Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-12-14 Ordinance
Item Number: 9.a. CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org December 14, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), approximately 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C), and approximately 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) for land located west of the intersection of IWV Road SW and Slothower Road. (Second Consideration) ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning and Zoning Commission Rezoning Staff Report Rezoning Exhibit Site Grading and Erosion Control Plan Wetland Delineation Report - Part 1 Wetland Delineation Report - Part 2 Wetland Delineation Report - Part 3 Wetland Delineation Report - Part 4 Rezoning Legal Description CI -1 Zone Permitted Uses Updated Conditions Memo for Planning and Zoning Commission P&Z Minutes 09/16 P&Z Minutes 10/21 Correspondence Ordinance & CZA STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Item: ANN21-0003/REZ21-0006 Date: September 16, 2021 GENERAL INFORMATION: MMS Consultants Applicant: 1917 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA 52240 319-351-8282 I.sexton@mmsconsultants.net Contact Person: Owner: Jon Marner MMS Consultants 1917 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA 52240 319-351-8282 j.marner@mmsconsultants.net Matt Adam IWV Holdings, LLC. 319-248-6316 madam@spmblaw.com Requested Action: Annexation & Rezoning Purpose: Annexation of 70.39 acres of land currently in unincorporated Johnson County and rezoning it from County Agricultural (A) zone to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone and Interim Development — Commercial (ID -C) zone. Rezoning of 9 acres of Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone. Location: South of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road. Location Map: 2 Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Annexation and rezoning - 70.39 acres; Rezoning within the City limits — 9 acres Farmland, Rural Residential (RR -1) and County Agricultural (A) North: (Farmland) County Residential R and Rural Residential RR -1 South: (Farmland, Rural Residential) County Agricultural A and Rural Residential RR -1 East: (Johnson County Poor Farm) Neighborhood Public P-1 West: (Farmland) County Agricultural A Comprehensive Plan: Intensive Commercial' District Plan: Southwest District Plan - Single- Family/Duplex Residential, Future Urban Development, & Vegetative Noise and Sight Buffer Neighborhood Open Space District: SW5 — Only for the 9 acres currently in the City limits. Public Meeting Notification: Property owners located within 300' of the project site and residents of the Country Club Estates Fourth and Fifth Addition Subdivisions received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were also posted on the site. File Date: May 27, 2021 45 Day Limitation Period: NA BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The owner is requesting annexation and rezoning of 70.39 acres of property located south of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road. The owner has requested that the property be rezoned from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) for approximately 53.36 acres, and to Interim Development Commercial (10-0) for approximately 17.03 acres. In addition, the owner has requested a rezoning of approximately 9 acres of land currently located within the City limits from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1). Pending approval of the associated Comprehensive Plan amendment to Intensive Commercial land use, per case number CPA21-0002. 3 The 70.39 acres of land that is currently located outside of the city limits is adjacent to Iowa City's current boundary and within Fringe Area C, inside the City's growth area of the Johnson County/Iowa City Fringe Area Agreement. The Southwest District Plan shows this area with a future land use designation of Rural Residential for the majority of this land, with a narrow strip of private/public open space to the west, bordering the City's landfill. The Southwest District Plan shows the portion of the subject properties that is currently within the City limits as Residential at 2-8 dwelling units per acre. The owner has also applied for a comprehensive plan amendment with the subject annexation and rezoning applications. If approved, the comprehensive plan amendment would change the future land use designations to Intensive Commercial. The owner has used the Good Neighbor Policy and held a Good Neighbor Meeting on July 28, 2021. Four neighbors attended. Attachment #11 provides the summary report of the meeting provided by the applicant. Staff has received one email expressing opposition to the annexation and rezoning, which is attached as correspondence. In addition, staff received several emails and phone calls asking questions about the annexation and rezoning. Pursuant to state code requirements for voluntary annexations, City staff held a consult with two Union Township Trustees on Thursday, July 29, 2021 to discuss the proposed annexation application. Trustees expressed concern about the loss of productive farmland and Township tax revenue losses. ANALYSIS: Annexation: The Comprehensive Plan has established a growth policy to guide decisions regarding annexations. The annexation policy states that annexations are to occur primarily through voluntary petitions filed by the property owners. Further, voluntary annexation requests are to be reviewed under the following three criteria. The Comprehensive Plan states that voluntary annexation requests should be viewed positively when the following conditions exist. 1. The area under consideration falls within the adopted long-range planning boundary. A growth area is illustrated in the Comprehensive Plan and on the City's Zoning Map. The subject property is located within the City's long-range growth boundary. 2. Development in the area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing an undue burden on the City. The Southwest District Plan identifies the subject area as being appropriate for annexation and development upon provision of sanitary sewer service. A sanitary sewer main line can be extended to the west from its current endpoint near the Johnson County Poor Farm property, along the south side of IWV Road. The extension could service the properties that would be rezoned to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zoning. The property seeking Interim Development Commercial zoning to the west will likely need a lift station for future sanitary sewer service to be provided. Since there are no plans to sewer this property right now, an interim zone is appropriate. The City's 2021 Capital Improvement Plan has budgeted over $5,000,000 for improvements to Melrose Avenue between Highway 218 and Hebl Avenue. These improvements will bring this stretch of roadway into compliance with the City's Urban Design Standards. As a part of these improvements, the City will also be extending its water main west to the City landfill site, allowing any future development between Highway 218 and the landfill to tap into the water main. Development in this area will engender suitable development to utilize these improvements, while providing the City with needed land for Intensive Commercial use. Staff's analysis for the associated comprehensive plan amendment (CPA21-0002) revealed that 4 approximately 13% of the City's Intensive Commercial zoned land is vacant. Furthermore, what land is available for Industrial use tends to be clustered in the southeast section of the City, in the City's Industrial Park and south of the Highway 1 at the US -218 interchange and north and east of the airport. While these are suitable locations for some industrial or intensive commercial uses, these properties may not have the desired degree of highway access that other Intensive Commercial or Industrial users may require. In addition, many of these vacant parcels are less than 2 acres in size. Lastly, the Comprehensive Plan encourages growth that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods to reduce the costs of providing infrastructure and City services. The subject properties are bordered by the city limits on the east side. Therefore, the subject property is contiguous to current development and meets the goal of contiguous growth. 3. Control of the development is in the City's best interest. The property is within the City's designated Growth Area. It is appropriate that the proposed property be located within the City so that future development may be served by Fire, Police, water, and sanitary sewer service. Annexation will allow the City to provide these services and control zoning so that development of the subject area is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. For the reasons stated above, staff finds that the proposed annexation complies with the annexation policy. Current Zoning: The western properties are currently zoned County Agricultural (A), while the eastern property already within the city limits is zoned Rural Residential (RR -1). The County (A) zone is intended to provide land for all types of agricultural production. The zone allows for a wide range of agriculturally oriented uses, as well single-family dwellings and manufactured homes. The City's RR -1 zone is intended to provide a rural residential character for areas in the city that are not projected to have the utilities necessary for urban development in the foreseeable future or for areas that have sensitive environmental features that preclude development at urban densities. Proposed Zoning: The request is to rezone the eastern two properties as Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone, and Interim Commercial zone (ID -C) for the far western property. This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan amendment application filed contemporaneously with this application, which staff supports for the reasons set forth in the associated staff report. Because the requested rezoning boundaries do not follow existing property lines, however, a plat is necessary to establish property lines consistent therewith. The purpose of the Interim Development (ID) zone is to provide for areas of managed growth in which agricultural and other nonurban uses of land may continue until such time as the City is able to provide services and urban development can occur. The ID zone is the default zoning district to which all undeveloped areas should be classified until City services are provided. Upon provision of City services, a rezoning to zones consistent with the Comprehensive Plan may be considered. The western property, shown in purple in Figure #1, does not have an immediate solution for sanitary sewer service. Therefore, an ID zone is appropriate. 5 Figure 1 — Western ID -C Parcel N EZONING PARCEL NO. 3 1;COl1NTY'A' TO I D -C } 17.Q3AC araz•E S+Yi ]'13'E vtr.1H ,E "E nim hd Th EtE-un_+ rf TIE ,IER'aw.T WMIEP E, _I:N OM, :Y SES11. �. TNf; .;Sf;F'EK Tl NMITti RE ■NING PARCEL NO. 2 .CCUNTY'A' TO CI -1 } @3.3d AC P�4 POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL NO. 2 350.17 ;qiv-1 x 5.732E -E 41.4.99' SEC'+ s�aa MTV. sew'.+•w FI The purpose of the Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone is to provide areas for those sales and service functions and businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display and storage of merchandise, by repair and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, by outdoor commercial amusement and recreational activities or by activities or operations conducted in buildings or structures not completely enclosed. The types of retail trade in this zone are limited in order to provide opportunities for more land intensive commercial operations and to prevent conflicts between retail and industrial truck traffic. City Code specifies that special attention must be directed toward buffering the negative aspects of allowed uses from adjacent residential zones. The uses in Table 1 are permitted by right in a CI -1 zone. Table 1 — Uses Permitted by Riaht in a CI -1 Zone Use: Exam • les: Building Trade Uses Electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning contractors, etc. Commercial Recreational Uses Outdoor: Campgrounds; commercial tennis and swimming facilities; drive-in theaters; outdoor skating rinks; golf driving ranges; outdoor miniature golf facilities; etc. Indoor: Physical fitness centers; health clubs; gyms; bowling alleys; indoor skating rinks; etc. Eating Establishments Restaurants; cafes; cafeterias; coffee shops; etc. Office Uses Professional offices, such as lawyers, accountants, engineers, architects, and real estate agents; financial businesses, such as mortgage lenders, government offices; etc. Retail Sales Sales Oriented: Stores selling, leasing, or renting consumer, home, and business goods. Personal Service Oriented: Retail banking establishments, Laundromats, catering services, dry cleaners, tailors, shoe repair, etc. Repair Oriented: Repair of consumer goods, such as electronics, bicycles, office equipment; appliances. 6 In addition to the uses that are permitted by right, several uses are permitted provisionally. Provisional uses must abide by additional requirements, which are detailed in section 14-4B-4 of the City Code. Attachment #12 provides a more detailed analysis of the additional criteria that is required for each provisional use. The uses in Table 2 are permitted as provisional uses in a 01-1 zone. Table 2 — Provisional Uses in a CI -1 Zone Use: Hospitality Oriented: Hotels; motels; convention centers; guesthouses; and commercial meeting halls/event facilities. Outdoor Storage and Display Oriented: Lumberyards; sales or leasing of consumer vehicles, including passenger vehicles, light and medium trucks, etc. Alcohol Sales Oriented: Liquor stores; wine shops; grocery stores; convenience stores; etc. Delayed Deposit Service Uses: Payday lenders and any other similar use that meets the definition of "delayed deposit service use", as defined in chapter 9, article A of Title 14 of the City Code. Industrial Service Uses Facilities, yards, and preassembly yards for construction contractors; welding shops; machines shops; tool repair; electric motor repair; repair of scientific or professional instruments; repair of heavy machinery; towing and vehicle storage; servicing and repair of medium and heavy trucks; etc. Self -Service Storage Uses Miniwarehouses; ministorage facilities. Warehouse and Freight Movement Uses Separate warehouses used by retail stores such as furniture and appliance stores; household moving and general freight storage; cold storage plants, including frozen food lockers; major wholesale distribution centers; truck and air freight terminals; etc. Wholesale Sales Uses Wholesale sales and rental of heavy trucks, machinery, equipment, building materials, special trade tools, welding supplies, machine parts, etc. In addition to the uses that are permitted by right, several uses are permitted provisionally. Provisional uses must abide by additional requirements, which are detailed in section 14-4B-4 of the City Code. Attachment #12 provides a more detailed analysis of the additional criteria that is required for each provisional use. The uses in Table 2 are permitted as provisional uses in a 01-1 zone. Table 2 — Provisional Uses in a CI -1 Zone Use: Exam • les: Adult Business Uses Adult bookstores; adult video stores; nightclubs featuring nude dancing. Animal Related Commercial Uses General: Veterinary clinics; animal grooming establishments; pet crematoriums; animal daycare; indoor animal recreation. Intensive: Kennels; stables. Quick Vehicle Servicing Uses Full serve and miniserve gas stations; unattended card key service stations; car washes. Vehicle Repair Uses Vehicle repair shops; auto body shops; transmission and muffler shops; etc. General Manufacturing Manufacturing, compounding, assembling or 7 Furthermore, several uses in the CI -1 zoning designation are permitted by special exception. Uses permitted by special exception must be approved by the City's Board of Adjustment. Like provisional uses, uses requiring special exception must meet additional criteria. Attachment #12 provides a more detailed analysis of the additional criteria that is required for each use that is permitted by special exception in the CI -1 zone. The uses in Table 3 are permitted by special exception in a CI - 1 zone. Table 3 — Uses Permitted by Special Exception in a CI -1 Zone Use: treatment of most articles, materials, or merchandise. Basic Utility Uses Utility substation facilities; water and sewer lift stations, water towers, and reservoirs. Community Service — Long-term Housing Long term housing for persons with a disability operated by a public or nonprofit agency. Daycare Uses Childcare centers; adult daycare; preschools and latchkey programs not accessory to an educational facility use. Communication Transmission Facility Uses Broadcast towers and antennas; wireless communication towers and antennas; etc. Furthermore, several uses in the CI -1 zoning designation are permitted by special exception. Uses permitted by special exception must be approved by the City's Board of Adjustment. Like provisional uses, uses requiring special exception must meet additional criteria. Attachment #12 provides a more detailed analysis of the additional criteria that is required for each use that is permitted by special exception in the CI -1 zone. The uses in Table 3 are permitted by special exception in a CI - 1 zone. Table 3 — Uses Permitted by Special Exception in a CI -1 Zone Use: Exam • les: Assisted Group Living Group care facilities, including nursing and convalescent homes; assisted living facilities. Heavy Manufacturing Concrete batch/mix plants; asphalt mixing plants; meatpacking plants; sawmills and planning mills; etc. Basic Utility Uses Utility substation facilities; water and sewer lift stations, water towers, and reservoirs. Community Service — Long Term Housing Long term housing for persons with a disability operated by a public or nonprofit agency. Community Service - Shelter Transient housing operated by a public or nonprofit agency. General Community Service Libraries; museums; transit centers; park and ride facilities; senior centers; community centers; neighborhood centers; youth club facilities; etc. Detention Facilities Prisons; jails; probation centers; juvenile detention homes; halfway houses. Education Facilities (Specialized) Music schools, dramatic schools, dance studios, martial arts studios, etc. Utility -Scale Ground -Mounted Solar Energy Systems A solar energy system that is structurally mounted on the ground and is not roof mounted, and the system's footprint is at least 1 acre in size. Communication Transmission Facility Uses Broadcast towers and antennas; wireless communication towers and antennas; etc. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. 8 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The current Southwest District Plan future land use map designates this area as appropriate for rural residential uses and private/public open space. The owner has requested, and staff supports, an amendment to this plan to show this area as appropriate for Intensive Commercial. The plan amendment would also change the Southwest District Plan's future land use map from Single-Family/Duplex Residential for the 9 acres within the city limits, and as Future Urban Development for the remaining acres located outside of the city limits to Intensive Commercial. That amendment is being contemporaneously considered by the Commission and the reasons for Staff's recommendation are described in detail in that staff report. Assuming that the amendment is approved, this application would be consistent therewith. The Comprehensive Plan identifies several goals and strategies regarding commercial and industrial development. Specifically: • Use the District Plans to identify appropriate commercial nodes and zone accordingly to focus commercial development to meet the needs of present and future population. • Identify, zone, and preserve land for industrial uses in areas with ready access to rail and highways. • Target industrial and business sectors that align with Iowa City's economic strengths, including biotechnology, healthcare, advanced manufacturing, information technology, education services, and renewable energy. • Focus growth within the Iowa City urban growth area by using the City's extra -territorial review powers to discourage sprawl and preserve prime farmland. The Weber Subarea of the Southwest District Plan's Future Land Use Map designates the subject properties as appropriate for future urban development until sewer service is extended and lift stations are constructed where required. The subject properties will eventually be bordered by arterial streets along the north (Melrose Ave./IWV Rd.) and west (Hwy. 965 extension) sides, with eventual improvements to Slothower Road creating a major collector street along the east side. The subject properties also fall within a 1/2 -mile to 1 -mile distance of the Melrose Ave./Hwy. 218 interchange. The enhanced road network and highway adjacency make this land desirable for future commercial or industrial development. While the City's comprehensive plan amendment analysis showed that there is a supply (approximately 51 acres) of vacant Intensive Commercial land within the current city limits, the suitability and location of much of that land may be inadequate, based on highway proximity and land area constraints The analysis also forecasted a potential growing need for future Intensive Commercial lands, given the region's increasing population and the ever-increasing demand for warehousing and logistics -oriented space. While the proposed annexation and rezoning would likely result in the removal of productive farmland, it is in the City and County's interest to ensure that this development takes place within the City's growth area, so as to not create "leapfrog style" development that cannot be adequately served by City services. Figure #2 below shows an outline of the City's current Growth Area within the Fringe Area. The subject properties that are outside of the City limits are highlighted within the Growth Area, in Fringe Area C. Land that is located within the City's Growth Area is anticipated to be annexed into the City and further developed. 9 Figure #2 — Growth Area Map til 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Miles I 1 1 ANN21-0003, CPA21-0002 & REZ21-0006 IWV and Slothower Rd. CITY OF IOWA CI IN Prepared 1iy; Ijjshua Engclbrcci IY,�R 1'rcp.rr��l 1,1,2U-21 .OTHOWER RD An application submitted by MMS Consultants, on behalf of IWV Holdings, LLC, for the Annexation of 70.4 acres of property located south of 1WV Rd. and west of Slothower Rd. the rezoning of 79.4 acres from County Agricultural (A) and Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Interim Development - Commercial (1D -C) and a comprehensive plan amendment changing the future land use from Public/Private Open Space, and Rural Residential to Intensive Commercial. cezznezeuna MELROSE AVE Compatibility with Existing Neighborhood Character: The subject properties are adjacent to undeveloped farmland to the north, south, and west. A mixture of farmland, streams, and woodlands can be found throughout these properties. The properties to the south and west contain County Agricultural (A) zoning, while the properties to the north contain a split of County Residential (R) and City Rural Residential (RR -1) zoning. The Johnson County Poor Farm is immediately east of the subject property. The Poor Farm currently contains farmland (approximately 400' x 1,270') for the entire stretch of adjacent property, across from Slothower Road. The County has expressed a desire to develop the southwest portion of the Poor Farm property with future residential dwellings, but it is not believed that this portion of the property will be directly across from this application's subject properties. Still, to soften the transition from an Intensive Commercial land use to an agricultural/residential use to the east, staff is proposing a condition that the developer provide an S3 landscape buffer along the entire Slothower Road frontage. In addition, staff is proposing a condition that the developer submit a landscape plan, which shall be approved by the City Forester, prior to issuance of any building permits for the subject properties. The current land use composition changes outside of the immediately adjacent properties. About 650' southwest of the southwestern extent of the subject properties begins the northern portion of the Iowa City landfill. While the areas abutting the landfill are currently still agricultural in nature, prudent planning would dictate that as the area between the landfill and Highway 218 continues to develop, uses should be scaled in intensity from the landfill, a geographically large area with several negative externalities (noise, odors, etc.) to the existing residences that can be found east of Slothower Road. The Weber Subarea Plan briefly touches upon the need to buffer residential uses from the landfill. Based on projected long-term demand and the characteristics of the subject 10 properties, including access to US -218 and intensive commercial uses being appropriate as a buffer against future landfill expansion and US -965 extension, the subject properties will likely be desired for future commercial or intensive commercial development. Furthermore, land located northwest of the Melrose Avenue/Highway 218 interchange is already zoned Public and contains lighter industrial and institutional uses in a County Public Works facility and an Iowa Armory Board facility. These public zones that contain more intense uses are directly adjacent to farmland and residential zoning (City and County), giving the corridor a light industrial aesthetic. The City's Commercial Site Development Standards provide some initial restrictions pertaining to the screening of parking and loading areas. Parking and loading areas must be set back at least 10' from any front and street -side lot lines. However, any loading area, parking spaces or aisles located within 50' of a residential zone boundary must be set back at least 20' from the front or street -side lot line. The Standards go on to specify that all areas of the site that are not used for buildings, parking, vehicular and pedestrian use areas, sidewalk cafes and plazas must be landscaped with trees and/or plant materials. A landscaping plan must be submitted for site plan review. Furthermore, surface parking areas, loading areas, and drives must be screened from view of abutting properties to at least the S2 standard. Additional screening is required for properties that abut properties zoned residential. Parking areas, loading areas, and drives must be screened from view of any abutting property zoned residential to at least the S3 standard. Staff is proposing a condition to require an S3 High Screen, along the property's eastern frontage. While outdoor storage and display oriented retail is a permitted use in a CI -1 zone, the Commercial Site Development Standards do regulate where these uses can locate, and how they are screened from public view. The Standards detail that outdoor storage of materials in the CH - 1 and CI -1 zones is permitted, provided it is concealed from public view to the extent possible. If it is not feasible to conceal the storage areas behind buildings, the storage areas must be set back at least 20' from any public right of way, including public trails and open space, and screened from view to at least the S3 standard. With respect to views into the subject properties from the south, the Standards elaborate that any outdoor display area located along a side or rear lot line that does not abut a public right of way must be set back at least 10' from said lot line and screened from view of abutting properties to at least the S2 standard. If the display area is adjacent to a residential zone boundary, it must be screened to the S3 standard. Although the zoning code includes regulations that further regulate parking areas, loading zones, and outdoor storage to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses, staff proposes a condition of the rezoning that parking, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall either not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the front yard right-of-way line, or be screened to the S3 standard along the IWV Road frontage. Staff is recommending this condition for the following reasons. Shielding these uses from the IWV Road right-of-way will help implement the Comprehensive Plan's goal of emphasizing green components in all street improvement projects, especially along arterial roads and entryways into the City. This portion of IWV Road is both an arterial road and an entryway into the City from the west. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages the preservation and enhancement of entryways into the City. Implementing the requested screening along the IWV Road right-of-way will enhance the aesthetics of the entryway into the city. In addition to the baseline standards in the Commercial Site Development Standards, Attachment #12 provides more detail on the additional criteria that applies to Provisional Uses in a CI -1 zone. In general, the additional criteria require additional setbacks from certain other uses (residential, religious, educational facility, etc.) as well as techniques to screen these CI -1 uses from adjacent lower intensity uses. Hours of operation may also be restricted for certain uses, such as vehicle repair uses. Certain General Manufacturing uses, such as chemical product manufacturing, 11 milling, motor vehicle manufacturing, and the processing of rubber and plastics are also prohibited in the CI -1 zone. Attachment #12 also provides more detail on the additional criteria that would be reviewed for any uses seeking a special exception from the Board of Adjustment. As is the case with additional criteria for provisional uses, the special exception criteria add more specific restrictions on use setbacks, screening, and outright restriction of certain uses. An example of this is Heavy Manufacturing, which is limited to concrete mixing plants that require a 500' buffer from any residential zone. The existing use specific criteria and special exception process provides additional regulation that are aimed are reducing conflicts with neighbors. While the combined acreage of the subject properties is over 79 acres, much of the land to the south will not be able to be fully developed since there are existing sensitive areas and logical places for stormwater detention. This creates a generous buffer of at least 1,700' from the nearest existing residential use to the southeast and any potential CI -1 use. In addition, required improvements to Slothower Road, upon subsequent development, to collector street standards will create a 66' wide right-of-way, which should create a clear physical distinction between the potential Intensive Commercial use on the subject properties and the rural and residential uses to the east and southeast. Lastly, as described previously, the IWV/Melrose corridor does already have some existing uses of higher intensity to the east, with the Iowa City landfill located further west. A high landscape screen along the property's east side and the additional regulations applicable to more intense CI -1 uses will help ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood character. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject properties contain several sensitive areas, as shown on the Sensitive Areas Plan (Attachment #6). The sensitive areas plan meets the woodland retention requirements and wetland buffer requirements and is not requesting any buffer reductions. Because there are no impacts to these areas or requested buffer reductions, the sensitive areas are reviewed under a Level 1 Sensitive Areas Review. This level of review is not considered a type of planned development. The southern 1/4 of the properties that are seeking Intensive Commercial zoning (CI -1) contains a blue line stream and a 50' stream corridor buffer. The area also contains .37 acres of wooded wetlands and .95 acres of emergent wetlands. The southern wetland (Wetland "A" from the Wetland Delineation Report, Attachment #7) is bordered by a 100' wetland buffer. Due to the location of sensitive areas within the southern portion of these properties, future development in this southern 14 will not be allowed, thereby creating a natural buffer from development to the south. An additional wetland (Wetland "B" from the Wetland Delineation Report, Attachment #7) is found on the westernmost property. This wetland contains .75 acres of wooded wetlands and .5 acres of emergent wetlands. This wetland also contains a 100' buffer. A stream bisects this property; however, it is not regulated under Iowa City's sensitive areas ordinance due to its lack of an ordinary high watermark. The westernmost property also contains 2.02 acres of sensitive woodlands, along with a 50' woodland buffer. A small area of steep slopes can be found adjacent to both Wetland "A" and Wetland "B". According to the Office of the State Archaeologist, the subject properties are not on record as ever having been subject to professional archaeological investigation. Examination of available data suggests the area to be a low to moderate probability location for preservation of significant archaeological resources. No archaeological investigations are deemed warranted. If in the course of ground -disturbing development activities unanticipated discovery of apparent 12 archaeological materials occurs, then construction activities must cease within 50 feet of the discovery and staff from the State Historic Preservation Office and Office of the State Archaeologist must be notified and allowed to evaluate and consult. Traffic Implications: As of 2018, Iowa DOT traffic counts showed an average daily trip count of approximately 2,000 vehicles per day on IWV Road in the vicinity of the subject properties. There are no recent counts for vehicles on Slothower Road, but any counts for Slothower are assumed to be insignificant, given the road's rural character. At 2,000 vehicles per day, this stretch of IWV Road is well below the arterial capacity of approximately 17,000 vehicles per day for a two-lane roadway. Access and Street Design: There is an existing driveway cutout along the south side of IWV Road where the potential end user can obtain access from IWV Road. The City's Access Management Standards discourages direct access to arterial roads when possible. Should the property to the west develop later, an additional access onto IWV Road will be required, unless a cross access easement to a singular access of IWV Road becomes feasible. Access to the site will be determined during site plan review. The attached grading plans shows two separate conceptual access points off IWV Road to the eastern property. These access points are conceptual and not supported by staff. Access to a future development at the southwest corner of IWV Road and Slothower Road will likely require an access point off Slothower Road as well. This is the City's preferred point of primary access to the overall site. The applicant will be responsible for any improvements needed to the southern end of the future Slothower Road access point. Furthermore, since Slothower Road is planned to be a future collector street, the applicant will be responsible for 25% of the cost of upgrading the remaining portion of Slothower Road (south of the previously described required improvements) for the entire section of Slothower Road that is adjacent to the subject property. In addition, staff will be recommending a condition that the applicant dedicate the necessary amount of land needed for a 66' wide right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage. Stormwater Management: On the applicant's Site Grading and Erosion Control and Sensitive Areas Plan, stormwater management for the eastern two properties (intended to be developed as one property) is shown as provided via three separate on-site detention basins. One smaller basin is shown in the northeast section of the subject properties, while the other two basins would be situated in the southern 1/4 of the subject properties, closer to the southern property boundary. Stormwater calculations will be reviewed more thoroughly once the properties are replatted to conform to the proposed zoning boundary lines. Infrastructure Fees: In addition to the previously described roadway improvements, the developer will be required to pay a water main extension fee of $503.57 per acre before public improvements are constructed. The subject properties will not be required to pay sanitary sewer tap -on fees. NEXT STEPS: After recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission the following will occur: • City Council will need to set a public hearing for both the annexation and rezoning. • Prior to the public hearing, utility companies and non -consenting parties will be sent the annexation application via certified mail. • City Council will consider the comprehensive plan amendment (CPA21-0002), annexation (ANN21-0003), and rezoning (REZ21-0006). • The application for annexation will be sent to the State Development Board for consideration and approval. 13 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ANN21-0003, a voluntary annexation of approximately 70.39 acres of property located south of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road. Staff also recommends approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: a. Plat all the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries; b. Submit a landscape plan, which shall be approved by the City Forester, to ensure that, when developed, the subject property is designed in a manner that emphasizes green components within its location along an arterial and as an entryway into the City. c. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of the proposed access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. 2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy on the property fronting Slothower Road: a. Installation of landscaping to the S3 standard, as detailed in section 14 -5F -6C of City Code, along the subject property's Slothower Road frontage. If said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy; and b. Improvement of Slothower Road to the southern end of the proposed access off Slothower Road. 3. At the time the final plat is approved, Owner shall dedicate additional right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in an amount and location approved by the City Engineer. 4. Parking, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall either not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the front yard right-of-way line or shall be screened to the S3 standard along the IWV Road frontage. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Fringe Area Map 4. Annexation Exhibit 5. Rezoning Exhibit 6. Site Grading and Erosion Control Plan and Sensitive Areas Plan 7. Wetland Delineation Report 8. Applicant Statement (July 8, 2021) 9. Annexation Legal Description 10. Rezoning Legal Description 11. Good Neighbor Meeting Summary 12. CI -1 Zone Permitted Uses Summary 13. Correspondence • St+10••••-•-------, Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #1 A PORTION OF THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence SO0°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet; Thence N00°00'59"E, 1307.41 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 300.04 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #1 contains 9.00 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #2 A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet, to the Point of Beginning; Thence continuing S88°45'34"W, along said North Line, 414.99 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S00°06'26"E, along the West Line of said Kauble's Subdivision, 3.41 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31"W, along said South Line, 1551.41 feet; Thence N13°37'32"W, 53.10 feet; Thence N04°19'09"E, 213.22 feet; Thence N22°47'41"E, 655.46 feet; Thence N33°02'35"E, 438.62 feet; Thence N00°53'27"W, 86.39 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 1471.32 feet; Thence S00°00'59"W, 1307.41 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #2 contains 53.36 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #3 A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence N89°06'50"E, along the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 862.10 feet; Thence S00°53'27"E, 86.39 feet; Thence S33°02'35"W, 438.62 feet; Thence S22°47'41 "W, 655.46 feet; Thence SO4°19'09"W, 213.22 feet; Thence S13°37'32"E, 53.10 feet, to a Point on the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31 "W, along said South Line, 370.12 feet, to the Southwest Corner of the North One- Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N00°08'52"E, along the West Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1315.30 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #3 contains 17.03 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. � I POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL NO. 3 0 NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 13—T79N—R7W OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN A o EM z ft FAVS MEM AMMON SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH ONE—HALF OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 13—T79N—R7W OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN 0 ro rr) N 00°08' 52"E N89°06'50"E LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE 9 E SE 11-79-7 .\,.._.:_,.EW,PRESBYIERIANICHIIRi ST. .1ar AN cc3 SW SW 12-79-7P2 SE SW 12-79-7 SW SE 12- 9-7 SE E as - M°�°Se n 9 W S W 7-74 ve f°2?e WAui b� B Melr°se HahAve. Malrn.PA:e, 1,1/1401112 \ k GALWAY SI IB[ REZONING PARCELS mE ALBERT AND FAY'S F I E NE 14-79-7 NW NE I"9-7 \ NE NE 1'5-7 7 -_____ -GALWAY, HILLS SIIBDI �-N eb2',. SW NW 13-79-7 K AUBLE S SUBDIVISION PI SE NE 13.79.7 ID -RS - •' '' SE NW 13-.--, 5W NE 13-79-7 WILD PRAIRIE WELD P4 EWF ETES,• H#V-NrEERS RUN SII: -�_Et _ , - 1 111W=Mil� M. WILC)'PRAIRIE:ESTA,IE' _-COUNTRY 4\w #6\ NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13-T79N-R7W REZONING PARCEL NO. 3 ro z 0 1- U Lu (i) LL 0 w 0 z w 0 LL J 2 I w 111 0 (COUNTY "A" TO ID -C ) 370.12' S89°03'31 "W LEGEND AND NOTES — CONGRESSIONAL CORNER, FOUND — PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES — CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES — RIGHT—OF—WAY LINES — CENTER LINES — EXISTING COOPERATIVE LIMITS — LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED — EXISTING EASEMENT LINES, PURPOSE NOTED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS `\/ AD AD 17.03 AC N N (c,ctY Ao r1, N1317'32"W S13°37'32"E N89°06'50"E N00'53'27"W S00'53'27"E 86.39' REZONING EXHIBIT PORTIONS OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA PLAT PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 ori 'MAD SW o F46 1471.32' EXISTING COOPERATIVE LIMITS REZONING PARCEL NO. 2 (COUNTY "A" TO CI -1 ) 53.36 AC O 0,6 POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL NO. 2 S00°06'26"E 3.41' SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13-T79N-R7W 1551.41' S89°03'31 "W 0 ro N00°00'59"E S00°00'59"W 414.99' S88°45'34"W S89°06'50"W N89°06'50"E 300.04' 300.00' • O Z J W • UU Q oo (,=,)) V Q Z Z 0 N W KZ MLEIS SUBDTAS N ACCORDANCE MTh TIE PLAT 1 HLREOE RECORDED IN PLAT if,OGK 20 AT PAGE 47 OP TI1E RECORDS OF 1114 JOHNSON GCUN1 R4GORPLR22, OFFICE 300.07 S88'45' 34"W OWNER/APPLICANT: IWV HOLDINGS LLC 2916 HIGHWAY 1 NE IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 0 20 50 100 150 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1"=200' POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL NO. 1 NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 13—T79N—R7W OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN 13-T79N-R7W z 0 1- � U "co v) Lt) LL 0 ow 0 w N 0 z w w 0 w J I w Z 0 1 LC) Lo •Z low r7 = I w 0 EAST LINE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH ONE—HALF OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 13—T79N—R7W OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN M M CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revision 08-24-21 REVISED ZONING BOUNDARIES -JDM REZONING EXHIBIT PORTIONS OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date: Designed by: Drawn by: Ghecked by: GDM KJ B 07-07-2021 RLW Project No: IOWA CITY 10355-010 Field Book No: Scale: Sheet No: 1"=200' 1 oF: 1 ST.ANDREW+PRE BV.1ERLl111CHURr U 6 SE 11-79-7 SW SW 12-79-7 SE SW 12-79-7 SW SE 12.-9-7 A2 SE E a9 �0.aa4ve — _ t97ie SWSW 7-7 VJAL11I a Melrose Aver 'hig�w Melr_-Ave '. . IF4fi. aye \\ -ALBERT AND FAV'S FIRST ADDITION PROJECT P,fAM12 GAL\WA\YHRLSSN NE 14-79-7 LOCATION NW - NW NE 13-711-7 NE NE l 1 79 7 GALW AIY HIe LS 5U �� N1i' raa � \ hL KAUBLE S 5UBDNISION Pi 1` 11-NS SE NE 13-794 SW NW 1879.7 SW NW 13-79-7 SE NW -t - SW NE 13-79-7 WILD PFWIRIE WIl➢ F'Rl IRIE�ESTA TES. PRF C:6UNTRY 0.UB.ESTATES SECOND�ADDITION - HUNTERS RIIN SVB WILD PFlAIR�,E5TA1IEt LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE IWV ROAD SW / F46SLOTHOWER ROAD HURT ROAD SWALBERT ANDFAY'S FIRSTADDITIONKAUBLE'SSUBDIVISIONNW 1 4 - N E 1 4SECTION 13-T79N-R7WSW 14 - NE14SECTION 13-T79N-R7WSE 14 - NW14SECTION 13-T79N-R7WNE 1 4 - NW 14SECTION 13-T79N-R7WNW 14 - NW 1 4SECTION 13-T79N-R7WNE 14 - NE 14SECTION 14-T79N-R7WSE 14 - NE 14SECTION 14-T79N-R7WSW 14 - NW 14SECTION 13-T79N-R7WSE 14 - SE 14SECTION 11-T79N-R7WSW 14 - SW 14SECTION 12-T79N-R7WSE 14 - SW 14SEC. 12-T79N-R7WSW 14 - SE 14SECTION 12-T79N-R7WPREPARED BY:MMS CONSULTANTS INC.1917 S. GILBERT STREETIOWA CITY, IA 52240OWNER/APPLICANT:NOT TO SCALELOCATION MAPPROJECTLOCATION(319) 351-8282LAND PLANNERSLAND SURVEYORSCIVIL ENGINEERSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSIOWA CITY, IOWA 52240MMS CONSULTANTS, INC.ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTSwww.mmsconsultants.net1917 S. GILBERT ST.PER CITY COMMENTS -JDM08-06-2107/08/21JDMFIELDBOOKTAVJDM10355-001162.36 ACPART OF THENW14-NW14 ANDTHE NE14-NW14OF SEC. 13,T79N, R7WJOHNSON COUNTY,IOWAREVISED BOUNDARY -JDM08-24-21SENSITIVE AREAS OVERALL MAP 21"=100'GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET1"=100'010255075100SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SENSITIVE AREASPART OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 AND NE1/4-NW1/4, SEC. 13,T79N,R7WJOHNSON COUNTY, IOWAIWV HOLDINGS LLC2916 HIGHWAY 1 NEIOWA CITY IA 52240 \ 11/1 / ///- N__ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / N - / / / / / / N / / / / / ` / N / / / / / / / / / / N - / / / N00°53'27"W _ — — ' 86.34' 1 / N \ - - N \ \ -13- \ T O,H - , -- ,crM E j / j / - - v N 1 I / / / // /I \ N / '11 / - / \ / 1 / / / // / / - - I / /1 1 / --> \ / / 1 ✓ N - / / vII -, AL�RTLINla n\� II A \ V / 1 FZ 11 IS F11 ROT /I 11- 1 -nn j�j� / j /I / I AQCD 11 JOJ 11- - / / \II1------ // 1,„ 11 - 1 1 / 1111 / 1"\II _ / p, \ / II II N / \ 11111 1 111 1 / II / 1j11 / 11„1 11, / 1111/ 1111 N - - 111 - _ _ I / / L__/ J I 1 \ - _ I \ \ 1111 11 1111 111 11 III 111 II 1 II/ II I / I / I/ I / / / /- / / / / / / / / / / — I / 1 / / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / RAV 120P.4 Si►W / F46 \ \ I 454.63' \ / / \ / / / / // / / / / - SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SENSITIVE AREAS D4 v v v \ I \ \ 1 5- \ / N PART OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 AND NE1/4-NW1/4, SEC. 13,T79N,R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA :///// / // // /I /I/ (//( // // N / / / II 1 / I -�— JJ_-`-� ��J� v v 1 / l / I I 1 1 1_/�I A / / -- -�- -- -- / -- -� - -- -i--r -�\� v / \ \ l\ \ \ / / / / / / V / _ -- N89°06'50"E. _ _ _ - _ _ - OF#E = TaI�E _ _ - OH� _ DHE =If) 0 O iE ,J- 6 _ SHE _ =i -- / I 1 / / — - V // // I _/I I / !� / /j \ \ \ I / / `/� J� / / -/ N 1 / / / / - - - I 1 / / / // / / / / / / / / / I / r N / / • / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 01 co / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 948.13' _ N _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - — — _ @H€ — = _ --0-HE = = -_ 01-F - - - _ _ _ �ki� _ = — -OHS _ _ = =C�HE _ \ �� -01--IE _ =C�7�E\c\�\ \ OHE - \ N- / 1 ----� -- I - --- -- - I --- - -–t - 1316.72' —_ — - - _ - / / - _ v - \ / \ \ — — — — — "N89°06'50"E I / / N / - N 1 1 N N N * ' ' : , / , - , . . . N / / / / / / I , I i 2 : : : --_-1- -- 11 "if— 1-- I: ill - 1-- - 1 I -1- - - . . , ,.. - - I- - - - - - - - - - - — — \ N / / + + + +4+iter • • +- N N N N / N I N __ '1,,.''N -2: N / / III II II II / / / yit 10 III / 3.41' N WEN ROAD Lri 0 kl fr • 0 PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 OWNER/APPLICANT: IWV HOLDINGS LLC 2916 HIGHWAY 1 NE IOWA CITY IA 52240 0 10 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SENSITIVE AREAS LEGEND STEEP SLOPES (18%-25%) rrrE,// STREAM CORRIDORS WATERCOURSE (NOT REGULATED BY IC) 50' STREAM CORRIDOR BUFFER WOODED WETLANDS (1.13 ACRES) EMERGENT WETLANDS (1.46 ACRES) WETLAND BUFFER (SIZE AS SHOWN) SENSITIVE WOODLAND (2.02 ACRES) 50' WOODLAND BUFFER NOTE: NO PROPOSED IMPACTS TO THE SENSITIVE AREAS LISTED ABOVE GROVE OF TREES (0.34 ACRES) STANDARD LEGEND AND NOTES -EXIST- AV (R) 22-1 -PROP- 41, PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES CENTER LINES EXISTING CENTER LINES LOT LINES, INTERNAL LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES - BENCHMARK - RECORDED DIMENSIONS - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER POWER POLE POWER POLE W/DROP POWER POLE W/TRANS — POWER POLE W/LIGHT — GUY POLE - LIGHT POLE - SANITARY MANHOLE - FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE DRAINAGE MANHOLE - CURB INLET FENCE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER WATER LINES ELECTRICAL LINES TELEPHONE LINES GAS LINES - CONTOUR LINES (2' INTERVAL) APPROXIMATE BASIN AREA (FULL CAPICITY) - PROPOSED GROUND - EXISTING TREE LINE - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE & SHRUB - EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES & SHRUBS THE ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED FACILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. 62.36 AC CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revision 08-06-21 PER CITY COMMENTS -JDM 08-24-21 REVISED BOUNDARY -JDM SENSITIVE AREAS STREAM CORRIDORS AND WETLANDS PART OF THE N\kil-NWi AND THE NEi-NWi OF SEC. 13, T79N, R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Designed by: Drawn by: JDM TAV Checked by: JDM Project No: 10355-001 07/08/21 Field Book No: FIELDBOOK Sheet No: 1 "=100' 3 al ST. ANDREW+PRESBY,TERWNit HV Rr \ s E SE 11-79-7 SW SW 12-79-7 SE SW 12-79-7 SW SE 1275-7 A2 N SE E a9 �0.aa4ve \ ® � t97ie SW SW 7-7 ,.N AM Nb tr ai Ifetrase Ave_ Mel rose Ave— � I F4fi wa \ ALBERT AND FAY'S FIRST ADDITION L.0 P121M12 J` 4 sl GALWAY HILLS SUBC E NE 14-T9-7 NW NW 11_79-7 NE NW 13-79-7 NW NE 11-79-7 C------- NE NE 17- 7. 7 \� GALWAYH`LLS SUBBDI' 1,44;1',1,X15,, , she - 1` KAUBLE'S SUBDIVISION x5 PI a I l -RS SE NE 13-79-7 SW NW 18-79.71 E NE 14-70-7 SW NW 13-79-7 SE NW i9 -T9=7— SW NE 13-79-7 I WILD PRAIRIE we I WILD PRI 1 IE -ESTATES. PAF --. --- - -- ..r e.... .. COUNTRY)0.UB.ESTATES SECOND;ADDITION,. I ILt NTR1N 1 1�1 I/�. - 1 / J -. HUNTERS RUN SUB VE WILD PRAIRTE,E5TAIIEt LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE :///// / // // /I /I/ (//( // // N / / / II 1 / I -�— JJ_-`-� ��J� v v 1 / l / I I 1 1 1_/�I A / / -- -�- -- -- / -- -� - -- -i--r -�\� v / \ \ l\ \ \ / / / / / / V / _ -- N89°06'50"E. _ _ _ - _ _ - OF#E = TaI�E _ _ - OH� _ DHE =If) 0 O iE ,J- 6 _ SHE _ =i -- / I 1 / / — - V // // I _/I I / !� / /j \ \ \ I / / `/� J� / / -/ N 1 / / / / - - - I 1 / / / // / / / / / / / / / I / r N / / • / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 01 co / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 948.13' _ N _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - — — _ @H€ — = _ --0-HE = = -_ 01-F - - - _ _ _ �ki� _ = — -OHS _ _ = =C�HE _ \ �� -01--IE _ =C�7�E\c\�\ \ OHE - \ N- / 1 ----� -- I - --- -- - I --- - -–t - 1316.72' —_ — - - _ - / / - _ v - \ / \ \ — — — — — "N89°06'50"E I / / N / - N 1 1 N N N * ' ' : , / , - , . . . N / / / / / / I , I i 2 : : : --_-1- -- 11 "if— 1-- I: ill - 1-- - 1 I -1- - - . . , ,.. - - I- - - - - - - - - - - — — \ N / / + + + +4+iter • • +- N N N N / N I N __ '1,,.''N -2: N / / III II II II / / / yit 10 III / 3.41' N WEN ROAD Lri 0 kl fr • 0 PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 OWNER/APPLICANT: IWV HOLDINGS LLC 2916 HIGHWAY 1 NE IOWA CITY IA 52240 0 10 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SENSITIVE AREAS LEGEND STEEP SLOPES (18%-25%) rrrE,// STREAM CORRIDORS WATERCOURSE (NOT REGULATED BY IC) 50' STREAM CORRIDOR BUFFER WOODED WETLANDS (1.13 ACRES) EMERGENT WETLANDS (1.46 ACRES) WETLAND BUFFER (SIZE AS SHOWN) SENSITIVE WOODLAND (2.02 ACRES) 50' WOODLAND BUFFER NOTE: NO PROPOSED IMPACTS TO THE SENSITIVE AREAS LISTED ABOVE GROVE OF TREES (0.34 ACRES) STANDARD LEGEND AND NOTES -EXIST- AV (R) 22-1 -PROP- 41, PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES CENTER LINES EXISTING CENTER LINES LOT LINES, INTERNAL LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES - BENCHMARK - RECORDED DIMENSIONS - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER POWER POLE POWER POLE W/DROP POWER POLE W/TRANS — POWER POLE W/LIGHT — GUY POLE - LIGHT POLE - SANITARY MANHOLE - FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE DRAINAGE MANHOLE - CURB INLET FENCE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER WATER LINES ELECTRICAL LINES TELEPHONE LINES GAS LINES - CONTOUR LINES (2' INTERVAL) APPROXIMATE BASIN AREA (FULL CAPICITY) - PROPOSED GROUND - EXISTING TREE LINE - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE & SHRUB - EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES & SHRUBS THE ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED FACILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. 62.36 AC CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revision 08-06-21 PER CITY COMMENTS -JDM 08-24-21 REVISED BOUNDARY -JDM SENSITIVE AREAS STREAM CORRIDORS AND WETLANDS PART OF THE N\kil-NWi AND THE NEi-NWi OF SEC. 13, T79N, R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Designed by: Drawn by: JDM TAV Checked by: JDM Project No: 10355-001 07/08/21 Field Book No: FIELDBOOK Sheet No: 1 "=100' 3 /// // ) \ /// ,/ 1 / / /'/ i / ;l I / / //'/ / / — ` / ( N —/ / / / / - , / U I / / / / / II / 1 IN I N I 1 \ / .7 N - \ \/ / / / / / / / — / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /- / / / / / / / / / /' \ -- - / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / - --_ __—_- N00°53'27"W = J = I =_' / 86.34' I 1 I 1 I I I / I ItsM N - - N / / \ / / / -11-\ SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SENSITIVE AREAS D4 N \ \ v v \ \ I \ \ I / / - - / / / / / / / 1 / / / / I ' / \ / / / / c - - — - - / / / / N / - - MVM ROW -RW a tF N89°06'50"E. 454.63' / / / PART OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 AND NE1/4-NW1/4, SEC. 13,T79N,R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA \ \ \ Vv ��E 47 �� / I I \ V 1 o N \ I _ V A ��% ( Iwlo / / / / / / V A A \ -fit 2- IJ �J \ >. 0 11 / I / 1 / 1 \ \ \ 1 N 1 1 I I l l I N \ 1 / l / / I 1 I \ / 1 / / / / I I / I I I I- - / / / - / 0)-1E- o- Ei - 011 O'Hg _ - —QN€_ -==_DHE/ OH�7 6 _ - SHE =OKE N // ' // /I / 1 \ ' / - 7 j/ / / / / - I I 1 / �p� / /iN 7V l I I I I / / / ----' I I 1 I \ I I I \ \ / - ALB -Ent Oa / I1 / / I II \ I\ \ I \ / - - - - - / I Vol 1ABEMOK \I\ \i Ir/n1111S Fd ROT, IIS -- - / / II_ - - / 7. IVIII ' / / / I / //� / A / / / / / /I 1 A II I 1 I / / �11j / / 1 1 1 I I / 11 N/ ( / / / / / I I / 11 II \ II 1 N \ / N / / / / / /' ' / / / / / / / 11111 I I A / / / ��' / / / / III/ / / / / / / / / I \ / / / / / / - - / / / / / / I / A — _ / / / / / / / / __ / / / / / 1j11,1 / I ' / / / 7 / / /N / N. ' 111 / I / / / / / / - - - / / 11/v/ / III \ / / // / / / / / - - �11 / / / / / / 7 / / / / / / / / / WI -- - - -- / / / / / / //N ' //// / 111 // / / / / i - �' / 1111 N N / ' / ' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / z 7 / I I l III - - - _ _ / / / N / / / 7 % --/ I I I I / / v / / / I / I / ' / / / / I / 11/ -- - - -- / / - V N / / / / / - I 1 / / II 7' '/ I 1 I / /' \ N / / / / / / / / / ' / / , - - / . 7 \ \ \ / A / r : / 7 _ ▪ , / / / N N N eilliff) 4400 I 1 / Imildb 4011 70) CO I // 111/1: 44002 N. 77 I I \ 7 / D .9 , /// ./ // // / / .. . _____ ............... ,...... , \ / / ///// / . ... _____ \ • , ...... ,_/ I/ I, /. // , \ N / //////////////////// ,_ .. ,,, ........_ ....,..__. / / ........, // ./ . ...... /1 1 1 II / / / / / / gt1 41;111111. jr ' . ° L.11• -1- r-211411;ijit*/ - wil 0 Lit: : / / / / N I 1 1 \ N - -.... is-,.‘liON-S , _ / >, _ - e _ _ __,--. - .- / / „ - . , . , 7, ,,, , , ,-, _,,,_\/. , , ,/ // , , , , , , , , \ N „ , , „ _ --sec -% , , ,--- 1 , -, , ,- , 44, \___ 4 , _ ., , ...., i) . . ../ , , , . .. , ,, I , , , , , „. , . , , , , , , , , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , . . , , , ,, , , _ , , , , _ . . . .„.. „ .4 N r / / ( _ / / / I I \ --- - / TaF�E _� _ _ OSE — 1 -DHE / — — —N / / - — \ N / / / / / / / / / / N _ N N.N. N N / I N\ / I I N I 1 1 \ \\\ \ \ \ / I \ V I A / I II I / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / '7 7/ / / // ' -- - / / N N \ / N N / / N N N N - i -- ----_ - - -N89°06'50"E I _ ski E _ = - - OH- z _ _ =0Hf \ � OH E 1316.72' I / i J / 1 \ / / /I "1/ 1/ / /// / / // // / / , ////1 / / / / I I / / / 1I/111 / I I1III I I JII,I I I / 1__ - I -/�1 - I I / J I / I / / I I I \ _ _ _ _ - - / / 1 I I 111111 / / 1I I I / - / 1 /N \ \ l\ - / / / 11/ / I I ,/ / // / / ) / sez / _IN / / / / / / N N OHE -77 N /--OHE _ 7-7 1/ N 10 I LL / N N N / - N N N - - - / N N / v 7 / / S88•45' 34"W N / zjj N / ▪ N N N N SOO*06'26"E NN XAUBLep I HI .2, WEN ROAD 0 11 fr • 0 PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 OWNER/APPLICANT: IWV HOLDINGS LLC 2916 HIGHWAY 1 NE IOWA CITY IA 52240 0 10 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SENSITIVE AREAS LEGEND STEEP SLOPES (18%-25%) rrrE,// STREAM CORRIDORS WATERCOURSE (NOT REGULATED BY IC) 50' STREAM CORRIDOR BUFFER WOODED WETLANDS (1.13 ACRES) EMERGENT WETLANDS (1.46 ACRES) WETLAND BUFFER (SIZE AS SHOWN) SENSITIVE WOODLAND (2.02 ACRES) 50' WOODLAND BUFFER NOTE: NO PROPOSED IMPACTS TO THE SENSITIVE AREAS LISTED ABOVE GROVE OF TREES (0.34 ACRES) STANDARD LEGEND AND NOTES -EXIST- AV (R) 22-1 -PROP- PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES CENTER LINES EXISTING CENTER LINES LOT LINES, INTERNAL LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES - BENCHMARK - RECORDED DIMENSIONS - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER POWER POLE POWER POLE W/DROP POWER POLE w/TRANS - POWER POLE W/LIGHT - GUY POLE - LIGHT POLE - SANITARY MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE DRAINAGE MANHOLE CURB INLET FENCE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER WATER LINES ELECTRICAL LINES TELEPHONE LINES GAS LINES CONTOUR LINES (2' INTERVAL) APPROXIMATE BASIN AREA (FULL CAPICITY) - PROPOSED GROUND - EXISTING TREE LINE - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE & SHRUB - EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES & SHRUBS THE ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED FACILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. 62.36 AC CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Date Revision 08-06-21 PER CITY COMMENTS -JDM 08-24-21 REVISED BOUNDARY -JDM SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLANDS AND GROVES, SLOPES PART OF THE N\kil-NWi AND THE NEi-NWi OF SEC. 13, T79N, R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. 07/08/21 Designed by: JDM Field Book No: FIELDBOOK Drawn by: TAV Checked by: JDM Project No: 10355-001 Sheet No: 4 al STEPAN HV Rr \ ESE 11-79-7 SW SW 12-79-7_ SE SW 12-79-7 SW SE 12.79-7 f4 2 SE E‘2. Afe r0.as ` � SW SW 7-7 4Ve t97iaryb WAIN a Metro. Ave_ 'h'4"4 Mel rose Ave— I, -"1I F4fi mim, I waG y� \\ ALBERT AND FAY'S FIRST ADDITION P151812 AY HILLS SUBS \\ `: ENE 14-T9-7 NW NW 1'3-79-7 NE NW 13-79-7 NW NE 11-79-7 1—� NE NE 17-7. 7 . GALWAY HILLSaSUBDI N4. 1a1, _ she - 1` KAUBLE'S SUBDIVISION x5 a 15-95 SE NE 13-79-7 SW NW 18-79.91 E NE 14-70-7 SW NW 13-79-7 SE NW 19-719.7— SW NE 13-79-7 I WILD PRAIRIE We I WI PRAIRIE:ESTATES. PAF `.-�HUUNTERS ..... _... -- -- ..,- e.... -. r��1?'} { j7 / / COUNTRY)0.UB.E5T0.TES SECOND�ADDITION,. I ILt —..,.. 1 1�1 I/�. - D 1 / J -. RUN SUB WILD PRAIR�,E5TAIIEt LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE / / / - / 0)-1E- o- Ei - 011 O'Hg _ - —QN€_ -==_DHE/ OH�7 6 _ - SHE =OKE N // ' // /I / 1 \ ' / - 7 j/ / / / / - I I 1 / �p� / /iN 7V l I I I I / / / ----' I I 1 I \ I I I \ \ / - ALB -Ent Oa / I1 / / I II \ I\ \ I \ / - - - - - / I Vol 1ABEMOK \I\ \i Ir/n1111S Fd ROT, IIS -- - / / II_ - - / 7. IVIII ' / / / I / //� / A / / / / / /I 1 A II I 1 I / / �11j / / 1 1 1 I I / 11 N/ ( / / / / / I I / 11 II \ II 1 N \ / N / / / / / /' ' / / / / / / / 11111 I I A / / / ��' / / / / III/ / / / / / / / / I \ / / / / / / - - / / / / / / I / A — _ / / / / / / / / __ / / / / / 1j11,1 / I ' / / / 7 / / /N / N. ' 111 / I / / / / / / - - - / / 11/v/ / III \ / / // / / / / / - - �11 / / / / / / 7 / / / / / / / / / WI -- - - -- / / / / / / //N ' //// / 111 // / / / / i - �' / 1111 N N / ' / ' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / z 7 / I I l III - - - _ _ / / / N / / / 7 % --/ I I I I / / v / / / I / I / ' / / / / I / 11/ -- - - -- / / - V N / / / / / - I 1 / / II 7' '/ I 1 I / /' \ N / / / / / / / / / ' / / , - - / . 7 \ \ \ / A / r : / 7 _ ▪ , / / / N N N eilliff) 4400 I 1 / Imildb 4011 70) CO I // 111/1: 44002 N. 77 I I \ 7 / D .9 , /// ./ // // / / .. . _____ ............... ,...... , \ / / ///// / . ... _____ \ • , ...... ,_/ I/ I, /. // , \ N / //////////////////// ,_ .. ,,, ........_ ....,..__. / / ........, // ./ . ...... /1 1 1 II / / / / / / gt1 41;111111. jr ' . ° L.11• -1- r-211411;ijit*/ - wil 0 Lit: : / / / / N I 1 1 \ N - -.... is-,.‘liON-S , _ / >, _ - e _ _ __,--. - .- / / „ - . , . , 7, ,,, , , ,-, _,,,_\/. , , ,/ // , , , , , , , , \ N „ , , „ _ --sec -% , , ,--- 1 , -, , ,- , 44, \___ 4 , _ ., , ...., i) . . ../ , , , . .. , ,, I , , , , , „. , . , , , , , , , , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , . . , , , ,, , , _ , , , , _ . . . .„.. „ .4 N r / / ( _ / / / I I \ --- - / TaF�E _� _ _ OSE — 1 -DHE / — — —N / / - — \ N / / / / / / / / / / N _ N N.N. N N / I N\ / I I N I 1 1 \ \\\ \ \ \ / I \ V I A / I II I / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / '7 7/ / / // ' -- - / / N N \ / N N / / N N N N - i -- ----_ - - -N89°06'50"E I _ ski E _ = - - OH- z _ _ =0Hf \ � OH E 1316.72' I / i J / 1 \ / / /I "1/ 1/ / /// / / // // / / , ////1 / / / / I I / / / 1I/111 / I I1III I I JII,I I I / 1__ - I -/�1 - I I / J I / I / / I I I \ _ _ _ _ - - / / 1 I I 111111 / / 1I I I / - / 1 /N \ \ l\ - / / / 11/ / I I ,/ / // / / ) / sez / _IN / / / / / / N N OHE -77 N /--OHE _ 7-7 1/ N 10 I LL / N N N / - N N N - - - / N N / v 7 / / S88•45' 34"W N / zjj N / ▪ N N N N SOO*06'26"E NN XAUBLep I HI .2, WEN ROAD 0 11 fr • 0 PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 OWNER/APPLICANT: IWV HOLDINGS LLC 2916 HIGHWAY 1 NE IOWA CITY IA 52240 0 10 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SENSITIVE AREAS LEGEND STEEP SLOPES (18%-25%) rrrE,// STREAM CORRIDORS WATERCOURSE (NOT REGULATED BY IC) 50' STREAM CORRIDOR BUFFER WOODED WETLANDS (1.13 ACRES) EMERGENT WETLANDS (1.46 ACRES) WETLAND BUFFER (SIZE AS SHOWN) SENSITIVE WOODLAND (2.02 ACRES) 50' WOODLAND BUFFER NOTE: NO PROPOSED IMPACTS TO THE SENSITIVE AREAS LISTED ABOVE GROVE OF TREES (0.34 ACRES) STANDARD LEGEND AND NOTES -EXIST- AV (R) 22-1 -PROP- PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES CENTER LINES EXISTING CENTER LINES LOT LINES, INTERNAL LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES - BENCHMARK - RECORDED DIMENSIONS - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER POWER POLE POWER POLE W/DROP POWER POLE w/TRANS - POWER POLE W/LIGHT - GUY POLE - LIGHT POLE - SANITARY MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE DRAINAGE MANHOLE CURB INLET FENCE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER WATER LINES ELECTRICAL LINES TELEPHONE LINES GAS LINES CONTOUR LINES (2' INTERVAL) APPROXIMATE BASIN AREA (FULL CAPICITY) - PROPOSED GROUND - EXISTING TREE LINE - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE & SHRUB - EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES & SHRUBS THE ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED FACILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. 62.36 AC CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Date Revision 08-06-21 PER CITY COMMENTS -JDM 08-24-21 REVISED BOUNDARY -JDM SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLANDS AND GROVES, SLOPES PART OF THE N\kil-NWi AND THE NEi-NWi OF SEC. 13, T79N, R7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. 07/08/21 Designed by: JDM Field Book No: FIELDBOOK Drawn by: TAV Checked by: JDM Project No: 10355-001 Sheet No: 4 M M IWV HOLDINGS Prepared For: IWV Holdings US Army Corps of Engineers Prepared By: Lee Swank 1.swank@mmsconsultants.net MMS Project No. 10355-010 08/25/2021 NW1/4, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, SEC.13-T79N-RW7W JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA "WATERS of the U.S." DELINEATION REPORT & PERMIT APPLICATION MMS Consultants, Inc. Experts in Planning and Development Since 1975 1917 S Gilbert Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.351.8282 mmsconsultants.net m m s@m m sco nsu lta n ts.net Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Land Planners Landscape Architects Environmental Specialists IWV HOLDINGS JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT SUMMARY MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PROJECT # 10355-010 AUGUST 5TH, 2021 MMS Consultants, Inc. was contracted by IWV Holdings to delineate potential "Waters of the United States" on an approximately 75 -acre parcel. The study area is located in the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 and the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 13, T79N, R7W, in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa. The Site Location and Vicinity Map, in Appendix A, show the approximate location of the site. According to aerial photos, it appears the site has been in row crop production for at least the last century and was planted with soybeans at the time of the wetland delineation in May of 2021. A treed fence row, and two buffered streams are also present on the property. Preliminary data research of the site revealed that aerial indicators of surface water, two streams, and hydric soils were present within the study area, and that further research and field data needed to be collected. An on-site investigation was conducted on May 1 1th to identify areas of potential "waters of the United States". Assessments determined that 1.45 acres of emergent wetland, 1.12 acres of wooded wetland, and 1,752 linear feet of stream channel are present within the study area. It appears the boundaries of the wetlands extend beyond the limits of the study area. Only wetlands that fall within the study area were delineated. As no impacts to wetlands are proposed, a copy of this report has not been sent to the Army Corps of Engineers. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH Preliminary data research included: • The USGS 24K Topographical Map • The USDA/NRCS Web Soil Survey Hydric Soils Map • The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map • FEMA's National Flood Hazard Map • and Aerial photos from the 1990s, and between 2004 and 2017 All of the above-mentioned figures are presented in the Appendix, respectively. METHODOLOGY A site visit was conducted on May 11th, 2021, to document soils, vegetation, and hydrology. Field verification followed the methodology outlined in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (January 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version Two). SITE DESCRIPTION Soils The soils throughout the project area are shown on the Hydric Soils Map from the Web Soil Survey in Appendix A. The mapped soils are listed in the below table along with their hydric rating and which sample points were taken within each soil type: IWV HOLDINGS JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Table 1: Hydric Soils MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PROJECT # 10355-010 AUGUST 5TH, 2021 Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Hydric Rating Sample Point Taken within Soil Type 11B Colo -Ely Complex, 0-5% slopes 55B 1-5 75 Givin silt loam, 0-2% slopes 5 1.11 76B Ladoga silt loam, 2-5% slopes 0 1.23 76C2 Ladoga silt loam, 5-9% slopes 5 Mar 76D2 Ladoga silt loam, 9-14% slopes 0 2.62 80B Clinton silt loam, 2-5% slopes 0 3.7 80C2 Clinton silt loam, 5-9% slopes 5 May 80D2 Clinton silt loam, 9-14% slopes 0 4.99 M163E2 Fayette silt loam, 14-18% slopes, eroded 0 5.14 M163E3 Fayette silt clay loam, 14-18% slopes, severely eroded 0 TOTAL According to the hydric soils map, approximately 15% of the study area is comprised of soils that are 55% hydric, approximately 26% of the study area is mapped as 5% hydric, with the residual 19% of study area mapped as 0% hydric. Hydric soils were observed at sample points 1, 4, and 5. Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11), Depleted Matrix (F3), Redox Dark Surface (F6), Depleted Dark Surface (F7), and Redox Depressions (F8) were the hydric soil indicators that were observed. Hydrology The below WETS table was obtained from AgACIS. Data utilized in the table was obtained from the weather station at the Iowa City Municipal Airport approximately four miles from the project site. Precipitation totals from Jan -June 2021 were considered below average. The month prior to the site visit was considered a normal month, and the month of the June site visit was considered dry. It rained 1.2 inches two days prior to the site visit. Table 2: WETS table WETS Station: Iowa City Municipal Airport Requested years: 1971- 2021 Month 2021 Monthly Precip Totals Avg Precip 30% chance precip less than 30% chance precip more than Normal/Wet/Dry Jan 1.48 0.91 0.46 1.11 Wet Feb 0.7 1.23 0.71 1.5 Dry Mar 2.63 2.15 1.26 2.62 Wet Apr 2.37 3.7 2.68 4.37 Dry May 4.33 4.26 3.17 4.99 Normal Jun 2.67 5.14 3.83 6.02 Dry TOTAL 14.18 17.39 Sources of on-site hydrology were also investigated. A culvert runs under IWV Rd at the northwest corner of the site. This culvert conveys water from the surrounding uplands north of IWV, to a stream channel that runs southwest across the west 1/2 of the property. This stream channel had active water flowing during the site visit in May. This stream appears to be fed by groundwater and surface runoff from the IWV HOLDINGS JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PROJECT # 10355-010 AUGUST 5TH, 2021 surrounding uplands. A second stream channel was identified along the center of the southern boundary line for the study area. This stream had flowing water during the site visit. Standing water was identified within the wetland area upslope of the stream. This stream appears to be fed by groundwater and surface runoff from the surrounding uplands. The presence of hydrology indicators were investigated during the wetland delineation. Sample points 1, 4 and 5 all classified as having wetland hydrology. Sample points 2 and 3 did not meet sufficient indicators to classify as exhibiting wetland hydrology. The following primary hydrology indicators were observed: High Water Table (A2) and Saturation (A3). The secondary indicators of Drainage Patters (B10), Geomorphic Position (D2), and the FAC -Neutral Test (D5) were also observed. Vegetation The study area consists of 3 separate Vegetative Areas (VA): • The row -crop farm fields, which comprise the majority of project area, are classified as Vegetative Area 1 (VA1) and were planted with Soybeans at the time of the site visit. • The vegetation surrounding the stream channels are classified as VA2 and dominated by Phalaris arundinacea and Acer saccharinum. • A treed fence row (VA3) is present through the center of the site. Understory vegetation is comprised primarily of Bromus inermis and dominant tree species include Acer saccharinum and Acer negundo. Summary Soils, hydrology, and vegetation were assessed throughout the project area to determine the presence of wetlands. Two areas were identified that met all three wetland criteria, which include 1.45 acres of emergent wetland and 1.12 acres of wooded wetland. Two stream channels were also identified within the study area with a total of 1,752 linear feet of intermittent stream channel. The table below provides a summary of the streams and wetlands. Table 3. Stream and Wetland Summa • Wetland A is located along the southern edge of the project area and was delineated at 1.32 acres. This wetland has 0.95 acres of emergent wetland, and 0.37 acres of wooded wetland. The wetland is associated with the Stream 1. Ground water and the stream appear to be the primary sources of hydrology for Wetland A. Vegetation of Wetland A was dominated by Phalaris arundinacea. • Wetland B is located along the west edge of the study area and was delineated at 1.25 acres. This wetland has 0.50 acres of emergent wetland and 0.75 acres of wooded wetland. Wetland B is associated with Stream 2. Groundwater and the stream appear to be the primary sources of hydrology for Wetland B. • Stream 1 flows along the southern edge of the project area and was measured at 232 linear feet. This stream has a defined bed and bank, and ordinary high-water mark. Water was observed within Emergent Wetland Wooded Wetland Intermittent Stream TOTAL Wetland A 0.95 AC 0.37 AC 1.32 Wetland B 0.50 AC 0.75 AC 1.25 Stream 1 232 LF Stream 2 1,520 LF TOTAL 1.45 1.12 1,752 2.57 • Wetland A is located along the southern edge of the project area and was delineated at 1.32 acres. This wetland has 0.95 acres of emergent wetland, and 0.37 acres of wooded wetland. The wetland is associated with the Stream 1. Ground water and the stream appear to be the primary sources of hydrology for Wetland A. Vegetation of Wetland A was dominated by Phalaris arundinacea. • Wetland B is located along the west edge of the study area and was delineated at 1.25 acres. This wetland has 0.50 acres of emergent wetland and 0.75 acres of wooded wetland. Wetland B is associated with Stream 2. Groundwater and the stream appear to be the primary sources of hydrology for Wetland B. • Stream 1 flows along the southern edge of the project area and was measured at 232 linear feet. This stream has a defined bed and bank, and ordinary high-water mark. Water was observed within IWV HOLDINGS JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT MMS CONSULTANTS INC. PROJECT # 10355-010 AUGUST 5TH, 2021 the stream channel during the site visit (less 12"). The sources of water for stream flow are ground water, and overland flow. Based on the sources of water for stream flow, water observed within the channel, and morphology of the stream channel, it was determined that Stream 1 was a intermittent stream. • Stream 2 flows through the western 1/4 of the study area and was measured at 1,520 linear feet. This stream has a defined bed and bank, and ordinary high-water mark. Water was observed within the stream channel during the site visit. The sources of water for stream flow are overland flow, channelized flow from a culvert that runs under IWV road and groundwater. Based on the sources of water for stream flow, water observed within the channel, and morphology of the stream channel, it was determined that Stream 2 is an intermittent stream. Conclusions The project area has historically been utilized for agriculture with a long history of row crop production. Approximately 90% of the land area is in crop production. The residual non -crop areas included a treed fence row, and two buffered streams. The site exhibits a mix of topography with uplands, drainage ways and lowland. Soils, hydrology, and vegetation were evaluated during the May site visit and followed the methodology outlined in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (January 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version Two). The May field visit verified the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydrology within two regions of the site. The boundaries of the wetlands were delineated using a handheld GPS and categorized as 1.12 acres of wooded wetland, and 1.45 acres of emergent wetland. Additionally, 1,752 linear feet of intermittent stream were identified within the project area. As no impacts to wetlands are proposed, a copy of this report has not been sent to the Army Corps of Engineers. Per City of Iowa City Code, a delineation of construction area limits has been provided around, and to protect, the wetland areas, as illustrated in the site grading and erosion control plan included in the appendix of this report. No grading, dredging, clearing, filling, draining, or other development activity is allowed within a regulated wetland or required buffer area, unless said activity is a use, activity or structure allowed according to subsection 14 -5I -2D of City of Iowa City Code. To protect the wetland, erosion control measures must be installed prior to any development activity occurring on the site. Appendix SITE LOCATION & VICINITY MAP USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP USDA NRCS WEBSOIL SURVEY (HYDRIC SOILS MAP) NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP FLOODPLAIN MAP Approximate Project Location HARDINTWP C7OMICCJ VICINITY MAP Kansas L•1 SW C IWV Rd SWIF46 -571 x ,_,_,/ .UNION nr P U Flrrls1 �3l01110wer San r?. V, ad Park 4- o c Phnenix Dr O�33.3 •• P1 ? EI Paso DI "sct 7acson nl L hl °O eG ass, ukcon 10 Weber - EIernentary V LOCATION MAP Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale SITE LOCATION & VICINITY MAPS MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ,,,„� , NORT ■ If1 IRA gm Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 NW114, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: Iowa Geographic Map Server https://isugisf.maps.arcgis.com IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 www.mmsconsultants.net 1W Approximate Study Location Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale USGS 24K TOPOGRAPHIC MAP MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ion Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 NW114, NW114, & NE114, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7WIOWA IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: USGS https://viewer.nationalmap.gov CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 -- ' NORT Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 www.mmsconsultants.net 41° 39'29" N 41° 39'9"N 615000 615100 615200 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Johnson County, Iowa 615300 615400 615500 615600 615700 615800 615900 76€2 80132 N 91° 3710"W x000 Gawp TiffIavg nod bQ e,5 -0o 7 as f E �a0�o 615000 615100 615200 Map Scale: 1:4,510 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. 615300 N 0 50 100 200 Meters 300 Feet 0 200 400 800 1200 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WG584 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WG584 615403 USDA Natural Resources rora Conservation Service 615500 Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 615600 615700 615800 615900 5/10/2021 Page 1 of 5 41° 39'29" N 41° 39'9"N Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Johnson County, Iowa MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons - Hydric (100%) 0 Hydric (66 to 99%) 0 Hydric (33 to 65%) 0 Hydric (1 to 32%) - Not Hydric (0%) 0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines rwr Hydric (100%) ,.wr Hydric (66 to 99%) r r Hydric (33 to 65%) r r Hydric (1 to 32%) ^00 Not Hydric (0%) r r Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points • Hydric (100%) • Hydric (66 to 99%) O Hydric (33 to 65%) O Hydric (1 to 32%) e Not Hydric (0%) o Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation 1-,-r Rails ~ I Interstate Highways peal US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Johnson County, Iowa Survey Area Data: Version 23, Jun 10, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 12, 2011—Nov 18, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources rora Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/10/2021 Page 2 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Johnson County, Iowa Hydric Rating by Map Unit USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/10/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 11B Colo -Ely complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 55 12.6 15.4% 75 Givin silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 5 2.6 3.1% 76B Ladoga silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes 0 24.5 29.9% 76C2 Ladoga silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes, eroded 5 16.8 20.6% 76D2 Ladoga silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes, eroded 0 2.2 2.7% 80B Clinton silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes 0 1.2 1.5% 80C2 Clinton silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes, eroded 5 2.0 2.5% 80D2 Clinton silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes, eroded 0 13.8 16.9% M163E2 Fayette silt loam, till plain, 14 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 0 0.7 0.9% M163E3 Fayette silty clay loam, till plain, 14 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded 0 5.3 6.4% Totals for Area of Interest 81.8 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/10/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 suougniarx U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventor 10355-010 May 10, 2021 Wetlands 0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater i Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Il Lake Other Riverine This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 91°379"W 41°39'32"N FEMA 0 250 500 Feet 1,000 1,500 2,000 Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 1:6,000 91°36'31"W 41°39'5"N Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS Q 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard zone x Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex Effective LOMRs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D - -- - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall 20.