boulevard to the south, a distance of approximately 2,000 feet with limited intersecting streets. Due to concerns with the block length of Preston Lane between Declan Drive and Camp Cardinal Boulevard, staff is recommending traffic calming measures. The preliminary plat shows traffic calming chokers at Preston Lane & Declan Drive and a traffic circle further south along Preston Lane. Chokers decrease the width of the pavement at the intersection, which can help to slow traffic. Public Works staff and transportation planning staff are still reviewing the traffic calming measures on the plat. Staff will have an update on their review at the Commission's meeting. Additionally, average daily traffic (ADT) count data for the area (Camp Cardinal Blvd. at Kennedy Parkway) is around 7,770. The theoretical capacity of Camp Cardinal Blvd. is 16,750 ADT. The completion of Cardinal Pointe West Part 3, assuming maximum build -out, is expected to generate approximately 1,261 additional trips per day. This estimate includes the proposed townhome style multi -family, duplex, and single-family units, as well as the potential build -out of Outlot K, which is reserved for future multi -family development. The resulting increase in traffic is still well below Camp Cardinal Blvd.'s capacity. In addition, both the Kennedy Parkway and future Preston Lane intersections with Camp Cardinal Blvd have left turn lanes. Currently, the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd does not have a sidewalk. The Clear Creek Master Plan includes typical cross sections, which show a 4 -foot sidewalk along the western side of Camp Cardinal Blvd. Therefore, staff is proposing as a condition of the rezoning that a sidewalk is constructed from Preston Lane to Kennedy Parkway on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd. Instead of the 4 -foot sidewalk proposed in the plan, staff is recommending that the sidewalk be 5 -feet in width, which is the current standard. The east side of Camp Cardinal Blvd currently has an 8 -foot side path. LIS This area is not served by transit. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The property contains steep slopes, critical slopes, and woodlands. In terms of slopes, approximately, 47% of the steep slopes and 18.4% of the critical slopes will be disturbed. This disturbance is less than the threshold of 35% of the critical slopes required by the sensitive area's ordinance. The sensitive areas development plan indicates that approximately 65% of the woodlands (6.31 acres) will be preserved. The plan shows the disturbed area as 35.3% or 3.45 acres of the woodlands. The disturbed area total includes the 50 -foot woodlands buffer area, which is located outside of the construction limits, but is not included in the preserve calculation. The sensitive areas ordinance includes a retention requirement of 50% for single-family zones, like the proposed RS -12 zone, and a retention requirement of 70% for the proposed RR -1 zone. The sensitive areas development plan is complicated by the fact that the woodlands cross two zoning designations with different retention requirements. Due to the fact that the plan demonstrates a continuation of the preserved woodlands to the north (at the corner of Kennedy Parkway & Camp Cardinal Blvd) and exceeds the 50% retention requirement for single-family zones, staff has determined that the plan meets the intent of the sensitive area's ordinance. In addition, this is consistent with how staff analyzed the sensitive areas in the previous phase of the development. Tables 1 and 2 provides a summary of the impacts to slopes and woodlands. Table 1. Slopes Summa Critical 3.95 acres 0.73 acres 35% 18.4% Steep 5.77 acres 2.71 acres n/a (47.0%) Table 2. Woodlands Summa Neighborhood Open Space: Public open space dedication or fees in lieu of are addressed at the time of final platting. Based on the 6.05 acres of RS -12 zoning, 3.46 acres of RM -12 zoning, and 4.88 acres of RM -20 zoning, the developer would be required to dedicate 0.96 acres of land or pay fees in -lieu. Parks and Recreation staff has determined that an in -lieu fee payment would be appropriate. Storm Water Management: The stormwater management basin located to the south within the Clear Creek subdivision has the capacity to provide stormwater management for Parts 1, 2, as well as Part 3. The adequacy of the existing basin has been confirmed by the City Engineer. In Cardinal Pointe West Part 1, Outlot D was designated as a stormwater management area. In order to meet lot area requirements for Lot 53 in Cardinal Pointe West Part 3, Outlot D must be reduced in size. Public Works staff has reviewed this and has determined that reducing the size of this outlot is not an issue. Storm water management requirements are met with the capacity provided in the basin to the south. Infrastructure Fees: This subdivision is subject to the water main extension fee for $456.75 per VA acre and sanitary sewer tap on fee of $570.98 per acre. Payment towards the cost of constructing Camp Cardinal Boulevard will also need to be addressed at the time of final plat approval. NFXT STFPS- After review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the two applications will be considered by the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon resolution of the deficiencies listed below, staff recommends approval of REZ20-0013 & SUB20-0004, two applications submitted by Crossing Land, LLC for a preliminary plat of the Cardinal Pointe West — Part 3 subdivision, a 19 -lot, residential subdivision located South of Kennedy Parkway and West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and the rezoning of 27.19 acres from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -12), High Density Single -Family Residential (RS -12), and Medium Density Multi - Family Residential (RM -20) zones subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the concept plan for the area shown as "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat, which includes townhouse -style, multi -family dwellings with vehicular access to garages from a rear lane with green space and landscaping between the rear driveways to reduce impervious surface and improve stormwater drainage. 2. Prior to approval of any site plan, Owner shall obtain staff approval of a landscaping plan which shall include the plans for useable outdoor space for "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat and screening of garages along Declan Drive and Mason Drive. 3. At the time of final platting, incorporation of traffic calming devices in a location approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Prior to the issuance of a certificate occupancy, construction of a 5' sidewalk on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd between Preston Lane and Kennedy Parkway. DEFICIENCIES AND DISCREPANCIES: 1. Review and acceptance of the traffic calming measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Concept Plan, submitted in 2015 4. Good Neighbor Letter 5. Rezoning Exhibit 6. Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Area Site Plan Approved by: 0 nieile Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services X/r ' �'1 1j 1� l / '�//' I �t�L_ ' ' 1 ti ► — %'//r /' /' I i ,1 \�� �1� f �! - �� I L1 �kawm t r ill Ili^1t�,.. �-��- � - I 11 1 II � � 1 I 11111{( �` 1 �, II,•-�If•,. � .. , /�r// • I - - �+-_- }/� x111� f r � 11 { 1 . } (F( c C 1 I 1i4� 'Ir�� _z .10 _.eo' irrf� /� 1 }l! J J -/l! // F ........., Irj �r� �1 ti� r� 1 ! I 1 r I I r/r//r I / r/ � � -�► r,,�� ��� x� r� II II II/0�omw" - , ,fes �1�1 / d/y 111 1-,XL 11 N `li Il� ;t 1,1� i 1 L 1 ! � � �� / I � ��:� t � I I 1 • /r -fr ��-� � �111 � Ll 1 1 � �„� �� 11 l � 1 1 II � .� r/ / / r I � f� 1 ,• � � 1 / � , if �� �r� !l lr z:z- z`_ rr r�1 r ! 1 1 I 1 � I1 1 11 1 - � , + 1 1 1 � ,� -} )lift1111 � � �j1 K I1'r� LNi� -q001. LY III // ,.- �,�. ♦ _ ��`��,� r }1rr/II/ }IIItr���' SII �//�/ �� .� -` . � 11 �, L 1 ! (LIII I ` --- •. ] 111 I II-�, .•� 4 r " J, f 1 1,1. } 11111}1)11 11!1 I//I 'i 1 1 1 1111111/ 1'11�I — !/ r �1 L1E ll 1.11111;.. 01 1 l ! 11 Jill 111 1 111. JJ]���j111 {l 1 fl1 ��,� 11 111 11i11 ti i 1 1,11111, 11 f �1L 11 111 111 �/1 I }1I1111 Ill - 7 � � 1�11�I1�I�J1111 �. / 1 1 j f � r/ 111 � •�` / / i � .1- 1 I i Mfr �:�L� �,1�� 11 �I 1 rr1�1�� 1`Il F1l I i- ��� Yrs^j r �. l 1 f l LII�I►�L rN1 �Ihv Jn 1 r I ` `I !! �f J� I l -�.\�`- 1 11.- �1 1 tc a- -- - -- 1 r � 1 1 ` �1�-- *p/'o 1\ �� r�� 'JG GRAPHIC SCALE 1H FEET � �. ���r)�I1L II r.� �����-fir% r��i `_ _.___ fes• `, � `� � � -�� � KEY SINGLE FAMILY LOTS (TYP.) Cardinal Pointe West CONCEPT PLAN IOWA CITY, IOWA AUGUST 2015 FOUR-PLEXES (TYP.) HI -RISE RESIDENTIAL (TYP.) Arlr"49 C./ ++ WATER QUALITY STRUCTURES (TYP.) December 18, 2020 Adjoining Property Owner RE: Cardinal Pointe West — Part Three, Iowa City, Iowa Adjoining Property Owners, The Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z) will soon consider a rezoning and preliminary plat for a property in your area. At this time, we are unable to have a Good Neighborhood Meeting/Open House due to COVID 19. However, the developer for the project will be available via phone or email to discuss any questions you have regarding this project. The project is located south of Kennedy Parkway and west of Camp Cardinal Blvd and depicted on the attached "Rezoning Exhibit" This project is the third phase of a master plan that Southgate Companies has been working on since 2015. Cardinal Pointe West -Part Three will continue the same model of product type diversity similar to Cardinal Pointe West -Part Two and will provide the community with more pricing opportunities and a wider range of building types/density within the neighborhood. Part Three will include the public right-of-way connection of Preston Lane with Camp Cardinal Blvd. The connection affords the opportunity for vehicular/traffic relief as a secondary access to the south. The enclosed Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Area Site Plan (prepared by Hall & Hall Engineers, Inc.) shows the proposed lot configurations and future street network and connectivity for this area. See below for breakdown of proposed zoning and housing type/use for Lots included in Part Three: Lot Number/Letter Proposed Zoning Housing Type/Use 48-53 RS -12 (High Density Single -Family Residential) Duplexes 54 RM -12 (Low Density Multi -Family Residential) 4 -Unit Townhomes 55-66 RS -12 (High Density Single -Family Residential) Single Family Residential Outlot I and J RR1 (Rural Residential) Open Space, owned and maintained by Homeowners Association Outlot K RM -20 (Medium Density Multi -Family Residential) Future Development It is anticipated that the P & Z will be reviewing this proposal on Thursday, January 7t", 2021. A notice of a formal review by P & Z will be sent to all property owners receiving this mailing. You are encouraged to attend these meetings and voice your opinions. For questions regarding this project, please contact Josh Entler, P.E. at Southgate Companies. He can be contacted at (319) 499-8836 or jentler@southgateco.com If you have questions for the City of Iowa City regarding this project, please contact Anne Russett, AICP at (319) 356-5251 or anne- russett@iowa-city.org ENNEDY PA K A C �\ _2 d21C J/ 24 23 y 1 CROSSING LANG LLc / 12 ExISTINGTING ZONING: RR1 25 13 O O 28 27 26 \ I \ PF,14 SPE 2 15 G, 0 9 CROSSING LAN LLC 22 G -" Z \ � EXISTING ZDNING:RR1 � _ A\ CROSSINGLANG, LLc 21 OP\ 17 \EXISTING LAND usE -RESIDENTIAL CROSSING LANG, LLc 1^ \ / EXISTING ZONING IG -RS EXISTING LAND USE - RESIDENTIAL \ V EXISTING ZONING - ID -RP 10 PROPOSED ZONING - PRI 19: \ MPSOtJ U I x \ I Axz CROSSING LAND, LLC \ EXISTING ZONING: RRI od�o n ,n CROSSING z➢In x mnz W 0 0 OUTLOT D CARDINAL LAND LLC PONTE WEST PART ONE ExSTING LAND NNo c zc+ O z N REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RM -20 PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PACE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER. PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 156 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RR BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N59°46'50"W 240.68 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID OUTPUT H; THENCE N32'38'01"W 225.83 FEET; THENCE N56'40'37"E n 1 , 157.32 FEET THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 18,97 FEET ALONG. THE ARC OFA 24.90 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY CHORD BEARS N53'58'07"W 18.48 FEET' THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 84.32 FEET a ALONG THE ARC OF 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY CHORD BEARS N59°2827"E 76.30 FEET' THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE v ( ). CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY CHORD. BEARS N38°59'45'E 19.09 FEET' THENCE N52°26'07"E 131.98 FEET THENCE SOUTHERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S75°49'21"E 45.27 FEET) N55°55'10"E 30.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 487.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S62°OD'35"E 468.38 FEET); THENCE SD°0339"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 5D.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 53D.OD FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS y I N87'19'59"E 50.45 FEET) TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT IT; THENCE S59'02'55"W 8.58 FEET ALONG. SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE S63°56'06"W 544.31 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE 1N POINT OF BEGINNING Y pPfzK `d2100)��(dwo) �` SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 4.88 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. KENNEO a PARKSIDE PROPERTIES LLC EXISTING ZONONING: C01 I I O 1- STEVEN ROWE & MARY LOUISE FLAVIN (RS -.8 ZONING) 16 0 i III J CITY OF IOWA CITY 1 EXISTING ZONIN G: RS -8 a P - n USE - RESIDENTIAL Z -m N -Z ➢ CROSSING LAND LLC a A EXISTING Z A, dro Z� 1 EXISTING LANG USE -RESIDENTIAL z➢0 n � In zoNwc ID -RP mnz,n 1 EXISTING zDN RP 1 z PROPOSED m PROPOSED ZONINGINC R:R1 ZONING: RM -M- 12 1 N I O 1 A r 1 r I -m aW n I 1a A rl \ �vz \ N d I CROSSING LAND, PLC EXISTING Nc zONINowNc. RR1 I OUTPUT ❑, CARDINAL \ I POINTE wesT - PArer ONE \ CROSSING \ I \ LAND, LLC Ex- INGRES LAND - USE RE GNnAL ZONINGEXISIN ID PRO\ \ \ ZONING: REG I ZONING: RM -20 I \ DUD CROSSING LAND, LLC EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL \ EXISTING ZONING: IO -RS I 1 I \ I R}q N �O COCK,- / u CARDINAL POINTE SOUTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION EXISTING ZONING:RS-5 / REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RM -12 PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 41 SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S71-1SD3"W 30.00 FEET ALONGTHE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE ( CONCAVE WESTERLY CHORD BEARS S10°0634"E 226.19 FEET' THENCE 51°26'12"E 44.62 FEET' THENCE SOUTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY CHORD BEARS 510°2713"E 156.73 FEET' THENCE 819°28'15"E 39.94 FEET' THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 127.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS 526°46'32"E 127.15 FEET.' THENCE 855°55'10"W 30.00 FEET' THENCE WESTERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY CHORD BEARS M5°49'21"W 45.27 FEE THENCE 862°26'07"W 131.98 FEET' THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS 538°59'45"W 19.09 FEET HENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 42.98 FEET ALONG. THE ARC OF 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY FORD BEARS 5375643" 41.90 5 TC C W FEET' THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY(CHORD BEARS N25°3709"W 160.65 FEET` THENCE N19'28'15 W 30.94 FEET: THENCE NORTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY CHORD BEARS N10°2713"W 235.09 FEET.` THENCE N12612"W 41.30 FEET' THENCE NORTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARG OFA 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY( CHORD BEARS N9'06'25"W 136.14 FEET M TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTPUT H' THENCE 3'13'22"E 30.00 FEET' THENCE NORTHERLY 16.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 540.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N17°38'00"W 16.14 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 29.63 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE. CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS N23'55'55"E 26.99 FEET' THENCE N66'23'16"E 151.01 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE' THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 32.83 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS 566°35'34"E 29.26 FEET); THENCE SOUTHERLY 9.94 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS 51910'40"E 9.94 FEET); THENCE N71°13'D3"E 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 3,46 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP. TO RS -12 PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 165 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH RANGE 7 WEST OF THE STH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 47 SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N69'14'D2'E 120.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 47 TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE' THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 34.84 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF AV AND THE ARC OF A 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY CHORD BEARS S18'51'24"E 34.84 FEET. TO THE N W SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DUBS DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY' THENCE N73°13"22"E 30.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE THENCE SOUTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY CHORD BEARS S9'D6'25"E 136.14 FEET),' THENCE S1°26'12"E 41.3D FEET' THENCE SOUTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 75D.D0 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY CHORD BEARS 810 2713°E 235.09. FEET' ), THENCE 519°28'75 E 30.94 FEET' THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS 525'3709"E 160.65 ET- THENCE WESTERLY 41.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS 581'51'46" 40 37 FEET); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 18.97 FE ), H T H ( H D W ), N FEET ALONG THE ARC OFA 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS 853'88'07"E 18.48 FEET); THENCE 856'40'37"W 157.32 FEET; THENCE N2539'42"W 240.94 FEET; THENCE N5°28'37"W 276.83 FEET; THENCE N2°23'14"W 108.81 FEET; THENCE N12°47'03"W 102.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST PART TWO THENCE SOUTHERLY 27549 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 91000 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10'06'34 E 274.44 FEET), THENCE S1'26'12'E 4462 FEET THENCE SOUTHERLY 107D2 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 34000 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10 -27'13 "E 106.58 FEET: THENCE S19'28'15"E 30.94 FEET' THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE AR F A 340.OD FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS S54°4218'E 392.3D FEET' THENCE N U C 0 0 C V ( ), 39''W 16000 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 614 95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CDC OD FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°4718'W 576 9 5' 2 FEET); THENCE N19°28'1W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 156.73 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.09 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 226.1.9 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H;. THENCE N71'13'D3"E 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCELS CONTAIN 8:05 ACRES SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS: AND RESTRICTIONS REZDNING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RRC PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 52, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE STH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N21°30'05 "W 86.33 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 41 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N26°56'28'W 53.53 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 40, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT G SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AND A NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N89°04'32"E 463.31 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTPUT G TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMP CARDINAL BOULEVARD; THENCE 50°53'41"W 193.50 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 422.39 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 760.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S15°01'37"E 416.97 FEET' THENCE 530°56'56"E 364.51 EEA ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID OUT OT H' THENCE NORTHERLY 32.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTPUT H' THENCE WESTERLY 286.85 T L FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE WESTERLY ExTEN510N THEREOF AND THE ARC OFA 530,00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS 574°33226"W 283.36 FEET); THENCE NO°03'39'E 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 392.30 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 1D6.58 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910,00 SCOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 274.44 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OULL T F SAID CARDINAL APOINTE WEST - PART TWO' THENCE N9 °00'00"E 424.72 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT F AND A NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT H SAID CARDINAL 0W 0 G UT A POINTE WEST -PART TING TO THE WEST CORNER OF LOT 45, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST -PART TWO; THENCE 530'041"E 1.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE 537°44b2"E 104.59 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S38'0839"E 103.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 46, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTH CORNER THEREOF' THENCE 528°55'22"E 99.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 47SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER" THEREOF' THENCE S12°47'03"E 102°84 FEET' THENCE S2'23'14"E 108.81 FEET; THENCE SS°25'37"E 276.83 FEET; THENCE 525°39'42"E 47.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N44°49'18'W 307.82 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N10°51'29"W 238.65 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE: THENCE N52'48'14"W 489.10 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE: THENCE NO°00'00"E 37.41 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCELS CDNTAIN 12.80 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS DRAWN BY: SKF HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. SHEET CHECKED BY: BDV REZONING EXHIBIT APPROVED BY; BDV 1860ROYSONROAD HIAWATHA, IOWA 52293 /1%/ /a CARDINAL POINTE WEST -PART THREE PHONE. (319)362-9548 FAX:(319)352-7595 DATE: 12118/2020 PHONE / �"- IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA CIVIL ENGINEERING a CITY �F IOWA CITY LAND DEVELOPSCAPE ROHITHANIN t/ FIELD BOOK: N/A NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE LAND SURVEYING DEVELOPMENT PLANNING wrrw.nmlay.com SCALE: 1" = 200' PROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS-- WNERS_1 1- STEVEN ROWE & MARY LOUISE FLAVIN (RS -.8 ZONING) 16 - JACK KADEMIAN LIVING TRUST(RS-12 ZONING) 2 - KATE DUCHENE THOMA (RS -8 ZONING) 17 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA .LLC (RS -12 ZONING) 3 - MAOHURADHAR CHEGON01 (RS -5 ZONING) 18 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA LLC (R5-12 ZONING) 4 - SATHEESH ELANGOVAN (RS -8 ZONING) 19 & 20 - CROSSING LANDING. LLC (RS -12 ZONING) 5 - BURSAR KRISHNAN AND ANSUYA NASSEN (RS -B ZONING) 21 -SCOTT & PATRICIA PETERSON (RS -12 ZONING) 6 - MICHAEL Be CINDY LEBSACK (RS -8 ZONING) JONATHAN PACHECO (RS -12 ZONING) 7 - CURTIS & LINDA ROESLER (RS -8 ZONING) 22 - DAVID & LEANN GERARD (RS -12 ZONING) 8 - MARK & LORNA CHRISTEN (RS -8 ZONING) LINDA GRAHAM (RS -12 ZONING) 9 - JOHN & PATRICIA LUBBER (RS -8 ZONING) 23 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA LLC AND CROSSING LANDING LLC (RS -12 ZONING) 10 - ERNEST & HEIDI GALER (RS -8 ZONING) 24 - CROSSING LANDING LPC (RS -5 ZONING) 0 100 zoo 9]o wo 11 - REBECCA CRANE (RS -8 ZONING) 25 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA LLC (RS -5 ZONING) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 12 - SPOORTHI JAGADISH & NISHANT SARAN (RS -12 ZONING) 26 - CHARLES & JENNIFER WADDILOVE (RS -5 ZONING) SCALE: 1"=200' 13 - NICHOLAS & KEELY LEPA (RS -12 ZONING) 27 - CROSSING LANDING LLC (RS -5 ZONING) 14 - ANDREW ASHBY (RS -12 ZONING) 28 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA LLC (RS -5 ZONING) 15 - SARAH & ALI SALAMATI (RS -12 ZONING) 29 - NAVIGATE HOMES IOWA LLC (RS -5 ZONING) DRAWN BY: SKF HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. SHEET CHECKED BY: BDV REZONING EXHIBIT APPROVED BY; BDV 1860ROYSONROAD HIAWATHA, IOWA 52293 /1%/ /a CARDINAL POINTE WEST -PART THREE PHONE. (319)362-9548 FAX:(319)352-7595 DATE: 12118/2020 PHONE / �"- IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA CIVIL ENGINEERING a CITY �F IOWA CITY LAND DEVELOPSCAPE ROHITHANIN t/ FIELD BOOK: N/A NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE LAND SURVEYING DEVELOPMENT PLANNING wrrw.nmlay.com SCALE: 1" = 200' PROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 UTILITY AND EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY WATER DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER DIVISIONS - COLLECTIONS IOWA ONE CALL (UTILITIES) MID -AMERICAN ENERGY UTILITY LEGEND -EXISTING (SS8) (ST15) (FM6) (W8) - - - (G)- - - - (G) ----(S)----(S)- - - - - (OHE)- - - - (OHE)- ----(E)----(E)- ----(C)----(C)- - - - - (OHC)- - - - (OHC)- - - --(OHT)- - - -(OHT)- - - - - (F)- - - - (F)- ----(OHF)----(OHF)- ---(T)----(T) (FP) (FW) (CORP) -�-800-�__ ❑T 0 0 0 ® OR 0 ®GV O O �BM 0 Q�SB O ®wv SANITARY SEWER W/SIZE STORM SEWER W/SIZE SUBDRAIN FORCE MAIN W/SIZE WATER MAIN W/SIZE GAS STEAM ELECTRIC -OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -UNDERGROUND CABLE TV -UNDERGROUND CABLE TV -OVERHEAD TELEPHONE -OVERHEAD FIBER OPTIC -UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC -OVERHEAD TELEPHONE -UNDERGROUND FENCE LINE SILT FENCE FLOODPLAIN LIMITS FLOODWAY LIMITS CITY CORPORATE LIMITS CONTOUR LINE LIGHT POLE W/O MAST LIGHT POLE W/MAST TELEPHONE POLE POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR GUY POLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE CABLE TV PEDESTAL UTILITY/CONTROL CABINET SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE GRATE INTAKE RA -3 INTAKE RA-5INTAKE RA -6 INTAKE RA -8 INTAKE HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/O FLUME HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/FLUME GAS VALVE FLARED END SECTION CLEANOUT, STORM OR SANITARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL W/MAST BOLLARD BENCHMARK STREET SIGN WELL SOIL BORING FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER SHUTOFF WATER BLOWOFF NOTE: THIS IS A STANDARD LEGEND. SOME ITEMS MAY NOT APPEAR ON DRAWINGS. IOWA 1, ONE -CALL 800/292-8989 TOLL-FREE CALL- BEFORE- YOU- DIG i (319)-356-5140 (319)-356-5275 911 (319)-356-5260 911 (319)-356-5166 (319)-631-1144 (800)-292-8989 (319)-339-1156 UTILITY LEGEND -PROPOSED SS8 ST18 FM6 W12 CORP 0 Q ® OR 01 r LTJ vr 0 v s�Oo SURVEY LEGEND O • A A X ----------------- PLANT LEGEND REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SENSITIVE AREA SITE PLAN FOR CARDINAL POINTE WEST -PART 3 IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA SANITARY SEWER W/SIZE STORM SEWER W/SIZE FORCE MAIN W/SIZE WATER MAIN W/SIZE CITY CORPORATE LIMITS SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE GRATE INTAKE RA -3 INTAKE RA-5INTAKE RA -6 INTAKE RA -8 INTAKE HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/O FLUME FLARED END SECTION CLEANOUT, STORM OR SANITARY FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER SHUTOFF WATER BLOWOFF SET REBAR W/CAP NO. FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED FOUND RIGHT OF WAY RAIL SECTION CORNER SET AS NOTED SECTION CORNER FOUND AS NOTED CUT "X" IN CONCRETE RECORDED AS EASEMENT LINE PLAT OR SURVEY BOUNDARY PLAT LOT LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE 1/4 SECTION LINE 1/4-1/4 SECTION LINE EXISTING LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS SHRUB CONIFEROUS SHRUB TREE STUMP TREE LINE DRIP EDGE INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 11/23/20 REVISION DATE: 12/30/20 CITY FILE NUMBER: HALL AND HALL PROJECT NUMBER: 20034-16-3 LOCATION MAP (SCALE: 1"=500') 2 �GI CORALVILLPC (CORP) CITY ORP) sk- PROJECT- LOCATION ROJECT- LOCATION tl NOTES THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF IOWA CITY ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL AND SUDAS. HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Lead= mrn (Land! Dove2oJpmentt Since 1953 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com PLAN APPROVED BY: CITY CLERK DATE SHEET INDEX P1.0) COVER P2.0) PRELIMINARY PLAT - SITE LAYOUT AND UTILITIES P3.0) PRELIMINARY PLAT - SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL P4.0) PRELIMINARY PLAT - WOODLAND DISTURBANCE AND PRESERVATION APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON THE CROSSING DEVELOPMENT, LC %JERRY WADDILOVE 755 MORMON TREK BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 1907 IOWA CITY, IA 52246 PH: 319-337-4195 FAX: 319-337-9823 EMAIL: INFO@SOUTHGATECO.COM OWNER THE CROSSING DEVELOPMENT, LC %JERRY WADDILOVE 755 MORMON TREK BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 1970 IOWA CITY, IA 52246 PH: 319-337-4195 FAX: 319-337-4195 EMAIL: INFO@SOUTHGATECO.COM OWNER'S ATTORNEY C. JOSEPH HOLLAND 123 NORTH LINN STREET SUITE 300 IOWA CITY, IA 52245 BRIAN VOGEL, PE 1860 BOYSON RD. HIAWATHA, IA 52233 PH: 319-362-9548 FAX: 319-362-7595 EMAIL: BRIAN@HALLENG.COM IMMU2 EXISTING: VACANT LAND PROPOSED: LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING EXISTING: ID -RP PROPOSED: RS -12, RM -12, RM -20 & RR -1 AREA TO BE REZONED: 27.19 AC ENTIRE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS (RS -12) DUPLEX (LOTS 48-53) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6,000 SF AREA PER UNIT: 3,000 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 55' MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 40' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 15' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5' + 2' PER STORY OVER TWO STORIES REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35' DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY (LOTS 55-66) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,000 SF AREA PER UNIT: 5,000 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 45' MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 40' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 15' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5' + 2' PER STORY OVER TWO STORIES REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35' DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS (RM -12 MULTI -FAMILY (LOT 54) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 8,175 SF AREA PER UNIT: 2,725 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 60' MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 40' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 20' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5' + 2' PER STORY OVER TWO STORIES REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA (EXCLUDING OUTLOTS): 449,104 SQ.FT. (10.31 AC) NET SITE AREA (EXCL. OUTLOTS AND R.O.W.): 312,761 SQ.FT. (7.18 AC) TOTAL LOTS (EXCLUDES OUTLOTS): 19 (12 SINGLE FAMILY, 6 DUPLEX, 1 MULTI -FAMILY) TOTAL DWELLING UNITS: 56 GROSS AREA PER UNIT (EXCLUDES OUTLOTS): 8,020 SQ.FT. (0.18 AC) NET AREA PER UNIT (EXCLUDING R.O.W.): 5,585 SQ.FT. (0.13 AC) PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N69°46'50"W 240.68 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N32°38'01"W 225.83 FEET; THENCE N25°39'42"W 153.73 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT D; THENCE S44°49'18"E 76.79 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE; THENCE S26°04'34"E 305.37 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RM -12: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 41 SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S71°13'03"W 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°06'34"E 226.19 FEET); THENCE S1°26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 156.73 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 127.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S26°46'32"E 127.15 FEET); THENCE S55°55'10"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N75°49'21"W 45.27 FEET); THENCE S62°26'07"W 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S38°59'45"W 19.09 FEET); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 42.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S37°56'43"W 41.90 FEET); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N25°37'09"W 160.65 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 235.09 FEET • THENCE N1°26'12"W 41.30 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N9°06'25' W 136.14 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N73°13'22"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 16.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 540.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N17°38'00"W 16.14 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 29.63 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY CHORD BEARS N23°56'56"E 26.99 FEET • THENCE N66°23'16"E 151.01 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 32.83 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S66°35'34"E 29.26 FEET); THENCE SOUTHERLY 9.94 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S19°10'40"E 9.94 FEET); THENCE N71°13'03"E 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 3.46 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RS -12: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST- PART TWO; THENCE N69°14'02"E 120.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 47 TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 34.84 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S18°51'24"E 34.84 FEET) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DUBS DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE N73°13'22"E 30.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S9°06'25"E 136.14 FEET); THENCE S1°26'12"E 41.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 235.09 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S25°37'09"E 160.65 FEET); THENCE WESTERLY 41.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S81°51'46"W 40.37 FEET); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 18.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S53°58'07"E 18.48 FEET); THENCE S56°40'37"W 157.32 FEET; THENCE N25°39'42"W 200.94 FEET; THENCE N5°28'37"W 276.83 FEET; THENCE N2°23'14"W 108.81 FEET; THENCE N12°47'03"W 102.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE SOUTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY CHORD BEARS S10°0634"E 274.44 FEET • THENCE S1°26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 106.58 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S54°42'18"E 392.30 FEET); THENCE SO°03'39"W 160.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 614.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 576.92 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 156.73 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 226.19 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N71°13'03"E 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCELS CONTAIN 6.05 ACRES SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RR -1: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST- PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST- PART TWO; THENCE N21°30'05"W 86.33 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 41 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N26°56'26"W 53.53 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 40, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT G, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AND A NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N89°04'32"E 463.31 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT G TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMP CARDINAL BOULEVARD; THENCE SO°53'41"W 193.50 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 422.39 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 760.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S15°01'37"E 416.97 FEET); THENCE S30°56'56"E 364.51 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE S59°03'04"W 32.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE WESTERLY 286.85 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S74°33226"W 283.36 FEET); THENCE NO°03'39"E 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 392.30 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 106.58 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 274.44 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT F, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST- PART TWO; THENCE N90°00'00"E 424.72 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT F AND A NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT H, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE WEST CORNER OF LOT 45, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S30°07'41"E 1.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S37°44'02"E 104.59 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S38°08'39"E 103.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 46, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTH CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S28°55'22"E 99.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S12°47'03"E 102.84 FEET; THENCE S2°23'14"E 108.81 FEET; THENCE S5°28'37"E 276.83 FEET; THENCE S25°39'42"E 47.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N44°49'18"W 307.82 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N16°51'29"W 238.65 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N52°48'14"W 489.10 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NO°00'00"E 37.41 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCELS CONTAIN 12.80 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ID -RP TO RM -20 PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N69°46'50"W 240.68 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N32°38'01"W 225.83 FEET; THENCE N56°40'37"E 157.32 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 18.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N53°58'07"W 18.48 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 84.32 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N59°28'27"E 76.30 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N38°59'45"E 19.09 FEET); THENCE N62°26'07"E 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S75°49'21"E 45.27 FEET); N55°55'10"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 487.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S62°00'35"E 468.38 FEET); THENCE 50°03'39"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 50.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N87°19'59"E 50.45 FEET) TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE S59°02'58"W 8.58 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE S63°56'06"W 544.31 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 4.88 ACRES, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS. PLANS SCALE CORRECTLY WHEN PLOTTED ON 22111104" PAPER I ui H 0 Q z H Q U tY 0 z a J a Lu Lu a Lu Cn z Lu (n z a a J LZ a z J Lu d Z r -i Z 0 N Lu I H u H u H 6d M M I 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=50' 54' O CAMP ORDINAL BOULEVARD , o 0 ----_ 1 305' 601 ---'----_ 1 1 OUTLOT J 1 ' \� � - I `� 351,795 SF 8.08 AC 11 11 11 I 1 1 II 1 1 I MAILBOX CLUSTER LOCATION (TO BE CONFIRMED WITH 1 1 II I POSTMASTER) 1 1 1I I 1 /- 1 / I I EXISTING 50' SANITARY ' 0 1 SEWER EASEMENTQn ,�� I I P 3 g 39 PPPR 2 8" DIAMETER C-900 40 � WATER MAIN (TYP. IOWA 1 1 41 gCITY LOOPED SYSTEM) AL p0� 3' I vI 55 / 11,272 SF 0.26 AC ---- _ __ 56 11,272 SF 4������� 0.26 AC g OUTLOT J SHALL BE OPEN / / O��(�� 66 1 I SPACE MAINTAINED BY _ o $p 'YM HOMEOWNERS �9s� 9,535 SF 57 ASSOCIATION `3�f�/ / / 0 0.22 AC /1 1 ----�S - o \\ 11,069 SF �ARcN �i 1 10 0.25 AC X _ _ - 6 62 9-} 1--- r I I II \ - $� \ ti 58 6 // 1 I / I I I z \\ 9,535 SF I I/ 9,907 SF 43, 0.22 AC / ,� ��� y LLj I I II II I \ \ 0.23 AC 48, 62 "64 -71 o, / y, 1 I II j I62 621 I I o ?i i? 4� \ 59 ------ 8,171 SF UNITS 10289 SF 0. 19 AC -L 4,650S 0.24 AC 63 (ST15) _� - II 411 \ \ GASKETED RCP '� 60 9,161 SF / / �� o g' STORM SEWER (TYP) 13,339 SF61 62 0 0.21 AC 60 ,� /5`�`s I 0.31 AC 9 643 SF o 9,535 SF 2$ �,� '� _ 0.22 AC o i �T {--'r--al II I� I� I 4UNIT T�< g2 0.22 AC ti / /N' J I III DUMPSTER (3,425 ) C?4 ¢i ati S /T\S I I 1 m I ENCLOSURE (TYP) 66 - - - - - -15 UTI ITY EASEMENT _ - - 50, �i' / 1 �C85 1 <S 1 UNITS (Typl \ St�S� / �A' 86 R ROTATE SANITARY SEWER II I I I I 3,650 SF J NF % MANHOLE CONE TO AVOID BACK OF CURB/PAVING (TYP) I ' gs st s -- (VV - L4 0 10 /o / I 7 / ------ =- ° _ � (Wg) j6r � PRIVATE STORM -)61 �'4 9 / I - 2 5 I � � SEWER(TYP) � X25 ,pis" � � � 4 UNITS Y j /, � (SS (SS8) /� � � - - � � 15) O - __ _ 70 3,425 S Sl I EXISTING 25' FIBER (ST UNITS o ( ) 1$9 _ _ I irI OPTIC EASEMENT (4,650 SF \ _ _ _ _ - - - - - / - - EXISTING 40' SANITARY I LO ----- �jg \ 2 MIN / --- ��------------ SEWER EASEMENT I WITH EWALK ------------- T \\ \��,\ St�S // ��I / THEIDFUTURE DEOVELOPMENT OFD OUTLOT K II _ _ EXISTING 30 SANITARY .35, �� / I 60' ROW LOT A (R.0.W.) I SEWER EASEMENT \` \ \\ 23, ��\ \ / // 28, W 1 136,179 SF I 3.13 AC I I 9 / (EXISTING 40' SANITARY i �So UNITS 47 SEWER EASEMENT �� (4,650S `� ��/��@lif St�S// r+� 1 //\ )\ ��\\\ \C/r/ 1 F ���t• J�� n, / I �0 s11WALK 48 q 14,631 SF / / ���� 20' MIN F FN 1"BACK (TYP.) T ���i� �>y�` V- N I I ------ 0.34 AC / / \� ST�1`� - 54 Z r I 1021792 F / �/ \ \ R�� (S ���---- 558 / ��"�� I LOT 54 ON-SITE OPEN SPACE I 99 / 49 \ \ " \ s(y $ L \ 36 AC - - 110SF PER BEDROOM ) -- �� 1 78 BEDROOMS jp 13,082 SF \ - -�� REQUIRED OPEN SPACE = 780 SF '3 / 0.30 AC SC/T/�� 1 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE = 13,470 SF co m0, \ FR FgToRn� ,VO FNT \ co ego EXISTING STORM SEWER SFMFNT �y "' W8 log, 50 fps' 1.9% ��5 OUTLOT K EXISTING 30' STORM SEWER EASEMENT 12,962 SF Y 24, 195,681 SF 0.30 AC 3Y' I 4.49 AC CO ,v R 51 9 / OUTLOT K FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT \ "'9 AND TO BE REZONED TO RM -20. 15,394 SF 17 0.35 AC \\\ g4, 2391 3, 30$' OUTLOT D (STORM WATER MANAGEMENT) CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE DRAWN BY: CJZ / / IOWA HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. / - CHECKED BY: BDV / 1,readenvinLan�JDevelopment,Since1953 APPROVED BY: BDV / / 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 DATE: 12/18/20 / / PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CITY CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIELD BOOK: NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION JAPPROVED I DATE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com 300' OFFSET FROM HIGHWAY 218 RIGHT-OF-WAY I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SENSITIVE AREA SITE PLAN FOR CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART 3 IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA STZ4 LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS IOWA CITY CODE 14-2B-6: C-3, 14-5E, & 14-5F LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING ZONING: EXISTING: ID -RP PROPOSED: RS -12 & RM -12 RM -12: LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS -12: SINGLE FAMILY & DUPLEX ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: RS-12/RM-12 SOUTH: ID -RP WEST: RR -1 EAST: RS -8 TREE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI -FAMILY: 14-5E-8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1 TREE/550 SF BUILDING SPACE BUILDING SPACE: 7 BUILDINGS TOTALING: 29,100 SF 29,100/550= 52.9 TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 53 BUFFERS/SCREENING PER 14 -2B -6:C-3 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS NO SCREENING REQUIRED AS PROPOSED BUILDINGS BLOCK VIEW OF DRIVEWAYS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 53 LEGEND OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE CONIFEROUS TREE LOT BREAKDOWN LOT # PURPOSE 48-53 DUPLEX 54 MULTI -FAMILY 55-66 SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION (PUBLIC) (NOT TO SCALE) PROFILE LINE, 4. ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1/2 R.O.W.- 30' 1/2 R.O.W - 30' 8.0' 8.0' 26' B -B (PRESTON LANE) 28' -B (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 1.0' PRESTON PRESTON PRESTON 5.0' TYP LANE LANE 13' (PRESTON LANE) 13' (PRESTON LANE) LANE TYP 5.0' DUBS 10.0' 14' (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 14' (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 10.0' DRIVE/ DUBS DUBS DECLAN DRIVE/ JOINT SEE DRIVE/ DRIVE DECLAN STANDARD 2 NDARDCURB NOTE5 DECLAN DRIVE DRIVE PROFILE TYP GRADE 2.0 4.0% 1.5 SUBDRAIN ) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED FILL 7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH SEE NOTE 2 NOTES: STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SUBDRAINS AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE THIRD POINT JOINTING PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION (PRIVATE DRIVE) (NOT TO SCALE) PROFILE LINE, E ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 18' B -B 9' 9' SEE NOTE 2 STANDARD LOW PROFILE CURB DRIVE VARIES KT -2 OR L-2 JOINT DRIVE VARIES 0.5% MIN SEE NOTE 4 PROFILE 0 50/ MIN 6.5% MAX2.0°/ 2.0% GRADE 6'5'/o MAX SUBDRAIN (TYP) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED FILL 7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED NOTES: JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SUBDRAINS AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE CENTERLINE AND 3' OFF THE BACK OF CURBS PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE LAYOUT & UTILITIES PROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 (MAX.) 3.5 11 P2.0 C) m T m 2 0 0- E N 0 0 N 0 N O M U N in 52 16,297 SF 0.37 AC ; 53 OUTLOT I 15,323 SF ILn EXISTING PLATTED BOUNDARY OUTLOT�2S' I SHALL BE OPEN 187,765 SF 0.35 AC '� FOR OUTLOT D, CARDINAL SPACE SPACE MAINTAINED BY POINTE WEST - PART ONE. 4.31 AC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AREA TO BE RE -PLATTED WITH FINAL PLAT 47, 2391 3, 30$' OUTLOT D (STORM WATER MANAGEMENT) CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE DRAWN BY: CJZ / / IOWA HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. / - CHECKED BY: BDV / 1,readenvinLan�JDevelopment,Since1953 APPROVED BY: BDV / / 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 DATE: 12/18/20 / / PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CITY CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIELD BOOK: NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION JAPPROVED I DATE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com 300' OFFSET FROM HIGHWAY 218 RIGHT-OF-WAY I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SENSITIVE AREA SITE PLAN FOR CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART 3 IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA STZ4 LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS IOWA CITY CODE 14-2B-6: C-3, 14-5E, & 14-5F LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING ZONING: EXISTING: ID -RP PROPOSED: RS -12 & RM -12 RM -12: LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS -12: SINGLE FAMILY & DUPLEX ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: RS-12/RM-12 SOUTH: ID -RP WEST: RR -1 EAST: RS -8 TREE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI -FAMILY: 14-5E-8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1 TREE/550 SF BUILDING SPACE BUILDING SPACE: 7 BUILDINGS TOTALING: 29,100 SF 29,100/550= 52.9 TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 53 BUFFERS/SCREENING PER 14 -2B -6:C-3 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS NO SCREENING REQUIRED AS PROPOSED BUILDINGS BLOCK VIEW OF DRIVEWAYS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 53 LEGEND OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE CONIFEROUS TREE LOT BREAKDOWN LOT # PURPOSE 48-53 DUPLEX 54 MULTI -FAMILY 55-66 SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION (PUBLIC) (NOT TO SCALE) PROFILE LINE, 4. ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1/2 R.O.W.- 30' 1/2 R.O.W - 30' 8.0' 8.0' 26' B -B (PRESTON LANE) 28' -B (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 1.0' PRESTON PRESTON PRESTON 5.0' TYP LANE LANE 13' (PRESTON LANE) 13' (PRESTON LANE) LANE TYP 5.0' DUBS 10.0' 14' (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 14' (DUBS/DECLAN DRIVE) 10.0' DRIVE/ DUBS DUBS DECLAN DRIVE/ JOINT SEE DRIVE/ DRIVE DECLAN STANDARD 2 NDARDCURB NOTE5 DECLAN DRIVE DRIVE PROFILE TYP GRADE 2.0 4.0% 1.5 SUBDRAIN ) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED FILL 7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH SEE NOTE 2 NOTES: STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SUBDRAINS AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE THIRD POINT JOINTING PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION (PRIVATE DRIVE) (NOT TO SCALE) PROFILE LINE, E ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 18' B -B 9' 9' SEE NOTE 2 STANDARD LOW PROFILE CURB DRIVE VARIES KT -2 OR L-2 JOINT DRIVE VARIES 0.5% MIN SEE NOTE 4 PROFILE 0 50/ MIN 6.5% MAX2.0°/ 2.0% GRADE 6'5'/o MAX SUBDRAIN (TYP) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED FILL 7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED NOTES: JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SUBDRAINS AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE CENTERLINE AND 3' OFF THE BACK OF CURBS PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE LAYOUT & UTILITIES PROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 (MAX.) 3.5 11 P2.0 C) m T m 2 0 0- E N 0 0 N 0 N O M U N in X \ opo pop I ° IN f f \ p ♦ �\ \\,J\ \ \ \� \ k� ♦ �\ \ ���\ \ f x, ice♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ ° o° o°0040° o o O o / \ e �Oo p��°� o°o°o . \ \ \♦\ /\ p \ �\ '�' \ `\ INSTALL STABILIZED \ / ) ° ` \ o o0 0 \ \\\\ \ �♦ \ �v .