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance t� s Water Surface Elevation a — — — Coastal Transect ^-^^-513...^ Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 8/5/2021 at 11:49 AM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Appendix B 2020 & 2019 AERIAL IMAGE 2017 & 2016 AERIAL IMAGES 2015 & 2014 AERIAL IMAGES PHOTOS 1-3 PHOTOS 4 - 6 PHOTOS 7 - 9 PHOTOS 10 - 12 PHOTOS 13 - 15 PHOTOS 16 - 18 2020 ■ 2019 Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale 2020 & 2019 AERIAL IMAGE MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Nig m ,'.. /- NORT Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 NW114, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: Iowa Geographic Map Server https://isugisf.maps.arcgis.com IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 www.mmsconsultants.net • 2017 Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 2016 2017 & 2016 AERIAL IMAGE NW114, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: Iowa Geographic Map Server https://isugisf.maps.arcgis.com MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M 2015 2014 Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale 2015 & 2014 AERIAL IMAGE MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Nig m „ .. /— NORT Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 NW114, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: Iowa Geographic Map Server https://isugisf.maps.arcgis.com IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 www.mmsconsultants.net • Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTO LOCATION MAP (LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE) NW114, NW1/4, & NE1/4, NW1/4, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Map Source: Iowa Geographic Map Server https://isugisf.maps.arcgis.com MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net I M Photo 1 (left): Standing near southeast edge of property, looking west. Photo 2 (right): Standing near southeast edge of property, looking north. Photo 3 (left): Standing near southeast edge of property, looking east. Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTOS 1-3 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M Photo 4 (left): Standing within Emergent Wetland A, looking south. ki Photo 5 (right): Looking east across Emergent Wetland A. Photo 6 (left): Looking at start of Intermittent Stream 1, within Wetland A. Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale PHOTOS 4 - 6 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ■ ■ if ENE Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 www.mmsconsultants.net /4 Photo 7 (left): Looking at Intermittent Stream 1. Photo 8 (right): Looking at north section of Emergent Wetland A within drainageway of Ag field. Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTOS 7-9 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 Photo 9 (left): Looking at standing water within above (photo 8) pictured section of wetland. MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M s Photo 10 (left): Looking at boundary of Wooded Wetland A. Photo 11 (right): Looking at Intermittent Stream 2 within Wetland B. Photo 12 (left): Looking at sample point 5 within Emergent Wetland B. Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTOS 10 -12 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M Photo 13 (left): Standing near center of Wetland B, looking north. Photo 14 (right): Standing on east side of Wetland B, looking north at boundary of wetland. Photo 15 (left): Standing on west side of Wetland B, looking south at boundary of wetland. Designed by: Scale: LRS not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTOS 13-15 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M Photo 16 (left): Looking north at Intermittent Stream 2 within Wetland B. Photo 17 (right): Looking north at Intermittent Stream 2, north of Wetland B boundary. Photo 18 (left): Looking at north end of Intermittent Stream 2 at culvert that feeds stream. Designed by: LRS Scale: not to scale Drawn by: LRS Date: 08/04/2021 Checked by: LRS Project No:: IC 10355-010 PHOTOS 16 -18 NW114, NW114, & NE1/4, NW114, Sec.13-T79N-R7W IWV RD SW IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA Photo source: MMS Consultants Inc. 2020 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net M M Appendix C • WETLAND DELINEATION MAP • SITE PLAN • DATA FORMS ST.ANDREW+PRESBV.1ERLS111 HUR' U 6 SE 11-79-7 SW SW 12-79-7 SE SW 12-79-7 SW SE 12.-9-7 A2 SE E a9 �0.aa4ve — _ t97ie SWSW 7-7 VJALIIl a Melrose Aver 'hig�w Melr_-Ave '. . IF4fi. aye \\ -ALBERT AND FAV'S FIRST ADDITION PROJECT P,fAM12 GAL\WA\YHRLSSN NE 14-79-7 LOCATION NW - NW NE 13-79-7 NE NE I79 7 GALW AIY HIe LS 5U �� N1i' raa� \ hL BAUBLE'S SUBDIVISION Pi 1` U-RS SE NE 13-794 SW NW 1B79.7 SW NW 13-79-7 SE NW -t - SW NE 13-79-7 WILD PFWIRIE WIl➢ F'Rl IRIE�ESTA TES. PRF C:6UNTRY 0.UB.ESTATES SECOND�ADDITION - HUNTERS RIIN SVB WILD PFlAIR�,E5TAREt LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 72 T =- - 6rrw�l«: •WOODED WETLAND B (0.75 ACRES) (0.50 ACRES) /- — —�� l/V7 �jA/,, / WOODED WETLAND A. "7-7771- •EMERGENT WETLAND B (0.37 ACRES) x//66 -EMERGENT WETLAND A (0.95 ACRES) INTERMITTENT STREAM 1 (232 LF) r 2 .......... O SP2 INTERMITTENT STREAM (1,752 LF) WOODED WETLAND (1.12 ACRES) WETLAND SAMPLE POINT EMERGENT WETLAND 1.45 ACRES 0 30 75 150 225 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1"=300' Field Book No:FIELDBOOK 0 EEO MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Nc0 Q M 0 €7)- (7) 0 www.mmsconsultants.net 0 O M WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region Project/Site: IWV ROAD SW Applicant/Owner: CKR Construction Services LLC City/County: Iowa City Sampling Date: 5/11/2021 Investigator(s): Lee Swank State: Iowa Sampling Point: SP1 Section, Township, Range: NE1/4, NWI/4, SEC13-T79N-R7W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toeslope Local Relief (Concave, Convex, None): concave Slope (%): 0-5% Lat: 41.653802 Long: -91.61294 Datum: Decimal Degree Soil Map Unit Name: 11B Colo -Ely Complex NWI Classification: none (adjacent mapped riverine) Are Climatic/ Hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a wetland? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No 4. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (AB) 50%= 10 20%= 4 VEGETATION - Use scientific name of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Absolute % Cover 5 Dominant Indicator Species? Status Yes FACW Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2. Salix nigra Black Willow 15 Yes OBL Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 3. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (AB) 50%= 10 20%= 4 20 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. 2. 3. FACW Species 105 x 2 = 210 4. FAC Species 0 x 3 = 0 5. FACU Species 0 x 4 = 0 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Yes FACW UPL Species 0 x 5= 0 Herbaceous Stratum (Plot Size: 5ft radius ) 95 Column Totals: 105 (A) 210 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 1. phalaris arundinacea Reed Canarygrass 2. Urtica dioica Stinging Nettle 5 No FACW 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Index: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophtic Vegetation 4. 5. _ X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. X 3 - Pevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation1 (Explain) 9. 10. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemtic 50%= 50 20%= 20 100 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Hydrophytic Yes X No Vegetation 1 2. Present? 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the Depth Matrix Redox Features absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (Moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc2 0-3 10YR 3/1 100 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: SiLo 3-11 10YR 4/1 55 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M/PL SiLo 10YR 5/2 25 D M 11-32 10YR 5/1 60 7.5YR 4/6 25 C M SiLo 10YR 6/2 15 D M 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) - Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: - Coast Prairie Redox (A16) — Dark Surface (S7) — Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) - Surface Water (Al) - Water -Stained Leaves (B9) - Soil Surface Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 23" Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 11" Wetland hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region Project/Site: IWV ROAD SW Applicant/Owner: CKR Construction Services LLC City/County: Iowa City Sampling Date: 5/11/2021 Investigator(s): Lee Swank State: Iowa Sampling Point: SP2 Section, Township, Range: NE1/4, NWI/4, SEC13-T79N-R7W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): FootSlope Local Relief (Concave, Convex, None): none Slope (%): 0-5% Lat: 41.653951 Long: -91.612911 Datum: Decimal Degree Soil Map Unit Name: 11B Colo -Ely Complex NWI Classification: None Are Climatic/ Hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Status Is the Sampled Area within a wetland? Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X 4. Remarks: 5. VEGETATION - Use scientific name of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 1. 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 3. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB) 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. 2. 3. FACW Species 85 x 2 = 170 4. FAC Species 15 x 3 = 45 5. FACU Species 0 x 4 = 0 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Yes FACW UPL Species 10 x 5 = 50 Herbaceous Stratum (Plot Size: 5ft radius ) 75 Column Totals: 110 (A) 265 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.41 1. Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canarygrass 2. Urtica dioica Stinging Nettle 10 No FACW 3. Arctium lappa Burdock 10 No UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Index: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophtic Vegetation 4. Alliaria petiolata Garlic Mustard 15 No FAC 5. _ X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. X 3 - Pevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation) (Explain) 9. 10. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemtic 50%= 55 20%= 22 110 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Hydrophytic Yes X No Vegetation 1 2. Present? 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the Depth Matrix Redox Features absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (Moist) % Color (Moist) % TypeLoc2 0-3 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 5/3 10 D M Silo 3-16 10YR 3/1 83 7.5YR 4/6 2 C M Silo 10YR 5/3 15 D M 16-30 10YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 3/4 15 C M SiCILo 10YR 5/2 10 D M 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) - Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) - Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) - Redox Dark Surface (F6) — Depleted Dark Surface (F7) — Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: - Coast Prairie Redox (A16) — Dark Surface (S7) — Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: sample not taken within a depression - does not meet indicator F8 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) - Surface Water (Al) - Water -Stained Leaves (B9) - Soil Surface Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region Project/Site: IWV ROAD SW Applicant/Owner: CKR Construction Services LLC City/County: Iowa City Sampling Date: 5/11/2021 Investigator(s): Lee Swank State: Iowa Sampling Point: 5P3 Section, Township, Range: NE1/4, NW1/4, SEC13-T79N-R7W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): footslope Local Relief (Concave, Convex, None): none Slope (%): 0-5% Lat: 41.54005 Long: -91.612063 Datum: Decimal Degree Soil Map Unit Name: 11B Colo -Ely Complex NWI Classification: Riverine Are Climatic/ Hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation X , Soil X , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a wetland? Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. Remarks: Sample point taken in Ag field 3. FACW Species 0 x 2 = 0 4. VEGETATION - Use scientific name of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 1. 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 3. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (AB) 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. 2. 3. FACW Species 0 x 2 = 0 4. FAC Species 0 x 3 = 0 5. FACU Species 0 x 4 = 0 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL UPL Species 15 x 5 = 75 Herbaceous Stratum (Plot Size: 5ft radius ) Column Totals: 15 (A) 75 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00 1. Glycine max Soybean 10 Yes 2. Arctium lappa Burdock 5 Yes UPL 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Index: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophtic Vegetation 4. 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Pevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation) (Explain) 9. 10. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemtic 50%= 7.5 20%= 3 15 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Hydrophytic Yes No X Vegetation 1 2. Present? 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sample point taken in Ag field subject to herbicide application US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the Depth Matrix Redox Features absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (Moist) % Color (Moist) % TypeLoc2 0-5 10YR 3/1 100 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: SiLo 5-13 10YR 3/1 97 7.5YR 3/3 3 C M SiCILo 13-30 10YR 3/2 85 10YR 5/2 15 D M SiCILo 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) - Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) - Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: - Coast Prairie Redox (A16) — Dark Surface (S7) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) - Surface Water (Al) - Water -Stained Leaves (B9) - Soil Surface Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region Project/Site: IWV ROAD SW Applicant/Owner: CKR Construction Services LLC City/County: Iowa City Sampling Date: 5/11/2021 Investigator(s): Lee Swank State: Iowa Sampling Point: SP4 Section, Township, Range: NW1/4, NWI/4, SEC13-T79N-R7W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Footslope Local Relief (Concave, Convex, None): concave Slope (%): 0-5% Lat: 41.653765 Long: -91.613343 Datum: Decimal Degree Soil Map Unit Name: 11B Colo -Ely Complex NWI Classification: none Are Climatic/ Hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a wetland? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No 4. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB) 50%= 25 20%= 10 VEGETATION - Use scientific name of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Absolute % Cover 25 Dominant Indicator Species? Status Yes FACW Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 1. Ulmus Americana American Elm 2. Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 25 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 3. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB) 50%= 25 20%= 10 50 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. 2. 3. FACW Species 110 x 2 = 220 4. FAC Species 45 x 3 = 135 5. FACU Species 0 x 4 = 0 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Yes FACW UPL Species 5 x 5 = 25 Herbaceous Stratum (Plot Size: 5ft radius ) 75 Column Totals: 160 (A) 380 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.38 1. Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canarygrass 2. Urtica dioica Stinging Nettle 10 No FACW 3. Arctium lappa Burdock 5 No UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Index: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophtic Vegetation 4. Alliaria petiolata Garlic Mustard 10 No FAC 5. Sanicula odorata Clustered blacksnakeroot 5 No FAC _ X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. Cryptotaenia canadensis Canadian Honewort 5 No FAC X 3 - Pevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation) (Explain) 9. 10. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemtic 50%= 55 20%= 22 110 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Hydrophytic Yes X No Vegetation 1 2. Present? 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the Depth Matrix Redox Features absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (Moist) % Color (Moist) % TypeLoc2 0-8 10YR 3/1 100 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: 8-14 10YR 5/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M/PL SiLo 10YR 6/2 10 D M 14-32 10YR 5/1 60 7.5YR 4/4 20 C M SiLo 10YR 6/2 20 D M 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) - Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: - Coast Prairie Redox (A16) — Dark Surface (S7) — Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) - Surface Water (Al) - Water -Stained Leaves (B9) - Soil Surface Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 33 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 22 Wetland hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region Project/Site: IWV ROAD SW Applicant/Owner: CKR Construction Services LLC City/County: Iowa City Sampling Date: 5/11/2021 Investigator(s): Lee Swank State: Iowa Sampling Point: SP5 Section, Township, Range: NW1/4, NWI/4, SEC13-T79N-R7W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): footslope Local Relief (Concave, Convex, None): concave Slope (%): 0-5% Lat: 41.653923 Long: -91.61764 Datum: Decimal Degree Soil Map Unit Name: 11B Colo -Ely Complex NWI Classification: none- adjacent to mapped riverine wetla Are Climatic/ Hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Naturally Problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a wetland? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No 3. 4. Remarks: 5. VEGETATION - Use scientific name of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Absolute % Cover 25 Dominant Indicator Species? Yes Status FACW Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 1. Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 3. 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB) 50%= 12.5 20%= 5 25 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply By: OBL Species 0 x 1 = 0 1. 2. 3. FACW Species 115 x 2 = 230 4. FAC Species 10 x 3 = 30 5. FACU Species 2 x 4 = 8 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Yes FACW UPL Species 0 x 5= 0 Herbaceous Stratum (Plot Size: 5ft radius ) 90 Column Totals: 127 (A) 268 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.11 1. Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canarygrass 2. Sanicula odorata Clustered blacksnakeroot 10 No FAC 3. Ambrosia artemisiifolia Ragweed 2 No FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Index: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophtic Vegetation 4. 5. _ X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. X 3 - Pevalence Index is <3.01 7. 4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic vegetation) (Explain) 9. 10. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problemtic 50%= 51 20%= 20.4 102 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: 30ft radius ) Hydrophytic Yes X No Vegetation 1 2. Present? 50%= 0 20%= 0 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the Depth Matrix Redox Features absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (Moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc2 0-5 10YR 3/1 80 10YR 5/8 10 C M/PL SiCILo 10YR 5/2 10 D M 5-26 10YR 4/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M SiCILo 26+ Gley 1 2.5/N 100 SiCILo 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) - Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Depleted Dark Surface (F7) X Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: - Coast Prairie Redox (A16) — Dark Surface (S7) — Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) - Surface Water (Al) - Water -Stained Leaves (B9) - Soil Surface Cracks (B6) X High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) X Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 7" Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 5" Wetland hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0 DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #1 A PORTION OF THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence 588°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet; Thence N00°00'59"E, 1307.41 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 300.04 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #1 contains 9.00 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #2 A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence 588°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet, to the Point of Beginning; Thence continuing 588°45'34"W, along said North Line, 414.99 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S00°06'26"E, along the West Line of said Kauble's Subdivision, 3.41 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31 "W, along said South Line, 1551.41 feet; Thence N13°37'32"W, 53.10 feet; Thence N04°19'09"E, 213.22 feet; Thence N22°47'41 "E, 655.46 feet; Thence N33°02'35"E, 438.62 feet; Thence N00°53'27"W, 86.39 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 1471.32 feet; Thence S00°00'59"W, 1307.41 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #2 contains 53.36 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #3 A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence N89°06'50"E, along the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 862.10 feet; Thence 500°53'27"E, 86.39 feet; Thence S33°02'35"W, 438.62 feet; Thence S22°47'41"W, 655.46 feet; Thence SO4°19'09"W, 213.22 feet; Thence S13°37'32"E, 53.10 feet, to a Point on the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31 "W, along said South Line, 370.12 feet, to the Southwest Corner of the North One- Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N00°08'52"E, along the West Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1315.30 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #3 contains 17.03 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. Permitted by Right Permitted Provisionally Permitted by Special Exception Selected Criteria Residential Uses Assisted group living S 1 roomer/300 sf lot area Commercial Uses T Building trade P Indoor/Outdoor Commercial Recreation P Eating establishments P General and medical/dental office P Most Retail: Alcohol sales, Hospitality, Outdoor storage and display, Personal service, Repair, Sales P Surface passenger service P Adult business PR Must be 1,000' from educational, parks, religious assembly use, or residential uses or zones and 500' from other adult business uses General/Intensive Animal related commercial PR Facilities with outdoor areas must be 400' from residential zones. Overnight boarding facilities must be completely indoors. Drinking Establishments PR Provisions not applicable here Quick vehicle servicing PR Vehicular use areas must be screened from the ROW (S2) and abutting residential zones (S3). Fuel dispensing equipment must be set back 50' from residential zone boundaries. Vehicle repair PR If abutting residential zone, outdoor work and loud indoor work is only allowed 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. The site must minimize views of vehicular use areas from the ROW and adjacent properties. All outdoor storage areas abutting other properties must be fenced (S5) and screened (S3) with landscaping. Industrial Uses Industrial service P Self-service storage P Warehouse and freight movement P Wholesale sales P General and Technical/light Manufacturing and production PR S Use is limited to 5,000 sf or 15,000 sf by special exception. The following are prohibited: Chemical, vehicle, rubber, or plastics manufacturing; milling or processing grain; leather tanning; and textile mills. Heavy manufacturing S Limited to concrete batch/mix plants at least 500' from any residentially zoned property. Institutional & Civic Uses Religious/private group assembly P Daycare PR Requires minimum usable interior floor space and childcare uses must provide a minimum fenced outdoor play area enclosed by a fence (S4) and screened along the perimeter (S3). A drop off/pick up area must be provided with adequate stacking and/or parking spaces. Basic utility PR S If located in a completely enclosed building with another principal use, it is allowed provisionally. If not, it typically requires a special exception and must be screened from public view and adjacent residential zones (S3). It must also be compatible with surrounding structures and uses, particularly if close to or within view of a residential zone. Community service - long term housing PR S A special exception is required if across the street from or adjacent to an RS zone. Minimum 900 sf of lot area per dwelling unit is required (with only eff./1-BDR units). Requires a site plan and a management plan and neighborhood meeting for nearby owners. Only 50% of the 15t floor may be occupied by residential uses. Community service - shelter S A minimum of 300 sf of lot area per permanent resident and 200 sf of lot area per temporary resident is required. The applicant must submit a site plan and a shelter management plan that address nuisance issues. General community service S Must not significantly alter the overall character of the zone or inhibit future development. Detention facilities S Must be 1,000' from educational, parks, religious assembly use, or residential uses or zones and 500' from other detention facilities. Requires a security plan. Specialized Educational Facilities S Must be compatible with surrounding uses. Utility -scale ground -mounted solar energy systems S Must be 200' and screened from view (S3) from any residential zone. Must be enclosed by a 6-8' tall security fence and the maximum height shall be no greater than 15'. Must also satisfy the special exception approval criteria for a basic utility use. Other Uses Communication transmission facility: Antennas PR The antenna must be mounted on another structure allowed in the zone and may not be illuminated by strobe lights unless required by federal regulations. Any equipment associated with the antenna must be within the walls of the building to which the antenna is attached or screened from public view (S3). Communication transmission facility: Towers S Must serve an area that cannot be served by an existing tower or industrial property or by locating antennas on existing structures in the area. The proposed tower must camouflage the structure and be no taller than is necessary, up to 120'. The tower must be set back at least a distance equal to the height of the tower from any residential, ID -R zone. Any associated equipment must be enclosed in an equipment shed, cabinet, or building, which must be adequately screened from view of the public right of way and any adjacent residential or commercial property. Use Categories Subgroups CI -1 Residential uses: Group living uses Assisted group living 1) Maximum Density: One roomer per 300 square feet of lot area. (staff/live-in staff of a facility are not considered roomers) S 2) Must have bath and toilet facilities available for use by roomers (per Title 17). May allow tenants' access to a communal kitchen, dining room, and other common facilities and services. 14 -4B -4A- 8 Fraternal group living Independent group living Household living uses Attached single- family dwellings Detached single-family dwellings Detached zero lot line dwellings Duplexes Group households Multi -family dwellings Commercial uses: Adult business uses PR Must be at least: 1) 1,000' from any property containing an existing daycare use, educational facility use, parks and open space use, religious/private assembly use, or residential use; or any single-family or multi -family residential zone. 2) 500' from any other adult business use. 14 -4B -4B - 1 General PR Animal related commercial uses Intensive PR Any facility with outdoor runs or exercise areas must be located at least 400' from any residential zone. Overnight boarding facilities must be located completely indoors within a soundproof building. If all aspects of the operation, including any accessory uses, are conducted completely indoors within a soundproof building, then the setback requirements of this provision do not apply. However, the use is subject to any setback requirements of the base zone. 14-46-46- 3 Building trade uses P Commercial parking uses Commercial recreational uses1 Indoor P Outdoor P Drinking establishments' PR Applies only to Drinking Establishments In the university impact area or riverfront crossings district. 14-4B-4B- 11 Eating establishments' P Office uses General office P Medical/dental office P Quick vehicle servicing uses' PR 1) All vehicular use areas, including parking and stacking spaces, drives, aisles, and service lanes, must be screened from the public right of way to the S2 standard and to the S3 standard along any side or rear lot line that abuts a residential zone boundary. 2) Sufficient vehicle stacking spaces must be provided to prevent congestion and vehicle conflicts along abutting streets. 3) Unenclosed canopies over gas pump islands must be set back at least 10' from any street right of way. Fuel dispensing equipment must be set back at least 10' from any street right of way, and at least 50' from any residential zone boundary. 4) All lighting must comply with 14-5G 14 -4B -4B - 12 Retail uses' Alcohol sales P Delayed deposit service uses Hospitality P Outdoor storage and display P Personal service P Repair P Sales P Surface passenger service uses P Vehicle repair uses PR 1) If on a property abutting a residential zone boundary, in addition to applicable noise control provisions (6-4-2), all outdoor work operations are prohibited between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. Any indoor operations that result in noise exceeding 60 dBA as measured at the residential zone boundary are prohibited between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. 2) No vehicle shall be stored on the property for more than 45 continuous days. 3) The site must be designed to minimize views of vehicular use areas from the public right-of-way and from adjacent properties. (a) Outdoor storage areas, including storage of vehicles to be repaired, must be concealed from public view to the extent possible. If it is not feasible to conceal the storage areas behind buildings, the storage areas must be set back at least 20' from any public right-of-way, including public trails and open space, and screened from public view to at least the S3 standard. (b) Other vehicular use areas that abut the public right-of-way, including parking and stacking spaces, driveways, aisles, and service lanes, must be set back at least 10' from the public right-of-way and landscaped according to the S2 standard. (c) All outdoor storage areas that abut other properties must be fenced to the S5 standard and screened to at least the S3 standard. Landscape screening must be located between the fence and the abutting property. The landscape screening requirement may be waived by the building official, upon convincing evidence that a planting screen cannot be expected to thrive because of intense shade, soil conditions, or other site characteristics. The presence of existing pavement, by itself, shall not constitute convincing evidence. 14 -4B -4B - 21 Industrial uses: Industrial service uses P Manufacturing and production uses GeneralPR manufacturing a. The proposed use is limited to 5,000 square feet of gross floor area, excluding floor area devoted to other principal or accessory uses, except it may be increased up to 15,000 square feet by special exception b. The proposed use meets the performance standards for off site impacts contained in 14-5H "Performance Standards". The city may require certification of compliance from a registered professional engineer or other qualified person. c. The following general manufacturing uses are prohibited in the CI -1 zone: The manufacturing of chemicals and allied products; Any manufacturing establishment that includes milling or processing of grain; Leather tanning; Manufacture of motor vehicles; Manufacture or processing of rubber and plastics; and Textile mills. 14 -4B -4C - 2 Technical/light manufacturing PR Heavy manufacturing S 1) Heavy manufacturing uses is limited to concrete batch/mix plants 2) Must be at least 500' from any residentially zoned property. 3) All proposed outdoor storage and work areas must be located and screened to adequately reduce the noise, dust, and visual impact of the proposed use from surrounding properties. 4) Traffic circulation and access points must be designed to prevent hazards to adjacent streets or property. 14 -4B -4C - 4 Salvage operations Self-service storage uses P Warehouse and freight movement uses p Waste related uses Wholesale sales uses P Institutional and civic uses: Basic utility uses PR/S 1) Basic utilities are permitted within a building that houses another principal use allowed in the zone, provided the facility is completely enclosed, and there is no visible indication of the existence of the facility from the exterior of the building. 2) Basic utilities not enclosed within a building are permitted only by special exception (except water and sanitary sewer pumps or lift stations approved as part of subdivision or site plan approval) a) Proposed uses must be screened from public view and from view of any adjacent residential zones to at least the S3 standard. b) In addition, the applicant must provide evidence that the proposed use will be compatible with surrounding structures and uses with regard to safety, size, height, scale, location, and design, particularly for facilities that will be located close to or within view of a residential zone. c) For uses located in highly visible areas, the board may consider additional design elements such as masonry or brick facades, and walls or fencing to improve public safety and to soften the visual impact of the proposed use. 14 -4B -4D- 1 Community service uses Community service - long term housing PR/S 1) A minimum of 900 sf of lot area per dwelling unit is required. 2) Dwelling units must be efficiency and/or one bedroom units. 3) The applicant must submit a site plan and a management plan that addresses potential nuisances such as loitering, noise, lighting, late night operations, odors, outdoor storage and litter. The management plan must include plans for controlling litter, loitering and noise; provisions for 24/7 on site management and/or security, and a conflict resolution procedure to resolve nuisances if they occur. The site plan and management plan must be submitted concurrently to the city, or if permitted as a special exception said plans must be submitted with the special exception application. 4) A special exception is required if the proposed use is across the street from or adjacent to a single-family residential zone. 5) Prior to a building permit being issued, the owner or operator of the community service - long term housing use must hold a neighborhood meeting inviting all property owners within 200' of the proposed use. At the neighborhood meeting, the owner or operator must provide copies of the management plan, and contact information for the management team of the proposed use. 6) Must comply with the minimum standards as specified in the Iowa City housing code and maintain a rental permit. 7) Up to 50% of the first floor of the building may be occupied by residential uses. 14 -4B -4D- 6 Community service - shelter S 1) A minimum of 300 sf of lot area per permanent resident and 200 sf of lot area per temporary resident is required. 2) Nuisance Issues: The proposed use will not have significant adverse effects on the livability of nearby residential or commercial uses due to loitering, noise, glare from lights, late night operations, odors, outdoor storage, and litter. The applicant must submit a site plan and a shelter management plan that address these issues. The management plan must include a litter control plan, a loitering control plan, a plan for on site security, and a conflict resolution procedure to resolve nuisance issues if they occur. The site plan and shelter management plan must be submitted along with the application for a special exception, or if allowed as a 14 -4B -4D- 5 provisional use, such plan must be included with the materials submitted for site plan review. 3) Must comply with the minimum standards as specified in the Iowa City housing code General communityproposed service S The proposed use will not significantly alter the overall character of the zone and will not inhibit future development of uses for which the zone is primarily intended. The board will consider such factors as size and scale of the development, projected traffic generation, and whether adequate transportation, transit, and pedestrian facilities exist to support the use. Community service uses that are industrial or repair oriented in nature or that include operations that require outdoor work areas may be particularly suited to these zones. 14-4B-4D- 4 Daycare uses PR 1) Building must contain at least 35 sf of usable interior floor space per child or 60 sf of usable floor area per adult client. An additional 20 sf of floor area is required for every adult client who uses ambulatory aids. Reception areas, kitchens, storage areas, offices, bathrooms, hallways, treatment rooms, and specialized areas used for therapy are excluded when calculating the required floor area. The dining area may only be included in the square footage calculation if used by daycare participants for activities other than meals. When collocated in a facility that houses other uses or services, the proposed daycare use must have its own separate identifiable space for program activities during operational hours. 2) Child daycare uses must provide a fenced outdoor play area of not less than 100 sf per child based on the maximum number of children that will be using the outdoor play area at any given time. The outdoor play area must meet the following standards: a) Playground equipment is not permitted within the front and side setbacks. b) Outdoor play areas must be well drained, free from hazards, and readily accessible to the daycare center. The outdoor play area must be completely enclosed by a fence built to the S4 standard and be screened along the perimeter of the fence to the S3 standard. The city may waive the screening requirement if it is determined that land uses surrounding the daycare use will not pose a nuisance or safety hazard to the children such that a screening buffer is necessary. 3) The use must provide a drop off/pick up area in a location that is convenient to or has good pedestrian access to the entrance to the facility. This drop off/pick up area must contain sufficient stacking spaces and/or parking spaces to ensure that traffic does not stack into adjacent streets or other public rights of way. (See 14-5A-4, table 5A-2) To promote safe vehicular circulation, one-way drives are encouraged. 4) A sidewalk must be constructed connecting the main entrance of the center to the adjacent public right of way. Pedestrian access must be clearly separated or distinguished from vehicular circulation areas to minimize the extent to which users of the facility are required to walk across drives or aisles to gain access to the daycare center. 14 -4B -4D- 7 Detention facilities S Must be located at least: 1) 1,000' from any property containing an existing daycare use, 14 -4B -4D- 8 educational facility use, parks and open space use, religious/private group assembly use or residential use; or from any residential zone. 2) The proposed use will be located at least 500' from any other detention facility. 3) The facility and its operations will not pose an unreasonable safety risk to nearby uses and residents. The applicant must submit to the board of adjustment a detailed plan for on site security. Educational facilities General Specialized S The use will be functionally compatible with surrounding uses, such that the health and safety of clients/students are not compromised. The board will consider factors such as the types of businesses that predominate in the immediate vicinity, whether there are any significant negative externalities created by these uses, such as excessive noise, dust, or vibrations from outdoor work areas that may pose a health or safety risk to clients/students of the proposed use; and where such negative externalities exist, whether the building(s) and site can and will be designed to mitigate the harmful effects. 14-4B-4D- 13 Hospitals Parks and open space uses Religious/private group assembly uses1 P Utility -scale ground -mounted solar energy systems 1) Must be at least 200' from any residential zone. 2) Must be screened from public view and from view of any adjacent residential zones to at least the S3 standard. 3) May not be closer than 20' from all property lines, or according to the minimum setback requirements in the underlying base zone, whichever is greater. 4) Must be enclosed by security fencing between 6' and 8' in height. Up to 3 individual horizontal strands of barbed wire may be placed atop the fence (not to be included in the overall fence height measurement). 5) The maximum height shall be no greater than 15'. 6) Any on-site lighting provided for the operational phase of the utility - scale ground -mounted solar energy system shall be equipped with full cutoff fixtures, shielded away from adjacent properties, and positioned downward to minimize light spillage onto adjacent properties. 7) Exterior surfaces of utility -scale ground -mounted solar energy system panels shall have a nonreflective finish to minimize glare and solar arrays shall be designed and installed to minimize glare towards vehicular traffic and any adjacent building. 8) Must also satisfy the approval criteria for a special exception for a basic utility set forth in Section 14 -4B -4D -lb -(2). 14 -4B -4D- 18 Other uses: Communication transmission facility uses PR/S 1) Communications antennas are permitted, provided the following conditions are met: a) The antenna must be mounted on another structure allowed in the zone, such as a rooftop, light pole, or utility pole. b) In CI -1 zones, antennas may not be illuminated by strobe lights unless required by federal regulations. If alternatives are allowed under federal guidelines, strobe lights may not be used. c) Any equipment associated with an antenna must be located within the exterior walls of the building to which the antenna is attached or screened from view of the public right of way and any adjacent property to at least the S3 standard. If the equipment is located on the roof, it must be set back and screened so that it is not within public view or appears to be part of the building. 2) Communications towers are allowed by special exception, and must comply with the following approval criteria: a) Must serve an area that cannot be served by an existing tower or industrial property or by locating antennas on existing structures in the area. The applicant must document attempts to utilize existing structures, towers, and industrial properties within 1/2 mile of the proposed tower including maps illustrating the location of existing towers and potential alternative sites for antenna and towers that have been explored and the reasons these locations were not feasible. b) The proposed tower will be constructed in a manner that will camouflage the structure and reduce its visual impact on the surrounding area. Examples of camouflage design include monopoles, which do not have guywires or support trusses and that are painted to blend in with the sky or surroundings, towers camouflaged as flagpoles, monuments, steeples, or the integration of rooftop towers onto existing buildings, water towers, etc. Rooftop towers must use materials similar to or that blend in with the structure to which it is attached. Other camouflaged tower structures must be of similar height and appearance as other similar structures allowed in the zone, e.g., towers camouflaged as light poles or utility poles must be of similar height and appearance as other such poles. The applicant must include an illustration of how the tower would appear in the proposed location. c) The proposed tower will be no taller than is necessary to 14 -4B -4E- 5 provide the service intended. Evidence presented should include coverage maps illustrating current gaps in coverage and changes to coverage with the proposed tower. Communications towers are exempt from the maximum height standards of the base zone, but under no circumstance may the tower be taller than 120' from grade. d) The proposed tower will be set back at least a distance equal to the height of the tower from any residential zone, ID -RS zone, and ID - RM zone. e) Any equipment associated with the tower facility will be enclosed in an equipment shed, cabinet, or building, which must be adequately screened from view of the public right of way and any adjacent residential or commercial property. f) The proposed tower will not utilize a backup generator as a principal power source. Backup generators may only be used in the event of a power outage. g) The proposed tower must be designed and constructed to accommodate at least one additional user, unless in doing so the tower will exceed the 120' height limitation or if the board of adjustment determines that allowing the additional height needed to accommodate another user will detract from the area to the extent that it will prevent future development intended in the zone. The applicant shall provide a certification by a professional engineer licensed in this state that the proposed tower will be designed to permit a second antenna system of comparable size to be added to the tower above or immediately below the original antenna system. h) If use of the tower is discontinued, the tower and any associated equipment must be removed by the owner of the tower, the operator, or the owner of the property within one year of discontinuance of use and the land graded and replanted to prevent erosion. The applicant shall present a signed lease agreement, a recorded declaration of covenants, or other satisfactory evidence acknowledging this obligation. t CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 21, 2021 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: REZ21-0006 — IWV/Slothower Rezoning — Updated Conditions BACKGROUND: On September 16, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on a rezoning of property located south of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road from County Agricultural (A) zone to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone for 53.36 acres, and to Interim Development — Commercial (ID -C) zone for 17.03 acres. The application also included a rezoning of 9 acres of Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone. The rezoning was recommended for approval by the Commission by a vote of 4-1. At that same meeting, the Commission considered an amendment to the comprehensive plan for this same property. That amendment did not pass, so the applicant has submitted a new comprehensive plan amendment, which the Commission is considering contemporaneous with this agenda item. In the event that this new comprehensive plan amendment receives the required 4 votes to recommend approval, then the Commission should reconsider the rezoning conditions. ANALYSIS: The newly requested comprehensive plan amendment seeks to mitigate the negative externalities of intensive commercial use on the surrounding land, particularly the undeveloped land to the south currently shown as appropriate for rural residential on the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. Concerns about these negative externalities were raised at the September 16, 2021 meeting. Rather than changing the boundaries of the Intensive Commercial zoning designation, Staff recommends imposing additional conditions on the land to be zoned Intensive Commercial to ensure that the goals of the Comprehensive Plan are met and the public need for this buffering are satisfied. To be consistent with the comprehensive plan's identified public need for buffering the intensive commercial uses along the south 350' of the subject property, Staff recommends that when the land is platted, the Owner should dedicate to the City a buffer easement and impose upon the land a use restriction prohibiting development within 350 feet of the southern boundary of the subject property. Such use restriction should prohibit installation of structures, parking lots, drive aisles, or loading areas. Streets may be necessary, as determined through the subdivision process. Additionally, at the time the land is platted and upon construction of the public improvements, the Owner shall plant landscaping to the S3 standard along the southern boundary within this easement area in locations that do not contain sensitive areas or sensitive areas buffers, as identified on the approved Site Grading and Erosion Control Plan and Sensitive Areas Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive October 15, 2021 Page 2 Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Owner shall plat the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. a. Said plat shall show a buffer easement area generally 350' wide consistent with the comprehensive plan map. This easement area shall be governed by an easement agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This easement area shall be planted according to a landscape plan approved by the City Forester at such times as required by the subdivider's agreement. b. Said plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in a size and location approved by the City Engineer to allow Slothower Road to be improved to City urban design standards. 2. Pursuant to Iowa City Code Title 15, Owner shall, contemporaneous with the final plat approval, execute a subdivider's agreement addressing, among other things, the following conditions: a. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of any future access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. b. Owner shall install landscaping to the S3 standard along the Slothower Road and IWV Road frontages; c. Improve Slothower Road to the southern end of any future access off Slothower Road. 3. For all lots fronting IWV Road and Slothower Road, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the public right-of-way line. Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 15 of 36 Townsend stated she is torn because of the intensive commercial in what was supposed to be a residential area, so she is still pondering that even though it has changed and it's going to continue to change, especially with the new development off of Rohret Road. Craig stated she is supportive of the of the change, staff makes the case for the changes that have happened and occurred and agrees that when you drive down Melrose and IWV it is not a residential neighborhood. Hensch stated in the immediate area it's pretty hard to see this as residential with the National Guard Armory, the SEATS and Secondary Roads campus, the Joint Emergency Communications Center, Chatham Oaks residential care facility, it's just not a residential character of that neighborhood. Signs agrees with Townsend and thinks there needs to be a lot of buffering but is impressed with the buffering that is currently proposed and won't have any problem suggesting maximum buffering when they get to some of the other phases as property develops, but he does think that's key, but there is quite a bit already there 300 feet is a lot of butter, that's a football field. Padron stated she will not be supporting this; she is concerned with the sensitive areas around the intensive commercial. Commercial is not a kind of buffer. Also, the Poor Farm has been used lately to for festival and family activities and this is too close to the Poor Farm and if that's the intention, or the plan, of how to use the Poor Farm, then there are too many concerns for her. Padron also didn't like that there weren't enough neighbors at the good neighbor meeting, there should have been more people there. A vote was taken and the motion failed 3-2 (Townsend and Padron dissenting). CASE NO. ANN21-0003 & REZ21-0006: Location: SW corner of Slothower Road and IWV Road a. An application for an annexation of approximately 70.39 acres of land currently in unincorporated Johnson County. b. An application for a rezoning from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial CI -1) for approximately 53.36 acres, Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) for approximately 17.03 acres, and approximately 9 acres of land from Rural Residential RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1). Heitner stated the presentation is going to have a lot of similarity between this agenda item and the previous agenda item so he would try to not be duplicative in the interest of time. He began with an aerial view of subject property and an overview of the existing zoning noting County Agriculture, Rural Residential and County Residential. Heitner noted the majority of the 70 acres of subject property is located in the growth area of the Fringe Area Agreement, there is a little strip, around 9 acres, to the east that is already in the City limits. That nine -acre strip along with about 53 acres of the proposed annexation would seek CI -1 (Intensive Commercial) zoning and the remaining balance to the west would seek ID -C (Interim Development Commercial) zoning for about 17 acres. Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 16 of 36 Heitner explained this agenda item is focusing on the actual annexation application and the rezoning associated with that annexation as the property is annex into the City. He also wanted to comment on a couple things from just the general background stance, there's been discussion about the lack of attendance at the good neighbor meeting. Those notices were sent out pursuant to the City's current requirement of a 300 -foot notification radius. Heitner attended that meeting, and they made a concerted effort in notification, they sent out notifications to residents within the Country Club Estates Fourth and Fifth Additions as well which is outside of the 300 - foot notification window. Staff did so because they understood that there is a potential for a larger impact for area, since it is a larger agricultural property. They also held a consult on the annexation on July 29th with two Union Township trustees and they also voiced concerns mostly about the potential loss of farmland and tax revenue to the township. Heitner showed an overview of the existing Southwest District Plan and Weber subarea, as Lehmann mentioned the majority of this area was slated for future urban development for single family duplex residential and then also a Vegetative and Noise and Sight Buffer to the west near the landfill. For the annexation component of this, voluntary annexations are reviewed under three different criteria, first, that the area under consideration falls within the adopted long range planning boundary, second that development in the area proposed annexation will fulfill and identify need without imposing an undue burden on the City, and third, that control of the development is in the City's best interest. Heitner stated on that first point with the area under consideration falling within the adapted long range planning boundary, the portion of the subject property that isn't already in the City limits is all entirely within the City's growth area in fringe area C and it's anticipated that anything within that growth area will eventually or could eventually be annexed into the City. Number two, that development in the area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing an undue burden on the City. The applicant has demonstrated that sanitary sewer service is possible to the eastern properties that are seeking the intensive commercial CI -1 zoning. There are capital improvements underway on IWV road with the intent of bringing the road to urban arterial standards. That will include an urban overlay of that segment of the road roughly between the Poor Farm and Hebl Avenue to the landfill as well as installation of a water line throughout that segment of road with the expectation that waterline and section of the road will be utilized for those infrastructure improvements. Heitner noted there is a great deal of highway adjacency lot size and also arterial proximity that makes this subject property pretty appealing for future commercial development. Also, with regards to the Comprehensive Plan the subject properties are contiguous the City limits there by satisfying that goal for annexation. The last point, control the development is in the City's best interest, as previously mentioned this property is within the City's growth area and is appropriate for properties seeking annexation upon development to seek adequate City services, this is especially true for commercial and industrial oriented uses that may develop within the growth area. It is a long-standing policy that the City tries to direct those uses within the City limits if possible. Heitner showed an overview of the zoning noting the eastern parcels will have intensive commercial zoning with the western parcel seeking interim development commercial. As an overview of a CI -1 zone, it is a zone with a lot of depth to it and the purpose of the zone is to Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 17 of 36 provide areas for sales and service functions, businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor displays and storage of merchandise, repair, and sales of large equipment or motor vehicles or commercial amusement recreational activities. It's an extensive zone and there's a lot of discussion within the zoning ordinance about how to buffer some of those uses from adjacent residential zones. Heitner acknowledged there's been a lot of talk about MidAmerican being a potential end user here, certainly a possibility, but when staff is assessing a rezoning like this, they have to analyze the potential for any kind of use that might be permitted within that zone. There are three different ways they look at uses in zones, they have uses that are permitted by right, meaning that if they follow all of the other items and steps within the zoning or subdivision ordinance they are permitted without any further scrutiny, there's provisional uses which require a few more steps and criteria to satisfy and then there's uses permitted by special exception which require even more criteria to satisfy and they have to obtain that special exception through the Board of Adjustment, an entirely different review body. Heitner showed a quick overview of some of the uses that are permitted through each mechanism. By right, they can have building trade, commercial recreational, eating establishments, office, retail, industrial service, self-service storage warehouse, and freight movement. Provisional uses, which again require a bit more criteria to satisfy are adult businesses, animal related commercial, some general manufacturing, and basic utility. Finally are the uses as permitted by special exception which deserve a bit more analysis and scrutiny, are things like heavy manufacturing, basic utilities that maybe are outside, detention facilities, and utility scale solar. The IDC zone to the far west is intended to provide areas for managed growth, it's a default zoning district that's often applied to undeveloped areas until City services can be provided, as is the case with this portion of the subject property. For the rezoning component Heitner explained there's two criteria that need to be satisfied, consistency with Comprehensive Plan and compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. With respect to consistency with Comprehensive Plan, a lot of that is tied to the previous agenda item and whether intensive commercial designation within the Comprehensive Plan is passed. What is existing right now is classified as future urban development. Heitner wanted to touch on the attractiveness of the site for a couple reasons, the highway adjacency and future arterial road access. As mentioned earlier, there are improvements ongoing right now to IWV Road to make that up to arterial urban design standards. Also discussed already tonight was the potential for the extension of 965 that would be on the west side of the subject property, closer to the interim zone area, and then in the Comprehensive Plan there are plans for making Slothower Road a collector street which is a step down from an arterial assuming less traffic than an arterial but still more volume than a local neighborhood street. With respect to compatibility with the existing neighborhood character Heitner wanted to highlight topography of the area, with the lighter industrial uses to the northeast of the subject property, the Poor Farm directly east, agricultural residential to the north and the Country Club Estates residential of the southeast. Staff does acknowledge there's definitely concerns with potentially having a zone with the breath of uses that an intensive commercial zone presents and being as sensitive as possible to existing neighbors and adjacent properties so there are a few conditions in that respect that staff would recommend for rezoning. Staff is recommending a S3 high screen landscape buffer along the properties on Slothower Road frontage. S3 is the most intense screening within the code and consists of six -foot -tall dense shrub and/or tree buffer with potential to incorporate berming with that buffer or a masonry wall. They are also recommending Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 18 of 36 a condition that any parking along the IWV Road frontage be screened to the S3 standard and that any loading areas and outdoor storage be located behind the principal structure. In addition, there's also some built in criteria for buffering that's for more intense uses that might fall under this zone, the code already prescribes in terms of buffering for uses such as manufacturing, which is limited concrete mix plants, would require at least the 500 foot buffer from any residential zone. General manufacturing has a size limitation of about 15,000 square feet and there's certain protocols for what production could take place out of that general manufacturing. Detention facilities must be at least 1000 feet from any residential zone and communication transmission facility towers have to be set back at least the distance equal to the height of the tower from any residential zone. Heitner next discussed the environmental sensitive areas, the applicant did submit sensitive areas plan as part of the review of the annexation and rezoning. It was already discussed about the natural buffering that will take place on the south side of the subject property spanning the entire width of the property and again that's largely because of a combination of planned detention, also the stream corridor on the south end of the property, as well as a wetland a little bit under an acre in size on the south of the property and associated 100 -foot buffer around that wetland. So there will be natural buffering on the south side of subject property that effectively prohibits any urban development from taking place within that area. Regarding traffic and access to the site, right now the most recent vehicle count that they have for IWV Road is approximately 2000 vehicles per day which is well below the arterial size capacity of about 17,000 vehicles per day. Staff is looking to finalize access to the site upon site plan review, however, there is a City Code policy on limiting access to arterial roads, and it is the City's preference to have that primary access point off Slothower Road, and there's a few conditions related to that access. One, that the applicant would be obligated to improve Slothower Road to the southern end of that proposed access and then contributes 25% toward the cost of upgrading the remaining portion of Slothower Road along the rest of the frontage. Staff is also requesting a dedication of approximately 13 feet of additional right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage. Heitner noted the public comments received regarding concerns with the annexation were largely similar to the concerns related to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment about the wide range of uses in the proposed zone, concerns about buffers and impacts to sensitive features, detrimental property valuation to adjacent residences, concerns about negative externalities from the use of traffic, lighting impacts, the large shift from a rural residential character to an intensive commercial or lighter industrial character and then potential implications for the larger area. With respect to the annexation policy, the role of the Commission tonight is to determine that the following are satisfied conditions by the Comprehensive Plans annexation policy, one that the area falls within the adopted long range planning boundary; two, that the development area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing undue burden on the City; and three, that control of the development is the City's best interest. With respect to next steps, after recommendation from this Commission the following will occur: • City Council would set a public hearing for both the annexation and rezoning. • Prior to the public hearing, utility companies and non -consenting parties will be sent the annexation application via certified mail. Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 19 of 36 • City Council will consider the comprehensive plan amendment (CPA21-0002), annexation ANN21-0003), and rezoning (REZ21-0006). • The application for annexation will be sent to the State Development Board for consideration and approval. Staff recommends approval of ANN21-0003, a voluntary annexation of approximately 70.39 acres of property located south of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road. Staff also recommends approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: a. Plat all the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. b. Submit a landscape plan, which shall be approved by the City Forester, to ensure that, when developed, the subject property is designed in a manner that emphasizes green components within its location along an arterial and as an entryway into the City. c. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of the proposed access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. 2. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy on the property fronting Slothower Road: a. Installation of landscaping to the S3 standard, as detailed in section 14 -5F -6C of City Code, along the subject property's Slothower Road frontage. If said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. b. Improvement of Slothower Road to the southern end of the proposed access off Slothower Road. 3. At the time the final plat is approved, Owner shall dedicate additional right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in an amount and location approved by the City Engineer. 4. Parking, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall either not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the front yard right-of-way line or shall be screened to the S3 standard along the IWV Road frontage. Hensch had three questions, one about uses as permitted by right, provisionally and by special exception. For the special exceptions, is it correct that those would have to go before the Board of Adjustment to get approval and there'd be no administrative course of action, because some of those uses sound pretty intensive. Heitner confirmed that was correct anything requiring a special exception will require Board approval. Hensch acknowledged a couple of the public speakers intermixed industrial zoning with intensive commercial zoning and they're not talking about any industrial zoning tonight, the heaviest zoning is intensive commercial. Again Heitner confirmed that was correct. Hensch noted that Slothower Road is currently a county level B road, so that means that there's zero maintenance going on and it's essentially non -traversable at this point by a regular motor vehicle. Heitner confirmed it's a level B road so the County provides no maintenance for the entire length of that road. Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 20 of 36 Hensch's last question is under the additional conditions in staff's recommendation, the recommendation was that there should be S3 screening standards applied for landscaping along the length of Slothower Road and he was curious why that wasn't extend to the length of the IWV Road since that is an entry area to Iowa City. Hensch noted the Commission has always paid particular importance to green entry ways into the City so was there any consideration given to have S3 standards for that length IWV Road and if not that's something he'd be interested in adding. Heitner stated there was consideration given to it and if it's the Commission's desire to create a new condition that would require that S3 screening on the IWV Road frontage staff would be supportive of that. Their focus with respect to IWV Road was just making sure that any parking within that front yard area off IWV Road be screened but again would be totally supportive of extending that screening throughout the entire IWV Road frontage. Hensch is not only concerned aesthetically but also quite certain the engineering staff would recommend limitation of access on IWV Road from the main property so if they're not going to have driveways anyway why not have this look as aesthetically pleasing as possible. Heitner agreed and stated it also goes to further satisfy the Comprehensive Plan goal about having aesthetically pleasing beautified entries into the City. Signs stated he did appreciate the review of the various uses this by right, provisional and by special exception, that did answer some of his questions. He would definitely be supportive of extending the S3 screening standard the entire length of the IWV Road on the side of that property. Signs noted one of the things that they seem to be bumping up against a lot lately, in the last year of applications that came before the Commission, is there's a common theme of not wanting change and not wanting growth. For those folks here tonight to speak against growth, if they stick around a little bit longer, they're going to hear the folks that are going to speak against growth on the south side. The Commission talked with all the folks on the northeast side of town a couple times in the last two years about the fact that they didn't want their natural areas to grow, and it really got him thinking and begging the question of where is the City going to grow if nobody wants to grow. In the paper last week it stated the official census estimate for Iowa City shows that the growth was less than expected, while the growth in the neighboring communities was way more than expected. And to be honest, there's a reason for that and it is because they want to grow and the Iowa City community, at least part of the community, doesn't want to grow. The Commission is seeing this trend and it's starting to concern him and as stated earlier their role is to look at the good of the community as a whole. He is not opposed to change, they've seen change happen on the IWV corridor and her anticipates that the demand for that's going to continue regardless of any decision made tonight. He personally thinks that if he had to choose between that and 230 some acres south of Rohret Road this makes the most sense to put in some type of a heavier use of zoning so there are some of those types of businesses and industries on that side of town and it's really the only place that seems logical for him. He likes the staff's conditions and totally support those, he would also support extending the screening on IWV Road and is inclined to support this. He is definitely inclined to support the annexation and is comforted by the chart that showed the uses of the zoning allowed so he is more inclined now to support the zoning. Hensch opened the public hearing. Jon Marner (MMS Consultants) stated they would also support the extension to the S3 screening along IWV Road. The other thing he wanted to add is just to reiterate again that this zoning amendment is being sought not just for one user, there's an opportunity for multiple other businesses, whether they've expressed interest at this point or not, this is a great location to Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 21 of 36 provide quick access to the arterial road and immediate access to Highway 218 and the interstate system and as staff pointed out there's not a lot of those types of properties in the area. Other areas are located away from the highway or from the interstate or the area on the east part of town is located near railways and are different uses or smaller parcels. A lot of the people that are interested in this type of property for this type of uses are searching for something more in the neighborhood of 10 to 15 acres or a little larger and those properties simply don't exist in the Iowa City area at this time, so this is a great location. John Bergstrom (Slothower Farms) want to state they are not anti -growth, they just don't like the abrupt change in the land plan and doesn't think he was hearing anti -growth. This area has always been deemed to be residential and he thinks it should continue as residential. As far as north of Melrose frankly this development would probably fit better north of Melrose, but as they turn onto Slothower Road that should be residential or neighborhood commercial because then to the south is residential and the County Farm will have a residential component to it. Again, this is just a big change, and as they change an instrument like the Comprehensive Plan it should be much more encompassing than just accommodating MidAmerican Energy because it's very clear from all the staff comments that is what this is all about. Hensch stated just so everybody knows they have not materials that state what the potential users of these properties and they strictly look at the application and what the application says. Eric Freedman (4401 Tempe Place) wanted to acknowledge he heard a couple of the Commissioners say this is not a residential area, west on Melrose, but that's not the concern, the concern is the views from the south, and what this impacts to the south. On the map it is shown that a ton of people live right across the Poor Farm, it's a clear line of sight. If the Poor Farm is going to be a community resource with trails and some housing and community farming, then right next to it will be a row of trees or shrubs like six feet high and he has no idea what it's going to look like so it'd be nice to at least see something that would show them what it's going to look like when this is built to the west of the Poor Farm. There is concern among people who live in this vibrant neighborhood of what the impact would be. He doesn't think any of them are opposed to annexing more land and creating space for things that are useful to the City, but they don't understand why it was chosen to be here without looking at other options. Why not north of Melrose, what's the long-term plan, is this going to be one little tiny piece, or is there going to be expansion for other intensive commercial, is there a plan for that they haven't seen. He'd like to know more, in order to be able to make a clear decision and he doesn't know how they can make a decision on this, given what they've heard so far. For example, something along the east side of that space that was more compatible and useful to the people living there. Nobody wants to live next to a dump so if there's going to be stuff farther west that is fine, but he thinks people are concerned about along Slothower Road is directly next to where people live. Jim Larimore (1143 Wildcat Lane) is one of the families that looks across that field at the proposed site. Since one of the Commissioners made some comments that are interpreted as being directed at those who are here in attendance, he thinks it's interesting sometimes that they can hear the same words and or be exposed to the same words and hear such dramatically different things. Larimore has not heard a single one of his neighbors express a concern about growth. Some of them came to Iowa City and contributed to the growth of the population, so he doesn't think that anyone is anti -growth. From what he's heard so far, they do have some concerns about what is planned, or what is potentially going to be for some of them within a very Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 22 of 36 long stone's throw of their neighborhood and the thing that he would point out and where he heard some things tonight that are worrisome was actually in the documentation that was posted online and there is a reference in some of the material that suggests the plan for the County and the Poor Farm. They're actually considering putting some residential units there which would be very close to the proposed site and that creates a much more immediate conflict between the kinds of uses for these properties. The thing he is very concerned about, because there were also comments that none of us has a crystal ball, they really don't know what will go there and there's no confirmed plan for MidAmerica Energy to use the site, but there is beyond the rights that can be exercised to build on that site subject only to provisional review. What was referenced as an adult video stores or strip clubs that's what the Code says so by opening up the door for intensive commercial use on this property, not very far from one of Iowa City's high schools and not very far from residential neighborhoods are possibilities that no one really want in their backyards. Cindy Seyfer (36 Tempe Court) wanted to follow up with that comment they're not concerned if it's MidAmerican or who it is that builds there, they are looking at what's in the best interest for Iowa City and the public. She thinks it's really dangerous to annex and start to allow that land to be used in a way that they don't have a plan for. They don't know what the future will hold for that land, but what they do know is what is near it. The Commissioners indicated it isn't residential, but she would assume that the residents of Walnut Ridge and Galway Hills would beg to differ, because they would find themselves pretty close to that area. Her neighborhood would find themselves close to that area and again that's where she thinks they need to be looking at tiers, rather than jumping straight from residential to intense commercial. Once it is intense commercial all of those options exist in terms of what could go on that land, and it makes it really hard to feel comfortable with what the future might hold. She also wanted to echo none of them are against the growth, they wanted residential growth or at the very least maybe some neighborhood commercial growth, they just don't think an appropriate use is intense commercial. Sherri Slothower Bergstrom (Slothower Farms) feels like the panel here maybe doesn't have a good understanding of that area. They have been talking a lot about IWV Road but the people that are here and the big impact that they are missing is what's going to happen south of there. There's a big strip of land there and this small piece of land that they're addressing tonight is going to set the tone for what happens in that whole area, and it really concerns her and bothers her a lot that the people on the panel are not really understanding that. Maybe the Commissioners are not real familiar with the area, but IWV Road is probably not what they should be thinking about here, there is going to be impact in the future from this decision on a large area of agricultural land and on a lot of people. Look at that neighborhood there and look at what's going to happen in the future on that agricultural land and what they are deciding here for a very small plot is going to impact that greatly. Duane Kruse (965 Slothower Road) and as Bergstrom just pointed out the decision that's being imposed on the Commission tonight does impact a lot of people and it's a very large decision. When one drives up and down IWV you see commercial, but you get past that and there's a lot of land there that is going to be impacted by this decision if this area goes to heavy industrial. He is also not opposed to growth, they all want to grow, they all want to be successful, but he also thinks if they make this decision in favor of the heavy industrial, they're opening pandora's box and can't close it once it's opened. Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 23 of 36 Craig corrected that it's not heavy industrial zoning. Kruse accepted that but stated he is opposed to this, his wife Kathy is opposed, their two dogs are opposed, their three cats are opposed and 49 pheasants in their front yard last winter are opposed. Hensch asked the applicant what's the CSR (corn suitability rating) for this land. Marner replied he did not know off the top of his head. Hensch noted several people mentioned the agricultural lands and he presumes it's around 50-60. He assumes it would be the same as the Poor Farm and the Poor Farm CSR is low, it's around 50. Freedman had a quick question as there was a mention in the conditions for the plan that the resident would pay 25% of the improvements to Slothower Road to the south of the site. What is the vision and is that going to extend all the way down to Rohret Road or that would connect up the Lake Shore. Hensch reminded him this is not a question/answer opportunity, it's an opportunity for the public to address the Commission and share information. He could certainly ask staff after the meeting. Freedman stated then if the idea was that collector road is going to feed on to Lake Shore and not go all the way down to Rohret Road it would be tremendously opposed by many, many people in the community because then lots of traffic would be going right through a street where there's tons of kids. So if there's thinking here about creating a collector road they have to be very careful and do an analysis of where that collector is going to go, he thinks it should go to Rohret Road. Marner stated the CSR is 72, he was able to look it up on the internet. Hensch noted just so people know it's a scale of zero to 100 and the closer to 100 is prime agricultural land and as it goes down its lesser value and that determines how it sells frankly. Hensch closed the public hearing. Townsend moved to recommend approval of ANN21-0003, a voluntary annexation of approximately 70.39 acres of property located south of IWV Road and west of Slothower Road. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch stated here they are talking about the annexation of approximately 70.39 acres and they need to analyze three criteria that's in the annexation policy. Number one, the area under consideration falls within the adopted long range planning boundary; number two, development in the area proposed for annexation will fulfill an identified need without imposing undue burden on the City, so talking about city services such as utilities and other services; and number three, the control of the development is in the City's best interest and really that's what the Commission is always to look at, what's best for the City. Hensch started he completely empathizes with everybody in this room, he lives on the south side of Iowa City and there's been a lot of zoning actions have been taken adjacent to his property Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 24 of 36 that he did not agree with and did not like but that's just the way it is. Other people make these decisions, sometimes in our favor and sometimes not. He looks at this critically, he has been doing this for seven years now, and so on these annexations he thinks it's usually pretty straightforward by reviewing the three criteria. Again, they are not talking about rezoning, it has nothing to do with the conversation right now, this is about annexation. He thinks all three of these criteria clearly been met. Signs agrees, he is very much supportive if the property owner wants to bring their property into the into the City and add value to the City. Hensch thanked Signs for bringing that up. The City's annexation policy is it's only voluntary annexation so the owner of this property wishes to be annexed into Iowa City. Signs agrees and states he personally thinks they need to look pretty favorably upon it, as long as it's not going to create some detriment to City services or resources. Townsend, Craig and Padron all agreed. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. Motion by Signs to recommend approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: a. Plat all the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. b. Submit a landscape plan, which shall be approved by the City Forester, to ensure that, when developed, the subject property is designed in a manner that emphasizes green components within its location along an arterial and as an entryway into the City. c. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of the proposed access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. 6. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy on the property fronting Slothower Road: a. Installation of landscaping to the S3 standard, as detailed in section 14 -5F - 6C of City Code, along the subject property's Slothower Road frontage. If said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. b. Improvement of Slothower Road to the southern end of the proposed access off Slothower Road. c. Installation of landscaping to the S3 standard along the property line and IWV Road. 7. At the time the final plat is approved, Owner shall dedicate additional right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in an amount and location approved by the City Engineer. 8. Parking, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall either not be located between the Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 25 of 36 front facade of the principal structure and the front yard right-of-way line or shall be screened to the S3 standard along the IWV Road frontage. The motion was seconded by Craig. Hensch stated this is the hardest part and he presumes no one in the audience will like what he has to say but they have to look at what's best for the entire city of Iowa City, not for particular areas. He has heard every word they said, he listened carefully, and he understands exactly why they feel the way they do but the Commission's job is to make decisions that's best for the entire city of Iowa City. He personally thinks Mr. Signs comments were correct that there seems to be a real strong, and he's not accusing anybody in here of this, of anti -development in Iowa City because the Commission has gone through some really rough public hearings for development on east side by Hickory Hills and on the south side with the new zoning standards. Somebody's got to pay property taxes, land has to be developed for the people that want to live here, people keep moving here and they have to live somewhere, they have to work somewhere, so the Commission has to make really hard decisions that are pretty thankless. At the end of the day, he has to look at is a Comprehensive Plan being complied with, are the district plans and the subdistrict plans being complied with, in general, because this is subjective when talking about comprehensive plans and district plans and then in a particularity are the development ordinances being followed. That's the Commission's role and he views it pretty literal and has to take out his personal feelings on a lot of things. Hensch acknowledged there's some subjectivity but mostly their job is are the rules being followed and is the intention of the plans being followed and the answer for him in this case is yes. He acknowledged he wouldn't like it if he was a neighbor, he does disagree with them that the residential area is farther to the south, and he is thrilled to have a developer voluntarily without coercion have one third of their property be a buffer. Hensch stated this is a onetime thing for the neighbors, but this is a regular every meeting for Commission and this is a great deal and he will support this without reservation Craig stated she also supports the rezoning, she would not support it if it came further south, but she thinks it's in keeping with what is going to be there when 965 comes down between the landfill and this property. They weren't going to be building residential houses to the west because like someone already said residential houses don't want to back up to the landfill, well residential houses don't want to live on 965 either, so there's going to be something happening there that is not residential, and this creates the beginning of that buffer that they are going to want to your residential neighborhoods. If this was that full strip of land they were asking for, she would not approve it, but she thinks the corner up there by Melrose is in keeping with the uses on Melrose, so she is very supportive of it. Padron is still opposed to the change; she still thinks the Poor Farm is too close. For example, the bike library is organizing rides to different farms in town, so people can ride their bike and go to other farms and the Poor Farm has been participating in that. She received notifications to go there and spend the day there with other nonprofit organizations doing family events as well, so she thinks it is too close to the Poor Farm. She is also concerned with all the uses that were listed; some are not very family friendly. Padron acknowledged Craig said if it were the whole strip she would not approve but Padron feels approving this corner might be a beginning for developers to keep asking for changes on the whole strip. She is very in favor of City growth but doesn't think this is the right way to grow the City and is concerned. This particular area is not the right place for it. Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2021 Page 26 of 36 Townsend noted at this point they're not voting on any specific proposal, right now they're just voting on rezoning the land and she doesn't have a problem. Hensch agreed, they never really know what it's going to end up somewhere when they rezone it, they rezone land and do not rezone for particular use that's going to happen eventually in the future. Signs appreciates that comment and would agree and is not making any decision based on the idea that MidAmerican Energy as maybe the tenant there. He supports this type of growth along IWV in whatever it might be. There were couple of references to some of the provisional uses there he can assure them if something like an adult bookstore came before the Board of Adjustment, he is sure there would be a tremendous neighborhood input in that session, and he is pretty sure it wouldn't get past. He also reiterated it is really important to note this is not industrial, this is intensive commercial and he is in support of the rezoning. A vote was taken and the motion passes 4-1 (Padron dissenting). CASE NO. CPA21-0001: A public hearing on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the South District Plan to facilitate development that follows form -based principles. Russett began with a brief summary of what's in the staff report, the City has been working with Opticos on this since 2019 and they've met with several stakeholders over the past two years to get input on the plan. A few things she wanted to highlight since the Commission last saw this is staff has made some changes to the Comprehensive Plan and some of those changes were also incorporated into the proposed zoning code. The vast majority of the changes are non - substantive changes, formatting issues and typos, but there were also a few things staff found that they wanted to clarify in the code so they made those changes. One thing is they did change the Comprehensive Plan future land use map based on recent input from a landowner south of Wetherby Park and that will be discussed later in the presentation. Lehmann stated for CPA21-0001, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is really a couple changes to the context, the goals and objectives, new land use descriptions, and a new future land use map. Lehmann showed an image of the new future land use map that takes a form - based approach to land use. As far as context and background, there's some information about the form -based code process and some added some information about history including planning and of the area and development that's happened since the Plan was initially adopted in 2015, as well as some generalizing language, based on the proposed new future land use map. Lehmann noted it also talks about form -based zoning and form -based codes and how those work, which is instead of organizing zones by uses, zones are organized by what they look like and trying to tailor the character to the form of the area. He explained that is a difference and it clarifies how that would occur in the South District. As part of that staff also is proposing three new goals and objectives that discuss exactly what form -based zoning looks like in the South District and how those would support other goals that are also within the Plan and broader goals of the City as well, including a diversity of housing types, promoting walkability and use of alternative modes of transportation, and including new neighborhood commercial areas. Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 10 of 18 Hensch can speak pretty intelligently on the Poor Farm since he's responsible for it, there's a 10 - year master plan and the possibility for affordable housing won't even occur until year seven. They're on year three and there's been no further discussion, there's been no consultants retained, there's been no development, no money has been spent on that. Signs asked if they could include an amendment to increase some tree planting along the south and the east borders, the S3 six-foot hedge is nice for when one is driving by but from a landscape perspective it really doesn't do a whole lot. Hensch noted that can be done in the rezoning, this is just a comprehensive plan. He noted last time they added the condition of S3 landscaping on the northern edge as well. Craig wanted to add she has gone out and driven the neighborhood's, she has a friend who lives in the neighborhood behind Weber School and she feels it is her responsibility as a member of the Commission to see the lay of the land. She had not had time to do it before the other meeting, but she did do it before this meeting. Her opinion is the same as it was in the initial meeting, there is development happening along IWV Road and this is compatible with what is there. She agrees with the person who said what is going to happen after this is more commercial development along IWV Road and she thinks from a City perspective and thinking about what's best for the City, they are spending money on upgrading the roads so it can handle all the traffic that is goes to the landfill and they are creating an infrastructure that costs all the taxpayers a lot of money and it makes it possible for some of this development to happen and will bring tax dollars back into the City. She is supportive of this project. Signs does have one more cynical observation as he was perusing the aerial map, there are two radio tower installations on the Slothower farm and it seems like that would affect a view of a neighborhood too. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. CASE NO. REZ21-0006: Location: SW corner of Slothower Road and IWV Road An application for a rezoning from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) for approximately 53.36 acres, Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) for approximately 17.03 acres, and approximately 9 acres of land from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1). Heitner noted there's some crossover with this presentation and what was just went over so he'll try his best to not be too duplicative. For the rezoning component, Heitner showed an aerial of the subject property, and a look at the existing zoning which showed County agricultural zoning and the narrow nine -acre sliver of City rural residential on the east. Most of the property which is zoned County Agricultural is in Fringe Area C inside the growth area, and the nine -acre strip on the far east is within Iowa City limits. Heitner next showed the proposed rezoning noting it has not changed since it was last discussed here. There are the two parcels to the east going to Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 11 of 18 intensive commercial zoning (CI -1) with the third parcel on the west going to interim development commercial. Regarding the background on why the rezoning is back in front of this Commission. At the September 16 meeting it was recommended for approval by a vote of 4-1 but there were concerns raised regarding negative externalities, negative impacts to viewsheds, noise, traffic etc. So, in an attempt quell those concerns, the applicant did submit the revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment that was just discussed, featuring the 350 -foot vegetative and noise buffer also designated as open space. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment that occurred within the last item does identify a need for buffering intensive commercial uses along that southern 350 -foot distance of the subject property. So with that in place, staff is recommending two additional conditions to the rezoning application which is why this item is here for discussion today. The two additional conditions staff is recommending are first when the land is platted the owner should dedicate to the City a buffer easement and impose upon the land a use restriction prohibiting development within 350 feet of the southern boundary of the subject property. This would effectively prohibit any installation of structures, parking lots, drive aisles or loading areas within this area. Secondly at the time the land is platted and upon construction of the public improvements the owner shall plant landscaping to the S3 standard along the southern boundary within the easement area in locations that do not contain sensitive areas or sensitive area buffers. The sensitive areas are focused mostly at the south property boundary and there's a sizable 1.3 acre wetland within that area with a 100 foot wetland buffer all around the wetland. There is also a wetland and stream corridor on the western most property. As far as the rezoning is concerned, the role of the Commission is to determine whether the rezoning meets the review criteria, which is consistency with Comprehensive Plan and compatibility with the existing neighborhood. Regarding consistency with Comprehensive Plan there will be consistency pending approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to intensive commercial. Also, the Southwest District Plan does call for future urban development within this subject property. The rationale for why intensive commercial development may be attractive in this location is due to the location and size of the properties, the adjacency to forthcoming arterial road access, and highway adjacency. With respect to compatibility with the existing neighborhood character, there are preexisting uses of comparable intensity to what might be found in an intensive commercial zone along the north side of IWV Road, the County Public Works facility and the Iowa National Guard Armory. Staff is proposing a S3 high screen landscape buffer, originally this was just proposed along the Slothower Road frontage but it was discussed at the last meeting to have this screening standard applied to the IWV Road frontage as well. Staff is also recommending placement of this S3 screen along the southern property boundary where there are no sensitive areas and there are additional screening standards within the City Code that are intended to conceal parking and loading areas from adjacent residential zones or neighborhoods. Lastly, staff does have a condition pertaining to the location of loading areas and outdoor storage and prohibiting those areas between the principal building facade and the IWV and Slothower Road right-of-way lines. With respect to next steps, there will be a public hearing on November 16, not only for the annexation and rezoning but also for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Prior to the public hearing, there is a notification process that is tied to the annexation where the City has to notify utility companies and non -consenting parties are sent the annexation application via certified Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 12 of 18 mail, and the annexation component of the project also has to gain City Development Board approval from the State. Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial {ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Owner shall plat the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. a. Said plat shall show a buffer easement area generally 350' wide consistent with the comprehensive plan map. This easement area shall be governed by an easement agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This easement area shall be planted according to a landscape plan approved by the City Forester at such times as required by the subdivider's agreement. b. Said plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in a size and location approved by the City Engineer to allow Slothower Road to be improved to City urban design standards. 2. Pursuant to Iowa City Code Title 15, Owner shall, contemporaneous with the final plat approval, execute a subdivider's agreement addressing, among other things, the following conditions: a. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of any future access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. b. Owner shall install landscaping to the S3 standard along the Slothower Road and IWV Road frontages; c. Improve Slothower Road to the southern end of any future access off Slothower Road. 3. For all lots fronting IWV Road and Slothower Road, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the public right-of-way line. Hensch noted it seems a little inconsistent stating the first part where would have to be approved by City Forester but does that also include the second highlighted portion also needing to be approved by the Forester. Hensch feels that both need to pre -approved by the Forester. Heitner confirmed that's the intent. Hensch next asked if at some point staff could share the City's development ordinances regarding what constitutes S2 or S3 screening, he would like to read more about that and have an understanding of those. Hekteon looked it up, it is as at 14-5-F6 in the zoning code. The S3 standard intent is a buffering treatment that uses dense landscape screening to provide a visual and physical separation between uses and zones. It is commonly applied between residential uses and commercial and industrial uses and to screen outdoor work or storage areas. Required materials are enough shrubs and small evergreens to form a continuous screen or hedge at least five to six feet in height and more than 50% solid year-round. Screening materials must be at least three feet high when planted and at least one half of the shrubs must be evergreen varieties. An alternative is to use a berm in conjunction with a hedge to achieve an overall height of at least six feet or a continuous or semi continuous five- to six -foot -high masonry wall or solid fence. Hekteon added Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 13 of 18 the permitted plants are described in table 5-F2 where it states S3 screening and says American Arborvitae, Emerald trees, compact burning bushes, or Hatfield trees are allowed. Deviations from the list of plants are allowed if the replacement shrubs are similar in form or hardiness to a permitted variety and are approved by the City. Signs asked if there is any way that they can add a provision that some of that screening area have some large evergreen and or deciduous trees. Heitner replied yes, if the Commission wishes to add deciduous or evergreen trees that's certainly the Commission's right to request that. Signs would normally refer to it as a reforestation plan but there is not just planting, so is there a percentage of the plant material needs to be trees of mature height over 30 feet or something. Hensch noted it said 50% has to be of evergreen variety, he hates to be too prescriptive but it'd be nice to try to beautify that reforest a little bit. Signs noted that all the shrubs described are six -to -eight -foot mature shrubs, even the evergreen ones. Craig added when they are talking about evergreens, they are talking 40 -50 -foot evergreen trees so could that be added to the buffer zone on the recommendation of the City Forester's plan as he decides. Hensch said they can just add that as a condition to the motion. Hekteon said they could add a condition giving some guidance to the City Forester. Nolte asked if the developer is obligated to maintain this land in perpetuity, it's an easement but it could be sold. Hektoen noted right now they haven't platted it so it could be platted as an outlot to be owned by the City to be owned by anyone at this point or put in a land trust or something like that, there is a use agreement but that doesn't mean that ownership can't be transferred because it's not City property. Signs stated they could potentially deed it to the City to be part of that western buffer. Hektoen confirmed at the time that the land is platted, they could plat it as an outlot to be dedicated to the City or to be dedicated to whomever or conveyed to whomever. Hensch opened the public hearing. Josh Entler (IWV Holdings) is representing the applicant and had a couple of comments he'd like to address. They are in agreement with those revised conditions with one technical clarification, in terms of the S3 buffer on the south, they will provide the S3 screening along the south line in areas where there's not sensitive features. He doesn't want to get into trouble with the Army Corps of Engineers because there is a designated wetland out there and a buffer and they need to stay out of it. Entler just wanted to explain that so if a year from now somebody asks why there's not a continuous straight line of brand-new trees, that is why. They'll plant new trees and S3 screening where there's not sensitive features. Another comment on the S3 screening, they just did this in coordination with Hiawatha for a development that also needed screening and as Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 14 of 18 mentioned this also works well in tandem with buffers or with berms and they are also in agreement to proposing a two- or three-foot berm to elevate the base of the planting up a little higher. They've found that seems to gain some traction with the adjacent residents. In terms of the specifics of the plant, he would like to propose to table the specific tree requirement to site plan review, once they have a specific user or person that's actually going to be planting those trees. He asks that they push that off to the site plan review and just focus on rezoning. He does welcome the idea of having that responsibility on to the City Forester. Hensch was happy to hear about the berm as the concern is they just don't want a wall of arborvitae. Entler agreed and doesn't want that either. Hensch wants to be sensitive to the neighbors and what they have to see and mixed deciduous and conifers is a year-round barrier and everybody would be much happier with that. Craig asked is that something that could be handled at site plan review. Russett replied yes, that's typically when they would review the landscaping plan, which would be required for this. However, if the Commission wants the condition to be more specific, that could be incorporated. Jim Seyfer (36 Tempe Court) stated he understands the Poor Farms plans are not set in stone but the map that he saw of future development on the Poor Farm, the affordable housing was going to backup to Slothower Road. Someone said earlier, correctly, it was in the southwest corner of the Poor Farm but that's subject to change. He understands but the plan was for that housing to be fairly close to Slothower and south of the southern boundary of the land to be rezoned. He just wanted to bring that up as a possible issue. Hensch closed the public hearing. Signs moved to recommend approval of REZ21-0006, a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), and 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial {ID -C) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Owner shall plat the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. a. Said plat shall show a buffer easement area generally 350' wide consistent with the comprehensive plan map. This easement area shall be governed by an easement agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This easement area shall be planted according to a landscape plan approved by the City Forester at such times as required by the subdivider's agreement. b. Said plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in a size and location approved by the City Engineer to allow Slothower Road to be improved to City urban design standards. 2. Pursuant to Iowa City Code Title 15, Owner shall, contemporaneous with the final plat approval, execute a subdivider's agreement addressing, among other things, the following conditions: a. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south Planning and Zoning Commission October 21, 2021 Page 15 of 18 of any future access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. b. Owner shall install landscaping to the S3 standard along the Slothower Road and IWV Road frontages; c. Improve Slothower Road to the southern end of any future access off Slothower Road. 3. For all lots fronting IWV Road and Slothower Road, loading areas, and outdoor storage shall not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the public right-of-way line. Townsend seconded the motion. Hensch noted his only concern is exactly the same thing Signs brought up about appropriate screening, mostly is out of ignorance with not being really familiar with S3 standards. Signs can totally defer to the City Forester but he doesn't want a six-foot hedge going around this entire boundary as that has very little impact on the view. He'd like to see something much more deciduous and evergreen trees that are 30 feet plus in that mature height. Craig proposes where it says installation of landscaping to the S3 standard along the Slothower Road and IWV Road frontage to state landscaping shall include in addition to the S3 standard, a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees as approved by the City Forester. The Commission's intent is pretty clear, they'd like to see deciduous and coniferous trees. Also they fully understand that in sensitive areas they should not be added there. Hekteon asked if this is in the 350 -foot buffer area or in all areas where S3 screening as required. Craig answered it's in the buffer area. Hensch noted although the motion would just be that the more intense screening would be in the buffer area he also doesn't want to see a wall of arborvitae on the north side either as it is an entrance to Iowa City. Signs amended his motion to add installation of landscaping to the S3 standard shall include a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees as approved by the City Forester. Craig seconded the amendment. A vote was taken on the motion and it passed 5-0 CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 7, 2021: Townsend moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 7, 2021. Signs seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. From: To: Date: Pamela Raymond Heitner Wednesday, August 18, 2021 7:32:08 PM I am against the rezoning of Slothower Rd. I feel like it will lead to loud traffic and distracting lighting to our neighborhood. Pamela Miller-DeKeyser 1630 Lake Shore Drive Iowa City, IA 52246 Sent from the all new AOL app for Android From: DEANAGHOLSON To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Rezoning at Melrose and Slothower Date: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:00:16 PM Mr. Heitner, I am emailing you in regard to the recent proposal of rezoning in the area of Melrose and Slothower. We have lived in Iowa City for twenty years this year. We built our home on the southwest side of town near Weber school and have loved our neighborhood and location. We have paid close attention to the area to our north (Poor Farm) and west (farmland) and were happy with the cities comprehensive plan for this area over time. We are very concerned that the recent rezoning proposal is to go from rural/residential to commercial in this area. We are aware that rezoning happens (it obviously had to in order for our neighborhood to be developed) but to leap from rural to commercial seems like quite a drastic change. Once a commercial property area is developed, it seems likely that it could very well continue to develop in that manner which could effect us in the future. I am unsure if we will be able to attend the P&Z meeting this week but would request that you log our concerns in with any others you may have gotten regarding this rezoning. We would like to see the city take a step back and reassess the situation and come up with a revised comprehensive plan to share with the southwest citizens before forging ahead at this time. Thanks for your time! Deana Gholson 1332 Phoenix Drive IC IA This email is from an external source. From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: John Bergstrom Raymond Heitner Sherri Bergstrom Case CPA21-0002 SW corner of Slothower Road and IWV Road Monday, September 13, 2021 6:28:15 PM As representatives of Slothower Farm we are expressing our objections to the dramatic change in the Comprehensive Plan to allow for Intensive commercial development on land that has long been anticipated to be residential. This change to the IWV Holding parcel is being brought about to allow for the development of a Mid American Energy service complex that the City evidently feels that they have no where else to place it. This is certainly a change to a relatively small parcel that will affect the future of many existing and future residents. We would like to see the following addressed or answered: 1. The staff report (as well as the MMS report) refer to the significant changes that have taken place. Frankly, the changes in the immediate area west of the interchange are not new. What is new is the significant residential growth to the area abutting the County Farm. The proposed changes will affect the existing neighborhoods, existing residents and the future development of the Johnson County Poor Farm. 2. There seems to be concern about the landfill needing a buffer. The proposed 965 extension will provide a natural separation. MMS has come to its own stated conclusion that the best buffer is commercial development. Seems a little self serving. 3. Why is a longstanding planning instrument being drastically altered to accommodate a 40 acre development (initially) that will affect a large overlay area. If the Comprehensive Plan is to be altered like this, it should be much more encompassing, studied and thought out. Not as a reaction to a single user. 4. The City feels it needs more intensive commercial land? Fine, don't put it on or next to areas long slated for residential. Or, if you can't accommodate certain uses, is there any harm letting them gravitate to a neighboring community that can? 5. There are complementary non-residential uses that are compatible with neighborhoods that don't infringe on residents. The uses allowed under the proposed zoning (including Mid American Energy) are not compatible. 6. The goal of the existing Comprehensive Plan is to encourage commercial and industrial development south and southwest of the Iowa City Municipal Airport. Now you appear to conveniently be changing the Fringe Area Agreement just to accommodate a single user. 7. How does Johnson County feel about this as it relates to the Poor Farm? Intensive commercial uses would not be complementary to the proposed development schemes we have seen for the farm. Please reconsider this change to the Comprehensive Plan and the subsequent zoning changes that would result. The City needs to slow down and better understand the ramifications of this action. John and Sherri Bergstrom From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: James Larimore Raymond Heitner Jim Larimore Opposition to proposed amendment to Comprehensive Plan Wednesday, September 15, 2021 3:43:33 PM Dear Mr. Heitner, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of land near the intersection of Melrose and Slothower in Iowa City. My family and I live on Wildcat Lane in the Southwest District, and our house is one of those with a direct line of site to the proposed location of Intensive Commercial development. We purchased our house seven years ago in large measure because of the assurances provided in the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Southwest District, which explicitly discouraged "the establishment of commercial uses around the Melrose Avenue -Highway 218 interchange" and envisioned that future development of this area should preserve the rural character of the district, provide a diversity of housing types, and potentially include the creation of a regional park that could be connected to a planned water reservoir, the Willow Creek trail and other parks in the Southwest District. I am certain that others who have purchased homes in this area, at the combined cost of tens of millions of dollars of personal investment, also took into account the rural and residential nature of the district when they decided to move into the Southwestern District. The proposed rezoning will irretrievably damage the rural and residential character of the Southwest District and creates a risk that the proposed Intensive Commercial development will eventually cascade further down Slothower Road, impacting home values and quality of life, as well as introducing unwanted vehicular traffic seeking a faster path to Highway 218. Furthermore, in stark contrast to the transparent and inclusive process that informed the current proposal takes a piecemeal rather than comprehensive approach, and with extremely limited effort at outreach, information dissemination, and community engagement on the part of the Planning and Zoning office. I am concerned that precipitous action on the part of the Planning and Zoning Commission puts at risk the public trust which was earned by the Commission's predecessors, who facilitated direct community engagement in the creation of the current Comprehensive Plan. Trust is hard to earn and easy to squander, and I urge the Commission not to trade away public trust and confidence in the expedient pursuit of a problem for which there are likely alternative solutions. I look forward to participating in the Commission's hearing on September 16th. Sincerely, Jim Larimore Wildcat Lane Iowa City From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: John Bergstrom Raymond Heitner Sherri Bergstrom; Seyfer, James W IWV/Slothower Road Monday, October 18, 2021 1:07:26 PM Ray, as we discussed, we continue to object to the change in the comprehensive plan and the rezoning at the corner of IWV and Slothower Road. It has been made clear that this change is being made to accommodate MidAmerican Energy with little thought as to how it affects a much greater area. That said, I believe there is a solution that everyone can live with. Move the MidAmerican facility to the 40 acres that IWV partners also owns on the north side of IWV Road. The comprehensive plan and zoning would remain in place on the south side of IWV. On the north side, the facility would be more consistent with the properties immediately to the east. While I cannot speak for the neighborhood to the south of the county farm, I am led to believe this is a solution they might consider to be palatable. Please consider this alternative with your staff. John Bergstrom Sent from Mail for Windows Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5238 (REZ21- 0006) Ordinance No. Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), approximately 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C), and approximately 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) for land located west of the intersection of IWV Road SW and Slothower Road. Whereas, the applicant, IWV Holdings, LLC., has requested a rezoning of approximately 53.36 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1), approximately 17.03 acres from County Agricultural (A) to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C), and approximately 9 acres from Rural Residential (RR -1) to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) for land located west of the intersection of IWV Road and Slothower Road; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject area is appropriate for intensive commercial development and vegetative noise and sight buffer in the southern portion of the subject area; and Whereas, the subject property is located within .3 miles of an established residential neighborhood within the city limits; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan calls for appropriate transitions between residential neighborhoods and higher intensity commercial development; and Whereas, there is a public need to buffer intensive commercial uses from residential uses to the south; and Whereas, the subject property will have frontage onto Slothower Road; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan calls for a collector street within the Slothower Road right- of-way, between Melrose Avenue and Rohret Road; and Whereas, there is a public need to upgrade Slothower Road to collector street standards upon development; and Whereas, the subject property is being annexed into the city limits; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan further establishes goals for preserving and enhancing entryways to the City; and Whereas, there is a public need to preserve and enhance aesthetics on City entryways by screening items used for outdoor storage and by implementing specific standards for landscaping along entryway corridors; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with reasonable conditions regarding satisfaction of public needs through the buffering of intensive commercial Ordinance No. Page 2 uses from existing residential uses, upgrading the subject property's Slothower Road frontage to collector street standards, and the preservation and enhancement of City entryways, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, the property described below is hereby reclassified as follows: For the property below, from its current zoning designation of Rural Residential (RR -1) zone to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone: A PORTION OF THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet; Thence N00°00'59"E, 1307.41 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 300.04 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #1 contains 9.00 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. For the property below, from its current zoning designation of County Agricultural (A) zone to Intensive Commercial (CI -1) zone: A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet, to the Point of Beginning; Thence continuing S88°45'34"W, along said North Line, 414.99 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S00°06'26"E, along the West Line of said Kauble's Subdivision, 3.41 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31 "W, along said South Line, 1551.41 feet; Thence N13°37'32"W, 53.10 feet; Thence N04°19'09"E, 213.22 feet; Thence N22°47'41"E, 655.46 feet; Thence N33°02'35"E, 438.62 feet; Thence N00°53'27"W, 86.39 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 1471.32 feet; Thence S00°00'59"W, 1307.41 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #2 contains 53.36 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. For the property listed below, from its current zoning designation of County Agricultural (A) zone to Interim Development Commercial (ID -C) zone: Ordinance No. Page 3 A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence N89°06'50"E, along the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 862.10 feet; Thence S00°53'27"E, 86.39 feet; Thence S33°02'35"W, 438.62 feet; Thence S22°47'41"W, 655.46 feet; Thence SO4°19'09"W, 213.22 feet; Thence S13°37'32"E, 53.10 feet, to a Point on the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31"W, along said South Line, 370.12 feet, to the Southwest Corner of the North One- Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence NO0°08'52"E, along the West Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1315.30 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #3 contains 17.03 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owner's expense, all as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of Attest: City Clerk City Attorneaf`s Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen —11/09/21) ,20 . Mayor Approved by: Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: First Consideration 11/30/2021 Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Vote for passage: AYES: Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration 12/14/2021 Voteforpassage: AYES: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Date published Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ21-0006) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made among the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and IWV Holdings, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 79.39 acres of property located west of the intersection of IWV Road SW and Slothower Road, legally described below; and Whereas, the Owner has requested the rezoning of said property to allow for future intensive commercial development; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject area is appropriate for intensive commercial development and vegetative noise and sight buffer in the southern portion of the subject area; and Whereas, the subject property is located within .3 miles of an established residential neighborhood within the city limits; and Whereas, the subject property will have frontage onto IWV Road and Slothower Road; and Whereas, in order to ensure the long-term health of existing neighborhoods by providing appropriate transitions between residential and intensive commercial areas, upgrading City roadway infrastructure to meet future travel demand, and to preserve and enhance aesthetics on City entryways, this rezoning creates public needs to provide a buffer between the proposed commercial development and existing residential areas to the south, upgrade the property's Slothower Road frontage to collector street standards, and to provide enhanced screening along entryway frontages; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding a buffer along the property's south side, dedication of right-of-way along the west side of Slothower Road, improvements to the southern end of any future access off Slothower Road, contribution toward the cost of 25% of future upgrades on Slothower Road, south of any future proposed access, enhanced landscaping along Slothower and IWV Roads, and screening of any loading areas or outdoor storage areas from the Slothower and IWV Road frontages; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. IWV Holdings, LLC. is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: 1 A PORTION OF THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet; Thence N00°00'59"E, 1307.41 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 300.04 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #1 contains 9.00 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Commencing at the North Quarter Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence S00°00'59"W, along the East Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1305.56 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Projection of the North Line of Kauble's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 20 at Page 47 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S88°45'34"W, along said Easterly Projection and North Line, 300.07 feet, to the Point of Beginning; Thence continuing S88°45'34"W, along said North Line, 414.99 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S00°06'26"E, along the West Line of said Kauble's Subdivision, 3.41 feet, to its intersection with the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S69°03'31"W, along said South Line, 1551.41 feet; Thence N13°37'32"W, 53.10 feet; Thence N04°19'09"E, 213.22 feet; Thence N22°47'41"E, 655.46 feet; Thence N33°02'35"E, 438.62 feet; Thence N00°53'27"W, 86.39 feet, to a Point on the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N89°06'50"E, along said North Line, 1471.32 feet; Thence S00°00'59"W, 1307.41 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #2 contains 53.36 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. A PORTION OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Section 13, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Johnson County, Iowa; Thence N89°06'50"E, along the North Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 862.10 feet; Thence S00°53'27"E, 86.39 feet; Thence S33°02'35"W, 438.62 feet; Thence S22°47'41"W, 655.46 feet; Thence SO4°19'09"W, 213.22 feet; Thence S13°37'32"E, 53.10 feet, to a Point on the South Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence S89°03'31"W, along said South Line, 370.12 feet, to the Southwest Corner of the North One - Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; Thence N00°08'52"E, along the West Line of the North One -Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, a distance of 1315.30 feet, to 2 the Point of Beginning. Said Rezoning Parcel #3 contains 17.03 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. 2. Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Owner shall plat the property herein rezoned to follow the zoning boundaries. i. Said plat shall show a buffer easement area generally 350' wide consistent with the comprehensive plan map. This easement area shall be governed by an easement agreement, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This easement area shall be planted according to a landscape plan approved by the City Forester at such times as required by the subdivider's agreement. Landscaping within the buffer easement area shall meet the S3 standards and include a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees that will be at least 30' tall upon maturity. ii. Said plat shall include the dedication of right-of-way along the Slothower Road frontage in a size and location approved by the City Engineer to allow Slothower Road to be improved to City urban design standards. b. Pursuant to Iowa City Code Title 15, Owner shall, contemporaneous with the final plat approval, execute a subdivider's agreement addressing, among other things, the following conditions: i. Owner shall contribute 25% of the cost of upgrading Slothower Road, south of any future access, to collector street standards, adjacent to the subject property. H. Owner shall install landscaping to the S3 standard along the Slothower Road and MA/ Road frontages; iii. Improve Slothower Road to the southern end of any future access off Slothower Road. c. For all lots fronting IWV Road and Slothower Road, loading areas and outdoor storage shall not be located between the front facade of the principal structure and the public right-of-way line. 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 3 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released by the City of Iowa City. Once a building permit is issued or certificate of occupancy is issued, as applicable, the conditions shall be deemed satisfied and no further release will be provided. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Owner's expense. Dated this day of City of Iowa City , 20 . Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: City Attorney's K.—IDG' n I /clizl City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ss: Johnson County IWV ds, By: "owl r This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20 by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) 4 IWV Holdings, LLC. Acknowledgement: State of (,o County of 'S,r(IWA is r ord w cknowledged be �1m�e on VouluthUr to 2021 by (name) as 14 / (title) of IWV Hold''gs, LLC. I r �. AMANDA J WAUGH VV -OW - AR. %CommtssionNumber799220 My Commission Expjte-q September t9, 20 /;I. Notary Public in • .i or ttie $tate of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: q_I - 2azz• 5 Item Number: 9.b. CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org December 14, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. from High density single-family residential (RS -12) to high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12). (REZ21-0009) (Second Consideration) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report with Attachments Letter to Council Supplemental Memo P&Z Minutes Ordinance & CZA Correspondence to Council STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Item: REZ21-0009 Date: October 21, 2021 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Ed Cole Cole's Community LLC 2254 S. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA 52246 319-321-1002 Dirtworks0405@gmail.com Contact Person: Owner: Requested Action: Brian Boelk, Axiom Consultants 60 E. Court Street, Unit 3 Iowa City, IA 52240 319-519-6220 BBOELK@AXIOM-CON.COM Cole's Community, LLC C/O Ed Cole 2254 S. Riverside Dr. Iowa City, IA 52256 319-321-1002 Dirtworks0405@gmail.com Rezoning from high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to OPD/RS-12 Purpose: Allow the expansion of existing manufactured housing development Location: East of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. Location Map: Size: 5.81 Acres 2 Existing Land Use and Zoning: High density single-family residential (RS -12); Manufactured Housing Development Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: Public Meeting Notification: File Date: North: South: East: West: Manufactured housing development; High density single-family residential (RS -12) Open space; Neighborhood public (P1) Neighborhood public (P1); High density single-family residential (RS -12) General Industrial (11); Neighborhood Public (P1); Institutional Public (P2) Single family residential South Central 51 Property owners located within 300' of the project site received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were also posted on the site. September 16, 2021, resubmitted application to proposed 5.81 -acre rezoning area on October 26, 2021 45 Day Limitation Period: Waived 45 -Day review period BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Ed Cole, is requesting a rezoning to approve a Planned Development Overlay (OPD) plan for a 5.81 -acre property located east of S. Riverside Drive and north of McCollister Blvd. to High Density Single Family Residential Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12) zoning designation. The property was rezoned (REZ15-00007, Ord. No. 15-4639) to high density single-family with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) for the entire 14 -acre parcel in 2015. Per 14 -8D -7C-4, OPD plans are valid for no more than 24 months unless otherwise specified in the ordinance approving the OPD overlay zone. Since a building permit for the OPD Plan was not issued within two years of the OPD approval from 2015, the OPD expired. A new OPD rezoning is required for development of a manufactured housing park. With the existing application, the applicant wishes to rezone the vacant 5.81 -acre section of the 14 -acre parcel. The rezoning is intended to facilitate expansion of the existing manufactured housing park. While the subject boundary has changed, the subject application is highly similar to the rezoning that was approved by the City in 2015. The subject application contains 3 fewer lease lots than the 2015 OPD Plan. The expansion of the manufactured housing park requires approval of an OPD Plan through the rezoning process. The existing manufactured home park was created in 1974 for 55 units, and the rezoning would allow for the development of an additional 35 manufactured homes in the undeveloped area of the parcel. Currently, the property contains Cole's Community Manufactured housing Park (formerly known as 3 Thatcher), along with approximately 5.81 acres of undeveloped land where the expansion is proposed. The neighboring property to the north contains another manufactured housing park (formally known as Baculis' Manufactured Housing Park), which has been acquired by the applicant. The applicant has indicated that he intends to combine the existing parks into one development that will share facilities such as storm shelters and playgrounds. The storm shelter will also function as a community room for the park. The surrounding area includes a permanent open space with a levee to the east, Mesquakie Park (former landfill) across McCollister Boulevard to the south, and general industrial parcel use to the west. The applicant held a virtual Good Neighbor Meeting on October 11, 2021. No members of the public attended the meeting. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The current zoning of the property is for High Density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12). The high density single-family residential zone (RS -12) is intended to provide for development of single-family dwellings, duplexes and attached housing units at a higher density than in other single- family zones. Because this district represents a relatively high density for single-family development, dwellings should be in close proximity to all city services and facilities, especially parks, schools and recreational facilities. Special attention should be given to site design to ensure the development of quality neighborhoods. Nonresidential uses and structures permitted in this zone should be planned and designed to be compatible with the character, scale, and pattern of the residential development. The RS -12 zone allows single family dwellings on lots with a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet and 45 -foot lot width. Duplexes and attached single family dwellings are permitted with a minimum lot area of 3,000 square feet. The overlay zone is required in order for a property owner to construct a manufactured housing park, a form of commercial property in which individual owners of manufactured homes lease lots for their dwellings from the property owner. Overlay zones also allow increased flexibility for development standards such as setbacks, lot area, and road widths as long as certain specifications are met and it is not contrary to the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting approval of an OPD/RS-12 rezoning to expand the existing manufactured housing park and to allow waivers from street standards, setbacks and minimum lot sizes. The details of the OPD plan are discussed below under the Planned Development Overlay (OPD) Plan heading. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development Rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. 1. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. Density — The proposal meets the standard pertaining to density. In OPD zones, density is calculated based on the underlying residential density in the base zone. In the case of RS -12, it allows up to 13 units per acre of net land area. The proposed density of 35 units on 5.81 acres equals approximately 6 units per acre. This density is comparable to the approximate density of 6.5- 7.5 units per acre that can be found in the existing manufactured housing park communities to the west and north. Land Uses Proposed — The proposed manufactured housing park use would be an expansion of 4 the existing manufactured housing park. Mass, Scale and General Layout — The manufactured homes will be approximately 14' x 70' in size, equaling 980 square feet. The RS -12 zone requires a minimum building width of 20'. The applicant has requested a waiver from this standard to allow for the installation of 14' -wide buildings throughout the planned development. While section 14 -3A -4K of the City Code does not contain a specific modified standard for a reduction in building width, section 14-3A-7 of the City Code does allow for exceptions to the OPD approval criteria, provided that the requested modification meets the following: • The modification will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City Code and the City Comprehensive Plan. • The modification will generally enhance the proposed planned development and will not have an adverse impact on its physical, visual, or spatial characteristics. • The modification shall not result in a configuration of lots or a street system that is impractical or detracts from the appearance of the proposed development. • The modification will not result in danger to public health, safety, or welfare by preventing access to emergency vehicles, by inhibiting the provision of public services, by depriving adjoining properties of adequate light and air, or by violating the purposes and intent of the City Code or City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff maintains that the requested modification to allow for the construction of 14' -wide manufactured homes in the planned development area meets the aforementioned criteria. While not specifically listed within the City's Planned Development Overlay approval criteria, there is a separate section of the Code that addresses additional requirements for manufactured housing park planned developments. The intent is to allow for the development of manufactured housing parks in certain situations. As stated earlier, it is not uncommon for manufactured homes to be less than 20' -wide. By allowing the proposed manufactured housing size, the planned development may proceed with developing land that is currently vacant and underutilized within the subject property. Since the manufactured homes will be arranged in a similar manner to the existing manufactured housing community to the west, the modification will not result in a configuration of lots or a street system that is impractical or detracts from the appearance of the proposed development. Finally, the smaller building width will not result in any apparent dangers to public health, safety, or welfare. Open Space — The proposed development provides the required 20' of separation between units, with 15' of separation provided between end to end units. However, each lease lot as proposed will not be able to meet the RS -12 base zone standard for having 500 square feet of usable open space with a minimum dimension of 20' in the rear yard (14 -2A -4E -2(b)). Because of this, the applicant is requesting a waiver of from this standard to allow for a minimum open space dimension of 10' in the rear yards of all lease lots except for lease lots 1-3, where the rear yard minimum open space dimension will be 0'. Section 14-3A-7 of the City Code does allow for exceptions to the OPD approval criteria, provided that the requested modification meets the following: • The modification will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City Code and the City Comprehensive Plan. • The modification will generally enhance the proposed planned development and will not have an adverse impact on its physical, visual, or spatial characteristics. • The modification shall not result in a configuration of lots or a street system that is impractical or detracts from the appearance of the proposed development. • The modification will not result in danger to public health, safety, or welfare by preventing access to emergency vehicles, by inhibiting the provision of public services, by depriving adjoining properties of adequate light and air, or by violating the purposes and intent of the City Code or City's Comprehensive Plan. 5 Each lease lot will still be able to achieve 500 square feet of usable private open space. The character of the lease lots will be similar to the existing neighborhoods to the north and west. The Comprehensive Plan does indicate a need for affordable housing in areas with access to parks and recreational amenities. An existing City Park is located east of the proposed manufactured housing park development, which provides some open space. Additionally, the positioning of each housing unit will ensure that each property receives adequate light and air. Staff does not see any other dangers to public health, safety, or welfare as a result of this requested modification. Staff is also recommending a condition that the property owner provide an open space plan for a vacant area near the entrance to the park. The plans should detail future amenities, such as playground equipment and/or recreational fields. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the new manufacturing housing park, compliance with the approved plan will be required, including construction of the open space improvements. This open space area will be available to all park residents. The OPD standards typically require a dedication of neighborhood open space or fees in lieu of in order to ensure that adequate usable neighborhood open space is provided for residents of new development. When the property to the east was purchased by the City from the previous owner of Cole's Community Manufactured Housing Park, the purchase agreement stipulated that the land satisfies future open space requirements upon expansion of the manufactured housing park. The applicant has agreed to install a trail connection to provide residents of the development with access to the open space Traffic Circulation — Staff does not have any concerns with the additional trips that will be generated as a result of the proposed planned development. McCollister Boulevard has controlled access at the intersections of Old Highway 218 and Gilbert Street. Both McCollister Boulevard and Gilbert Street have excess capacity to accommodate the development's traffic demand. The internal street network will consist of an extended access street from S. Riverside Drive, with a loop street that will accommodate the new lease lots. This layout is similar to the existing layout to the west. The applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the required street width from 26' to 22' and the required right-of-way from 60' to 32'. Private streets do not have specific modification standards in the City Code. However, section 14 -3A -4K -2c(1) of the City Code does specify that private streets in single-family and two-family residential areas are discouraged and that requests for private streets in these areas will be carefully scrutinized and will only be approved if the proposed private street serves as a shared access to a cluster or small group of housing units and does not support any through traffic. The Code further specifies that if private streets are approved, the developer must submit a legally binding instrument setting forth the procedures to be followed for maintaining private streets and providing garbage service and snow removal, and for financing these services. The private streets will only serve the cluster of housing within the manufactured housing park and will not support any through traffic. The owner will be responsible for street maintenance and garbage service provision. With respect to the requested reduction, staff views the request as fair, given the comparable private street network that is seen in the existing adjacent manufactured housing park communities to the west and north. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. This property has public street access from Riverside Drive to the west. McCollister Boulevard is located approximately 680 feet to the south. Old Highway 218 is approximately 1,000 feet to the north. These arterial streets provide good access from the development to the larger community. The proposed 35 dwelling units are estimated to generate approximately 250 vehicle trips per day. Staff maintains that the existing roadway capacity in the surrounding street network is adequate for this additional traffic. 6 Within the existing development the current streets are asphalt without curb and gutter or sidewalks. The entrance road will have a 5' -wide sidewalk along the south side of the road. Staff has proposed that installation of this sidewalk be a condition of the rezoning. All new lots are proposed to have a sidewalk integrated with the curb. A sidewalk on the south side of the development will provide access to McCollister Boulevard, which leads to the Iowa River Corridor Trail and the Terry Trueblood Recreation Center located on the east side of the Iowa River. City water and sanitary sewer services are adequate to serve the proposed development. Construction plans providing at the time of platting will need to address connections to City system. The plan indicates that storm water will be directed to an existing drainage way that is located adjacent to McCollister Boulevard. The site grading plan is also necessary to review the proposed routing of storm water through the site including piping and culverts, overland flow routes, drainage ways, and channels. The current plan should also include any proposed storm sewer and culvert layout. Staff recommends as a condition of the rezoning that the property is final platted prior to the issuance of building permits. At the time of final platting, the applicant will be required to submit construction drawings and a site and grading plan for the City Engineer to review. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. The proposed planned development will meet this standard. The base RS -12 zone allows single family homes to be as tall as 35 feet. The applicant proposes to create additional lots for manufactured homes that would be substantially lower in height. This will result in no more adverse effect than conventional development. 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with the purposes of this Title, and with other building regulations of the City. Setback Reductions In addition to the previously described variations from the underlying zoning requirements for minimum building width, open space, and street and right-of-way width, the applicant is requesting three different waivers for setback reductions, which are described below. 1. 30' setback from the edge of the property (Lease Lots 1-3 (0') and Lease Lots 4-13 (10')). 2. Reduction of the rear yard setback from 20' to 10' (All Lease Lots except 1-3). 3. Reduction of the side yard setback from 5' to 0' (Lease Lots 1-3). Section 14 -3A -4K -la of the City Code provides the criteria that must be met if minimum setbacks are to be reduced. The criteria and staff's rationale are outlined below. (1) The setbacks proposed will provide adequate light, air, and privacy between dwellings and between dwellings and public rights of way. (2) Sufficient setbacks are incorporated to provide the opportunity for adequate private open space for each dwelling unit. (3) The setbacks proposed will provide sufficient area for utilities and street trees. 7 (4) If front setbacks are reduced, measures should be taken to preserve privacy within residential dwellings and to provide a transition between the public right of way and private property. To ensure privacy within single-family and two-family dwellings for which setbacks are reduced, the first floor must be elevated at least thirty inches (30") above the grade of the adjacent public sidewalk. Other methods to increase privacy are also encouraged, such as use of front porches. (5) Residential buildings that are located in close proximity to each other must be designed to preserve privacy. This can be achieved by placement of windows to prevent direct views into the windows of adjacent residential dwelling units. In addition, balconies and air conditioning units may not be located along a building wall that is within twenty feet (20') of a building wall of an adjacent principal building on the same lot, if the wall of the adjacent building contains window or door openings into dwelling units. Proximity of building walls will be subject to all current building code fire protection requirements. 30' setback from the edge of the property (Lease Lots 1-3 and Lease Lots 4-13) The 30' setback reduction request for the lots along the east side of the development will still allow for adequate light, air, and privacy as these lots abut city -owned open space to the east. The City acquired the land for flood control purposes, and it will remain as permanent open space lessening the need for a setback for the residential units. Lease lots 1-3 will border the existing manufactured housing park to the north. The buildings on Lease lots 1-3 will still be required to maintain a 15' separation between buildings from end to end. The resulting setbacks will be 0' for lease lots 1-3, and 10' for lease lots 4-13. Reduction of the rear yard setback from 20' to 10' (All Lease Lots except 1-3) The requested 10' rear yard setback will match what is generally seen in the existing manufactured housing park community to the west. The homes will be offset from one another, so that one unit is not directly across the street from another unit. Between units on the same side of the street, the minimum separation distance of 20' will be in place. Building lot coverage on each lease lot will range between 18% and 22%. The RS -12 zone allows for a building lot coverage of up to 50% for detached single-family homes. Therefore, the proposed lease lots will still have ample on-site open space. Reduction of the side yard setback from 5' to 0' (Lease Lots 1-3) The buildings on Lots 1-3 will be positioned diagonally, running from the northwest to the southeast. This will help to vary views to and from each neighboring lease lot. The positioning also creates room for private open space to the north and south of each building. No more than 21% of each lot's area will be occupied by the manufactured housing structure, leaving room for on-site open space on each lot. The attached OPD Plan shows that street trees can still be located on each lease lot. Minimum Lot Size Reduction from 5,000 sq. ft. to 4,500 sq. ft. (Lease Lots 1-2 and Lease Lots 32- 36 Finally, the applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the minimum lot area for Lease lots 1-2 and Lease lots 32-36 from 5,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet. Section 14 -3A -4K -lc of the City Code provides the criteria that must be met if the minimum lot area is to be reduced. The criteria and staff's rationale are outlined below. (1) The proposed modifications will not result in increased traffic congestion or a reduction in neighborhood traffic circulation. To mitigate for the concentration of dwellings, shorter block lengths may be appropriate, and the location of driveways and pedestrian facilities must be carefully planned. (2) Garages and off-street parking areas must be located so that they do not dominate the 8 streetscape. Alley or private rear lane access will be required, unless garages are recessed behind the front facade of the dwelling in a manner that allows the residential portion of the dwelling to predominate along the street. As detailed earlier in the report, the proposed planned development will not result in increased traffic congestion to the greater area. Neighborhood traffic circulation will mirror existing traffic circulation seen in the established neighborhood to the west. The density of the planned development will actually be slightly less at 6 dwelling units per acre than the neighborhoods to the west and north, which are approximately 6.5-7.5 dwelling units per acre. Driveways within the development are intended to be offset, thereby reducing potential traffic conflicts. Sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of the new private streets, and a pedestrian connection will be provided to McCollister Boulevard to the south. While the planned development will not provide alley or private rear lane access to each dwelling unit, parking pads will be recessed so that designated parking areas will be located behind the front fagade of each dwelling unit. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The subject property falls within the South Central District Plan. The future land use map shows this parcel as being an intensive commercial or highway commercial use. At the time the district plan was written the only access to the area was from Riverside Drive, which was surrounded by industrial uses. There was a concern that the residential uses in this area were isolated among industrial uses. The District Plan notes that in the long-term to avoid conflicts with the industrial uses and potential flooding, residential uses should be phased out in this area. The District Plan was written before McCollister Boulevard and the levee were constructed. The IC2030 Comprehensive Plan also indicates a need for affordable housing, especially in areas with good access to parks and other amenities. Unless an alternative location or form of affordable housing is provided, the goal of removing manufactured housing from this area may not be realistic at least in the near term. The City may want to consider studying the area and determine if the land use designation should be changed to reflect the current residential uses and the recent construction of the levee and McCollister Boulevard. The application does not up -zone the area. That is, it maintains the existing base zone. Because the property is maintaining an existing use, provides a relatively affordable housing alternative, and has good access to the street network, trails and open space, it is staff's opinion a comprehensive plan amendment is not necessary in order to approve the OPD plan. If this was a proposal to change the underlying zoning and establish a new residential use, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. Environmentally Sensitive Areas and Floodplain: The subject property does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas, but the proposed development is currently in the 100 -year floodplain (as shown in Figure 1). A levee was designed and constructed along the Iowa River to meet US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) and FEMA design standards, but has not been certified or accredited. FEMA accreditation would change the flood zone designation from A to X which means the area is still technically in the 100 -year floodplain but the mandatory flood insurance requirement is lifted. USACE certification would make the levee eligible for federal funding if the levee system was damaged by a flood event. Development on the subject property will be required to conform to the City's Floodplain Management Standards (detailed in 14-5J-7 of the City Code). The City Engineer and Building Inspection staff require review of a site grading plan to show proposed ground elevations in relation to the floodplain. The grading plan will need to demonstrate that the lowest floor of new dwelling units are located 1 foot above the 0.2% (500 -year) flood elevation and that the private 9 streets are passible during a flood event per section 14 -5J -7K-1 of the code: "Any subdivision, planned development, or manufactured housing park intended for residential development must provide all lots with a means of vehicular access that will remain passable during occurrence of the 1% flood event." Figure 1. Floodplain Coverage Infrastructure Fees: A water main extension fee of $503.57 per acre applies. There are no additional infrastructure fees in this neighborhood. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. Staff plans to have this application on the November 30, 2021 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's November 16, 2021 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0009, a proposal to rezone approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Drive and north of McCollister Boulevard from high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to high density single- family with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12), subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the planned development overlay plan attached hereto, which shall include the construction of a storm shelter and sidewalk along the existing east -west private street to Riverside Drive; and 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, approval of a final plat of the subject property, at which time, the applicant shall submit for review by the City Engineer: a. Construction drawings b. A site grading and drainage plan 10 3. As part of the final platting process the lot line between the property described herein and the property to the north shall be dissolved. This condition will ensure that the required 30' setback along the northern property boundary of the subject property is nullified when the properties are combined. The final plat will need to include the adjoining properties to the west and north, all of which are under the same ownership as the subject property. 