♦ \\\ CONSTRUCTION \ �\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ o o p4 oA oho / o 0�d °�°a°o I� 0 00 opo o, O - \ \ S \ \ O i ♦\ ♦ O° Op Op o0 O O 0 30 60 90 120 ENTRANCE PER SUDAS \ \\ �O °o°DD - J / �a°� °°oo / / I I I I �` _ \ \\\ \\ \ \ ♦\ �( \♦ i\ ` \ \ WASTE CONTAINER/ 1 °o �� ,` \ ^ DETAIL 9040.20 (TYP) p O O O o0 00 op oo pope \ \� \ wf \' \ \ \ \ CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA / p ° o° 0 0 0 0 0° \ \ �\ \ � 5� � � / -•-\ \ -� \ \ \ 41 I \ \ \ \ I I � � � �O� p � o° o° o° o° o°I o°' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 46� \\\ \ \ \\ \ �\ \ \� �` ,]/'% o 'o °`�o '^ - \ / / �Oo o°�Po��� °o0 00 00 00 oc�'oo \\\\\ ��\ `� Q CONCRETE PORTA-POTTY \O ^ I / \ Qp�O� \ \�� \ \ \ \ \ \ oo -oq p�� J / 1 ��op0`Q�Q 00 00 00 00 00 0o SCALE; 1 =60 \\\\A \ \ - �p°�o° g°°o ° °°o \ - \ \ \ `\_ \ \ \ \ \� \ \\t\ Sl WASHOUT AREA \ \ AREA I/ o��°#��/ / \�\\ / - - - o p p� ° °moo°� p°� \ \ \ \\ i \ \\ 1 \\ \\ \ P� <5 I l\\\ \ \ \60° � a \_--\1 �pgip °po°po°°o7°0 \ EXISTING SLOPES HATCH LEGEND�O� �o��so�o°o::. `�\2 T ��p� oo EQUIPMENT/ MATERIAL / \ I \ \ \ > p ,/ '0 STORAGE &STAGING AREA i o _ / O 47\\\ \ 2 vl r- � � / _ 11 \ "\Oq O STEEP SLOPES _- 0 \ \ \ \ \ O OUTLOT H SHALL BE OPEN / J p o�0 0 0 ✓O �O�O � O �� �p O O (18 /o - 24 /o) \ ^ \ \\ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION \\\ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ p�p°Y'� \ _ � °-°ora o0 0 ,\\ \ \ \ \ � � •° p�°O p p � °o��'o�Q°� °�po \ � � � ��p � � \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \\\ \ \ \ - \ \ °c\ _ �°�o�cfo \ C 1 ) \ \ \ \ \ I \ CRITICAL SLOPES 1 2\7`_ S o °�,°° o °bono�o p pp \ p ° � o � 0 0 0 opo o (25% - 39 /o) r ° o oo° o ao� \ opo ) �o°�� 19!4 � 4Q AA�� �o z � o -_44 Q 7(7 � �0 0 o�o q�p n �y o \ ........ CONSTRUCTION LIMITS A l 1V A \\ \ \ \ I V \ 4/ p 3.5:1 MAX - I I I 1 �°q'�o� V A ° �v.;II �� - ° I v v I v / / moo,/ / �' � \ I EXISTING SLOPE CALCULATIONS °' N TOTAL SITE AREA: 27.06 AC. TOTAL STEEP SLOPES ONSITE: 5.77 AC OU LOT J \ \ / TOTAL CRITICAL SLOPES ONSITE: 3.95 AC 35 , 79 5 SF \ \ \ DISTURBED STEEP SLOPES ONSITE: 2.71 AC (47.0% DISTURBED) ,8. 8 AC ° DISTURBED CRITICAL SLOPES ONSITE: 0.73 AC (18.4% DISTURBED) \VA\� \ I � / A\�VA� v o '�, O�Oo o ° ) 1 �21 � � �• \ \ I A � \�\\ \I I � f3�f II I\\\ \s\ I \\ J \\ \ I I \ \ \ 9 907 SF- / OUTLOT J SHALL BE OPEN -0.23 AC I I o� O c3o o� l / \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \\\ \\\ \ \°°b T \ \ 6°A oI'o� \ \ \ � / / � � � \ \ O ` v N p � O O SPACE MAINTAINED BY \ \ \\\\\\ \\\ \ I I \\\ \ \ \ \ �Oo \ \ \ �o� I I \I I \ I \ \ \ I $ op°�o4 HOMEOWNERS pOpo°ASSOCIATION -/j�\oe" l /o TI , - \ I I \\\\ \\ mooLINEON - �\\\�\\\ \ \\ l 6° \ I \\ oma• o ob�°o hS O p -z- 10,289 SF' q - - U. 24 AC V,- \� INSTALL SILT FENCE, 60 FILTER SOCK OR o0 °o o / r\ EQUIVALENT PER SUDAS 03,339 SFS DETAILS 9040.19 & 9040.20 0,31 AC \ AND AROUND ALL INTAKES. 15 394 \\ �'op d o °r doc ' p� ° o \ \ \ \ - �� \ \ \ �o °oo oo°°�O� op o°o• op co�'°o \ 'o°� p \ / \ \\ �p 0.35 AC`'�p O\ p O O 0 o�Oo 2.36 AC V � V � ♦ �,� 61 ♦ o o� �° - v o 0 0 \ \ I \\I 11 \ � /` � / /� / ` � �o �o 0 00 � _ \ ( \ > 9 643 S F� ° o��°�Ro \ \ \ \ \ \ / // ( \ I \ \ \ _ \ \ I I \ ^ \ �O �o O o ao \ \ \ \ \ r \ \ \ \��\ \\\\ \�°�S \ 0.22 AC \ \ \ \ \ INLET \ O O O O O O O \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \\ �\ \\\� �� _ �i \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ �o \ ,�` \ \ \ \\ // \\ \\\\ \ \ \ O \ \ I \ \ \ PROTECTION '45) \\ CONSTRUCTION LIMIT LINE' \ \ ° o p \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 7 62 / °Qp \ QO°� b OO O `"�♦pp f \ 9,535 SF52 \\\ \ ---- \ --__0.22 AC's 16f297 Svv v - - - _ _ / / / IJl\\�\ \ \\ \\�\ \ \\ \ \ _ 0.37 AC \ \ \\ \ , NOTES: � � \ \ \ \ \ \ � �°` \ \ \ \ ��� _ - \ - _ 63 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND \ \ ( I / / // /�/ / / J % I \ \� \ \ \ �� \\ o wp \ \\ \ \ \ �smS _ //� \ �� \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ � \ ��2c , 9,161 SF_ STRUCTURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. \ \ /\\ \ \ \ I \ \ k \ 9s s - - 0.21 AC - > / 2. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UNDERGROUND \ \ \ \ \ I I I �(/ ( /( (I\\\ \ I 1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�\ �,\ ,FX65\\ ° y ' ��j \ \ `�� °� FACILITIES. \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \1 I I 1 ( 8,17 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL \ \ \ \ \ \ 16, \ 1 \ �°°oma.. 0.19 AC " OQ EXPLORATION REPORT OF RECORD FOR THE SITE, WHERE APPLICABLE. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \� �\ �\ �\ \ I ✓ EXISTJVG TREE \\\ \ \ 1 \ \ °� I /\ TOPSOIL O O� p �O$ �O 65 O LINE (TYP) \\ I 53 .I I \ I \ STOCKPILESF- 4. V 4. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE KEPT ON THE \ \\\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\\� \\ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \ \\ \\\ _15,323 SF I I \ 1 AREACONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES - ^ \ _ - 9,535 SF THE DATE OFF NAL STABILIZATION. ALL OPERATORS/CON CONSTRUCTION RACTORS WORKING ONSITE TO \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ I\`\ \ \\ _ \ \\ \ _0.35 AC I� -I� \ \ \ \ \ / �� THE DATE _ _ \ 0 3.22 AC / MUST SIGN THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT PROVIDED AND WILL BECOME CO -PERMITTEES \ \ \ \ I \ \ I / \\ \ \�� \ \ \ ON THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NO. 2 FOR THIS SITE. ALL OPERATORS/CONTRACTORS WORKING ONSITE SHALL BE SUPPLIED A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND MUST BE FAMILIAR WITH \ OUTLOT D ITS CONTENTS. THE SWPPP MUST BE PERIODICALLY UPDATED TO SHOW CURRENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. UPDATED VERSIONS OF THE SWPPP WILL BE PROVIDED TO \ \\ CARDINAL POINTE WEST\ PART ONE \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\ N \\ \\ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ L \ • X55 ° e� o� o - �o °o F32 - qq b \ % \� \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ � � \ � \ 1"� �s \ \ I \ `\ \ \ \ \ INSTALL FILTER SOCK O° ALL OF THE OPERATORS/CONTRACTORS WHOM ARE AFFECTED BY THE CHANGES MADE TO \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ .I\ \ BEHIND ALL DROP CURBS - /°�°� THE SWPPP. IT WILL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE (OWNER OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR) \\\ \ < \ > \ T \\ AT SIDEWALK RAMP TO SEE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.�� \ \ \\1 11 \\ 1 \ \ I I I I\ 1\ \\ "'o \\ \ �� \\ \ �o� \� \ \ \ LOCATIONS (TYP.) / / // / / 74 - - p 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP ALL ORGANIC MATERIAL WITHIN GRADING LIMITS. AMINIMUM 6" DEPTH. REFER TO IOWA CITY AND SUDAS FOR All OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS. 6. PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A CSR PERMIT \ / 1 I I \ ( ( \ \ \\ \ II Il \\11 111 \\\ \ \\ ��° p �°\o�o�O°o�' \ \ \ � / / /-� � -- - -- y/ / � - FROM THE CITY OF IOWA CITY. ) �\ \ \ \ \ \I \ I \ 7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED OR HARD SURFACE ON THE SITE SHALL RECEIVE \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ MINIMUM 6" TOPSOIL. \- 1 8. MAINTAIN SUBSTANTIAL VEGETATED AREA AROUND ENTIRE PROJECT PERIMETER TO ACT AS - \ \ \ \\ \\ \ G� \ \ \ \\ fop cD b°a b�° \ / / / / - - - - - / / - f i / .y� _ // / �/ // / // / / / \ \\ \ VEGETATED FILTER STRIP. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE OR / _O�pQ�o�p / EQUIVALENT TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE \\ \ \ \ \\\\ oFy�eS \\\ \\ \ \\ X40 �\ �"b°p \\ \�\ o o` GENERAL PERMIT NO. 2. �\ \\ I C \ \ \ �o \\ \\ \\\ \\\\\\ \� \0��p��p��0 l \ \ O L \ \ \ \ \ ( 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES FROM DISRUPTION DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3.5:1 MAX 10. FILL AREAS WITHIN STREETS AND AREAS OF 4' OR GREATER FILLS WITHIN BUILDING AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN REQUIRE SOIL TESTING BY AN APPROVED GEOTECHNICAL FIRM. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE STRUCTURAL FILL AND TESTING PER LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS TO OWNER AND \\ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ - _ °o _ r Q \ � ENGINEER OF RECORD. \ \ \ \ \\ \ < - - \ '\�� / I735 11. PROPER PERMITS SHALL BE IN PLACE FOR ANY GRADING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY�\ \ �\ \\ O °P ° O \ _ RIGHT OF WAY. \ \ I \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ O - / 0 12. FINISHED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISH GROUND ELEVATIONS. 13. ALL SLOPES TO BE NO STEEPER THAN 3.5:1. DRAWN BY: CJZ / / IOWA HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. CHECKED BY: BDV / / Leaders inLand Development Since 1953 REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SENSITIVE AREA SITE PLAN FOR CARDINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED BY: BDV / / 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 POINTE WEST - PART 3 SITE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL P3 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 DATE: 12/18/20 / / CITY IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA CIVIL ENGINEERING � LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIELD BOOK: XXX NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com PROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 OUTLOT F � P `��v v\ v \\� Av vv v\ �Av\ / / vv�\ y, ♦ �,♦�♦ ♦ s\r�A v\\ �j► \ \ ++++++++ + + + W+++ + ++CARDINAL POINTE WEST 01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + x + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1G + + + + + + +40 r � i+ 0 30 60 90 120 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 45 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "'4 + + + + + + GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET + �++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PA 2 + + + + + + SCALE: 1"=60'+++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \�\ '�\`\\°�\\\v\\\\\ \\ J��\ �\\\ \\\\\\ \ `� \\\\\�.�♦��i . ♦ �%P���Q'\`\�sms`��sis � % J QP /"S�♦s�' / �/ A \\\ \ t\ \ \ \\ + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I1� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 'A" + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + 3 - WOODLANDS HATCH LEGEND + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 41 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 46 DISTRUBED WOODLAND ARE A WITHIN GRADING LIMITS + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , \\ \ \\ \ \\ Q� �/ _w� /�/ \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ��`� \ �\ \ �' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4[ + + + + + + + + + + + + + `\' �f \ \\ `� - /�' / \ 55 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + 50' WOODLAND BUFFER AREA* + + + + + + + + + + + , �s \ �\ / + + + + + + + + + + �' s����c\\ \ \ \%�� ��/ \ \\ 11 272 026 ACF++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++t++ +++++++++++++++� 47 9S�32J\\ \\\ \++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++ � X29 \ \\\ � � t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + WOODLAND PRESERVATION AREA + + + + + + OUTLOT I SHALL BE OPEN \ \\ / / \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + SPACE MAINTAINED BY \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + 1 + + + + + + + \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +j J + + + + + + HOMEOWNERS \ �\\ \ \ \ I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4. I . + + + + + + ASSOCIATION \ \ \\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I/ EXISTING TREE LINE + + + + + + + `\ \ \\ ♦ I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +11 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \\\ \ I + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� I WOODLAND DISTURBANCE CALCULATIONS + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I 48 I \\ \l I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + TOTAL SITE AREA: 27.06 AC. t + + 14,631 SF I � + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.34 AC I II I . + + + + + + + + + + + + + TOTAL WOODLAND AREA ONSITE: 9.76 AC I I I I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + DISTURBED WOODLAND AREAS ONSITE = 3.45 AC (35.3%)* + + + + + + pG1 / III I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 9s�3s� , _ _ _ — 1 I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + TOTAL WOODLAND ONSITE PRESERVATION AREA = 6.31 AC (64.7%)* + + + + + + + + + + F�°p3 ' — I I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + *INCLUDES ALL TREES WITHIN 50 FEET OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO ACCOUNT II , + + + + + + OUTL� . J+ + + + + . FOR POSSIBLE ROOT DAMAGE + + + + I I y + + + + + + 351,795 SF+ + + + + � + + + + I I + + + + + + + C. + + + + + \ + + + I I I + + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + + \ + + + + 49 II 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - \ i. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ II I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - \ ++++++++++ -� 13,082 SF I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ ++++++++++++ 1 0.30 AC I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ \ + + + + + + 1 I II I � + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ \ + + + + + + , I I I I in + + + + + + + + + + +OUTjLOT4J SF#ALL4BE QPEN4- +� \ + + + + + +♦ I I I + + + + + + + + + + + .$PACE MAINTAINE-D BY + + �\ + + + + + a I I 00II I + + + + + + + + + + + + + HGMEQWNBRS + + + + \ \ + + + + + - , I I + + + + + + + + + + + + .ASS®CIATION + + + + \ + + + + + + + I I I CONSTRUCTION + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \� \ + + + + + + + + I I �, LIMIT LINE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + I I I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ +++++++++++ � 50 II `\ I r + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++ 12,962 SF. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I �� I �' \ I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �\ \ +++++ 0.30 AC I �\ I 1 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++,\\\ \\\ \ + + 41f I t� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ \ + J* I ` \I \ Q \-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\\ \ \ \ \ Z \ 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ \\ \ �+ OUTLOT I I `\ 1`� s `13,339 SF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ \ \ \ , r \ 0.31 AC 4. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 187 ^ \ ,765 SF\ 4.31 AC \ 51 \ yrs + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +. + \\ \ \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 15,394 SF \ 54 \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ low 0.35 AC \ `1021792 SF--- --- \ \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ \ \\ \61 - + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ C� \ 2.36 AC `\ 9,643 SF \ + + + + + + + + + + + + +� (sss 0.22 AC \\ , + + 1 + ++++++++ SSS ` \ \ ♦ + + + +� \\ \\ \ \ CONSTRUCTION + + + \ \ \ LIMIT LINE V / ` \V 62 V � + + + N 52 V v v �� ' v v vvv 9,535 SF v v + + + + + �,�� vvv (Ssza)` 01 16,297 SF \\ CbT `\ \ \ 0.22 AC \ + + + /+ \ 0.37 AC /\ CP � � 136,1�9\� mss \\ \ \ �,?,o + /+ \ , � 63 i+ � � s . �+ �9,161 � \ \ / / `�`���� \ \\ \ 9 161 SIF 0.21 A C 64 8,171 SF ,� QQoo \� EXISTING TREE�� \� \ 0.19 AC 65 LINE (TYP) 53 \ / \ S \ SF 15,323 SF _ 0� 225AC 0.35 AC ' — \ 66 Lh 9,535 SF �i� \ ` OUTLOT D \ \ �'P cQo \ \ \ 0.22 AC / / \ (STORM WATER MANAGEMENT) , N� \ F9s�392J CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE, � �P� \ ST�7 — — 7- i \ \ , �A \ 00 40 I 01 44h 10 AAdl to 00 *40 10 \ OUTLOT K 9O \ \ 195,681 SF \ \ 4.49 AC ` , 2 DRAWN BY: CJZ / / IOWA HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. CHECKED BY: BDV / / Leaders rinLand DevelopmentSince 1953 � REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SENSITIVE AREA SITE PLAN FOR CARDINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED BY: BDV / / 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 ` POINTE WEST - PART 3 WOODLAND DISTURBANCE AND PRESERVATION P4.0 DATE: 12/18/20 / / CITY PHONE: ENGINEERING 8 FAX: LANDSCAPE IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA CIVIL ENGINEERING � LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIELD BOOK: XXX NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com 1 iPROJECT NO: 20034-16-3 0 m T m Q, 0 ° a M V O 0 N O N 0 M N 0 a� 0 a ru 0 0) rn 0 m M v M 0 0 N H 0 a- 0 0 0 fa M L a a a) a� a- u U M ko M O O N i M O O N O O O O N 0 0- -2 LL 0 Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 2 of 11 CASE NO. REZ20-0013 & SUB20-0004: Applicant: Crossing Land LLC Location: South of Kennedy Parkway and West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard An application for a rezoning of approximately 27.19 acres of land from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Rural Residential (RR -1) zone for 12.80 acres, High Density Single -Family (RS -12) for 6.05 acres, Low Density Multi -Family (RM- 12) for 3.46 acres, and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20) for 4.88 acres and an application for the preliminary plat of Cardinal Pointe West Part 3, a residential subdivision with 12 single-family lots, 6 duplex lots, and 1 multi -family lot. Russett began the staff report noting there are two applications with this agenda item, a rezoning and a preliminary plat. She next showed a map of the area which is located south of Kennedy Parkway and west of Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The property is currently zoned Interim Development Research Park and north of the project area there are multiple residential zones and some rural residential. Russett noted the majority is single family, with the exception of one area which is zoned for multifamily development. In terms of background Russett noted this area was annexed into the City in the late 60s and early 70s and was zoned Interim Development Research Park in 1983 as at that time it was thought that this area could maybe be developed as an office park. The Comprehensive Plans after 1983 recognize that this is probably not realistic, and then the Clear Creek Master Plan was developed as a joint effort between the City of Iowa City, South Gate development, and the City of Coralville in 2015. In 2016 Cardinal Point West Part One was approved predominantly as a single-family subdivision, Part Two was approved in 2018 has some homes that are built and some homes under construction. Unlike the first part, Part Two has a variety of housing types incorporated into the design, there is single family, duplexes, and townhome, multi -family style development. All of the vehicular access to the townhomes is through a private alley and there are also some duplexes planned. Cardinal Point West Part Three is an extension of Part Two and it's located to the south of Part Two. Russett showed some images of the land pointing out slopes and some sensitive areas and showed the property off to the to the west where the trees are located. Russett reiterated this is a proposed zoning with four different zoning designations being proposed. The first is rural residential which are the areas where for the most part will be preserved as open space for the homeowner's association as a lot of these areas have sensitive features and will not allow any development. The next is the RS -12 area which is the single family and duplex development, there is RM -12 where the proposed townhomes would be located and a proposed outlot for future development that the applicant is requesting a designation of RM -20 which is a medium density multifamily zone. In terms of review criteria staff looks at compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and compatibility with the neighborhood and for subdivision review they also look at compliance with Comprehensive Plan and compliance with the subdivision regulations. In terms of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, this area is in the Clear Creek Master Plan which was developed and envisioned for residential and commercial and office development. There are also policy goals in this plan related to conservation design because of all the sensitive features and ensuring that there was housing diversity and a variety of housing types. So staff finds that this Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 3 of 11 plan, the rezoning and the preliminary plat, are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending one condition that the property owners install a five -foot -wide sidewalk on the west side from Kennedy Parkway to Preston Lane. In terms of compatibility with the neighborhood, Russett noted this is a continuation of the existing development pattern in the area, the area already contains a mix of single-family homes, duplexes and townhomes, and multifamily buildings. Staff is recommending two conditions that are carried forward from the previous rezoning of Part Two, which are compliance with the concept plan, shown for the townhome style development to ensure that garage accesses is at the rear that there's a private drive and also that there is green space between the driveways. The second condition is approval of a landscaping plan which ensures that there is usable outdoor open space on Lot 54 and that the garages are screened from the streets. Russett next showed the preliminary plat pointing out the single family lots proposed along Preston Lane and will connect with Camp Cardinal Boulevard. In the center are the townhome style multifamily buildings and the duplexes are on the side. There are two outlots, which again are predominantly sensitive areas and are proposed to be private open space maintained by the homeowner's association. Outlet K is the area that's proposed for future development which the applicant is requesting the RM -20 designation. Russett noted a couple things related to traffic and transportation. The block length of Preston Lane from Declan Drive to Camp Cardinal Boulevard exceeds the preferred 600 foot maximum for block length which is in order to preserve more of those woodlands and sensitive areas. Staff is okay with the increased block length but have asked the applicant to incorporate traffic calming features, so they have incorporated a traffic circle on Preston Lane and then they've incorporated chokers at Declan Drive and Preston Lane. Russett noted that Public Works has reviewed and approved the traffic calming measures so there's no longer any deficiencies associated with the plat. In terms of traffic counts, Camp Cardinal Boulevard is an arterial street and the average daily traffic capacity for that street is over 16,000. Current data shows that at Camp Carnival Boulevard and Kennedy Parkway it is currently around 7,780 and staff has estimated that maximum build out of the proposed development, even including the outlet for future development, would add additional trips per day of around 1,261 so with the proposed development it will still be below the capacity of Camp Carnival Boulevard. Russett reiterated there are sensitive features and so the applicant has submitted a sensitive areas development plan. Russett showed a couple of summary tables to show the preserved areas for both the slopes and the woodlands. For the critical slopes, the Zoning Code allows a disturbance of up to 35% and the applicant's sensitive areas plan shows a disturbance of below 19% so they meet the requirements of the Code. In terms of the woodlands, they are showing that the preserved area is almost 65% of the woodlands but there are two retention requirements for this area because of the two separate zoning designations. Staff has determined the application does comply with the sensitive areas ordinance as the applicant is proposing to extend the woodlands to the south that have been preserved as part of Part Two. They are doing the same on the west side preserving the woodlands from the north and extending them south. The retention requirements for single family is 50% and the applicant is well above that at 65%. In terms of stormwater management, the basin to the south of the subdivision shown has the capacity to serve Parts One, Two and Three and this has been confirmed by Public Works. Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 4 of 11 In terms of next steps, the Commission's recommendation will go to City Council and then upon approval by City Council the applicant can submit a final plat which will be reviewed by City Council and then upon approval of final plat the applicant can submit site plans and building permits, which will be reviewed by staff. Russett reiterated all deficiencies mentioned in the staff report have been addressed. Staff did receive one piece of correspondence from a resident on Preston Lane who's interested in some type of pocket park or playground area. Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0013 & SUB20-0004, two applications submitted by Crossing Land, LLC for a preliminary plat of the Cardinal Pointe West — Part 3 subdivision, a 19 - lot, residential subdivision located South of Kennedy Parkway and West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and the rezoning of 27.19 acres from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -12), High Density Single - Family Residential (RS -12), and Medium Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -20) zones subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the concept plan for the area shown as "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat, which includes townhouse -style, multi -family dwellings with vehicular access to garages from a rear lane with green space and landscaping between the rear driveways to reduce impervious surface and improve stormwater drainage. 2. Prior to approval of any site plan, Owner shall obtain staff approval of a landscaping plan which shall include the plans for useable outdoor space for "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat and screening of garages along Declan Drive and Mason Drive. 3. At the time of final platting, incorporation of traffic calming devices in a location approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Prior to the issuance of a certificate occupancy, construction of a 5' sidewalk on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd between Preston Lane and Kennedy Parkway. Hensch asked about the removal of trees and there were any requirements to replant any trees. Russett replied the applicant exceed the retention requirements so would not be required to replant any trees. Hensch noted by looking at that aerial map it looks like they've already cleared a large area of land and noted they should have to wait to get permission before they clear any land. Russett said they can ask the applicant if anything has been removed. Hensch asked if there's access to this development from Deer Creek Road or is it all from Camp Cardinal or Kennedy Parkway. Russett confirmed it is all from Camp Cardinal or Kennedy Parkway. Hensch noted looking at Lot 53, it looks like it's closest to Highway 218 and when the Commission approved the rezoning for the development just south of that they put in some specific requirements due to the proximity to 218. He wondered about the distance Lot 53 is from 218. Russett confirmed it is further away from 218 than the other development to the south and none of Lot 53 is located within the 300 -foot buffer area. Hensch asked if the large outlots on both sides of this proposal development will be maintained by the HOA. He would hate to see it be overrun with invasive species. Russett noted what would be required is as part of the final plat there will be restrictions placed on those outlets in terms of Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 5 of 11 development but it won't require maintenance and clearing of invasive species and woodland management, there is nothing currently in the Code that would require that. Hensch shared that is a concern, there are so many problems nowadays with invasive species so he thinks it's something as a Commission they need to start looking at when they're looking at some of these developments. Martin asked about the traffic calming circle, and it appears that there are driveways on the roundabout. Russett noted there are no driveways shown on the plat but there will need to be a driveway off of the circle for lots 64 and 63. Martin noted that seems dangerous. Townsend asked if there is going to be any affordable housing in these units. Russett replied none would be required by the City, but they can ask the applicant their intentions. Craig asked about the alley and thinking about the whole kerfuffle with garbage pickup on the Peninsula in the alleys, will the garbage pickup be in that alley, or is it going to be out of the street. Russett stated the City won't be picking up the garbage for the townhouses it will be a private hauler because it is a neighborhood association, and the City doesn't collect garbage and recycling and compost for multifamily. Signs stated he is intrigued that there is some land left in rural residential zoning and is wondering what is the reasoning or the benefit to that and why wasn't it just pulled into the remainder of the development. Russett stated because those are outlets, the zoning matters a lot less because they're going to be restricted from development through the subdivider's agreement legal documents as part of final platting. Since Part Two had those rural residential zones this part is just continuing that zoning designation. Hektoen added the outlots will have that rural residential zoning designation and it will be plated as an outlot for private open space and be restricted in that manner. Staff also discussed the possibility of zoning it consistent with the adjacent land, but then imposing a conservation easement, so there's a number of ways to reserve land so that doesn't get redeveloped, they chose this path based on consistency with the previous subdivision. Townsend asked about the traffic counts, noting that right now with COVID people are working from home, so will it be different when there is a regular amount of traffic. Russett explained the counts were taken prior to the pandemic. Craig asked about the letter from the resident about a park and staff replied about a small area near the townhouses of open space. Russett confirmed and noted the City only requires open space and providing open space, but it cannot require playground equipment or anything like that. Hensch noted in the past the Commission has put on requirements to put in some open space or some recreation space or some playground equipment in those areas. Craig noted it is a pretty big development and is a little isolated from lots of recreational options. She asked if transit even goes out there. Russett replied transit currently does not. Signs said they could address it with the developer and also ask if in Parts One or Two were there any parks put into those areas. Signs also noted he feels like dirt has been moved down there, and that is something they need to pay attention to if and when developers get a little ahead of the game. Hensch agreed and said it has happened in the past and people need to be held accountable. Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 6 of 11 Elliott asked about the multifamily lot and it is labeled high rise residential (RM -20). Hensch stated that is for future development so it's not relevant tonight. Russett added a high rise wouldn't be allowed there. Hensch opened the public hearing. Josh Entler (Crossing Land, LLC) thanked the Commission and did want to address a couple of the questions but first wanted to share some of the highlights of their intent and vision for the area. First with Phase one back in 2016 they had to bring sanitary sewer essentially from Camp Cardinal Boulevard at the pond all the way up through that agriculture field so it seems like there's been years of disturbance, but it was really getting sewer up to Part One and then the heavy dirt moving started in Part Two in 2018. They were essentially just peeling off the excess dirt and shifting it to the old cornfield that has since been stabilized with temporary seeding. In terms of the question about woodland management and what the HOA would do, they are certainly open to providing some information resource connections. Right now they have a development proposal on the north side of Kennedy Parkway in Coralville that they're working with the Iowa DNR as well as the City of Coralville to do a 10% management plan so by the time they execute that plan they will have some good resources to be able to deliver to the HOA should they want to take a more direct approach on woodland management. Regarding the driveways on traffic circles he too had a little bit of a concern, but from the same token, it's not real clear on the plat, but just to point out the technical details, each lane of that traffic circle is -24 feet in width which is equivalent to a normal two-lane traffic but in the movement of the traffic circle it's only one way traffic so there should be ample amount of room to be able to back out, maneuver a vehicle, and not impede the other lane of traffic. For the land left in rural residential that was really a request from staff to place it in rural residential as another mechanism to be able to convey to the public that they don't intend to develop this land and the land is reserved and not for development. Regarding a possible park area, as in Parts One and Two there is the open space requirement, and again, those are going to go to the HOA once development is complete. Entler did respond that particular neighbor that they would like to see some playground equipment, and there is likely a need for it. They are open to it being part of that initiative, whether it be basketball courts or some playground equipment. With Parts One, Two, and Three all in is almost 72 acres of open space and excluding outlets that have been reserved for future developments it leaves around 33 acres. There's two opportunities within Parts One and Two in the townhome areas that they could do some pocket parks, but also if there's a timber if they need to make sure they stay withing the 10% management plan. Entler also acknowledged he did see on the 2015 Master Plan the label of a high-rise multifamily, it is not their intention to do high rise development, at most they may do a 30- or 40-plex and really requested the RM -20 at this time is to be able to keep their options open. Regarding their vision for the area, Entler stated it is a continued focus on cluster development with minimal impact the surrounding areas. As noted in the staff report the Clear Creek Memorandum of Understanding could go up to 20 units per acre but that is certainly not what their intention is here. In Parts One and Two they development at much less than even the minimum allowance, they prefer to dedicate a lot of space to the HOA management for a more natural type of layout and preservation, and focus their density on providing a diversity of products. They had much success in Part Two and want to continue that model for a much wider buyer pool and a diversity of homebuyers. Lastly he wanted to note one of the major Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 7 of 11 impacts is the connection of Preston Lane which is going to provide a lot of vehicular relief and more opportunities for Parts Two and Three and Outlot K for future development. Entler also acknowledged they did send information packets to the neighbors in the surrounding community in lieu of a in person meeting and there were three comments that they've received. The first one has already been addressed regarding community parks. Second was traffic impact with this development which was covered in the staff report but the short answer is they will still be well under the design capacity of Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The third comment impact on surrounding infrastructure but this development is not going to negatively impact or exceed the stormwater management as well. The basin or pond has been designed to handle actually a much higher intensity than what is planned for the development. Hensch asked for reference to a woodland management plan, and the development of that. He also wanted to know if there is an area or an outlet that could be for a recreation area or recreation equipment how would they see that looking or what would be their preference. Entler replied he thinks how he sees that playing out is once they find success with what works in this part of town and with the natural environment (because what they're working with on the Coralville side of Kennedy Parkway is very similar terrain and steep slopes) then they can deliver that successful plan and packet to the HOA. Regarding the woodland management plan, he stated he personally walked that timber with the DNR and identified pockets that were preferred species and clustered segments of 75 mature Red Oak and Black Oak species in a specific area. They want to focus on retaining those oaks and then actually do some management practices with the understory growth so that those oaks can prosper. Signs asked about the traffic circle issue and noted it seems like an oddly placed traffic circle with just three lots later having a choker corner and prior to the traffic circle there's only two lots so is there some correlation of there potentially being one of the entrances to Outlot K. Entler replied there could be a couple of different options of what Outlot K could look like and the intent is to leave the options open in terms of whether a variety of big buildings or a continuation of Parts Two and Three in the next phase. They did the best they could to align a future intersection, whether it be the entrance to a multifamily or a future intersection where Dubs Drive comes in and hooks into Preston Lane. Martin asked if it has to be a traffic circle, she feels with a lot of the families that live nearby there are a lot of budding young inexperienced drivers. She wants to be thoughtful going forward but acknowledged she doesn't know what the answer is. Obviously, the City is asking for traffic calming but perhaps there is something else that could be done. Russett stated that staff also explored median islands as a potential option but this pavement was not wide enough for median islands there so staff really felt that the traffic circle was the best option. Signs asked if the traffic circle is required. Russett replied it is not required, staff is recommending it because they've had issues before with long block lengths and speeding in other developments with no traffic calming and within a year the neighborhood comes together and requests speed humps. Signs noted it seems like a relatively short space to have a speed bump and from Declan Drive to Kennedy Parkway it appears to be no traffic calming. He asked if choker would suffice in that area. Russett explained they can only do a choker at an intersection. Townsend asked about affordable housing included in this development. Entler stated they have Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 8 of 11 not specifically identified anything as set aside for affordable housing. Hensch closed the public hearing. Nolte moved to approve REZ20-0013 & SUB20-0004, two applications submitted by Crossing Land, LLC for a preliminary plat of the Cardinal Pointe West — Part 3 subdivision, a 19 -lot, residential subdivision located South of Kennedy Parkway and West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and the rezoning of 27.19 acres from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -12), High Density Single -Family Residential (RS -12), and Medium Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -20) zones subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the concept plan for the area shown as "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat, which includes townhouse -style, multi -family dwellings with vehicular access to garages from a rear lane with green space and landscaping between the rear driveways to reduce impervious surface and improve stormwater drainage. 2. Prior to approval of any site plan, Owner shall obtain staff approval of a landscaping plan which shall include the plans for useable outdoor space for "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat and screening of garages along Declan Drive and Mason Drive. 3. At the time of final platting, incorporation of traffic calming devices in a location approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Prior to the issuance of a certificate occupancy, construction of a 5' sidewalk on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd between Preston Lane and Kennedy Parkway. Townsend seconded the motion. Hensch stated he like this development because it has a lot of housing types and some high density to help with the whole missing middle concept. The one thing he is interested in is to perhaps add another condition that a woodland management plan to be developed and this is a great opportunity to start a practice of making sure that larger timber stands are maintained over time and deal with invasive species. Additionally, they could add in something about that plan for some recreation area or recreation equipment if others are interested. Signs agreed starting to look at woodland management issues is probably something the Commission should be doing. Craig also supports that because it sounds like if they're doing it on the northern part it should be simple enough to extend it on down and maybe this is something the Commission should look at more systematically in the future. Martin also agrees. Hektoen asked who the Commission would want to implement the management plan and when. Hensch feels it is something where the developer would create the plan and then ultimately be the responsibility of the HOA. Hektoen agreed that's probably the developer's preference, she did note they have seen challenges with stormwater management being passed along to a HOA. Hensch shares her concern as there are detention ponds all throughout the City that just don't Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 9 of 11 get maintained. Craig stated it should be the responsibility of the HOA, it's certainly not the developers responsibility 10 years down the road, and it's not the City's responsibility, and it lends value to all their properties if well maintained. Signs agrees but also confirms that traditionally they aren't taken care of, because for one thing, there's money involved with that and no HOA wants to spend any more money than they absolutely have to. It should be the HOA responsibility and they should appreciate it but there's a good chance this is unless they find a way to put some teeth into it. Craig suggested they start by what they're doing, which is asking for this plan from the developer and assuming that the developer will pass that responsibility on to the HOA. If it is problem city- wide then it is something that is put on a to do list of figuring out how to put teeth in it. Hensch suggested they could do it similar to the wording in a condition number two, where it says owner shall obtain staff approval on a landscaping plan, and have the condition say owner must obtain staff approval on a timber management plan. They could put initial responsibility of development of the plan and implementation on the development and then it is transferred to the HOA. Hektoen stated typically the transition of maintenance of common elements from the developer to the home owners is a function of the HOA declaration. If the Commission wants the obligation to stay with the developer, that would need to be expressly stated in the CZA. Otherwise the HOA declaration will control. Signs also wanted to comment as far as the rest of development goes, he thinks they've done a nice job and he also likes the connection to Camp Cardinal Boulevard with Preston Lane and the different types of housing and the preservation of the green space with the cluster development. Nolte amended his motion to add a fifth condition: Nolte moved to approve REZ20-0013 & SUB20-0004, two applications submitted by Crossing Land, LLC for a preliminary plat of the Cardinal Pointe West — Part 3 subdivision, a 19 -lot, residential subdivision located South of Kennedy Parkway and West of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and the rezoning of 27.19 acres from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -12), High Density Single -Family Residential (RS -12), and Medium Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -20) zones subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the concept plan for the area shown as "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat, which includes townhouse -style, multi -family dwellings with vehicular access to garages from a rear lane with green space and landscaping between the rear driveways to reduce impervious surface and improve stormwater drainage. 2. Prior to approval of any site plan, Owner shall obtain staff approval of a landscaping plan which shall include the plans for useable outdoor space for "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat and screening of garages along Declan Drive and Mason Drive. 3. At the time of final platting, incorporation of traffic calming devices in a location Planning and Zoning Commission January 7, 2021 Page 10 of 11 approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Prior to the issuance of a certificate occupancy, construction of a 5' sidewalk on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd between Preston Lane and Kennedy Parkway. 5. Owner shall obtain staff approval of a Woodland Management Plan. Townsend seconded the amended motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: DECEMBER 17,2020: Townsend moved to approve the meeting minutes of December 17, 2020. Martin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1 (Signs abstained). PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett gave an updated that the City Council had their public hearing on the Carson Farms annexation and rezoning on Tuesday and the applicant had requested that Council indefinitely defer that item if there wasn't support for it and there was not support to approve the annexation or the rezoning so they approved an indefinite deferral of both. The applicant has withdrawn both applications. Hensch asked if the fundamental issue was it affordable housing. Russett confirmed Council had concerns with the existing affordable housing annexation policy and at the next work session they're going to discuss it and provide more direction to staff on what their concerns are and what they'd like to see changed. Townsend asked about an update for the development off of Dubuque Street where they have all the prefab houses. Russett did not have any updates on that. Signs asked if there could be an introduction of new members at some point. Hensch noted that is a good idea, many things have been difficult in the era of COVID and zoom meetings. ADJOURNMENT: Signs moved to adjourn. Townsend seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. IM, Prepared by Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (RE220-0013) Ordinance No. Ordinance conditionally rezoning property located south of Kennedy Parkway and west of Camp Cardinal Blvd from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Rural Residential (RR -1), High Density Single -Family (RS -12), Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12), and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20) for approximately 27.19 acres of land. (REZ20-0013) Whereas, the owner, Crossing Land, LLC, has requested a rezoning of approximately 27.19 acres of property located west of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and south of Kennedy Parkway from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), High Density Single - Family (RS -12), Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12) and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20); and Whereas, this property is located within the Clear Creek Master Plan subarea of the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, there is a public need to provide pedestrian facilities along the western side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard; and Whereas, there is a public need to incorporate traffic calming devices to address concerns related to speeding along Preston Lane; and Whereas, there is a public need to ensure compatibility with the existing development pattern of the neighborhood; and Whereas, there is a public need to ensure long-term management of the preserved woodlands; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding compliance with the concept plan for the townhome style, multi -family buildings; landscaping and screening; traffic calming; installation of a sidewalk along Camp Cardinal Boulevard, and a woodland management plan to address these public needs, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, the property described below is hereby reclassified to Rural Residential (RR - 1), High Density Single -Family (RS -12), Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12) and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20): RR -1: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. Page 2 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N21 °30'05"W 86.33 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 41 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N26°56'26"W 53.53 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 40, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT G, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AND A NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N89°04'32"E 463.31 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT G TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMP CARDINAL BOULEVARD; THENCE SO 53'41 W 193.50 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 422.39 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 760.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S15°01'37"E 416.97 FEET); THENCE S30°56'56"E 364.51 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE S59°03'04"W 32.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE WESTERLY 286.85 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S74°33226"W 283.36 FEET); THENCE NO°03'39"E 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 392.30 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10027'13"W 106.58 FEET); THENCE N1026'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 274.44 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT F, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N90 00 00 E 424.72 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT F AND A NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT H, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE WEST CORNER OF LOT 45, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S30 0741E 1.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S37044'02"E 104.59 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S38008'39"E 103.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 46, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTH CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S28°55'22"E 99.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S12°47'03"E 102.84 FEET; THENCE S2023'14"E 108.81 FEET; THENCE S5°28'37"E 276.83 FEET; THENCE S25°39'42"E 47.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N44o 49'18„ W 307.82 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N16°51'29"W 238.65 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N52o„ 4814 W 489.10 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NO°00'00"E 37.41 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RS -12: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. Page 3 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N69°14'02"E 120.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 47 TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 34.84 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S18°51'24"E 34.84 FEET) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DUBS DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE N73°13'22"E 30.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S9°06'25"E 136.14 FEET); THENCE S1°26'12"E 41.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 235.09 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S25°37'09"E 160.65 FEET); THENCE WESTERLY 41.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S81°51'46"W 40.37 FEET); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 18.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S53°58'07"E 18.48 FEET); THENCE S56040'37"W 157.32 FEET; THENCE N25°39'42"W 200.94 FEET; THENCE N5°28'37"W 276.83 FEET; THENCE N2°23'14"W 108.81 FEET; THENCE N12°47'03"W 102.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE SOUTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°06'34"E 274.44 FEET); THENCE S1 °26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 106.58 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S54°42'18"E 392.30 FEET); THENCE SO°03'39"W 160.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 614.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 576.92 FEET); THENCE N19028'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 156.73 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10006'34"W 226.19 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N71 °13'03"E 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RM -12: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S71 °13'03"W 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10006'34"E 226.19 FEET); THENCE S1 °26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY Ordinance No. Page 4 (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 156.73 FEET); THENCE S19`28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 127.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S26°46'32"E 127.15 FEET); THENCE S55055'10"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N75049'21"W 45.27 FEET); THENCE S62°26'07"W 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S38 59'45 W 19.09 FEET); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 42.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S37056'43"W 41.90 FEET); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N25037'09"W 160.65 FEET); THENCE N19028'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 235.09 FEET); THENCE N1026'12"W 41.30 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N9°06'25"W 136.14 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N73013'22"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 16.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 540.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N17 -38-00"W 16.14 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 29.63 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N23°56'56"E 26.99 FEET); THENCE N66°23'16"E 151.01 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 32.83 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S66°35'34"E 29.26 FEET); THENCE SOUTHERLY 9.94 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S19010'40"E 9.94 FEET); THENCE N71°13'03"E 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RM -20: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N690 46'50„ W 240.68 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N32038'01"W 225.83 FEET; THENCE N56°40'37"E 157.32 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 18.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N53°58'07"W 18.48 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 84.32 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N59°28'27"E 76.30 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N38 5945E 19.09 FEET); THENCE N62°26'07"E 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S75°49'21"E 45.27 FEET); N55°55'10"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 487.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S62000'35"E 468.38 FEET); THENCE SO°03'39"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 50.46 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N87°19'59"E 50.45 FEET) TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; Ordinance No. Page 5 THENCE S59002'58"W 8.58 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE S63°56'06"W 544.31 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 20_• Mayor Approved City Clerk CityAttorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 01/26/2021) ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner First Consideration 02/02/2021 Voteforpassage: AYES: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date published that the Prepared by Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ20-0013) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and Crossing Land, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 27.19 acres of property located west of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and south of Kennedy Parkway; and Whereas, Owner has requested the rezoning of said property from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Rural Residential (RR -1), High Density Single -Family (RS -12), Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12) and Medium Density Multi -Family (RM -20); and Whereas, this rezoning creates public needs to provide pedestrian facilities along the western side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard, to incorporate traffic calming devices to address concerns related to speeding along Preston Lane, to ensure compatibility with the existing development patterns, and to ensure long-term management of the preserved woodlands; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding compliance with the concept plan for the townhome style, multi -family buildings; landscaping and screening; traffic calming; installation of a sidewalk along Camp Cardinal Boulevard, and a woodland management plan to address these public needs, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Crossing Land, LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: RR -1: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N21 °30'05"W 86.33 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 41 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE N26°56'26"W 53.53 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 40, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT G, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AND A NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N89°04'32"E 463.31 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT G TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMP CARDINAL BOULEVARD; THENCE SO°53'41"W 193.50 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 422.39 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 760.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S15°01'37"E 416.97 FEET); THENCE S30°56'56"E 364.51 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE S59°03'04"W 32.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE WESTERLY 286.85 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S74°33226"W 283.36 FEET); THENCE NO°03'39"E 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 392.30 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10027'13"W 106.58 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°06'34"W 274.44 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUTLOT F, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N90°00'00"E 424.72 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT F AND A NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT H, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE WEST CORNER OF LOT 45, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S30007'41 "E 1.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S37044'02"E 104.59 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO SOUTH CORNER OF SAID LOT 45; THENCE S38°08'39"E 103.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 46, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTH CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S28°55'22"E 99.33 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S12°47'03"E 102.84 FEET; THENCE S2023'14"E 108.81 FEET; THENCE S5028'37"E 276.83 FEET; THENCE S25°39'42"E 47.21 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N44°49'18"W 307.82 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N16°51'29"W 238.65 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE N52°48'14"W 489.10 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NO°00'00"E 37.41 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RS -12: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER, PART OF OUTLOT D, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART ONE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 166 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 47, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE N69 -14'02"E 120.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 47 TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 34.84 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF A 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S18°51'24"E 34.84 FEET) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID DUBS DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE N73'1 3'22"E 30.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBS DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S9°06'25"E 136.14 FEET); THENCE S1 °26'12"E 41.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 235.09 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S25°37'09"E 160.65 FEET); THENCE WESTERLY 41.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARS S81 °51'46"W 40.37 FEET); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 18.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S53°58'07"E 18.48 FEET); THENCE S56040'37"W 157.32 FEET; THENCE N25°39'42"W 200.94 FEET; THENCE N5°28'37"W 276.83 FEET; THENCE N2°23'14"W 108.81 FEET; THENCE N12°47'03"W 102.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE SOUTHERLY 275.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 910.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°06'34"E 274.44 FEET); THENCE Sl 026'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 107.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 106.58 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 418.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 340.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S54°42'18"E 392.30 FEET); THENCE SO°03'39"W 160.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 614.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N54°42'18"W 576.92 FEET); THENCE N19028'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS NIO-27'13"W 156.73 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 44.62 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10006'34"W 226.19 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N71013'03"E 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RM -12 PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S71 °13'03"W 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10006'34"E 226.19 FEET); THENCE S1°26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 156.73 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 127.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S26°46'32"E 127.15 FEET); THENCE S55055'1 0"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N75°49'21"W 45.27 FEET); THENCE S62°26'07"W 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S38059'45"W 19.09 FEET); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 42.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S37056'43"W 41.90 FEET); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N25037'09"W 160.65 FEET); THENCE N19°28'15"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10°27'13"W 235.09 FEET); THENCE N1°26'12"W 41.30 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N9°06'25"W 136.14 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N73°13'22"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 16.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 540.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N17°38'00"W 16.14 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 29.63 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N23°56'56"E 26.99 FEET); THENCE N66°23'16"E 151.01 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 32.83 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S66°35'34"E 29.26 FEET); THENCE SOUTHERLY 9.94 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S19°10'40"E 9.94 FEET); THENCE N71 °13'03"E 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RM -20: PART OF OUTLOT H, CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 62, PAGE 22 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 41, SAID CARDINAL POINTE WEST - PART TWO; THENCE S71°13'03"W 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY 227.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°06'34"E 226.19 FEET); THENCE S1°26'12"E 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 157.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S10°27'13"E 156.73 FEET); THENCE S19°28'15"E 30.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 127.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S26°46'32"E 127.15 FEET); THENCE S55055'1 0"W 30.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 49.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF 34.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY (CHORD BEARS N75°49'21 "W 45.27 FEET); THENCE S62°26'07"W 131.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 19.64 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 24.00 FOOT RADIUS, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS S38059'45"W 19.09 FEET); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 42.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S37056'43"W 41.90 FEET); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 160.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N25037'09"W 160.65 FEET); THENCE N19'28'1 5"W 30.94 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 236.07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 750.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N10027'13"W 235.09 FEET); THENCE Ni 126'12"W 41.30 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 136.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 510.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N9°06'25"W 136.14 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OUTLOT H; THENCE N73°13'22"E 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 16.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 540.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS N17038'00"W 16.14 FEET); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 29.63 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY (CHORD BEARS N23°56'56"E 26.99 FEET); THENCE N66123'1 6"E 151.01 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 32.83 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S66°35'34"E 29.26 FEET); THENCE SOUTHERLY 9.94 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND THE ARC OF A 720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY (CHORD BEARS S1 9-10,40--E 9.94 FEET); THENCE N71°13'03"E 30.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2. Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Development shall substantially comply with the concept for the area shown as "Lot 54" on the preliminary plat, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which includes townhouse -style, multi -family dwellings with vehicular access to garages from a rear lane with green space and landscaping between the rear driveways to reduce impervious surface and improve stormwater drainage. b. Prior to approval of any site plan for the RM -12 -zoned land, Owner shall obtain staff approval of a landscaping plan for said property which shall include the plans for useable outdoor space and screening of garages from adjacent public rights- of-way. c. The final plat for any of the above-described land shall incorporate traffic calming devices in locations approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d, Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for an of the above-described land, construction of a 5' sidewalk on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard between Preston Lane and Kennedy Parkway. e. Outlots I and J, as shown on the preliminary plat, shall be managed according to a woodland management plan approved by staff prior to Issuance of a building permit for any of the above-described land. 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. S. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain In full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property Is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Owner's expense. Dated this day of 20_ City of Iowa City Crossing Land, LLC Bruce Teague, Mayor By: Jerry Waddilove, Manager Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk A r ed by: City Attorney's Office — 14,e-p=cr-N 0 1 12-4,1 O2( City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ) ss: Johnson County ) This Instrument was acknowledged before me on . 20_ by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public In and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Crossing Land, LLC Acknowledgement: State of County of This cord was acknowledged before me on 1i 201 by crt� 11t1Adu� i I Olre (name) as (title) of Crossing Land, LLC. e o " ro.Mls`.ausnIOn Number 794422 N ry ublic in a fo o z r..- slon Tres "09V ro z My Csrtvnisston eq (Stamp or SeaQ My commission expires: 1-- 5- So u' Item Number: 10.b. �r CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org February 2, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque Street & 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone. (REZ20-0011) (Second Consideration) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report with Attachments Correspondence P&Z Minutes Ordinance & CZA Correspondence from Michael Welch - Axiom Consultants To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ20-0011 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Date: December 17, 2020 Gilbane Development 7 Jackson Walkway Providence, RI 02903 267-256-4520 Mapt@Gilbaneco.com Gilbane Development 7 Jackson Walkway Providence, RI 02903 267-256-4520 Mapt@Gilbaneco.com Rezoning from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) Development of multi -family housing 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque St. & 220 Lafayette St. �.i o y�l{1 J4 1.9 Acres Commercial (CC -2), (CI -1) j1 r �r MAIDS Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K North: RFC -CX, Riverfront Crossing - Central Crossings South: CI -1, Intensive Commercial East: CC -2, Community Commercial West: Institutional Public (P-2); RFC -CX, Riverfront Crossing - Central Crossings; CI - 1, Intensive Commercial 25+ dwelling units / acres Central District, Urban Mixed Use C7 Property owners and some residents located within 300' of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were also posted on the site. November 12, 2020 December 27, 2020 The applicant, Gilbane Development, has requested a rezoning from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone to Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (RFC - CX) zone for 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street. In a separate application that will be discussed at a later Commission meeting, the applicant is also applying to vacate an alley that separates the South Dubuque Street properties from 220 Lafayette Street. The proposed vacation area is shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1 77. -- i ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1). The CC -2 portion of the subject property is located in the northwest corner, on what is currently 700 S. Dubuque Street. The remaining balance of the subject property is zoned CI -1. The purpose of the CC -2 zone is to provide for major business districts to serve a significant segment of the total community population. In addition to a variety of retail goods and services, these centers may typically feature a number of large traffic generators requiring access from 3 major thoroughfares. While these centers are usually characterized by indoor operations, uses may have limited outdoor activities; provided, that outdoor operations are screened or buffered to remain compatible with surrounding uses. The purpose of the CI -1 zone is to provide areas for those sales and service functions and businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display and storage of merchandise, by repair and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, by outdoor commercial amusement and recreational activities or by activities or operations conducted in buildings or structures not completely enclosed. The types of retail trade in this zone are limited in order to provide opportunities for more land intensive commercial operations and also to prevent conflicts between retail and industrial truck traffic. Special attention must be directed toward buffering the negative aspects of allowed uses from adjacent residential zones. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting to rezone the entire 1.9 acres to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone. The Central Crossings zone is intended for moderate intensity mixed use development in buildings with entries opening onto pedestrian friendly public streets and streetscapes. The zone generally allows the same uses as the City's Central Business Support (CB -5) zone, with some exceptions. The RFC -CX zone does not have a maximum density requirement; however, height is regulated within the zone. The zone has a base maximum height of four (4) stories and a bonus maximum height of eight (8) stories. The applicant is proposing an additional two (2) stories of bonus height for the proposed development, yielding a total of six (6) stories. One story of bonus height will be requested for contributions to the City's Public Art Program. An additional story will be requested for the bonus height option related to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Existing Land Uses: The subject property itself contains commercial uses at 700, 710, and 730 S. Dubuque Street, with multi -family residential uses at 720 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street. The Iowa City Bike Library occupies the spaces at 700 and 710 S. Dubuque Street. Public Space One (PS1), a contemporary arts center, is the owner of the property at 730 S. Dubuque Street. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The subject properties are already designated as within the Central Crossings Subdistrict of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Figure 2 shows an excerpt from the master plan that lists the plan objectives, desired development character for the district, and the types of development envisioned for this area. The development that is currently planned for the proposed rezoning would satisfy several of these objectives. The conceptual development, shown on the attached conceptual elevations, aligned with this rezoning would add contextual infill in the form of a 6 -story building that follows the form -based design elements outlined in the Riverfront Crossings form -based code. Figure 2 Central C.:. . .. rrnmary alaster Plan Objc. . Encourage contextual infill Leverage future investments in transit-TOD Restore and enhance conditions along Ralston creek Provide a mix of residential and retail uses i Promote new housing options Leverage the Clinton Street mobility spine Create a new Civic space as a focal point - the transit plaza L:-cvclopmcrt Char­tcc Integrate with South Downtown and Park District Build on on-going efforts to improve quality residential design i Enhanced public realm (Clinton Street Promenade, Ralston Creek, etc.) r Maintain moderate scale and intensity of use .:�evelopment Program. Multiple housing option typologies Office Limited convenience retail in TOD area Civic, such as future regional passenger rail station and light rail stop C! The Master Plan also includes a vision for how this area could re -development (Figure 3). An important component of that redevelopment includes improvements to Ralston Creek. Specifically, the Master Plan outlines goals for the restoration of Ralston Creek in order to improve the health of the creek and turn it into an amenity. Figure 3 The applicant has proposed to restore and enhance conditions along the subject property's Ralston Creek frontage. Staff recommends a condition that would require the owner to partake in certain measures intended to improve this frontage area. The improvement measures are similar to what was conditioned for the rezoning at 225 E. Prentiss Street. More specifically, staff will request that the applicant remove invasive trees, stabilize the stream bank as Public Works determines necessary, plant trees under a plan to be approved by the City Forrester, and install a 6 -foot wide sidewalk along the stream bank that features pedestrian -scale lighting. The rezoning would build upon on-going efforts to improve quality residential design by updating the existing housing stock in the subject area under a form -based design that follows the intent of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. By keeping the conceptual development at six (6) stories, the proposed use should not be out of scale of overly intensive with respect to the surrounding area. The proposed rezoning would also contribute an appropriate scale of density toward transit -oriented development options that exist with the adjacent Iowa Interstate Railroad and CRANDIC railroad. Compatibility with the Existing Neighborhood Character: The RFC -CX zoning designation can be found across the street from the subject property at 707 S. Dubuque Street, and north of the subject property, along the east side of S. Dubuque Street. The proposed rezoning would be the next logical piece of the area's transformation from a predominantly Intensive Commercial locale to that of a form -based neighborhood that meets the intent of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The existing neighborhood contains an array of older multi -family housing buildings, intensive commercial uses, and office buildings. The Johnson County Administration Building and a facility for the University of Iowa can be found along the west side of S. Dubuque Street. Rezoning of the subject area to the RFC -CX zone will trigger the affordable housing requirement. The requirement states that except for developments exclusively providing elder apartment housing, any development containing ten (10) or more dwelling units on land zoned a riverfront crossings zoning designation is required to provide affordable housing dwelling units in an amount equal to or greater than ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units. 5 Floodplain:_Figure 4 below shows that a small portion of the 500 -year floodplain does cross the northeast and southeast corners of the subject property. Subsequent development of the subject area will be required to comply with the City's floodplain management standards. Utilities and Infrastructure: The subject property contains a sanitary sewer line that runs between the S. Dubuque Street properties and 220 Lafayette Street. The applicant has discussed the need to relocate this sewer line upon development with Public Works. The line will likely be relocated near planned improvements adjacent to the Ralston Creek frontage area. Staff will be recommending a condition that the applicant provide a sanitary sewer easement in a location to be determined by the City Engineer. Staff is also looking into the possibility of providing a connection, under the railroad bridge, to the existing sidewalk along the west bank of Ralston Creek to the north, at 225 E. Prentiss Street. It is anticipated that the City would provide this connection. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. Staff plans to have this application on the January 19, 2021 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's January 5, 2021 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0011, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque St. and 220 Lafayette street from Community Commercial (CC -2) zone and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone subject to the following conditions: Improvement of Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: a. Removal of invasive trees. b. Stream bank stabilization, including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. c. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by the City Forrester. d. Installation of a minimum 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the top of the stream bank. LIS e. Installation of pedestrian -scale lighting. f. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, provision of a sanitary sewer easement, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer, and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney's Office. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Applicant Statement 4. Statement of Intent 5. Conceptual Elevations Approved by: L-anielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services I r 1 CITY OF 1OwA CITY • I. •. IsM 0 0 WKWAqIf IMMUM Vol - WRIGHT ST i LAFAYETTE ST o Mq�pFN GN a 1 Dim to 11 0 1"P • it '^ ter' a L -JL 2. • s An application submitted by Gilbane Development for the rezoning E BENTON ST of properties located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque St. & 220 Lafayette St. from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive �_, •, _ . i.. Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings - Central Crossings (RFC -CX) AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY November 11, 2020 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR REZONING The proposed development area consists of five existing parcels identified as: • 700 S Dubuque Street (CC -2 Community Commercial) • 710 S Dubuque Street (CI -1 Intensive Commercial) • 720 S Dubuque Street (CI -1 Intensive Commercial) • 730 S Dubuque Street (CI -1 Intensive Commercial) • 220 Lafayette Street (CI -1 Intensive Commercial) These parcels are bounded on the west by S. Dubuque Street, on the north by the Iowa Interstate Railroad, on the east by Ralston Creek, and on the south by Lafayette Street and the CRANDIC railroad. The current zoning classifications are CC2 — Community Commercial and CI1 — Intensive Commercial. These parcels are within the proposed Riverfront Crossings area. The Applicant is seeking to rezone the three parcels to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings District. The regulating plan depicts theses parcels to be within the Central Crossings District with the required Ralston Creek Frontage as depicted on the Regulating Plan. Rezoning the parcels as the Applicant is requesting will allow for a redevelopment of the properties in a manner consistent with the Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings District including improvements to Ralston Creek. The total area being re -zoned is 1.93 acres with 347 feet of frontage on Ralston Creek, 169 feet of frontage on Lafayette Street, and 320 feet of frontage on S. Dubuque Street. Sincerely, MichaeJ. Welch, PE ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL S. Dubuque Street Development DEVELOPER: SUBMITTED TO: Planning Staff NOVEMBER 12, 2020 INTRODUCTION It is my pleasure to share Gilbane Development's vision for the re -development of the properties located at 700, 710, 720, & 730 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street in Iowa City. This development is currently referred to as "The South Dubuque Street Development." The project will provide a mix of units including studio, one bedroom, two bedroom, and three bedroom units. The new residential tenants will be located close to public transportation, within a 10 -minute walk of downtown and the new River Front Crossing Park, and surrounded by numerous restaurants and businesses. The building will feature an amenity courtyard, clubhouse, study rooms, and other amenities for the private use of the building occupants. The east side of the property will be improved with the addition of a pedestrian access along Ralston Creek that will benefit residents and the public. The Project Team and I look forward to working with the City of Iowa City to create a successful project for the developer and the city. MICHAEL WELCH Project Lead Section i The project team consists of: OWNER / DEVELOPER: GILBANE DEVELOPMENT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC PROJECT ARCHITECT: KITCHEN & ASSOCIATES SERVICES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEER: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC Project PROCESS THREE DISTINCT PHASES n PHASE 1 Rezonina/Heiaht Bonus Spring 2020—Spring 2021 The rezoning phase of the project began in the spring of 2020 with several meetings with city staff and continues now with the submission of the rezoning application seeking to rezone the property to Riverfront Crossings—Central Crossings District. A Level I Design Review will be required to achieve the desired six -floors. The Project Team will commence work on the Design Review submissions once it is clear that P&Z and the Council are supportive of rezoning. PHASE 2 Desian Winter 2020—Spring 2021 The design process will begin with the submittal of materials for the Design Review / Height Bonus process. The design team will move into preparation of Construction Documents after the Design Review process is completed. These efforts will culminate in an approved Site Plan and Building Plans by the summer of 2021 to allow construction to begin in Fall of 2021. The Project Team will work closely with City staff throughout the process to streamline the design to the greatest extent possible. PHASE 3 Construction Fall 2021—Summer 2023 Construction is expected to begin in Fall of 2021 upon the approval of the Site Plan and Building Permits. The building is expected to take approximately 22 months, including Ralston Creek stabilization and right -of-way improvements. The building should be ready for an August 2023 occupancy. Section c SITE NARRATIVE Master Plan COMPARISION PLACEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN (PAGE 66) 1 , X" .FF A To Or A IX uj w ra nip JPA�r dk - _ Ic 45 & oa a.: r4b r - W 4 , _C. . . WE YY� ur c r � , 'le 4 Plan diagram of the Central Crossings Sub -District from the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan document with the S. Dubuque Street Development site outlined in red. �C r ` T._ 1 { - T _ -- Plan diagram of the Central Crossings Sub -District from the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan document with the S. Dubuque Street Development site outlined in red and the proposed building overlaid. The proposed building replaces the surface parking with structured parking within the building footprint. Project DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF WHAT COMPRISES THIS EFFORT The project is located on S. Dubuque Street between the Iowa Interstate Railroad and the CRANDIC Railroad / Lafayette Street. Ralston Creek is on the east side of the property. The development area is approximately 1.9 acres. The proposed building is six levels with residential apartment units on the upper levels and structured parking on the lower level. The building will include a clubhouse, amenity courtyards, and below -grade parking. The project will also include pedestrian accommodations on the east side of the building to provide access from Lafayette Street north to the Iowa Interstate Railroad Bridge. The connection under the railroad to the existing trail on the 225 E. Prentiss Street property will not be within the scope of this project; however, the Project Team will evaluate the feasibility of such a connection. At the CRANDIC Railroad Bridge looking North along Ralston Creek This project will make improvements to the west bank of the Ralston Creek Corridor between the Iowa Interstate Railroad and the CRANDIC Railroad. These improvements will seek to enhance the pedestrian experience and create the frontage envisioned in the River Front Crossing Master Plan. The improvements will include the removal of invasive species from the west bank of Ralston Creek, stabilizing the creek bank, enhancing the landscaping along Ralston Creek, and providing opportunities for both the public and building residents to gather along the creek. Stabilizing the channel and bank will be accomplished with natural materials, such as rock boulders or outcroppings and native plants suitable for the riparian zone of the lower banks, in a way that mimics Ralston Creek's natural conditions. 4l �URLINGT E B RLINGTON $7 E N w m W E COURT ST E C RT ST F x ,off W O ? � HARRISON ST ~ u W O w o y Z J aJ z Q f..) U o m ST o a F. ENTISS BOWERY ST WRIGHT PROJECT LOCATION �A S LAFA E ST J This project will make improvements to the west bank of the Ralston Creek Corridor between the Iowa Interstate Railroad and the CRANDIC Railroad. These improvements will seek to enhance the pedestrian experience and create the frontage envisioned in the River Front Crossing Master Plan. The improvements will include the removal of invasive species from the west bank of Ralston Creek, stabilizing the creek bank, enhancing the landscaping along Ralston Creek, and providing opportunities for both the public and building residents to gather along the creek. Stabilizing the channel and bank will be accomplished with natural materials, such as rock boulders or outcroppings and native plants suitable for the riparian zone of the lower banks, in a way that mimics Ralston Creek's natural conditions. Section s SCALE Scale of BUILDINGS SIMILAR BUILDING SCALE COMPARISON MATRIX The scale of buildings is an important aspect in planning and creating spaces that are visually pleasing and comfortable for building occupants and the public alike. The Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and Riverfront Crossings Zoning Code go to great lengths to provide parameters and guidance to achieve the proper scale as properties re -develop. 602 S DUBUQUE 620 S DUBUQUE 5285 DUBUQUE E 724 FT 735 FT 715 FT 70077 S S DUB UE 727 F7 JOHNSON COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICES 808 S DUBUQUE 685 FT ❑❑❑1111❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �rr ��" S. DUBUQUE STREET ❑ 1111❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ 1111 ❑ ❑ 1111 /•' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ 1111 y DEVELOPMENT CRANDIC ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1111 ❑ ❑ U 736 FT ¢ RAILROAD mud IOWA INTERSTATE � RAILROAD ~ U n West Elevation View of S. Dubuque Street showing the proposed building in comparison to the existing buildings in the area NARRATIVE: S. Dubuque Street Development will be located along the S. Dubuque Street hill between the Iowa Interstate Railroad on the upper end and the CRANDIC Railroad on the lower end. The proposed building will step down at the middle of the block to maintain a scale and mass that is compatible with the surrounding buildings and topography. The natural rise in the topography on the north end of the site allows for the proposed 6—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings. This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the S. Dubuque Street Development. The view above looks east with a north -to -south cut along the centerline of S. Dubuque Street. HEIGHT BONUS Section 4 Height BONUS JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST REQUEST PER CODE. Per the City of Iowa City Riverfront Crossings District General Requirements, under 14 -2G -7-G: Building Height Bonus Provisions, our team is requesting consideration for: Bonus Height in the amount of two (2) stories for the proposed building within the S. Dubuque Street Development which encompasses the following addresses: 700 S. Dubuque Street • 710 S. Dubuque Street 720 S. Dubuque Street • 730 S. Dubuque Street • 220 Lafayette Street Granting this request would allow for the construction of one 6 -story structure on the site. The code provides for a number of incentives for developments to incorporate features that provide both public benefits as well as important goals towards furthering the objectives of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. This project is eligible to utilize two (2) different means of achieving height bonus. Both of these areas are detailed in the subsequent sections to identify how we aim to achieve the associated goals. HEIGHT BONUS FOR PUBLIC ART (14 -2G -7-G-6) HEIGHT BONUS FOR LEADERSHIP IN ENERGYAND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (14 -2G -7-G-7) Level I design review will be required for this project. As a result, the requested Height Bonus will be put before the Design Review Committee. Leight Bonus for Public Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY. Per item 14 -2G -7-G-6 of the Iowa City code, one additional floor of building height may be granted for a contribution to the City's public art program equal to one percent (1%) of threshold value of the project. Threshold value is the sum of all construction costs shown on all building permits associated with the project, including site preparation. Funds contributed shall be used by the City for public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that the project will improve the aesthetics and pedestrian experience along S. Dubuque Street. Opportunities for improving the aesthetics of the Iowa City area don't necessarily need to be limited to re -development sites. Public Art can be used to enhance existing spaces as well. The Project Team is happy to contribute to the Public Art fund to support creative means to improve the aesthetics and experience on this site or throughout the Iowa City Community! .r Mural located outside of Dulcinea in Downtown Iowa City "Jazz" located in the Pedestrian Mall with the Yotopia Mural in the background. Height Bonus for Leadership in Energy and Environmental "design 14.2G -7-G-7 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY. Per item 14 -2G -7-G-7 of the Iowa City code, up to four (4) additional floors of building height may be granted for projects that are designed to meet high standards with regard to energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the Riverfront Crossings District subarea plan adopted in April 2011. A long term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that this property is well situated to create a pedestrian friendly and inviting place along Ralston Creek. This project plans to improve the long term health of Ralston Creek by aiding in its restoration and stabilization. This will be accomplished through a multi -step process starting with the removal of invasive species and man-made debris from the channel, and secondly applying natural stabilizing materials along the bed and bank of the waterway. This project will also include the construction of a pedestrian pathway that will allow the public to engage more closely with the area surrounding Ralston Creek. These efforts would ultimately result in a more sustainable and natural waterway, as well as potentially a greater public use and appreciation for Ralston Creek. Axiom Consultants has received positive feedback on other recent projects along Ralston Creek and look forward to working with this Project Team, City Staff, the Planning & Zoning Commission, and City Council to continue these positive improvements to this valuable natural resource in Iowa City. The building design will incorporate many features that are in accordance with the LEED certification system; however, consistent with City requirements, the Project Team will not seek LEED certification. ALLOWED: Up to 4 floors REQUESTING: 1 floor height BONUS SYNOPSIS OF THE REQUEST NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: The City of Iowa City code allows for ten (10) different methods for a developer to request additional height for a project. We are planning to make requests within two (2) of these categories at the current time. # NAME SECTION ALLOWED REQUESTED JUSTIFICATION 1 Public Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 1 1 1% of threshold value contribution LEED 14 -2G -7-G-7 4 1 Energy Efficiency and Ralston Creek 2k Improvements REQUEST NARRATIVE: The Project Team will be requesting the additional height for this project in order to fully develop the site. The project will implement improvements to the pedestrian experience along Ralston Creek, Lafayette Street, and S. Dubuque Street. These improvements and the project will continue the implementation of the vision for Riverfront Crossings identified in the Master Plan. REQUEST NUMBERS: 2 total floors requested FLOORS ALLOWED IN BASE ZONE = 4 FLOORS REQUESTED BY BONUS HEIGHT = 2 TOTAL FLOORS PROPOSED ACROSS THE SITE = 6 _ �rl 11`�� n ■ 11 ■ ■ ■ fl �� ■ fl 11 l ■ fl ■ Ei . _ R{ TYP.WIINVOW.DETAIL e tlni '. IZ2020- lGtchen &Associates. AAplanning and an-hiterNrai cwrrLpisshown on this documentam theintellectual property oficiWhen &Assuciates. This design may not be duplicated orincorporated in any otherplan ordocument withoutthe express written consent ofRitchen &Associates. Alldimensions, areas, and propertylines ore approximate based on available tux maps, Gi5information, and/arinfounution provided by the client and aresubjectto change withoutnotiee. (bane L. A5 -CONCEPTUAL S. DUBUQUE 51 ELEVATION ARAPHICSULE a ton an W �J Kitchen & Associates IOWA CITY STUutN I ►�rxK i nntN i 5 Architecture • Engineering • Planning • Interiors Iowa City, Iowa ELEVATION KEYNOTES 'A11 MATERIALSTYPICAL t1k0. I. AWM.STOREERUNTWANTEGRALALUM.BRICRMOULOINU -rt STFELACCESS900RW10VERHEADCAXDPY zt METAL PANEL (COLOR II ate MRSONRYVENHRI LOR 1} u METAL PANEL (COLOR 2) ea- MASONRY VENEER ICO., r.r W 00 -LOOK ALUM. PANEI/SIOING s.r WALL -MOUNTED BACKLIT BUILDING SIGNAGE a.t MASONRY AETAININGWALL To.t TIBER CEMENT PANEL (COLOR II �i TIESICOLOR I} Lox FIRER CEMENTPANFL(MULTI-COLOR) u EIFS{COLO11k ios FIBEHCEMENTLAP SIDING&CORNERTRIMUOLOR21 u RAISED EIF$PANLL[COLOR II EXPOSED CDNCREIt(ELAY10MIRIC PAINT FINISHi Ea FIRE RGI.A55RESIOENTMI.WINOOW e,t OVERHEAD ODOR TYP.WIINVOW.DETAIL e tlni '. IZ2020- lGtchen &Associates. AAplanning and an-hiterNrai cwrrLpisshown on this documentam theintellectual property oficiWhen &Assuciates. This design may not be duplicated orincorporated in any otherplan ordocument withoutthe express written consent ofRitchen &Associates. Alldimensions, areas, and propertylines ore approximate based on available tux maps, Gi5information, and/arinfounution provided by the client and aresubjectto change withoutnotiee. (bane L. A5 -CONCEPTUAL S. DUBUQUE 51 ELEVATION ARAPHICSULE a ton an W �J Kitchen & Associates IOWA CITY STUutN I ►�rxK i nntN i 5 Architecture • Engineering • Planning • Interiors Iowa City, Iowa MefIN IfMfN1100A en'Yx0 ELEVATION KEYNOTES "A it AMTEALALSTYPICAL U.N.O. t.t: ALUM -STOREFRONT WANTEGRAL ALUM. FOR ICKMORLOIRG nt 1REIALPANELLCOLOAiI u METALPANCL{,ULORZi zz 1N 000-L00XALOM.PANEVSIOSNG ss. MASONRPRLTAINSNGWALL 'e.t. E3F5 (COLOR I) ez FIFS ICOL4R7) es' RAISED FIFS PANEL;COLOR71 sa FIBERGLASS RESIDENTIAL WIN DDW s.t OYERNEAPPOOR rz- STEEL ACCESS DOORWlOYERAEAD CANOPY e,t MASONRYYENEERICDLOR i1 ea MASONRYYENEERICOI15R71 s.t r WALL -MOUNTER BA[N,LIT RUlLDING SIGNAGE im FIBER CEMENT PANEL( COLOR 1) lu FIBER CEMENT PANEL IMULTI-COLOR} tes FIBERCEMENT LAPSIDING&CON HER TO IM ODOR 2) ua EXPOSED EDN ER ETE [ E LASTO MERI C PA{NT FINISH) A7- CONCEPTUAL RALSTON CREEK ELEVATION 4MRiK5CAlE mn mn ®2020-Krtchen&Assaucltes, AllplartaingandaChiteeturafcunrepts shown an[his dacumentare