4. Submission of an open space plan for the vacant area located south of the park entrance and west of least lot 2 to be approved by the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services. The plans shall detail future amenities, such as playground equipment and/or recreational fields. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the approved open space plan is required and includes construction of the approved open space improvements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Applicant Statement 4. Rezoning Exhibit 5. Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan Approved by: AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services ante a Sitzman, lJ F 0 0.04 0.08 REZ21-0009 East of S. Riverside Dr. & north of McCollister Blvd. 0.16 Miles i I C• MOBILE H 01;1 32.11, .7PN'.1'-4.4.all‘ral.11"1:1111112k CITY OF IOWA CITY Prepared By: Joshua Engelbrecht Date Prepared: October 2021 .r—mss— IIIMIIIMMMW Q� Cm 0 m - O _J= 0 J W V ri W U.1 J �m W c0- UO Z. O O COLE's �O a IF1 • • • • • • • AIL An application submitted by Axiom Consultants, on behalf of Cole's Community, for the rezoning of 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. from High Density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12) to High Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12). Overlay Zones Overlay Description Planned Development (OPD) 0 0.04 0.08 REZ21-0009 East of S. Riverside Dr. & north of McCollister Blvd. 0.16 Miles i I CITY OF IOWA CITY Prepared By: Joshua Engelbrecht Date Prepared: October 2021 An application submitted by Axiom Consultants, on behalf of Cole's Community, for the rezoning of 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. from High Density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12) to High Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-12). XIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY September 16, 2021 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR REZONING The proposed development area consists of a portion of Parcel 1022351009. The area being rezoned is approximately 14.36 acres of private property located west of S. Riverside Drive and north of McCollister Boulevard. Refer to the Rezoning Exhibit included with the Rezoning Application for additional information, include the legal description. It is bounded on the west by S. Riverside Drive as well as a self -storage facility owned by Linn Street Place, LLC. It is bounded to the south by McCollister Boulevard and to the east by City property and the Iowa River. It is bounded to the north by existing manufactured housing owned by applicant. The current zoning classification is RS -12 — High Density Residential. The Applicant is seeking to rezone property to an ODP/RS-12 zoning to allow for the expansion of the current manufactured housing. The zoning will be utilized with the expansion. The applicant is requesting waivers for: • A 10 -ft rear yard setback • A 14 -ft minimum building width • A private street width of 22 -ft in a 32 -ft public access easement • A reduced setback on east property line due to being adjacent to City owned property. • A reduced setback on north property line due to combining two properties into one. • A reduced setback on lots 44 and 45 due to 35' distance to the back of the self -storage units to the south. The proposed is an expansion of the single-family manufactured home development adjacent to the open space. City utilities will serve the site. No storm water management is required due to proximity to Iowa River. Thank you for the consideration. Sincerely, Brian Boelk, PE PRINCIPAL Project Number 200194 Page 11 REZONING & LAND USE EXHIBIT COLE COMMUNITY MOBILE HOME PARK IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA S RIVERSIDE DR 500 YEAR FLOOD LINE 2264 S RIVERSIDE DR ZONING: 11 tee- mIlF 4003 f 00 >/ y 1 Ai A 0 03 101 MCCOLLISTER BLVD ZONING: P1 I "Sin- Car 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE .1 2128 S RIVERSIDE DR ZONING: RS -12 #14 DR RS -12 PROPOSED ZONING: OPD / RS -12 "r////1"/ MCOLLISTER BLVD 2254 S RIVERSIDE ZONING: OPD / 0U, UU 500 YEAR FLOOD LINE PARCEL ID: 1022329007 ZONING: RS-1� 396 MCCOLLISTER BLVD CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING A PART OF LOT 3 IN PADEN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 4 OF CHARLES SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 98057 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 2576, PAGE 229 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE N80°01'00"W, 212.69 FEET; THENCE S10"10'07"W, 83.45 FEET; THENCE N79"49'53"W, 82.48 FEET; THENCE S13"19'10"W, 18.21 FEET; THENCE N79°00'06"W, 106.78 FEET; THENCE S18°25'11"W, 606.29 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ACQUISITION PARCEL SHOWN FOR MCCOLLISTER BOULEVARD EXTENSION IN CONDEMNATION RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 392.02 FEET ON A 3842.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARING S78°34139"E, 391.85 FEET); THENCE N16°32'54"E, 716.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 5.81 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THE FEE SIMPLE ACQUISITION DESCRIBED IN CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 AND RE-RECORDED IN BOOK 4244, PAGE 762. 4.„A\'. a f,,,,c, 4 1 _a 7OPS G ,\ rn r- fr ,. McCOLLISTER BLVD IIII PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT INFORMATION: BEING A PART OF LOT 3 IN PADEN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 4 OF CHARLES SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 98057 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 2576, PAGE 229 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE N80°01'00"W, 212.69 FEET; THENCE S10"10'07"W, 83.45 FEET; THENCE N79"49'53"W, 82.48 FEET; THENCE S13"19'10"W, 18.21 FEET; THENCE N79°00'06"W, 106.78 FEET; THENCE S18°25'11"W, 606.29 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ACQUISITION PARCEL SHOWN FOR MCCOLLISTER BOULEVARD EXTENSION IN CONDEMNATION RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 392.02 FEET ON A 3842.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARING S78°34139"E, 391.85 FEET); THENCE N16°32'54"E, 716.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 5.81 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THE FEE SIMPLE ACQUISITION DESCRIBED IN CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 AND RE-RECORDED IN BOOK 4244, PAGE 762. APPLICANT INFORMATION: ZONING INFORMATION: APPLICANT: PREPARED BY: COLE'S COMMUNITY C/O ED COLE 2254 S RIVERSIDE DR IOWA CITY, IA 52246 319-321-1002 DIRTWORKS0405@GMAIL.COM AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC C/O BRIAN BOELK 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319-519-6220 BBOELK@AXIOM-CON.COM // ZONING INFORMATION: Oct 28, 2021 - 8:50am S:\PROJECTS\2021\210178\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\210178 - Rezoning Exhibit.dwg EI :1 z°N' 0 i— 7-1M z8 U >I< O z u° 0 X 3 Z Z w 0 30 60 DRAWING LOG w Q 09-16-2021 N O N 0 ti DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES OPD REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS OPD REZONING RESUBMITTAL W ti N M MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION REZONING EXHIBIT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL J W 0 PROJECT NO.: 00 9 fV SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: OPD / RS -12 OPD / RS -12 // Oct 28, 2021 - 8:50am S:\PROJECTS\2021\210178\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\210178 - Rezoning Exhibit.dwg EI :1 z°N' 0 i— 7-1M z8 U >I< O z u° 0 X 3 Z Z w 0 30 60 DRAWING LOG w Q 09-16-2021 N O N 0 ti DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES OPD REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS OPD REZONING RESUBMITTAL W ti N M MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION REZONING EXHIBIT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL J W 0 PROJECT NO.: 00 9 fV SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PLAN COLE'S COMMUNITY MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA c:7---c:1-r-fir a 0 99€ill -r EXISTING -j'- /5A ARY (MAIN AND INSTALL MAWHOL'E -f 11 5' SIDEWALK 0051IN0 HYDRANT PSTER TYPICAL 70' X 14' BUILDING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 0.12 AC Sr 0.12 AC 012 'AC PLANT SCHEDULE TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT HEIGHT AR 30 ACER RUBRUM RED MAPLE B & B SO' MS 33 MALUS, MALUSQUEST CRAB APPLE B & B 15-25' RO 29 QUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK 80' SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT HEIGHT SR 26 SYRINGA MEYERI PALIBIN DWARF KOREAN LILAC 10 GAL 4-5' TA 12 ARBORVITAE EMERALD ARBORVITAE 10 GAL 10-15' CO 12 CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTON BUSH 10 GAL 3-10' AA 7 ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA RED CHOKEBERRY 10 GAL 6-13' TS 20 TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUTONI' TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 2'-3' BS 13 BUXUS SINICA GREEN VELVET BOXWOOD 3' 0.12 AC 0.12 AC 5, 0.12 AC 0.12 AC 0.12 AC 0.12 AC VARIATIONS FROM UNDERLYING ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS 0.12 AC 1 D.12 AC 5, 95 06, VP u. 0.14 A . -4C ,459 5F RO - RED OAK MS - CRAB APPLE AR - RED MAPLE cw> SHRUB (TYPE AND FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR) FDrI5TING510FM NAHnar RIM 64597 6fISIK. ama INTAKE RIN 413.40 RAINAGE SWALE T20F2 DETA #3 RIM 145.12 A. 0 0•4- A 0 os A 00' • •t 00i: SITE INFORMATION Standards Variation from Standards Private street min 26' with 60' public access easement 22' street and 32' public access easement as approved by City staff 30' setback from edge of property Reduced setback on east property line to 10' due to adjacent city owned property. Reduced setback on north property line to 0' due to combining two properties into one. 20' rear setback Reduced rear setback to 10'. Reduced rear setback to 0' for lots 1-3. 5' side setback Maintain a minimum 15' building separation for lots 1-3. 5,000 SF minimum lot size Reduced to 4,500 SF for Lots 1-2, and 32-36. 20' minimum building width Reduced to 14'. 500 SF minimum rear yard open space w/ 20' setback 500 SF minimum is acheived in funtional rear yards of each lot. Reduced rear setback to 10'. Reduced rear setback to 0' for lots 1-3. 1 D.12 AC 5, 95 06, VP u. 0.14 A . -4C ,459 5F RO - RED OAK MS - CRAB APPLE AR - RED MAPLE cw> SHRUB (TYPE AND FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR) FDrI5TING510FM NAHnar RIM 64597 6fISIK. ama INTAKE RIN 413.40 RAINAGE SWALE T20F2 DETA #3 RIM 145.12 A. 0 0•4- A 0 os A 00' • •t 00i: SITE INFORMATION ll--tg " z2 0 I- (4 --i en N 2 z8 v >< O Z u° 0 X Q w z z z w 0 30 60 DRAWING LOG w Q C 09-16-2021 10-12-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES OPD REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS OPD REZONING RESUBMITTAL CC CC 5 M MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION OPD SITE PLAN DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: PROJECT NO.: Co N r -I 0 i e-1 N SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 2 Oct 28, 2021 - 9:15am 5: PROJECTS 2021 210178 05 Design Civi -Survey S eets 210178 - OPD Site P an..wg LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING A PART OF LOT 3 IN PADEN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 4 OF CHARLES SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW %) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 98057 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 2576, PAGE 229 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE N80°01'00"W, 212.69 FEET; THENCE S10°10'07"W, 83.45 FEET; THENCE N79°49'53"W, 82.48 FEET; THENCE S13°19'10"W, 18.21 FEET; THENCE N79°00'06"W, 106.78 FEET; THENCE S18°25'11"W, 606.29 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ACQUISITION PARCEL SHOWN FOR MCCOLLISTER BOULEVARD EXTENSION IN CONDEMNATION RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 392.02 FEET ON A 3842.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY (CHORD BEARING S78°34'39"E, 391.85 FEET); THENCE N16°32'54"E, 716.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 5.81 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THE FEE SIMPLE ACQUISITION DESCRIBED IN CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS RECORDED IN BOOK 4202, PAGE 714 AND RE-RECORDED IN BOOK 4244, PAGE 762. TOTAL AREA: 5.81 ACRES PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED - MANUFACTURED HOMES 14' X 17' TRAILER 35 LOTS STORMSHELTER 1 LOT TOTAL 36 LOTS BUILDING SIZE: APPROXIMATELY 70' X 14' = 980 SF UTILITY INFORMATION METERS - WATER SERVICES 36 SERVICES ZONING INFORMATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE - HIGH-DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -12) MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE: 13 PARKING REQUIREMENTS 2 SPACES PER RESIDENCE PARKING SPACES MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN FRONT SETBACK SETBACKS AND YARDS (MULTI -FAMILY) ARTERIAL STREET 40 FEET FRONT YARD 15 FEET SIDE YARD 5 FEET REQUEST WAIVER FOR LOTS 1-3. REAR YARD 10 FEET REQUEST WAIVER FROM THE 20' REAR SETBACK REQUIREMENT AND REDUCE TO 10'. MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS MIN. LOT AREA 5,000 SF REQUEST WAIVER FROM MINIMUM LOT AREA AND MIN. LOT WIDTH 45 FEET REDUCE TO 4500 SF FOR LOTS 1-2, AND 32-36. MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET MAX LOT COVERAGE 50 % MAX. SETBACK COVERAGE 50 % LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH 56 FEET (TYP) SETBACK COVERAGE 32 % MINIMUM BUILDING WIDTH 14' REQUEST WAIVER FROM 20' MINIMUM BUILDING WIDTH. MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION 15' BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 980 / 5320 = 18,4% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 39% FLOOD ELEVATION 100 -YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 642.1 500 -YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: 644.3 MINIMUM LOW OPENING ELEVATION: 646.3 FEMA FIRM MAP: 19103C0195E EFFECTIVE DATE: 02/16/2007 ll--tg " z2 0 I- (4 --i en N 2 z8 v >< O Z u° 0 X Q w z z z w 0 30 60 DRAWING LOG w Q C 09-16-2021 10-12-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES OPD REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS OPD REZONING RESUBMITTAL CC CC 5 M MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION OPD SITE PLAN DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: PROJECT NO.: Co N r -I 0 i e-1 N SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 2 Oct 28, 2021 - 9:15am 5: PROJECTS 2021 210178 05 Design Civi -Survey S eets 210178 - OPD Site P an..wg 0 N ry 1- ZN 0 I— Q1 JI m N 2 AZO >< O tJ z U C) Y 2 O X Q v1J -5' 32' PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT 22' 4" PCC SIDEWALK WITH 4" GRANULAR BASE DROP CURB AT PARKING & GARAGE ENTRANCES 11' 11' 5,--- 7" PCC PAVEMENT X40, f o, 2%—a -- ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 6" SUBDRAIN NOTE: 53 SCREENING REQUIREMENTS SHOWN. CONTINUOUS SCREENING5' TO 6' TALL 50% EVERGREENS REQUIRED. ALTERNATIVELY, S5 SCREENING IS ACCEPTABLE PER CITY CODE 14 -5F -6E AA (TYP) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SCREENING (2) NOT TO SCALE WALK 1.38" DRIVE Q WALK -VARIES SEE PLAN I"— 8± SEE PLAN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PRIVATE DRIVE. SEE TYPICAL SECTION VARIES SEE PLAN 3:11,A0 SEE PU\N EXISTING FENCE EXISTING WALK SWALE: CONSTRUCT WALLS AS REQUIRED (MAX. HEIGHT OF WALL 15 30"). TO BE DESIGNED WITH FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS N S NOTE: FINAL GRADING TO BE DONE WITH SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE/SWALE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE (3) HOME SCREENING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE C4) MCCOLLISTER BLVD DRAWING LOG w Q 0 09-16-2021 10-12-2021 N 0 0 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES OPD REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS OPD REZONING RESUBMITTAL w CC T -1 N M z 0 U Lu z J 0 w 0 o U MOBILE HOME PARK EXPANSION CROSS SECTIONS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: J w 0 m PROJECT NO.: CO N r -I 0 e-1 N SHEET NUMBER: 20F2 Oct 26, 2021 - 8:22am 5: PROJECTS 2021 210178 05 Design Civi -Survey S eets 210178 - OPD Site P an..wg Maria Padron Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 930-9528 marialorena.padron@icloud.com November 7, 2021 City Council 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 RE: CASE No. REZ21-0009, Location: East of S. Riverside Dr and North of McCollister Blvd Honorable Members of the City Council, My name is Maria Padron, and I am a commissioner in the Planning and Zoning Commission. On Thursday, November 4th the commission reviewed CASE No. REZ21-0009, Location: East of S. Riverside Dr and North of McCollister Blvd. I supported the rezoning of this plot because it will increase affordable housing in this city; however, I have a few comments I would like to express. This plot is in a 100 -year floodplain zone. The frequency of floods is changing dramatically due to the climate crisis. In a recent conference Des Moines mayor Frank Cownie said his city had four 500 -year flood events in three years recently (COP26 Climate Breakfast with Mayors, https://youtu.be/aRGonrbe8rQ?t=4420). Our meeting agenda mentioned that a levee was built along the river, if this levee becomes certified FEMA will change the zone designation from A to X, and lift the insurance requirement of this plot. I would like to know: 1) What would happen if FEMA lifted the insurance requirement for these homes and there is a flood? Who would be responsible if homeowners lose everything? 2) Could the city provide training to home buyers, or request that the developer provides information (brochures or flyers) to the home buyers explaining all the risks, and how the flood frequency is changing due to climate crisis? 3) There was also mention of the possibility of raising the plot. This action will affect the neighboring plots. Will this increase the flood area nearby? Will the neighbors be notified? 4) If the city allows construction in flood zones, how will the city protect these buyers? In particular, vulnerable populations buying affordable houses. The City of Iowa City is always in need of more affordable housing. Housing is a human right, but it must be sustainable, safe and affordable. Building houses in flooding zones is not sustainable nor safe. This is not in compliance with the City Climate Action Plan. Thank you for your consideration, Maria Padron Commissioner, Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 1 r -1.r CITY OF IOWA CITY ''Ptt\ MEMORANDUM Date: November 30, 2021 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Overview of Manufactured Housing Flood Protection and Insurance Requirements for Cole's Manufactured Housing Park (REZ21-0009) Background The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning of approximately 5.81 acres from high density single-family with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to OPD/RS-12 for the expansion of an existing manufactured housing park. The proposed rezoning is located within the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplains. The property is currently zoned for residential development. Residential development can occur on this site if it complies with the City's General Floodplain Management Standards in addition to other City regulations. The purpose of the rezoning is to allow a specific type of residential use — manufactured housing. After the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning, one Commissioner raised questions and concerns regarding the safety of allowing manufactured housing within a floodplain. Manufactured Housing Overview Per the City's zoning code, manufactured homes are detached single-family dwellings which are constructed subject to federal construction and safety standards and are not constructed with a permanent hitch or other device allowing it to be moved other than for the purpose of moving to a permanent site. After the home is in position on a permanent site, utilities (water, sewer, electric) are connected, and ancillary components (siding, skirting) are installed.1 Manufactured homes provide an affordable housing option that, for most, are easier to maintain than traditional single-family structures due to their size, they are typically placed on a small lot and they do not have basements or underground foundations. In a typical manufactured housing community, as with the subject property, residents own their homes (structures) but lease lot space from the community or park owner. Manufactured homes also provide home ownership opportunities for many low to moderate income households. As of 2019, approximately 4% of all housing in the United States was manufactured housing.2 Manufactured Housing and Flooding Manufactured homes can be vulnerable to natural disaster such as tornadoes and flooding. The Department of Homeland Security describes those living in manufactured housing communities as "The most vulnerable residential population to hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding and other natural disasters".3 The subject property is located within the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplains, as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). A property located within a 100 -year floodplain has a 1% annual chance of flooding. Additionally, a property located within a 500 -year floodplain has a .2% annual chance of flooding. However, as climatic conditions change flood events may occur more frequently. In addition to designating floodplains, FEMA assigns varying levels of risk to each geographic area, which are known as Special Flood Hazard Areas. The subject property is characterized as a high-risk flood zone "A", meaning that it is an area that is subject to inundation by the 1% annual 1 FEMA, "Protecting Manufactured Homes from Floods and Other Hazards". 2 American Planning Association, PAS Memo "Preserving Manufactured Home Communities". November 30, 2021 Page 2 chance flood event (i.e. 100 -year floodplain). Because detailed hydraulic analyses had not been previously used, no base flood elevations are established.3 The base -flood elevation is the water - surface elevation resulting from the base, or 100 -year flood. When a manufactured home is proposed on a zone "A" site, FEMA encourages communities to obtain base flood elevation data to achieve a reasonable measure of flood protection. The applicant has established a base flood elevation of 642.1' for the subject rezoning application. Flood Insurance Under the Disaster Protection Act of 1973, homes with government -backed mortgages within the high-risk flood zone area "A" are required to have flood insurance.4 Once mortgages are paid in full, homeowners have the option to pay for flood insurance, but are not required to do so. Landowners, such as manufactured housing park owners, are not required to carry flood insurance. Whether a future owner of a manufactured home in this area will be required to have insurance will depend on if the owner secures a government -backed mortgage. If there is a flood, the home owner is the one responsible for costs associated with damage from the flood. If the owner has flood insurance, benefits are paid out based on their policy provisions. If the grade of the site is raised above the flood hazard elevation and a Letter of Map Amendment with FEMA is pursued to update the existing Special Flood Hazard Area Zone "A" to a Non -Special Flood Hazard Area Zone "X", homeowners would not be required to purchase flood insurance. However, homeowners still have the option to purchase flood insurance in a Zone "X" area, typically at a lower premium than in a Zone "A" area. City Regulations & Existing Levee The City allows development within floodplains. After the 2008 flood, the City updated its regulations to establish the existing General Floodplain Management Standards. The Standards (per 14-5J-7 of City Code) require that manufactured housing be anchored to resist flotation, collapse or lateral movement. In addition, homes must be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the structure is a minimum of one foot (1') above the flood hazard elevation. The flood hazard elevation is the elevation of the 0.2% flood (i.e. 500 -year floodplain) as profiled in the flood insurance study for Johnson County, Iowa. Structures are often elevated by means of adding fill to a site. The applicant intends to add fill to the subject area to achieve the required elevation. As a condition of the rezoning, the applicant will be required to submit a site grading and drainage plan when the final plat is submitted. City staff will review the site grading and drainage plan to ensure that stormwater runoff from the proposed development is managed per City standards. In response to the 2008 flood, the City constructed a levee along the west side of the Iowa River to help protect the existing and future manufactured housing park communities from future flood damage. This levee has not been certified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or accredited by FEMA but was built to meet both USACE and FEMA standards. FEMA accreditation is tied to the map revision for the area and even though the levee is complete, if the City revised the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) prior to the area being raised above the 500 -year flood elevation, it would still be shown as located within the 100 -year floodplain. Staff believes it would be best to complete development in the area and then revise the FIRM to accurately reflect the final grading. FEMA accreditation is tied to the map revision, which has fees associated with the application and map revision process. For a levee or man-made structure, these fees could range from $6,000 to $7,000. Approved by:- \1/4r(A-L- �\'\�� '-- Tracy Hights oe Direct`or Neighborhood and Development Services Department 3 FEMA, "Protecting Manufactured Homes from Floods and Other Hazards". 4 Iowa DNR, "Floodplain Management Desk Reference". MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 2021 —7:00 PM FORMAL MEETING THE CENTER — ASSEMBLY ROOM CASE NO. REZ21-0009: Location: East of S. Riverside Dr and north of McCollister Blvd PRELIMINARY An application for a rezoning of approximately 5.81 acres of land from high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to OPD/RS-12. A rezoning is necessary to expand the existing manufactured housing park due to the expiration of the previously approved OPD plan. Heitner began the staff report with an aerial view of the subject property, it is about 5.81 acres and zoned a base zone of RS -12 with a planned development overlay. Regarding the background on this application, this property was rezoned to OPD/RS-12 in 2015 as the rezoning was necessary to expand the existing manufactured housing park. An OPD rezoning is required for development of manufactured housing parks so that's the rationale for the planned development overlay. The manufactured home park, situated to the west, was developed in 1974 with the build out of 55 units. The subject application wishes to add on an additional 35 manufactured homes in the undeveloped parcel area to the east. Heitner noted it's staffs understanding that the applicant intends to combine the existing manufactured housing park to the north and west along with the subject property. Some amenities that would be shared by the community include a storm shelter and future playground and recreational areas. Staff is proposing a condition that the applicant construct the storm shelter, as well as the adjacent sidewalk along the south side of the entrance street prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant did hold a virtual Good Neighbor meeting on October 11 but there were no members of the public in attendance at that meeting. Heitner explained with planned development rezonings there's more criteria for those rezonings to be reviewed against, in addition to the standard rezoning review criteria of consistency with Comprehensive Plan and compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The additional criteria for OPDs is related to density and design being compatible with the adjacent development, assurance that the development will not overburden existing streets and utilities, assurances that development will not adversely affect views, property values, or privacy, and the interaction of land use and building types will be in the public interest. With respect to density and design being compatible to adjacent development, Heitner stated the proposed density with 35 units would come up to about six dwelling units per acre, which is allowed within the RS -12 base zone, which allows up to 13 dwelling units per acre. The proposed homes would be about 14 feet by 70 feet, which is a fairly standard size for a manufactured home of this type and so there does appear to be adequate open space within each lease lot. Within the context of the greater community, there is vacant land in the northwest area of the park and staff is proposing a condition that the applicant submit an open space plan for that open land, particularly for the area south of the entrance road, and that open space plan should show any future recreational amenities. Lastly, transportation planning staff did review the impact to the local transportation road network and did not express any concerns with the build out of this development to that network. Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 2 of 10 Heitner noted the manufacture homes have a width of 14 feet and there is a requirement within RS -12 zones that the minimum building width is 20 feet. However, through the planned development process there's a mechanism to request a waiver from that standard or modification of that standard. In judging that waiver request, there's criteria from section 14-3A-7 of the City Code which allows for exceptions to the OPD approval criteria. One is that the modification will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan; two that the modification will generally enhance the proposed planned development and will not have an adverse impact on physical, visual or spatial characteristics; three that the modification will not result in configuration of lots or street system that is impractical or detracts from the appearance of the proposed development; and lastly, the modification will not result in danger to public health, safety or welfare by preventing access to emergency vehicles, inhibiting the provision of public services, depriving adjoining properties of adequate light and air or violating the purposes and intent of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. Heitner noted the requested building width of 14 feet is in line with the existing manufactured housing stock that is in the neighborhoods to the west and the north. Development of this vacant portion of the parcel would allow for development of underutilized land within the subject parcel and the configuration of lots in the layout of the internal street network will be similar to the neighborhood to the west. As mentioned earlier, staff is recommending a condition for an open space plan just south of the entrance road. The second criteria point that development will not overburden existing streets and utilities, as already mentioned transportation planning staff looked at this and estimated 250 vehicle trips per day generated from the development and the surrounding road network has sufficient capacity to absorb that estimated trip amount. Staff is recommending a condition that with the final plat of the subject property the applicants submit a site grading plan for the city engineer to review. It's with that review that City staff will finalize its review of stormwater plans. Criteria three is that development will not adversely affect views, property values and privacy. Heitner explained this is mostly with respect to making sure that any structures are within the confines of what's allowed within the base zone. These homes will be well within the allowable bulk dimensions for structures, there's an allowable height of 35 feet within that base zone and these will be well below that. Finally, fourth that the land use and building types will be in the public interest. Heitner stated there are several setback reductions that the applicant is requesting but noted this is something that they would probably see in just about any manufactured housing park application due to the nature of the lease lots not typically aligning with the lot size requirements that is in a base zone (in this case RS -12). With the setback reductions the first is that there's a requirement for a 30 - foot setback from the edge of the property. Lots 1 through 3 and 4 through 13 are requesting this reduction, 1 through 3 down to 0 feet and 4 through 13 to 10 feet. Second, reduction of the rear yard setback for all least lots except 1 through 3 from 20 feet to 10 feet; and third reduction of the side yard setback from 5 feet to 0 feet for lease lots 1 through 3. Regarding criteria evaluated for setback reduction requests, one is that the setbacks proposed will provide adequate light, air and privacy between dwellings and between dwellings and the public right-of-way; two, sufficient setbacks provide the opportunity for adequate private open space for each dwelling unit; three, setbacks proposed will provide sufficient area for utilities and street trees; four, if front setbacks are reduced measures should be taken to preserve privacy within residential dwellings and to Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 3 of 10 provide a transition between the public right-of-way and private property; and five, residential buildings that are located in close proximity to each other must be designed to preserve privacy. Heitner explained with the first request of a 30 -foot setback from the edge of the property this would be applicable to the north side of the subject property for lots 1 through 3 and the east side of the property for lots 4 through 13. For lots 4 through 13, the property to the immediate east is a City owned park that will remain as open space due to its location within the floodplain. Lots 1 through 3 will still maintain a 15 -foot separation distance which is also required by Code to the structures to the north. Staff is recommending a condition to combine the existing neighborhood to the north with the subject property at final platting as this would effectively remove this requirement for a 30 -foot setback from the edge of the property. Second is the reduction requests of the rear yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet. This applies to every property except for lots 1 through 3, though they will all have a 10 -foot setback, which generally matches what is seen in the existing neighborhoods to the west and north. Heitner showed an imagine noting the homes are offset across the street, meaning that they don't perfectly align with one another and the homes on each side of the street will maintain that required minimum separation distance of 20 feet. The resulting building coverage will only be between 18% and 22% for each of these lease slots and that that can go up to 50% of the base zone. Heitner stated that should provide adequate open space within each lease lot. The side yard reduction requests from 5 feet 0 feet for lease lots 1 through 3 is because the southeast corner of each of the proposed buildings, their grade does touch the side yard line so that's why that request would be down to 0 feet. But again, the positioning of the homes here helps to offset views in each home where they're diagonally arranged so one wouldn't be necessarily looking into their neighbor's home. There is a good amount of open space, both north and south of these structures and approximately 21% of each lease lot will be covered by the proposed homes. In addition to the setback reduction requests, there's also a waiver reduction request for minimum lot size for a few of these lots. The base zone requires a minimum lot size of 5000 square feet. Lots 1 and 2 and 32 through 36 are requesting that gets reduced down to 4500 square feet. As mentioned before, the smaller lots won't result in any increased density at six dwelling units per acre. The existing neighborhood to the west is at about six and a half dwelling units per acre and to the north it's at seven and a half dwelling units per acre. So just because they are smaller lots that doesn't mean its greater density. The driveways within each of these lots will be offset from the lots across the street and there will also be recessed parking pads behind each front facade as well. Regarding the standard rezoning review criteria with respect to consistency with Comprehensive Plan Heitner noted the South Central District does note that residential uses should be phased out of this area. However, that plan was written close to 20 years ago and there have been some changes in the surrounding areas since that Plan, mostly the improvement of McCollister Boulevard with access eastward to Sycamore Street as well as construction of a levee to the east. The Iowa City Comprehensive Plan also indicates a need for affordable housing, especially in areas with good access to parks and other amenities, which staff thinks this application achieves. Because the property is expanding on an existing use, provides a relatively affordable Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 4 of 10 housing alternative and has good access to street network, trails and open space, it's staffs opinion that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not necessary to prove this OPD plan. With respect to compatibility with the existing neighborhood character, there is already manufactured housing parks to the north and west. The proposed development will be built within a similar style and layout. Heitner next discussed that the entirety of the subject property is located within the 100 -year floodplain. There was a levee constructed along the Iowa River in 2008 to meet US Army Corps of Engineer and FEMA design standards but has not been certified or accredited. However, FEMA accreditation would change the flood zone designation from A to X, which means the area is still technically within the 100 -year floodplain, but mandatory flood insurance would be lifted at that stage. USACE certification would make the levee eligible for federal funding if the levee system was damaged by a flood event. The subject property would be required to conform to those standards and the city engineer and building inspection staff would require review of that site grading plan to show that the proposed ground elevations are acceptable in relation to that floodplain. Heitner noted staff has not received any public comments on this rezoning, as previously mentioned there was a good neighbor meeting on October 11 but there were no neighbors in attendance at that meeting. The role of the Commission tonight is to see if the proposed rezoning meets the aforementioned planned development approval criteria along with the rezoning review criteria. With respect to next steps, upon recommendation from this Commission, a public hearing would be scheduled for City Council consideration. Staff anticipates the timeline of Council setting that public hearing is at its November 16 meeting for a public hearing on November 30. Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0009, a proposal to rezone approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Drive and north of McCollister Boulevard from high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to high density single family with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12), subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the planned development overlay plan attached hereto, which shall include the construction of a storm shelter and sidewalk along the existing east -west private street to Riverside Drive; and 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, approval of a final plat of the subject property, at which time, the applicant shall submit for review by the City Engineer: a. Construction drawings b. A site grading and drainage plan 3. As part of the final platting process the lot line between the property described herein and the property to the north shall be dissolved. This condition will ensure that the required 30' setback along the northern property boundary of the subject property is nullified when the properties are combined. The final plat will need to include the adjoining properties to the west and north, all of which are under the same ownership as the subject property. 4. Submission of an open space plan for the vacant area located south of the park entrance and west of least lot 2 to be approved by the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services. The plans shall detail future amenities, such as playground equipment and/or Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 5 of 10 recreational fields. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the approved open space plan is required and includes construction of the approved open space improvements. Hensch has three questions and they're all interconnected. He recalls when they rezoned this last time, in 2015 there were some conditions at that time as well, so the four conditions added to the recommendations to the rezoning how do those vary from the conditions that were approved by P&Z in 2015. Heitner stated the condition related to dissolving the north property line for the 30 -foot setback was in the 2015 OPD, there was also a condition related to construction of the storm shelter as well as that sidewalk on the east/west private street so those are carryovers. New for this application would be requiring a final plat as staff saw that as necessary for getting a more formal opportunity for reviewing these construction drawings and creating a drainage plan as well as submission of that open space plan for the vacant area, that's a condition that they've added for this subject rezoning. Hensch noted regarding the floodplain he has noticed through the years they have been filling in and raising the elevation of that subject parcel. Is the intention with the grading plan to raise it above the 100 -year floodplain and/or the 500 or both and if it's raised up does it technically come out of the floodplain. Heitner is not sure if it's out of the floodplain necessarily, his understanding is that the applicant intends to incorporate fill to raise above the flood hazard elevation level which would be required by flood management standards. It has to be raised one foot above the 500 -year floodplain. Martin asked if the City put out that good neighbor meeting letter. Heitner said typically it is the applicant who will reach out to the community with that good neighbor letter. Martin noted if the notification goes out 300 feet, the City of Iowa City seems to own the land that would be in that range so does someone from the City go to those meetings. Heitner replied there are staff at the good neighbor meetings always just to see how those meetings are conducted, but not necessarily ever to wear the hat of a neighbor. There was representation from the manufactured housing park community in attendance at that meeting, just no members of the general public. Townsend noted it's being built in the flood zone, but the mandatory flood insurance requirement would be lifted, so what happens if there is a flood, would their regular insurance cover that or would they just be out of luck. Russett replied that since the levy has not been certified or accredited, the mandate is that area is still required to have flood insurance. Craig asked why the levee isn't certified, and what does it take to get it certified, shouldn't that be one of the requirements of application. Russett said the City built the levee to FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers standards, but it was never certified or accredited because it takes money to go through that process. She is not sure how much money but could talk to public works about that and find out. Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 6 of 10 Craig noted the general concern she has is meeting the criteria of adequate private open space. When looking at the map, it seems like things are really crammed in and they're asking for exceptions. She gets that with the type of housing and neighborhood that it is they're not going to have the standard setbacks but to go down to zero seems too much and in her mind that is not adequate private open space, particularly along the border with the City property. If a housing development came in here and wanted to even change the back setback from 20 feet to 10 feet along a City park people would be up in arms over that but just because the City owns it they can go to zero. Is there a definition of adequate, private open space? Hekteon clarified when the City acquired that land back in 1998 they retained an easement over that area to satisfy any future open space requirement. Mr. Cole is the easement holder that conveyed it to the City and said in the event that the mobile home expands they get to use this land in their calculation for that open space requirement. Russett wanted to just further clarify that for the public open space, the neighborhood open space requirement, not the private on site or open space requirement that they typically require, for a development in an RS -12 zone, would be 500 square feet on site. Because these lease lots don't meet that standard, staff has proposed that condition for the community open space area. Sings is understanding that the places where the setback is going to zero is on lots one, two, and three, and where the homes are built at an angle from corner to corner of those lots, but it still seems, quite frankly, there's more open space on those three lots than there is on any of the rest of them. Heitner stated it is zero on the back on everything that backed up to the City, lots 1 through 3 on the north side and lots 4 through 13 on the east side, the rear yard setback would be 10 feet from the rear property line. Craig stated it feels that in a neighborhood, and with all of the conversations about walking and biking and things that they don't want a vehicle access onto McCollister, but to have a pedestrian bicycle access onto McCollister feels like something that that whole little neighborhood would benefit from. Heitner noted the OPD plan does show a connection in the southwest corner. Hensch opened the public hearing. Nick Bettis (Axiom Consultants) is here on behalf of the applicant and able to answer any questions they might have with the drawings. They feel that it's going to be a good addition and a good continuation of the park in this part of town. Hensch noted it looks like it's been elevated with a lot of grading and fill, is there still more work to do to bring that up elevation out of the floodplain. Bettis confirmed yes, there has been fill dirt added to the site over the years and it's continuing to be brought in as is become available. It is planned to be elevated to that 500 year, plus one, elevation for the low openings as required. Hensch asked if that is for the entire parcel, including the roadways. Bettis stated they are connecting on that northwest corner in the existing part of the park where it does not meet those requirements so they will be connecting under the existing street at the northwest corner and then coming up from that to the elevations. And then the entire subject parcel will be elevated Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 7 of 10 above the 500 -year floodplain. Nolte has a question is in regard to the flood insurance to even when that time comes that they're not mandated by FEMA to carry that level of coverage, does the owner generally still provide some level of security on that. Ed Cole (620 Foster Road) is the owner and applicant, and as far as the dirt goes on one end they're out of the 500 year but on the other they're not but by the time they leveled it out and cut the streets in all the mobile home lots will be out of the floodplain, the yards might have a waterway through it, but they're going to make sure they're taken care of. As far as the insurance, each homeowner has their own insurance, and if they have financing against it they're required to have flood insurance on their homes until it is out of the floodplain. Cole noted when he bought the park he was told he would get a loan certificate for the levee, which meant they're in the clear but when he checked into with the engineer there was never a definite yes, it was just part of his selling tactic. However, Cole stated they have a great community down there, he grew up in that park and it's a close-knit community. It really doesn't get any better as far as security, he was reluctant to put the sidewalk in off McCollister because they have one way in and one way out of both the parks and know who's coming and who's going. Martin asked what 2008 looked like over there. Cole replied he didn't own the park in 2008, he bought it in 2013. Craig asked regarding the insurance question, does the park carry the flood insurance as well as the individual unit people on their units would have to carry flood insurance. Cole confirmed that is correct. In both floods they were basically manmade, because of lack of using the reservoir for what it was for. But they've not even been close since 2008 as far as water coming out and they are really tracking it. He has been in the excavating business his whole life so they went out did the proper thing and added fill to make sure they wouldn't get hit with anything. Marissa Rosenquist is with Cole's Community and wanted to express the interest from all of their tenants. Everybody that she has talked to wants a spot in the new section, so regardless of the floodplain status, they're very excited. She is really hoping that this gets passed through and everybody can be happy. Martin asked if they have current residents that are interested in the newer homes, do they also have people ready for those older units, would they do rehab on those. Rosenquist noted they are really lucky, like her dad mentioned they are a tight -knit community and a lot of times what happens is when something comes up for sale, it'll get sold within the same day, and it's usually to a family member of a current tenant. Their waiting list is already halfway full. Nolte asked what's the supply chain for getting homes right now. Rosenquist noted it is a little bit backed up and they're still really in the very beginning phases working on the right financing, and Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 8 of 10 that kind of stuff to even start. Probably what they'll have to end up doing is bring in 10 at a time, do it in phases, that'll probably be the most efficient way to do it. Padron asked what are the price ranges for these units and when would they be ready? Rosenquist would estimate the time of arrival for the first batch could be the spring if this goes through, but realistically, a year and a half from now it could be completed. They'd like to start the infrastructure as soon as possible and have people get them their financing and stuff. Currently lot rents at $380, they raise rents on average about $10 a year. This year they were hit with some pretty hard property taxes because of out of state buyers coming in and purchasing mobile home parks for well above asking and as everyone knows, so they're trying to stay local and stay family owned and operated. Regarding the price of the units that is hard to say but would probably be an average of about $50,000 for a good quality -built place. Hensch closed the public hearing. Nolte moved to recommend approval of REZ21-0009, a proposal to rezone approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Drive and north of McCollister Boulevard from high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12) to high density single family with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS- 12), subject to the following conditions: 5. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the planned development overlay plan attached hereto, which shall include the construction of a storm shelter and sidewalk along the existing east -west private street to Riverside Drive; and 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, approval of a final plat of the subject property, at which time, the applicant shall submit for review by the City Engineer: a. Construction drawings b. A site grading and drainage plan 7. As part of the final platting process the lot line between the property described herein and the property to the north shall be dissolved. This condition will ensure that the required 30' setback along the northern property boundary of the subject property is nullified when the properties are combined. The final plat will need to include the adjoining properties to the west and north, all of which are under the same ownership as the subject property. 8. Submission of an open space plan for the vacant area located south of the park entrance and west of least lot 2 to be approved by the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services. The plans shall detail future amenities, such as playground equipment and/or recreational fields. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the property described herein, compliance with the approved open space plan is required and includes construction of the approved open space improvements. Townsend seconded the motion. Craig is very appreciative of the sidewalk to McCollister, this is a good thing but is still concerned if this is adequate private open space, the map makes it look like they're so jammed in there, Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 9 of 10 there are so many extreme requests for accommodations, but it is a housing need, and it's a nice part of town. Nolte trusts that the park owner knows what is attractive to their users and if those setbacks were too narrow they would know that so he leans to trust their judgment of what will work there. Signs noted it is hard to see on the images and has been looking trying to decipher what exactly is the home, what exactly is the driveway, what exactly trees are there, it appears to him that if the home is 980 square feet, and there's 500 square feet of open space minimum in those lots it's pretty typical for manufactured home community and honestly that is part of the affordability factor and part of what makes it affordable. Martin feels that affordability brings them back to the floodplain, which is super real and they have to really think about it. Flood insurance is expensive, even when it's inexpensive, it's expensive, but if it was taken out of the flood zone, and there is no flood insurance, and it floods, what happens to those people. Maybe the rules have changed, but she thought after 2008 the City was not allowing homes to be built so close to the river, thus the stopping of the continuation of Idlewild and buying out Normandy. Regarding the levee, with as many levees as were built between now and 2008 how is it not automatic they have to get accredited. That's shocking. Hensch voted for this in 2015 so doesn't want to be contradictory and now vote against it but being out of the 500 -year floodplain mitigates all reasonable risk. A lot of people are going to be hurt if there is another flood, especially one outside of a 500 -year floodplain, there's going to be people throughout the entire community affected. Martin agreed but at the same time it's out of the floodplain because of a levee. Hensch replied it's out of the floodplain because they are raising the elevation. Reasonable steps have been taken and if there is a flood of that caliber, there will need to be assistance for everybody. Craig stated the point is they're supposed to be mitigating that as a country and not allowing development in floodplains and not putting people in the situation where that could happen. She just wants some assurance that, yes, anything can happen, but it's very, very minimal that it will happen here. Hekteon stated this will have to comply with the City's flood mitigation ordinances, which is the elevation, those were the Code changes that were made after the 2008 flood. She noted looking at photos from 2008 some of this area was under water in 2008, but that was before the added fill and the existing manufactured housing park was not. Padron noted that elevating the terrain has other consequences, they cannot just move land and expect it all to be okay, the water is going to go somewhere else so if they raise the land here some other place is going to get flooded and they have to be careful about that. Hekteon agreed and noted there is a requirement about projects not having significant impact on adjacent land. Planning and Zoning Commission November 4, 2021 Page 10 of 10 Signs stated if the units will be built on pillars and the pillars are also on a concrete pad so the there'll be several feet above the ground. The risk is probably pretty minimal. Nolte agreed and stated they have 100% certainty that they need more affordable housing. Pardon stated though if these houses have to have insurance, then how much is more the mortgage, how much is the impact and then are they still going to be affordable. Flood insurance is not cheap. Signs stated compared to any other any other structure in Iowa City there are going to be affordable. Hensch noted there are many areas of Iowa City in floodplains, it's not just contained along the Iowa river, there are all the creeks in town as well so a substantial portion of this City is in a floodplain of some sort of the other. This is not a localized thing. Padron wondered if units one, two, and three, where there is no setback, maybe they could be smaller units and then they have more of a setback. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. REZ21-0008: Location: South of Scott Blvd and West of 1St Ave, Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park An application for a rezoning of approximately 48.75 acres of land from Interim Development Single -Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). Heitner began the staff report with an ariel view of the subject property with the zoning applied. It is currently ID -RS Interim Development Single Family residential zone. Regarding background on this case, there was a series of previous applications for rezoning on this property in spring 2021. The last proposal had 41 detached single-family homes as well as a senior living facility with 135 bedrooms but that was ultimately denied by the City Council. The current application is still seeking the OPD/RS-5 zoning, but it does not contain that single family home component that was in the previous application. This current application only contains the senior living facility with a count of 134 bedrooms. The current application also includes a proposed dedication of 30.98 acres of land that was previously considered for development dedicated as neighborhood open space. Heitner showed site plans of where the senior living facility would be as well as the dedicated open space. He also noted the private open space located within the courtyard areas of senior living facility. With respect to zoning, the current zoning is Interim Development Single Family residential which is intended to be a holding zone for property until their preferred use can be developed or infrastructure can reach the property. The proposed zoning would be OPD/RS-5 with planned development overlay. Typically, in the RS -5 zone it is housing for individual households. It's the STATE OF IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY WY IIII1110 1011101100 II Doc ID: 031765750009 Type: GEN Kind: ORDINANCE Recorded: 02/07/2022 at 11:05:04 AM Fee Amt: $47.00 Page 1 of 9 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder 6K6341 PG422-430 ) SS 1 4.0 My of A IN I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Ordinance attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.21-4868 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of December 2021, is a true and correct copy, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 4th day of February 2022. -�s, Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk \ord 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 Prepared by: Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5230 (REZ21-0009) Ordinance No. 21-4868 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. from High density single-family residential (RS -12) to high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12). (REZ21- 0009) Whereas, the applicant, Cole's Community, LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd. from High density single-family residential (RS -12) to high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS- 12); and Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd., legally described below; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property to allow for the expansion of an existing manufactured housing park, as shown in the attached plan; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages a mix of housing types in all neighborhoods to provide options for households of all types and people of all incomes; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan further states the need to maintain and improve safety for all housing; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to ensure the safety of future residents from inclement weather with the construction of community storm shelter, sidewalk access to said shelter, and effective drainage controls to mitigate excessive on-site stormwater runoff; and Whereas, the subject property is directly adjacent to existing manufactured housing to the west and north; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan supports the efficient use of land for new development by encouraging compact, contiguous development at the edge of the City; and Whereas, the applicant is the owner of said existing manufactured housing to the west and north; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to dissolve the north property line of the subject property upon final platting to create greater efficiency; and Whereas, the subject rezoning will add 35 new homes to the existing neighborhood; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan also encourages the development of adequate and appropriate open space to serve new neighborhoods; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to plan for future recreational amenities within the subject property; and Ordinance No. 21-4846 Page 2 Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions addressing the need for construction of a storm shelter and sidewalk along the existing east -west private street to Riverside Drive, submission of construction drawings and a site and grading plan during final platting, dissolving the north property line upon final platting, and submission of an open space plan for the vacant area located south of the park entrance and west of the existing manufactured housing park; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner and applicant has agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby classified high density single-family residential with a planned development overlay (OPD/RS-12): Part of Lot 3 in Paden's Resubdivision of Lots 1 and 4 of Charles Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter (SW '/) of Section 22, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, described as: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Auditor's Parcel 98057 as recorded in Book 2576, Page 229 of the Johnson County Recorder's Office, thence N80°01'00"W, 212.69 feet; thence S10°10'07"W, 83.45 feet; thence N79°49'53"W, 82,48 feet; thence S13°19'10"W, 18.21 feet; thence N79°00'06"W, 106.78 feet; thence S18°25'11"W, 606.29 feet to the North line of the acquisition parcel shown for McCollister Boulevard Extension in condemnation recorded in Book 4202, Page 714 of the Johnson County Recorder's Office, thence Southeasterly along said North line 392.02 feet on a 3842.50 foot radius curve concave Southwesterly (chord bearing S78°34'39"E, 391.85 feet); thence N16°32'54"E, 716.20 feet to the Point of Beginning. Described area contains 5.81 acres and is subject to easements and other restrictions of record. Section II. Zoning Mao, The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section Ill. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification and Recording, Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and any agreements or other documentation authorized and required by the Conditional Zoning Agreement, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Ordinance No. 21-4846 Page 3 Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication in accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 380. Passed and approved this 14thday of December f„1'ri Attest: I Approved by City Attorne s Office (Sara Greenwood-Hektoen -11/23/21) ,2021 Ordinance No. 21-4846 Page 4 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Weiner Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus x Mims x Salih x. Taylor Teague x Thomas Weiner First Consideration 11/30/2021 Vote f©r passage: AYES: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration Vote for passage: that the Date published 12/23/2021 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Salih, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims. NAYS: Taylor. ABSENT: None. Prepared by: Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ21-0009) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made among the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), Cole's Community, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and as "Applicant") Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 5.81 acres of property located east of S. Riverside Dr. and north of McCollister Blvd., legally described below; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property to allow for the expansion of an existing manufactured housing park, as shown in the attached plan; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages a mix of housing types in all neighborhoods to provide options for households of ail types and people of all incomes; and Whereas, the subject property is directly adjacent to existing manufactured housing to the west and north; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan further states the need to maintain and improve safety for all housing; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to 'ensure the safety of future residents from inclement weather with the construction of community storm shelter, sidewalk access to said shelter and existing public sidewalks, and effective drainage controls to mitigate excessive on-site stormwater runoff; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan also encourages the development of adequate and appropriate open space to serve new neighborhoods; and Whereas, this rezoning creates a public need to plan for recreational amenities to serve residents on the subject property; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding construction of a storm shelter, sidewalk, and open space recreational amenities, and development of a site and grading plan, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Cole's Community, LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: Being a part of Lot 3 in Paden's Resubdivision of Lots 1 and 4 of Charles Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 22, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa. Beginning at the Northwest corner of Auditor's Parcel 98057 as recorded in Book 2576, Page 229 of the Johnson County Recorder's Office, thence N80°01'00"W, 212.69 feet; thence S10°10'07"W, 83.45 feet; thence N79°49'53"W, 82.48 feet; thence S13°19'10"W, 18.21 feet; thence N79°00'06"W, 106.78 feet; thence S18°25'11"W, 606.29 feet to the North line of the acquisition parcel shown for McCollister Boulevard Extension in condemnation recorded in Book 4202, Page 714 of the Johnson County Recorder's Office, thence Southeasterly along said North line 392.02 feet on a 3842.50 foot radius curve concave Southwesterly (chord bearing S78°34'39"E, 391.85 feet); thence N16°32'54"E, 716.20 feet to the Point of Beginning. Described area contains 5.81 acres and is subject to easements and other restrictions of record. 2. Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, Owner acknowledges that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the subject property, Owner shall construct a storm shelter in general conformance with the approved preliminary planned development overlay plan; b. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property described herein, Owner shall: i. Obtain approval of a final plat of the subject property, which shall include the adjoining properties to the west and north, combining the existing manufactured housing developments into one parcel; ii. Said final plat application shall include a site grading and drainage plan; and iii, The subdivider's agreement executed at the time of said final plat approval shall require Owner to make certain off-site improvements, including pavement of a 5' sidewalk and development of open space along the south side of the existing east -west private street to S, Riverside Drive. The open space shall be developed according to an open space plan approved by the City with recreational amenities, such as playground equipment and/or recreational fields. 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released by the City of Iowa City. Once a building permit is issued or certificate of occupancy is issued, as applicable, the conditions shall be 2 deemed satisfied, and no further release will be provided. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided,, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 14th: day of December Ci of Iowa City Teague, Mayo st: Kelli Fruehling, Approved by: City Attorney's /1 ffi' -,!-{.1{ City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa Johnson County ss: ) , 2021. Cole's Community, LLC. This instrument was acknowledged before me on . 'ceri\bQ r f hl , 202by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, resile ively, of the Ci of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for they tate of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Cole's Community, LLC. Acknowledgement: State of \� County of lv 6r, 3 '£ STO * 161W * IOWA CHRISTINE OLNEY Commission Number 806232 My . mi. ion Expires 7 This record was acknowledged before i Cp LQ, (name) as on Roup\fir ` , 2021 by title) of Cole's Community, LLC. LAURA CLEMONS T. Commission Number 819420 My Commission Expires /?A oto Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: Ow()9 - 4 Kellie Fruehlin From: Anne Russett Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 10:40 AM To: Kellie Fruehling Cc: Raymond Heitner; Danielle Sitzman Subject: FW: Cole's Community Mobile Home Park Kellie — Please see the request below regarding the Cole's rezoning and collapsing the 2nd and 3rd reading_ Thanks, Anne From: Brian Boelk <bboelk@axiom-con.com> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 10:36 AM To: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Cc: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org>; Danielle Sitzman <Danielle-Sitzman@iowa-city.org> Subject: Cole's Community Mobile Home Park Good morning Ray. Please consider this a request to collapse the 2nd and 3rd readings of the OPD Rezoning for Cole's Community Mobile Home Park expansion. Please let me know if you need anything additional or more formal to make this request. Thanks, ACOQ SULT,,NfS X I ONS BRIAN BOELK PE, CPMSM, CPESC OWNER - PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEERING LEAD m. 319.400.1056 o. 319.519.6222 w. www.axiom-con.com VOTED BEST ENGINEERING FIRM 2021, 2020, 2019 (Corridor Business Journal) DISCLAIMER: This email and the information contained herein is confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the 1 Item Number: 9.c. CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org December 14, 2021 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 48.75 acres of property located south of N. Scott Blvd. & west of N. 1st Ave., from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) to Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). (REZ21-0008) (Second Consideration) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report with Attachments Updated OPD Plan Elevations P&Z Minutes Ordinance & CZA Correspondence to Council STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ21-0008 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Contact Person: Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Date: November 4, 2021 Nelson Development Jacob Wolfgang jacob@nelsonconstruct.com See above. Owner: ACT, Inc. Jason Happel 500 ACT Drive Iowa City, IA 52243-0168 Jason.Happel@act.org Requested Action: Purpose: Rezoning from Interim Development — Residential Single Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) Construction of Senior living facility and open space dedication for the expansion of Hickory Hill Park. Location: West of N. 1st Avenue and south of N. Scott Boulevard. Location Map: Size: 48.75 Acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: UndevelopedNacant Open Space, Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: 2 Interim Development — Single Family (ID - RS) North: RM -12, Low density Multi -family Residential RDP, Research Development Park ODP, Office Development Park South: P-1, Neighborhood Public East: RS -8, Medium Density Single Family Residential ID -RS, Interim Development — Single Family Residential ID -RP, Interim Development — Research Park West: P-1, Neighborhood Public RS -5, Low Density Single Family Residential 2-8 units / acres Northeast District C8 Property owners west of the subject property in the Hickory Heights development and owners east of 1st Avenue received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were posted on the site at both Scott Boulevard and 1st Avenue. September 16, 2021 Completed application submitted on October 25, 2021 — 45 -day limitation due on December 9, 2021 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Nelson Development, LLC, has requested a rezoning from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone for 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Boulevard and west of N. 1st Avenue. The applicant intends to develop 8.85 acres as a senior living facility, which will contain approximately 134 bedrooms for its residents (REZ21-0008). The subject application is different from a previous application to rezone this property that was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in Spring of 2021 (REZ20- 0016). The former rezoning application sought an OPD/RS-5 zoning designation, with both a senior living facility component and single-family residential housing developed over the 48.75 -acre property. The subject application will still apply for the OPD/RS-5 zoning designation but will only construct the senior living facility component of the prior application. With the proposed application, the applicant intends to plat and dedicate a 38.98 -acre outlot to the City as parkland. A future 3 rezoning to a Public (P) zone would be done by the City once the City acquires the dedicated land. The development proposes to extend Hickory Trail from 1st Avenue to a cul-de-sac that will terminate just short of the west lot line of the senior living facility. Sidewalks will be added to both sides of the Hickory Trail extension, which will ultimately connect to the Hickory Hill Park trail network, located south and west of the subject property. The applicant also intends to grant the entirety of Outlot A from the OPD Plan (approximately 38.98 acres) to the City as neighborhood open space. This would exceed the required open space contribution of 1.1 acres and would increase Hickory Hill Park's size by about 21%. Because the proposed development contains regulated sensitive features in the way of wetlands, streams, woodlands, critical slopes, and steep slopes and modifications to the underlying zoning designation are being requested, a Level II Sensitive Areas Review is required. A Level II Sensitive Areas Review requires submission of a sensitive areas development plan (SADP). Furthermore, a Level II sensitive areas review is considered a type of planned development and as such, must comply with the applicable approval criteria set forth in chapter 3, article A, "Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)". The applicant conducted a virtual Good Neighbor meeting on September 22, 2021, which was attended by 16 members of the public. Staff has received three additional emails pertaining to the subject rezoning. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS). In ID -RS zones, only plant related agriculture is allowed by right. This zoning designation effectively pauses development for a property until a time that the preferred use can be developed, and the property can be rezoned. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting to rezone the entire property (48.75 acres) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). The RS -5 zone is intended to provide housing opportunities for individual households. The zone generally provides a collection of homes with larger lot sizes and setbacks creating neighborhoods with a limited density. While the proposed development contains group living in the senior living facility, the OPD process allows for a mixture of uses, provided that additional criteria in section 14 -3A -4C of the City Code are met. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development Rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. 1. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. Density — Table 3A-1 from the City Code outlines the maximum allowable density for planned development zones. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to an OPD/RS-5 zone, which allows for a density of (5) dwelling units per net acre of land area (total land minus public and private streets right-of-way). The senior living facility is considered a group living use, as the proposed facility most closely resembles the following criteria for a group living use from section 14 -4A -3B-1 of the City Code: "Rooming units contain private space for living and sleeping, but not for cooking. Bathroom facilities may be private or shared. There may also be shared kitchen and dining facilities and shared 4 common rooms and amenities for all residents. The rooming units are furnished with locks through which one member of the group may prevent other members of the group from entering his/her private rooming unit. The residents may or may not receive any combination of care, training, or treatment, but those receiving such services must reside at the site." The senior living facility is estimated to have 134 bedrooms. These bedrooms are not included in the site's density calculation, because they are not dwelling units. As there are no dwelling units to factor into the site's density calculation, the proposed level of density is allowed within an OPD/RS-5 zone. Land Uses Proposed — The applicant is proposing a group living land use (shown more closely in Attachment #1) to accommodate a senior living facility in the southeast portion of the subject property. There are currently two different multi -family developments near the subject property. The first of which, Oaknoll East, can be found north of the subject property, along Scott Boulevard. The second of which, the Hickory Pointe Condominiums, can be found directly east of the proposed senior living facility. The addition of the senior living facility will help to satisfy an ongoing need for elder housing within the City, while increasing the diversity of housing that is offered in the Northeast District. The proposed senior living facility will be reviewed against the Multi -Family Site Development Standards during Design Review. Mass, Scale and General Layout —At a ground -floor area of 69,589 square feet, the footprint of the senior living facility will be considerably larger than that of the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building, which has a footprint of only 6,975 square feet. The applicant has requested a waiver for the maximum height requirement of 35', requesting an allowable height of 42'. The senior living facility would be 3 -stories at the north end and only 1 -story on the south end. The adjacent Hickory Pointe Condominiums building is 2 stories. Open Space — The proposed development will need to comply with private open space standards, outlined in section 14 -2A -4E of the City Code. The senior living facility will be required to accommodate 10 square feet of private open space per bedroom, for a total of 1,340 square feet of private open space. The OPD plans shows three courtyards providing approximately 27,000 square feet of on-site open space. Traffic Circulation — The proposed development will be situated off an extension of Hickory Trail. An interior access drive will provide access to the entire site, with points of access onto the east and west ends of the Hickory Trail street extension. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. The subject property can be serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. Public Works has indicated that both sanitary sewer and water mains have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. Transportation Planning Staff requested that the applicant submit a traffic study which examined how the proposed development would impact traffic at the intersection of 1st Avenue and Hickory Trail. The traffic study (Attachment #3) submitted by Axiom Consultants (performed by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc.) indicates that the total average daily trips generated by the proposed development is 288 (144 entering / 144 exiting) to 1st Avenue at full build -out. During peak hours this breaks down to a total of 17 AM peak hour trips and 19 PM peak hour trips. The study shows that all movements at the Hickory Trail access currently operate at a Level -of -Service D (or better) and remain at a LOS D (or better) with the proposed development. As none of the individual movements at the 1St Avenue intersection are anticipated to reach a failing Level -of -Service, Staff is not recommending any off-site improvements at this time as a result of the proposed development. Additionally, a 5' -wide sidewalk will be added along the north side of Hickory Trail, and an 8' -wide 5 sidewalk will be added along the south side of Hickory Trail. Staff is recommending a condition that the 8' -wide sidewalk on the south side of Hickory Trail be extended as an off-site public improvement from the eastern property line of the subject property to 1st Avenue. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. Attachment #1 shows the proposed elevations for the senior living facility. The facility will be roughly 1-3 stories in height, portions of which are taller than the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building to the east, but similar in height to the Oaknoll East buildings off Scott Boulevard. Additionally, the OPD plan is showing a separation distance of approximately 185' between the senior living facility and the Hickory Point Condominiums property. 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with the purposes of this Title, and with other building regulations of the City. Staff finds that the proposed land use and building type meets the public interest. Staff finds the requested height of 42' versus the allowable 35' in an RS -5 zone to be reasonable. Section 14- 3A -4K -1(b) of the City Code allows for the maximum building height and building coverage to be modified or waived, provided the design of the development results in sufficient light and air circulation for each building and adequate, accessible open space for all residents of the development. When the underlying base zone is single-family residential, at least thirty five percent (35%) of the net land area in a planned development shall remain free of buildings, parking and vehicular maneuvering areas. The facility will be 185' from the Hickory Pointe Condominiums property line, and approximately 300' from the Hickory Pointe building. The 69,589 square foot facility (with a building coverage of approximately 18%) will be situated on an 8.85 - acre lot, with 38.98 acres of open space (to be dedicated to Hickory Hill Park) to the west. The adjacent public open space is in addition to 1,340 square feet of private open space that is required to be on site. Staff finds that the facility's placement within the greater site will provide sufficient light and air circulation, with accessible open space for all residents. When factoring in Outlot A, approximately 92% of the net land area will remain free of buildings, parking and vehicular maneuvering areas. Lastly, Staff recommends that no building permit shall be issued for any of the subject property until the City Council approves a final plat subdividing the subject property to confirm to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Neighborhood Open Space: A neighborhood open space requirement of approximately 1.1 acres accompanies the proposed OPD rezoning. The applicant has proposed to dedicate the entirety of Outlot A to the City for public open space, which is approximately 38.98 acres. Dedication of Outlot A will be formalized through the subsequent subdivision process. City Code requires that at least 90% of the land required to be dedicated be located outside of floodways, lakes or other water bodies, areas with slopes greater than 15%, wetlands subject to federal or state regulatory jurisdiction and other areas the city reasonably deems unsuitable for neighborhood open space due to topography, flooding or other appropriate considerations. However, the Code allows land in addition to the required dedication amount to include lakes, ponds, creeks, other water bodies, wetlands falling under the jurisdiction of state or federal agencies and other sensitive areas including woodland areas. City Staff views the proposed 38.98 acres of dedication from Outlot A as sufficient abutting land that would be usable and extend the existing Hickory Hill Park. This addition would increase the Park's acreage by approximately 21%. In addition to the dedication of land from Outlot A, the applicant will be required to provide a trail 6 connection from the proposed development to an existing trail south of the site as shown on the OPD Plan (Attachment #2). Per 14 -5K -3C of the City Code, notice of the land dedication request was sent to Parks and Recreation staff for comment and recommendation. Parks and Recreation staff support the proposed dedication. City programming and planning for the additional parkland is not determined at rezoning. Future programming and planning for the dedicated parkland will be done as part of the Parks & Recreation planning process and the adoption of the Capital Improvement Program by the City Council. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: With respect to compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Staff looks to the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast District Plan for direction. The Northeast District Plan features several areas of focus for the subject property's neighborhood (the Bluffwood Neighborhood) that are discussed in more detail below. Preserve Natural Features — The Northeast District Plan emphasizes the use of cul-de-sac streets and single loaded streets (i.e. homes only on one side), where appropriate, to preserve sensitive areas. The Plan's intent is to preserve areas with ravines and potential wetland areas as a buffer along the eastern and northern edges of Hickory Hill Park. Additionally, the City's comprehensive plan encourages the development of single -loaded street along parks. The Bluffwood Neighborhood map (Figure #2) shows two cul-de-sac streets within the subject property. One cul-de-sac is stemming southward from Scott Boulevard, while the other is a westward continuation of an extension to Hickory Trail. Housing is shown mostly on both sides of the street on the northern cul-de-sac, with an exception for the southwestern portion of the cul- de-sac. The southern cul-de-sac shows housing only on one side of the street. A woodland buffer is shown on the map, but dimensions for how wide the buffer are not provided. Figure #2 - Bluffwood Neighborhood Map The applicant intends to build just one cul-de-sac off 1st Avenue to provide access to the senior living facility. Section 15-3-2A-4 of the City Code states the following "Use of cul-de-sacs and other roadways with a single point of access should be avoided. Cul-de-sacs will be considered 7 where it can be clearly demonstrated that environmental constraints, existing development, access limitations along arterial streets, or other unusual features prevent the extension of the street to the property line or to interconnect with other streets within or abutting the subdivision." While previously submitted plans for this property illustrated that through access to this property could be provided without the use of cul-de-sacs, the current proposal only includes one structure being developed at the southeast corner of the overall site. Additionally, the applicant intends to grant the entire 38.98 acres of Outlot A to the City as neighborhood open space. The proposed land dedication would remove the portion of land where a through street connection to Scott Boulevard could be made within the subject property. Provide Pedestrian/Bicyclist Connections — The Plan calls for an interconnected sidewalk system that is augmented by a trail system that will provide opportunities for people to walk, bike, or jog to various destinations. The applicant is showing a 5' wide sidewalks along the north side of the Hickory Trail extension, with an 8' wide sidewalk along the south side of Hickory Trail. The sidewalk along the south side of Hickory Trail will connect to the existing trail network in Hickory Hill Park. Encourage a Reasonable Level of Housing Diversity — In addition to single-family dwellings, the Plan calls for townhouses or small apartment houses at the edges of neighborhoods, where the increased density can take advantage of the being located near major arterial streets. In -lieu of small apartment buildings, the applicant is proposing to develop a senior living facility off the extended Hickory Trail, just west of 1st Avenue. Staff believes that this development will add to the neighborhood's growing housing diversity, and compliment nearby comparable uses such as the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building to the east, and the Oak Knoll East complex that is located north of Scott Boulevard. Create and Enhance Neighborhood Parks within the District (Natural Open Space/Buffer Areas) The proposed plan improves and expands the existing Hickory Hill Park by 38.98 acres. Increased opportunity for neighborhood access will be provided through sidewalk improvements that will be made to both sides of the Hickory Trail. A connection to the existing Hickory Hill Park trail network will be provided from the south side of the Hickory Trail. Sensitive Areas Review: The applicant has applied for approval of a Sensitive Areas Development, a type of planned development. The purpose of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance is to permit and define the reasonable use of properties that contain sensitive environmental features and natural resources and allowing reasonable development while protecting these resources from damage. Outlot A contains the vast majority of the site's sensitive features. Outlot A will be protected through the dedication to the City as an extension of Hickory Hill Park. Jurisdictional Wetlands - The purpose of regulating development in and around wetlands is to: 1. Preserve the unique and valuable attributes of wetlands as areas where storm water is naturally retained, thereby controlling the rate of runoff, improving water quality, recharging ground water resources, providing erosion control and lessening the effects of flooding; 2. Promote the preservation of habitat for plants, fish, reptiles, amphibians or other wildlife; 3. Minimize the impact of development activity on wetland areas; 4. Provide a greater degree of protection for many wetland areas above and beyond that provided by the federal and state government; and 5. Minimize the long-term environmental impact associated with the loss of wetlands. For this application, the subject property contains two wetlands, which are shown below in Figure #3. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 100 ft. buffer to be maintained between a regulated wetland and any development activity (14-51-6E-1). The Ordinance does allow for buffer 8 averaging to be permitted where an increased buffer is deemed necessary or desirable to provide additional protection to one area of a wetland for aesthetic or environmental reasons. The applicant has not chosen to request buffer averaging for either wetland, as each wetland and wetland buffer will remain unimpacted. Fi. ure #3 — Wetland Delineation Stream Corridors - The purpose of regulating development in and around stream corridors is to: 1. Preserve the value of stream corridors in providing floodwater conveyance and storage; 2. Promote filtration of storm water runoff; 3. Reduce stream bank erosion; and 4. Protect and enhance wildlife habitat. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires the delineation of any stream corridor and its required natural buffer (14-51-7). The subject property contains two drainageways, which require a 30' wide stream corridor (spanning both sides of the stream) and 50' wide stream corridor buffer on each side of the stream. Both stream corridors are situated far enough away from the proposed construction limits that neither corridor will be impacted. Steep, Critical, and Protected Slopes — The purpose of regulating development on and near steep slopes is to: 1. Promote safety in the design and construction of developments; 2. Minimize flooding, landslides and mudslides; 3. Minimize soil instability, erosion and downstream siltation; and 4. Preserve the scenic character of hillside areas, particularly wooded hillsides. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 2 ft. buffer for each foot of vertical rise of the protected slope, up to a maximum buffer of fifty feet (50') (14-51-8D-1). The buffer area is to be measured from the top, toe and sides of the protected slope. No development activity, including removal of trees and other vegetation, will be allowed within the buffer. The SADP contains 321,719 square feet of critical slopes, but no disturbance to protected slopes. Approximately 20%, or roughly 65,559 square feet of critical slopes will be impacted by the development. Table 1 below breaks out the proposed impact to critical slopes. The City Code defines critical slopes as having a slope greater than 25% but less than 40%. Section 14-51-8E-4 states that a Level II sensitive areas review is required if more than 35% of critical slopes are disturbed. The applicant is proposing to only to disturb 20% of critical slopes, which is within the allowable threshold. 9 Table #1 — Critical Sloe Summa Existing Critical Slopes Impacted Slopes Non -Impacted Slopes 321,719 sq ft 65,559 sq ft (20%) 256,160 sq ft (80%) Woodlands — The purpose of regulating development in and around wooded areas is to: 1. Reduce damage to wooded areas, particularly wetlands, steep slopes and stream corridors; 2. Reduce erosion and siltation; 3. Minimize destruction of wildlife habitat; and 4. Encourage subdivision and site plan design which incorporate groves and woodlands as amenities within a development. The subject property has approximately 1,325,064 square feet of woodlands. The SADP plan (Attachment #2) shows that the development will preserve approximately 81% of woodlands, which is above the 50% allowed per the sensitive areas ordinance. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. Staff plans to have this application on the November 30, 2021 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's November 16, 2021 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Blvd. and west of N. 1st Ave. from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the acceptance of public improvements corresponding to the subdivision: a. Construction of trail connections, as shown on the OPD Plan dated 10/28/2021. b. Construction of an 8' -wide sidewalk extending from the subject property's eastern property line to 1st Avenue. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a. Submission of a landscape plan detailing any proposed landscaping on Lot 1. The landscape plan shall be approved by the City Forrester before a building permit is issued. b. City Council approval of a final plat subdividing the subject property to conform to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Senior Living Facility Elevations 2. OPD/SADP Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Traffic Study 5. Location Map 6. Aerial Photograph 7. Applicant Statement 8. Rezoning Exhibit 9. Correspondence Approved by: pp Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 4 AG500 GOMMONS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 COMPOSITE METAL . . WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 016.10 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 3 AC500 !Ilf I r 6 I FP1 I I— sv: GSV STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM PER 084114- STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 A GSV l I J FORTE GOGHERE SIDE ELEVATION L A Ell WP1 ■'t'1 1111111 GSV ■ ■ A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 rJ L1 L J , GSV G5V 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM 1 TRUSS BEARING 116 116'-O" TOP OF CONCRETE 100,-O" C-TRU55 BEARING 125 125'-0" NIF C-TRU55 BEARING 124 124'-0' PORTE GOGHERE TRUSS BEARING 116'-0' C -TRUSS BEARING lib 112'-0' \ VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111'-0' TOP OF CONCRETE A 100'-O" COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 FF1 2 .AC500 11 5V: r ' r — L J EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH. SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREF INISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FPI VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 . NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL. A FP1 ImImEna PORTE COCHERE TRUSS BEARING 116'-0" ESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111'-0" TOP OF CONCRETE 100,-O" -5/4X6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FORTE GOGHERE FRONT ELEVATION WP1 FF1! G 5 V AC500 GOMMONS r' G5V mimemlimdri 3" CUT STONE 51LL -5/4X6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM L L _L A -2x12 CEDAR RAFTERS -METAL WRAPPED BEAM AND COLUMNS -2x8 CEDAR SLATS IN METAL FRAME Li B� GSV 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM C-TRU55 BEARING 125 125'-0" NIF C TRUSS BEARING 124 gb 124'-0' TRUSS BEARING 116 116'-0" TRUSS BEARING 114 114'-0" VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111-0" TOP OF CONCRETE lib 100,-0" NIF A ASSISTED B COMMONS • (up L 05 I"- bp ›N • > O J 173V 492 4,J‘ T v) � V • lri Q 0 „so 0 • Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MEMORY SUPPORT • . THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AC500 H hitectural R2o.rvt 5/4X6 FIBER GEMENT HEN Hun ■nn I'll" II II II "pull r I J CUT STONE SILL th(&.CULSTO. E2BIM EXTERIOR ELEVATION INNG A ,MING B 12" ■ ■ GSV 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL L EXTERIOR ELEVATION IAIING B 5 AA500. r 5/4 X 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM GSV 4 AA500 r 3" CUT I STONE SILL 1 L :GSV L 6X8 GUT STONE TRIM i I I I 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION INN& B r- 6XS CUT STONE TRIM, L 3" CUT STONE SILL 2 AA500 i 5/4 X 6 FIBER EMENT TRIM GSV 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA PREFINI HED ALUMINUM GUTTE / DOWNSPOUT 1x10 Fl EMENT rFASGI I` I EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING B I3"CUT I STONE SILL i ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL H6T PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 555.565.5311 AA500 1 3" CUT STONE SILL I 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM L A AL -TRUSS BEARING a 132'-0 1/& TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" OP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1: PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS. WHICH SPILL ONTO... GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1. NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4 X 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM L_ I•� 3 AA500 G5V GSV 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM L Iio 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION IAIING B A -F7 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT V\ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA GSV GSV 1 3" GUT STONE SILL EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING B GSV I, 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM ■ ■ 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA WP1 A AL -TRUSS BEARING S 132-0 1/5" METAL PANEL CORNER AL -TRUSS BEARING 132'-0 1/5" METAL PANEL CORNER 5V 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL J l I J TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" 4. TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" 4. TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" ASSISTED COMMONS • ro L o� I"- bp ›N • ,> O -' V 492 4,J' • it2, Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M A r c h i t e c t u r e Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION F, ■ MEMORY SUPPORT ■ • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL. ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT. BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AA500 1 hitectural R2o.rvt ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL HST PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 888.568.8311 /4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM 5 AA501 F' 1 1 L '■i EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING A A 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM F7 A F7 F7 r 1 1 J FF1 11111 1111 G5V A F7 1 AASOQ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FAS IA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM G TTER/ DOWNSPOUT A J 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM F7 G5V G5V WP1 5/4x FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL GSV 4 AA501 r "INC A- NORTH "EST METAL PANEL CORNER ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL HST PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 888.568.8311 2 AA501 -9-6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL 1 J L METAL PANEL CORNER A 1x10 FIBER CEME T FACIA PREFINISHED A i. -- DOWNSPOUT WP G5V 5V F 1 1 L L 3" CUT STONE SILL "INC A -SOUTH "EST 6x8 GUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL i I I 1 UTTER/ LL L r 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL R CEMENT -5/4-x x FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM A •i_ 11iiiii TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" AL -TRUSS BEARING 132'-0 1/5" poul IN ■ —F7 L I L OP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR k 111'-11 1/8" 5V EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES TOP OF CONCRETE IS 100'-0" 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL. DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO . . GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER. CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NIGHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM METAL PANEL CORNER A FP1 3 AA501 G5V GSV 11 FP1 A 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT 11, Illi "I N G A- IAIEST AA501 A FP1 A 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM X11, III A IbxS GUT STONE TRIM 13" CUT STONE SILL L A Ii ■ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER GEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT G5V ■t F7 GSV 1111111 111111 L EXTERIOR ELEVATION "INC A FF1 II I" II II" F7 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL .1 AL-TRU55 BEARING AL 132'-0 1/8" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR AI 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/8 TOP OF CONCRETE AL-TRU55 BEARING 14) 132'-0 1/8" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122-11" 4. TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/8" TOP OF CONCRETE Ab 100'-O' 100'-0" • v)lri Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION % COMMONS r MEMORY SUPPORT a • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR.MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AA501 e I so n/2o 2201 _Arch itectu ra I_R2o. rvt 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM A A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT VESTIBULE TRUSS FP1 1NP1 FP1 GSV G5V A III PMI 11'1 I L r I L FF1 r 1 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL L 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM GSV 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT CORNER TRIM GSV M5 - TRUSS BEARING 115 118'-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 111'-0" MS - TRUSS 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE • 100'-O' A 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM A A 12" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT r L GSV GSV GSV FP1 CSV FF1 A GSV r 5/4 < 4 FIBERICEMENT TRIM I L GSV 1 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL J /4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA /4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM A 12" J6" WF1 r I L G5V GSV GSV FF1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION TYPICAL NOTES THREE DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SIDING WITH 5" EXPOSURE VINYL SIDING WITH X" EXPOSURE ALUMINUM SIDING WITH X" SIDING 1 x COMPOSITE TRIM 5/4 COMPOSITE TRIM 1/4" COMPOSITE PANEL - NO EXPOSED JOINTS MANUFACTURED STONE BRICK BRICK SILL CUT STONE BAND CAST STONE BAND CUT STONE SILL CAST STONE SILL CUT STONE HEAD CAST STONE HEAD FIBER. CEMENT SHAKE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM RAKE FLASHING 12" SOLDIER COURSE PROJECT 3/5" FF1 GSV 4" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/S 5" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/5" CONTROL JOINT DECORATIVE CMU SHAKE SIDING WITH 7". EXPOSURE . . PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT BRICK - ACCENT COLOR 'A' PREFINISHED METAL COPING 1 x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER BOARDS 5/4 x S FIBER CEMENT HEAD 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM FYPON BRACKET BKT3Ox3O FIXED SHUTTERS WP1 .1. ...._a FP1l-- EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE. CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT; METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16 0.C.- COLOR A . . A THREE. DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL INSERT WINDOWS AS LEGEND COMPONENTS (ANNOTATE TAB, COMPONENT, LEGEND COMPONENT) MOVE TO SHEET AT401 IF TOO LARGE FOR THIS SHEET SEE STANDARDS FOR EXAMPLEOFSCHEDUIE v v ) • ± °VI firt WINDOW SGHEDUL¢ FF1 I I GSV GSV _l 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM 6x8 GIFT STONE TRIM 3" GUT STONE SILL L G5V A 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT L GSV MS - TRUSS BEARING 115 118'-O' MS - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr1 11 10P-6' TOP OF CONCRETE a 100'-O" STOREFRONT INSTRUCTIONS: REFER TO X:\03-Revit Documentation\01-Revit Procedures TO FIND A DOCUMENT ABOUT HOW TO SETUP STOREFRONT ELEVATION VIEWS. 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M A r r h i t e c t u r e Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION STOREFRONT SCHEDULE M5 —TRUSS BEARING 115 115'-0' U55 BEARING 116. • 116'-O' 1 5/4x 4 FIBER'CEMENT TRIM J 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr111 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" A ASSISTED COMMONS Lil % MEMORY SUPPORT r\ WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR .. . • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AM500 hitectural R2o.rvt 5/4x 10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING GSV 111'-0" A A WP1 FP1 WP1 fr _1 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT I TRIM II 11 Ll J 3" GUT STONE SILL' WP1 r WP1 GSV FF1 GSV COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 STANDING SEAM A METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 FF1 GSV STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM 12" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT • r - I I L L WP CUSTOM 2 -SIDED r GAS FIREPLACE PER 10300 1 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM MS - TRUSS BEARING 118 lib 118'-0' U55 BEARING 116 a 116'-O" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr 11 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 06. 100'-O" FP1 GSV 3" GUT STONE SILL M5 - TRUSS BEARING 118 118-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr111 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE oh 100,-0" A EXTERIOR ELEVATION TYPICAL THREE DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SIDING WITH 5" EXPOSURE VINYL SIDING WITH X" EXPOSURE ALUMINUM SIDING WITH X" SIDING 1 x COMPOSITE TRIM 5/4 COMPOSITE TRIM 1/4" COMPOSITE PANEL - NO EXPOSED JOINTS MANUFACTURED STONE BRICK BRICK SILL CUT STONE BAND CAST STONE BAND CUT STONE SILL CAST STONE SILL CUT STONE HEAD CAST STONE HEAD FIBER CEMENT SHAKE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM RAKE FLASHING 12" SOLDIER COURSE PROJECT 3/8" NOTES 4" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/8" 8" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/8" CONTROL. JOINT DECORATIVE CMU SHAKE SIDING WITH 1" EXPOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT BRICK - ACCENT COLOR 'A' 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING FP1 1 x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT . . CORNER BOARDS 5/4 x 8 FIBER CEMENT HEAD 5/4 x FIBER CEMENT TRIM FYPON BRACKET BKT30x30 FIXED SHUTTERS A A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT FP1 FF1 GSV 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FF1 A T 3" GUT STONE SILL L RUSS BEARING 118 118'-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr1 11 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE fib 100,-0" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT A GSV F 3" GUI STONE SILL J GSV 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FP1 A ASSISTED M5 - TRU55 BEARING 118 lib 118'-0" M5 - TRU55 BEARING 112 112'-0" M5 - TRU55 BEARING AI 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-O" • (up L o� I"- bp ›N • > O J V 4,J‘ • �� • v) c� V cr) Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 T E L FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION % COMMONS Lil MEMORY SUPPORT a • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR.MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AM5O1 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA J NOT TO SCALE • ; HICKORY TRAIL OUTLOTS: OUTLOT SF A 1,698,087 PROJECT VICINITY MAP APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY CLERK DATE APPLICANT: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM SHEET INDEX C1.00 OVERALL SENSITIVE FEATURES C1.10 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -SENSITIVE SLOPES C1.20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WOODLAND AREAS C1.30 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WETLAND AND BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR C2.00 CONCEPT PLAN C2.10 LOT 1 - SENIOR LIVING CONCEPT PLAN L1.00 COVER NOTES, SCHEDULE AND DETAILS L1.01 PLANTING PLAN ACRES INTENDED USE 38.98 DEDICATED TO CITY FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND EXPANSION OF HICKORY HILL PARK ROW 40,220 0.92 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR HICKORY TRAIL EXTENSION NOTES: 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. / LEGEND: SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS EXISTING — 100 — 101 —x—x—x— PROPOSED �locj- - 00 —x—x—x- 0 0 111= r TREE REMOVAL LIMITS =11=11=11= SENSITIVE AREAS • • \cs, '1110? STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) AREA BUFFER ` ------- I - -- �. • --- • I• et> 11 —J \\\fir\", \ \\\\` IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (>40%) WOODLAND PRESERVATION IMPACTED WOODLAND WETLAND PRESERVATION REGULATED STREAM + 4 + 4 4- + + 1- + 1- + + + + + + • I / O • --. I, ` \�\\\\\\\\ \\N‘ ?:\\, \H \I: 1'•11" 74Ci�`7 1•fi_��_ '� i.>•i+P w.• k 1" •\ Il 0 \ +0 0 4s ihk vot • + ♦ - nt_a + + + { / /- + + } + + + + + +tF+{+++}+-+��-+.. }++z. ^- 71.; + �, --..t --+ +--k 4 +' +', + F+ +. + + -:.—}---i., + + +'-t + + + +,+r + + i•_+ + + +.+ + + ♦+ f %+ + +`+ + + L 4 +f�++� +++ `-- + + + : i'. kms_+•'4 + + - -_ -.� a + + �•+?+ + + + }--1-_-I- +"+—a--., l + sv1/4440 N 710,, lei `, /V // // . + i + + + •. + + I. 4 f + +.- + + + _F + + L /. i i • • } ++- 1; /— f OUTLOT A 38,98 -AC /)4698,087 SF -a / r Y- v / 4 • • 144, Lk 44. • • ORTOULARK • • 1 un Cy- T, in 2 >< 0 g 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 CC CO LJ PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN LU LU LU 0 LU SHEET NAME: CC LU 0 SENSITIVE FEATURES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: SHEET NUMBER: PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA NOTES: 1. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A BUFFER EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR BUFFERS ARE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. 2. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 21,533 7% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 256,7199 80% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 44,026 13% CRITICAL SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 321,719 100% 3. STEEP SLOPE CALCULATION IMPACTED SLOPES NON -IMPACTED SLOPES STEEP SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) AREA (SF) 60,533 265,430 325,963 LEGEND: SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX — 100 (100)— CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE — 101 — FENCE: BARB BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN a a CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS aa —x—x—x——x—x—x— TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT SENSITIVE AREAS STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (> 40%) AREA BUFFER PERCENTAGE 19% 81% 100% s S IMPACTED QUANTITIES: CRITICAL SLOPES LOCATION AREA (SF) ®1,933 40,906 © 5,422 12 834 13 6,713 14 2,488 © 4,143 © 2,940 TOTAL 21,533 STEEP SLOPES LOCATION AREA (SF) a 40,906 a 1,058 a 5,036 19 1,418 20 1,885 © 972 © 2,940 © 6,318 TOTAL 60,533 1----- 1.. — a a - a-`-W.B - remit=a a '• • 1 \ IA G°3FAOG�[� TV�1Sso• DM • a a - a - e0 - a • I a i / -U ------� \\\J t 8.85 AC \ ' 385,355 SF 1 r ; LO41- "A" •o 11.11r .r auAqeiussu i �M1 _•_ A • r�rl�u�r sort „„ n j 0.92 AC 40,220 SF n1, N --comr= - ,e, I ry��S4�r1,1� i • • ?•. 1 i \ N 8U._ i OUTL ITA 38,58 -AC ),68,087 SF r _.___740 N "710- 2o- \ 7N 7 • y IY \ �1Lr 1 �1'1 11��9 I} 'I ISI"\Ui'LL'�e. 1111111111 r, r ! ! •-- N MIT•ew,-;N- \ N qj \ l@f�b1bL' A'Ns. \ , r i /` 5- ;I 0 c. • 7--- orl 0 i— 72, in 2 D L- Z 8 >< 0 g 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 CC CO tJ PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN LU LU LU 0 6j 0 LU SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS SENSITIVE SLOPES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: ict CFI aa SHEET NUMBER: PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA NOTES: 1. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PER IOWA CITY CODE FOR RS -5 ZONING, A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. RS -5 WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION IMPACTED WOODLAND BUFFER (50' WIDE) PRESERVED WOODLAND WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) AREA (SF) 208,941 38,179 1,077,944 1,325,064 LEGEND: SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT EXISTING — 100 - - 101 x—xx— SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLAND PRESERVATION IMPACTED WOODLAND PROPOSED TREE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPOSED (loo) (100 —x—x—x- 0 0 —II—II—II— AREA BUFFER + + 4 ♦ 4 + 4 + + + + + + C PERCENTAGE 16% 3% 81% 100% s> IMPACTED QUANTITIES: WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA (SF) AC 15,787 ® 40,474 © 3,808 © 139,596 © 9,276 TOTAL 208,941 �y0 OJ` 4 0, r 14 • + — • — 4 — 4 — L — + — 4 a + �\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \, \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \. \\\ \\\ *\\\\\ \,\\\* \\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\ \\\\\\ \\ \\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\�\\\\\\\�\-\\\\�\\\\\\V\\ \\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\�� \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\. �\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\.\\\\\\\\ \\\\�\\� \\\\\'\\\\\\\\��. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\, \\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\ _ \\ \\ \\ ' \\ \. \\\\\ \� \. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ O \\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\kr \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\'\\\\\ • \\\\\\\\\\\.\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\,-\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \Ns- \\\\� •\\•\�\\\\ • 4 4 4 + + + r + + 1 8.85 AC 385,355 SF 4 + 4 4 + + + + + t 4 4-4 + + + + + 4 + + + + + +4 + + + 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 4- + + + + ,. 1- + + - + 4+ 4 4 4 1- 4 4 + 4 + + ++ { + 4 ++-4 I- ++k + ++++ + t 4++}+i4 + +++ + + + +'4 + + 4++ * + + + + i + + + + + + +4 + • + 4 + + + 4+4-4+i+4++++4++ + , ' + T 4 t+ + 4++ 4 4 4- _ + 4 4 4 -'+♦ T++ 4 a- } ++ +'+4 +4+44•++f+ + +444k_+4+4e++a++++1 .. • + 4 + + ++ 4 4 h+ - + + + + 4- +'+ + + # + + }- + i + + ++++t + + + +++a. + + r + + + + a + + + + 4 + ++++++ +++ + + * + + + + + +++a+++T++++++{+++ + + + + + ++a+++}4+T + + + 4 + + + + + # 4 4 +{+++++++++ + 44• 4 4- + +.++++++{y+++i++*+4 + + + ii+ + . 4 +t+++++t4++# + + + + + + y +++4 4 i++ 4+ 4 h 4+ + .+ + + + + i + rY + + + f + + + + 4 + + 4 +++ + + } + + + + + '' 4 + + + + + + 4- ,. + 4 + + + 4 + ++4. +++ +1'4a'++++ + + ++ + +T+++'+'+'++++++a'a+l+ 4..4 + T + + + +'+'+'t++'4 + + 4 4++++ ++ 4- 4 + + + ++ + +++ 4+ + • + ++++{+}+T.++++4{{++ y4+'+r4+ "+Y4+4+44 J + 1+ + -r + + + + 4 4 + 1 + + + + 4 +++t+++++i ++i+{+'+}•4++i+ + + +a+ + + + + + + + + +++ +++4 ++4 h + +t+' '++.++.+•+ + ++ + 4 -f 4 4 _w `\\\\ �, \ O \\ ;� , \\ 47i� sou —sDur— 4 L 4 4 4 4 4 +++a++i++++++++4+y+++++++ + +++4 + + + 4. + + + + T + 4 + L + + + 4 + + + + T + + fi + + +l++++ +4+4-++ ++++y+++#+4+4 •+T 1++++++++++4# 4 '+ + 4 +++ • + + i + + + .. „ y 4 + 1/ + ! +4+'ii4 + + + + + 4 + 4 + ' T - CO)+ 4 +. } + + + 4 ++ ++ + 4 + + + + + + + + +++ 4 + + + + + + Vs,+ + ++ 4 + + + + + + ++ i + { + + 4 + + + 4 + + + 4+ + + 4 + T + 4 + + + + + ++a++ + + i + + + + + + { • + 4 + + +++ 4 + + + + + + + + + + + f + + + + + + + t + + + + 4 4 + + + + + + fi -4 ++ + + + + L + 4 + + + + + + + # + + + f + + + + + + + + + + + L + + t + 4 i + + t 4 ++ + + ' + + 4 + + F++4+t+++1- + 4L+ f + + +4 4 + +++++ + 4 4 + + + + + + } + + + + + 4 + } k + '4'+4 44+-441-4-4 ++41-'+4 ++ + ++f++++f++4t"+fL+++*4+ + + 4- + 4 4 ++4+++4t+++i + T+t+1+.14 n++4 f 4- 4 + + -4 1- + 4{+{++1++ i•++i+i+ 1- 4 + + 4 4 + + + +++4 + +'++4++ + + + + i + + + ++ + 4 4 + + + 4 ++++• f + + 4 4 .!. f + + i + + • + + + + +++ i+f+++f+++ft?f+ + 4 4 T + •+ + + + + a.+ 4 4f++++t+• + + + + f + + + + + +4 +++}1+,+ + + + + + +++ ++ + + 4 4 + + • 4 + }L + + 4 4++++f1- + + ++} +t+++'l+ +L++4+++'L+++44+444}hf++'++++4++++t+++4'++4+++++fi++++4 + 4- + f++ '4 + + + + +t+ + .4+i 4- 4 + + + + + + +++ ,. + + + + +'+ .,. + + m+4 + + 4- +++++ 4 + T + 4. + + +++f+4+ ++.+++++t+++4'1. + + + + + + + + + +f+++++++4+4i++4.+++4i4i4.+++++f*+++4+++++++++++41+++4++++{+a+ + } } + L4 +4+ 4- 4'+ + + + + 4 ++ + + + + i + + + + + + + ++f+4i++ ++++ +'4 i + +• + ++i + + 4- • ++ + + ++ + 4 + i + + + + + + +4_4++ + -+ -+h - + +'+ + + ++ + ++ ++ ++-++ + + + + + + + 4+ - + + ++ + • + + + 4 + + i+ 4++4+ -I- -4 + +4+++4 + + ++ + +r+ +�4 4 ♦ + + ♦ •+ 4+ + + + + + +} 4 + +'4 ..4 + 4• 4 +4+++++1- a+ + + ++++++++++T+++.1 +4i4+++4 -F +i+4* + + 4 + 4 ++++++1 4 + 4 + +'+ 4 + 4+++-++ 4 + ++ 4+ 4 + 4 + 4 + f + + + + + + h + 4 + + +a + 4+ + 4 + + + 4- + 4++ + 4 + 4- + + + ,. + ++ +44 + ++4 4 / + + 4 + 2+44414+44+ '4+++ y + 41-4+1-+4+ +++ 4 + + i� i + 4 + + + + 4 i + 4 4 + T + i + +4 + + 4 4 + 4 + + 4 + + 4 + T 4 + 4 + + + + + 4 4 4 4 + 4 + + +4+4+ T 4 + +4+i+T4 4+4-4+4+++44++ + + + + F + 4++++++ 4 + 4+ :4+ 4 4 t++ ♦++4+ k+++i++ {+}t 4.4+++++++++t+++ ++ +a++ + 4 +++ 4 4-4 i, + +++++ ++ ++ a4+f++++4+++;t + ++++++4* + + + 4 -4+ ++ +4+ +" 4 4+ + + + ++ + 4+ + + + ++ + +.+ ++ + r + fi 4 4 + + 4 T -ti+'4++4++++++++++Yr{+4+++4rTi r+++4 4+4+ 4r + ++ 44 i+ + i+ 1. + 4++++Y++++ 4- + !++ +4+ + + ++++ + 4 4 4 { ++ T+ 4 *+ + + + T + 4.++ * + + + ++4++ ++++# +++++++i+ + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + * + + + + + + '+ i + + + + + + + 4 Li+ + +++ + ++• +•+ # + ++ + + + + +L + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + 4 -• + + + + i 4 + + + + +L- + +'+ +-4++i+i#+++ + + + } 4 + + + + + } + +4 + 4- +- + +. + + + -h + 4 + + + 4 + + 4+4+++4 + +++4+++4++T+} -I. 4 + + + 4+•4++++++++++y.} T 4+++++4 4 ++ + + + + + + + + + + + +++ 4 + + + + + u + + + T + 4 + -' + + ++ .4 + + + + 4+ + + + + 4 +4i + + ++ + 4 + 4 + 4 + ++ ++++ + + 4 ++++ • + + + ++t + + + + r + +++ +4+4i+4+ 4 + 4 + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + L + + +++ +a 4 4 4 4 + 1- r + + 4 L + + + + + + + T + 4 + 4 + + t + + + + + + + 4 4 + + + + T 4 + 4- .!. + 4 + + T + + -F + + 1- + 4 4 + + . + + ? +++ 4+ 4 + 44+ + #44 + + + ++ # + + ++ ++ + 4 + + + 4 ++r++i++4+++++1++i4++++ ++i +4 +}+i++4y+++y- 4+4-# +++h+4+++++4++r++ + +4 + + + + + + + * ++4 + + + T + + 4++ + + + + + +4 4 4 + + f + + 4 + #++4,++++# + + +++ + + + + 4 + + + T + i # + + + + + . + 4 + +++ + + + + + 4 + 4- + +a + + + + + t'4 + + + + + 4 4 ++ 1- '++ +ii 4 + • + 4 4 + + +4 + + + 4 + + 4 + 4+ 1-4 + +# + 4 + + -i + + + 4 + + n + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + } f + } + 4 4 + + + } + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + 4 4 ' + + + + + + + 4 i + 4 4 + + + 4 #4+i+++++.444 + + 4 4 + + + + + + 4 + + + + +++ 44++ 4 + + + ▪ + + + 4 + + 4 4 + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + +L+++r+ + ++ t' + + + 4- 4 + 4 + + + +++++ 4 } 4 + + 4+ + + + + + +} + +++ + 4 + + + + L 4 4 4 + + + + + +++'+++ + 4i++4+4 +i• + + t4 a.++ + + 1 4 + + 4 + + 4 + + 4 +++ 4 + + + +•+ + + 4 + + + 4 + + + + + + i + + + + 4 _ + + + 4 T 4 •+ _ 4 + + + +4 + + + + 1- +•+ 4 4 + T + + + T + 4+ + f + + 4 + + f + + + + + 4- 4 ++ 4 + + + + + 4'+ i. 4 i i + + + + 4- + + + h + + + + + + + ++ +. + + + + + + 4- • + 4 4 + 4 + + + + + + + 1 + 4 + + + + +4 + 4 +++++4+++++++4 { + } 4 T 4 + + 4- + + + 4 + + # +f+ + + + r + + + + +.+ + + + • + + + + +'+++++ + + + + + + + # + + + + 4 + }4+++++++.L 4+4 # +++ + + + ++ + i + 4 + + + +41-+++• +4414 1+ + 4 + + + + 4 + - 4 4 4 + + 4 + f 4 + 4+ t+ + - + } 4++ + • +4+ +4} + + + !- + 4 + + 4- + + + + 4 4 + + T + + + 4 + + 4 + + + + + + 4 + 4 4 + 4 4 4+++#i++'+ + 4 + + + 4 + 4- + + + .i. + + + } + a + + + + + • + 4- + + + • 4 4 + + t + i # + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + + fiT++i'ni+ +4+++ + +y + + T + 4 4 + + + 4 4 r + 4 I- 4 + + 4 + + ! + 4 , + 4 { ;1..4.7177 + + ++ 4 +++ r+ # -+ +i++4 + + 4 +T + + + 1� + + .7+ } y + + ++++ ice+: + + T # i. } _ + F '+ + 4 4 4 i + 4 4 + + + + + T 4 4 4 + + + + + n + + + + + + + 4 + 4 + + + + + + + 4 + 4 + + + 4 + 4+ 4 4 + 4 + f+ • + + + + 4 + + + + + + • + + + + + + + 4 4 + 4 + + r + ! { 4 + + + + + • 4 + + + r'+ + -F • 4 + + + ++4 + + + + + + + + t + + + + } + + 4 + + 1- 4. + + + + + 4- 4 + + + 4 + 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 + + T a+ } ' + ++tell �// i + + 4 4- 4 + 4 + + lir 4 + i, { 1+ r` �+ + + + + + + + + + 4 + 4 4 4 + + + + + + + + T • + +$+ 1-4 + + 4 +fi + + + + + + 4 4 + + + + T + + T 4 + 4 `4 \+ + 4 + + + + + + + T 41- + 4 + + + + + + 4+ + 1-4÷...4f + 4i. +4+,4.1.4 + + ++ +4- + + +•+ +4+01 + + + ++++++++ 4 + • i....i++ 4 + + + Tom} + + + + + + 4 + + ++ p4r + + 1 4 + 4 + 4 44+ +x \* 4 + + 1 + { 4 + 4 +f4 # OC\ 4... + +. 400s / 4 + 4 4 4. + 4 OUTLOT A 38.98 AC 1,698,087 SF 4 + # t + +4 + + + + 4 + + + 4 4 4 teas 4p0, ` AQ + + + + .L + + + + t + i + f 4 L + + + + + ++ + 4 + 4 4 + + + 0 X r i • 4 t I } f 17 'U1 11:9t1VS i I • I i • 13 / 51 \ •\ 0 ROOM NIL PO : I Oct 22, 2021 - 10:15am S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design \Civil-Survey\Plats\200194 PP.dwg lY 14.1 z W 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG 1.1.4 Q C 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 w cc a CO PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN z LU I L 0 J LU LLI 0 6j0 z J LUJ L SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLAND AREAS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: SHEET NUMBER: C1.20 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGEND: SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX 100 — —000)— CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE 000)— CONTOUR-INTERMEDIATE 101 — FENCE: BARB WIRE -- x— x—x—x—x—x— STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN o o CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS SILT FENCE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WETLAND E= REGULATED STREAM / i / / / / TEEM IP1�M,t_M MOI�G��1 r TG3�11T WI • 1= •—,—.—.—•—.a 8.85 AC 385,3555F 7, ......\. /—//77-1H- -- 7/ / I141111e1141111111111411 50' STREAM BUFFER 0.92 AC 40,220 SF >♦I11•1II✓lllr 14141114.1 liga11x11_ 1. 1 T�Ilasllill ant, 5004 — AUY 004 —500' a / / } 100' / WETLAND BUFFER / N4 \\ \SN) 1 /i /ii (1 i'7ity---____jil l--- ! _ T -, `i: •.4. r1 15 I 15 • r SONIS fnC51C 448 r 144 r I 50' /STREAM BUFFER 100' WETLAND BUFFER 30' STREAM CORRIDOR STREAM BUFFER 0 OUTLOT A 38.98 AC 1,698,087 SF / 112 sac a 0 x HIL PARK sr I 4 I L i I I I I I I I w I I I I 1 1 I1 1 Oct 22, 2021 - 10:15am S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\200194 PP.dwg O IF—N z°I 0 1"'"m 1 z8 O ><OgV U O X Q 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG W I— Q C 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 w CC Q CO u PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN z LU I - 0 J LU LU 0 z 6j0 z J LJJ wz SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS WETLANDS AND REGULATED STREAM CORRIDOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J w CFI O V wo 0 C cc CA a SHEET NUMBER: C1.30 CONCEPT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES IOWA CITY, IOWA CUL-DE-SAC TOTAL LENGTH 775' FROM 1. ST AVE. TO' CENTER OF BULB PROJECT DATA: TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA SENIOR LIVING SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION PARK DEDICATION AREA 48.75 ACRES 8.85 ACRES 18.1% 0.92 ACRES 1.9% 38.98 ACRES 80.0% *\\WW‘eNt NIWN . � \\S\V N‘sitittkt NOX\C\e\\ ts\\\%, \ • • s \ \ \\\ \'‘ '‘‘ • \\Z'\%• • � �� �. '� e � ���'� �;• �'�. � �o a� e e e �� � ��� �� p� e� ,���to'��� � � � � �ee�; �� SrtI NG"- TRAI L; APARK Oct 25, 2021 - 8:03am 5:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\200194 PP.dwg / + / -. �� --/ / 1•/ I I `\ `` I"... \. ,• <\ / ,,•••• / \\ N. �• \ • \ / 1 / • • \ • • • \. \ /1 1 \ r \ \.1 1 \ , 't \ I •�_ 1 / 1 , I 1 / -- / / r 1 1 \ 1 �; 11 i / , /r / --------- ' I/ I/ I I I1 \1 `I / 1_- I/ // ', /, / / I I 1 I 1 ! / / / / 1 1 I 1 , I / / / 1 1 1 1 I / / / / /i / I / / // ���' / /i/ I 1 / / // // I / / I/1 •/ I / / 1 / I / /II / -- / Ire I / II r 1 / ,- / / /1 1 r / / I I f: i a - I 1 '/ i/ , i r' I I 1 mI 1 / • 1 r I r- I I l 1 I _ co I ' i i1 r. \ I. II i /, r I I't I I I. I I l i J ^ i I I I1 •I / 1 � /'/\\ y+ N it 1\ ,\ / I N• I / O 1\ \ s 1. \ \ / ) 1-\ r•CDW 1\ \ I 1 l .e.1. / I r 1 I\\ i \ , 0 1 y 1 \ /\\\N) ♦• \— 1 I r 11 v 1 r ` 1\, I I` 1 1 1 / ,\ \111 I -n. / / \ 1 1 I. / // / / l \ 1 1 .+ // +11 1 / // 11 / I / 1 r / I / /, 1 r / /-- i 6� / / i / II I I • I / / • / \ 1 I I 1 \ ii 7 I r r , I r , I I I I I I r I , , I I I i I _ \ -• ' -.! _s \ • --4 '_� _! —i ? ---�� /' � 1 J >22 y' 6'. GA` p W W v' W O { �\ - � _-- \��.` i `" \ . it S • i / // / / /// / / // / /l / , It - , - 11 �`•.-_rte-�' --_- \ 7 / / O , , .72.----.-21--.--- - / / / / / St RG'A • `, KA) f//INI ST ii I/R50' / / R75' 3.06' ,,� --720— 718 STORI 2, STORIES -768 I 17.9' R15' R25' PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 734.25 -:N_ /I I I II I I I I II __748-__ I / / / / / 0 SITE INFORMATION KEYNOTES: UTILITY NOTES: HICKORY TRAIL (A) RETAINING WALL (B) PROPOSED 8' PEDESTRIAN PATH PROPOSED CROSSWALK 1. ALL WATER MAIN TO BE 8" C900 PVC WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 2. SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE 8" PVC SDR 26. BUILDING CONNECTION SIZES TO BE COORDINATED WITH MEP PLANS 3. STORM SEWER TO BE RCP WITH GASKETED JOINTS 4. SANITARY SEWER TO EXTEND TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN. ww z z w tot Z ° ><og V U X• 0 20 40 DRAWING LOG w a 0 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 0 NJ 0 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 U-1 CC G CO u PROJECT NAME: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOT 1 - HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES Z LU a 0 LU LU 0Z cu O z J w Z SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LOT 1- SENIOR LIVING HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J w SHEET NUMBER: C2.10 Oct 28, 2021 - 8:35am S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Sheets\Senior\200194 - Senior - Site Plan.dwg LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) TOTAL LOT AREA: 385,355 SF (8.85 AC) PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT SENIOR LIVING FACILITY ASSISTED LIVING 1 GUEST SUITE 1 BED 73 ONE BEDROOM 73 BEDS 14 TWO BEDROOMS 28 BEDS TOTAL 102 BEDS MEMORY CARE 32 BEDS TOTAL NUMBER OF BEDS 134 BEDS GROSS BUILDING FOOTPRINT 69,589 SF ZONING INFORMATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE - LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OPD/RS-5) SETBACKS AND YARDS (MULTI -FAMILY) FRONT YARD 20 FEET SIDE YARD 10 FEET REAR YARD 20 FEET HEIGHT 42 FEET REQUEST WAIVER FROM THE 35' HEIGHT MAXIMUM. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING, AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS, SHALL NOT EXCEED 42'. MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS MIN. LOT AREA 8,000 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH 60 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET MAX LOT COVERAGE 45 % MAX. SETBACK COVERAGE 50 % BUILDING WIDTH ALONG FRONTAGE 212.33 FEET LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH 668 FEET SETBACK COVERAGE 32 % BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 69,589 / 385,355 = 18% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 167,002 / 405,366 = 43% FLOOD ELEVATION N/A PARKING CALCULATIONS: USE REQUIREMENT # OF STALLS MEMORY CARE 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 32 BEDS 11 ASSISTED LIVING 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 103 BEDS 34 STAFF 1 STALL PER EMPLOYEE 40 EMPLOYEES* 40 TOTAL REQUIRED = 85 * NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED AT THE FACILITY PARKING PROVIDED = 85 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED = 4 TOTAL PROVIDED = 89 KEYNOTES: UTILITY NOTES: HICKORY TRAIL (A) RETAINING WALL (B) PROPOSED 8' PEDESTRIAN PATH PROPOSED CROSSWALK 1. ALL WATER MAIN TO BE 8" C900 PVC WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 2. SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE 8" PVC SDR 26. BUILDING CONNECTION SIZES TO BE COORDINATED WITH MEP PLANS 3. STORM SEWER TO BE RCP WITH GASKETED JOINTS 4. SANITARY SEWER TO EXTEND TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN. ww z z w tot Z ° ><og V U X• 0 20 40 DRAWING LOG w a 0 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 0 NJ 0 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 U-1 CC G CO u PROJECT NAME: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOT 1 - HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES Z LU a 0 LU LU 0Z cu O z J w Z SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LOT 1- SENIOR LIVING HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J w SHEET NUMBER: C2.10 Oct 28, 2021 - 8:35am S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Sheets\Senior\200194 - Senior - Site Plan.dwg HI II 2X ROOTBALL SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OVERSTORY TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 1r ill 11 2X ROOTBALL SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE w 7,7•Ze__ - ®m®w®! / Il111l.I i 1 1/2X ROOTBALL SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE HI HI 2X ROOTBALL SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE IRRIGATION NOTES 1. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. DAMAGE DONE TO UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, OR OTHER FINISHED WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT TO BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT BUILDING CONNECTION POINT INDICATED ON PLAN. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSURE THE POINT OF CONNECTION MEETS ALL CODES AND IS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION. 3. LAWN WILL NEED TO BE IRRIGATED WITH TURF HEADS. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. 4. EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATING AND WORKING NEAR UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND CONDITION OF ALL UTILITIES AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE. FIELD ADJUST SPRINKLER LOCATIONS SO AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES (FIRE HYDRANTS, TRANSFORMERS, ETC) 5. ADJUST HEAD LOCATION IF SPRAY IS DETRIMENTAL TO OR BLOCKED BY TREE, SHRUB, OR STRUCTURE, MAINTAINING EVEN COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS. 6. ALL SPRINKLER HEADS TO BE ADJUSTED SO THEY DO NOT SPRAY ONTO WALKS, PARKING AREAS, RETAINING WALLS, BUILDINGS OR HARDSCAPE AREAS. HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE REQUIRED IN ALL LAWN AREAS. 7. PLACE VALVE BOXES IN LANDSCAPE BEDS, PARALLEL TO CURBS AND WALKS. GROUPED VALVES TO BE EQUALLY SPACED. 8. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PVC SCH 40 PIPE SLEEVES UNDER HARDSCAPE AT ALL POINTS WHERE IRRIGATION MAIN LINE AND LATERALS ARE LOCATED. Oct 28, 2021 - 10:46am Z:\Projects2\20042-IC SENIOR LIVING\04 CAD\03 Current\P&Z_20042-PP_PLANTING PLAN.dwg PLANTING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND SHALL REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. 4. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE NUMBER OF PLANTS ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ANSI Z 60.1, OR LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO THE A.S.N.S. 6. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE PLANT MATERIAL TYPE, SIZE, AND/OR QUANTITY. 8. STAKE LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED PLANTING FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PLANTING. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PER PLAN. ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING SOIL. 11. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, TREES TO BE CENTERED IN PLANTING AREAS. 12. TO AVOID DISRUPTION TO EXISTING TREES, HAND DIGGING REQUIRED WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREES. NO TREE ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER ARE TO BE CUT. 13. PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANT SAUCERS AND PLANTING BEDS TO A 3 -INCH MAXIMUM DEPTH. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 14. NEW TREES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PLANT BEDS, SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET AWAY FROM PLANT BED. 15. NO TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 5' FROM ANY UTILITY SERVICE VALVE, BASED ON ANTICIPATED TRUNK SIZE. DRAWING INDEX SHEET NUMBER L1.00 L1.01 SHEET TITLE COVER NOTES, SCHEDULE & DETAILS PLANTING PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE OVERSTORY TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 3 BP BETULA PLATYPHYLLA'FARGO' DAKOTA PINNACLE KAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH 2" CAL. B&B 3 2 CB CARPINUS BETULUS 'FASTIGIATA' COMMON HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 9 6 CR CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 7 4 CT CATALPA SPECIOSA NORTHERN CATALPA 2" CAL. B&B 7 7 CO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2" CAL. B&B 2 3 CK CLADRASTIS KENTUCKEA YELLOW WOOD 2" CAL. B&B 76 2 CC CORYLUS COLURNA TURKISH FILBERT 2" CAL. B&B 131 8 GT GLIDETSIA TRICANTHOS 'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 7 10 GD GYMNOCLADUS DIOCUS 'ESPRESSO' ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE 2" CAL. B&B 115 10 LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2" CAL. B&B 49 8 MA MACCKIA AMURENSIS AMUR MAAKIA 2" CAL. B&B 2 NS NYSSA SYLVATICA BLACK GUM 2" CAL. B&B 5 OV OSTRYA VIRGINIANA EASTERN HOP HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 1 PA PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA LONDON PLANE TREE 2" CAL. B&B 6 QB QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2" CAL. B&B 3 QC QUERCUS COCCINEA SCARLET OAK 2" CAL. B&B 3 QM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL. B&B 2 QR QUERCUS RUBRA 'LONG' RED OAK 2" CAL. B&B 2 RP ROBINIA PSUEDOACACIA 'CHICAGO BLUES' BLACK LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 5 UT ULMUS THOMASII ROCK ELM 2" CAL. B&B 2 ZS ZELKOVA SERRATA 'MUSASHINO' ZELKOVA 2" CAL. B&B EVERGREEN TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 1 WF ABIES CONCOLOR WHITE FIR 6'-8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 3 PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE 6'-8' HT B&B 4' X 4' 9 PG PICEA CLAUCA 'DENSATA' BLACK HILLS SPRICE 6'-8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 7 TC TSUGA CANADENSIS EASTERN HEMLOCK 6'-8' HT B&B 10' X 8' ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 2 AG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 4 CG CRATEGUS CRUS-GALLI VAR. INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPIR HAWTHRON 2" CAL. B&B 4' X 4' 2 MS MAGNOLIA X SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 3 MXP MALUS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 10' X 8' 7 MXS MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 3' X 4' 2 SR SYRINGA RETICULATA SSP. RETICULATA 'IVORY SILK' IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2" CAL. B&B 3' X 3' SHRUBS QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 23 BB CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTONBUSH #3 CONT. 6' X 5' 209 DK DIERVILLA 'KODIAK ORANGE' KODIAK ORANGE DIERVILLA 18" HT CONT. 4' X 4' 18 FM FOTHERGILLA 'MOUNT AIRY' DWARF FOTHERGILLA #3 CONT. 4' X 4' 6 HV HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA WITCH HAZEL 6' HT CONT 10' X 8' 8 HP HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'ILVOBO' PP#22,782 BOBO HARDY HYDRANGEA #3 CONT. 3' X 4' 78 IV ITEA VIRGINICA LITTLE HENRY SWEETSPIRE #3 CONT. 3' X 3' 76 JH JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'HUGHES' HUGHES JUNIPER #3 CONT. 1' X 6' 131 PO PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NINEBARK #1 CONT 5' X 4.5' 7 RL RHODODENDRON X 'LANDMARK' LANDMARK RHODODENDRON #3 CONT. 4' X 4' 115 ST SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' TOR SPIREA #3 CONT. 3' X 3' 49 TD TAXUS X MEDIA 'DENSIFORMIS' DENSE SPREADING YEW 48" HT CONT. 4' X 6' genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 WWW.GENUS-LA.COM N Z o. fi u U 2 O_ X z z m C rr 0 rn H z rn m m z 0 20 z m m cn z n z H z m m rr V SETM O o „z z m n � T 70 LC N 1- LC 0 0 V) N I— N ZO m v) Z O V ozO U V 2 O_ X z c) z m 0 20 40 1 1 104.52' c 1 QM N77° -pler, r 4}4®r" 64 QC 1 QC 3 UT Li) 00 M /W LO 2 CT 3 GD I 1 0 4' DIA. MULCH RINGS AT ALL TREES IN LAWN SPACE, TYP. 1 1 Sr 1 RP 1 NS 1 QR 1 PA er "-AA alowNew_ � 1 QR - 11.' 1 UT 1 ZS 11 LT 8) 8) 1 CC 8) LEGEND w T E SAN ST TP G E SAN ST TP SHADE TREE 0 SHRUB TURFGRASS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY SETBACK WATER TELECOM GAS ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER EXISTING EASEMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCING EXISTING CONTOUR TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT EVERGREEN TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE MIX genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 WWW.GENUS-LA.COM Oct 28, 2021 - 10:49am Z: Projects2 20042 -IC SENIOR LIVING 04 CAD 03 Current P&Z_20042-PP_PLANTING PLAN.dwg £O1 f9NIMVIG G rr U r T c z -r -r r :31AIVN 1J3fO2i11 S31V1S3 1IV2:I1 AH0>IJIIIS '8 ado ANVNIWI33H11 NV1d SVRIV 3AI1ISN36 :31NVN 1N311D '1WH1r) uriacnr •m 0 z r- IA Sig ETeyM Ertlr O 1� Dm � z m O Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. Introduction The Hickory Trail Estates development will consist of 120 continuing care retirement community (CCRC) units with a total of 134 beds. The development is located south of Scott Boulevard and west of N 1" Avenue. The development will extend the west side of Hickory Trail and construct a cul-de-sac. The development will be constructed and fully occupied by 2025. Methodology The trip generation for the Hickory Trail Estates is calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition + Supplement (2020). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 255, continuing care retirement community (CCRC) have been used. The intersection of N Is' Avenue at Scott Boulevard is not being analyzed as part of this report as it is planned to be upgraded with a city project to a roundabout. The following intersection is being analyzed as part of this report: 1. N lm Avenue at Hickory Trail — Two-way Stop Controlled The development is expected to be fully built out and occupied by the year 2025; therefore, the year 2025 was used for future analysis. The analysis has been performed for the existing conditions, 2025 baseline conditions, and 2025 future with development conditions during the AM and PM peak -hours. Existing counts were collected by AXIOM, on Thursday, January 7, 2021, for the AM and Tuesday, January 12, 2021, for the PM at the intersection of N 1" Avenue at Hickory Trail. Existing traffic volumes when collected were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the traffic volumes have been increased by a 35% during the AM peak -hour and 30% during the PM peak -hour. This was determined based on non-COVID-19 counts at the intersection of N 1st Avenue at Scott Boulevard and comparing link volumes between the intersections. The 2025 baseline turning movements were calculated by applying an annually compounding growth rate of 1% to the normalized existing turning volumes. The 1% growth rate is based on conversations with Iowa City staff. The 2025 future with development turning movements have been calculated by adding the development's trips to the 2025 baseline turning movements. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue • Suite B - Everett, WA 98201 Tel: 425-339-8266 • Fax: 425-258-2922 • E-mail: info@gibsontraffic.com Hickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis The peak -hour level of service (LOS) analysis calculations were completed using the Synchro 11 software. This software applies the operational analysis methodology of the current Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Traffic congestion is generally measured in terms of level of service. In accordance with the HCM 6'h Edition, road facilities and intersections are rated between LOS A and LOS F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or over -capacity conditions. The level of service criteria is summarized in Table 1. The level of service at two-way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay of the worst approach. The level of service at signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay for all approaches. Geometric characteristics and conflicting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining level of service values. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level of I Service Expected Delay Intersection Control Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A Little/No Delay <10 <10 n Short Delays >10 and <15 >10 and X20 < Average Delays >15 and <25 >20 and <35 I) Long Delays >25 and <35 >35 and <55 1: Very Long Delays >35 and <50 >55 and 40 F Extreme Delays2 >50 >80 The acceptable level of service for intersections w'thin Iowa City is LOS CID and the significance of impacts on intersections operating at LOS E or LOS F is taken on a case-by-case basis. I Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 0 Edition. LOS A: Free-flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: Generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: Occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: During short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e. vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: Intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on all approaches and long delays. LOS F: Jammed conditions on all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. 2 When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 2021 info®gibsontraffic.com 2 GTC #21-005 I lickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Trip generation calculations for the Hickory Trail Estates are based on national statistics contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition + Supplement (2020). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 255, continuing care retirement community (CCRC) have been used. There will be a total of 120 CCRC units as part of the development. The Hickory Trail Estates is anticipated to generate 288 new daily trips, 17 new AM peak -hour trips and 19 new PM peak -hour trips. The trip generation is summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Summary Land Uses Average Daily Trips AM Peak -Hour Trips PM Peak -Hour Trips Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total LUC 255 CCRC 120 Units Generation Rate 2.40 Trips per Unit 0.14 Trips per Unit 0.16 Trips per Unit Splits 50% 50% 100% 65% 35% 100% 39% 61% 100 Trips 144 144 288 II 6 17 7 12 19 TOTAL 144 144 288 11 6 17 7 12 19 The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. Trip distribution and traffic assignments for the development are based on the existing turning movement counts at the intersection of N 1' Avenue and Hickory Trail. It is anticipated that 75% of the development traffic would travel to and from the south and 25% to and from the north on N 1" Avenue from Hickory Trail. The development trips are included in the turning movement sheets for the AM and PM peak -hours. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 2021 info®gibsontraffic.com 3 GTC #21-005 I lickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis The existing channelization at the study intersection as well as the existing peak -hour factors were utilized in determining the level of service analysis. The tuning movements are included in the attachments. The level of service analysis for the normalized existing, 2025 baseline, and 2025 future with development conditions is summarized in Table 3. Intersection Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Summary Time Period Normalized Existing Conditions 2025 Baseline Conditions 2025 Future with Development Conditions LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. N 1n Avenue at Hickory Trail AM D 25.4 sec D 26.4 sec D 28.2 sec PM C 18.5 sec C 19.5 sec C 20.2 sec The study intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better in he normalized existing, 2025 baseline and 2025 future with development conditions during both the AM and PM peak -hours. Collision Data Collision Data was compiled for the years 2018 through 2021 from the Iowa DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool for the intersection of N 1s' Avenue at Hickory Trail. There were two collisions (one rear -end and one sideswipe) at the intersection of N In Avenue and Hickory Trail. The collisions resulted in property damage and possible injury. There was no collision trend or significant collision history associated with the geometry of the road network. The detailed crash reports are included in the attachments. Attachments Trip Generation A-1 to A-5 Counts B -I to B-3 Turning Movements C-1 to C-2 Level of Service Calculations D-1 to D-6 Collision Data E -I Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 2021 info®gibsontraffic.com 4 GTC #21-005 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE I 3 Z w w Z i Z O 0 iiicq W C z Q > J Z C y U U m w d' co O < a 0 C 3 O O O C O O 5 0 0 O C O 0 O • 9• 0 C 8 N 8 CO03N O 88 0 0 `o x e w H 0 • 3 88 v to m N N N > C O 0 0 N • 13. 0 S. Ti aO r O O f I0- `o c c Z.-- 0 f w 0 Cu C m 0. 5 N C 0 O 0 N CO ~ ee O N e ?o N 0. O o f ▪ C N d m f J O cv U mW Fe C O A - I 2 O1 C C 10 n C 0 0 .0 0 O S 0 C 0 C 10 t_ F.. d m V 4S C 0 U 10 a Q 0 S. L O O Y m Y • C 0 - a co T -a Y 3• 0 o R C s R CO C C 00 a NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE 0 Z W Z Z O Its C m 0 m tll C Z Q w J Z O U U w K O NEW 1 PASS -BY O 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 Ybc co 0 O • 3o C 0 0 O Ka e w � 0 C 2>- O 0 O y z a O • A 0 0 O x a e w f 0 O 07• 7, 0 C r - m` C o 0 m U N 0 ao e it 0 1- N a f m N 0 o • o n n e 0 o O c0> e z (n CI. $ o 7- tif I- it LAND USES A - f a V C R C m d m .0 0 0 S m C 0 u R I- F N m w N c m u la 'a Q 0 3 ` O 3 S O S Y a CO a� A T RI OS 0 0 w6 c O a, C C m CD a I- NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE I- z w 2 a w z n n C m m a 0 0 0 C 3 O 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 w Z '= A O 0 c m m 0 07 IW -a CC 0 Z U K 2 O 0 c 0 0 o x 6 "W 1- 0 o m a, yy 2 a A Oo 0 0 o X a e w r 0 0 � m O 0 c 0' m n > N 0 O U a 02 0 0 0 0. on on 0 a 0 PA m m I- O c0 "? M a2 f K 0 LIJ 1-J 0 u N w mJ 5 N N LAND USES A•3 Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 AM Peak -Hour % New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total 100% 288.00 10.92 5.88 16.80 1% 2.88 0.11 0.06 0.17 2% 5.76 0.22 0.12 0.34 3% 8.64 0.33 0.18 0.50 4% 11.52 0.44 0.24 0.67 5% 14.40 0.55 0.29 0.84 6% 17.28 0.66 0.35 1.01 7% 20.16 0.76 0.41 1.18 8% 23.04 0.87 0.47 1.34 9% 25.92 0.98 0.53 1.51 10% 28.80 1.09 0.59 1.68 11% 31.68 1.20 0.65 1.85 12% 34.56 1.31 0.71 2.02 13% 37.44 1.42 0.76 2.18 14% 40.32 1.53 0.82 2.35 15% 43.20 1.64 0.88 2.52 16% 46.08 1.75 0.94 2.69 17% 48.96 1.86 1.00 2.86 18% 51.84 1.97 1.06 3.02 19% 54.72 2.07 1.12 3.19 20% 57.60 2.18 1.18 3.36 21% 60.48 2.29 1.23 3.53 22% 63.36 2.40 1.29 3.70 23% 66.24 2.51 1.35 3.86 24% 69.12 2.62 1.41 4.03 25% 72.00 2.73 1.47 4.20 26% 74.88 2.84 1.53 4.37 27% 77.76 2.95 1.59 4.54 28% 80.64 3.06 1.65 4.70 29% 83.52 3.17 1.71 4.87 30% 86.40 3.28 1.76 5.04 31% 89.28 3.39 1.82 5.21 32% 92.16 3.49 1.88 5.38 33% 95.04 3.60 1.94 5.54 34% 97.92 3.71 2.00 5.71 35% 100.80 3.82 2.06 5.88 36% 103.68 3.93 2.12 6.05 37% 106.56 4.04 2.18 6.22 38% 109.44 4.15 2.23 6.38 39% 112.32 4.26 2.29 6.55 40% 115.20 4.37 2.35 6.72 41% 118.08 4.48 2.41 6.89 42% 120.96 4.59 2.47 7.06 43% 123.84 4.70 2.53 7.22 44% 126.72 4.80 2.59 7.39 45% 129.60 4.91 2.65 7.56 46% 132.48 5.02 2.70 7.73 47% 135.36 5.13 2.76 7.90 48% 138.24 5.24 2.82 8.06 49% 141.12 5.35 2.88 8.23 50°4 144.00 5.46 2.94 8.40 % New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total 100% 288.00 10.92 5.88 16.80 51% 146.88 5.57 3.00 8.57 52% 149.76 5.68 3.06 8.74 53% 152.64 5.79 3.12 8.90 54% 155.52 5.90 3.18 9.07 55% 158.40 6.01 3.23 9.24 56% 161.28 6.12 3.29 9.41 57% 164.16 6.22 3.35 9.58 58% 167.04 6.33 3.41 9.74 59% 169.92 6.44 3.47 9.91 60% 172.80 6.55 3.53 10.08 61% 175.68 6.66 3.59 10.25 62% 178.56 6.77 3.65 10.42 63% 181.44 6.88 370 10.58 64% 184.32 6.99 3.76 10.75 65% 187.20 7.10 3.82 10.92 66% 190.08 7.21 3,88 11.09 67% 192.96 7.32 3.94 11.26 68% 195.84 7.43 4.00 11.42 69% 198.72 7.53 4.06 11.59 70% 201.60 7.64 4.12 11.76 71% 204.48 7.75 4.17 11.93 72% 207.36 7.86 4.23 12.10 73% 210.24 7.97 4.29 12.26 74% 213.12 8.08 4.35 12.43 75% 216.00 8.19 4.41 12.60 76% 218.88 8.30 4.47 12.77 77% 221.76 8.41 4.53 12.94 78% 224.64 8.52 4.59 13.10 79% 227.52 8.63 4.65 13.27 80% 230.40 8.74 4.70 13.44 81% 233.28 8.85 4.76 13.61 82% 236.16 8.95 4.82 13.78 83% 239.04 9.06 4.88 13.94 84% 241.92 9.17 4.94 14.11 85% 244.80 9.28 5.00 14.28 86% 247.68 9.39 5.06 14.45 87% 250.56 9.50 5.12 14.62 88% 253.44 9.61 5.17 14.78 89% 256.32 9.72 5.23 14.95 90% 259.20 9.83 5.29 15.12 91% 262.08 9.94 5.35 15.29 92% 264.96 10.05 5.41 15.46 93% 267.84 10.16 5.47 15.62 94% 270.72 10.26 5.53 15.79 95% 273.60 10.37 5.59 15.96 96% 276.48 10.48 5.64 16.13 97% 279.36 10.59 5.70 16.30 98% 282.24 10.70 5.76 16.46 99% 285.12 10.81 5.82 16.63 100°4 288.00 10.92 5.88 16.80 A-4 Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 PM Peak -Hour % New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In Out Tote) 100% 288.00 7.49 11.71 19.20 1% 2.88 0.07 0.12 0.19 2% 5.76 0.15 0.23 0.38 3% 8.64 0.22 0.35 0.58 4% 11.52 0.30 0.47 0.77 5% 14.40 0.37 0.59 0.96 6% 17.28 0.45 0.70 1.15 7% 20.16 0.52 0.82 1.34 8% 23.04 0.60 0.94 1.54 9% 25.92 0.67 1.05 1.73 10% 28.80 0.75 1.17 1.92 11% 31.68 0.82 1.29 2.11 12% 34.56 0.90 1.41 2.30 13% 37.44 0.97 1.52 2.50 14% 40.32 1.05 1.64 2.69 15% 43.20 1.12 1.76 2.88 16% 46.08 1.20 1.87 3.07 17% 48.96 1.27 1.99 3.26 18% 51.84 1.35 2.11 3.46 19% 54.72 1.42 2.22 3.65 20% 57.60 1.50 2.34 3.84 21% 60.48 1.57 2.46 4.03 22% 63.36 1.65 2.58 4.22 23% 66.24 1.72 2.69 4.42 24% 69.12 1.80 2.81 4.61 25% 72.00 1.87 2.93 4.80 26% 74.88 1.95 3.04 4.99 27% 77.76 2.02 3.16 5.18 28% 80.64 2.10 3.28 5.38 29% 83.52 2.17 3.40 5.57 30% 86.40 2.25 3.51 5.76 31% 89.28 2.32 3.63 5.95 32% 92.16 2.40 3.75 6.14 33% 95.04 2.47 3.86 6.34 34% 97.92 2.55 3.98 6.53 35% 100.80 2.62 4.10 6.72 36% 103.68 2.70 4.22 6.91 37% 106.56 2.77 4.33 7.10 38% 109.44 2.85 4.45 7.30 39% 112.32 2.92 4.57 7.49 40% 115.20 3.00 4.68 7.68 41% 118.08 3.07 4.80 7.87 42% 120.96 3.15 4.92 8.06 43% 123.84 3.22 5.04 8.26 44% 126.72 3.30 5.15 8.45 45% 129.60 3.37 5.27 8.64 46% 132.48 3.45 5.39 8.83 47% 135.36 3.52 5.50 9.02 48% 138.24 3.60 5.62 9.22 49% 141.12 3.67 5.74 9.41 50°4 144.00 3.75 5.86 9.60 % New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In Out Tote) 100% 288.00 7.49 11.71 19.20 51% 146.88 3.82 5.97 9.79 52% 149.76 3.89 6.09 9.98 53% 152.64 3.97 6.21 10.18 54% 155.52 4.04 6.32 10.37 55% 158.40 4.12 6.44 10.56 56% 161.28 4.19 6.56 10.75 57% 164.16 4.27 6.67 10.94 58% 167.04 4.34 6.79 11.14 59% 169.92 4.42 6.91 11.33 60% 172.80 4.49 7.03 11.52 61% 175.68 4.57 7.14 1131 62% 178.56 4.64 7.26 11.90 63% 181.44 4.72 7.38 12.10 64% 184.32 4.79 7.49 12.29 65% 187.20 4.87 7.61 12.48 66% 190.08 4.94 7.73 12.67 67% 192.96 5.02 7.85 12.86 68% 195.84 5.09 7.96 13.06 69% 198.72 5.17 8.08 13.25 70% 201.60 5.24 8.20 13.44 71% 204.48 5.32 8.31 13.63 72% 207.36 5.39 8.43 13.82 73% 210.24 5.47 8.55 14.02 74% 213.12 5.54 8.67 14.21 75% 216.00 5.62 8.78 14.40 76% 218.88 5.69 8.90 14.59 77% 221.76 5.77 9.02 14.78 78% 224.64 5.84 9.13 14.98 79% 227.52 5.92 9.25 15.17 80% 230.40 5.99 9.37 15.36 81% 233.28 6.07 9.49 15.55 82% 236.16 6.14 9.60 15.74 83% 239.04 6.22 9.72 15.94 84% 241.92 6.29 9,84 16.13 85% 244.80 6.37 9.95 16.32 86% 247.68 6.44 10.07 16.51 87% 250.56 6.52 10.19 1610 88% 253.44 6.59 10.30 16.90 89% 256.32 6.67 10.42 17.09 90% 259.20 6.74 10.54 17.28 91% 262.08 6.82 10.66 17.47 92% 264.96 6.89 10.77 17.66 93% 267.84 6.97 10.89 17.86 94% 270.72 7.04 11.01 18.05 95% 273.60 7.12 11.12 18.24 96% 276.48 7.19 11.24 18.43 97% 279.36 7.27 11.36 18.62 98% 282.24 7.34 11.48 18.82 99% 285.12 7.42 11.59 19.01 100°4 288.00 7.49 11.71 19.20 A-5 1,1 O 101 0 M R en 0 0 N 0 a x 0 O ry •Pi 0 .M. 0 1'3 J el R 0 L J 0 0 o 3 o p o a e e 6 op I `® 2 r S {5S o C _ S (S o ® 6 S { a a5 y V L Ti 2 .„0 n 4 u 0 0' 0 0 F - N 0 0. fl ©� 0 0 c agN "aa§55 a ,884538288 O es oo E E ; 11 00.00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 00000000 # II T O N V n {qp V T M e 2..N2.4•100 az Eg 2 r 00000000 N..v..NO 4 O N N 8 m 0 0 00000000 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 r 0 6„ a a <<<< r E$— •$ N 2 q 0 0 o E 11 ii 2 u` $ 1 o E g ax $2341288$$.8$ •. 0.0000000000 000000000000 00..00000.00.. a a f 11 cz3 i $` 0 p FC 8 S X 2 ..000000..00 N 888 N N$ 8'A M N N W O N M n a N^ .n O n N N N n N O N O M N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 meO.• N.n--o Van" O N O O N N N n .% n .0 M N O N Ji N N N 82118 0.0.000000.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 r o a N a N a a a a a a a a 2E848$0 404'8-04' .n B-1 I- I C I® C E awes: IUI :.3I riRMI 0 wS ON Mg VLL -000000 00NNO- Fvvvvn - ssao8ai S `awnom v —00--ooN 12 w((aa 0 a neeeeee 000-0- Paaaaaa$ moo88at 6 g 6 s o S 5 5 o 00 00 owy owy 0 0 0 3e I9i��I N b ON* ON* 0 0 osg 0 ONj O Omy 1 osx 0 ON* O 13-2 Intersection Peak Hour Location: 1st Ave at Scott Blvd , GPS Coordinates: Date: 2018-09-06 Day of week: Thursday Weather: Analyst: NB Intersection Peak Hour 16:15 - 17:15 13.3 SouthBound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Total Loft Thru Right Loft Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Vehicle Total 35 45 27 0 200 9 378 7 2 6 224 336 1269 Factor 0.51 062 0.48 0.00 0.93 0.56 0.92 0.88 0.50 0.50 0.85 0.92 0.97 Approach Factor 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.91 13.3 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour Year: 117121 Data Source: MOM 0 6 6 1 0 5 1 N 1st Ave @ Hickory Trail 290 0 1 285 1 5 553 ( 263 8 Hickory Trail O b N 1st Avenue 608 N 1st Avenue 4 4 a a Hickory Trail 0 O 0 1 254 I 20 320 1594 274 8 38 63 25 0 30 Page 1 of 1 1 North Normalized Existing (COVID- 19 Factor) Average Weekday AM Peak Hour Percent Change: 35.0% Based on balancing volumes from the intersection of N 1st Avenue at Scott Blvd. 0 8 8 1 0 7 392 747 0 1 385 1 7 O 0 Hickory Trail 0 b N 1st Avenue n N 1st Avenue 4 355 I 4 a Hickory Trail 0 0 0 1 343 I 27 432 1 802 370 11 0 41 51 85 34 North Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour Year: 2025 Growth Rate = 1.0% Years of Growth = 4 Total Growth = 1.0406 0 8 8 0 407 776 369 0 1400 1 7 0 N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail O b C N 1st Avenue 4 4 a 0 Hickory Trail 0 0 0 1357 I 28 449 1 834 385 11 0 42 53 88 35 7 North Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 17 6 3 $ 3 1 0 1 0 4 4 N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail O b m N 1st Avenue 4 4 0 Hickory Trail 0 O I 4 1 12 8 1 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 11 25 14 3 0 11 410 781 371 3 1400 1 7 a 4 N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail O a 870 N 151 Avenue 4 4 a 0 Hickory Trail 0 0 8 1357 I 28 453 1 846 393 11 0 42 53 88 35 7 North C - l Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year 1112121 Data Source: MOM 1 2 1 0 0 1 N 1st Ave @ Hickory Trail 302 594 1 292 0 1 289 1 13 O b N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail 0 639 N 1st Avenue 4 4 a 0 Hickory Trail 0 O 1 1287 1 24 309 1 621 312 5 0 19 24 61 37 Page 1 of 1 North Normalized Existing (COVID- 19 Factor) Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Percent Change: 30.0% Based on balancing volumes from the intersection of N 1st Avenue at Scott Blvd. 1 3 1 0 0 393 0 1376 I 17 772 I 380 0 9 4 N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail 0 II ESE N 1st Avenue 4 Q D 1 1 373 I 31 402 807 406 Hickory Trail 7 0 25 31 79 48 North Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: 2025 Growth Rate = 1.0% Years of Growth = 4 Total Growth = 1.0406 2 0 0 409 804 395 0 1 391 1 18 0 a Hickory Trail P N 1st Avenue 0 4 0 Hickory Trail N 1st Avenue 4 g 0 418 1839 1 1 388 1 32 421 7 0 26 33 50 North Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 7 19 12 3 0 9 2 $ 2 1 0 1 0 9 b N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail a a 19 N 1st Avenue 4 4 a 0 Hickory Trail 0 D $ 1 0 1 0 1 9 1 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 T North Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 8 21 13 3 0 10 411 809 2 1 391 I 18 9 b N 1st Avenue Hickory Trail a 0 N 1st Avenue 4 4 a 0 Hickory Trail 0 D 6 1 388 1 32 427 1 853 426 7 0 26 33 83 50 1 North C-2 Existing Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 44 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 41 0 7 0 343 27 7 385 0 Future Vol, vehlh 1 0 7 41 0 7 0 343 27 7 385 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # • 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 1 0 9 54 0 9 0 451 36 9 507 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 999 1012 507 999 994 469 507 0 0 487 0 0 Stage 1 525 525 - 469 469 - Stage 2 474 487 - 530 525 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 223 240 568 223 246 596 1063 - 1081 Stage 1 538 531 - 577 562 - - Stage 2 573 552 - 534 531 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 218 237 568 217 243 596 1063 - 1081 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 218 237 - 217 243 Stage 1 538 525 - 577 562 - Stage 2 564 552 - 519 525 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 25.4 0 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.1 Capacity (veh/h) 1063 - - 473 239 1081 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio - 0.022 0.264 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 12.8 25.4 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - B D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1 0 GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions AM Page 1 D - I Existing Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 25 0 7 1 373 31 17 376 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 0 1 25 0 7 1 373 31 17 376 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 27 0 8 1 410 34 19 413 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 884 897 413 881 880 427 413 0 0 444 0 0 Stage 1 451 451 - 429 429 - Stage 2 433 446 - 452 451 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 267 280 641 268 287 630 1151 - - 1121 Stage 1 590 573 - 606 586 - - Stage 2 603 576 - 589 573 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 259 274 641 263 280 630 1151 - 1121 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 259 274 - 263 280 Stage 1 589 560 - 605 585 - Stage 2 595 575 - 575 560 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 18.5 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.4 Capacity (veh/h) 1151 - - 641 301 1121 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002 0.117 0.017 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 10.6 18.5 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.4 0.1 GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions PM Page 1 O.2 Baseline Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4+ 4i 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 42 0 11 0 357 28 7 400 0 Future Vol, vehlh 1 0 7 42 0 11 0 357 28 7 400 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 1 0 9 55 0 14 0 470 37 9 526 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1040 1051 526 1038 1033 489 526 0 0 507 0 0 Stage 1 544 544 - 489 489 - Stage 2 496 507 - 549 544 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 209 228 554 210 233 581 1046 - 1063 Stage 1 525 521 - 562 551 - Stage 2 558 541 - 522 521 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap4 Maneuver 202 225 554 205 230 581 1046 • 1063 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 202 225 - 205 230 Stage 1 525 515 - 562 551 Stage 2 544 541 507 515 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 26.4 0 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.1 Capacity (veh/h) 1046 - - 455 237 1063 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio - 0.023 0.294 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 13.1 26.4 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - B D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1.2 0 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions AM Page 1 D-3 Baseline Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 26 0 7 1 388 32 18 391 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 0 1 26 0 7 1 388 32 18 391 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 29 0 8 1 426 35 20 430 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 920 933 430 917 916 444 430 0 0 461 0 0 Stage 1 470 470 - 446 446 Stage 2 450 463 - 471 470 Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 • 6.11 5.51 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 253 267 627 254 273 616 1135 - 1105 Stage 1 576 562 - 593 576 - Stage 2 590 566 - 575 562 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap.1 Maneuver 245 260 627 249 266 616 1135 • 1105 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 245 260 - 249 266 Stage 1 575 549 - 592 575 - Stage 2 582 565 - 560 549 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.8 19.5 0 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR 0.4 Capacity (veh/h) 1135 - - 627 285 1105 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002 0.127 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - 10.8 19.5 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.4 0.1 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions PM Page 1 f)-4 Future With Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 11 42 0 11 8 357 28 7 400 3 Future Vol, vehlh 3 0 11 42 0 11 8 357 28 7 400 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 4 0 14 55 0 14 11 470 37 9 526 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1064 1075 528 1064 1059 489 530 0 0 507 0 0 Stage 1 546 546 - 511 511 - Stage 2 518 529 - 553 548 - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 202 220 552 202 225 581 1042 - 1063 Stage 1 524 520 - 547 539 - - Stage 2 542 529 - 519 519 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 193 214 552 193 219 581 1042 • 1063 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 193 214 - 193 219 Stage 1 516 514 - 539 531 Stage 2 521 521 - 499 513 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.6 28.2 0.2 0.1 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1042 - - 395 224 1063 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.01 - 0.047 0.311 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 - 14.6 28.2 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B D A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0 - 0.1 1.3 0 GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions AM Page 1 D-5 Future With Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, srveh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4i 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 10 26 0 7 6 388 32 18 391 2 Future Vol, vehlh 3 0 10 26 0 7 6 388 32 18 391 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 3 0 11 29 0 8 7 426 35 20 430 2 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majort Major2 Conflicting Flow All 933 946 431 935 930 444 432 0 0 461 0 0 Stage 1 471 471 - 458 458 Stage 2 462 475 - 477 472 Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 247 263 626 247 268 616 1133 - 1105 Stage 1 575 561 - 585 569 - Stage 2 582 559 - 571 561 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 238 255 626 237 259 616 1133 • 1105 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 238 255 - 237 259 Stage 1 570 548 - 580 564 - Stage 2 570 555 - 548 548 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.2 20.2 0.1 0.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1133 - - 455 273 1105 - HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.006 - 0.031 0.133 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - 13.2 20.2 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - B C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.5 0.1 GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions PM Page 1 D-6 DOT Crash Detail Report 20181073217 10/16/2018 15:24 County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Followed too close Roadway Type: Intersection: T -intersection Severity:: Possible/Unknown Injury Fatalities: 0 Major Injuries: 0 Minor Injuries: 0 Possible Injuries: 2 Severity:: Possible/Unknown Injury Init Tray Dir: Veh Action: Configuration: Driver Age: Driver Gender: Driver Cond: Driver Contr 1: Driver Contr 2: Fixed Object: HICKORY TRL AND N 1ST AVE Manner of Crash: Rear -end (front to rear) Surface Conditions: Dry Light Conditions: Daylight Weather Conditions: Clear Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Property Damage: $3,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit South Movement essentially straight Sport utility vehicle 33 F Emotional (e.g., depressed, angry) Followed too close Not reported None (no fixed object struck) South Slowing/stopping (deceleration) Sport utility vehicle 71 F Apparently normal No improper action Not reported None (no fixed object struck) 20201157310 01/15/2020 04:30 County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Roadway Type: Severity:: Fatalities: Major Injuries: Minor Injuries: Possible Injuries: Severity:: Other Feature: Non-junction/no special feature Property Damage Only 0 0 0 0 Property Damage Only Init Tray Dir: Veh Action: Configuration: Driver Age: Driver Gender: Driver Cond: Driver Contr 1: Driver Contr 2: Fixed Object: HICKORY TRL AND N 1ST AVE Manner of Crash: Sideswipe, opposite direction Surface Conditions: Ice/frost Light Conditions: Dark - unknown roadway lighting Weather Conditions: Cloudy Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Property Damage: $5,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit South Movement essentially straight Four -tire light truck (pick-up) 47 F Apparently normal Other Not reported None (no fixed object struck) North Movement essentially straight Passenger car 55 F Apparently normal No improper action Not reported None (no fixed object struck) January 21, 2021 Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page 1 F -I 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles I I I I I REZ21-0008 Hickory Trail Estates CITY OF IOWA CITY Prepared By: Joshua Engelbrecht Date Prepared: September 2021 CalAIM �r �. .'404 01� Y =�I • _ N SCOTT Bk-vD DODGE STREET CT UK - SIE • ■ Iw ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ •■ ■ • • • • • • i ■ ( ■ ■ ••II• • MOP' AWUN/if All An application submitted by Axiom Consultants, on behalf of Nelson Development 1, LLC, for the rezoning of 48.75 acres of property located South of N. Scott Blvd, and West of N. 1st Ave. from Interim Development - Single -Family (ID -RS) to Low-density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) Overlay Zones Overlay Description A Planned Development (OPD) 11111111111111 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles I I I i REZ21-0008 Hickory Trail Estates Prepared By: Joshua Engelbrecht Date Prepared: September 2021 111DOEiGE STREET • HICKORY TRL An application submitted by Axiom Consultants, on behalf of Nelson Development 1, LLC, for the rezoning of 48.75 acres of property located South of N. Scott Blvd, and West of N. 1st Ave. from Interim Development - Single -Family (ID -RS) to Low-density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) XIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY September 16, 2021 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR REZONING The proposed development area consists of a portion of Parcel 1002476002. The area being rezoned is approximately 48 acres of private property located west of N. 1St Avenue and south of N. Scott Boulevard. It is bounded on the south and west by Hickory Hill Park. The current zoning classification is ID -RS — Interim Development Single -Family Residential. The Applicant is seeking to rezone the entire 48.75 acres of the property to RS -5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential. There is 1,332.95 feet of frontage on North Scott Boulevard. There are approximately 14 acres between the proposed development and N. Scott Boulevard and N. 1st Avenue that are not included in this development and are not included in the rezoning application. Refer to the Rezoning Exhibit included with the Rezoning Application for additional information, including the legal description. Comprehensive Plan & District Plan The Future Land Use Map within the Comprehensive Plan shows this area as Conservation Design. The Conservation Design designation indicates the presence of sensitive features on the property. These features include wetlands, a waterway, steep slopes, and woodlands. The Northeast District Plan includes the property within the "Bluffwood Neighborhood" (Figure 1). The Bluffwood concept plan shows single- family housing and two cul de sacs on the south and west portion of the property. There is Neighborhood Commercial depicted on the southeast portion of the property (four red buildings on Figure 1) and Small Apartment Buildings shown on the northeast portion (five pink buildings on Figure 1). The plan shows wooded areas remaining along the waterway at the center of the property. Hickory Hill Park can be seen along the west and south of the property. The cul de sacs allow for a connection from Hickory Hill Park to the drainageway at the center of the property. Previous Projects A previous rezoning application for the property located Bluffwood NORTH Figure 1: Bluffwood Neighborhood from Northeast District Plan with Approximate Project Boundary r/ u(JUJCu rl uJCL..l ry Ca JI IUVVI I Ill !ICU Project Number 200194 1 AXIOMCONSULTANTS at 831 N. 1St Avenue (immediately east of this project) was approved as a Planned Development Overlay Medium -Density Single -Family (OPD RS -8) and a twelve -unit, 3 -story building was constructed (Figure 2) in place of the Neighborhood Commercial shown on the Bluffwood plan. Project Overview The Applicant proposes to develop a Senior Living Facility with Assisted Living and Memory Care east of the waterway. The south end of the Senior Facility building will be a single -story structure memory care, the center of the building will be a two-story structure containing the main entry, dining, common areas, and administrative areas, and the north end of the north end of the building will consist of three stories of assisted living apartments. Refer to Figure 3 for a rendering). Hickory Trail, which currently dead ends at the east property line, is being extended to the west and will terminate in a cul de sac on the east side of the existing waterway. Low -Density Single -Family Residential (RS -5) The Low -Density Single Family Residential (RS -5) zoning proposed is consistent with the Bluffwood plan and is the least dense zoning designation allowed within the Iowa City Code. The proposed senior living facility will occupy a 9 -acre lot at the southeast corner of the property. Approximately 1 acre will be dedicated to the city as right-of-way for the extension of Figure 3:Conceptual Rendering of the Proposed Senior Facility (looking northeast) Hickory Trail, and the remaining 38 acres will be dedicated to the city as Public Open Space and the expansion of Hickory Hill Park. Project Number 200194 Page 12 AXIOMCONSULTANTS The area where the Senior Living Facility is proposed was shown as a mix of single-family homes and small apartment building on the Bluffwood Plan. The proposed building and site have been designed to take advantage of the existing topography to prevent the building from dominating the view. The existing topography rises from the southwest to the north east corner of the Senior Living site. The building has a single -story on the south and three -stories on the north (refer to Figure 3). This prevents the mass of the building from dominating views from the park. The building is set into the existing site with a first -floor elevation of approximately 735 and the eave on the tallest portion of the building is at an elevation of approximately 768. The elevation of the northeast corner of the property 768 and N. 1st Avenue is at an elevation of 760 in this area. This allows the natural grade along N. 1St Avenue to block the building from view as pedestrians and vehicles travel along N. 1St Avenue. Refer to the Site Plan included in the rezoning submittal. The proposed building and site achieve the density desired by the Applicant without a large footprint or excessive amounts of impervious area. The zoning suggested on the District Plan would allow for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of up to 1.0. The proposed site has a FAR of 0.3. Another measure of building density on a property is the amount of impervious surfaces (pavement, sidewalks, roof top). Impervious areas averaging eighty-five percent are common in commercial areas. This building and site combine for an impervious area of 40%. This relatively low amount of imperviousness is by design. The building features an interior courtyard within the memory care wing and a community garden space east of the dining and kitchen facility. Parking is located along the loop road, where possible, to minimize the pavement associated drive aisles in traditional parking lots. There is ample green space along the west and east sides of the loop road to help provide buffers to adjacent properties. Each of these features combine to reduce the imperviousness of the site. The Applicant is committed to planting replacement trees to achieve the 20% woodland retention requirement of this zoning designation. These trees will be planted along the west, east, and south portions of the Senior Living facility. These plantings will enhance the view from inside the building, provide unique spaces on the property for outdoor activities, and protect the views from those looking at the property from either the park or the single-family portion of the development. The applicant is not seeking adjustments to minimum area regulations or setbacks. A variance allowing building height of 40 feet (code allows for 35 feet) is being requested. The proposed development will avoid protected slopes, provide the required 50% woodland preservation, and meets other regulations of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance as required by City Code. A buffer will be provided between the rear of the single-family lots that are adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. City Utilities There is city water along the north side of N. Scott Boulevard and water at the end of Hickory Trail. The watermain on Hikcory Trail will be extended to the end of the proposed cul de sac. There is sanitary sewer at the dead-end of Hickory Trail and along the waterway south of the project. The sanitary sewer on Hickory Trail will be used to serve the proposed Project Number 200194 Page 13 AXIOMCONSULTANTS Senior Living building. Private utilities such as gas, electric, and communications are also available. Storm water management is provided by an existing basin downstream of the project. Sensitive Areas Detailed Analyses have been undertaken and, in addition to the woodlands and the waterway, have documented the presence of wetlands and protected slopes. The Office of the State Archaeologist has completed a field investigation and determined that no further archaeologic investigation is required. A Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan accompanies this application. The development has been designed to avoid the sensitive features and minimize impacts. Protected slopes have been avoided completely and less than 7% of critical slopes are impacted. Hickory Hill Park The development team has met with the Friends of Hickory Hills Park (FHHP) to gain their insight to the development. The two groups are seeking areas where the goals of the development and FHHP align and are discussing how each can benefit from this relationship. The Applicant will also be utilizing the Good Neighbor Meeting process to seek additional community input. Sincerely, Michael J. Welch, PE Project Engineer Project Number 200194 Page 14 REZONING EXHIBIT HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES IOWA CITY, IOWA I� 1725 N DODGE ST ZONING: P1 PARCEL ID: \ 1002153001', ZONING: CO1 I HICKOf2 HEIGHTS ZONIN OPD/RS5 2041 N DUBUQUE RD ZONING: RDP PARCEL ID: 1002401005 ZONING: ID -RS 2640 N SCOTT BLVD ZONING: OPD/RM12 PARCEL ID: 1001327004 ZONING: ID -RP W % PARCEL ID: 1002426001 ZONING: P1 500-YEAR FLOOD LINE 800 CONKLIN LN ZONING: P1 Soo z PARCEL ID: 1002476002 ZONING: ID -RS 48.75 ACRES PROPOSED ZONING: OPD/RS-5 HICKORY HILL PARK 1439 E BLOOMINGTON ST ZONING: P1 I 1 \ !v I 1 \� PARCEL ID: 1001326004 ZONING: ID -RP PARCEL ID: 1001351002 ZONING: ID -RS PARCEL ID: 1001351003 ZONING: ID -RS EVAN HEIGHTS ZONING: RS5 411110 AR SUBDIV ZONIN .2545 BLUFFWOOD DR ZONING: ID -RS rn TAM ' ' TRA( rn, DIVISIO ZONING` OPD 'S cc W Q > d a O H M o11111 CO NJ 2530 BLUFFWOOD CIR ZONING: RM12 640 STUART CT ZONING: RM12 BLUFFWOOD goo ZONING: RM12 'Si z O ZONIN OPD/ RM12 ZONING: OPD/ RM12 HICKORY TRL - 0 O BLUFFWOOD CIR HXKORY TRAIL SUBDIVISIeN ZO,NIN?: RS1 I PROJECT VICINITY MAP NDUBUQUE RD PROJECT LOCATION NOT TO SCALE APPLICANT INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 52, PAGE 143 OF APPLICANT: PREPARED BY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC ATTN: JACOB WOLFGANG 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM APPLICANT ATTORNEY: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC C/O MICHAEL WELCH 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319-519-6220 MWELCH@AXIOM-CON.COM KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN: BRYCE K. DALTON 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65°18'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZONING INFORMATION: BEING PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 52, PAGE 143 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL, THENCE N01°07'52"W, 656.03 FEET; THENCE N01°41'17"W, 1094.66 FEET; THENCE N01°38'34"W, 210.49 FEET; THENCE N01°20'33"W, 538.67 FEET; THENCE TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65°18'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE S27°14'33"W, 924.73 FEET; THENCE S01°14'34"E, 378.49 FEET; THENCE N77°55'52"E, 649.63 FEET; THENCE S01°15'42"E, 868.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S87°54'07"W, 1302.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 48.75 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ZONING INFORMATION: Sep 14, 2021 - 9:13am S: PROJECTS 2020 200194 05 Design Civil -Survey Sheets 200194 - Rezoning Exhibit.dwg ENGINEER: 0 150 300 DRAWING LOG W I- 0 09-14-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING APPLICATION > W IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52245 CLIENT NAME: NELSON DEVELOPMENT SHEET NAME: REZONING EXHIBIT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J W PROJECT NO.: SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: ID -RS OPD/RS-5 Sep 14, 2021 - 9:13am S: PROJECTS 2020 200194 05 Design Civil -Survey Sheets 200194 - Rezoning Exhibit.dwg ENGINEER: 0 150 300 DRAWING LOG W I- 0 09-14-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING APPLICATION > W IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52245 CLIENT NAME: NELSON DEVELOPMENT SHEET NAME: REZONING EXHIBIT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J W PROJECT NO.: SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 From: Anne Russett To: "Jason Napoli"; Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Hill development w/Nelson Development...on this week"s P&Z agenda? Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 3:28:47 PM Hi, Jason — When we send out these meeting notices we try to strike a balance between letting the neighborhood know as soon as possible of the application and ensuring that the meeting date listed in the notice will actually be the meeting date. That's why we list the meeting date as tentative and include the paragraph about the meeting date being subject to change. Because of the community's interest in this rezoning we wanted to get out the notices as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the application was not ready for this week's meeting. The main reason is that staff is still waiting on an updated traffic study from the applicant. The proposal has not changed from what was presented at the good neighbor meeting. The plan still includes the senior housing development and dedication of 38 acres to the City for parkland. Due to your concern, though, we'll try to reach out to those that we know are interested in this application via email. Thanks, Anne From: Jason Napoli <jasnap23@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 1:11 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org>; Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa- city. o rg> Subject: Re: Hickory Hill development w/Nelson Development...on this week's P&Z agenda? Hi Anne - Thank you for the prompt follow-up. I'm not sure how many people received the attached notice, however will the City update the public on the information in the attached notification no longer being accurate? This would've been a massive inconvenience to arrange childcare for an in-person only meeting, only to learn the reason for attending the meeting is no longer on the agenda. Also, can you please let us know if the developer still intends to present the same rezoning request/development plan as was discussed at the good neighbor meeting? It's concerning to see this development take a direction that is favorable to so many concerned residents and stakeholders, however now when we think it's on the agenda, it disappears. Is there new activity that's caused the case to longer be on the agenda this week? Any additional explanation you can provide would be great and please include this correspondence in future P&Z packets related to this case. Thanks again, Jason Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, October 18, 2021, 12:26, Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> wrote: Hi, Jason — The rezoning adjacent to Hickory Hill Park is not on this week's agenda. We anticipate that it'll be on the Nov 4 Commission agenda, but keep checking in with us or checking their website. We will also include your email below in the Commission agenda packet. Let us know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Anne From: Jason Napoli <jasnap23@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 11:10 AM To: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org>; Anne Russett <Anne- RussettP iowa-citv.org> Subject: Hickory Hill development w/Nelson Development...on this week's P&Z agenda? Greetings Ray and Anne - Just a quick note to confirm whether or not the Nelson/Axiom development abutting Hickory Hill Park will be on this week's Planning and Zoning agenda. I had thought there was notification of it being so, however it doesn't appear to be on the latest agenda published by the city. https://www.iowa-city.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx? id=2026480&dbid=0&repo=CityoflowaCity Any additional information you can provide would be great. That said, I would also like to take this opportunity to support the development as proposed during the good neighbor meeting last month. Provided the —38 acres of land would be gifted to the city as dedicated parkland, this appears to be a very strong result to nearly a year of votes, redesigns and correspondence. Thank you for your service to the city and I appreciate this support being shared with the P&Z Commission prior to the case being discussed. All the best, Jason Napoli Vice -chair, Friends of Hickory Hill Park Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA ICLLIL J NOT TO SCALE ; HICKORY TRAIL I7 OUTLOTS: OUTLOT SF A 1,698,087 PROJECT VICINITY MAP APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY CLERK DATE APPLICANT: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM SHEET INDEX C1.00 OVERALL SENSITIVE FEATURES C1.10 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -SENSITIVE SLOPES C1.20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WOODLAND AREAS C1.30 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WETLAND AND BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR C2.00 CONCEPT PLAN C2.10 LOT 1 - SENIOR LIVING CONCEPT PLAN L1.00 COVER NOTES, SCHEDULE AND DETAILS L1.01 PLANTING PLAN ACRES INTENDED USE 38.98 DEDICATED TO CITY FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND EXPANSION OF HICKORY HILL PARK ROW 40,220 0.92 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR HICKORY TRAIL EXTENSION NOTES: 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. / • LEGEND: SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS EXISTING PROPOSED - 100 — 101 —00e)- 111= - (too)- -- r TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SENSITIVE AREAS STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (>40%) WOODLAND PRESERVATION IMPACTED WOODLAND WETLAND PRESERVATION REGULATED STREAM AREA BUFFER - 1 I • I ------- I - -- �. • --- • f• ,45 M1,L Y r• TRUSIC \,<K\\ -- (\k\ am\\\\_\ $\` ,. \\\\\\ U \\\\\` 4- 4 + 4 4 + + + + + + + + + + , - -- — L1711 • I / O \\�\. \\\�.\., •I,\ `\\�\\\\ \\\\. f S� \\ ▪ • N /- ++++++ + + +tF+{++ ti}+ _k + f } + z 4 +.. + -14-.4_ ,- ---- It 71/-- + 4, t �`y:!!!"1.6 111 it li` Il 11) 40' !%„ 41t4 019N + Q ;10- + + +*T ++` ++ + + l- a + + •.t +."- +, '+ + - + +++ + + ++•_+. + + +`.+ + + + f . + +N i + + L 4 + f'•+, +� + + + •. + i + + +'.+ + + + + Vsv1/4440 f raA + '+.- + + � + - +_. + L + + .4- 4- + / . 7. .44' J / 1 . / �. _ - `N/ • , • + •\' ++• -. -/.. -.r '— OUTLOTA 38:98 -AC `)4698,087 SF 74 - 0 {o N • - • N t • -, * 4.4 . +11-0 { 4 21. • • irg • 2114 • ORTOULARK k 1" 0 • un Cy- T, in 2 ><Og Uy DRAWING LOG 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 CC PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN LU LU LLI 0 6j 0 LLI SHEET NAME: CC LU SENSITIVE FEATURES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: SHEET NUMBER: PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA NOTES: 1. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A BUFFER EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR BUFFERS ARE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. 2. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 21,533 7% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 256,7199 80% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 44,026 13% CRITICAL SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 321,719 100% 3. STEEP SLOPE CALCULATION IMPACTED SLOPES NON -IMPACTED SLOPES STEEP SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) AREA (SF) 60,533 265,430 325,963 LEGEND: SITE EXISTING CONTOUR - INDEX — 100 CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE — 101 — FENCE: BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROPOSED (too)- -(100 —x—x—x——x—x—x— SENSITIVE AREAS STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (> 40%) a o —IMI—IIS AREA BUFFER PERCENTAGE 19% 81% 100% • IMPACTED QUANTITIES: CRITICAL SLOPES LOCATION AREA (SF) @0 1,933 © 5,422 © 834 a3 6,713 14 2,488 © 4,143 © 2,940 TOTAL 21,533 STEEP SLOPES LOCATION AREA (SF) 1@ 40,906 \11 1,058 a 5,036 19 1,418 200 1,885 © 972 © 2,940 6,318 TOTAL 60,533 • TEERVA REPAte trow • / S • • lager men 1 • LAA yint • I orl 0 1— 72, in 2 >< 0 g 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 CC PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN LU CL LU LU 0 6j 0 SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS SENSITIVE SLOPES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: cc CA SHEET NUMBER: PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA NOTES: 1. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PER IOWA CITY CODE FOR RS -5 ZONING, A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. RS -5 WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION IMPACTED WOODLAND BUFFER (50' WIDE) PRESERVED WOODLAND WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) AREA (SF) 208,941 38,179 1,077,944 1,325,064 LEGEND: SITE CONTOUR - INDEX CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE FENCE: BARB WIRE STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT EXISTING — 100 - - 101 x —xx— SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLAND PRESERVATION IMPACTED WOODLAND PROPOSED TREE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN O AREA + + + a 4 ♦ 4 + 4 + + + + + + PROPOSED (loo) (100 —x—x—x- 0 —'I—Il—I'— BUFFER 4 PERCENTAGE 16% 3% 81% 100% s, 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 + + + r 4 + 4 + + + + 4 4 4 4-f + + + + + 4 + 4 + + + ++ + + + 4 + 4 + 4 4 4 a- + + + + 4 + + + r+ + F+ 4 4+ T 4 4 + + + 4 +4+++'h- +++++k 4+j}T+Y4Y}T u++4+i4 ++1- ++ + + ++r + +++ + + + +'4 + +4 4 4++ + + + +4 + + + + 4- + + + 44 + + 4 + • + + 444-4+4 4++++4++ + , '' T 4 +4 + 4 ++ .. 4 + _ + IMPACTED QUANTITIES: WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA (SF) AO 15,787 © 40,474 © 3,808 OD 139,596 ®E 9,276 TOTAL 208,941 �y0 OJ` �t—•—a—.—L—+-4a+ x\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ . \\\\\\\\\\\\\\•\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\�\\\ \\ \\\ \\�\\\\\\\\\ \,\\\* \\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\<"\\\\\\::\\:\<\\N\\:\\ \\ \\\\\\ \\ \\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\•\\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\�\\\\\\\�\��\�\�\\\\\\ VI .\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� \\\\\\\\\. \\\\\\ \\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \'N\\�\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\�. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\, \\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\ _ \\ \\ \\ ' \\ \. \\\\\ \� \. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ O \\\\\\\\�\\ ��\\�\\N\\\\\\ AN �\\\\\ A\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\.• \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\ + y T Y♦ T++ i +++++T++ +++4+`+ f + + + = y i { a + r+++ + + 4++4+ + 4+++ + + + + + i. + + + + + + 4 + + + + } { + + # 4 ++r+++'++++++++ 4- + 4 4 + + + + + + + + ++++++++++}++{++++ + + + + + ++44}4' 4 + + ++++ + + + 1 + # + + +4+++++4+++ + ++4 4-4.+++ + # }4++++++++4++++4 4+ + + + 4+T4++4 + + + + + + 4 4 ++4 i+ 4 + 4+ 1 h F• + . r + + 4 + + i ++ 4 + + + + + ++ F r + 4 ++ + + + + + + Y + + 4 + + + + + * + + ,. + 4 + + + + + 4+ +++ +44+4-+ +t1 + + + + 4 + 4- + +++'+'+'+`++++a y41+y +.+ + T + + + +'+'+'tr+'4 ++ + + + + +*+ * `4 + + + ++++++}++ + i +.++4.144++4+'+T4'+"+Yy+y+yT i .L + J 1 + + -r 4 + + +i + + + 4 ++++++++14 4 + + + + + + + \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\\�\\\\.\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\,-\\\\\\\\ \\• \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\� •\\\\\\\\ • 1 8.85 AC 385,355 SF 4 4 + -f + + + ▪ = -- 4 T a + + + . + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + + 4 +.r r h +++��. + +++++++++++4+ ++4+++ + + + + + + +'+ + + + + + + 4 + + 4 4 + n. + + + + + + 4 + + + + T + + + - # + + +. - + h + + + + + + ++ + -I- 4 f + 4 T + 4 + + ♦ + + + 4- ++ ++* + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + + t + +*# * u4 4 4 + + + + + r + * + + + 4 + - 4 + 4 + + + + + + + + +++ 4 ++ + + + + + 4+4 r+ + +-y + + 4 + 4 +h+ + + + + + + + 4 +r+ + + + r + - 4- 4 4 + + + 4 + + + + + + L F 4 ++'++ +}+4++++i l++ + + + + 4 4 4- + 44++ +++ + +'+++++ 4- + u + + + + + ++ + + 4 + + + * + + + + 4 + 4 + F + + 4 + * + + L + + ++ 44+++4+ ++++4++4# + 44+.+•+Y ♦4+++++++++1# 4 '+ + + +++ + + + 4 + 4- .. .. i 4 + 4 4 F `\\\\ �, \ O \\ ;� , \\ + + # + 4 + 4 + + 4 + + + 4o + + + } T + 1- * + + 4+++444++44++4-÷ + + 4 + 4 + + + -4+.4-41-44F-444-44-4\<1H. + + + + + T +++444-4 +34 \ 4 + + 4 �F + h + + + + } L + + + 4 + + + + ++ k + +4+ i r i + SUU -F--•-F--•t + + r + + 4 4 + F '4 + + / + + + + + 4 + + + + r + + + 4-+ i4- ++ 4 * 4+ 4++4 4 T i + 4 4 + 4 4 + 4 4 4 + + + -F +++1+ T + + + + + ++Y++ +++4+T 4 +44-4+F4+4++ + + 4 + + + + + 4++++++ 1- + 4+ y+ 4- +++ +++ ♦4+4+ k+++i++ 4+++++++++++++ ++ +L++4 ++ 4 ' + + . + ++++4 +++444* 4++t+++*;+ + ++++++'++ + + + + ++ 44+ + + +'T 4 +++ + + + +++ 4- 4 + + -+++-++.+4+++4+4•++4i+{++++44rTr4+4+ 4++4+ + ` +4 4 +'+ 1.+++1+ + i 4- + + + + + ++ 4 4 4 + ! 4 + F r `+ 3 4+ 4 i + + + + + + 4 + + yy/\ + F + 4- + + + + 4 + + + + + + + +4+ + + k'Jk + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + <4x, + + 1 + + J 4 + + + 1 + + ++ + +4 + + 4 + 4 + + 4 4 + + ++r+ + 4 + r + 4 + + + + r +++++ + + i + 4- + + + + { • + 4+ + +t+ 4 + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + 4 4 + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + L 4 + + + + r * + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + 4 + + L + + r + u ++ L ' 4 + + + 4 + + + F++++++ 4 * + + *+ + + + + 4 4 ++ + +++ + 4+ + + + + { + } + 4 4 + + F + 4- + + ++ ' 4'++ _ +++++++++++++++F-4 +++4 + 4 + + ++4 ++++.F ++ +4+f+++r4++n4+ 4 4++ f 4- 4 +444+4+4+4+ 4{4{++1++ 4+{4+4 + + + + 4++ + + 4 + ' + + + +++++ + + 4 + i + + + +++ + + 4 •; 4 + + +++ + + + = + 4 .1. + + + 4 + + ♦ 4 + + + + + a •+ ++++++4 T ?+ + + 4 4 4 t + 4 + + + + + +•+4 +++++t4+41- + + ++ + + + 4 + + 4 + + + ++4 ++4 4 +1+♦+ + + + + + + 4 s 1 4+ 4, +F+ 4- + -+` ,+}+. ++• }+•1n++44++,++♦+i +4+rT++Y++ ++++++++++4++4++++++++++++4+4+44+44r1F++++++++'4 ,+ + + + + +++ 44 + ++ + + + + ++ I. + +4++ T 4 +4-F ++u + + + ++ ++4+++i+1 + + +41 4+ L +++ +++ +++++++f44+++++#+444+++ + +i'ii++ 4 4++ 4 +++ + 4 i+ + 4 4 + + 4 ++ + + + 4 +++ +44 }+ +4 +l + - +• ++ + '+4 4 + + - +1+ + • + + + + +4 + T 44 ++ ++ ++4++ t ++• + 4 + + + 4+ - + + +4 +� + + + F + + i+ +++++++.y++4+ ++++4* + + 4+ + +T 4- + +++ L + + + 4 + 4 + + + + + + T } i + 4 a + + + + „4 +4++++++ ♦+ + + +`++ +++++T+++1 +4 4++++ i4 +4 44 + + + 4 + +++ 4 ++4 + +'+ 4 +++_++ 4 + ++4*++ + 4 + ++ + 4 + 4 + f + + •*+ + + ++ + + + +*i + +++ + + + . + + + T+ + ++ ++ 4 + + +'+ F 4 14'444 + +/+++4444-4+ +++r y 4 F + + + ate + + + + + f + + + T+ + /++++ 4 _ +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + } + + T 4. + + + + + +4k + + + ++ + + + + +++ + + + 4 + 4- +++ + + + +++4++++++ +4}+4++4#4+++ +4+ + + + + + # Li+4+++ + + # + 4'+ 4 + + + + ++ ++ +4s a+ + + + 4 ++ + '+ + 4 + + + +` - ++l- 4+-++++i-+•+}-}+}+i++++++++i' + + + + + } + + + * + + + + 4 + h + * } 4 + 4 + 4 4+4+++4 + ++T4} 4 + + 4- 4+ + 1+++4+4+++i++ r 4++4++4 4 + + f + + 4+. .• + + + + + 4 + + + + + } + + ++ + +'4F4T 4 + + + ++ ++4+ + + + + + 4 + + + + ++t + + + + r + +++ + + 4 + i + + + 4 + * 4 4+ ++ + + + + L r 4 T +*+ a + 4 4 4 + + + + + +4 + + 4 + + + T + 4.L + + + + + + 4 + + + + + 4 F + + + + * 4 + + .!. + + 4 + r + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + 4 + + 4 + 4 * + 1- + + + + 4 + 4 + + + 4 + +r++i++4++++++4++4++++ ++i +++4+4#4+F++++4+ + + + + + + + { ` +'4 + + + + + + + + +++ ++ + ++ a + a + + + + + + + 4 + + * + + ++ 4 + + f + Y + + ++44�++4+ ++ F • + + + + r + i # + + + • + + + + +++ + + -+ + + 4 + + + +4 ' 4 + + + + + + '+ + + + + + T + + + + + r4++ + + + + * + +++ + + + +' 4 4 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + r + + + + + + + + r + +4+ +4+ + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + +F + L 4 + + + + 4 + +f+ + + + + 4 + + 4+ ++ + 4 4�+4++F++++4+++ { } } } T 4 + + 4- + + ♦ + 4 + -F + + + + ++4+ +++ +++4 + ++*+++ F+++++++++.L ++4 + + +++ + + + + + 4 + i 4 4 + + 4 + + { 4 + + + 4 ++ + + + + +y#++ 4 4 + ♦ 4 + + + + + F + + + + + + + + * + + + + + 4 + + + + + } f t } + 4 + } { + } + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4- + 4 + + + + + + ' + + + + + 4 + 4 + + + 4 + + + 4 #4+4++++++14 + + 4 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + +4++++++++* + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + } + + + + + + + * + + 1- + 4 + +L4 44++++ + 4 + . } + + +' + + + + + 4 + + + + L + + + + + + + + ++}i+ } + 4+++4.4 ++ + + + i. 4 4 4+ + + + + + + 4 + + 4 + + + 4+ # + + + +•+ + + 4 + 4 + + + + + + + + 4 L 4 + + + _ _ r + +++ + + + +4 4- F + 4 +4T+++. + + 4+r` 1+ + + + * f + 4 + 4 4 4 + + + + + . + ++ Y+ +, + - + + ++ + +•+ +4} ; + + 1- + + + • + + + + + + + 4 _ + + + + + r + + + + i + + + + 4 + + 4 4 4++44+4+4+ 4 + + 1- + + . + 4 + 4- + + .0 + + 4- + + a + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + i # + + + F + ++ + + F + + + + 4 + + + + + * + + + + + + • + + + + + 1 + ++++4n4+ +++4+ 4 4 4 4 4 r + r 4 4 + + + + + + F + 4 + + J i + + + + 4 T 4 4 4 + + 4 + + + + + 1 + 4 -F + + + + + + 4 + 4 + + + 4 + 4+ F + 4 + + • + + + +Y+ +' + + i + + + • + + + + + + + 4 + + 4 + + r + 'F + + + + + + 1- + + + + + 4 r + '- + + + + + + + + + 4- + + + r + + + + + + + + + + + } + + .F + + 1- 4. + + + + + 4- 4 + + + + + + 4 4 4 4 4 4 + 4 + 4- + 1 + 4 4 Y 4 + + + + + + 4 4 4 + + + + + 4- + + 4 4 + + +• +4 4- + ++ ++I- + 4 4 OUTLOT A 38.98 AC 1,698,087 SF 4 + + + 4 4 4 + # + + + + + + + + + 4 + - + 4 + +#per` y+++ -F- 4— x+---1x+—tx 4 + 4 + 4- 4 + r + 4 40x5 Seg +00, + + + + + + r + i + f 4 L + + T + + ++ 4 4 4 4 F + + + fff 0 4 4 + 4 r t I } f l�7 511 IgV41:13 i i 500T 0 ROOM Pt ll -.EERY Nfil PG G°�G`S / 12 /I e (I `� I s i 1 1 I X moo` —Leanr -� i r 1 I I I I 1 1 I i 1 r 44C2- 0 cvei Z 8 >< 0 g 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 cc CO PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN LU 0 LLI 0 6j 0 (11 LLI SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS WOODLAND AREAS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: cn SHEET NUMBER: C1.20 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGEND: SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX 100 — —000)— CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE 000)— CONTOUR-INTERMEDIATE 101 — —(ion) --- FENCE: BARB WIRE -- x— x—x—x—x—x— STREAM CENTERLINE SIGN o o CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS SILT FENCE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WETLAND E= REGULATED STREAM / i / STEM PARelleletat TRUST M,tM . I • — , — - — . — • — -' a I i \ j�Lf PAY \ ` '- - \ / '•,%.,, 104, • oG,11 8.85 AC 385,3555F 7, N. ......\. /— //1 ' . . -77 -1/-- 7/ / ' 50' STREAM BUFFER LOT "A" 0.92 AC 40,220 SF >♦I11•1II✓lllr l 4141ll`IIa IIai11_ T-C�ll�ll any 5004 — SOOT' 00r — 500' / / / / } 100' / WETLAND BUFFER / N.4 t \`SN) 15 17 I 1 ! (--_ j ! T —, •.-. r1 I 15 • I SONIS fnC51C 448 S144 tis I 50' /STREAM BUFFER 100' WETLAND BUFFER 30' STREAM CORRIDOR OUTLOT A 38.98 AC 1,698,087 SF / 112 ROOM HIL PG"aG��S II II I I � I I -ri- ��11.YlrM'1'YYeW^1I'M••M'=�'*'vYl pi--iu..v 409, STREAM BUFFER 0 x x—J-Y x 1 HIL sr I 1 i 1/f a 0 soP I / x I I L i I I I I I II I I w I I I II I 1 1 i Oct 22, 2021 - 10:15am S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\200194 PP.dwg Z � J 0 50 100 DRAWING LOG W I— Q C 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 w CC Q CO u PROJECT NAME: HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES PRELIMINARY OPD & SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN z LU I - 0 J LU LU 0 z 6j0 z J wz SHEET NAME: PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS WETLANDS AND REGULATED STREAM CORRIDOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: U J w ick CFI O V I w o C 0-A a SHEET NUMBER: C1.30 CONCEPT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES IOWA CITY, IOWA CUL-DE-SAC TOTAL LENGTH 775' FROM 1. ST AVE. TO' CENTER OF BULB fi PROJECT DATA: TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA SENIOR LIVING SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION PARK DEDICATION AREA 48.75 ACRES 8.85 ACRES 18.1% 0.92 ACRES 1.9% 38.98 ACRES 80.0% t"\ .‘\\\\\\'?> \":„, \ •SNkikAA XtStI NG" TRAIL; Oct 25, 2021 - 8:03am 5:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Plats\200194 PP.dwg I— W 2 d 0 J LU LU 0 Z cuO z J LU w Z d w Q C 09-16-2021 10-13-2021 CV N 0 N 0 NJ N 0 LON DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES REZONING SUBMITTAL RESPOND TO STAFF COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMETNS #2 DRAWING LOG O in N rJ Z°' r -I .~J m v/ Z O ><og V v goi0 ad t7 0 20 40 Per \ ./ I \\ ..t A �, / ,�\ / � \ A \ \ / \ // r- \! A \.\ \\ `\ \\ `\ \\ I \\ ) / // \ ..\\ \' \... , r \\ \ t, 1% \\ -/ . \ \ l, % \ , - ... / \ \ \ 1 \/\ / 1 ' \ / 11 Imo" / / /i I 1 % I i i / / / P / / , / // - - - - / / / i / / / / // / , , ;/ // ! i ; ; / / / ,// /+ I +, / /f fr /f / / r ;. / 1 1 I 0' II I ( r� 1 r` I �. 1 • 1r l I 1 1 I I I I' I I 1 I I 1 'tI I I / .1 1 I .r 1 I. 1- / IlV \ \'-I 5. 4 l / \ -_t.—':1 1 1 1 \� / ��0 1 1 / • t. J .,> 2 • a .cp... O\ LA --I W W V' V' O -r --14". Ppt �� -r_ `�- /� `��` > I' Iti J Imo..`` v �\ t`.�` 1-.3 'A CT C\ \\ lJ• '1 \ A �\ �%/• �. `�1 I - - - - l \ M • r / ./ / / / // / , ail - - - t, - ..`�r J �' -- =r A It is/ l c I - / / /O a 1 /. r , / , �� , / I - _ , // 11 G,g5 ' } / ./ , // / , -�— - - - - _ -,- Q 1 I 111 �®. I t', �. , / 15" R 1�\ 1\ , �j >R ,/ /' , -t — J _ ST ST �— ,P. �� ST \t � _1` \ 111 1 II II S'A ST s 26' R75' 1 sT - *A 1 ® 1.3 w 3.06' \ I I I I I r \1 I , /1 1 oW \\ 1 t '\ �\ !1. m 11 \\ \I t1 \ ._ 1 1 , 1 I I\ \\\\ 1 ' \ \ 1 \ . \ \ • N- • (I N1+` \ `-722 --720- ;\� �,' ILC /ry Ary / —768 1 17.9' R15' R25' —760_ / f I I I I 1 I 1 , I I I 1 I 1 1, -1] II \ 1 /1 I ,.-, \ I I I 1 ' \1 I I \ 1 \ \ 1 1 II ', 1 ) 11 -k../ /I 1 1\ 1 p 1 a 1 Q f1 '/// j I i -< I 1 I / ! I I \ / / / , I I / , ! / I / 1 ) 1 1 I , I 1 1, 1 1 1 I I r I l ,/ / 1 I 1 1 ' , 1 j 1 , / / I r 1 I 1 \ I , I 1 I / I I r 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 ' I I 1 1 1 I / // r 1 1 1 1 j I -736-__ SITE INFORMATION HICKORY TRAIL KEYNOTES: UTILITY NOTES: 1 1 1 0 (A) RETAINING WALL (B) PROPOSED 8' PEDESTRIAN PATH iA PROPOSED CROSSWALK 1. ALL WATER MAIN TO BE 8" C900 PVC WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 2. SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE 8" PVC SDR 26. BUILDING CONNECTION SIZES TO BE COORDINATED WITH MEP PLANS 3. STORM SEWER TO BE RCP WITH GASKETED JOINTS 4. SANITARY SEWER TO EXTEND TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN. PROJECT NAME: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOT 1 - HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES SHEET NAME PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LOT 1- SENIOR LIVING HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: SHEET NUMBER: C2.10 Nov 16, 2021- 3:23pm S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Sheets\Senior\200194 - Senior - Site Plan.dwg LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) TOTAL LOT AREA: 385,355 SF (8.85 AC) PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT SENIOR LIVING FACILITY STANDARD ASSISTED LIVING (KITCHENETTE) 1 GUEST SUITE 1 BED 7 STUDIO 7 BEDS 42 ONE BEDROOM 42 BEDS 9 TWO BEDROOMS 18 BEDS TOTAL 68 BEDS PREMIUM ASSISTED LIVING (FULL KITCHEN) 24 ONE BEDROOM 24 BEDS 5 TWO BEDROOMS 10 BEDS TOTAL 34 BEDS MEMORY CARE 32 BEDS TOTAL NUMBER OF BEDS 134 BEDS GROSS BUILDING FOOTPRINT 69,589 SF ZONING INFORMATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE - LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OPD/RS-5) SETBACKS AND YARDS (MULTI -FAMILY) FRONT YARD 20 FEET SIDE YARD 10 FEET REAR YARD 20 FEET HEIGHT 42 FEET REQUEST WAIVER FROM THE 35' HEIGHT MAXIMUM. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING, AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS, SHALL NOT EXCEED 42'. MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS MIN. LOT AREA 8,000 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH 60 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET MAX LOT COVERAGE 45 % MAX. SETBACK COVERAGE 50 % BUILDING WIDTH ALONG FRONTAGE 212.33 FEET LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH 668 FEET SETBACK COVERAGE 32 % BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 69,589 / 385,355 = 18% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 167,002 / 405,366 = 43% FLOOD ELEVATION N/A PARKING CALCULATIONS: USE REQUIREMENT # OF STALLS STANDARD ASSISTED LIVING 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 68 BEDS PREMIUM ASSISTED LIVING 1 STALL PER 2 UNITS 29 UNITS MEMORY CARE 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 32 BEDS STAFF 1 STALL PER EMPLOYEE 40 EMPLOYEES* 23 15 11 40 TOTAL REQUIRED = * NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED AT THE FACILITY PARKING PROVIDED = ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED = 89 85 4 TOTAL PROVIDED = 89 HICKORY TRAIL KEYNOTES: UTILITY NOTES: 1 1 1 0 (A) RETAINING WALL (B) PROPOSED 8' PEDESTRIAN PATH iA PROPOSED CROSSWALK 1. ALL WATER MAIN TO BE 8" C900 PVC WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 2. SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE 8" PVC SDR 26. BUILDING CONNECTION SIZES TO BE COORDINATED WITH MEP PLANS 3. STORM SEWER TO BE RCP WITH GASKETED JOINTS 4. SANITARY SEWER TO EXTEND TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN. PROJECT NAME: SENIOR LIVING FACILITY LOT 1 - HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES SHEET NAME PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LOT 1- SENIOR LIVING HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: SHEET NUMBER: C2.10 Nov 16, 2021- 3:23pm S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Sheets\Senior\200194 - Senior - Site Plan.dwg COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 4 AG500 GOMMONS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 COMPOSITE METAL . . WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 016.10 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 3 AC500 !Ilf I r 6 I FP1 I I— sv: GSV STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM PER 084114- STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 A GSV l I J FORTE GOGHERE SIDE ELEVATION L A Ell WP1 ■'t'1 1111111 GSV ■ ■ A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 rJ L1 L J , GSV G5V 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM 1 TRUSS BEARING 116 116'-O" TOP OF CONCRETE 100,-O" C-TRU55 BEARING 125 125'-0" NIF C-TRU55 BEARING 124 124'-0' PORTE GOGHERE TRUSS BEARING 116'-0' C -TRUSS BEARING lib 112'-0' \ VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111'-0' TOP OF CONCRETE A 100'-O" COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 A STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS PER 01610 STANDING SEAM METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 FF1 2 .AC500 11 5V: r ' r — L J EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH. SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREF INISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FPI VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 . NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL. A FP1 ImImEna PORTE COCHERE TRUSS BEARING 116'-0" ESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111'-0" TOP OF CONCRETE 100,-O" -5/4X6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FORTE GOGHERE FRONT ELEVATION WP1 FF1! G 5 V AC500 GOMMONS r' G5V mimemlimdri 3" CUT STONE 51LL -5/4X6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM L L _L A -2x12 CEDAR RAFTERS -METAL WRAPPED BEAM AND COLUMNS -2x8 CEDAR SLATS IN METAL FRAME GSV 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM C-TRU55 BEARING 125 125'-0" NIF C TRUSS BEARING 124 gb 124'-0' TRUSS BEARING 116 116'-0" TRUSS BEARING 114 114'-0" VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING 111-0" TOP OF CONCRETE lib 100,-0" NIF A ASSISTED B COMMONS • (up L 05 I"- bp ›N • > O J 173V 492 4,J‘ T v) � V • lri Q 0 „so 0 • Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MEMORY SUPPORT • . THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AC500 H hitectural R2o.rvt 5/4X6 FIBER GEMENT HEN Hun ■nn I'll" II II II "pull r I J CUT STONE SILL th(&.CULSTO. E2BIM EXTERIOR ELEVATION INNG A ,MING B 12" ■ ■ GSV 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL L EXTERIOR ELEVATION IAIING B 5 AA500. r 5/4 X 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM GSV 4 AA500 r 3" CUT I STONE SILL 1 L :GSV L 6X8 GUT STONE TRIM i I I I 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION INN& B r- 6XS CUT STONE TRIM, L 3" CUT STONE SILL 2 AA500 i 5/4 X 6 FIBER EMENT TRIM GSV 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA PREFINI HED ALUMINUM GUTTE / DOWNSPOUT 1x10 Fl EMENT rFASGI I` I EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING B I3"CUT I STONE SILL i ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL H6T PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 555.565.5311 AA500 1 3" CUT STONE SILL I 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM L A AL -TRUSS BEARING a 132'-0 1/& TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" OP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1: PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS. WHICH SPILL ONTO... GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1. NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4 X 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM L_ I•� 3 AA500 G5V GSV 3" CUT STONE SILL 6X8 CUT STONE TRIM L Iio 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION IAIING B A -F7 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT V\ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA GSV GSV 1 3" GUT STONE SILL EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING B GSV I, 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM ■ ■ 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA WP1 A AL -TRUSS BEARING S 132-0 1/5" METAL PANEL CORNER AL -TRUSS BEARING 132'-0 1/5" METAL PANEL CORNER 5V 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL J l I J TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" 4. TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/5" 4. TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" ASSISTED COMMONS • ro L o� I"- bp ›N • ,> O -' V 492 4,J' • it2, Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M A r c h i t e c t u r e Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION F, ■ MEMORY SUPPORT ■ • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL. ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT. BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AA500 1 hitectural R2o.rvt ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL HST PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 888.568.8311 /4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM 5 AA501 F' 1 1 L '■i EXTERIOR ELEVATION lAIING A A 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM F7 A F7 F7 r 1 1 J FF1 11111 1111 G5V A F7 1 AASOQ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FAS IA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM G TTER/ DOWNSPOUT A J 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM F7 G5V G5V WP1 5/4x FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL GSV 4 AA501 r "INC A- NORTH "EST METAL PANEL CORNER ARCHITECTURAL LOUVERS - MODEL HST PAINTED METAL RECTANGULAR TUBE BLADE SUNSHADE LOUVER 6" DEEP, 24" PROJECTION (service@arch louvers.com) 888.568.8311 2 AA501 -9-6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL 1 J L METAL PANEL CORNER A 1x10 FIBER CEME T FACIA PREFINISHED A i. -- DOWNSPOUT WP G5V 5V F 1 1 L L 3" CUT STONE SILL "INC A -SOUTH "EST 6x8 GUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL i I I 1 UTTER/ LL L r 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL R CEMENT -5/4-x x FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM A •i_ 11iiiii TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122'-11" AL -TRUSS BEARING 132'-0 1/5" poul IN ■ —F7 L I L OP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR k 111'-11 1/8" 5V EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES TOP OF CONCRETE IS 100'-0" 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL. DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO . . GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER. CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NIGHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM METAL PANEL CORNER A FP1 3 AA501 G5V GSV 11 FP1 A 1x10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT 11, Illi "I N G A- IAIEST AA501 A FP1 A 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM X11, III A IbxS GUT STONE TRIM 13" CUT STONE SILL L A Ii ■ 1x10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA 1x8 FIBER GEMENT TRIM PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER/ DOWNSPOUT G5V ■t F7 GSV 1111111 111111 L EXTERIOR ELEVATION "INC A FF1 II I" II II" F7 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM 3" CUT STONE SILL .1 AL-TRU55 BEARING AL 132'-0 1/8" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR AI 122'-11" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/8 TOP OF CONCRETE AL-TRU55 BEARING 14) 132'-0 1/8" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 3RD FLOOR 122-11" 4. TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 111'-11 1/8" TOP OF CONCRETE Ab 100'-O' 100'-0" • v)lri Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION % COMMONS r MEMORY SUPPORT a • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR.MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AA501 e I so n/2o 2201 _Arch itectu ra I_R2o. rvt 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT TRIM A A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT VESTIBULE TRUSS FP1 1NP1 FP1 GSV G5V A III PMI 11'1 I L r I L FF1 r 1 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL L 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM GSV 5/4x 6 FIBER GEMENT CORNER TRIM GSV M5 - TRUSS BEARING 115 118'-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 111'-0" MS - TRUSS 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE • 100'-O' A 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM A A 12" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT r L GSV GSV GSV FP1 CSV FF1 A GSV r 5/4 < 4 FIBERICEMENT TRIM I L GSV 1 6x8 CUT STONE TRIM I 3" CUT STONE SILL J /4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA /4x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM A 12" J6" WF1 r I L G5V GSV GSV FF1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION TYPICAL NOTES THREE DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SIDING WITH 5" EXPOSURE VINYL SIDING WITH X" EXPOSURE ALUMINUM SIDING WITH X" SIDING 1 x COMPOSITE TRIM 5/4 COMPOSITE TRIM 1/4" COMPOSITE PANEL - NO EXPOSED JOINTS MANUFACTURED STONE BRICK BRICK SILL CUT STONE BAND CAST STONE BAND CUT STONE SILL CAST STONE SILL CUT STONE HEAD CAST STONE HEAD FIBER. CEMENT SHAKE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM RAKE FLASHING 12" SOLDIER COURSE PROJECT 3/5" FF1 GSV 4" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/S 5" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/5" CONTROL JOINT DECORATIVE CMU SHAKE SIDING WITH 7". EXPOSURE . . PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT BRICK - ACCENT COLOR 'A' PREFINISHED METAL COPING 1 x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER BOARDS 5/4 x S FIBER CEMENT HEAD 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT TRIM FYPON BRACKET BKT3Ox3O FIXED SHUTTERS WP1 .1. ...._a FP1l-- EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE. CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT; METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16 0.C.- COLOR A . . A THREE. DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL INSERT WINDOWS AS LEGEND COMPONENTS (ANNOTATE TAB, COMPONENT, LEGEND COMPONENT) MOVE TO SHEET AT401 IF TOO LARGE FOR THIS SHEET SEE STANDARDS FOR EXAMPLEOFSCHEDUIE v v ) • ± °VI firt WINDOW SGHEDUL¢ FF1 I I GSV GSV _l 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM 6x8 GIFT STONE TRIM 3" GUT STONE SILL L G5V A 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT L GSV MS - TRUSS BEARING 115 118'-O' MS - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr1 11 10P-6' TOP OF CONCRETE a 100'-O" STOREFRONT INSTRUCTIONS: REFER TO X:\03-Revit Documentation\01-Revit Procedures TO FIND A DOCUMENT ABOUT HOW TO SETUP STOREFRONT ELEVATION VIEWS. 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 TEL FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M A r r h i t e c t u r e Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION STOREFRONT SCHEDULE M5 —TRUSS BEARING 115 115'-0' U55 BEARING 116. • 116'-O' 1 5/4x 4 FIBER'CEMENT TRIM J 5/4x 6 FIBER CEMENT CORNER TRIM M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr111 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-0" A ASSISTED COMMONS Lil % MEMORY SUPPORT r\ WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR .. . • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WITHOUT . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AM500 hitectural R2o.rvt 5/4x 10 FIBER GEMENT FASCIA A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT VESTIBULE TRUSS BEARING GSV 111'-0" A A WP1 FP1 WP1 fr _1 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT I TRIM II 11 Ll J 3" GUT STONE SILL' WP1 r WP1 GSV FF1 GSV COMPOSITE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 STANDING SEAM A METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM PER 01610 FF1 GSV STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM 12" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA A PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT • r - I I L L WP CUSTOM 2 -SIDED r GAS FIREPLACE PER 10300 1 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM MS - TRUSS BEARING 118 lib 118'-0' U55 BEARING 116 a 116'-O" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr 11 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 06. 100'-O" FP1 GSV 3" GUT STONE SILL M5 - TRUSS BEARING 118 118-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr111 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE oh 100,-0" A EXTERIOR ELEVATION TYPICAL THREE DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SIDING WITH 5" EXPOSURE VINYL SIDING WITH X" EXPOSURE ALUMINUM SIDING WITH X" SIDING 1 x COMPOSITE TRIM 5/4 COMPOSITE TRIM 1/4" COMPOSITE PANEL - NO EXPOSED JOINTS MANUFACTURED STONE BRICK BRICK SILL CUT STONE BAND CAST STONE BAND CUT STONE SILL CAST STONE SILL CUT STONE HEAD CAST STONE HEAD FIBER CEMENT SHAKE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM RAKE FLASHING 12" SOLDIER COURSE PROJECT 3/8" NOTES 4" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/8" 8" STACK BOND PROJECT 3/8" CONTROL. JOINT DECORATIVE CMU SHAKE SIDING WITH 1" EXPOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT BRICK - ACCENT COLOR 'A' 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHICH SPILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES: MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR A F2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING FP1 1 x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA 5/4 x 6 FIBER CEMENT . . CORNER BOARDS 5/4 x 8 FIBER CEMENT HEAD 5/4 x FIBER CEMENT TRIM FYPON BRACKET BKT30x30 FIXED SHUTTERS A A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - COLOR B VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A THREE DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CSV CUT STONE VENEER WP1 NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD AWP -3-3- FIBER CEMENT PANEL- VERTICAL 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT FP1 FF1 GSV 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FF1 A T 3" GUT STONE SILL L RUSS BEARING 118 118'-0" M5 - TRUSS BEARING 112 MS -CORNER BEARING -111 M5 - TRUSS BEr1 11 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE fib 100,-0" 5/4x 10 FIBER CEMENT FASCIA PREFINISHED ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT A GSV F 3" GUI STONE SILL J GSV 5/4x 4 FIBER GEMENT TRIM FP1 A ASSISTED M5 - TRU55 BEARING 118 lib 118'-0" M5 - TRU55 BEARING 112 112'-0" M5 - TRU55 BEARING AI 109'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE 100'-O" • (up L o� I"- bp ›N • > O J V 4,J‘ • �� • v) c� V cr) Q 0 Architecture 1419 UNDERWOOD AVE. WAUWATOSA, WI 53213 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 3 1 3 1 4 1 4. 4 3 1. 0 5 3 1 T E L FAX W W W. A G A R C H. C 0 M Architecture Engineering P 1 a n 11 i n g REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION % COMMONS Lil MEMORY SUPPORT a • • THIS DRAWING, ITS DESIGN CONCEPT AND ITS DETAIL ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AG ARCHITECTURE, INC. AND SHALL NOT' BE COPIED IN ANY FORM OR.MANNER WITHOUT . WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ITS DESIGNER/CREATOR . DATE 23 JUL 2021 PROJECT 202201 SHEET NO. 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AM5O1 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 2021 —7:00 PM FORMAL MEETING THE CENTER — ASSEMBLY ROOM CASE NO. REZ21-0008: Location: South of Scott Blvd and West of 1St Ave, Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park PRELIMINARY An application for a rezoning of approximately 48.75 acres of land from Interim Development Single -Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). Heitner began the staff report with an ariel view of the subject property with the zoning applied. It is currently ID -RS Interim Development Single Family residential zone. Regarding background on this case, there was a series of previous applications for rezoning on this property in spring 2021. The last proposal had 41 detached single-family homes as well as a senior living facility with 135 bedrooms but that was ultimately denied by the City Council. The current application is still seeking the OPD/RS-5 zoning, but it does not contain that single family home component that was in the previous application. This current application only contains the senior living facility with a count of 134 bedrooms. The current application also includes a proposed dedication of 30.98 acres of land that was previously considered for development dedicated as neighborhood open space. Heitner showed site plans of where the senior living facility would be as well as the dedicated open space. He also noted the private open space located within the courtyard areas of senior living facility. With respect to zoning, the current zoning is Interim Development Single Family residential which is intended to be a holding zone for property until their preferred use can be developed or infrastructure can reach the property. The proposed zoning would be OPD/RS-5 with planned development overlay. Typically, in the RS -5 zone it is housing for individual households. It's the lowest intensity residential zone but the planned development process does allow for some mixture of uses that one wouldn't typically see in a RS -5 zone such as this senior living facility. Heitner stated there are some additional approval criteria within the OPD section of the City Code as well as compliance with the City's multifamily site development standards. Staff is proposing a condition that the applicant submit a final plat conforming the proposed lots to the proposed zoning designation. The approval criteria for OPD are the density and design of the planned development will be compatible and are complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. With respect to density the OPD/ RS -5 zoning allows for five dwelling units per acre. There is no density calculation for this application because this is a group living use and those bedrooms are not factored into density calculations. With respect to mass and scale, there is about 69,000 plus square feet in the building footprint, the height that's being requested is 42 feet and there's about 27,000 square feet of onsite open space. Regarding traffic circulation, the previous application had Hickory Trail extending to the west from First Avenue and then north to Scott Boulevard. Because there's no proposed housing going in on that outlot A portion of this planned development of the proposed application it culminates in a cul-de-sac. So stemming off that cul- de-sac there'd be two access points along the north side of Hickory Trail for facilitating access within the senior living facility. There will be construction of sidewalks along both sides of the street extension with a five -foot -wide sidewalk on the north side and then an eight -foot -wide sidewalk along the south side. Staff is also recommending a condition to construct that eight -foot sidewalk east as an offsite improvement all the way to First Avenue so that there isn't a gap in that sidewalk system. With respect to development not overburdening existing streets and utilities, city water and sewer is available to the subject property. Staff did ask the applicant to submit an updated traffic study based on the fact that previous iterations of this application had two points of access from the development, one to First Avenue and one to Scott Boulevard. Staff's concern this time was primarily how would that anticipate a traffic funnel out to just one access point on First Avenue with the cul-de-sac being proposed. Heitner stated the returns from that traffic study yielded that the First Avenue/Hickory Trial intersection would be a level of service D which transportation planning staff found acceptable. A level of service D is in the middle leaning toward being more congested, but again, it is a level that staff felt comfortable with going forward so no off-site traffic related improvements are recommended at this time. With respect to views, property values and privacy, there's 185 -foot buffer distance between the senior living facility and the property line for the Hickory Point Condominiums property to the east. There is also considerable landscaping within that 185 -foot buffer area with a combination of shade and evergreen trees to soften that transition. Staff is proposing a condition requiring approval of a landscape plan by the city forester prior to issuance of a building permit. Heitner showed a general look at that landscaping pointing out a healthy concentration of shade and evergreen trees along the east side. With respect to land use and building types being in public interest, Heitner reiterated that the current application is seeking 42 -foot max height on senior living facility building. The base zone has a maximum height of 35 feet, but staff did find that that requested height waiver basically details that there will be at least 35% of the subject area free of structures, parking and loading areas. Staff is recommending that no building permit is issued for any of the subject property until the City Council approves a final plat subdividing the subject property to confirm these zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Regarding neighborhood open space, the OPD plan being proposed does show a dedication of 38.98 acres of outlot A to the City as public open space which would eventually be incorporated into the existing footprint of Hickory Hill Park. The plan does show a trail connection to the south off of the extended Hickory Trail Street, which will connect into the parks trail network at the southeast corner of the subject property. Parks and Recreation staff has commented that they support the proposed dedication. With respect to compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast District Plan, both promote the use of cul-de-sacs and single loaded streets where appropriate and the use of ravine and wetland areas as a buffer to the park boundary. So even though the Comprehensive Plan does contemplate single family housing along the left side of the subject property staff feels that there are goals being accomplished by the subject OPD plan, mainly in the preservation of natural features through the 38.98 acres of open space dedication, as well as the ability to enhance the interconnectedness of the sidewalk system and trail network and providing more housing diversity within the Northeast District with the senior living facility. Heitner did address some sensitive areas noting the impacts to which are far less than they were when previous iterations of this were being considered. With respect to wetlands and stream corridors, there are two wetlands and two stream corridors within that outlot A lot. Both the wetlands and stream corridors will be unimpacted and the wetlands will have a 100 -foot buffer and the streams will have a 30 -foot stream corridor in addition to a 50 -foot -wide stream corridor buffer on each side of the stream corridor. There are some critical slopes being impacted as a result of development on the senior living facility lot. However, only 20% of those critical slopes will be impacted which is within the allowable threshold of up to 35%. Heitner noted there'll be far less impact to woodlands with preservation of about 81% of the woodlands. The OPD/RS-5 designation would allow impact to their disturbance up to 50%. Staff has received some correspondence regarding this rezoning. They've received emails from two residents supporting the rezoning and the inclusion of outlot A as park land. Regarding next steps, upon recommendation from this Commission, a public hearing would be scheduled for consideration with Council with the anticipated timeline of Council setting that public hearing on November 16 for a November 30 public hearing. Staff recommends approval of REZ21-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Blvd. and west of N. 1st Ave. from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the acceptance of public improvements corresponding to the subdivision: a. Construction of trail connections, as shown on the OPD Plan dated 10/28/2021. b. Construction of an 8' -wide sidewalk extending from the subject property's eastern property line to 1st Avenue. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a. Submission of a landscape plan detailing any proposed landscaping on Lot 1. The landscape plan shall be approved by the City Forrester before a building permit is issued. b. City Council approval of a final plat subdividing the subject property to conform to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Padron asked when the developer presented these in September, the use was a different use and now they are keeping the same building but they changed the use. Heitner confirmed the zoning designation being applied for is the same, it's OPD/RS-5 the big difference was that previous application included development of single-family residential housing within that area that's now described as outlot A within this application. This application just contains the senior living facility component. The building use is the same, it's still a senior living facility. Hensch noted one of his concerns was the wetlands and the jurisdictional stream because of the invasive species, and with being the responsibility in previous iterations of the homeowner's association which is pretty much the same as saying that's not going to be dealt with for the invasive species. He feels much better knowing the City will manage those. Townsend asked why all of a sudden did they decide to donate that almost 40 acres to the City. Signs said because Council wouldn't let them build all that out. Townsend asked but why wouldn't they keep that for themselves and try to do something later, just questioning how their mind changed. Nolte stated he thinks the math just get really impossible. Hensch opened the public hearing. Nick Bettis (Axiom Consultants) is here on behalf of the applicant for the senior living facility and the property as a whole and can answer any questions regarding the engineering portions of the application. Andrew Alden (AG Architecture) can talk about the building and also wanted to share a video that they showed at the Good Neighbor meeting a few weeks ago. In the video the first two images are the renderings that they've seen before but then they have a fly -over of the property with the building on site. Alden wanted to point out three things, the topography is accurate, the hills and valleys are accurate, the building size and mass is accurate, but the trees and the underbrush they didn't do species specific, so it's just to get the point across. Hensch asked about the change in building height. Alden noted the two extra feet was requested because of recent changes in best practice for dealing with older adults and mechanical systems due to the pandemic. They need bigger ducts to have higher air flows and filtration systems, and as a result they need more space between floors in order to fit it. Martin asked how many people were at the good neighbor meeting. Alden replied 16. Signs asked why they went from 135 bedrooms to 134. Alden replied that might be a typographical error, it's 120 units plus one guest suite but in the AL apartments are some two bedrooms and honestly he couldn't remember if it was 13 two bedrooms or 14 two bedrooms. Laura Goddard (1807 Winston Drive) is speaking tonight as a member of and treasurer for the Friends of Hickory Hill Park Board. This has been a long journey together, so she first wanted to say thank you to the City staff and to all of the Commissioners. She reiterated this has been a long process, but the Friends of Hickory Hill Park support this latest proposal and commend Nelson Construction and Development for taking community and ecological input into consideration for this latest design. They are glad that this proposal will both provide needed assisted living facilities and maintain the integrity of an important and beloved natural space. She was glad to see the clarity about the outlot A, that nearly 40 acres, because they do want to make clear that their support is contingent upon that land being deeded to the City and being incorporated into the park. Goddard also wanted to say while this was a long process, it has not been a waste of time because this has been a good example of community involvement and voices being heard. Regarding the invasive species Commissioner Hensch mentioned, the Friends of Hickory Hill Park is committed to continuing their involvement with the space as they have for many years and being active managers. They do regularly deal with invasive species in partner with the Parks and Recreation Department to manage those species. Goddard hopes the Commission will support this proposal. Arturs Kalnins (44 Evergreen Place) has spoken to the Commission on this topic several time and wanted to follow up as his perspective is not much different than the Friends of the Hickory Hill Park. This new proposal is great, if they remember the one big debate was in the springtime was about the view shed and it makes him very happy that the wonderful view will continue and be intact. A huge part of the splendor of that park is having those views in what's otherwise becoming a pretty densely populated residential area. Kalnins also wanted to state in addition of that land added to the park there is also a nice potential access to the park from Scott Boulevard, which is nice. So again, having that 38 acre lot which may become a prairie, or whatever the plans the City would have for it, maybe walking trails, is a great access. Finally, Kalnins stated he is 100% in favor and he is not an expert on issues of zoning, but he's just curious why they're still calling for a zoning that's going to include unit housing development when none is going to be in the current plan. Maybe it's just some technicality and that's just the way it works with zoning, but overall he is hugely in support of this current plan. Hensch closed the public hearing. Craig moved to recommend approval of REZ21-0008, a proposal to rezone approximately 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Blvd. and west of N. 1st Ave. from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the acceptance of public improvements corresponding to the subdivision: c. Construction of trail connections, as shown on the OPD Plan dated 10/28/2021. d. Construction of an 8' -wide sidewalk extending from the subject property's eastern property line to 1st Avenue. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: e. Submission of a landscape plan detailing any proposed landscaping on Lot 1. The landscape plan shall be approved by the City Forrester before a building permit is issued. f. City Council approval of a final plat subdividing the subject property to conform to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Martin seconded the motion. Hensch had a couple notes, the real positives from this is the senior living facility is in the application, which he thinks is a strong need in the community, and now the City will have the opportunity to manage the wetlands and take some control of the invasive species which is such a serious problem. He doesn't think anybody can deny that it's very positive to increase a City Park by 21%, he hopes the City can afford to manage it and spend money in there and remember that means property taxes, that money just doesn't magically appear. Hensch acknowledged that's not part of their consideration but as a citizen of Iowa City it is his concern. He thinks that the negatives are, when he first saw this, and the cul-de-sac, he never wants to vote for a cul-de-sac because he really believes in complete streets and the City's philosophy on that. But because it is essentially an access drive for the senior living facility, he backed off. He is still concerned about lack of housing diversity, certainly the senior facility is housing diversity, but he's talking about multifamily, that's a loss for the community. They always have to keep in mind that by increasing all housing types, there's just a chain reaction, if you build a new house, somebody moves out of a house, they move into the new house and it causes theoretically, increasing the total supply, which over time in a normal healthy market would reduce prices but Iowa City has always been very odd, because it's such a high demand place. But if people question why he's always supported these applications, it's because he's a 100% supporter of affordable housing and they have to make hard choices to add to the housing diversity and the only way for that to happen is to build places for people to live period, even if you don't really like it in your neighborhood. In the south side with a lot of housing around him, he didn't care for but sucked it up because it's his responsibility as a citizen to participate for the welfare of the entire city. So he will support this application. Craig has supported the senior housing portion of this from day one and hope that's where her kids put her when the day comes so she is a neighbor to Hickory Hill Park. She loves the park and is very pleased to see it grow. Signs want to point out that the developer has given up 80% of their land to get this to go through, they have spent tens of thousands of dollars satisfying the community, satisfying this Commission, satisfying City Council, including spending thousands of dollars on a fly -over video just so they could see how much the roof did or did not stick above the treeline. His point is there's a reason builders are not building in Iowa City, and they're building in all the communities around us, and those things just mentioned are part of it. As a Commission, as a Council, as a community have to understand that there are ramifications. If Iowa City doesn't grow everyone's taxes will grow to maintain the services needed. Padron wishes developers would start considering more sustainability when they design the buildings because in the renders all the facades have the same amount of windows, there is not a study of the sun, there is not a study of the facade, there's not an energy study, and this is why they end up asking for more height when it shouldn't be necessary. There are other ways where they can reduce the ducts and make the building more sustainable. There are mental illnesses that people have that make them sensitive to light, people that will be living there could potentially have dementia, or Alzheimer's or illnesses like that, so there's an opportunity to make some of the windows smaller and have a different impact. The facades have different energy consumption, there is a difference in how they affect the building energy. Also, the renderings and the flyovers are very easy to make right now with the technology that they have so it's not so impressive as it is something useful as she was worried impacted woodland in that area. She will be supporting this project but do hope to see more projects in the future that are sustainable. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. 