theintelleciv¢!property afKiMTeR&gss0[iates. Rlisdesignmaynotbeduplimtedarinwrpomtedin anyatherpfan ardorument without v torrss written cansentafffitehen&Assooates. Alldimensions,area£andpmpertyline omappnvtimatebasedoneivailableta maps,GlSinlbrmailon,and/arinformationpmvidedbytheclientandaresubfecttochangewithautnotice. I DATE: OT OCR HOARY 7070 k I � Kitchen & Associates C Archifecture - Engineering • planning • intenors IT7 IOWA CITY STUDENT APARTMENTS Iowa City, Iowa CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Date: December 15, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Proposed Rezoning at 700, 710, 720, and 730 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street (REZ20-0011) — Correspondence Staff has received the attached correspondence pertaining to the proposed rezoning at 700, 710, 720, and 730 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street. The attached correspondence was not included in the original packet distribution. Attachments: 1. Correspondence for Planning and Zoning Commission From: The Broken Spoke <the broken spoke(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 10:04 AM To: 720sdubugue(agmail.com; Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(c)iowa-city.org>; abricker)axiom-con.com Cc: Jane Bourgeois <docbourgeois(a-)_gmail.com>; JoAnn Larpenter Sinclair <honeybeehairparlor(a-)_gmail.com> Subject: redevelopment of 700 block of south dubuque street... Hello... have received the good neighbour letter from Axiom Consultants & have a few concerns. Yet another block in Iowa City being proposed for redevelopment with absolutely no plan for commercial space. The continued elimination of current commercial is more than disappointing. I would highly encourage a mixed use building with the lower level as commercial to be a requirement of this development. As for the cleanup & stabilization of the bank of Ralston Creek, I would assume that the properties to the east of the creek would be more prone to flooding unless the same techniques were also used. Even if both sides were bolstered, anything downstream would then become increasingly at risk to flooding. I would hope that the trees along the creek would remain as their established root system already gives added stability to the bank & they would help obscure such a large building from view from the east side of the creek. Lastly, what is the effect of increasing property taxes on the surrounding properties? The surrounding properties have already seen a significant increase this year. Thank you... Michael Chamberlain The Broken Spoke 757 South Gilbert Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 338-8900 www.thebrokenspoke.com Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Planning & zoning meeting/ City of IC & Axiom Consultants Date: Thursday, December 3, 2020 8:24:44 AM From: Jane Bourgeois <docbourgeois@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 1:06 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Planning & zoning meeting/ City of IC & Axiom Consultants Michael Chamberlain has included me in on the new changes/developments that are in the planning/zoning stages for what is to occur 'across the creek' from the building that I share as a tenant of Michael's (The Broken Spoke/business & owner of building). I hope that I can express concerned viewpoints to be passed on to appropriate committees as a professional in the community that searched hard and wide for business commercial space in 2015 that included three very important points of attention for me on building/space search. (1) Sufficient non -metered parking & parking lot available for drive up, easy access for patient care (2) Affordability for long term successful tenant lease structure that would not be stressed by the constant change of property taxes increasing annually (3) Flood history of buildings affected by the 1993 and 2008 flood From the history research, the building location of where I decided was the best in town, more than adequate patient care parking spaces, a building owner that 100% has opened his building structure for two additional small business owners to remain successful in their businesses & affordability of lease responsibilities. Lastly, a building that has been spared with any structural flood damage of Ralston Creek ... that I see every day of the week right outside my patient treatment rooms. I have learned to —never assume that all engineers, planners and construction companies are on the same page when it comes to'across the creek' home or building owners. This comes from an experience with my husband and I working with rebuilding roads, mountain water flow runoff, fire lanes, bridges and creek beds at our former property in Bozeman, Montana - if not done right the first time ... all hell breaks loose to be blunt. My voice of concern as a solid tenant in the building at 759 S. Gilbert St. is that the structural foundation changes of the new development of building structures that are in the plans for 'across the creek' will address 'both' sides of the creek for long term stabilization of the land structure affected by the development. If anything I support beautification projects along creeksides vs. the trashy dumping of concrete, etc. that are unfortunately on the creekside area of where I am a tenant. Annually, I clean up what I can get to outside my office windows, creating an ongoing quiet & reflective sitting area, would love to see the lower creek cleaned up of excessive tree debris, but, moving along concrete 'dumping site' for whomever created the mess many years ago is a bit risky. Thank you for your time, Anne and thank you for passing this on to the appropriate committee(s). Sincerely, Jane F. Bourgeois Dr. Jane F. Bourgeois, DC PC Synchronicity Chiropractic & Healing Arts Phone: (319) 337-7890 Fax: (844) 270-2468 759 S Gilbert St Iowa City, IA 52240 The information in this e-mail is legally privileged, confidential and intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that viewing, disseminating, distributing or copying this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you received and/or are viewing this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mailfrom your system immediately. Thank you. MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2020 —7:00 PM ELECTRONIC FORMAL MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Maggie Elliott, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Nolte, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Signs STAFF PRESENT: Ray Heitner, Sara Hektoen, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Jeff Clark, Mike Welch, Michael Apt, Jeff Edberg Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of REZ20-0011, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 South Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) zone and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Improvement of Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: a. Removal of invasive trees. b. Stream bank stabilization, including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. c. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by the City Forrester. d. Installation of a minimum 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the top of the stream bank. e. Installation of pedestrian -scale lighting. f. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, provision of a sanitary sewer easement, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer, and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney's Office. CASE NO. REZ20-0011: Applicant: Gilbane Development Location: 700, 710, 720, and 730 S Dubuque St. and 220 Lafayette St. An application for a rezoning from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone for approximately 1.9 acres of land. Heitner began the staff report with an aerial view of the subject property and a view of the zoning applied to the area. Currently there are two zoning designations covering the subject property, the northwest corner is CC -2 (Community Commercial) and the balance of the property is CI -1 (Intensive Commercial). Regarding background, this is a rezoning for 700 through 730 South Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street to the Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone. Heitner noted there's a separate application accompanying this project not on the agenda tonight but will be discussed at a later Commission meeting regarding vacation of an alley that separates the South Dubuque Street properties from 220 Lafayette Street. It is staff's understanding that with this rezoning the applicant intends to build a six -story building on the subject property. With the current zoning, the CC -2 is generally intended for retail goods and services typically applied to major business districts and the uses tend to generate a considerable amount of traffic. CI -1 is similar to CC -2 but there's a bit more allowances for outdoor display and storage and is typically used for motor vehicle sales and repair businesses. The proposed zoning of Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings zone is a zone of moderate intensity of mixed-use development striving for pedestrian friendly streets and streetscapes, uses are comparable to what is allowed in CB -5 with a few exceptions. In terms of building mass, generally buildings have a maximum base height of four stories up to eight stories. The proposed project associated with this rezoning is looking for a six -story building with bonus stories applied for public art and LEED. In terms of existing land uses of the property, there is some general commercial service at 700-710 South Dubuque Street occupied by the Iowa City Bike Library, multifamily residential at 720 South Dubuque Street and 220. Lafayette Street, and then some commercial land use at 730 South Dubuque owned by Public Space One. Heitner stated for general review criteria for rezonings they look at two points of emphasis, one is compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and two is compatibility with the existing neighborhood. With respect to compliance with the Comprehensive Plan there were several objectives that they noticed as being achieved with the proposed rezoning here, specifically regarding planned improvements to the Ralston Creek frontage and the pedestrian streets. From what staff can ascertain, the building and associated rezoning would add some appropriate contextual infill in terms of height, scale and use typically seen in the Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings zone. Also, it is an appropriate scale of density to contribute to potential future transit -oriented development as there is a remote possibility that the two adjacent rail lines could accommodate future passenger rail. An image from the Comprehensive Plan illustrated the goal for the Ralston Creek frontage improvements specifically along the west creek bank in terms of cleaning up the creek bank, beautifying it and trying to make it an amenity for new buildings that will come in the area. Heitner showed an image of some of the improvements that took place just to the north at 225 East Prentiss Street. There is six -foot -wide sidewalk on top of the creek bank with separation for some landscaping and then some riprap on the ascension of the creek bank. He showed an image of the frontage that the proposed building has on this on this area and an image of the proposed elevations. Although these are just conceptual renderings, he noted the images show compliance with the aesthetic direction that the form -based code is looking for. In terms of compatibility with the existing neighborhood character Heitner noted this neighborhood is in a bit of transition from a land use and zoning perspective. There is some Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings zoning adjacent to the subject property and a generous amount just to the north across from the Iowa Interstate Railroad, and then also west of the subject property on the west side of Dubuque Street. In the context of the surrounding neighborhood it is in a bit of transition between moving forward some of these projects that are more fitting of the form -based code within the Comprehensive Plan and also accommodating preexisting structures. Craig asked about the parking ramp and lot that was nearby. Heitner noted those are the County's ramp and lot so there cannot be overnight parking there, however there is a City parking ramp just a few blocks north and to the west. Heitner also noted this rezoning would trigger the affordable housing requirements at 10% of the total number of dwelling units, assuming that more than 10 dwelling units are built on site. Heitner did want to touch on the floodplain aspect as it does clip the existing property a little bit, in the northeast corner and southeast corner. The majority of the floodplain would be in the Ralston Creek stream corridor and is in the 500 -year floodplain. Heitner stated they did receive some correspondence with some concern regarding whether these improvements would result in flooding on the east side of the creek. He stated the Public Works staff hasn't gone through a full site plan review of this rezoning, as that doesn't happen until later on in the process with the site plan review, but what they have informed is that their opinion right now is that since the cross section of the creek or the width of the creek bank should remain roughly the same and they don't believe there will be flooding to the east or downstream. Heitner reiterated the improvements to the west side of the creek would be reviewed upon site plan review. In terms of next steps, upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. Staff plans to have this application on the January 19, 2021 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's January 5, 2021 meeting. Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0011, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 South Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) zone and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Improvement of Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: a. Removal of invasive trees. b. Stream bank stabilization, including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. c. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by the City Forrester. d. Installation of a minimum 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the top of the stream bank. e. Installation of pedestrian -scale lighting. f. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, provision of a sanitary sewer easement, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer, and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney's Office. Hensch noted Heitner said that these specifications are similar to what was done at 225 East Prentiss Street. Heitner said they are very similar with the hope of getting a pretty similar product. Hensch asked about item B of the conditions, about the riprap, he stated when looking at Axiom's presentation they talk specifically about adding natural stabilizing materials on the bed and bank of the waterway. He really wants to specify no concrete rubble or no broken up concrete should be used, it is done along the river and it's horrible. He wants to really strongly advocate that the City specify that it cannot be that or specify and use wording of using natural stabilizing materials on the bed and bank. Craig notes she had a thought when reading the letters and the concern about the loss of the small commercial that's happening, it appears this is definitely a residential building but will the zoning allow small commercial in this building if they chose to. Heitner confirmed yes the zoning does allow for mixed use buildings that would typically have a commercial element on the ground floor. However, in this case it is likely going to be a residential building but theoretically they could have commercial in this building. Elliott asked for more information about the possibility providing a connection under the railroad bridge to the existing sidewalk along the west bank of Ralston Creek. Heitner replied that's something that the City initiated but it's outside of the scope for the applicant for this project at the moment. The City is working with potential consultants on the possibility of making that connection. There are a few options that staff is in discussion with some consultants about to possibly make that connection and doing so in a way that wouldn't undermine the structural integrity of the railroad overpass. It would probably be some kind of a sidewalk that clips along the overpass, but those discussions are pretty early on right now. He reiterated however that is not part of this rezoning at this point, it's something that City staff is looking into right now outside the scope of this project. Hensch noted staff made a brief comment about the adjacent Iowa Interstate Railroad and how there were some studies going on about commuter opportunities between Iowa City, Coralville, North Liberty and can staff elaborate on that. Heitner stated this property is uniquely situated between two different railroads, the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the north and Cranic Railroad to the south. He noted there are ongoing studies about potential commuter rail between Iowa City, Coralville and North Liberty on the Cranic line. There's also a potential, although not very likely potential, of an Amtrak service on the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the north, which would terminate at the existing station that's about a block west. He cannot speak of the timeframe for either of those passenger rail projects, but from a planning perspective they don't want to shut the door on any potential to those projects. He noted this is the appropriate kind of infill development or redevelopment that they would look for in a transit oriented development in terms of the scale of the building, the likely density with something that's six stories on this site and adjacency to potential other amenities. Hensch opened the public hearing. Mike Welch (Axiom Consultants) wanted to add a couple of comments he thought of during staff's presentation, who did a nice job of covering the project, and hopefully he can show their intent and give the Commission a clearer picture of what they intend to do. First he noted they didn't do the good neighbor meeting due to COVID going on but they did send out a mailing on November 16 to the surrounding properties and included not only deed holders but also residents of the specific buildings in the area. From that mailing they did receive a couple of comments, some of which staff addressed, but one other that hasn't been brought up was a question about parking on South Dubuque Street and would that change or not with this project. Welch noted obviously they haven't gotten to the point of doing a site plan yet, but their intention is that they would be eliminating the curb cuts that currently exist on South Dubuque Street so likely there would be an increase in street parking. But again, he reiterated that would be flushed out during site plan approval. Welch noted he (or Axiom) was involved in both the 225 East Prentiss and the property on the east side of Prentiss so they'd be looking for a lot of those similar Ralston Creek improvements. He agrees with Hensch that they should do a natural product and avoid waste concrete, as it is not a great thing. Michael Apt (Gilbane Development) stated Gilbane Development Company is a family owned, privately held company based out of Providence, Rhode Island. They've been around a long time and are celebrating their 1501" year. They've been around since 1873 and done a lot of development over the years. They also plan to be owners for a long time when they come into a community and be part of it and not come in and build something and disappear. They do development, market rate housing, multifamily, mixed use, student housing, build -to -suit, public private partnerships and affordable housing, so they do a very wide array all over the country. They have over 40 offices around the country, the closest one to Iowa City is in Ames, Iowa where they have three projects totaling about 1000 beds. They also have an office close by in Chicago, Apt is based out of Philadelphia. Gilbane consists of two operating companies, they have Gilbane Building Company, who did four projects at the University of Iowa Hospital system in 2013 and their building company also has done many projects throughout the state of Iowa and are familiar with the state of Iowa. They brought on Mike Welch and his group from Axiom as a local consultant to help with the zoning and everything and Jeff Edberg also to help with the seller and the development. They are looking forward to it fitting in and becoming part of the Iowa City Community. Hensch asked what brought Gilbane to be interested in Iowa City? Apt noted it is because of The University of Iowa as it is a fine institution that's growing. He noted there's not much purpose-built housing that houses the students other than the market rate there and they're looking forward to capturing not just students but the community to live in the project. Jeff Edberg (Lepic-Kroger Realtors) stated he felt this is a good example of what the Council and City officials have brought in with form -based housing. Frankly, he didn't understand it when it was first introduced but he's seen some of it come to fruition and it offers the flexibility to deliver the type of buildings that are appropriate to the site. Jeff Clark is here and he can attest prior to form -based housing there was a one zone model they had to follow and his building at 507 Gilbert was required to have commercial on the first floor when it was built in 2011 and still has vacant space on the ground floor, it just wasn't a good fit. With regard to displacing commercial, in the downtown and surrounding areas there's 78 vacant spaces right now so they are not displacing commercial property with this project that couldn't otherwise be absorbed immediately in other good spots. Hensch closed the public hearing. Nolte moved to approve REZ20-0011, a proposal to rezone approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 South Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) zone and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Improvement of Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riverfront Crossings as follows: a. Removal of invasive trees. b. Stream bank stabilization, including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. c. Planting of trees in accordance with a plan approved by the City Forrester. d. Installation of a minimum 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the top of the stream bank. e. Installation of pedestrian -scale lighting. f. The above work shall be done according to a plan prepared by the Owner and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, provision of a sanitary sewer easement, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer, and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney's Office. Elliot seconded the motion. Hensch started the discussion with two points. First, it's really interesting as he is on his second five-year term and believes this is the first time they've ever received a letter where somebody complained about wanting commercial on first floor, usually just the opposite with people noting all the commercial unoccupied throughout the City. Second, he does enthusiastically support improvements to Ralston Creek and is pleased with how the project just right across the railroad treated Ralston Creek and is keeping it from a being treated as a drainage ditch, and turning the buildings to face the creek and use it as a natural asset to be highlighted rather than something just to dump stormwater in and ignore. Craig agrees with the whole Ralston thing, the beauty of this project is getting a corridor there that one might actually want to walk down or ride a bike down so that is a strength of this project. Russett clarified that the condition related to streambank stabilization just applies to the west side. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Late Handouts Distributed Z- 1—Zt (Date) � r i CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (3 19) 3 56-5 000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Council Agenda — February 2, 2021 — Regular Formal Meeting Information submitted between distribution of packet on Thursday and close of business on Monday. Late Handout(s): Consent Calendar Item 10 Planning & Zoning Items: Item 10.b. Rezoning - 700, 710, 720, and 730 S. Dubuque Street and 220 Lafayette Street: Correspondence from Martha Norbeck [Staff response included] Kellie Fruehlina From: Geoff Fruin Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:38 PM To: 'Martha Norbeck'; *City Council Subject: RE: Riverfront Crossings - require minimum environmeI perform ce improv enents for density bonus Late tlaIICIOUtS�1St11UleU Hi Martha, 2 — 1 — 2 - Thank Thank you for your thoughtful email. I have no doubt the Councilors will each find JPua'e� reading through your suggestions. I did want to offer some thoughts on this topic. In early 2020, the Council approved the height bonus for the 12 E. Court project. With that project the Council required LEED Silver equivalency (certified by an architect) with 8 points in the Optimize Energy Performance section. They also required rooftop solar and low -flow fixtures that exceed code requirements by 20% or more unless infeasible. As City Council awarded height bonus is completely discretionary and can be rejected even if an applicant meets the criteria for a bonus, that approval set a new bar for height bonus requests. The 'Capstone' project on Prentiss is only other height bonus that was awarded in 2020 and that too was required to have LEED Silver +8, rooftop solar and low - flow fixtures. The project also included some enhanced creek bed work above minimum code requirements for redevelopment. It appears the Dubuque and Lafayette project will seek a height bonus as well, but perhaps one that will only need to be considered administratively due to it only be two stories. Regardless, staff will work diligently with the developer to accomplish more than the minimum set forth by the current height bonus language. I offer this not to suggest these efforts are sufficient and that code language does not need to be revisited. Indeed, we should revisit the City Code. However, the discretionary nature of the Council's height bonus approvals do provide an interim opportunity to ensure new development that requests a height bonus meet more stringent environmental standards. Thanks again Martha. Take care, Geoff From: Martha Norbeck[mailto:martha_norbeck@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 31, 20215:59 PM To: *City Council <-43dfb@iowa-city.org> Subject: Riverfront Crossings - require minimum environmental performance improvements for density bonus RISK Dear Council Members, The River Front Crossings Form -Based Code was adopted in 2013. At the time, the best accommodation of environmental standards that was politically feasible was to allow LEED certification to be one of multiple provisions that would allow for a bonus height provision. By the time the city reviewed the TIF policies (adopting updates in November 2017) the city level emphasis on environmental stewardship had expanded. This increased focus led to the TIF requirement for LEED certification and a minimum energy performance requirement. Since the TIF policy was adopted in 2017, I've been circling back to the same message. It is past time for the River Front Crossings Bonus Height incentive to require more rigorous environmental performance. I've been told again and again that this requires "a process." Then do the process. Every bonus height provision given without the LEED requirement is 30+ year missed opportunity for improved building performance. If the council chooses not to simply vote this provision up or down, I see this dragging on and on. Even when it is very likely that the same people involved in the LEED conversation about TIF will be at the table for this conversation. The group involved in the TIF conversation reached a consensus that LEED was right tool because it is 3rd party verified, well known in the marketplace and has measurable results. This is the TIF Language: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Policies approved Nov. 21, 2017 New office and mixed-use building projects receiving TIF in any urban renewal area shall be certified Silver or better under the LEED for New Construction Rating System current at the time of design development. New Residential projects shall be certified Silver under the National Green Building Standard or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type. Further, for LEED projects, at least 8 points shall be awarded for the LEED-NC Optimize Energy Performance credit to ensure that TIF projects help meet the City's carbon emission reduction goals. Riverfront Crossings text. The bold text represents proposed changes: Riverfront Crossings Form -based Zoning Code; Title 14, Chapter 2, Article G (initial adoption 2013) https:Hcodelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/iowacitvia/latest/iowacitv is/0-0 0 21602#JD 14-2G-7 14-2G-7: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: G. Building Height Bonus Provisions: The building height bonus provisions provide an incentive for developments to incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objective of the downtown and riverfront crossings master plan according to the eligible bonuses set forth in this section. 1. Review Process: Request for building height bonuses will be reviewed by the FBC Committee through the design review process according to the following rules. If Level II design review is required the proposal must also be approved by the City Council: e. All requests for bonus height shall meet the applicable approval criteria. 1) All proposals shall demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. The resulting development must meet all other applicable zoning standards. Bonus height is granted solely at the discretion of the City based on the quality of the proposal. For buildings receiving height transfers or granted bonus height, additional upper floor stepbacks may be required to help reduce the mass and scale of the building as it relates to surrounding development and public open space. 2) All New and Major Renovation office and mixed-use building proposals shall be certified Silver or better under the LEED for New Construction and Major Renovation Rating System current at the time of design development. New Residential projects shall be certified Silver under the National Green Building Standard or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type. Further, for LEED projects, at least 8 points shall be awarded for the LEED-NC Optimize Energy Performance credit to ensure projects help meet the City's carbon emission reduction goals. Summary of Bonus Height Provisions 5. Class A Office Space: 2 floors 6. Public Art: 1 floor 7. LEED: 4 floors 8. Student Housing: 5 floors 9. Hotel Space: 1 floor 10. Workforce/Affordable Housing: 5 floors, minimum of 15% 11. Elder Housing: 5 floors 7. Height Bonus For Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design: Up to four (4) additional floors of building height maybe granted for projects that are designed to exceed the approval meet highcriteria rtandar-ds for building height bonus provisions with regard to energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. 8. Height Bonus for Rainwater Management: Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, greenroofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the Riverfront Crossings District subarea plan adopted in April 2011. Any such green feature(s) must be designed using Best Management Practices and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the design will be successful given applicable factors, such as soil conditions, access to sunlight, topography, etc. A long term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. 14-2G-8: AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT: C. General Requirements: 1. Affordable Housing Requirement: ... any development containing ten (10) or more dwelling units on land zoned a riverfront crossings zoning designation is required to provide affordable housing dwelling units in an amount equal to or greater than ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units. Council declared a Climate Emergency in 2019. This is a tool you can use. No changes in building codes required. Get it done before the 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque Street & 220 Lafayette Street requests a density bonus. Sincerely, Martha Norbeck 906 S. 7th Ave. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 FCL Doc ID: 027986440014 Type: GEN Kind: ORDINANCE Fee RecoAmt: $72-00'Page S2021 t of0143.20 AM Johnson Countv Iowa Kim Painter GOuntV Recorder SK6174 PG319-332 STATE OF IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY ) SS } 1 P 1 lot � rIMlm��q� �• City Of� I, Kellie K. Freehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Ordinance attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.21-4847 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of February, 2021, is a true and correct copy, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 4th day of February 2021. Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk Q7T.1 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 9 (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 I0,b Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; (REZ20-0011) Ordinance No. 21-4847 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque Street & 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone. (REZ20-0011) Whereas, the applicant, Gilbane Development, and owners of property have requested a rezoning of approximately 1.9 acres of land located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque Street & 220 Lafayette Street from Community Commercial (CC -2) and Intensive Commercial (CI -1) to Riverfront Crossing — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone; and Whereas, this property is located within the Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings Subdistrict of the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, there is a public need to provide a more pedestrian -friendly framework along the west side of Ralston Creek, in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards outlined in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; and Whereas, there is a public need to beautify the creek's frontage to match the goals Form - Based Development Standards outlined in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; and Whereas, there is a public need to relocate an existing sanitary sewer main that currently bisects the subject property, to not conflict with future development; and Whereas, the rezoning will provide affordable housing in Iowa City pursuant to requirements set forth in 14-2G-8 of the City Code for any new residential development; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding satisfaction of public needs through improvements to Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street in accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, provision of a sanitary sewer easement, and provision of affordable housing, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, the property described below is hereby classified Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX): A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND ALL OF LOTS 5, 6, 7, AND 8, ALL IN BLOCK 18 COUNTY SEAT ADDITION TO IOWA CITY, IOWA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 1 & 2, PAGE 253 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 18, OF THE COUNTY SEAT ADDITION TO IOWA CITY, IOWA; THENCE N 01°15'47" W, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF Ordinance No. 21-4847 Page 2 WAY LINE OF DUBUQUE STREET, 200.97 FEET; THENCE N 00°47'29° W, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 118.70 FEET, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 8; THENCE N 89'22'53" E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 8, 150.00 FEET; THENCE S 00°41'06" E, 15.97 FEET; THENCE S 87°16'28" E, 137.31 FEET; THENCE S 32°51'20" W, 60.29 FEET; THENCE S 02°26'27" E, 286.42 FEET; THENCE S 89°21'34" W, 91.10 FEET; THENCE N 00°52'18" W, 40.00 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID BLOCK 18 AND THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LAFAYETTE STREET; THENCE S 89°21'34" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 168.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1.93 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 2nd day of February 2021. Mayor Approved b Attest: City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 01/12/21) Ordinance No. 21-4847 Page 3 It was moved by Weiner and seconded by Mims that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner First Consideration 01/19/2021 Voteforpassage: AYES: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published 02/11/2021 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Mims. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Bergus. Prepared by. Ray Hehner, Aseoolate Planar, 4101. Waahinglon, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REMO-0011) Conditional Zoning Agreement: This agreement Is made among'the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter °City"), Dragonfly •Properties iII, LLC, 6 Corp, Public Space One, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"), and Gilbert Development Company (hereinafter referred to as 'APAIicanr). Whereas, Owner Is the legal tltie holder of approximately 1.9 acres of property located at 700, 710, 720, 730 S. Dubuque St & 220 Lafayette St, legally described below; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of the property legally described below from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX) zone; and Whereas, this rezoning creates public needs to Improve the health of Ralston Creek and provide a more pedestrian-frlandly framework along the Creek's frontage; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to reroute existing sanitary sewer service to accommodate future development while still providing adequate sewerage; and Whereas, the. Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding the improvements of Ralston Creek and the adjacent pedestrian street In accordance with the Form -Based Development Standards for Riveftnt Crossing, and fulfillment of sanitary sewer easement provisions, the proposed rezoning Is consistent with the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan and rsoommends approval; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.6•(2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may Impose reasonable condltions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, In order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner and Applicant agrees to develop this property In accordance with the terns and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement Now, therefore, In.considerstion of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Dragonfly Propertles III, LLC, B Corp, and Public Space One, Inc. are the collective legal title holders of fie property legally described as: A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND ALL OF LOTS 6, 6, 7, AND 8, ALL IN BLOCK 18 COUNTY SEAT ADDITION TO IOWA CITY, IOWA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 1 & 2, PAGE 263 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER, AND MORE PARTICULARLY'DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 18, OF THE COUNTY SEAT ADDITION TO IOWA CITY, IOWA; THENCE N 01'15'47" W, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LiNE OF DUBUQUE STREET, 200.07 FEET; THENCE N 00'47129" W, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LiNE, 118.70 FEET, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT B; THENCE N 89'22163' E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 8, 160.00 FEET; THENCE S 00'41'08' E, touENTwoRK1491 MOOH1T .Q 1 16.97 FEET; THENCE S 87116128" E, 137.31 FEET; THENCE S 32°51'20" W, 60.29 FEET; THENCE S 02'26'27" E, 28e.42 FEET; THENCE S 89'21'34" W, 91.10 FEET; THENCE N 00152'18" W, 40.00 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID BLOCK 18 AND THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LAFAYETTE STREET; THENCE S 89°21'34" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 168.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 1.93 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 2. Owner and Applicant acknowledge that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may Impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, In order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. in consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: 0. Owner shall cause that part of Ralston Creek adjacent to the above-described property, between the parcel's west boundary line and five feat east of the toe of the stream bank, to be Improved as follows: I. Removal of Invasive tress; Ii. Stream bank stabilization, Including necessary grading and addition of rip - rap; III. Tree planting; Iv. Installation of a minimum 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the top of the stream bank; v. Installation of pedestrian -scale lighting; vi. Prior to Issuance of a building permit for any portion of the above- described property, Owner shell; Enter Into a temporary construction easement agreement with the City of Iowa City, owner of the adjacent land upon with the above- described improvements are to be constructed. Said easement agreement shall be In a form approved by the City Attorney's Office; 2. Obtain approval from the Qty Engineer of the streambank restoration and sidewalk construction plans; and 3. Obtain approval from the City Forester of the tree planting plan. A]. The above-described work shall be completed prior- to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the above-described property, which shall Include a temporary certificate of occupancy. MWrW0R"i17710000H176ffW.1) 2 b. Prior to Issuance of building permits, Owner shall dedicate, at no cost to the City, a sanitary sewer easement, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer, and In a form of agreement acceptable to the City Attorney's Office. 4. Owner and Applicant acknowledge the requirements of Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8, which requires the execution of an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligations through the provision of on-site owner-occupled dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee In lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on-site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the CRY. 5. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to Impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 8. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain In full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. Once a building permit is Issued or certificate of occupancy is Issued, as applicable, the conditions shall be deemed satisfied and no further release will be provided. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall Inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property Is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided,'ell development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 7. Nothing In this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state,and_fademl-regulafioms. ._ 8. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be Incorporated by reference Into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded In the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 2nd day of February .20 21 CI of Iowa City BrLtb Teague, Mayor Attest: Ke Ile Fruehling, C y Clerk 7 oved by: !✓ 4. 0�L_ City Attorney's Office — i-I,IL-tzfr-'� pumrwowo 17710000 H1755553:1) SELL /:jJQ0bL{�'TG/< vice PR&moi,>cN r Dragonfly Properties III, LLC By: Douglas A. Goschke, Authorized Member 6 Corp By: Public Space One, Inc. By: City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ) as: Johnson County ) This Instrument was acknowledged before me on . 20 by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Gllbane Development Company Acknowledgement: State of RHV'D9- I5 LA Al b County of J pVJ )>QV CE This record was acknowledged be r mapr�,�}AJN�y / 2021 by (name) as _�, /, p, (title) of GlIbane Development Company R�DC:7 I ^/ /' I,�MYOiA N�ryPuPu�blicc In and for -the State of I Rho e :�5 /And (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank)/Vv j-arf Puj�, VT ON My commission expires: 0";-f y -a / 1< o ti - 0 r gpN" Q t` (WENT WORM 1177MOOD H 1755587:1 DrumTeanue, MOyor1W. Aftost; 01, LLO 1(91110 Fruehung, City Clefk APPS by A. Dosobks, Aulhoft'v CIty,Aitomey'a Cflloe 9 Corp By pobuovpnoADno, LLO. 4 lar 61 ty,.-allows O1tyAoknawlodBotnenlf MOW Iowa ) 08: 4,11mon County ) a Ineb mont was eokaowtedoad "pfq 7lla'on —�--- +� $0-- by Oruoo eeguean9lCelUeFn�ehlingaeMOyarfiE►Altlrai$paely,othaGl IDU City. Notdry Publla In and for.tho Vats aflOW4 teidtnjSpr89a4?. iilfe (and'Ratilij: .i t3tlbaKa ilri(r,@)ap�11��'��re,Ypdny A6lcdowi9dt)sin9hf: State t3Y•_•.•,., Oounw or C(il�iao9rdWaeaqtetowledgedbefor9meprr__r_ _ 2021by (neme)me (title).of011banopevolopmehtt>ompany Notery,publio in and for tie state of Iowa (stamp or seep Tine WAank) My 4ommiasltut exptros: RfMOMW FraperAes, Ill, LLO AolmbwlodpeMonf; County ofumn r TWpreootdwasoolmovwledgsdbefomniaorf' 202tlbypbua)pA. Onahlae aAuthorized Member of Dragonfly pf o Is A16 N4taty pubito j ` H91 +HER•R, •t((Stamp yr seal)POIC ��'e�nlul ,11,NO s �8, 3047 T- Me (and Rank) ;� , f51y commisdlan bxpiros; � � Cdtp Actinowlagoomonlr (1 unty of ti7rT�fecord�aseotmowlad$odWoo Mbo 2x29 by (f�mb).ao xtT e)`O om. Notary'pub(lo In and+f or the Isfato OfAvim . (Stamper 8��p Title (andT2ankj ; MY'iomntfulbn. 1 0 � al' ow Puhll'aSpaop Ono, It% City pf Iowa laity Acknowledgement: seta ofowt dahnson County This )nsErumsrn we ncknawledgsd bafbrema an„(? k $)t)pe 7r�aus anal ibllla Fh mhl Ino ate Mgyor and MY tjork, roepsctiv&tys of tk� f5-1la,ws is Jk t )dotdry. 06WO ) '44 idFib, a.ato of Iti'ta pamp Orem) Ta (ana Raq GllbaO AhvaloPmOnt CattlpMy Rakn'oW141doempnit 4tafe At' _ This rscord war, aqknowJ%Wdd ghidte me art . 2021 by (name) aa.�— �ffla) of �Ilbine.13avd1opmenf Company Notaly'Puhlla (nand far•tha Stats of [awe (stamp & 8wal) Vie (and hank) .My commlaplon•explres (9uCHr WOf{Im1171000pH170108m) Drj�gQnfiy Propertlos, III, LLt: Acknowledgement: t3tgt9 County `Phld Word was..•aaknowled0ed bofora meon , 2021lfy Dbugla5 A, :Goschke as Authorized Membor.of Drsgorlfly Progartlas III, LLC. Public (stomp or Seal) Title (andThnk) My commisston expires; 6 Gorp•At*nawIad0omen1*.. Statta of . ' t3nUtat AM -4 Thlo rop,oY WR 1015 i0VA0dged Wore m q dn, 'i�r J% , •2021 by E q t r (deme) ah .it'x ftsaw c^ (title) afA corg. Nota PublIlfo In e dfbrthe•S a of eve NOi.$ a � R tlEA4 ,ibtPS�u 6n Mug � d EER4,20*1 '(Slamp,Draw) s Titia(and Ranjn ivb7lfrtq.�bl9aro . My oommloslon e)tplydq:.:tY P.U61l -$pgob.0rlar lno. Acknowfadgioment, $.wa . Oounfy of k — This reaordwas 00moW1ddQ0d 15001V me on , 202f by , ! __ _ (name) as� (tkle) of PubtlaSpace One, Ino Nobly PublldIn erid r the tale oflaw& (stamp or 8WQ hltlo (and RahR) My d6mmisslon expires:�___�_____ rnusxrwarixw��nrss�Auss6ee;4 $ i 8 Corp Inc. City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa } ) as: Johnson County ) This Instrument was acknowledged before'ma on 20 by Bruce Teague and Kelile Fruehling as Mayor and City Clark, respectively, of the City of Iowa City, Notary PubllcIn and forlhe State of Iowa (Stemp orSeal) Title (and Rank) 011bane Development Company Acknowledgement: State of_, County of This record was acknowledged before me on 2021 by (name) as _ (flue of 611bane Development Company Notary Public In and for the Stale of Iowa (Stamp or seat) Title (and Rank) My commission expires:, pucN MIM4f177 MtasM) 4 0 O i Dragonfly Properties, III, LLC Acknowledgement: State of County of This record was acknowledged before me on , 2021 by Douglas A. Gtoschke as Authorized Member of Dragonfly Properties III, LLC, Notary Public (Slampar8eal) Title (and Rank)' My commission oxplres:,_ 6 Corp Acknowledgement: state of �_ County at This record was acknowledged before me o�, 2021 by (name) as. _ (' due) of Notary Publlo In and for the SloWe of Iowa (Stamp or Seal Title (and Rank) My commission expires: Public Space One, Ino, Acknowledgement: mate oF.T4vA County of 6401\ T%9 rec� rd w s a knowledged bet le�f�t� o unit _ �__"9 2021 by k r��l�k'L�+t (name) as �F(t der (tide) of Publlospaoa One, Ino Title (and Rank) (♦foxal %:nbi t L My commission explres: l a0 aa- Kellie Fruehling From: Anne Russett Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:28 AM To: Kellie Fruehling Cc: Danielle Sitzman; Raymond Heitner Subject: Fw: 190173 - 2nd & 3rd readings - S. Dubuque Street Development Kellie - Please see the request below to consolidate the 2nd & 3rd readings for the Gilbane rezoning. Thanks, Anne From: Mike Welch <mwelch@axiom-con.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 20217:54 PM To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Cc: Apt, Michael A. Subject: 190173 - 2nd & 3rd readings - S. Dubuque Street Development Good evening Anne & Ray On behalf of Mike Apt and Gilbane Development, I'd like to request that council considers collapsing the 2nd & 3rd readings of the rezoning at their next meeting. Thanks for all your help getting us to this point! ACOQS,L,MTS MICHAEL WELCH PE, LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER m. 920.475.8060 o. 319.519.6224 w. www.axiom-con.com KI ® O VOTED BEST ENGINEERING FIRM 2020 and 2019 (Corridor Business Journal) DISCLAIMER: This email and the information contained herein is confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the