11211111111111111111111111111 ll llll Illi Doc ID: 031765760008 Type: Kind: ORDINANCE Recorded: $42.00,2022 Page 1tof1B06:32 AM Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder BK6341 PG431-438 t,j'Wvitike14.4,1 City of STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS JOHNSON COUNTY ) I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Ordinance attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.21-4869 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of December 2021, is a true and correct copy, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 4th day of February 2022. Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk \ord 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 Prepared by: Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5230 (REZ21-0008) Ordinance No. 21-4869 Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 48.75 acres of property located south of N. Scott Blvd. & west of N. 1st Ave., from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) to Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). (REZ21-0008) Whereas, Nelson Development 1, LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located south of N. Scott Blvd. & west of N. 1St Ave., from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the provision of trail connections between important neighborhood destinations, such as parks; and Whereas, there is a public need to connect the subject property with adjacent parkland; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of wide, accessible sidewalks that connect with neighborhood parks; and Whereas, there is a public need to implement the City's adopted complete streets policy; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions addressing the need for provision of a trail connection to Hickory Hill Park, provision of an 8' -wide sidewalk between the subject property and 1st Avenue, and required submission of a landscape plan and final plat; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner, ACT, Inc., and applicant have agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby classified Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5): BEING PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 52, PAGE 143 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL, THENCE N01 °07'52"W, 656.03 FEET; THENCE N01°41'17"W, 1094.66 FEET; THENCE N01°38'34"W, 210.49 FEET; THENCE N01°20'33"W, 538.67 FEET; THENCE TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE Ordinance No. 21-4869 Page 2 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65°18'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE S27°14`331W, 924.73 FEET; THENCE 501 °14'34"E, 378.49 FEET; THENCE N77°55'52"E, 649.63 FEET; THENCE S01 °15'42"E, 868.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S87°54'07"W, 1302.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 48.75 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Section II. Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification and Recordinc. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and any agreements or other documentation authorized and required by the Conditional Zoning Agreement, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication in accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 380. Passed and approved this 14th day of December , 2021. City Clerk Approved by City Attorne s " ice (Sara Greenwood-Hektoen - 11/23/21) Ordinance No. 21-4869 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Salih Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner that the First Consideration 11/30/2021 Voteforpassage: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date published 12/23/2021 Moved by Mims, seconded by Taylor, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor. NAYS: None. AYES: None. Prepared by: Joshua Engelbrecht, Planning Intern, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ21-0008) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made among the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), ACT, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and Nelson Development 1, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 48.75 acres of property located south of N. Scott Blvd. & west of N. 1st Ave., legally described below; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property legally described below from Interim Development Single -Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject area is appropriate for conservation design and single-family residential development; and Whereas, to be compatible with the surrounding land uses, this rezoning creates public needs to provide formal trail access to Hickory Hill Park, create pleasant spaces for walking to neighborhood destinations, and to provide enhanced landscaping near future development; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding construction of a trail connection, construction of an 8' -wide sidewalk between the proposed cul-de-sac and lst Avenue, and required submission of a landscape plan to be approved by the City Forester, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner and Applicant agree to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. ACT Inc. is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 52, PAGE 143 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL, THENCE N01 °07'52"W, 656.03 FEET; THENCE N01 °41'17"W, 1094.66 FEET; THENCE N01 °38'34"W, 210.49 FEET; THENCE N01 *20'33"W, 538.67 FEET; THENCE TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65°18'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE S27°14'33"W, 924.73 FEET; THENCE S01 °14'34"E, 378.49 FEET; THENCE N77°65'52"E, 649.63 FEET; 1 THENCE S01°15'42"E, 868.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S87°54'07"W, 1302.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 48.75 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 2. Owner and Applicant acknowledge that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit: i. Submission of a landscape plan detailing the location of proposed shade and evergreen trees on Lot 1. The landscape plan shall be approved by the City Forrester. ii City Council approval of a final plat subdividing the subject property to conform to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance, and acceptance of the public improvements required thereby, which shall include: i. Construction of trail connections, generally in locations as shown on the OPD Plan dated 1012812021, and ii. Construction of an 8' -wide sidewalk extending from the subject property's eastern property line to 1st Avenue. 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released by the City of Iowa City. Once a building permit is issued, the conditions shall be deemed satisfied and no further release of this agreement will be provided. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 14th day of December , 2021. 2 C.i of Iowa City ACT, Inc. Teague, May .� u e Kellie Fruehling, {pity Clerk Approved by: City Atto ey's ffice City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of lowa Johnson County ) ss: } I2 By: turf- '%e + K Nelson Development 1, LLC This instrument was acknowledged before me on n be it \ `f , 20.24 by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respegtively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for thetate of Iowa (Stamp or ACT, Inc. Acknowledgement: State of IOW - a A ` • �e'S I1 _ CHRISTINE OLNEY Co My Commission Expires32 ission Number County of J4611 Ion This record was acknowledged before me on 14v .n6eJ 30 , 2021 by Ct.r - 1I at; K (name) as C FO (title) of ACT, Inc a 4., Notary Pub Lit c in and fov'the Stat?owa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: SQP B, 9-40R3 Nelson Development 1, LLC. Acknowledgement: State of 1 A County of 'Vol 3 This record was acknowledged before me on Nuc( 3Q , 2021 by M i Kt& 1\1 _0 SO IN (name) as1 vtio�c�..4, r (title) of Nelson Development 1, LLC t 0" A a,. SIERRA SICILY ANDREAS . Commission Number 827127 • My Commission Expires '4 M' October 27, 2D 3 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: 10 12-i /2o2-3 4 Kellie Fruehling From: Anne Russett Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 10:41 AM To: Kellie Fruehling Cc: Raymond Heitner; Danielle Sitzman Subject: FW: Nelson's Hickory Trail Senior Living Kellie — Another request to collapse 2nd and 3rd readings. This one for the Hickory Trail rezoning. Thanks, Anne From: Brian Boelk <bboelk@axiom-con.com> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 10:39 AM To: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Cc: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org>; Danielle Sitzman <Danielle-Sitzman@iowa-city.org>; Nick Bettis <nbettis@axiom-con.com>; Jacob Wolfgang <jacob@nelsonconstruct.com> Subject: Nelson's Hickory Trail Senior Living Good morning again Ray. Please consider this a request to collapse the 2nd and 3rd readings of the OPD Rezoning for the Hickory Trail Senior Living and Hickory Trail Estates. Please let me know if you need anything additional or more formal to make this request. Thanks, AXIOM BRIAN BOELK PE, CPMSM, CPESC OWNER - PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEERING LEAD m. 319.400.1056 o. 319.519.6222 w. www.axiom-con.com 1 i 1 I �'���� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT Item Number: 10. CITY OF IOWA CITY December 14, 2021 Ordinance amending section 1-9-3B of the Code of Ordinances of Iowa City, Iowa, establishing the boundaries of the voting precincts in Iowa City; and section 1-5-1, establishing the voting precincts that comprise the three city council districts in Iowa City. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Recommendations: Attachments: Eric Goers, City Attorney Geoff Fruin, City Manager N/A Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Iowa City Plan A with Council Districts listed Iowa City Plan A with Precincts and Council Dist inset Iowa City Plan C with Council Districts listed Iowa City Plan C with Precincts and Council Dist inset Ordinance Executive Summary: At the December 7th work session City Council met with representatives from the Johnson County Auditors office to review the reprecincting process and proposed maps drawn by the County. All precincts in all cities must meet the following standards: • Precinct population cannot exceed 3,500 — If there are areas in the city where substantial growth is anticipated in the next ten years, the Council may wish to establish precincts with populations smaller than the 3,500 maximum allowed by law. • Precinct must lie within one legislative district • Composed of contiguous territory • Precincts boundaries must follow census block boundaries • Voter convenience and electoral efficiency are considered — The convenience of voters means the precinct boundaries are easy to describe and identify and provide voters with relatively direct routes of travel to polling places. Electoral efficiency means reducing election costs by only creating as many precincts as necessary. • Include annexed territory — Territory annexed after January 1, 2020, must be included when drawing precincts. — Use the annexed territory population certified by the city. Background /Analysis: The following two map options will be discussed at the December 14th public hearing: • Plan A - focuses on clear lines while taking into account election turnout and polling location proximity. • Plan C - creates population balance between precincts and within house districts. ATTACHMENTS: Description Iowa City Plan A with Council Districts listed Iowa City Plan A with Precincts and Council Dist inset Iowa City Plan C with Council Districts listed Iowa City Plan C with Precincts and Council Dist inset Ordinance Correspondence to Council Kellie Fruehling From: Tom Carsner <carsner@mchsi.com> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:26 PM To: *City Council Subject: Iowa City Re-Precincting To the Council: I urge the City Council to adopt Plan C (Revised) for drawing new precincts. This plan maintains some of the existing precinct boundaries, and makes for efficiency in organizing election campaign work as well as in Election Day voting access. Thank you for your consideration of my opinion. Tom Carsner This email is from an external source. 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Kelcey Patrick -Ferree <kelcey.patrickferree@gmail.com> Wednesday, December 8, 2021 4:07 PM *City Council Support for Map A Dear Council Members: I'm writing to express my support for Map A for redistricting. I like that it splits the fewest districts across Highway 1 / Highway 6, which makes it more likely that folks can and will safely walk or bike to vote in good weather. I also like that it allows for growth in the South District area, where the City has just approved the form -based code that will likely add a lot of population to this area. Please vote in favor of Map A at your next meeting. Warm regards, Kelcey And biannual time changes must be abolished. #LockTheClock Virus -free. www.avast.com 1 Plan A Legal Descriptions City Council District Descriptions: Council District A: Voting Precincts: 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 26, 27 Council District B: Voting Precincts: 1, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24 Council District C: Voting Precincts: 3, 4, 5, 11, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 Late Handouts Distributed (Date) Precinct Legal Descriptions: Precinct 1: Beginning at the intersection of S Scott Boulevard and E Court Street, proceeding north along the centerline of Scott Boulevard to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to the intersection at N 15t Avenue; south on N 15t Avenue to E Washington Street; east along E Washington Street to S Westminster Street; south along S Westminster Street to E Court Street; then east along E Court Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 2: Beginning at the intersection of Emerald Street and Melrose Avenue, proceeding west along Melrose Avenue to its intersection with Westgate Street; following Westgate Avenue south to the Keswick Drive; west along Keswick Drive, curving south, to the intersection of Keswick Drive and W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Teg Drive, thence south on Teg Drive and east along Aber Avenue to the intersection of Aber Avenue and Sunset Street; southeast along Sunset Street to the intersection at Highway 1 W; northeast along the centerline of the southwest -bound lanes on Highway 1 W to a point at the apparent intersection of the centerline of Weeber Street extended and Highway 1 W; northwest to the centerline at the easterly termination of Edingale Drive pavement, then southwest along Edingale Drive to its intersection with Weeber Street; north on Weeber Street to W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Oaknoll Drive; north along Oaknoll Drive to Oakcrest Street; west on Oakcrest Street to George Street; north along George Street to the point of apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; generally west along said Corporate Limits to their intersection with Sunset Street; south along Sunset Street to W Benton Street; west on W Benton Street to Emerald Street; north along Emerald Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 3: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 W and 15t Avenue, following 1st Avenue southwest towards the Iowa Interstate Railroad Bridge, then tracing the path of the Iowa Interstate Railroad generally southeast to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River; north along the western bank of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with W Iowa Avenue; west along W Iowa Avenue to S Riverside Drive/US Highway 6; thence generally northwest along S Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 to the point of beginning. Precinct 4: From the point of beginning at the intersection N Dubuque Street and Foster Road, west along Foster Road to its terminus at Walker Circle; northeast following the northwest parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; northwest following the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision to the southern bank of the Iowa River, and continuing to the apparent intersection of said parcel line extended with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; generally south following the Corporate Limits to the point at which they intersect with Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 W; generally southeast along Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 W to W Iowa Avenue, then east along W Iowa Avenue to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with E Park Road; east on E Park Road to N Dubuque Street; generally north following the centerline of N Dubuque Street to a point approximately adjacent to the property 1032 N Dubuque Street, then generally north following the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 5: Beginning at the intersection of N Dubuque Street and E Park Road, west on E Park road to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River, thence southwest following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with W Iowa Avenue; west along W Iowa Avenue to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River; south along the western bank of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the eastbound lanes of W Burlington Street/Highway 1; east along the centerline of the eastbound lanes of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the CRANDIC Railroad; then east along the centerline of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the intersection with S Clinton Street; north along Clinton Street to Church Street, then continuing east on Church Street to its intersection with N Dubuque Street; then north on N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 6: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and 4th Avenue, south along 4th Avenue to F Street; west along F Street to its intersection with 5th Avenue, then following 5th Avenue south to I Street; east along I Street to 3rd Avenue; south on 3rd Avenue to J Street; east on J Street to 2nd Avenue; south along 2nd Avenue to the extended centerline's apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; following the Iowa Interstate Railroad southeast to the point at which it crosses the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; north following the Corporate Limits to the point at which it intersects American Legion Road, east of the Silvercrest Way and American Legion Road intersection; then west along American Legion Road, continuing on Muscatine Avenue, to the point of beginning. Precinct 7: Beginning at the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Hawkeye Park Road, following Hawkeye Park Road to the north and east to it's terminus at the intersection with N Mormon Trek Boulevard; northeast along N Mormon Trek Boulevard to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad at City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally west-northwest to a point on Deer Creek Road SE, then continuing to follow the Corporate Limit boundary south, to its intersection with Melrose Avenue west of Slothower Road; then east on Melrose Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 8: Beginning at the intersection of Rohret Road and Mormon Trek Boulevard, following Rohret Road west to its apparent intersection with US Highway 218; northwest on US Highway 218 to its apparent intersection with Melrose Avenue; west along Melrose Avenue to the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits south, then generally east, to the apparent intersection of the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended, southwest of Mormon Trek Boulevard; then proceeding north, continuing on Mormon Trek Boulevard, to the point of beginning. Precinct 9: Beginning at the intersection of N Mormon Trek Boulevard and Hawkeye Park Road, following Hawkeye Park Road generally west and south to its terminus at Melrose Ave; east along Melrose Avenue to Westwinds Drive; south on Westwinds Drive to Roberts Road; east along Roberts Road to Bartelt Road; generally north along Bartelt Road following the curve to Mormon Trek Boulevard; south along Mormon Trek Boulevard to a point that is approximately adjacent to the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Plaen View Drive, then continuing south along the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended, and eventually tracing the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits generally south then east then north to the point at which the Corporate Limit boundary intersects Grace Drive; northwest following the western boundary of the Iowa City Municipal Airport parcel to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the southbound lanes of Highway 1 W; northeast following said centerline to Sunset Street; northwest along Sunset Street to Aber Avenue; west on Aber Avenue, then generally north on Teg Drive to W Benton Street; west along W Benton Street to Keswick Drive; north on Keswick Drive, following the curve, to Westgate Street; north on Westgate Street to Melrose Avenue; east on Melrose Avenue to its apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; following the Corporate Limits generally northeast to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Mormon Trek Boulevard; then south along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 10: Beginning at the intersection of Sycamore Street and Wetherby Drive, heading west along Wetherby Drive to Russell Drive; north on Russell Drive to Burns Avenue; west on Burns Avenue to Taylor Drive; north on Taylor Drive to Sandusky Drive; generally west on Sandusky Drive to Pepper Drive; following Pepper Drive south then generally west along its curve to the intersection with Sandusky Drive; northeast on Sandusky Drive to Keokuk Street; north on Keokuk Street to Southgate Avenue; west on Southgate Avenue to its apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad; following the CRANDIC Railroad southwest to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits and then continuing along said limits generally south, then north, then east, to the point of apparent intersection of said limits with the centerline of the Iowa River; continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; then continuing east along said boundary line to the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits west of Soccer Park Road and then continuing along said limits generally north, then west to the point of apparent intersection of said limits and Sycamore Street, south of the intersection of Sycamore St and Langenberg Avenue; then north along Sycamore Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 11: Beginning at the intersection of E Burlington Street and S Linn Street, following E Burlington Street/Highway 1 west to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River, continuing south along the western bank of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; west along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Greenwood Drive; southwest along Greenwood Drive to W Benton Street; east along W Benton Street to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with US Highway 6 E; following US Highway 6 E east to the intersection with S Gilbert Street; north along S Gilbert Street to its apparent intersection with Iowa Interstate Railroad; west, following the path of the Iowa Interstate Railroad, to its apparent intersection with the centerline of Ralston Creek; north along the centerline of Ralston Creek to its apparent intersection with E Prentiss Street; north from the center of the intersection of E Prentiss Street and S Linn Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 12: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and Sycamore Street, south along Sycamore Street to the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits, then east to its intersection with the Sycamore Greenway Trail; following the Sycamore Greenway Trail north to its apparent intersection with the centerline of Whispering Meadow Drive extended; east along Whispering Meadow Drive to Whispering Prairie Avenue; north along Whispering Prairie Avenue to Lakeside Drive; northeast along Lakeside Drive to the centerline of the northwest bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E; northwest following said centerline of US Highway 6 E to the point of beginning. Precinct 13: Beginning at the intersection of W Benton Street and Weeber Street, south on Weeber Street to Edingale Drive; east along Edingale Drive to its terminus, then in a southeast trajectory to a point of intersection with the centerline of the southbound travel lanes of Highway 1 W; southwest along the centerline of the southbound travel lanes of Highway 1 W to Mormon Trek Boulevard; southeast along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of apparent intersection with the northern boundary of JJR Davis Fourth Addition, along the property line of the Iowa City Municipal Airport; east following the aforementioned property line to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits near Grace Drive; tracing the Corporate Limits, generally southeastern, to the apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad southwest of the intersection of Old Highway 218 and Mormon Trek Boulevard/McCollister Boulevard; northeast following the CRANDIC Railroad to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; generally north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with W Benton Street; west along W Benton Street to Greenwood Drive; northeast along Greenwood Drive to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the point of apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally southwest to the apparent intersection with George Street; south along George Street to Oakcrest Street; east along Oakcrest Street to Oaknoll Drive; south along Oaknoll Drive to W Benton Street; then west on W Benton Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 14: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and S Gilbert Street, following the centerline of the northeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest to Plum Street, then following the centerline of the southeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest, to Sycamore Street; then following the centerline of the southeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest to the intersection with Fairmeadows Boulevard; following Fairmeadows Boulevard to the northeast to Lower Muscatine Road; northwest along Lower Muscatine Road to 5 1st Avenue; northeast along S 1st Avenue to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; following the Iowa Interstate Railroad generally northwest to its apparent intersection with S Gilbert Street; then south along S Gilbert Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 15: Beginning at the intersection of 420th Street and US Highway 6 SE, following the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits east and continuing to trace the boundary until the apparent intersection of the Corporate Limits with the Iowa Interstate Railroad, north of the terminus of Compass Drive; northwest along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S 1st Avenue; southwest along S 1st Avenue to Lower Muscatine Road; southeast along Lower Muscatine Road to Fairmeadows Boulevard; southwest along Fairmeadows Boulevard to the centerline of the northeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E; southeast following said centerline to Industrial Park Road; southwest along the centerline of Industrial Park Road and continuing along the centerline of Lakeside Drive to Whispering Prairie Avenue; south on Whispering Prairie Avenue to Whispering Meadow Drive; west on Whispering Meadow Drive to a point at the approximate apparent intersection of the centerline of Whispering Meadow Drive extended and the Sycamore Greenway Trail; south along the Sycamore Greenway Trail to the apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limit boundary south to a point near Napoleon Street SE; continuing east along Napoleon Street SE to Sioux Avenue SE; north along Sioux Avenue SE until the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then continuing to trace the Corporate Limit boundary east to the point of beginning. Precinct 16: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, following E Court Street west to the intersection with Kenwood Drive; south on Kenwood Drive to Friendship Street; southwest on Friendship Street to Meadow Street; south on Meadow Street to Dover Street; south along Dover Street to its intersection with Muscatine Avenue; then east following Muscatine Avenue and continuing east on American Legion Road to the apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits back to the point of beginning. Precinct 17: Beginning at the intersection of E Washington Street and S Westminster Street, west along E Washington Street to N 1St Avenue; north on N 15t Avenue to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to N 7th Avenue; south following N 7th Avenue to its intersection with Muscatine Avenue; southeast following Muscatine Avenue to Dover Street; north on Dover Street, and continuing north on Meadow Street to the intersection of Meadow Street and Friendship Street; northeast on Friendship Street to Kenwood Drive; north on Kenwood Drive to E Court Street; west on E Court Street to S Westminster Street; then north on Westminster Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 18: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and E Burlington Street, west along E Burlington Street to S Governor Street; south on S Governor Street to Bowery Street; west on Bowery Street to S Dodge Street; south on Dodge Street to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; southeast along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with 2nd Avenue; north on 2nd Avenue to J Street; west on J Street to 3rd Avenue; north on 3rd Avenue to I Street; west on I Street to 5th Avenue; north on 5th Avenue to F Street; east on F Street and continuing onto 4th Avenue to the intersection with Muscatine Avenue; then northwest along Muscatine Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 19: Beginning at the intersection of E Burlington Street/Highway 1 and S Van Buren Street, north on S Van Buren Street to E College Street; west on E College Street to S Linn Street; south on S Linn Street and continuing south along the centerline of Ralston Creek to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; generally east along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Dodge Street; north on S Dodge Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; then west on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 20: Beginning at the intersection of E Iowa Avenue and S Clinton Street, south on S Clinton Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Linn Street; north on S Linn Street to E College Street; east on E College Street to S Van Buren Street; south on S Van Buren Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Dodge Street/Highway 1; south along S Dodge Street to Bowery Street; east on Bowery Street to S Governor Street; north on S Governor Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street to Muscatine Avenue; northwest on Muscatine Avenue to the centerline of the eastbound lane of E Iowa Avenue; then following the centerline of E Iowa Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 21: Beginning at the intersection of Kimball Road and N Governor Street, generally southwest along Kimball Road to N Dubuque Street; south on N Dubuque Street to Church Street; west on Church Street and continuing south on N Clinton Street to the intersection with E Iowa Avenue; east on E Iowa Avenue to N Gilbert Street; north on N Gilbert Street to E Davenport Street; east on E Davenport Street to N Governor Street/Highway 1; north on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; then north-northwest on N Governor Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 22: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street and Kimball Road, south on N Governor Street to its intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; northeast on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Summit Street/Prairie Du Chien Road; north along Prairie Du Chien Road to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits east to the apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; continuing along said boundary line north, then west to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; then continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision; southeast along the aforementioned parcel line to the point of intersection with the parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; then southwest following said parcel line to the terminus of Foster Road at Walker Circle; generally east following the curvature of Foster Road to N Dubuque Street; south along the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street a point approximately adjacent to 1032 N Dubuque Street, then following the centerline of the northbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the intersection with Kimball Road; then generally northeast along Kimball Road to the point of beginning. Precinct 23: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street/Highway 1 and E Bloomington Street, east on E Bloomington Street to Pleasant Street; south on Pleasant Street to Rochester Avenue; east on Rochester Avenue and continuing on to Herbert Hoover Highway to the apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits of Iowa City; following the Corporate Limits north and then west to the apparent intersection with Prairie Du Chien Road; south along Prairie Du Chien Road to N Dodge Street/Highway 1; southwest on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Governor Street/Highway 1; then south on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 24: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, following the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits north to the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and Lower West Branch Road; continuing to follow the Corporate limits west to a point adjacent to Broadmoor Lane, then continuing along the Corporate Limits north and encompassing the area containing the Churchill Meadows subdivisions, then continuing along the Corporate Limits south to Lower West Branch Road; then following the Corporate Limits west and north to the apparent intersection with Herbert Hoover Highway; southwest along Herbert Hoover Highway to N Scott Boulevard; south on N Scott Boulevard to E Court Street; then east on E Court Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 25: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street/Highway 1 and E Davenport Street, west along E Davenport Street to N Gilbert Street; south on N Gilbert Street to E Iowa Avenue; east on E Iowa Avenue along the centerline of the eastbound lane to Muscatine Avenue; southeast on Muscatine Avenue to S 7th Avenue; north along S 7th Avenue to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to Pleasant Street; north on Pleasant Street to E Bloomington Street; then west on E Bloomington Street to N Governor Street/Highway 1; north on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 26: Beginning at the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Bartelt Road, west along Bartelt Road to Roberts Road; west on Roberts Road to Westwinds Drive; north on Westwinds Drive to Melrose Avenue; west on Melrose Avenue to its apparent intersection with US Highway 218; southeast following US Highway 218 to its apparent intersection with Rohret Road; east along Rohret Road to Mormon Trek Boulevard; then north along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 27: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and Sycamore Street, west along US Highway 6 E to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; south following the centerline of the Iowa River to the point of apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad; northeast following the CRANDIC Railroad to its apparent intersection of Southgate Avenue; east along Southgate Avenue to Keokuk Street; south on Keokuk Street to Sandusky Drive; southwest following the curve of Sandusky Drive to Pepper Drive; following Pepper Drive, east and then north, to the intersection with Sandusky Drive; east on Sandusky Drive to Taylor Drive; south on Taylor Drive to Burns Avenue; east on Burns Avenue to Russell Drive; south on Russell Drive to Wetherby Drive; east on Wetherby Drive to Sycamore Street; then north on Sycamore Street to the point of beginning. Plan C Legal Descriptions City Council District Descriptions: Council District A: Voting Precincts: 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 26, 27 Council District B: Voting Precincts: 1, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24 Council District C: Voting Precincts: 3, 4, 5, 11, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 Late Handouts Distributed (Date) Precinct 1: Beginning at the intersection of N Scott Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, west along Rochester Avenue to the intersection with N 1st Avenue; south on N 1st Avenue to E Washington Street; east on E Washington Street to Potomac Drive; south and east following the curve of Potomac Drive to its intersection with Washington Park Road; south on Washington Park Road to E Court Street; east along E Court Street to Friendship Street; north on Friendship Street to E Washington Street; east on E Washington Street to N Scott Boulevard; then north on N Scott Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 2: Beginning at the intersection of W Benton Street and Wylde Green Road, west on W Benton Street to Sunset Street; south on Sunset Street to Derwen Drive; west on Derwen Drive to Penkridge Drive; south on Penkridge Drive to Denbigh Drive; west on Denbigh Drive, following the curve, to Hafor Drive; west on Hafor Drive to Teg Drive; north on Teg Drive to W Benton Street; west on W Benton Street to Mormon Trek Boulevard; south on Mormon Trek Boulevard to a point adjacent to the terminus of Plaen View Drive on the centerline of Mormon Trek Boulevard; south along the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended to the apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits, then south following the Corporate Limits to the centerline of the southwest bound travel lanes of Highway 1 SW; continuing northeast along the centerline of the southwest bound travel lanes of Highway 1 S/W to its intersection with Sunset Street; northwest along Sunset Street to Ashley Drive; northeast on Ashley Drive to Wylde Green Road; then generally north on Wylde Green Road to the point of beginning. Precinct 3: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 W and 1st Avenue, southwest along 1st Avenue to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; generally southeast following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Melrose Avenue; east along Melrose Avenue and continuing on to Byington Road to the southern edge of Grand Avenue pavement; following the southern edge of Grand Avenue pavement east to the centerline of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 where it intersects US Highway 6/5 Riverside Drive; then north on US Highway 6/Riverside Drive, following the curve, to the point of beginning. Precinct 4: From the point of beginning at the intersection N Dubuque Street and Foster Road, west along the centerline of Foster Road to its terminus adjacent to Walker Circle; northeast following the northwest parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; northwest following the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision to the southern bank of the Iowa River, and continuing to the apparent intersection of said parcel line with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; generally south following the Corporate Limits to the point at which US Highway 6 intersect; generally southeast along Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 to the intersection at W Iowa Avenue, then east on W Iowa Avenue to the apparent centerline of the Iowa River; north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with E Park Road; east along E Park Road to N Dubuque Street; generally north following the centerline of N Dubuque Street to a point approximately adjacent to the property 1032 N Dubuque Street, then generally north following the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 5: Beginning at the intersection of N Dubuque Street and E Park Road, west along E Park Road to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; generally south following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the centerline of W Iowa Avenue; west on W Iowa Avenue to US Highway 6/S Riverside Drive; south on US Highway 6/S Riverside Drive to the apparent intersection of the eastbound lanes of Highway 1/Burlington Street and US Highway 6/S Riverside Drive, then west following the southern edge of the Grand Avenue pavement to Byington Road; south following Byington Road, then continuing west along Melrose Avenue to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; generally southeast following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the eastbound lanes of Highway 1/W Burlington Street; east along Highway 1/W Burlington Street to the intersection of Highway 1/E Burlington Street and S Linn Street; north on S Linn Street to E College Street; west on E College Street to the apparent intersection of E College Street and S Dubuque Street; north on S Dubuque Street to E Iowa Avenue; west along E Iowa Avenue to N Clinton Street; north on N Clinton Street to E Jefferson Street; west on E Jefferson Street to its apparent intersection with N Capitol Street; north along the apparent centerline of N Capitol Street to its intersection with E Davenport Street; east on E Davenport Street to N Clinton Street; north on N Clinton Street to Fairchild Street; east on Fairchild Street to N Dubuque Street; then north on N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 6: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue/American Legion Road and S Scott Boulevard, west along Muscatine Avenue to 4th Avenue; south on 4th Avenue and west on F Street to 5th Avenue; south on 5th Avenue to I Street; east on I Street to 3rd Avenue; south on 3rd Avenue to J Street; east on J Street to 2nd Avenue; south on 2nd Avenue to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; southeast following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Scott Boulevard; then north on S Scott Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 7: Beginning at the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Bartelt Road, west on Bartelt Road, following the curve, to Roberts Road; west on Roberts Road to Westwinds Drive; north on Westwinds Drive to its intersection with the centerline of the westbound travel lanes of Melrose Avenue; west along the centerline of the westbound travel lanes of Melrose Avenue to Galway Drive; south on Galway Drive to Killarney Road; southeast on Killarney Road to Donegal Court; south along Donegal Court following the curve to Tipperary Road; south on Tipperary Road to Shannon Drive; south on Shannon Drive to Rohret Road; east on Rohret Road to Mormon Trek Boulevard; then north on Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 8: Beginning at the intersection of Rohret Road and Mormon Trek Boulevard, following the centerline of Rohret Road west to the apparent intersection with US Highway 218; northwest along US Highway 218 to the apparent intersection with Melrose Avenue; west along Melrose Avenue to the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits south, then generally east, to the apparent intersection of the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended, southwest of Mormon Trek Boulevard; then proceeding north, continuing on Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 9: Beginning at the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Hawkeye Park Road, west and then south along Hawkeye Park Road to its intersection with the centerline of the westbound travel lanes of Melrose Avenue; east along the centerline of the westbound travel lanes of Melrose Avenue to Westwinds Drive; south along Westwinds Drive to Roberts Road; east on Roberts Road to Bartelt Road; north and east on Bartelt Road following the curve to Mormon Trek Boulevard; south on Mormon Trek Boulevard to W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Teg Drive; south following Teg Drive to Hafor Drive; east along Hafor Drive to Denbigh Drive; south on Denbeigh Drive, following the curve, to Penkridge Drive; north on Penkridge Drive to Derwen Drive; generally east on Derwen Drive to Sunset Street; north on Sunset Street to W Benton Street; west on W Benton Street to Emerald Street; north on Emerald Street and continuing north following the City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits; continuing along the City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits to the point of apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Mormon Trek Boulevard; southwest along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 10: Beginning at the intersection of E Benton Street and S Clinton Street, west along E Benton Street to Weeber Street; south on Weeber Street to Edingale Drive; southwest along Edingale Drive to Wylde Green Road; south on Wylde Green Road to Ashley Drive; southwest on Ashley Drive to Sunset Street; southeast on Sunset Street to the centerline of the southwest bound travel lanes of Highway 1 W; southwest along the southwest bound travel lanes of Highway 1 W to the apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally southeast to their apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; then continuing east along said boundary line to the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits west of Soccer Park Road and then continuing along said limits generally north, then west to the point of apparent intersection of said limits and Sand Road SE; north along Sand Road SE and continuing on S Gilbert Street to the apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad; following the CRANDIC Railroad northeast to its apparent intersection with Southgate Avenue; east on Southgate Avenue to Keokuk Street; north on Keokuk Street to Plum Street; southeast on Plum Street to Marcy Street; north on Marcy Street to Highland Avenue; east on Highland Avenue to Marcy Street; north on Marcy Street to Florence Street; west on Florence Street to Keokuk Street; south on Keokuk Street to Keokuk Court; west on Keokuk Court to Diana Street; north on Diana Street to Kirkwood Avenue; west on Kirkwood Avenue to S Clinton Street; then north on S Clinton Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 11: Beginning at the intersection of S Dubuque Street and E Burlington Street/Highway 1, west along E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the apparent intersection of the centerline of the eastbound travel lane of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 and the center line of the Iowa River; south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with W Benton Street; east along W Benton Street to S Clinton Street; south on S Clinton Street to Kirkwood Avenue; east on Kirkwood Avenue to Diana Street; south on Diana Street to Keokuk Court; east on Keokuk Court to Keokuk Street; north on Keokuk Street to Florence Street; east on Florence Street to Marcy Street; north on Marcy Street to Kirkwood Avenue; west on Kirkwood Avenue to S Lucas Street; north on S Lucas Street to Page Street; west on Page Street to S Dodge Street; north on S Dodge Street to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; west along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Gilbert Street; north on S Gilbert Street to E Court Street; west on E Court Street to Maiden Lane; south and then west on Maiden Lane to S Linn Street; north on S Linn Street to E Court Street; west on E Court Street to S Dubuque Street; then north on S Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 12: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 SE and 420th Street SE, east along 420th Street to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate limits generally east to Taft Avenue SE then along Taft Avenue SE to the north then west to the point of apparent intersection of the Corporate Limits with S Scott Boulevard; west following the Iowa Interstate Railroad from its apparent intersection with S Scott Boulevard to its apparent intersection with the centerline of Industrial Park Road extended; southwest along Industrial Park Road and continuing southwest along Lakeside Drive to its intersection with Nevada Ave; north on Nevada Avenue to Miami Drive; southwest on Miami Drive to Lakeside Drive; west on Lakeside Drive to the apparent intersection with the Sycamore Greenway Trail; south along the Sycamore Greenway Trail to the apparent intersection with the centerline of Whispering Meadow Drive extended; east then south following Whispering Meadow Drive to its apparent intersection with the northern boundary of the Saddlebrook Meadows Part 1 subdivision; west along said boundary to the point of apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally south to Napoleon Street SE; continuing east along Napoleon Street SE to Sioux Avenue SE; north along Sioux Avenue SE until the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then continuing to trace the Corporate Limits east to the point of beginning. Precinct 13: Beginning at the intersection of Marietta Avenue and George Street, south along George Street to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; west along the Corporate Limits to the point of apparent intersection with Sunset Street; south on Sunset Street to W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Wylde Green Road; south along Wylde Green Road to Edingale Drive; northeast on Edingale Drive to Weeber Street; north following Weeber Street to W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; northwest along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; generally northwest following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; generally southwest following the Corporate Limits to their apparent intersection with Marietta Avenue; then west along Marietta Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 14: Beginning at the intersection of S Summit Street and Kirkwood Avenue, west on Kirkwood Avenue to its intersection with Marcy Street; south on Marcy Street to Highland Avenue; west on Highland Avenue to Marcy Street; south on Marcy Street to Plum Street; northwest on Plum Street to Keokuk Street; south on Keokuk Street to Sandusky Drive; east following Sandusky Street to Bancroft Drive; north on Bancroft Drive to Crosby Lane; east on Crosby Lane to Sycamore Street; north on Sycamore Street to Lower Muscatine Road; northwest on Lower Muscatine Road to its intersection with Pine Street; north on Pine Street to the apparent intersection of Pine Street's centerline extended with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; west along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Summit Street; then south on S Summit Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 15: Beginning at the intersection of Pine Street and Lower Muscatine Road, southeast along Lower Muscatine Road to Sycamore Street; south on Sycamore Street to Crosby Lane; west on Crosby Lane to Bancroft Drive; south on Bancroft Drive to Sandusky Drive; west on Sandusky Drive to Taylor Drive; south on Taylor Drive to Burns Avenue; east on Burns Avenue to Russell Drive; south on Russell Drive to Wetherby Drive; east on Wetherby Drive, and continuing on Lakeside Drive, to Miami Drive; northeast on Miami Drive to Nevada Avenue; southeast on Nevada Avenue to Lakeside Drive; generally northeast along Lakeside Drive, continuing on Industrial Park Road, to the apparent intersection of its centerline extended and the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with the extended centerline of Pine Street; then south on Pine Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 16: Beginning at the intersection of N 1st Avenue and Rochester Avenue, west along Rochester Avenue to N 7th Avenue; south on N 7th Avenue to Muscatine Avenue; southeast along Muscatine Avenue to Willow Street; north on Willow Street to Eastwood Drive; west on Eastwood Drive to Brookside Drive; west on Brookside Drive to Meadow Street; north on Meadow Street to Friendship Street; east on Friendship Street to Kenwood Drive; north on Kenwood Drive to E Court Street; west on E Court Street to Washington Park Road; north on Washington Park Road to Potomac Drive; west and north on Potomac Drive to E Washington Street; west on E Washington Street to N 1st Avenue; then north on N 1st Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 17: Beginning at the intersection of N 7th Avenue and Rochester Avenue, west on Rochester Avenue to Parsons Avenue; south on Parsons Avenue to E Jefferson Street; west on E Jefferson Street to N Dodge Street/Highway 1; south on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to E Iowa Avenue; west on E Iowa Avenue to S Johnson Street; south on S Johnson Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Dodge Street; south on S Dodge Street to Bowery Street; east on Bowery Street to S Governor Street; north on S Governor Street E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street to Muscatine Avenue; southeast along Muscatine Avenue to S 7th Avenue; then north on S 7th Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 18: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and E Burlington Street, west on E Burlington Street to S Governor Street/Highway 1; south on S Governor Street to Bowery Street; west on Bowery Street to S Gilbert Street; south on S Gilbert Street to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; east along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Dodge Street; south on S Dodge Street to Page Street; east on Page Street to S Lucas Street; south on S Lucas Street to Kirkwood Avenue; east on Kirkwood Avenue to S Summit Street; north on S Summit Street to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; southeast along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with 2"d Avenue extended; north on 2"d Avenue to J Street; west on J Street to 3rd Avenue; north on 3rd Avenue to I Street; west on I Street to 5th Avenue; north on 5th Avenue to F Street; east on F Street and north on 4th Avenue to Muscatine Avenue; then northwest on Muscatine Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 19: Beginning at the intersection of S Van Buren Street and E College Street, west on E College Street to S Linn Street; south on S Linn Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; west on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Dubuque Street; south on S Dubuque Street to E Court Street; east on E Court Street to S Linn Street; south on S Linn Street to Maiden Lane; east on Maiden Lane following the curve north to E Court Street; east on E Court Street to S Gilbert Street; south on S Gilbert Street to Bowery Street; east on Bowery Street to S Dodge Street; north on S Dodge Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; west on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Van Buren Street; then north on S Van Buren Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 20: Beginning at the intersection of E Davenport Street and N Dubuque Street, west on E Davenport Street to N Capitol Street; south along the apparent centerline of N Capitol Street to E Jefferson Street; east on E Jefferson Street to N Clinton Street; south on N Clinton Street to E Iowa Avenue; east on E Iowa Avenue to S Dubuque Street; south on S Dubuque Street to E College Street; east along the apparent centerline of E College Street to S Van Buren Street; south on S Van Buren Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Johnson Street; north on S Johnson Street to E Market Street; west on E Market Street to N Dubuque Street; then north on N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 21: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street and Kimball Road, southwest along Kimball Road to N Dubuque Street; south on N Dubuque Street to Fairchild Street; west on Fairchild Street to N Clinton Street; south on N Clinton Street to E Davenport Street; east on E Davenport Street to N Dubuque Street; south on N Dubuque Street to E Market Street; east on E Market Street to N Johnson Street; south on N Johnson Street to E Iowa Avenue; east along E Iowa Avenue to N Dodge Street/Highway 1; north on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to E Jefferson Street; east on E Jefferson Street to N Governor Street/Highway 1; north on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to its intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; then continuing along N Governor Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 22: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street and Kimball Road, south on N Governor Street to its intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; northeast on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Summit Street/Prairie Du Chien Road; north along Prairie Du Chien Road to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits east to the apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; continuing along said boundary line north, then west to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; then continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision; southeast along the aforementioned parcel line to the point of intersection with the parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; then southwest following said parcel line to the terminus of Foster Road; generally east following the curvature of Foster Road to N Dubuque Street; south along the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street a point approximately adjacent to 1032 N Dubuque Street, then following the centerline of the northbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the intersection with Kimball Road; then generally northeast along Kimball Road to the point of beginning. Precinct 23: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street/Highway 1 and E Jefferson Street, east along E Jefferson Street to Parsons Avenue; north on Parsons Avenue to Rochester Avenue; east along Rochester Avenue and continuing on Herbert Hoover Highway to the point of apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits north, then west, to their intersection with Prairie Du Chien Road; south along Prairie Du Chien Road to N Dodge Street/Highway 1; southwest along N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Governor Street/Highway 1; then south along N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 24: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, west along E Court Street to Kenwood Drive; south on Kenwood Drive to Friendship Street; southwest on Friendship Street to Meadow Street; southeast on Meadow Street to Brookside Drive; east on Brookside Drive to Eastwood Drive; generally east on Eastwood Drive to Willow Street; south on Willow Street to Muscatine Avenue; east on Muscatine Avenue to S Scott Boulevard; south on S Scott Boulevard to the apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits north of Wellington Drive; then tracing the Corporate Limit boundary generally east, then north, to the point of beginning. Precinct 25: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, following the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits north to the intersection of Taft Avenue and Lower West Branch Road; continuing to follow the Corporate limits west to a point adjacent to Broadmoor Lane, then continuing along the Corporate Limits north and encompassing the area containing the Churchill Meadows subdivisions, then continuing along the Corporate Limits south to Lower West Branch Road; then following the Corporate Limits west and north to the apparent intersection with Herbert Hoover Highway; southwest along Herbert Hoover Highway to N Scott Boulevard; south on N Scott Boulevard to E Washington Street; west on E Washington Street to Friendship Street; south on Friendship Street to E Court Street; then east on E Court Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 26: Beginning at the intersection of Hawkeye Park Road and N Mormon Trek Boulevard, north on N Mormon Trek Boulevard to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad and the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; northwest tracing the Corporate Limits, and continuing southwest, to the point of intersection on Kennedy Parkway; following Kennedy Parkway to the west and continuing west along the Corporate Limits to their apparent intersection with Deer Creek Road SE; tracing the Corporate Limits generally south to Melrose Avenue; east on Melrose Avenue to US Highway 218; southeast along US Highway 218 to its apparent intersection with Rohret Road; east on Rohret Road to Shannon Drive; north along Shannon Drive to Tipperary Road; generally northwest along Tipperary Road to Donegal Court; generally northeast along Donegal Court to Killarney Road; northwest along Killarney Road to Galway Drive; north on Galway Drive to Melrose Avenue; east on Melrose Avenue to Hawkeye Park Road; then north and east along Hawkeye Park Road to the point of beginning. Precinct 27: Beginning at the intersection of Keokuk Street and Southgate Avenue, west along Southgate Avenue to its apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad; south along the CRANDIC Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Gilbert Street; south on S Gilbert Street to its intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; east along the Corporate Limit boundary, tracing the boundary south, to its intersection with Sycamore Street SE; north on Sycamore Street SE to its apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; east along this boundary, and continuing along the southern boundary of the Sycamore Woods Part 5 and Whispering Meadows Part 2 subdivisions to their apparent intersection with Whispering Meadows Drive; following Whispering Meadows Drive north and then west to its apparent intersection with the Sycamore Greenway Trail; north along the Sycamore Greenway Trail to Lakeside Drive; west on Lakeside Drive and continuing on Wetherby Drive to Russell Drive; north on Russell Drive to Burns Avenue; west on Burns Avenue to Taylor Drive; north on Taylor Drive to Sandusky Drive; west following Sandusky Drive to Keokuk Street; then north on Keokuk Street to the point of beginning. City of Iowa City Proposed Plan A With Council Districts Council Precinct Population District lows City 1 2739 B Iowa City 2 2969 A Iowa City 3 3353 C Iowa City 4 2413 C Iowa City 5 3388 C Iowa City 6 3034 B Iowa City7 1947 A Iowa City 8 2496 A Iowa City 9 3203 A Iowa City 10 2525 A Iowa City 11 2974 C Iowa City 12 2997 A Iowa City 13 3169 A Iowa City 14 2573 8 Iowa City 15 2381 B Iowa City 16 2929 B Iowa City 17 3080 B Iowa City 18 2175 B Iowa City 19 3182 C Iowa City 20 2978 C Iowa City 21 2783 C Iowa City 22 2583 C Iowa City 23 2510 B Iowa City 24 2665 B Iowa City 25 2439 C Iowa City 26 2896 A Iowa City 27 2447 A Late Handouts Distribut 12-14-2-1 (Date) N A Po OI qt -0o IovVa City 22 yv ly _rco Foster Rd a p6W,^ ouncil Dis't W Park 'y`.EPetk R�. 11W Rd SW Cornb. Precincts Tot. Pop. East Lucas North 232 IC22/ELN • 2,815 Iowa City 22 2,583 IC22/ELN East Lucas SE 14 IC15/ELSE 2,395 Iowa City 15 2381 IC15/ELSE East Lucas SW 234 IC10/ELSW 2,759 Iowa City 10 2525 IC10/ELSW Legend OHouse District boundaries OCity & Township boundaries 1 Census blocks Proposed Precincts Current Polling Place Locations Proposed Council Dists. (inset) M, Council District A Council District B F-1 Council District C I 1 Council District Population Council District A 24,649 Council District B 24,086 Council District C 26,093 Naples Ave SW Harmony Ln SE Lloyd Ave SE East Lucas SW iberty pr 20 City of Iowa City Proposed Plan C With Council Districts Council Precinct Population District Iowa City 1 2,894 B Iowa City 2 2,848 A Iowa City 3 2,856 C Iowa City 4 2,413 C Iowa City 5 2,920 Iowa City 6 2,875 Iowa City 7 2,409 Iowa City 8 2,496 Iowa City 9 2,729 Iowa City 10 2,757 Iowa City 11 2,794 Iowa City 12 2,761 Iowa City 13 2,783 Iowa City 14 2217 Iowa City 15 Iowa City 16 Iowa City 17 Iowa City 18 Iowa City 19 Iowa City 20 Iowa City 21 Iowa City 22 Iowa City 23 Iowa City 24 Iowa City 25 Iowa City 26 owa City 27 2,779 2,884 2,937 2,758 2,737 2,968 2,905 2,583 2,865 2,883 2,911 2,434 2,832 A A A A A 8 A A Late Handouts Distrib Z-I�-ZI (Date) Legend DHouse District boundaries OCity & Township boundaries Census blocks Proposed Precincts Al Proposed Precincts * Current Polling Place Locations Proposed Council Dists. (inset) I. Council District A Council District B Council District C A ewpott 340th Graham Poo. Comb. Pre Ings Tot. Pa East Wcas Norh 232 IC22/ELY 2,815 lava OW 22 2,583 !022/E0 East Was SE 14 SC15/ELSE , 2,775 Iowa City 52 27b1 IC15/ELSE East Lucas SW 234 LCSO/ELSW 2,991 Iowa City 10 2757 ICIC/EISW 1 Council District Population Council District A 24,101 Council District B 25,768 Council District C 24,959 Auek Cr°\ - Council District A 4 21J-17 23 25 5a20 f=CounciI.Dishict'B- 11 18 16 1 1 _ 24 6 Council District C 71S[fICI l2 ■■■■■14 p ■•■■■f,4i' ur� 57■AREN7L'I:IgIL'O .mfii■Ai MAIM■_ I i�Ij,�i.a5- �■rr ■,��. is3��a 1�«1311 iJ ■■■ m .�.: ■�ia��7 11��� CouncilDistnot B 6i1 1 a7 11,-;11%�i7\6 NZ� � ^ Y■ . 11 1011111114 &�E �uuuili :AWN vua:5� n e s Min � ■�e 1��■ WeNI Pleasant Valley PAUL D. PATE SECRETARY OF STATE 1/12/2022 Kellie Fruehling City of' Iowa City 410 E Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mrs. Kellie Fruehling: OFFICE OF THE IOWA SECRETARY OF STATE LUCAS BUILDING DES MOINES, IOWA 50319 The City of Iowa City's reprecincting plan materials have been received by the Iowa Secretary of State's Office and appear to meet the requirements set forth by the Iowa Code. These plans are approved for use. A copy of the approved precinct ordinance is enclosed for your file. Please don't hesitate to contact our office if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Lance Kramer CC: Travis Weipert, Johnson County Auditor Phone 515-281-5204 Fax 515-242-5953 sos.iowa.gov sos@sos.iowa.gov sos.iowa.gov Prepared by: Eric Goers, City Attorney, 410 East Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5030 Ordinance number 21-4870 Ordinance amending section 1-9-3B of the Code of Ordinances of Iowa City, Iowa, establishing the boundaries of the voting precincts in Iowa City; and section 1-5-1, establishing the voting precincts that comprise the three city council districts in Iowa City. Section I. Purpose. The purpose of this amendment is to revise the voting precincts in Iowa City to reflect changes in population exhibited in the 2020 decennial census and to reflect changes as results of the reprecincting process. Section II. Amendment. 1. Section 1-9-3B of the Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by deleting said section and replacing it with the following: Section 1-9-3B. Boundaries of Precincts The area encompassed within the voting precincts shall be indicated as follows: Precinct 1: Beginning at the intersection of S Scott Boulevard and E Court Street, proceeding north along the centerline of Scott Boulevard to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to the intersection at N 1s' Avenue; south on N 1 s' Avenue to E Washington Street; east along E Washington Street to S Westminster Street; south along S Westminster Street to E Court Street; then east along E Court Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 2: Beginning at the intersection of Emerald Street and Melrose Avenue, proceeding west along Melrose Avenue to its intersection with Westgate Street; following Westgate Avenue south to the Keswick Drive; west along Keswick Drive, curving south, to the intersection of Keswick Drive and W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Teg Drive, thence south on Teg Drive and east along Aber Avenue to the intersection of Aber Avenue and Sunset Street; southeast along Sunset Street to the intersection at Highway 1 W; northeast along the centerline of the southwest -bound lanes on Highway 1 W to a point at the apparent intersection of the centerline of Weeber Street extended and Highway 1 W; northwest to the centerline at the easterly termination of Edingale Drive pavement, then southwest along Edingale Drive to its intersection with Weeber Street; north on Weeber Street to W Benton Street; east on W Benton Street to Oaknoll Drive; north along Oaknoll Drive to Oakcrest Street; west on Oakcrest Street to George Street; north along George Street to the point of apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; generally west along said Corporate Limits to their intersection with Sunset Street; south along Sunset Street to W Benton Street; west on W Benton Street to Emerald Street; north along Emerald Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 3: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 W and 1St Avenue, following 1St Avenue southwest towards the Iowa Interstate Railroad Bridge, then tracing the path of the Iowa Interstate Railroad generally southeast to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River; north along the western bank of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with W Iowa Avenue; west along W Iowa Avenue to S Riverside Drive/US Highway 6; thence generally northwest along S Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 to the point of beginning. Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 2 Precinct 4: From the point of beginning at the intersection N Dubuque Street and Foster Road, west along Foster Road to its terminus at Walker Circle; northeast following the northwest parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; northwest following the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision to the southern bank of the Iowa River, and continuing to the apparent intersection of said parcel line extended with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; generally south following the Corporate Limits to the point at which they intersect with Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 W; generally southeast along Riverside Drive/US Highway 6 W to W Iowa Avenue, then east along W Iowa Avenue to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with E Park Road; east on E Park Road to N Dubuque Street; generally north following the centerline of N Dubuque Street to a point approximately adjacent to the property 1032 N Dubuque Street, then generally north following the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 5: Beginning at the intersection of N Dubuque Street and E Park Road, west on E Park road to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River, thence southwest following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with W Iowa Avenue; west along W Iowa Avenue to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River; south along the western bank of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the eastbound lanes of W Burlington Street/Highway 1; east along the centerline of the eastbound lanes of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the CRANDIC Railroad; then east along the centerline of W Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the intersection with S Clinton Street; north along Clinton Street to Church Street, then continuing east on Church Street to its intersection with N Dubuque Street; then north on N Dubuque Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 6: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and 4th Avenue, south along 4th Avenue to F Street; west along F Street to its intersection with 5th Avenue, then following 5th Avenue south to I Street; east along I Street to 3rd Avenue; south on 3" Avenue to J Street; east on J Street to 2nd Avenue; south along 2nd Avenue to the extended centerline's apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; following the Iowa Interstate Railroad southeast to the point at which it crosses the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; north following the Corporate Limits to the point at which it intersects American Legion Road, east of the Silvercrest Way and American Legion Road intersection; then west along American Legion Road, continuing on Muscatine Avenue, to the point of beginning. Precinct 7: Beginning at the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Hawkeye Park Road, following Hawkeye Park Road to the north and east to it's terminus at the intersection with N Mormon Trek Boulevard; northeast along N Mormon Trek Boulevard to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad at City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally west-northwest to a point on Deer Creek Road SE, then continuing to follow the Corporate Limit boundary south, to its intersection with Melrose Avenue west of Slothower Road; then east on Melrose Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 8: Beginning at the intersection of Rohret Road and Mormon Trek Boulevard, following Rohret Road west to its apparent intersection with US Highway 218; northwest on US Highway 218 to its apparent intersection with Melrose Avenue; west along Melrose Avenue to the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits south, then generally east, to the apparent intersection of the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended, southwest of Mormon Trek Boulevard; then proceeding north, continuing on Mormon Trek Boulevard, to the point of beginning. Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 3 Precinct 9: Beginning at the intersection of N Mormon Trek Boulevard and Hawkeye Park Road, following Hawkeye Park Road generally west and south to its terminus at Melrose Ave; east along Melrose Avenue to Westwinds Drive; south on Westwinds Drive to Roberts Road; east along Roberts Road to Bartelt Road; generally north along Bartelt Road following the curve to Mormon Trek Boulevard; south along Mormon Trek Boulevard to a point that is approximately adjacent to the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Plaen View Drive, then continuing south along the centerline of Kitty Lee Road extended, and eventually tracing the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits generally south then east then north to the point at which the Corporate Limit boundary intersects Grace Drive; northwest following the western boundary of the Iowa City Municipal Airport parcel to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the southbound lanes of Highway 1 W; northeast following said centerline to Sunset Street; northwest along Sunset Street to Aber Avenue; west on Aber Avenue, then generally north on Teg Drive to W Benton Street; west along W Benton Street to Keswick Drive; north on Keswick Drive, following the curve, to Westgate Street; north on Westgate Street to Melrose Avenue; east on Melrose Avenue to its apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; following the Corporate Limits generally northeast to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest following the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Mormon Trek Boulevard; then south along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 10: Beginning at the intersection of Sycamore Street and Wetherby Drive, heading west along Wetherby Drive to Russell Drive; north on Russell Drive to Burns Avenue; west on Burns Avenue to Taylor Drive; north on Taylor Drive to Sandusky Drive; generally west on Sandusky Drive to Pepper Drive; following Pepper Drive south then generally west along its curve to the intersection with Sandusky Drive; northeast on Sandusky Drive to Keokuk Street; north on Keokuk Street to Southgate Avenue; west on Southgate Avenue to its apparent intersection with the CRAND1C Railroad; following the CRANDIC Railroad southwest to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits and then continuing along said limits generally south, then north, then east, to the point of apparent intersection of said limits with the centerline of the Iowa River; continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; then continuing east along said boundary line to the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits west of Soccer Park Road and then continuing along said limits generally north, then west to the point of apparent intersection of said limits and Sycamore Street, south of the intersection of Sycamore St and Langenberg Avenue; then north along Sycamore Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 11: Beginning at the intersection of E Burlington Street and S Linn Street, following E Burlington Street/Highway 1 west to its apparent intersection with the western bank of the Iowa River, continuing south along the western bank of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; west along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with Greenwood Drive; southwest along Greenwood Drive to W Benton Street; east along W Benton Street to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; south along the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with US Highway 6 E; following US Highway 6 E east to the intersection with S Gilbert Street; north along S Gilbert Street to its apparent intersection with Iowa Interstate Railroad; west, following the path of the Iowa Interstate Railroad, to its apparent intersection with the centerline of Ralston Creek; north along the centerline of Ralston Creek to its apparent intersection with E Prentiss Street; north from the center of the intersection of E Prentiss Street and S Linn Street to the point of beginning. Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 4 Precinct 12: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and Sycamore Street, south along Sycamore Street to the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City's Corporate Limits, then east to its intersection with the Sycamore Greenway Trail; following the Sycamore Greenway Trail north to its apparent intersection with the centerline of Whispering Meadow Drive extended; east along Whispering Meadow Drive to Whispering Prairie Avenue; north along Whispering Prairie Avenue to Lakeside Drive; northeast along Lakeside Drive to the centerline of the northwest bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E; northwest following said centerline of US Highway 6 E to the point of beginning. Precinct 13: Beginning at the intersection of W Benton Street and Weeber Street, south on Weeber Street to Edingale Drive; east along Edingale Drive to its terminus, then in a southeast trajectory to a point of intersection with the centerline of the southbound travel lanes of Highway 1 W; southwest along the centerline of the southbound travel lanes of Highway 1 W to Mormon Trek Boulevard; southeast along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of apparent intersection with the northern boundary of JJR Davis Fourth Addition, along the property line of the Iowa City Municipal Airport; east following the aforementioned property line to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits near Grace Drive; tracing the Corporate Limits, generally southeastern, to the apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad southwest of the intersection of Old Highway 218 and Mormon Trek Boulevard/McCollister Boulevard; northeast following the CRANDIC Railroad to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; generally north following the centerline of the Iowa River to its apparent intersection with W Benton Street; west along W Benton Street to Greenwood Drive; northeast along Greenwood Drive to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; northwest along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to the point of apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limits generally southwest to the apparent intersection with George Street; south along George Street to Oakcrest Street; east along Oakcrest Street to Oaknoll Drive; south along Oaknoll Drive to W Benton Street; then west on W Benton Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 14: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and S Gilbert Street, following the centerline of the northeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest to Plum Street, then following the centerline of the southeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest, to Sycamore Street; then following the centerline of the southeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E southwest to the intersection with Fairmeadows Boulevard; following Fairmeadows Boulevard to the northeast to Lower Muscatine Road; northwest along Lower Muscatine Road to S 15' Avenue; northeast along S 15' Avenue to the apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; following the Iowa Interstate Railroad generally northwest to its apparent intersection with S Gilbert Street; then south along S Gilbert Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 15: Beginning at the intersection of 420th Street and US Highway 6 SE, following the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits east and continuing to trace the boundary until the apparent intersection of the Corporate Limits with the Iowa Interstate Railroad, north of the terminus of Compass Drive; northwest along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S 15t Avenue; southwest along S 15' Avenue to Lower Muscatine Road; southeast along Lower Muscatine Road to Fairmeadows Boulevard; southwest along Fairmeadows Boulevard to the centerline of the northeast bound travel lanes of US Highway 6 E; southeast following said centerline to Industrial Park Road; southwest along the centerline of Industrial Park Road and continuing along the centerline of Lakeside Drive to Whispering Prairie Avenue; south on Whispering Prairie Avenue to Whispering Meadow Drive; west on Whispering Meadow Drive to a point at the approximate apparent intersection of the centerline of Whispering Meadow Drive extended and the Sycamore Greenway Trail; Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 5 south along the Sycamore Greenway Trail to the apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits; tracing the Corporate Limit boundary south to a point near Napoleon Street SE; continuing east along Napoleon Street SE to Sioux Avenue SE; north along Sioux Avenue SE until the apparent intersection with City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then continuing to trace the Corporate Limit boundary east to the point of beginning. Precinct 16: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, following E Court Street west to the intersection with Kenwood Drive; south on Kenwood Drive to Friendship Street; southwest on Friendship Street to Meadow Street; south on Meadow Street to Dover Street; south along Dover Street to its intersection with Muscatine Avenue; then east following Muscatine Avenue and continuing east on American Legion Road to the apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits back to the point of beginning. Precinct 17: Beginning at the intersection of E Washington Street and S Westminster Street, west along E Washington Street to N lst Avenue; north on N 1st Avenue to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to N 7th Avenue; south following N 7th Avenue to its intersection with Muscatine Avenue; southeast following Muscatine Avenue to Dover Street; north on Dover Street, and continuing north on Meadow Street to the intersection of Meadow Street and Friendship Street; northeast on Friendship Street to Kenwood Drive; north on Kenwood Drive to E Court Street; west on E Court Street to S Westminster Street; then north on Westminster Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 18: Beginning at the intersection of Muscatine Avenue and E Burlington Street, west along E Burlington Street to S Governor Street; south on S Governor Street to Bowery Street; west on Bowery Street to S Dodge Street; south on Dodge Street to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; southeast along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with 2nd Avenue; north on 2nd Avenue to J Street; west on J Street to 3rd Avenue; north on 3rd Avenue to I Street; west on I Street to 5th Avenue; north on 5th Avenue to F Street; east on F Street and continuing onto 4th Avenue to the intersection with Muscatine Avenue; then northwest along Muscatine Avenue to the point of beginning. Precinct 19: Beginning at the intersection of E Burlington Street/Highway 1 and S Van Buren Street, north on S Van Buren Street to E College Street; west on E College Street to S Linn Street; south on S Linn Street and continuing south along the centerline of Ralston Creek to its apparent intersection with the Iowa Interstate Railroad; generally east along the Iowa Interstate Railroad to its apparent intersection with S Dodge Street; north on S Dodge Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; then west on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 20: Beginning at the intersection of E Iowa Avenue and S Clinton Street, south on S Clinton Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Linn Street; north on S Linn Street to E College Street; east on E College Street to S Van Buren Street; south on S Van Buren Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street/Highway 1 to S Dodge Street/Highway 1; south along S Dodge Street to Bowery Street; east on Bowery Street to S Governor Street; north on S Governor Street to E Burlington Street/Highway 1; east on E Burlington Street to Muscatine Avenue; northwest on Muscatine Avenue to the centerline of the eastbound lane of E Iowa Avenue; then following the centerline of E Iowa Avenue to the point of beginning. Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 6 Precinct 21: Beginning at the intersection of Kimball Road and N Governor Street, generally southwest along Kimball Road to N Dubuque Street; south on N Dubuque Street to Church Street; west on Church Street and continuing south on N Clinton Street to the intersection with E Iowa Avenue; east on E Iowa Avenue to N Gilbert Street; north on N Gilbert Street to E Davenport Street; east on E Davenport Street to N Governor Street/Highway 1; north on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; then north- northwest on N Governor Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 22: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street and Kimball Road, south on N Governor Street to its intersection with N Dodge Street/Highway 1; northeast on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Summit Street/Prairie Du Chien Road; north along Prairie Du Chien Road to its apparent intersection with the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits; then tracing the Corporate Limits east to the apparent intersection with the East Lucas Township boundary line; continuing along said boundary line north, then west to the apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; then continuing south along the centerline of the Iowa River to the apparent intersection with the southwest parcel line of Outlot "A" of Oakmont Estates subdivision; southeast along the aforementioned parcel line to the point of intersection with the parcel line of lot 110 of the Peninsula Neighborhood Phase 2A subdivision; then southwest following said parcel line to the terminus of Foster Road at Walker Circle; generally east following the curvature of Foster Road to N Dubuque Street; south along the centerline of the southbound lanes of N Dubuque Street a point approximately adjacent to 1032 N Dubuque Street, then following the centerline of the northbound lanes of N Dubuque Street to the intersection with Kimball Road; then generally northeast along Kimball Road to the point of beginning. Precinct 23: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street/Highway 1 and E Bloomington Street, east on E Bloomington Street to Pleasant Street; south on Pleasant Street to Rochester Avenue; east on Rochester Avenue and continuing on to Herbert Hoover Highway to the apparent intersection with the Corporate Limits of Iowa City; following the Corporate Limits north and then west to the apparent intersection with Prairie Du Chien Road; south along Prairie Du Chien Road to N Dodge Street/Highway 1; southwest on N Dodge Street/Highway 1 to N Governor Street/Highway 1; then south on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Precinct 24: Beginning at the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and E Court Street, following the City of Iowa City Corporate Limits north to the intersection of Taft Avenue SE and Lower West Branch Road; continuing to follow the Corporate limits west to a point adjacent to Broadmoor Lane, then continuing along the Corporate Limits north and encompassing the area containing the Churchill Meadows subdivisions, then continuing along the Corporate Limits south to Lower West Branch Road; then following the Corporate Limits west and north to the apparent intersection with Herbert Hoover Highway; southwest along Herbert Hoover Highway to N Scott Boulevard; south on N Scott Boulevard to E Court Street; then east on E Court Street to the point of beginning. Precinct 25: Beginning at the intersection of N Governor Street/Highway 1 and E Davenport Street, west along E Davenport Street to N Gilbert Street; south on N Gilbert Street to E Iowa Avenue; east on E Iowa Avenue along the centerline of the eastbound lane to Muscatine Avenue; southeast on Muscatine Avenue to S 71h Avenue; north along S 7th Avenue to Rochester Avenue; west on Rochester Avenue to Pleasant Street; north on Pleasant Street to E Bloomington Street; then west on E Bloomington Street to N Governor Street/Highway 1; north on N Governor Street/Highway 1 to the point of beginning. Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 7 Precinct 26: Beginning at the intersection of Mormon Trek Boulevard and Bartelt Road, west along Bartelt Road to Roberts Road; west on Roberts Road to Westwinds Drive; north on Westwinds Drive to Melrose Avenue; west on Melrose Avenue to its apparent intersection with US Highway 218; southeast following US Highway 218 to its apparent intersection with Rohret Road; east along Rohret Road to Mormon Trek Boulevard; then north along Mormon Trek Boulevard to the point of beginning. Precinct 27: Beginning at the intersection of US Highway 6 E and Sycamore Street, west along US Highway 6 E to its apparent intersection with the centerline of the Iowa River; south following the centerline of the Iowa River to the point of apparent intersection with the CRANDIC Railroad; northeast following the CRANDIC Railroad to its apparent intersection of Southgate Avenue; east along Southgate Avenue to Keokuk Street; south on Keokuk Street to Sandusky Drive; southwest following the curve of Sandusky Drive to Pepper Drive; following Pepper Drive, east and then north, to the intersection with Sandusky Drive; east on Sandusky Drive to Taylor Drive; south on Taylor Drive to Burns Avenue; east on Burns Avenue to Russell Drive; south on Russell Drive to Wetherby Drive; east on Wetherby Drive to Sycamore Street; then north on Sycamore Street to the point of beginning. 2. Section 1-5-1 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adopting a new said section to read as follows: Section 1-5-1. City Council Districts There are hereby established in the City three (3) City Council Districts. The following voting precincts, as defined in Chapter 9 of this Title, shall comprise the three (3) City Council districts: A. City Council District A: Voting precincts 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 26, 27 B. City Council District B: Voting precincts 1, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24 C. City Council District C: Voting precincts 3, 4, 5, 11, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify these precinct and district boundaries to the Iowa Secretary of State. Section III. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section IV, Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinances shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section V. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective on January 15, 2022. Passed and approved this 14th day of December , 20 21, M a .(_-.1r) // Ordinance No. 21-4870 Page 8 Attes Approved by City Attor y's Office -12/14/21 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Salih Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: X Bergus X Mims x Salih X Taylor X Teague X Thomas x Weiner that the First Consideration 12/14/2021 Voteforpassage: AYES: Weiner, Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date puolished 01/14/2022, 01/21/2022, 01/28/2022 Moved byvMims,seconded by Taylor, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Item Number: 11. 1 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !kr4gi,'��� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT December 14, 2021 Ordinance amending Title 3, "Finance, Taxation and Fees" of the City Code to add a new Chapter, to establish the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 386, Code of Iowa; and providing for the establishment of an operation fund and the levy of an annual tax in connection therewith. Prepared By: Wendy Ford, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed By: Eric Goers, City Attorney Fiscal Impact: N/A Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation, Nov. 4, 2021 (7-0). Attachments: Petition Map Evaluative Report from P&Z chairperson Notice of Public Hearing Ordinance Executive Summary: The petition met the required threshold of signatures and was forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their review and recommendation. At its November 4, 2021 meeting, the Commission recommended approval (7-0). Background /Analysis: The purpose of the proposed South District SSMID shall be the undertaking of additional or enhanced services within the district and administration of work to benefit the property within the proposed South District SSMID which includes developing and managing business retention, attraction, marketing, special events and activities, making physical or other improvements designed to improve the image and appearance and hiring an Executive Director to execute the program of work. The City will continue the type and extent of governmental services currently provided and the work of the South District SS MI D will provide new and enhanced services. The maximum rate of tax which is requested to be levied annually for a period of 5 years shall not exceed $5.00 per $1,000.00 of taxable value of the property annually, in addition to all other taxes. The proposed levy shall be distributed to the operation fund. The SSMI D Board will be created and is intended to hire an executive director and direct the activities of the SSMID. The Board will consist of the following voting members: two from property owners or their representatives from a single property within the Proposed District that has an assessed value in excess of 1.0% of the total assessed value of property within the district boundaries; two from property owners or their representatives from a single property within the Proposed District that has an assessed value less than of 1.0% of the total assessed value of property within the district boundaries; two from business owners within the Proposed District that lease more than 3,000 square feet of commercial space; two from business owners within the Proposed District that lease less than 3,000 square feet of commercial space; two from residents of the South District Neighborhood Association; and one from the Pepperwood Plaza parking association. Board membership may also consist of up to four (4) other stakeholders of the Proposed District as voting members of the Board. Board membership may also include ex -officio non-voting members from community development agencies and partners, such as Black Voices Project, Johnson County Interfaith Coalition, LULAC, Iowa City Area Business Partnership, Iowa City Area Development Group, and the City of Iowa City. ATTACHMENTS: Description Petition Map Evaluative Report from P&Z Notice of Public Hearing Ordinance Correspondence to Council PETITION To establish the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) pursuant to Chapter 386 of the Code of Iowa. We, the undersigned, being owners of the property within the SSMID boundaries described herein, hereby petition the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 386 of the Code of Iowa (the "Act") as follows: 1. To establish by ordinance a Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa: a. The name of which shall be the "South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District" (herein referred to as the "Proposed District"), b. A description of boundaries and map of the Proposed District is attached hereto as Exhibit A. c. The purposes of which shall be the undertaking of actions authorized by the Act and the performance of administration, redevelopment, and revitalization of the Proposed District, as authorized by the Act, any and all of which actions and improvements are intended to benefit the property, businesses, and residents within the Proposed District, including, but not limited to, activities that expand the mix of businesses, increase consumer traffic, enhance beautification and landscaping, and expand civic opportunities within the district. 2. To establish an operation fund for the Proposed District and levy an annual tax (the "Operation Tax") upon the property defined in the Act (excluding property assessed as residential property for property tax purposes) at a maximum levy rate not to exceed five dollars ($5) per one thousand dollars ($1,000) assessed value for a period of five (5) years, commencing with the levy of taxes for collection in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 for the purpose of : (a) paying the administrative and operational expenses of the Proposed District, as defined and authorized in the Act, and (b) paying part or all of the maintenance expenses of "improvements" or "self-liquidating improvements" as defined in the Act with respect to the Proposed District. 3. It is the intent of this Petition that the operation taxes levied and collected on behalf of the Proposed District shall be expended for new, additional, or enhanced services within the Proposed District, and that the City shall not diminish the type and extent of governmental services currently provided. 4. This Petition is not requesting any amount of levy for either a Debt or Capital Fund. 5. To disburse annually all amounts collected in the Operation Fund, for one or more of the following purposes, at such times and under such conditions as shall be recommended to the City Council by a SSMID Advisory Board composed of an executive committee of a board of directors (as described in Section 6). a. Development and management of activities in support of marketing, business retention and attraction, including, but not limited to: i. Database establishment ii. Space referrals and assistance iii. Marketing activities, including media and advertising campaigns and communication materials iv. Miscellaneous business support services v. Establishment and promotion of special events, festivals, and activities vi. Support of urban design and policy development that would enhance the activities within the SSMID; b. Physical or other improvements designed to enhance the image and appearance of the Proposed District, including, but not limited to: i. Lighting Improvements ii. Seasonal and decorative enhancements iii. Signage and banners iv. Landscaping v. Central market development vi. Maintenance/Repairs; c. To hire an Executive Director and, if needed, other support staff who will work for a non-profit Board of Directors to manage the work of the South District SSMID Board and to fulfill the intent of this Petition. 6. It is the intent of this Petition that the City of Iowa City enter into an Operating Agreement with the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District Board (herein referred to as the "Board"). This Proposed Board will be formed and described in the Operating Agreement. All SSMID levy monies shall be appropriated to the Proposed Board for the management and operation of the District. From time to time, the City of Iowa City may provide additional revenue to the Board for the purposes of the management and operation of the District. a. The Board shall establish itself as a 501 (c)(6) non-profit organization. The Board of Directors will be established as described below after passage of the ordinance in order to effectuate an Operating Agreement with the City of Iowa City and establishment of its bylaws. Once the Operating Agreement is established, the receipt of the first SSMID levy reimbursement from the City shall commence. i. Board membership shall consist of voting members: 1. Two from property owners or their representatives from a single property within the Proposed District that has an assessed value in excess of 1.0% of the total assessed value of property within the district boundaries. 2. Two from property owners or their representatives from a single property within the Proposed District that has an assessed value less than 1.0% of the total assessed value of property within the district boundaries. 3. Two from business owners within the Proposed District that lease more than 3,000 square feet of commercial space. 4. Two from business owners within the Proposed District that lease less than 3,000 square feet of commercial space. 5. Two from residents of the South District Neighborhood Association. 6. One from the Pepperwood Plaza parking association. ii. Board membership may consist of up to four (4) other stakeholders of the Proposed District as voting members of the Board. iii. Board membership may consist of ex -officio non-voting members from community development agencies and partners, such as: 1. Black Voices Project; 2. Johnson County Interfaith Coalition; 3. LULAC; 4. Iowa City Area Business Partnership; 5. Iowa City Area Development Group; and 6. City of Iowa City. iv. Board membership shall include the Executive Director as an ex -officio non-voting Board member. v. It is the intent of this Petition that no revenues produced through property taxes imposed specifically for the Proposed District or tax increment financing revenues attributable to the operation tax levy on properties in the Proposed District shall be spent by the City Council without the approval of the Board. b. The initial Board shall be appointed by a diverse group of stakeholders that will include four (4) persons representing: 1. Southgate; 2. South District Neighborhood Association; 3. Multicultural Development Center of Iowa; and 4. MidwestOne Bank. 7. It is the further intent of this Petition that, notwithstanding the fact that the Proposed District is located within the boundaries of a Tax Increment Finance District which has been created by the City, an amount of funds which would be derived from the annual SSMID levy of the Operation Tax against property within the Proposed District if the Proposed District were not located within such Tax Increment Finance Districts shall be made available annually for the services, improvements, and activities set out in this Petition, and that the City should take all actions necessary to accomplish this purpose, including, if necessary, allocation to these services, improvements and activities of a portion of the incremental property taxes which are attributable to properties within the Proposed District. These allocations may be from the SSMID levy or other sources. EXHIBIT A South District SSMID 536 Plum St Euclid Ave 1602 1907 1629 Olympic Ct 545 1067 Southgate Ave 2018 1st 41,0 20182 2ndP 2018 2018 2018 Pepperwood Ln 1059 1055 1051 1049 1045 T fo ea 0 m 1956 2030 2030 1027 925 947 959 1030 1958 2003 2005 2103 2119 2051 2048 802 e 2050 806 a 820 845 2009 2011 N n 2018 This map is intended to serve as an aid in graphic representation only. This information is not warranted or accuracy or other purposes. 15 0 0.1 0.1 831 Cross Park Ave 2010 2020 I S , Ir , di 203 , ,m 44ibaN CITY OF IOWA CITY DESCRIPTION FOR SOUTH DISTRICT SSMID BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, PART OF BLOCK 2 BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY, IOWA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 20, IN THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, AND ITS NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF BROADWAY STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF BROADWAY STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROSS PARK AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENDED NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROSS PARK AVENUE, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 17, OF A PORTION OF BLOCK 1, BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 137 IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 17 AND LOT 16, OF SAID A PORTION OF BLOCK 1, BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY, IOWA, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 16 AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF KEOKUK STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF KEOKUK STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF BRAVERMAN CENTER, LOT 2 OF BLOCK 1 AND BLOCKS 5,6 AND 7, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 69 IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOCK 7 OF SAID BRAVERMAN CENTER; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8, BLOCK 7 OF BRAVERMAN CENTER AND ITS NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SOUTHGATE AVENUE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 60 FEET OF LOT 4 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 5 AND 6, BRAVERMAN CENTER, PARTS 1 AND 2, IOWA CITY, IOWA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 93 IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENDED LINE AND ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 60 FEET OF LOT 4 OF BLOCK 5 AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 OF BLOCK 5 OF SAID RESUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 5 AND 6, BRAVERMAN CENTER, PARTS 1 AND 2, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLYMPIC COURT; THENCE NORTH TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLYMPIC COURT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 OF BLOCK 5 OF SAID RESUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 5 AND 6, BRAVERMAN CENTER, PARTS 1 AND 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6 OF BLOCK 5 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 5 AND 6, BRAVERMAN CENTER, PARTS 1 AND 2; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6 OF BLOCK 5 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 5 AND 6, BRAVERMAN CENTER, PARTS 1 AND 2, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2020034, CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 64, PAGE 135 IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2020034 AND ITS NORTHERLY EXTENSION, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EAST BOUND LANE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.6; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF THE EAST BOUND LANE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 6, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF PART OF BLOCK 2, BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 20 IN SAID RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENDED LINE AND ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PART OF BLOCK 2, BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY, IOWA TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, PART OF BLOCK 2, BRAVERMAN CENTER, IOWA CITY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Owner(s) Name (Printed) Signature of Owner(s) or Authorized Representative Address of Property Assessed Value in Proposed SSMID South District SSMID Euclid Ave Southgate Ave Pepperwood Ln 925 947 1059 1055 1926 1051 m 1049 / / 1045 1027 1030 958 2018 2018 2103 2119 D 2018 This map is intended to serve as an aid in graphic representation only. This information is not warranted or accuracy or other purposes. 2048 802 820 2051 c 2050 806 a 1960 2009 2011 N Cross Park Ave 2010 2020 15 831 845 1037 1053 � __ CITY OF IOWA CITY 4: .....ifilv-,k,A,, MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Mike Hensch, Chair, Planning & Zoning Commission Date: November 5, 2021 Re: Evaluative Report on a Proposed South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) Council recently forwarded a petition by property owners within the South District, requesting the creation of the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) as defined by Iowa Code Chapter 386. To be considered by P&Z, the SSMID petition must be signed by at least 25% of the property owners (within the district) representing at least 25% of the assessed value of the proposed district. Staff confirmed the petition meets these two thresholds containing the signatures of 25% of the property owners representing 27.2% of the assessed value within the proposed district. Next, Iowa Code requires P&Z to review the petition for its merit and feasibility and make an evaluative report to the City Council. After the review at its meeting on November 4, 2021, the P&Z Commission recommended approval and forwarding this review to the City Council for their further consideration of the South District SSMID. The following is a review and our determination of the proposed South District SSMID's merit and feasibility. 1. Does the property in the proposed district meet all of the criteria established in Section 386.3(1)? • The South District Self Supported Municipal Improvement petition appears to meet the minimum requirements of Iowa Code Section 386.3(1), which states that a district shall: 1) be compromised of contiguous property, zoned for commercial or industrial uses and be located wholly within the boundaries of the city, 2) be given a descriptive name containing the words "self-supporting municipal improvement district", and 3) be comprised of property related in some manner. • The Proposed District is comprised of contiguous property zoned for commercial use and is within the boundaries of the City of Iowa City. The petition states that the Proposed District is entitled "South District Self Supported Municipal Improvement District. " Finally, the property within the Proposed District is related in that it is physically located in Iowa City, is contiguous, and serves as a commercial hub for the community. 2. Does the petition submitted is sufficiently clear and contains the requisite number of signatures from property owners representing the necessary assessed value of all the taxable property within the proposed district? November 8, 2021 Page 2 • The Proposed District petition provides detailed explanations of the proposed operations of the SSMID and the requirements of SSMID property owners. • Staff has reviewed the petition and verifies the signatures of at least twenty-five percent of all the owners of property within the proposed district have signed the petition, and that these signatures together represent ownership of property with an assessed value of at least twenty-five percent of the assessed value of all of the property in the proposed district per Iowa Code Section 386.3(2)(a). 3. Does the petition sufficiently describe the boundaries of the district or provide a consolidated description of the property contained therein? • The petition provides a legal description of the boundaries of the Proposed District, and a map indicating the parcels of land included within the Proposed District. 4. Is a maximum rate of tax that may be imposed upon the property within the district and the purposes for which it may be levied set forth? • The Proposed District petition establishes a maximum tax rate of $5 per $1,000 of assessed value. This meets the requirement of Iowa Code Section 386.3(2)(d). The petition states the purpose of the tax is to provide new, additional or enhanced services within the Proposed District. 5. Is the purpose of the district is adequately described, as well as any improvements or other project activities that may be the subject of the petition? • As stated in Item 4, the petition states that the purpose of the Proposed District is to provide for new, additional or enhanced services within the Proposed District. In particular, revenues collected for the Proposed District Operating Fund may be used for the following: o Development and management of activities in support of marketing, business retention and attraction, including, but not limited to database establishment, space referrals and assistance, marketing activities, including media and advertising campaigns and communication materials, miscellaneous business support services, establishment and promotion of special events, festivals, and activities, support of urban design and policy development that would enhance the activities within the SSMID. o Physical or other improvements designed to enhance the image and appearance of the Proposed District, including, but not limited to lighting improvements, seasonal and decorative enhancements, signage and banners, landscaping, central market development, and maintenance/repairs. November 8, 2021 Page 3 o To hire an Executive Director and, if needed, other support staff who will work for a non-profit Board of Directors to manage the work of the South District SSMID Board and to fulfill the intent of this Petition. 6. Does the proposed district or improvements conflict in any way with any existing laws, plans or City policies, including comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, local or regional development plans or programs, local, state or federal laws or regulations or other established special districts? • The operational functions and marketing that can occur under the Proposed District do not appear to conflict with any existing laws, plans or policies. • The Proposed District overlaps with the existing Highway 6 Commercial Urban Renewal Area, which sunsets in 2025. As proposed, the SSMID petition does not conflict with the goals or purposes of the Highway 6 Commercial Urban Renewal Area. • The proposed SSMID district falls into the newly established Highway Commercial Urban Revitalization Area which allows for a three-year 100% property tax exemption on eligible improvements to building value. Property owners continue to pay 100% of their tax bill on the original value. Tax exemptions through this program must be approved by City Council. • It is noted in the petition the intention that, notwithstanding the fact that a part of the proposed SSMID district is located within the Highway 6 Commercial TIF district, the amount of funds which would be derived from the annual SSMID levy from properties within the TIF district be made available annually for the SSMID activities and that the City take all actions necessary to accomplish this purpose, including the allocation of a portion of the incremental property taxes which are attributable to properties within the proposed district. 7. Are the taxes proposed sufficient to pay the anticipated costs or other expenses? • The revenue generated from the proposed SSMID would be approximately $104,000 per year. This amount would be sufficient to hire the Executive Director, and to cover costs associated with marketing campaigns, operational costs, and projects in the Proposed District. 8. Is the formation of the district is consistent with or in furtherance of other identifiable City policies or goals? • Iowa City's Comprehensive Plan notes the importance of thriving retail centers for sustaining residential neighborhoods and employment centers. Neighborhood commercial areas can provide a focal point and gathering place and be within convenient walking distance for the residents in the immediate area. November 8, 2021 Page 4 • The South District Plan states a goal to encourage and support residents, neighborhood organizations, and business and property owners to advocate for the continued improvement of Southside neighborhoods in keeping with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically noted is a goal to improve aesthetic appearance of commercial areas along Highway 6 and other commercial streets within the district. • The Proposed District petition states that one of the purposes of the SSMID is to provide physical enhancements, or beautification, to improve the image and appearance of the Proposed District. The review by the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the petition meets the requirements of Iowa Code Chapter 386, and that: • the operational activities (as defined in Iowa Code Section 386.8) of the Proposed District are appropriate in relation to existing laws, plans and policies, and • that the means to implement the proposal appear reasonably calculated to accomplish the Proposed District objectives. Notice of public hearing Notice of public hearing by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, considering a petition to establish a self -supported municipal improvement district within the City of Iowa City, Iowa Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at 6:00 p.m., on December 14, 2021 in The Center, 22 S. Linn Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk; at which hearing the Council will consider the creation of a Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District within the city limits. Pursuant to Chapter 386 of the Code of Iowa, herein "Act", a Petition has been filed with the City Council requesting that the City establish a Self -Supported Improvement District as contemplated by Chapter 386 of the Code. The name of the proposed District shall be the "South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District". The property to be included in the proposed South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) is located within the Pepperwood Plaza area, and currently zoned CC -2 and CI -1, generally south of Highway 6 West, north of Cross Park Avenue, along both sides of Keokuk Street and west of Broadway St, excepting Casey's, which is also included. Said property is legally described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of lot 1, part of block 2 Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat recorded in plat book 7, page 20, in the Records of the Johnson county recorder's office; Thence northwesterly along the southerly line of said lot 1, and its northwesterly extension to a point on the centerline of Broadway Street; Thence south along said centerline of Broadway Street to its intersection with The easterly extension of the northerly right-of-way line of cross park avenue; Thence west along said easterly extended northerly right-of-way line and Along the northerly right-of-way line of cross park avenue, to the southeast corner of lot 17, of a portion of block 1, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in plat book 31, page 137 in said recorder's office; Thence north along the east line of lot 17 and lot 16, of said a portion of block 1, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, to the northeast corner of said lot 16; Thence west along the northerly line of said lot 16 and its westerly extension to Its intersection with the centerline of Keokuk Street; Thence north along said centerline of Keokuk Street to its intersection with the South line of Braverman Center, lot 2 of block 1 and blocks 5,6 and 7, according to The plat recorded in plat book 8, page 69 in said recorder's office; Thence west along said south line to the southwest corner of lot 8, block 7 of said Braverman Center; Thence north along the west line of said lot 8, block 7 of Braverman Center and its northerly extension to the centerline of Southgate Avenue; Thence west along said centerline of Southgate Avenue to its intersection with the southerly extension of the east line of the west 60 feet of lot 4 of block 5 of The resubdivision of portions of blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2, Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat recorded in plat book 19, page 93 in said Recorder's office; Thence north along said southerly extended line and along said east line of the West 60 feet of lot 4 of block 5 and along the west line of lot 5 of block 5 of said Resubdivision of portions of blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2, to its Intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of Olympic court; Thence north to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of Olympic court, said Point being on the west line of lot 6 of block 5 of said resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2; Thence north along the west line of said lot 6 of block 5 to the northwest corner Of said lot 6 of block 5 of the resubdivision of portions of blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2; Thence east along the north line of said lot 6 of block 5 of the resubdivision of portions of blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2, to its intersection With the west line of auditor's parcel 2020034, City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in plat book 64, page 135 in said recorder's Office; Thence north along said west line of auditor's parcel 2020034 and its northerly extension, to its intersection with the centerline of the east bound lane of U.S. Highway 6; Thence southeasterly, along said centerline of the east bound lane of U.S. Highway 6, to its intersection with the northerly extension of the east line of part of block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat Recorded in plat book 7, page 20 in said recorder's office; Thence south along said northerly extended line and along said east line of part of block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa to the southeast corner of lot 1, Part of block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City to the point of beginning. The purposes of the proposed South District SSMID shall be the undertaking of actions authorized by the Act and include, additional or enhanced services within the district and administration of operational expenses for actions intended to benefit the property within the proposed South District SSMID which include developing and managing business retention, attraction, marketing, special events and activities, making physical or other improvements designed to improve the image and appearance and hiring an Executive Director to execute the program of work. The City will continue the type and extent of governmental services currently provided and the work of the South District SSMID will provide new and enhanced services. The maximum rate of tax which is requested to be imposed and to be levied annually shall not exceed $5.00 per $1,000.00 of taxable value of the "property' in any one year in addition to all other taxes. The proposed levy shall be distributed to the operation fund. All residents may appear and be given an opportunity to express their views for or against the proposed establishment of a self -supported municipal improvement district. Copies of the proposed ordinance and a map of the proposed Iowa City Downtown SSMID area are on file for public examination in the office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged to appear at the above-mentioned time and place. Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Kellie Fruehling From: Dorothy Whiston <dorothy.whiston@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 5:21 PM To: *City Council Subject: Southside Business Revitalization efforts Late Handouts Distributed 2 - (Date) 3 - Dear Council members, I hope you will support the Southside business revitalization efforts through the SSMID they are proposing. I think this is an incredibly creative and intelligent initiative and that the effects of implementing the SSMID would be far reaching and long lasting, to the benefit of the Southside and all of Iowa City. Again, I hope you will give your full support to this project. Thanks for all you do! Dorothy Whiston Dorothy Whiston, D. Min. Interfaith Chaplain, Inside Out Reentry Community Spiritual Director, Soul Friends Ministry 319-321-7920 dorothy.whiston@gmall.com "Life is this simple: we are living in a world that is absolutely transparent and the divine is shining through it all the time." — Thomas Merton Kellie Fruehling -il From: Susan Blanchard <gigiblanchard15@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 6:49 PM To: *City Council Subject: South Disrict SSMID Dear Council, Late Handouts Distributed 12 - 1 3-2 t (Date) This is what we need on our side of town. For locals its a way to revitalize our neighborhoods and promote local entrepreneurs. We can invest in , support and build these businesses. Please give us hope and a way to make Southeast Iowa City as vital as the rest of the community. Thanks for your support. Susan Blanchard 2801 HWY 6E, lot 362 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Elizabeth Liddle <ELiddle@midwestone.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 11:26 AM To: *City Council Subject: South District SSMID To City Council members, Late Handouts Distributed 12 -1 —ZI (Date) Thank you for your time and review of the South District SSMID proposal. I represent MidWestOne Bank and we are in full support of this proposal. MidWestOne Bank has had a long standing commitment to serving this neighborhood. There are several things that excite me about the SSMID. Specifically, bringing our community together and uplifting one another. The ability to increase foot traffic and attract new businesses to the neighborhood are key to each of our unique businesses success. I so admire this community and am able to see on a daily basis the impact this SSMID could have. If the last two years have taught me anything, it is that we are stronger together. This South District SSMID would make that collaboration a reality and bring positive attention. We are asking for your support in this proposal. Thank you for your consideration, Liz Liddle ELIZABETH LIDDLE RETAIL MANAGING OFFICER NMLS ID 1754594 Direct: 319.356.5817 Phone: 800.247.4418 Fax: 319.356.5849 1906 Keokuk Street Iowa City, IA 52240 MidWestOne SW Bank. MidWestOne.bank IMPORTANT: This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy your copy. Thank you. Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: V Fixmer-Oraiz <vfixmeroraiz@astigplanning.com> Friday, December 10, 2021 3:20 PM *City Council Astig Planning- Support for the South District SSMID comment Late Handouts Distributed (Date) Hello City Council Members and staff, As the CEO and Founder of Astig Planning, an Iowa City -based planning firm located in the proposed South District SSMID area, I want to officially offer my full endorsement of this plan in writing. The South District SSMID would be a huge boost to the commercial area and begin to reflect the vibrant and diverse neighborhood that surrounds it. I have had the honor and privilege of being a commercial neighbor and hosting community engagement and outreach activities in this area has shown me just how incredible the South District is. There is so much going on and having a SSMID would only accelerate and compliment the hard work and fun that is happening here. I also think it's important to build up a physical space where people can potentially see other small businesses run by BIPOC individuals that are serving their communities. I hope you see the benefit of building up another strong commercial hub in Iowa City, one that truly reflects and supports the diverse communities in this town. Sincerely, V V Fixmer-Oraiz, AICP (they, she, siya) CEO & Founder 319.243.3426 astigplanning.com 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Temple Hiatt <templehiatt@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 9:55 PM To: *City Council Subject: SDNA SSMID Late Handouts Distributed i2-l�-Zl (Date) Dear City Council, I am a volunteer with the local group of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America. Our group has frequently supported efforts in the South District Neighborhood Association to include the annual team up to clean up, fundraising for the art mural, and the diversity market. All of these efforts, including the SDNA SSMID, contribute to a concept called Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. As a south district resident of Iowa City for more than 40 years, I support these Business Revitalization efforts spearheaded by the SDNA. Sincerely, Temple Hiatt, Iowa City, IA https://evervtownsupportfund.orWreport/crime-prevention-through-environmental-designf 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Barbara Anderson <gretlmam@hotmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 2:28 PM *City Council YOUR SUPPORT OF THE SOUTH DISTRICT SSMID at your City Council Meeting, December 14, 2021 Late Handouts Distributed Dear Iowa City Council Members, (Date) I strongly believe each and every one of you should vote for the South District SSMID which will bring vital and meaningful growth to current and new businesses as well as provide a much-needed haven for community involvement, interaction, and a sense of well-being not only for residents of the South District but for our entire City and beyond. Patterned after the successful SSMID of the Iowa City Downtown District, this economic tool will greatly benefit businesses and the community of the South District beyond the basic municipal services the City will still provide. I have volunteered for the South District for almost two years now, and after living in Ilinois, Colorado, and Los Angeles, have never been part of a more vibrant, energetic, goal -oriented community as the South District. Hats off to Angie Jordan and the Leadership Committee and to our many allies and volunteers who have worked countless hours in making the South District a real neighborhood with so many meaningful happenings. Residents of this community and beyond have flocked to our many events: the huge mural ribbon cutting, the drive-through turkey dinner during the Pandemic, the beautiful success of our Spring Clean Up Saturday, and the amazing success of our summer long Diversity Markets. I witnessed most of these markets and it was a joy to see the expressions of people as they leisurely strolled along between the many vendors offering home cooked food, unique art, delightful music, the Children's Museum, and more. Clearly, there was great comradery at this neighborhood summer adventure both in seeing small businesses do well, and the overall enjoyment we had being part of this market scene. Now imagine Pepperwood Plaza, Vital and Lively year around ! People milling around a renovated plaza, eating at the outdoor cafes of new restaurants, listening to music by a fountain, meeting friends for coffee at a diner or a coffee shop, buying socks and jeans at a retail shop and more! This grand intersection of businesses and community will thrive and help the business owners of the South District as they have helped those businesses in our Downtown District. The monies to help with this expansion and business growth come from the South District 1 businesses themselves. They believe in themselves, in their ability to grow and succeed even more, and in doing so provide for not only a stable economic environment but provide meaningful interaction, fun, and a joyful community that benefits us all. I implore you, the Iowa City Council to recognize the value the South District SSMID brings to the Community, to the entire city of Iowa City, and vote YES on establishing the South District SSMID. Thank you so much! All the best, Barbara D. Anderson South District Ally 2 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: James Pobst <simulacraj@gmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 2:53 PM *City Council My support for the South District SSMID petition Late Handouts Distributed —lam "Z1 (Date) Hello, I am an Iowa City resident and I am writing the City Council to offer my strong support for the SSMID proposal to revitalize the Pepperwood Plaza and adjacent areas for the benefit of local and city-wide residents. I live nearby in Bon Aire, and can't tell you how many times I've driven by or biked by the Pepperwood area along Hwy 6 and thought to myself how depressing/sad it is that most people only know this area for the Taco Bell, a bank, and the post office, and have no idea of the diversity of local business ventures in the surrounding residential area. In a recent community discussion at Film Scene (part of the Witching Hour events), it was shared with me how many local businesses could benefit from having their own storefronts in Pepperwood, instead of having to be run out of their own homes. Having the plazas fill up with local business would also be a visible sign of how the City supports efforts at a local economy based on cultural diversity. For the benefit of local residents, please support this petition for funding and other support to revitalize Pepperwood, by the South District Neighborhood Association. I think this would be a win for everybody involved - residents, tourists, and commuters. If possible, I plan to also show up at the public hearing tomorrow night. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James H Pobst P.S. I can also be reached atjames.pobst@pearson.com 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Carrie Z. Norton <czn46@hotmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 3:47 PM *City Council Support for the Southside SSMID Late Handouts Distributed (Date) As a long serving member of the Shelter House Board of Directors and Immediate Past President, I am delighted to express our organization's support of the SSMID proposal before City Council. At our recent Board of Directors meeting, the Board was unanimous in its support of our Executive Director signing the South District Self -Supporting Municipal Improvement District Petition, which includes the Housing First project Cross Park Place that we own and operate at 820 Cross Park Avenue and near our other properties located at 429 Southgate Avenue (Emergency Shelter), and 501 Southgate Avenue (a new and additional Housing First program, the 501 Project). Shelter House continues to invest in the neighborhoods in which we operate. And our South District neighbors have continued to support our work and expanding housing services at Cross Park Place. We have invested staff time in development of this SSMID district and will continue to support its success and formation as it grows. This proposed SSMID district will enhance important efforts throughout the South District, including the wayfinding, retail recruitment and retention, pedestrian connects, special projects, events, and other improved neighborhood access for all residents. The Board of Directors of Shelter House urges you to support this initiative and invest in its success. And on a personal note, as a southeast Iowa Citian, I totally applaud the enrichment of my neighborhood and another step toward becoming a "destination"! Carrie Z. Norton Immediate Past President Shelter House Board of Directors 1 fit- Wendy Ford, Ec. Dev. Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5248 Ordinance No.: Ordinance amending Title 3, "Finance, Taxation and Fees" of the City Code to add a new Chapter, to establish the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 386, Code of Iowa; and providing for the establishment of an operation fund and the levy of an annual tax in connection therewith. Whereas, the City of Iowa City is authorized by Chapter 386, Code of Iowa (the "Act") to create a self -supported municipal improvement district in the City, to provide for the existence and operation of such district, to provide for the maintenance of improvements or self-liquidating improvements for such district, and to levy taxes with respect to such district, all as more specifically defined in the Act; and Whereas, a petition (the "Petition") was filed with the City Clerk on October 11, 2021, pursuant to the Act petitioning the City Council to create the South District SSMID (the "Proposed District") to establish an operation fund with respect to the Proposed District, and to levy an annual tax for such fund for a period of five years, all for the purpose of paying the operational expenses of the Proposed District; and Whereas, the Petition is in compliance with the provisions of the Act; and Whereas, on October 19, 2021, the City Council received the Petition and referred it to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission for review in accordance with the Act; and Whereas, on November 16, 2021 the City Council received the report of the City's Planning and Zoning Commission on the merit and feasibility of the Proposed District; and Whereas, on November 16, 2021, the City Council scheduled a public hearing for December 14, 2021, at 6:00 P.M., at which it proposed to take action for the establishment of the Proposed District, and did direct that notice of such hearing be given in accordance with the Act; and Whereas, notice of the hearing was published in the Iowa City Press Citizen on November 22, 2021, and a copy of such notice was mailed by certified mail on November 20, 2021 to all the owners of record of real property located within the Proposed District as shown by the records of the Johnson County Auditor, in satisfaction of the notice requirements of the Act; and Whereas, at the aforementioned time and place, the City Council did meet and hear all owners of property in the Proposed District and residents of the City desiring to express their views with respect to the establishment of the Proposed District; and Whereas, on December 14, 2021, the City Council closed the public hearing on the creation of the Proposed District and found that the Petition and the Proposed District satisfied the applicable requirements imposed by the Act; and Whereas, prior to adoption of this ordinance, more than thirty days will have passed since the public hearing on the creation of the Proposed District was closed, and a petition containing the requisite number of signatures that would require the matter to be withdrawn from Council consideration has not been filed with the City Clerk opposing the creation of the Proposed District. Now therefore, be it ordained, by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, Section I. That a new Chapter 8 entitled "South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District" shall be added to Title 3, "Finances, Taxation and Fees" of the City Code, as follows: 1. In accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 386 ("the Act") there is hereby established and created in the City of Iowa City, a self -supported municipal improvement district as defined in the Act, the name of which shall be the "South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District" (herein the "South District SSMID"), 2. The South District SSMID shall include all property within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 1, part of Block 2 Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 7, page 20, in the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's office; Thence northwesterly along the southerly line of said Lot 1, and its northwesterly extension to a point on the centerline of Broadway Street; Thence south along said centerline of Broadway Street to its intersection with the easterly extension of the northerly right-of-way line of Cross Park Avenue; Thence west along said easterly extended northerly right-of-way line and along the northerly right-of-way line of Cross Park Avenue, to the southeast corner of Lot 17, of a portion of Block 1, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 137 in said Recorder's office; Thence north along the east line of Lot 17 and Lot 16, of said a portion of Block 1, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, to the northeast corner of said Lot 16; Thence west along the northerly line of said Lot 16 and its westerly extension to its intersection with the centerline of Keokuk Street; Thence north along said centerline of Keokuk Street to its intersection with the South line of Braverman Center, Lot 2 of Block 1 and Blocks 5, 6 and 7, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 69 in said Recorder's office; Thence west along said south line to the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 7 of said Braverman Center; Thence north along the west line of said Lot 8, Block 7 of Braverman Center and its northerly extension to the centerline of Southgate Avenue; Thence west along said centerline of Southgate Avenue to its intersection with the southerly extension of the east line of the west 60 feet of Lot 4 of Block 5 of the resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, Parts 1 and 2, Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 19, Page 93 in said Recorder's office; Thence north along said southerly extended line and along said east line of the West 60 feet of Lot 4 of Block 5 and along the west line of Lot 5 of Block 5 of said resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, Parts 1 and 2, to its intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of Olympic Court; Thence north to a point on the northerly right- of-way line of Olympic Court, said point being on the west line of Lot 6 of Block 5 of said resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, parts 1 and 2; Thence north along the west line of said Lot 6 of Block 5 to the northwest corner of said Lot 6 of Block 5 of the resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, Parts 1 and 2; Thence east along the north line of said Lot 6 of Block 5 of the resubdivision of portions of Blocks 5 and 6, Braverman Center, Parts 1 and 2, to its intersection with the west line of Auditor's Parcel 2020034, City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 64, page 135 in said Recorder's Office; Thence north along said west line of Auditor's Parcel 2020034 and its northerly extension, to its intersection with the centerline of the east bound lane of U.S. Highway 6; Thence southeasterly, along said centerline of the east bound lane of U.S. Highway 6, to its intersection with the northerly extension of the east line of part of Block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 20 in said Recorder's office; Thence south along said northerly extended line and along said east line of part of Block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City, Iowa to the southeast corner of Lot 1, Part of Block 2, Braverman Center, Iowa City to the point of beginning. 3. It is hereby found and determined that all property within the South District SSMID is similarly related so that the present and potential use or enjoyment of the property is benefitted by the condition, performance of administration, redevelopment, revitalization and maintenance of the South District SSMID and the owners of property in the South District SSMID have a present and potential benefit from the condition, performance of administration, redevelopment, revitalization and maintenance of the South District SSMID. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, there is hereby established and created a self - supported municipal improvement district operation fund with respect to the South District SSMID to be known as the "South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District Operation Fund" (herein the "Operation Fund"), for which the City may certify taxes, against the property within the South District SSMID, to the extent allowed by the Act, each year (the "Operation Tax"), in addition to all other taxes, commencing with the levy of taxes for collection in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 for the purposes of paying the administrative and operational expenses of the district, as defined and authorized in the Act and this Ordinance, or paying part or all of the maintenance expenses of "improvements" or "self-liquidating improvements", as defined in the Act, for a period of five (5) years. 5. The City may disburse the amounts in the Operation Fund to a South District SSMID Advisory Board, pursuant to an agreement between the City and said Board ("Operating Agreement"), for one or more of the following purposes: A. Develop and manage activities in support of marketing, business retention and attraction, including but not limited to: 1. Database establishment; 2. Space referrals and assistance; 3. Marketing activities, including media and advertising campaigns and communication materials; 4. Miscellaneous business support services; 5. Establishment and promotion of special events, festivals, and activities; and 6. Support of urban design and policy development that would enhance the activities within the South District SSMID. B. Physical or other improvements designed to enhance the image and appearance of the South District, including but not limited to: 1. Lighting improvements; 2. Seasonal and decorative enhancements; 3. Signage and banners; 4. Landscaping; 5. Central market development; and 6. Maintenance and repairs. C. Hire an Executive Director and other support staff, as may be necessary, who will work for the Advisory Board to manage the work of the South District SSMID and to fulfill the purposes of the district. 6. The rate of the Operation Tax to be levied annually, in addition to all other taxes, as aforesaid, shall not exceed a rate of five dollars ($5) per one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, commencing with the levy of taxes for collection in the five fiscal years. Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication. Passed and approved this day of , 20 . Attest City Clerk Mayor Approved by G City Attorney' Office — 1 2/08/2021 Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: First Consideration 12/14/2021 Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Vote for passage: AYES: Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner, Mims. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Bergus. Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date published Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Nick Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@thinkiowacity.com> Monday, November 29, 2021 11:15 AM *City Council Support for the South District Neighborhood SSMID Dear City Councilors: On behalf of Think Iowa City, the Iowa City/Coralville Area Convention & Visitors Bureau, I am writing to express support for the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) petition. Angie Jordan and her team have established a fantastic plan that will not only improve the quality of life in the South District Neighborhood, but will make it a destination for others throughout Johnson County and beyond. We have seen what a SSMID can do first hand with the development of the Iowa City Downtown District. Our downtown is the envy of similar cities throughout the nation. I have no doubts that the SSMID can bring great success to the South District Neighborhood and the businesses within. Thank you for your consideration. Nick Pkille. r - Vice President of Marketing & Communications Think is,,Ya C':7 - The !ow it Cor a vii e Area i invention & Visitors. S+u ecu Pfeiffer4ThinklowaCitv.com 7,37-6592 — THINK IOWA CITY A COLLECT'ON CURIOUS COMMUNITIES THINKIOWACITY.COM Kellie Fruehling From: Stacey Houseman [CVB] <stacey@thinkiowacity.com> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 11:50 AM To: *City Council Subject: Letter of support for South District SSMID Attachments: We sent you safe versions of your files; CVB Support Letter - South District SSMID - Council Email.docx Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Iowa City Council, Please see attached letter of support from Josh Schamberger, President of Think Iowa City — Iowa City/Coralville Convention & Visitors Bureau for the South District SSMID. Thank You Stacey Houseman Executive Assistant & Special Projects Manager Think Iowa City - Iowa sity/Co; aiville Area Convention & Visitors Bureau stacev(a7thinkiowacitv.com j i.319) 337-5-592 ?•:). Ist Avenue. Heiden Fv A 1 Co;aMile, LA 5224'1 --- THINK IOWA CITY A COLLECTION - CURIOUS COMMUNITIES THINKIOWACITY.COM I AL GIFT CARD LTR= 1 r1OWA CITY COLLECTION CURIOUS COMMUNITIES November 29, 2021 City of Iowa City City Councilors RE: Support for the South District Neighborhood SSMID Dear City Councilors: On behalf of Think Iowa City, the Iowa City/Coralville Area Convention & Visitors Bureau, I am writing to express support for the South District Self -Supported Municipal Improvement District (SSMID) petition. Angie Jordan and her team have established a fantastic plan that will not only improve the quality of life in the South District Neighborhood, but will make it a destination for others throughout Johnson County and beyond. We have seen what a SSMID can do first hand with the development of the Iowa City Downtown District. Our downtown is the envy of similar cities throughout the nation. I have no doubts that the SSMID can bring great success to the South District Neighborhood and the businesses within. Thank you for your consideration_ Warm regards, c,-41,LTh Josh Schamberger, President Think Iowa City — The Iowa City/Coralville Area Convention & Visitors Bureau Kellie Fruehling From: Kristie Doser <kristie@dvipiowa.org> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 10:49 AM To: *City Council Subject: South District SSMID RISK'r., Good Day - As one of the businesses located in the proposed South District SSMID, I want to share our support for passing the SSMID. So much positive work has been done to create a more collaborative and expansive South District community, the SSMID is the next step in improving the quality of life for SE community members and businesses. As a non-profit organization, our clients rely on community support from neighbors and businesses on the SE side of town. A larger, more targeted vision for the South District will benefit our entire community. I encourage you to pass the South District SSMID. Thank ou for our time and consideration of this matter. "Kristie kristie@dvipiowa.org 319-356-9863 ext. 2 Cell: 319-382-2003 Kristie Fortmann-Doser, Executive Director Domestic Violence Intervention Program Pronouns: she, her, hers : What's this? When considering your and others' safety, please be aware that E-mail is not considered a confidential method of communication. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. This e-mail (including attachments) is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. Please reply to the sender that you received this message in error, then delete it. Thank you! Kellie Fruehling From: Dorothy Whiston <dorothy.whiston@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 5:21 PM To: *City Council Subject: Southside Business Revitalization efforts Late Handouts Distributed 12 -►3-21 (Date) Dear Council members, I hope you will support the Southside business revitalization efforts through the SSMID they are proposing. I think this is an incredibly creative and intelligent initiative and that the effects of implementing the SSMID would be far reaching and long lasting, to the benefit of the Southside and all of Iowa City. Again, I hope you will give your full support to this project. Thanks for all you do! Dorothy Whiston Dorothy Whiston, D. Min. Interfaith Chaplain, Inside Out Reentry Community Spiritual Director, Soul Friends Ministry 319-321-7920 dorothy.whistan@qmail.com "Life is this simple: we are living in a world that is absolutely transparent and the divine is shining through it all the time." — Thomas Merton -il Kellie Fruehling From: Susan Blanchard <gigiblanchard15@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 6:49 PM To: *City Council Subject: South Disrict SSMID Dear Council, Late Handouts Distributed 12 - 13-2 t (Date) This is what we need on our side of town. For locals its a way to revitalize our neighborhoods and promote local entrepreneurs. We can invest in , support and build these businesses. Please give us hope and a way to make Southeast Iowa City as vital as the rest of the community. Thanks for your support. Susan Blanchard 2801 HWY 6E, lot 362 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 1 Kellie Fruehlinq From: Elizabeth Liddle <ELiddle@midwestone.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 11:26 AM To: *City Council Subject: South District SSMID To City Council members, Late Handouts Distributed 12 -1 —ZI (Date) Thank you for your time and review of the South District SSMID proposal. I represent MidWestOne Bank and we are in full support of this proposal. MidWestOne Bank has had a long standing commitment to serving this neighborhood. There are several things that excite me about the SSMID. Specifically, bringing our community together and uplifting one another. The ability to increase foot traffic and attract new businesses to the neighborhood are key to each of our unique businesses success. I so admire this community and am able to see on a daily basis the impact this SSMID could have. If the last two years have taught me anything, it is that we are stronger together. This South District SSMID would make that collaboration a reality and bring positive attention. We are asking for your support in this proposal. Thank you for your consideration, Liz Liddle ELIZABETH LIDDLE RETAIL MANAGING OFFICER NMLS ID 1754594 Direct: 319.356.5817 Phone: 800.247.4418 Fax: 319.356.5849 1906 Keokuk Street Iowa City, IA 52240 MidWestOne TM• Bank. MidWestOne.bank IMPORTANT: This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy your copy. Thank you. 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: V Fixmer-Oraiz <vfixmeroraiz@astigplanning.com> Friday, December 10, 2021 3:20 PM *City Council Astig Planning- Support for the South District SSMID comment Late Handouts Distributed 12-13—L� (Date) Hello City Council Members and staff, As the CEO and Founder of Astig Planning, an Iowa City -based planning firm located in the proposed South District SSMID area, I want to officially offer my full endorsement of this plan in writing. The South District SSMID would be a huge boost to the commercial area and begin to reflect the vibrant and diverse neighborhood that surrounds it. I have had the honor and privilege of being a commercial neighbor and hosting community engagement and outreach activities in this area has shown me just how incredible the South District is. There is so much going on and having a SSMID would only accelerate and compliment the hard work and fun that is happening here. I also think it's important to build up a physical space where people can potentially see other small businesses run by BIPOC individuals that are serving their communities. I hope you see the benefit of building up another strong commercial hub in Iowa City, one that truly reflects and supports the diverse communities in this town. Sincerely, V V Fixmer-Oraiz, AICP (they, she, siya) CEO & Founder 319.243.3426 astigplanning.com 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Temple Hiatt <templehiatt@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 9:55 PM To: *City Council Subject: SDNA SSMID Late Handouts Distributed i2-l�-Zl (Date) Dear City Council, I am a volunteer with the local group of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America. Our group has frequently supported efforts in the South District Neighborhood Association to include the annual team up to clean up, fundraising for the art mural, and the diversity market. All of these efforts, including the SDNA SSMID, contribute to a concept called Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. As a south district resident of Iowa City for more than 40 years, I support these Business Revitalization efforts spearheaded by the SDNA. Sincerely, Temple Hiatt, Iowa City, IA https://everytownsupportfund.orglreporticrime-prevention-through-environmental-design! 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Barbara Anderson <gretlmam@hotmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 2:28 PM *City Council YOUR SUPPORT OF THE SOUTH DISTRICT SSMID at your City Council Meeting, December 14, 2021 Late Handouts Distributed Dear Iowa City Council Members, (Date) I strongly believe each and every one of you should vote for the South District SSMID which will bring vital and meaningful growth to current and new businesses as well as provide a much-needed haven for community involvement, interaction, and a sense of well-being not only for residents of the South District but for our entire City and beyond. Patterned after the successful SSMID of the Iowa City Downtown District, this economic tool will greatly benefit businesses and the community of the South District beyond the basic municipal services the City will still provide. I have volunteered for the South District for almost two years now, and after living in Ilinois, Colorado, and Los Angeles, have never been part of a more vibrant, energetic, goal -oriented community as the South District. Hats off to Angie Jordan and the Leadership Committee and to our many allies and volunteers who have worked countless hours in making the South District a real neighborhood with so many meaningful happenings. Residents of this community and beyond have flocked to our many events: the huge mural ribbon cutting, the drive-through turkey dinner during the Pandemic, the beautiful success of our Spring Clean Up Saturday, and the amazing success of our summer long Diversity Markets. I witnessed most of these markets and it was a joy to see the expressions of people as they leisurely strolled along between the many vendors offering home cooked food, unique art, delightful music, the Children's Museum, and more. Clearly, there was great comradery at this neighborhood summer adventure both in seeing small businesses do well, and the overall enjoyment we had being part of this market scene. Now imagine Pepperwood Plaza, Vital and Lively year around ! People milling around a renovated plaza, eating at the outdoor cafes of new restaurants, listening to music by a fountain, meeting friends for coffee at a diner or a coffee shop, buying socks and jeans at a retail shop and more! This grand intersection of businesses and community will thrive and help the business owners of the South District as they have helped those businesses in our Downtown District. The monies to help with this expansion and business growth come from the South District 1 businesses themselves. They believe in themselves, in their ability to grow and succeed even more, and in doing so provide for not only a stable economic environment but provide meaningful interaction, fun, and a joyful community that benefits us all. I implore you, the Iowa City Council to recognize the value the South District SSMID brings to the Community, to the entire city of Iowa City, and vote YES on establishing the South District SSMID. Thank you so much! All the best, Barbara D. Anderson South District Ally 2 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: -i� James Pobst <simulacraj@gmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 2:53 PM *City Council My support for the South District SSMID petition Late Handouts Distributed (Date) Hello, I am an Iowa City resident and I am writing the City Council to offer my strong support for the SSMID proposal to revitalize the Pepperwood Plaza and adjacent areas for the benefit of local and city-wide residents. I live nearby in Bon Aire, and can't tell you how many times I've driven by or biked by the Pepperwood area along Hwy 6 and thought to myself how depressing/sad it is that most people only know this area for the Taco Bell, a bank, and the post office, and have no idea of the diversity of local business ventures in the surrounding residential area. In a recent community discussion at Film Scene (part of the Witching Hour events), it was shared with me how many local businesses could benefit from having their own storefronts in Pepperwood, instead of having to be run out of their own homes. Having the plazas fill up with local business would also be a visible sign of how the City supports efforts at a local economy based on cultural diversity. For the benefit of local residents, please support this petition for funding and other support to revitalize Pepperwood, by the South District Neighborhood Association. I think this would be a win for everybody involved - residents, tourists, and commuters. If possible, I plan to also show up at the public hearing tomorrow night. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James H Pobst P.S. I can also be reached at lames.pobst@pearson.com 1 Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Carrie Z. Norton <czn46@hotmail.com> Monday, December 13, 2021 3:47 PM *City Council Support for the Southside SSMID Late Handouts Distributed (Date) As a long serving member of the Shelter House Board of Directors and Immediate Past President, I am delighted to express our organization's support of the SSMID proposal before City Council. At our recent Board of Directors meeting, the Board was unanimous in its support of our Executive Director signing the South District Self -Supporting Municipal Improvement District Petition, which includes the Housing First project Cross Park Place that we own and operate at 820 Cross Park Avenue and near our other properties located at 429 Southgate Avenue (Emergency Shelter), and 501 Southgate Avenue (a new and additional Housing First program, the 501 Project). Shelter House continues to invest in the neighborhoods in which we operate. And our South District neighbors have continued to support our work and expanding housing services at Cross Park Place. We have invested staff time in development of this SSMID district and will continue to support its success and formation as it grows. This proposed SSMID district will enhance important efforts throughout the South District, including the wayfinding, retail recruitment and retention, pedestrian connects, special projects, events, and other improved neighborhood access for all residents. The Board of Directors of Shelter House urges you to support this initiative and invest in its success. And on a personal note, as a southeast Iowa Citian, I totally applaud the enrichment of my neighborhood and another step toward becoming a "destination"! Carrie Z. Norton Immediate Past President Shelter House Board of Directors 1